Modulation of irinotecan metabolism by ketoconazole

Fecal SN-38 Content as a Surrogate Predictor of Intestinal SN-38 Exposure and Associated Irinotecan-induced Severe Delayed-Onset Diarrhea by a Novel Use of the Spectrofluorimetric Method

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan administration can lead to severe delayed-onset diarrhea (SDOD) in clinical practice. Currently, there is no reliable surrogate predictor of intestinal exposure to SN-38 and subsequent diarrhea incidence.

METHODS

The relationship between fecal 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) content and SDOD was investigated in Fisher 344 rats using a novel spectrofluorimetric method. Additionally, a pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan was performed to evaluate the biodistribution of SN-38 to establish the relationship between tissue and fecal SN-38 exposure.

RESULTS

The spectrofluorimetric method was successfully employed to measure fecal SN-38 and CPT-11 content from Day 3 to Day 6 post-irinotecan administration. Only fecal SN-38 content on Day 3 exhibited a significantly positive correlation with SDOD incidence on Days 4 and 5. A cutoff value of SN-38 ≥ 0.066 mg/g in feces was identified, predicting severe diarrhea incidence with 81% accuracy and 80% specificity. The positive correlation between fecal SN-38 content and SN-38 exposure in the ileum on Day 3 was also reflected in the changes of indicators during intestinal injury, such as prostaglandin E2 level and antioxidant activity.

CONCLUSION

Fecal SN-38 content proves to be representative of intestinal exposure to SN-38, indicative of intestinal injury, and predictive of SDOD incidence in rats, while the spectrofluorimetric method demonstrates the translational potential.

UGT1A1 Testing in Breast Cancer: should it become routine practice in patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates?

The use of genetic testing to personalize therapeutic strategies in cancer is rapidly evolving and thus changing the landscape of treatment of oncologic patients. The UGT1A1 gene is an important component for the metabolism and glucoronidation of certain drugs, including irinotecan and sacituzumab govitecan (SG); therefore, various UGT1A1 polymorphisms leading to decreased function of the UGT1A1 enzyme may lead to increased risk of treatment-related side effects. Testing for UGT1A1 polymorphism is not routinely adopted in clinical practice; that is due to the lack of concise studies and recommendations concerning the clinical relevance of this test and its impact on the quality of life of cancer patients. The knowledge regarding UGT1A1 polymorphism and its clinical relevance will be reviewed in this article, as well as the published literature on the association between UGT1A1 polymorphism and the toxicity risk of irinotecan as well as sacituzumab govitecan. The current recommendations and guidelines on UGT1A1 testing will be discussed in detail in the hopes of providing guidance to oncologists in their clinical practice.

Evaluation of UGT1A1 and CYP3A Genotyping and Single-Point Irinotecan and Metabolite Concentrations as Predictors of the Occurrence of Adverse Events in Cancer Treatment

PURPOSE

The variability on irinotecan (IRI) pharmacokinetics and toxicity has been attributed mostly to genetic variations in the UGT1A1 gene, responsible for conjugation of the active metabolite SN-38. Also, CYP3A mediates the formation of inactive oxidative metabolites of IRI. The association between the occurrence of severe adverse events, pharmacokinetics parameters, and UGT1A1 and CYP3A4 predicted phenotypes was evaluated, as the evaluation of [SN-38]/IRI dose ratio as predictor of severe adverse events.

METHODS

Forty-one patients undergoing IRI therapy were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were collected 15 min after the end of drug the infusion, for IRI, SN-38, SN-38G, bilirubin concentrations measurements, and UGT1A1 and CYP3A genotype estimation. Data on adverse event was reported.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (36.5%) developed grade 3/4 adverse events. A total of 9.8% (n = 4) of the patients had UGT1A1 reduced activity phenotype, and 48.7% (n = 20) had UGT1A1 and 63.4% (n = 26) CYP3A intermediary phenotypes. Severe neutropenia and diarrhea were more prevalent in patients with reduced UGT1A1 in comparison with functional metabolism (50% and 75% versus 0% and 13%, respectively). SN-38 levels and its concentrations adjusted by IRI dose were significantly correlated to toxicity (rs = 0.31 (p = 0.05) and rs = 0.425 (p < 0.01)). The [SN-38]/IRI dose ratio had a ROC curve of 0.823 (95% CI 0.69-0.956) to detect any severe adverse event and 0.833 (95% CI 0.694-0.973) to detect severe diarrhea. The cut-off of 0.075 ng mL-1 mg-1 had 100% sensitivity and 65.7% specificity to predict severe diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirmed the relevance of the pre-emptive genotypic information of UGT1A1. The [SN-38]/IRI ratio, measured 15 min after the end of the IRI infusion, was a strong predictor of severe toxicity and could be applied to minimize the burden of patients after IRI administration.

Repurposing antifungal drugs for cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Repurposing antifungal drugs in cancer therapy has attracted unprecedented attention in both preclinical and clinical research due to specific advantages, such as safety, high-cost effectiveness and time savings compared with cancer drug discovery. The surprising and encouraging efficacy of antifungal drugs in cancer therapy, mechanistically, is attributed to the overlapping targets or molecular pathways between fungal and cancer pathogenesis. Advancements in omics, informatics and analytical technology have led to the discovery of increasing "off-site" targets from antifungal drugs involved in cancerogenesis, such as smoothened (D477G) inhibition from itraconazole in basal cell carcinoma.

AIM OF REVIEW

This review illustrates several antifungal drugs repurposed for cancer therapy and reveals the underlying mechanism based on their original target and "off-site" target. Furthermore, the challenges and perspectives for the future development and clinical applications of antifungal drugs for cancer therapy are also discussed, providing a refresh understanding of drug repurposing.

KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW

This review may provide a basic understanding of repurposed antifungal drugs for clinical cancer management, thereby helping antifungal drugs broaden new indications and promote clinical translation.

Drug-Drug Interactions and Disease Status Are Associated with Irinotecan-induced Hepatotoxicity: A Cross-Sectional Study in Shanghai

Irinotecan-induced hepatotoxicity can cause severe clinical complications in patients; however, the underlying mechanism and factors affecting hepatotoxicity have rarely been investigated. In this cross-sectional study, we screened all clinical, demographic, medication and genetic variables among 126 patients receiving irinotecan and explored potential associations with the incidence and time to onset of irinotecan-induced hepatotoxicity. Approximately 38.9% of the patients suffered from hepatotoxicity after irinotecan administration. The presence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) increases the incidence of hepatotoxicity approximately 2.9-fold and doubles the hazard of time to hepatotoxicity. Patients with liver metastasis had a more than 4-fold higher risk of hepatotoxicity and a 3.5-fold increased hazard of time to hepatotoxicity compared to those without liver metastasis. Patients who took CYP3A inducers had a 4.4-fold increased incidence of hepatotoxicity, and furthermore, concomitant use of platinum-based antineoplastics revealed 4.2 times the hazard of time to hepatotoxicity compared to those receiving antimetabolites. The cumulative dose of irinotecan (5-9 cycles) increased hepatotoxicity by 8.5 times. However, the genotypes and phenotypes of UGT1A1*28/*6 failed to be predictive factors of hepatotoxicity. The findings of this study suggest that irinotecan-induced hepatotoxicity is not directly associated with genetic variables but is mostly related to concomitant use of CYP3A inducers and platinum, as well as the presence of liver metastasis and CVD. Thus, close monitoring of liver function is recommended, especially in patients with liver impairment or using CYP3A inducers and platinum antineoplastic drugs, which may be the best way to prevent hepatotoxicity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

