Epirubicin plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone in node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer: A randomized trial of the International Collaborative Cancer Group

Risk of Secondary Cancer after Adjuvant Tamoxifen Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea

Endocrine therapy is the mainstay treatment for hormone receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ. The aim of this study was to examine the long-term secondary malignancy risk of tamoxifen therapy. The data of patients diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2007 and December 2015 were retrieved from the database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of South Korea. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, was used to track all-site cancers. Age at the time of surgery, chronic disease status, and type of surgery were considered covariates in the propensity score matching analysis. The median follow-up duration was 89 months. Forty-one patients in the tamoxifen group and nine in the control group developed endometrial cancer. The Cox regression hazard ratio model showed that tamoxifen therapy was the only significant predictor of the development of endometrial cancer (hazard ratio, 2.791; 95% confidence interval, 1.355-5.747; p = 0.0054). No other type of cancer was associated with long-term tamoxifen use. In consonance with the established knowledge, the real-world data in this study demonstrated that tamoxifen therapy is related to an increased incidence of endometrial cancer.

CCDC114, DNAI2 and TOP2A involves in the effects of tibolone treatment on postmenopausal endometrium

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the molecular mechanisms of tibolone treatment in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

The gene set enrichment profile, GSE12446, which includes 9 human endometrial samples from postmenopausal women treated with tibolone (tibolone group) and 9 control samples (control group), was downloaded from GEO database for analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in tibolone vs. control groups were identified and then used for function and pathway enrichment analysis. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and module analyses were also performed. Finally, drug-target interaction was predicted for genes in modules, and then were validated in Pubmed.

RESULTS

A total of 238 up-regulated DEGs and 72 down-regulated DEGs were identified. These DEGs were mainly enriched in various biological processed and pathways, such as cilium movement (e.g., CCDC114 and DNAI2), calcium ion homeostasis, regulation of hormone levels and complement/coagulation cascades. PPI network contained 368 interactions and 166 genes, of which IGF1, DNALI1, CCDC114, TOP2A, DNAH5 and DNAI2 were the hue genes. A total of 96 drug-gene interactions were obtained, including 94 drugs and eight genes. TOP2A and HTR2B were found to be targets of 28 drugs and 38 drugs, respectively. Among the 94 obtained drugs, only 12 drugs were reported in studies, of which 7 drugs (e.g., epirubicin) were found to target TOP2A.

CONCLUSIONS

CCDC114 and DNAI2 might play important roles in tibolone-treated postmenopausal women via cilium movement function. TOP2A might be a crucial target of tibolone in endometrium of postmenopausal women.

Comparison of cardiac events associated with liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin and doxorubicin in breast cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anthracyclines play a broad and important role in the care of patients with either operable or metastatic breast cancer. However cardiotoxicity narrows the therapeutic index of this drug class leading to potentially clinically meaningful treatment delays or discontinuations. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis, a validated statistical methodology, allowing direct and indirect comparison of cardiotoxicity of different anthracycline and non-anthracycline regimens.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of prospective randomised controlled trials through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar comparing non-anthracycline based regimens (NON), doxorubicin (DOX), epirubicin (EPI) and liposomal doxorubicin (LD). We included studies published up to 1st January 2014 in both adjuvant and metastatic contexts. Notably, HER2/neu-targeted regimens were excluded. We assessed the studies' eligibility criteria and data collection with consensus of two independent authors. Our primary outcome measure was cardiac events grade 3 or greater (CE3) in accordance with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. A Bayesian pairwise and network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled Odds Ratio (OR).

FINDINGS

Nineteen randomised controlled trials met eligibility criteria and were included in this analysis. We found a trend showing that LD is less cardiotoxic than DOX with an OR of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-1.07) There was no difference between Epi and LD with an OR of 0.95 (95%CI 0.39-2.33). DOX is more cardiotoxic than Non with an OR of 1.57 (95%CI 0.90-2.72).

INTERPRETATION

DOX has higher CE3 rates than NON does. LD statistically trended to lower cardiac event rates than DOX. Non-statistical significance among EPI, LD and DOX with regard to cardiac toxicity indicates that avoidance of CE3 should not motivate selection of a particular anthracycline in otherwise healthy women in whom total lifetime anthracycline exposure will likely be limited. Overall low incidence of CE3 with any type of anthracycline indicates that we can safely use any anthracycline if cumulative dose limits are not exceeded. While CE3 does not limit our choice of anthracycline LD appears to be the least cardiotoxic.

FUNDING

Takeo Fujii is supported by the grant named Young Investigator Award for Study Abroad in Clinical Epidemiology from St. Luke's Life Science Institution.

Adjuvant therapy in breast cancer and venous thromboembolism

Breast cancer patients are considered to be at relatively low risk of developing a TEE. The highest incidence of VTE events occurs in metastatic breast cancer patients likely due to extension of disease, immobility for pathologic bone fractures, cancer cachexia and venous compression by the tumour mass. Although thrombosis is less common in patients with early stage cancer compared to those with more advanced disease, it does occur and is clinically challenging. The adjuvant setting is of particular interest in order to assess the specific thrombogenic potential of systemic chemotherapy, because of the low tumor burden with only microscopic tumor foci at the time of treatment administration. This review summarizes risk factors, incidence and strategies to avoid VTE in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy.

[Short and medium term cardiotoxicity of anthracyclins: a prospective study]

There is evidence that anthracyclins may affect the heart and ventricular function. This cardiac toxicity is frequent and serious. It is the first study in Morocco to investigate the frequency of anthracyclins cardiotoxicity. It has for objective to analyze the cardiotoxicity connected to anthracyclins, these risk factors as well as the echocardiographic parameters, which deteriorate prematurely. We led a forward-looking study between October 2008 and December 2009. With 90 patients followed in the service of oncology-radiotherapy and put under chemotherapy with anthracyclins. We conducted a study of various ultrasound parameters of cardiac function, before with anthracyclins, the third cure of chemotherapy, then in the 6th cure of treatment. Only 70 patients have been assessable. Average age was of 47 years (20-68 years); 91% were female. The cardiac function was preserved in 40% of the cases. Among our patients, 56% developed a decrease moderated in light of the cardiac function and 4% of cases developed a severe cardiotoxicity. The echocardiographic parameter most significant in our series was LVEF, followed by TEI index. We found a cardiotoxicity was strictly correlated with the cumulative dose, anthracyclins type and associated comorbidity. The anthracyclins cardiotoxicity is quite common in our series, which requires more thorough preventive measures including monitoring by echocardiography.

