Effective biomodulation by leucovorin of high-dose infusion fluorouracil given as a weekly 24-hour infusion: results of a randomized trial in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Exploring Gut Microbiome Composition and Circulating Microbial DNA Fragments in Patients with Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) significantly contributes to cancer-related mortality, necessitating the exploration of prognostic factors beyond TNM staging. This study investigates the composition of the gut microbiome and microbial DNA fragments in stage II/III CRC.

METHODS

A cohort of 142 patients with stage II/III CRC and 91 healthy controls underwent comprehensive microbiome analysis. Fecal samples were collected for 16S rRNA sequencing, and blood samples were tested for the presence of microbial DNA fragments. De novo clustering analysis categorized individuals based on their microbial profiles. Alpha and beta diversity metrics were calculated, and taxonomic profiling was conducted.

RESULTS

Patients with CRC exhibited distinct microbial composition compared to controls. Beta diversity analysis confirmed CRC-specific microbial profiles. Taxonomic profiling revealed unique taxonomies in the patient cohort. De novo clustering separated individuals into distinct groups, with specific microbial DNA fragment detection associated with certain patient clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

The gut microbiota can differentiate patients with CRC from healthy individuals. Detecting microbial DNA fragments in the bloodstream may be linked to CRC prognosis. These findings suggest that the gut microbiome could serve as a prognostic factor in stage II/III CRC. Identifying specific microbial markers associated with CRC prognosis has potential clinical implications, including personalized treatment strategies and reduced healthcare costs. Further research is needed to validate these findings and uncover underlying mechanisms.

Prospects of new targeted nanotherapy combining liponiosomes with berberine to combat colorectal cancer development: An in vivo experimental model

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most identified and deadly malignancies worldwide. It presents a serious challenge due to its quick growth, which finally culminates in severe malignancy. It is critical to improve the efficacy of berberine (BR) as an anticancer agent to overcome its limited bioavailability. Implementation of a novel, effective nanocarrier system of liponiosomes for BR (LipoNio.BR) can support mechanistic actions associated with its anti-CRC role. Following CRC induction in rats using 1,2 Dimethylhydrazine (40 mg DMH/kg/week), the potency and mechanistic actions of LipoNio.BR were assessed by evaluating the lesion severity and molecular mechanisms controlling oxidative stress, apoptosis, autophagy, and inflammatory responses, and conducting histopathological and immunohistochemistry examinations of colonic tissues. The results indicated that the severity of clinical signs comprising weight gain loss, increased diarrhea and rectal bleeding, and reduced survivability were greatly restored in the LipoNio.BR-treated group. LipoNio.BR remarkably reduced CRC development compared to FBR (free berberine), as it induced apoptosis via upregulating apoptotic genes (Bax and caspase3, increased up to 7.89 and 6.25-fold, respectively) and downregulating the anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-2 by 2.25-fold. LipoNio.BR mitigated the oxidative stress associated with CRC and maintained redox homeostasis. Notably, the excessive inflammatory response associated with CRC was prominently reduced following administration of LipoNio.BR [which decreased iterleukin (IL-B, IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), follistatin, and activin BA (beta-A) expression]. LipoNio.BR modulated the expression of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which impacted tumor vascularity (decreased Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression by 2.36-fold). The severity of the histopathological alterations in the colonic tissues, including the development of neoplastic epithelium and the invasion of some neoplastic masses, was greatly reduced in the LipoNio.BR group compared to the FBR-(free berberine) administrated group. Following CRC induction, immunohistochemical staining revealed that the overexpression of cyclin and COX-2 in colonic tissues were suppressed in the LipoNio.BR group. Taken together, these findings suggest that LipoNio.BR has a potential role in reducing CRC progression to a greater extent compared to free BR and could be considered a promising and potent therapy against CRC.

Irinotecan: a new treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer

Objective. Historically, outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy have been disappointing, with fluorouracil (5-FU) producing response rates of no more than 15%. The addition of leucovorin increases response rates; however, survival rates are largely unaffected. Recently, the topoisomerase I inhibitor, irinotecan, has proved active in metastatic colorectal cancer and is indicated as second-line therapy following disease recurrence or progression after 5-FU-based therapy. More recently, irinotecan plus 5-FU-LV was compared with 5-FU-LV as first line treatment of colorectal cancer, showing impressive results. This article discusses the role of irinotecan, as a single agent and in combination with 5-FU-LV, in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Data sources. A MEDLINE search was conducted using 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin, and metastatic colorectal cancer as primary search terms. Reference lists, bibliographies of pertinent articles, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology annual meetings were also identified and reviewed. Clinical literature was reviewed and analyzed.

Data synthesis. Results of studies comparing irinotecan with continuos infusion 5-FU or best supportive care suggest that irinotecan is superior to either treatment as second-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer. Based on these study results, along with irinotecan's lack of cross-resistance with other chemotherapy agents and mechanism of action that differs from 5-FU, phase III trials evaluating the use of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU-LV as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer were conducted. The results of a pivotal trial evaluating irinotecan plus 5-FU-LV in this setting show superior response rates (RRs), time to tumor progression (TTP), and median survival times (MSTs) when compared with 5-FU-LV alone. This combination represents a major advance in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and should be considered the first-line treatment standard.

Multicenter phase II study of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab after discontinuation of oxaliplatin-based regimen for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer (CR0802)

Background

To investigate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen with irinotecan (180 mg/m²) in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer who were of the wild-type or heterozygous group for UGT1A1*28 and *6 polymorphisms and discontinued to oxaliplatin-based regimen, prospectively.

Methods

The study population consisted of patients who had discontinued oxaliplatin-based regimen for any reason. The primary endpoint was the response rate. FOLFIRI and bevacizumab regimen [irinotecan: 180 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil infusion: 2400 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil bolus: 400 mg/m², levofolinate calcium: 200 mg/m², bevacizumab: 5 mg/kg] was repeated every 2 weeks for up to 24 cycles.

Results

Ninety-four patients were enrolled; 93 patients were evaluated on safety, 94 patients on efficacy. The response rate was 10.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.7-18.3%). The median time to treatment failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.8-4.8 months), 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.1-6.2 months), and 14.5 months (95% CI: 11.8-17.0 months), respectively. The treatment-related death was 1.1%, and the early death ≤30 days after the last study treatment was 1.1%. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 60.2% for neutropenia, 23.7% for leukopenia, 9.7% for diarrhea, 6.5% for anorexia, and 5.4% for fatigue. All these adverse events and other adverse events were controllable.

Conclusions

FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen with an initial irinotecan dose of 180 mg/m² exhibited an adequate antitumor effect and was confirmed to be manageable and tolerable in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer, who had discontinued oxaliplatin-based regimen.

Trial registration

UMIN000001817.