All You Need to Know About UGT1A1 Genetic Testing for Patients Treated With Irinotecan: A Practitioner-Friendly Guide

Irinotecan is an anticancer agent widely used for the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal and pancreatic cancers. Severe neutropenia and diarrhea are common dose-limiting toxicities of irinotecan-based therapy, and UGT1A1 polymorphisms are one of the major risk factors of these toxicities. In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration revised the drug label to indicate that patients with UGT1A1*28 homozygous genotype should receive a decreased dose of irinotecan. However, UGT1A1*28 testing is not routinely used in the clinic, and specific reasons include lack of access to concise information on this wide issue as well as mixed recommendations by regulatory and professional entities. To assist oncologists in assessing whether and when to use UGT1A1 genetic testing in patients receiving irinotecan-based therapies, this article provided (1) essential knowledge of UGT1A1 polymorphisms; (2) an update on the impact of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on efficacy and toxicity of contemporary irinotecan-based regimens; (3) dosing adjustments based upon the UGT1A1 genotypes, and (4) recommendations from currently available guidelines from the US and international scientific consortia and major oncology societies.

Elucidating the role of pharmacogenetics in irinotecan efficacy and adverse events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Irinotecan is a cytotoxic agent that is widely used in the treatment of several types of solid tumors. However, although it is generally well tolerated, approximately 20% to 35% of patients develop severe toxicity, particularly delayed-type diarrhea and neutropenia. As the incidence of such toxicities is often associated with the UGT1A1 *28/*28, *6/*28 and *6/*6 genotypes, individualized dosing could reduce these adverse events. Furthermore, prospective trials have shown that patients harboring the UGT1A1 *1/*1 and *1/*28 genotypes can tolerate higher doses of irinotecan, which may in turn impact on a better outcome. Upfront UGT1A1 genotyping could therefore be a usefulness strategy in order to individualize irinotecan dosing, but consensus on the recommended dose based on the UGT1A1 genotype is still lacking.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the results of the main pharmacogenetic studies focused on irinotecan. We provide an overview of current evidence and recommendations for individualized dosing of irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Implementation of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 genotyping in clinical practice is a first step toward personalizing irinotecan therapy. This approach is likely to improve patient care and reduce healthcare costs. Future large and prospective studies will help to clarify the clinical value of other genetic markers in irinotecan treatment personalization.

Role of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Proteins in CNS Tumors: Resistance- Based Perspectives and Clinical Updates

Despite gigantic advances in medical research and development, chemotherapeutic resistance remains a major challenge in complete remission of CNS tumors. The failure of complete eradication of CNS tumors has been correlated with the existence of several factors including overexpression of transporter proteins. To date, 49 ABC-transporter proteins (ABC-TPs) have been reported in humans, and the evidence of their strong association with chemotherapeutics' influx, dissemination, and efflux in CNS tumors, is growing. Research studies on CNS tumors are implicating ABC-TPs as diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers that may be utilised in preclinical and clinical studies. With the current advancements in cell biology, molecular analysis of genomic and transcriptomic interplay, and protein homology-based drug-transporters interaction, our research approaches are streamlining the roles of ABC-TPs in cancer and multidrug resistance. Potential inhibitors of ABC-TP for better clinical outcomes in CNS tumors have emerged. Elacridar has shown to enhance the chemo-sensitivity of Dasatanib and Imatinib in various glioma models. Tariquidar has improved the effectiveness of Temozolomide's in CNS tumors. Although these inhibitors have been effective in preclinical settings, their clinical outcomes have not been as significant in clinical trials. Thus, to have a better understanding of the molecular evaluations of ABC-TPs, as well as drug-interactions, further research is being pursued in research labs. Our lab aims to better comprehend the biological mechanisms involved in drug resistance and to explore novel strategies to increase the clinical effectiveness of anticancer chemotherapeutics, which will ultimately improve clinical outcomes.

Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics

Since its clinical introduction in 1998, the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan has been widely used in the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal, pancreatic, and lung cancer. Irinotecan therapy is characterized by several dose-limiting toxicities and large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Irinotecan has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecan itself. Several phase I and II enzymes, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A, are involved in the formation of inactive metabolites, making its metabolism prone to environmental and genetic influences. Genetic variants in the DNA of these enzymes and transporters could predict a part of the drug-related toxicity and efficacy of treatment, which has been shown in retrospective and prospective trials and meta-analyses. Patient characteristics, lifestyle and comedication also influence irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Other factors, including dietary restriction, are currently being studied. Meanwhile, a more tailored approach to prevent excessive toxicity and optimize efficacy is warranted. This review provides an updated overview on today’s literature on irinotecan pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics.

Altered cytochrome 2E1 and 3A P450-dependent drug metabolism in advanced ovarian cancer correlates to tumour-associated inflammation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Previous work has focussed on changes in drug metabolism caused by altered activity of CYP3A in the presence of inflammation and, in particular, inflammation associated with malignancy. However, drug metabolism involves a number of other P450s, and therefore, we assessed the effect of cancer-related inflammation on multiple CYP enzymes using a validated drug cocktail.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer and healthy volunteers were recruited. Participants received caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dextromethorphan, and omeprazole as in vivo probes for CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP2D6, CYP3A, and CYP2C19. Blood was collected for serum C-reactive protein and cytokine analysis.

KEY RESULTS

CYP2E1 activity was markedly up-regulated in cancer (6-hydroxychlorzoxazone/chlorzoxazone ratio of 1.30 vs. 2.75), while CYP3A phenotypic activity was repressed in cancer (omeprazole sulfone/omeprazole ratio of 0.23 vs. 0.49). Increased activity of CYP2E1 was associated with raised serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α. Repression of CYP3A correlated with raised levels of serum C-reactive protein, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

CYP enzyme activity is differentially affected by the presence of tumour-associated inflammation, affecting particularly CYP2E1- and CYP3A-mediated drug metabolism, and may have profound implications for drug development and prescribing in oncological settings.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Markers of Irinotecan Toxicity

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan (IRI) is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug, mostly used for first-line treatment of colorectal and pancreatic cancer. IRI doses are usually established based on patient's body surface area, an approach associated with large inter-individual variability in drug exposure and high incidence of severe toxicity. Toxic and therapeutic effects of IRI are also due to its active metabolite SN-38, reported to be up to 100 times more cytotoxic than IRI. SN-38 is detoxified by the formation of SN-38 glucuronide, through UGT1A1. Genetic polymorphisms in the UGT1A1 gene are associated to higher exposures to SN-38 and severe toxicity. Pharmacokinetic models to describe IRI and SN-38 kinetic profiles are available, with few studies exploring pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic-based dose individualization. The aim of this manuscript is to review the available evidence supporting pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic dose individualization of IRI in order to reduce the occurrence of severe toxicity during cancer treatment.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched, considering papers published in the period from 1995-2017, using the keywords irinotecan, pharmacogenetics, metabolic genotyping, dose individualization, therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, either alone or in combination, with original papers being selected based on the presence of relevant data.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this review confirm the importance of considering individual patient characteristics to select IRI doses. Currently, the most straightforward approach for IRI dose individualization is UGT1A1 genotyping. However, this strategy is sub-optimal due to several other genetic and environmental contributions to the variable pharmacokinetics of IRI and its active metabolite. The use of dried blood spot sampling could allow the clinical application of limited sampling and population pharmacokinetic models for IRI doses individualization.

Effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on irinotecan-induced clinical effects in rats

Because of the great interest for research on the potential use of cannabis preparations as co-medication for alleviation of toxic effects in cancer management, we investigated the influence of Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC) to modulate irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced toxicity. Male Wistar rats were treated either with a single irinotecan intraperitoneal dose, 100 mg/kg body-weight (b.w.), or with irinotecan in combination with THC (7 mg/kg b.w., p.o., administered repeatedly for 1, 3 and 7 days). Serial blood samples were obtained up to seven days after dosing and were analyzed for complete blood count and biochemical parameters (liver enzymes, creatinine, inflammatory markers, and lipid status). Serial urine samples were collected in the first 24 h to monitor the time-course of THC metabolite 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ⁹-THC (THC-COOH) excretion with concomitant irinotecan treatment or without. Both irinotecan and irinotecan + Δ⁹-THC administration caused moderate leukopenia but a greater decrease in leukocyte count was observed in the irinotecan + Δ⁹-THC treated compared to the single irinotecan suggesting higher cytotoxic effects in combined treatment. Irinotecan treatment induced elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in rats without diarrheal symptoms and without an increase in circulating pro-inflammatory mediators. Interestingly, the elevation of AST was not observed in the irinotecan + Δ⁹-THC group. The median creatinine-corrected urinary THC-COOH concentration was higher in the irinotecan + THC group compared to the THC-only group in a time-dependent manner, suggesting a possible early interaction between cannabinoids and irinotecan. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of cannabinoids particularly on hematological toxicity, irinotecan metabolism and their role as a possible modifiable factor among irinotecan-treated hosts.

Relevance of CYP3A4*20, UGT1A1*37 and UGT1A1*28 variants in irinotecan-induced severe toxicity

Severe irinotecan-induced toxicity is associated with UGT1A1 polymorphisms. However, some patients develop side-effects despite harbouring a normal UGT1A1 genotype. As CYP3A4 is also an irinotecan-metabolizing enzyme, our study aimed to elucidate the influence of the CYP3A4*20 loss-of-function allele in the toxicity profile of these patients. Three-hundred and eight metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with an irinotecan-containing chemotherapy were studied. The presence of CYP3A4*20, UGT1A1*37 and UGT1A1*28 alleles was tested. Associations between these genetic variants and toxicity were evaluated. UGT1A1*28 was significantly associated with severe diarrhoea, neutropenia and asthenia (P = 0.002, P = 0.037 and P = 0.041, respectively). One patient with the UGT1A1*28/*37 genotype presented with grade IV neutropenia and lethal septic shock. One heterozygous UGT1A1 (*1/*28) patient also carried the CYP3A4*20 allele but did not develop toxicity. We confirm that UGT1A1*37 and UGT1A1*28 are associated with severe toxicity and suggest that the CYP3A4*20 allele does not play a role in irinotecan-induced toxicity.

Combined use of irinotecan with histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat could cause severe toxicity by inhibiting SN-38 glucuronidation via UGT1A1

SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) such as belinostat, vorinostat and panobinostat, have all been shown to be deactivated by glucuronidation via UGTs. Since they all compete for UGTs for deactivation, we aimed to investigate the inhibitory effect of various HDACis on the glucuronidation of SN-38. This inhibitory effect was determined by measuring the formation rate of SN-38 glucuronide after SN-38 incubation with human recombinant UGT1A isoforms (1A1, 1A6, 1A7 and 1A9) and pooled human liver microsomes (HLM, wild type, UGT1A1*1*28 and UGT1A1*28*28 allelic variants), with and without HDACis. The data showed that belinostat at 100 and 200 µmol/L inhibited SN-38 glucuronidation via UGT1A1 in a dose-dependent manner, causing significant decrease in V_max and CL_int (p < 0.05) from 12.60 to 1.95 pmol/min/mg and 21.59 to 4.20 μL/min/mg protein respectively. Similarly, in HLMs, V_max dropped from 41.13 to 10.54, 24.96 to 3.77 and 6.23 to 3.30 pmol/min/mg, and CL_int reduced from 81.25 to 26.11, 29.22 to 6.10 and 5.40 to 1.34 µL/min/mg protein for the respective wild type, heterozygous and homozygous variants. Interestingly, belinostat at 200 µmol/L that is roughly equivalent to the average Cmax, 183 µmol/L of belinostat at a dose of 1,400 mg/m² given intravenously once per day on days 1 to 5 every 3 weeks, was able to inhibit both heterozygous and homozygous variants to same extents (~64%). This highlights the potential clinical significance, as a large proportion of patients could be at risk of developing severe toxicity if irinotecan is co-administered with belinostat.

Irinotecan-induced muscle twitching from a possible drug interaction: A case report

We report the case of a 50-year-old human immunodeficiency virus-positive patient with stage IV KRAS-mutated colorectal cancer who experienced visible muscle twitching in the right lateral triceps brachii from irinotecan administration for which typical supportive care measures were unsuccessful, including the administration of atropine and slowing down the infusion rate. The patient was able to tolerate this reaction and received 20 cycles of irinotecan-based chemotherapy despite experiencing the muscle twitching with every cycle at the same onset, duration, and severity. It is possible that competitive metabolism by concomitant medications metabolized by CYP3A4 or UGT1A1 was responsible for this event. Due to ethical concerns, we were unable to formally assess the drug interaction by discontinuing the suspected interacting medications and re-initiating them to evaluate the effects. A formal pharmacokinetic study may be warranted to better elucidate these potential drug interactions.

Clarithromycin co-administration does not increase irinotecan (CPT-11) toxicity in colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is used to treat advanced colorectal cancer. The drug is activated by carboxylesterases and rendered inactive by CYP3A4. Recently, the efficacy of combining CPT-11 and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents was confirmed in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Clarithromycin (CAM) is a strong CYP3A inhibitor often used to prevent rash associated with anti-EGFR therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of increased neutropenia and diarrhea in combining CPT-11 and CAM.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses were conducted at Osaka National Hospital (Osaka, Japan) on the records of colorectal cancer patients treated with a CPT-11-containing regimen between November 2006 and January 2014. The incidence of neutropenia and diarrhea was compared between patients who received CPT-11 and CAM and patients who received CPT-11 without CAM.

RESULTS

One-hundred and twenty-eight patients were included in this study, of whom 21 were concomitantly treated with CAM and 107 were not. There was no difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia between the CAM co-administration group (10%) and the non-CAM group (16%) [Odds ratio: 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.12-2.62), p = 0.45]. No difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 diarrhea was found between the CAM co-administration group (0%) and the non-CAM group (4%) (p = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not identify an increase in CPT-11 toxicity by co-administration with CAM.

