Phase III study comparing second- and third-generation regimens with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group WJTOG0105

Salvage extended surgery after immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the surgical outcomes of salvage extended surgery after definitive medical treatment with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for locally advanced or unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The subjects of this single-center retrospective analysis were 14 patients who underwent salvage surgery after ICI treatment between May, 2017 and April, 2023 at our institute. We reviewed the comprehensive surgical outcomes, including operative procedures, intraoperative findings, and postoperative morbidities. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier estimation.

RESULTS

The initial clinical stage before medical treatment (c-stage) was stage III in eight patients, stage IV in five patients, and one patient had postoperative lung cancer recurrence. The indications for surgery were as follows: local control for relapse or residual tumor in ten patients and discontinuation of systemic therapy because of treatment-related complications in four patients. The surgical modes were segmentectomy (n = 1), lobectomy (n = 4), bilobectomy (n = 3), pneumonectomy (n = 6), and bronchoplasty (n = 7). Grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidities were observed in six patients, including only one case of 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series demonstrated that the surgical outcome of salvage extended surgery after ICI therapy may be positive with careful selection of the procedure and indication.

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab Administration Following Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The PACIFIC trial established durvalumab administration after chemoradiotherapy as the standard of care for unresectable locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in elderly patients aged 75 years or above remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab for LA-NSCLC, with a specific focus on elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 214 patients who received durvalumab out of 278 patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who underwent chemoradiotherapy at 7 institutions between July 2018 and March 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of durvalumab in elderly patients.

RESULTS

The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 42.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.7%-49.5%) and 77.1% (95% CI, 70.1-82.7%), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 8.2% of patients. PSM analysis revealed that OS was significantly shorter in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) than in younger patients (< 75 years) (hazard ratio [HR]; 95% CI, 1.39-8.99; P = .008), whereas PFS did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (HR: 1.50, 95% CI, 0.84-2.68, P = .169). The frequency of irAEs did not differ between these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab administration following chemoradiotherapy for LA-NSCLC coincided with the PACIFIC trial's findings. Disease control achieved with this protocol did not differ significantly between elderly and younger patients but had acceptable tolerability, demonstrating its benefit even in elderly LA-NSCLC patients aged 75 years or above.

Cystine and theanine for chemoradiotherapy-induced esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE

Although several potential radioprotectants have been explored, radiation esophagitis is still difficult to control. Further development of supportive therapies is required. Our purpose was to investigate the efficacy and safety of cystine and theanine for esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

This study is a prospective observational study. The participants were recruited from unresectable locally advanced NSCLC who had scheduled to receive weekly paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin plus radiation therapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) for 6 weeks. They took an oral amino acid supplement containing 700 mg cystine and 280 mg theanine once daily regardless of CRT timing from the start of CRT until completion. The primary endpoint was the incidence of any grade esophagitis. The secondary endpoints were quality of life (QoL) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were evaluated. All participants completed 60 Gy of RT in 30 fractions. The overall incidence of esophagitis was 73%; however, no ≥ grade 3 was reported. There were no AEs likely to be related to cystine and theanine. The mean EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level health index score before and after chemoradiotherapy was 0.952 ± 0.0591 and 0.952 ± 0.0515 (P = 0.89), and the mean Visual Analogue Scale scores before and after treatment were 67.9 ± 15.4 and 79.4 ± 13.2 (P = 0.0047), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed no severe esophagitis, any AEs, nor QoL decrease in NSCLC patients receiving CRT. Cystine and theanine are potentially effective to reduce severe CRT-induced esophagitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000052622, 26 October 2023, retrospectively registered.

Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Importance

The PACIFIC trial established consolidation durvalumab as the standard of care following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Understanding its benefit in routine US clinical practice is critical.

Objective

To report characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients who did or did not receive durvalumab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Two prespecified cohorts were curated in this retrospective cohort study (SPOTLIGHT). Deidentified patient-level data from a US database (Flatiron Health) were analyzed. Patients had unresectable stage III NSCLC, were diagnosed on or after January 1, 2011, had 2 or more visits on or afterward, and received CRT. Data were analyzed from May 2021 to October 2023.

Exposures

Patients started durvalumab after CRT (durvalumab cohort) or ended CRT without durvalumab (nondurvalumab cohort) by June 30, 2019, to allow 15 or more months of follow-up from CRT end.

Main Outcomes and Measures

End points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST), and time to distant metastasis or death (TTDM).

Results

The durvalumab cohort included 332 patients (median [IQR] age, 67.5 [60.8-74.0] years; 187 were male [56.3%], 27 were Black [8.7%], 33 were other races [10.7%], and 249 were White [80.6%]) and the nondurvalumab cohort included 137 patients (median (IQR) age, 70.0 [64.0-75.0] years; 89 [65.0%] were male, 11 [8.9%] were Black, 19 [15.4%] were other races, and 93 [75.6%] were White). Most patients had a smoking history (durvalumab, 316 patients [95.2%] and nondurvalumab, 132 patients [96.4%]) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 through 1 (durvalumab, 251 patients [90.9%] and nondurvalumab, 88 patients [81.5%]). Median (IQR) CRT duration was 1.6 (1.4-1.8) months for the durvalumab cohort and 1.5 (1.4-1.8) months for the nondurvalumab cohort. Median time to durvalumab discontinuation was 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.8-10.6 months). Median TFST and TTDM were not reached (NR) in the durvalumab cohort and 8.3 months (95% CI, 4.8-11.8 months) and 11.3 months (95% CI, 6.4-14.5 months), respectively, in the nondurvalumab cohort. Median PFS and OS were 17.5 months (95% CI, 13.6-24.8 months) and NR in the durvalumab cohort and 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.2-9.8 months) and 19.4 months (95% CI, 11.7-24.0 months) in the nondurvalumab cohort. In Cox regression analyses of patients who completed concurrent CRT without progression, durvalumab was associated with a lower risk of progression or death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.26-0.51) and lower risk of death (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.43), adjusted for prior platinum agent and patient characteristics.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, findings were consistent with PACIFIC, and durvalumab was associated with a lower risk of progression and/or death. Further investigation is warranted to explain why patients did not receive durvalumab after its approval.

Population Survival Kinetics Derived from Clinical Trials of Potentially Curable Lung Cancers

Using digitized data from progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival Kaplan-Meier curves, one can assess population survival kinetics through exponential decay nonlinear regression analyses. To demonstrate their utility, we analyzed PFS curves from published curative-intent trials of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADAURA trial), chemoradiotherapy for inoperable NSCLC, and limited small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These analyses permit assessment of log-linear curve shape and estimation of the proportion of patients cured, PFS half-lives for subpopulations destined to eventually relapse, and probability of eventual relapse in patients remaining progression-free at different time points. The proportion of patients potentially cured was 41% for adjuvant controls, 58% with adjuvant chemotherapy, 17% for ADAURA controls, not assessable with adjuvant osimertinib, 15% with chemoradiotherapy, and 12% for SCLC. Median PFS half-life for relapsing subpopulations was 11.9 months for adjuvant controls, 17.4 months with adjuvant chemotherapy, 24.4 months for ADAURA controls, not assessable with osimertinib, 9.3 months with chemoradiotherapy, and 10.7 months for SCLC. For those remaining relapse-free at 2 and 5 years, the cure probability was 74%/96% for adjuvant controls, 77%/93% with adjuvant chemotherapy, 51%/94% with chemoradiation, and 39%/87% with limited SCLC. Relatively easy population kinetic analyses add useful information.

Phase II Study of Durvalumab Immediately after Completion of Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: TORG1937 (DATE Study)

PURPOSE

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab consolidation for up to 12 months is the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, exactly when to initiate durvalumab therapy after chemoradiation completion remains unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab, administered immediately after CCRT completion, for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a prospective, single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial. Patients without disease progression after definitive CCRT (two cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with 60 Gy/30 Fr radiotherapy) received durvalumab (every 2 weeks for up to 12 months) from the next day (up to 5 days) after the final radiation dose. The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) from registration before the start of CCRT.

RESULTS

From January 2020 to August 2020, 47 of 50 enrolled patients were evaluable for treatment efficacy and safety. The 1-year PFS from registration was 75.0% [60% confidence interval (CI), 69.0-80.0 and 95% CI, 59.4-85.3]. The objective response rate throughout the study treatment and median PFS from registration were 78.7% and 14.2 months (95% CI, 13.4 to not reached), respectively. Grade 3/4 pneumonitis and febrile neutropenia were each 4.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study met the primary endpoint. The incidence of pneumonitis was similar to that of a Japanese subset in the PACIFIC study. Our data support the efficacy and safety of durvalumab administered immediately after the completion of CCRT for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Selection of the appropriate treatment for the combination of interstitial lung disease and lung cancer: A retrospective observational study

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) independently heightens the risk of lung cancer (LC), often necessitating chemoradiotherapy (CRT) due to advanced disease stages. However, CRT may compromise survival through complications such as ILD exacerbation or radiation pneumonitis. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal surgical or nonsurgical treatment approaches for patients with concurrent ILD and LC. Over a 10-year period, a retrospective evaluation was conducted on 647 patients with confirmed diagnoses of LC and ILD from a total of 4541 patients examined in the polyclinic. This assessment included a comprehensive review of demographic, treatment, and survival records. Study groups included those treated for both ILD and LC with surgical treatment (ST), chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), or CRT. A control group comprised ILD-only cases. In the whole sample of 647 patients with complete data, the length of stay in hospital and respiratory intensive care unit was significantly shorter in the ST group and longer in the CT group. Significant differences in discharge status (P < .001) were observed, with higher recovery rates in the ST and RT groups. The CT group showed an increased rate of transfer to other centers, in-hospital mortality was determined to be higher in the CRT group, and the control group exhibited no change in discharge. No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups with respect to the 24- and 48-month survival rates (P = .100). Although no disparity was found in 2- and 4-year survival rates, there were seen to be advantages in survival and quality of life with the addition of radiotherapy to regions aligning with surgical margins for LC patients with ILD, evaluated as radiological N0, undergoing wedge resection. This underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies to balance effective cancer control and to minimize ILD-related complications.

