1
|
Corsini C, Bergengren O, Carlsson S, Garmo H, Hjelm-Eriksson M, Fransson P, Kindblom J, Robinson D, Westerberg M, Stattin P, Carlsson SV. Patient-reported Side Effects 1 Year After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Register-based Nationwide Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:605-613. [PMID: 38233329 PMCID: PMC11102330 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on functional and psychological side effects following curative treatment for prostate cancer are lacking from large, contemporary, unselected, population-based cohorts. OBJECTIVE To assess urinary symptoms, bowel disturbances, erectile dysfunction (ED), and quality of life (QoL) 12 mo after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and radiotherapy (RT) using patient-reported outcome measures in the Swedish prostate cancer database. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a nationwide, population-based, cohort study in Sweden of men who underwent primary RARP or RT between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Absolute proportions and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression, with adjustment for clinical characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 2557 men underwent RARP and 1741 received RT. Men who underwent RT were older (69 vs 65 yr) and had more comorbidities at baseline. After RARP, 13% of men experienced incontinence, compared to 6% after RT. The frequency of urinary bother was similar, at 18% after RARP and 18% after RT. Urgency to defecate was reported by 14% of men after RARP and 34% after RT. At 1 yr, 73% of men had ED after RARP, and 77% after RT. High QoL was reported by 85% of men after RARP and 78% of men after RT. On multivariable regression analysis, RT was associated with lower risks of urinary incontinence (OR 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.33), urinary bother (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95), and ED (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46-0.65), but higher risk of bowel symptoms (OR 2.86, 95% CI 2.42-3.39). QoL was higher after RARP than after RT (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.12-1.61). CONCLUSIONS Short-term specific side effects after curative treatment for prostate cancer significantly differed between RARP and RT in this large and unselected cohort. Nevertheless, the risk of urinary bother was lower after RT, while higher QoL was common after RARP. PATIENT SUMMARY In our study of patients treated for prostate cancer, urinary bother and overall quality of life are comparable at 1 year after surgical removal of the prostate in comparison to radiotherapy, despite substantial differences in other side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Corsini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Oskar Bergengren
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Stefan Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Hans Garmo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Per Fransson
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Cancercentrum, Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jon Kindblom
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - David Robinson
- Department of Urology, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Marcus Westerberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Pär Stattin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Urological Cancers, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alberti A, Nicoletti R, Castellani D, Yuan Y, Maggi M, Dibilio E, Resta GR, Makrides P, Sessa F, Sebastianelli A, Serni S, Gacci M, De Nunzio C, Teoh JYC, Campi R. Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Experience Measures After Active Surveillance Versus Radiation Therapy Versus Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Prospective Comparative Studies. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00138-X. [PMID: 38816298 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Current management options for localized prostate cancer (PCa) include radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), and active surveillance (AS). Despite comparable oncological outcomes, there is still lack of evidence on their comparative effectiveness in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing PROMs and PREMs after all recommended management options for localized PCa (RP, RT, AS). METHODS A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases in accordance with recommendations from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Office and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. All prospective clinical trials reporting PROMs and/or PREMs for comparisons of RP versus RT versus AS were included. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize the review findings. No quantitative synthesis was performed because of the heterogeneity and limitations of the studies available. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Our findings reveal that RP mostly affects urinary continence and sexual function, with better results for voiding symptoms in comparison to other treatments. RT was associated with greater impairment of bowel function and voiding symptoms. None of the treatments had a significant impact on mental or physical quality of life. Only a few studies reported PREMs, with a high rate of decision regret for all modalities (up to 23%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS All recommended treatments for localized PCa have an impact on PROMs and PREMs, but for different domains and with differing severity. We found significant heterogeneity in PROM collection, so standardization in real-world practice and clinical trials is warranted. Only a few studies have reported PREMs, highlighting an unmet need that should be explored in future studies. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed differences in patient reports of their outcomes and experiences after surgical prostate removal, radiotherapy, or active surveillance for prostate cancer. We found differences in the effects on urinary, bowel, and sexual functions among the treatments, but no difference for mental or physical quality of life. Our results can help doctors and prostate cancer patients in shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Alberti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Dibilio
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Raffaele Resta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pantelis Makrides
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Arcangelo Sebastianelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith WJ, VanDyke ME, Venishetty N, Langford BT, Franzen BP, Morey AF. Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success. Res Rep Urol 2023; 15:217-232. [PMID: 37366389 PMCID: PMC10290851 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s395359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has detrimental and long-lasting effects on patients. Management of this condition is an evolving field with multiple options for surgical treatment. We sought to review the pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative considerations, post-operative care, and future directions for treatment of male SUI. Methods A literature review was performed using the PubMed platform to identify peer-reviewed, English-language articles published within the last 5 years pertaining to management of male stress urinary incontinence with an emphasis on devices currently on the market in the United States including the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), male urethral slings, and the ProACTTM system. Patient selection criteria, success rates, and complications were compared between the studies. Results Twenty articles were included in the final contemporary review. Pre-operative workup most commonly included demonstration of incontinence, PPD, and cystoscopy. Definition of success varied by study; the most common definition used was social continence (0-1 pads per day). Reported rates of success were higher for the AUS than for male urethral slings (73-93% vs 70-90%, respectively). Complications for these procedures include urinary retention, erosions, infections, and device malfunction. Newer treatment options including adjustable balloon systems and adjustable slings show promise but lack long-term follow-up. Conclusion Patient selection remains the primary consideration for surgical decision-making for management of male SUI. The AUS continues to be the gold standard for moderate-to-severe male SUI but comes with inherent risk of need for revision. Male slings may be a superior option for appropriately selected men with mild incontinence but are inferior to the AUS for moderate and severe incontinence. Ongoing research will shed light on long-term results for newer options such as the ProACT and REMEEX systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley J Smith
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Maia E VanDyke
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Nikit Venishetty
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brian T Langford
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Bryce P Franzen
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Allen F Morey
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hale GR, Shahait M, Lee DI, Lee DJ, Dobbs RW. Measuring Quality of Life Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:1373-1382. [PMID: 34188454 PMCID: PMC8236265 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s271447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) represents the most common solid organ malignancy in men. Fortunately, at the time of diagnosis, the majority of cases are staged as localized or regional disease, conferring excellent 5- and 10-year cure rates. There are several first line treatment options including surgical approaches such as robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and radiation therapy (RT) available to patients with localized disease that offer similar PCa oncologic outcomes but are associated with potentially significant side effects which may impact health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains. Recently, clinicians and investigators have sought to better understand these changes in HRQOL metrics with the utilization of patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Given that RARP represents the most common surgical treatment for PCa in the United States, there has been a particular interest in assessing these outcomes derived by patient perspectives to more fully appreciate treatment-related impact on quality of life following RARP. OBJECTIVE This narrative review sought to explore the instruments available to measure quality of life after RARP, a review of the PRO data after RARP, and future directions for assessing and improving quality of life outcomes following this surgery. CLINICAL USE There are several treatment options for men diagnosed with local and regional prostate cancer with similar oncologic outcomes but differing patterns of side effects affecting post-treatment quality of life. Understanding data reported directly by patients following RARP about their side effects and quality of life gives providers additional information for appropriate preoperative counseling for patients choosing between treatment options for their prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham R Hale
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mohammed Shahait
- Department of Urology, King Hussein Cancer Foundation and Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - David I Lee
- Department of Urology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Daniel J Lee
- Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryan W Dobbs
