Anti-B-Cell Maturation Antigen BiTE Molecule AMG 420 Induces Responses in Multiple Myeloma

Cancer organoids 2.0: modelling the complexity of the tumour immune microenvironment

The development of neoplasia involves a complex and continuous interplay between malignantly transformed cells and the tumour microenvironment (TME). Cancer immunotherapies targeting the immune TME have been increasingly validated in clinical trials but response rates vary substantially between tumour histologies and are often transient, idiosyncratic and confounded by resistance. Faithful experimental models of the patient-specific tumour immune microenvironment, capable of recapitulating tumour biology and immunotherapy effects, would greatly improve patient selection, target identification and definition of resistance mechanisms for immuno-oncology therapeutics. In this Review, we discuss currently available and rapidly evolving 3D tumour organoid models that capture important immune features of the TME. We highlight diverse opportunities for organoid-based investigations of tumour immunity, drug development and precision medicine.

Clinical Significance of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Patients With Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Who Were Treated With Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody: A Retrospective Analysis in a Single Institution

INTRODUCTION

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have improved the prognosis of patients with plasma cell dyscrasia (PCD), but are also associated with increased infectious adverse events. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common latent pathogen that is reactivated in immunocompromised individuals. Although CMV reactivation has mostly been reported after high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation in patients with PCD, cases of reactivation during anti-CD38 mAb therapy have been reported recently. Due to limited studies, we aimed to determine the frequency and impact of CMV reactivation during anti-CD38 mAb therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 154 consecutive patients with PCD who were treated with anti-CD38 mAbs at a single institution.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were evaluated for CMV reactivation by CMV pp65 antigen testing, and 29 (38%) patients, including nine with newly diagnosed PCD, showed positive results. Patients who tested positive for the CMV pp65 antigen had substantially lower serum albumin levels than those who tested negative. However, the two groups showed no marked difference in the concurrent anti-PCD medications or baseline absolute lymphocyte count. Although most patients showing positive results in the CMV pp65 antigen test had mild or no symptoms, with fever being the most common symptom, some patients developed CMV end-organ disease. In addition, CMV reactivation interfered with the course of anti-PCD treatment in most patients, necessitating dose reductions, delays, and discontinuation of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This study provides an overview of the clinical impact of CMV reactivation in patients with PCD treated with anti-CD38 mAb-containing regimens.

Mechanisms of resistance against T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma: implications for novel treatment strategies

Off-the-shelf T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies targeting BCMA, GPRC5D, and FcRH5 have high activity in multiple myeloma with a manageable toxicity profile. However, not all patients respond to bispecific antibodies and patients can develop bispecific antibody resistance after an initial response. Mechanisms that contribute to bispecific antibody resistance are multifactorial and include tumour-related factors, such as high tumour burden, expression of T-cell inhibitory ligands, and antigen loss. Resistance due to antigen escape can be prevented by simultaneously targeting two tumour-associated antigens with a trispecific antibody or a combination of two bispecific antibodies. There is also increasing evidence that primary resistance to bispecific antibodies is associated with impaired baseline T-cell function. Long-term exposure to bispecific antibodies with chronic T-cell stimulation further aggravates T-cell dysfunction, which could contribute to failure of disease control. Therapeutic interference with T-cell exhaustion by targeting inhibitory or costimulatory pathways could improve bispecific antibody-mediated antitumour activity. The immunosuppressive microenvironment also contributes to bispecific antibody resistance. CD38-targeting antibodies hold promise as combination partners for bispecific antibodies because of their potential to eliminate CD38+ immune suppressor cells. In conclusion, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the absence of disease response has provided novel insights to optimise T-cell activity and bispecific antibody efficacy in multiple myeloma.

T-Cell Characteristics Impact Response and Resistance to T-Cell-Redirecting Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

Bispecific antibodies (BsAb) directed against B-cell maturation antigen (teclistamab) or the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5D (talquetamab) induce deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma. However, mechanisms underlying primary and acquired resistance remain poorly understood.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The anti-multiple myeloma activity of teclistamab and talquetamab was evaluated in bone marrow (BM) samples from patients with multiple myeloma. T-cell phenotype and function were assessed in BM/peripheral blood samples obtained from patients with multiple myeloma who were treated with these BsAb.

RESULTS

In ex vivo killing assays with 41 BM samples from BsAb-naive patients with multiple myeloma, teclistamab- and talquetamab-mediated multiple myeloma lysis was strongly correlated (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001). Both BsAb exhibited poor activity in samples with high regulatory T-cell (Treg) numbers and a low T-cell/multiple myeloma cell ratio. Furthermore, comprehensive phenotyping of BM samples derived from patients treated with teclistamab or talquetamab revealed that high frequencies of PD-1+ CD4+ T cells, CTLA4+ CD4+ T cells, and CD38+ CD4+ T cells were associated with primary resistance. Although this lack of response was linked to a modest increase in the expression of inhibitory receptors, increasing T-cell/multiple myeloma cell ratios by adding extra T cells enhanced sensitivity to BsAb. Further, treatment with BsAb resulted in an increased proportion of T cells expressing exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIGIT, and TIM-3), which was accompanied by reduced T-cell proliferative potential and cytokine secretion, as well as impaired antitumor efficacy in ex vivo experiments.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary resistance is characterized by a low T-cell/multiple myeloma cell ratio and Treg-driven immunosuppression, whereas reduced T-cell fitness due to continuous BsAb-mediated T-cell activation may contribute to the development of acquired resistance.

Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy of plasma cells, characterized by osteolytic bone lesions, anemia, hypercalcemia, renal failure, and the accumulation of malignant plasma cells. The pathogenesis of MM involves the interaction between MM cells and the bone marrow microenvironment through soluble cytokines and cell adhesion molecules, which activate various signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, RAS/MAPK, JAK/STAT, Wnt/β-catenin, and NF-κB pathways. Aberrant activation of these pathways contributes to the proliferation, survival, migration, and drug resistance of myeloma cells, making them attractive targets for therapeutic intervention. Currently, approved drugs targeting these signaling pathways in MM are limited, with many inhibitors and inducers still in preclinical or clinical research stages. Therapeutic options for MM include non-targeted drugs like alkylating agents, corticosteroids, immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and histone deacetylase inhibitors. Additionally, targeted drugs such as monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, bispecific T-cell engagers, and bispecific antibodies are being used in MM treatment. Despite significant advancements in MM treatment, the disease remains incurable, emphasizing the need for the development of novel or combined targeted therapies based on emerging theoretical knowledge, technologies, and platforms. In this review, we highlight the key role of signaling pathways in the malignant progression and treatment of MM, exploring advances in targeted therapy and potential treatments to offer further insights for improving MM management and outcomes.

