Phase II randomized study of trastuzumab emtansine versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Paclitaxel Plus Trastuzumab for Stage I Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: 5-Year Results and Correlative Analyses From ATEMPT

PURPOSE

Long-term outcomes of patients with stage I human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) remain undefined, and prognostic predictors represent an unmet need.

METHODS

In the ATEMPT phase II trial, patients with stage I centrally confirmed HER2-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned 3:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 for 1 year or paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (TH). Coprimary objectives were to compare the incidence of clinically relevant toxicities between arms and to evaluate invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with T-DM1. Correlative analyses included the HER2DX genomic tool, multiomic evaluations of HER2 heterogeneity, and predictors of thrombocytopenia.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 11 iDFS events were observed in the T-DM1 arm, consistent with a 5-year iDFS of 97.0% (95% CI, 95.2 to 98.7). At 5 years, the recurrence-free interval (RFI) was 98.3% (95% CI, 97.0 to 99.7), the overall survival was 97.8% (95% CI, 96.3 to 99.3), and the breast cancer-specific survival was 99.4% (95% CI, 98.6 to 100). Comparable iDFS was observed with T-DM1 irrespective of tumor size, hormone receptor status, centrally determined HER2 immunohistochemical score, and receipt of T-DM1 for more or less than 6 months. Although ATEMPT was not powered for this end point, the 5-year iDFS in the TH arm was 91.1%. Among patients with sufficient tissue for HER2DX testing (n = 187), 5-year outcomes significantly differed according to HER2DX risk score, with better RFI (98.1% v 81.8%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.10, P = .01) and iDFS (96.3% v 81.8%, HR, 0.20, P = .047) among patients with HER2DX low-risk versus high-risk tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant T-DM1 for 1 year leads to outstanding long-term outcomes for patients with stage I HER2-positive breast cancer. A high HER2DX risk score predicted a higher risk of recurrence in ATEMPT.

Impact of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) on spleen volume in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a novel therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer, combining the targeted action of trastuzumab with the cytotoxic effects of emtansine. Although T-DM1 has demonstrated greater efficacy and safety compared to traditional therapies, concerns about hepatotoxicity and spleen-related complications have arisen.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 64 HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with T-DM1 at our institution. Patients underwent computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and during treatment cycles. Spleen volume, portal vein diameter, and laboratory values were compared between baseline and 12 months after T-DM1 treatment.

RESULTS

Median spleen volume significantly increased from 201 cm3 (IQR, 157-275) at baseline to 291 cm3 (IQR, 215-420) after 12 months of T-DM1 treatment (P < 0.001). Spleen enlargement was observed in 87.5% of patients, while no significant alteration was detected in portal vein diameter. The change in spleen volume was positively correlated with changes in serum globulin levels, liver enzymes, and bilirubin levels, but did not impact survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

T-DM1 therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer leads to significant spleen enlargement and systemic biochemical changes. Future studies should focus on elucidating the long-term implications of these findings and optimizing monitoring strategies for spleen-related complications.

Prevalence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with antibody-drug conjugates in metastatic breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are revolutionizing metastatic breast cancer treatment, resulting in a better prognosis and a higher safety profile than chemotherapy. Nevertheless, treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) have been extensively documented. We searched five databases for articles published up to December 2023 and conducted a meta-analysis on 23 clinical trials to estimate TRAE prevalence related to currently approved ADCs. The prevalence of the most common TRAEs ranged from 12 % to 33 %, depending on the ADC type and study design. Gastrointestinal disorders were highly prevalent during Trastuzumab Deruxtecan, general disorders were extremely common during Trastuzumab Emtansine, and blood system disorders and gastrointestinal disorders were the most prevalent during Sacituzumab Govitecan. This study provides an estimate of ADC-related TRAEs for each treatment based on study design. Despite each ADC having specific toxicities, gastrointestinal symptoms were highly prevalent in all treatments. This study lays the groundwork for developing personalized risk-stratified care pathways.