- Division of Urology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mishra SC. A discussion on controversies and ethical dilemmas in prostate cancer screening. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2020; 47:medethics-2019-105979. [PMID: 32631969 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the the most common cancers in men. A blood test called prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has a potential to pick up this cancer very early and is used for screening of this disease. However, screening for prostate cancer is a matter of debate. Level 1 evidence from randomised controlled trials suggests a reduction in cancer-specific mortality from PCa screening. However, there could be an associated impact on quality of life due to a high proportion of overdiagnosis and overtreatment as part of the screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) in 2012 recommended that PSA-based PCa screening should not to be offered at any age. However, considering the current evidence, USPSTF recently revised its recommendation to offer the PSA test to men aged 55-69 years with shared decision-making, in line with earlier guidelines from the American Cancer Society and the American Urological Association. A shared decision making is necessary since the PSA test could potentially harm an individual. However, the literature suggests that clinicians often neglect a discussion on this issue before ordering the test. This narrative discusses the main controversies regarding PCa screening including the PSA threshold for biopsy, the concept of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, the practical difficulties of active surveillance, the current level 1 evidence on the mortality benefit of screening, and the associated pitfalls. It offers a detailed discussion on the ethics involved in the PSA test and highlights the barriers to shared decision-making and possible solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satish Chandra Mishra
- Department of Surgery, WHO Collaboration Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMIC, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Hospital, Mumbai, MH 400094, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ten Ham RMT, Broering JM, Cooperberg MR, Carroll P, Wilson LS. Understanding the Major Factors Affecting Response Shift Effects on Health-Related Quality of Life: What the Then-Test Measures in a Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Registry. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 18:e21-e27. [PMID: 31796344 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatments provide high survival rates, with patients often surviving a decade or longer after treatment. Therefore, treatment options are progressively based on quality of life. The objective of this research was to investigate magnitude of response shift (RS) in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) responses in men with clinically localized PCa using a generic questionnaire and a disease-specific questionnaire in an observational longitudinal patient registry study. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cohort study was conducted using the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) database. Patients were annually surveyed using the Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (PCI) HRQOL measures. A total of 3161 active patients were eligible for a one-off supplemental study asking retrospective HRQOL scores (then-test). We calculated RS, observed change, and RS adjusted change. Statistical difference was determined by t test. RESULTS Patients consistently reported higher recalled pretreatment HRQOL compared to baseline scores for SF-36 and PCI, confirming the existence of a RS (P < .05). On average, PCI demonstrated larger RS by a factor of 2 than SF-36. More specific, RS was greater especially in SF-36 physical domains compared to mental health items. PCI measured PCa-specific physical adverse effects only. Patients whose cancer had recurred reported slightly lower SF-36 RS than those whose cancer had not recurred. CONCLUSION RS occurrence was measured in both the disease-specific questionnaire and the generic HRQOL questionnaire, demonstrating continued low health and symptom scores after RS adjustment. Therefore, health professionals should adjust for this phenomenon when assessing patient's HRQOL treatment responses, and clinicians should address their continued sexual and urinary functional loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renske M T Ten Ham
- Health Policy and Economics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jeanette M Broering
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter Carroll
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Leslie S Wilson
- Health Policy and Economics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sibert NT, Dieng S, Oesterle A, Feick G, Carl G, Steiner T, Minner J, Roghmann F, Kaftan B, Zengerling F, Hinkel A, Beyer B, Heidenreich A, Harke N, Brehmer B, Pfitzenmaier J, Fichtner J, Neisius A, Hammerer P, Wesselmann S, Kowalski C. Psychometric validation of the German version of the EPIC-26 questionnaire for patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. World J Urol 2019; 39:11-25. [PMID: 31552467 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02949-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE For patients with prostate cancer, validated and reliable instruments are essential for measuring patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to validate the German version of the widely established Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite with 26 items (EPIC-26). METHODS A German translation of the original questionnaire was tested in 3094 patients with localized or locally advanced (any T, any N and M0) prostate cancer with treatment intent (including radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, active surveillance, watchful waiting). They completed the EPIC-26 questionnaire before treatment. A total of 521 of them also completed a questionnaire 12 months afterward. Internal consistency, sensitivity to change, and construct validity were assessed. RESULTS The internal consistency of all domains was sufficient (Cronbach's alpha between 0.64 and 0.93). Item-to-scale correlation coefficients showed acceptable associations between items and their domain score (all > 0.30), with the lowest scores for "bloody stools" (r = 0.37) and "breast problems" (r = 0.32). Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis confirmed the five-dimension structure of the EPIC-26 (comparative fit index 0.95). CONCLUSIONS Psychometric evaluation suggests that the German version of the EPIC-26 is a well-constructed instrument for measuring patient-reported health-related symptoms in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Tabea Sibert
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Strasse 8, Berlin, 14057, Germany.
| | | | | | - Günter Feick
- Federal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Bonn, Germany
| | - Günther Carl
- Help for Prostate Cancer Patients (Förderverein Hilfe bei Prostatakrebs e.V.-FHbP), Tornesch, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Minner
- Hegau-Bodensee-Klinikum Singen, Singen, Germany
| | | | - Björn Kaftan
- Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Burkhard Beyer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Nina Harke
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Fichtner
- Johanniter Krankenhaus Oberhausen, Oberhausen, Germany
| | | | | | - Simone Wesselmann
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Strasse 8, Berlin, 14057, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ghiasy S, Abedi AR, Moradi A, Hosseini SY, Karkan MF, Sadri G, Davari M. Is active surveillance an appropriate approach to manage prostate cancer patients with Gleason Score 3+3 who met the criteria for active surveillance? Turk J Urol 2019; 45:261-264. [PMID: 30461380 PMCID: PMC6619850 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.72920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prostate cancer is one of the common malignant tumors in men worldwide. Nowadays it seems that Gleason Score 3+3 may not need definite treatment and some of the experts even ignore it as a cancer but we should be aware that in some patients with Gleason Score 3+3 there is a higher risk for harboring higher-grade cancer. We had done this study to evaluate patients with prostate cancer with Gleason Score 3+3 to determine the value of tumor volume in these cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS From September 2010 to October 2017, radical prostatectomy was done for 123 sequential patients with localized prostate cancer in two referral centers of Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Tehran, Iran, and 42 cases with Gleason Scores 3+3 which who were candidates for active surveillance were included in the study. RESULTS Thirty of 42 (71.4%) patients had significant tumor volumes (≥0/5 cm3). When tumor volume was less than 0.5 cm3, none of the patients had extra prostatic tumor extension. In patients with tumor volume greater than 0.5 cm3, two cases (6.6%) had extra prostatic extension, 4 cases (13.3%) had positive margins, four cases (13.3%) reactive lymph nodes and 16 cases (53.3%) perineural invasion. CONCLUSION We suggest that some patients with Gleason Score 3+3 have tumor volume >0.5 cm3 who are considered having significant cancer pathology and active surveillance may not be appropriate approach to manage all cases with Gleason Score 3+3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saleh Ghiasy
- Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center (irhrc), Shahid Beheshti Medical Science University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Reza Abedi
- Department of Urology, Shohadae-tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Afshin Moradi
- Department of Pathology, Shohadae-tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Yousef Hosseini
- Department of Urology, Shahid Modares Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morteza Fallah Karkan
- Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center (irhrc), Shahid Beheshti Medical Science University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ghazal Sadri
- Department of Radiology. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Davari
- Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center (irhrc), Shahid Beheshti Medical Science University, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mullins BT, Basak R, Broughman JR, Chen RC. Patient-reported sexual quality of life after different types of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: Analysis of a population-based prospective cohort. Cancer 2019; 125:3657-3665. [PMID: 31256432 PMCID: PMC6763377 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although patients with prostate cancer face many treatment options, to the authors' knowledge the comparative effects of different surgical and radiotherapy (RT) options on sexual function are unclear. METHODS In the current study, a population-based cohort of 835 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2011 through 2013 was recruited throughout North Carolina in collaboration with the Rapid Case Ascertainment system of the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. All men were enrolled prior to treatment and followed prospectively using the validated Prostate Cancer Symptom Indices (PCSI) instrument. This analysis compares the sexual dysfunction scores of the PCSI among patients who received external-beam RT (EBRT), EBRT with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), brachytherapy, nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP), and non-nerve-sparing RP. Propensity scores were used to balance patient characteristics across groups, and multiple imputation was used for missing data. RESULTS EBRT and brachytherapy resulted in similar PCSI scores through 24 months. Compared with those receiving EBRT, patients treated with EBRT with ADT and RP with or without nerve sparing were found to have worse PCSI scores at all posttreatment time points. Preservation of useful sexual function at 24 months was associated with treatment type, baseline score, and