A guide to clinically relevant drug interactions in oncology

This paper presents an overview of new information on clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, particular focuses on negative drug interactions in oncology. We have generated a concise table of drug-drug interactions that provides a synopsis of the clinical outcome of the interaction along with a recommendation for management. We have also generated other tables that describe specific interactions with methotrexate and dosing guidelines for cytotoxic drugs in the presence of renal or hepatic dysfunction. Since warfarin is one of the non-anticancer drugs that is commonly used in cancer patients for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism, its interactions with other anticancer drugs that have been reported in literatures were also reviewed in this paper. In general, drug interactions observed in cancer patients may be categorized into pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmaceutic interactions. Pharmacokinetic interactions involve one drug altering the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of another drug. Interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic profile of many anticancer agents often complicates the predictability of the antitumor response and toxicities. Among four pharmacokinetic characteristics, drug interactions involving hepatic metabolism is probably the most common and important mechanism responsible for oncologic drug interactions. For example, several anticancer drugs including taxanes, vinca alkaloids, and irinotecan are known to be metabolized by cytochrome CYP3A4. Enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants have been shown to significantly decrease the plasma levels of these anticancer drugs, thereby compromising the anti-tumor effects. N ephrotoxicity or changes in hepatic function caused by some anticancer drugs (e.g., cisplatin, asparaginase) may also have an impact on the pharmacokinetics of the interacting agents. Pharmacodynamic interactions may occur when two or more drugs acting at a common receptor-binding site impact on the pharmacologic action of the object drug, without influencing the pharmacokinetics of each interacting agent. In clinical setting, a decrease of antitumor efficacy was observed in breast cell lines when gemcitabine or vinorelbine were used in combination with paclitaxel. On the other hand, a decreased incidence of thrombocytopenia was seen in patients receiving combination of carboplatin and palcitaxel compared to those receiving carboplatin alone. The third type of drug-drug interaction is known as pharmaceutic interaction. When one drug may alter the physical or chemical compatibility of another drug that utlimately leads to a change in appearance of the solution or a decrease of effectiveness of the drug due to drug inactivation or degradation.

Evaluation of drug-drug interactions for oncology therapies: in vitro-in vivo extrapolation model-based risk assessment

AIMS

Understanding drug-drug interactions (DDI) is a critical part of the drug development process as polypharmacy has become commonplace in many therapeutic areas including the cancer patient population. The objectives of this study were to investigate cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated DDI profiles available for therapies used in the oncology setting and evaluate how models based on in vitro-in vivo extrapolation performed in predicting CYP-mediated DDI risk.

METHODS

A dataset of 125 oncology therapies was collated using drug label and approval history information, incorporating in vitro and clinical PK data. The predictive accuracy of the basic and net effect mechanistic static models was assessed using this oncology drug dataset, for both victim and perpetrator potential of CYP3A-mediated DDI.

RESULTS

The incidence of CYP3A-mediated interaction potential was 47%, 22% and 11% for substrates, inhibitors and inducers, respectively. The basic models for precipitants gave conservative predictions with no false negatives, whilst the mechanistic static models provided reasonable quantitative predictions (2.3-3-fold error). Further analysis revealed that incorporating DDI at the level of the intestine was in most cases over-predicting interaction magnitude due to overestimates of the rate and extent of oral absorption of the precipitant. Quantifying victim DDI potential was also demonstrated using fmCYP3A estimates from ketoconazole clinical DDI studies to predict the magnitude of interaction on co-administration with the CYP3A inducer, rifampicin (1.6-3.3 fold error).

CONCLUSIONS

This work illustrates the utility and limitations of current DDI risk assessment approaches applied to a range of contemporary anti-cancer agents, and discusses the implications for therapeutic combination strategies.

Cytochrome P450 in Cancer Susceptibility and Treatment

Cytochrome 450 (CYP450) designates a group of enzymes abundant in smooth endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes and epithelial cells of small intestines. The main function of CYP450 is oxidative catalysis of various endogenous and exogenous substances. CYP450 are implicated in phase I metabolism of 80% of drugs currently in use, including anticancer drugs. They are also involved in synthesis of various hormones and influence hormone-related cancers. CYP450 genes are highly polymorphic and their variants play an important role in cancer risk and treatment. Association studies and meta-analyses have been performed to decipher the role of CYP450 polymorphisms in cancer susceptibility. Cancer treatment involves multimodal therapies and evaluation of CYP450 polymorphisms is necessary for pharmacogenetic assessment of anticancer therapy outcomes. In addition, CYP450 inhibitors are being evaluated for improved pharmacokinetics and oral formulation of several anticancer drugs.

Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in cancer patients treated with oral anticancer drugs

BACKGROUND

Potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) in patients with cancer are common, but have not previously been quantified for oral anticancer treatment. We assessed the prevalence and seriousness of potential PDDIs among ambulatory cancer patients on oral anticancer treatment.

METHODS

A search was conducted in a computer-based medication prescription system for dispensing oral anticancer drugs to outpatients in three Dutch centres. Potential drug-drug interactions were identified using electronic (Drug Interaction Fact software) and manual screening methods (peer-reviewed reports).

RESULTS

In the 898 patients included in the study, 1359 PDDIs were identified in 426 patients (46%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=42-50%). In 143 patients (16%), a major PDDI was identified. The drug classes most frequently involved in a major PDDI were coumarins and opioids. The majority of cases concerned central nervous system interactions, PDDIs that can cause gastrointestinal toxicity and prolongation of QT intervals. In multivariate analysis, concomitant use of more drugs (odds ratio (OR)=1.66, 95% CI=1.54-1.78, P<0001) and genito-urinary cancer (OR=0.25, 95% CI=0.12-0.52, P<0001) were risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Potential drug-drug interactions are very common among cancer patients on oral cancer therapy. Physicians and pharmacists should be more aware of these potential interactions.

Pharmacologic modulation strategies to reduce dose requirements of anticancer therapy while preserving clinical efficacy

Drug interactions may be exploited to overcome pharmacokinetic issues in order to improve the therapeutic index of a drug, with clinical goals of reducing the dose of the active drug while preserving efficacy or reducing toxicity. This strategy has been used in infectious disease and transplant medicine, and, more recently, in oncology. Pharmacologic modulation strategies range from coadministration of either a drug that inhibits a metabolizing enzyme that would inactivate the drug of interest, a drug that induces an enzyme that activates the drug of interest or a drug that inhibits transporters that affect the uptake or elimination of the drug of interest. This review will discuss pharmacologic modulation strategies that have been tested clinically in order to increase systemic drug exposure. Important examples include ketoconazole inhibition of hepatic CYP3A4 in order to increase systemic exposure to docetaxel, irinotecan and etoposide, and cyclosporine inhibition of intestinal ATP-binding cassette transporters in order to decrease the toxicity of irinotecan and increase the bioavailability of oral docetaxel, paclitaxel and topotecan.

Impaired irinotecan biotransformation in hepatic microsomal fractions from patients with chronic liver disease

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

The anticancer agent irinotecan is a prodrug that is hydrolyzed by hepatic carboxylesterase to its active and toxic metabolite SN-38 and oxidized by CYP3A4 to its inactive metabolite APC. Irinotecan therapy is complicated by co-administered drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 and decrease APC formation and that indirectly increase SN-38 formation. Dose adjustment in cancer patients with liver disease has been recommended.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

In microsomal fractions from patients with severe hepatic dysfunction both APC and SN-38 formation were decreased due to down-regulation of CYP3A4 and carboxylesterase enzymes. Thus relative SN-38 : APC formation was preserved. In some fractions the SN-38:APC ratio was increased, thus providing a possible explanation for clinical reports of increased SN-38 exposure in some patients with liver dysfunction. Close monitoring of SN-38 formation in patients with severe liver disease is warranted.