Cardiac toxicity of HER-2 targeting antibody-drug conjugates: overview and clinical implications

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have recently emerged as a promising therapeutic option that combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies and the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy. With numerous ADCs approved and on the market, a particular concern of ADCs that target HER-2 has been their cardiac side effects, in view of the crucial role of HER-2 in cardiac development and physiology. While rarely toxic and generally safe, numerous publications have outlined the consistent association of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with the development of cardiac toxicity. Despite not being clinically relevant in most cases, cardiac baseline evaluation, monitoring and early detection of cardiac adverse events remain pivotal with HER-2 targeting ADCs. This review aims to summarize and better characterize the complete cardiac toxicity profile of HER-2 ADCs, with the goal of improving clinical understanding of this adverse event, leading to better recognition, monitoring and management.

Trastuzumab emtansine induced hyponatremia in breast cancer - A case report

ABSTRACT

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate of trastuzumab and the cytotoxic agent emtansine (DM1), approved for use as an adjuvant treatment for patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and antihuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) therapy and in metastatic HER-2-positive breast cancer. Previous studies have shown that T-DM1 has a favorable safety profile, with few high-grade toxicities reported so far. We describe a patient who developed profound hyponatremia-which has not been reported previously-following treatment with adjuvant T-DM1 for HER-2+ breast cancer.

Efficacy and safety of first-line regimens for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

The current standard of care for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel as first-line therapy. However, with the development of newer treatment regimens, there is a lack of evidence regarding which is the optimal treatment strategy. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line regimens for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer by indirect comparisons.

Methods

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were conducted. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published through to December 2023. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between treatments, and the odds ratio and 95% CrI were used to compare the objective response rate (ORR) and safety.

Results

Twenty randomized clinical trials that included 15 regimens and 7094 patients were analyzed. Compared with the traditional trastuzumab and docetaxel regimen, PFS was longer on the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen (HR: 0.41, 95% CrI: 0.22-0.75) and the pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen (HR: 0.65, 95% CrI: 0.43-0.98). Consistent with the results for PFS, the ORR was better on the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen and the pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen than on the traditional trastuzumab and docetaxel regimen. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen was most likely to rank first in achieving the best PFS and ORR. Comparable results were found for grade ≥3 AE rates of ≥10%.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen is most likely to be the optimal first-line therapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

HER-2 positive gastric cancer: Current targeted treatments

Gastric cancer (GC) is highly metastatic and characterized by HER2 amplification. Aberrant HER2 expression drives metastasis, therapy resistance, and tumor recurrence. HER2 amplification contributes to drug resistance by upregulating DNA repair enzymes and drug afflux proteins, reducing drug efficacy. HER2 modulates transcription factors critical for cancer stem cell properties, further impacting drug resistance. HER2 activity is influenced by HER-family ligands, promoting oncogenic signaling. These features point to HER2 as a targetable driver in GC. This review outlines recent advances in HER2-mediated mechanisms and their upstream and downstream signaling pathways in GC. Additionally, it discusses preclinical research investigation that comprehends trastuzumab-sensitizing phytochemicals, chemotherapeutics, and nanoparticles as adjunct therapies. These developments hold promise for improving outcomes and enhancing the management of HER2-positive GC.

A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality of Life in Women with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Trastuzumab

BACKGROUND

Many trials of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer treatment with trastuzumab have provided evidence of improved clinical outcomes. This systematic review examined how a regimen that includes trastuzumab affects patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) during and after treatment.

METHODS

A systematic search for articles published up to February 2023 without restrictions of language or publication year was performed using the Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus databases. We included studies of women aged > 18 years with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer treated with a trastuzumab-containing regimen. We assessed the quality of the studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool (2.0) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for cross-sectional studies. We used Microsoft Excel to extract and synthesize data, and documented the review procedure following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, eight studies compared 1104 trastuzumab-treated patients and 1003 non-trastuzumab-treated patients. Most studies were RCTs (n = 7) and one was a prospective observational study. All the included studies used the EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BR23, FACT-B, or FACT-G questionnaires. During treatment, patients taking regimens that included trastuzumab showed clinical improvement in HRQoL, social functioning, and role functioning. After the treatment, patients' HRQoL profiles in the trastuzumab and chemotherapy arms were similar. However, trastuzumab (versus chemotherapy) treatment led to clinically improved functional status, role and physical functioning, and fatigue. The quality assessment revealed some concerns in most RCTs, with the risk of bias being high in two studies, low in one study, and moderate in the cross-sectional study.

