Survival of patients with resected N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: evidence for a subclassification and implications

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

Impact of skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis on outcomes after resection for primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and nodal disease are a heterogeneous group with varied patterns of disease. The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of patients with skip N2 disease in comparison to those with N1 or non-skip N2 disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 445 patients undergoing anatomical lung resection for primary lung cancer between 2012 and 2019 with post-operative histological confirmation of nodal disease was undertaken. Log rank analysis was used to assess differences in estimated median overall survival according to nodal status. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether skip N2 disease was independently associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 67.0 years (standard deviation ± 9.2 years) and 48.1% (n = 214) were male. In total, 20.7% (n = 92) of patients had N1 disease, 32.1% (n = 143) had skip N2 disease and 47.2% (n = 210) had non-skip N2 disease. Post-operative upstaging took place in 33.0% (n = 147) of patients. Median follow-up time was 35 months (interquartile range 14-68 months). Skip N2 patients had significantly longer estimated median overall survival in comparison to their non-skip N2 counterparts (47 months vs 28 months, log rank analysis p = 0.029) and non-skip N2 disease remained independently associated with reduced overall survival after multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.421, 95% confidence interval 1.060-1.907, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Skip N2 disease is a positive prognostic factor for patients with N2 lung cancer, suggesting that lung cancer staging guidelines should consider separating N2 disease into additional subgroups in order to improve prognostic accuracy.

Occult lymph node metastasis is not a favorable factor for resected NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND

This study was to compare the clinical presentations and survivals between the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) and those with evident lymph node metastasis (ELNM). We also intended to analyze the predictive factors for OLNM.

METHODS

Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare survivals between groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-penalized Cox multivariable analysis was used to identify the prognostic factors. Random forest was used to determine the predictive factors for OLNM.

RESULTS

A total of 2,067 eligible cases (N0: 1,497 cases; occult N1: 165 cases; evident N1: 54 cases; occult N2: 243 cases; evident N2: 108 cases) were included. The rate of OLNM was 21.4%. Patients with OLNM were tend to be female, non-smoker, adenocarcinoma and had smaller-sized tumors when compared with the patients with ELNM. Survival curves showed that the survivals of the patients with OLNM were similar to those of the patients with ELNM both before and after PSM. Multivariable Cox analysis suggested that positive lymph nodes (PLN) was the only prognostic factor for the patients with OLNM. Random forest showed that clinical tumor size was an important predictive factor for OLNM.

CONCLUSIONS

OLNM was not rare. OLNM was not a favorable sign for resected NSCLC patients with lymph node metastasis. PLN determined the survivals of the patients with OLNM. Clinical tumor size was a strong predictive factor for OLNM.

Minimally invasive surgery vs. open thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer with N2 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery [MIS, including robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)] and open thoracotomy (OT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with N2 disease.

Methods

We searched online databases and studies from the creation of the database to August 2022, comparing the MIS group to the OT group for NSCLC with N2 disease. Study endpoints included intraoperative outcomes [e.g., conversion, estimated blood loss (EBL), surgery time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), and R0 resection], postoperative outcomes [e.g., length of stay (LOS) and complication], and survival outcomes [e.g., 30-day mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS)]. We estimated outcomes using random effects meta-analysis to account for studies with high heterogeneity (I² > 50 or p < 0.05). Otherwise, we used a fixed-effect model. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes and standard mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes. Treatment effects on OS and DFS were described by hazard ratio (HR).

Results

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies on MIS vs. OT for NSCLC with N2 disease included 8,374 patients. Compared to OT, patients that underwent MIS had less estimated blood loss (EBL) (SMD = - 64.82, p < 0.01), shorter length of stay (LOS) (SMD = -0.15, p < 0.01), higher R0 resection rate (OR = 1.22, p = 0.049), lower 30-day mortality (OR = 0.67, p = 0.03), and longer overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.61, P < 0.01). The results showed no statistically significant differences in surgical time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), complications, and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups.

Conclusion

Current data suggest that minimally invasive surgery may provide satisfying outcomes, a higher R0 resection rate, and better short-term and long-term survival than open thoracotomy.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022355712.

Treatment Decisions for Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Balancing Less With More?

For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the outcomes for patients with resectable disease are historically poor compared with other solid organ malignancies. In recent years, there have been significant advances in multidisciplinary care, which have resulted in improved outcomes. Innovations in surgical oncology include the use of limited resection and minimally invasive techniques. Recent data in radiation oncology have suggested refinements in pre- and postoperative radiation therapy, resulting in optimization of techniques in the curative setting. Finally, the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in the advanced setting has paved the way for inclusion in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, resulting in recent regulatory approvals for four regimens (CheckMate-816, IMpower010, PEARLS, ADAURA). In this review, we will provide an overview of the seminal studies informing advancements in optimal surgical resection, radiation treatment, and systemic therapy for resectable NSCLC. We will summarize the key data on survival outcomes, biomarker analyses, and future directions for perioperative studies.

Extracapsular extension of pN2 lymph node metastases is not prognostically significant in surgically resected patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objectives

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the pathologic lymph node status N2 is a heterogeneous entity, with different degrees of lymph node involvement representing different prognoses. It is speculated whether extra capsular nodal extension may help to define a subgroup with implications on long-term survival.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 118 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (65 men, 53 women), who were treated between 2013 and 2018 and found to have pathologic N2 lymph node involvement. In all patients lung resection with systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection was performed with curative intent. In N2 lymph node metastases capsules of affected lymph nodes were examined microscopically as to whether extracapsular extension was present.

Results

51 patients (43 %) had extracapsular extension (ENE). Most of these patients (n=35) only had ENE in a single lymph node (69 %). The overall 5-year survival rate was 24.6 % and progression-free survival rate 17.8 %. In the multivariate analysis OS was worse for patients with multiple affected pN2 stations, concurrent N1 metastases, increasing age, and larger tumor size. For the percentage of lymph nodes affected with ENE (of total examined) only a non-significant trend towards worse OS could be observed (p=0.06).

Conclusions

Although we could not demonstrate significant prognostic differences between N2 extra capsular nodal involvement within our patient population, other analyses may yield different results. However, clinicians should continue performing thorough lymph nodes dissections in order to achieve local complete resection even in patients with extra capsular tumor spread.

Survival impact of unexpected N2 in stage IIIB/N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We investigated the effect of unexpected N2 on survival in stage IIIB/N2 cases.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1803 non-small cell lung cancer patients between 2010 and 2016. There were 89 patients (4.9%) with unexpected N2 (pathological (p) IIIB/N2 group), whereas 49 patients (2.7%) with cN2 (clinical (c) IIIB/N2 group). Although pIIIB/N2 group underwent surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, the cIIIB/N2 group of patients had multimodality treatment including induction chemotherapy ± radiotherapy followed by surgery.

RESULTS

The five-year overall survival (OS) for all patients was 36.0% [median survival time (MST) 27.9 months], and disease-free survival (DFS) was 28.9% (MST, 18.2 months). The OS was 39.6% (MST: 34.4 months) and the median DFS time was 31.1% (Median: 23.1 months) in the pIIIB/N2 group, whereas it was 29.2% (MST: 23.0 months) for OS and 22% (median: 12.4 months) for DFS in the cIIIB/N2 group. There were no significant OS and DFS differences between the pIIIB/N2 group and the cIIIB/N2 group (p = 0.124 and p = 0.168, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In stage IIIB/N2 cases, the fact that N2 could not be detected preoperatively with minimally invasive or invasive methods and was detected in the pathological examination after surgery does not provide a survival advantage.

