Nonrandomized comparison of primary chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage IIA and IIB nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer

Initial surveillance in men with marker negative clinical stage IIA non-seminomatous germ cell tumours

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether extended surveillance with repeated computed tomography (CT) scans for patients with clinical stage IIA (CS IIA; <2 cm abdominal node involvement) and negative markers (Mk-) non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs) can identify those with true CS I. To assess the rate of benign lymph nodes, teratoma, and viable cancer in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) histopathology for patients with CS IIA Mk- NSGCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Observational prospective population-based study of patients diagnosed 2008-2019 with CS IIA Mk- NSGCT in the Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group (SWENOTECA) registry. Patients were managed with surveillance, with CT scans, and tumour markers every sixth week for a maximum of 18 weeks. Patients with radiological regression were treated as CS I, if progression with chemotherapy, and remaining CS IIA Mk- disease with RPLND. The end-point was the number and percentage of patients down-staged to CS I on surveillance and rate of RPLND histopathology presented as benign, teratoma, or viable cancer.

RESULTS

Overall, 126 patients with CS IIA Mk- NSGCT were included but 41 received therapy upfront. After surveillance for a median (range) of 6 (6-18) weeks, 23/85 (27%) patients were in true CS I and four (5%) progressed. Of the remaining 58 patients with lasting CS IIA Mk- NSGCT, 16 received chemotherapy and 42 underwent RPLND. The RPLND histopathology revealed benign lymph nodes in 11 (26%), teratoma in two (6%), and viable cancer in 29 (70%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance with repeated CT scans can identify patients in true CS I, thus avoiding overtreatment. The RPLND histopathology in patients with CS IIA Mk- NSGCT had a high rate of cancer and a low rate of teratoma.

Testicular cancer with small metastatic burden: optimal approach in 2024

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent advancements in the management of clinical stage II (CS II) testicular cancer have transformed it into a predominantly curable condition. This success in treatment advancements has markedly extended patient survival. However, these treatments carry risks and morbidities, which is important to consider given the disease's impact on young men and the emerging understanding of long-term treatment consequences.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging data support primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for select CS II seminoma patients, with similar short-term outcomes to chemotherapy but less treatment intensity. Recent studies have also challenged the reflexive use of adjuvant chemotherapy for pathologic node-positive disease, as growing evidence shows low relapse rates regardless of nodal stage. Furthermore, novel biomarkers like circulating serum microRNA-371a-3p levels can help predict the presence of viable germ cell tumor at time of RPLND.

SUMMARY

Advances in risk stratification and therapy enable personalized de-escalation approaches for oligometastatic testicular cancer, optimizing survivorship. Upfront RPLND, reassessing adjuvant systemic therapy for RPLND pN+ disease, and novel biomarkers will shape precision treatment to achieve high cure rates with excellent quality of life. Ongoing trials of reduced-intensity regimens, accurate prognostic models, improved surgical strategy, and emerging biomarkers represent the next frontier in tailored curative therapy.

Comparative cost-effectiveness of contemporary treatment strategies for stage IIA seminoma

BACKGROUND

The Surgery in Early Metastatic Seminoma (SEMS) trial examined retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as first-line treatment for patients with isolated 1-3 cm retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. To date, the standard of care for these patients has been either chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the relative cost-effectiveness of these management strategies.

METHODS

A microsimulation model assessed the cost-effectiveness of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for stage IIA seminoma. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model robustness. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection recurrence probabilities were obtained from the SEMS trial. All other probability and utility values were obtained from published literature. Primary outcomes included costs from a commercial insurer's perspective, effectiveness (quality adjusted life-years [QALYs]), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY.

RESULTS

At a lifetime horizon, the mean costs per patient for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were $58 469, $98 783, and $104 096, and the mean QALYs were 40.61, 40.70, and 39.15, respectively. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was found to be the most cost-effective approach because of high costs and accrued disutility of chronic toxicities associated with radiotherapy (cost-effectiveness ratios = $433 845/QALY) and chemotherapy (dominated). On 1-way sensitivity analyses, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was no longer cost-effective if the probabilities of infertility and cardiovascular toxicity after radiotherapy were less than 13% and 16%, respectively, or if the 2-year probability of progression after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was more than 26%.

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was the most cost-effective treatment approach for stage IIA seminoma. These findings support clinical guideline consideration of including retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a treatment option for well-selected patients with stage IIA seminoma.

Comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for non-seminomatous germ cell tumor: a single-center retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare the perioperative outcomes of L-RPLND, R-RPLND and O-RPLND, and determine which one can be the mainstream option.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 47 patients undergoing primary RPLND by three different surgical techniques for stage I-II NSGCT between July 2011 and April 2022 at our center. Standard open and laparoscopic RPLND was performed with usual equipment, and robotic RPLND was operated with da Vinci Si system.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients underwent RPLND during 2011-2022, and 26 (55.3%) of them received L-RPLND, 14 (29.8%) were operated with robot, while 7 (14.9%) were performed O-RPLND. The median follow-up was 48.0 months, 48.0 months, and 60.0 months, respectively. The oncological outcomes were comparable among all groups. In L-RPLND group, there were 8 (30.8%) cases of low grade (Clavien I-II) complications, and 3 (11.5%) cases of high-grade (Clavien III-IV) complications. In R-RPLND group, one (7.1%) low-grade complication and four (28.6%) high-grade complications were observed. In O-RPLND group, there were 2 (28.5%) cases of low-grade complications and one case (14.2%) of high-grade one. The operation duration of L-RPLND was the shortest. In O-RPLND group, the number of positive lymph nodes were higher than other two groups. Patients undergoing open surgery had lower (p < 0.05) red blood cell count, hemoglobin level, and higher (p < 0.05) estimated blood loss, white blood cell count than those receiving either laparoscopic or robotic surgery.

CONCLUSION

All three surgical techniques are comparable in safety, oncological, andrological, and reproductive outcomes under the circumstance of not using primary chemotherapy. L-RPLND might be the most cost-effective option.

