Palliative thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer: a systematic review

Non-emergent hemoptysis in patients with primary or metastatic lung tumors: The role of transarterial embolization

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of systemic arterial embolization for the management of non-emergent hemoptysis in patients with primary or metastatic lung tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective single center study of consecutive patients who underwent systemic arterial embolization for non-emergent hemoptysis between 2011 and 2023. Study endpoints included technical success, clinical success (partial or complete resolution of hemoptysis) and overall survival. Hemoptysis-free and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictive factors for hemoptysis-free survival and overall survival were evaluated using univariate analysis (Cox regression). Post-procedural 30-day adverse events were recorded in line with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were identified. Technical success was achieved in 24/30 (80 %) patients. Clinical success following embolization was achieved in 23/30 (76.7 %) patients. Median length of hospitalization was 5 days (Range: 1 to 16 days). Median overall survival was 194 days (95 % CI: 89 to 258). Median hemoptysis-free survival was 286 days (95 % CI: 42 to not reached). No significant clinical or procedural predictors of hemoptysis-free survival or overall survival were identified. Serious adverse events (CTCAE Grade > 3) occurred in 1 patient (3.4 % - fatal respiratory failure).

CONCLUSION

Embolization of non-emergent hemoptysis in patients with lung malignancies is safe and effective. Recurrence is however high in this patient population, likely due to the nature of the underlying disease.

Effect of palliative radiation dose on symptom response in metastatic sarcomas

Purpose

Palliative radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in alleviating symptoms associated with metastatic sarcoma. However, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal palliative radiation dose and fractionation for metastatic sarcomas. We analyzed the association between biologically effective radiation dose and symptom response for patients who underwent palliative RT for metastatic sarcomas.

Methods and materials

We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic sarcoma treated with palliative RT between 1999 and 2021 at our institution. We assessed the association between equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) with an α/β of three and symptom relief or overall survival (OS) using univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results

Of the 198 metastatic sites treated, the most common indications for palliative radiation were pain (n = 181, 91 %) and compression of adjacent structures (n = 16, 8 %). In our analysis, an EQD2 of > 20 Gy was associated with greater rates of short-term symptom relief (n = 143, 85 %) at the RT site compared to an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy (n = 14, 54 %, P = 0.001) with no reports of grade 3 or higher toxicity. However, there was no significant improvement in short-term symptom relief for higher radiation doses. Patients treated with an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy had a significantly worse performance status, but there was no significant difference in overall survival based on EQD2 on multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

An EQD2 ≤ 20 Gy (e.g., 8 Gy in 1 fraction) provided inadequate palliative benefit in this series. An EQD2 > 20 Gy resulted in greater rates of symptom palliation in metastatic sarcomas, but further dose escalation did not improve symptom response or durability. These findings suggest standard palliative regimens such as 20 Gy in 5 fractions (EQD2 of 28 Gy) are effective for patients with metastatic sarcomas.

Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy in the Era of Modern Cancer Care for NSCLC

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy provides rapid and effective symptom relief in approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients treated. In patients with poor performance status, the degree of palliation appears unrelated to the radiation dose or fractionation schedule. Conversely, in patients with good performance status, higher radiation doses administered over longer periods have shown modest survival benefits. These findings stem from studies conducted before the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in clinical practice. Currently, there are no large prospective studies specifically dedicated to palliative radiotherapy conducted in this new treatment era. Modern radiotherapy technologies are now widely available and are increasingly used for palliative purposes in selected patients, reflecting the expanded array of therapeutic options for disseminated NSCLC and improved prognosis. Some traditional tenets of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, such as the improvement of overall survival with a protracted radiation schedule and the use of simple, cost-effective radiation techniques for palliative purposes, may no longer hold true for patients receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The application of IMRT or SBRT in the context of palliative radiotherapy for NSCLC is not yet sufficiently explored, and this is addressed in this review. Moreover, new risks associated with combining palliative radiotherapy with these systemic treatments are being explored and are discussed within the context of palliative care. The optimal timing, doses, fractionation schedules, and treatment volumes for radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy are currently subjects of investigation. In emergencies, radiotherapy should be used as a life-saving measure without delay. However, for other indications of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, decisions regarding doses, timing relative to systemic treatments, and treatment volumes should be made in a multidisciplinary context, considering the patient's prognosis, anticipated outcomes, and access to potentially effective treatments. We still lack robust data from prospective studies on this matter. This review examines and discusses available evidence on the use of palliative thoracic radiotherapy within the framework of modern treatment strategies for NSCLC.

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Unresectable Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Importance

The treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has been informed by more than 5 decades of clinical trials and other relevant literature. However, controversies remain regarding the application of various radiation and systemic therapies in commonly encountered clinical scenarios.

Objective

To develop case-referenced consensus and evidence-based guidelines to inform clinical practice in unresectable LA-NSCLC.

Evidence Review

The American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Thoracic Committee guideline is an evidence-based consensus document assessing various clinical scenarios associated with LA-NSCLC. A systematic review of the literature with evidence ratings was conducted to inform the appropriateness of treatment recommendations by the ARS AUC Thoracic Committee for the management of unresectable LA-NSCLC.

Findings

Treatment appropriateness of a variety of LA-NSCLC scenarios was assessed by a consensus-based modified Delphi approach using a range of 3 points to 9 points to denote consensus agreement. Committee recommendations were vetted by the ARS AUC Executive Committee and a 2-week public comment period before official approval and adoption. Standard of care management of good prognosis LA-NSCLC consists of combined concurrent radical (60-70 Gy) platinum-based chemoradiation followed by consolidation durvalumab immunotherapy (for patients without progression). Planning and delivery of locally advanced lung cancer radiotherapy usually should be performed using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. A variety of palliative and radical fractionation schedules are available to treat patients with poor performance and/or pulmonary status. The salvage therapy for a local recurrence after successful primary management is complex and likely requires both multidisciplinary input and shared decision-making with the patient.

Conclusions and Relevance

Evidence-based guidance on the management of various unresectable LA-NSCLC scenarios is provided by the ARS AUC to optimize multidisciplinary patient care for this challenging patient population.

The incidence of and risk factors for radiation pneumonitis in patients treated with simultaneous bevacizumab and thoracic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

First-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab is one of the standard treatment modes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) can provide significant local control and survival benefits to patients during the treatment of advanced NSCLC. However, the safety of adding TRT has always been controversial, especially because of the occurrence of radiation pneumonia (RP) during bevacizumab treatment. Therefore, in this study, we used an expanded sample size to evaluate the incidence of RP when using bevacizumab in combination with TRT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using an institutional query system, all medical records of patients with NSCLC who received TRT during first-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab from 2017 to 2020 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were reviewed. RP was diagnosed via computed tomography and was classified according to the RTOG toxicity scoring system. The risk factors for RP were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Ultimately, 119 patients were included. Thirty-eight (31.9%) patients developed Grade ≥ 2 RP, of whom 27 (68.1%) had Grade 2 RP and 11 (9.2%) had Grade 3 RP. No patients developed Grade 4 or 5 RP. The median time for RP occurrence was 2.7 months (range 1.2-5.4 months). In univariate analysis, male, age, KPS score, V20 > 16.9%, V5 > 33.6%, PTV (planning target volume)-dose > 57.2 Gy, and PTV-volume > 183.85 cm3 were correlated with the occurrence of RP. In multivariate analysis, male, V20 > 16.9%, and PTV-volume > 183.85 cm3 were identified as independent predictors of RP occurrence. The mPFS of all patients was 14.27 (95% CI, 13.1-16.1) months. The one-year and two-year PFS rates were 64.9% and 20.1%, respectively. The mOS of all patients was 37.09 (95% CI, 33.8-42.0) months. The one-year survival rate of all patients was 95%, and the two-year survival rate was 71.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of Grade ≥ 2 RP in NSCLC patients who received both bevacizumab and TRT was 31.9%. Restricting factors such as V20 and PTV will help reduce the risk of RP in these patients. For patients who receive both bevacizumab and TRT, caution should be exercised when increasing TRT, and treatment strategies should be optimized to reduce the incidence of RP.