A randomised phase III intergroup trial comparing high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil with or without folinic acid with standard bolus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer: the Pan-European Trial in Adjuvant Colon Cancer 2 study

PURPOSE

To investigate whether infusional high-dose 5-flurouracil (HD-FU) provides a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with a standard bolus 5-FU regimen (Mayo Clinic) in patients with curatively resectable stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients (n=1601) were randomised to receive either the Mayo Clinic regimen or one of the three HD-FU regimens; LV5FU2, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO) or the Grupo Espaňol para el Tratamiento Digestivos (TTD), the data from which were combined to provide the HD-FU arm for final analysis.

RESULTS

Patients were evenly balanced for age, TMN, tumor grade and vascular and lymphatic invasion. Median follow-up was approximately 42months, RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.997) and OS (HR=0.96) (primary end-point) were not statistically different between the two treatment arms. Infusional HD-FU was generally better tolerated than bolus 5-FU regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Infusional HD-FU does not improve RFS and OS in curatively resected stage III colon cancer patients compared to the Mayo Clinic regimen, but is less toxic.

Cancer prevention as biomodulation: targeting the initiating stimulus and secondary adaptations

In a medical sense, biomodulation could be considered a biochemical or cellular response to a disease or therapeutic stimulus. In cancer pathophysiology, the initial oncogenic stimulus leads to cellular and biochemical changes that allow cells, tissue, and organism to accommodate and accept the oncogenic insult. In epithelial cell cancer development, the process of carcinogenesis is frequently characterized by sequential cellular and biochemical adaptations as cells transition through hyperplasia, dysplasia, atypical dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, and invasive cancer. In some cases, the adaptations may persist after the initial oncogenic stimulus is gone in a type of “hit-and-run” oncogenesis. These pathophysiological changes may interfere with cancer prevention therapies targeted solely to the initial oncogenic insult, perhaps contributing to resistance development. Characterization of these accommodating adaptations could provide insight for the development of cancer preventive regimens that might more effectively biomodulate preneoplastic cells toward a more normal state.

A survival analysis of the liver-first reversed management of advanced simultaneous colorectal liver metastases: a LiverMetSurvey-based study

BACKGROUND

Liver-first reversed management (RM) for the treatment of patients with simultaneous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) includes liver-directed chemotherapy, the resection of the CRLM, and the subsequent resection of the primary cancer. Retrospective data have shown that up to 80% of patients can successfully undergo a complete RM, whereas less than 30% of those undergoing classical management (CM) do so. This registry-based study compared the 2 approaches.

METHODS

The study was based on the LiverMetSurvey (January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2010) and included patients with 2 or more metastases. All patients had irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy before liver surgery. Patients undergoing simultaneous liver and colorectal surgery were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 787 patients were included: 729 in the CM group and 58 in the RM group. Patients in the 2 groups had similar numbers of metastases (4.20 vs 4.80 for RM and CM, P = 0.231) and Fong scores of 3 or more (79% vs 87%, P = 0.164). Rectal cancer, neoadjuvant rectal radiotherapy, and the use of combined irinotecan/oxaliplatin chemotherapy were more frequent in the RM group (P < 0.001), whereas colorectal lymph node involvement was more frequent in the CM group (P < 0.001). Overall survival and disease-free survival were similar in the RM and CM groups (48% vs 46% at 5 years, P = 0.965 and 30% vs 26%, P = 0.992).

CONCLUSIONS

Classical and reversed managements of metastatic liver disease in colorectal cancer are associated with similar survival when successfully completed.

Triplet chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: toward the best way to safely administer a highly active regimen in clinical practice

A major problem concerning the addition of more drugs in a chemotherapy combination is designing a proper schedule assuring the balance between dose intensity of each drug, efficacy of the combination, and tolerability lessening the burden of drug toxicity. We evaluated triplet chemotherapy-based intensive regimens proposed as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Using a FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) combination regimen, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer now have the possibility of longer survival, but disappointingly, with increased toxicities. Triplet chemotherapy regimen according to 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan /5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, characterized by timed flat-infusion 5-FU administration, without leucovorin, obtained efficacy equivalent to other reported similar combination regimens (5-FU, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin), with increased received 5-FU dose intensity and lower grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. To guarantee the proper balance between dose intensities, efficacy, and toxicity, triplet chemotherapy schedules could be further improved by abrogation of folinic acid and bolus 5-FU, a new and easy modality of 5-FU administration, such as timed flat-infusion 5-FU, associated with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin; this could favor diffusion of this intensive treatment in clinical practice.

A phase I and II trial of epirubicin, cisplatin, 24-hour infusion 5 fluorouracil and sodium folinate in patients with advanced esophagogastric carcinomas

AIM

Advanced esophagogastric carcinoma has a poor prognosis. Palliative chemotherapy provides a survival advantage and improved quality of life. Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECF) is a well-established chemotherapy regimen but a continuous chemotherapy infusion is not always feasible or acceptable.

METHODS

We conducted a phase I and II trial of a modified version of ECF, utilizing 5-FU as a 24-h infusion on day 1 and day 8 of a 21-day cycle, administered with sodium folinate as a modulator of 5-FU (ECSF). In the phase I study the dose of 5-FU was increased in successive cohorts from 1250 mg/m(2) , 1500 mg/m(2) , and 1750 mg/m(2) to 2000 mg/m(2) per 24 h.

RESULTS

Dose limiting toxicity of febrile neutropenia was encountered at 2000 mg/m. The recommended dose for 5-FU was 1750 mg/m(2) . Overall 29 patients were treated with ECSF of whom 27 were evaluable for toxicity. The response rate was 45% on an intention-to-treat analysis with a complete response rate of 3%. The median response rate was 4.1 months and the median survival was 10.7 months. A total of 23 patients (72%) obtained clinical benefit with improvement in dysphagia or weight gain. central venous catheter (CVC) complications were observed in 12 (41%) patients.

CONCLUSION

ECSF was associated with a response rate and survival similar to that reported with standard ECF. ECSF may provide an alternative regimen to standard ECF when a continuous ambulatory infusion pump is not feasible or not preferred by the patient. CVC complications are a limitation.

Anti-invasion effect of rosmarinic acid via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase and oxidation-reduction pathway in Ls174-T cells

Rosmarinic acid is a major phenylpropanoid isolated from Prunella vulgaris L., which is a composition of herbal tea for centuries in China. However, the anti-invasion activity on Ls174-T human colon carcinoma cells has not been studied. In this study, we investigated the anti-metastasis functions according to wound healing assay, adhesion assay, and Transwell assay and found that rosmarinic acid could inhibit migration, adhesion, and invasion dose-dependently. Rosmarinic acid also could decrease the level of reactive oxygen species by enhancing the level of reduced glutathione hormone. In addition, rosmarinic acid repressed the activity and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2,9. According to Western blot and quantitative real-time PCR assay, rosmarinic acid may inhibit metastasis from colorectal carcinoma mainly via the pathway of extracellular signal-regulated kinase. In animal experiment, intraperitoneal administration of 2 mg of rosmarinic acid reduced weight of tumors and the number of lung nodules significantly compared with those of control group. Therefore, these results demonstrated that rosmarinic acid can effectively inhibit tumor metastasis in vitro and in vivo.

