When Does the Presence of the Target Predict Response to the Targeted Agent?

Anti-EGFR Antibody Plus Chemotherapy Treatment in a Patient with Synchronous Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine cutaneous malignancy. During early stages, surgery is the primary treatment followed by radiotherapy in patients at high risk of recurrence. Definitive radiation therapy is an alternative for patients who are not surgical candidates, reserving chemotherapy for metastatic disease. We present a case of a male patient diagnosed with MCC and stage IV colorectal cancer and we focus on the skin tumor shrinkage after specific colorectal cancer treatment.

Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Several comparative randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed including combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors since the publication of a Cochrane Review on targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in 2008. This review represents an update of that original review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of targeted therapies for clear cell mRCC in patients naïve to systemic therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search with no restrictions on language or publication status. The date of the latest search was 18 June 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials, recruiting patients with clear cell mRCC naïve to previous systemic treatment. The index intervention was any TKI-based targeted therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the included studies and extracted data for the primary outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and serious adverse events (SAEs); and the secondary outcomes: health-related quality of life (QoL), response rate and minor adverse events (AEs). We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and rated the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs reporting on 11,590 participants randomised across 18 comparisons. This abstract focuses on the primary outcomes of select comparisons. 1. Pazopanib versus sunitinib Pazopanib may result in little to no difference in PFS as compared to sunitinib (hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 1.23; 1 study, 1110 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 420 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this corresponds to 18 fewer participants experiencing PFS (95% CI 76 fewer to 38 more) per 1000 participants. Pazopanib may result in little to no difference in OS compared to sunitinib (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.06; 1 study, 1110 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 550 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this corresponds to 27 more OSs (95% CI 19 fewer to 70 more) per 1000 participants. Pazopanib may result in little to no difference in SAEs as compared to sunitinib (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.09; 1 study, 1102 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 734 per 1000 in this trial, this corresponds to 7 more participants experiencing SAEs (95% CI 44 fewer to 66 more) per 1000 participants. 2. Sunitinib versus avelumab and axitinib Sunitinib probably reduces PFS as compared to avelumab plus axitinib (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.80; 1 study, 886 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 550 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this corresponds to 130 fewer participants experiencing PFS (95% CI 209 fewer to 53 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib may result in little to no difference in OS (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.79; 1 study, 886 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 890 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this would result in 29 fewer OSs (95% CI 78 fewer to 8 more) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib may result in little to no difference in SAEs (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.10; 1 study, 873 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 705 per 1000 in this trial, this corresponds to 7 more SAEs (95% CI 49 fewer to 71 more) per 1000 participants.  3. Sunitinib versus pembrolizumab and axitinib Sunitinib probably reduces PFS as compared to pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.76; 1 study, 861 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 590 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this corresponds to 125 fewer participants experiencing PFS (95% CI 195 fewer to 56 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib probably reduces OS (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.65; 1 study, 861 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 880 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this would result in 96 fewer OSs (95% CI 167 fewer to 40 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib may reduce SAEs as compared to pembrolizumab plus axitinib (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.02; 1 study, 854 participants; low-certainty evidence) although the CI includes the possibility of no effect. Based on the control event risk of 604 per 1000 in this trial, this corresponds to 60 fewer SAEs (95% CI 115 fewer to 12 more) per 1000 participants.  4. Sunitinib versus nivolumab and ipilimumab Sunitinib may reduce PFS as compared to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.52; 1 study, 847 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 280 per 1000 in this trial at 30 months' follow-up, this corresponds to 89 fewer PFSs (95% CI 136 fewer to 37 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib reduces OS (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.89; 1 study, 847 participants; high-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk 600 per 1000 in this trial at 30 months, this would result in 140 fewer OSs (95% CI 219 fewer to 67 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib probably increases SAEs (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.53; 1 study, 1082 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 457 per 1000 in this trial, this corresponds to 169 more SAEs (95% CI 101 more to 242 more) per 1000 participants.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the low to high certainty of evidence, several combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors appear to be superior to single-agent targeted therapy in terms of PFS and OS, and with a favourable AE profile. Some single-agent targeted therapies demonstrated a similar or improved oncological outcome compared to others; minor differences were observed for AE within this group. The certainty of evidence was variable ranging from high to very low and all comparisons were based on single trials.