CONCLUSIONS

Trastuzumab-containing regimens administered to HER2-positive breast cancer patients at the metastatic stage evidenced beneficial effects on total HRQoL during and after treatment. Upon therapy cessation, patients' HRQoL scores for both interventions improved. Nevertheless, HRQoL profiles of patients treated with trastuzumab were more favorable, particularly for functional status, role functioning, physical well-being, and fatigue.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

This review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021259826).

Relative efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates and other anti-HER2 treatments on survival in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) drugs present a promising anti-cancer treatment, although survival benefits for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BC) remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the comparative effect of ADCs and other anti-HER2 therapy on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for treatment of HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic BC.

METHODS

Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from five databases. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for RCTs by RevMan5.4 software. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted to evaluate the benefit of ADCs on PFS and OS in HER2-positive advanced BC by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of six RCTs with 3870 patients revealed that ADCs significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.80, P = 0.0002) and OS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72-0.86, P < 0.0001) of patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic BC. Subgroup analysis showed that PFS and OS were obviously prolonged for patients who previously received HER2-targeted therapy. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias suggested that the results were stable and reliable.

CONCLUSION

Statistically significant benefits for PFS and OS were observed with ADCs in HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic BC, especially for those who received prior anti-HER2 treatment.

CyTOF analysis revealed platelet heterogeneity in breast cancer patients received T-DM1 treatment

T-DM1 (Trastuzumab Emtansine) belongs to class of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADC), where cytotoxic drugs are conjugated with the antibody Trastuzumab to specifically target HER2-positive cancer cells. Platelets, as vital components of the blood system, intricately influence the immune response to tumors through complex mechanisms. In our study, we examined platelet surface proteins in the plasma of patients before and after T-DM1 treatment, categorizing them based on treatment response. We identified a subgroup of platelets with elevated expression of CD63 and CD9 exclusively in patients with favorable treatment responses, while this subgroup was absent in patients with poor responses. Another noteworthy discovery was the elevated expression of CD36 in the platelet subgroups of patients exhibiting inadequate responses to treatment. These findings suggest that the expression of these platelet surface proteins may be correlated with the prognosis of T-DM1 treatment. These indicators offer valuable insights for predicting the therapeutic response to T-DM1 and may become important references in future clinical practice, contributing to a better understanding of the impact of ADC therapies and optimizing personalized cancer treatment strategies.

Navigating Breast Cancer Oligometastasis and Oligoprogression: Current Landscape and Future Directions

PURPOSE

We examine the potential for curative approaches among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients by exploring the recent literature on local ablative therapies like surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer. We also cover therapies for MBC patients with oligoprogressive (OP) disease.

KEY FINDINGS

Surgery and SBRT have been studied for OM and OP breast cancer, mainly in retrospective or non-randomized trials. While many studies demonstrated favorable results, a cooperative study and single-institution trial found no support for surgery/SBRT in OM and OP cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While there is interest in applying local therapies to OM and OP breast cancer, the current randomized data does not back the routine use of surgery or SBRT, particularly when considering the potential for treatment-related toxicities. Future research should refine patient selection through advanced imaging and possibly explore these therapies specifically in patients with hormone receptor-positive or HER2-positive disease.

Efficacy and safety of Trastuzumab Emtansine in treating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Chinese population: a real-world multicenter study

Background

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been approved worldwide for treating metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in patients who have received first-line therapy, shown disease progression, and are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive. T-DM1 received approval in China to treat early-stage breast cancer (BC) in 2020 and for mBC in 2021. In March 2023, T-DM1 was included in medical insurance coverage, significantly expanding the eligible population.