Phase III randomized trial of dose intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without G-CSF in locally advanced breast cancer: long-term results

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus dose-intense FAC plus G-CSF in the neoadjuvant setting and to compare the delivered dose intensity, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) times, and toxicity between treatment arms in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive preoperative FAC (5-FU, 500 mg/m(2); doxorubicin, 50 mg/m(2); cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m(2)) every 21 days for four cycles or dose-intense FAC (5-FU, 600 mg/m(2); doxorubicin, 60 mg/m(2); cyclophosphamide, 1,000 mg/m(2)) plus G-CSF every 18 days for four cycles.

RESULTS

Two hundred two patients were randomly assigned. The median follow-up was 7.5 years. Patients randomized to FAC plus G-CSF had a higher pCR rate as well as clinical complete response rate; however, these differences were not statistically different from those with the FAC arm. Patients in the FAC + G-CSF arm had a higher delivered dose intensity of doxorubicin in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings than those in the standard FAC arm. DFS and OS times were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the OS and DFS rates were significantly higher for patients who achieved a pCR than for those who did not. Thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and infection rates were higher in the FAC + G-CSF arm.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher delivered dose intensity of doxorubicin with the FAC + G-CSF regimen did not result in a statistically significant higher pCR rate. However, patients who achieved a pCR experienced longer DFS and OS times.

Randomized, Phase III Trial of Sequential Epirubicin and Docetaxel Versus Epirubicin Alone in Postmenopausal Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose

The Docetaxel Epirubicin Adjuvant (DEVA) trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of incorporating docetaxel after epirubicin to create a sequential anthracycline-taxane regimen in early breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

After complete tumor excision, postmenopausal women with node-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to either epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks for six cycles (EPI × 6) or three cycles of epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (EPI-DOC). A subset of patients also participated in a quality of life (QOL) study. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

From 1997 to 2005, 803 patients entered DEVA (EPI × 6, n = 397; EPI-DOC, n = 406). At a median follow-up of 64.7 months (interquartile range, 45.2 to 84.4 months), 198 DFS events had been reported (EPI × 6, n = 114; EPI-DOC, n = 84). The 5-year DFS rates were 72.7% (95% CI, 68.0% to 77.3%) for epirubicin alone and 79.5% (95% CI, 75.2% to 83.8%) for epirubicin followed by docetaxel; evidence of improvement in DFS was observed with EPI-DOC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.91; P = .008). One hundred twenty-seven patients have died (EPI × 6, n = 75; EPI-DOC, n = 52); a reduction in deaths was observed with EPI-DOC (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.94; P = .02). The 5-year overall survival rates were 81.8% (95% CI, 77.7% to 85.9%) for epirubicin and 88.9% (95% CI, 85.5% to 92.2%) for epirubicin followed by docetaxel. Assessment of toxicity and QOL showed that EPI-DOC was associated with greater toxicity but with no difference in QOL between arms during follow-up.

Conclusion

These results suggest, within a relatively small trial, that substitution of docetaxel for epirubicin for the last three cycles of chemotherapy results in improved outcome in postmenopausal women with node-positive, early breast cancer compared with six cycles of epirubicin monotherapy.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly ER-negative breast cancer patients: benefits and pitfalls

Approximately 50% of breast cancer (BC) cases occur in women aged 65 and older, and more than 30% occur in those aged over 70, yet very old (older than 70) patients are under-represented in clinical trials. In the Oxford meta-analysis, the hazard ratios for recurrence and BC mortality in women aged over 70 were 0.88 and 0.87, respectively, suggesting a benefit from chemotherapy in this group of patients as well; however, the large confidence intervals surrounding reductions in this subgroup reflect the small number of older patients recruited in randomized trials in Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group meta-analyses. If we consider the tumor biology of BC in older adults, we will see that they are more likely to develop a tumor with high estrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor-positive status and a lower proliferative index. However, the biology of these tumors appears to change according to chronological age into aggressive forms diagnosed in these patients as well. This subgroup analysis for the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients (at least 65 years) is reported in a few studies, even though a limited statistical significance has been revealed. Retrospective evidences suggest that even more aggressive treatments such as taxanes and dose-dense schedule appear feasible (but probably more toxic) in the elderly. Age is no longer considered the only criterion for choosing the right treatment for patients with BC; in fact, functional status and comorbidity have to be taken into consideration as well. Fit elderly patients with more aggressive forms (node-positive and ER-poor disease) seem to obtain the same benefits as younger patients, and thus have to be treated in the same manner.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy of benefit for postmenopausal women who receive endocrine treatment for highly endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer? International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VII and 12-93

To compare the efficacy of chemoendocrine treatment with that of endocrine treatment (ET) alone for postmenopausal women with highly endocrine responsive breast cancer. In the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trials VII and 12-93, postmenopausal women with node-positive, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive or ER-negative, operable breast cancer were randomized to receive either chemotherapy or endocrine therapy or combined chemoendocrine treatment. Results were analyzed overall in the cohort of 893 patients with endocrine-responsive disease, and according to prospectively defined categories of ER, age and nodal status. STEPP analyses assessed chemotherapy effect. The median follow-up was 13 years. Adding chemotherapy reduced the relative risk of a disease-free survival event by 19% (P = 0.02) compared with ET alone. STEPP analyses showed little effect of chemotherapy for tumors with high levels of ER expression (P = 0.07), or for the cohort with one positive node (P = 0.03). Chemotherapy significantly improves disease-free survival for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, but the magnitude of the effect is substantially attenuated if ER levels are high.

Changes in cellular immunity during chemotherapy for primary breast cancer with anthracycline regimens

Anthracyclines are the most widely used anticancer agents for breast cancer, of which doxorubicin and epirubicin have been reported to have equal efficacy. Unfortunately, the integrity of the immune system of breast cancer patients is severely affected by chemotherapy. This study compared the effect of combination chemotherapy with epirubicin (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC)) and doxorubicin (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FDC)) regimens on subsets of the immune cells of patients with primary malignant breast tumors. Our aim was to determine the best regimen that produces the least degree of myelosuppression. Blood from 80 breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (40 FEC and 40 FDC) was taken before chemotherapy and after every cycle (3 weeks) for 6 cycles. Blood was also taken from 40 normal healthy donors who served as normal control. Subsets of lymphocytes T-helper cells (CD3(+)CD4(+)), T-cytotoxic cells (CD3(+) CD8(+)), B-cells (CD19(+) CD20(+)) and NK cells (CD16(+)/CD56(+)CD3(-)) were analyzed by flow cytometry (FacsCalibur, BD) using monoclonal antibodies (Multitest, BD). All patients in the FEC and FDC groups suffered from myelosuppressive side effects. Both regimens led to an increase in the counts of monocytes but decreased polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) and lymphocytes. Percentages of T-cytotoxic cells and NK cells were increased, but the percentage of B-cells was dramatically decreased. The phagocytic and intracellular killing ability of PMNs were also suppressed (p<0.01). No significant difference was found between the epirubicin-based regimen and doxorubicin-based regimen with regard to numbers of immune cells, percentages of lymphocytes subsets, Th/CTL ratio, engulfment and killing abilities of PMNs. In conclusion, we found that the epirubicin-based regimen is not superior to the doxorubicin-based regimen with respect to their toxicity of the immune cells, Th/CTL ratio and PMN count and functions. Moreover, both FEC and FDC regimens appear to conserve the cell-mediated immunity response needed for fighting against cancer cells.

