Survival Outcomes in T3 Laryngeal Cancers: Primary Total Laryngectomy vs. Concurrent Chemoradiation or Radiation Therapy-A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of cT3 laryngeal cancers remains controversial, with studies recommending surgical or non-surgical approaches. Despite the many papers that have been published on the subject, there is a lack of studies showing which treatment has better results in terms of survival.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the difference in survival outcomes following total laryngectomy (TL), concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) or radiation therapy (RT) alone in T3 laryngeal cancers.

METHODS

Search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from 1995 to 2023 employing specific keywords and Boolean operators to retrieve relevant articles. Statistical analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q-test and I2 statistic. Funnel plot asymmetry was assessed using rank correlation and regression tests.

RESULTS

The qualitative data synthesis comprised 10,940 patients from 16 included studies. TL was performed in 2149 (19.4%), CRT in 6723 (61.5%), RT in 295 (2.7%), while non-surgical treatment was not specified in 1773 (16.2%) patients. The pooled 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were TL = 73%, CRT = 74.7%, RT = 57.9%, 3-year OS rates were TL = 64.3%, CRT = 62.9%, RT = 52.4%, and 5-year OS rates were TL = 54.2%, CRT = 52.7%, RT = 40.8%. There was a significant heterogeneity in the included studies. There was no statistically significant difference in 2-year OS (logOR= -0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.99 to 0.23), p = 0.12), 3-year OS (logOR = -0.6 (95% CI: -1.34 to 0.15), p = 0.11), and 5-year OS (logOR = -0.54 (95% CI: -1.29 to 0.21), p = 0.16) between TL and CRT. Instead, there was significant difference in 2-year OS (logOR= -1.2383 (95% CI: -2.1679 to -0.3087), p = 0.009), 3-year OS (-1.1262 (95% CI: -1.6166 to -0.6358), p < 0.001), and 5-year OS (-0.99 (95% CI: -1.44 to -0.53)), p < 0.001) between TL and RT alone.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

TL followed with adjuvant (chemo)radiation on indication and CRT with salvage surgery in reserve appear to have similar OS outcomes. Both resulted in better OS outcomes compared to RT alone in the treatment of T3 laryngeal cancers. If patients are unfit for chemotherapy, making CRT impossible, surgery may become the choice of treatment.

The use of artificial intelligence models to predict survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Most recent survival prediction has been based on TNM staging, which does not provide individualized information. However, clinical factors including performance status, age, sex, and smoking might influence survival. Therefore, we used artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze various clinical factors to precisely predict the survival of patients with larynx squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). We included patients with LSCC (N = 1026) who received definitive treatment from 2002 to 2020. Age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, location of tumor, TNM stage, and treatment methods were analyzed using deep neural network (DNN) with multi-classification and regression, random survival forest (RSF), and Cox proportional hazards (COX-PH) model for prediction of overall survival. Each model was confirmed with five-fold cross validation, and performance was evaluated using linear slope, y-intercept, and C-index. The DNN with multi-classification model demonstrated the highest prediction power (1.000 ± 0.047, 0.126 ± 0.762, and 0.859 ± 0.018 for slope, y-intercept, and C-index, respectively), and the prediction survival curve showed the strongest agreement with the validation survival curve, followed by DNN with regression (0.731 ± 0.048, 9.659 ± 0.964, and 0.893 ± 0.017, respectively). The DNN model produced with only T/N staging showed the poorest survival prediction. When predicting the survival of LSCC patients, various clinical factors should be considered. In the present study, DNN with multi-class was shown to be an appropriate method for survival prediction. AI analysis may predict survival more accurately and improve oncologic outcomes.

Combined modality treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx is a major public health concern; it causes substantial morbidity and mortality, and arises chiefly as a result of tobacco and alcohol consumption. Early stage disease is best treated with radiation or surgery alone, but for patients with more locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, combined modality treatment has been shown to benefit selected patients, particularly when cisplatin-based chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy are employed, with or without altered fractionated radiation therapy. Substantial laryngectomy-associated quality-of-life decrements can be avoided in selected, potentially resectable patients with organ-sparing approaches, without sacrificing survival. Recently, trials have addressed the role of targeted systemic agents to the epidermal growth factor receptor, and other targets are under investigation. The addition of induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a promising treatment strategy that warrants further evaluation, but has not yet emerged as a standard of care; the toxicity of such regimens must be balanced with the potential benefits on a case-by-case basis, and functional outcomes are often quite variable. Treatment planning, management and follow-up are complex, and thus should ideally be performed in a comprehensive, multidisciplinary fashion, in a center accustomed to a high volume of such cases. Future research directions are described herein.