Durvalumab Plus Concurrent Radiotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The DOLPHIN Phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Administration of durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment of unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, 20% to 30% of patients do not receive durvalumab because of adverse events (AEs) during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In addition, radiotherapy and immunotherapy have a synergistic effect.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab immunotherapy plus concurrent radiotherapy followed by maintenance with durvalumab therapy for treatment of locally advanced NSCLC without chemotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The multicenter, single-arm DOLPHIN (Phase II Study of Durvalumab [MEDI4736] Plus Concurrent Radiation Therapy in Advanced Localized NSCLC Patients) nonrandomized controlled trial was performed by 12 institutions in Japan from September 13, 2019, to May 31, 2022. Participants in the primary registration phase included 74 patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC. The current analyses were conducted from June 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022.

Interventions

Patients received radiotherapy (60 Gy) in combination with concurrent and maintenance durvalumab immunotherapy, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, for up to 1 year.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point of the rate of 12-month progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent central review, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated with 90% CIs calculated using the Greenwood formula. The key secondary end points were PFS, objective response rate, treatment completion rate, and AEs.

Results

Data from 35 patients (median [range] age, 72 [44-83] years; 31 [88.6%] men) were included in the full analysis set of the evaluable population. The 12-month PFS rate was 72.1% (90% CI, 59.1%-85.1%), and the median PFS was 25.6 months (95% CI, 13.1 months to not estimable) at a median follow-up of 22.8 months (range, 4.3-31.8 months). Scheduled radiation therapy was completed in 97.1% of patients. The confirmed objective response rate was 90.9% (95% CI, 75.7%-98.1%), and the treatment completion rate was 57.6% (95% CI, 39.2%-74.5%). Among 34 patients evaluated in the safety analysis set, AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 18 patients (52.9%), and of grade 5 in 2 patients (5.9%). Pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis of any grade occurred in 23 patients (67.6%), and of grades 3 or 4 in 4 patients (11.8%).

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings from this phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial indicate that durvalumab immunotherapy combined with curative radiotherapy for patients with PD-L1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC is a promising treatment with tolerable AEs and is appropriate as a study treatment for phase 3 clinical trials.

Trial Registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ID: jRCT2080224763.

The timing of durvalumab administration affects the risk of pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The PACIFIC study has demonstrated that the administration of durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy can significantly improve both overall survival and progression-free survival rates in patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. While the latest NCCN guidelines recommend this combination regimen, they do not specify the optimal timing for administering durvalumab after completing radiotherapy. The PACIFIC study suggested initiating durvalumab within 42 days of completing radiotherapy, but early administration of the drug may increase the incidence of pneumonitis. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate whether the time interval between completion of radiotherapy and initiation of durvalumab treatment is associated with the risk of pneumonitis (Grade ≥ 3), which is the primary endpoint, as well as progression-free survival, which is the secondary endpoint.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of clinical trials in PubMed and EMBASE was conducted up to March 2023 to identify clinical trials involving locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer patients who were treated with durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy. Meta-analysis was performed on single-arm studies to estimate the incidence of pneumonitis (Grade ≥ 3) and progression-free survival in all studies, as well as in studies that administered durvalumab within 42 days after completion of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis consisted of nine studies with a total of 2560 patients. The analysis showed that the incidence of pneumonitis (Grade ≥ 3) was 5.36% [95%CI (0.03, 0.08), I2 = 18.41%, p = 0.29], while the 1-year progression-free survival rate was 57.91% [95%CI (0.53, 0.63), I2 = 10.57%, p = 0.35]. Furthermore, when the duration between completion of radiotherapy and initiation of durvalumab treatment was shorter than 42 days, the incidence of pneumonitis (Grade ≥ 3) was 4.12% [95%CI (0.02, 0.06), I2 = 0.00%, p = 0.56], with a 1-year progression-free survival rate of 61.03% [95%CI (0.51, 0.71), I2 = 59.06%, p = 0.09].

CONCLUSION

Overall, based on the available evidence, it appears that there is no significant increase in pneumonitis or decrease in progression-free survival (PFS) when the time interval is less than 42 days and a shorter interval between treatment sessions does not necessarily have a detrimental effect on the rate of pneumonitis. We recommend that clinicians carefully evaluate the specific circumstances of each patient to determine the optimal timing for initiating immunotherapy.

A Case of Radiation-Associated Vertebral Compression Fracture Mimicking Solitary Bone Metastasis of Lung Cancer

Radiation therapy plays an important role in the treatment of lung cancer. Although adverse effects of radiation are well known, they are sometimes difficult to be diagnosed. We report a case of a radiation-associated vertebral compression fracture which mimicked bone metastasis of lung cancer. The patient was a 57-year-old man diagnosed with lung squamous cell carcinoma (cT1aN2M0, c-stage IIIA). He received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in combination with 6 weeks of weekly carboplatin plus paclitaxel and thoracic radiation of 60 Gy/30 fractions, followed by bi-weekly durvalumab for 12 months. On the last day of the 12-month durvalumab regimen, he complained of backache. Magnetic resonance imaging showed compression fracture of the seventh thoracic vertebra with the spinal cord compressed, and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography demonstrated weak focal uptake only at the seventh thoracic vertebra. Although the fracture had been suspected to be bone metastasis, surgical biopsy revealed no evidence of malignancy. Since the seventh thoracic vertebra was included in the irradiation area, the patient was diagnosed with a radiation-associated fracture. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar vertebrae (L2 - 4) after the surgery revealed osteopenia. In conclusion, we successfully diagnosed the radiation-associated vertebral fracture caused by radical CRT. The fracture mimicked bone metastasis in preoperative imaging tests. Thus, surgical biopsy was useful for diagnosis.

A phase II study of S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy followed by durvalumab for unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan (SAMURAI study): primary analysis

Background

The standard of care for unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab, based on the PACIFIC study. Although multiple Japanese phase II studies have shown high efficacy and tolerability of CRT with cisplatin plus S-1 (SP), no prospective study using durvalumab after SP-based CRT has been reported.

Objectives

We conducted a multicenter phase II study of this approach, the interim analysis of which showed a high transition rate to durvalumab consolidation therapy. Here, we report the primary analysis results.

Design

In treatment-naïve LA-NSCLC, cisplatin (60 mg/m², day 1) and S-1 (80-120 mg/body, days 1-14) were administered with two 4-week cycles with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy) followed by durvalumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for up to 1 year.

Methods

The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). The expected 1-year PFS and its lower limit of the 80% confidence interval (CI) were set as 63% and 47%, respectively, based on the results of TORG1018 study.

Results

In all, 59 patients were enrolled, with 51 (86.4%) proceeding to durvalumab. The objective response rate throughout the study was 72.9% (95% CI: 59.7-83.6%). After median follow-up of 21.9 months, neither median PFS nor OS was reached. The 1-year PFS was 72.5% (80% CI: 64.2-79.2%, 95% CI: 59.1-82.2%), while the 1-year overall survival was 91.5% (95% CI: 80.8-96.4%). No grade 5 adverse events were observed throughout the study. The most common adverse event during the consolidation phase was pneumonitis (any grade, 78.4%; grade ⩾3, 2.0%). Eventually, 52.5% of patients completed 1-year durvalumab consolidation therapy from CRT initiation.

Conclusion

This study of durvalumab after SP-based CRT met its primary endpoint and found a 1-year PFS of 73% from CRT initiation. This study provides the first prospective data on the prognosis and tolerability of durvalumab consolidation from the initiation of CRT.

Trial registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190127, registered 1 November, 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031190127.