Treatment Outcomes for Men with Clinical Stage II Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumours Treated with Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Guidelines recommend primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a treatment option for tumour marker-negative stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT).

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on oncological outcomes for men with stage II NSGCT treated with RPLND.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of studies describing clinicopathological outcomes following primary RPLND in stage II NSGCT was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Baseline data, perioperative and postoperative parameters, and oncological outcomes were collected.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In total, 12 of 4387 studies were included, from which we collected data for 835 men. Among men with clinical stage II NSGCT, pathological stage II was confirmed in 615 of 790 patients (78%). Most studies administered adjuvant chemotherapy in cases with large lymph nodes, multiple affected lymph nodes, or persistently elevated tumour markers. Recurrence was observed in 12-40% of patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and 0-4% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature describing RPLND in clinical stage II NSGCT is heterogeneous and no meta-analysis was possible, but RPLND can provide accurate staging and may be curative in selected patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the literature to summarise results after surgical removal of enlarged lymph nodes in the back of the abdomen in men with testis cancer. This procedure provides accurate information on how far the cancer has spread and may provide a cure in selected patients.

Advances in diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer

Testicular cancer is a curable cancer. The success of physicians in curing the disease is underpinned by multidisciplinary advances. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy and the refinement of post-chemotherapy surgical procedures and diagnostic strategies have greatly improved long term survival in most patients. Despite such excellent outcomes, several controversial dilemmas exist in the approaches to clinical stage I disease, salvage chemotherapy, post-chemotherapy surgical procedures, and implementing innovative imaging studies. Relapse after salvage chemotherapy has a poor prognosis and the optimal treatment is not apparent. Recent research has provided insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying cisplatin resistance. Phase 2 studies with targeted agents have failed to show adequate efficacy; however, our understanding of cisplatin resistant disease is rapidly expanding. This review summarizes recent advances and discusses relevant issues in the biology and management of testicular cancer.

Retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) as upfront management in stage II germ-cell tumours: evaluation of safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Patients with stage II germ-cell tumours (GCT) usually undergo radiotherapy (seminoma only) or chemotherapy. Both strategies display a recognised risk of long-term side effects. We evaluated retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as exclusive treatment in stage II GCT.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2019 included, 66 selected stage II GCT patients underwent primary open (O-) or laparoscopic (L-)RPLND. Type of procedure and extent of dissection, operative time, node rescue, hospital stay, complications (according to Clavien-Dindo), administration of chemotherapy, relapse and site of relapse were evaluated.

RESULTS

Five patients had pure testicular seminoma. Nineteen (28.8%) had raised markers prior to RPLND; 48 (72.7%), 16 (24.2%) and two (3.0%) were stage IIA, IIB and IIC, respectively. O-RPLND and unilateral L-RPLND were 36 and 30 respectively. Six stage II A patients (12.5%) had negative nodes. Four patients underwent immediate adjuvant chemotherapy. One patient was lost at follow-up. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 48 (77.4%) of the 62 patients undergoing RPLND alone remained recurrence-free; one patient had an in-field recurrence following a bilateral dissection. According to procedure, number of rescued nodes (O-RPLND: 25. IQR 21-31; L-RPLND: 20, IQR 15-26; p: 0.001), hospital stay (L-RPLND: 3 days, IQR 3-4; O-RPLND: 6 days, IQR 5-8; p: .001) and grade ≥2 complications (L-RPLND 7%, O-RPLND 22%; p: 0.1) were the only significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Primary RPLND is safe in stage II GCT, including seminoma, and may warrant a cure rate greater than 70%. When feasible, L-RPLND may be as effective as O-RPLND with better tolerability.

Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer at a national referral centre

Objectives

We aim to determine if robot‐assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R‐RPLND) can be performed as a safe option to open RPLND in selected patients with metastatic germ cell cancer.

Patients and methods

This population‐based prospective study was performed at a one of two national referral centres for RPLND in Sweden. All patients referred during January 2017–March 2021 were screened for possible inclusion. R‐RPLND was performed using the Da Vinci Xi surgical system. Perioperative parameters, postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo), final pathology, preservation of antegrade ejaculation and relapse rates were evaluated. Classifiers for selecting patients to open versus robotic RPLND were analysed by logistic regression modelling. The median follow‐up was 23 months.

Results

Of 87 patients referred, 29 were selected for R‐RPLND, 19 in a post‐chemotherapy setting. In median, retroperitoneal tumour diameter was 18 mm, BMI 24 kg/m², operative time 433 min, estimated blood loss 50 ml and length of stay 3 days. One patient underwent open conversion due to failure to progress. Four patients had Clavien–Dindo grade 3 complications, of which three were chylous‐related. No in‐field recurrences occurred during follow‐up.

Conclusion

This population‐based study suggests that R‐RPLND can be safely performed in at least one third of patients referred for an RPLND. A relatively high rate of lymph‐leakage may represent a potential drawback. Tumour size may be the most important discriminator when deciding on robotic versus open RPLND. Further studies with longer follow‐up are needed to validate the results.

Narrative review of developing new biomarkers for decision making in advanced testis cancer

Management of testicular germ cell tumor (GCT) patients is based on clinical determinants, mainly CT scan and serum tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein, beta subunit of HCG and LDH). Treatment decisions are usually straightforward for patients with clear evidence of metastatic disease, confirmed either by imaging tests or by unequivocal elevated tumor markers. However, there are several clinical scenarios where the assessment of metastatic disease is complicated by the limited specificity of the current imaging tests and serum tumor markers. These include patients with clinical stage IIA GCT with negative tumor markers and patients with post-chemotherapy residual disease where, in absence of clear indicators of GCT, decision making and patient treatment allocation become challenging. Therefore, more accurate biomarkers are critical to reduce the risk of under-or over-treatment and to always deliver the most optimal therapy. The objectives of this narrative review are to review the available publications about micro-RNAs in GCT s and their potential clinical applications. Two clusters of micro-RNAs, miR-371a-3p and miR-302/367, specifically expressed by both seminoma and non-seminoma GCT and easily detectable in the peripheral blood, have demonstrated to be promising in this endeavor. Large prospective trials are ongoing to define the operating characteristics of these biomarkers and their clinical utility to improve GCT patient management and reduce the error rate deriving from clinical uncertainty, therefore reducing the risk of sub-optimal treatments.