Radiotherapy in the management of synchronous metastatic lung cancer

Metastatic lung cancer classically portends a poor prognosis. The management of metastatic lung cancer has dramatically changed with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy and due to a better understanding of the oligometastatic process. In metastatic lung cancers, radiation therapy which was only used with palliative intent for decades, represents today a promising way to treat primary and oligometastatic sites with a curative intent. Herein we present through a literature review the role of radiotherapy in the management of synchronous metastatic lung cancers.

Radiation Therapy in the Last Month of Life: Association With Aggressive Care at the End of Life

CONTEXT

Half of the patients with cancer who undergo radiation therapy do so with palliative intent.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the proportion of undergoing radiation in the last month of life, patient characteristics, cancer course, the type and duration of radiation, whether palliative care was involved, and the of radiation with aggressive cancer care metrics.

METHODS

One thousand seven hundred twenty-seven patients who died of cancer between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were included. Demographics, cancer stage, palliative care referral, advance directives, use of home health care, radiation timing, and survival were collected. Type of radiation, course, and intent were reviewed. Chi-square analysis was utilized for categorical variables, and Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables. A stepwise selection was used to build a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-three patients underwent radiation in the last month of life. Younger patients underwent radiation 67.3 years (SD 11.52) versus 69.2 years (SD 11.96). 42.6% had radiation within two weeks of death. The average fraction number was 5.5. Individuals undergoing radiation were more likely to start chemotherapy within the last 30 days of life, continue chemotherapy within two weeks of death, be admitted to the ICU, and have two or more hospitalizations or emergency room visits. Survival measured from the date of diagnosis was shorter for those undergoing radiation, 122 days (IQR 58-462) versus 474 days (IQR 225-1150). Palliative care consultations occurred later in those undergoing radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy in the last month of life occurs in younger patients with rapidly progressive cancer, who are subject to more aggressive cancer care, and have late palliative care consults.

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

Feasibility and safety of shortened hypofractionated high-dose palliative lung radiotherapy – A retrospective planning study

OBJECTIVE

Assess the safety and feasibility of shortened hypofractionated high-dose palliative lung radiotherapy in a retrospective planning study.

METHODS

Fifteen late stage (III or IV) NSCLC lung radiotherapy patients previously treated with the standard palliative 36 Gy in 12 fractions (12F) schedule were non-randomly selected to achieve a representative distribution of tumour sizes, volumes, and location. Plans were produced using 30 Gy in 5 fractions (5F) and 6 fractions (6F) using a 6MV FFF co-planar VMAT technique. Plans were optimised to meet dose-constraints for planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) with established OAR constraints expressed as biological equivalent doses (BEDs). The potential safety was assessed using these BEDs and also with reductions of 10% (BED-10%) and 20% (BED-20%) to account for a reduction in tolerance doses from the effects of chemotherapy or surgery.

RESULTS

Mandatory BED constraints were met for all fifteen 5F and 6F plans; BED-10% constraints were met by all 6F plans and six 5F plans. BED-20% constraints were met by six 6F and three 5F respectively.

CONCLUSION

It is potentially safe and feasible to deliver high-dose palliative radiotherapy for late stage NSCLC using the 5F or 6F regimes described, when planned to comparable OAR BEDs as standard radical techniques. It appears toxicity from these regimes should be within acceptable limits provided the dose-constraints described are met. A Phase II study is required to fully assess safety and feasibility, the outcomes of which could reduce the number of patient hospital visits for radiotherapy, thereby benefiting patients and optimising resource utilisation.

Impact of palliative radiotherapy with or without lung irradiation in patients with interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acute exacerbations or acute lung injury, including radiation pneumonitis (AE-ALI/RP) of interstitial lung disease (ILD), has a fatal prognosis. We evaluated the risk of palliative-intent radiotherapy (RT), with or without lung irradiation, for AE-ALI/RP of ILD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of patients with ILD who received palliative-intent RT between January 2011 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Factors associated with AE-ALI/RP grade ≥3 were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients were examined, with median imaging and survival follow-up times of 88 (2-1440) and 144 (8-1441) days. The median time to onset of AE-ALI/RP grade ≥3 was 72 (5-206) days. In multivariate analysis, a higher pulmonary fibrosis score (PFS ≥ 3) (hazard ratio, HR: 2.16; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.36-3.43; p < 0.01) and lung irradiation (lung-RT) (HR: 3.82; 95% CI: 1.01-15.73; p = 0.04) were significant factors for AE-ALI/RP grade ≥3. In patients who received lung-RT, the 100-day survival rate and cumulative incidence of AE-ALI/RP grade ≥3 were 56.8% and 13.7%, respectively. In patients with PFS ≥3 and who underwent lung-RT, the 100-day cumulative incidence of AE-ALI/RP grade ≥3 was 37.5%; all patients with AE-ALI/RP grade ≥3 had grade 5. In patients with PFS ≥3 without lung-RT, the 100-day cumulative incidence of AE-ALI/RP grade ≥3 was 4.8%.

CONCLUSION

High PFS and lung-RT are significant risk factors for AE-ALI/RP grade ≥3. Even with relatively low doses, palliative-intent lung-RT carries an extremely high risk of AE-ALI/RP when PFS is high.

Incidence of and risk factors for non-hematologic toxicity with combined radiotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer using dose-volume parameters analysis: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data on combined radiotherapy (RT) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) risk factors and toxicity. This study aimed to assess the incidence of and risk factors for non-hematologic toxicities in patients treated with combined RT and CDK4/6i using dose-volume parameter analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving RT within 14 days of CDK4/6i use. The endpoint was non-hematologic toxicities. Patient characteristics and RT treatment planning data were compared between the moderate or higher toxicities (≥ grade 2) group and the non-moderate toxicities group.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study. CDK4/6i was provided at a median daily dose of 125 mg and 200 mg for palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively. In patients who received concurrent RT and CDK4/6i (N = 29), the median concurrent prescribed duration of CDK4/6i was 14 days. The median delivered RT dose was 30 Gy and 10 fractions. The rate of grade 2 and 3 non-hematologic toxicities was 30% and 2%, respectively. There was no difference in toxicity between concurrent and sequential use of CDK4/6i. The moderate pneumonitis group had a larger lung V20 equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction and planning target volume than the non-moderate pneumonitis group.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate toxicities are frequent with combined RT and CDK4/6i. Caution is necessary concerning the combined RT and CDK4/6i. Particularly, reducing the dose to normal organs is necessary for combined RT and CDK4/6i.