Target Practice: Figuring Out Which, When, and Why to Use Systemic Therapies for Metastatic Colon Cancer

There have been many recent advances in the field of systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Each treatment affects a different target, including thymidylate synthase, topoisomerase, DNA, the epidermal growth factor receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor. These treatments have been used in multiple combinations, schedules, and as first-line, second-line, and third-line therapies. The current clinical trials reported can help guide the clinician to determine the appropriate timing, combination, and schedule of chemotherapy agents. Although the decision regarding colorectal cancer chemotherapy is now more complicated, our patients have certainly benefited from better response rates and most importantly, longer survival times.

XELOX versus FOLFOX6 as an adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer: an economic analysis

OBJECTIVES

An economic analysis (based on interim data from a long-term, randomised, multi-centre, controlled, clinical trial) to evaluate chemotherapy with XELOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) versus FOLFOX6 (5Fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) as an adjuvant treatment for high risk colorectal cancer patients in Greece.

METHODS

As survival rate was the same in the two arms, a cost-minimisation analysis was carried out, from the perspectives of the National Health Service (NHS), Social Insurance Funds (SIF) and patients in Greece. Patient data were combined with 2008 unit prices to estimate the total cost of patient care, the patients' travelling expenditure and their productivity losses. Raw data were bootstrapped 5000 times in order to allow statistical testing.

RESULTS

From an NHS perspective, the mean chemotherapy cost was 8762 euro with FOLFOX6 and 9713 euro with XELOX; costs of administration and hospitalisations were 5154 euro and 1050 euro, respectively. Total treatment cost with FOLFOX6 reached 17,480 euro and with XELOX 12 525 euro, a difference of 4955 euro (p < 0.001) in favour of the latter therapy. From an SIF perspective, the total cost of treatment was 16,240 euro with FOLFOX6 and 12,617 euro with XELOX, a reduction of 3623 euro (p < 0.001) with the latter therapy. Mean patient travelling cost was 184 euro with FOLFOX6 and 80 euro with XELOX, a difference of 104 euro (p < 0.001). Mean productivity loss was 100 euro with FOLFOX6 and 31 euro with XELOX, a difference of 69 euro (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy combining oral capecitabine and oxaliplatin reduces total treatment cost for the Greek National Health Service and Social Insurance Funds, mainly through a reduction in the cost of administration. From patients' perspective, it reduces travelling expenditure and productivity losses. Therefore, this combination may be a cost-effective approach for the management of colorectal cancer patients who have had surgery in Greece. This is an analysis alongside a clinical trial, and should be interpreted in this specific context in which it was undertaken.

A phase I study of an oral simulated FOLFOX with high dose capecitabine

BACKGROUND

A phase I study of high-dose capecitabine given over 2 days, along with oxaliplatin, bolus 5FU and leucovorin (LV), was designed to simulate FOLFOX6 without the need for infusional 5FU.

METHODS

Schedule A included oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2), 5FU 400 mg/m(2), and LV 20 mg/m(2) (all given IV on days 1 and 15, 28 day cycle). Capecitabine was administered orally every 8 h x 6 doses, days 1 and 15. Schedule B excluded 5FU and LV, maintaining oxaliplatin and capecitabine. Pharmacokinetics were performed for capecitabine for 6 patients on each schedule.

RESULTS

36 patients were treated. The dose-limiting toxicities seen included nausea, dehydration, fatigue, hypotension and confusion. Minimal palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was seen. Myelosuppression was common, but not a dose limiting toxicity. The pharmacokinetic parameters for capecitabine were unaltered.

CONCLUSION

Using capecitabine to mimic FOLFOX6 is feasible and well tolerated with a toxicity profile that differs from standard 14-day capecitabine dosing, with less palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The phase II dose for capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin, 5FU, and LV is 1,500 mg/m(2)/dose or 2,250 mg/m(2)/dose in the absence of bolus 5FU/LV.

Economic analysis of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial comparing FOLFOXIRI with FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece

INTRODUCTION

An economic evaluation of the irinotecan, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) combination versus the irinotecan, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOXIRI) regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was performed in the context of a randomised phase III study.

METHODS

The trial did not find any differences in efficacy and, therefore, a cost-minimisation analysis was undertaken. Treatment cost accounts for the administration of first and second line chemotherapy, for concomitant medications, for laboratory and other examinations and hospitalisations due to treatment side effects. Unit prices used reflect 2006 and are common among NHS hospitals in Greece.

RESULTS

The mean total cost of therapy in the FOLFOXIRI group (18,344 euros, 95% CI: 16,951 euros-19,776 euros), was significantly higher than the FOLFIRI group (12,201 euros, 95% CI: 11,011 euros-13,427 euros). Mean chemotherapy cost of the FOLFOXIRI group (9016 euros; 95% CI: 8338 euros-9669 euros) was significantly higher than that of the FOLFIRI group (4830 euros; 95% CI: 4435 euros-5231 euros). The next largest component of cost involves second line drugs, where the average cost per patient was 3306 euros (95% CI: 2479 euros-4237 euros) in the FOLFIRI group and 3996 euros (95% CI: 3196 euros-4892 euros) in the FOLFOXIRI group. The cost of hospitalisations was 1814 euros (95% CI: 1672 euros-1954 euros) in the first group and 2663 euros (95% CI: 2469 euros-2859 euros) in the second. The rest of the components represent a small part of the total cost and there are no differences in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The combination of irinotecan, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil has the same effectiveness as the combination of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, nonetheless it is associated with a much lower overall treatment cost and it should be the preferred treatment regimen in this context.