Bispecific and multispecific antibodies in oncology: opportunities and challenges

Research into bispecific antibodies, which are designed to simultaneously bind two antigens or epitopes, has advanced enormously over the past two decades. Owing to advances in protein engineering technologies and considerable preclinical research efforts, bispecific antibodies are constantly being developed and optimized to improve their efficacy and to mitigate toxicity. To date, >200 of these agents, the majority of which are bispecific immune cell engagers, are in either preclinical or clinical evaluation. In this Review, we discuss the role of bispecific antibodies in patients with cancer, including history and development, as well as innovative targeting strategies, clinical applications, and adverse events. We also discuss novel alternative bispecific antibody constructs, such as those targeting two antigens expressed by tumour cells or cells located in the tumour microenvironment. Finally, we consider future research directions in this rapidly evolving field, including innovative antibody engineering strategies, which might enable more effective delivery, overcome resistance, and thus optimize clinical outcomes.

Anti-BCMA CAR-T cell-based therapies and bispecific antibodies in the immunotherapy era: are we ready for this?

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic strategies against multiple myeloma (MM) have evolved dramatically in recent decades, with unprecedent results in the treatment landscape, culminating in the recent incorporation of novel agents in the anti-myeloma armamentarium.

AREAS COVERED

BCMA represents one of the most promising targets in MM and currently available immune approaches, either approved or under active investigation, are clearly showing their greater potential over standard regimens. In this context, immunotherapies based on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T-cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have taken center stage, being the ones that are yielding the most promising results in clinical trials. This review focuses on the current landscape of BsAbs and CAR-T, summarizing the latest advances and possible future developments.

EXPERT OPINION

CAR-T and BsAbs anti-BCMA strategies represent breakthrough therapies against MM. However, their inclusion in clinical practice is almost feared, due to the associated limitations, some of which have been addressed here. Meanwhile, all the efforts should be focused on individualizing and choosing the most suitable candidates for each treatment and to understand how to combine, or sequence, these therapies to improve efficacy and minimize toxicity, especially for those patients with limited available treatment options.

Bispecific antibodies for multiple myeloma: past, present and future

Despite the development of various therapeutic agents, multiple myeloma remains incurable. Recently, T-cell redirected immunotherapy has become a promising strategy for the treatment of refractory myeloma. Clinical trials using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells and bispecific antibodies have demonstrated successful anti-myeloma responses in triple-class-refractory patients. However, unique and unwanted immune effects associated with on-target/off-target reactivity of activated immune cells need to be considered and properly managed. This review summarizes recent advances in bispecific antibodies for the treatment of refractory myeloma. It outlines the history of their development, along with a discussion of their mechanisms of action and their current and potential future role in myeloma therapy. As more evidence emerges to inform the timing of CAR-T-cell therapy, the results of clinical trials and off-the-shelf nature of bispecifics also suggest the timing of their treatment. These findings will promote further development and application of bispecifics for refractory myeloma in combination with other appropriate agents.

Bispecific Antibodies for the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are artificially engineered antibodies that can bind simultaneously to the CD3 subunit within the T-cell receptor complex and an antigen on tumor cells, leading to T-cell activation and tumor cell killing. BsAbs against BCMA or GPRC5D have shown impressive clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), with some agents having already received regulatory approval after the third (by the European Medicines Agency, EMA) or fourth (by the Food and Drug Administration, FDA) line of therapy; the results of early-phase clinical trials targeting FcRH5 are also promising. Overall, BsAbs as monotherapy correlated with an ORR that exceeded 60%, with a high CR rate ranging between 25% and 50% and a median PFS of around 1 year among patients with a median of 4-6 prior lines of therapy. The main toxicities include cytokine release syndrome, cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinemia, and infections; on-target off-tumor adverse events involving the skin, mucosa, hair, and nails may also occur with anti-GPRC5D BsAbs. Active research to increase their efficacy and improve their tolerance is still in progress, including combination therapies and application in earlier treatment lines and the development of novel agents. A better understanding of the mechanisms of resistance is a challenge and could lead to more personalized approaches.

Current status of bispecific antibodies and CAR-T therapies in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy of plasma cells, is an incurable disease that is characterized by the neoplastic proliferation of plasma cells leading to extensive skeletal destruction. This includes osteolytic lesions, osteopenia, and pathologic fractures. MM is clinically manifested through bone pain, renal insufficiency, hypercalcemia, anemia, and recurrent infections. Its prevalence and the need for effective treatment underscore the importance of this research. Recent advancements in MM therapy have been significant, particularly with the integration of daratumumab into first-line treatments. The use of daratumumab in regimens such as DRD (Daratumumab, Revlimid, Dexamethasone) and D-RVd (Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone) represents a paradigm shift in the treatment landscape. GRIFFIN and CASSIOPEIA trials have highlighted the efficacy of these regimens, particularly in prolonging progression-free survival and deepening patient responses. The shift from older regimens like MPV (Melphalan, Prednisone, Velcade) to more effective ones like DRD and RVD has been pivotal in treatment strategies. This review also focuses on the potential of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies in MM. CAR-T therapy, which has shown success in other hematological malignancies, is being explored for its ability to specifically target MM cells. The latest clinical trials and research findings are analyzed to evaluate the efficacy and challenges of CAR-T therapy in MM. Additionally, the role of bispecific antibodies, which are designed to bind both cancer cells and T cells, is explored. These antibodies offer a unique mechanism that could complement the effects of CAR-T therapy.

Antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies and CAR-T cells therapy in multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Modern immunotherapy approaches are revolutionizing the treatment scenario of relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) patients, providing an opportunity to reach deep level of responses and extend survival outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and T-cell redirecting treatments, including bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells therapy, have been recently introduced in the treatment of RRMM. Some agents have already received regulatory approval, while newer constructs, novel combinations, and applications in earlier lines of therapy are currently being explored. This review discusses the current landscape and possible development of ADCs, BsAbs and CAR-T cells immunotherapies.

EXPERT OPINION

ADCs, BsAbs, and CAR-T therapy have demonstrated substantial activity in heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed (TCE) MM patients, and T-cell redirecting treatments represent new standards of care after third (European Medicines Agency, EMA), or fourth (Food and Drug Administration, FDA), line of therapy. All these three immunotherapies carry advantages and disadvantages, with different accessibility and new toxicities that require appropriate management and guidelines. Multiple on-going programs include combinations therapies and applications in earlier lines of treatment, as well as the development of novel agents or construct to enhance potency, reduce toxicity and facilitate administration. Sequencing is a challenge, with few data available and mechanisms of resistance still to be unraveled.