Selective targeted delivery of doxorubicin via conjugating to anti-CD24 antibody results in enhanced antitumor potency for hepatocellular carcinoma both in vitro and in vivo

PURPOSE

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising therapeutic approach for clinical application. Cluster of differentiation 24 (CD24) is over-expressed in several human malignancies, especially in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to develop a new class of CD24-targeted ADCs for HCC.

METHODS

DOX was conjugated with G7mAb by a heterobifunctional cross-linker GMBS (N-[gamma-maleimido butyryloxy] succinimide ester) and further analyzed using HPLC. The targeting specificity and endocytosis of the newly generated ADC, G7mAb-DOX, were characterized using flow cytometry assay, near-infrared fluorescence imaging and laser scanning confocal microscope. The antitumor effects were evaluated in nude mice bearing HCC xenografts.

RESULTS

G7mAb-DOX with average two drug molecules per antibody was selectively captured and endocytosed by CD24 (+) tumor cells in vitro. In vivo, the ADC was proved to target tumor tissues, suppress tumor growth and prolong the survival of HCC-bearing nude mice with improved efficacy and less systemic toxicity compared with either G7mAb or DOX single-agent treatment.

CONCLUSION

These studies provide proof of concept for development of DOX-based ADCs which provide a novel approach for HCC-targeted immune therapy in clinical application.

Predictive biomarkers for bevacizumab: are we there yet?

Therapy targeting VEGF has become the standard of care in several solid malignancies. Early investigations attempting to identify predictive markers for the efficacy of therapy failed to identify any predictive markers that could help oncologists decide who should-and, more importantly, who should not-receive VEGF-targeted therapies. However, interest has been renewed in predictive biomarkers for VEGF-targeted therapies, especially in light of the fact that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration withdrew approval for use of bevacizumab, an antibody to VEGF, in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In a recent publication in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, investigators identified circulating VEGF and tumor neuropilin-1 expression as potential predictive biomarkers for bevacizumab. From this perspective, we provide a critical evaluation of the use of these markers and the need for validation in prospective clinical trials.

Alcohol dehydrogenase-1B Arg47His polymorphism and upper aerodigestive tract cancer risk: a meta-analysis including 24,252 subjects

BACKGROUND

Cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) include malignant tumors of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus, account for approximately 4% of all new cancers in world. Alcohol drinking is an established risk factor for UADT cancers, and the rate of alcohol metabolism could significantly been influenced by genetic polymorphisms of alcohol dehydrogenase-1B (ADH1B) His47Arg (rs1229984). To evaluate whether combined evidence shows ADH1B His47Arg as a common genetic variant that influenced the risk of UADT cancers, we considered all available studies in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Eighteen studies were combined representing data of 8,539 cases and 15,713 controls for meta-analysis. Stratified analyses were carried out to determine the gene-environment interaction between ADH1B His47Arg and alcohol drinking and gene-gene interaction between ADH1B His47Arg and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) Glu/Lys related to UADT cancer risk. Potential sources of heterogeneity between studies were explored; sensitivity analysis and publication bias was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The ADH1B 47Arg allele was found to be associated with increased risk of UADT cancers, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) being 1.66 (95% CI: 1.54 to 1.79) and 3.47 (95% CI: 2.76 to 4.36) for the His/Arg and Arg/Arg genotypes compared with the His/His genotype, respectively. An 18.48-fold increase in OR (95% CI: 12.95 to 26.40) for UADT cancers among alcohol drinkers with Arg/Arg genotype was found, when compared among nondrinkers with the His/His genotype. Significant interaction between carriers with ADH1B 47Arg and ALDH2 487Lys allele related to risk for UADT cancers was more evident, compared with noncarriers (OR = 10.31, 95% CI: 5.45 to 18.85).

CONCLUSIONS

ADH1B 47Arg allele is a common genetic variant that increased the risk of UADT cancers; furthermore, it modulates the susceptibility to UADT cancers coupled with alcohol drinking and interaction with the ALDH2 487Lys allele.