Treatment of breast cancer in older women

BACKGROUND

Breast carcinoma management in the elderly often differs from the management in younger women and there is considerable controversy about what constitutes appropriate cancer care for older women. This controversy is reflected in the persistence of age-dependent variations in care over time, with older women being less likely to receive definitive care for breast cancer. There has been a significant increase in the last years in the number of studies conducted in older patients with breast cancer. Although available age-specific clinical trials data demonstrate that treatment efficacy is not modified by age, this evidence is limited by the lack of inclusion of substantial numbers of older women, particularly those of advanced age and those with comorbidities.

METHOD

The literature-based evidence of the last 10 years was extensively reviewed on the main issues concerning the treatment of breast cancer in older women.

RESULTS

Surgical treatment in older patients has evolved from avoidance to mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery, similarly to younger patients. Given its negative effect on the quality of life, in the last few years the role of adjuvant radiotherapy has been questioned in elderly patients with breast cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in older patients applies mainly to Estrogen-receptor-negative patients, while in Estrogen-receptor-positive patients a major role is played by endocrine treatment. New "elderly-friendly" drugs, that can help clinicians to reduce toxicity, are now available for breast cancer.

Breast cancer in elderly women. Optimizing the treatment

The elderly population is on the rise. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in western women and its incidence increases with age. Despite the epidemiological burden of this condition, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the management of older patients, as treatment planning is mainly based on personal preferences rather than hard data. Older women are often offered sub-optimal treatment when compared to their younger counterpart at any particular stage. This is due to various reasons, including the lack of scientific evidence from well-conducted clinical trials. Reluctance to prescribe systemic treatments may be explained by the complexity of cost-benefit evaluations in such patients. It is also an ethical dilemma to decide how aggressive one should be when it comes to treat cancer in the elderly in view of the higher rate of cognitive impairment and specific patients' expectations. This paper reviews the currently available evidence and attempts presenting and discussing chemoprevention of breast cancer, risk and benefit of hormone replacement therapy and the various treatment options for older women with breast cancer.

Breast Cancer in the Elderly

Screening and adjuvant postoperative therapies have increased survival among women with breast cancer. These tools are seldom applied in elderly patients, although the usually reported incidence of breast cancer is close to 50% in women 65 years or older, reaching 47% after 70 years in the updated Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Elderly breast cancer patients, even if in good medical health, were frequently excluded from adjuvant clinical trials. Women age 70 years who are fit actually have a median life expectancy of 15.5 years, ie, half of them will live much longer and will remain exposed for enough time to the potentially preventable risks of a relapse and specific death. In the last few years, a new concern about this issue has developed. Treatment now faces two major end points, as in younger women: to improve disease-free survival in the early stages, and to palliate symptoms in advanced disease. However, in both settings, the absolute benefit of treatment is critical because protecting quality of life and all its related aspects (especially functional status and independence), is crucial in older persons who have more limited life expectancy. Furthermore, the new hormonal compounds (aromatase inhibitors) and chemotherapeutic drugs (capecitabine, liposomal doxorubicin), are potentially less toxic than and equally as effective as older more established therapies. These new treatments bring new challenges including higher cost, and defining their benefit in elderly breast cancer must include an analysis of the cost/benefit ratio. These issues emphasize the urgent need to develop and support clinical trials for this older population of breast cancer patients both in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, a move that will take us from a prejudiced, age-based medicine to an evidence-based medicine.

Doit-on prescrire une prophylaxie de la maladie thromboembolique aux patients porteurs d'un cathéter central et/ou recevant unechimiothérapie pour une tumeur solide?

INTRODUCTION

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are well-recognized complications of cancer, especially in patients with a venous access device or receiving chemotherapy. The pathogenic mechanisms of thrombosis in cancer patients involve a complex interaction between the patient's tumor cells and hemostatic system. Chemotherapy and central venous catheters increase the risk of thromboembolism. Prophylactic treatment for these patients remains controversial.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review using the Medline database and abstract books for meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology since 2000. Our search focused on clinical trials of primary prevention of venous catheter-related thrombosis or prevention of chemotherapy-related venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.

RESULTS

Ten studies evaluating primary prevention of patients with central catheters were identified, and their results are contradictory. Currently only one study has examined prevention of chemotherapy-related venous thromboembolism, in women with metastatic breast cancer. Its results cannot be extrapolated to other tumors.

CONCLUSION

Systematic prophylaxis cannot yet be recommended. In the near future we must improve our knowledge of the risk factors of these complications. Prophylaxis should be individualized for each patient. New anticoagulant drugs should be tested in cancer patients.

Prognostic factors of early distant recurrence in hormone receptor-positive, postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy

BACKGROUND

Current adjuvant hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer is debatable between upfront aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and sequential treatment with tamoxifen. A major concern is the higher rate of early recurrences observed with sequential treatment. The authors conducted a retrospective analysis to identify risk factors of early recurrences in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, postmenopausal women within the first 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen.

METHODS

Between 1986 and 2000, operable breast cancer patients who received exclusively adjuvant tamoxifen for at least 3 years were selected from the authors' institutional database. Age, histology, pathologic tumor size, modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (mSBR) grade, mitotic index, tumor necrosis, peritumoral vascular emboli (PVE), HR status, and the number of involved axillary lymph-node were considered as prognostic factors of recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 715 patients who met the inclusion criteria, a distant recurrence occurred in 38 patients (5.3%) within the first 3 years of tamoxifen therapy. Significant prognostic factors of early recurrence were mSBR, axillary lymph node involvement, tumor necrosis, mitotic index, PVE, and pathologic tumor size. Grade 1 and/or lymph node-negative tumors were excluded from the multivariate analysis (1 recurrence in 208 patients). In this model, mSBR grade 3 was the only significant predictive factor of early recurrence (hazard ratio, 3.72; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a subset of patients was identified that was at low-risk of early recurrence (mSBR grade 1 and/or negative lymph node status). Women in that subset could be treated using sequential hormone therapy with tamoxifen and AIs. In women with mSBR grade 3 or lymph node-positive tumors, an upfront treatment with AIs seemed to be the current optimal strategy.