Impact of Treatment Modality and Route of Administration on Cytokine Release Syndrome in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting immunotherapies (e.g., chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs)) have achieved remarkable clinical responses in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Their use is accompanied by exaggerated immune responses related to T-cell activation and cytokine elevations leading to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in some patients, which can be potentially life-threatening. However, systematic evaluation of the risk of CRS with BCMA-targeting BsAb and CAR-T therapies, and comparisons across different routes of BsAb administration (intravenous (i.v.) vs. subcutaneous (s.c.)) have not previously been conducted. This study utilized a meta-analysis approach to compare the CRS profile in BCMA-targeting CAR-T vs. BsAb immunotherapies administered either i.v. or s.c. in patients with RRMM. A total of 36 studies including 1,560 patients with RRMM treated with BCMA-targeting CAR-T and BsAb therapies were included in the analysis. The current analysis suggests that compared with BsAbs, CAR-T therapies were associated with higher CRS incidences (88% vs. 59%), higher rates of grade ≥ 3 CRS (7% vs. 2%), longer CRS duration (5 vs. 2 days), and more prevalent tocilizumab use (44% vs. 25%). The proportion of CRS grade ≥ 3 may also be lower (0% vs. 4%) for BsAb therapies administered via the s.c. (3 studies, n = 311) vs. i.v. (5 studies, n = 338) route. This meta-analysis suggests that different types of BCMA-targeting immunotherapies and administration routes could result in a range of CRS incidence and severity that should be considered while evaluating the benefit-risk profiles of these therapies.

Multiple Myeloma: The Role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of Immunotherapy

Upfront high-dose therapy with melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has established itself as a core treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients in the past 30 years. Induction therapy, HDM-ASCT, and subsequent consolidation and maintenance therapy comprise the current fundamental framework for MM treatment. The introduction of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab has changed the treatment paradigm for transplant-eligible NDMM patients in that quadruplets have become the new standard induction therapy. The treatment landscape of MM is undergoing a transformative shift with the introduction of potent new immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), which are currently used in the relapsed/refractory setting (RRMM) and are already being tested in the NDMM. This review will focus on the incorporation of immunotherapy in the treatment scenario of NDMM patients eligible for ASCT.

T-Cell Engagers-The Structure and Functional Principle and Application in Hematological Malignancies

Recent advancements in cancer immunotherapy have made directing the cellular immune response onto cancer cells a promising strategy for the treatment of hematological malignancies. The introduction of monoclonal antibody-based (mAbs) targeted therapy has significantly improved the prognosis for hematological patients. Facing the issues of mAb-based therapies, a novel bispecific antibody (BsAb) format was developed. T-cell engagers (TCEs) are BsAbs, which simultaneously target tumor-associated antigens on tumor cells and CD3 molecules present on T-cells. This mechanism allows for the direct activation of T-cells and their anti-tumor features, ultimately resulting in the lysis of tumor cells. In 2014, the FDA approved blinatumomab, a TCE directed to CD3 and CD19 for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Since then, numerous TCEs have been developed, allowing for treating different hematological malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. As of November 2023, seven clinically approved TCE therapies are on the market. TCE-based therapies still have their limitations; however, improving the properties of TCEs, as well as combining TCE-based therapies with other forms of treatment, give hope to find the cures for currently terminal diseases. In this paper, we summarized the technical basis of the TCE technology, its application in hematology, and its current issues and prospects.

Efficacy and safety of bispecific antibodies vs. immune checkpoint blockade combination therapy in cancer: a real-world comparison

Emerging tumor immunotherapy methods encompass bispecific antibodies (BSABs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and adoptive cell immunotherapy. BSABs belong to the antibody family that can specifically recognize two different antigens or epitopes on the same antigen. These antibodies demonstrate superior clinical efficacy than monoclonal antibodies, indicating their role as a promising tumor immunotherapy option. Immune checkpoints are also important in tumor immunotherapy. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) is a widely acknowledged immune checkpoint target with effective anti-tumor activity. PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated notable therapeutic efficacy in treating hematological and solid tumors; however, more than 50% of patients undergoing this treatment exhibit a poor response. However, ICI-based combination therapies (ICI combination therapies) have been demonstrated to synergistically increase anti-tumor effects and immune response rates. In this review, we compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of BSABs and ICI combination therapies in real-world tumor immunotherapy, aiming to provide evidence-based approaches for clinical research and personalized tumor diagnosis and treatment.

Bispecific Antibodies in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) is evolving rapidly. In recent years, T-cell-based novel immunotherapies emerged as new treatment strategies for patients with relapsed/refractory MM, including highly effective new options like chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells and bispecific antibodies (bsAbs). Currently, B-cell maturation antigen is the most commonly used target antigen for CAR T-cell and bsAb therapies in MM. Results from different clinical trials have demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable safety profile of bsAb in RRMM.

BCMA-directed therapy, new treatments in the myeloma toolbox, and how to use them

To address the dearth of therapeutic options available for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), attention has shifted to immunotherapeutic strategies, with most products in development targeting the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). BCMA is a transmembrane receptor of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, essential for plasma cell survival and minimally expressed on non-hematopoietic tissues; it represents an ideal therapeutic target. Three categories of BCMA-directed therapies exist, with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are immediately available with modest single-agent efficacy in RRMM, but deliverability is hampered by corneal toxicity. CAR T-cells are the most effective class but face significant logistical and financial barriers. Bispecific antibodies offer superior efficacy and tolerability compared to ADCs, but prolonged exposure causes significant cumulative infectious risk. In this review, we will examine the role of BCMA in MM biology, the approved and emerging therapies targeting this antigen, and how these agents can be optimally sequenced.

Arming oncolytic viruses with bispecific T cell engagers: The evolution and current status

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging as therapeutically relevant anticancer agents as contemporary immunotherapy gains traction. Furthermore, OVs are an ideal platform for genetic modification to express therapeutic transgenes. Bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) can redirect T cells to tumor cells, resulting in targeted cytotoxicity. BiTEs have demonstrated success in hematological cancers but are rarely used in solid tumors. The drawbacks of BiTEs, including inadequate delivery and on-target-off-tumor activity have limited their efficacy. Combining OVs with BiTEs is a prospective area to investigate. This combined strategy can benefit from the best qualities of both therapies while overcoming the limitations.

Real-world analysis of teclistamab in 123 RRMM patients from Germany

Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) × CD3 directed bispecific antibody, has shown high response rates and durable remissions in the MAJESTEC-1 trial in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We retrospectively assessed efficacy and tolerability in 123 patients treated at 18 different German centers to determine whether outcome is comparable in the real-world setting. Most patients had triple-class (93%) or penta-drug (60%) refractory disease, 37% of patients had received BCMA-directed pretreatment including idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) CAR-T cell therapy (21/123, 17.1%). With a follow-up of 5.5 months, we observed an overall response rate (ORR) of 59.3% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.7 months. In subgroup analyses, we found significantly lower ORR and median PFS in patients with extramedullary disease (37%/2.1 months), and/or an ISS of 3 (37%/1.3 months), and ide-cel pretreated patients (33%/1.8 months). Nonetheless, the duration of response in ide-cel pretreated patients was comparable to that of anti-BCMA naive patients. Infections and grade ≥3 cytopenias were the most frequent adverse events. In summary, we found that teclistamab exhibited a comparable efficacy and safety profile in the real-world setting as in the pivotal trial.

