Treatment of leptomeningeal metastases evaluated by interphase cytogenetics

Application of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization on Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytospins for the Detection of Residual Leukemic Cells in Patients With Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis of central nervous system involvement in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) requires morphologic expertise; therefore, we evaluated interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytospin preparations as a potential complementary test.

METHODS

Twenty-three CSF cytospin specimens from 13 pediatric patients with ALL were included. iFISH probes detecting BCR-ABL1, ETV6-RUNX1, and KMT2A rearrangement and CDKN2A deletion, which were present at initial diagnosis, were used on follow-up CSF cytospin specimens and were compared with cytology.

RESULTS

Seventeen (73.9%) follow-up specimens showed concordant results between iFISH and cytology. Two (8.7%) samples with discordant results were positive by iFISH but not by cytology; one (4.3%) was positive only by cytology. In the remaining three (13.0%) specimens, too few cells were available for cytology, whereas iFISH interpretation was possible.

CONCLUSIONS

iFISH of CSF cytospin preparations improves malignant cell detection in pediatric ALL.

Leptomeningeal disease: current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies

Leptomeningeal disease has become increasingly prevalent as novel therapeutic interventions extend the survival of cancer patients. Although a majority of leptomeningeal spread occurs secondary to breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma, a wide variety of malignancies have been reported as primary sources. Symptoms on presentation are equally diverse, often involving a combination of neurological deficits with the possibility of obstructive hydrocephalus. Diagnosis is definitively made via cerebrospinal fluid cytology for malignant cells, but neuro-imaging with high quality T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging can aid diagnosis and localization. While leptomeningeal disease is still a terminal, late-stage complication, a variety of treatment modalities, such as intrathecal chemotherapeutics and radiation therapy, have improved median survival from 4–6 weeks to 3–6 months. Positive prognosticative factors for survival include younger age, high performance scores, and controlled systemic disease. In looking to the future, diagnostics that improve early detection and chemotherapeutics tailored to the primary malignancy will likely be the most significant advances in improving survival.

Novel approaches to treating leptomeningeal metastases

Leptomeningeal metastasis is a devastating complication of the central nervous system in patients with late-stage solid or hematological cancers. Leptomeningeal metastasis results from the multifocal seeding of the leptomeninges by malignant cancer cells. Although central nervous system metastasis usually presents in patients with widely disseminated and progressive late-stage cancer, malignant cells may spread to the cerebrospinal fluid during earlier disease stages in particularly aggressive cancers. Treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis is largely palliative but will often provide stabilization and protection from further neurological deterioration and improve quality of life. There is a need to raise awareness of the impact of leptomeningeal metastases on cancer patients and its known and putative biological basis. Novel diagnostic approaches include identification of biomarkers that may stratify the risk for developing leptomeningeal metastasis. Current therapies can be used more effectively while waiting for advanced treatments to be developed.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors (meningeal carcinomatosis)

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are increasingly recognized as a devastating complication of solid tumors. Improved treatment of primary malignancy and advances in diagnostic imaging have led to an apparent increase in the number of patients diagnosed with LM. Unfortunately, therapeutic options remain limited. Radiotherapy is used to treat bulky tumor and provide symptomatic relief. Intrathecal chemotherapy benefits a selected subset of patients. The challenge to the future is to delineate the molecular mechanisms underlying LM and to develop novel therapeutic or prophylactic modalities to combat LM.

The utility of fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Molecular tools are used to refine the diagnosis of malignancy in pleural fluids. This review discusses the rationale and recent findings of the application of one of these tools, fluorescence in-situ hybridization, in pleural effusions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aneuploidy (i.e., pronounced numeric and structural chromosomal changes) is a recurrent finding in cells of solid tumors. Different methods attempt to detect tumor-associated aneuploidy to prove micrometastasis in different compartments, such as urine, cerebrospinal fluid, bone marrow, and body fluids. In recent years, fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis has proved viable for detecting metastasis based on the observation of matching patterns of chromosomal aneusomies in primary tumors and corresponding metastasis.