Evolving treatment paradigms for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer

While men with early stage prostate cancer typically enjoy long-term survival after definitive management, for those who present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, survival is compromised. Multimodality therapy can prolong survival in these patients, with state-of-the-art options including intensity-modulated radiation or brachytherapy in conjunction with androgen ablation, adjuvant androgen ablation and/or chemotherapy with radical retropubic prostatectomy. In addition, novel biological therapies are being explored to target the unique molecular changes in prostate cancer cells and their interactions with the microenvironment. With these advances the outlook will undoubtedly improve, even for patients presenting with advanced disease. Careful application of these emerging therapies to a select group of prostate cancer patients most likely to obtain benefit from them is the challenge for urologists, medical oncologists and radiation oncologists for the future.

A systematic review of current and emerging approaches in the field of larynx preservation

Treatment options targeting laryngeal preservation include conservative surgery, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radiotherapy (RT), and alternating chemo-radiation. The goal of this paper was to perform a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on current and emerging approaches in the field of larynx preservation. The search identified 36 papers of which 27 did not fall within the inclusion criteria (i.e. non-RCTs). IC followed by RT has been shown to allow laryngeal preservation in about two-thirds of pts with locally advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer without compromising survival. IC is regarded as the landmark treatment of non-surgical larynx preservation approaches. Concomitant and alternating chemoradiotherapy treatments are also acceptable in larynx preservation.

Randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy to concomitant chemoradiotherapy for laryngeal preservation in T3M0 pyriform sinus carcinoma

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin is significantly superior to induction cisplatin fluorouracil chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in terms of laryngeal preservation in patients with T3 hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Despite a high rate of laryngeal preservation no survival benefit was recorded in this selected population.

OBJECTIVES

To compare conventional radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin to induction chemotherapy with cisplatin fluorouracil followed by conventional radiotherapy. The primary end point was the preservation of the larynx. The secondary end points included toxicity, causes of death, and survival rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one adult patients with previously untreated resectable T3 pyriform sinus squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled in the multicenter prospective randomized phase III trial. They were evaluated for organ preservation, survival rates, and toxic reactions.

RESULTS

The rates of laryngeal preservation at 2 years were 68% for the induction chemotherapy (IC) group and 92% for the chemoradiotherapy (CR) group (p = 0.016). At 2 years, the event-free survival rates were 36% and 41% for the IC group and CR group, respectively.

Induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced head and neck cancer

Objective:

Induction chemotherapy (IC) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced head and neck cancer has been studied in many clinical trials. This study was conducted to determine the response rate of IC with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin followed by CCRT with cisplatin for this group of patients, and the effect of the entire treatment on survival and time to disease progression.

Methods:

Thirty patients with advanced and unresectable head and neck cancer were treated with 2 cycles of induction paclitaxel/ ifosfamide/ cisplatin. If the primary tumor had a complete or partial response, patients were treated with 2 more cycles of IC followed by radiotherapy 70 Gy plus 3 cycles of cisplatin. For those with less than partial response or disease progression were treated according to the discretion of the physicians.

Results:

Ninety percent of patients had stage IV disease and 40% of them had primary tumor at maxillary sinus and nasal cavity. One patient (3%) achieved complete response (CR) and 18 patients had partial responses (PR) to IC. CCRT enhanced the response rate, resulting in a total of 3 CR (10%) and 16 PR (53%) to treatment. The median time to progression was 11.5 months. The median overall survival was 27 months. The most severe hematologic toxicity occurred during IC was grade3-4 neutropenia (40%). Grade 3-4 mucositis occurred in 68% of patients during CCRT.

Conclusion:

This novel combined-modality treatment program, is toxic but feasible, and can be administered for selected patients with advanced and unresectable head and neck cancer. © 2010 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal. All rights reserved.

Phase I Study of C-TPF in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Purpose

Phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of fluorouracil (FU) in the docetaxel/cisplatin/FU (TPF) regimen when combined with cetuximab (C) for induction treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Patients and Methods

Patients with previously untreated SCCHN were enrolled. FU cohorts were 700, 850, and 1,000 mg/m2/d for 4 days via continuous infusion. TPF given every 3 weeks for three cycles and C was given weekly for a total of 9 weeks, starting on day 1 of TPF. All patients received chemoradiotherapy after C-TPF.