Apoptosis and chemo-resistance in colorectal cancer

Systemic chemotherapy plays an integral part in treating advanced colorectal cancer. However 50% of patients respond poorly or have disease progression due to resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. This article reviews the pathways that regulate apoptosis, apoptotic mechanisms through which chemotherapeutic agents mediate their effect and how deregulation of apoptotic proteins may contribute to chemo-resistance. Also discussed are potential therapeutic strategies designed to target these proteins and thereby improve response rates to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Irinotecan plus weekly 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as salvage treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (CPT-11/5-FU/LV (AIO schedule)) as salvage treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

33 patients relapsing after oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-based first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Their median age was 69 years, 20 (61%) patients were male, and performance status (WHO) was 0, 1, and 2 in 15, 16 and 2 patients respectively; prior surgery 20 (61%) patients; adjuvant chemotherapy 11 (33%) patients, and adjuvant radiotherapy 6 (18%) patients. The number of metastatic sites was 1, 2, and > or =3 in 11, 11, and 11 patients, respectively. CPT-11 was administered on day 1 at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) in 30-90 min infusion and LV (500 mg/m(2)) on the same day as a 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU (2,600 mg/m(2)/day) as a 22-hour infusion on day 1 for 6 subsequent weeks. The regimen was repeated every 7 weeks.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and for response. Complete response was achieved in 2 patients (6%) and partial response in 4 patients (12%) (RR 18%, CI 5.95-35.43%); 13 patients (40%) had stable disease, and 14 (42%) progressive disease. After a median follow-up period of 9 months, the median duration of response was 5 months, the median time to progression 7.5 months, and OS 14 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 13 patients (39%), febrile neutropenia in 3 (9%), grade 2 anemia in 11 (33%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 1 (3%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred in 12 patients (36%), grade 3-4 neurotoxicity in 3 (9%), and grade 3 asthenia in 4 (12%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The median dose intensity was 85% for CPT-11, and 88% for 5-FU and LV.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly CPT-11 and infusional 5-FU/LV is an active and relatively well-tolerated regimen as salvage treatment in MCC.

FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): a multicentre randomised phase III trial from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFOXIRI) vs irinotecan and 5-FU/LV (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). A total of 283 chemotherapy-naïve patients with MCC were enrolled (FOLFIRI arm: n=146; FOLFOXIRI arm: n=137). In the FOLFOXIRI arm, CPT-11 (150 mg m(-2)) was given on d1, L-OHP (65 mg m(-2)) on d2, LV (200 mg m(-2)) on days 2 and 3 and 5-FU (400 mg m(-2) as i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) as 22 h i.v. continuous infusion) on days 2 and 3. In the FOLFIRI arm, CPT-11 (180 mg m(-2)) was given on d1 whereas LV and 5-FU were administered in the same way as in the FOLFOXIRI regimen. Both regimens were administered every 2 weeks. There was no difference in terms of overall survival (median OS: 19.5 and 21.5 months, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.337), median time to disease progression (FOLFIRI: 6.9 and FOLFOXIRI: 8.4 months; P=0.17), response rates (33.6 and 43% for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.168). Patients treated with FOLFOXIRI had a significantly higher incidence of alopecia (P=0.0001), diarrhoea (P=0.0001) and neurosensory toxicity (P=0.001) compared with patients treated with FOLFIRI. The present study failed to demonstrate any superiority of the FOLFOXIRI combination compared with the FOLFIRI regimen, although the observed median OS is one of the best ever reported in the literature.

Does Reimbursement Influence Chemotherapy Treatment For Cancer Patients?

Before the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003, Medicare reimbursed physicians for chemotherapy drugs at rates that greatly exceeded physicians' costs for those drugs. We examined the effect of physician reimbursement on chemotherapy treatment of Medicare beneficiaries older than age sixty-five with metastatic lung, breast, colorectal, or other gastrointestinal cancers between 1995 and 1998 (9,357 patients). A physician's decision to administer chemotherapy to metastatic cancer patients was not measurably affected by higher reimbursement. Providers who were more generously reimbursed, however, prescribed more-costly chemotherapy regimens to metastatic breast, colorectal, and lung cancer patients.

Continued survival of more than ten years, without resection of metastatic disease, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with biomodulated fluorouracil: report of two cases

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer by chemotherapy alone was considered palliative and without the potential to cure patients unless patients were rendered resectable. We report two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer involving the liver who were considered inoperable and were treated with systemic chemotherapy using biomodulated 5-fluorouracil. Both patients received 5-fluorouracil and N-(phosphonoacetyl)-l-aspartic acid; one also received methotrexate, leucovorin, and triacetyluridine with the N-(phosphonoacetyl)-l-aspartic acid and 5-fluorouracil. Both patients had a complete remission with chemotherapy and are still alive with no evidence of cancer ten years after the diagnosis of unresectable metastatic disease. These patients provide evidence that prolonged survival can be achieved withsystemic chemotherapy without the use of surgery or other forms of local therapy. These patients also confirm the importance of continued investigation of fluorouracil modulating agents, which may further enhance the recent progress made with fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI regimen) as first line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with bolus and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI regimen) as first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive, previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, aged (median 76 years; range 70-84) were enrolled. The performance status (WHO) was 0 in 8, 1 in 16 and 2 in 6 patients; 19 (63%) patients had prior surgery and 8 (27%) adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 (180 mg/m(2) as a 90 min i.v. infusion) was administered on day 1, LV (200 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour i.v. infusion), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)/d i.v. bolus followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d as a 22-hour i.v. continuous infusion) were given on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Complete response was achieved in one (3.3%) patient and partial response in 10 (33.3%) (overall response rate: 36.6%; 95% C.I.: 26.6-48.4%); 11 (36.6%) patients had stable disease and, 8 (26.6%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months and the median time to disease progression 7.0 months. After a median follow-up period of 17 months, the median overall survival was 14.5 months. Main toxicities were: grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 6; 20%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 3.3%), grade 2 anemia (n = 9; 30%), grade 3-4 diarrhea (n = 5; 17%) and grade 3 asthenia (n = 3; 10%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

The FOLFIRI combination is an active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in patients above 70 years of age.

An alternating regimen of irinotecan/ 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin/ 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer: a Phase II trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and activity of a combination schedule with irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (L-OHP), brief infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC) patients.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients were treated with CPT-11 125 mg/m2 as a 90-min intravenous infusion, followed by FA 20 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus, and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 over a 2-hour intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8. L-OHP was administered at 85 mg/m2 over 2 h on day 15, in combination with a FA 60 mg/m2 intravenous bolus and 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 2-hour intravenous infusion on days 15-16. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of 9 cycles.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 50 assessable patients achieved a complete (n=5) or partial (n=20) response, leading to a response rate of 50% (95% CI 35-64%). Eighteen (36%) patients showed stable disease. The median time to tumor progression was 10.3 months (95% CI 9.6-10.9 months). After a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median survival was not reached. Grade 3 neutropenia (8%), grade 3 nausea/vomiting (6%) and grade 3 diarrhea (2%) were the major adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This alternating three-drug regimen is very well tolerated, manageable and effective in terms of activity and time to progression.