AIMS

Dose modification with the anticancer agent irinotecan is recommended in patients with severe liver dysfunction. This study evaluated the impact of liver disease on the relative formation of phase I products of irinotecan biotransformation in human microsomes in vitro.

METHODS

Microsomes from subjects with normal liver function and liver dysfunction (n=20) were assessed for irinotecan biotransformation and the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and carboxylesterase (CES) enzymes.

RESULTS

Liver disease down-regulated CYP3A4 expression (median 33% of control, range 0-126%, P<0.05) and impaired CYP3A4-dependent oxidation of irinotecan to the inactive 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (APC) (median 0.2, range 0-1.21 pmol mg protein(-1) min(-1) compared with median 0.66, range 0-2.35 in control, P<0.01). CES-mediated hydrolysis of irinotecan to 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) was also impaired in liver disease (median 8.38, range 0-20.7 pmol mg protein(-1) min(-1) compared with median 13.3, range 0-28.9 in control, P<0.05). In seven of 20 liver disease microsomes neither metabolite was detected but in three the SN-38:APC ratio was high (41-68) compared with the remaining 10 samples (ratio 11-36).

CONCLUSIONS

Down-regulation of CYP3A4 in liver disease decreased APC formation from irinotecan. SN-38 production was decreased and CES1 and 2 were down-regulated in most samples. However, in a subset of disease samples SN-38 production was relatively high because CYP3A4 activity was markedly impaired. This may account for clinical reports of increased SN-38 exposure in some patients with liver disease. Dose adjustments in cancer patients with liver disease who receive irinotecan are important and circulating SN-38 concentrations should be monitored closely.

Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and toxicities of irinotecan in cancer patients: a prospective cross-over drug-drug interaction study

BACKGROUND

Omeprazole is one of the most prescribed medications worldwide and within the class of proton pump inhibitors, it is most frequently associated with drug interactions. In vitro studies have shown that omeprazole can alter the function of metabolic enzymes and transporters that are involved in the metabolism of irinotecan, such as uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase subfamily 1A1 (UGT1A1), cytochrome P-450 enzymes subfamily 3A (CYP3A) and ATP-binding cassette drug-transporter G2 (ABCG2). In this open-label cross-over study we investigated the effects of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and toxicities of irinotecan.

METHODS

Fourteen patients were treated with single agent irinotecan (600mg i.v., 90min) followed 3weeks later by a second cycle with concurrent use of omeprazole 40mg once daily, which was started 2weeks prior to the second cycle. Plasma samples were obtained up to 55h after infusion and analysed for irinotecan and its metabolites 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycampothecin (SN-38), SN-38-glucuronide (SN-38G), 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-amino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (NPC) and 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (APC) by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Non-compartmental modelling was performed. Toxicities were monitored during both cycles. Paired statistical tests were performed with SPSS.

RESULTS

The exposure to irinotecan and its metabolites was not significantly different between both cycles. Neither were there significant differences in the absolute nadir and percentage decrease of WBC and ANC, nor on the incidence and severity of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting when irinotecan was combined with omeprazole.

CONCLUSION

Omeprazole 40mg did not alter the pharmacokinetics and toxicities of irinotecan. This widely used drug can, therefore, be safely administered during a 3-weekly single agent irinotecan schedule.

Effects of mannose-binding lectin polymorphisms on irinotecan-induced febrile neutropenia

OBJECTIVE

Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is important in the innate immune response. MBL2 gene polymorphisms affect MBL expression, and genotypes yielding low MBL levels have been associated with an elevated risk for infections in hematological cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, these reported associations are inconsistent, and data on patients with solid tumors are lacking. Here, we investigated the effects of MBL2 genotypes on irinotecan-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Irinotecan-treated patients were genotyped for the MBL2 gene. Two promoter (-550 H/L and -221 X/Y) and three exon polymorphisms (52 A/D, 54 A/B, and 57 A/C) were determined, together with known risk factors for irinotecan-induced toxicity. Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were recorded during the first course.

RESULTS

Of the 133 patients, 28% experienced severe neutropenia and 10% experienced febrile neutropenia. No associations were found between exon polymorphisms and febrile neutropenia. However, patients with the H/H promoter genotype, associated with high MBL levels, experienced significantly more febrile neutropenia than patients with the H/L and L/L genotypes (20% versus 13% versus 5%). Moreover, patients with the HYA haplotype encountered significantly more febrile neutropenia than patients without this high MBL-producing haplotype (16% versus 4%). In the subgroup with wild-type exon polymorphisms (A/A), patients with the high MBL promoter phenotype had the highest incidence of febrile neutropenia, regardless of known risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Patients with high MBL2 promoter genotypes and haplotypes seem more at risk for developing febrile neutropenia. If confirmed, these preliminary findings may contribute to more individualized approaches of irinotecan treatment.

Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of udenafil in healthy Korean subjects

AIMS

Udenafil is a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. It is metabolized to DA-8164, a major metabolite, by CYP3A4. This study was performed to investigate the effect of ketoconazole, a known CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of udenafil.

METHODS

An open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence crossover study was performed in 12 healthy male volunteers. They received a single 100-mg oral dose of udenafil. Following a 5-day interval, 400 mg of ketoconazole was administered once a day for three consecutive days. On day 3 of ketoconazole treatment, a second 100 mg of udenafil was dosed concomitantly. Blood samples were collected at time points up to 48 h without ketoconazole treatment and up to 72 h with ketoconazole co-administration. The plasma concentration of udenafil was determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Following ketoconazole co-administration, the mean C(max) and AUC(last) of udenafil (95% confidence interval) increased 1.9-fold (1.60, 2.27) and 3.2-fold (2.82, 3.63), respectively. The median time to reach the C(max) was delayed in the co-administrated treatment, while the mean terminal elimination half-life (t(1/2)) remained relatively unchanged regardless of ketoconazole co-administration. The metabolic AUC ratio (AUC(last) of DA-8164/AUC(last) of udenafil) was 1.71 when udenafil was administered alone, and the value decreased to 0.19 when udenafil was dosed in the presence of ketoconazole. Regarding safety assessments, no clinically significant difference or serious adverse event was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The systemic exposure of udenafil increased significantly when it was administered with ketoconazole. Dose adjustment may be required when these drugs are used together.

Effects of methimazole on the elimination of irinotecan

PURPOSE

To study the possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between irinotecan and methimazole.

METHODS

A patient treated for colorectal cancer with single agent irinotecan received methimazole co-medication for Graves' disease. Irinotecan pharmacokinetics and side effects were followed during a total of four courses (two courses with and two courses without methimazole).