[Bronchial carcinoma: metastatic pathways with involvement of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes]

SIGNIFICANCE OF LUNG CANCER

Lung cancer has enormous socioeconomical impact on our society due to its high prevalence and mortality. About 59,700 new cases of lung cancer were forecasted for 2022.

TNM SCHEME FOR STAGING

Correct staging is the basis for therapy planning, prognosis estimation, and future analyses. Staging is performed using the TNM scheme from the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). Involvement of lymph nodes is used to differentiate between stage IIB and IIIC.

LYMPH NODE LEVELS FOR LUNG CANCER

Knowledge of the intrathoracic lymph node levels is crucial for the exact classification and its involvement has direct implications on therapy. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) proposed a unified lymph node map with exact anatomic definitions, which is recommended by the German national lung cancer guideline. The extent of lymph node involvement is stratified into N0-N3. Different metastatic paths are known depending on the location of the primary tumor, but the burden of disease has a greater influence on survival, than the location of metastases.

ASSESSING THE SPREAD OF LUNG CANCER

Computed tomography can assess operability of the primary tumor safely in most cases. Invasive procedures to confirm the diagnosis by sampling tissue should be performed after noninvasive diagnostics.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATION

Systematic lymph node dissection for all patients with non-small cell lung cancer intended for curative resection is recommended in the current German national guideline for lung cancer.

Association of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics Features with Clinicopathological Factors and Prognosis in Lung Squamous Cell Cancer

Aim

To evaluate the role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) radiomics features (RFs) for predicting clinicopathological factors (CPFs) and prognosis in patients with resected lung squamous cell cancer (LSCC).

Material and Methods

Patients with early-stage (stage I-III) LSCC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before surgical resection between August 2012 and February 2020 were analyzed. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and RFs were extracted from PET images for primary tumors. The diagnostic performances of PET parameters in groups of tumor differentiation, stage, and mediastinal lymph node metastasis (MLNM) status were evaluated. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with RFs, SUVmax, and CPFs to find independent predictors of PFS and OS.

Results

A total of 77 patients (5 female, 72 male) were included in the study. SUVmax and GLCM entropy were independently associated with tumor differentiation. The only parameter with significant diagnostic performance for MLNM was GLZLM-SLZGE. Tumor diameter and NGLDM busyness were independently associated with the stage. MLNM and tumor differentiation were found to be independent predictors of PFS. NGLDM contrast and MLNM were independently associated with OS.

Conclusion

Using radiomic features in addition to CPFs to predict disease recurrence and shorter overall survival can guide precision medicine in patients with LSCC.

Randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed-cisplatin plus bevacizumab or thoracic radiotherapy followed by surgery for stage IIIA (N2) nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Personalized Induction Therapy-1 is a multicenter, randomized phase II selection design trial of the efficacy and safety of platinum-doublet induction chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors/concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) followed by surgery for stage IIIA (N2) nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with pathologically proven stage IIIA (N2) nonsquamous NSCLC were assigned at random to 1 of 2 arms. Patients received (1:1) induction therapy with pemetrexed 500 mg/m² and cisplatin 75 mg/m² plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 3 cycles (bevacizumab arm) or concurrent TRT (45 Gy in 25 fractions; TRT arm) before surgery. The primary endpoint was the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were treated, including 42 in the bevacizumab arm and 40 in the TRT arm. Thirty-eight patients (90%) in the bevacizumab arm and 37 patients (93%) in the TRT arm underwent surgery. The objective response rates in the 2 groups were 50% and 60%, respectively (P = .36). The 2-year PFS and overall survival rates were 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.4%-51.2%) and 50% (95% CI, 33.8%-64.2%) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; P = .28), respectively, and 81% (95% CI, 64.7%-89.7%) and 80% (95% CI, 64.0%-89.5%) (HR, 1.10; P = .83), respectively. Although grade 5 toxicity did not occur during induction therapy, 2 patients in the bevacizumab arm died due to bronchopleural fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not significant, the 2-year PFS rate was higher in the TRT arm than in the bevacizumab arm. Fatal surgical complications were observed only in the bevacizumab arm. Therefore, pemetrexed-cisplatin with concurrent TRT was chosen as the investigational induction treatment strategy for future phase III trials.

The effect of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on survival after R0 resection for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer after R0 resection, and it is still controversial whether conventional adjuvant radiotherapy is needed. We used meta-analysis to try to answer whether adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) can bring survival benefits to patients with stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer after R0 resection.

METHODS

Up to June 25, 2021, the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched, and clinical studies on POCRT for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer were included. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 8959 patients were included in 5 randomized controlled trials and 17 retrospective studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed that POCRT could improve 3 and 5 years overall survival (OS) rate (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.05-2.20; OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.16-1.46), 3 and 5 years disease-free survival (DFS) rate (OR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.01-1.76; OR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.43-2.12), and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate (OR = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.76-4.11) in patients with stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer compared with adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) alone. But could not improve 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate (OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.52-2.52). The results of subgroup analysis showed that postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy could improve the 3 and 5 years OS rate (OR = 2.06, 95%CI: 1.22-3.46; OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.21-1.59). Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can improve the 3 and 5 years OS rate (OR = 1.80, 95%CI: 1.09-2.99; OR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.04-1.66). In addition, POCRT could improve the 3-year OS rate (OR = 1.88, 95%CI: 1.21-2.92) in patients with N2 single-station lymph node metastasis compared with POCT alone.

CONCLUSION

Compared with POCT alone, adjuvant POCRT can significantly improve the overall survival rate of patients with NSCLC after R0 resection of stage III-N2, especially in patients with N2 single-station lymph node metastasis. Accurate radiotherapy techniques such as 3DCRT or IMRT are recommended, and postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy is the best treatment mode.

Treatment Sequencing in Resectable Lung Cancer: The Good and the Bad of Adjuvant Versus Neoadjuvant Therapy

The treatment scenario for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer has changed dramatically with the incorporation of immunotherapy. The introduction of immunotherapy into treatment algorithms has yielded improved clinical outcomes in several phase II and III trials in both adjuvant (Impower010 and PEARLS) and neoadjuvant settings (JHU/MSK, LCMC3, NEOSTAR, Columbia/MGH, NADIM, and CheckMate-816), leading to new U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals in this sense. Different treatment options are now available for patients, making the optimal treatment scenario a matter of intense debate. In this review, we summarize the main results concerning treatment sequencing in resectable non-small cell lung cancer from the past 30 years in the preimmunotherapy era, focusing on recent advances after incorporation of immunotherapy. Finally, the utility of several parameters (PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, radiomics, circulating tumor DNA, T-cell receptor, and immune populations) as predictive biomarkers for therapy personalization is discussed.

Real-World Perspectives From Surgeons and Oncologists on Resectability Definition and Multidisciplinary Team Discussion of Stage III NSCLC in People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, and Macau: A Physician Survey

Introduction

Decision-making in diagnosis and management of stage III NSCLC remains complex owing to disease heterogeneity and diverse treatment options, and often warrants multidisciplinary team discussion. Specifically, the selection of patients for multimodality approaches involving surgical resection presents notable challenges owing to heterogeneity in guideline definitions and the subjective, case-specific nature of evaluating resectability on the basis of preoperative assessments.

Methods

An internet- and paper-based survey was conducted in 2020 among lung cancer specialists in the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, and Macau. This survey captured perspectives on stage III NSCLC on real-world diagnosis/staging practice, definition and evaluation of resectability using case scenarios, and preferred treatment paradigms.