Critical evaluation of current treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer

Fluorouracil (FU) has been the mainstay of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for many years. However, in recent years, newer chemotherapeutic agents, particularly irinotecan (Campostar; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY, http://www.pfizer.com) and more recently oxaliplatin (Eloxatin; Sanofi-Aventis Inc., New York, NY, http://www.sanofi-aventis.com), have been shown to improve survival in combination with FU-based therapies. These agents were therefore incorporated into first- and second-line treatment strategies. The development of targeted agents that are tumor specific with better toxicity profiles than chemotherapeutic agents has widened the spectrum of therapies for this disease. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved two targeted agents for treating mCRC: an antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody (mAb), bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, http://www.gene.com), in combination with first-line 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens and the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-1/EGFR)-targeted mAb cetuximab (Erbitux; ImClone Systems, Inc., New York, NY, http://www.imclone.com) as monotherapy or in combination with irinotecan as second-line therapy in refractory cancer. These newer, more effective agents are improving clinical outcome for patients with mCRC. However, as the number of agents has increased, choosing the most effective treatment strategy has become increasingly complex. This review discusses the role of the individual agents in the treatment of mCRC and identifies the most effective regimens.

The treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with interferon-alpha: a review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the western world. The majority of patients who develop this tumour will ultimately die from metastatic disease. The fluorinated pyrimidine 5 fluorouracil (5-FU) is at present the most active drug available for first-line therapy of this disease. Randomised studies have consistently demonstrated a survival advantage from early treatment with 5-FU in advanced CRC, which can be achieved without deterioration in quality of life. Despite over 30 years of use, the optimal 5-FU schedule remains controversial with a wide range of response rates reported in the literature. Single agent activity is in the order of 10-11%. In an attempt to improve response rates, modulation of 5-FU with a variety of agents has been intensively investigated. This article examines the role of interferon-alpha in the treatment of advanced CRC.

Phase III study of weekly high-dose infusional fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40986

PURPOSE

To demonstrate that adding irinotecan to a standard weekly schedule of high-dose, infusional fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (folinic acid [FA]) can prolong progression-free survival (PFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred thirty patients with measurable or assessable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either FA 500 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion and FU 2.6 g/m(2) by intravenous 24-hour infusion, both administered weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie [AIO] arm, n = 216), or a similar schedule but with FU 2.3 or 2.0 g/m(2) preceded by irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) administered over 30 minutes (experimental group, n = 214).

RESULTS

The median PFS time in the experimental group was 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 9.9 months) compared with 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2 months) in the AIO arm (P < .0001). The median overall survival time was increased from 16.9 to 20.1 months (P = .2779). The objective response rate was 62.2% (95% CI, 55.0% to 69.5%) in the experimental group and 34.4% (95% CI, 27.5% to 41.3%) in the AIO arm (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The addition of irinotecan to the standard AIO FU/FA regimen was associated with a highly significant improvement in PFS and response rate and was well tolerated. The results of this study confirm that irinotecan in combination with high-dose infusional FU/FA is a reference first-line treatment.

Application of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer -- a survey in the region of Essen, Germany

BACKGROUND

The value of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is definitely proven and its application is clearly recommended by the German Cancer Society (GCS). The goal of this study was to investigate whether these findings and recommendations have been introduced in daily practice and whether this might depend on the specialization of the treating physicians.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients presenting with CRC in the department of oncology of the Kliniken Essen-Mitte between 1997 and 2002 who had started AC until the end of 2001 were evaluated. Data on AC were collected retrospectively from patients' records and prospectively by patient interviews. We investigated whether the guidelines of the GCS were followed and whether 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was applied properly and we correlated the results with the treating institution.

RESULTS

133 patients were analyzed for correlation of their treatment with the guidelines of the GCS. In 81% the AC met these guidelines. This was significantly more frequent in oncologic institutions than in non-specialized ones (96 vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Regarding dose and infusion time chemotherapy was properly administered to 83% of the patients (109/132) treated with 5-FU. Again, correct treatment was significantly correlated with specialization of the physicians (98 vs. 9%, medical oncology vs. other, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our random search in the region of Essen, Germany, lead to the hypothesis that a quality-assured chemotherapy is best provided by specialized oncologic institutions, even if the treatment has been established for years. This should be proven by a large epidemiologic study.

Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The modulation of fluorouracil (FU) by folinic acid (leucovorin [LV]) has been shown to be effective in terms of tumor response rate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but a meta-analysis of nine trials previously published by our group failed to demonstrate a statistically significant survival difference between FU and FU-LV. We present an update of the meta-analysis, with a longer follow-up and the inclusion of 10 newer trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analyses are based on individual data from 3,300 patients randomized in 19 trials on an intent-to-treat basis. Two trials had multiple comparisons, leading to a total of 21 pair-wise comparisons. FU doses were similar in both arms in 10 pair-wise comparisons, 15% to 33% higher in the FU-alone arm in six comparisons, and more than 66% higher in five comparisons.

RESULTS

Overall analysis showed a two-fold increase in tumor response rates (11% for FU-LV v 21% for FU-LV v 11% for FU [corrected] alone; odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.63; P <.0001) and a small but statistically significant overall survival benefit for FU-LV over FU alone (median survival, 11.7 v 10.5 months, respectively; hazards ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.94; P =.004), which were primarily seen in the first year. We observed a significant interaction between treatment benefit and dose of FU, with tumor response and overall survival advantages of FU-LV over FU-alone being restricted to trials in which a similar dose of FU was prescribed in both arms.

CONCLUSION

This updated analysis demonstrates, on a large data set, that FU-LV improves both response rate and overall survival compared with FU alone and that this benefit is consistent across various prognostic factors.

New chemotherapeutic advances in pancreatic, colorectal, and gastric cancers

Pancreatic, gastric, and colorectal cancers are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. When curative surgical resection is not an option, these malignancies tend to respond very poorly to chemotherapy and carry a dismal prognosis. There is, therefore, an urgent need for novel treatment strategies for these cancers. Great strides have been made in colon cancer treatment with the recent introduction of several novel agents, including capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin either alone or in combination regimens. Treatment of advanced colon cancer, however, remains essentially palliative, and treatment-related toxicity remains a significant problem. The treatment of advanced gastric and pancreatic cancer has also seen the introduction of new agents, such as gemcitabine and irinotecan; however, the impact of these agents on survival has been small, and toxicity continues to be a major obstacle. The search for new chemotherapeutic agents and treatment strategies will need to focus on improving outcomes and safety and tolerability profiles. To date, several new agents have shown promise, including pemetrexed, G17DT, bevacizumab, and other targeted agents. Further research into their optimal use either alone or in combination regimens should be a priority.