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of the active irinotecan metabolite SN-38 and its inactive metabolite SN-38-Glucuronide were both higher (a mean increase of 14 and 67%, respectively) with methimazole co-medication, compared to irinotecan monotherapy. As a result, the mean SN-38 glucuronidation rate increased with 47% during concurrent treatment. Other possible confounding factors did not change over time. Specific adverse events due to methimazole co-treatment were not seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional in vitro experiments suggest that these results can be explained by induction of UGT1A1 by methimazole, leading to higher SN-38G concentrations. The prescribed combination of these drugs may lead to highly toxic intestinal SN-38 levels. We therefore advise physicians to be very careful in combining methimazole with regular irinotecan doses, especially in patients who are prone to irinotecan toxicity.

An overview of the recent progress in irinotecan pharmacogenetics

Recent developments in a number of molecular profiling technologies, including genomic/genetic testing, proteomic profiling and metabolomic analysis have allowed the development of 'personalized medicine'. Irinotecan is one of the models for personalized medicine based on pharmacogenetics, and a number of clinical studies have revealed significant associations between UGT1A1*28 and irinotecan toxicity. Based on this cumulative evidence, the US FDA and pharmaceutical companies revised the irinotecan label in June 2005. However, a recommended strategy for irinotecan-dose adjustments based on individual genetic factors has not yet been fully established. This article provides an overview of recent progress in irinotecan pharmacogenetics and discusses the clinical significance of the UGT1A1 genotype/haplotype with regard to severe irinotecan toxicity.

Effect of the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover drug-drug interaction study

BACKGROUND

The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib undergoes oxidative biotransformation via multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, with CYP3A4 identified as a partial, yet potentially important, contributor based on in vitro drug metabolism studies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of concomitant administration of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of bortezomib.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, 2-way crossover study in patients with advanced solid tumors. All patients received bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) IV (on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of two 21-day cycles) and were randomized to receive concomitant ketoconazole 400 mg on days 6, 7, 8, and 9 of cycle 1 or 2. Serial blood samples were collected over the day-8 dosing interval (immediately prior to bortezomib administration, and from 5 minutes to 72 hours after administration) in cycles 1 and 2 for measurement of plasma bortezomib concentrations for noncompartmental PK analysis and blood 20S proteasome inhibition for PD analysis. All adverse events (AEs) were recorded during each cycle including serious AEs and all neurotoxicity events for up to 30 days after the last dose of bortezomib.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (median age, 57 years; sex, 67% male; race, 86% white; median body surface area, 2.01 m(2)) were randomized to treatment. Twelve patients completed the protocol-specified dosing and PK sampling in both cycles 1 and 2. Assessment of the effect of ketoconazole on bortezomib PK and PD was based on data in these 12 PK-evaluable patients. The ratio of geometric mean bortezomib AUC(0-tlast)(AUC from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration) for bortezomib plus ketoconazole versus bortezomib alone was 1.352 (90% CI, 1.032-1.772). Consistent with this observed mean increase in bortezomib exposure, concomitant administration of ketoconazole was associated with a corresponding increase (24%-46%) in the blood proteasome inhibitory effect.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant administration of the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole with bortezomib resulted in a mean increase of 35% in bortezomib exposure. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00129207.

A CYP3A4 phenotype-based dosing algorithm for individualized treatment of irinotecan

PURPOSE

Irinotecan, the prodrug of SN-38, is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450-3A4 (CYP3A4). A randomized trial was done to assess the utility of an algorithm for individualized irinotecan dose calculation based on a priori CYP3A4 activity measurements by the midazolam clearance test.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were randomized to receive irinotecan at a conventional dose level of 350 mg/m(2) (group A) or doses based on an equation consisting of midazolam clearance, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, and height (group B). Pharmacokinetics and toxicities were obtained during the first treatment course.

RESULTS

Demographics of 40 evaluable cancer patients were balanced between both groups, including UGT1A1*28 genotype and smoking status. The absolute dose of irinotecan ranged from 480 to 800 mg in group A and 380 to 1,060 mg in group B. The mean absolute dose and area under the curve of irinotecan and SN-38 were not significantly different in either group (P > 0.18). In group B, the interindividual variability in the area under the curve of irinotecan and SN-38 was reduced by 19% and 25%, respectively (P > 0.22). Compared with group A, the incidence of grades 3 to 4 neutropenia was >4-fold lower in group B (45 versus 10%; P = 0.013). The incidence of grades 3 to 4 diarrhea was equal in both groups (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of CYP3A4 phenotyping in dose calculation resulted in an improved predictability of the pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile of irinotecan, thereby lowering the incidence of severe neutropenia. In combination with UGT1A1*28 genotyping, CYP3A4 phenotype determination should be explored further as a strategy for the individualization of irinotecan treatment.

UGT1A1 genotyping: a predictor of irinotecan-associated side effects and drug efficacy?

Irinotecan [Camptosar (CPT-11), Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, USA] is one of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. In vivo, the prodrug CPT-11 is biotransformed by carboxylesterase into its active metabolite SN-38. SN-38 is inactivated by uridine disphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1 (UGT1A1) into the inactive compound SN-38G, which is excreted with the bile.This review concentrates on a critical evaluation of UGT1A1 gene polymorphism as a predictor of toxicity and treatment efficacy in patients who received irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan is explained with its main toxicities as well as the underlying mechanisms. The enzyme UGT1A1 is shown in the context of other metabolic pathways and different UGT enzymes involved. We will review in detail the controversy of the current literature with regard to the significance of identifying patients carrying the homozygous genotype UGT1A1 28. Racial differences concerning UGT enzymes have to be considered when discussing a pragmatic approach to determine gene polymorphisms as a predictor of treatment efficacy and outcome in patients receiving irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Dose dependency of toxicity and the clinical relevance of various UGT1 enzymes and single nucleotide polymorphisms in different alternative metabolic pathways are clarified to put UGT1A1 genotyping in a broad context with additional and competing strategies of patient-tailored therapy.

Modulation of Oral Drug Bioavailability: From Preclinical Mechanism to Therapeutic Application

Currently, more than one fourth of all anticancer drugs are developed as oral formulations, and it is expected that this number will increase substantially in the near future. To enable oral drug therapy, adequate oral bioavailability must be achieved. Factors that have proved to be important in limiting the oral bioavailability are the presence of ATP-binding cassette drug transporters (ABC transporters) and the cytochrome P450 enzymes. We discuss the tissues distribution and physiological function of the ABC transporters in the human body, their expression in tumors, currently known polymorphisms and drugs that are able to inhibit their function as transporter. Furthermore, the role of the ABC transporters and drug-metabolizing enzymes as mechanisms to modulate the pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents, will be reviewed. Finally, some clinical examples of oral drug modulation are discussed. Among these examples are the coadministration of paclitaxel with CsA, a CYP3A4 substrate with P-glycoprotein (P-gp) modulating activity, and topotecan combined with the BCRP/P-gp transport inhibitor elacridar. Both are good examples of improvement of oral drug bioavailability by temporary inhibition of drug transporters in the gut epithelium.