The Multidisciplinary Approach in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer over Ten Years: From Radiation Therapy Optimisation to Innovative Systemic Treatments

Background: About 30% of new non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage, which includes a highly heterogeneous group of patients with a wide spectrum of treatment options. The management of stage III NSCLC involves a multidisciplinary team, adequate staging, and a careful patient selection for surgery or radiation therapy integrated with systemic treatment. Methods: This is a single-center observational retrospective and prospective study including a consecutive series of stage III NSCLC patients who were referred to the Veneto Institute of Oncology and University Hospital of Padova (Italy) between 2012 and 2021. We described clinico-pathological characteristics, therapeutic pathways, and treatment responses in terms of radiological response in the entire study population and in terms of pathological response in patients who underwent surgery after induction therapy. Furthermore, we analysed survival outcomes in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 301 patients were included. The majority of patients received surgical multimodality treatment (n = 223, 74.1%), while the remaining patients (n = 78, 25.9%) underwent definitive CRT followed or not by durvalumab as consolidation therapy. At data cut-off, 188 patients (62.5%) relapsed and the median RFS (mRFS) of the entire population was 18.2 months (95% CI: 15.83−20.57). At the time of analyses 140 patients (46.5%) were alive and the median OS (mOS) was 44.7 months (95% CI: 38.4−51.0). A statistically significant difference both in mRFS (p = 0.002) and in mOS (p < 0.001) was observed according to the therapeutic pathway in the entire population, and selecting patients treated after 2018, a significant difference in mRFS (p = 0.006) and mOS (p < 0.001) was observed according to treatment modality. Furthermore, considering only patients diagnosed with stage IIIB-C (N = 131, 43.5%), there were significant differences both in mRFS (p = 0.047) and in mOS (p = 0.022) as per the treatment algorithm. The mRFS of the unresectable population was 16.3 months (95% CI: 11.48−21.12), with a significant difference among subgroups (p = 0.030) in favour of patients who underwent the PACIFIC-regimen; while the mOS was 46.5 months (95% CI: 26.46−66.65), with a significant difference between two subgroups (p = 0.003) in favour of consolidation immunotherapy. Conclusions: Our work provides insights into the management and the survival outcomes of stage III NSCLC over about 10 years. We found that the choice of radical treatment impacts on outcome, thus suggesting the importance of appropriate staging at diagnosis, patient selection, and of the multidisciplinary approach in the decision-making process. Our results confirmed that the PACIFIC trial and the following introduction of durvalumab as consolidation treatment may be considered as a turning point for several improvements in the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway of stage III NSCLC patients.

Consolidation Systemic Therapy in Locally Advanced, Inoperable Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer-How to Identify Patients Which Can Benefit from It?

BACKGROUND

Consolidation systemic therapy (ST) given after concurrent radiotherapy (RT) and ST (RT-ST) is frequently practiced in locally advanced inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Little is known, however, about the fate of patients achieving different responses after concurrent phases of the treatment.

METHODS

we searched the English-language literature to identify full-length articles on phase II and Phase III clinical studies employing consolidation ST after initial concurrent RT-ST. We sought information about response evaluation after the concurrent phase and the outcome of these patient subgroups, the patterns of failure per response achieved after the concurrent phase as well as the outcome of these subgroups after the consolidation phase.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven articles have been initially identified, of which 20 studies were excluded for various reasons, leaving, therefore, a total of 67 studies for our analysis. Response evaluation after the concurrent phase was performed in 36 (54%) studies but in only 14 (21%) response data were provided, while in 34 (51%) studies patients underwent a consolidation phase regardless of the response. No study provided any outcome (survivals, patterns of failure) as per response achieved after the concurrent phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Information regarding the outcome of subgroups of patients achieving different responses after the concurrent phase and before the administration of the consolidation phase is still lacking. This may negatively affect the decision-making process as it remains unknown which patients may preferentially benefit from the consolidation of ST.

Genetic variations in the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCC10 are associated with neutropenia in Japanese patients with lung cancer treated with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel

ABCC10/MRP7, an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, has been implicated in the extracellular transport of taxanes. Our group reported that the ABCC10 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), rs2125739, influences docetaxel cytotoxicity in lung cancer cell lines as well as its side effects in clinical practice. In this study, we investigated whether the rs2125739 variant could affect paclitaxel (PTX) cytotoxicity in lung cancer cell lines. We also investigated the effect of rs2125739 on the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound PTX (nab-PTX) in clinical practice. The association between rs2125739 genotypes and the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of PTX was investigated in 18 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines, HeLa cells, and genome-edited HeLa cells. Next, blood samples from 77 patients with NSCLC treated with carboplatin plus nab-PTX were collected and analyzed for six SNPs, including rs2125739. The clinical outcomes among the different genotype groups were evaluated. In NSCLC cell lines, HeLa cells, and genome-edited HeLa cells, the IC₅₀ was significantly higher in the ABCC10 rs2125739 T/T group than in the T/C and C/C groups. In 77 patients with NSCLC, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the T/T and T/C groups. However, the rs2125739 T/T genotype was associated with a higher frequency of Grades 3/4 neutropenia. In contrast, there was no association between other SNPs and clinical efficacy or neutropenia. Our results indicate that the ABCC10 rs2125739 variant is associated with neutropenia in response to nab-PTX treatment.

Clinically-meaningful improvements in therapy for unresectable NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

The ideal management of patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still developing. Unresectable NSCLC has a high mortality rate and poor prognosis, but the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and molecular-targeted therapies has been a breakthrough in the treatment. The correct treatment of this patient population is crucial to maximize the clinical benefits without compromising their quality of life (QOL).

AREAS COVERED

We review the chemoradiotherapies, cytotoxic chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and molecular-targeted therapies available for unresectable NSCLC, focusing on their effects on overall survival, progression-free survival, and QOL.

EXPERT OPINION

Although cure is the ultimate goal of cancer treatment, it is often difficult to achieve in advanced NSCLC. Biomarker surveillance techniques, such as next-generation sequencing, have made it possible to provide the most appropriate treatment for each patient. This has led to clinically-meaningful improvements in therapies for unresectable NSCLC. The development of new molecular-targeted therapies and the establishment of treatment for patients who acquired drug resistance after initial treatment have a positive impact on patients' long-term survival. ICIs lead the long-term survival that can be considered a cure of some patients with advanced NSCLC, but such curative survival is difficult to achieve with cytotoxic chemotherapies and molecular-targeted therapies.

Prospective multicenter cohort study of durvalumab for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer and grade 1 radiation pneumonitis

OBJECTIVE

Durvalumab was safe and effective in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in a phase 3 trial (PACIFIC trial). Although a history of radiation pneumonitis (RP) has been reported to increase the risk of exacerbation of pneumonitis associated with programmed death-1 axis inhibitors, the detailed clinical results of durvalumab treatment in patients with baseline grade 1 RP were not reported in the PACIFIC trial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of durvalumab therapy in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter prospective cohort study involving 35 patients. Patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: inoperable stage III NSCLC, administration of durvalumab within 42 days after CCRT using platinum-based chemotherapy, no disease progression after CCRT, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and presence of grade 1 RP at baseline. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of durvalumab with a minimum 1-year follow-up period for all patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled in our study from February 2019 to December 2019. The median progression-free survival was 11.4 months (95 % confidence interval, 7.1 months-not reached), and the median overall survival was not reached. Eleven (31 %) patients had grade ≥2 pneumonitis/RP, 10 (28 %) developed grade 2 pneumonitis/RP, and 1 (3 %) developed grade 5 pneumonitis/RP. Five (14 %) patients experienced treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Durvalumab might be safe and effective in patients with stage III NSCLC with baseline grade 1 RP following chemoradiotherapy.

A network meta-analysis for efficacies and toxicities of different concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has become the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies and toxicities of different CCRT regimens in the treatment of LA-NSCLC by adopting a network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

An exhaustive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was conducted to identify relevant studies from inception to October 1, 2020. Direct and indirect evidence was combined to calculate the odds radios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as well as to plot the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves. Cluster analyses were adopted to compare the efficacies and toxicities of different CCRT regimens according to the similarity of 2 variables. Publication bias was detected by comparison-adjusted funnel plots.

Results

Twenty-two studies were enrolled in this NMA, including 18 regimens: CCRT (cisplatin + etoposide), CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + carboplatin), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), CCRT (docetaxel + cisplatin), CCRT (S-1 + cisplatin), CCRT (mitomycin + vindesine + cisplatin), CCRT (cisplatin + vinorelbine), CCRT (cisplatin), CCRT (etoposide + cisplatin + amifostine), RT, CCRT (5-FU), CCRT (paclitaxel + cisplatin), CCRT (irinotecan + carboplatin), CCRT (nedaplatin), CCRT (carboplatin + etoposide), CCRT (paclitaxel), and CCRT (carboplatin). The results indicated that the regimens with CCRT (cisplatin + etoposide), CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), CCRT (S-1 + cisplatin), and CCRT (cisplatin + vinorelbine) had relatively better efficacies compared with other regimens. As for toxicities of different CCRT regimens, the CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), and CCRT (docetaxel + cisplatin) were relatively lower.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin) and CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel) might be the best options for the treatment of LA-NSCLC, and CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin) had the highest 3-year overall survival (OS) rate.

Early administration of durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy increased risk of pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

AIMS

Durvalumab (Durva) administration after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the standard of care, associated with relatively prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall survival. However, pneumonitis occurs in 73.6% of Japanese patients. This retrospective study aimed to identify factors associated with Durva efficacy and safety, specifically, the risk of pneumonitis.

METHODS

This study included data from 26 consecutive patients with locally advanced NSCLC who underwent CRT followed by Durva. The rates of adverse events and PFS were examined.