SUMMARY

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis using specific probes for visualizing numeric aberrations in a microscopic evaluation (thus complementing routine cytologic evaluation) has been shown to be relatively simple, very robust, and thus applicable in material of lesser quality and more sensitive than routine cytology. Remarkably, dual-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis allows for an efficient analysis in effusions, and the approach presented in this review proved to be more specific than other molecular procedures applied in effusions to detect malignancy, such as polymerase chain reaction. Prospective studies are needed to demonstrate that refinement of staging by fluorescence in-situ hybridization or polymerase chain reaction ('molecular upstaging') will translate into meaningful therapeutic consequences.

Leptomeningeal metastasis: survival and prognostic factors in 155 patients

In this single-center retrospective study, 155 consecutive patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) were analyzed for the prognostic role of patient- and therapy-related variables. Ten percent of the patients received radiotherapy alone, 32% had chemotherapy alone, 31% received radiochemotherapy, 17% had supportive therapy only, and 10% were not evaluable for therapy. Chemotherapy was systemic (17%), combined systemic and intrathecal (10%), or intrathecal only (35%). Clinical improvement was noted in 41% of the patients. Overall median survival time (MST) was 4.8 months. Survival varied considerably depending on the type of primary tumor in this largest published cohort of LM patients. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age >60 and elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) albumin or lactate levels were therapy-independent predictors of poor survival in the entire cohort as well as in the subgroup of patients with systemic primary tumors (n=105). The assessment of three therapy-independent parameters allows to group LM patients into groups of low, intermediate, and high risk of poor survival. Moreover, the application of systemic chemotherapy was a positive prognostic factor in patients with subarachnoid lesions detected by neuroimaging (RR 1.94, p=0.001) or with extra-CNS tumor deposits (RR 1.52, p=0.05). The results of this study suggest that systemic chemotherapy alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities may improve outcome in patients with subarachnoid tumor cell deposits detectable by neuroimaging.

Sensitive detection of tumour cells in effusions by combining cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH)

Diagnosis of malignant cells in effusions is important for staging procedures and resulting therapeutic decisions. Cytodiagnostics in effusions is sometimes difficult since reactive mesothelial cells can mimic malignant cells. We used fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in single-colour or if appropriate in dual-colour evaluation to detect chromosomal aberrations in effusion cells as markers of malignancy, to raise the diagnostic yield. Cytologic and FISH evaluations – by using probes representing several chromosomes always including chromosomes 11 and 17 – were performed in 358 effusion fluids. Cytology was positive for malignancy in 44.4% of all effusions, whereas FISH was positive in 53.9% (P=0.0001). The combination of cytology and FISH was diagnostic for malignancy in 60.9% of effusions. Diagnostic superiority of FISH was demonstrated in effusions from breast cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and in effusions from the entire group of gynaecological and gastrointestinal carcinomas. In transudates (effusion protein <2.5 g dl⁻¹), malignant cells were detectable by cytology, FISH, and combined use of both methods in 18.6, 30, and 37.1% of effusions, respectively, suggesting that cytologic and molecular analysis should be performed also with transudates. In conclusion, FISH in combination with conventional cytology is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for detecting malignant cells in effusions.

Combination of cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization for aneuploidy, and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for human mammaglobin/mammaglobin B expression improves diagnosis of malignant effusions

PURPOSE

The identification of malignant cells in effusions by conventional cytology is hampered by its limited sensitivity. The aim of this study was to improve tumor cell detection in effusions by molecular approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 157 effusions from patients with tumors and 72 effusions from patients without a history or evidence of malignancy were included in this study. All effusion specimens were evaluated in parallel by cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for aneuploidy, and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for expression of human mammaglobin (hMAM) and mammaglobin B (hMAM-B).

RESULTS

In effusions from patients with tumors, the sensitivities of tumor cell detection by cytology, FISH, and hMAM and hMAM-B detection were 46.2%, 53.3%, 36.4%, and 57.7%, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 94.4%, 97.0%, 87.1%, and 88.6%. Notably, a high percentage of effusions containing malignant cells were in fact transudates, indicating the necessity for molecular diagnostic work-up of transudates collected from patients with tumors. Dependent on the tumor type, the use of appropriate marker combinations improved tumor cell detection in effusions significantly. By combining all four diagnostic tests, a positive test result indicating the presence of malignancy was achieved in 81.1%, with a fairly good specificity of 70.1%.