Results

A total of 60 completed responses were obtained (60.0% surgeons; 40.0% oncologists). The surgeons' and oncologists' responses differed most in the assessment of resectability in specific case scenarios despite overall agreement on top factors determining resectability (T stage, lymph node size, and lymph node location). Of the 17 scenarios, specialists agreed (≥80%) on four "resectable" and six "unresectable" scenarios; of the seven scenarios with less than 80% agreement, surgeons and oncologists had diverging responses for six scenarios. Multidisciplinary team discussions were available in most of the respondents' institutions but usually covered only selected (<50%) stage III cases.

Conclusions

This survey used a comprehensive set of stage III NSCLC case scenarios to understand how working definitions of resectability may differ between surgeons and oncologists, and thus, identify types of cases to prioritize for multidisciplinary discussions to maximize limited resources. In parallel, the development of a multidisciplinary expert consensus on treatment approaches could complement local institutional expertise as a reference for decision-making.

Updated Prognostic Factors in Localized NSCLC

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 80% of lung cancer subtypes. Patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer may be considered for upfront surgical treatment. However, the overall 5-year survival rate is 59%. To improve survival, adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was largely explored and showed an overall benefit of survival at 5 years < 7%. The evaluation of recurrence risk and subsequent need for ACT is only based on tumor stage (TNM classification); however, more than 25% of patients with stage IA/B tumors will relapse. Recently, adjuvant targeted therapy has been approved for EGFR-mutated resected NSCLC and trials are evaluating other targeted therapies and immunotherapies in adjuvant settings. Costs, treatment duration, emergence of resistant clones and side effects stress the need for a better selection of patients. The identification and validation of prognostic and theranostic markers to better stratify patients who could benefit from adjuvant therapies are needed. In this review, we report current validated clinical, pathological and molecular prognosis biomarkers that influence outcome in resected NSCLC, and we also describe molecular biomarkers under evaluation that could be available in daily practice to drive ACT in resected NSCLC.

An Observational Study on Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Stage III NSCLC in Taiwan: The KINDLE Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with stage III NSCLC represent a very heterogenous group that requires different treatment strategies, especially in patients with N2 (2 nearby lymph nodes having cancer)-positive NSCLC and unresectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This real-world study may provide more insights into treatment decisions.

METHODS

The KINDLE study is a large, multinational real-world observational study that assessed different treatment strategies in patients with stage III NSCLC. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank testing. Patients were classified on the basis of disease stage, resectability, and treatment modalities.

RESULTS

The Taiwan subgroup enrolled 200 patients. The median PFS and OS values were similar among patients with stage IIIA and stage IIIB disease, but were significantly better in patients who were deemed as a resectable disease than in those who were deemed as an unresectable disease. In patients with N2-positive NSCLC, patients who underwent surgery had better PFS, but not OS, than patients administered with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (PFS 13.4 vs. 7.3 mo, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.18, p < 0.001; OS 32.4 vs. 22.0 mo, HR = 0.64, p = 0.215). Among patients with unresectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC, OS was significantly poorer after upfront EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) than after upfront CRT with sequential EGFR-TKI (27.4 vs. 49.0 mo, HR = 3.09, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that surgery could be added as part of therapy for patients with stage III N2-positive NSCLC. Moreover, upfront CRT with sequential EGFR-TKI seems to be appropriate for stage III unresectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Further randomized studies are needed to validate these results.

Lung cancer with PET/CT-defined occult nodal metastasis yields favourable prognosis and benefits from adjuvant therapy: a multicentre study

PURPOSE

To investigate the surgical prognosis and efficacy of adjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with occult lymph node metastasis (ONM) defined by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

METHODS

A total of 3537 NSCLC patients receiving surgical resection were included in this study. The prognosis between patients with ONM and evident nodal metastasis, ONM patients with and without adjuvant therapy was compared, respectively.

RESULTS

ONM was associated with significantly better prognosis than evident nodal metastasis whether for patients with N1 (5-year OS: 56.8% versus 52.3%, adjusted p value = 0.267; 5-year RFS: 44.7% versus 33.2%, adjusted p value = 0.031) or N2 metastasis (5-year OS: 42.8% versus 32.3%, adjusted p value = 0.010; 5-year RFS: 31.3% versus 21.6%, adjusted p value = 0.025). In ONM population, patients receiving adjuvant therapy yielded better prognosis comparing to those without adjuvant therapy (5-year OS: 50.1% versus 33.5%, adjusted p value < 0.001; 5-year RFS: 38.4% versus 22.1%, adjusted p value < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ONM defined by PET/CT identifies a unique clinical subtype of lung cancer, ONM is a favorable prognostic factor whether for pathological N1 or N2 NSCLC and adjuvant therapy could provide additional survival benefits for ONM patients.

Survival of clinical stage III NSCLC according to therapeutic strategy: Relevance of the tumor board decision in the era of immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Stage III NSCLC comprises a heterogeneous population. Different treatment strategies are available, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The PACIFIC trial results represented a significant change and improvement in the therapeutic strategy for these patients. We aimed to compare the different treatment strategies employed in Stage III NSCLC patients within our institution.

METHODS

All Stage III NSCLC patients discussed during the weekly thoracic oncology multidisciplinary team meetings at the University hospital Grenoble Alpes (France) between January 2010 and January 2017 were included. Patients' overall survival (OS) according to treatment strategies along with their respective changes were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 476 patients were identified. Among patients initially scheduled to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (n = 60), only 37 (62%) actually underwent surgery. Median OS of the cohort was 21.3 months [IQR 25%-75%: 9.6-48.3]. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery displayed better survival than those treated by CT-RT: 53.2 months [IQR 25%-75%: 16.1-87.3] versus 23.9 [IQR 25%-75%, 13.3-48.1]. Survival was slightly superior for patients treated by upfront CT-RT than for those planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery who eventually converted to CT-RT (concurrent or sequential): 23.9 months [IQR 25%-75%: 13.3-48.1] versus 20.4 [IQR 25%-75%:10.8-36], respectively.

CONCLUSION

While patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery displayed a better survival than those treated using CT-RT, switch from surgery to CT-RT actually shortened survival. These results stress the relevance of the tumor board in deciding which is the best therapeutic strategy for Stage III disease patients.

Update on adjuvant therapy in completely resected NSCLC patients

In patients with completely resected non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has been associated with improvement in survival by minimizing the risk of recurrence. For years, systemic chemotherapy including platinum based regimen has been a mainstay treatment modality of adjuvant treatment after complete resection. ADAURA study showed that among completely resected IB to IIIA NSCLC, disease‐free survival was significantly better in patients under adjuvant osimertinib than a placebo group. After the advent of a variety of new treatment regimens, such as third generation TKI and immunotherapy, the landscape of postoperative adjuvant treatment has been changing. In this review, we discuss some key issues regarding choice of adjuvant treatment after complete resection in NSCLC, and provide further updates on recent advances in treatment modalities.

Surgical or medical strategy for locally-advanced, stage IIIA/B-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: Reproducibility of decision-making at a multidisciplinary tumor board

BACKGROUND

Stage IIIA/B-N2 is a very heterogeneous group of patients and accounts for one third of NSCLC at diagnosis. The best treatment strategy is established at a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB): surgical resection with neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy versus definitive chemoradiation with immune checkpoint inhibitors consolidation. Despite the crucial role of MTBs in this complex setting, limited data is available regarding its performances and the reproducibility of the decision-making.