RESULTS

The median PFS time was 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.7-not available). Patients developed pneumonitis of grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 at the rate of 62%, 27%, 12%, and 0%, respectively. The median PFS time was 6.4 months for patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level of <50% and not reached for patients with PD-L1 expression level of ≥50% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; 95% CI: 0.04-0.89), which was significantly prolonged. The cumulative incidence of pneumonitis grade 2 or above was significantly higher when the time between the last day of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and the start of Durva therapy was within 14 days compared to >14 days (HR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.06-0.59). This association was statistically significant in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The initiation of Durva therapy within 14 days after TRT may increase the risk of pneumonitis grade 2 or above. Careful observation and suitable treatment are recommended.

Consolidation treatments after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard of care for inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. To further improve prognosis, the use of consolidation treatments after CCRT has been explored extensively. Although durvalumab is the only consolidation treatment recommended by national clinical practice guidelines, there have been many studies exploring the effectiveness of other agents. However, until now, no studies have compared all agents systematically, and no studies have provided evidence for the optimal combination of different CCRTs and consolidation treatments regimens. This systematic review will evaluate the comparative clinical efficacy of consolidation therapies after CCRT as well as various combinations of CCRTs and consolidation therapies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PubMed, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched for relevant information. The estimated end date for the search will be 3 February 2022. Each stage of the review, including the study section, data extraction and risk of bias and quality of evidence assessments, will be performed in duplicate. We will include randomised controlled trials that included participants who received CCRT and consolidation treatment in at least one treatment arm. The primary endpoints will be overall survival and progression-free survival. Tumour response, health-related quality of life, disease-free survival and treatment-related toxicity will be presented as secondary outcomes. Both traditional meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) with the Bayesian approach will be conducted. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression will be completed to investigate heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval and patient consent are not required as this study is a meta-analysis based on published studies. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. In case of any changes in the protocol, protocol amendments will be updated in PROSPERO and explanations of these modifications will be described in the final report of this review. The results of this systematic review and NMA will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021239433.

Creation of an Integrated Clinical Trial Database and Data Sharing for Conducting New Research by the Japan Lung Cancer Society

Introduction

Although data accumulated in clinical trials have higher accuracy compared with real-world data and are irreplaceably valuable, most previous clinical trial data have been left unused.

Methods

The Japan Lung Cancer Society (JLCS) asked six clinical trial groups that conducted randomized clinical trials on curative chemoradiation for locally advanced NSCLC to provide data. After obtaining consent from all six groups, data were collected from August 2019 to June 2021.

Results

A total of eight trials, JCOG9812, JCOG0301, NJLCG0601, OLCSG0007, WJTOG0105, WJOG5008L, SPECTRA, and TORG1018, were included. More than 3000 data items were integrated into 408 items by adjusting their definitions and units. The total number of collected cases was 1288: median age (range), 66 (30-93) years; sex (male/female) 1064/224; pathological type (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, other NSCLC, and unknown) 517, 629, 138, and 4; and stage IIIA and B, 536 and 752. The median overall survival was 26.0 months, with 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 53.7%, 24.8%, and 15.2%, respectively, in all enrollments. The median progression-free survival was 9.6 months, with 2-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival rates of 23.6%, 14.0%, and 9.4%, respectively. Part of the information in the database has been made available on the JLCS web page, and the JLCS members were provided the right to propose research using the database.

Conclusions

The integration and sharing of clinical trial data for research purposes was made real by the nonprofit, academic organization, the JLCS. This database will lead to innovative researches and contribute to the improvement of lung cancer treatment and future research.

Multi-institutional feasibility study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This multi-institutional clinical trial evaluated the feasibility of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The major inclusion criteria were clinical stage III NSCLC, age 20-74 years, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Patients were treated with either cisplatin + S-1 (CS; four cycles every 4 weeks) or carboplatin + paclitaxel (CP; administered weekly with thoracic radiotherapy [RT], plus two consolidation cycles) concurrently with IMRT (60 Gy in 30 fractions). The primary endpoint was a treatment completion rate, defined as at least two cycles of CS or five cycles of CP during IMRT and completing 60 Gy IMRT within 56 days after the start of treatment, assumed its 90% confidence interval exceeds 60%. RT quality assurance was mandatory for all the patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were registered. One patient withdrew due to pulmonary infection before starting treatment. RT plans were reviewed and none was judged as a protocol violation. Grade 2 and 3 pneumonitis occurred in four (19%) and one (5%) patients, respectively. Seventeen patients met the primary endpoint, with a treatment completion rate of 77.3% (90% confidence interval [CI] 58.0%-90.6%). Four patients failed to complete chemotherapy due to chemotherapy-related adverse events, but 20 patients completed IMRT. There were no treatment-related deaths. The 2-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 31.8% (95% CI 17.3%-58.7%) and 77.3% (95% CI 61.6%-96.9%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The treatment completion rate did not meet the primary endpoint, but 20 of 22 patients completed IMRT.

Radiotherapy Patterns of Care for Locally-advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Pre- and Post-durvalumab Era: A Region-wide Survey in a Japanese Prefecture

The promising results of the PACIFIC study led to the approval of consolidation durvalumab for coverage by the National Health Insurance (NHI) in 2018 for patients with locally-advanced unresectable non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the effect of NHI coverage on the patterns of care for this population remains unclear. Here, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey to determine the patterns of care for patients with stage II-III NSCLC treated with definitive radiotherapy in 2017 (pre-durvalumab era) or in 2019 (post-durvalumab era). Data were obtained from 11 radiotherapy facilities in Gunma prefecture, which has a population of 1.94 million. We identified 80 and 83 patients with stage II-III NSCLC who received definitive radiotherapy in Gunma in 2017 and 2019, respectively. At a given facility, CCRT was the treatment of choice in a significantly greater proportion of patients in 2019 than in 2017 (66% ± 20% vs 51% ± 29%, P = 0.041). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was more frequent in 2019 than in 2017 (24% vs 1.2%). Carboplatin plus paclitaxel was used for CCRT at higher rate in 2019 than in 2017 (73% vs 44%). Consolidation durvalumab was performed in 73% (40/55) of CCRT-treated patients in 2019, and the treatment was performed for the planned 12 months in 45% (18/40) of patients. These data indicate that NHI coverage of durvalumab might be a possible reason for choosing CCRT in patients with stage II-III NSCLC in the real-world setting.

The time-series behavior of systemic inflammation-immune status in predicting survival of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

Background

Systematic inflammation is believed to play a crucial role in tumorigenesis and metastasis. This study aims at evaluating the prognostic value of time-series behavior of systematic inflammation-immune status before and after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).

Methods

The relationship between systematic inflammation-immune score (SIS, defined as pretreatment peripheral platelet count × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count) and the prognosis was tested in a retrospective study of 386 consecutive LA-NSCLC patients (Group A) with pretreatment SIS and 161 patients (Group B) with SIS before and one month after the dCRT.

Results

SIS of 1400 × 109 was found to be an optimal cutoff point to stratify the patients into high (>1400 × 109) and low (≤1400 × 109) SIS groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the SIS, whether before or after dCRT, was an independent predictor for overall survival (OS), progress-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). High SIS (>1400 × 109) was shown to predict poor 3-year OS (P=0.006, hazard ratio [HR]=2.427), PFS (P=0.001, HR=2.442) and DMFS (P=0.015, HR=2.119). However, SIS was not related to local regional recurrence-free survival in either Group A (P=0.346) or Group B (P=0.486). Further, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the SIS for OS was higher than the neutrophil count/lymphocyte count ratio, platelet count/lymphocyte count ratio, and other conventional clinic-pathological indices.

Conclusions

The SIS is a stable and more sensitive survival predictor than other inflammation-based factors and conventional clinical indices, which may aid in more accurately stratifying patients for risk assessment and treatment decisions.

Dose-escalation by hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost IMRT in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

To explore the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the safety of dose escalation using hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) concurrent with chemotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Four escalating radiation dose levels were used. This study included 25 patients with previously untreated NSCLC who received six concurrent weekly chemotherapy cycles comprising cisplatin and docetaxel. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any acute toxicity that interrupted radiotherapy for more than 1 week. MTD was defined as the highest dose level that didn’t induce DLT or grade 5 toxicity in two patients.

Results

All 25 patients received the prescribed escalating radiation dose from the start dose up to LEVEL 4. Two patients experienced DLT at dose LEVEL 4. One patient died because of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 6 months after radiotherapy, whereas another patient among the additional five patients died because of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis within 2 months after radiotherapy. Dose LEVEL 3 was defined as MTD. The 1- and 2-year local controls were 82.8 and 67.8%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 15.4 months, whereas the median overall survival was 27.3 months.

Conclusions

Dose escalation was safely achieved up to LEVEL 3 [the planning gross target volume (PTVG) 60.5 Gy/22 Fx, 2.75 Gy/Fx; the planning clinical target volume (PTVC) 49.5 Gy/22 Fx] using SIB-IMRT concurrently with chemotherapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC, and the acute toxicities were generally well tolerated. Further prospective studies on long-term outcomes and late toxicities are warranted.

Trial registration

Retrospective registration, ChiCTR1900027290(08/11/2019).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09099-3.