Editorial by Bendu K. Konneh, John T. Lafin and Aditya Bagrodia on pp. 341-342 of this issue: MicroRNA-371a-3p as a blood-based biomarker in testis cancer

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs involved in the regulation of mRNA transcription and translation, and possess all desirable features of an ideal tumor marker. Of almost 31 different miRNA clusters identified in germ cell tumors (GCTs), miR-371a-3p has shown exceptionally high sensitivity and specificity for both seminomatous and nonseminomatous GCTs. It is easily obtainable and correlates well with tumor burden. Recent multi-institutional prospective studies have shown promising test characteristics for miR-371a-3p as a diagnostic blood-based biomarker for GCT prior to orchiectomy including 80%-100% sensitivity and 90%-100% specificity. This accuracy may address other unmet needs in the management of patients with GCT. Early studies have suggested the utility of miR-371a-3p in detecting occult nodal metastasis in high-risk clinical stage I and early stage II disease. Ongoing clinical trials including SWOG 1823 and AGCT1531 are specifically designed to confirm the utility of miR-371a-3p in clinical stage I GCT. Despite its strong association with viable GCT after treatment with chemotherapy, miR-371a-3p does not seem to accurately predict the presence of teratoma in residual lesions. Also, standardization of extraction and interpretation methods is a necessary step to assure uniform results across different institutions.

Nerve-sparing Robot-assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: The Monoblock Technique

Background

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is a treatment option for men with stage 1 or 2 testis cancer and the standard of care for men with postchemotherapy retroperitoneal residual disease. Given the morbidity of RPLND, four important surgical modifications have been proposed: minimally invasive access, nerve-sparing resection, template resection, and en-bloc resection.

Objective

To describe the surgical steps and perioperative outcomes of robotic nerve-sparing unilateral template RPLND with en-bloc resection (roboRPLND-NS+).

Design, setting, and participants

From 2017 to 2019, five patients with suspicion of retroperitoneal metastatic testicular cancer on abdominopelvic computed tomography underwent roboRPLND-NS+ at a single referral center. All surgeries were carried out by a single surgeon who has performed more than 500 extended and more than 50 super-extended robot-assisted lymph node dissections.

Surgical procedure

A lateral transperitoneal robotic approach with a da Vinci Xi Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in six-arm configuration was used. The sympathetic chains, postganglionic sympathetic fibers, and hypogastric plexus were preserved as much as possible to ensure a nerve-sparing procedure. The template borders consisted of the renal vein cranially, the ureter laterally, the interaortocaval space medially, the common iliac artery caudally, and the psoas muscle dorsally for the right and left modified RPLND templates. Lymph nodes and the surrounding fatty tissue were progressively resected from the common iliac vessels and the abdominal aorta using the split-and-roll technique, and all of the template tissue was resected as a single specimen. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

Measurements

Lymph node yield and perioperative and postoperative oncological and functional outcomes were measured.

Results and limitations

The median patient age was 38 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 32–41) and the median operative time was 274 min (IQR 238–280). Node metastases were pathologically confirmed in three patients. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 19 (IQR 18–21), and the median number of positive lymph nodes was 2 (IQR 1–3). No patient experienced intraoperative or postoperative complications. The postoperative hospital stay was either 3 or 4 d. Maintenance of antegrade ejaculation was achieved in all patients. After median follow-up of 15 mo (IQR 14–30), all patients were alive and no recurrence was observed. Limitations include the low number of patients and the single surgeon experience.

Conclusions

RoboRPLND-NS+ is a safe and feasible technique that allows removal of a high number of lymph nodes with good functional outcomes. Short-term survival outcomes were excellent, with no recurrences or deaths recorded.

Patient summary

We describe a feasible and safe robot-assisted surgical procedure for removal of lymph nodes in patients with testicular cancer. Our technique has potential to decrease the medical problems arising as side effects of the surgery while achieving good cancer control.

Clinical stage II seminoma: management options

INTRODUCTION

The management of clinical stage II seminoma has evolved with a recent emphasis on minimizing long-term morbidity while achieving oncologic cure.

METHODS

In this review we discuss the available management options for clinical stage II seminoma with an emphasis on the emerging role of surgery in this patient population.

RESULTS

Historically, treatment options available to clinical stage II seminoma patients were limited to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Survival rates with these options are excellent; however, both are associated with significant long-term morbidities including cardiovascular, pulmonary, and neurologic toxicities. Additionally, higher rates of secondary malignancies are witnessed in this young patient population, decades after successful treatment of the primary cancer. Recently, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has been proposed as a first-line treatment option for patients with low-volume metastatic seminoma.

CONCLUSION

The SEMS and PRIMETEST trials are two studies examining the role of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage II seminoma, and early data show significant promise.

Radiotherapy role in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors, radiobiological and technical issues of an unexplored scenario

Historically, non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) has been considered a radio-resistant disease, excluding radiotherapy (RT) from curative strategies. However, case series exploring the use of radiation treatment in this setting are often outdated, and prospective ongoing studies testing new radiotherapeutic approaches in NSGCT are lacking. Considering that tremendous advances in radiotherapy technology have enabled improved precision in RT delivery as well as dose escalation while decreasing treatment-related morbidity, we overviewed the currently available literature to explore the radiobiological basis, the technical issues, and potential strategies for implementation of RT in the management of this clinical entity. The purpose of the present overview is to provide insight for future research in this unexplored scenario. In summary, the biological rationale for RT use and potential implementation with systemic therapies exist, especially considering the advantage of new technologies, which were unavailable in the era of early literature reports. The NSGCT radioresistance paradigm could be based only on the fact that effective treatment schedules were simply undeliverable with older RT techniques due to toxicity issues, but the availability of actual techniques may prompt further exploration to offer treatment alternatives to these patients. Ongoing trials on this issue are lacking, but potential areas of research are platinum-refractory disease and consolidation therapy for residual masses after PST.