BRACHY: A Randomized Trial to Evaluate Symptom Improvement in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With External Beam Radiation With or Without High-Dose-Rate Intraluminal Brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Uncontrolled studies suggest that the addition of high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (HDRIB) to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) may improve palliation for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential clinical benefit of adding HDRIB to EBRT in a multicenter randomized trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with symptomatic stage III or IV NSCLC with endobronchial disease were randomized to EBRT (20 Gy in 5 daily fractions over 1 week or 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions over 2 weeks) or the same EBRT plus HDRIB (14 Gy in 2 fractions separated by 1 week). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved symptomatic improvement in patient-reported overall lung cancer symptoms on the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at 6 weeks after randomization. Secondary outcomes included improvement in individual symptoms, symptom-progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. The planned sample size was 250 patients based on detection of symptomatic improvement from 40% to 60% with a 2-sided α of .05 and 80% power.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were randomized over 4.5 years: 67 to each arm. The study closed early owing to slow accrual. The mean age was 69.8 years, and 67% of patients had metastatic disease. At 6 weeks, 19 patients (28.4%) in the EBRT arm and 20 patients (29.9%) in the EBRT plus HDRIB arm experienced an improvement in lung cancer symptoms (P = .84). When limited to patients who completed the LCSS, percentages were 40.4% versus 47.6%, respectively (P = .49). Between group differences in mean change scores (0.3-0.5 standard deviations) in favor of EBRT plus HDRIB were observed for overall symptoms, but only hemoptysis was significantly improved (P = .03). No significant differences were observed in progression-free or overall survival. Grade 3/4 toxicities were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Small to moderate improvements were seen in symptom relief with the combined therapy, but they did not reach statistical significance. Further research is necessary before recommending HDRIB in addition to EBRT for palliation of lung cancer symptoms.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Malignant Pleural Effusion May Require Primary Tumor Radiotherapy in Addition to Drug Treatment

PURPOSE

The impact of primary tumour radiotherapy on the prognosis for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with controlled malignant pleural effusion (MPE-C) (MPE-C-NSCLC) is unclear. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of primary tumor radiotherapy in patients with MPE-C-NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 186 patients with MPE-C-NSCLC were enrolled and divided into two groups. The patients in the D group were treated with only drugs. Those in the RD group were treated with drugs plus primary tumour radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the Log rank test was used for between-group analysis and univariate prognostic analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform multivariate analyses to assess the impacts of factors on survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was matched based on clinical characteristics, systematic drug treatment and drug response to further adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for the RD group and D group were 54.4%, 26.8%, and 13.3% and 31.1%, 11.5%, and 4.4%, respectively; the corresponding MSTs were 14 months and 8 months, respectively (χ 2=15.915, p<0.001). There was a significant difference in survival by PSM (p=0.027).Before PSM, multivariate analysis showed that metastasis status (organ≤3 and metastasis≤5), primary tumour radiotherapy, chemotherapy cycles≥4, and drug best response (CR+PR) were independent predictors of prolonged OS. After PSM, primary tumour radiotherapy and drug best response (CR+PR) were independent predictors of prolonged OS were still independent predictors of prolonged OS. There were no grade 4-5 radiation toxicities.

CONCLUSION

For MPE-C-NSCLC, the response of systemic drug treatment plays a crucial role in survival outcomes, and we also should pay attention to primary tumour radiotherapy in addition to systematic drug treatment.

The Use of Palliative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Lung Cancer

There have been significant advances in the systemic treatment of stage IV lung cancer, which is now recommended first line in patients with adequate fitness. This includes some patients with brain metastases due to the increased understanding of the central nervous system penetration of targeted therapies. The trials evidence base for palliative radiotherapy pre-dated this routine use of systemic therapy in our practice, which means that the sequence and role of palliative radiotherapy are not currently well defined in the first-line treatment setting. However, due to its efficacy in symptom control, radiotherapy remains a core component in the palliative management of lung cancer, particularly in the second-line setting and those unsuited to primary systemic treatment. This overview focuses on the evidence behind palliative radiotherapy to the thorax and brain for non-small cell and small cell lung cancer and the potential for future studies, including the TOURIST Trial Platform, to guide the future direction of these treatments.

Optimal Initial Time Point of Local Radiotherapy for Unresectable Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis on Overall Arrangement of Local Radiotherapy in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma

Local radiotherapy (LRT) is reported to be of survival benefit for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in accumulating evidence, but research on the optimal initial time point remains scarce. This IRB-approved retrospective analysis identified patients diagnosed with stage IIIb–IV unresectable lung adenocarcinoma who initiated front-line LRT at our institution between 2017 and 2020. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to cut off the initial time of LRT (before and beyond 53 days). Patients were divided into two groups: one early to initiate radiotherapy group (≤53 days, EAR group) and one deferred radiotherapy group (>53 days, DEF group). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate time-to-event endpoints; the Cox proportional hazard model was used to find out predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 265 patients with a median age of 57 were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 26.4 months (ranging from 2.2 to 69.7 months). The mOS was 38.6 months and mPFS was 12.7 months. Age >60, bone and brain metastases, multisite metastases, and EGFR 19 mutation were independent predictors associated with OS. Early initiation of local radiotherapy within 53 days after diagnosis resulted in better PFS, but not in OS. A better OS was observed in patients with bone metastasis who underwent local radiotherapy initiated within 53 days.

Palliative Radiation for Advanced Central Lung Tumors With Intentional Avoidance of the Esophagus (PROACTIVE): A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Can modern radiation techniques reduce the risk of radiation-associated esophageal adverse effects in patients with advanced lung cancer?

Findings

In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial of esophageal-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ES-IMRT) or standard palliative radiotherapy for 90 patients with stage III/IV incurable non–small cell lung cancer, ES-IMRT significantly reduced symptomatic esophagitis (24% [n = 11] vs 2% [n = 1]), but did not significantly improve esophageal-related quality of life.

Meaning

In this trial, the use of ES-IMRT did not definitively improve esophageal quality of life but reduced symptomatic esophagitis in patients with advanced lung cancer who were receiving palliative thoracic radiotherapy; this technique holds merit for translation into clinical practice.

Importance

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy (RT) can alleviate local symptoms associated with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but esophagitis is a common treatment-related adverse event. Whether esophageal-sparing intensity-modulated RT (ES-IMRT) achieves a clinically relevant reduction in esophageal symptoms remains unclear.

Objective

To examine whether ES-IMRT achieves a clinically relevant reduction in esophageal symptoms compared with standard RT.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Palliative Radiation for Advanced Central Lung Tumors With Intentional Avoidance of the Esophagus (PROACTIVE) is a multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients between June 24, 2016, and March 6, 2019. Data analysis was conducted from January 23, 2020, to October 22, 2021. Patients had up to 1 year of follow-up. Ninety patients at 6 tertiary academic cancer centers who had stage III/IV NSCLC and were eligible for palliative thoracic RT (20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions) were included.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to standard RT (control arm) or ES-IMRT. Target coverage was compromised to ensure the maximum esophagus dose was no more than 80% of the RT prescription dose.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was esophageal quality of life (QOL) 2 weeks post-RT, measured by the esophageal cancer subscale (ECS) of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Esophagus questionnaire. Higher esophageal cancer subscale scores correspond with improved QOL, with a 2- to 3-point change considered clinically meaningful. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, toxic events, and other QOL metrics. Intention-to-treat analysis was used.

Results

Between June 24, 2016, and March 6, 2019, 90 patients were randomized to standard RT or ES-IMRT (median age at randomization, 72.0 years [IQR, 65.6-80.3]; 50 [56%] were female). Thirty-six patients (40%) received 20 Gy and 54 (60%) received 30 Gy. For the primary end point, the mean (SD) 2-week ECS score was 50.5 (10.2) in the control arm (95% CI, 47.2-53.8) and 54.3 (7.6) in the ES-IMRT arm (95% CI, 51.9-56.7) (P = .06). Symptomatic RT-associated esophagitis occurred in 24% (n = 11) of patients in the control arm vs 2% (n = 1) in the ES-IMRT arm (P = .002). In a post hoc subgroup analysis based on the stratification factor, reduction in esophagitis was most evident in patients receiving 30 Gy (30% [n = 8] vs 0%; P = .004). Overall survival was similar with standard RT (median, 8.6; 95% CI, 5.7-15.6 months) and ES-IMRT (median, 8.7; 95% CI, 5.1-10.2 months) (P = .62).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, ES-IMRT did not significantly improve esophageal QOL but significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic esophagitis. Because post hoc analysis found that reduced esophagitis was most evident in patients receiving 30 Gy of RT, these findings suggest that ES-IMRT may be most beneficial when the prescription dose is higher (30 Gy).