Drug interaction prediction using ontology-driven hypothetical assertion framework for pathway generation followed by numerical simulation

BACKGROUND

In accordance with the increasing amount of information concerning individual differences in drug response and molecular interaction, the role of in silico prediction of drug interaction on the pathway level is becoming more and more important. However, in view of the interferences for the identification of new drug interactions, most conventional information models of a biological pathway would have limitations. As a reflection of real world biological events triggered by a stimulus, it is important to facilitate the incorporation of known molecular events for inferring (unknown) possible pathways and hypothetic drug interactions. Here, we propose a new Ontology-Driven Hypothetic Assertion (OHA) framework including pathway generation, drug interaction detection, simulation model generation, numerical simulation, and hypothetic assertion. Potential drug interactions are detected from drug metabolic pathways dynamically generated by molecular events triggered after the administration of certain drugs. Numerical simulation enables to estimate the degree of side effects caused by the predicted drug interactions. New hypothetic assertions of the potential drug interactions and simulation are deduced from the Drug Interaction Ontology (DIO) written in Web Ontology Language (OWL).

RESULTS

The concept of the Ontology-Driven Hypothetic Assertion (OHA) framework was demonstrated with known interactions between irinotecan (CPT-11) and ketoconazole. Four drug interactions that involved cytochrome p450 (CYP3A4) and albumin as potential drug interaction proteins were automatically detected from Drug Interaction Ontology (DIO). The effect of the two interactions involving CYP3A4 were quantitatively evaluated with numerical simulation. The co-administration of ketoconazole may increase AUC and Cmax of SN-38(active metabolite of irinotecan) to 108% and 105%, respectively. We also estimates the potential effects of genetic variations: the AUC and Cmax of SN-38 may increase to 208% and 165% respectively with the genetic variation UGT1A1*28/*28 which reduces the expression of UGT1A1 down to 30%.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that the Ontology-Driven Hypothetic Assertion framework is a promising approach for in silico prediction of drug interactions. The following future researches for the in silico prediction of individual differences in the response to the drug and drug interactions after the administration of multiple drugs: expansion of the Drug Interaction Ontology for other drugs, and incorporation of virtual population model for genetic variation analysis, as well as refinement of the pathway generation rules, the drug interaction detection rules, and the numerical simulation models.

Renal function as a predictor of irinotecan-induced neutropenia

Although approximately half of the administered dose of irinotecan is recovered in urine, scarce data are available on the association of renal function with irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Here, these relationships are investigated in 187 patients treated with irinotecan in a three-weekly schedule. No significant effects on irinotecan pharmacokinetics were found in these patients. However, in 131 patients treated with the registered dose, categorized renal function was related to hematological toxicity. The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia decreased as function of creatinine clearance, particularly in nonsmoking patients (P < 0.01). Patients with slower creatinine clearance (35-66 ml/min) had a four-times higher risk of grade 3-4 neutropenia (58% vs. 14%; P < 0.001). This study suggests that pretreatment renal function values are associated with irinotecan-induced neutropenia. A confirmatory analysis is warranted to determine whether measures of renal function should be incorporated in future attempts toward individualized treatment with irinotecan.

Interactions of azole antifungal agents with the human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)

Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) is an efflux transporter that plays an important role in drug disposition. The goal of this study was to investigate the interactions of azole antifungal agents, ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, and voriconazole, with BCRP. First, the effect of the azoles on BCRP efflux activity in BCRP-overexpressing HEK cells was determined by measuring intracellular pheophorbide A (PhA) fluorescence using flow cytometry. We found that keotoconazole and itraconazole significantly inhibited BCRP-mediated efflux of PhA at low microM concentrations. However, fluconazole only mildly inhibited and voriconazole did not inhibit BCRP efflux activity at concentrations up to 100 microM. The IC(50) value of ketoconazole for inhibition of BCRP-mediated PhA efflux was 15.3 +/- 6.5 microM. Ketoconazole and itraconazole also effectively reversed BCRP-mediated resistance of HEK cells to topotecan. When direct efflux of [(3)H]ketoconazole was measured in BCRP-overexpressing HEK cells, we found that [(3)H]ketoconazole was not transported by BCRP. Consistent with this finding, BCRP did not confer resistance to ketoconazole and itraconazole in HEK cells. Taken together, ketoconazole and itraconazole are BCRP inhibitors, but fluconazole and voriconazole are not. These results suggest that BCRP could play a significant role in the pharmacokinetic interactions of ketoconazole or itraconazole with BCRP substrate drugs.

Severe toxicities after irinotecan-based chemotherapy in a patient with lung cancer: a homozygote for the SLCO1B1*15 allele

Irinotecan is used widely in the treatment of several malignancies, but unpredictable severe toxicities such as myelosuppression and delayed-type diarrhea are sometimes experienced. Polymorphism of the UGT1A1 gene is one of the likely reasons for interindividual differences in irinotecan pharmacokinetics and severe toxicity. Also, polymorphic organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1, SLCO1B1) is reported to be involved in the hepatocellular uptake of SN-38. A 61-year-old man with lung cancer developed severe toxicities, including grade 3 diarrhea, grade 4 leukopenia, and grade 4 neutropenia, after the first cycle of irinotecan (60 mg/m) plus cisplatin chemotherapy. The irinotecan and SN-38 areas under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity in this patient were 43% and 87% higher than the corresponding mean values for 10 other patients with lung cancer treated with irinotecan (60-100 mg/m) normalized for the dose of irinotecan. Analysis of genetic variants in genes encoding the drug-metabolizing enzyme (UGT1A1) and transporter (SLCO1B1) involving irinotecan disposition revealed that this patient was homozygous for the SLCO1B1*15 allele, which may result in severe toxicities attributable to the extensive accumulation of SN-38. Screening of SLCO1B1*15 is suggested to be useful in irinotecan chemotherapy to avoid unpredicted severe toxicity, although the homozygous genotype is rare among the Japanese.

Impact of CYP3A4 haplotypes on irinotecan pharmacokinetics in Japanese cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) converts an anticancer prodrug, irinotecan, to inactive metabolites such as APC. However, the contribution of CYP3A4 genetic polymorphisms to irinotecan pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) is not fully elucidated. In paclitaxel-administered cancer patients, an association of CYP3A4*16B harboring the low activity allele *16 [554C > G (Thr185Ser)] has been shown with altered metabolite/paclitaxel area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios, suggesting a possible impact of *16B on the PK of other drugs. In this study, the effects of CYP3A4 haplotypes including *16B on irinotecan PK/PD were investigated in irinotecan-administered patients.

METHODS

The CYP3A4 genotypes for 177 Japanese cancer patients who received irinotecan were defined in terms of 4 major haplotypes, i.e., *1A (wild type), *1G (IVS10 + 12G > A), *16B [554C > G (Thr185Ser) and IVS10 + 12G > A], and *18B [878T > C (Leu293Pro) and IVS10 + 12G > A]. Associations of CYP3A4 genotypes with irinotecan PK and severe toxicities (grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia) were investigated.

RESULTS

Area under the concentration-time curve ratios of APC/irinotecan, an in vivo parameter for CYP3A4 activity, were significantly higher in females than in males. The male patients with *16B showed significantly decreased AUC ratios (APC/irinotecan) with 50% of the median value of the non-*16B male patients (no *16B-bearing female patients in this study), whereas no significant alteration in the AUC ratios was observed in the patients with *18B. A slight trend toward increasing AUC ratios (20%) was detected in both male and female patients bearing *1G. Multivariate analysis confirmed contributions of CYP3A4*16B (coefficient +/- SE = -0.18 +/- 0.077, P = 0.021) and *1G (0.047 +/- 0.021, P = 0.029) to the AUC ratio. However, no significant association was observed between the CYP3A4 genotypes and total clearance of irinotecan or toxicities (severe diarrhea and neutropenia).