[Testicular and penile cancer-survival and quality of life : New guideline and network for second opinions]

Testicular cancer occupies a special position in several respects. Although it belongs to the group of rare tumors, which is why extensive experience in treating this tumor can not be guaranteed, interdisciplinary experts collaboration and the consequent implementation of clinical studies have resulted in standardized treatment recommendations. Because testicular cancer is one of the most curable cancers, long-term toxicity and treatment sequelae are of special importance. In the early stages, toxicity could be reduced by minimizing therapy to the extent possible, but without decreasing treatment success. Nevertheless, treatment is still controversially discussed, especially concerning treatment of stage I disease. Finally particular focus should be paid to non-germinal tumors which are even more rare, but partly also more dangerous. Therefore known facts should be made available for the broad medical community. In penile cancer, which is also a very rare tumor entity, organ-sparing surgery and consequent invasive lymph node staging are mandatory.

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes for testicular choriocarcinoma: a population-based study

Background

Due to the scarcity of cases of testicular choriocarcinoma (CC), its clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis have not been well summarized. Consequently, we conducted this population-based case-control study to characterize the features of testicular CC.

Methods

The SEER database was used to extract qualified data. Dichotomous variables were compared by Pearson’s Chi-squared or Fisher exact test. Survival variables were compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests. The univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied to figure out risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control confounding factors in the study.

Results

In total, 788 patients with CC and 19,571 patients with seminoma were identified. Significant differences were found between two groups in terms of age (≤30 years: 65.4% vs. 26.5%; >30 years: 34.6% vs. 73.5%; P<0.001), marital status (28.8% vs. 52.1%; P<0.001), laterality (proportion of bilateral tumors: 4.1% vs. 1.0%, P<0.001), tumors size (≤4 cm: 40.2% vs. 49.3%; >4 cm: 45.8% vs. 43.0%; P<0.001), SEER stage (localized: 43.9% vs. 79.1%; regional: 14.6% vs. 15.4%; distant: 41.0% vs. 4.7%; P<0.001), surgery (92.4% vs. 98.2%; P<0.001) and chemotherapy (65.4% vs. 19.8%; P<0.001). However, no differences were found between two groups after Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Furthermore, CC had worse outcomes than seminoma in terms of 5-year rate of OS (85.5% vs. 97.3%) and 5-year rate of CSS (86.8% vs. 98.6%). In univariable Cox hazard model, age, laterality, SEER stage (distant), surgery, chemotherapy and pathological type were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. However, in multivariable Cox hazard model, only age, SEER stage(distant) and surgery remained as the independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS.

Conclusions

Choriocarcinoma is exceedingly rare disease with metastases at initial diagnose and has poor survival even after treatment. Old age and advanced tumor stage indicate a poor prognosis, while surgery therapy can improve prognosis. Nevertheless, longer-term studies with larger population of patients are needed to verify their biological behavior and therapeutic efficacy.

[French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: testicular germ cell tumors]

OBJECTIVE

- To update French guidelines concerning testicular germ cell cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

- Comprehensive Medline search between 2018 and 2020 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell cancer and treatments toxicities. Level of evidence was evaluated.

RESULTS

- Testicular Germ cell tumor diagnosis is based on physical examination, biology tests (serum tumor markers AFP, hCGt, LDH) and radiological assessment (scrotal ultrasound and chest, abdomen and pelvis computerized tomography). Total inguinal orchiectomy is the first-line treatment allowing characterization of the histological type, local staging and identification of risk factors for micrometastases. In case of several therapeutic options, one must inform his patient balancing risks and benefits. Surveillance is usually chosen in stage I seminoma compliant patients as the evolution rate is low between 15 to 20%. Carboplatin AUC7 is an alternative option. Radiotherapy indication should be avoided. In stage I non seminomatous patients, either surveillance or risk-adapted strategy can be applied. Staging retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has restricted indications. Metastatic germ cell tumors are usually treated by PEB chemotherapy according to IGCCCG prognostic classification. Lombo-aortic radiotherapy is still a standard treatment for stage IIA. Residual masses should be evaluated by biological and radiological assessment 3 to 4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy. Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is advocated for every non seminomatous residual mass more than one cm. 18FDG uptake should be evaluated for each seminoma residual mass more than 3 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

- A rigorous use of classifications is mandatory to define staging since initial diagnosis. Applying treatments based on these classifications leads to excellent survival rates (99% in CSI, 85% in CSII+).

Role of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in stage I and low-volume metastatic germ cell tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Early-stage testicular cancers are highly curable. Following orchidectomy, management options for stage I disease include active surveillance, nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) and primary chemotherapy as recommended by the current guidelines. Primary RPLND has for decades played an integral part of treatment in patients with early-stage testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT), particularly in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) with focus on reducing the long-term morbidity. We review the role of RPLND in stage I NSCGT as well as stage II A/B NSGCT and as seminoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy are established treatments for seminoma; however, long-term data has demonstrated the association of such therapies with late toxicity including secondary malignancies, hearing loss, cardiovascular disease as well as metabolic syndromes. Given the well established role of RPLND in NSGCTs, clinicians have developed an interest in utilization of surgery for low-volume retroperitoneal metastatic disease. Two prospective clinical trials (SEMS and PRIMETEST) are underway to determine the role of RPLND alone in low volume metastatic seminoma.

SUMMARY

RPLND is a highly effective treatment for early-stage germ cell tumors but represents overtreatment in low-volume stage I disease where active surveillance is recommended. RPLND has shown a promising role in low-volume stage II seminomas. Two phase II clinical trials are underway to further determine the curative potential of this approach.