Materials and methods

This post-marketing observational study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of T-DM1 in real-world clinical practice in China. This study enrolled 31 individuals with HER2-positive early-stage BC and 70 individuals with HER2-positive advanced BC from 8 study centers in Shandong Province, China. The T-DM1 dosage was 3.6 mg/kg injected intravenously every 3 weeks until the disease advanced or the drug toxicity became uncontrollable, whichever occurred earlier. Additionally, efficacy and safety information on T-DM1 were collected.

Results

During the 7-month follow-up period, no recurrence or metastases were observed in patients who had early-stage BC. The disease control rate was 31.43% (22/70) in patients with advanced BC. The most common adverse effect of T-DM1 was thrombocytopenia, with an incidence of 69.31% (70/101), and the probability of Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia was 11.88% (12/101).

Conclusion

This real-world study demonstrated that T-DM1 had good efficacy and was well tolerated by both HER2-positive early-stage BC and mBC patients.

Comparison of trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and disitamab vedotin in a multiresistant HER2-positive breast cancer lung metastasis model

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with lung metastases resistant to targeted agents is a common therapeutic challenge. Absence of preclinical lung metastasis models that are resistant to multiple anti-HER2 targeted drugs hampers the development of novel therapies. We established a novel HER2-positive breast cancer cell line (L-JIMT-1) with a high propensity to form lung metastases from the parenteral JIMT-1 cell line by injecting JIMT-1 cells into immunodeficient SCID mice. Lung metastases developed in all mice injected with L-JIMT-1 cells, and more rapidly and in greater numbers compared with the parental JIMT-1 cells. L-JIMT-1 cells expressed more epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2 than JIMT-1 cells. L-JIMT-1 cells were resistant to all five tyrosine kinase inhibitors tested in vitro (afatinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, sapitinib, and tucatinib). When we compared JIMT-1 and L-JIMT-1 sensitivity to three HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and disitamab vedotin (DV) in vitro, JIMT-1 cells were resistant T-DXd, partially sensitive to T-DM1, and sensitive to DV, while L-JIMT-1 cells were resistant to both T-DM1 and T-DXd, but moderately sensitive to DV. In a mouse model, all three ADCs inhibited the growth of L-JIMT-1 lung metastases compared to a vehicle, but DV and T-DXd more strongly than T-DM1, and DV treatment led to the smallest tumor burden. The L-JIMT breast cancer lung metastasis model developed may be useful in the evaluation of anti-cancer agents for multiresistant HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

Incidence of antibody-drug conjugate-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have reported the efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for treating breast cancer. However, during cytotoxic drug treatment, long-term disabling fatigue is common. Moreover, studies in the relevant literature have indicated that fatigue can significantly increase the incidence of depression and sleep disorders. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to evaluate the incidence of fatigue in breast cancer survivors treated with ADCs.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles and conference abstracts published before March 16, 2023. Further, two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of all-grade fatigue caused by the use of ADCs in patients with breast cancer. Finally, a random-effects model was used to calculate the incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, 7963 patients from 31 studies were included in this meta-analysis to assess the incidence of fatigue caused by the use of approved and marketed ADCs in patients with breast cancer. Notably, the incidence of all-grade fatigue during ADC monotherapy was 39.84% (95% CI, 35.09%-44.69%). In subgroup analyses, among ADCs, the incidence of trastuzumab deruxtecan-induced fatigue was the highest, with an all-grade fatigue incidence of 47.05% (95% CI, 42.38%-51.75%). Meanwhile, the incidence of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)-induced all-grade fatigue was 35.17% (95% CI, 28.87%-41.74%), which was the lowest among ADCs. Further, the incidence of all-grade fatigue due to sacituzumab govitecan was 42.82% (95% CI, 34.54%-51.32%), which was higher than that due to T-DM1. Moreover, the incidence of fatigue was higher with T-DM1 combination therapy than with monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians have highlighted the high incidence of ADC-related fatigue and its negative impact on patients' physical and mental health, making fatigue an important research variable. The results of this study will further contribute to a comprehensive understanding of ADCs, which have some clinical importance and are of great benefit to patients with breast cancer.