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that CYP3A4*16B was associated with decreased metabolism of irinotecan to APC. However, the clinical impact of CYP3A4 genotypes on total clearance and irinotecan toxicities was not significant.

Lopinavir–Ritonavir Dramatically Affects the Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan in HIV Patients With Kaposi’s Sarcoma

The coadministration of protease inhibitors with anticancer drugs in the management of human immunodeficiency virus-related malignancies can cause potential drug-drug interactions. The effect of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan (CPT11) has been investigated in seven patients with Kaposi's sarcoma. Coadministration of LPV/RTV reduces the clearance of CPT11 by 47% (11.3+/-3.5 vs 21.3+/-6.3 l/h/m(2), P=0.0008). This effect was associated with an 81% reduction (P=0.02) of the AUC (area under the curve) of the oxidized metabolite APC (7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic-acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin). The LPV/RTV treatment also inhibited the formation of SN38 glucuronide (SN38G), as shown by the 36% decrease in the SN38G/SN38 AUCs ratio (5.9+/-1.6 vs 9.2+/-2.6, P=0.002) consistent with UGT1A1 inhibition by LPV/RTV. This dual effect resulted in increased availability of CPT11 for SN38 conversion and reduced inactivation on SN38, leading to a 204% increase (P=0.0001) in SN38 AUC in the presence of LPV/RTV. The clinical consequences of these substantial pharmacokinetic changes should be investigated.

Cigarette smoking and irinotecan treatment: pharmacokinetic interaction and effects on neutropenia

PURPOSE

Several constituents of cigarette smoke are known to interact with drug metabolizing enzymes and potentially affect treatment outcome with substrate drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of cigarette smoking on the pharmacokinetics and adverse effects of irinotecan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 190 patients (49 smokers, 141 nonsmokers) treated with irinotecan (90-minute intravenous administration on a 3-week schedule) were evaluated for pharmacokinetics. Complete toxicity data were available in a subset of 134 patients receiving 350 mg/m2 or 600 mg flat-fixed dose irinotecan.

RESULTS

In smokers, the dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve of irinotecan was significantly lower (median, 28.7 v 33.9 ng x h/mL/mg; P = .001) compared with nonsmokers. In addition, smokers showed an almost 40% lower exposure to SN-38 (median, 0.54 v 0.87 ng x h/mL/mg; P < .001) and a higher relative extent of glucuronidation of SN-38 into SN-38G (median, 6.6 v 4.5; P = .006). Smokers experienced considerably less hematologic toxicity. In particular, the incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was 6% in smokers versus 38% in nonsmokers (odds ratio [OR], 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.43; P < .001). There was no significant difference in incidence of delayed-onset diarrhea (6% v 15%; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.07 to 1.57; P = .149).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that smoking significantly lowers both the exposure to irinotecan and treatment-induced neutropenia, indicating a potential risk of treatment failure. Although the underlying mechanism is not entirely clear, modulation of CYP3A and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 may be part of the explanation. The data suggest that additional investigation is warranted to determine whether smokers are at increased risk for treatment failure.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of UCN-01 in combination with irinotecan in patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

7-Hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) is a protein kinase inhibitor that inhibits several serine-threonine kinases including PKC and PDK1. Due to the preclinical synergistic effects seen with topoisomerase I inhibitors and non-overlapping toxicity, UCN-01 and irinotecan were combined in a dose-finding study designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of UCN-01 and irinotecan.

METHODS

Patients with incurable solid malignancies received UCN-01 intravenously (IV) as a 3-h infusion on day 1 and irinotecan IV over 90 min on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Doses of UCN-01 for subsequent cycles were half the starting dose. Dose level 1 (DL1) consisted of UCN-01 and irinotecan doses of 50 and 60 mg/m(2), respectively. Blood samples were collected in cycle 1 for UCN-01, irinotecan, and irinotecan metabolites.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were enrolled on the trial at UCN-01/Irinotecan doses of 50/60 mg/m(2) (DL1; n = 1), 70/60 mg/m(2) (DL2; n = 6), 90/60 mg/m(2) (DL3; n = 4), and 70/90 mg/m(2) (DL4; n = 5). Two dose-limiting toxicities were observed each in DL3 and DL4 (2 grade 3 hypophosphatemia, 1 grade 4 hyperglycemia and grade 3 hypophosphatemia, 1 grade 4 febrile neutropenia). Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and anorexia were the most prevalent toxicities. No objective responses were documented, and four patients had stable disease for at least ten cycles. The long half-life (292.0 +/- 135.7 h), low clearance (0.045 +/- 0.038 l/h), and volume of distribution (14.3 +/- 5.9 l) observed for UCN-01 are consistent with prior UCN-01 data. There was a significant decrease in C(max) of APC, AUC of APC and SN-38, and AUC ratio of SN-38:irinotecan when comparing days 1 and 8 PK.

CONCLUSIONS

APC and SN-38 exposure decreased when administered in combination with UCN-01. The MTD of the combination based on protocol criteria was defined as 70 mg/m(2) of UCN-01 on day 1 and 60 mg/m(2) of irinotecan on days 1 and 8 in a 21-day cycle.

Medicinal Cannabis Does Not Influence the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan and Docetaxel

OBJECTIVE

To date, data regarding the potential of cannabinoids to modulate cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A (CYP3A) activity are contradictory. Recently, a standardized medicinal cannabis product was introduced in The Netherlands. We anticipated an increased use of medicinal cannabis concurrent with anticancer drugs, and undertook a drug-interaction study to evaluate the effect of concomitant medicinal cannabis on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and docetaxel, both subject to CYP3A-mediated biotransformation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four cancer patients were treated with i.v. irinotecan (600 mg, n = 12) or docetaxel (180 mg, n = 12), followed 3 weeks later by the same drugs concomitant with medicinal cannabis (200 ml herbal tea, 1 g/l) for 15 consecutive days, starting 12 days before the second treatment. Blood samples were obtained up to 55 hours after dosing and analyzed for irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G), respectively, or docetaxel. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed during both treatments. Results are reported as the mean ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the observed pharmacokinetic parameters with and without concomitant medicinal cannabis.

RESULTS

Medicinal cannabis administration did not significantly influence exposure to and clearance of irinotecan (1.04; CI, 0.96-1.11 and 0.97; CI, 0.90-1.05, respectively) or docetaxel (1.11; CI, 0.94-1.28 and 0.95; CI, 0.82-1.08, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Coadministration of medicinal cannabis, as herbal tea, in cancer patients treated with irinotecan or docetaxel does not significantly influence the plasma pharmacokinetics of these drugs. The evaluated variety of medicinal cannabis can be administered concomitantly with both anticancer agents without dose adjustments.

A systematic review on drug interactions in oncology

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review drug interactions in oncology.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for eligible articles and online databases abstracts of major oncology meetings from 2002 to 2005.

RESULTS

One study reported on the frequency of drug interactions. Interactions between chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy agents have been reported mostly in small clinical trials and case series. Interactions between chemotherapic agents have been reported mostly in Phase I studies. Few studies described fatal outcomes of drug interactions in cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Drug interactions comprise an important issue in oncology, but very limited data exist on their frequency and clinical consequences.