Long-term assessment of cardiac function after dose-dense and -intense sequential doxorubicin (A), paclitaxel (T), and cyclophosphamide (C) as adjuvant therapy for high risk breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the incidence of late cardiotoxicity after dose-dense and -intense adjuvant sequential doxorubicin (A), paclitaxel (T), and cyclophosphamide (C) for breast cancer (BC) with > or = 4 involved ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled from 1994 to 2001 after definitive BC surgery if > or =4 axillary nodes were involved. Planned treatment was A 90 mg/m(2) q 14 days x 3, T 250 mg/m(2) q 14 days x 3, C 3 g/m(2 )q 14 days x 3 with filgrastim (G) support. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was monitored using equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) before the initiation of chemotherapy, and after three cycles of each chemotherapeutic agent. At a median follow-up of 7 years, we obtained ERNA scans on 32 patients to evaluate the long-term cardiotoxicity of this regimen.

RESULTS

Eighty-five eligible patients enrolled on the treatment protocol. Clinical heart failure developed in one patient. Seven (8%) patients had LVEF < 50% at the end of therapy. No cardiac-related deaths occurred. Thirty-two (46%) of 69 surviving patients have consented to late cardiac imaging. At a median follow-up of 7 years, the median absolute change in LVEF from baseline was -5.5%; [range (-8%) to (+36%)], and from the end of chemotherapy was -2.0%; [range (-25%) to (+16%)]. Four patients (12%) had a LVEF < 50%; two of these four patients had an LVEF of < 50% at the end of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Late development of asymptomatic decline in cardiac function may occur after dose-dense and -intense adjuvant therapy, but is uncommon.

Tromboembolia venosa en pacientes con cáncer

The association between neoplastic diseases and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is known since long time ago. The nature of this association is bidirectional. On one hand, cancer increases the incidence of venous thrombosis and, on the other hand, the hemostatic system does play a key role in the tumorigenesis process. However, despite recent advances in the field, prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in cancer patients is still a challenge, due to the complexity of this type of patients. This review is focused on some important points regarding management of VTE in cancer patients such as physiopathology, epidemiology, search for hidden malignancy, prognostic impact, prophylaxis in the medical and surgical setting, or initial and long-term treatment.

Improved disease-free survival with epirubicin-based chemoendocrine adjuvant therapy compared with tamoxifen alone in one to three node-positive, estrogen-receptor-positive, postmenopausal breast cancer patients: results of French Adjuvant Study Group 02 and 07 trials

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between epirubicin-based chemoendocrine therapy and tamoxifen alone in one to three node-positive (N1-3), estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+), postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed, retrospectively, 457 patients randomized in FASG 02 and 07 trials who received: tamoxifen alone (30 mg/day, 3 years); or FEC50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, six cycles every 21 days) plus tamoxifen started concurrently. Radiotherapy was delivered after the third cycle in FASG 02 trial, and after the sixth in FASG 07 trial.

RESULTS

The 9-year DFS rates were 72% with tamoxifen and 84% with FEC50-tamoxifen (P = 0.008). The multivariate analysis showed that pathological tumor size >2 cm was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002), and treatment effects remained significantly in favor of chemoendocrine therapy (P = 0.0008). The 9-year overall survival rates were 78% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.11). In the multivariate model, there was a trend in favor of chemoendocrine therapy (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

The addition of FEC50 adjuvant chemotherapy to tamoxifen significantly improves long-term DFS in N1-3, ER+ and postmenopausal women. Chemoendocrine therapy seems to be more effective than tamoxifen in terms of long-term survival.

Breast Cancer: Achievements in Adjuvant Systemic Therapies in the Pre‐Genomic Era

In recent decades, the use of adjuvant systemic therapies for early breast cancer has increased extensively and has most likely contributed to the decline in breast cancer mortality observed in the U.S. and in some European countries. The last few years have witnessed accelerated progress in the treatment of early breast cancer, with the introduction of taxanes and aromatase inhibitors and, most impressively, trastuzumab to the adjuvant portfolio. When compared with anthracycline-based regimens, the addition of taxanes to treatments for patients with node-positive breast cancer has shown benefits in disease-free survival and, in some trials, in overall survival; however, these drugs are not yet universally accepted as standard treatment. Significant improvements in endocrine therapy in both pre- and postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive disease have been made. In the postmenopausal setting, aromatase inhibitors have shown superiority over tamoxifen in a direct comparison upfront or when given in sequence after 2-5 years of tamoxifen, but the optimal modality of administration remains unclear. For premenopausal women, ovarian function suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues combined with tamoxifen has generated similar results to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF)-based regimens. Recently, trastuzumab has had a dramatic impact on the evolution of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive early breast cancer treated with standard adjuvant modalities; specifically, relapses, including distant relapses, have been halved. In this review, we summarize these main achievements, discuss the currently available adjuvant treatment options for breast cancer patients, and emphasize the need for more efficient translational research to improve individual treatment tailoring.

Dealing with metastatic breast cancer in elderly women: results from a French study on a large cohort carried out by the 'Observatory on Elderly Patients'

BACKGROUND

Treatment of elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is not clearly defined and seems to vary according to the subjective appreciation of the physician.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After interviewing 107 French specialists qualified in oncology, data concerning 1009 MBC patients were collected: 500 patients were between 65 and 74 years and 509 were >75 years of age. Differences in diagnosis and treatment strategy were analyzed for both age groups to identify the physician's criteria of choice and the eventual use of the geriatric assessment among those criteria.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, synchronous metastatic disease was more frequent in patients over 75 years old (52% versus 39%; P<0.001). Physicians indicated that treatment was based on age and on a subjective evaluation of the patient's general status. Sixty-eight per cent of younger patients and only 31% of older ones received chemotherapy (P<0.001). In the older group drug doses were lower than those usually recommended in three-quarters of cases. Only 10% of physicians considered that they under-treat patients using the FEC 50 regimen. Over 75 years of age, hormone therapy was offered to most patients, including 8% with hormone-independent tumors. Geriatric covariates were never considered. Geriatricians rarely, if ever, played a role in the therapeutic decision.