A review of the clinical efficacy of FDA-approved antibody‒drug conjugates in human cancers

While strategies such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy have become the first-line standard therapies for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, acquired resistance is still inevitable in most cases. The introduction of antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) provides a novel alternative. ADCs are a new class of anticancer drugs comprising the coupling of antitumor mAbs with cytotoxic drugs. Compared with chemotherapeutic drugs, ADCs have the advantages of good tolerance, accurate target recognition, and small effects on noncancerous cells. ADCs occupy an increasingly important position in the therapeutic field. Currently, there are 13 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‒approved ADCs and more than 100 ADC drugs at different stages of clinical trials. This review briefly describes the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved ADCs, and discusses the related problems and challenges to provide a reference for clinical work.

Targeted Therapies and Drug Resistance in Advanced Breast Cancer, Alternative Strategies and the Way beyond

"Targeted therapy" or "precision medicine" is a therapeutic strategy launched over two decades ago. It relies on drugs that inhibit key molecular mechanisms/pathways or genetic/epigenetic alterations that promote different cancer hallmarks. Many clinical trials, sponsored by multinational drug companies, have been carried out. During this time, research has increasingly uncovered the complexity of advanced breast cancer disease. Despite high expectations, patients have seen limited benefits from these clinical trials. Commonly, only a minority of trials are successful, and the few approved drugs are costly. The spread of this expensive therapeutic strategy has constrained the resources available for alternative research. Meanwhile, due to the high cost/benefit ratio, other therapeutic strategies have been proposed by researchers over time, though they are often not pursued due to a focus on precision medicine. Notable among these are drug repurposing and counteracting micrometastatic disease. The former provides an obvious answer to expensive targeted therapies, while the latter represents a new field to which efforts have recently been devoted, offering a "way beyond" the current research.

Systemic Therapies for HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

Despite recent advances, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains a largely incurable disease, with resistance to conventional anti-HER2 drugs ultimately unavoidable for all but a small minority of patients who achieve an enduring remission and possibly cure. Over the past two decades, significant advances in our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of HER2-driven oncogenesis have translated into pharmaceutical advances, with the developing of increasingly sophisticated therapies directed against HER2. These include novel, more potent selective HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); new anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates; and dual epitope targeting antibodies, with more advanced pharmacological properties and higher affinity. With the introduction of adjuvant T-DM1 for incomplete responders to neoadjuvant therapy, fewer patients are relapsing, but for those who do relapse, disease that may be resistant to standard first- and second-line therapies requires new approaches. Furthermore, the risk of CNS relapse has not been abrogated by current (neo)adjuvant strategies; therefore, current research efforts are being directed towards this challenging site of metastatic disease. In this article, we review the currently available clinical data informing the effective management of HER2-positive breast cancer beyond standard first-line therapy with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and taxanes, and the management of relapse in patients who have already been exposed to both these agents and T-DM1 for early breast cancer (EBC). We additionally discuss novel anti-HER2 targeted agents and combinations in clinical trials, which may be integrated into standard treatment paradigms in the future.

The ever-expanding landscape of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in solid tumors: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The advent of targeted therapies signaled novel avenues for more optimal oncological outcomes. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have risen as a cornerstone of the ever-expanding targeted therapy era. The purpose of this systematic review is to delineate the rapidly evolving clinical landscape of ADCs for solid tumors.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases for phase II and III clinical trials. Outcomes of interest were the objective response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 92 clinical trials (76 phase II and 16 phase III) evaluated the efficacy and safety of ADCs for a plethora of solid tumors. Out of the 30 investigated ADCs, 8 have received approval by regulatory organizations for solid tumors. Currently, 52 phase III clinical trials for ADCs are ongoing.

