Combination chemotherapy with mastectomy or radiotherapy for stage III breast carcinoma: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

Omission of Breast Surgery in Exceptional Responders

Breast cancer management has transformed significantly over the last decades, primarily through the integration of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and the evolving understanding of tumor biology, enabling more tailored treatment strategies. The aim of this review is to critically present the historical context and contemporary evidence surrounding the potential of omission of surgery post-NST, focusing on exceptional responders who have achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). Identifying these exceptional responders before surgery remains a challenge, however standardized image-guided biopsy may allow optimized patient selection. The safety and feasibility of omitting breast and axillary surgeries in these exceptional responders are explored in ongoing clinical trials and the reported preliminary results appear promising. Moreover, understanding patient and physician perspectives regarding the potential elimination of surgery post-NST is integral. While some patients express a preference to omit or minimize surgery, the majority of healthcare providers are intrigued by the prospect of avoiding surgical interventions and endorse further research in this field.

Different approaches to target volume definition and boost delivery in surgery de-escalation clinical trial in breast cancer patients with pathological complete response

PURPOSE

We evaluate various approaches to target volume definition and boost delivery in patients with complete response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) who were treated by radiotherapy without a surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pathological complete response (pCR) was diagnosed in 21 of 27 patients included in "surgery de-escalation" prospective observation study. Clips were placed in the primary tumor volume (PrTV) before NST and during the vacuum aspiration biopsy. Twenty patients with pCR underwent the whole breast irradiation and a boost to the PrTV. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) was the basic technique for boost delivery. Finally, we identified the value of fused images (computed tomography [CT] before NST with simulation CT), clips and their combination for an accurate boost delivery.

RESULTS

A complete overlap between PrTV on pre-treatment CT with the localization of the clips on simulation CT was mentioned in 10, partial mismatch in three patients. In 12 of these 13 women, HDRB was successfully used for the boost delivery. In five cases we mentioned a marked discrepancy between the PrTV on fused images and the topography of the clips. In other two women we did not find clips on simulation CT. The fused images in five of these seven patients showed anatomical landmarks (scar, fibrosis) used for identification of the gross tumor volume. In all 20 women with pCR (average follow-up of 16.6 months), there were no locoregional recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Combination of the clips with fusion of pre-NST and simulation CTs is important for an accurate boost delivery.

Assessment of Pathological Complete Response Using Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients Who Have Clinical and Radiological Complete Response After Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Background

Any treatment protocol that leads to complete elimination of surgery may lead to a better patient acceptance of breast cancer treatments.

Objectives

We conducted this study to assess the feasibility of preoperative vacuum-assisted biopsies in identifying pathological complete response (pCR) and its accuracy in correlation to final histopathology report (HPR), in an Indian setting.

Methods

This was a prospective study conducted between October 1, 2019, and March 31, 2021. Patients with early breast cancer, estrogen and progesterone receptors negative and either Her2 positive or negative, and who were fit to undergo marker placement at the centre of the tumour and to receive third-generation chemotherapy (4 cycles of 3 weekly doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of 3 weekly docetaxel) were included in the study. Following the enrolment, a tissue marker was placed at the centre of the tumour and appropriate chemotherapy was started. Patients who achieved clinical complete response were subjected to ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) from the tumour bed before surgery. Pathology results of the VAB and resected specimen were then compared. Descriptive statistics were used in the study.

Results

Eighteen patients were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 43.6 ± 9.8 years. However, only 10 were eligible for VAB procedure, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on the results of these 10 patients only. Vacuum-assisted biopsy showed sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 100% in identifying pCR. Combination of mammography, ultrasonography, and VAB showed sensitivity of 77.8% and specificity of 66.7% in identifying pCR.

Conclusion

Vacuum-assisted biopsy of tumour bed may not be sensitive enough to eliminate surgery even in patients who have had exceptional response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Locoregional Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives

BACKGROUND

The locoregional recurrence of breast cancer has been reduced due to the multidisciplinary approach of breast surgery, systemic therapy and radiation. Early detection and better surgical techniques contribute to an improvement in breast cancer outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to have an overview and summary of the current evidence behind the current approaches to the locoregional treatment of breast cancer and to discuss its future direction.

SUMMARY

With improved surgical techniques and the use of a more effective neoadjuvant systemic therapy, including checkpoint inhibitors and dual HER2-directed therapies that lead to a higher frequency of pathologic complete responses and advances in adjuvant radiation therapy, breast cancer patients are experiencing better locoregional control and reduced local and systemic recurrence. De-escalation in surgery has not only improved the quality of life in the majority of breast cancer patients, but also maintained the low risk of recurrence. There are ongoing clinical trials to optimize radiation therapy in breast cancer. More modern radiation technologies are evolving to improve the patient outcome and reduce radiation toxicities.

Local Recurrence is Frequent After Heroic Mastectomy for Classically Inoperable Breast Cancers

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), some patients with aggressive T4 breast cancers do not respond. The efficacy of 'heroic' mastectomy in maintaining local control is unclear.

METHODS

In consecutive patients with primary or recurrent T4 cancers with < 50% shrinkage on NST who underwent mastectomy from 2007 to 2017, clinicopathologic characteristics and locoregional recurrence (LRR) were examined.

RESULTS

Among 104 patients, 59 (57%) had primary T4M0, 12 (12%) had locally recurrent T4M0, and 33 (32%) had T4M1 disease. Median age was 58.5 years and the majority had high-grade (74%) ductal cancers (85%); 45 (44%) were estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-), 26 (25%) were HER2 positive (HER2+), and 31 (30%) were triple negative (TN). Postoperative complications developed in 41 (39%) patients. At a median follow-up of 37 months, 42 (40%) patients developed LRR. TN (hazard ratio [HR] 7.5) and HER2+ (HR 2.67) subtypes, lymphovascular invasion (LVI; HR 3.80), and positive margins (HR 4.09) were predictive of LRR. The 3-year LRR rate was highest and overall survival (OS) was lowest among patients with TN cancers, at 66% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-83%) and 30% (95% CI 14-47%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

After heroic mastectomy, postoperative complications were frequent and LRR occurred in 40% of patients despite a median OS of 3.8 years. Among TN patients, the 3-year LRR rate of 66% and 3-year OS of 30% suggest limited surgery benefit. Careful patient selection is prudent when considering heroic mastectomy.