age. Predicted preservation rates were 14.1% to 70.7% for EBRT, 8.4% to 52.3% for EBRT with ADT, 4.7% to 45.3% for nerve-sparing RP, and 4.8% to 34.5% for non-nerve-sparing RP. CONCLUSIONS The findings of the current study indicate that RT alone results in the best preservation of sexual function, and brachytherapy provides similar outcomes. RT with ADT and nerve-sparing RP yielded similar outcomes, whereas patients treated with non-nerve-sparing RP experienced the worst sexual function. These results help patients to make decisions among the specific types of surgery and RT they face based on each individual's diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon T Mullins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ramsankar Basak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - James R Broughman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brundage MD, Barbera L, McCallum F, Howell DM. A pilot evaluation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite for clinical practice (EPIC-CP) tool in Ontario. Qual Life Res 2018; 28:771-782. [PMID: 30382479 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-2034-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To introduce the EPIC-CP symptom screening tool in routine ambulatory cancer care, and to evaluate its acceptability and perceived usefulness from the perspective of patients and clinicians. METHODS Eligible prostate cancer patients from four cancer centres were recruited (November 2014-June 2015) from radiation or surgical oncology clinics. A physician and/or health care professional reviewed the EPIC-CP results as part of the clinical encounter. Patient experience with the tool was evaluated using a nine-item Patient Exit Survey (PES). Clinician experience was evaluated through semi-structured qualitative interviews. Patient and clinician results were compared to identify common themes. RESULTS A total of 333 patients were enrolled, of whom, 287 completed the PES. Most patients had one clinical encounter, although the number of EPIC-CP assessments ranged from 1 to 11 per patient, for a total of 937 EPIC-CP questionnaires completed. Item completion rates were high (91-100%), with items addressing sexual health among the lowest (91-92%). On the PES, most patients (70%) agreed with the item: "Completing this questionnaire helped me tell the clinicians about how I have been feeling". Thematic analysis from clinician interviews revealed that the EPIC-CP captures essential prostate-specific effects that facilitated person-centred communication and customization of interventions. Targeted clinical education and patient resources were seen as necessary for uptake. CONCLUSIONS EPIC-CP was generally endorsed by clinicians and patients. The implementation of a disease-specific measure in place of a generic symptom screening tool has the potential to improve the quality of the clinical encounter and provide outcome measures for further health services research. Provincial implementation of this tool as a standard of care is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Brundage
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | - L Barbera
- Clinical Department of Oncology, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - F McCallum
- Patient Reported Outcomes and Symptom Management, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D M Howell
- Psychosocial Oncology and Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
De Vincentis G, Monari F, Baldari S, Salgarello M, Frantellizzi V, Salvi E, Reale L, Napolitano S, Conti G, Cortesi E. Narrative medicine in metastatic prostate cancer reveals ways to improve patient awareness & quality of care. Future Oncol 2018; 14:2821-2832. [PMID: 29905090 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To describe the journey of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in treatment with radium-223. METHODS A multiperspective analysis was performed using narrative medicine in four Italian centers. RESULTS The substantial impact of mCRPC on quality of life through all phases of the disease was described. After an initial lack of awareness of the disease or denial of its effects, symptoms of pain, fatigue and side effects often led to sadness, fear and loneliness. The majority underwent radium-223 therapy positively, restoring their quality of life and routine activities. CONCLUSION Using narrative medicine, the importance of a patient-centered approach in the pathway of care for patients with mCRPC through all the stages of the disease was highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe De Vincentis
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology & Anatomo-Pathology, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Monari
- UO Metabolic Radiation Unit Bologna, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Sergio Baldari
- Department of Biomedical Sciences & Morphological & Functional Images, Università degli Studi di Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Matteo Salgarello
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria Hospital, Negraro (VR), Italy
| | - Viviana Frantellizzi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology & Anatomo-Pathology, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Salvi
- UO Metabolic Radiation Unit Bologna, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Luigi Reale
- ISTUD Foundation, Healthcare Area, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giario Conti
- Department of Urology, Sant'Anna Hospital, Como, Italy.,Segretario Nazionale della Società Italiana di Urologia Oncologica (SIUrO), Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Medical Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Magnetic resonance guided focused high frequency ultrasound ablation for focal therapy in prostate cancer – phase 1 trial. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:4281-4287. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5409-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
13
|
Barqawi AB, Huebner E, Krughoff K, O'Donnell CI. Prospective Outcome Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Partial and Complete Cryoablation in Organ-confined Prostate Cancer. Urology 2018; 112:126-131. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
14
|
Werneburg GT, Kongnyuy M, Halpern DM, Salcedo JM, Kosinski KE, Haas JA, Schiff JT, Corcoran AT, Katz AE. Patient-reported quality of life progression in men with prostate cancer following primary cryotherapy, cyberknife, or active holistic surveillance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017; 21:355-363. [PMID: 29217830 PMCID: PMC5991980 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-017-0004-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technological advancements have led to the success of minimally invasive treatment modalities for prostate cancer such as CyberKnife and Cryotherapy. Here, we investigate patient-reported urinary function, bowel habits, and sexual function in patients following CyberKnife (CK) or Cryotherapy treatment, and compare them with active holistic surveillance (AHS) patients. METHODS An IRB-approved institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent CK, Cryotherapy, or AHS. Quality of life (QoL) survey responses were collected every three months and the mean function scores were analyzed in yearly intervals over the 4 years post-treatment. RESULTS 279 patients (767 survey sets) were included in the study. There was no difference among groups in urinary function scores. The CyberKnife group had significantly lower bowel habit scores in the early years following treatment (year 2 mean difference: -5.4, P < 0.01) but returned to AHS level scores by year 4. Cryotherapy patients exhibited initially lower, but not statistically significant, bowel function scores, which then improved and approached those of AHS. Both CyberKnife (year 1 mean difference: -26.7, P < 0.001) and Cryotherapy groups (-35.4, P < 0.001) had early lower sexual function scores relative to AHS, but then gradually improved and were not significantly different from AHS by the third year post-treatment. A history of hormonal therapy was associated with a lower sexual function scores relative to those patients who did not receive hormones in both CyberKnife (-18.45, P < 0.01) and Cryotherapy patients (-14.6, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS After initial lower bowel habits and sexual function scores, CyberKnife or Cryotherapy-treated patients had no significant difference in QoL relative to AHS patients. These results highlight the benefit of CyberKnife and Cryotherapy in the management of organ-confined prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn T Werneburg
- Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
| | - Michael Kongnyuy
- Department of Urology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA
| | - Daniel M Halpern
- Department of Urology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA
| | - Jose M Salcedo
- Department of Urology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA
| | | | - Jonathan A Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA
| | - Jeffrey T Schiff
- Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.,Department of Urology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA
| | | | - Aaron E Katz
- Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.,Department of Urology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen C, Chen Z, Wang K, Hu L, Xu R, He X. Comparisons of health-related quality of life among surgery and radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 8:99057-99065. [PMID: 29228751 PMCID: PMC5716791 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study is to compare health-related quality of life (QOL) outcomes between radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science (to July 2017) were searched. Pooled analysis of each domain-specific score was calculated in relevant studies, and its change with follow-up time was explored by sub-group analysis. A total of six studies containing 4423 patients were included. Men underwent RP was associated with worse urinary and sexual domain score than EBRT (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.59, -0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.73 to -0.45, -0.72 to -0.44). In contrast, EBRT group had lower bowel domain score than RP group (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.52). The sub-group analysis revealed the most severe urinary and sexual QOL in RP as well as bowel QOL in EBRT group all happened in the first month post operation. The different performance of two treatments in three QOL domains diminished afterwards. Health-related QOL should be considered comprehensively when planning follow-up for men after RP or EBRT for localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Chen
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Zhen Chen
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Kun Wang
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Linkun Hu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Renfang Xu
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xiaozhou He