Current Status of Clinical Studies for Colorectal Cancer in Taiwan

The incidence and age-adjusted mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) has drastically increased in the past 2 decades in Taiwan. Fortunately, chemotherapy for metastatic CRC also showed improvement in terms of tumor response rate and survival in the corresponding time period. For its low toxicity profile and high objective response rate (17.5%-31.9% in patients who received low-dose 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] that failed and 53.3%-61.5% in patients who were chemotherapy-naive), weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) has been a favorable regimen for advanced CRC for medical oncologists in Taiwan. Investigators also put their effort in exploring the mechanisms of high efficacy and low toxicity profile of this regimen, as well as the prognostic factors in predicting tumor response to this regimen. With the emergence of new, active compounds for metastatic CRC, a simple 2-hour infusion of oxaliplatin plus 46-hour infusion of 5-FU/LV every 2 weeks has become a favorable regimen, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 40%-50% and overall survival of 18.2 months in chemotherapy-naive patients. Conversely, there were also studies to suggest that biweekly oxaliplatin plus weekly or biweekly bolus 5-FU/LV was shown to achieve a comparable tumor response and survival in 5-FU-refractory metastatic CRC. In patients who had been treated with oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-FU/LV that failed, salvage biweekly irinotecan plus bolus and infusional 5-FU/LV could achieve an ORR of 22.2% with a median duration of response of 8 months. As for oral fluoropyrimidine analogues, oral tegafur/uracil and capecitabine are available in Taiwan. In addition, a clinical trial of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy for chemotherapy-refractory metastatic CRC has also been initiated and is in progress.

Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Recently published population-based investigations showed elderly patients to be underrepresented in clinical trials and less often treated according to the standard therapy. Although there is evidence that elderly patients benefit from adjuvant (radio-) chemotherapy to the same extent as younger patients, no large series describes the influence of age on efficacy of chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis using source data of 3825 patients who received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing treatment in 22 European trials and identified 629 patients with an age of > or = 70 years.

RESULTS

We found an equal overall survival in elderly patients [10.8 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.7-11.8] and in younger patients (11.3 months, 95% CI 10.9-11.7; P = 0.31). Response rate did not differ between age groups > or = 70 and <70 years (23.9% and 21.1%; respectively; P = 0.14). Progression-free survival was marginally prolonged in elderly patients (5.5 months, 95% CI 5.2-5.8; compared with 5.3 months, 95% CI 5.1-5.5; P = 0.01). In both age groups, infusional 5-FU resulted in significantly increased response rates, overall survival and progression-free survival compared with bolus 5-FU.

CONCLUSIONS

'Fit' elderly patients benefit at least to the same extent from palliative chemotherapy with 5-FU as younger patients. Infusional 5-FU was shown to be more effective than bolus 5-FU in both age groups. Therefore, standardized palliative chemotherapy should generally be offered to elderly patients and they should not be excluded from clinical trials.

Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a phase II study of the EORTC GastroIntestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group

The aim of the study was to assess the response rate and toxicity of high-dose 24 h infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Patients with measurable disease, performance status 0-2, and no prior chemotherapy were registered to receive cycles of leucovorin (LV) 500 mg/m2 (or l-LV 250 mg/m2 over 1 h followed by 5FU 2.6 g/m2 over 24 h, weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. The main endpoints were the response rate and toxicity. From 37 patients, 36 were the analysed for toxicity, and 33 were eligible and analysed for response. The median age was 59 years (range 28-74 years), and the median performance status was 1. Partial response was observed in three patients (9%) (95% Confidential Interval (CI): [2-24]%). Main grade 3/4 National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria toxicities (patients) were diarrhoea (n = 3), vomiting (n = 2) and hand-foot syndrome (n = 5). Median time to progression was 7 weeks (95% CI: [6.4-11.7] weeks) and median survival 19 weeks (95% CI: [12-35] weeks). In conclusion, high-dose 5FU and folinic acid is well tolerated, but has only modest activity in pancreatic cancer.

Weekly gemcitabine plus 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract

Both gemcitabine and weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (HDFL) have shown promising antitumour activity for patients with locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract (CBT). From April 1999 through December 2002, 30 patients with inoperable CBT were treated with gemcitabine 800 mg m⁻², intravenous infusion for 30 min, followed by 5-FU, 2000 mg m⁻² and leucovorin, 300 mg m⁻², intravenous infusion for 24 h, on day 1, 8 and 15, every 4 weeks. A total of 166 cycles were given (median of four cycles per patient, range 1–24 cycles). Response was evaluable in 28 patients and toxicity in 29 patients. Partial response was obtained in six patients, stable disease in 13, while progressive disease occurred in nine. The objective response rate was 21.4% (95% CI: 5.2–37.6%). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was infection (nine patients). Other types of grade 3 or 4 toxicity included leucopenia (four patients), thrombocytopenia (three patients), anaemia (three patients), nausea/vomiting (two patients) and elevation of liver transaminases (three patients). As of 30 September 2003, the median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.8–4.6 months) and the median overall survival was 4.7 months (95% CI: 0.8–8.6 months). Our data suggest that weekly gemcitabine plus HDFL is modestly active with acceptable treatment-related toxicity for patients with advanced CBT.

Down-regulation of thymidylate synthase expression and its steady-state mRNA by oxaliplatin in colon cancer cells

Recently, evidence has accumulated that weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with leucovorin (LV, folinic acid) biochemical modulation may improve the response rates compared with the bolus 5-FU regimens in colorectal cancer (CRC). Combining the infusional 5-FU/LV (iFL) regimens with oxaliplatin or irinotecan is widely adopted to further improve treatment efficacy. Either oxaliplatin-iFL or irinotecan-iFL may achieve an overall response rate of more than 50% in the first-line treatment. Intriguingly, in the salvage treatment for metastatic CRC patients who had failed iFL, only oxaliplatin-iFL may achieve a response rate of about 13-25%. In contrast, oxaliplatin alone or irinotecan-iFL had a very low response rate of 5% or less. To test if the oxaliplatin may reverse the iFL-related 5-FU resistance in CRC, we used DLD-1 colon adenocarcinoma cells as the in vitro study model. First, we revealed that oxaliplatin and 5-FU act synergistically on DLD-1 cells by MTT cytotoxicity assay and median drug effect analysis. Second, we treated the DLD-1 cells with serial concentrations of oxaliplatin (0.1-10 microM). Oxaliplatin treatment results in down-regulation of free thymidylate synthase (TS) protein expression by Western blotting. Further, we analyzed the TS mRNA level by reverse transcription and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. Oxaliplatin treatment results in down-regulation of the TS mRNA level up to 40% (mean +/- SD of ratio to reference control = 0.60 +/- 0.21, range 0.42-0.84). In this study, our data provide important information explaining the reason why the combination of oxaliplatin and 5-FU results in a better objective response in 5-FU-resistant patients than oxaliplatin alone does. Our data also suggest that TS down-regulation happens at the transcriptional level. TS modulation and down-regulation had, thus, shed light on the useful potential strategy to achieve objective responses in 5-FU-resistant CRC patients.