Results

A total of 30 patients were enrolled and 28 were assessable. The median age was 57 years, 92% had stage 4 disease, 71% were oropharynx, and 100% had a performance status of 0. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered on dose levels 1 and 2. At dose level 3 of 1000 mg/m2, one DLT was encountered and three more patients were enrolled with no DLTs. In the expansion cohort at the MTD, three DLT's were encountered. The decision was made to decrease the FU from 1,000 mg/m2to dose level 2 of 850 mg/m2. A total of 13 patients were enrolled at the MTD of 850 mg/m2. The number of average weeks that C was delivered was seven of nine planned.

Conclusion

C-TPF appears to be safe and feasible as given in this study. GI toxicity (mucositis, enteritis, and diarrhea) appears to be the major combined DLT. Reducing the FU in TPF to 850 mg/m2reduces GI toxicity and is the recommended phase II dose.

Clinical practice guidance for radiotherapy planning after induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

The use of induction chemotherapy (IC) for locoregionally advanced head-and-neck cancer is increasing. The response to IC often causes significant alterations in tumor volume and location and shifts in normal anatomy. Proper determination of the radiotherapy (RT) targets after IC becomes challenging, especially with the use of conformal and precision RT techniques. Therefore, a consensus conference was convened to discuss issues related to RT planning and coordination of care for patients receiving IC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten participants with special expertise in the various aspects of integration of IC and RT for the treatment of locoregionally advanced head-and-neck cancer, including radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and a medical physicist, participated. The individual members were assigned topics for focused, didactic presentations. Discussion was encouraged after each presentation, and recommendations were formulated.

RESULTS

Recommendations and guidelines emerged that emphasize up-front evaluation by all members of the head-and-neck management team, high-quality baseline and postinduction planning scans with the patient in the treatment position, the use of preinduction target volumes, and the use of full-dose RT, even in the face of a complete response.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary approach is strongly encouraged. Although these recommendations were provided primarily for patients treated with IC, many of these same principles apply to concurrent chemoradiotherapy without IC. A rapid response during RT is quite common, requiring the development of two or more plans in a sizeable fraction of patients, and suggesting the need for similar guidance in the rapidly evolving area of adaptive RT.

Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a new standard of care?

Locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite progress through the use of multimodality treatment involving surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in recent years, the survival remains poor, and treatment-related morbidity-mainly caused by radiation-induced effects such as soft tissue scarring, esophageal stenosis, xerostomia, dental decay, and osteoradionecrosis-is a major problem in long-term survivors. Data from early trials and encouraging results from meta-analyses have revived interest in the use of neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy before definitive local treatment. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated marked improvements in survival with the addition of the taxane docetaxel (Taxotere) to the traditional induction regimen consisting of cisplatin and 5FU (TPF) compared with cisplatin and 5FU (PF) alone and have established a new standard of care. The newer TPF induction chemotherapy regimens also appear to be tolerated better than PF when accompanied by adequate supportive measures. Studies to enhance the efficacy of TPF induction chemotherapy by adding new targeted agents, such as the EGF-R inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab, are underway.

Targeting important pathways in head and neck cancer: from the bench to the clinic

Radiation therapy as single or combined modality (concurrent chemoradiotherapy) has been the cornerstone of treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck for a long time. Fortunately, advances in tumor biology have provided new insights of tumor proliferation, metastases, migration and cell cycle regulation. The success seen with the use of cetuximab alone or in combination with conventional treatments has led the roadmap to discover other potential target mechanisms which may translate into better response rate with less local and systemic toxicity and improved overall survival. In this review, we discuss other cellular pathways that have shown to be involved in the carcinogenesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and the actual efforts to target these mechanisms.

Current concepts for the management of head and neck cancer: chemotherapy

Chemotherapy can be administered in patients with locoregionally advanced (LA) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) either concurrently with irradiation or as induction chemotherapy prior to local treatment or as palliative therapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is still the standard for LA-SCCHN. TPF has emerged as the new standard regimen when induction chemotherapy is indicated. Areas of active investigation in LA-SCCHN are the sequential administration of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and the integration of targeted therapies. None of the combination chemotherapy regimens demonstrated an overall survival benefit when compared to single agent methotrexate, cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil in recurrent/metastatic disease. Combination chemotherapy in this setting is preferably used in younger patients with a good performance status and with symptomatic disease who require prompt symptom relief. However, a survival benefit was observed when cetuximab was combined with platinum-5-fluorouracil.