Comparison between surgery plus radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in treating breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis

Background

Ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (ISLM) with breast cancer patients has always been a hard problem for breast surgery. It is generally believed that radiotherapy can benefit the survival of patients, but whether local surgical resection is needed or not is controversial. The study aims to compare the efficacy between supraclavicular lymph node (SLN) dissection combined with radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in the treatment of breast cancer with ISLM.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed using 122 cases of breast cancer with ISLM but without distant metastasis. Among them, 14 cases were eliminated due to insufficient data. The 108 remaining cases were divided into 2 groups based on different treatment proposals for metastatic SLNs. The groups were dissection plus radiotherapy (surgery group), and simple radiotherapy (radiotherapy group).

Results

For the 108 patients, the overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 30.6% and 67.8%, respectively. In the surgery group, distant metastases occurred in 41 patients, and the 5-year DFS was 34.3%; in the radiotherapy group, 18 patients had distant metastases, and the 5-year DFS was 26.1%; the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the surgery group, 11 patients died, and the 5-year OS rate was 67.9%; in the radiotherapy group, 6 patients died, and the 5-year OS rate was 67.5%; the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The dissection of SLN combined with radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone had similar effects on the survival rates in breast cancer patients with ISLM. The local control in the surgery group was better than that in the radiotherapy group. The status of estrogen receptors (ER) and the number of axillary lymph node metastases were independent influencing factors of DFS. The ER status is an independent factor affecting the OS rate of patients.

Targets and mechanisms of sulforaphane derivatives obtained from cruciferous plants with special focus on breast cancer - contradictory effects and future perspectives

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women. Therefore, discovery of new and effective drugs with fewer side effects is necessary to treat it. Sulforaphane (SFN) is an organosulfur compound obtained from cruciferous plants, such as broccoli and mustard, and it has the potential to treat breast cancer. Hence, it is vital to find out how SFN targets certain genes and cellular pathways in treating breast cancer. In this review, molecular targets and cellular pathways of SFN are described. Studies have shown SFN inhibits cell proliferation, causes apoptosis, stops cell cycle and has anti-oxidant activities. Increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) produces oxidative stress, activates inflammatory transcription factors, and these result in inflammation leading to cancer. Increasing anti-oxidant potential of cells and discovering new targets to reduce ROS creation reduces oxidative stress and it eventually reduces cancer risks. In short, SFN effectively affects histone deacetylases involved in chromatin remodeling, gene expression, and Nrf2 anti-oxidant signaling. This review points to the potential of SFN to treat breast cancer as well as the importance of other new cruciferous compounds, derived from and isolated from mustard, to target Keap1 and Akt, two key regulators of cellular homeostasis.

Inflammatory Component: A Worsening Factor in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Treated by Radiotherapy and Systemic Therapy

Locally advanced and inflammatory carcinomas of the breast are two distinct entities with clear differential clinical criteria. We described a particular type of locally advanced breast cancer which, during its evolution, developed inflammatory characteristics limited to a small area of the skin. It, therefore, did not meet the common diagnostic criteria of inflammatory carcinoma. In our series, studied from December 1977 to January 1987, we treated 59 cases of locally advanced breast cancer and 105 cases of locally advanced breast cancer with an inflammatory component. The actuarial overall survival was 53.3 % at 5 years and 38.4 % at 7 years. Differences were observed when the two tumor types were compared. Specifically, locally advanced breast cancer with an inflammatory component had a worse prognosis, poorer survival and poorer disease-free rates than locally advanced breast cancer.

Is Breast Surgery Necessary for Breast Carcinoma in Complete Remission Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

The likelihood of pathological complete remission (pCR) of breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasing; most of all in the triple negative and HER2 positive tumour subgroups. The question thus arises whether or not breast surgery is necessary when there is complete remission after NACT, and whether it provides any improvement of the oncological treatment result when tumour is no longer detectable. Avoiding surgery and possibly even radiotherapy would only be conceivable on the basis of a reliable diagnosis of pCR without operating. Current imaging does not achieve the necessary sensitivity and specificity to assure the diagnosis of pathological complete remission. Further studies are therefore required to determine which methods are best able to evaluate tumour response to NACT. Studies on image-guided, minimally invasive biopsies after NACT have delivered first promising results towards diagnosing pCR before surgery and could provide the basis for further studies on the possibility of avoiding surgery in this specific patient collective.

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Use for Younger Patients with Breast Cancer Treated in Different Types of Cancer Centers Across the United States

BACKGROUND

Multiple clinical trials have shown that neoadjuvant systemic therapy has a benefit in women who are borderline lumpectomy candidates and in those with locally advanced breast cancers by reducing the mastectomy rate and making inoperable tumors operable. The study aim was to examine the patterns of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy use among younger women in the United States treated at different types of cancer centers.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from the National Cancer Data Base for 118,086 women younger than 65 years with clinical stage IIA (T2N0 only) to IIIC breast cancer. Following the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline categorization, patients were grouped into those who were borderline lumpectomy candidates (clinical stage IIA [T2N0 only], IIB, or IIIA [T3N1 only]) or those with locally advanced disease (clinical stage IIIA [T0-3N2 only], IIIB, or IIIC). The main outcome was the proportion of women who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

RESULTS

Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ranged from 17% (stage IIA) to 79% (stage IIIB). Across almost all stage and receptor subtypes, the use was lower in community vs academic centers. On multivariable analysis, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was decreased in community vs academic centers (borderline lumpectomy candidates: adjusted risk ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.77; locally advanced disease: adjusted risk ratio = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of guideline-concordant neoadjuvant chemotherapy is significantly higher among women treated at academic vs community centers in young and healthy women who do not commonly have contraindications to this treatment. Our study identified a potential disparity in cancer care by type of center where patients receive treatment.