Predicting factors of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis induced by durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab is the standard of care for unresectable locally-advanced non-small cell carcinoma (LA-NSCLC). However, a major concern about administration of durvalumab after CCRT is whether the incidence of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) may increase or not. In the present analysis, we report the initial results of CCRT followed by durvalumab in patients with LA-NSCLC in a real-world setting with focus on predicting factors for symptomatic RP.

Methods

Patients who were pathologically diagnosed as NSCLC and initiated treatment with CCRT followed by durvalumab between July 2018 to December 2019 were eligible for this study. Patients were included if they completed the planned CRT course and administered at least one course of durvalumab. We retrospectively investigated the preliminary survival outcome and incidence and predicting factors for symptomatic RP.

Results

Of the 67 patients who planned CCRT, 63 patients completed the entire CCRT course. Of these, 56 patients proceeded to consolidation with durvalumab. The median time to eternal discontinuation of durvalumab was 9.7 months. The cumulative proportion of the patients who exhibited symptomatic RP was 30, 40 and 44% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. In multivariate analyses, pulmonary fibrosis score and lung V40 were significant predictive factors for symptomatic RP (p < 0.001, HR: 7.83, 95% CI: 3.38–18.13, and p = 0.034, HR: 3.17, 95% CI: 1.09–9.19, respectively).

Conclusions

Pulmonary fibrosis sore and lung V40 were significant predictive factors for symptomatic RP. We should be cautious about the administration of durvalumab for patients having subclinical pulmonary fibrosis. To our best knowledge, this is one of the first report showing the predictive value of high dose volumes to the lung in patients with LA-NSCLC who received CCRT followed by durvalumab.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01979-z.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin + S-1 versus cisplatin + other third-generation agents for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of individual participant data

BACKGROUND

For decades, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy with cisplatin-based regimen has been a standard therapy for locally advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted individual-participant-data (IPD) meta-analyses to compare S-1/cisplatin versus other third-generation anti-cancer medications plus cisplatin regimens with the goal of determining whether or not S-1/cisplatin was the ideal choice for treatment accompanied by radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

A thorough search was performed using multiple electronic databases. We integrated the IPD of each trial and analyzed the resulting meta-database. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included the progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), toxicities, and treatment delivery. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on baseline characteristics. Statistical analyses were stratified by trials.

RESULTS

Three randomized control trials (WJOG5008L study, SPECTRA study, and TORG1018 study) were found. Of the 316 patients enrolled in those studies, 159 received S-1/cisplatin (SP), and 157 were assigned to other combination chemotherapy. The median OS for the SP arm was 48.2 months, and that of the non-SP arm was 42.4 months. The combined hazard ratio (HR) for the OS was 0.895 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.638-1.256), and no heterogeneity was noted among the trials (test for heterogeneity, p = 0.87; I² = 0). The median PFS for the SP and non-SP arms was 12.8 and 14.0 months, respectively. The corresponding HR for the PFS was 1.022 (95% CI 0.776-1.347), and there was evidence of moderate heterogeneity among the trials (test for heterogeneity, p = 0.16; I² = 0.46). The ORRs were 69.7% (95% CI 62.1-76.7%) and 70.9% (95% CI 63.7-78.1%) in the SP and non-SP arms, respectively. The toxicity profile showed that SP caused significantly fewer instances of grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia than non-SP regimens.

CONCLUSION

No marked differences were detected in the OS, PFS, or ORR between the SP and non-SP arms. SP had significantly less myelosuppression and better treatment compliance as a chemotherapy regimen for concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced NSCLC than non-SP regimens.

Prospective analysis of factors precluding the initiation of durvalumab from an interim analysis of a phase II trial of S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy followed by durvalumab for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Japan (SAMURAI study)

Background:

The standard of care for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab, based on the PACIFIC trial. Disease progression and pneumonitis were reported as the main reasons to preclude the initiation of durvalumab in multiple retrospective studies. However, the transition rate and the reasons for failure to proceed to consolidation therapy with durvalumab after CRT were not evaluated prospectively. Although phase II studies in Japan have shown high efficacy and tolerability of CRT with cisplatin + S-1 (SP), no prospective study using durvalumab after SP-based CRT has yet been reported. We therefore conducted a phase II study to verify the efficacy and safety of durvalumab following SP-based CRT. In this interim analysis, we report the transition rate and the reasons for its failure.

Methods:

In treatment-naïve LA-NSCLC, cisplatin (60 mg/m², day 1) and S-1 (80–120 mg/body, days 1–14) were administered with two 4-week cycles with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy) followed by durvalumab every 2 weeks for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was 12 month progression-free survival rate.

Results:

Fifty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom 86.4% (51/59) proceeded to durvalumab. All of them initiated durvalumab within 42 days after CRT [median 18 days (range: 3–38)], including 27.5% (14/51) in <14 days. Common reasons for failure to proceed to durvalumab were disease progression (2/59, 3.4%) and adverse events (6/59, 10.2%). Among the latter cases, four resumed treatment and proceeded to durvalumab within 42 days on off-protocol. The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 62.7% and 93.2%, respectively. The incidences of ⩾grade 3 pneumonitis, febrile neutropenia, and esophagitis were 0%, 8.5%, and 3.4%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Regarding durvalumab after CRT, this interim analysis of the SAMURAI study clarified the high transition rate, early introduction, and reasons for failure to proceed to consolidation therapy, which were not determined in the PACIFIC trial.

Trial registration:

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190127, registered 1 November, 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031190127.

Real-world Safety and Efficacy of Consolidation Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Consolidation durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved patient outcomes in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) since the practice-changing results of the PACIFIC trial, while real-world evidence regarding the PACIFIC regimen has not been systematically reviewed. This meta-analysis comprehensively investigated the real-world toxicity and efficacy of this regimen and identified differences between the real world and clinical trials.

METHODS

Real-world studies (RWSs) on patients with stage III NSCLC treated with durvalumab after CRT were identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases. We summarized the differences in demographic and therapeutic characteristics between RWSs and the PACIFIC trial. A meta-analysis of short-term efficacy and adverse event rates was performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify potential influencing factors.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 1,885 patients were included. More elderly and poor performance status patients, prolonged interval from CRT completion to durvalumab exceeding 42 days, median infusions of durvalumab less than 20 cycles and sequential CRT were observed in the real world. The pooled 12-month overall-survival (OS) and progression-free-survival (PFS) rates were 90% (95% CI, 83%-98%) and 62% (95% CI, 56%-68%), respectively. Subgroup analysis determined that delay in durvalumab initiation beyond 42 days neither impacted 12-month OS (P=0.068) nor PFS (P=0.989). Pooled incidences of all-grade and ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis were 35% (95% CI, 22%-48%) and 6% (95% CI, 3%-8%), respectively. Higher all-grade pneumonitis rates were observed in the studies with a median age of patients > 65 years (P=0.008) and from Asian regions (P=0.017), whereas expanded-access-program-related studies reported significantly lower rates (P=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and short-term efficacy of consolidation durvalumab in real-life use align with the PACIFIC trial. RWSs can be helpful for understanding the true efficacy and toxicity of consolidation durvalumab given the less restrictive eligibility criteria.

Rationale and Design for a Multicenter, Phase II Study of Durvalumab Plus Concurrent Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The DOLPHIN Study (WJOG11619L)

Durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand-1) administration after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has improved the survival of patients with unresectable, locally advanced (LA) stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some patients are unable to complete cCRT and cannot receive immunotherapy due to poor performance status based on adverse events after cCRT. Immunotherapy plays an important role in anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced NSCLC and is replacing chemotherapy. In addition, radiotherapy and immunotherapy have been reported to have a synergistic effect. This Phase II, multicenter study (DOLPHIN, WJOG11619L, JapicCTI-194840) is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus concurrent curative radiation therapy for PD-L1-positive unresectable LA-NSCLC without chemotherapy. Unresectable LA stage III NSCLC patients aged 20 years or older with a World Health Organization/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 and PD-L1 positivity are enrolled. The patients will receive curative radiation therapy (60 Gy) plus durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w) for up to 12 months until there is evidence of disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is the 12-month progression-free survival rate as assessed by an independent central review. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, treatment completion rate, and safety. Recruitment began in September 2019.

Radiation pneumonitis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor: a retrospective study

Background

Immunotherapy has been administered to many patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only few studies have examined toxicity in patients receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to determine factors that predict radiation pneumonitis (RP) in these patients.

Methods

We evaluated the size of the planning target volume, mean lung dose (MLD), and the lung volume receiving more than a threshold radiation dose (VD) in 106 patients. The primary endpoint was RP ≥ grade 2, and toxicity was evaluated.

Results

After CCRT, 51/106 patients were treated with ICI. The median follow-up period was 11.5 months (range, 3.0–28.2), and RP ≥ grade 2 occurred in 47 (44.3%) patients: 27 and 20 in the ICI and non-ICI groups, respectively. Among the clinical factors, only the use of ICI was associated with RP (p = 0.043). Four dosimetric variables (MLD, V20, V30, and V40) had prognostic significance in univariate analysis for occurrence of pneumonitis (hazard ratio, p-value; MLD: 2.3, 0.009; V20: 2.9, 0.007; V30: 2.3, 0.004; V40: 2.5, 0.001). Only V20 was a significant risk factor in the non-ICI group, and MLD, V30, and V40 were significant risk factors in the ICI group. The survival and local control rates were superior in the ICI group than in the non-ICI group, but no significance was observed.