New Biological Therapies for Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a cancer of bone marrow plasma cells that represents approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies. Though it is typically incurable, a remarkable suite of new therapies developed over the last 25 years has enabled durable disease control in most patients. This article briefly introduces the clinical features of multiple myeloma and aspects of multiple myeloma biology that modern therapies exploit. Key current and emerging treatment modalities are then reviewed, including cereblon-modulating agents, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, other molecularly targeted therapies (selinexor, venetoclax), chimeric antigen receptor T cells, T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates. For each modality, mechanism of action and clinical considerations are discussed. These therapies are combined and sequenced in modern treatment pathways, discussed at the conclusion of the article, which have led to substantial improvements in outcomes for multiple myeloma patients in recent years.

Targeted immunotherapy: harnessing the immune system to battle multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable hematological malignancy disease characterized by the progressive dysfunction of the patient's immune system. In this context, immunotherapy for MM has emerged as a prominent area of research in recent years. Various targeted immunotherapy strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T cells/natural killer (NK) cells, and checkpoint inhibitors have been developed for MM. This review aims to discuss promising experimental and clinical evidence as well as the mechanisms of action underlying these immunotherapies. Specifically, we will explore the design of exosome-based bispecific monoclonal antibodies that offer cell-free immunotherapy options. The treatment landscape for myeloma continues to evolve with the development of numerous emerging immunotherapies. Given their significant advantages in modulating the MM immune environment through immune-targeted therapy, these approaches provide novel perspectives in selecting cutting-edge treatments for MM.

Current use of bispecific antibodies to treat multiple myeloma

Targeted immunotherapy has significantly improved the outcome of patients with hematological malignancies by leveraging the power of the immune system to eliminate tumor cells. In multiple myeloma (MM), bispecific T-cell engagers (BsAb) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), G protein-coupled receptor, class C, group 5, member D (GPRC5D), and Fc receptor-like 5 (FcRL5) have already demonstrated remarkable clinical activity in triple-class refractory patients. However, responses to BsAb are not universal, and resistance often emerges while on therapy. Mechanisms mediating resistance are tumor intrinsic or immune dependent. Reported tumor intrinsic factors include antigenic loss (biallelic or functional) through deletions or mutations of target genes, increased soluble BCMA (for BCMA targeting BsAb), high tumor burden, and extramedullary disease. Immune-mediated resistance are largely dependent on T-cell fitness and tolerant immune environment. Understanding these mechanisms will allow the design of optimized BsAb therapy and an informed approach to sequencing and combining these molecules with other anti-MM agents and immune therapies.

Revolutionizing cancer immunotherapy: unleashing the potential of bispecific antibodies for targeted treatment

Recent progressions in immunotherapy have transformed cancer treatment, providing a promising strategy that activates the immune system of the patient to find and eliminate cancerous cells. Bispecific antibodies, which engage two separate antigens or one antigen with two distinct epitopes, are of tremendous concern in immunotherapy. The bi-targeting idea enabled by bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) is especially attractive from a medical standpoint since most diseases are complex, involving several receptors, ligands, and signaling pathways. Several research look into the processes in which BsAbs identify different cancer targets such angiogenesis, reproduction, metastasis, and immune regulation. By rerouting cells or altering other pathways, the bispecific proteins perform effector activities in addition to those of natural antibodies. This opens up a wide range of clinical applications and helps patients with resistant tumors respond better to medication. Yet, further study is necessary to identify the best conditions where to use these medications for treating tumor, their appropriate combination partners, and methods to reduce toxicity. In this review, we provide insights into the BsAb format classification based on their composition and symmetry, as well as the delivery mode, focus on the action mechanism of the molecule, and discuss the challenges and future perspectives in BsAb development.

Reinforced antimyeloma therapy via dual-lymphoid activation mediated by a panel of antibodies armed with bridging-BiTE

Immunotherapy using bispecific antibodies including bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) has the potential to enhance the efficacy of treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. However, myeloma may still recur after treatment because of downregulation of a target antigen and/or myeloma cell heterogeneity. To strengthen immunotherapy for myeloma while overcoming its characteristics, we have newly developed a BiTE-based modality, referred to as bridging-BiTE (B-BiTE). B-BiTE was able to bind to both a human immunoglobulin G-Fc domain and the CD3 molecule. Clinically available monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were bound with B-BiTE before administration, and the mAb/B-BiTE complex induced antitumor T-cell responses successfully while preserving and supporting natural killer cell reactivity, resulting in enhanced antimyeloma effects via dual-lymphoid activation. In contrast, any unwanted off-target immune-cell reactivity mediated by mAb/B-BiTE complexes or B-BiTE itself appeared not to be observed in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, sequential immunotherapy using 2 different mAb/B-BiTE complexes appeared to circumvent myeloma cell antigen escape, and further augmented immune responses to myeloma relative to those induced by mAb/B-BiTE monotherapy or sequential therapy with 2 mAbs in the absence of B-BiTE. Therefore, this modality facilitates easy and prompt generation of a broad panel of bispecific antibodies that can induce deep and durable antitumor responses in the presence of clinically available mAbs, supporting further advancement of reinforced immunotherapy for multiple myeloma and other refractory hematologic malignancies.

IVIg Use Associated with Ten-Fold Reduction of Serious Infections in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Anti-BCMA Bispecific Antibodies

BCMA-targeted bispecific antibodies (BiAb) are efficacious in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; however, serious infections have emerged as important toxicities. In this retrospective study, we characterized all infections and their risk factors, and evaluated the impact of infection prophylaxis in patients treated with BCMA-targeted BiAbs. Among 37 patients, 15 (41%) experienced a grade 3-5 infection, with two infection-related deaths during deep remissions. Most (84%) infections occurred during disease remissions. The cumulative probability of grade 3-5 infection increased over time with no plateau. Among responders (n = 26), profound hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in 100% and continued throughout the entire duration of treatment. During periods when patients were receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), the rate of grade 3-5 infections was 90% lower than during observation (incidence rate ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.80; P = 0.0307). No other risk factors for infection were identified. This study demonstrates that profound hypogammaglobulinemia is universal with BCMA-targeted BiAbs, with intravenous immunoglobulin potentially abrogating most of the infection risk.