Application of a rhomboid flap for the coverage of defects after malignant breast tumor resection: A case report

Resection for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or malignant phyllodes tumors may cause a large skin defect with bone exposure. Although skin grafts are frequently used to cover such defects, they can result in poor cosmetic outcomes and graft acceptance is dependent upon the condition of the recipient site. To overcome the limitations of skin grafts, various flaps have been developed to cover such defects. The present study used a rhomboid flap for the coverage of skin defects after mastectomy and breast-conservative surgery (BCS). A total of 11 patients with malignant breast cancer underwent reconstructive surgery using the rhomboid flap between September 2011 and December 2013 (mastectomy, 9 patients; BCS, 2 patients). Skin resection size, axillary lymph node dissection, bone exposure, length of surgery, wound complications and whether preoperative/postoperative adjuvant therapy was received were analyzed. The maximum size of skin defect covered with the rhomboid flap in the present study was 20×20 cm. There were no major wound complications and all patients underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy on schedule. During BCS, a portion of the flap was used for augmentation of the breast, in addition to coverage of the skin defect, which resulted in good cosmetic outcomes. The rhomboid flap can be quickly and easily fashioned, and it does not require any special instruments.

A prognostic index for locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

The appropriate selection criteria for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are poorly defined. The aim of this study is to analyse the incidence and prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with breast cancer (BC) treated with NAC to develop a prognostic score to help with clinical decision-making.

Materials and methods

Using our retrospective maintained BC database, we identified 730 patients treated with NAC (327 patients treated with BCS and 403 patients treated with mastectomy) between 1998 and 2014. To identify variables associated with an increased LRR rate, we performed firstly Kaplan–Meier curves, with comparisons among groups using log-rank test, and then, significant variables were included in a multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards. The prognostic index was developed by assigning score 0 (favourable) or score 1 (unfavourable) for each significant variable of multivariate analysis and was created separately for patients with BCS and mastectomy.

Results

At a median follow-up of 72 months, the 6-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 7.2% ( ± 3%) for BCS and 7.9% ( ± 3%) for mastectomy.

By univariate analysis, variables associated with an increased LRR were for BCS: HER2 positive, grade III, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), No-pCR (ypTis, ypN0), and age < 40 years; and for mastectomy, HER2-positive, DCIS, No-pCR, and LVI. By multivariate analysis, variables associated with an increased LRR were for BCS: HER2 positive (HR: 11.1, p = 0.001), DCIS (HR: 3.1, p = 0.005), and age < 40 years (HR: 2.8, p = 0.02); and for mastectomy: HER2 positive (HR: 9.5, p = 0.03), DCIS (HR: 2.7, p = 0.01), No-pCR (HR: 11.4, p = 0.01), and age < 40 years (HR: 2.8, p = 0.006).

The score stratified patients into three subsets with statistically different levels of risk for LRR. For BCS, the six-year LRR rates were 3%, 13%, and 33% for the low (score 0, n = 120), intermediate (score 1, n = 95) and high (score 2–3, n = 27) risk groups, respectively (p = 0.001). For mastectomy, the six-year LRR rates were 0%, 8%, and 27% for the low (score 0, n = 20), intermediate (score 1–2, n 191), and high (score 3–4, n = 30) risk groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Of note, 21 patients that had a LRR event were HER2 positive, all of them had received trastuzumab.

Conclusions

Patients with a score of 0, which made up to 19% of the study population, had very low risk of LRR. The score enabled the identification of a small group (7%) of patients with very high risk of LRR, and who may benefit from alternative treatment.

Selective elimination of breast cancer surgery in exceptional responders: historical perspective and current trials

With improvements in chemotherapy regimens, targeted therapies, and our fundamental understanding of the relationship of tumor subtype and pathologic complete response (pCR), there has been dramatic improvement in pCR rates in the past decade, especially among triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancers. Rates of pCR in these groups of patients can be in the 60 % range and thus question the paradigm for the necessity of breast and nodal surgery in all cases, particularly when the patient will be receiving adjuvant local therapy with radiotherapy. Current practice for patients who respond well to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is often to proceed with the same breast and axillary procedures as would have been offered women who had not received NCT, regardless of the apparent clinical response. Given these high response rates in defined subgroups among exceptional responders it is appropriate to question whether surgery is now a redundant procedure in their overall management. Further, definitive radiation without surgical resection with or without systemic therapy has been proven effective for several other malignant disease sites including some stages of esophageal, anal, laryngeal, prostate, cervical, and lung carcinoma. The main impediments for potential elimination of surgery have been the fact that prior and current standard and functional breast imaging methods are incapable of accurate prediction of residual disease and that integrating percutaneous biopsy of the breast primary and nodes following NCT may circumvent this issue. This article highlights historical attempts at omission of surgery following NCT in an earlier era, the current status of breast and nodal imaging to predict residual carcinoma, and ongoing and planned trials designed to identify appropriate patients who might be selected for clinical trials designed to test the safety of selected elimination of breast cancer surgery in percutaneous image-guided biopsy-proven exceptional responders to NCT.

DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer V: Therapy for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer, as well as local therapy in cases with synchronous distant metastases

AIM

The purpose of this work is to give practical guidelines for radiotherapy of locally advanced, inflammatory and metastatic breast cancer at first presentation.