Clinical, laboratory and molecular factors predicting chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment has evolved significantly over the last ten years with the use of active chemotherapeutic agents including fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin and irinotecan plus targeted monoclonal antibodies bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab. The addition of newer chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies has improved patient outcomes at the cost of increased toxicity with not all patients benefiting from these treatments. It is necessary for clinicians to more accurately predict clinical outcomes particularly in the predominantly elderly CRC patient population. This review aims to summarise existing data regarding the use of clinical and laboratory variables plus molecular markers in predicting response, survival and toxicity to chemotherapy agents and targeted monoclonal antibodies currently used in the treatment of CRC.

Tyrosine kinases in inflammatory dermatologic disease

Tyrosine kinases (TKs) are enzymes that catalyze the phosphorylation of tyrosine residues on protein substrates. They are key components of signaling pathways that drive an array of cellular responses including proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival. Specific TKs have recently been identified as critical to the pathogenesis of several autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Small-molecule inhibitors of TKs are emerging as a novel class of therapy that may provide benefit in certain patient subsets. In this review, we highlight TK signaling implicated in inflammatory dermatologic diseases, evaluate strategies aimed at inhibiting these aberrant signaling pathways, and discuss prospects for future drug development.

Anti-angiogenic therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Angiogenesis inhibitors have been developed to block tumour angiogenesis and target vascular endothelial cells. While some of them have already been approved by the health authorities and are successfully integrated into patient care, many others are still under development, and the clinical value of this approach has to be established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of targeted anti-angiogenic therapies, in addition to chemotherapy, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Primary endpoints are both progression-free and overall survival. Response rates, toxicity and secondary resectability were secondary endpoints. Comparisons were first-line chemotherapy in combination with angiogenesis inhibitor, to the same chemotherapy without angiogenesis inhibitor; and second-line chemotherapy, to the same chemotherapy without angiogenesis inhibitor.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, as well as proceedings from ECCO, ESMO and ASCO until November 2008. In addition, reference lists from trials were scanned, experts in the field and drug manufacturers were contacted to obtain further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials on targeted anti-angiogenic drugs in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis was performed, according to a previously published protocol. Because individual patient data was not provided, aggregate data had to be used for the analysis. Summary statistics for the primary endpoints were hazard ratios (HR's) and their 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

At present, eligible first line trials for this meta-analysis were available for bevacizumab (5 trials including 3101 patients) and vatalanib (1 trial which included 1168 patients). The overall HR s for PFS (0.61, 95% CI 0.45 - 0.83) and OS (0.81, 95% 0.73 - 0.90) for the comparison of first-line chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, confirms significant benefits in favour of the patients treated with bevacizumab. However, the effect on PFS shows significant heterogeneity. For second-line chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, a benefit in both PFS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51 - 0.73) and OS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89) was demonstrated in a single, randomized trial. While differences in treatment-related deaths and 60-day mortality were not significant, higher incidences in grade III/IV hypertension, arterial thrombembolic events and gastrointestinal perforations were observed in the patients treated with bevacizumab. For valatanib, currently available data showed a non-significant benefit in PFS and OS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs both PFS and OS in first-and second-line therapy.

Bevacizumab immune complexes activate platelets and induce thrombosis in FCGR2A transgenic mice

BACKGROUND

Treatment with Bevacizumab has been associated with arterial thromboembolism in colorectal cancer patients. However, the mechanism of this remains poorly understood, and preclinical testing in mice failed to predict thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether thrombosis might be the result of platelet activation mediated via the FcgammaRIIa (IgG) receptor - which is not present on mouse platelets - and aimed to identify the functional roles of heparin and platelet surface localization in Bev-induced FcgammaRIIa activation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We found that Bev immune complexes (IC) activate platelets via FcgammaRIIa, and therefore attempted to reproduce this finding in vivo using FcgammaRIIa (hFcR) transgenic mice. Bev IC were shown to be thrombotic in hFcR mice in the presence of heparin. This activity required the heparin-binding domain of Bev's target, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Heparin promoted Bev IC deposition on to platelets in a mechanism similar to that observed with antibodies from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. When sub-active amounts of ADP or thrombin were used to prime platelets (simulating hypercoagulability in patients), Bev IC-induced dense granule release was significantly potentiated, and much lower (sub-therapeutic) heparin concentrations were sufficient for Bev IC-induced platelet aggregation.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevailing rationale for thrombosis in Bev therapy is that VEGF blockade leads to vascular inflammation and clotting. However, we conclude that Bev can induce platelet aggregation, degranulation and thrombosis through complex formation with VEGF and activation of the platelet FcgammaRIIa receptor, and that this provides a better explanation for the thrombotic events observed in vivo.

Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

No effective systemic therapy exists for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A preliminary study suggested that sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Raf may be effective in hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

In this multicenter, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 602 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received previous systemic treatment to receive either sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Primary outcomes were overall survival and the time to symptomatic progression. Secondary outcomes included the time to radiologic progression and safety.

RESULTS

At the second planned interim analysis, 321 deaths had occurred, and the study was stopped. Median overall survival was 10.7 months in the sorafenib group and 7.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the sorafenib group, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.87; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the median time to symptomatic progression (4.1 months vs. 4.9 months, respectively, P=0.77). The median time to radiologic progression was 5.5 months in the sorafenib group and 2.8 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the sorafenib group (2%) and two patients in the placebo group (1%) had a partial response; no patients had a complete response. Diarrhea, weight loss, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia were more frequent in the sorafenib group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, median survival and the time to radiologic progression were nearly 3 months longer for patients treated with sorafenib than for those given placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00105443.)

Expression of VEGF-A/C, VEGF-R2, PDGF-alpha/beta, c-kit, EGFR, Her-2/Neu, Mcl-1 and Bmi-1 in Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare but very aggressive tumor of the skin. With current treatment options, Merkel cell carcinoma is associated with a high incidence of recurrence and metastasis. Targeted anticancer therapies such as receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antisense oligonucleotides have been found to be a promising new type of treatment for various types of cancer. To evaluate whether the use of targeted therapies is a possible treatment option in Merkel cell carcinoma, we determined the expression of the target molecules c-kit, Mcl-1, Bmi-1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-receptor 2 (VEGF-R2), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-alpha, PDGF-beta, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Her-2/Neu in a tissue microarray of 32 samples of 29 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma. C-kit-positive samples were analyzed for mutations in exons 9 and 11. The tissue microarray was stained immunohistochemically with antibodies directed against the above-mentioned proteins, and an immunoreactivity score was calculated. DNA was extracted from c-kit-positive samples and was analyzed for exon 9 and 11 mutations using direct DNA sequencing. We found that c-kit (7%), Mcl-1 (88%), Bmi-1 (78%), VEGF-A (91%), VEGF-C (75%) VEGF-R2 (88%), PDGF-alpha (72%) and PDGF-beta (13%) were expressed in Merkel cell carcinomas. All samples showed a lack of EGFR and Her-2/Neu expression. Analysis of c-kit revealed no mutations. As VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-R2, PDGFs and c-kit are targets of new cytostatic agents used in the treatment of other cancers, inhibition by a multitargeted chemotherapy could be a very promising treatment option. High expression of Bmi-1 and Mcl-1 warrants further studies on the use of antisense oligonucleotides in Merkel cell carcinoma.

Targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Advanced renal cell carcinoma has been resistant to drug therapy of different types and new types of drug therapy are needed. Targeted agents inhibit known molecular pathways involved in cellular proliferation and neoangiogenesis, the induction by the tumour of host microvascular networks. Angiogenesis is of special interest in the clear cell histologic subtype of renal cancer because of its vascularity and constitutively activated hypoxia-inducible path in the majority of tumours.

OBJECTIVES

1) To provide a systematic review of studies testing targeted agents.2) To identify the type and degree of clinical benefit, if any, of targeted agents over the prior standard of care, particularly any impact on overall survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

1) Electronic search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.2) Hand search of international cancer meeting abstract and other sources specified in the protocol.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled studies of targeted agents in patients with advanced renal cell cancer reporting major remission rate or overall survival by allocation. Progression-free survival (PFS) was adopted as an additional outcome because PFS was a commonly chosen primary outcome, and because several pivotal studies allowed crossover from the control to the investigational arm after closure to accrual thereby making overall survival a problematic endpoint.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Nineteen fully eligible studies tested ten different targeted agents (Table 04). One additional study was excluded because no outcome data by allocation have been reported (Hutson 2007). For purposes of comparison, the studies were divided into three groups: Group 1 studies compared different doses of the same agents; Group 2 studies examined the impact of targeted agents in patients who had received prior cytokine or other systemic therapy; and Group 3 studies tested targeted agents in systemically naive patients, either against standard interferon-alfa or against another control therapy. Meta-analysis was not utilized because there were very few situations where the same agents had been tested in the same group in more than one study.