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02752126

Patient-Provider Communication, Decision-Making, and Psychosocial Burdens in Palliative Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study on Patients' Perspectives

CONTEXT

Patient-provider communication impacts how patients with cancer make decisions about treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To examine patient perceptions of discussions, decision-making, and psychosocial burdens related to receiving palliative radiotherapy (RT), in order to inform best practices for communication about palliative RT.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory qualitative study using oral questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Seventeen patients receiving their first course of palliative RT for lung or bone metastases at a comprehensive cancer center were interviewed. Patient interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using NVivo software.

RESULTS

Themes that impacted patients' decisions to initiate RT included a desire to minimize pain, optimism about what RT could provide for the future, perception of having "no other choice," disappointment about cancer progression, and unfamiliarity with RT. Most patients preferred shared decision-making regarding RT initiation and reported patient empowerment, effective communication, and team collaboration as contributing to shared decision-making. Most patients preferred their physicians to make decisions about RT treatment intensity and described trust in their physicians, institutional reputation, and RT expertise as motivators for this preference. Patients who possessed a proactive decisional mindset about initiating RT as opposed to having "no other choice" were less likely to report experiencing psychosocial burdens.

CONCLUSION

Most patients prefer shared decision-making regarding RT initiation but prefer their radiation oncologists to make decisions regarding treatment intensity. Communication that empowers patients in their desired level of engagement for RT decision-making may help patients make informed decisions, contribute toward a proactive decisional mindset, and reduce their perception of psychosocial burdens.

Predictors for survival in patients with bone metastasis of small cell lung cancer: A population-based study

The objective of the current study is to analyze the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with bone metastasis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and explore their survival predictors.We retrospectively extracted patients with bone metastasis of SCLC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We applied Cox regression analyses to identify independent survival predictor of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Only significant predictors from univariable analysis were included for multivariable Cox analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival differences between groups by the log-rank test.A total of 5120 patients with bone metastasis of SCLC were identified and included for survival analysis. The 1-year OS and CSS rates of bone metastasis of SCLC were 19.8% and 21.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, gender, age, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, liver metastasis, brain metastasis, insurance status, and marital status independently predicted OS and CSS. There was no significant difference of OS and CSS in terms of race and tumor size.Independent predictors of survival were identified among patients with bone metastasis of SCLC, which could be valuable to clinicians in treatment decision. Patients with bone metastasis of SCLC may benefit from radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Impact of radiotherapy on daily function among older adults living with advanced cancer (RT impact on function in advanced cancer)

BACKGROUND

While radiation therapy (RT) improves function, and quality of life for patients with advanced cancers, patients frequently experience a period of acute toxicity during which functional abilities may decline. Little is understood about changes in functional outcomes after RT in older adults. This study aims to examine changes in daily function at 1 and 6 months following RT.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 117 patients who underwent palliative RT on a prospective registry. Activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scores ranging from 0 to 6 and 0-8, respectively, were collected at baseline, one-month, and six months post-RT. Patients were classified as low deficit for ADL/IADL if they had 0-1 deficits and high deficit if they had 2+ deficits.

RESULTS

One-hundred seventy RT courses were identified; 99 were evaluable at each time point. The median age was 67 years. At baseline, 29.5 and 29.9% of patients were classified as high-deficit for ADL and IADL functioning, respectively. At one-month, the majority of patients who were low-deficit at baseline remained so for both measures while approximately one quarter of high-deficit patients showed improvement. Most patients identified as low-deficit at one-month remained so at six-months, while no high-deficit patients improved from one- to six-months. Factors associated with high ADL and IADL deficits included: time (six months), increasing age, and Hispanic/other race. Compared to those with ECOG score of 3, patients with lower scores (0-2) had lower odds of high deficit.

CONCLUSION

ADL and IADL tools may be useful in describing changes in daily function after palliative RT and in identifying groups of patients who may benefit from additional supportive geriatric care interventions.

Efficacy and Survival after Palliative Radiotherapy for Malignant Pulmonary Obstruction

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of palliative radiotherapy (PRT) for patients with pulmonary obstruction from advanced malignancy and identify factors associated with lung re-expansion and survival. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all patients treated with PRT for malignant pulmonary obstruction (n = 108) at our institution between 2010 and 2018. Radiographic evidence of lung re-expansion was determined through review of follow-up CT or chest X-ray. Cumulative incidence of re-expansion and overall survival (OS) were estimated using competing risk methodology. Clinical characteristics were evaluated for association with re-expansion, OS, and early mortality. Treatment time to remaining life ratio (TT:RL) was evaluated as a novel metric for palliative treatment. Results: Eighty-one percent of patients had collapse of an entire lung lobe, 46% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 3-4, and 64% were inpatient at consultation. Eighty-four patients had follow-up imaging available, and 25 (23%) of all patients had lung re-expansion at median time of 35 days. Rates of death without re-expansion were 38% and 65% at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Median OS was 56 days. Death within 30 days of PRT occurred in 38%. Inpatients and larger tumors trended toward lower rates of re-expansion. Notable factors associated with OS were re-expansion, nonlung histology, tumor size, and performance status. Median TT:RL was 0.11 and significantly higher for subgroups: ECOG 3-4 (0.19), inpatients (0.16), patients with larger tumors (0.14), those unfit for systemic therapy (0.17), and with 10-fraction PRT (0.14). Conclusion: One-fourth of patients experienced re-expansion after PRT for malignant pulmonary obstruction. Survival is poor and a significant proportion of remaining life may be spent on treatment. Careful consideration of these clinical factors is recommended when considering PRT fractionation.

Radiation pneumonitis after palliative radiotherapy in cancer patients with interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE

The risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) after palliative radiotherapy (RT) in cancer patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, severity, and predictive factors of RP among patients with ILD who received palliative RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The medical records of cancer patients with ILD who received palliative RT involving a lung field between January 2008 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Screening for ILD was performed by using the ICD-10 diagnosis code, and the ILD was evaluated on the basis of pretreatment computed tomography (CT). RP was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Associations between both clinical and dosimetric factors and RP were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included in the analysis. The median prescribed physical dose of RT was 25 Gy (range, 6-40 Gy). The RP was graded 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in 6 (10%), 3 (5%), 1 (2%), 2 (3%), and 6 (10%) patients, respectively. The median time to onset of grade 3 or more RP (≥Gr3 RP) was 39 days (range, 10-155). The results of the multivariate analysis indicated that ILD pattern was a significant predictive factor for ≥Gr3 RP (odds ratio, 12.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1664; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RT involving a lung field, even when prescribed with palliative intent, should be administered carefully to ILD patients. Evaluation of the ILD pattern on pretreatment CT images may be of help in determining whether to perform RT.

Palliative radiotherapy for gross hematuria in patients with advanced cancer

This study assessed the efficacy of palliative radiotherapy for gross hematuria caused by advanced cancer. Patients who received palliative radiotherapy to control gross hematuria in two hospitals between October 2006 and May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the gross hematuria response, gross hematuria control duration, blood transfusion rate, blood transfusion-free duration, and overall survival. Cox multivariate analysis was performed to examine factors associated with hematuria control duration. Fifty-three consecutive patients were included. The most frequently used dose fractionation regimen was 30 Gy in 10 fractions (BED10 = 39 Gy), followed by 20 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 = 20 Gy). Forty patients (76%) became gross hematuria free. The median hematuria control duration was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval 1.9-6.6). Twenty-six patients received blood transfusion 3 months before radiotherapy; 17 of them (65%) were free from blood transfusion 1 month after radiotherapy. A high BED10 (≥ 36 Gy) was a statistically significant factor for hematuria control duration in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.02). Palliative radiotherapy can effectively relieve gross hematuria irrespective of the primary tumor site. A high BED10 may be recommended for a prolonged hematuria control duration if patients have a good prognosis.