METHODS

A comprehensive survey of the literature using the search phrases "locally advanced breast cancer", "inflammatory breast cancer", "breast cancer and synchronous metastases", "de novo stage IV and breast cancer", and "metastatic breast cancer" and "at first presentation" restricted to "clinical trials", "randomized trials", "meta-analysis", "systematic review", and "guideline" was performed and supplemented by using references of the respective publications. Based on the German interdisciplinary S3 guidelines, updated in 2012, this publication addresses indications, sequence to other therapies, target volumes, dose, and fractionation of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

International and national guidelines are in agreement that locally advanced, at least if regarded primarily unresectable and inflammatory breast cancer should receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy first, followed by surgery and radiotherapy. If surgery is not amenable after systemic therapy, radiotherapy is the treatment of choice followed by surgery, if possible. Surgery and radiotherapy should be administered independent of response to neoadjuvant systemic treatment. In patients with a de novo diagnosis of breast cancer with synchronous distant metastases, surgery and radiotherapy result in considerably better locoregional tumor control. An improvement in survival has not been consistently proven, but may exist in subgroups of patients.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is an important part in the treatment of locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer that should be given to all patients regardless to the intensity and effect of neoadjuvant systemic treatment and the extent of surgery. Locoregional radiotherapy in patients with primarily distant metastatic disease should be prescribed on an individual basis.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer

SUMMARY Preoperative therapy in breast cancer was initially considered a therapeutic tool to downstage large tumors. In the last few years, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy has emerged as an active approach for the treatment of locally advanced estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Moreover, the parallel results obtained with neoadjuvant and adjuvant endocrine trials suggest that rationale for future adjuvant designs should be based on previously confirmed positive outcomes obtained in neoadjuvant studies. Ki-67, a proliferation-associated antigen determined by serial biopsies during therapy, has been validated as a biomarker and can provide useful information to define prognosis and establish therapeutic decisions. This review focuses on the classical indications of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, the parallelism between adjuvant and neoadjuvant studies and the potential role of this approach to predict outcomes based on short-term molecular markers in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

The integrated evaluation of the results of oncoplastic surgery for locally advanced breast cancer

The optimal surgical management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains undefined. The aim of the study was to obtain long-term results of oncoplastic surgery in terms of overall survival, loco-regional recurrence, and quality of life in case of LABC. Prospective cohort study enrolled 60 patients with stage III breast cancer. Forty-two (70%) patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, 28 patients were considered suitable for surgery as initial treatment option. Type II oncoplastic surgery was performed for all patients: hemimastectomy and breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap - for 29 (48.3%), lumpectomy - 31 (51.7%), and reconstruction with subaxillary flap for four (6.7%), with bilateral reduction mammoplasty - 14 (23.3%) and with J-plastic - 13 (21.7%) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy followed surgery for all, except one, patients. Sequential radiotherapy was administered for all patients. The mean period of follow-up was 86 months. Postoperative morbidity rate was 5%. Local-regional recurrence was detected in six (10%) patients. After reoperation no local relapse was diagnosed. However, three of these patients had systemic dissemination of the disease. Distant metastasis was detected in 23 (38.3%) patients. Distant metastasis-free survival at 5 years was 61.7%. Fourteen patients died (23.3%). A total of 87.2% of the patients had good and excellent esthetic outcome. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery can be proposed for selected patients with LABC with acceptable complication, local recurrence rate, and good esthetic results.

The role of chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable T4 breast tumors

PURPOSE

Unresectable T4 tumors of the breast are usually treated with systemic therapies, while the role of local therapies remains debatable. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy as a part of T4 breast cancer treatment, and to assess the role of local radiotherapies in patients with unresectable T4 breast tumors.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Between February 1998 and June 2010, 39 unresectable T4 breast tumors were treated with chemoradiotherapy at our institutes. Clinical stages included stage IIIB (n = 15), stage IIIC (n = 3), and stage IV (n = 21). Twenty-one cases had undergone previous systemic therapies, whereas the remaining 18 cases reported no history of previous treatment. Radiation doses of 59-66 Gy (median 60 Gy) were administered to the breast in addition to concurrent chemotherapies. Acute adverse effects were assessed on a weekly basis during treatment to 2 weeks after completion of treatment, and were scored by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Treatment response was assessed at 1 month after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Statistical analysis of survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Chemoradiotherapy was completed in all cases. Greater than grade 3 hematological toxicities were observed with regard to lymphocytes (33%), platelets (8%), neutrophils (3%), and hemoglobin (3%). Greater than grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities included chemoradiation dermatitis (23%) and pneumonitis (5%). Sixteen T4 tumors (41%) achieved complete response, whereas 23 (59%) achieved partial response. All patients were treated with chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy following chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up period was 20 months (range 3-96 months). Nineteen patients died because of progressive breast cancer. Infield recurrence or relapse was observed in 11 cases during the course of treatment, but only 3 cases were symptomatic. The 2-year overall local control rate was 73.6%, and the survival rate was 65.9%.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiotherapy represents a viable option for local treatment of unresectable T4 breast tumors.

Intrinsic Resistance to Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Systemic therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer, but does not cure patients with advanced or metastatic disease, and fails to benefit the majority of patients with localized breast cancer. Intrinsic resistance to chemotherapy is emerging as a significant cause of treatment failure and evolving research has identified several potential causes of resistance, such as drug efflux pumps, disregulation of apoptosis and cancer stem cells. Building upon preclinical models, drugs designed to reverse resistance to therapy are currently under investigation in clinical trials for the treatment of breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Focus on chemotherapy and biological targeted treatments' armamentarium

Despite progress achieved in diagnosis and therapy in recent years, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major clinical issue. Biological characteristics and clinical behavior varies widely, ranging from indolent to locally aggressive or generalized disease. In depth knowledge of biology of cancer progression and cancer could lead to the identification of tumor characteristics associated with outcome. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) integrated into a multimodality program is nowadays the established treatment in LABC. Although our efforts in this research task are ongoing, of special clinical interest is the integration of anti-HER2 and other biological therapies, as anti-angiogenesis targeted treatments, that may further improve the long term control of LABC. Clinical management of LABC could be modified based on molecular biology and an approach tailored to each patient will optimize therapy.