CONCLUSION

ADCs have shown promising results for several solid tumors and various cancer settings.

Exploring the therapeutic potential of ADC combination for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Currently, standard treatment options for TNBC are limited to surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, these treatment methods are associated with a higher risk of intrinsic or acquired recurrence. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a useful and promising class of cancer therapeutics. ADCs, also known as "biochemical missiles", use a monoclonal antibody (mAb) to target tumor antigens and deliver a cytotoxic drug payload. Currently, several ADCs clinical studies are underway worldwide, including sacituzumab govitecan (SG), which was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of TNBC. However, due to the fact that only a small portion of TNBC patients respond to ADC therapy and often develop resistance, growing evidence supports the use of ADCs in combination with other treatment strategies to treat TNBC. In this review, we described the current utilization of ADCs and discussed the prospects of ADC combination therapy for TNBC.

The History and Development of HER2 Inhibitors

HER2 is highly expressed in a variety of malignant tumors and affects the prognosis of patients, making it a highly sensitive target for cancer therapy. Since the approval of the first HER2 inhibitor, trastuzumab, in 1998, HER2-targeted drugs have rapidly evolved. Currently, targeting HER2 drugs mainly include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). This article reviews the development of HER2 inhibitors for various tumors over the past 20 years.

Incidence and risk of fatal adverse events in cancer patients treated with HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that target human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are leading a new era of targeted cancer therapy. These drugs have also been associated with several fatal adverse events, such as pneumonia, interstitial lung disease, and infection. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to estimate the incidence and risk of fatal adverse events in cancer patients treated with HER2-targeted ADCs.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to February 1, 2022, and the last search was updated to July 1, 2023. The eligible studies for inclusion in our analysis were limited to RCTs of HER2-targeted ADCs that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and examined on cancer patients with available data on fatal adverse events. The protocol for this study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42022331627).

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (13 RCTs) involving 7,277 patients were finally included for meta-analysis. Of these patients, 4,246 received HER2-targeted ADCs and 3,481 received the control treatment. The data were combined using Bayesian hierarchical modeling, which allowed for the estimation of the mean incidence of fatal adverse events to be 0.78% (95% CrI: 0.28-1.37%, τ = 0.006) for the patients treated with HER2-targeted ADCs. The relative risk was 0.80 (95% CrI, 0.5-1.26, τ = 0.17) compared to control patients. Among 43 reported deaths caused by HER2-targeted ADCs, the most common fatal adverse event was respiratory toxicity, including pneumonia, pneumonitis, and interstitial lung disease. On subgroup analysis, no difference in the risk of fatal adverse events was found between different HER2-targeted ADCs or cancer types.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the risk of fatal adverse events with HER2-targeted ADCs may be lower compared to standard control therapies in cancer patients, and there is no significant difference in risk observed between different HER2-targeted ADCs or cancer types. However, the most common fatal adverse event was respiratory toxicity, suggesting that cancer patients who use the above drugs should strengthen respiratory system monitoring and take preventive measures in some severe cases.

Meta-analysis of quality of life in patients with cancer treated with antibody-drug conjugates in randomized controlled trials

Purpose: To evaluate the patient-reported outcomes of patients treated with commercially approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) reported in randomized controlled trials (RCT) published up to September 2023. Methods: A meta-analysis of 6430 patients from 12 randomized controlled trials was conducted. Results: No significant change was observed between the groups from baseline to end of treatment and end of follow-up, with a standardized mean difference of -0.08 (95% CI: -0.27-0.12) and 0.01 (95% CI: -0.11-0.12), respectively. Treatment with ADCs delayed the deterioration of patients' clinical condition compared with treatment with non-ADCs, with a hazard ratio of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67-0.92). Conclusion: ADCs have a good correlation with delay of clinical deterioration in patients with cancer.