Palliative radiotherapy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The optimal dose fractionation for palliative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with symptomatic advanced bladder cancer is unclear. This study aimed to determine if a higher dose of RT was associated with improved symptoms response rates.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Central and Embase for eligible studies published from 1990 to 2019. The primary outcomes were symptoms response rates for hematuria, dysuria and frequency. Secondary outcomes included treatment-related adverse events and quality of life.

RESULTS

We found one randomized, four prospective and eight retrospective non-comparative observational studies including 1320 patients who received palliative bladder radiotherapy for symptom relief. The dose fractionation schedules varied across studies ranging from 8 Gy single fraction to 60 Gy in 2 to 8 Gy per fraction. The pooled response rates for hematuria, dyuria and frequency symptoms were 74%, 58% and 71% respectively. A higher dose of RT was not associated with improved response rates of hematuria and frequency. However, a higher dose of RT was associated with a longer duration of hematuria response and reduced response of dysuria. Grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity occurred in up to 26% of patients. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were reported in one study.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrates that a higher dose of bladder RT was not associated with improved response rates of hematuria and frequency symptoms but was associated with reduced response of dysuria. Higher doses of bladder RT was associated with more durable hematuria response. Prospective studies to determine the effects of palliative bladder radiotherapy on HRQOL outcomes are warranted.

Effects of glutamine for prevention of radiation-induced esophagitis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Purpose Acute radiation-induced esophagitis (ARIE) leads to treatment delays, decreased quality of life (QOL), and secondary adverse events such as weight loss. Grade 3 ARIE occurs in 15%-30% of patients undergoing radiotherapy to the esophagus, leading to disruption or discontinuation of treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of glutamine, a common nutritional supplement, on ARIE in patients with thoracic malignancies. Patients and methods This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients with advanced thoracic malignancies receiving concurrent chemotherapy/radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone, with radiation doses to the esophagus ≥45 Gy. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 4 g of glutamine or glycine placebo twice daily. The primary objective was to determine whether glutamine decreases the severity of ARIE in these patients. Secondary objectives included assessment of the effects of glutamine on other measures of ARIE, weight, symptom burden measure assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-HN) questionnaire and the toxicity profile of glutamine. Results At the time of interim analysis, 53 patients were enrolled: 27 in the glutamine arm and 26 in the placebo arm. There was no difference in the incidence of esophagitis in the first 6 weeks of radiotherapy between the glutamine and placebo arms (74% versus 68%; P = 1.00). There were no significant differences between the two arms for time to onset of esophagitis. The duration of ARIE was shorter (6.3 versus 7.1 weeks; P = 0.54) and median weight loss was lower (0.9 kg versus 2.8 kg; p = 0.83) in the glutamine arm versus the placebo arm. The groups differ significantly in core symptom severity (2.1 vs 1.5, p < .03) but not in head and neck specific symptom severity (1.2 vs 1.1, p < .60) nor in symptom interference (2.1 vs 1.7, p < .22). There was no grade 3 or higher adverse event at least possibly related to glutamine. The study was terminated for futility following interim analysis. Conclusion Oral glutamine was not associated with significant improvement in severity of ARIE, weight loss, head and neck specific symptoms or symptom interference compared with placebo in patients with advanced thoracic malignancies receiving radiotherapy to the esophagus.Clinical trial information. NCT01952847, and date of registration is September 30, 2013.

A narrative review of evolving roles of radiotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: from palliative care to active player

Radiotherapy, along with other loco-regional interventions, is conventionally utilized as a palliative approach to alleviate symptoms and mitigate oncological emergencies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thanks to the ongoing improvement of medical treatments in the last decade, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC has been considerably prolonged, making it feasible and clinically beneficial for radiotherapy to play a more active role in highly selected subpopulations. In this review, we will focus on the evolving roles of radiotherapy in advanced NSCLC. First of all, among patients who are initially unable to tolerate aggressive treatment due to severe symptoms caused by metastases and/or tumor emergencies, timely radiotherapy could significantly improve their performance status (PS) and general condition, thus giving them a chance for intensive treatment and prolonged survival. The efficacy, potential candidates, and optimal dose-fractionation regimens of radiotherapy in this clinical scenario will be discussed. Additionally, radiotherapy can play a curative role as a concurrent therapy, consolidation therapy, and salvage therapy for patients with oligo-metastatic, oligo-residual, and oligo-progressive disease, respectively. Accumulating evidence from recent clinical trials, basic research, and translational investigations regarding the potentially curative roles of radiotherapy in NSCLC patients with oligo-metastatic disease will be summarized. Moreover, with the advent of various small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment efficacy and overall survival of oncogene-addicted NSCLC with brain metastases have been significantly improved, and the clinical value and optimal timing of cranial radiotherapy have become topics of much debate. Finally, synergistic antitumor interactions between radiotherapy and immunotherapy have been repeatedly demonstrated. Thus, the immune sensitizing role of radiotherapy in advanced NSCLC is also highlighted in this review.

Early High-Grade Thoracic Toxicity After Palliative Radiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Palliative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may cause thoracic toxicities due to the radiation dose delivered to the lungs, heart, and esophagus. We studied severe thoracic toxicities resulting in hospitalization or death during the acute and sub-acute phase, i.e., three months from commencing radiotherapy. In addition, risk factors were identified.  Methods: A retrospective review of 165 patients treated with three-dimensional conformal palliative radiotherapy or CRT was performed. The prescribed total dose was equivalent to at least 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Uni- and multivariate analyses were employed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (7%) were hospitalized within three months from the start of radiotherapy or CRT. Six patients were hospitalized for esophagitis, three for dyspnea most likely caused by pneumonitis, and three for cardiac arrhythmia. Fatal toxicity was not observed. However, 19% of the 165 patients died from tumor-related causes during the time period of interest. In multivariate analysis, the only esophageal dose was significantly associated with the risk of hospitalization.  Conclusion: The safety profile of palliative radiotherapy or CRT in the acute and subacute phases was satisfactory. The hospitalization rate can be reduced by lowering the esophageal dose, as long as safe lung and heart doses can be maintained.

A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Palliative Radiation Therapy Versus Concurrent Chemotherapy and Palliative Radiation Therapy in Patients With Good Performance Status, Locally Advanced, or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Symptoms due to Intrathoracic Disease Who are Not Suitable for Radical Chemo-radiation Therapy: Results of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 11.03 Trial

PURPOSE

We compared intrathoracic symptom response rate, quality of life (QOL) and toxicity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not suitable for radical chemo-radiation therapy, experiencing symptoms from intrathoracic disease, who were randomized to receive palliative radiation therapy (PRT_36/12) or concurrent chemotherapy and PRT (C-PRT_40/20).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We included patients with stage III or IV NSCLC, with a Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status 0 to 1, who were experiencing at least one of the following: dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, or chest pain. The primary outcome was a change in intrathoracic response rate from baseline to 6 weeks post completion of therapy using (1) a composite measure, the Intrathoracic Symptom Burden Index(ISBI), and (2) individual symptom scores measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire - Lung Cancer 13 item (QLQ-LC 13) instruments.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were recruited with 68 eligible for analysis. In addition, 42.6% and 57.4% had stage III and IV disease, respectively. The Intrathoracic Symptom Burden Index was significantly lower at 6 weeks posttreatment than at baseline (adjusted mean difference -8.77, standard error 2.67; 95% confidence interval, -13.97% to -3.58%; P < .01) for the entire cohort with no difference between trial arms (P = .34). Both treatments provided effective palliation of individual symptoms with no significant difference between trial arms. QOL during treatment was significantly better for patients receiving C-PRT_(40/20). There was no difference between arms in overall QOL between baseline and 6 weeks posttreatment. There was no difference in toxicity between treatment arms during treatment nor between baseline and 6 weeks posttreatment. There was no difference in progression-free survival. A nonstatistically significant 3-month improvement in median survival favored C-PRT_(40/20).

