Spotlight on International Quality: COVID-19 and Its Impact on Quality Improvement in Cancer Care

Treatment delays for cancer patients in Sub-Saharan Africa: South Africa as a microcosm

Purpose

Delays in initiating cancer treatment time to treatment initiation (TTI) can negatively impact patient outcomes. This study aimed to quantify the association between TTI and survival in breast, cervical and prostate cancer patients at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital (IALCH) in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, as a microcosm of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

Methods

We analyzed electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with breast, cervical or prostate cancer at IALCH between 2010 and 2020. Median TTI was calculated for different treatment modalities. To assess the link between treatment delay and mortality, we employed a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), treating breast cancer and patients over 40 as competing events. Additionally, Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis and linear regression were used to compare TTI across racial groups.

Results

The study included patients with breast (44%), cervical (44%) and prostate cancer (12%). Mean age at diagnosis was 62.6, 56.6 and 73.0 years, respectively. Breast cancer patients experienced the longest delays for mastectomy (median 18.4 weeks), followed by prostate cancer patients waiting for radiotherapy (median 16.6 weeks). Significantly longer TTI for radiotherapy was observed in patients younger than 40 with cervical (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 2.16-2.44, p < 0.001) or prostate cancer (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03-1.95, p = 0.033) compared to older breast cancer patients. Similar trends were seen for younger patients with cervical cancer receiving chemotherapy. Notably, all racial groups exhibited substantial delays in initiating treatment for all three cancers (breast p < 0.001, prostate p = 0.004 and cervical cancer p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study identified significant delays in treatment initiation (TTI) for breast, prostate and cervical cancer patients at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital (IALCH) in South Africa. These delays were concerning, particularly for younger patients and individuals across all racial backgrounds. Delays in treatment initiation have been linked to increased mortality risk in other studies, highlighting the urgency of addressing this issue. Furthermore, this study serves as a valuable model for future research throughout SSA to collectively address the challenges of treatment delays and improve cancer care for the region.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Timeliness of Clinical Care Pathway for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Austria: The PRATER Retrospective Study

This was a retrospective study of the profile and initial treatments of adults diagnosed with early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during January 2018-December 2021 at 16 leading hospital institutions in Austria, excluding patients enrolled in clinical trials. In total, 319 patients were enrolled at a planned ~1:1:1 ratio across StI:II:III. Most tested biomarkers were programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1; 58% expressing), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS; 22% positive), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; 18% positive). Of 115/98/106 StI/II/III patients, 82%/85%/36% underwent surgery, followed by systemic therapy in 9%/45%/47% of those [mostly chemotherapy (ChT)]. Unresected treated StIII patients received ChT + radiotherapy [43%; followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 39% of those], ICI ± ChT (35%), and ChT-alone/radiotherapy-alone (22%). Treatment was initiated a median (interquartile range) of 24 (7-39) days after histological confirmation, and 55 (38-81) days after first medical visit. Based on exploratory analyses of all patients newly diagnosed with any stage NSCLC during 2018-2021 at 14 of the sites (N = 7846), 22%/10%/25%/43% had StI/II/III/IV. The total number was not significantly different between pre-COVID-19 (2018-2019) and study-specific COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods, while StI proportion increased (21% vs. 23%; p = 0.012). Small differences were noted in treatments. In conclusion, treatments were aligned with guideline recommendations at a time which preceded the era of ICIs and targeted therapies in the (neo)adjuvant setting.