CONCLUSION

Molecular techniques are definitely useful to detect malignancy in cytologically negative effusions. Tumor cell detection in effusions can be significantly improved by FISH and PCR techniques applying appropriate molecular markers. This finding should help to improve tumor staging, prognostic assessment, and treatment monitoring.

Clinical follow-up indicates differential accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and immunocytology of the cerebral spinal fluid for the diagnosis of neoplastic meningitis - a single centre experience

In patients with neoplastic meningitis (NM), the rapid institution of intrathecal therapy may ameliorate the course of disease, indicating that a timely diagnosis is clinically relevant. As immunocytology (IC) of cerebrospinal fluid and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as diagnostic methods, have potential pitfalls, the present study assessed the results of both methods, to determine the predictive capability of the initial evaluations with respect to the risk that the patient would develop NM during the course of their disease. A total of 166 individuals with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL; n = 95), B-acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL; n = 18), acute myeloid leukaemia (n = 27) or solid tumours (n = 26), with at least one definitive IC and MRI result within 3 weeks, were evaluated at a median follow-up of 29.5 months (range 6-53 months). IC and MRI results reached the highest concordance (98%) in B-NHL patients and were most discordant in ALL patients (43%). In haematological malignancies, IC displayed considerable sensitivity, ranging from 89% to 95%, while MRI had very low sensitivity. Conversely, MRI showed high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92%) in solid tumours. We conclude that IC is of particular value in the diagnosis of NM due to haematological malignancies while MRI is superior to IC in the diagnosis of NM due to solid tumours.

Molecular cytogenetics in solid tumors: laboratorial tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy

The remarkable progress in the understanding of leukemogenesis was soundly sustained by methodological developments in the cytogenetic field. Nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities frequently associated with specific types of hematological disease play a major role in their diagnosis and have been demonstrated as independent prognostic indicators. Molecular pathways altered by chimeric or deregulated proteins as a consequence of chromosomal abnormalities have also significantly contributed to the development of targeted therapies, and cytogenetic assays are valuable for selecting patients for treatment and monitoring outcome. In solid tumors, significantly high levels of chromosome abnormalities have been detected, but distinction between critical and irrelevant events has been a major challenge. Consequently, the application of cytogenetic technology as diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic tools for these malignancies remains largely under appreciated. The emergence of molecular-based techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization was particularly useful for solid malignancies, and the spectrum of their application is rapidly expanding to improve efficiency and sensitivity in cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection, alone or in combination with other diagnostic methods. This overview illustrates current uses and outlines potential applications for molecular cytogenetics in clinical oncology.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis after major remission to taxane-based front-line therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer

AIM

To determine the incidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC), as the first manifestation of systemic progression, in breast cancer patients after obtaining a major response (complete response, CR or >80% partial response, PR) to first-line taxane-based chemotherapy treated between 1996 and 2000 in our Medical Oncology Unit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically proven breast cancer having either metastatic disease, or high-risk locoregional disease that were entered into treatment protocols with first-line taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus anthracyclines or mitoxantrone combinations and developed LMC as the first evidence of progression after major response (CR or >80% PR) were analyzed in the present study (n = 155).

RESULTS

Seven patients with a median age of 54 (range: 40-70) years developed LMC as their first evidence of progression after taxane-based regimens with a median interval of 6 months (range: 2-18) from start of treatment to diagnosis of LMC. Five patients received intrathecal (i.t.) methotrexate treatment and whole brain radiotherapy (RT), while one patient received i.t. methotrexate and RT to lumbar spine. Two patients responded to treatment for LMC, while two achieved stable disease and three progressed. Two patients had elevated cerebrospinal fluid tumor markers (more than serum marker levels) that proved useful in monitoring response to treatment. Median survival after LMC was 3.6 months (range: 1-31+) and correlated positively to the interval from the initiation of taxane-based therapy to LMC (r = 0.84, P = 0.019). Seven out of 86 responders (8.1%; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-13.9) developed LMC as the first sign of progression after a major response to first-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

LMC after a major response to front-line taxane-based regimens represents a grave disease manifestation and its incidence appears increased when compared in retrospect to non-taxane-treated patients. Prospective evaluation of the incidence of LMC after taxane versus non-taxane-based treatment from large randomized multiinstitutional trials is warranted and identification of potential prognostic factors might help identify patients requiring appropriate prophylactic therapy.