Cytokines secreted from adipose tissues mediate tumor proliferation and metastasis in triple negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a high-risk factor for development and poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which was considered as a high malignant and poor clinical outcome breast cancer subtype. TNBC proliferation and migration regulated by obesity is complex. Here, we studied effects of cytokines secreted from adipose tissue on development of TNBC.

METHODS

Forty postmenopausal cases by Yuebei People's Hospital of Shaoguan with stage I/IIA TNBC were enrolled. Cytokine concentrations were examined using ELISA analysis. Proliferation and migration of TNBC cell lines were performed using CCK8 assays and Transwell tests. The Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test, two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test and two-tailed unpaired t test were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.4.2.

RESULTS

Survival analysis indicated that obese patients with TNBC had worse disease free survival (DFS) as compared with normal weight group (Hazard Ratio 4.393, 95% confidence interval (CI) of ratio 1.071-18.02, p < 0.05). Obese patients with TNBC had severe insulin resistance and high plasma triglycerides. However, plasma adiponectin concentration was decreased and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) concentration was increased in obese TNBC patients as compared with the nonobese group. The similar results were found in the cytokine secretion from adipose tissues and insulin-resistant adipocytes. The secretion of adipose tissue from obese TNBC patients could promote proliferation and migration of TNBC cell lines, including MDA-MB-157, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-453 and HCC38 cells. These TNBC cell lines co-incubated with insulin-resistant 3T3-L1 adipocytes or supplementing these cytokines medium also exhibited increase of proliferative and migratory capacity.

CONCLUSION

TNBC patients with obesity had worse prognosis compared with the normal weight groups. Alteration of cytokines secreted from adipose tissues mediated proliferation and migration of TNBC, leading to tumor progression in TNBC patients with obesity.

Identification of putative actionable alterations in clinically relevant genes in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Individualising treatment in breast cancer requires effective predictive biomarkers. While relatively few genomic aberrations are clinically relevant, there is a need for characterising patients across different subtypes to identify actionable alterations.

METHODS

We identified genomic alterations in 49 potentially actionable genes for which drugs are available either clinically or via clinical trials. We explored the landscape of mutations and copy number alterations (CNAs) in actionable genes in seven breast cancer subtypes utilising The Cancer Genome Atlas. To dissect the genomic complexity, we analysed the patterns of co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity in actionable genes.

RESULTS

We found that >30% of tumours harboured putative actionable events that are targetable by currently available drugs. We identified genes that had multiple targetable alterations, representing candidate targets for combination therapy. Genes predicted to be drivers in primary breast tumours fell into five categories: mTOR pathway, immune checkpoints, oestrogen signalling, tumour suppression and DNA damage repair. Our analysis also revealed that CNAs in 34/49 (69%) and mutations in 13/49 (26%) genes were significantly associated with gene expression, validating copy number events as a dominant oncogenic mechanism in breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

These results may enable the acceleration of personalised therapy and improve clinical outcomes in breast cancer.

A phase 2 study of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus temozolomide in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors such as veliparib are potent sensitizing agents and have been safely combined with DNA-damaging agents such as temozolomide. The sensitizing effects of PARP inhibitors are magnified when cells harbor DNA repair defects.

METHODS

A single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study was performed to investigate the disease control rate (DCR) after 2 cycles of veliparib plus temozolomide in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to all standard therapies. Fifty patients received temozolomide (150 mg/m² /d) on days 1 to 5 and veliparib (40 mg twice daily) on days 1 to 7 of each 28-day cycle. Another 5 patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors were also enrolled. Twenty additional patients were then treated with temozolomide at 200 mg/m² /d. Archived tumor specimens were used for immunohistochemistry to assess mismatch repair, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN), and O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) protein expression levels.