CONCLUSION

PRT_(36/12) and C-PRT_(40/20) provide effective symptom palliation in patients with stage III NSCLC not suitable for radical chemo-radiation therapy and in patients with stage IV disease. Chemotherapy added to PRT_(40/20) does not provide superior symptomatic relief in this patient cohort.

Comparison of Rapid to Standard Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Palliative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients

Patients with incurable lung cancer often present with debilitating symptoms that require urgent palliative radiotherapy. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) provides several dosimetric advantages compared to basic non-conformal techniques, but involves complex planning resulting in a slower turn-around time for treatment. A simplified planning technique known as 'rapid VMAT' was developed with an aim to deliver palliative treatment to patients within 48 hours. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the dosimetric quality of rapid VMAT plans to standard VMAT plans. Fourteen consecutive rapid VMAT cases were re-planned de novo as per standard VMAT planning guidelines. Planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were then compared. PTV coverage and dose to OARs including the spinal canal, lung, heart, and esophagus were similar between rapid and standard VMAT. Each plan was ready for treatment within 48 hours of the CT simulation. This study describes an expedited process for which palliative radiotherapy can be delivered to lung tumors with a similar robust quality that is provided for curative intent VMAT radiotherapy plans.

The role of palliative care in the management of patients with lung cancer

Palliative care (PC) is the care of patients and their families with serious illness and is rapidly becoming an important part of the care of cancer patients. Patients with advanced lung cancer are a highly symptomatic population of patients and clearly experience benefits in quality of life and potentially benefits in overall survival when PC is incorporated early on after diagnosis. However, referrals to PC are still reliant on clinical judgment of patient prognosis and symptom burden. Moving forward, improving the integration of PC and lung cancer care will require more efficient real-time screening of patient symptoms, which may be accomplished through the use of patient-reported outcomes.

Palliative Lung Radiotherapy: Higher Dose Leads to Improved Survival?

Aims

Choosing the optimal palliative lung radiotherapy regimen is challenging. Guidance from The Royal College of Radiologists recommends treatment stratification based on performance status, but evidence suggests that higher radiotherapy doses may be associated with survival benefits. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fractionation regimen and additional factors on the survival of palliative lung cancer radiotherapy patients.

Materials and methods

A retrospective univariable (n = 925) and multivariable (n = 422) survival analysis of the prognostic significance of baseline patient characteristics and treatment prescription was carried out on patients with non-small cell and small cell lung cancer treated with palliative lung radiotherapy. The covariates investigated included: gender, age, performance status, histology, comorbidities, stage, tumour location, tumour side, smoking status, pack year history, primary radiotherapy technique and fractionation scheme. The overall mortality rate at 30 and 90 days of treatment was calculated.

Results

Univariable analysis revealed that performance status (P < 0.001), fractionation scheme (P < 0.001), comorbidities (P = 0.02), small cell histology (P = 0.02), ‘lifelong never’ smoking status (P = 0.01) and gender (P = 0.06) were associated with survival. Upon multivariable analysis, only better performance status (P = 0.01) and increased dose/fractionation regimens of up to 30 Gy/10 fractions (P < 0.001) were associated with increased survival. Eighty-five (9.2%) and 316 patients (34%) died within 30 and 90 days of treatment, respectively.

Conclusion

In this retrospective single-centre analysis of palliative lung radiotherapy, increased total dose (up to and including 30 Gy/10 fractions) was associated with better survival regardless of performance status.

•

Larger doses of palliative lung radiotherapy are associated with increased survival.

•

Performance status is independently linked to survival.

•

Palliative lung radiotherapy dose is independently linked to survival.

Mitigating Coronavirus-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome by Radiotherapy

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by SARS-CoV-2-mediated cytokine storm (CS) in lungs leads to the high mortality in COVID-19 patients. To reduce ARDS, an ideal approach is to diminish virus loading by activating immune cells for CS prevention or to suppress the overactive cytokine-releasing immune cells for CS inhibition. Here, a potential radiation-mediated CS regulation is raised by reevaluating the radiation-mediated pneumonia control in the 1920s, with the following latent advantages of lung radiotherapy (LR) in treatment of COVID-19: (1) radiation accesses poorly circulated tissue more efficiently than blood-delivered medications; (2) low-dose radiation (LDR)-mediated metabolic rewiring and immune cell activation inhibit virus loading; (3) pre-consumption of immune reserves by LDR decreases CS severity; (4) higherdose radiation (HDR) within lung-tolerable doses relieves CS by eliminating in situ overactive cytokine-releasing cells. Thus, LDR and HDR or combined with antiviral and life-supporting modalities may mitigate SARS-CoV-2 and other virus-mediated ARDS.

Management of Lung Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a devastating impact around the world. With high rates of transmission and no curative therapies or vaccine yet available, the current cornerstone of management focuses on prevention by social distancing. This includes decreased health care contact for patients. Patients with lung cancer are a particularly vulnerable population, where the risk of mortality from cancer must now be balanced by the potential risk of a life-threatening infection. In these unprecedented times, a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach is required to streamline but not compromise care. We have developed guidelines at our academic cancer center to standardize management of patients with lung cancer across our health care system and provide guidance to the larger oncology community. We recommend that general principles of lung cancer treatment continue to be followed in most cases where delays could result in rapid cancer progression. We recognize that our recommendations may change over time based on clinical resources and the evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. In principle, however, treatment paradigms must continue to be individualized, with careful consideration of risks and benefits of continuing or altering lung cancer-directed therapy.

Radiographic patterns of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: Imaging predictors for clinical severity and outcome

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the spectrum of radiographic patterns of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients and identify imaging markers for high-grade RP and RP-related death.

METHODS

Eighty-two patients with lung cancer treated with conventional chest radiotherapy who had symptomatic RP were identified from the radiation oncology database. The imaging features of RP were studied for association with high-grade RP (Grade ≥3) and RP-related death (Grade 5).

RESULTS

RP was Grade 2 in 60 (73%), Grade 3 in 15 (18%), and Grade 5 in 7 patients (9%). Lower performance status (p = 0.04), squamous cell histology (p = 0.03), and FEV1 ≤ 2 (p = 0.009) were associated with high-grade pneumonitis. Older age (p = 0.03) and squamous cell histology (p = 0.03) were associated with RP-related death. The CT findings included ground-glass and reticular opacities in all patients, with traction bronchiectasis in 77 (94%) and consolidation in 74 (90%). The most common radiographic pattern of RP was cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) pattern (n = 54), followed by acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) pattern (n = 10). Higher extent of lung involvement, diffuse distribution, and AIP/ARDS pattern were associated with high-grade pneumonitis and RP-related death. AIP/ARDS pattern was a significant factor for high-grade pneumonitis (OR:12.62, p = 0.01) in multivariable analyses adjusting for clinical variables.

CONCLUSION

COP pattern was the most common radiographic pattern for symptomatic RP in lung cancer patients. AIP/ARDS pattern was significantly associated with high-grade RP and RP-related deaths, and was an independent marker for high-grade RP. The recognition of the radiographic patterns of RP can help to effectively contribute to patient management.

Factors associated with the receipt and completion of whole brain radiation therapy among older adults in the United States from 2010-2013

INTRODUCTION

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is widely used to treat patients with brain metastases. However, there is debate regarding its utility in patients with poor prognoses. In this study, we sought to characterize the use of WBRT in the United States, especially in adults aged 55 and above.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with brain metastases were identified using the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2013. The receipt and completion of WBRT with various patient factors were correlated using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

28,422 patients with brain metastases were identified, 23,362 of whom were aged 55 or above. 14,845 patients received WBRT and 12,310 patients completed treatment. Among adults aged 55 and above, 11,945 patients received WBRT, and 9812 patients completed treatment. Patients aged 60 and above were less likely to receive WBRT, while those aged 65 and above were less likely to complete WBRT.