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lao C, Edlin R, Rouse P, Brown C, Holmes M, Gilling P, Lawrenson R. The cost-effectiveness of active surveillance compared to watchful waiting and radical prostatectomy for low risk localised prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:529. [PMID: 28789623 PMCID: PMC5549326 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3522-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radical prostatectomy is the most common treatment for localised prostate cancer in New Zealand. Active surveillance was introduced to prevent overtreatment and reduce costs while preserving the option of radical prostatectomy. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of active surveillance compared to watchful waiting and radical prostatectomy. Methods Markov models were constructed to estimate the life-time cost-effectiveness of active surveillance compared to watchful waiting and radical prostatectomy for low risk localised prostate cancer patients aged 45–70 years, using national datasets in New Zealand and published studies including the SPCG-4 study. This study was from the perspective of the Ministry of Health in New Zealand. Results Radical prostatectomy is less costly than active surveillance in men aged 45–55 years with low risk localised prostate cancer, but more costly for men aged 60–70 years. Scenario analyses demonstrated significant uncertainty as to the most cost-effective option in all age groups because of the unavailability of good quality of life data for men under active surveillance. Uncertainties around the likelihood of having radical prostatectomy when managed with active surveillance also affect the cost-effectiveness of active surveillance against radical prostatectomy. Conclusions Active surveillance is less likely to be cost-effective compared to radical prostatectomy for younger men diagnosed with low risk localised prostate cancer. The cost-effectiveness of active surveillance compared to radical prostatectomy is critically dependent on the ‘trigger’ for radical prostatectomy and the quality of life in men on active surveillance. Research on the latter would be beneficial. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3522-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhuan Lao
- National Institute of Demographic and Economic Analysis, The University of Waikato, Level 3 Hockin building, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
| | - Richard Edlin
- School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Paul Rouse
- The University of Auckland Business School, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Charis Brown
- National Institute of Demographic and Economic Analysis, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Michael Holmes
- Urology Department, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Peter Gilling
- Department of Urology, Tauranga Hospital, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Ross Lawrenson
- National Institute of Demographic and Economic Analysis, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gnanaraj J, Umar Z, Balakrishnan S, Ponor L, Wright EJ, Khaliq W. Predictors of recurrent hospital admissions among prostate cancer survivors. Med Oncol 2017; 34:150. [PMID: 28752314 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-1013-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 07/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cancer survivors often have poor outcomes compared to their peers without cancer. Mortality from prostate cancer has been steadily decreasing, and these cancer survivors have other comorbidities that progress over time. Current study explores the type of admissions and associated risk factors with recurrent hospitalizations among prostate cancer survivors. A retrospective review of medical records was performed at a single academic institution for male patients aged 40 years and older who were diagnosed with prostate cancer more than 2 years prior to the study's observation period from January 2008 to December 2010. Unpaired t test and Chi-square tests were used to compare patients' characteristics, and logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors association with recurrent admissions. In total, 245 prostate cancer survivors were stratified by single versus recurrent hospital admission. The characteristics of the study population were similar to the exception of mean Gleason score that was lower, while cardiovascular admissions and clinical comorbidities were higher in the recurrent group. In the multivariable regression analyses where sociodemographic, primary prostate cancer treatment-related sequelae and clinical comorbid conditions were simultaneously analyzed, congestive heart failure (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.25-12.2) and history of metastasis (OR 8.10, 95% CI 1.10-60.1) were associated with recurrent hospital admissions. Prostate cancer survivors experience a greater number of recurrent admissions, and therefore, understanding the nature of these admissions and associated medical comorbidities may help us in developing screening or preventive strategies to reduce the readmissions for this group of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome Gnanaraj
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Zarish Umar
- Department of Medicine, Queens Hospital Center, Jamaica, NY, USA
| | | | - Lucia Ponor
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Edward James Wright
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Waseem Khaliq
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Urinary Incontinence Following Prostate Brachytherapy. Urology 2016; 95:151-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
19
|
Eton DT, Lai JS, Cella D, Reeve BB, Talcott JA, Clark JA, McPherson CP, Litwin MS, Moinpour CM. Data Pooling and Analysis to Build a Preliminary Item Bank. Eval Health Prof 2016; 28:142-59. [PMID: 15851770 DOI: 10.1177/0163278705275338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Assessing bowel function (BF) in prostate cancer can help determine therapeutic trade-offs. We determined the components of BF commonly assessed in prostate cancer studies as an initial step in creating an item bank for clinical and research application. We analyzed six archived data sets representing 4,246 men with prostate cancer. Thirty-one items from validated instruments were available for analysis. Items were classified into domains (diarrhea, rectal urgency, pain, bleeding, bother/distress, and other) then subjected to conventional psychometric and item response theory (IRT) analyses. Items fit the IRT model if the ratio between observed and expected item variance was between 0.60 and 1.40. Four of 31 items had inadequate fit in at least one analysis. Poorly fitting items included bleeding (2), rectal urgency (1), and bother/distress (1). A fifth item assessing hemorrhoids was poorly correlated with other items. Our analyses supported four related components of BF: diarrhea, rectal urgency, pain, and bother/distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Eton
- Northwestern University School of Medicine, Evanston, IL 60201, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Medical hospitalizations in prostate cancer survivors. Med Oncol 2016; 33:81. [PMID: 27324503 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-016-0796-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to explore the context and reasons for medical hospitalizations among prostate cancer survivors and to study their relationship with obesity and the type of prostate cancer treatment. A retrospective review of medical records was performed at an academic institution for male patients aged 40 years and older who were diagnosed and/or treated for prostate cancer 2 years prior to the study's observation period from January 2008 to December 2010. Unpaired t test, ANOVA, and Chi-square tests were used to compare patients' characteristics, admission types, and medical comorbidities by body mass index (BMI) and prostate cancer treatment. Mean age for the study population was 76 years (SD = 9.2). Two hundred and forty-five prostate cancer survivors were stratified into two groups: non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). The study population's characteristics analyzed by BMI were similar including Gleason score, presence of metastatic disease and genitourinary-related side effects. Only 13 % of admissions were for complaints related to their genitourinary system. Neither the specific treatment that the patients had received for their prostate cancer, nor obesity was associated with the reasons for their medical admission. Survivorship after having a diagnosis of prostate cancer is often lengthy, and these men are at risk of being hospitalized, as they get older. From this inquiry, it has become clear that neither body mass index nor prior therapy is associated with specific admission characteristics, and only a minority of such admissions was directly related to prostate cancer or the genitourinary tract.
Collapse
|
21
|
Baker H, Wellman S, Lavender V. Functional Quality-of-Life Outcomes Reported by Men Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. Oncol Nurs Forum 2016; 43:199-218. [DOI: 10.1188/16.onf.199-218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
22
|
Moul JW. Population Screening for Prostate Cancer and Early Detection. Prostate Cancer 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800077-9.00001-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
23
|
Reesink DJ, Fransen van de Putte EE, Vegt E, De Jong J, van Werkhoven E, Mertens LS, Bex A, van der Poel HG, van Rhijn BWG, Horenblas S, Meijer RP. Clinical Relevance of Incidental Prostatic Lesions on FDG-Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography-Should Patients Receive Further Evaluation? J Urol 2015; 195:907-12. [PMID: 26598424 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE FDG ((18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose)-PET/CT (positron emission tomography)/(computerized tomography) is a widely used diagnostic tool for whole body imaging. Incidental prostatic uptake is often found on FDG-PET/CT. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical relevance of incidental prostatic uptake on FDG-PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed 108 consecutive male patients with bladder cancer who underwent FDG-PET/CT and subsequently radical cystoprostatectomy between May 2009 and November 2014. PET/CT scans were blindly reviewed by a dedicated nuclear medicine physician for incidental prostatic FDG uptake. If present, the maximum standardized uptake value was determined. Subsequently incidental prostatic uptake was categorized as suspect, indeterminate or nonsuspect for prostate cancer. RESULTS Incidental prostatic uptake was present in 43 of 108 patients (40%). Of these 43 patients 13 (30%) had occult prostate cancer in cystoprostatectomy specimens. Overall prostate cancer was found in 25 of 108 specimens (23%). If all incidental prostatic uptake was regarded as prostate cancer, the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT for prostate cancer detection were 52% and 64%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 30% and 82%, respectively. If only lesions labeled suspect or indeterminate were regarded as prostate cancer, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 32%, 76%, 29% and 79%, respectively. Categorizing indeterminate lesions as nonprostate cancer did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Gleason score did not correlate with maximum standardized uptake value or serum prostate specific antigen. CONCLUSIONS Incidental prostatic uptake on FDG-PET/CT has a low positive predictive value for prostate cancer. An attempt to classify lesions as suspect or nonsuspect did not increase diagnostic accuracy. Based on these results physicians should be cautious about applying invasive diagnostic methods to detect prostate cancer in case of incidental prostatic uptake on FDG-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan J Reesink
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen De Jong
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik van Werkhoven
- Department of Medical Statistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Raleigh DR, Chang AJ, Tomlin B, Cunha JA, Braunstein SE, Shinohara K, Gottschalk AR, Roach M, Hsu IC. Patient- and treatment-specific predictors of genitourinary function after high-dose-rate monotherapy for favorable prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
25
|
Korzeniowski M, Kalyvas M, Mahmud A, Shenfield C, Tong C, Zaza K, Howell D, Brundage M. Piloting prostate cancer patient-reported outcomesin clinical practice. Support Care Cancer 2015; 24:1983-1990. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2949-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
26
|