Testicular Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Testicular cancer is relatively uncommon and accounts for <1% of all male tumors. However, it is the most common solid tumor in men between the ages of 20 and 34 years, and the global incidence has been steadily rising over the past several decades. Several risk factors for testicular cancer have been identified, including personal or family history of testicular cancer and cryptorchidism. Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise 95% of malignant tumors arising in the testes and are categorized into 2 main histologic subtypes: seminoma and nonseminoma. Although nonseminoma is the more clinically aggressive tumor subtype, 5-year survival rates exceed 70% with current treatment options, even in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the primary treatment for most patients with testicular GCTs. Postorchiectomy management is dictated by stage, histology, and risk classification; treatment options for nonseminoma include surveillance, systemic therapy, and nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Although rarely occurring, prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor, with >50% of patients dying within 1 year of diagnosis. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Testicular Cancer focuses on recommendations for the management of adult patients with nonseminomatous GCTs.

Surgical treatment of metastatic germ cell cancer

Among young men between the ages of 15 and 40 years, germ cell cancer is the most common solid tumor [1]. The worldwide incidence of germ cell cancer is 70 000 cases. Compared to all solid tumors of men, germ cell cancer accounts for 1% of all male tumors. Nevertheless, the mortality of this rare tumor entity is about 13% since 9507 patients died worldwide of germ cell cancer. The improvement in survival of germ cell cancer patients is due to a multimodal treatment of germ cell cancer including cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgery leading to higher cure-rates even in advanced stages [1], whereas the increasing incidence of germ cell cancers cannot be thoroughly explained. In this article we review the current indications for surgery in metastatic germ cell cancers, highlight the strength and weaknesses of techniques and indications and raise the question how to improve surgical treatment in metastatic germ cell cancer.

National management trends in clinical stage IIA nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) and opportunities to avoid dual therapy

INTRODUCTION

For marker-negative clinical stage (CS) IIA nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT), National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association guidelines recommend either retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or induction chemotherapy. The goal is cure with one form of therapy. We evaluated national practice patterns in the management of CSIIA NSGCT and utilization of secondary therapies.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify 400 men diagnosed with marker negative CSIIA NSGCT between 2004 and 2014 treated with RPLND or chemotherapy. Trends in the utilization of initial and adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy only, RPLND only, RPLND with adjuvant chemotherapy, and postchemotherapy RPLND) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 400 cases, 233 (58%) underwent induction chemotherapy with surveillance, 51 (20%) underwent RPLND with surveillance, 89 (22%) underwent RPLND followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, and 14 (4%) underwent induction chemotherapy followed by RPLND. Thirty percent of patients received dual therapy. After RPLND with pN1 staging, 43 (61%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. The pN0 rate after primary RPLND was 22%. Five year overall survival ranged from 95% to 100% based on initial treatment choice.

CONCLUSIONS

For marker negative CS IIA nonseminoma, dual, therapy, and treatment with chemotherapy is common. With low volume retroperitoneal disease resected at RPLND, adjuvant chemotherapy was frequently administered but has debatable therapeutic value. These data highlight opportunities to decrease treatment burden in patients with CS IIA nonseminoma.

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection as Primary Treatment for Men With Testicular Seminoma: Utilization and Survival Analysis Using the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2014

BACKGROUND

The role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as first-line treatment for testicular seminoma is less well defined than for testicular nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors. We describe utilization of primary RPLND in the United States and report on overall survival (OS) after surgery for these men.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using 2004-2014 data from the National Cancer Data Base, we identified 62,727 men with primary testicular cancer, 31,068 of whom were diagnosed as having seminoma. After excluding men with benign, non-germ cell, and nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor histologies, those who did not undergo RPLND, those where clinical stage and survival data were unavailable, and those with testicular seminoma who underwent RPLND in the postchemotherapy setting (n = 47), 365 men comprised our final cohort. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical and demographic factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine OS.

RESULTS

A total of 365 men with testicular seminoma underwent primary RPLND. At a median follow-up of 4.1 years, there were 16 deaths in the entire cohort. Five-year OS was 94.2%. Subset analysis of men with stage I and IIA/B disease who underwent primary RPLND revealed 5-year OS rates of 97.3% and 92.0%, respectively (P = .035). OS did not significantly differ in patients with stage IIA versus IIB disease (91.8% vs. 92.3%, respectively, P = .907).

CONCLUSION

Although RPLND is rarely used as primary therapy in testicular seminoma, OS rates appear to be comparable to rates reported in the literature for primary chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Ongoing prospective trials will clarify the role of RPLND in the management of testicular seminoma.

Current management and management controversies in early- and intermediate-stage of nonseminoma germ cell tumors

Early stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) remains a treatable disease, with stage I cancer specific survival exceeding 95%. Using a risk-adapted approach; active surveillance (AS), adjuvant chemotherapy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) all options for treatment; with surveillance being increasingly used. With persistently elevated markers (stage IS), chemotherapy remains the hallmark of treatment. Management of stage II NSGCT varies based on status of tumor markers. With negative markers, both induction chemotherapy and upfront RPLND remain options. Management of a residual mass <1 cm after chemotherapy remains controversial, with AS and nerve-sparing RPLND considered options. The development of miR-371a-3p microRNA shows promise a novel biomarker for testicular cancer (GCT). Despite controversies in management, cures for NSGCT are achievable in 95-99% of patients.

Systemic therapy for primary and extragonadal germ cell tumors: prognosis and nuances of treatment

Testicular germ cell tumors are the most common solid tumors in young men. These cancers represent a success story of modern medicine in our ability to cure young patients and offer decades of life, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 95%. This review outlines the staging and risk classification of testicular cancers, and reviews the current state of knowledge and standard of care for the systemic treatment of testicular germ cell tumors with chemotherapy, focusing on the relevant clinical data supporting each treatment regimen. This review also briefly highlights current areas of active investigation, notably in the relapsed and refractory setting, including ongoing clinical trials.

ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.

[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Testicular germ cell tumors]

OBJECTIVE

To update French guidelines concerning testicular germ cell cancer.

METHODS

Comprehensive Medline search between 2016 and 2018 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell cancer and treatments toxicities. Level of evidence was evaluated.

RESULTS

Testicular Germ cell tumor diagnosis is based on physical examination, biology tests (serum tumor markers AFP, hCGt, LDH) and radiological assessment (scrotal ultrasound and chest, abdomen and pelvis computerized tomography). Total inguinal orchiectomy is the first- line treatment allowing characterization of the histological type, local staging and identification of risk factors for micrometastases. In case of several therapeutic options, one must inform his patient balancing risks and benefits. Surveillance is usually chosen in stage I seminoma compliant patients as the evolution rate is low between 15 to 20 %. Carboplatin AUC7 is an alternative option. Radiotherapy indication should be avoided. In stage I non-seminomatous patients, either surveillance or risk-adapted strategy can be applied. Staging retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has restricted indications. Metastatic germ cell tumors are usually treated by PEB chemotherapy according to IGCCCG prognostic classification. Lombo-aortic radiotherapy is still a standard treatment for stage IIA. Residual masses should be evaluated by biological and radiological assessment 3 to 4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy. Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is advocated for every non-seminomatous residual mass more than one cm. 18FDG uptake should be evaluated for each seminoma residual mass more than 3cm.

CONCLUSIONS

A rigorous use of classifications is mandatory to define staging since initial diagnosis. Applying treatments based on these classifications leads to excellent survival rates (99 % in CSI, 85 % in CSII+).

[Management of metastatic testicular germ cell tumors]

Metastatic testicular germ cell tumors are rare entities with a high cure rate owing to their major chemosensitivity. Current guidelines should be strictly followed to ensure maximal cure rate. Germ cell tumor treatment requires multidisciplinary skills and is based on cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The current challenge for these patients with favorable prognosis is to limit over- or under-treatment. Centralization of care for patients with these rare cancers is a key point to achieve the best chance of cure.

Management of Stage II Germ Cell Tumors

There are several treatment approaches for stage II germ cell tumors (GCTs), and a thorough understanding of the staging classification and histologic differences in tumor biology and therapeutic responsiveness is critical to determine an effective, multimodal management strategy that involves urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists. This article discusses contemporary management strategies for stage II GCTs, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), and surveillance. Patient selection, histology, and extent of lymphadenopathy drive management, and, as both treatment and detection strategies continue to emerge and be refined, the management of patients with stage II GCT continues to evolve.

Nationwide Patterns of Care for Stage II Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor of the Testicle

BACKGROUND

Management strategies for advanced testicular cancer published from a few, high-volume clinical centers may not be generalizable.

OBJECTIVE

To discern treatment patterns for stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) in a nationwide cancer registry.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with a stage II NSGCT from 2004 to 2014. Patients were stratified by clinical nodal status: cN1/stage IIA, cN2/stage IIB, and cN3/stage IIIC.

OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Logistic regression was performed to determine factors independently associated with primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), primary chemotherapy, and postchemotherapy RPLND (PC-RPLND).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 2203 patients (stages IIA, n=1060; IIB, n=869; and IIC, n=274) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 83% of patients underwent primary chemotherapy, while 17% underwent primary RPLND. Stratified by stage, use of primary chemotherapy was 78%, 88%, and 86% for stages IIA, IIB, and IIC, respectively. Overall, 24% of patients underwent PC-RPLND. Factors independently associated with a lower likelihood of undergoing primary RPLND were a more recent diagnosis and a higher clinical nodal stage. Conversely, patients treated at high-volume facilities were more likely to receive primary RPLND. Factors associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing PC-RPLND included a higher clinical nodal stage, treatment at a high-volume center, and a greater distance of patient travel. Associations based on serum tumor markers could not be assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

For clinical stage II NSGCT, nationwide utilization of primary chemotherapy is increasing compared with RPLND and is the preferred therapy for more advanced nodal disease. Primary RPLND may be underutilized in stage IIA disease. Utilization of PC-RPLND is driven by nodal stage as well as accessibility of a high-volume center.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The use of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in early nodal disease is declining, while upfront chemotherapy is increasingly utilized. Primary RPLND may identify patients who are actually pN0 and would not benefit from systemic chemotherapy. Primary RPLND and postchemotherapy RPLND are performed more frequently at centers of excellence.

Management of Stage II Germ Cell Tumors: Be Sure, Be Patient, Be Safe

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.A healthy 27-year-old man discovered a left testicular mass. Several months later he saw an urologist, who palpated a suspicious mass on the left testicle; an ultrasound confirmed a 2-cm solid mass. Serum tumor marker testing disclosed a slightly elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) of 12.3 µg/L (upper limit of normal, 8.0 µg/L), and a normal β-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). Staging imaging with a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest/abdomen/pelvis showed no evidence for retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy or distant metastases. He underwent a left radical orchiectomy, and pathology showed a 1.5-cm mixed germ cell tumor with 85% embryonal, 10% yolk sac tumor, and 5% mature teratoma histologies. Lymphovascular invasion was present. His AFP normalized after surgery. After discussion of management alternatives, he chose active surveillance, but 4 months later a scheduled surveillance CT scan identified a 1.4-cm left para-aortic lymph node just below the left renal hilum (Fig 1). Serum tumor markers remained negative. He returns to discuss his results and potential management options.

Update on epidemiologic considerations and treatment trends in testicular cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to give an overview of the epidemiology and treatment trends of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs), with an emphasis on recent trends.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of TGCT appears to be increasing, particularly in developed countries, although the reasons are not well understood. There is evidence of racial differences in predisposition to TGCT, with white men having highest risk and men of African or Asian descent having lower risk. In the United States, the incidence of TGCT among Hispanics appears to be rising most quickly. A recent genomic analysis indicates there is no highly penetrant major TGCT susceptibility gene. Incorporation of multidisciplinary care has led to excellent long-term cure rates; however, access to care and insurance remains barriers in young men. Recent treatment trends have centered on maximizing oncologic outcomes while minimizing long-term morbidity.