DISCUSSION

These results suggest that WBRT may be over-utilized in the United States, especially among older adults. Better interventions to improve pre-WBRT decision-making in this population are needed to select patients who might derive benefit.

Efficacy of Palliative Bladder Radiotherapy for Hematuria in Advanced Bladder Cancer Using Contemporary Radiotherapy Techniques

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of palliative radiotherapy (RT) for hematuria treated with modern RT techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. The primary endpoint was symptom response rate. Secondary endpoints included symptom recurrence rate, overall survival and treatment-related toxicity.

RESULTS

Median age was 82 years (range=36-98 years). Median biologically effective dose (BED) was 36 Gy. Sixty-seven percent of patients (39/58) responded to RT. The median survival duration was 5.6 months (range=0.02-47.6 months). One third (13/39) of responders had recurrence of hematuria. Competing Risk regression with death as the competing risk showed that patients treated with low BED regimen (<36 Gy) had 5.76 times the hazard of recurrence compared to high BED regimen (>36 Gy) (p=0.01). One patient (2%) developed grade 3 nausea and vomiting which required admission for intravenous hydration.

CONCLUSION

BED regimens should be recommended as they are associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent hematuria.

Radiation Oncology Emergencies

This article reviews the most common oncologic emergencies encountered by the radiation oncologist, including malignant spinal cord compression, intramedullary spinal cord metastasis, superior vena cava syndrome, hemoptysis, and airway compromise caused by tumor. Important trials evaluating different treatments for these emergencies are reviewed. The role of corticosteroids, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy in these patients is discussed and patient-specific treatment guidelines are suggested.

STAT-ART: The Promise and Practice of a Rapid Palliative Single Session of MR-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART)

This work describes a novel application of MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) in the management of patients whom urgent palliative care is indicated using statum-adaptive radiotherapy (STAT-ART). The implementation of STAT-ART, as performed at our institution, is presented including a discussion of the advantages and limitations compared to the standard of care for palliative radiotherapy on conventional c-arm linacs. MR-based treatment planning techniques of STAT-ART for density overrides and deformable image registration (DIR) of diagnostic CT to the treatment MR are also addressed.

Haemostatic radiotherapy for bleeding cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract

Bleeding can cause significant morbidity in patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Palliative radiotherapy can palliate bleeding effectively across numerous cancer sites such as the lung and rectum. The data available regarding the role in bleeding from upper gastrointestinal cancers are limited to a single meta-analysis, a phase 2 trial, eleven retrospective cohorts and two case reports, with the majority focusing on gastric cancer. From the data available radiotherapy appears to be a well-tolerated, effective haemostatic agent that should be considered in all patients with bleeding from an upper gastrointestinal malignancy. Questions remain regarding the radiobiology of haemostasis and the optimum fractionation schedule. There is no convincing evidence that protracted higher dose regimens provide additional benefit. Commonly used fractionation schedules use 1, 5 or 10 fractions. Short fractionation schedules have been used in patients with deteriorating performance status.

Radiotherapy in the control of bleeding from primary and secondary lung tumours

This literature review clarifies the role of radiotherapy in the management of low-volume haemoptysis. Embase and Medline were interrogated, and PRISMA guidelines were then used to select relevant articles. Seventy-eight articles were considered relevant and manually reviewed. The evidence suggests that external beam radiotherapy is more effective than endobronchial brachytherapy at controlling low-volume haemoptysis. There is no evidence to recommend a combination of the two techniques. Different doses and fractionations appear equally effective, with a potential survival advantage of higher dose regimens for fitter patients. Palliative radiotherapy is effective at controlling low-volume haemoptysis. External beam radiotherapy is the first-line treatment, with endobronchial brachytherapy recommended following external beam radiotherapy failure. Choice of dose and fractionation should take into account the patient's performance status.

Current landscape of palliative radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

Radiotherapy (RT) is a cornerstone in the management of advanced stage III and stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Despite international guidelines, clinical practice remains heterogeneous. Additionally, the advent of stereotactic ablative RT (SABR) and new systemic treatments such as immunotherapy have shaken up dogmas in the approach of these patients. This review will focus on palliative thoracic RT for NSCLC but will also discuss the role of stereotactic radiotherapy, endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB), the interest of concomitant treatments (chemotherapy and immunotherapy), and the role of RT in lung cancer emergencies with palliative intent.

When Should we Irradiate the Primary in Metastatic Lung Cancer?

Metastatic lung cancer encompasses a heterogenous group of patients in terms of burdens of disease, ranging from patients with extensive metastases to those with a limited number of metastatic lesions (oligometastatic disease). Histopathological heterogeneity also exists within two broad categories, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), portraying different patterns and evolution of disease. Local consolidative therapy to the primary tumour and metastatic sites, including surgery and/or radical dose radiotherapy, is increasingly being used to improve survival outcomes, particularly in the context of oligometastatic disease, with or without the use of molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Recently, randomised studies in oligometastatic NSCLC have shown that local consolidative therapy may confer a survival advantage. This review explores whether treating just the primary tumour with radiotherapy may similarly produce improved clinical outcomes. Such a treatment strategy may carry less potential toxicity than treating multiple sites upfront. The biological rationale behind the potential benefits of treating just the primary in metastatic malignancy is discussed. The clinical evidence of such an approach across tumour sites, such as breast and prostate cancer, is also explored. Then the review focuses on treating the primary in NSCLC and SCLC with radiotherapy, by first exploring patterns of failure in metastatic NSCLC and second exploring evidence on survival outcomes from studies in metastatic NSCLC and SCLC. It is challenging to draw conclusions on the clinical benefit of treating the primary cancer in isolation from the evidence available. This highlights the need to collect data within the ongoing clinical trials on the clinical outcome and toxicity of radiotherapy delivery to primary thoracic disease specifically. This challenge also identifies the need to design future clinical trials to produce randomised evidence for such an approach.

Management of Bleeding from Unresectable Gastric Cancer

Bleeding from unresectable gastric cancer (URGC) is not a rare complication. Two major ways in which the management of this issue differs from the management of benign lesions are the high rate of rebleeding after successful hemostasis and that not only endoscopic therapy (ET) and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) but palliative radiotherapy (PRT) can be applied in the clinical setting. However, there are no specific guidelines concerning the management of URGC with bleeding. We herein discuss strategies for managing bleeding from URGC. A high rate of initial hemostasis for active bleeding is expected when using various ET modalities properly. If ET fails in patients with hemostatic instability, emergent TAE is considered in order to avoid a life-threating condition due to massive bleeding. Early PRT, especially, regimens with a high biologically effective dose (BED) of ≥39 Gy should be considered not only for patients with hemostatic failure but also for those with successful hemostasis and inactive hemorrhage, as longer duration of response with few complications can be expected. Further prospective, comparative studies considering not only the hemostatic efficacy of these modalities but the patients' quality of life are needed in order to establish treatment strategies for bleeding from URGC.

Personalized Radiation Therapy in Cancer Pain Management

The majority of advanced cancer patients suffer from pain, which severely deteriorates their quality of life. Apart from analgesics, bisphosphonates, and invasive methods of analgesic treatment (e.g., intraspinal and epidural analgesics or neurolytic blockades), radiation therapy plays an important role in pain alleviation. It is delivered to a growing primary tumour, lymph nodes, or distant metastatic sites, producing pain of various intensity. Currently, different regiments of radiation therapy methods and techniques and various radiation dose fractionations are incorporated into the clinical practice. These include palliative radiation therapy, conventional external beam radiation therapy, as well as modern techniques of intensity modulated radiation therapy, volumetrically modulated arch therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy or radionuclide treatment (e.g., radium-223, strontium-89 for multiple painful osseous metastases). The review describes the possibilities and effectiveness of individual patient-tailored conventional and innovative radiation therapy approaches aiming at pain relief in cancer patients.