Induction therapy in the modern era of combined-modality therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer

As therapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) has evolved, treatment has become increasingly aggressive and cure rates have risen. However, survival still remains poor. The evolving standard of care has focused on the concurrent use of chemotherapy with more aggressive radiotherapy; however, patients continue to recur locally and/or regionally, albeit at a diminished rate, and distant metastases have become a major site of fatal recurrence, while long-term local and acute systemic toxicities have increased. As a result of these changes in outcomes and a re-evaluation of earlier historical data by meta-analyses, interest in cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) induction chemotherapy has re-emerged and evolved. Most recently randomized studies comparing PF with PF plus a taxane, in particular docetaxel (TPF regimen), have demonstrated markedly superior survival with the three-drug regimens. TPF is now considered the standard of care for induction chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy, known as sequential therapy, has been shown to be safe and effective. This approach is promising and may have a survival advantage over chemoradiotherapy alone. Both TPF induction and sequential therapy are considered appropriate platforms upon which the new molecularly targeted agents can be tested.

Chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer

Three decades of collaborative research have led to the integration of platinum-based chemotherapy into the curative management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and gains in local-regional control, organ preservation and survival endpoints. Concomitant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the strategy that has proven most effective for organ preservation for larynx and oropharynx cancers, the treatment of unresectable disease, nasopharyngeal cancer and the post-operative adjuvant treatment of patients at high risk of recurrence. The evolution of current indications for this multimodality approach is reviewed and current areas of investigation discussed. Nearly all patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer receive chemotherapy as part of initial curative treatment. The focus of future trials should be on survival improvement, toxicity reduction and risk stratification for treatment decision making.

[Organ sparing treatment modalities - which type of treatment for which carcinoma?]

Radical surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy is still the most effective treatment option for advanced resectable head and neck cancer. It is therefore of utmost importance to determine the resectability before start of the treatment. For those patients who suffer from unresectable cancer or refuse to undergo surgery, alternatives, such as induction-chemotherapy or radiotherapy plus chemotherapy alone may be offered. Historical studies investigating alternative treatment protocols were conducted almost 20 years ago. These studies demonstrated that in approximately 2/3 of all patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer undergoing induction-chemotherapy according to the PF-protocol (cisplatin plus 5-FU as a continuous infusion) and subsequent radiotherapy, larynx preservation without negative impact on overall survival could be achieved. At least three randomized studies have shown a clinical advantage for a treatment combination consisting of docetaxel or paclitaxel plus CDDP/5-FU over a historical control regimen containing CDDP/5-FU alone. This novel combination therefore is currently regarded as the gold-standard for induction-chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer patients. A further significant addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for the head and neck radiation oncologist is the recently introduced monoclonal antibody cetuximab. It was found in a randomized landmark study that addition of cetuximab to radiotherapy significantly improves local control as well as overall survival of advanced stage head and neck cancer patients. In light of these recent developments this review discusses the role of organ sparing treatment protocols and different levels of evidence with special consideration of tumor localization.

Head and neck cancer

Most head and neck cancers are squamous cell carcinomas that develop in the upper aerodigestive epithelium after exposure to carcinogens such as tobacco and alcohol. Human papillomavirus has also been strongly implicated as a causative agent in a subset of these cancers. The complex anatomy and vital physiological role of the tumour-involved structures dictate that the goals of treatment are not only to improve survival outcomes but also to preserve organ function. Major improvements have been accomplished in surgical techniques and radiotherapy delivery. Moreover, systemic therapy including chemotherapy and molecularly targeted agents--namely, the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors--has been successfully integrated into potentially curative treatment of locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In deciding which treatment strategy would be suitable for an individual patient, important considerations include expected functional outcomes, ability to tolerate treatment, and comorbid illnesses. The collaboration of many specialties is the key for optimum assessment and decision making. We review the epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis and staging, and the latest multimodal management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Neoadjuvant cisplatin chemotherapy before chemoradiation: a flawed paradigm?