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusion of elderly patients with MBC in prospective trials is warranted to define standards of care and reduce heterogeneity in the decision-making process.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer: Optimal Use of Epirubicin

Anthracyclines are central components of adjuvant combination chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer. Epirubicin is underutilized for this indication in the United States, where it was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1999, compared to Europe and Canada, where it gained approval in 1980. Use of epirubicin offers advantages in specific treatment settings and patient subsets, including situations where use of dose-dense and/or dose-intense protocols may provide additional benefits and where combinations including taxanes and/or trastuzumab may provide increased efficacy. Epirubicin also has a distinct safety profile compared to doxorubicin with regard to cardiotoxicity. In order to optimize treatment benefits and safety concerns for node-positive, node-negative and HER-2-positive patients as well as patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and elderly patients it is worthwhile to consider the potential benefits of epirubicin.

Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in trials of adjuvant epirubicin for early breast cancer: correlation with doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide

PURPOSE

We reviewed follow-up of patients treated in 19 randomized trials of adjuvant epirubicin in early breast cancer to determine incidence, risk, and risk factors for subsequent acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients (N = 9,796) were observed from the start of adjuvant treatment (53,080 patient-years). Cases of AML or MDS (AML/MDS) were reported, with disease characteristics. Incidence and cumulative risk were compared for possible risk factors, for assigned regimens, and for administered cumulative doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide.

RESULTS

In 7,110 patients treated with epirubicin-containing regimens (92% of whom also received cyclophosphamide), 8-year cumulative probability of AML/MDS was 0.55% (95% CI, 0.33% to 0.78%). The risk of developing AML/MDS increased in relation to planned epirubicin dose per cycle, planned epirubicin dose-intensity, and administered cumulative doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Patients with administered cumulative doses of both epirubicin and cyclophosphamide not exceeding those used in standard regimens (</= 720 mg/m(2) and </= 6,300 mg/m(2), respectively) had an 8-year cumulative probability of developing AML/MDS of 0.37% (95% CI, 0.13% to 0.61%) compared with 4.97% (95% CI, 2.06% to 7.87%) for patients administered higher cumulative doses of both epirubicin and cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with standard cumulative doses of adjuvant epirubicin (</= 720 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (</= 6,300 mg/m(2)) for early breast cancer have a lower probability of secondary leukemia than patients treated with higher cumulative doses. Increased risk of secondary leukemia must be considered when assessing the potential benefit to risk ratio of higher than standard doses.

Secondary leukemia after epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer patients: 16 years experience of the French Adjuvant Study Group

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among eight French Adjuvant Study Group trials, 3653 patients were assessable: 2603 received epirubicin; 682 received hormonotherapy; and 368 had no systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was FEC regimen in 85% of cases (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50, 75 or 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, three or six cycles). Epirubicin cumulative dose was <300 mg/m2 in 1045 patients; 300-600 mg/m2 in 1187; and > or =600 mg/m2 in 286, followed by radiotherapy in 96% of cases. The median follow-up was 104 months.

RESULTS

Eight cases of leukemia occurred in epirubicin-exposed patients and one in non-exposed patients. After 9 years, the risk of developing a leukemia was 0.34% (95% confidence interval 0.11-0.57) in epirubicin-exposed patients. In patients receiving chemotherapy, leukemia subtypes were: AML2 (two), AML3 (one), AML4 (three) and ALL (two). None of the classically recognized risk factors was significantly correlated with the occurrence of a leukemia.

CONCLUSION

Irrespective of the dose, the incidence of secondary leukemia after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy was low. After a long follow-up, the benefit/risk ratio for early breast cancer patients remained in favor of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: eight cases (0.31%) occurred, and in some of them, treatment causality could be debatable.

Chemotherapy for older women with early breast cancer

The incidence of breast cancer increases with age, reaching over 300 per 100,000 in women aged 70-75 years in the U.K., increasing to almost 400 per 100,000 in women aged over 85 years. As a healthy 70-year old woman can now expect to live for an average of 15 years, control of breast cancer is likely to significantly affect survival. Variations exist in surgical care, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, depending on age; however, virtually all elderly women with hormone-responsive disease are given adjuvant endocrine therapy, usually tamoxifen. For older women who do not have hormone-responsive cancer, and who have high-risk disease characteristics, questions remain over their best management. Overview data of adjuvant chemotherapy in clinical trials show a significant benefit of chemotherapy for women up to the age of 69 years but, for older women, there are too few data to draw any firm conclusions. When considering treatment options for older women, assessment is critical; functional status and comorbidity are some of the factors linked to shorter survival.

Timing of CMF chemotherapy in combination with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: role of endocrine responsiveness of the tumor

BACKGROUND

Controversy persists about whether chemotherapy benefits all breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial VII, 1212 postmenopausal patients with node-positive disease were randomized to receive tamoxifen for 5 years or tamoxifen plus three concurrent courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil ('classical' CMF) chemotherapy, either early, delayed or both. In IBCSG trial IX, 1669 postmenopausal patients with node-negative disease were randomized to receive either tamoxifen alone or three courses of adjuvant classical CMF prior to tamoxifen. Results were assessed according to estrogen receptor (ER) content of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

For patients with node-positive, ER-positive disease, adding CMF either early, delayed or both reduced the risk of relapse by 21% (P=0.06), 26% (P=0.02) and 25% (P=0.02), respectively, compared with tamoxifen alone. There was no difference in disease-free survival when CMF was given prior to tamoxifen in patients with node-negative, ER-positive tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

CMF given concurrently (early, delayed or both) with tamoxifen was more effective than tamoxifen alone for patients with node-positive, endocrine-responsive breast cancer, supporting late administration of chemotherapy even after commencement of tamoxifen. In contrast, sequential CMF and tamoxifen for patients with node-negative, endocrine-responsive disease was ineffective.

Toremifene and tamoxifen are equally effective for early-stage breast cancer: first results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials 12-93 and 14-93

BACKGROUND

Toremifene is a chlorinated derivative of tamoxifen, developed to improve its risk-benefit profile. The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) conducted two complementary randomized trials for peri- and postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer to compare toremifene versus tamoxifen as the endocrine agent and simultaneously investigate a chemotherapy-oriented question. This is the first report of the endocrine comparison after a median follow-up of 5.5 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

1035 patients were available for analysis: 75% had estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary tumors, the median number of involved axillary lymph nodes was three and 81% received prior adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Toremifene and tamoxifen yielded similar disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS): 5-year DFS rates of 72% and 69%, respectively [risk ratio (RR)=0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.76-1.18]; 5-year OS rates of 85% and 81%, respectively (RR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.78-1.36). Similar outcomes were observed in the ER-positive cohort. Toxicities were similar in the two treatment groups with very few women (<1%) experiencing severe thromboembolic or cerebrovascular complications. Quality of life results were also similar. Nine patients developed early stage endometrial cancer (toremifene, six; tamoxifen, three).