SIGNIFICANCE

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively analyze risk factors and mitigation strategies to prevent infections in myeloma patients receiving anti-BCMA bispecific antibodies. Profound and prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia was universal among responders, while immunoglobulin replacement was associated with 90% lower rates of grade 3-5 infections. See related commentary by Garfall and Stadtmauer, p. 427 . This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 419.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell and Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Moving Into the Future

Historically, the outcomes for individuals with triple-class refractory and penta-drug refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have been poor because of a dearth of effective treatment options. However, the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell and T-cell redirecting bispecific antibody (BsAb) therapies has led to unprecedented response rates and durations of response in heavily relapsed/refractory (R/R) populations. Currently, two B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T-cell therapies (idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel) as well as one BCMA/CD3 BsAb (teclistamab) have been approved for late-line (greater than four previous lines) R/R MM in the United States. The purpose of this review is to analyze the recent data for these approved therapies as well as provide an overview of other related CAR T-cell and BsAb therapies under development, including non-BCMA-targeting agents. We review efficacy and safety considerations, with particular focus on cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and infection risk. The relative merits and limitations of each class of therapy are discussed, as well as the areas of unmet need with respect to optimal sequencing and supportive care measures. We examine the factors that challenge equitable access to these novel therapies across minoritized racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic populations. Although it is evident that CAR T-cell and BsAb therapies will transform treatment paradigms in MM for years to come, significant work remains to identify the optimal utilization of these novel therapies and ensure equitable access.

Differential Diagnosis and Therapeutic Advances in Multiple Myeloma: A Review Article

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the abnormal clonal proliferation of plasma cells that may result in focal bone lesions, renal failure, anemia, and/or hypercalcemia. Recently, the diagnosis and treatment of MM have evolved due to a better understanding of disease pathophysiology, improved risk stratification, and new treatments. The incorporation of new drugs, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 antibodies and high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, has resulted in a significant improvement in patient outcomes and QoL. In this review, we summarize differential diagnoses and therapeutic advances in MM.

Safety and efficacy of T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies for patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, several bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have been introduced that revolutionized the treatment approach for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In the present study, we sought for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of evaluating the safety and efficacy of BsAbs in MM patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched on June 10, 2022. Two steps of title/abstract and full-text screening were performed for selecting the relevant articles. The primary endpoint was considered to evaluate the safety of BsAbs by examining the rate of hematologic and non-hematologic adverse effects (AEs). The secondary outcome was set at the efficacy of BsAbs through pooling objective response rate (ORR), (stringent) complete response (sCR/CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR).

RESULTS

Eleven publications with a total of nine evaluable BsAbs were included for qualitative and quantitative data synthesis. Hematologic AEs were more common among patients than non-hematologic events, with the most frequent events being anemia (41.4%), neutropenia (36.4%), and thrombocytopenia (26.3%). The most common non-hematological AE was infection, which occurred in 39.9% of patients, followed by dysgeusia (28.3%), fatigue (26.5%), and diarrhea (25.8%). Besides, 8.1% of patients experienced immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 5.1% of them. Moreover, 59.8% of patients experienced cytokine release syndrome. The pooled rate of deaths attributable to BsAbs was estimated at 0.1%. In terms of efficacy measures, the ORR was achieved in 62.6% of MM patients, and the pooled rates of sCR/CR, VGPR, and PR were 22.7%, 23.0%, and 12.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In an era with several emerging promising treatments for MM, BsAbs have achieved a high ORR and tolerable AEs in heavily pretreated patients. However, there is still room for developing BsAbs with a lower rate of AEs and capable of bypassing tumor evasion mechanisms.

Immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies: achievements, challenges and future prospects

The immune-cell origin of hematologic malignancies provides a unique avenue for the understanding of both the mechanisms of immune responsiveness and immune escape, which has accelerated the progress of immunotherapy. Several categories of immunotherapies have been developed and are being further evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of blood cancers, including stem cell transplantation, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antigen-targeted antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapies. These immunotherapies have shown the potential to induce long-term remission in refractory or relapsed patients and have led to a paradigm shift in cancer treatment with great clinical success. Different immunotherapeutic approaches have their advantages but also shortcomings that need to be addressed. To provide clinicians with timely information on these revolutionary therapeutic approaches, the comprehensive review provides historical perspectives on the applications and clinical considerations of the immunotherapy. Here, we first outline the recent advances that have been made in the understanding of the various categories of immunotherapies in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. We further discuss the specific mechanisms of action, summarize the clinical trials and outcomes of immunotherapies in hematologic malignancies, as well as the adverse effects and toxicity management and then provide novel insights into challenges and future directions.

T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma: Current landscape and future directions

T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have substantial activity in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The overall response rate obtained with B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting BsAbs is approximately 60%-70%, including a high proportion of patients achieving very good partial response or complete response. Comparable efficacy is seen with BsAbs targeting GPRC5D or FcRH5. Cytokine release syndrome is frequently observed with BsAb treatment, but mostly during the step-up doses and the first full dose. Early intervention with IL-6 receptor blocking antibodies (e.g., tocilizumab) prevents escalation to severe manifestations. Infections are also common during treatment and related to the extent of exposure to immune suppressive anti-MM agents, as well as development of hypogammaglobulinemia due to elimination of normal plasma cells, and probably because of T-cell exhaustion resulting from continuous BsAb-mediated T-cell activation. Adequate monitoring for infections and institution of infectious prophylaxis are essential. Patients treated with GPRC5D-targteing BsAbs often develop skin and nail disorders and loss of taste, which is likely related to GPRC5D expression in cells that produce hard keratin. Currently ongoing studies are aiming at further improving these results by evaluating BsAbs in combination with other drugs, such as immunomodulatory agents and anti-CD38 antibodies, as well as the application of BsAbs in earlier lines of therapy, including patients with newly diagnosed disease. We expect that the outcomes of patients with MM will further improve by the introduction of this novel type of T-cell immunotherapy.

Monitoring, prophylaxis, and treatment of infections in patients with MM receiving bispecific antibody therapy: consensus recommendations from an expert panel

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are emerging as an important novel class of immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), and are set to be more widely used in clinical practice. However, this new class of therapies is associated with a distinct adverse event (AE) profile that includes cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, as well as AEs leading to increased infection risk such as cytopenias and hypogammaglobulinemia, and infections themselves. As preliminary data with this class of agents shows an increased risk of infections as compared with conventional MM treatment regimens, such as immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), guidance on infection monitoring, prophylaxis and treatment is required. This review provides consensus recommendations from a panel of 13 global experts, following a meeting in August 2022. The meeting objective was to review existing literature and identify relevant information on infections with all BsAbs in patients with MM, as well as to discuss clinical experience of experts in managing these infections. The recommendations outlined here can be used to guide management of infection risk factors, such as hypogammaglobulinemia and neutropenia. In addition, they can be used to guide the monitoring, prophylaxis, and treatment of bacterial, viral and fungal infections, including emerging infections of interest, such as coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), and the use of vaccinations prior to and during BsAb treatment. The recommendations have been graded by the panel based on level of data available. Key recommendations include universal herpes simplex and varicella zoster virus prophylaxis, screening for hepatitis B virus reactivation risk in all patients, monthly intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for immunoparesis and in the absence of life-threatening infectious manifestations, use of colony-stimulating factors in patients with Grade 3 neutropenia, universal pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis and no routine anti-fungal prophylaxis.