MAIN RESULTS

In systemically untreated patients in studies using subcutaneous interferon-alfa as control therapy, the major findings were: 1) An improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated only with the use of weekly intravenous temsirolimus in patients with unselected renal cancer histology and adverse prognostic features (median survival 10.9 months versus 7.3 months for temsirolimus or interferon-alfa respectively, HR 0.73, P = 0.008 log rank, Hudes 2007). However, the chance of major remission was low and not improved with temsirolimus. 2) In patients with mostly good or intermediate prognostic risk with clear cell renal cancer, oral sunitinib improves the chance of major remission, the probability of symptomatic improvement, and freedom from disease progression (Motzer 2007); in a similar setting, the addition of biweekly intravenous bevacizumab to interferon-alfa also improved the chance of major remission and prolonged progression-free survival (Escudier 2007b); overall survival had not changed at the time of interim reporting of either study. In patients with clear cell renal cancers who had failed prior cytokine therapy, oral sorafenib gives a better quality of life than placebo as well as improved chance of being free of disease progression; overall survival may have improved but is hard to evaluate because of crossover of placebo-assigned patients after the study closed to accrual (Escudier 2007a).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on less than a decade of experience, some targeted agents with specified molecular targets have demonstrated clinically useful benefits over the previous standard of care for patients with advanced renal cancer. Much more research is required to fully establish the role of targeted agents in this condition.

Phase I study of sorafenib in Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib is an orally active multikinase inhibitor that targets serine and threonine, and tyrosine kinases that are involved in tumor-cell signal transduction and tumor angiogenesis. This phase I trial was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and preliminary efficacy of sorafenib in Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with underlying liver dysfunction. Patients with unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh status A or B, and adequate organ functions were treated. A single dose of sorafenib was administered, followed by a 7-day wash-out period, after which patients received either sorafenib 200 mg (cohort 1) or 400 mg (cohort 2) twice daily. The PK were investigated after a single dose and during steady state. The efficacy was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A total of 27 patients were evaluated for PK, safety, and efficacy. Although both area under the concentration-time curve for 0-12 h and maximal concentration at steady state were slightly lower in Child-Pugh B patients than in Child-Pugh A patients, the difference was not considered to be clinically relevant. Common adverse drug events included elevated lipase, amylase, rash or desquamation, diarrhea, and hand-foot skin reaction. A dose-limiting toxicity of hand-foot skin reaction was observed in one patient (cohort 2). Among the 24 patients evaluable for tumor response, one patient (4%) achieved a partial response, 20 (83%) had stable disease, and three (13%) had progressive disease. Sorafenib demonstrated a favorable tolerability and safety profile in Japanese HCC patients. Moreover, promising preliminary antitumor activity has been observed. Finally, there were no clinically relevant differences in PK between Child-Pugh A and B patients.

Biomarkers and the design of clinical trials in cancer

Scientific innovation has promoted the rapid discovery and development of cancer-related biomarkers. This has fostered improved mechanistic understandings of disease biology, facilitated the development of novel targeted therapies and offers the potential to better define the natural history of a disease and to predict response to specific treatment. Clinical trials are evolving, from the use of exploratory 'correlative studies’ that assist in the understanding of disease mechanisms, to the use of validated biomarkers that are integral to the design of definitive prospective studies. A rigorous process for biomarker development and validation, followed by evaluation in well-designed, prospective clinical trials that demonstrate improved patient outcomes is required for new biomarkers to change clinical practice. To date, the number of biomarkers considered clinically useful is disappointingly small because of conflicting conclusions generated from trials with practical and methodological limitations. This review will highlight several important aspects related to the design and analysis of clinical trials that incorporate a biomarker as a central component. First, we review biomarker development, how biomarkers may be used as targets and how biomarkers can influence methodology to optimize efficiency of drug development through the use of surrogate outcomes. Second, we focus on issues related to trials evaluating potential prognostic biomarkers and how the predictive properties of biomarkers may be used to determine which patients might optimally benefit from a specific intervention.