CONCLUSIONS

Toremifene is a valid and safe alternative to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer.

The choice of systemic adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive early breast cancer

Patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer represent a distinct population for which tailored adjuvant treatments are needed. Endocrine therapy is mandatory for this population. For premenopausal patients, ovarian ablation or tamoxifen can be recommended; the combination of both, as well as the combination of ovarian ablation and aromatase inhibitors is under investigation. For postmenopausal patients, tamoxifen for 5 years is the 'standard of care'. Anastrozole can be recommended for patients with a contraindication to tamoxifen. The addition of 5 years of letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen has yielded benefits in terms of disease-free survival. The sequential use of tamoxifen and exemestane was superior to tamoxifen for 5 years. However, in both studies, long-term toxicity is still not fully evaluated. The addition of chemotherapy to endocrine treatment can be recommended for patients at high risk of relapse and in young patients. Chemotherapy should consist of 3-6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil or of an anthracycline-containing regimen. The addition of taxanes cannot be routinely recommended in this population. Endocrine treatment should start after completion of chemotherapy.

[Treatment of cancer and hematological malignancy in elderly people: oncogeriatrics as a discipline for the future (Part I): geriatric evaluation and management of solid tumors]

PURPOSE

Fifty percent of cancer arise in people older than 65 year-old. Most clinical trials in cancer treatment are limited in patients younger than 65 year-old. We review literature describing particularity of cancer treatment in elderly patients.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Therapeutic decisions should be based on an estimation of the patient's life expectancy, and risks and benefits should be weighted up accordingly. Geriatric oncology is made of a geriatric evaluation of patient and of knowledge of clinical trial about elderly patients.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

We present in this issue the principle of geriatric evaluation and the results of recent clinical trial on elderly cancer patients.

Disease-free survival advantage of weekly epirubicin plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone as adjuvant treatment of operable, node-positive, elderly breast cancer patients: 6-year follow-up results of the French adjuvant study group 08 trial

PURPOSE

To assess whether an epirubicin (EPI) -based chemotherapy plus hormonal regimen improves disease-free (DFS) in women older than 65 years, with node-positive, operable breast cancer (BC), relative to tamoxifen (TAM) alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 338 patients were randomly assigned after surgery to receive TAM 30 mg/d for 3 years (TAM, n = 164), or EPI 30 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for six cycles plus TAM 30 mg/d for 3 years (EPI-TAM, n = 174). In both arms, patients received radiotherapy, delivered after chemotherapy (CT) in the EPI-TAM group.

RESULTS

The 6-year DFS rates were 69.3% with TAM and 72.6% with EPI-TAM (P = .14). The multivariate analysis shows a relative risk of relapse of 1.93 (95% CI, 1.70 to 2.17) with TAM compared with EPI-TAM (P = .005). The 6-year OS, related to disease progression, was 79.1% and 79.8%, respectively (P = .41). Compliance with CT was good: 96.9% of patients received six cycles. The acute toxicity per patient was mild: grade 2 neutropenia in 5.9%, grade 2 anemia in 2.0%, grade 3 nausea or vomiting in 4.6%, and grade 3 alopecia in 7.2%. Five cases (in five patients) of decreased left ventricular ejection fraction occurred after CT: three after adjuvant CT, and two after anthracycline-based CT for relapse. One patient died as a result of dysrhythmia related to carcinomatous lymphangitis. No secondary leukemia occurred.

CONCLUSION

This study conducted in node-positive elderly patients demonstrates a significant contribution of a weekly EPI regimen in terms of DFS. Moreover, this regimen is safe for hematologic, nonhematologic, and cardiac toxicities.

Long-term cardiac follow-up in relapse-free patients after six courses of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, with either 50 or 100 mg of epirubicin, as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: French adjuvant study group

PURPOSE To evaluate long-term cardiac function in patients without disease who had received six cycles of fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 50 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) (FEC 50) or the same regimen with epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) (FEC 100) as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer in the French Adjuvant Study Group-05 trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred fifty patients (FEC 50, n = 65; FEC 100, n = 85) who were without disease and who gave their informed consent were enrolled for long-term cardiac assessment. The assessment included cardiac events occurring after the end of chemotherapy, vital signs, concomitant disease, ECG, isotopic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and echographic parameters. Abnormal files were blindly reviewed by cardiologists and oncologists. Results The median follow-up time was 102 months. After FEC 100, LVEF was less than 50% in five patients (radioisotopic method), and two patients experienced congestive heart failure (CHF) that was possibly related to treatment. Asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) was experienced in 18 patients after FEC 100 and in one patient after FEC 50. In these patients, treatment causality was probable in eight patients. Two additional years after this assessment, all 18 patients were still asymptomatic. CONCLUSION After more than 8 years of follow-up, the cardiac toxicity observed after adjuvant treatment with FEC 100 comprised two cases of well-controlled CHF and 18 cases of asymptomatic LVD. In the majority of women with primary breast cancer, the benefits of treatment with FEC 100 in terms of disease-free and overall survival outweigh the risks, and cardiac risk factors should be carefully evaluated in patient selection.

Adjuvant Therapy in Elderly Patients with Breast Cancer

The elderly population has been neglected by the traditional approach to clinical breast cancer research. Elderly women have been underrepresented in breast cancer clinical trials, with the majority of studies being restricted to patients aged < 70 years. Elderly patients frequently have comorbidities and/or impaired organ function. These facts may often lead to death from causes other than cancer, thus nullifying any possible benefit of adjuvant treatment; furthermore, they render extrapolation of standard treatment recommendations to the elderly potentially hazardous, particularly with respect to chemotherapy. Therefore, specific clinical trials are needed to investigate adjuvant treatments tailored for the heterogeneous older population.