Effective chemotherapy (CT) treatment of solid tumors emerged with the introduction of anthracyclines and platinum CT in the late 1970s, at first with palliative intent, and later extended into the adjuvant setting. High response rates led to the belief that systemic CT might improve locoregional control and also decrease the risk of distant metastases. A new strategy advocated cisplatin-based neoadjuvant CT (NACT) before definitive local treatment-either surgery or radiotherapy (RT). Response to NACT was viewed as a favorable prognostic sign, which allows the selection of patients most likely to benefit from RT or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The aim of this discussion is to raise the debate regarding NACT in reducing metastases, improving local control and selecting out good responders for nonsurgical treatment in the following sites: head and neck, esophagus, cervix, anus, nasopharynx, and bladder; as well as non-small-cell lung cancer. NACT has almost invariably failed to deliver an improved outcome in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) when delivered before RT or CRT in all solid tumor sites. The evidence that NACT may improve outcome in terms of DFS or OS is strongest when it is administered before surgical resection, but remains scant before RT or CRT. Taxane-containing regimens look more promising than does cisplatin NACT, but have not been shown to improve on concurrent CRT. Future meta-analyses should compare induction CT followed by RT and induction followed by CRT versus RT or CRT alone.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: Should it be revisited?

Locally advanced SCCHN (LA-SCCHN) is generally treated by a combination of chemotherapy, irradiation and/or surgery. Timing of the chemotherapy has for long been a matter of debate but concurrent chemoradiation was widely adopted as standard of care for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after the publication of a large meta-analysis which demonstrated that concurrent chemoradiation confers an absolute survival benefit of 8% at 2 and 5 years. Induction chemotherapy has some appealing advantages including the opportunity of assessing tumor response and selecting the patients who are candidates for organ preservation. The cisplatin-fluorouracil combination has been the induction regimen of choice for two decades but has recently been superseded by a combination of cisplatin, fluorouracil and a taxane which can be considered the standard regimen when induction chemotherapy is appropriate. Multiple large randomized trials designed to compare sequential induction, i.e., chemotherapy followed by CRT to CRT alone are currently underway. New challenges are the integration of targeted therapies into the current treatment strategies and the identification of prognostic biomarkers and of factors predicting the response to treatment which would help to select patients who are likely to benefit most from induction chemotherapy.

Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) versus cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC)

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a multicentric randomized phase II trial comparing 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) and cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC). Primary objective was complete response (CR) to IC and overall survival (OS) was a secondary objective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PF: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. Day 1 (D1) and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) per day i.v. continous infusion D1-D5, every 21 days. UFTVP: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. D1; UFT 200 mg/m(2) per day p.o. D1-D21 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. D1 and D8, every 21 days. Four IC courses were planned in both arms.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients (pts) were included (PF/UFTVP: 99/107): oral cavity: 8%/10%, oropharynx: 20%/25%, hypopharynx: 17%/14%, larynx: 54%/50%. Stage (TNM, 2002): III: 41%/35%, IVA: 23%/27%, IVB: 35%/38%. Complete response to IC: PF:36%/UFTVP:31% (P: no significative (NS)). G 3-4 toxicity (PF/UFTVP): neutropenia: 52%/72%; febrile neutropenia: 3%/20% (P < 0.001); anaemia:1%/14% (P < 0.001); trombocytopenia: 5%/0% (P = 0.02); mucositis: 15%/7% (P < 0.001). Deaths during IC: 2(2%)/3(3%). IC with UFTVP was associated with a favourable OS in the Cox analysis (actuarial 5 year OS: 49% vs. 34%; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95, P: 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical response is equal in both arms, overall survival (Cox) is better in the UFTVP arm. Febrile neutropenia and anaemia were more frequent with UFTVP while mucositis and trombocytopenia were more severe with PF.

Phase II trial of chemoradiation for organ preservation in resectable stage III or IV squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx or oropharynx: results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2399

PURPOSE

Taxane-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCR) for head and neck cancers has proven to have a favorable toxicity profile compared with cisplatin and radiation. This phase II multi-institutional trial evaluates taxane-based induction chemotherapy followed by CCR for organ preservation in resectable stage III/IVA and IVB larynx and oropharynx (OP) cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility required resectable stage T2N+, or T3-T4N0-3M0 biopsy-proven squamous carcinoma, age at least 18 years, PS 0 to 2, good organ function, and no prior chemotherapy or radiation. Treatment was induction paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 6 for two cycles every 21 days followed by concurrent paclitaxel 30 mg/m(2) every 7 days with 70 Gy if no evidence of tumor progression. Weekly erythropoietin alpha 40 kU was used for suboptimal hemoglobin (< 14 gm/dL men, < 13 gm/dL women). The primary end point was organ preservation (freedom from primary site salvage surgery or primary tumor recurrence).