[Molecular heterogeneity of malignant melanomas]

Malignant melanomas make up a heterogeneous group of tumors characterized by particular genetic aberrations depending on their anatomic localization and UV exposure. Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway is found in the majority of melanomas, with either somatic missense mutations of BRAF or, considerably more rarely, mutations of N-RAS. The loss of both products of the CDKN2A gene, proteins p16(ARF) and p14(INK4a), or amplification of microphthalmia-associated transcriptional factor (MITF) are also predisposing factors in the development of melanoma. BRAF mutations are observed mainly in melanomas on skin liable to intermittent UV exposure. Acral and mucosal melanomas, and also melanomas on skin damaged by chronic exposure to the sun are characterized by distinct patterns of chromosomal aberrations with frequent amplifications and alterations of the KIT gene, while BRAF mutations are rarely found in these sites. Uveal melanomas show recurrent chromosomal losses (1p, 3, 6q) and gains (6p, 8q), but mutations of BRAF are hardly ever found. So far, ancillary molecular studies are not regularly applied in the routine diagnostic procedures performed when malignant melanoma is suspected. In the future, however, the development of targeted molecular therapies will require that molecular pathological techniques are used to identify the melanoma patients who will most probably benefit from a particular therapy.

Prognostic factors for anaplastic astrocytomas

Anaplastic astrocytomas (WHO grade III) constitute about 10% of all gliomas. Definitive data on predictive and prognostic factors are lacking for these neoplasms that are considered the most enigmatic entity among the whole spectrum of astrocytic tumors because of their unclear biologic behavior and variable clinical outcome. Currently, only few factors have been identified as useful for prognosis of anaplastic astrocytoma: age and Karnofsky Performance Status. Attempts have been made to identify biological prognostic factors for response to therapy and clinical outcome, as well as potential targets for new therapies. Potential prognostic biomarkers concern tumor suppressor genes on chromosome 9q that are involved in the RB1 pathway; PTEN, the PI3k/Akt/p70s6k cascade, survivin gene, Formylpeptide receptor, minichromosome maintenance protein 3 and genes on chromosome 7. Furthermore, some angiogenic factors (e.g. hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor and scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor) and the methylation status of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene (one of the main effectors of DNA repair system) are emerging novel putative determinants of prognosis. Moreover, recent studies on magnetic resonance imaging characteristics give prognostic significance to the presence of necrosis and enhancement. The state of the art pictured here underlie the recent interest on gene expression profile to identify aberrations useful to understand the biologic behavior of astrocytic tumors. Our knowledge in this field is still limited, and remains an issue of great concern.

Zukunft der Chemotherapie

The future development of chemotherapy is derived based upon recent advances. With regard to adjuvant therapy a trend towards standardized prediction of recurrence risk using all available prognostic markers (e.g., nomograms) is observed. Furthermore, in some tumors major progress has been made regarding the development of "molecular classifiers" defining tumor biology (predicting clinical outcome) by analysis of molecular changes. In adjuvant therapy considerable advances may be achieved by use of new chemotherapeutic agents as well as sequential, dose-dense and dose-intensified regimens. However, in metastatic disease no breakthrough can be expected at least with regard to survival suggesting that quality of life needs to be addressed with more emphasis. Using targeted drugs alone or in combination with chemotherapy advances concerning adjuvant therapy as well as metastatic disease are observed. Further targeted drugs have entered clinical development. However, clarification of the relation between detection of the target(s) and drug activity will fundamentally change current treatment concepts.

Molecularly targeted therapy for melanoma

Effective therapy for melanoma remains an unmet goal, with most traditional therapies representing inadequate trade-offs among the several goals of specificity, efficacy, and toxicity. Targeted molecular therapeutics are tailored to genetic abnormalities that are associated with tumor progression. Modulation of aberrant signaling pathways in cancer cells has the potential to provide more effective and potentially nontoxic therapy for a broad range of cancers, including melanoma. Among the possible targets in melanoma are the Ras-MAPK and PI3K/AKT signal transduction pathways, the proteasome, histone deacetylases, methyltransferases, and melanoma-induced angiogenesis.