Adjuvant cytotoxic and endocrine therapy in pre- and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer and one to nine infiltrated nodes: five-year results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized HE 10/92 study

SUMMARY

The present randomized phase III trial was designed to detect a 15% benefit in relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) from the incorporation of adjuvant tamoxifen to the combination of CNF [cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2; mitoxantrone (Novantrone), 10 mg/m2; fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2 chemotherapy and ovarian ablation in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer and conversely from the incorporation of CNF chemotherapy to adjuvant tamoxifen in node-positive postmenopausal patients. From April 1992 until March 1998, 456 patients with operable breast cancer and one to nine infiltrated axillary nodes entered the study. Premenopausal patients were treated with six cycles of CNF chemotherapy followed by ovarian ablation with monthly injections of triptoreline 3.75 mg for 1 year (Group A, 84 patients) or the same treatment followed by 5 years of tamoxifen (Group B, 92 patients). Postmenopausal patients received 5 years of tamoxifen (Group C, 145 patients) or 6 cycles of CNF followed by 5 years of tamoxifen (Group D, 135 patients). Adjuvant radiation was administered to all patients with partial mastectomy. After a median follow-up period of 5 years, 125 patients (27%) relapsed and 79 (17%) died. The 5-year actuarial RFS for premenopausal patients was 65% in Group A and 68% in Group B (p = 0.86) and for postmenopausal patients 70% in Group C and 67% in Group D (p = 0.36). Also, the respective OS rates were 77% and 80% (p = 0.68) for premenopausal and 84% and 78% (p = 0.10) for postmenopausal patients. Severe toxicities were infrequently seen, with the exception of leukopenia (18%), among the 311 patients treated with CNF. In conclusion, the present study failed to demonstrate a 15% difference in RFS in favor of node-positive premenopausal patients treated with an additional 5 years of tamoxifen after CNF adjuvant chemotherapy and ovarian ablation. Similarly, six cycles of CNF preceding 5 years of tamoxifen did not translate to a 15% RFS benefit in node-positive postmenopausal patients.

Second cancers after breast cancer treatment

Breast irradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and tamoxifen are associated with an increased risk of second cancers that may manifest decades after treatment. Although very small, it is nonetheless important for clinicians and women to be aware of and to recognize the risk. Postmastectomy irradiation is associated with a slight increase in the risk of developing a sarcoma or lung cancer after a latency period of more than 10 years. However, the majority of information on radiation-associated cancers is derived from large tumor registries, which reflect outdated radiation treatment practices. Modern treatment approaches, which use lower fraction size (or dose) and limit the exposure of surrounding normal tissue to radiation, are less likely to cause radiation-associated cancers. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with any detectable increased risk of solid tumors beyond that which occurs as the population ages. However, alkylating agents, such as cyclophosphamide, and the topoisomerase II inhibitors, doxorubicin and epirubicin, are associated with two types of cytogenetically distinct leukemias after adjuvant chemotherapy. The absolute risk of developing leukemia is lower by orders of magnitude than the improvement in breast cancer mortality that results from adjuvant chemotherapy. Tamoxifen is associated with a two- to threefold increase in the risk of developing endometrial cancer, or about 80 excess cases per 10,000 treated women at 10 years. The benefits of adjuvant therapy outweigh the risks of developing second cancers. Additional studies are needed to more precisely identify patients who are or are not likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy, and individual host and treatment factors that influence the development of second cancer.

Long-term medical costs of postmenopausal breast cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Since the incidence of breast cancer is growing, prevention programs can be expected to have a large economic impact on the health care system. From a health economic point of view, one is interested in the costs saved by disease prevention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To predict 10-year cumulative incidence-based costs of postmenopausal breast cancer, a state transitional model was developed based on published clinical data. The model simulates disease progression and includes nine health states of 1 year: node-negative and node-positive early cancer; local relapse; metastasis, each with its follow-up states; and death. The cost per state was obtained from a chart review in 118 patients with different disease states. Costs were calculated from the health insurance perspective and discounted at 3%.

RESULTS

The cumulative 10 year cost per patient was equal to 31,774 euro [95% confidence interval (CI) 30,536-33,012 euro] of which 30% was hospital costs, 28% systemic treatment, surgery and radiotherapy and 14% testing. Costs were at their highest following diagnosis and before death.

CONCLUSIONS

This incidence-based approach identified the cost of postmenopausal breast cancer over time and may serve as a valid baseline for assessment of new interventions in prevention or early treatment.

A phase III trial of sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma: final analysis with 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The current study was performed to assess whether sequential potentially noncross-resistant chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with operable breast carcinoma.

METHODS

Seven hundred eighty-nine patients were registered and followed for a median of 10 years. They were treated in two groups. In Group 1, patients age < 50 years or age > 50 years but with either negative or unknown estrogen receptor (ER) status were randomized to receive 6 cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) alone or followed by 4 cycles of methotrexate and vinblastine (MV). In Group 2, patients age > or = 50 years with ER-positive disease were randomized to receive either tamoxifen or combination chemotherapy (FAC + MV) for 10 cycles. Analysis was performed according to allocated treatment (intention to treat), with all randomized patients included.

RESULTS

In Group 1 there were no significant differences with regard to DFS or OS between the two treatment arms. The DFS at 5 years was 0.70 and 0.76, respectively, for FAC compared with FAC+MV (P = 0.26). The OS was similar for both groups (0.84 vs. 0.83). It is interesting to note that there was a statistically nonsignificant trend for improved DFS in the FAC + MV arm for patients who were ER-positive. In Group 2, tamoxifen alone led to more prolonged DFS compared to FAC+MV (0.78 vs. 0.66, respectively) but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.28). OS also was associated with a trend (P = 0.86) toward prolonged survival for the tamoxifen arm compared with the FAC+MV arm (0.85 vs. 0.74, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current trial concerning sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma, which to our knowledge contains the longest follow-up presented to date, failed to demonstrate any additional benefit from the addition of 4 cycles of MV to 6 cycles of FAC chemotherapy.

Risk of secondary leukemia after a solid tumor in childhood according to the dose of epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines: a case-control study by the Société Française d'Oncologie Pédiatrique

PURPOSE

To estimate the risk of secondary leukemia as a function of the dose of epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study of the risk of secondary leukemia or myelodysplasia after a solid tumor in childhood within the Société Française d'Oncologie Pédiatrique, including 61 patients with leukemia matched with 196 controls. The characteristics of the first cancer, the patient's family history of cancer, and the treatment (type, cumulative dose of chemotherapy, schedule of etoposide administration, and radiation dose delivered to active bone marrow) were compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

Only two factors were found to increase the risk of leukemia in multivariate analysis, namely, the type of the first tumor, with an excess risk in patients with Hodgkin's disease (relative risk 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 24) or osteosarcoma (relative risk 5; 95% CI, 1.3 to 19), and exposure to epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines. The risk of leukemia increased regularly with the cumulative dose of etoposide. In summary, patients who received between 1.2 and 6 g/m(2) of epipodophyllotoxins or more than 170 mg/m(2) of anthracyclines had a seven-fold higher risk (95% CI, 2.6 to 19) compared with patients who received lower doses or none of these drugs. The risk of leukemia in patients who received more than 6 g/m(2) of epipodophyllotoxins was multiplied by 197 (95% CI, 19 to 2,058). The risk of leukemia was not increased by exposure to alkylating agents or radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Both epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines increase the risk of secondary leukemia. The current challenge is to minimize the mutagenic effects of these drugs by diminishing cumulative doses without losing the therapeutic benefits.