RESULTS

The combination was well tolerated, although some patients required dose reductions for myelosuppression. The primary endpoint was successfully met with a DCR of 24% and 2 confirmed partial responses. The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months, and the median overall survival was 6.6 months. PTEN protein expression and MGMT protein expression were not predictors of DCR. There was also a suggestion of worse outcomes for patients with dMMR tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this heavily pretreated mCRC population, a combination of veliparib and temozolomide was well tolerated with temozolomide doses up to 200 mg/m² /d, and it was clinically active. PARP inhibitor-based therapy merits further exploration in patients with mCRC. Cancer 2018;124:2337-46. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

BRCA1-Mutated Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Shows BRCAness, Suggesting Sensitivity to Drugs Targeting Homologous Recombination Deficiency

Purpose: As estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers arises at an older age with less aggressive tumor characteristics than ER-negative (ER^-) BRCA1-mutated breast cancer, it has been suggested that these tumors are "sporadic" and not BRCA1 driven. With the introduction of targeted treatments specific for tumors with a nonfunctioning BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, the question whether the BRCA genes are impaired in the tumor is highly relevant. Therefore, we performed genomic profiling of BRCA1-mutated ER⁺ tumors.Experimental Design: Genomic profiling, BRCA1 promoter methylation assessment, and loss of heterozygosity analysis were done on 16 BRCA1-mutated ER⁺ tumors. Results were compared with 57 BRCA1-mutated ER^- tumors, 36 BRCA2-mutated ER⁺-associated tumors, and 182 sporadic ER⁺ tumors.Results: The genomic profile of BRCA1-mutated ER⁺ tumors was different from BRCA1-mutated ER^- breast tumors, but highly similar to BRCA2-mutated ER⁺ tumors. In 83% of the BRCA1-mutated ER⁺ tumors, loss of the wild-type BRCA1 allele was observed. In addition, clinicopathologic variables in BRCA1-mutated ER⁺ cancer were also more similar to BRCA2-mutated ER⁺ and sporadic ER⁺ breast cancer than to BRCA1-mutated ER^- cancers.Conclusions: As BRCA1-mutated ER⁺ tumors show a BRCAness copy number profile and LOH, it is likely that the loss of a functional BRCA1 protein plays a role in tumorigenesis in BRCA1-mutated ER⁺ tumors. Therefore, we hypothesize that these tumors are sensitive to drugs targeting the BRCA1 gene defect, providing new targeted treatment modalities for advanced BRCA-deficient, ER⁺ breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 23(5); 1236-41. ©2016 AACR.

Triple negative breast cancer: clinical characteristics in the different histological subtypes

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical behavior of triple negative breast cancer (TNC), including age distribution, occurrence of LN (lymph node) invasion and prognosis in different histological subtypes.

METHODS

For this cohort study we used data on 476 patients with newly diagnosed TNC at the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium) between 1999 and 2009. Of these, 395 received upfront surgery, 68 neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 21 had metastases at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Apocrine and invasive lobular TNC occur more often in older patients compared to IDC-NOS. Of the primarily operated patients with TNC, 35.1% has pathological LN involvement. There were no significant differences in nodal invasion between different histological subtypes, but most subtypes contained few patients. In contrast to previous reports, 6/14 of apocrine TNC had LN involvement. Disease free survival (DFS) was different in different histological subtypes, but group sizes were insufficient to be able to draw firm conclusions. Within the histologically 'homogeneous' IDC-NOS group with primary surgery and outcome data (n = 300), DFS with 3.5 year median follow-up decreased with increasing age, but chemotherapy and radiotherapy were much less frequently given with increasing age. In multivariable analysis, lower age, presence of LN involvement, lack of administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy were significant predictors of relapse.

CONCLUSION

TNC is not a uniform disease. Different histological subtypes have different age distribution and behavior. The prognosis of the most common histological subgroup, IDC-NOS, is better in older patients, but this is counterbalanced by significantly decreased use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Novel agents and future directions for refractory breast cancer

Tumor resistance remains a major clinical challenge. Numerous pathways are under investigation to determine how best to target therapies to specific mutations in tumor biology and circumvent resistance. Agents in development include inhibitors of the poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) pathway, such as iniparib, olaparib, and veliparib; the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitor everolimus; and the Src family tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib. Research is ongoing to determine whether patients with specific biochemical attributes, such as the presence of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, will have a better response to targeted therapy and whether targeted agents act synergistically with chemotherapeutic agents.