Conclusions

Patients receiving ICI after definitive CCRT were more likely to develop RP, which may be related to the lung volume receiving high-dose radiation. Therefore, several factors should be carefully considered for patients with NSCLC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01930-2.

Phase I study of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in elderly patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Few clinical studies have been designed for elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the tolerability of carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC. The eligibility criteria were: unresectable stage III NSCLC, performance status 0 or 1, and age ≥ 75 years. Eligible patients received 6 weeks of weekly carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy with a total dose of 64 Gy in 32 fractions. Carboplatin was fixed to an area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) of 2 mg/mL/min, and the recommended dose of nab-paclitaxel was evaluated using a dose-escalation study (30 or 40 mg/m²). Tolerability at the recommended dose was evaluated in an expansion study. Nineteen patients were enrolled at four institutions, all of whom were eligible and assessable. The recommended nab-paclitaxel dose was set at 30 mg/m² because two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at 40 mg/m². The treatment completion rate of the 17 patients analyzed at the recommended dose was 100% (80% confidence interval (CI), 83.8-100%). The overall response rate was 76.5%, and the median progression free survival was 13.4 months (95% CI, 4.2-21.4 months). Common grade 3 and 4 toxicities included leukopenia (23.5%), neutropenia (17.6%), anemia (5.9%), and infection (5.9%). One treatment-related death due to pneumonitis was observed six months after the end of the study. In conclusion, carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy show good tolerability and exhibit promising efficacy in elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC. This trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on March 11, 2019 (trial no. jRCTs042180077).

Gefitinib induction followed by chemoradiotherapy in EGFR-mutant, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 phase II study

Background

The role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) induction coupled with standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is unclear in unresectable, stage III, EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, a phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib induction followed by CRT in this disease setting.

Patients and methods

Patients with unresectable, EGFR-mutant, stage III NSCLC were administered gefitinib monotherapy (250 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Subsequently, patients without disease progression during induction therapy were administered cisplatin and docetaxel (40 mg/m² each) on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 with concurrent radiotherapy at a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, which was hypothesized to reach 85%, with a threshold of the lower limit of 60%.

Results

Twenty patients (median age: 66 years; male/female: 9/11; histology: 20 adenocarcinoma; stage IIIA/IIIB: 9/11; and exon 19/21: 10/10) were enrolled. The 2-year OS rate was 90% (90% confidence interval: 71.4% to 96.8%), indicating that this trial met the primary objective. The overall response rate and 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 85.0%, 58.1%, and 36.9%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (>10%) included hepatic toxicity during the induction phase and neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in the CRT phase. Radiation pneumonitis grade ≥3 or treatment-related death did not occur.

Conclusions

This is the first prospective study to demonstrate the favorable efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKI induction followed by standard CRT in EGFR-mutant, stage III NSCLC. Further confirmatory studies are needed.

•

This is the first prospective study evaluating gefitinib induction followed by CRT in EGFR-mutated, locally advanced NSCLC.

•

The 2-year OS rate was 90% (90% confidence interval: 71.4% to 96.8%), indicating that this trial met the primary objective.

•

The objective response rate throughout the treatment protocol was 85.0% (17 of 20).

•

The safety findings were consistent with the known safety profiles of all agents administered.

•

Our results might raise a critical point that needs to be evaluated in further studies to improve the cure rate.

Gefitinib With Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy in Unresectable Locally Advanced NSCLC With EGFR Mutation; West Japan Oncology Group 6911L

INTRODUCTION

About 10% of patients with locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) harbor EGFR mutation and recent reports suggested the declined benefit with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in this population. The attempt that introduces EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor into the treatment of LA-NSCLC with EGFR mutation has been warranted.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC with sensitive EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R point mutation) were enrolled. Patients were treated with gefitinib (250 mg/d for 2 y) plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (64 Gy/32 fractions). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years (trial identifier, UMIN000008366).

RESULTS

Between August 2012 and November 2017, a total of 28 patients were enrolled and 27 were eligible. The median age was 67 years (range: 45-74); never/current or former smoker in 15/12 patients, respectively; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1 in 19/8; EGFR exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R in 13/14; and c-stage IIIA/IIIB in 14/13. The PFS rate at 2 years by independent review was 29.6% (one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.6%-). The overall response rate was 81.5% (95% CI: 63.3%-91.3%), median PFS was 18.6 months (95% CI: 12.0-24.5 mo), and median overall survival was 61.1 months (95% CI: 38.1 mo-not reached). Approximately half of the patients exhibited solitary brain metastasis as their first site of relapse. Adverse events greater than or equal to grade 3 were fatigue, skin reaction, and appetite loss (3.7% each).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study revealed the tolerability and the possible efficacy of gefitinib plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with LA-NSCLC having EGFR mutation.

Effect of Second-generation vs Third-generation Chemotherapy Regimens With Thoracic Radiotherapy on Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: 10-Year Follow-up of a WJTOG0105 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Insufficient data are available regarding the long-term outcomes and cumulative incidences of toxic effects that are associated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Objective

To evaluate survival and late toxic effects 10 years after patients were treated with curative CRT.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, phase 3 West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 0105 randomized clinical trial was conducted between September 2001 and September 2005 in Japan. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer with unresectable stage III disease were assessed for eligibility. Additional data were analyzed from January 2018 to December 2019.

Interventions

A total of 440 eligible patients were randomly assigned to groups as follows: A (control), 4 cycles of mitomycin/vindesine/cisplatin plus thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) of 60 Gy; B, weekly irinotecan/carboplatin for 6 weeks plus TRT of 60 Gy followed by 2 courses of irinotecan/carboplatin consolidation; or C, weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin for 6 weeks plus TRT of 60 Gy followed by 2 courses of paclitaxel/carboplatin consolidation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was 10-year survival probability after CRT. The secondary outcome was late toxic effects that occurred more than 90 days after initiating CRT.

Results

From September 2001 to September 2005, 440 patients (group A, n = 146 [33.2%; median (range) age, 63 (31-74) years; 18 women (12.3%)]; group B, n = 147 [33.4%; median (range) age, 63 (30-75) years; 22 women (15.0%)]; group C, n = 147 [33.4%; median (range) age, 63 (38-74) years; 19 women (12.9%)]) were enrolled. The median (range) follow-up was 11.9 (7.6-13.3) years. In groups A, B, and C, median (range) overall survival times were 20.5 (17.5-26.0), 19.8 (16.7-23.5), and 22.0 (18.7-26.2) months, respectively, and 10-year survival probabilities were 13.6%, 7.5%, and 15.2%, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall survival among treatment groups. The 10-year progression-free survival probabilities were 8.5%, 6.5%, and 11.1% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 late toxic effect rates were 3.4% (heart, 0.7%; lung, 2.7%) in group A, and those only affecting the lung represented 3.4% and 4.1% in groups B and C, respectively. No other cases of late toxic effects (grades 3/4) were observed since the initial report.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this 10-year follow-up of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, group C achieved similar efficacy and toxic effect profiles as group A 10 years after initiating treatment. These results serve as a historical control for the long-term comparisons of outcomes of future clinical trials of CRT.

Trial Registration

UMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000030811.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment-related toxicities of curative and palliative radiation therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Treatment-related toxicity is an important component in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management decision-making. Our aim was to evaluate and compare the toxicity rates of curative and palliative radiotherapy with and without chemotherapy. This meta-analysis provides better quantitative estimates of the toxicities compared to individual trials. A systematic review of randomised trials with > 50 unresectable NSCLC patients, treated with curative or palliative conventional radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy. Data was extracted for oesophagitis, pneumonitis, cardiac events, pulmonary fibrosis, myelopathy and neutropenia by any grade, grade ≥ 3 and treatment-related deaths. Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect method was used to obtain pooled risk ratio. Forty-nine trials with 8609 evaluable patients were included. There was significantly less grade ≥ 3 acute oesophagitis (6.4 vs 22.2%, p < 0.0001) and any grade oesophagitis (70.4 vs 79.0%, p = 0.04) for sequential CRT compared to concurrent CRT, with no difference in pneumonitis (grade ≥ 3 or any grade), neutropenia (grade ≥ 3), cardiac events (grade ≥ 3) or treatment-related deaths. Although the rate of toxicity increased with intensification of treatment with RT, the only significant difference between treatment regimens was the rate of oesophagitis between the use of concurrent and sequential CRT. This can aid clinicians in radiotherapy decision making for NSCLC.