Optimal timing and clinical value of radiotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with or without baseline brain metastases: implications from pattern of failure analyses

Background

Despite development of several next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), crizotinib remains one of the first-line treatment options for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and is widely used in situations where next-generation TKIs aren’t yet approved or economically inaccessible. However, the pattern of failure and clinical value of radiotherapy in metastatic crizotinib-treated ALK-mutant lung cancer, with or without baseline brain metastases (BBM), are largely unknown.

Methods

Consecutive crizotinib-treated NSCLC patients with adequate imaging and measurable disease were retrospectively enrolled. Disease progression in original sites (primary/metastatic), new sites, or both, are classified as original failure (OF), distant failure (DF) and ODF, respectively. Progression free survival, from crizotinib initiation to the first disease progression, and from that to the second disease progression, were calculated as PFS1 and PFS2.

Results

Ninety-three patients were identified. With a median follow up of 22.0 (range, 2.0–72.0) months, 52 patients had crizotinib-treatment failure. The frequencies of OF, ODF, and DF, were 50.0, 26.9, and 23.1%, respectively. Histology, primary tumor size and presence of BBM, were independently associated with OF, using competing risks analyses. The brain was the most common site of initial disease progression. Patients with BBM had a significant higher possibility developing multiple-progressive lesions in the brain (p = 0.002). Importantly, four of the ten patients who had baseline oligo-metastatic cranial disease but didn’t receive upfront brain radiation, developed multiple-progressive disease in the brain. Brain radiation before crizotinib could alter the disease failure patterns and improve PFS1 among patients with BBM (p = 0.006). Extracranial radiation was efficient in controlling symptoms but it was not associated with PFS1 (p = 0.223), and the majority of patients were eligible for salvage radiotherapy upon disease progression to crizotinib. By the time of data cut-off, 28 patients had second disease progression, with a median PFS2 of 7.0 (95% CI 5.4–8.6) months and salvage radiotherapy significantly prolonged PFS2 (p = 0.003). Additionally, patients receiving any radiotherapy during their treatment course had a significant longer overall survival (p = 0.048).

Conclusions

Among patients with baseline oligo-metastatic brain lesions which are suitable for stereotactic radiosurgery, upfront brain radiotherapy provides considerable clinical benefits. While, extracranial radiation may be deferred in asymptomatic patients with multiple-metastatic lesions.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1240-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy near the end of life in lung cancer: A population-based analysis

OBJECTIVES

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy (RT) can improve quality of life for patients with advanced lung cancer, but treatment can be associated with acute toxicity and symptomatic relief may take several weeks. The optimal fractionation schedule is not known. Delivery of RT near the end of life (EOL) is an emerging indicator of poor quality care. The aim of this study was to determine utilization of palliative thoracic RT in the last 4 weeks of life, and factors associated with its use, in patients with incurable lung cancer in a population-based healthcare system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with lung cancer in British Columbia treated with palliative thoracic RT in 2014 and 2015 were identified. Associations between starting a course of palliative thoracic RT within 4 weeks of death and patient/treatment characteristics were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

1676 courses of palliative thoracic RT were delivered to 1584 lung cancer patients. Median survival was 20 weeks. 12% of palliative thoracic RT courses were delivered in the last 4 weeks of life, with short fractionation schedules and simple RT planning techniques used more frequently near EOL. Of RT courses delivered in the last 4 weeks of life 89% were courses of 1 - 5 fractions, 75% were completed as prescribed and 94% involved simple 1-2 field RT techniques. Receipt of RT in the last 4 weeks of life was associated with male gender, younger age, poor performance status, metastatic disease, small cell carcinoma histology and no prior chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Further study and standardization of quality indicators for palliative RT utilization near EOL is required. Whilst clarification occurs, physicians should consider the prognosis of patients with incurable lung cancer and the realistic expectation of benefit from palliative thoracic RT when considering treatment indications and fractionation schedules.

Palliative radiotherapy in symptomatic locally advanced gastric cancer: A phase II trial

To evaluate the response and quality of life of palliative gastric radiotherapy in patients with symptomatic locally advanced gastric cancer. Patients with bleeding, pain or obstruction and were treated with palliative gastric radiotherapy to a dose of 36 Gy in 12 daily fractions. The primary outcomes were symptom response rates. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, adverse events and proportion of patients with ≥10‐point absolute improvement in the fatigue, nausea/vomiting and pain subscales in the EORTC Qualify of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ‐C30) and dysphagia/pain subscales in the gastric specific module (STO22) at the end of RT and 1 month after the completion of radiotherapy. Fifty patients were accrued. Median survival duration was 85 days. 40/50 patients (80%) with bleeding, 2/2 (100%) patients with obstruction and 1/1 (100%) patient with pain responded to radiotherapy. Improvements fatigue, nausea/vomiting and pain subscales of the EORTC QLQ‐C30 was seen in 50%, 28% and 44% of patients at the end of RT and in 63%, 31% and 50% of patients 1 month after RT. Improvements in dysphagia/pain subscales of the STO22 was seen in 42% and 28% of patients at then end of RT and 44% and 19% of patients 1 month after RT. Two patients (5%) had grade 3 anorexia and gastritis. Palliative gastric radiotherapy was effective, well tolerated and resulted in improvement in fatigue, dysphagia and pain at the end of radiotherapy and 1 month after the completion of radiotherapy in a significant proportion of patients.

Radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matched analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

Background

The survival advantage of radiotherapy for patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) has not been adequately evaluated.

Methods

We analyzed stage IV SCLC patients enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry through January 2010 and December 2012. Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching was performed to ensure well-balanced characteristics of all comparison groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazardous model were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and corresponding 95% CI.

Results

Overall, for all metastatic ED-SCLC, receiving radiotherapy was associated with both improved OS and CSS. Radiotherapy for thoracic lesion and any metastatic sites could significantly improve the OS and CSS, except for brain metastasis. For M1a-SCLC patient, radiotherapy, most likely to the primary site, significantly improved the survival (P<0.001). Furthermore, for those ED-SCLC patients with ≥ 2 metastatic sites, that is, polymetastatic ED-SCLC patients, radiation also significantly improved the median OS from 6.0 to 8.0 months (P=0.015) and the median CSS from 7.0 to 8.0 months (P=0.020).

Conclusion

The large SEER results support that radiotherapy in addition to chemotherapy might improve the survival of patients with metastatic ED-SCLC.

Radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with stage IV NSCLC: A propensity score matched analysis of the SEER database

OBJECTIVES

The survival advantage of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been adequately evaluated.

METHODS

We analyzed stage IV NSCLC patients enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry through January 2010 to December 2012. Propensity score (PS) analysis with 1:1 nearest neighbor matching method was used to ensure well-balanced characteristics of all comparison groups by histological types and metastatic sites. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazardous model were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI).

RESULTS

Generally speaking, there was a trend toward improved OS and CSS for using RT to stage IV NSCLC patients for any metastatic sites and for any histological types except adenocarcinoma (AD). Radiotherapy significantly improved the survival of NSCLC patients with metastasis to brain (P < 0.001), especially for AD (P < 0.001). For stage IV lung cancer patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQC), RT for any metastatic sites could universally improve the OS (P < 0.001) and CSS (P < 0.001). In particular, RT was also associated with improving OS (P < 0.001) and CSS (P = 0.012) for stage IV patients with metastases of two or more sites, ie, polymetastatic disease. Furthermore, for those stage IV SQC patients without metastasis, RT, most likely to the primary site, also significantly improved the survival (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results support that RT might improve the survival of patients with metastatic NSCLC in a PS-matched patient cohort from the large SEER database. It is prudent to carefully select patients for RT in metastatic NSCLC.