SUMMARY

Emerging population-level data provide critical insight into the evolving demographics of TGCT, which may allow for elucidation of biologic and environmental determinants of TGCT. Further, identification of socioeconomic barriers to excellent clinical outcomes will allow for targeted interventions to patients with unique demographic and socioeconomic considerations. Treatment trend analyses suggest that the field is moving toward minimizing treatment-related morbidity.

Indications, evolving technique, and early outcomes with robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Examine and discuss indications, technique, and outcomes for robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for testicular cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Open RPLND has been the longstanding standard of care for both primary and post chemotherapy RPLND. Recently, robotic RPLND has been an attractive option with the intent of reducing the morbidity associated with open surgery while providing identical oncologic efficacy. Naysayers of robotic RPLND suggest it is often inappropriately used as a staging procedure and consequently can compromise oncologic efficacy.

SUMMARY

Robotic RPLND is being evaluated as a therapeutic equivalent to open RPLND. On the basis of limited published data with modest follow-up from experienced centers, robotic RPLND appears to provide effective staging and therapeutic data mirroring that of open surgery.

The Role of Robotic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is complex; however, recent advances in technology have allowed adoption of the robotic platform for highly select cases. Initial case series have shown improved cosmesis, less blood loss, and decreased length of stay compared with open RPLND. Our preference for performing robotic RPLND is via a transperitoneal approach with the patient in the supine position, thus facilitating a bilateral template dissection identical to that used in all our open procedures. Robotic RPLND should mimic the open approach with regard to oncologic principles and should only be performed by clinicians well versed in open RPLND.

Current controversies on the role of lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer for the journal: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations for the special seminars section on the role of lymphadenectomy for urologic cancers

The role of surgery in the locoregional management of many solid tumors has long been established. For testicular cancer, the incorporation of lymphadenectomy has played an important part in generating long-term survival outcomes in excess of 90% for germ cell tumor patients. In this review, we address several clinical scenarios in which lymphadenectomy at times is underutilized, and others ill advised.

Current controversies on the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an important component of the multimodal treatment which cures most patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors. Considering the high cure rates achieved, research focus in recent years has been directed toward improving quality of life and decreasing long-term treatment related sequelae. Consequently, the role of RPLND has evolved over the past 3 decades in both low-stage and advanced testicular cancer. The use of RPLND in clinically stage I and low volume stage II disease may offer the advantages of treating retroperitoneal teratoma which is present in 15% to 20% of patients, avoiding chemotherapy and reducing the need for frequent imaging during follow-up. Similarly, ongoing studies are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of RPLND for the treatment of early stage seminoma to avoid the long-term effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RPLND is traditionally used for the treatment of residual masses >1 cm after completion of chemotherapy. Its role in subcentimeter residual masses remains somewhat controversial given the fact that 25% to 30% of these patients are found to harbor either teratoma or viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumors. The presence of teratoma increases the probability of teratoma in metastatic sites. Modified unilateral templates were developed based on early mapping studies with the aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation. Recent data suggests initial mapping studies underestimated the risk of contralateral retroperitoneal metastases which may reach 32%. Furthermore, antegrade ejaculation may be preserved in >95% of patients undergoing bilateral nerve sparing primary RPLND and >80% undergoing nerve-sparing PC-RPLND, which, in our view is the more prudent oncologic approach. Recently, multiple series have demonstrated the safety and short-term efficacy of minimally invasive RPLND; however, larger studies with prolonged follow-up are required to validate the long-term oncologic efficacy of newer techniques.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU — Actualisation 2018—2020 : tumeurs germinales du testicule French ccAFU guidelines — Update 2018—2020: Testicular germ cell tumors

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.009. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.009. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

Primary and Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for Testicular Cancer

Clinical stage I (CS I) testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) are highly curable. Following orchidectomy, a risk-adapted approach using active surveillance, nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) and primary chemotherapy is recommended by the current guidelines. CS I is defined as showing negative values for tumour markers (or values declining to their half-life following orchidectomy) and negative imaging studies of the chest, abdomen and retroperitoneum. Active surveillance can be performed in low- and high-risk NSGCT with an anticipated relapse rate of about 15% and 50%, respectively. The majority of patients will relapse with good and intermediate prognosis tumours, which have to be treated with 3 to 4 cycles of chemotherapy. About 25-30% of these patients will have to undergo postchemotherapy (PC) RPLND for residual masses. Primary chemotherapy with 1-2 cycles of cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin (PEB) is a therapeutic option for high-risk CS I NSGCT associated with a recurrence rate of only 2-3% and a minimal acute and long-term toxicity rate. Nerve-sparing RPLND, if performed properly, will cure about 85% of all high-risk patients with CS I NSGCT without the need for chemotherapy. PC-RPLND plays an integral part of the multimodality treatment in patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT). According to current guidelines and recommendations, PC-RPLND in advanced seminomas with residual tumours is only indicated if a positron emission tomography scan performed 6-8 weeks after chemotherapy is positive. In non-seminomatous TGCT, PC-RPLND is indicated for all residual radiographical lesions with negative or plateauing markers. Loss of antegrade ejaculation represents the most common long-term complication, which can be prevented by a nerve-sparing or modified template resection. The relapse rate after PC-RPLND is around 12%; however, it increases significantly to about 45% in cases with redo RPLND and late relapses. Patients with increasing markers should undergo salvage chemotherapy. Only select patients with elevated markers who are thought to be chemo-refractory might undergo desperation PC-RPLND if all radiographically visible lesions are completely resectable. PC-RPLND requires a complex surgical approach and should only be performed in experienced, tertiary referral centres.

