Nilotinib in a patient with postnecrotic liver cirrhosis related to imatinib

Liver Pathology Related to Onco-Therapeutic Agents

Oncotherapeutic agents can cause a wide range of liver injuries from elevated liver functions tests to fulminant liver failure. In this review, we emphasize a newer generation of drugs including immune checkpoint inhibitors, protein kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and hormonal therapy. A few conventional chemotherapy agents are also discussed.

Hepatotoxicity of FDA-approved small molecule kinase inhibitors

Introduction: Given their importance in cellular processes and association with numerous diseases, protein kinases have emerged as promising targets for drugs. The FDA has approved greater than fifty small molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs) since 2001. Nevertheless, severe hepatotoxicity and related fatal cases have grown as a potential challenge in the advancement of these drugs, and the identification and diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are thorny problems for clinicians.Areas covered: This article summarizes the progression and analyzes the significant features in the study of SMKI hepatotoxicity, including clinical observations and investigations of the underlying mechanisms.Expert opinion: The understanding of SMKI-associated hepatotoxicity relies on the development of preclinical models and improvement of clinical assessment. With a full understanding of the role of inflammation in DILI and the mediating role of cytokines in inflammation, cytokines are promising candidates as sensitive and specific biomarkers for DILI. The emergence of three-dimensional spheroid models demonstrates potential use in providing clinically relevant data and predicting hepatotoxicity of SMKIs.

Novel Score-based Decision Approach in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients After Acute Toxic Imatinib-induced Liver Injury

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib in rare cases can cause acute toxic hepatitis, hepatic failure, and death. Currently, the choice of further chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy in patients after acute hepatotoxicity is still a difficult question, which requires a complex individual approach based on the clinical guidelines of adverse event management. Data about the further follow-up strategy approach in patients with CML after acute toxic imatinib-induced liver injury are of concern, and at times controversial. In addition, one of the questions is about the necessity and safety of the imatinib therapy resumption after acute hepatotoxicity. In some publications, imatinib resumption without the recurrence of hepatotoxicity has been discussed; in others, imatinib resumption with the recurrence of imatinib hepatotoxicity has been mentioned. There are a few publications about the experience of administration of the second-line TKIs after acute imatinib hepatotoxicity. There are no clear data on which factors the physician's decision should be based on in patients with CML after acute toxic imatinib-induced liver injury. Imatinib should be restarted or withdrawn, when and for whom second-line therapy should be started. The physician's decision is usually based on the published data of similar cases, personal experience, and the severity of hepatotoxicity. We have discussed the clinical guidelines devoted to the peculiarities of the patient's management after acute toxic imatinib-induced hepatitis and main strategy approaches. A complex score-based decision algorithm for choosing the further strategy approach after acute toxic imatinib-induced hepatitis in patients with CML has been presented. The following parameters should be assessed: the grade of hepatotoxicity reaction, the presence of liver transplantation or imatinib-induced liver cirrhosis and its possible pathogenetic mechanism, the presence of early molecular response (EMR) to imatinib therapy defined as three-month BCR-ABL1 ≤10% according to the international scale (BCR-ABL1^IS ) or/and six-month BCR-ABL1 ^IS <1%; and the presence of the offender concomitant drug that probably caused the drug interaction with imatinib and the presence of viral hepatitis reactivation identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

The use of SAMe in chemotherapy-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains the most common cause of acute liver failure in the Western world. Chemotherapy is one of the major class of drugs most frequently associated with idiosyncratic DILI. For this reason, patients who receive chemotherapy require careful assessment of liver function prior to treatment to determine which drugs may not be appropriate and which drug doses should be modified. S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) is an endogenous agent derived from methionine. Its supplementation is effective in the treatment of liver disease, in particular intrahepatic cholestasis (IHC). The target of this review is to analyze the mechanisms of hepatotoxicity of the principal anticancer agents and the role of SAMe in the prevention of this complication.

[Hepatotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Mechanisms involved and practical implications]

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used for the targeted treatment of solid cancers. TKIs produce a variable incidence of liver adverse events (5-25%) which can progress to severe liver injury in a minority of patients if treatment is maintained despite ongoing injury. This risk requires careful patient management to maintain treatment benefit without harm. This review highlights the various mechanisms of idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity, the formation of reactive metabolites and how this leads to toxicity. These critical events depend of the drug-specific characteristics of each TKI and the patient risk factors, especially genetic characterization. With improved understanding of the mechanisms leading to hepatotoxicity, several strategies have been adopted to prevent or treat this side effect. Recommendations on liver function liver test monitoring have been proposed according to each TKI.