First-Line Treatment Strategies to Improve Survival in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Advanced colorectal cancer is a significant cause of worldwide cancer-related mortality. For the majority of patients, palliative chemotherapy can yield substantial improvements in survival. Fluorouracil has been the mainstay of treatment in this setting for the past few decades. The relatively recent availability of new combinations with active agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin makes this a promising and hopeful time for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, with median survivals now approaching 18-21 months. For patients presenting with resectable metastases, the goal of therapy is surgery with a curative intent. There exists the potential for this approach to be extended also to a greater proportion of patients whose cancer may be rendered resectable following effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, an improved understanding of molecular predictors for treatment response and toxicity may facilitate the future selection of individualised treatments for a given tumour profile. Further improvements in the management of advanced disease will continue to be pursued through the ongoing development of multimodality approaches and the incorporation of novel targeted agents with innovative chemotherapy combinations.

Mortality associated with daily bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin administered in combination with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin

BACKGROUND

Intergroup Trial N9741 evaluated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) administered in conjunction with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The current report describes two treatment arms that were withdrawn from the protocol due to unexpected treatment-related toxicities and a high mortality rate. The complications observed in these arms highlight the importance of aggressive and immediate supportive care in the management of digestive toxicity.

METHODS

In Trial N9741, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following six regimens: 1) irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/LV (Arm A); 2) sequential irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/LV (Arm B); 3) bolus 5-FU/LV only (Mayo Clinic regimen; Arm D); 4) oxaliplatin plus bolus 5-FU/LV (Arm E); 5) oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-FU/LV (Arm F); or 6) oxaliplatin plus irinotecan (Arm G). In the current study, the authors investigated treatment-related toxicity in patients who received either of the two combination regimens containing daily bolus 5-FU (i.e., patients in Arm B or Arm E).

RESULTS

Sixty-one and 47 patients were enrolled in Arm B and Arm E, respectively. Diarrhea and neutropenia were the most common toxicities in both groups. Five patients in Arm B (8.2%) and 4 patients in Arm E (8.5%) died within 60 days of study entry. All fatal toxicities occurred within 15 days of treatment administration, and all deaths were associated with the simultaneous occurrence of multiple symptoms, which were dominated by Grade > or = 3 diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination regimens containing daily bolus 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin or irinotecan can be associated with severe gastrointestinal toxicity and high mortality rates. Therefore, the authors recommend the use of more tolerable infusional 5-FU-based regimens in the treatment of metastatic CRC.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two different schedules of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

We sought to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities and clinical activity of two irinotecan (CPT-11), fluorouracil (FU), leucovorin (LV), and oxaliplatin schedules in patients with advanced solid tumors. Additionally, we investigated the effect of CPT-11 on oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients (cohort 1) received intravenous CPT-11 (infusion) and FU/LV (bolus) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and oxaliplatin (infusion) on days 1 and 15 every 6 weeks for a total 37 courses (median, three courses) at three dose levels. Twenty-two cohort 2 patients received intravenous CPT-11/oxaliplatin (infusion, day 1) and FU/LV (90-minute bolus infusion, days 2 to 5) every 3 weeks for a total of 122 courses (median, four courses) at three dose levels. Pharmacokinetic and neurotoxicity assessments were performed at the cohort 2 MTD.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) seen in both cohorts at the starting dose required dose de-escalation. Cohort 1 DLT included diarrhea and neutropenia. In cohort 2, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and paresthesias were DLTs. Antitumor activity was seen in both cohorts. In cohort 2, the total platinum area under the curve of patients increased 17% in cycle 2 (P =.048), but objective neurotoxicity was not seen.

CONCLUSION

The toxicities resulting from the addition of oxaliplatin to CPT-11/FU/LV are significant but manageable. The MTDs for the weekly schedule are CPT-11 (75 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2), FU (320 mg/m2), and LV (20 mg/m2); and, for the 3-weekly schedule, the MTDs are CPT-11 (175 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), FU (240 mg/m2), and LV (20 mg/m2). Second-cycle platinum accumulation raises the possibility for enhanced cumulative neurotoxicity with CPT-11/oxaliplatin combinations.

Randomized phase III study of high-dose fluorouracil given as a weekly 24-hour infusion with or without leucovorin versus bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: European organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40952

PURPOSE

This trial was conducted to determine whether high-dose fluorouracil (FU) given as a weekly 24-hour infusion is more active than bolus FU + leucovorin (LV), and whether high-dose infusional FU can be modulated by LV.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 497 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive bolus FU 425 mg/m2 intravenously + LV 20 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 and repeated on day 28 (FU + LV), or FU 2600 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion alone (FU24h) or in combination with 500 mg/m2 LV (FU24h + LV)-all given weekly x6 followed by a 2-week rest period. Survival was the major study end point.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of more than 3 years, survival did not differ among the treatment groups (median FU + LV, 11.1 months [95% CI, 10.2 to 15.0 months]; FU24h, 13.0 months [95% CI, 10.4 to 15.4 months]; FU24h + LV, 13.7 months [95% CI, 12.0 to 16.4 months]; P =.724). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for FU24h + LV (median FU + LV, 4.0 months [95% CI, 3.4 to 4.9]; FU24h, 4.1 months [95% CI, 3.4 to 5.0]; FU24h + LV 5.6 months [95% CI, 4.4 to 6.7]; P =.029). The response rates in the subgroup of patients with measurable disease were 12%, 10%, and 17% for FU + LV, FU24h, and FU24h + LV, respectively (not significant). Occurrence of grade 3 and 4 diarrhea was higher in the FU24h + LV arm (22%) compared with the FU24h (6%) or FU + LV (9%) arms; however, stomatitis (11% in FU + LV v 3% in FU24h v 5% in FU24h + LV arms) and hematologic toxicity were higher in the bolus FU + LV arm. Global quality of life did not differ within the three arms.

CONCLUSION

Neither FU24h + LV nor FU24h prolong survival, relative to bolus FU + LV. Leucovorin increases PFS if added to FU24h, but increases toxicity.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 24-hour infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with organ dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction are often treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), but there are few data to confirm the safety of this practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with solid tumors were eligible if they were able to fit into one of three organ dysfunction cohorts: I, creatinine >1.5 but < or =3.0 mg/dl and normal bilirubin; II, bilirubin >1.5 but <5.0 mg/dl with normal creatinine; or III, bilirubin > or =5.0 mg/dl with normal creatinine. 5-FU doses were escalated separately within each of the three cohorts. Leucovorin (LV) dosage was fixed at 500 mg/m(2). 5-FU was given as a 24-h infusion at 1000, 1800 or 2600 mg/m(2), and plasma concentrations were measured every 3 h during the first two infusions for each patient.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were treated. Toxicities did not appear to be related to organ dysfunction cohort. A weekly dose of of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) produced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in six of 20 evaluable patients. These DLTs included grade 3 fatigue (n = 3), grade 2 neutropenia precluding weekly dosing (n = 1), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and grade 3 mental status changes (n = 1). There was no relationship between serum bilirubin or serum creatinine and 5-FU clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with elevated bilirubin may be safely started on a weekly regimen of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) with leucovorin 500 mg/m(2) as a 24-h continuous infusion.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: systemic treatment in the new millennium

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common in North America. Metastatic disease is present at diagnosis in 30% of the patients, and approximately half of early-stage patients will eventually present with metastatic disease. Until recently, few chemotherapy options were available to treat metastatic CRC.