Grindstad T, Andersen S, Al-Saad S, Donnem T, Kiselev Y, Nordahl Melbø-Jørgensen C, Skjefstad K, Busund LT, Bremnes RM, Richardsen E. High progesterone receptor expression in prostate cancer is associated with clinical failure. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0116691. [PMID: 25723513 PMCID: PMC4344236 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease and one of the leading causes of mortality in developed countries. Specific prognostic and predictive markers for prostate cancer patients are still lacking. A causal relationship between androgens and the development of prostate cancer is generally considered biologically plausible, but androgens are not the sole effector in the complexity of prostate carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of progesterone receptor in tumor tissue of T1-3N0 prostate cancer patients undergoing prostatectomy. METHODS Tissue microarrays from 535 patients with prostate cancer were constructed. Duplicate cores of tumor cells and tumor stromal tissue from each resected specimen were extracted. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the in-situ expression of progesterone receptor. RESULTS In univariate analyses, high tumor cell density (p = 0.006) and high tumor stromal cell density level (p = 0.045) of progesterone receptor were both significantly associated with tumor progression and clinical failure. In multivariate analysis, progesterone receptor expression in tumor cells was an independent negative prognostic factor for clinical failure (HR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.2, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION High progesterone receptor density in tumor cells of the prostate cancer tumor is an independent negative prognostic factor for clinical failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thea Grindstad
- Dept. of Medical Biology, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
- * E-mail:
| | - Sigve Andersen
- Dept. of Clinical Medicine, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
- Dept. of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Samer Al-Saad
- Dept. of Medical Biology, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
- Dept. of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Tom Donnem
- Dept. of Clinical Medicine, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
- Dept. of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Yury Kiselev
- Dept. of Medical Biology, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
- Dept. of Pharmacy, UiT—The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | | | - Kaja Skjefstad
- Dept. of Medical Biology, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Lill-Tove Busund
- Dept. of Medical Biology, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
- Dept. of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Roy M. Bremnes
- Dept. of Medical Biology, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
- Dept. of Clinical Medicine, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Elin Richardsen
- Dept. of Medical Biology, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
- Dept. of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dahl S, Loge JH, Berge V, Dahl AA, Cvancarova M, Fosså SD. Influence of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on work status and working life 3 years after surgery. J Cancer Surviv 2014; 9:172-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s11764-014-0399-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2014] [Accepted: 09/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
28
|
Chen RC, Chang P, Vetter RJ, Lukka H, Stokes WA, Sanda MG, Watkins-Bruner D, Reeve BB, Sandler HM. Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in prostate cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju132. [PMID: 25006192 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life Steering Committee convened four working groups to recommend core sets of patient-reported outcomes to be routinely incorporated in clinical trials. The Prostate Cancer Working Group included physicians, researchers, and a patient advocate. The group's process included 1) a systematic literature review to determine the prevalence and severity of symptoms, 2) a multistakeholder meeting sponsored by the NCI to review the evidence and build consensus, and 3) a postmeeting expert panel synthesis of findings to finalize recommendations. Five domains were recommended for localized prostate cancer: urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction and irritation, bowel-related symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and hormonal symptoms. Four domains were recommended for advanced prostate cancer: pain, fatigue, mental well-being, and physical well-being. Additional domains for consideration include decisional regret, satisfaction with care, and anxiety related to prostate cancer. These recommendations have been endorsed by the NCI for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald C Chen
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS).
| | - Peter Chang
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Richard J Vetter
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Himansu Lukka
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - William A Stokes
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Martin G Sanda
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Deborah Watkins-Bruner
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| | - Howard M Sandler
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (RCC, WAS), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (BBR), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (RCC, WAS); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (PC); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (RJV); Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (HL); Department of Urology (MGS), and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (DW-G), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (HMS)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Carlsson S, Berglund A, Sjoberg D, Khatami A, Stranne J, Bergdahl S, Lodding P, Aus G, Vickers A, Hugosson J. Effects of surgeon variability on oncologic and functional outcomes in a population-based setting. BMC Urol 2014; 14:25. [PMID: 24602348 PMCID: PMC3975576 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2013] [Accepted: 02/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oncologic and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) can vary between surgeons to a greater extent than is expected by chance. We sought to examine the effects of surgeon variation on functional and oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing RP for prostate cancer in a European center. Methods The study comprised 1,280 men who underwent open retropubic RP performed by one of nine surgeons at an academic institution in Sweden between 2001 and 2008. Potency and continence outcomes were measured preoperatively and 18 months postoperatively by patient-administered questionnaires. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value > 0.2 ng/mL with at least one confirmatory rise. Multivariable random effect models were used to evaluate heterogeneity between surgeons, adjusting for case mix (age, PSA, pathological stage and grade), year of surgery, and surgical experience. Results Of 679 men potent at baseline, 647 provided data at 18 months with 122 (19%) reporting potency. We found no evidence for heterogeneity of potency outcomes between surgeons (P = 1). The continence rate for patients at 18 months was 85%, with 836 of the 979 patients who provided data reporting continence. There was statistically significant heterogeneity between surgeons (P = 0.001). We did not find evidence of an association between surgeons’ adjusted probabilities of functional recovery and 5-year probability of freedom from BCR. Conclusions Our data support previous studies regarding a large heterogeneity among surgeons in continence outcomes for patients undergoing RP. This indicates that some patients are receiving sub-optimal care. Quality assurance measures involving performance feedback, should be considered. When surgeons are aware of their outcomes, they can improve them to provide better care to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid Carlsson
- Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 307 E, 63rd St, 2nd floor, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Williams KC, Hicks EM, Chang N, Connor SE, Maliski SL. Purposeful normalization when caring for husbands recovering from prostate cancer. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2014; 24:306-316. [PMID: 24590418 DOI: 10.1177/1049732314523842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite a growing awareness that prostate cancer is a "couple's disease," the coping strategies, subjective distress, and emotional needs of partners are not adequately addressed. To better understand wives' experiences and processes they enact, we recruited 28 low-income Latinas caring for husbands recovering from prostatectomies to participate in interviews at three time points. Their narratives destabilize a common focus on physical side effects and an implicit bias toward men's reactions. We critically examine an overarching process of normalization, with underlying themes working both toward and against normality. We identified dissonance between detailed accounts of major lifestyle changes and professed normalization. We detail the women's purposeful methods to counteract negative impacts on their lives while seeking support externally. A better understanding of women's strategies and coping is critical to design interventions and education to both capitalize on partners' role in recovery while also addressing hidden causes of increased subjective distress.
Collapse
|
31
|
Factors related to patient-perceived satisfaction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on the expanded prostate cancer index composite survey. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2013; 16:341-5. [PMID: 23917307 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2013.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2013] [Revised: 06/14/2013] [Accepted: 06/20/2013] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have analyzed factors that influence longitudinal changes in patient-perceived satisfaction during the recovery period following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer. We investigated variables that were associated with patient-perceived satisfaction after RARP using the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) survey. METHODS Of 175 men who underwent RARP between 2010 and 2011, 140 men completed the EPIC questionnaire preoperatively and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. On the basis of the EPIC question no. 32 (item number 80), patients were divided into four groups according to the pattern of satisfaction change at postoperative 3 and 12 months: satisfied to satisfied (group 1); satisfied to dissatisfied (group 2); dissatisfied to satisfied (group 3); and dissatisfied to dissatisfied (group 4). Longitudinal changes in EPIC scores over time in each group and differences in EPIC scores of each domain subscale between groups at each follow-up were analyzed. A linear mixed model with generalized estimating equation approach was used to identify independent factors that influence overall satisfaction among repeated measures from same patients. RESULTS On the basis of the pattern of satisfaction change, groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 had 103 (74.3%), 21 (15.0%), 11 (7.9%) and 5 (2.9%) patients, respectively. The factor that was associated with overall satisfaction was urinary bother (UB) (β=0.283, 95% confidence interval (0.024, 0.543 ); P=0.033) adjusted for other factors under consideration. CONCLUSIONS UB was the independent factor influencing patient-perceived satisfaction after RARP. During post-RARP follow-up, physician should have the optimal management for the patient's UB.