The macro domain protein family: structure, functions, and their potential therapeutic implications

Macro domains are ancient, highly evolutionarily conserved domains that are widely distributed throughout all kingdoms of life. The 'macro fold' is roughly 25kDa in size and is composed of a mixed α-β fold with similarity to the P loop-containing nucleotide triphosphate hydrolases. They function as binding modules for metabolites of NAD(+), including poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR), which is synthesized by PAR polymerases (PARPs). Although there is a high degree of sequence similarity within this family, particularly for residues that might be involved in catalysis or substrates binding, it is likely that the sequence variation that does exist among macro domains is responsible for the specificity of function of individual proteins. Recent findings have indicated that macro domain proteins are functionally promiscuous and are implicated in the regulation of diverse biological functions, such as DNA repair, chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation. Significant advances in the field of macro domain have occurred in the past few years, including biological insights and the discovery of novel signaling pathways. To provide a framework for understanding these recent findings, this review will provide a comprehensive overview of the known and proposed biochemical, cellular and physiological roles of the macro domain family. Recent data that indicate a critical role of macro domain regulation for the proper progression of cellular differentiation programs will be discussed. In addition, the effect of dysregulated expression of macro domain proteins will be considered in the processes of tumorigenesis and bacterial pathogenesis. Finally, a series of observations will be highlighted that should be addressed in future efforts to develop macro domains as effective therapeutic targets.

Molecular classification of gastric cancer: a new paradigm

PURPOSE

Gastric cancer may be subdivided into 3 distinct subtypes--proximal, diffuse, and distal gastric cancer--based on histopathologic and anatomic criteria. Each subtype is associated with unique epidemiology. Our aim is to test the hypothesis that these distinct gastric cancer subtypes may also be distinguished by gene expression analysis.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma being screened for a phase II preoperative clinical trial (National Cancer Institute, NCI #5917) underwent endoscopic biopsy for fresh tumor procurement. Four to 6 targeted biopsies of the primary tumor were obtained. Macrodissection was carried out to ensure more than 80% carcinoma in the sample. HG-U133A GeneChip (Affymetrix) was used for cDNA expression analysis, and all arrays were processed and analyzed using the Bioconductor R-package.

RESULTS

Between November 2003 and January 2006, 57 patients were screened to identify 36 patients with localized gastric cancer who had adequate RNA for expression analysis. Using supervised analysis, we built a classifier to distinguish the 3 gastric cancer subtypes, successfully classifying each into tightly grouped clusters. Leave-one-out cross-validation error was 0.14, suggesting that more than 85% of samples were classified correctly. Gene set analysis with the false discovery rate set at 0.25 identified several pathways that were differentially regulated when comparing each gastric cancer subtype to adjacent normal stomach.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtypes of gastric cancer that have epidemiologic and histologic distinctions are also distinguished by gene expression data. These preliminary data suggest a new classification of gastric cancer with implications for improving our understanding of disease biology and identification of unique molecular drivers for each gastric cancer subtype.

C12orf48, termed PARP-1 binding protein, enhances poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) activity and protects pancreatic cancer cells from DNA damage

To identify novel therapeutic targets for aggressive and therapy-resistant pancreatic cancer, we had previously performed expression profile analysis of pancreatic cancers using microarrays and found dozens of genes trans-activated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells. Among them, this study focused on the characterization of a novel gene C12orf48 whose overexpression in PDAC cells was validated by Northern blot and immunohistochemical analysis. Its overexpression was observed in other aggressive and therapy-resistant malignancies as well. Knockdown of C12orf48 by siRNA in PDAC cells significantly suppressed their growth. Importantly, we demonstrated that C12orf48 protein could directly interact with Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP-1), one of the essential proteins in the repair of DNA damage, and positively regulate the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation activity of PARP-1. Depletion of C12orf48 sensitized PDAC cells to agents causing DNA damage and also enhanced DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest through reduction of PARP-1 enzymatic activities. Hence, our findings implicate C12orf48, termed PARP-1 binding protein (PARPBP), or its interaction with PARP-1 to be a potential molecular target for development of selective therapy for pancreatic cancer.