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia

Most reports on chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) focus on efficacy, particularly on molecular response and outcome. In contrast, adverse events (AEs) are often reported as infrequent, minor, tolerable and manageable, but they are increasingly important as therapy is potentially lifelong and multiple TKIs are available. For this reason, the European LeukemiaNet panel for CML management recommendations presents an exhaustive and critical summary of AEs emerging during CML treatment, to assist their understanding, management and prevention. There are five major conclusions. First, the main purpose of CML treatment is the antileukemic effect. Suboptimal management of AEs must not compromise this first objective. Second, most patients will have AEs, usually early, mostly mild to moderate, and which will resolve spontaneously or are easily controlled by simple means. Third, reduction or interruption of treatment must only be done if optimal management of the AE cannot be accomplished in other ways, and frequent monitoring is needed to detect resolution of the AE as early as possible. Fourth, attention must be given to comorbidities and drug interactions, and to new events unrelated to TKIs that are inevitable during such a prolonged treatment. Fifth, some TKI-related AEs have emerged which were not predicted or detected in earlier studies, maybe because of suboptimal attention to or absence from the preclinical data. Overall, imatinib has demonstrated a good long-term safety profile, though recent findings suggest underestimation of symptom severity by physicians. Second and third generation TKIs have shown higher response rates, but have been associated with unexpected problems, some of which could be irreversible. We hope these recommendations will help to minimise adverse events, and we believe that an optimal management of them will be rewarded by better TKI compliance and thus better CML outcomes, together with better quality of life.

Drug-induced hepatotoxicity in cancer patients - implication for treatment

INTRODUCTION

All anticancer drugs can cause idiosyncratic liver injury. Therefore, hepatoprotective agents assume particular importance to preserve liver function. Hepatic injury represents 10% of cases of acute hepatitis in adults; drug-related damage is still misjudged because of relative clinical underestimation and difficult differential diagnosis. Chemotherapeutic agents can produce liver toxicity through different pathways, resulting in different categories of liver injuries, but these drugs are not homogeneously hepatotoxic. Frequently, anticancer-induced hepatotoxicity is idiosyncratic and influenced by multiple factors.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this paper is to perform a review of the literature regarding anticancer-induced liver toxicity. We described hepatotoxicity mechanisms of principal anticancer agents and respective dose reductions. Furthermore, we reviewed studies on hepatoprotectors and their optimal use. Tiopronin, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate and S-Adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) demonstrated, in some small studies, a potential hepatoprotective activity.

EXPERT OPINION

Actually, in the literature only small experiences are reported. Even though hepatoprotective agents seem to be useful in the oncologic setting, the lack of well-designed prospective Phase III randomized controlled trials is a major limit in the introduction of hepatoprotectors in cancer patients and these kind of studies are warranted to support their use and to give further recommendations for the clinical practice.

Hepatotoxicity of targeted therapy for cancer

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the mechanism of DILI with MTA, and how to avoid and manage these toxicities is essential for minimising inferior cancer treatment outcomes. An organised and comprehensive overview of MTA-associated hepatotoxicity is lacking; this review aims to fill the gap.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was performed based on published case reports and relevant studies or articles pertaining to the topics on PubMed. Food and Drug Administration drug information documents and search on the US National Library of Medicine LiverTox database was performed for all relevant MTA.

EXPERT OPINION

MTA-associated hepatotoxicity is common but rarely fatal. The pattern of hepatotoxicity is predominantly idiosyncratic. Pharmacogenomics show potential in predicting patients at risk of poorly metabolising or developing immunoallergic responses to MTA, but prospective data is scant. Preventing reactivation of viral hepatitis using anti-viral drugs, and avoidance of drug combinations at high risk of negative interactions are the most readily preventable measures for DILI.

Imatinib-induced Severe Hepatitis in a 9-Year-old Girl With Philadelphia Chromosome-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Imatinib mesylate has dramatically improved the outcome of children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph* ALL) and is now included as first-line therapy. Uncommon adverse effects of this drug for pediatric use, however, are largely unknown. We report the first case of a 9-year-old child who developed severe acute hepatitis with grade 4 transaminases and bilirubin elevation during imatinib treatment for Ph* ALL. Liver biopsy showed extensive lobular and pericentral necrosis of hepatocytes. Liver function recovered after discontinuing imatinib with a 4-week prednisolone. Extensive hepatic necrosis should be considered not only in adults but also in children under imatinib administration.

Formation of reactive metabolites and management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Existing clinical evidence indicates that many tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are associated with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. TKIs possess risk factors for developing drug-induced liver injury such as their high daily dose, being substrates of P450 enzyme and being involved in significant hepatic metabolism. Several successful strategies to overcome TKI-induced hepatotoxicity include: switching to an alternative TKI with a similar mechanism of action, using an alternative dose and introduction of corticosteroids for treatment and prevention of hepatotoxicity.

AREAS COVERED

This review highlights the formation of reactive metabolites and how this leads to toxicity, as well as the current clinical management of TKI-induced hepatotoxicity.

EXPERT OPINION

Numerous events need to occur in an individual patient before converging into an idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity episode. Of these, the formation of a reactive intermediate through metabolism appears to be the prerequisite. This critical event involves an intricate chemico-biological interaction where, on one hand, drug-specific characteristics create the propensity for occurrence and, on the other hand, patient risk factors determine the individuality of response. With improved understanding of the mechanisms leading to adverse events, several strategies are being adopted to prevent and treat TKI-induced hepatotoxicity. However, further evidence is required before they can be recommended to larger populations.

Hepatotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: clinical and regulatory perspectives

The introduction of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in clinical oncology has transformed the treatment of certain forms of cancers. As of 31 March 2013, 18 such agents have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 15 of these also by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and a large number of others are in development or under regulatory review. Unexpectedly, however, their use has been found to be associated with serious toxic effects on a number of vital organs including the liver. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity has resulted in withdrawal from the market of many widely used drugs and is a major public health issue that continues to concern all the stakeholders. This review focuses on hepatotoxic potential of TKIs. The majority of TKIs approved to date are reported to induce hepatic injury. Five of these (lapatinib, pazopanib, ponatinib, regorafenib and sunitinib) are sufficiently potent in this respect as to require a boxed label warning. Onset of TKI-induced hepatotoxicity is usually within the first 2 months of initiating treatment, but may be delayed, and is usually reversible. Fatality from TKI-induced hepatotoxicity is uncommon compared to hepatotoxic drugs in other classes but may lead to long-term consequences such as cirrhosis. Patients should be carefully monitored for TKI-induced hepatotoxicity, the management of which requires individually tailored reappraisal of the risk/benefit. The risk is usually manageable by dose adjustment or a switch to a suitable alternative TKI. Confirmation of TKI-induced hepatotoxicity can present challenges in the presence of hepatic metastasis and potential drug interactions. Its diagnosis in a patient with TKI-sensitive cancer requires great care if therapy with the TKI suspected to be causal is to be modified or interrupted as a result. Post-marketing experience with drugs such as imatinib, lapatinib and sorafenib suggests that the hepatotoxic safety of all the TKIs requires diligent surveillance.

Treatment with dasatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia following imatinib-induced hepatotoxicity

Treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) of disease may cause severe hepatotoxicity in rare cases. However, it remains unclear (1) how imatinib-induced hepatotoxicity should be treated; and (2) if and how TKI treatment can be resumed after recovery. We report a 32-year-old woman with CML-CP and histology confirmed imatinib-induced liver toxicity after 6 months of treatment. In this case, the early administration of corticosteroid therapy resulted in rapid and complete hepatic recovery, and treatment for CML-CP with the second generation TKI dasatinib was continued safely after recovery. Thus, dasatinib represents an option for maintaining therapeutic response in patients in whom continuation of imatinib is not possible due to its hepatic toxicity.

Imatinib-induced liver cirrhosis in a patient with advanced gastrointestinal stroma tumor (GIST)

Background

The use of imatinib mesylate is associated with a progression free survival of 41 months in first line treatment of metastatic or locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and other studies approved that adjuvant imatinib treatment improves the recurrence-free survival in patients with GIST. Current recommendations include 1 year adjuvant treatment in GIST patients at risk but active studies explore different durations of treatment with an interval of up to 5 years. While the most frequent adverse events (AEs) are blood count alterations, abdominal discomfort and edema, the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 increase of AST or ALT is specified with 2.1% and 2.7% respectively.

Case presentation

We report a 49-year old male with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the small bowel who developed liver cirrhosis under adjuvant imatinib treatment.

Conclusions

Our report supports the notion that imatinib-induced hepatotoxicity may lead to acute liver damage with subsequent cirrhotic remodelling. Patients developing grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity during imatinib treatment should therefore be carefully evaluated for chronic liver disease.

A central role for CD68(+) macrophages in hepatopulmonary syndrome. Reversal by macrophage depletion

RATIONALE

The etiology of hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), a common complication of cirrhosis, is unknown. Inflammation and macrophage accumulation occur in HPS; however, their importance is unclear. Common bile duct ligation (CBDL) creates an accepted model of HPS, allowing us to investigate the cause of HPS.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that macrophages are central to HPS and investigated the therapeutic potential of macrophage depletion.

METHODS

Hemodynamics, alveolar-arterial gradient, vascular reactivity, and histology were assessed in CBDL versus sham rats (n = 21 per group). The effects of plasma on smooth muscle cell proliferation and endothelial tube formation were measured. Macrophage depletion was used to prevent (gadolinium) or regress (clodronate) HPS. CD68(+) macrophages and capillary density were measured in the lungs of patients with cirrhosis versus control patients (n = 10 per group).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

CBDL increased cardiac output and alveolar-arterial gradient by causing capillary dilatation and arteriovenous malformations. Activated CD68(+)macrophages (nuclear factor-κB+) accumulated in HPS pulmonary arteries, drawn by elevated levels of plasma endotoxin and lung monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. These macrophages expressed inducible nitric oxide synthase, vascular endothelial growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor. HPS plasma increased endothelial tube formation and pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation. Macrophage depletion prevented and reversed the histological and hemodynamic features of HPS. CBDL lungs demonstrated increased medial thickness and obstruction of small pulmonary arteries. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition unmasked exaggerated pulmonary vasoconstrictor responses in HPS. Patients with cirrhosis had increased pulmonary intravascular macrophage accumulation and capillary density.

CONCLUSIONS

HPS results from intravascular accumulation of CD68(+)macrophages. An occult proliferative vasculopathy may explain the occasional transition to portopulmonary hypertension. Macrophage depletion may have therapeutic potential in HPS.