Clinical Stage IIA-IIC Seminoma: Radiation Therapy versus Systemic Chemotherapy versus Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

BACKGROUND

Clinical stage II (CSII) seminoma is defined by the presence of pure seminoma accompanied by retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. In patients with bulky disease (lymph nodes > 5 cm in diameter), platinum-based chemotherapy is the widely accepted standard of care. However, the optimal choice of treatment for CSIIA and IIB is more controversial.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search using the key words stage II seminoma, BEP (cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin), hockey-stick radiotherapy, dog-leg radiotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Most relevant publications were summarized for this review.

RESULTS

To date, no randomized trials have prospectively compared radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RLND) for CSII seminoma. Because of the predominantly retrospective analyses and only few prospective trials data interpretation is complex. In CSIIA with lymph nodes of < 2 cm, RT and CT seem to be equally effective, while in CSIIB, a decreased number of relapses were observed in CT-treated patients. In addition, RT seems to be associated with a higher incidence of long-term sequelae when compared with CT.

CONCLUSION

Prospective clinical trials are needed to systematically compare the different treatment modalities. De-escalation of treatment intensity without loss of efficacy is required to improve long-term outcome for this young patient population.

Modern Management of Testicular Cancer

Testicular cancer is a rare urological malignancy with high cure rate. The development of highly effective systemic treatment regimens along with advances in surgical treatment of advanced disease has led to continued improvement in outcomes. Patients with testicular cancer who are treated following the treatment guideline mostly achieved high quality of life and long-term survival. However, patients who were identified as having non-guideline directed care were at significantly higher risk of relapse. In this book chapter, we introduce in depth the modern management of testicular cancer, including diagnosis, staging and risk stratification, treatment strategies of seminoma and non-seminoma germ cell tumors, follow-up protocols, and salvage treatment for disease relapse. We also review new studies and updates on medical and surgical management of advanced testicular cancer.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: an update in testicular malignancies

Management of testicular cancer has evolved through many breakthroughs. The decades of zeal to improve oncologic adequacy and to decrease morbidity has led to the current scientific knowledge of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection templates. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) has potential for staging, prognostication and therapeutic importance in the management of testicular malignancy. RPLND has overcome limitations of current imaging which understage 30% of stage I disease and overstage 25-30% of stage II disease. For low-volume disease, RPLND is curative in up to 90% cases without adjuvant therapy and has important role in postchemotherapy residual disease. Risk of recurrence after RPLND is 1% and follow-up imaging can be limited, thus avoiding their potential risk of radiation exposure. RPLND reveals vital information of disease nature and guide adjuvant therapy. Despite the long evolution period, certain controversies still surround RPLND. We aim to refine this challenging management in the following manuscript based on available evidence.

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: Anatomical and Technical Considerations from a Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

Metastatic testis cancer in the retroperitoneum presents a technical challenge to urologists in the primary and post-chemotherapy settings. Where possible, bilateral nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection should be performed in an effort to preserve ejaculatory function. However, this is often difficult to achieve, given the complex neurovascular anatomy. We performed what is to our knowledge the first comprehensive examination of the anatomical relationships between the sympathetic nerves of the aortic plexus and the lumbar vessels to facilitate navigation and nerve sparing during bilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The relative anatomy of the infrarenal vasculature (lumbar vessels, right gonadal vein and inferior mesenteric artery) was investigated in 21 embalmed human cadavers. The complex relationships between these vessels and the sympathetic nerves of the aortic plexus were examined by dissection of an additional 8 fresh human cadavers.

RESULTS

Analysis of the infrarenal vasculature from 21 cadavers demonstrated that the position of the right gonadal vein and the inferior mesenteric artery may be useful to locate the right superior lumbar vein and the first pair of infrarenal lumbar arteries as well as the common lumbar trunk (vein) and the second pair of infrarenal lumbar arteries, respectively. Furthermore, the lumbar splanchnic nerves supplying the aortic plexus were most often positioned anteromedial to the respective lumbar vein.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study describes the complex neurovascular relationships that are crucial to performing successful nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Surgical techniques are also discussed. Collectively, these results may help surgeons decrease the rate of postoperative retrograde ejaculation and/or anejaculation.

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Treated for Testis Cancer: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pathologic findings and clinical outcome data for patients undergoing pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in the course of management of testicular germ cell tumors at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, data on 2186 patients who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) at MSKCC between 1989 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these 2186 patients, we analyzed data for 44 patients (2%) who underwent PLND at the time of RPLND.

RESULTS

PLND was performed in 14/44 (31%) patients at time of primary RPLND (P-RPLND), and in 21/44(48%) patients at time of postchemotherapy RPLND (PC-RPLND), usually for suspicious radiologic or intraoperative findings, whereas 9/44 (21%) underwent PLND for treatment of relapse. Positive pelvic findings on imaging included pelvic disease ≤5 cm in 17/44 (39%) patients and >5 cm in 11/44 (25%) patients (median size = 4 cm). At the time of PC-RPLND, alpha-fetoprotein and beta human chorionic gonadotropin were elevated in 6/21 (29%) and 4/21 (19%) patients, respectively. Histology revealed teratoma in 15/44 (34%) and viable tumor in 5/44 (11%) patients. At a median follow-up of 46 months, 40/44 (91%) patients were living without disease, 3/44 (7%) were living with disease (1 after PC-RPLND and 2 after relapse), and 1/44 (2%) died of other causes.

CONCLUSION

PLND was performed infrequently in our series of patients who underwent RPLND for testis cancer. Teratoma was the dominant tumor histology in the resected tissue.

Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer

Germ cell tumors (GCT) are relatively uncommon, accounting for only 1% of male malignancies in the United States. It has become an important oncological disease for several reasons. It is the most common malignancy in young men 15-35 years old. GCTs are among a unique numbers of neoplasms where biochemical markers play a critical role. Finally, it is a model of curable cancer. In this review we discuss cancer epidemiology, genetics, and therapeutic principles. Recent advances in the management of stage I GCT and controversies in the management of post chemotherapy residual mass are presented.