METHODS

Using a large cohort of IIIA/B-N2 NSCLC patients, we described patient's characteristics and treatment strategies established at the initial MTB: with a "surgical strategy" group, for potentially resectable disease, and a "medical strategy" group for non-resectable patients. A third group consisted of patients who were not eligible for surgery after neoadjuvant treatment and switched from the surgical to the medical strategy. We randomly selected 30 cases (10 in each of the 3 groups) for a blinded re-discussion at a fictive MTB and analyzed the reproducibility and factors associated with treatment decision.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven IIIA/B-N2 NSCLC patients were enrolled between June 2017 and December 2019. The initial MTB opted for a medical or a surgical strategy in 44% and 56% of patients respectively. We identified histology, tumor size and localization, extent of lymph node involvement and the presence of bulky mediastinal nodes as key decision-making factors. Thirteen patients were not eligible for surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy and switched for a medical strategy. Overall concordance between the initial decision and the re-discussion was 70%. The kappa correlation coefficient was 0.43. Concordance was higher for patients with limited mediastinal node invasion. Survival did not appear to be impacted by conflicting decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of treatment decision-making for stage IIIA/B-N2 NSCLC patients at a MTB is moderate but does not impact survival.

Texture features of primary tumor on 18F-FDG PET images in non-small cell lung cancer: The relationship between imaging and histopathological parameters

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to evaluate the relationships between textural features of the primary tumor on FDG PET images and clinical-histopathological parameters which are useful in predicting prognosis in newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

PET/CT images of ninety (90) patients with NSCLC prior to surgery were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had resectable tumors. From the images we acquired data related to metabolism (SUVmax, MTV, TLG) and texture features of primary tumors. Histopathological tumor types and subgroups, degree of Ki-67 expression and necrosis rates of the primary tumor, mediastinal lymph node (MLN) status and nodal stages were recorded.

RESULTS

Among the two histologic tumor types (adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) significant differences were present regarding metabolic parameters, Ki-67 index with higher values and kurtosis with lower values in the latter group. Textural heterogeneity was found to be higher in poorly differentiated tumors compared to moderately differentiated tumors in patients with adenocarcinoma. While Ki-67 index had significant correlations with metabolic parameters and kurtosis, tumor necrosis rate was only significantly correlated with textural features. By univariate and multivariate analyses of the imaging and histopathological factors examined, only gradient variance was significant predictive factor for the presence of MLN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Textural features had significant associations with histologic tumor types, degree of pathological differentiation, tumor proliferation and necrosis rates. Texture analysis has potential to differentiate tumor types and subtypes and to predict MLN metastasis in patients with NSCLC.

Major pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation in potentially resectable stage III non-small cell lung carcinoma

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of postoperative outcome and survival of locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) resections after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. Medical records of all patients with clinical stage III potentially resectable NSCLC initially treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation followed by major pulmonary resections were retrieved from the databases of four Israeli Medical Centers between 1999 to 2019. The 124 suitable patients included, 86 males (69.4%) and 38 females (30.6%), with an average age of 64.2 years (range 37-82) and an average hospital stay of 12.6 days (range 5-123). Complete resection was achieved in 92.7% of the patients, while complete pathologic response was achieved in 35.5%. The overall readmission rate was 16.1%. The overall 5-year survival rate was 47.9%. One patient (0.8%) had local recurrence. Postoperative complications were reported in 49.2% of the patients, mainly atrial fibrillation (15.9%) and pneumonia (13.7%), empyema (10.3%), and early bronchopleural fistula (7.3%). The early in-hospital mortality rate was 6.5%, and the 6-month mortality rate was 5.6%. Pre-neoadjuvant bulky mediastinal disease (lymph nodes > 20 mm) (p = 0.034), persistent postoperative N2 disease (p = 0.016), R1 resection (p = 0.027), preoperative N2 multistation disease (p = 0.053) and postoperative stage IIIA (p = 0.001) emerged as negative predictive factors for survival. Our findings demonstrate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation in locally advanced potentially resectable NSCLC, followed by major pulmonary resection, is a beneficial approach in selected cases.

Surgical mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Background

The current preferred approach for surgical mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma is video-assisted mediastinoscopy. An alternative technique in which lymph nodes are resected instead of biopsied is video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) that is suggested to be superior in detecting N2 disease. Yet, evidence is conflicting and furthermore limited by sample size. The objective was to compare mediastinal staging through VAMLA and video-assisted mediastinoscopy.

Methods

A single-center cohort study was conducted. All consecutive patients that underwent surgical mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma by VAMLA (2011 to 2018) were compared to historic video-assisted mediastinoscopy controls (2007 to 2011). Patients with negative surgical mediastinal staging underwent subsequent anatomical resection with systematic regional lymphadenectomy. Primary outcome was the sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting N2 disease.

Results

Two-hundred-sixty-nine video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomies and 118 video-assisted mediastinoscopies were performed. The prevalence of N2 disease was 20% and 26% respectively in the VAMLA and video-assisted mediastinoscopy group, while the rate of unforeseen pN2 resulting from lymph node dissection during anatomical resection was 4% and 11%, respectively. Invasive staging using VAMLA demonstrated superior sensitivity of 0.82 and a negative predictive value of 0.96 when compared to video-assisted mediastinoscopy (0.62 and 0.89, respectively), offering a 64% decrease in risk of unforeseen pN2 following anatomical resection. However, VAMLA is also associated with a 75% risk increase on complications (P=0.36).

Conclusions

We conclude that performing invasive mediastinal lymph node assessment for staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma, VAMLA should be the preferred technique with superior sensitivity and negative predictive value in detecting N2 disease. Though, VAMLA is also associated with an increased risk of complications.

Significantly favourable outcome for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer stage IIIA/IIIB and single-station persistent N2 (skip or additionally N1) disease after multimodality treatment

OBJECTIVES

Persistent lymph nodes infiltration after neoadjuvant treatment remains a controversial topic in the treatment of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to identify subgroups with persistent N2 disease, who could experience survival benefit from the addition of surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-institutional study was conducted to analyse all patients with a final histopathology of NSCLC and persistent mediastinal disease after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery from January 1998 to June 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients (93 men, 52 women) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median age was 60 years (range 38-78). A total of 82 (56.5%) patients received a lobectomy, 48 (33.1%) a pneumonectomy, 11 (7.6%) a bilobectomy and 4 (2.6%) an anatomical segmentectomy; 128 (88.3%) were completely resected (R0). Operative mortality was 2.6% (4 patients), and morbidity was 35.2% (51 patients). Overall survival at 5 years was 47.3% (n = 19) for single N2 (skip), 30.2% (n = 16) for single N2 and N1 lymph nodes and under 5% (n = 1) for multiple mediastinal stations disease. Overall survival at 5 years after lobectomy/bilobectomy was not statistically different than after pneumonectomy (33.5% vs 20.5%, P = 0.082). Disease-free survival at 5 years was 30.6% (n = 6) for ypN2a1, 23.4% (n = 7) for ypN2a2 and under 5% (n = 1) for ypN2b status.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobectomy or bilobectomy has to be taken into account as a potentially curative option with promising long-term results for patients after induction treatment and persistent single-station N2 involvement (skip or additionally N1 status).

TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

14-6138-BO.