Risk of infections associated with the use of bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis

The use of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is showing early promising overall response rates in heavily pretreated patients. Infectious complications related to the use of BsAbs are not well described. We conducted a pooled analysis that included all single-agent BsAbs used in MM with no prior use of different BsAbs. A total of 1185 patients with MM were treated with a BsAb in the studied period (71.6% of the patients treated with an agent targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). Pooled median follow-up was short at 6.1 months (7.5 vs 5.2 months for BCMA vs non-BCMA BsAbs, respectively). Adverse events of interest included all grade neutropenia in 38.6%, all grade infections in 50% (n = 542/1083), all grade cytokine release syndrome in 59.6% (n = 706/1185), grade III/IV neutropenia in 34.8% (n = 372/1068), grade III/IV infections in 24.5% (n = 272/1110), grade III/IV pneumonia in 10% (n = 52.4/506), and grade III/IV coronavirus disease 2019 in 11.4% (n = 45.4/395) of the patients. Non-BCMA-targeted BsAbs were associated with lower grade III/IV neutropenia (25.3% vs 39.2%) and lower grade III/IV infections (11.9% vs 30%) when compared with BCMA-targeted BsAbs. Hypogammaglobulinemia was reported in 4 studies, with a prevalence of 75.3% (n = 256/340) of the patients, with IV immunoglobulin used in 48% (n = 123/256) of them. Death was reported in 110 patients, of which 28 (25.5%) were reported to be secondary to infections. Certain precautions should be used when using BsAbs to mitigate the risk and/or identify and treat infections promptly.

T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies in cancer

T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) simultaneously bind to antigens on tumour cells and CD3 subunits on T cells. This simultaneous binding results in the recruitment of T cells to the tumour, followed by T-cell activation and degranulation, and tumour cell elimination. T-cell-engaging BsAbs have shown substantial activity in several haematological malignancies by targeting CD19 in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, CD20 in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and BCMA and GPRC5D in multiple myeloma. Progress with solid tumours has been slower, in part due to the paucity of therapeutic targets with a tumour-specific expression profile, which is needed to limit on-target off-tumour side-effects. Nevertheless, BsAb-mediated recognition of a peptide fragment of gp100 presented by HLA-A2:01 molecules has shown marked activity in patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. Cytokine release syndrome is the most frequent toxicity associated with BsAb treatment and is caused by activated T cells secreting proinflammatory cytokines. Understanding of resistance mechanisms has resulted in the development of new T cell-redirecting formats and novel combination strategies, which are expected to further improve depth and duration of response.

Toxicity Profile of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell and Bispecific Antibody Therapies in Multiple Myeloma: Pathogenesis, Prevention and Management

Multiple myeloma is the second-most common hematologic malignancy in adults worldwide. Despite ongoing advancement in therapeutic modalities, it remains an incurable disease with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%. The recent development and introduction of anti-BCMA immunotherapies into clinical practice, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies and bispecific antibodies, has radically shifted the treatment paradigm. However, despite the promising potential of these therapies for broader application, frequent and significant adverse effects have been reported, both in short- and in long-term settings, requiring increasing awareness and vigilance in the treating team, close monitoring, and prompt interventions with a multidisciplinary approach. In this review, we will discuss the toxicities associated with CAR-T cell and bispecific antibody therapies, focusing on results from major clinical studies and real-world observations. In addition, we will emphasize on effective strategies for prevention, monitoring and management, and provide expert recommendations.

Multi-targeted immunotherapeutics to treat B cell malignancies

The concept of multi-targeted immunotherapeutic systems has propelled the field of cancer immunotherapy into an exciting new era. Multi-effector molecules can be designed to engage with, and alter, the patient's immune system in a plethora of ways. The outcomes can vary from effector cell recruitment and activation upon recognition of a cancer cell, to a multipronged immune checkpoint blockade strategy disallowing evasion of the cancer cells by immune cells, or to direct cancer cell death upon engaging multiple cell surface receptors simultaneously. Here, we review the field of multi-specific immunotherapeutics implemented to treat B cell malignancies. The mechanistically diverse strategies are outlined and discussed; common B cell receptor antigen targeting strategies are outlined and summarized; and the challenges of the field are presented along with optimistic insights for the future.

The Role of Bispecific Antibodies in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review

Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous clonal malignant plasma cell disorder, which remains incurable despite the therapeutic armamentarium's evolution. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) can bind simultaneously to the CD3 T-cell receptor and tumor antigen of myeloma cells, causing cell lysis. This systematic review of phase I/II/III clinical trials aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of BsAbs in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A thorough literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and major conference abstracts. A total of 18 phase I/II/III studies, including 1283 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Among the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting agents across 13 studies, the overall response rate (ORR) ranged between 25% and 100%, with complete response/stringent complete response (CR/sCR) between 7 and 38%, very good partial response (VGPR) between 5 and 92%, and partial response (PR) between 5 and 14%. Among the non-BCMA-targeting agents across five studies, the ORR ranged between 60 and 100%, with CR/sCR seen in 19-63%, and VGPR in 21-65%. The common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (17-82%), anemia (5-52%), neutropenia (12-75%), and thrombocytopenia (14-42%). BsAbs have shown promising efficacy against RRMM cohorts with a good safety profile. Upcoming phase II/III trials are much awaited, along with the study of other agents in concert with BsAbs to gauge response.

Identification and Targeting of Mutant Neoantigens in Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Multiple myeloma (MM) is malignant disease characterized by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow, leading to anemia, immunosuppression, and other symptoms, that is generally hard to treat. In MM, the immune system is likely exposed to neoplasia-associated neoantigens for several years before the tumor onset. Different types of neoantigens have been identified. Public or shared neoantigens derive from tumor-specific modifications often reported in several patients or across diverse tumors. They are intriguing therapeutic targets because they are frequently observed, and they have an oncogenic effect. Only a small number of public neoantigens have been recognized. Most of the neoantigens that have been identified are patient-specific or "private", necessitating a personalized approach for adaptive cell treatment. It was demonstrated that the targeting of a single greatly immunogenic neoantigen may be appropriate for tumor control. The purpose of this review was to analyze the neoantigens present in patients with MM, and to evaluate the possibility of using their presence as a prognostic factor or as a therapeutic target. We reviewed the most recent literature on neoantigen treatment strategies and on the use of bispecific, trispecific, and conjugated antibodies for the treatment of MM. Finally, a section was dedicated to the use of CAR-T in relapsed and refractory patients.