METHODS

The authors review the results of recent clinical trials and the design of ongoing trials in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Fluorouracil (5-FU) with leucovorin (LV) modulation has a marginal but positive effect on survival in those patients. The recent incorporation of irinotecan (CPT-11) and oxaliplatin for the management of advanced CRC has generated further improvement in survival. The development of oral fluoropyrimidines, mimicking continuous infusion 5-FU, is convenient. In randomized trials, capecitabine was equally effective to bolus 5-FU and LV in the management of metastatic CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Recently completed or ongoing clinical trials to study novel targeting agents have initiated a new era of drug development. Anti-angiogenesis drugs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and epidermal growth factor blockers are among this new generation of agents with encouraging preliminary data. Randomized trials will determine the impact of these newer agents on survival and quality of life of patients with metastatic CRC.

Phase II study of irinotecan with bolus and high dose infusional 5-FU and folinic acid (modified de Gramont) for first or second line treatment of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer

We investigated the activity of irinotecan given with a more convenient modified bimonthly de Gramont regimen of bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil [IrMdG] in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer in the first and second line setting. Irinotecan 180 mg m(-2) was infused over 90 min. L-folinic acid 175 mg or d,l folinic acid 350 mg was given over 2 h followed by a bolus of 5-fluorouracil (400 mg m(-2)) and a 46 h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (2.4-2.8 g m(-2)). Forty-six previously untreated patients (Group A) and 36 who had received 5-fluorouracil for metastatic disease (Group B) were recruited. Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for response. A partial response was seen in 13 out of 43 (30% [95%CI 28.1-31.9%]) in Group A and 8/35 (23% [95% CI 17.9-28.1%]) in Group B. 40% (95%CI 38.1-41.9%) of Group A and 26% (95% CI 20.9-31.1%) of Group B patients achieved disease stabilisation. The median progression free survival from the start of this treatment was 7 months (95% CI 4.4-9.6 months) in Group A and 5 months (95% CI 2.8-7.2 months) in Group B. Median overall survival was 14 months (95% CI 9.0-18.9) in Group A and 11 months (95% CI 5.9-16.1) in Group B. Grade 3-4 toxicity in both treatment groups were similar; leucopenia 17% and diarrhoea 7-8%. Grade 3-4 mucositis was not seen and severe alopecia affected only three patients. IrMdG is an active and well-tolerated regimen for both the first and second line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

A phase I study of sequential irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin are active agents in colorectal cancer. A sequence-dependent synergism of SN-38 followed by 5-FU/leucovorin in vitro led us to conduct a phase I trial of CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/leucovorin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicities of this regimen and to obtain preliminary indications of its activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients were enrolled in sequential cohorts to receive escalating doses of CPT-11 (90 min infusion) on day 1, followed by leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) (intravenous push) and 5-FU (90 min infusion) on days 2-5 of each 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 347 treatment cycles (median 4, range 1-25) were administered. Dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea, neutropenia and fatigue. Nine patients with colorectal cancer and one with gastric cancer had partial or minor responses. Eight of the 10 had prior chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

CPT-11 and 5-FU/leucovorin, as constituents of this novel mechanism-based schedule, have promising activity in patients who have received prior chemotherapy. The recommended phase II/III starting doses are CPT-11 275 mg/m(2) over 90 min on day 1, and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) plus leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 2-5 every 21 days. This combination can be administered safely to this schedule if there is strict adherence to the 90 min infusion time for both CPT-11 and 5-FU.

[Measure of quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: techniques and main results]

PURPOSE

Until the 1990s, the patient's duration of life was the main measure for determining the value of palliative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Quality of life recently appeared as a main end point. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the instruments used to measure quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, to review the published data and to analyse the bias and methodological problems.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

QoL is a multidimensional subjective concept, which can be measured using psychometric instruments. Quality of life measurement has a descriptive and prognostic value. Results from quality of life assessment in randomized trials have given useful information and help patients and physicians to choose between treatment options. More than half of the patients with palliative chemotherapy had at least stabilization of quality of life. Response to chemotherapy and side-effects influence quality of life. Quality of life assessment clearly requires methodological improvement. Missing data are a particularly difficult problem, which should be improved by a better organization.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Psychometric properties of EORTC QLQ-CR38 et FACT-C should be checked in French language. An international consensus on methods of measurement of quality of life in oncology is warranted to enhance compliance, to better interpret quality of life results et to optimize publications of precise quality of life data.

Triplet combination with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) plus fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with MCC who had not received prior therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. Their median age was 60 years; performance status (World Health Organization) was 0 in 12, 1 in 14, and 2 in five patients; 19 patients (61%) had prior surgery, and 14 (45%) had adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 was administered on day 1 at 150 mg/m(2) as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion; L-OHP was administered on day 2 at 65 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour IV infusion; and on days 2 and 3, LV 200 mg/m(2) preceded 5-FU administration of 400 mg/m(2)/d initial IV bolus dose followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d 22-hour IV continuous infusion. The regimen was repeated every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

All patients were assessable for toxicity and 30 for response to treatment. Complete response was achieved in two patients (6.5%) and partial response in 16 (51.6%) (overall response rate, 58.1%; 95% confidence interval, 40.7% to 75.4%); eight patients (25.8%) had stable disease, and five (16.1%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 9 months, and the median time to disease progression was 13 months. Neutropenia grade 3 to 4 occurred in 14 patients (45%) and febrile neutropenia in two (6%). Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10 patients (32%), neurotoxicity grade 3 to 4 in three (9%), and asthenia grade 3 in two (10%). No treatment-related death has occurred.

CONCLUSION

The triplet combination of 5-FU/LV + CPT-11 + L-OHP is a highly active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in MCC.

Advanced colorectal cancer treatment in Europe: what have we achieved?

The goal of the present paper is to review how treatment of advanced colorectal cancer has evolved during the last 10 years and to make some suggestions on how that disease could be managed today. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with folinic acid (FA) remains the basis for advanced colorectal cancer treatment. In Europe, infusional 5-FU is considered to be more active and better tolerated than bolus 5-FU. New agents including oral 5-FU prodrugs UFT/FA, and capecitabine, tomudex, irinotecan and oxaliplatin have been shown active in advanced colorectal cancer. At presentation the combination of infusional 5-FU/FA with irinotecan or oxaliplatin is considered to be superior to any of these agents used alone, yielding a median survival of up to 16-19 months. Second-line therapy could further prolong survival in selected patient populations. Eventually chemotherapy could allow curative resection of previously unresectable hepatic and pulmonary metastases.