Collapse
|
32
|
Langzeitverlauf der Lebensqualität nach Prostatektomie und perkutaner Strahlentherapie beim lokal begrenzten Prostatakarzinom. Strahlenther Onkol 2013; 189:804-5. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0385-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
33
|
Abstract
Background: Previous studies on the effects of different prostate cancer treatments on quality of life, were confounded because patients were not comparable. This study examined treatment effects in more comparable groups. Methods: From 2008–2011, 240 patients with localised prostate cancer were selected to be eligible for both radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Brachytherapy (BT) was a third option for some. Health-related quality of life was measured by expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) up to 12 months after treatment. Results: In the sexual domain, RP led to worse summary scores (P<0.001) and more often to a clinically relevant deterioration from baseline than BT and EBRT (79%, 33%, 34%, respectively). In the urinary domain, RP also led to worse summary scores (P=0.014), and more deterioration from baseline (41%, 12%, 19%, respectively). Only on the irritative/obstructive urinary scale, more BT patients (40%) showed a relevant deterioration than RP (17%) and EBRT patients (11%). In the bowel domain, the treatment effects did not differ. Conclusion: This study provides a more unbiased comparison of treatment effects, as men were more comparable at baseline. Our results suggest that, for quality of life, radiotherapy is as least as good an option as RP for treating localised prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
34
|
Shen YJ, Li J, Ye DW. Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: patients' attitude and feasibility in China. Transl Androl Urol 2013; 2:4-9. [PMID: 26816718 PMCID: PMC4708603 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.01.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the behavior of Chinese erectile dysfunction (ED) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) who were offered the penile rehabilitation and to assess their attitude and feasibility of rehabilitation after RP in China. Materials and methods Comprehensive medical and sexual histories of 187 evaluable PCa patients for RP were obtained together with their attitude towards penile rehabilitation. The rehabilitation data was compared between patients who accepted this treatment or not. The successful intercourse rate six months after treatment was also compared among three rehabilitation interventions, including phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE-5i), vacuum erection device (VED) and combination of both. Results 141 (75.4%) patients reported being sexually active in the six months before RP.122 (65.2%) patients wished to preserve sexual activity and 80 (42.8%) had interest in penile rehabilitation after RP. Penile rehabilitation rate was 30.5%. The patients with younger age (P<0.001), higher IIEF-5 score preoperatively (P=0.03) and no adjuvant therapy post-RP (P=0.01) were more acceptable for rehabilitation. Main reasons for refusal of rehabilitation included lack of sexual interest followed by high cost of treatment. The successful intercourse rate was not significantly different among three rehabilitation interventions (P=0.32). Conclusions Less than one-third of Chinese RP patients accepted penile rehabilitation postoperatively. Patients’ attitude towards rehabilitation was conservative because of many reasons from traditional Chinese culture, doctors and patients themselves. Penile rehabilitation was feasible and effective in Chinese RP patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Jun Shen
- 1 Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China ; 2 Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Li
- 1 Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China ; 2 Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ding-Wei Ye
- 1 Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China ; 2 Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sonn GA, Sadetsky N, Presti JC, Litwin MS. Differing perceptions of quality of life in patients with prostate cancer and their doctors. J Urol 2013; 189:S59-65; discussion S65. [PMID: 23234635 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As the number of prostate cancer survivors increases, urologists must recognize their quality of life impairment. In the past physician ratings of patient symptoms did not correlate with patient self-assessments. We determined if urologists have improved their reporting of patient health related quality of life. We also investigated if urologists assessed health related quality of life more accurately in the short or long term. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 1,366 men from CaPSURE™, a national, prospective cohort, who had undergone prostatectomy, brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy. At each visit urologists assessed fatigue, pain, and sexual, urinary and bowel dysfunction. Participants independently completed the SF-36™ and the UCLA-PCI. We contrasted the frequency of impairment reported by physicians and participants in select health related quality of life domains in the short (less than 1 year) and long (greater than 2 years) term. We also compared physician-patient concordance between the periods 1995 to 2000 and 2001 to 2007. RESULTS In short-term and long-term followup, and for the 1995 to 2000 and 2001 to 2007 cohorts, physician and participant assessments differed in all analyzed domains. Urologists noted impairment in urinary and sexual function more often than fatigue or pain. Disagreement between physician and participant ratings did not vary dramatically from short-term to long-term followup, or from the earlier to the later cohort. CONCLUSIONS In men treated for localized prostate cancer physician ratings of symptoms do not correlate well with patient self-assessments of health related quality of life. Physician reporting did not improve over time. It is increasingly important to recognize and address impairments in quality of life from prostate cancer and its treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey A Sonn
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pastaur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Heijnsdijk EAM, Wever EM, Auvinen A, Hugosson J, Ciatto S, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Villers A, Páez A, Moss SM, Zappa M, Tammela TLJ, Mäkinen T, Carlsson S, Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML, Otto SJ, Draisma G, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schröder FH, de Koning HJ. Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:595-605. [PMID: 22894572 PMCID: PMC4982868 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1201637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 297] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After 11 years of follow-up, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) reported a 29% reduction in prostate-cancer mortality among men who underwent screening for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. However, the extent to which harms to quality of life resulting from overdiagnosis and treatment counterbalance this benefit is uncertain. METHODS On the basis of ERSPC follow-up data, we used Microsimulation Screening Analysis (MISCAN) to predict the number of prostate cancers, treatments, deaths, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained after the introduction of PSA screening. Various screening strategies, efficacies, and quality-of-life assumptions were modeled. RESULTS Per 1000 men of all ages who were followed for their entire life span, we predicted that annual screening of men between the ages of 55 and 69 years would result in nine fewer deaths from prostate cancer (28% reduction), 14 fewer men receiving palliative therapy (35% reduction), and a total of 73 life-years gained (average, 8.4 years per prostate-cancer death avoided). The number of QALYs that were gained was 56 (range, -21 to 97), a reduction of 23% from unadjusted life-years gained. To prevent one prostate-cancer death, 98 men would need to be screened and 5 cancers would need to be detected. Screening of all men between the ages of 55 and 74 would result in more life-years gained (82) but the same number of QALYs (56). CONCLUSIONS The benefit of PSA screening was diminished by loss of QALYs owing to postdiagnosis long-term effects. Longer follow-up data from both the ERSPC and quality-of-life analyses are essential before universal recommendations regarding screening can be made. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and others.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline A M Heijnsdijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
van Tol-Geerdink JJ, Willem Leer J, Weijerman PC, van Oort IM, Vergunst H, van Lin EN, Alfred Witjes J, Stalmeier PF. Choice between prostatectomy and radiotherapy when men are eligible for both: a randomized controlled trial of usual care vs decision aid. BJU Int 2012; 111:564-73. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11402.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan Willem Leer
- Department of *Radiation Oncology; Radboud University Medical Centre; Nijmegen
| | | | - Inge M. van Oort
- Department of Urology; Radboud University Medical Centre; Nijmegen
| | - Henk Vergunst
- Department of Urology; Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital; Nijmegen; The Netherlands
| | - Emile N. van Lin
- Department of *Radiation Oncology; Radboud University Medical Centre; Nijmegen
| | - J. Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology; Radboud University Medical Centre; Nijmegen
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Taylor KL, Luta G, Miller AB, Church TR, Kelly SP, Muenz LR, Davis KM, Dawson DL, Edmond S, Reding D, Mabie JE, Riley TL. Long-term disease-specific functioning among prostate cancer survivors and noncancer controls in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:2768-75. [PMID: 22734029 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.41.2767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO), we assessed the long-term disease-specific functioning among prostate cancer (PCa) survivors versus noncancer controls, the impact of trial arm (screening/usual care) on functioning, and the effect of treatment modality on functioning. PATIENTS AND METHODS PCa survivors (n = 529), 5 to 10 years postdiagnosis, were frequency-matched to noncancer controls (n = 514) for race, screening center, year of enrollment, and trial arm. Participants completed a telephone interview regarding PCa-specific symptomatology. Weights accounted for patient selection from the five PLCO screening centers. Propensity-score methods were used to balance groups of interest with respect to demographic and medical characteristics. RESULTS Weighted linear regression analyses revealed poorer sexual and urinary function among PCa survivors compared with noncancer controls (P < .001). Trial arm was not significantly related to any outcome (P > .31). Compared with radical prostatectomy patients (n = 201), radiation-therapy patients (n = 110) reported better sexual (P < .05) and urinary (P < .001) functioning but poorer bowel outcomes (P < .05). Survivors who received treatment combinations including androgen deprivation (n = 207) reported significantly poorer hormone-related symptoms compared with radical prostatectomy patients (P < .05). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the persistence of clinically significant, long-term PCa treatment-related sexual and urinary adverse effects up to 10 years postdiagnosis. To our knowledge, this was the first comparison of prostate-related dysfunction among screened survivors versus screened noncancer controls and indicated that these long-term problems were attributable to PCa treatment and not to aging or comorbidities. Finally, differences in long-term adverse effects between treatment modalities are particularly relevant for patients and clinicians when making treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn L Taylor
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven St, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kyrdalen AE, Dahl AA, Hernes E, Småstuen MC, Fosså SD. A national study of adverse effects and global quality of life among candidates for curative treatment for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2012; 111:221-32. [PMID: 22672151 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11198.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide population-based estimates of typical adverse effects (AEs), e.g. urinary, bowel and sexual dysfunction, in patients with non-metastatic recurrence-free prostate cancer (PCa) by curative treatment method, including no treatment. To describe associations between typical AEs and global quality of life (QoL) and to study patients' use of medication for erectile dysfunction (EDmed) and the relationship between such use and global QoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS In October 2006 a national population-based sample of PCa survivors diagnosed in 2004 was invited to a postal survey focusing on treatment-related AEs and global QoL, 12-32 months after treatment start. All had completed their initial treatment. In the present study, 771 compliers were categorized into four groups of localized or locally advanced PCa related to the treatment they completed: (i) no treatment; (ii) radical prostatectomy (RP); (iii) radiotherapy (RAD) without hormones; and (iv) RAD with hormone therapy of 3-24 months duration. Measurement of AEs was restricted to function, using selected items from the 50-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and the Brief Sexual Function Inventory among others, whereas global QoL was measured with the 12-item short-form health survey. National prescription data enabled assessment of adjuvant hormone application and EDmed use. RESULTS Men who had undergone RP reported more urinary incontinence (24%) than the other treatment groups, but had the lowest level of moderate/severe urinary irritative-obstructive symptoms. Men from the 'no treatment' group had the highest level of moderate/severe irritative-obstructive urinary symptoms. Men who had undergone RAD reported higher levels of irritative intestinal symptoms and faecal leakage compared with the RP group and the no treatment group. In all treatment groups, poor sexual drive and poor erectile function were common AEs, with men treated with RP reporting the highest prevalence of poor erectile function (89%). Presence of irritative-obstructive urinary symptoms and poor sexual drive were independently associated with low global QoL in multivariate analyses. Fifty percent of the study group had used EDmed after treatment start, but only 47% of them were still using EDmed at the time of the survey. Use of EDmed was not significantly associated with global QoL. CONCLUSIONS PCa survivors after curative treatment, but also patients without any anticancer therapy, report high levels of urinary and sexual AEs. Irritative-obstructive urinary symptoms and poor sexual drive were significantly associated with low global QoL, whereas erectile function and use of EDmed were not.