Application of N Descriptors Proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer in Clinical Staging

Background Patients with N1 or N2 non-small cell lung cancer exhibit prognostic heterogeneity. To refine the current N staging system, new N stages were proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. However, those proposed new N stages have not been validated. Purpose To evaluate the prognostic performance of the proposed N descriptors for clinical staging. Materials and Methods Participants with non-small cell lung cancer without distant metastasis from January 2010 to December 2014 were retrospectively included. Each patient's clinical N (cN) stage was assigned to one of seven categories (cN0, cN1a, cN1b, cN2a1, cN2a2, cN2b, cN3). The 5-year overall survival rates were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% CIs were estimated by using a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Ad hoc analyses according to lymph node (LN) size were performed. Results A total of 1271 patients (median age, 66 years; interquartile range, 59-73 years; 812 men) were included. The 5-year overall survival rates were 77.3%, 53.7%, 36.0%, 29.2%, 34.4%, 18.0%, and 12.4% for stages cN0, cN1a, cN1b, cN2a1, cN2a2, cN2b, and cN3, respectively. Patients with cN2b disease had a worse prognosis than patients with cN2a disease (HR, 1.53; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.22; P = .02). There was no prognostic difference between cN1b and cN1a (HR, 1.13; 95% CI: 0.61, 2.09; P = .71); however, there was a difference between cN1 subgroups when stratified by LN size (≥2 cm; HR, 2.26; 95% CI: 1.16, 4.44; P = .02). Within cN2a disease, there were no differences between cN2a1 and cN2a2 (HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.61, 1.56; P = .93) or between subgroups according to LN size (HR, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.40, 1.37; P = .34). Conclusion A survival difference was observed between single- and multistation involvement among cN2 disease. The number of involved lymph node stations in patients with cN1 disease and the presence of skip metastasis in patients with cN2 disease were not associated with survival differences. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Oncological issues in staging mediastinal lymph node metastases in left lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to discuss the underlying oncological issues in staging of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with left lung cancer who underwent extended radical lymphadenectomy (ERL).

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective study analyzed 116 patients with left non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent bilateral paratracheal lymph node dissection (ERL) via median sternotomy. The clinicopathological records of patients with mediastinal lymph node metastasis were examined for prognostic factors, including age, sex, histology, tumor size, cN number, preoperative data, metastatic stations (number and distribution), pT, and adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Mediastinal lymph node metastases were found in 43 patients, and right paratracheal lymph node metastases (pN3) were found in 13 patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 25.2% in patients with pN3 tumors (n = 13) and 23.1% in patients with pN2 tumors (n = 30). The prognosis did not differ between patients with pN3 and pN2. Univariate analyses showed that histology, cN, and adjuvant chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors in patients with mediastinal lymph node metastasis. In these 43 patients, cN and adjuvant chemotherapy were significant independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic factors for left lung cancer with mediastinal lymph node metastasis were cN status and adjuvant chemotherapy, and not pN status (pN2 or pN3). We hope that the study results, which suggest that there may be no difference in prognosis between pN2 and pN3, would broaden the discussion of oncological issues in the staging of mediastinal lymph node metastasis of left lung cancer.

Texture features of primary tumor on 18F-FDG PET images in non-small cell lung cancer: The relationship between imaging and histopathological parameters

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to evaluate the relationships between textural features of the primary tumor on FDG PET images and clinical-histopathological parameters which are useful in predicting prognosis in newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PET/CT images of ninety (90) patients with NSCLC prior to surgery were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had resectable tumors. From the images we acquired data related to metabolism (SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume [MTV] and total lesion glycolysis [TLG]) and texture features of primary tumors. Histopathological tumor types and subgroups, degree of Ki-67 expression and necrosis rates of the primary tumor, mediastinal lymph node (MLN) status and nodal stages were recorded.

RESULTS

Among the 2histologic tumor types (adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) significant differences were present regarding metabolic parameters, Ki-67 index with higher values and kurtosis with lower values in the latter group. Textural heterogeneity was found to be higher in poorly differentiated tumors compared to moderately differentiated tumors in patients with adenocarcinoma. While Ki-67 index had significant correlations with metabolic parameters and kurtosis, tumor necrosis rate was only significantly correlated with textural features. By univariate and multivariate analyses of the imaging and histopathological factors examined, only gradient variance was significant predictive factor for the presence of MLN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Textural features had significant associations with histologic tumor types, degree of pathological differentiation, tumor proliferation and necrosis rates. Texture analysis has potential to differentiate tumor types and subtypes and to predict MLN metastasis in patients with NSCLC.

Mediastinal radiotherapy after adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non–small cell lung cancer with N2 lymphadenopathy: A novel meta-analysis

Introduction

Treatment for stage IIIA N2 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically involves a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, but the optimal sequencing is not determined. Local recurrence rates following surgery remain high, and the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in N2 disease is unclear. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether PORT provides additional survival advantage beyond observation for patients with stage IIIA N2 disease who have undergone complete surgical resection and received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

All studies comparing adjuvant chemotherapy and PORT versus adjuvant chemotherapy alone after curative surgical resection for stage IIIA N2 NSCLC were included. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects modelling in accordance with MOOSE (Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies) guidelines. Subgroup analysis, heterogeneity, and risk of bias were assessed, with meta-regression to determine the effects of patient and tumor characteristics on outcomes.

Results

Ten studies with a pooled dataset of 18,077 patients (5453 PORT, 12,624 no PORT) were included. PORT significantly improved both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.768; DFS: HR, 0.733), 3 years (OS: HR, 0.914; DFS: HR, 0.732), and 5 years (OS: HR, 0.898; DFS: HR, 0.735, all P < .0001). These effects were independent of specific patient or tumor characteristics.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a significant DFS and OS benefit from the addition of PORT following adjuvant chemotherapy. We advocate the consideration of PORT for such patients following specialist multidisciplinary assessment and comprehensive discussion of the benefits and risks of treatment.

Is Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy Always Mandatory in Patients with Resected N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

BACKGROUND

 In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the pathologic union for international cancer control (UICC) stage IIIA is a heterogeneous entity, with different forms of N2-lymph node involvement representing different prognoses. Although a multimodality treatment approach, including surgery, systemic therapy, and/or radiotherapy, is almost always recommended, in this retrospective observational study, we sought to determine whether long-term survival might be possible in selected patients who are treated with complete surgical resection alone.

METHODS

 Between 2013 and 2018, we retrospectively identified 24 patients with NSCLC (16 men and 8 women), who were found to have pathologic N2-lymph node involvement, and were treated with complete surgical lung resection and systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection but no neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

 The most frequent reason (n = 14) for forgoing adjuvant treatment was patient refusal. The mean overall survival (OS) was 34.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 15.5-53.5 months). The mean disease-free survival (DFS) was 18 months (IQR: 4.75-46.75 months). We identified five patients who survived at least 5 years without recurrence (21%). In each of these cases, the nodal metastases were restricted to a single level and no extracapsular lymph node involvement were detected. Additionally, worse DFS was associated with pT3/4 (vs. a lower T-stage), as well as microscopic lymphovascular invasion.

CONCLUSION

 Although the small sample size precludes any definitive conclusions, it was possible to demonstrate that long-term survival without neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment is possible in some patients if complete tumor and nodal resection is performed.

Clinical impact of the tumor immune microenvironment in completely resected stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer based on an immunoscore approach

Background:

Completely resected stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises a heterogeneous population according to discrepancies in survival prognosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are clinically significant, despite a lack of consensus regarding the immunoscore (IS) in NSCLC. Here, we determined the prognostic value of the immune microenvironment as an IS in a uniform cohort of patients with completely resected stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC.

Methods:

Consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC and who underwent complete resection (2005–2012) were retrospectively reviewed. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from surgical paraffin-embedded primary lung tumor specimen. For each case, two representative regions from the tumor center (CT) and two from the invasive margin (IM) containing the highest density of lymphocytes were selected. Densities of CD3+, CD45RO+, and CD8+ lymphocytes were assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) by specialized pathologists according to predefined scoring scales. Patients were classified according to IS definition based on TIL type, density, and distribution, and relationships between IS and prognosis were evaluated.

Results:

Patients (N = 288) with complete IHC-based TMA spots were included. Univariate analyses showed that CD3+ T cell density was associated with neither overall survival (OS) nor distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), whereas CD45RO+ T cell density in the IM was a significant prognostic factor for DMFS (p = 0.02) and was predictive of OS (p = 0.05). Combined CD45RO+ and CD8+ cell infiltration in tumor regions (CT and IM) significantly improved IS prognostic impact. Multivariate analyses revealed IS as an independent prognostic predictor for both DMFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.002).