RESULTS

One hundred five of 111 patients (36 larynx, 69 OP) were eligible. Median follow-up was 36.7 months. Ninety-four percent received full-dose radiotherapy and 91% received at least five cycles of concurrent paclitaxel. No patient progressed while receiving chemotherapy. Organ preservation was 81% at 2 years after completion of therapy (larynx 74%, OP 84%). Thirteen patients required primary-site salvage surgery (seven larynx, six OP), and six of these have progressed and died (three larynx, three OP). Thirteen patients developed distant metastases (seven larynx, six OP; P = .02) and 10 of 36 larynx and 11 of 69 OP patients have died as a result of their disease. Two-year survival is 76% (63% larynx v 83% OP).

CONCLUSION

A high organ preservation rate was obtained with this regimen for OP but not for larynx patients. Toxicity was low, and induction chemotherapy did not preclude delivery of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Evolving Strategies for Combined‐Modality Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Despite continual advances in the treatment of head and neck cancer, disease-free survival, functional outcome, toxicity of therapy, and overall survival remain less than optimal. While traditional treatment has focused on surgical resection with or without radiation and chemoradiotherapy, newer combined-modality regimens may offer patients a better prognosis, organ preservation, and less morbidity. In this paper, single agents and doublet therapy are reviewed, as are emerging data on the utility of induction therapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery as a sequential treatment regimen. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Clinical trial design limitations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present article reviews the randomized trials contributing to the establishment of current standards for the treatment of head and neck cancer. It provides critical analysis of their methodology in order to facilitate future trial design.

RECENT FINDINGS

From a prognosis perspective, head and neck cancers are a heterogeneous group of diseases. Following a number of randomized clinical trials evaluating the role of chemotherapy in the induction, concomitant and adjuvant settings, there has been considerable improvement in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancers during the last decade. It is, however, difficult to interpret and compare the results optimally and to build on efficient trial designs as most of the trials included patients with different levels of essential prognostic factors.

SUMMARY

All key randomized trials will be reviewed according to eligibility criteria, subgroup issues, trial power and historical controls. Methodological interpretation and possible plans for the next generation of clinical trials will be presented.

The role of taxanes and targeted therapies in locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review presents new data on the role of taxanes and targeted therapies in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

RECENT FINDINGS

Taxane-containing triplets are clearly superior as an induction regimen in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck when compared with cisplatin/5 fluorouracil which has been the standard for two decades. Preliminary data suggest that the addition of a taxane to cisplatin/5 fluorouracil as induction regimen followed by chemoradiation may be superior to chemoradiation alone. The addition of cetuximab to radiation prolongs locoregional control and survival without increasing mucositis. Areas of active investigation are the search for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and the optimal way of integrating epidermal growth factor receptor-directed therapies into standard management. Meanwhile new targets are explored.

SUMMARY

Taxane/cisplatin/5 fluorouracil induction chemotherapy is clearly superior to cisplatin/5 fluorouracil. Epidermal growth factor receptor directed therapies can safely be combined with radiation and the combination shows encouraging results.

Induction chemotherapy for squamous cancer of the head and neck

This paper reviews the efficacy and hazard of sequential combined treatment programs for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. These regimens consist of initial systemic chemotherapy, known as neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy, followed by radiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy.

Current opinion in diagnosis and treatment of laryngeal carcinoma

Laryngeal carcinoma is the 11th commonest form of cancer in men world-wide, with 121,000 new cases in 1985. More than 95% of all laryngeal malignancies are squamous cell carcinomas. Treatment indications in cancer of the larynx are often controversial, since there are few comparative studies of different available therapeutic approaches. Surgery and radiotherapy are both widely used, and the choice between these two procedures is the most common therapeutic decision which has to be taken. Laryngeal function preservation has gained more and more weight in the last decades and chemotherapy is also a significant component of several curative approaches. In the last decades, several organ-preserving surgical techniques have become available and consequently total laryngectomy results less applied. Regardless of the treatment modality, Tis, T1, T2 laryngeal carcinomas have an 80-90% probability of cure, whereas for more advanced tumours this is approximately 60%. The most effective approach to laryngeal cancer remains prevention and early diagnosis when this cancer is curable with function preserving treatments.