Current Main Topics in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains a difficult to treat disease mainly due to its biological heterogeneity, of which we are more and more knowledgeable thanks to the development of increasingly sensitive molecular methods that allow us to build better prognostication models. The biological diversity translates into a wide range of clinical outcomes from long-lasting remission in some patients to very early relapse in others. In NDMM transplant eligible (TE) patients, the incorporation of mAb as daratumumab in the induction regimens, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and consolidation/maintenance therapy, has led to a significant improvement of PFS and OS.; however, this outcome remains poor in ultra-high risk MM or in those who did not achieve a minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Several trials are exploring cytogenetic risk-adapted and MRD-driven therapies in these patients. Similarly, quadruplets-containing daratumumab, particularly when administered as continuous therapies, have improved outcome of patients not eligible for autologous transplant (NTE). Patients who become refractory to conventional therapies have noticeably poor outcomes, making their treatment a difficult challenge in need of novel strategies. In this review, we will focus on the main points regarding risk stratification, treatment and monitoring of MM, highlighting the most recent evidence that could modify the management of this still incurable disease.

Management of Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Advanced Therapies: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Routine Clinical Practice

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in adults worldwide. Over the past few years, major therapeutic advances have improved progression-free and overall survival, as well as quality of life. Despite this recent progress, MM remains incurable in the vast majority of cases. Patients eventually relapse and become refractory to multiple drug classes, making long-term management challenging. In this review, we will focus on the treatment paradigm of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in the era of advanced therapies emphasizing the available novel modalities that have recently been incorporated into routine practice, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and other promising approaches. We will also discuss major factors that influence the selection of appropriate drug combinations or cellular therapies, such as relapse characteristics, and other disease and patient related parameters. Our goal is to provide insight into the currently available and experimental therapies for RRMM in an effort to guide the therapeutic decision-making process.

Sequencing T-cell redirection therapies leads to deep and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma

T-cell redirection therapy using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and bispecific antibodies (BiAbs) has shown promising efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), leading to the approval of 2 CAR T-cell products and numerous BiAb trials. Data on the outcomes after relapse following BiAbs are urgently required to develop strategies for sequencing salvage therapies. We identified 58 patients progressing after a BiAb trial at Mount Sinai Hospital. Progression-free survival (PFS) to the first salvage (PFS1), second salvage therapy (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age of the patients was 67 years, and 78% had high-risk cytogenetics. They had a median of 6 prior therapy lines, 89% were triple-class refractory, and 44% were penta-drug refractory. After the BiAb trial, patients were followed for a median of 30.5 months and received a median of 2 additional salvage therapies (range, 1-9). The most common first salvage was T-cell redirection in 19 patients (10 BiAb and 9 CAR T cells). Ten patients underwent T-cell redirection as a second salvage treatment. T-cell redirection therapy as first or second salvage was feasible and associated with a median PFS1 of 28.9 months, PFS2 of 30.9 months, and an OS of 62% at 2 years. The sequential use of different T-cell redirection therapies is possible and may lead to deep and durable responses following the relapse after BiAb therapy in RRMM.

Clinical evidence for immune-based strategies in early-line multiple myeloma: current challenges in decision-making for subsequent therapy

Almost all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will eventually develop disease that has relapsed with or become refractory to available treatments and will require additional therapy. However, data are still lacking on how best to sequence regimens in the relapsed/refractory (RR) setting after the failure of early-line lenalidomide, bortezomib, and/or daratumumab, the most commonly used agents in clinical practice today. With the treatment landscape rapidly changing in response to emerging clinical trial data and approvals of several new drugs and additional combinations, it is critically important to focus on patients with RRMM. Variability in patient baseline characteristics, such as the number of prior lines of treatment, refractoriness to prior treatments, prior stem cell transplant, and timing and dosing of prior lenalidomide, makes it difficult to select the best options for patients with RRMM for whom first-line treatments have failed. The aim of this review is to provide both an overview of current therapies and future directions within the RRMM treatment landscape, and a framework for clinicians to choose the most promising next treatment option.

Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: Opportunities to Enhance Efficacy and Improve Safety

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological neoplasm of adults in the Western world. Overall survival has doubled since the advent of proteosome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies. However, patients with adverse cytogenetics or high-risk disease as determined by the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) continue to have poorer outcomes, and triple-refractory patients have a median survival of less than 1 year. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) commonly bind to a tumour epitope along with CD3 on T-cells, leading to T-cell activation and tumour cell killing. These treatments show great promise in MM patients, with the first agent, teclistamab, receiving regulatory approval in 2022. Their potential utility is hampered by the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), a hallmark of MM, which may limit efficacy, and by undesirable adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and infections, some of which may be fatal. In this review, we first consider the means of enhancing the efficacy of BsAbs in MM. These include combining BsAbs with other drugs that ameliorate the effect of the immunosuppressive TME, improving target availability, the use of BsAbs directed against multiple target antigens, and the optimal time in the treatment pathway to employ BsAbs. We then discuss methods to improve safety, focusing on reducing infection rates associated with treatment-induced hypogammaglobulinaemia, and decreasing the frequency and severity of CRS. BsAbs offer a highly-active therapeutic option in MM. Improving the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents may enable more patients to benefit from these novel therapies and improve outcomes for patients with high-risk disease.

The BAFF-APRIL System in Cancer

B cell-activating factor (BAFF; also known as CD257, TNFSF13B, BLyS) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL; also known as CD256, TNFSF13) belong to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family. BAFF was initially discovered as a B-cell survival factor, whereas APRIL was first identified as a protein highly expressed in various cancers. These discoveries were followed by over two decades of extensive research effort, which identified overlapping signaling cascades between BAFF and APRIL, controlling immune homeostasis in health and driving pathogenesis in autoimmunity and cancer, the latter being the focus of this review. High levels of BAFF, APRIL, and their receptors have been detected in different cancers and found to be associated with disease severity and treatment response. Here, we have summarized the role of the BAFF-APRIL system in immune cell differentiation and immune tolerance and detailed its pathogenic functions in hematological and solid cancers. We also highlight the emerging therapeutics targeting the BAFF-APRIL system in different cancer types.