Patterns of failure in a randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen

BACKGROUND

We studied the effect of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with resected early breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The trial included 835 patients with either axillary lymph node involvement, or tumors with histological grade II or III. They were randomized after local surgery to receive either tamoxifen (TAM group) or tamoxifen plus chemotherapy (TAM-CT group) consisting of six courses of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC), or 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC). Radiotherapy was given after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy in the TAM-CT group and after surgery in the TAM group.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 73% in the TAM group and 79% in the TAM-CT group (log-rank test, P = 0.06). The 5-year overall survival rates were 82% and 87%, respectively (P = 0.06). The 5-year distant metastasis rates were 22% and 16% (P = 0.02), and the 5-year local recurrence rates were 6% and 4%, respectively (P = 0.23). There were no significant differences for contralateral breast cancer or other new primary malignancies. Chemotherapy tended to be more effective for patients who had tumors without estrogen receptors (trend test, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Anthracycline-based chemotherapy administered to postmenopausal patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen gave a borderline significant benefit on overall and DFS, mainly by a reduction in distant metastases. Delaying radiotherapy after six courses of chemotherapy did not affect local control after up to 10 years of follow-up.

Superselective arterial chemotherapy for inoperable metastases in the dura mater and cranium

SUMMARY

Diffuse metastases to the cranium and dura mater of the bilateral hemisphere do not allow surgical intervention. We describe an excellent case which was treated by intra-arterial chemotherapy using Epirubicine (Farumorbicine). A 58-year-old woman treated for breast cancer ten years ago was admitted to our hospital with headache and frontal mass lesions.Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on admission revealed a remarkable enhanced lesion of the bilateral dura mater and cranium, and bilateral brain edema in the frontal lobe. Angiography disclosed a vascular rich tumour supplied by bilateral external carotid artery branches.We successfully treated the lesion using superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy with a minimal dose of Epirubicine followed by embolization of bilateral external carotid artery branches. Followup MR imaging two years after the endovascular treatment showed disappearance of the enhanced lesion and remodeling of the skull bone. The patient is neurologically free of symptoms.

The expanding role of epirubicin in the treatment of breast cancer

Adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer has experienced major changes in the last 25 years. Since the mid 1970s, when cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease-free and overall survival, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy has become common practice worldwide. Anthracyclines are considered to be among the most active available agents to treat breast cancer and have become core components of adjuvant regimens. Anthracycline-containing polychemotherapy regimens provide a significant benefit over CMF. Regimens containing epirubicin are generally associated with prolongation in relapse-free and overall survival rates compared with standard therapies including CMF. Epirubicin-taxane combinations are active in treating metastatic breast cancer and do not appear to be associated with any pharmacokinetic interactions. Ongoing research is focusing on combining anthracyclines with taxanes in an effort to continue to improve outcomes following adjuvant therapy.

The worldwide perspective in the adjuvant treatment of primary lymph node positive breast cancer

Adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer has experienced major changes in the last 25 years. Since the mid 1970s when cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease-free and overall survival, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy has become common practice worldwide. Anthracyclines have long been considered to be among the most active available agents to treat breast cancer and they have become a core component of adjuvant regimens. Anthracycline-containing polychemotherapy regimens provide a significant benefit over CMF. Regimens containing epirubicin are associated with a significant prolongation in relapse-free and overall survival rates compared with standard therapies including CMF. Epirubicin-taxane combinations are highly active in treating metastatic breast cancer and do not appear to be associated with any pharmacokinetic interactions. Epirubicin is a unique anthracycline whose introduction to the US market represents a significant advance in breast cancer treatment. Ongoing research efforts are focusing on combining anthracyclines with taxanes in an effort to continue to improve outcomes following adjuvant therapy.

Management of breast cancer in the older woman

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of all breast cancer cases occur after age 65. Several aspects for the treatment of early breast cancer may be influenced by patient age, including postoperative irradiation after partial mastectomy, axillary lymphadenectomy, primary medical treatment of early breast cancer, and adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

The authors review the literature regarding age-specific issues in the management of breast cancer, and they report their own experience in treating older women with breast cancer.

RESULTS

In terms of survival and disease-free survival, tamoxifen alone in primary breast cancer is inferior to surgical treatment followed by adjuvant tamoxifen. Tamoxifen alone should be reserved for patients with absolute contraindications to mastectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial to women with hormone receptor-poor tumors. In those with hormone receptor-rich tumors, adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial for HER2-positive tumors, and the regimen should contain an anthracycline.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the risk of local recurrence after partial mastectomy declines with increasing age, the decision to forego radiation therapy is individualized based on risk of recurrence and on patient desires and resources. The advent of lymph node mapping obviates the need for lymphadenectomy in most patients. The benefits and risks of adjuvant chemotherapy should be individually assessed according to tumor stage, life expectancy, comorbidity, and expected tolerance of treatment.

Meta-analysis of adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer

Conflicting results have been published regarding the efficacy of adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF)-type chemotherapy in postmenopausal, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive women. The Oxford overview suggests real but limited benefit of any chemotherapy in this group of patients but avoids analyzing smaller subsets. We wished to better quantitate the benefit of adding CMF to tamoxifen in postmenopausal ER-positive women with tumor involvement of axillary lymph nodes. Six randomized studies comparing CMF plus tamoxifen to tomoxifen alone in postmenopausal, ER-positive, node-positive women have been published since 1992. They include 2368 patients. We performed a meta-analysis of 6 endpoints: survival, disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, contralateral breast recurrence, and thromboembolic complications. There was a statistically significant increase in disease-free survival from the addition of CMF-type chemotherapy to tamoxifen in this population; the absolute risk of relapse was reduced by 5.5% at 5 years. Effects of locoregional recurrence were greater than those on overall recurrence. No significant survival benefit was observed.