BARD1 homozygous deletion, a possible alternative to BRCA1 mutation in basal breast cancer

Hereditary breast cancers (BCs) are incompletely explained by BRCA genes abnormalities, as ∼70% of them are not associated with known genetic alterations. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) of tumors provides an opportunity for identifying new BC susceptibility genes. By analyzing our database of high-resolution aCGH profiles of 330 BCs, we identified a case with homozygous deletion of the entire BARD1 gene. The BARD1-deleted case displayed a familial history of BC and other clinico-pathological features of BRCAness, and a 17% probability of BRCA1/2 mutation. Analysis of constitutional DNA showed a BARD1 germline heterozygous deletion without BRCA1/2 mutation. Gene expression analysis using DNA microarrays classified the tumor as basal-like, with very low BARD1 and ID4 expression, but high expression of BRCA1, RAD51, PARP1, CHEK1, and FANCA. The tumor displayed a BRCA1-mutated expression profile. This is the first report of a non-BRCA1/2-mutated BC with somatic homozygous and germ-line heterozygous deletion of the entire BARD1 gene. This observation suggests that BARD1 might be a BC susceptibility gene that follows the Knudson rule. Identification of BARD1 deletion could have clinical applications including screening for hereditary forms. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Minireview: Basal-like breast cancer: from molecular profiles to targeted therapies

The classification of breast cancer into molecular subtypes with distinctive gene expression signatures that predict treatment response and prognosis has ushered in a new era of personalized medicine for this remarkably heterogeneous and deadly disease. Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) is a particularly aggressive molecular subtype defined by a robust cluster of genes expressed by epithelial cells in the basal or outer layer of the adult mammary gland. BLBC is a major clinical challenge because these tumors are prevalent in young woman, often relapsing rapidly. Additionally, most (but not all) basal-like tumors lack expression of steroid hormone receptors (estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, limiting targeted therapeutic options for these predominantly triple-negative breast cancers. This minireview will focus on new insights into the molecular etiology of these poor-prognosis tumors that underlie their intrinsic genomic instability, deregulated cell proliferation and apoptosis, and invasive tumor biology. We will also review ongoing efforts to translate these fundamental insights into improved therapies for women with BLBC.

Clinical implications of the cancer genome

Cancer is a disease of the genome. Most tumors harbor a constellation of structural genomic alterations that may dictate their clinical behavior and treatment response. Whereas elucidating the nature and importance of these genomic alterations has been the goal of cancer biologists for several decades, ongoing global genome characterization efforts are revolutionizing both tumor biology and the optimal paradigm for cancer treatment at an unprecedented scope. The pace of advance has been empowered, in large part, through disruptive technological innovations that render complete cancer genome characterization feasible on a large scale. This article highlights cardinal biologic and clinical insights gleaned from systematic cancer genome characterization. We also discuss how the convergence of cancer genome biology, technology, and targeted therapeutics articulates a cohesive framework for the advent of personalized cancer medicine.

Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease in terms of histology, therapeutic response, dissemination patterns to distant sites, and patient outcomes. Global gene expression analyses using high‐throughput technologies have helped to explain much of this heterogeneity and provided important new classifications of cancer patients. In the last decade, genomic studies have established five breast cancer intrinsic subtypes (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2‐enriched, Claudin‐low, Basal‐like) and a Normal Breast‐like group. In this review, we dissect the most recent data on this genomic classification of breast cancer with a special focus on the Claudin‐low subtype, which appears enriched for mesenchymal and stem cell features. In addition, we discuss how the combination of standard clinical‐pathological markers with the information provided by these genomic entities might help further understand the biological complexity of this disease, increase the efficacy of current and novel therapies, and ultimately improve outcomes for breast cancer patients.

Pilot Study Using Molecular Profiling of Patients' Tumors to Find Potential Targets and Select Treatments for Their Refractory Cancers

Purpose

To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) using a treatment regimen selected by molecular profiling (MP) of a patient's tumor with the PFS for the most recent regimen on which the patient had experienced progression (ie, patient as his own control).