Collapse
|
40
|
Current Challenges in Prostate Cancer Management and the Rationale behind Targeted Focal Therapy. Adv Urol 2012; 2012:862639. [PMID: 22649447 PMCID: PMC3357537 DOI: 10.1155/2012/862639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2012] [Revised: 02/28/2012] [Accepted: 03/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Among men, prostate cancer has a high prevalence, with relatively lower cancer-specific mortality risk compared to lung and colon cancer. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has increased prostate cancer awareness since its implementation as a screening tool almost 25 years ago, but, due to the largely indolent course of this disease and the unspecific nature of the PSA test, increased incidence has largely been associated with cancers that would not go on to cause death (clinically insignificant), leading to an overdiagnosis challenge and an ensuing overtreatment consequences. The overtreatment problem is exacerbated by the high risk of side effects that current treatment techniques have, putting patients' quality of life at risk with little or no survival benefit. The goals of this paper are to evaluate the rise, prevalence, and impact of the overdiagnosis and ensuing overtreatment problems, as well as highlight potential solutions. In this effort, a review of major epidemiological and screening studies, cancer statistics from the advent of prostate-specific antigen screening to the present, and reports on patient concerns and treatment outcomes was conducted to present the dominant factors that underlie current challenges in prostate cancer treatment and illuminate potential solutions.
Collapse
|
41
|
Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Critical Analysis of the Literature. Eur Urol 2012; 61:112-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2010] [Accepted: 09/27/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
42
|
Alemozaffar M, Regan MM, Cooperberg MR, Wei JT, Michalski JM, Sandler HM, Hembroff L, Sadetsky N, Saigal CS, Litwin MS, Klein E, Kibel AS, Hamstra DA, Pisters LL, Kuban DA, Kaplan ID, Wood DP, Ciezki J, Dunn RL, Carroll PR, Sanda MG. Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer. JAMA 2011; 306:1205-14. [PMID: 21934053 PMCID: PMC3831607 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 222] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Sexual function is the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domain most commonly impaired after prostate cancer treatment; however, validated tools to enable personalized prediction of erectile dysfunction after prostate cancer treatment are lacking. OBJECTIVE To predict long-term erectile function following prostate cancer treatment based on individual patient and treatment characteristics. DESIGN Pretreatment patient characteristics, sexual HRQOL, and treatment details measured in a longitudinal academic multicenter cohort (Prostate Cancer Outcomes and Satisfaction With Treatment Quality Assessment; enrolled from 2003 through 2006), were used to develop models predicting erectile function 2 years after treatment. A community-based cohort (community-based Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor [CaPSURE]; enrolled 1995 through 2007) externally validated model performance. Patients in US academic and community-based practices whose HRQOL was measured pretreatment (N = 1201) underwent follow-up after prostatectomy, external radiotherapy, or brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Sexual outcomes among men completing 2 years' follow-up (n = 1027) were used to develop models predicting erectile function that were externally validated among 1913 patients in a community-based cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-reported functional erections suitable for intercourse 2 years following prostate cancer treatment. RESULTS Two years after prostate cancer treatment, 368 (37% [95% CI, 34%-40%]) of all patients and 335 (48% [95% CI, 45%-52%]) of those with functional erections prior to treatment reported functional erections; 531 (53% [95% CI, 50%-56%]) of patients without penile prostheses reported use of medications or other devices for erectile dysfunction. Pretreatment sexual HRQOL score, age, serum prostate-specific antigen level, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and intended treatment details were associated with functional erections 2 years after treatment. Multivariable logistic regression models predicting erectile function estimated 2-year function probabilities from as low as 10% or less to as high as 70% or greater depending on the individual's pretreatment patient characteristics and treatment details. The models performed well in predicting erections in external validation among CaPSURE cohort patients (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.74-0.80] for prostatectomy; 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80-0.94] for external radiotherapy; and 0.90 [95% CI, 0.85-0.95] for brachytherapy). CONCLUSION Stratification by pretreatment patient characteristics and treatment details enables prediction of erectile function 2 years after prostatectomy, external radiotherapy, or brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrdad Alemozaffar
- Urology Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chang P, Szymanski KM, Dunn RL, Chipman JJ, Litwin MS, Nguyen PL, Sweeney CJ, Cook R, Wagner AA, DeWolf WC, Bubley GJ, Funches R, Aronovitz JA, Wei JT, Sanda MG. Expanded prostate cancer index composite for clinical practice: development and validation of a practical health related quality of life instrument for use in the routine clinical care of patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 2011; 186:865-72. [PMID: 21788038 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2011] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Measuring the health related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer in routine clinical practice is hindered by the lack of instruments enabling efficient, real-time, point of care scoring of multiple health related quality of life domains. Thus, we developed an instrument for this purpose. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice is a 1-page, 16-item questionnaire that we constructed to measure urinary incontinence, urinary irritation, and the bowel, sexual and hormonal health related quality of life domains. We eliminated conceptually overlapping items from the 3-page Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 and revised the questionnaire format to mirror the AUA symptom index, thereby enabling practitioners to calculate health related quality of life scores at the point of care. We administered the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice to a new cohort of patients with prostate cancer in community based and academic oncology, radiation, and urology practices to evaluate instrument validity as well as ease of use in clinical practice. RESULTS A total of 175 treated and 132 untreated subjects with prostate cancer completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice. The domain scores of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice correlated highly with the respective domain scores from longer versions of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (r≥0.93 for all domains). The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.64-0.84) and sensitivity to prostate cancer treatment related effects (p<0.05 in each of 5 health related quality of life domains). Patients completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice efficiently (96% in less than 10 minutes and with 11% missing items). It was deemed very convenient by clinicians in 87% of routine clinical encounters and clinicians accurately scored completed questionnaires 94% of the time. CONCLUSIONS The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice is a valid instrument that enables patient reported, health related quality of life to be measured efficiently and accurately at the point of care, and thereby facilitates improved emphasis and management of patient reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Chang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Shah NL, Sanda M. Health-related quality of life in treatment for prostate cancer: looking beyond survival. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 1:230-6. [PMID: 18628147 DOI: 10.3816/sct.2004.n.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Improvements in detecting and treating prostate cancer account for the need to evaluate strategies for optimizing quality of life (QOL) among survivors of prostate cancer. Several management options are available when prostate cancer is diagnosed at an early stage. However, the optimal treatment for localized prostate cancer is unknown, and reports in the literature are controversial regarding the best treatment modality. In this article, the authors will review the standard therapies used to treat localized prostate cancer and the effects of these therapies on a patient's QOL. Ultimately, the decision of which treatment modality to choose will be a decision based largely on individual patient preferences in concert with his physician and family members, in view of a thorough understanding of the available treatments and the full range of possible treatment-related side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil L Shah
- Henry Ford Health Systems, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Detroit, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Benedict SH, De Meerleer G, Orton CG, Stancanello J. High intensity focused ultrasound may be superior to radiation therapy for the treatment of early stage prostate cancer. Med Phys 2011; 38:3909-12. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3561500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
46
|
