A new beginning: can omidubicel emerge as the next, viable alternative donor source?

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation (CBT) has been an important alternative donor option for patients lacking matched related donor (MRD) or unrelated donor (URD) grafts. Only 30% of patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies have a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling; subjects without a MRD option are referred for HLA-matched URD selection, or utilize alternative donor sources such as HLA-mismatched URD, UCB, or haploidentical donor grafts. While CBT demonstrates an excellent graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, use of UCB as a graft source is limited due to a lower cell dose that can result in delayed engraftment and an immature immune system with increased infectious risk as a consequence. Together, increased transplant related mortality (TRM) has been associated with UCB allografts. Omidubicel is an ex vivo expanded single cord blood product that has demonstrated rapid engraftment, improved immune reconstitution, and reduced infectious complications in clinical trials. Omidubicel has now been granted U.S. Food & Drug Administration approval to enhance neutrophil recovery and decrease infectious risk. This review will focus on CBT, benefits and barriers to using this alternative donor source, and finally the potential advancements with incorporation of omidubicel in the transplant setting for malignant and non-malignant diseases.

Emerging approaches to improve allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes for nonmalignant diseases

Many congenital or acquired nonmalignant diseases (NMDs) of the hematopoietic system can be potentially cured by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with varying types of donor grafts, degrees of HLA matching, and intensity of conditioning regimens. Unique features that distinguish the use of allogeneic HCT in this population include higher rates of graft failure, immune-mediated cytopenias, and the potential to achieve long-term disease-free survival in a mixed chimerism state. Additionally, in contrast to patients with hematologic malignancies, a priority is to completely avoid graft-versus-host disease in patients with NMD because there is no theoretical beneficial graft-versus-leukemia effect that can accompany graft-versus-host responses. In this review, we discuss the current approach to each of these clinical issues and how emerging novel therapeutics hold promise to advance transplant care for patients with NMDs.

Standardization, workforce development and advocacy in cell and gene therapies: a summary of the 2020 Regenerative Medicine InterCHANGE

Cell and gene therapy is a promising and disruptive new field of medicine for diseases lacking effective treatments. Collaboration among stakeholders has become critically important as investigators, health care providers, manufacturers, couriers, data registries, regulators and payers all become more invested in the success of this field. Many organizations have collaborated with each other to increase clarity, advocate for improvements and share lessons learned. These efforts appear to be making an impact, although the potential for duplicative efforts could slow progress. The second Regenerative Medicine InterCHANGE, hosted by the Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy, took place at the Phacilitate Leaders World/World Stem Cell Summit conference in Miami, Florida, on January 24, 2020. Participants from several organizations outlined needs to advance cell and gene therapies. Efforts to address these include standardization, workforce development and advocacy. This article summarizes the major challenges and opportunities discussed during the InterCHANGE.

Novel immunotherapy strategies for treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms. Well-differentiated tumors are often slow growing and characterized by low tumor mutational burden. Poorly differentiated NECs are aggressive, with an increased mutational burden and higher propensity to express PD-L1. While the therapeutic landscape for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has evolved substantially over the past decade, immunotherapy has been unexplored in NENs until recently. Checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents, bi-specific tumor-targeting antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are examples of treatments that have demonstrated efficacy in other cancers and have recently been investigated in NENs. This review examines the immune landscape of NENs in detail, summarizes recent clinical study results, and discusses potential future directions for immunotherapy.