Patients and Methods

Patients with refractory metastatic cancer had tissue samples submitted for MP in two formats including formalin-fixed tissue for immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization assays and immediately frozen tissue for oligonucleotide microarray (MA) gene expression assays (all performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [ CLIA ] –certified laboratory). The MP approach was deemed of clinical benefit for the individual patient who had a PFS ratio (PFS on MP-selected therapy/PFS on prior therapy) of ≥ 1.3.

Results

In 86 patients who had MP attempted, there was a molecular target detected in 84 (98%). Sixty-six of the 84 patients were treated according to MP results. Eighteen (27%) of 66 patients had a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3 (95% CI, 17% to 38%; one-sided, one-sample P = .007). Therefore, the null hypothesis (that ≤ 15% of this patient population would have a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3) was rejected.

Conclusion

It is possible to identify molecular targets in patients' tumors from nine different centers across the United States. In 27% of patients, the MP approach resulted in a longer PFS on an MP-suggested regimen than on the regimen on which the patient had just experienced progression. Issues to be considered in interpretation of this study include limited prior experience with patients as their own controls as a study end point and overall patient attrition.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 mRNA expression in human breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Although poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibition is a recent promising therapy in breast cancer, PARP1 expression in this disease is not known. Using DNA microarray and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH), we examined PARP1 mRNA expression and copy number alterations in 326 invasive breast cancer samples and normal breast (NB) samples. A meta-analysis was performed on a large public retrospective gene expression data set (n = 2,485) to analyze correlation between PARP1 mRNA expression and molecular subtypes and clinico-pathological parameters. PARP1 was overexpressed in 58% of cancers, and its expression was heterogeneous between tumors. ArrayCGH data revealed an association between mRNA overexpression and gain/amplification at the PARP1 locus (P < 1.0E-8). Meta-analysis showed that PARP1 expression was higher in basal breast cancers (P < 1.0E-72), but overexpression was also found in other subtypes. PARP1 expression correlated with high grade, medullary histological type, tumor size, and worse metastasis-free survival (MFS; HR = 1.12 [1.04-1.22], P = 0.004) and overall survival (OS; HR = 1.16 [1.04-1.29], P = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, PARP1 expression had an independent prognostic value for MFS, which was restricted to patients untreated with any adjuvant chemotherapy. These data demonstrate overexpression of PARP1 in a large number of breast cancers and support the development of PARP inhibitors in basal subtype, but also potentially in other breast cancer subtypes.

A phase II trial of oxaliplatin and trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

We investigated the feasibility/efficacy of oxaliplatin in combination with trastuzumab as first-/second-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients received oxaliplatin/trastuzumab every 21 days and were evaluated every 6 weeks using RECIST criteria. The study closed early due to slow accrual. Twenty-five patients were evaluable; of these, 5 (20%) had objective responses to oxaliplatin/trastuzumab. Therapy was well tolerated (no grade-4 and gastrointestinal grade-3 toxicity in 4% of patients), but had only modest activity (median time-to-progression 1.8 months). Substitution of oxaliplatin for cisplatin or carboplatin, in combination with trastuzumab, does not appear to improve first-/second-line therapy in HER2-positive MBC.

Triple-negative breast cancer

Perou's molecular classification defines tumors that neither express hormone receptors nor overexpress HER2 as triple-negative (TN) tumors. These tumors account for approximately 15% of breast cancers. The so-called basaloid tumors are not always synonymous with TN tumors; they differ in the fact that they express different molecular markers, have a higher histologic grade, and have a worse prognosis. Clinically they occur in younger women as interval cancer, and the risk of recurrence is higher within the first 3 years. Distant recurrences in the brain and visceral metastases are more common than in hormone receptor-positive tumors. Therapeutically, despite being highly chemosensitive, their progression-free time is generally short. In terms of chemotherapeutic treatment, anthracyclines and taxanes are useful drugs, and high response rates have been described for the combination of ixabepilone-capecitabine and platinums. The combination with antiangiogenic drugs has also proven useful. A group of new drugs, poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase inhibitors, showed favorable results in TN tumors with BRCA mutation. There are currently several ongoing studies with new drugs including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, c-kit inhibitors, Raf/Mek/Map kinase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors.