Barkati M, Williams SG, Foroudi F, Tai KH, Chander S, van Dyk S, See A, Duchesne GM. High-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy for favorable-risk prostate cancer: a Phase II trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 82:1889-96. [PMID: 21550182 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2010] [Revised: 09/01/2010] [Accepted: 09/15/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are multiple treatment options for favorable-risk prostate cancer. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy is appealing, but its use is still investigational. A Phase II trial was undertaken to explore the value of such treatment in low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a single-institution, prospective study. Eligible patients had low-risk prostate cancer features but also Gleason scores of 7 (51% of patients) and stage T2b to T2c cancer. Treatment with HDR brachytherapy with a single implant was administered over 2 days. One of four fractionation schedules was used in a dose escalation study design: 3 fractions of 10, 10.5, 11, or 11.5 Gy. Patients were assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 2.0 for urinary toxicity, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring schema for rectal toxicity, and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire to measure patient-reported health-related quality of life. Biochemical failure was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir plus 2 ng/ml. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2008, 79 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 39.5 months, biochemical relapse occurred in 7 patients. Three- and 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates were 88.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.0-96.2%) and 85.1% (95% CI, 72.5-94.5%), respectively. Acute grade 3 urinary toxicity was seen in only 1 patient. There was no instance of acute grade 3 rectal toxicity. Rates of late grade 3 rectal toxicity, dysuria, hematuria, urinary retention, and urinary incontinence were 0%, 10.3%, 1.3%, 9.0%, and 0%, respectively. No grade 4 or greater toxicity was recorded. Among the four (urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal) domains assessed with the EPIC questionnaire, only the sexual domain did not recover with time. CONCLUSIONS HDR brachytherapy as a monotherapy for favorable-risk prostate cancer, administered using a single implant over 2 days, is feasible and has acceptable acute and late toxicities. Further follow-up is still required to better evaluate the efficacy of such treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maroie Barkati
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ilic D, O'Connor D, Green S, Wilt TJ. Screening for prostate cancer: an updated Cochrane systematic review. BJU Int 2011; 107:882-91. [PMID: 21392207 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.10032.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE •To determine whether screening for prostate cancer reduces prostate cancer-specific mortality, impact on all-cause mortality and patient health-related quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS •An update to our 2006 Cochrane systematic review was performed by re-running an updated search of several databases, including MEDLINE and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials. • Articles were included if they were a randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining screening vs no screening for prostate cancer. Data was collected and analysed according to the methods outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. RESULTS •Five RCTs with a total of 341,351 participants were included in this updated Cochrane systematic review. All involved PSA testing, although the interval and threshold for further evaluation varied across trials. The age of participants was 50-74 years, with durations of patient follow-up of 7-15 years. •The methodological quality of three of the studies was assessed as posing a high risk of bias. •Meta-analysis of the five included studies indicated no statistically significant difference in prostate cancer-specific mortality between men randomized to screening and control [relative risk (RR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.85-1.07]. Sub-group analyses indicated that prostate cancer-specific mortality was not affected by age at which participants were screened. A pre-planned analysis of a 'core' age group of men aged 55-69 years from the largest RCT (European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer) reported a significant 20% relative reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality; (95% CI 0.65-0.98; absolute risk 0.71 per 1000 men). The number of men diagnosed with prostate cancer was significantly greater in men randomized to screening, compared with those randomized to control (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.72). •Harms of screening included high rates of false-positive results for the PSA test, over-diagnosis and adverse events associated with transrectal ultrasonography guided biopsies such as infection, bleeding and pain. CONCLUSIONS •Prostate cancer screening did not significantly decrease all-cause or prostate cancer-specific mortality in a combined meta-analysis of five RCTs. •Any benefits from prostate cancer screening may take > 10 years to accrue; therefore, men who have a life expectancy of < 10-15 years should be informed that screening for prostate cancer is not beneficial and has harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dragan Ilic
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Steenland K, Goodman M, Liff J, DiIorio C, Butler S, Roberts P. Quality of Life Among Men With Prostate Cancer in Rural Georgia. Urology 2011; 77:927-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2010] [Revised: 12/13/2010] [Accepted: 12/17/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
49
|
Crook JM, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Wallace K, Ma C, Fung S, Alibhai S, Jewett M, Fleshner N. Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life 5 Years After SPIRIT: Surgical Prostatectomy Versus Interstitial Radiation Intervention Trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:362-8. [PMID: 21149658 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.31.7305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group phase III Surgical Prostatectomy Versus Interstitial Radiation Intervention Trial comparing radical prostatectomy (RP) and brachytherapy (BT) closed after 2 years due to poor accrual. We report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at a mean of 5.3 years for 168 trial-eligible men who either chose or were randomly assigned to RP or BT following a multidisciplinary educational session. Patients and Methods After initial lack of accrual, a multidisciplinary educational session was introduced for eligible patients. In all, 263 men attended 47 sessions. Of those, 34 consented to random assignment, 62 chose RP, and 94 chose BT. Five years later, these 190 men underwent HRQOL evaluation by using the cancer-specific 50-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite, the Short Form 12 Physical Component Score, and Short Form 12 Mental Component Score. Response rate was 88.4%. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare summary scores between the two interventions. Results Of 168 survey responders, 60.7% had BT (9.5% randomly assigned) and 39.3% had RP (9.5% randomly assigned). Median age was 61.4 years for BT and 59.4 for RP (P = .05). Median follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 3.2 to 6.5 years). For BT versus RP, there was no difference in bowel or hormonal domains, but men treated with BT scored better in urinary (91.8 v 88.1; P = .02) and sexual (52.5 v 39.2; P = .001) domains, and in patient satisfaction (93.6 v 76.9; P < .001). Conclusion Although treatment allocation was random in only 19%, all patients received identical information in a multidisciplinary setting before selecting RP, BT, or random assignment. HRQOL evaluated 3.2 to 6.5 years after treatment showed an advantage for BT in urinary and sexual domains and in patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juanita Mary Crook
- From the University of Toronto, University Health Network, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- From the University of Toronto, University Health Network, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kris Wallace
- From the University of Toronto, University Health Network, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Clement Ma
- From the University of Toronto, University Health Network, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Fung
- From the University of Toronto, University Health Network, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shabbir Alibhai
- From the University of Toronto, University Health Network, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Jewett
- From the University of Toronto, University Health Network, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- From the University of Toronto, University Health Network, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Carlsson S, Aus G, Bergdahl S, Khatami A, Lodding P, Stranne J, Hugosson J. The excess burden of side-effects from treatment in men allocated to screening for prostate cancer. The Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial. Eur J Cancer 2010; 47:545-53. [PMID: 21087857 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2010] [Revised: 10/18/2010] [Accepted: 10/19/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of men needed to treat to prevent one death is rather high in prostate cancer screening. How this affects the burden of treatment-related side-effects is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment related morbidity following radical prostatectomy in men participating in the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial. METHODS In 1995, 20,000 men aged 50-64 years were randomly allocated (1:1) to biennial PSA-screening or to a control group not invited. A subset of prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2001 and 2008 responded to questionnaires preoperatively and at 18 months postoperatively. The primary endpoint was patient-reported frequencies of erectile dysfunction as measured by the validated International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire and urinary incontinence as assessed by use of pads. Analyses were made according to intention to screen. FINDINGS After 14 years of follow-up, a total of 1849 men were detected with prostate cancer (1138 screened versus 711 controls, excluding 7 cancers detected at autopsy in the control group). Overall, 1047 received treatment with curative intent and radical prostatectomy was performed in 829 cases (79.2%). In this study, 294 of these men participated (205 screened and 89 controls). Of preoperatively potent men 79.1% (91/115) in the screening-group and 90.7% (49/54) in the control-group became impotent or sexually inactive 18 months postoperatively, whereas 14.3% (29/203) of screened men and 20.5% (18/88) of controls were considered postoperatively incontinent (regular use of pads). Extrapolated data yields that 120/10,000 more men become impotent and 25/10,000 more men will have the need of pads among men invited to regular PSA screening. The 'cost' per life saved at the same follow-up of screening is four men impotent and less than one man incontinent. INTERPRETATION Despite the relatively high risk of erectile dysfunction and incontinence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, the excess burden of permanent side-effects after population-based screening can be regarded as relatively low, when related to the number of men saved from prostate cancer death. These data can be useful when calculating the harms and benefits of screening. However, the outcome on a population-level may differ from the benefit for the individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Göteborg, Bruna Straåket 11B, Göteborg, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|