Conclusion:

The proposed IS might provide valuable prognostic information, including prediction of DMFS and OS in stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC patients. Larger patient cohorts are needed to validate this IS classification, which might assist with accurate risk stratification and treatment decisions.

Prognostic factors in potentially resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant treatment-a narrative review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in worldwide. The most important treatment for patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgery. Resected stage II and III NSCLC patients should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy and in patients with resected stage IB disease and with a primary tumor >4 cm this treatment could be considered. The treatment of resectable locally advanced NSCLC should be evaluated within an experienced multidisciplinary team. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be considered in patients with resectable disease and clear candidates for complementary chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has similar impact on overall survival (OS) than adjuvant chemotherapy, however postoperative chemotherapy has more evidence-based support. Immunotherapy is being studied in early and locally advanced NSCLC as a neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Different prognostic factors have been described in patients with stage III who have received neoadjuvant treatment, which we intend to review in this article.

Which N Descriptor Is More Predictive of Prognosis in Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The Number of Involved Nodal Stations or the Location-Based Pathological N Stage?

BACKGROUND

The eighth edition of nodal classification for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is defined only by the anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes.

RESEARCH QUESTION

We sought to evaluate the prognostic significance and discriminatory capability of the number of involved nodal stations (nS) in a large Chinese cohort.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 4,011 patients with NSCLC undergoing surgical resection between 2009 and 2013 were identified. The optimal cutoff values for nS classification were determined with X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox analysis were used to examine the prognostic performance of nS classification in comparison with location-based N classification. A decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the standardized net benefit of nS classification in predicting prognosis.

RESULTS

All the patients were classified into four prognostically different subgroups according to the number of involved nodal stations: (1) nS0 (none positive), (2) nS1 (one involved station), (3) nS2 (two involved stations), and (4) nS ≥ 3 (three or more involved stations). The prognoses among all the neighboring categories of nS classification were statistically significantly different in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival. The multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that nS was an independent prognostic factor of disease-free survival and overall survival. Patients with N1 or N2 stage disease could be divided into three prognostically different subgroups according to nS classification. However, the prognosis was similar between the N1 and N2 subgroups when patients were staged in the same nS category. The decision curve analysis showed that nS classification tended to have a higher predictive capability than location-based N classification.

INTERPRETATION

The nS classification could be used to provide a more accurate prognosis for patients with resected NSCLC. The nS is worth taking into consideration when defining nodal category in the forthcoming ninth edition of the staging system.

Local failure patterns after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pN2 nonsmall-cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

Background

The patterns of local failure in stage pN2 nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy are controversial.

Methods

The sites of local failure were compared in subgroups of patients with relevant clinicopathologic features (e.g., location and size of primary lesions).

Results

Totally 75 patients with local failure after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pN2 NSCLC were included in the analysis. Thirty-seven (49.3%) patients had distant metastasis. The median duration from surgical resection to local failure was 11 months (range: 3-45 months). Sites with ≥10% failure rate in all subgroups based on the location of the primary lesions included 4R, 7, the ipsilateral hilum, and the stump. Additional sites with ≥10% failure rate included 2R, 2L, 4L, and 5 for lesions in the left upper lobe; 4L and 5 for lesions in the left lower lobe; and 2R and 3P for lesions in the right upper-middle lobe. Squamous cell carcinoma affected the stump failure rate compared to adenocarcinoma (56.3% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.003). Tumor diameter ≥5 cm affected the stump failure rate compared to tumor diameter < 5 cm (44.0% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.016). Skip N2 metastasis affected the ipsilateral hilum failure rate compared to nonskip N2 metastasis (7.5% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.008).

Conclusions

For pN2 NSCLC patients undergoing radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, different lung lobes had different high-risk failure sites. Left lung cancer is prone to bilateral mediastinal lymph nodes recurrence, while right lung cancer mainly recurs with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes. Moreover, the local failure patterns are influenced by pathological type, tumor size, and skip N2 metastasis.

Adjuvant therapy following induction therapy and surgery improves survival in N2-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment strategies and factors influencing overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in resectable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mediastinal (N2) lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

All patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC with N2 disease between 2006 and 2016 were included. Treatment approaches included surgery only, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery, surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, and neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy (triple therapy). Patient clinical and pathologic data were retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients were included in the study. In total, 209 patients had neoadjuvant therapy, 47.4% of which went on to received additional adjuvant therapy. The pathologic complete response rate was 12.9%. The treatment strategy which included triple therapy was isolated as a significant contributor to improved OS and DFS. Nodal downstaging (N0) after induction therapy conferred an OS benefit (38.3% vs. 15.6%, p = .03). Patients with single-station N2 disease experienced higher DFS. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy completion rates were higher at the end of the study period compared to the beginning (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo neoadjuvant therapy for N2-positive NSCLC may benefit from additional adjuvant therapy. Single-station N2 disease confers higher DFS. VATS completion rates for lobectomy increase as experience increases.

Advances in the Treatment of Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) traditionally has involved combinations of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical resection. Although the multimodality approach remains standard, only a fraction of patients with stage III lung cancer can undergo complete resection, and long-term prognosis remains poor. The PACIFIC trial generated significant enthusiasm when it demonstrated that the programmed death ligand-1 inhibitor, durvalumab, improved survival in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC after completion of definitive concurrent chemoradiation. This article reviews the indications for traditional therapies in stage III NSCLC and highlights ongoing advances that have led to the incorporation of novel therapeutic agents.

The changing landscape of stage III lung cancer: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains challenging and associated with overall poor outcomes. Since seminal studies in the early 90s introduced concurrent chemo-radiotherapy as standard of care for treatment of this disease, no major advances have been introduced in this landscape. Both radiation dose escalation and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy strategies were unsuccessful to improve the survival over standard of care radiation dose and chemotherapy schedule: five-year overall survival (OS) ranging from 15-20%. However, in 2017 the PACIFIC Trial demonstrated that the addition of consolidative immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab for 1 year led to superior progression-free survival (PFS) and 3-year overall survival with no significant increase in toxicity compared to placebo in patients who achieved disease control with concurrent chemo-RT.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the treatment evolution of stage III NSCLC over the past decades, discusses current standard of care strategies, and highlights potential future directions for the management of this condition.

EXPERT OPINION

Ongoing trials incorporating upfront checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy will answer whether adding checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy or substituting them for chemotherapy altogether will improve long-term outcome.

Analysis of clinical features and prognostic factors of lung cancer patients: A population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This paper analyses clinical features of lung cancer patients and discusses factors influencing the lung cancer occurrence and prognosis.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with lung cancer from 1975 to 2016 are analysed based on SEER database. The samples are divided into groups according to the number of positive lymph nodes of LN > 3 and LN ≤ 3. Univariate and multivariate Cox risk models are performed. After balancing the clinicopathological features of the two groups with the propensity score matching (PSM) method, the survival rates of the two groups are compared.