Present and future evolution of advanced breast cancer therapy

Although the introduction of novel therapies and drug combinations has improved the prognosis of metastatic breast cancer, the disease remains incurable. Increased knowledge of the biology and the molecular alterations in breast cancer has facilitated the design of targeted therapies. These agents include receptor and nonreceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (epidermal growth factor receptor family), intracellular signaling pathways (phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase, AKT, mammalian target of rapamycin) angiogenesis inhibitors and agents that interfere with DNA repair (poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors). In the present review, we present the most promising studies of these new targeted therapies and novel combinations of targeted therapies with cytotoxic agents.

Synthetic lethal approaches to breast cancer therapy

The promise of personalized therapy for breast cancer is that therapeutic efficacy will be increased while toxic effects are reduced to a minimum. To achieve this goal, there is now an emphasis on the design of therapies that are based not only on the clinical manifestations of the disease, but also on the underlying molecular and cellular biology of cancer. However, identifying targets for personalized therapies in breast cancer is challenging. Here, we describe how biological concepts such as synthetic lethality and oncogene addiction can be used to identify new therapeutic targets and approaches. We discuss the current clinical developments in implementing synthetic lethality therapies, and highlight new ways in which this approach could be used to target specific subsets of breast cancer.

Hereditary ovarian cancer: biology, response to chemotherapy and prognosis

Recent evidence has indicated that the prognosis of women with epithelial ovarian cancer who are BRCA-mutation carriers may be better than for noncarriers. Part of the explanation is a higher sensitivity to platinum and other chemotherapies, as was demonstrated in in vitro studies, as well as a possible different biology. BRCA genes are important in double-strand DNA break repair and in other important processes of the cell cycle. Mutation or reduced activity of BRCA genes leads to a higher vulnerability to DNA damage (caused by chemotherapy and radiotherapy) compared with malignant tumors of noncarriers. New targeted drugs, such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and -2 inhibitors, are currently under investigation, as are new biomarkers that will hopefully lead the way to better treatment and longer survival. Testing for the BRCA mutation should be carried out and used as a guide for therapy in most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?

This Review outlines the understanding and management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC shares morphological and genetic abnormalities with basal-like breast cancer (BLBC), a subgroup of breast cancer defined by gene-expression profiling. However, TNBC and BLBC tumors are heterogeneous and overlap is incomplete. Breast cancers found in BRCA1 mutation carriers are also frequently triple negative and basal like. TNBC and BLBC occur most frequently in young women, especially African Americans, and tend to exhibit aggressive, metastatic behavior. These tumors respond to conventional chemotherapy but relapse more frequently than hormone receptor-positive, luminal subtypes and have a worse prognosis. New systemic therapies are urgently needed as most patients with TNBC and/or BLBC relapse with distant metastases, and hormonal therapies and HER2-targeted agents are ineffective in this group of tumors. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors, EGFR-targeted agents, and src kinase and mTOR inhibitors are among the therapeutic agents being actively investigated in clinical trials in patients with TNBC and/or BRCA1-associated tumors. Increased understanding of the genetic abnormalities involved in the pathogenesis of TNBC, BLBC and BRCA1-associated tumors is opening up new therapeutic possibilities for these hard-to-treat breast cancers.

Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibition: "targeted" therapy for triple-negative breast cancer

In contrast to endocrine-sensitive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, novel agents capable of treating advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are lacking. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are emerging as one of the most promising "targeted" therapeutics to treat TNBC, with the intended "target" being DNA repair. PARPs are a family of enzymes involved in multiple cellular processes, including DNA repair. TNBC shares multiple clinico-pathologic features with BRCA-mutated breast cancers, which harbor dysfunctional DNA repair mechanisms. Investigators hypothesized that PARP inhibition, in conjunction with the loss of DNA repair via BRCA-dependent mechanisms, would result in synthetic lethality and augmented cell death. This hypothesis has borne out in both preclinical models and in clinical trials testing PARP inhibitors in both BRCA-deficient and triple-negative breast cancer. The focus of this review includes an overview of the preclinical rationale for evaluating PARP inhibitors in TNBC, the presumed mechanism of action of this novel therapeutic class, promising results from several influential clinical trials of PARP inhibition in advanced breast cancer (both TNBC and BRCA deficient), proposed mechanisms of acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors, and, finally, concludes with current challenges and future directions for the development of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase as a novel therapeutic target in cancer

Cancer chemotherapy exploits limitations in repairing DNA damage in order to kill proliferating malignant cells. Recent evidence suggests that cancers within and across tissue types have specific defects in DNA repair pathways, and that these defects may predispose for sensitivity and resistance to various classes of cytotoxic agents. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and BRCA proteins are central to the repair of DNA strand breaks and, when defective, lead to the accumulation of mutations introduced by error-prone DNA repair. Breast, ovarian, and other cancers develop in the setting of BRCA deficiency, and these cancers may be more sensitive to cytotoxic agents that induce DNA strand breaks, as well as inhibitors of PARP activity. A series of recent clinical trials has tested whether PARP inhibitors can achieve synthetic lethality in BRCA-pathway-deficient tumors. Future studies must seek to identify sporadic cancers that harbor genomic instability, rendering susceptibility to agents that induce additional and lethal DNA damage.

DNA damage and repair in translational oncology: an overview

Unknown to early investigators, DNA damage and repair has been a major focus of anticancer therapy from the beginning of clinical oncology. From the early days of using x-irradiation, to the development of nitrogen mustard analogs, to today's more sophisticated approaches, DNA damage and repair has strongly impacted our ability to successfully treat human malignancy. This area of basic, translational, and clinical science is very broad. The traditional focus of DNA damage and repair has been on diseases such as Xeroderma pigmentosum, and attempting to understand the basic molecular mechanisms of DNA repair processes. It is only recently that we have begun to appreciate how we might modulate these processes to improve our ability to advance cancer care. No fewer than 10 separate DNA repair processes are operative in higher organisms, and the total number of separable processes could be substantially higher. Some of our most useful clinical agents depend on causing DNA damage that is repaired by nucleotide excision repair. X-irradiation induces damage that is mostly repaired by base excision repair and double-strand break repair. We are now learning how to modulate select DNA repair pathways to benefit patients with breast cancer and other malignancies.

Histone gammaH2AX and poly(ADP-ribose) as clinical pharmacodynamic biomarkers

Tumor cells are often deficient in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, and anticancer therapies are commonly based on genotoxic treatments using radiation and/or drugs that damage DNA directly or interfere with DNA metabolism, leading to the formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), and ultimately to cell death. Because DSBs induce the phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX) in the chromatin flanking the break site, an antibody directed against γH2AX can be employed to measure DNA damage levels before and after patient treatment. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP1 and PARP2) are also activated by DNA damage, and PARP inhibitors show promising activity in cancers with defective homologous recombination (HR) pathways for DSB repair. Ongoing clinical trials are testing combinations of PARP inhibitors with DNA damaging agents. Poly(ADP-ribosylation), abbreviated as PAR, can be measured in clinical samples and used to determine the efficiency of PARP inhibitors. This review summarizes the roles of γH2AX and PAR in the DDR, and their use as biomarkers to monitor drug response and guide clinical trials, especially phase 0 clinical trials. We also discuss the choices of relevant samples for γH2AX and PAR analyses.

Perspective on the pipeline of drugs being developed with modulation of DNA damage as a target

Inhibitors of various elements of the DNA repair pathways have entered clinical development or are in late preclinical stages of drug development. It was initially considered that agents targeting DNA repair would act to overcome tumor resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. More recent data have shown that targeting DNA repair pathways can be effective in selected tumors via a synthetically lethal route, with single agent activity having been shown with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. An increased understanding of the biology and interaction of the DNA repair pathways also means that rational combination of DNA repair inhibitors may also give great benefit in the clinic.