Long-term outcomes of high-dose (74 GyE) proton beam therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for stage III nonsmall-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of high-dose (74 GyE) proton beam therapy (PBT) with concurrent chemotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Between July 2007 and March 2018, 45 patients with stage III NSCLC were treated with passive-scattering PBT of 74 GyE and concurrent chemotherapy. Among the 45 patients, the median age was 62 years (range 39-79 years) and 32 patients were men. The clinical stages were stage IIIA in 14 patients and stage IIIB in 31 patients. Thirty-six patients received chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin and vinorelbine.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 42.1 months (range 6.4-127.0 months) for all patients and 63.5 months (range 9.4-127.0 months) for the 12 survivors. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 63.7% and 38.8%, respectively, and the median overall survival was 49.1 months. Over the follow-up period, disease recurrence was observed in 32 (71%) patients. The 3- and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 22.2% and 17.7%, respectively, with a median progression-free survival of 13.1 months. In-field control improved survival and the in-field control rate was better in patients with T0-3 tumors (p = 0.023) and stage IIIA/IIIB-N3 disease (p = 0.030). Dosimetric parameters of the heart and lung were not associated with survival. No grade 4 or 5 acute or late non-hematologic toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Passive-scattering PBT of 74 GyE with chemotherapy showed favorable survival and a low incidence of severe adverse events in patients with stage III NSCLC.

A phase II study of S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy followed by durvalumab for unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan (SAMURAI study)

Background:

Based on the results of the PACIFIC study, chemoradiotherapy followed by 1-year consolidation therapy with durvalumab was established as the standard of care for unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, some topics not foreseen in that design can be explored, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the start of chemoradiotherapy, the proportion of patients who proceeded to consolidation therapy with durvalumab, and the optimal chemotherapeutic regimens. In Japan, the combination regimen of S-1 + cisplatin (SP), for which the results of multiple clinical studies have suggested a good balance of efficacy and tolerability, is frequently selected in clinical settings. However, the efficacy and safety of consolidation therapy with durvalumab following this SP regimen have not been evaluated. We therefore planned a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II study.

Methods:

In treatment-naïve LA-NSCLC, two cycles of combination chemotherapy with S-1 (80–120 mg/body, Days 1–14) + cisplatin (60 mg/m², Day 1) will be administered at an interval of 4 weeks, with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy). Responders will then receive durvalumab every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint is 1-year PFS rate.

Discussion:

Compared with the conventional standard regimen in Japan, the SP regimen is expected to be associated with lower incidences of pneumonitis, esophagitis, and febrile neutropenia, which complicate the initiation of consolidation therapy with durvalumab, and have higher antitumor efficacy during chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, SP-based chemoradiotherapy is expected to be successfully followed by consolidation therapy with durvalumab in more patients, resulting in prolonged PFS and OS. Toxicity and efficacy results of the SP regimen in this study will also provide information important to the future establishment of the concurrent combination of chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab.

Trial registration:

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190127, registered 1 November 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031190127

Incidence and Risk Factors of Symptomatic Radiation Pneumonitis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Consolidation Durvalumab

INTRODUCTION

Data on the risk factors for symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and consolidation durvalumab are limited; we aimed to investigate these risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study, conducted at 15 institutions in Japan, included patients who were ≥20 years of age; who started definitive CCRT for NSCLC between July 1, 2018, and July 31, 2019; and who then received durvalumab. The primary endpoint was grade 2 or worse (grade 2+) RP.

RESULTS

In the 146 patients analyzed, the median follow-up period was 16 months. A majority of the patients had stage III disease (86%), received radiation doses of 60 to 66 Gy equivalent in 2-Gy fractions (93%) and carboplatin and paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel (77%), and underwent elective nodal irradiation (71%) and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (75%). RP grade 2 was observed in 44 patients (30%); grade 3, in four patients (3%); grade 4, in one patient (1%); and grade 5, in one patient (1%). In the multivariable analysis, lung V20 was a significant risk factor, whereas age, sex, smoking history, irradiation technique, and chemotherapy regimen were not. The 12-month grade 2+ RP incidence was 34.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.7%-42.1%); the values were 50.0% (95% CI, 34.7%-63.5%) and 27.1% (95% CI, 18.8%-36.2%) in those with lung V20 ≥ 26% and < 26%, respectively (P = .007).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of grade 2+ RP was relatively high in this multicenter real-world study, and its risk increased remarkably at elevated lung V20. Our findings can aid in RP risk prediction and the safe radiotherapy treatment planning.

Randomized phase II trial of uracil/tegafur and cisplatin versus pemetrexed and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable stage III non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: NJLCG1001

Background

The optimal regimen for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) of locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was not definitive. We conducted randomized phase II study, NJLCG0601, and chemoradiotherapy with uracil/tegafur (UFT) and cisplatin achieved promising efficacy without severe toxicities. Here, we evaluated between this regimen and pemetrexed plus cisplatin in chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-squamous NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with inoperable stage III non-squamous NSCLC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to UFT 400 mg/m² on days 1–14 and 29–42, and cisplatin 80 mg/m² on days 8 and 36 (UP), or cisplatin 75 mg/m² and pemetrexed 500 mg/m² on days 1, 22, and 43 (PP). Involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) underwent from day 1 to a total dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions. Consolidation chemotherapy after CCRT was prohibited for this study. The primary endpoint was defined as 2-year overall survival (OS). This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000003948).

Results

From November 2010 to June 2017, 86 patients were entered from 11 institutions. Median follow-up was 54 months. Of the 85 eligible patients, the 2-year OS rate was 78.6% (95% CI, 62.8–88.3%) in UP and 85.5% (95% CI, 70.5–93.2%) in PP. Median PFS and OS was 12.3 and 64.2 months in UP, 26.2 months and not reached in PP, respectively. Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia was more frequent in the UP group (14.0% vs. 2.0%).

Conclusions

Both UP and PP with IFRT achieved the expected 2-year OS. PP engendered more favorable OS and PFS compared to UP in terms.

Clinical outcomes and radiation pneumonitis after concurrent EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Concurrent epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKI) with radiotherapy in patients with EGFR‐mutant unresectable stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might improve survival. However, both treatments carry a potential risk of pneumonitis.

Methods

Between May 2012 and December 2017, patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent radiotherapy and EGFR‐TKI were enrolled in this retrospective study. The baseline characteristics were evaluated to determine correlations with toxicity development.

Results

Among 45 eligible patients, 20 (44.4%) had an EGFR mutation and 44 (97.8%) received 50–66 Gy of radiotherapy. The median follow‐up was 62.7 months. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with EGFR‐mutations were 27.9 (95% CI: 18.7–37.2) and 49.7 (95% CI: 27.7–71.8) months, and 13.8 (95% CI: 8.8–18.9) and 31.1 (95% CI: 9.8–52.4) months for EGFR wild‐type/unknown patients. A total of 17 patients (37.7%) developed radiation pneumonitis/pneumonitis (14 grade 2, 3 grade 3). In 16 patients, pneumonitis occurred within the radiation field and one patient had bilateral pneumonitis. The median time from the initial radiotherapy to pneumonitis was 74 days. Logistic regression analysis revealed a trend between the time of EGFR‐TKI and the development of G2+ pneumonitis. For late toxicity, only two patients had G2+ fibrosis. The daily dyspnea symptoms of patients with G2+ pneumonitis recovered significantly after the phase of pneumonitis (P = 0.007).

Conclusions

Combined EGFR‐TKI and radiotherapy showed favorable survival in EGFR‐mutant patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC, with a 6.7% incidence of grade 3 radiation pneumonitis/pneumonitis, despite a higher incidence of mild‐to‐moderate radiation pneumonitis.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

We evaluated the outcomes and radiation pneumonitis after EGFR‐TKI during interval radiotherapy. EGFR‐TKI plus radiotherapy increased survival in patients with EGFR‐mutant inoperable stage III NSCLC. The mild‐to‐moderate radiation pneumonitis incidence increased but no grade 4–‐5 adverse events occurred.

What this study adds

The combination of EGFR‐TKI and radiotherapy might carry a risk of pneumonitis; however, there are limited data concerning dose constraints. Our results showed a slightly higher incidence of mild or moderate radiation pneumonitis by strict dose limitation.

Differences in patterns of recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma after radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the differences in patterns of recurrence and treatment results by histology after definitive radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III NSCLC who underwent definitive radiotherapy between 2000 and 2016 in our institution were included. A total of 217 patients were enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to exclude the following confounding factors: (1) age (≥70 years or <70 years), (2) gender, (3) T factor, (4) N factor, (5) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score and (6) smoking status (Brinkman index ≥400 or <400).

RESULTS

The median observation period for survivors was 55.1 months. After propensity score matching, the Sqcc and adenocarcinoma groups each included 62 paired patients. There was no significant difference in OS or PFS between the adenocarcinoma and Sqcc groups. However, rates of recurrence in the GTV-primary site (p = 0.009) and GTV-lymph node site (p = 0.037) were significantly higher in patients with Sqcc than in patients with adenocarcinoma. New metastatic recurrence was more frequent in patients with adenocarcinoma than in patients with Sqcc (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

There were significant differences in patterns of recurrence after definitive (chemo)radiotherapy between patients with Sqcc and patients with adenocarcinoma.