RESULTS

A total of 30 864 patients are included in this study. Kaplan-Meier curves show that the survival rate of patients with LN ≤ 3 is higher than that of patients with LN > 3 (P < 0.0001). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional risk model analysis suggests that the number of lymph nodes is an independent prognostic risk factor for lung cancer. LN ≤ 3 group shows better OS (HR2.066; 95% CI 1.941-2.199, P < 0.01) and better CSS (HR 2.461; 95% CI 2.304-2.629, P < 0.01). In addition, age at diagnosis, gender, Laterality, Derived AJCC T, 7th ed (2010-2015), Derived AJCC N, 7th ed (2010-2015) and Derived AJCC M, 7th ed, (2010-2015) have also been proved to be potential prognostic factors. A total of 1,851 pairs of patients are screened after 1:1 PSM matching. Patients with LN ≤ 3 have significant improvements in OS and CSS (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.001-1.187, P < 0.05 and HR 1.127; 95% CI 1.03-1.232, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The number of lymph nodes is an independent prognostic risk factor for lung cancer. Patients with fewer lymph node positives have a better survival prognosis than patients with more lymph nodes.

Resectable IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): In Search for the Proper Treatment

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer accounts for one third of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the time of initial diagnosis and presents with a wide range of clinical and pathological heterogeneity. To date, the combined multimodality approach involving both local and systemic control is the gold standard for these patients, since occult distant micrometastatic disease should always be suspected. With the rapid increase in treatment options, the need for an interdisciplinary discussion involving oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists and radiologists has become essential. Surgery should be recommended to patients with non-bulky, discrete, or single-level N2 involvement and be included in the multimodality treatment. Resectable stage IIIA patients have been the subject of a number of clinical trials and retrospective analysis, discussing the efficiency and survival benefits on patients treated with the available therapeutic approaches. However, most of them have some limitations due to their retrospective nature, lack of exact pretreatment staging, and the involvement of heterogeneous populations leading to the awareness that each patient should undergo a tailored therapy in light of the nature of his tumor, its extension and his performance status.

Chemoradiotherapy efficacy is predicted by intra-tumour CD8+/FoxP3+ double positive T cell density in locally advanced N2 non-small-cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy is a standard of care for locally advanced stage III N2 non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) combined with surgery/chemotherapy. Radiotherapy is hypothesised to induce tumour immunogenic cell death, to release neoantigen resulting in intra-tumoural immune infiltration and abscopal effect. Conversely, it has not been demonstrated if immune cells are necessary to drive radiotherapy efficacy and predict patient's survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed tumour samples and clinical data from 113 patients, 89 resected (PORT) and 24 non-resected (DRC) N2-NSCLC treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (same radiotherapy department from 2002 to 2015). The immune environment was characterised with in situ multiplex staining (CD8, FoxP3, PD-L1 and cytokeratin) and correlated with clinical data and survival.

RESULTS

High density of CD8+ T cells was associated with OS (p = 0.04, HR = 1.93 [0.99-3.78]) and DFS (p = 0.003, HR = 2.42 [1.31-4.47]) in the PORT. High density of CD8+/FoxP3+ double positive cells was associated with OS (p = 0.01, HR = 1.97 [1.11-3.48]) in the whole population, with OS (p = 0.05, HR = 1.92 [0.98-3.74]) and PFS (p = 0.03, HR = 1.83 [1.03-3.23]) in the PORT without reaching significance for the DRC. Intermediate PD-L1 expression in tumour cells (TPS = 1-49%) was associated with a higher survival in the PORT.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-tumoural CD8+ T cell and particularly CD8+/FoxP3+ double positive T cell densities predict survival in stage III N2-NSCLC suggesting the need for a pre-existing intra-tumour immunity to mediate the action of radiotherapy. Density of CD8+/FoxP3+ cells was the best predictor of patient's survival in multivariate analysis and could represent a biomarker of radiotherapy efficacy.

Prognostic impact of the number of involved lymph node stations in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer: a proposal for future revisions of the N classification

OBJECTIVE

The current nodal staging for lung cancer is defined only by the anatomical site of metastasis. However, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) proposed further subdivisions of the N descriptor that considers the locations and numbers of involved lymph node stations. This study aimed to test the new IASLC categories and compare their prognostic abilities to those of our proposed model that considers only the number of involved lymph node stations instead of the sites of metastasis.

METHODS

Between September 2002 and December 2016, 1581 patients who underwent complete resection for pathologically diagnosed Tis-4N0-2M0 non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated the survival rates according to the patients' N classification as recently proposed by the IASLC and by the number of involved lymph node stations, and determined the optimal N classification.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rates for patients with IASLC stages N1a, N1b, N2a1, N2a2, and N2b were 71.5%, 49.9%, 73.7%, 62.1%, and 46.9%, respectively. These results showed relatively good categorizations; however, some prognostic overlaps existed and not all differences were significant. After redefining the number of involved stations as Nα for 1, Nβ for 2-3, and Nγ for ≥ 4 without considering the metastasis sites, the 5-year survival rates for patients in these categories were 72.1%, 58.3%, and 29.6%, respectively; the differences between them were significant.

CONCLUSION

The number of involved lymph node stations is a more accurate prognostic indicator in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer.

A Novel Nomogram including AJCC Stages Could Better Predict Survival for NSCLC Patients Who Underwent Surgery: A Large Population-Based Study

Objective

In this study, we aimed to establish a novel nomogram model which was better than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage to predict survival for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent surgery. Patients and Methods. 19617 patients with initially diagnosed NSCLC were screened from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. These patients were randomly divided into two groups including the training cohort and the validation cohort. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the influence of different variables on overall survival (OS). Then, using R software version 3.4.3, we constructed a nomogram and a risk classification system combined with some clinical parameters. We visualized the regression equation by nomogram after obtaining the regression coefficient in multivariate analysis. The concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve were used to perform the validation of nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the clinical utility of the nomogram.

Results

Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that seven factors including age, sex, stage, histology, surgery, and positive lymph nodes (all, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of OS. Among them, stage (C-index = 0.615), positive lymph nodes (C-index = 0.574), histology (C-index = 0.566), age (C-index = 0.563), and sex (C-index = 0.562) had a relatively strong ability to predict the OS. Based on these factors, we established and validated the predictive model by nomogram. The calibration curves showed good consistency between the actual OS and predicted OS. And the decision curves showed great clinical usefulness of the nomogram. Then, we built a risk classification system and divided NSCLC patients into two groups including high-risk group and low-risk group. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that OS in the two groups was accurately differentiated in the training cohort (P < 0.001). And then, we validated this result in the validation cohort which also showed that patients in the high-risk group had worse survival than those in the low-risk group.

Conclusion

The results proved that the nomogram model had better performance to predict survival for NSCLC patients who underwent surgery than AJCC stage. These tools may be helpful for clinicians to evaluate prognostic indicators of patients undergoing operation.

Risk factors of brain metastases as initial failure in completely resected stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer

Background

This study aimed to identify the risk factors of brain metastases (BM) as the initial site of failure in patients with completely resected stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

From January 2005 and June 2012, the clinical data of 357 patients with completely resected stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC were reviewed in this study. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to identify the incidence of BM as the initial site of failure and survival. To assess the risk factors of BM, the log-rank test and Cox regression were used for univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, separately.

Result

Seventy-three (20.4%) patients developed BM; 60 patients had BM as their initial site of failure. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year risk for patients developing BM as the initial site of failure was 9.1%, 27.4% and 35.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed adenocarcinoma histology (P=0.000), number of regional LN >4 (P=0.018), multiple N2 stations (P=0.027), multiple region of LN involvement (P=0.010) were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing BM as the initial site of failure. Multivariate analysis showed adenocarcinoma (P=0.001; HR =0.150; 95% CI, 0.047–0.479), multiple regions of LN involvement (P=0.015; HR =2.010; 95% CI, 1.146–3.524) were significantly associated with the high risk of developing BM as the initial site of failure. In patients with adenocarcinoma and multiple regions of LN involvement, the 5-year actuarial risk of BM as the initial failure was 47.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Adenocarcinoma and multiple regions of LN involvement were independent risk factors for BM as the initial failure in completely resected stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC. Prospective clinical trials are needed to verify the effect of PCI in the highest-risk subset we identified.