Inflammatory breast cancer: what are the treatment options?

An otherwise healthy, 68-year-old woman presents to her primary-care physician complaining of right breast enlargement, warmth, and progressive pink to dark red skin changes over the past month. She denies fever, pain, or breast discharge. Physical examination reveals erythema of the whole right breast, warmth, swelling, induration, and nipple retraction. Palpable axillary lymphadenopathy is appreciated on the right only. The left breast is uninvolved. The physician is concerned that she may have inflammatory breast cancer.

Breast cancer surgery: an historical narrative. Part III. From the sunset of the 19th to the dawn of the 21st century

The 20th century is marked by significant advances regarding the management of breast cancer. A clear trend towards less aggressive surgical operation was constantly noted. Modified radical mastectomy gradually replaced radical mastectomy during the second half of the 20th century, while during the last two decades breast-conservation therapy became the treatment of choice for the treatment of breast cancer. This type of therapy includes segmental mastectomy (either quadrantectomy or lumpectomy) with axillary lymph node dissection, followed by postoperative irradiation. Other significant advances during the 20th century include the introduction of systemic therapy (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy) and radiation therapy. Better patient follow-up, statistical analysis, development of staging systems and the introduction of frozen section, the development and wide use of mammography (including screening mammography), breast reconstruction following mastectomy and the development of newer diagnostic methods [including breast magnetic resonance imaging and the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI)] are other advances that contributed to a better management of breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has been introduced during the 1990 s in an attempt to reduce morbidity due to axillary lymph node dissection. Despite these advances, breast cancer remains a significant problem and represents a field of active and intense research.

Fifteen-year median follow-up results after neoadjuvant doxorubicin, followed by mastectomy, followed by adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) followed by radiation for stage III breast cancer: a phase II trial (CALGB 8944)

PURPOSE

To describe long-term results of a multimodality strategy for stage III breast cancer utilizing neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by mastectomy, CMF, and radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with biopsy-proven, clinical stage III breast cancer and adequate organ function were eligible. Neoadjuvant doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2) days 1-3, every 28 days for 4 cycles) was followed by mastectomy, in stable or responding patients. Sixteen weeks of postoperative CMF followed (continuous oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day); methotrexate (0.7 mg/kg IV) and fluorouracil (12 mg/kg IV) weekly, weeks 1-8, and than biweekly, weeks 9-16). Radiation therapy followed adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Clinical response rate was 71% (79/111, 95% CI = 62-79%), with 19% complete clinical response. Pathologic complete response was 5% (95% CI = 2-11%). Median follow-up is 15.6 years. Half of the patients progressed by 2.2 years; half died by 5.4 years (range 6 months-15 years). The hazard of dying was greatest in the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter. Time to progression and overall survival were predicted by number of pathologically involved lymph nodes (TTP: HR [10 vs. 1 node] 2.40, 95% CI = 1.63-3.53, P < 0.0001; OS: HR 2.50, 95% CI = 1.74-3.58, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

After multimodality treatment for locally advanced breast cancer, long-term survival was correlated with the number of pathologically positive lymph nodes, but not to clinical response. The hazard of death was highest during the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter, indicating a possible intermediate endpoint for future trials of neoadjuvant treatment.

Breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for large primary breast cancer

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of breast conserving surgery in patients with breast tumours satisfactorily downstaged after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to analyze the loco-regional recurrence (LRR) after breast conserving surgery. We enrolled 88 patients with breast cancer subjected to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT group) who achieved an objective response due to neoadjuvant treatment and compared them with 191 patients with early breast cancer (EBC group) who were submitted to primary conserving surgery. Lumpectomy or quadrantectomy with axillary lymph node dissection was performed in all patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy. Systemic adjuvant therapy was offered to all patients. The mean periods of observation were 61.3 months in the NAT group and 67.5 months in the EBC group.

RESULTS

The mean age was 53 years in the NAT group and 56 years in the EBC group (p=0.04). There was no histological type and histological grade difference between groups. In the NAT group, the mean diameter of residual tumour was lower and the mean volume of breast tissue resection was higher than in the EBC group (p=0.01 and p=0.002, respectively). The ipsilateral recurrence rate was 7.9% in the NAT group and 7.8% in the EBC group (p=0.9). The most important predictive factor of recurrence in the NAT group was the age of patient.

CONCLUSION

Breast conserving therapy is a safe procedure in satisfactorily downstaged breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27

PURPOSE

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-18 was designed to determine whether four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) administered preoperatively improved breast cancer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with AC administered postoperatively. Protocol B-27 was designed to determine the effect of adding docetaxel (T) to preoperative AC on tumor response rates, DFS, and OS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analyses were limited to eligible patients. In B-18, 751 patients were assigned to receive preoperative AC, and 742 patients were assigned to receive postoperative AC. In B-27, 784 patients were assigned to receive preoperative AC followed by surgery, 783 patients were assigned to AC followed by T and surgery, and 777 patients were assigned to AC followed by surgery and then T.

RESULTS

Results from B-18 show no statistically significant differences in DFS and OS between the two groups. However, there were trends in favor of preoperative chemotherapy for DFS and OS in women less than 50 years old (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85, P = .09 for DFS; HR = 0.81, P = .06 for OS). DFS conditional on being event free for 5 years also demonstrated a strong trend in favor of the preoperative group (HR = 0.81, P = .053). Protocol B-27 results demonstrated that the addition of T to AC did not significantly impact DFS or OS. Preoperative T added to AC significantly increased the proportion of patients having pathologic complete responses (pCRs) compared with preoperative AC alone (26% v 13%, respectively; P < .0001). In both studies, patients who achieved a pCR continue to have significantly superior DFS and OS outcomes compared with patients who did not.