Emerging targeted therapies for breast cancer

Increased understanding of the molecular events involved in cancer development has led to the identification of a large number of novel targets and, in parallel, to the development of multiple approaches to anticancer therapy. Targeted therapy focuses on specific molecules in the malignant cell signal transduction machinery, including crucial molecules involved in cell invasion, metastasis, apoptosis, cell-cycle control, and tumor-related angiogenesis. In breast cancer, two new targeted agents have recently been approved: lapatinib, directed against the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2); and bevacizumab, directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Multiple other targeted agents are under evaluation in clinical trials, including inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), dual EGFR and HER2 inhibitors, other VEGF or VEGF-receptor inhibitors, and agents that alter crucial signaling pathways, such as RAS/MEK/ERK; phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt/ mammalian target of rapamycin; insulin-like growth factor/insulin-like growth factor receptor; poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1; and others. In this review, we present the most promising studies of these new targeted therapies and novel combinations of targeted therapies with traditional cytotoxic agents.

Dose-dense chemotherapy for breast cancer: what does the future hold?

Within the last several decades adjuvant polychemotherapy for breast cancer has evolved with the development of anthracyclines and taxanes. Parallel to these developments, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support has permitted the safe delivery of chemotherapy at shorter (‘dose-dense’) intertreatment intervals, which, as predicted by preclinical models, has further improved survival. Recently, insights into tumor biology have led the development of targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab for HER2-positive disease, and this has now been successfully incorporated into dose-dense therapy. Newer targeted agents may be similarly incorporated into dose-dense regimens to further improve patient outcomes. This article reviews dose-dense therapy and discusses its role as a chemotherapy foundation for additional targeted agents.

Novel targets for pancreatic cancer therapy

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA) is one of the cancers that is resistant to most conventional anticancer therapies. PDA-affected patients show a poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rate for PDA is 5% and has changed little over the past few decades. This has prompted extensive research to identify new agents that can be used for anticancer therapy. The only cytotoxic drug that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is gemcitabine, which offers marginal benefits to patients in terms of symptom control and prolongation of life. Various strategies like targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor pathway have been researched upon. But these strategies have not provided promising results and none of the FDA-approved targeted agents have added any substantial clinical benefit to gemcitabine except for a marginal benefit from erlotinib. This article discusses various possible new targets and new agents for the anticancer therapy for PDA.

Poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibition: frequent durable responses in BRCA carrier ovarian cancer correlating with platinum-free interval

PURPOSE

Selective tumor cell cytotoxicity can be achieved through a synthetic lethal strategy using poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in whom tumor cells have defective homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. Platinum-based chemotherapy responses correlate with HR DNA repair capacity. Olaparib is a potent, oral PARP inhibitor that is well tolerated, with antitumor activity in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with BRCA1/2-mutated ovarian cancer were treated with olaparib within a dose-escalation and single-stage expansion of a phase I trial. Antitumor activity was subsequently correlated with platinum sensitivity.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were treated: 48 had germline BRCA1/2 mutations; one had a BRCA2 germline sequence change of unknown significance, and another had a strong family history of BRCA1/2-associated cancers who declined mutation testing. Of the 50 patients, 13 had platinum-sensitive disease, 24 had platinum-resistant disease, and 13 had platinum-refractory disease (according to platinum-free interval). Twenty (40%; 95% CI, 26% to 55%) achieved Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) complete or partial responses and/or tumor marker (CA125) responses, and three (6.0%) maintained RECIST disease stabilization for more than 4 months, giving an overall clinical benefit rate of 46% (95% CI, 32% to 61%). Median response duration was 28 weeks. There was a significant association between the clinical benefit rate and platinum-free interval across the platinum-sensitive, resistant, and refractory subgroups (69%, 45%, and 23%, respectively). Post hoc analyses indicated associations between platinum sensitivity and extent of olaparib response (radiologic change, P = .001; CA125 change, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Olaparib has antitumor activity in BRCA1/2 mutation ovarian cancer, which is associated with platinum sensitivity.