Trimodality Therapy in the Treatment of Stage III N2-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Significant controversy remains regarding the care of patients with clinical stage III (N2-positive) NSCLC. Although multimodality therapy is effective, the roles of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are not fully defined and the optimal treatment approach is not firmly established. We analyzed outcomes and predictors associated with trimodality therapy (TT) in the National Cancer Database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The NCDB was queried from 2004 to 2014 for patients with NSCLC diagnosed with stage III (N2) disease and treated with chemotherapy and radiation (CRT). Three cohorts of patients were studied: CRT only/no surgery (NS), CRT plus lobectomy (LT), and CRT plus pneumonectomy (PT). The univariate and multivariable analyses (MVA) were conducted using Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 29,754 patients were included in this analysis: NS 90.1%, LT 8.4%, and PT 1.5%. Patient characteristics: median age 66 years; male 56% and white 85%. Patients treated at academic centers were more likely to receive TT compared with those treated at community centers (odds ratio: 1.85 [1.53-2.23]; p < .001). On MVA, patients that received TT were associated with better survival than those that received only CRT (hazard ratio: 0.59 [0.55-0.62]; p < .001). The LT group was associated with significantly better survival than the PT and NS groups (median survival: 62.8 months vs. 51.8 months vs. 34.2 months, respectively). In patients with more than two nodes involved, PT was associated with worse survival than LT and NS (median survival: 51.4 months in LT and 39 months in NS vs. 37 months in PT). The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were found to be significantly higher in PT patients than in LT.

CONCLUSION

TT was used in less than 10% of patients with stage III N2 disease, suggesting high degree of patient selection. In this selected group, TT was associated with favorable outcomes relative to CRT alone.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This analysis demonstrates that trimodality therapy could benefit a selected subset of patients with stage III (N2) disease. This plan should be considered as a treatment option following patient evaluation in a multidisciplinary setting in experienced medical centers with the needed expertise.

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Resected Stage IIIA-N2 Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Time-Trend Study

INTRODUCTION

The value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for resected stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial with few studies focusing on whether PORT always plays a part in clinical practice and generates benefits to patients across different time periods. We investigated this issue using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database (SEER) and assessed the temporal trends spanning 27 years.

METHODS

Within SEER, we selected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients who underwent a lobectomy or pneumonectomy and coded as receiving PORT or never receiving radiotherapy over three time periods: 1988 to 1996, 1997 to 2005, 2006 to 2014. For each period, survival analyses were performed and propensity score matching (PSM) was used in the potentially beneficial subgroup.

RESULTS

45.4% of 5568 eligible patients received PORT. The yearly PORT use rates varied largely from 27.8% to 74.4%. Overall survival (OS) was distinctly improved over the period. The application of PORT had a significant impact on survival only in period 1 and 3. In subgroup analysis, the OS benefit of PORT was significant in each period in patients with 50% or more lymph node ratio (LNR) both before (hazard ratios, and P values of 0.647, P = .002; 0.804, P = .008; 0.721, P < .001 for period 1, 2, 3, respectively) and after PSM (0.642, P = .006; 0.785, P = .004; 0.748, P = .003 for period 1, 2, 3, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of PORT are lasting and stable throughout the years in patients with LNR of 50% or more. This might provide a clue on proper patient selection for PORT application.

Recommended Change in the N Descriptor Proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer: A Validation Study

INTRODUCTION

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recently proposed a new N descriptor by combining the location of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs), nN (single-station versus multiple-station), and absence versus presence of skip metastasis as pN1a, pN1b, pN2a1, pN2a2 and pN2b. This study aimed to evaluate the discriminatory ability and prognostic performance of the proposed N descriptor in a large independent NSCLC cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed 1228 patients who underwent major pulmonary resection for pathological N1 or N2 NSCLC between 2004 and 2014. Survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model was performed to assess the prognostic significance of the N descriptor.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2014, a total of 7437 patients were operated on for NSCLC. Patients pathologically confirmed as having N1 (n = 732) or N2 (n = 496) disease after surgery were included. The median total number of dissected LNs was 24 (range 10-83), and the median number of involved LNs was 2 (range 1-40). The 5-year overall survival rates were 62.6%, 57.0%, 64.7%, 48.4%, and 42.8% for stages N1a, N1b, N2a1, N2a2, and N2b, respectively. Analysis of overall and recurrence-free survival revealed that N2a1 is not sufficiently distinguished from N1a and N1b. In terms of overall survival, N1b is not sufficiently distinguished from N2a2.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the N descriptor proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, some of the prognostic implications of the five groups overlapped. It would be better to classify similar prognostic groups into three or four groups to divide the group. A large-scale prospective study is needed to validate these N descriptors.

Single-station skip-N2 disease: good prognosis in resected non-small-cell lung cancer (long-term results in skip-N2 disease)

OBJECTIVES

Pathological N2 (pN2) involvement has a negative impact on prognosis in patients operated on due to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). pN2 disease may cause skip (pN0N2) or non-skip (pN1N2) metastases with pathological N1 (pN1) involvement. The effect of pN2 subgroups on prognosis is still controversial. We analysed the effect of pN1 disease and single-station pN2 disease subgroups on survival outcomes.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent anatomical lung resection due to NSCLC at a single centre between January 2007 and January 2017 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Operative mortality, sublobar resection, Stage IV disease, incomplete resection and carcinoid tumour were considered exclusion criteria. After histopathological examination, the prognosis of patients with pN1, pN0N2 and pN1N2 was compared statistically. Univariable and multivariable analyses were made to define independent risk factors for overall survival rates.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time for 358 patients with 228 pN1 disease (63.7%), 59 pN0N2 disease (16.5%) and 71 pN1N2 disease (19.8%) was 40.4 ± 30.4 months. Median and 5-year overall survival rates for pN1, pN0N2 and pN1N2 diseases were 73.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 55.5-91.7] and 54.1%, 60.3 months (95% CI 26.8-93.8) and 51.2%, 20.8 months (95% CI 16.1-25.5) and 21.5%, respectively. The survival CIs of pN1 and pN0N2 diseases were similar, and the survival rates of these 2 groups were significantly better than those with pN1N2 (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively). In multivariable analysis, patients over the age of 60 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.13, P < 0.001], patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (HR 1.52, P = 0.01) and patients with pN1N2 disease (HR 2.91, P < 0.001) had a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age, not receiving adjuvant therapy and having pN1N2 disease are negative prognostic factors in patients with nodal involvement who underwent curative resection due to NSCLC. The overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates of pN1 disease and single-station pN0N2 disease are similar, and they have significantly better survival rates than pN1N2 disease. Based on these results, surgical treatment may be considered an appropriate choice in patients with histopathologically diagnosed single-station skip-N2 disease.

Interdisciplinary multimodality management of stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer

Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises about one-third of NSCLC patients and is very heterogeneous with varying and mostly poor prognosis. It is also called "locoregionally or locally advanced disease". Due to its heterogeneity a general schematic management approach is not appropriate. Usually a combination of local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy, depending on functional, technical and oncological operability) with systemic platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and, recently, followed by immune therapy is used. A more aggressive approach of triple agent chemotherapy or two local therapies (surgery and radiotherapy, except for specific indications) has no benefit for overall survival. Until now tumour stage and the general condition of the patient are the most relevant prognostic factors. Characterising the tumour molecularly and immunologically may lead to a more personalised and effective approach. At the moment, after an exact staging and functional evaluation, an interdisciplinary discussion amongst the tumour board is warranted and offers the best management strategy.