CONCLUSION

B-18 and B-27 demonstrate that preoperative therapy is equivalent to adjuvant therapy. B-27 also showed that the addition of preoperative taxanes to AC improves response.

Management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer

The indications and benefits of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) continue to evolve. Advances in systemic adjuvant therapy and targeted therapy for breast cancer are likely to play an increasingly important role in control of locoregional as well as distant disease. Ongoing scrutiny of patterns of chest wall failure will be required to define the net benefit derived from PMRT. This article discusses the 2001 American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for PMRT and current practices using PMRT in selected groups of patients who have breast cancer.

Selective Mastectomy in the Management of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate local control for patients with locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer (LABC) managed by selective mastectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1979 and 1996, 176 patients with LABC were prospectively managed by chemotherapy (CT)-irradiation (RT)-CT without routine mastectomy. All surviving patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients (75%) had a T4 tumor and 22 (12.5%) supraclavicular nodal disease. The clinical complete response rate was 91% (160/176), which included 13 patients who underwent mastectomy and 2 an iridium wire implant. The first site of failure was local for 43 patients (breast +/- axilla for 38); 27 of these patients underwent salvage mastectomy and 11 did not for an overall mastectomy rate of 23% (40/176). If all 176 patients had undergone routine mastectomy (136 extra mastectomies), 11 additional patients may have avoided an unsalvageable first local relapse. The others would have either have not had a local relapse or would have suffered local relapse after distant disease. No tumor or treatment related factor was found to predict local disease at death. Median disease-free and overall survival for all patients was 26 and 52 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective mastectomy in LABC may not jeopardize local control or survival.

Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine the effect of adding docetaxel (T) to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) on breast cancer response rates and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with operable breast cancer (N = 2,411) were randomly assigned to receive preoperative AC followed by surgery, AC followed by T and surgery, or AC followed by surgery and then T. Tamoxifen was initiated concurrently with chemotherapy. Median time on study for 2,404 patients with follow-up was 77.9 months.

RESULTS

Addition of T to AC did not significantly impact DFS or OS. There were trends toward improved DFS with addition of T. The addition of T reduced the incidence of local recurrences as first events (P = .0034). Preoperative T, but not postoperative T, significantly improved DFS in patients who had a clinical partial response after AC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.91; P = .007). Pathologic complete response, which was doubled by addition of preoperative T, was a significant predictor of OS regardless of treatment (HR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.47; P < .0001). Pathologic nodal status after chemotherapy was a significant predictor of OS (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The addition of preoperative or postoperative T after preoperative AC did not significantly affect OS, slightly improved DFS, and decreased the incidence of local recurrences. The sample size of this study was not sufficient to yield significance for the moderate DFS improvement. Concurrent use of tamoxifen may have limited the impact of adding T.

Breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: long-term results

The purpose of this study was to determine patterns of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and local-regional recurrence (LRR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conserving therapy (BCT). A total of 153 breast cancer patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery and radiation therapy between 1980 and 2002. The clinical stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] 1997) at diagnosis was IIA in 22%, IIB in 28%, IIIA in 39%, and IIIB in 11%. The prechemotherapy T size distribution was less than 2 cm in 5 patients, 2.1-5 cm in 100 patients, and greater than 5.1 cm in 48 patients. Sixty-seven patients (44%) underwent cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF)-based chemotherapy and 86 (56%) underwent Adriamycin-based chemotherapy. Thirty-seven patients (24%) had a complete pathologic response in the breast. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (G.F.S.). The surgery was local excision alone in 19 patients, local excision and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in 130 patients, and ALND alone in 4 patients. Eleven patients had positive surgical margins. Rates of LRR-, IBTR-, and distant metastasis (DM)-free survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient and pathologic variables were then analyzed in an attempt to identify predictors of clinical outcome. With a median follow-up period of 55 months (range 6-200 months), eight patients developed LRR, five of which were classified as IBTR. Five- and 10-year actuarial rates of LRR-free, IBTR-free, and DM-free survival were 93% and 88%, 96% and 91%, and 70% and 58%, respectively. Pretreatment and pathologic parameters that positively correlated with IBTR were advanced stage (p = 0.03) and margin positivity (p = 0.04). No other clinical factors were predictive of higher recurrence. BCT results in a low rate of IBTR and LRR in appropriately selected patients. Advanced stage at presentation is associated with increased risk of IBTR, although overall recurrence is low. In selected cases, BCT is safe and an effective alternative to mastectomy.

The benefits and limitations of sentinel lymph node biopsy

The status of the axilla is the single most important prognostic indicator of overall survival in patients with breast cancer. Staging is based on tumor size and on the presence of lymph node metastases. The number of lymph nodes, although prognostic, no longer impacts treatment options. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and dissection is a more sensitive and accurate technique for nodal evaluation and has been applied to staging of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer, providing prognostic information, with less surgical morbidity than with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). When analyzed by an experienced pathologist with serial sectioning and immunohistochemical evaluation, SLN is the most accurate detection tool used in staging of breast cancer. In many centers that use these staging principles, ALND is no longer performed for histologically negative axillary SLNs. In addition, this technique may also be therapeutic because in most patients, the SLN is the only positive axillary node. SLN biopsy is justified in women with ductal carcinoma in situ who have a high risk of invasive carcinoma, such as those with large tumors, a mass, or high-grade lesions. SLN biopsy is performed in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and demonstrates accurate evaluation of the axilla in 90% of the cases. Women with locally advanced breast cancer may derive great benefit from a minimally invasive approach to the axilla because the extent of nodal involvement is unlikely to change further treatment. For clinically palpable nodes, ALND should be performed for therapeutic and local control. The use of sentinel node mapping in pregnancy is controversial. Vital blue dye is contraindicated in pregnant patients, although some have used radioactive colloid alone to map this subgroup of patients.