Detection of programmed cell death-ligand 1 using 22C3 antibody in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a biomarker for administering immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer. Although the consolidation therapy of durvalumab after definitive chemoradiotherapy has become the new standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer, the prevalence and prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in this population remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer who received definitive chemoradiotherapy at our institution between 2012 and 2017. Levels of PD-L1 were assessed using 22C3 antibody, and associations of progression-free and overall survival rates with PD-L1 statuses at a tumor proportion score cutoff of 1% were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 104 patients enrolled, PD-L1 statuses were as follows: tumor proportion score < 1%, 73 (70.2%); 1-49%, 21 (20.2%); and ≥ 50%, 10 (9.6%). The number of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer with pretreatment PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 1% was less than the number with advanced stage disease. There was no association between patient characteristics and PD-L1 status, and no significant differences were observed in progression-free and overall survival rates relative to PD-L1 status.

CONCLUSION

Expression of PD-L1 in patients with stage III non-small cell cancer before chemoradiotherapy should be assessed because of the low prevalence of tumors with tumor proportion scores ≥ 1%. Further studies are needed to clarify whether durvalumab improves survival after definitive chemoradiotherapy, irrespective of tumor PD-L1 expression.

Durvalumab for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer and grade 1 radiation pneumonitis following concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Introduction/Background Durvalumab demonstrated a good efficacy and safety in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the PACIFIC trial. Although a history of radiation pneumonitis (RP) has been reported to increase the risk of pneumonitis associated with programmed death-1 inhibitors, the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in patients with baseline Grade 1 RP have not been assessed. Therefore, we carried out a multicenter prospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in these patients. Patients and Methods This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of 35 patients with Grade 1 RP after CCRT and before durvalumab initiation. This study was a first prespecified analysis for the first 20 patients with the primary objective of assessing the short-term safety; it was assessed 3 months after durvalumab initiation. Results Twenty patients were enrolled in this study between March 1, 2019, and September 3, 2019. Three patients (15%) experienced drug-related Grade ≥3 adverse events, while three patients (15%) had Grade ≥2 pneumonitis/RP within 3 months after durvalumab initiation. Three months after durvalumab initiation, all the patients were alive and four patients (20%) experienced disease progression. Conclusion Durvalumab can be a feasible treatment option for patients with stage III NSCLC with baseline Grade 1 RP following CCRT.(Trial registration number: UMIN000036061. The registration period was between March 2019 and December 2019.).

Induction treatment in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises a highly heterogeneous group of patients defined according to the extent and localization of disease. Patients with discrete N2 involvement identified preoperatively with resectable disease are candidates for multimodal therapy either with definitive chemoradiation therapy, induction chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) followed by surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has yielded comparable survival benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II-III disease and may allow for downstaging the tumor or the lymph nodes, an earlier delivery of systemic treatment, and better compliance to systemic therapy. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as induction therapy shows encouraging activity and a favorable safety profile in patients with resectable early stage or locally advanced NSCLC. An unprecedented rate of pathological response and downstaging has been reported in single-arm clinical trials, especially when immunotherapy is combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ongoing randomized phase II/III clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of induction with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy have the potential to establish this therapeutic approach as a novel standard of care. These trials aim to validate pathological response as a surrogate marker of survival benefit and to demonstrate that this therapeutic strategy can improve the cure rate in patients with stage II-III NSCLC.

Bronchoplastic Procedure Versus Pneumonectomy After High-dose Radiation for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies have revealed that salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer improves survival with acceptable surgical adverse events. Few reports exist regarding pneumonectomy or the bronchoplastic procedure in this setting.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2018, 27 patients (21 men; median age, 61 years) underwent salvage surgery after definitive CRT for non-small cell lung cancer. We investigated postoperative short- and long-term outcomes of salvage surgery and aimed to elucidate the feasibility of pneumonectomy or the bronchoplastic procedure.

RESULTS

The median radiation dose was 60 Gy. The median period from the last day for irradiation to the operative day was 8.5 months. Pneumonectomy was performed in 9 patients, including 2 carinal resections; lobectomy was performed in 18 patients, including 5 bronchoplasties. Bronchial wrapping was performed in 9 cases (33%), R0 resection was achieved in 24 (89%), and postoperative complications were detected in 16 (59%). Although bronchopleural fistulas were found in only 2 patients who underwent pneumonectomy, arrhythmia was observed more frequently in patients who underwent the bronchoplastic procedure (P = .05). Regarding major complications, no relationship with any factors were found. The 90-day mortality was 0%. The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival were 63% and 27%, respectively. R0 resection was a good prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative short- and long-term outcomes of salvage surgery after definitive CRT for non-small cell lung cancer were acceptable. Complete resection offered a better recurrence-free survival. The bronchoplastic procedure or pneumonectomy should be considered as an option even after administration of high-dose CRT.

Randomized phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin or docetaxel plus cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Cisplatin‐based chemoradiotherapy is considered standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (LA‐NSCLC). This study examined two regimens of chemotherapy in concurrent chemoradiation. Eligible patients with unresectable, radically irradible LA‐NSCLC were randomized to either the SP (S‐1 and cisplatin) or DP (docetaxel and cisplatin) arms with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy, comprising 2 Gy per daily fraction. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate at 2 years (the 2‐year OS rate). From May 2011 to August 2014, 110 patients were enrolled. Of 106 eligible patients, the 2‐year OS rates were 79% (95% CI: 66%–88%) and 69% (95% CI: 55%–80%) the SP and DP arms, respectively. The median progression‐free survival was 11.6 months for the SP arm and 19.9 months for the DP arm, while the median survival time was 55.2 months for the SP arm and 50.8 months for the DP arm. Grade 3/4 leukopenia were more frequent in DP arm. The incidences of febrile neutropenia and pneumonitis tended to be higher in DP arm. There were no treatment‐related deaths in either arm. The primary endpoint was met in both arms. The SP arm as a future reference regimen will be chosen due to fewer toxicities and better OS.

Efficacy and Toxicity of Different Chemotherapy Protocols for Concurrent Chemoradiation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Secondary Analysis of the PET Plan Trial

Simple Summary

Concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) with a platinum-based doublet, followed by immunotherapy, is the treatment of choice in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A remaining open question is the difference between cisplatin and carboplatin in combination with second and third generation agents for concurrent chemoradiation, as they have a substantially different toxicity profile and data are scarce and inconclusive concerning cCRT. We here present a secondary analysis of the international PET Plan trial in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of different chemotherapy regimens as well as the difference between the commonly used platinum based agents, cisplatin and carboplatin. All regimens were well tolerated and cisplatin in combination with vinorelbin either as a single dose or daily doses per cycle showed comparable efficacy. Patients treated with carboplatin doublets had a worse survival, but after adjusting for possibly relevant factors, this difference became non-significant, probably due to existing selection bias.

Abstract

(1) Background: The optimal chemotherapy (CHT) regimen for concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) is not well defined. In this secondary analysis of the international randomized PET-Plan trial, we evaluate the efficacy of different CHT. (2) Methods: Patients with inoperable NSCLC were randomized at a 1:1 ratio regarding the target volume definition and received isotoxically dose-escalated cCRT using cisplatin 80 mg/m² (day 1, 22) and vinorelbin 15 mg/m² (day 1, 8, 22, 29) (P1) or cisplatin 20 mg/m² (day 1–5, 29–33) and vinorelbin 12.5 mg/m² (day 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43) (P2) or carboplatin AUC1 (day 1–5, 29–33) and vinorelbin 12.5 mg/m² (day 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43) (P3) or other CHT at the treating physician’s discretion. (3) Results: Between 05/2009 and 11/2016, 205 patients were randomized and 172 included in the per-protocol analysis. Patients treated in P1 or P2 had a better overall survival (OS) compared to P3 (p = 0.015, p = 0.01, respectively). Patients treated with carboplatin had a worse OS compared to cisplatin (HR 1.78, p = 0.03), but the difference did not remain significant after adjusting for age, ECOG, cardiac function creatinine and completeness of CHT. (4) Conclusions: Carboplatin doublets show no significant difference compared to cisplatin, after adjusting for possibly relevant factors, probably due to existing selection bias.

A Phase I/II Study of Biweekly Carboplatin and Nab-paclitaxel With Concurrent Radiotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cell cancer (LA-NSCLC). We conducted a phase I/II study of biweekly carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) with radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the phase I part, patients with inoperable stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC were treated with carboplatin (area under the time-concentration curve, 4) and nab-PTX (60-100 mg/m²) on days 1, 15, and 29. Thoracic RT was administered from day 1 to a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. In the phase II part, patients were administered carboplatin and nab-PTX on days 1, 15, and 29 at the recommended dose (RD). The primary endpoint of the phase I part was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the RD. In the phase II part, the primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, and secondary endpoints were the objective response rate, progression-free survival, OS, and safety profile.

RESULTS

In the phase I part, although maximum tolerated dose was not obtained, the RD was carboplatin (area under the time-concentration curve, 4) and nab-PTX (100 mg/m²). Of the evaluable 28 patients, the rate of 2-year OS was 67.8% (95% confidence interval, 49.3%-82.1%). The objective response rate was 96.4%, and the median follow-up time was 33.2 months. The median progression-free survival was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval, 13.1 months to not reached). The most common toxicities of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (60.5%), anemia (14.2%), thrombocytopenia (7.2%), and pneumonitis (3.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study achieved the primary endpoint. Biweekly carboplatin and nab-PTX with concurrent RT was well-tolerated and exerted promising antitumor activity.