How We Manage Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma With Circulating Tumor Cells

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Careful evaluation of peripheral blood for the presence of circulating plasma cells by morphologic assessment or by flow cytometric analysis is an essential component of the diagnostic workup in all patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) to timely differentiate between MM and primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL), which is the most aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia. The improvement in survival over time is more modest in pPCL, compared with what has been achieved in MM. pPCL is currently defined by the presence of ≥ 5% circulating plasma cells. However, this cutoff is now challenged by new data, from three large cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed MM, showing that a threshold of 2% circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by flow cytometry can be used to identify a subset of patients with ultra-high-risk MM with comparable prognosis as patients with pPCL. These patients may benefit from more intensified first-line therapies, or from enrollment into specific clinical trials, designed for ultra-high-risk MM and pPCL. Apart from differentiating MM from pPCL, the quantification of CTCs is also useful for risk stratification in MM. The detection of CTCs above a threshold of 0.01%-0.07% (much lower than the threshold to define pPCL) appears to be an independent predictor of poor clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed MM. Additional studies, including transplant-ineligible patients or with incorporation of novel immunotherapies, are needed to identify a definitive prognostic CTC cutoff. The next step will be the incorporation of CTC detection into existing staging systems to improve risk stratification and treatment personalization.

Preclinical models for prediction of immunotherapy outcomes and immune evasion mechanisms in genetically heterogeneous multiple myeloma

The historical lack of preclinical models reflecting the genetic heterogeneity of multiple myeloma (MM) hampers the advance of therapeutic discoveries. To circumvent this limitation, we screened mice engineered to carry eight MM lesions (NF-κB, KRAS, MYC, TP53, BCL2, cyclin D1, MMSET/NSD2 and c-MAF) combinatorially activated in B lymphocytes following T cell-driven immunization. Fifteen genetically diverse models developed bone marrow (BM) tumors fulfilling MM pathogenesis. Integrative analyses of ∼500 mice and ∼1,000 patients revealed a common MAPK-MYC genetic pathway that accelerated time to progression from precursor states across genetically heterogeneous MM. MYC-dependent time to progression conditioned immune evasion mechanisms that remodeled the BM microenvironment differently. Rapid MYC-driven progressors exhibited a high number of activated/exhausted CD8⁺ T cells with reduced immunosuppressive regulatory T (T_reg) cells, while late MYC acquisition in slow progressors was associated with lower CD8⁺ T cell infiltration and more abundant T_reg cells. Single-cell transcriptomics and functional assays defined a high ratio of CD8⁺ T cells versus T_reg cells as a predictor of response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). In clinical series, high CD8⁺ T/T_reg cell ratios underlie early progression in untreated smoldering MM, and correlated with early relapse in newly diagnosed patients with MM under Len/Dex therapy. In ICB-refractory MM models, increasing CD8⁺ T cell cytotoxicity or depleting T_reg cells reversed immunotherapy resistance and yielded prolonged MM control. Our experimental models enable the correlation of MM genetic and immunological traits with preclinical therapy responses, which may inform the next-generation immunotherapy trials.

Bispecific T-cell engagers for treatment of multiple myeloma

Bispecific T cell engagers (TCE) derive from monoclonal antibodies and concomitantly engage a target on the surface of cancer cell and CD3 on the surface of T-cells. TCEs promote T cell activation and lysis of tumor cells. Most TCEs in development for multiple myeloma (MM) target the B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and differ among themselves in structure, pharmacokinetics, route and schedule of administration. CD3/BCMA TCEs produce response in ~60% of patients treated in phase 1 trials. TCEs are also in development targeting the G protein-coupled receptor, class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) and the Fc receptor homologue 5 (FcRH5). Main toxicities are cytokine release syndrome and cytopenias. Here we review the current development and future directions of TCEs in MM.

BCMA-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable hematologic malignancy, despite the development of numerous innovative therapies during the past two decades. Immunotherapies are changing the treatment paradigm of MM and have improved the overall response and survival of patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM. B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), selectively expressed in normal and malignant plasma cells, has been targeted by several immunotherapeutic modalities. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, the breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy, have revolutionized the treatment of B cell malignancies and remarkably improved the prognosis of RRMM. BCMA-targeting CAR T cell therapy is the most developed CAR T cell therapy for MM, and the US Food and Drug Administration has already approved idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) for MM. However, the development of novel BCMA-targeting CAR T cell therapies remains in progress. This review focuses on BCMA-targeting CAR T cell therapy, covering all stages of investigational progress, including the innovative preclinical studies, the initial phase I clinical trials, and the more developed phase II clinical trials. It also discusses possible measures to improve the efficacy and safety of this therapy.

A Novel BCMA Immunohistochemistry Assay Reveals a Heterogenous and Dynamic BCMA Expression Profile in Multiple Myeloma

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a promising target for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) because the expression of this protein is largely limited to B-cell sets, plasma cells, MM, and other B-cell malignancies. Early studies assessing BCMA protein expression and localization have used insufficiently qualified immunohistochemistry assays, which have reported broad ranges of BCMA expression. As a result, our understanding of BCMA tissue expression derived from these data is limited, specifically the prevalence of BCMA expression on the cell surface/membrane, which has mechanistic relevance to the antimyeloma activity of several novel biotherapeutics. Here, we report on the qualification and application of a novel anti-BCMA immunohistochemistry antibody, 805G12. This antibody shows robust detection of BCMA in formalin-fixed, decalcified bone marrow tissue and provides key insights into membrane BCMA expression. The clone 805G12, which was raised against an intracellular C-terminal domain peptide of membrane BCMA, exhibited increased sensitivity and superior specificity across healthy and diseased tissue compared with the frequently referenced commercial reagent AF193. The new clone also demonstrated a broad range of expression of BCMA in MM and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma specimens. Additionally, cross-reactivity with closely related tumor necrosis factor receptor family members was observed with AF193 but not with 805G12. Furthermore, via established 805G12 and other independent BCMA assays, it was concluded that proteolytic processing by γ-secretase contributes to the levels of BCMA localized to the plasma membrane. As BCMA-directed therapeutics emerge to address the need for more effective treatment in the relapsed or refractory MM disease setting, the implementation of a qualified assay would ensure that reliable and consistent data on BCMA surface expression are used to inform clinical trial decisions and patient responses.

How I treat high-risk acute myeloid leukemia using preemptive adoptive cellular immunotherapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with high-risk acute leukemias, but unfortunately disease recurrence remains the major cause of death in these patients. Infusion of donor lymphocytes (DLI) has the potential to restore graft-versus-leukemia immunologic surveillance; however, efficacy varies across different hematologic entities. Although relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia, transplanted in chronic phase, has proven remarkably susceptible to DLI, response rates are more modest for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To prevent impending relapse, a number of groups have explored administering DLI preemptively on detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) or mixed chimerism. Evidence for the effectiveness of this strategy, although encouraging, comes from only a few, mostly single-center retrospective, nonrandomized studies. This article seeks to (1) discuss the available evidence supporting this approach while highlighting some of the inherent challenges of MRD-triggered treatment decisions post-transplant, (2) portray other forms of postremission cellular therapies, including the role of next-generation target-specific immunotherapies, and (3) provide a practical framework to support clinicians in their decision-making process when considering preemptive cellular therapy for this difficult-to-treat patient population.