Controversies in the therapy of early stage breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among U.S. women, with more than 200,000 new cases diagnosed annually. In the U.S., mortality from breast cancer has declined in recent years as a result of more widespread screening, leading to earlier detection, as well as advances in the adjuvant treatment of early-stage disease. It is widely accepted that the appropriate use of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy improves the disease-free and overall survival of patients with early-stage breast cancer. It is, therefore, standard clinical practice to administer adjuvant systemic therapy to patients with node-positive and high-risk, node-negative breast cancer. There remain, however, many controversies in the primary systemic therapy of breast cancer, which are discussed in this review.

Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer in Countries with Limited Resources: Program Implementation and Evidence-Based Recommendations

Radiotherapy is an essential part of the multimodality treatment of breast cancer. Applying safe and effective treatment requires appropriate facilities, staff, and equipment, as well as support systems, initiation of treatment without undue delay, geographic accessibility, and completion of radiotherapy without undue prolongation of the overall treatment time. Radiotherapy can be delivered with a cobalt-60 unit or a linear accelerator (linac). In early stage breast cancer, radiotherapy is an integral part of breast-conserving treatment. Standard treatment includes irradiation of the entire breast for several weeks, followed by a boost to the tumor bed in women age 50 years or younger or those with close surgical margins. Mastectomy is an appropriate treatment for many patients. Postmastectomy irradiation with proper techniques substantially decreases local recurrences and improves survival in patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. It is also considered for patients with negative nodes if they have multiple adverse features such as a primary tumor larger than 2 cm, unsatisfactory surgical margins, and lymphovascular invasion. Many patients present with locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer. Their initial treatment is by systemic therapy; after responding to systemic therapy, most will require a modified radical mastectomy followed by radiotherapy. For those patients in whom mastectomy is still not possible after initial systemic therapy, breast and regional irradiation is given, followed whenever possible by mastectomy. For patients with distant metastases, irradiation may provide relief of symptoms such as pain, bleeding, ulceration, and lymphedema. A single fraction of irradiation can effectively relieve pain from bone metastases. Radiotherapy is also effective in the palliation of symptoms secondary to metastases in the brain, lungs, and other sites. Radiotherapy is important in the treatment of women with breast cancer of all stages. In developing countries, it is required for almost all women with the disease and should therefore be available.

Ipsilateral breast tumor reappearance in patients treated with conservative surgery after primary chemotherapy. The role of surgical margins on outcome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the ipsilateral breast tumor reappearance (IBTR) rate after breast conservative surgery (BCS) following primary chemotherapy (PC) and to assess whether positive margins affects IBTR rate and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Three hundred nine women candidates for mastectomy received PC before surgery. One hundred ninety-five patients (63.1%) underwent BCS and 114 patients (36.9%) a modified radical mastectomy.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 41 months (range 7-90), 13 patients of the 195 treated with BCS had an IBTR (6.7%), 6 patients had a regional relapse (3.1%), 28 women had distant metastases (14.4%). Twenty-three patients died of breast cancer (11.8%). Twenty-four patients treated with BCS had positive margins (12.3%). At 3 years, the crude cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 4.7% in women with negative margins, and 13.3% in women with positive margins (P=0.05). Cumulative incidence of distant metastases was similar in patients with positive and negative margins (P=0.16) and there was no significant difference in terms of OS according to the margin status (P=0.577).

CONCLUSIONS

BCS after PC has an acceptable rate of IBTR. After a short follow-up, the presence of positive margins does not affect OS.

Increased incidence of stroke in women with breast cancer

Meta-analyses have shown an excess of vascular deaths in women with breast cancer given radiotherapy (RT). In women with breast cancer, RT to the supraclavicular lymph nodes gives a substantial radiation dose to the proximal carotid artery. RT is known to increase the risk of carotid stenosis and ischaemic stroke in head and neck cancer. A study base of 25,171 women with breast cancer was defined. A linkage between the study base and the Hospital Discharge Register yielded 1766 women who were diagnosed with a stroke after a breast cancer. The observed number of strokes was compared with the expected number in the background population. The Relative Risk (RR) of stroke in the study group with breast cancer was 1.12 (95% Confidence Interval (CI)=1.07-1.17). The increased risk was confined to the subtype cerebral infarction, RR=1.12 (95% CI=1.05-1.19). A statistically significant increase in the risk of stroke was seen among women with a history of breast cancer. Whether this risk is associated with the breast cancer disease per se or related to any treatment requires further study.

[Association of taxanes and radiotherapy: preclinical and clinical studies]

Taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) stabilized microtubules against depolymerization, and inhibit their function. Their radiosensitizing properties have been discovered more than 10 years ago; they synchronized tumor cells in G2/M phase, the most radiosensitive portion of the cell cycle. Other radiosensitizing mechanisms have been also discussed, as reoxygenation, promotion of radio-apoptosis and antiangiogenic cooperation. Many phase I and II studies have been performed, essentially in bronchus and head and neck carcinomas. In lung cancer, paclitaxel was delivered weekly at a dose of 60 mg/m2. Many studies combined cisplatin or carboplatin with paclitaxel, demonstrating that this combination is feasible and efficient. Only one phase III trial was reported; after two cycles of chemotherapy for inoperable lung cancers, radiotherapy was delivered, with or without paclitaxel radiosensitization: a benefit in disease-free survival was observed for the combination arm. In head and neck carcinomas, conomitant association of cisplatin, paclitaxel and radiation was feasible and showed promising results. Clinical trials with docetaxel are in progress.

Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The appropriate selection criteria for breast-conserving therapy (BCT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are poorly defined. The purpose of the current report was to develop a prognostic index to help refine selection criteria and to serve as a general framework for clinical decision-making for patients treated by this multimodality approach.

METHODS

From a group of 340 patients treated with BCT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the authors previously determined 4 statistically significant predictors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and locoregional recurrence (LRR): clinical N2 or N3 disease, residual pathologic tumor size > than 2 cm, a multifocal pattern of residual disease, and lymphovascular space invasion in the specimen. The M. D. Anderson Prognostic Index (MDAPI) was developed by assigning scores of 0 (favorable) or 1 (unfavorable) for each of these 4 variables and using the total to give an overall MDAPI score of 0-4.

RESULTS

The MDAPI stratified the 340 patients into 3 subsets with statistically different levels of risk for IBTR and LRR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and BCT. Actuarial 5-year IBTR-free survival rates were 97%, 88%, and 82% for patients in the low (MDAPI overall score 0 or 1, n=276), intermediate (MDAPI score 2, n=43), and high (MDAPI score 3 or 4, n=12) risk groups, respectively (P<0.001). Corresponding actuarial 5-year LRR-free survival rates were 94%, 83%, and 58%, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an MDAPI score of 0 or 1, which made up 81% of the study population, had very low rates of IBTR and LRR. The MDAPI enabled the identification of a small group (4%) of patients who are at high risk for IBTR and LRR and who may benefit from alternative locoregional treatment strategies.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin and Docetaxel in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Fifty patients with histologically confirmed stage III breast cancer were enrolled in this study of doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously infused over 1 hour every 21 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 4 cycles. This was followed by surgery (mastectomy or lumpectomy) and 4 more cycles of doxorubicin/docetaxel postoperatively, then radiation and tamoxifen as indicated. Forty-six of the 50 patients (92%) completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 38 patients (76%) completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical response (defined as > 50% decrease in size of tumor) was achieved after 2 cycles in 37 patients (74%) and after 4 cycles in 42 of the 46 patients (91%) who finished neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathologic complete response (pCR; no pathologic invasive cancer) at the primary site was obtained in 7 of 46 patients (15%); 11 had no residual gross disease but did have microscopic persistence or microscopic complete response (mCR), for a combined pCR and mCR of 18 of 46 patients (39%). No treatment-related deaths occurred, but 3 patients died during treatment: 1 from progressive disease, 1 from a gastrointestinal bleeding, and 1 from unexplained sudden cardiac death. Dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic (grade 3 neutropenia in 5 patients and grade 4 in 23 patients). Congestive heart failure developed in 4 of 50 patients (8%), with a mean decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20% in affected patients and 1 asymptomatic decrease in LVEF of 25%. At last follow-up, 10 patients had died of progressive disease, and 1 each from sudden cardiac death and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. In locally advanced breast cancer, neoadjuvant doxorubicin/docetaxel is a very active regimen that achieved pCR of 15% and a combined pCR and mCR of 39%, for an overall clinical response rate of 91%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was complicated by dropouts and congestive heart failure. This regimen should be used with close monitoring of cardiac function.

Combined chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation for locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer: updated results in a series of 120 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate our updated data concerning survival and locoregional control in a prospective study of locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer (LABC) after primary chemotherapy (CT) followed by external preoperative irradiation (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1982 and 1998, 120 patients (75 Stage IIIA, 41 Stage IIIB, and 4 Stage IIIC according to AJCC staging system 2002) were treated by four courses of induction CT with anthracycline-containing combinations followed by preoperative RT (45 Gy to the breast and nodal areas) and a fifth course of CT. Three different locoregional approaches were proposed depending on tumor characteristics and tumor response. After completion of local therapy, all patients received a sixth course of CT and a maintenance adjuvant CT regimen without anthracycline. The median follow-up from the beginning of treatment was 140 months.

RESULTS

Mastectomy and axillary dissection were performed in 49 patients (with residual tumor larger than 3 cm in diameter or located behind the nipple or with bifocal tumor), and conservative treatment in 71 patients (39 achieved clinical complete response or partial response >90% and received additional radiation boost to initial tumor bed; 32 had residual mass < or =3 cm in diameter and were treated by wide excision and axillary dissection followed by a boost to the excision site). Ten-year actuarial local failure rate was 13% after RT alone, 23% after wide excision and RT, and 4% after mastectomy (p = 0.1). After multivariate analysis, possibility of breast-conserving therapy was related to initial tumor size (<6 cm vs. > or =6 cm in diameter, p = 0.002). Ten-year overall metastatic disease-free survival rate was 61%. After multivariate analysis, metastatic disease-free survival rates were significantly influenced by clinical stage (Stage IIIA-B vs. IIIC, p = 0.0003), N-stage (N0 vs. N1-2a, and 3c, p = 0.017), initial tumor size (<6 cm vs. > or =6 cm in diameter, p = 0.008), and tumor response after induction CT and preoperative RT (clinically complete response + partial response vs. nonresponder, p = 0.0015). In the nonconservative breast treatment group, of the 32 patients with no change in clinical tumor size after induction CT, the 10-year metastatic disease-free survival rate was 59% with only one local relapse. Arm lymphedema was noted in 17% (14 of 81) after axillary dissection and in 2.5% (1 of 39) without axillary dissection. Cosmetic results were satisfactory in 70% of patients treated by RT alone and in 51.5% of patients after wide excision and RT.

CONCLUSION

Despite the poor prognosis of patients with LABC resistant to primary anthracycline-based regimen, aggressive locoregional management using preoperative RT and mastectomy with axillary dissection offers a possibility of long-term survival with low local failure rate for patients without extensive nodal disease. On the other hand, the rate of local failure seems to be high in patients with clinical partial tumor response after induction CT and breast-conserving treatment combining preoperative RT and large wide excision.