Treatment-related adverse events of antibody-drug conjugates in clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The wide use of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) is transforming the cancer-treatment landscape. Understanding the treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of ADCs is crucial for their clinical application. We conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the profile and incidence of AEs related to ADC use in the treatment of solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published from January 2001 to October 2022. The overall profile and incidence of all-grade and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs were the primary outcomes of the analysis.

Results

A total of 138 trials involving 15,473 patients were included in this study. The overall incidence of any-grade treatment-related AEs was 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 99.9%-100.0%; I 2 = 89%) and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs was 6.2% (95% CI: 3.0%-12.4%; I² = 99%).

Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive overview of AEs related to ADCs used for cancer treatment. ADC use resulted in a high incidence of any-grade AEs but a low incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs. The AE profiles and incidence differed according to cancer type, ADC type, and ADC components.

Toxicity profiles of antibody-drug conjugates for anticancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antibody-drug conjugates are attractive targeted agents in anticancer treatment because of their unique mechanism of action and reduced toxicity. Little is known about the spectrum of adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates, despite tens of clinical trials.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating antibody-drug conjugate efficacy in anticancer treatment was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched for relevant studies. Meta-analyses assessed the odds ratios (ORs) of 12 treatment-related symptoms and toxicities in patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates compared with those receiving other anticancer agents without antibody-drug conjugates. All-grade and high-grade (grade ≥3) toxicities were examined.

RESULTS

Twenty studies involving 10 075 patients were included. Compared with control groups, antibody-drug conjugates were associated with a higher risk of all-grade fatigue (OR = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08 to 1.45), anorexia (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.69), nausea (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.97), and sensory neuropathy (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.27 to 3.76) as treatment-related symptoms. Patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates had a statistically significantly lower risk of all-grade febrile neutropenia (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.96). Conversely, they had a higher risk of thrombocytopenia (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.00 to 4.31), increased alanine aminotransferase (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.84 to 3.40), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 2.04 to 3.93). Subgroup analysis showed a similar toxicity profile when comparing the solid tumors with hematologic malignancy groups and the antibody-drug conjugate vs antibody-drug conjugate plus chemotherapy groups, except for some neurologic and hematologic adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive profile of adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugate-based treatment shows an increase in various types of all-grade treatment-related symptoms and adverse events, although no increase in high-grade adverse events was seen.

Nanotechnology - a robust tool for fighting the challenges of drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Genomic and proteomic mutation analysis is the standard of care for selecting candidates for therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors against the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR TKI therapies) and further monitoring cancer treatment efficacy and cancer development. Acquired resistance due to various genetic aberrations is an unavoidable problem during EGFR TKI therapy, leading to the rapid exhaustion of standard molecularly targeted therapeutic options against mutant variants. Attacking multiple molecular targets within one or several signaling pathways by co-delivery of multiple agents is a viable strategy for overcoming and preventing resistance to EGFR TKIs. However, because of the difference in pharmacokinetics among agents, combined therapies may not effectively reach their targets. The obstacles regarding the simultaneous co-delivery of therapeutic agents at the site of action can be overcome using nanomedicine as a platform and nanotools as delivery agents. Precision oncology research to identify targetable biomarkers and optimize tumor homing agents, hand in hand with designing multifunctional and multistage nanocarriers that respond to the inherent heterogeneity of the tumors, may resolve the challenges of inadequate tumor localization, improve intracellular internalization, and bring advantages over conventional nanocarriers.

Effects of trastuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine on corrected QT interval and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with metastatic (HER2+) breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine are specific antibody and antibody-drug conjugates used in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this study was to test their effect on the QTc interval duration and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in our patients, two parameters used in evaluation of cardiotoxicity. From May 2015 to October 2017, 26 patients with preserved LVEF were included in the study. All of them were previously treated with standard paclitaxel and cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded just before each trastuzumab dose application and six months after the last dose. Echocardiography with LVEF measurement was performed several days before the application of the initial dose, and six months after the last cycle. Later, 24 patients with metastatic disease received additional treatment with trastuzumab emtansine after six months and the same ECG and echocardiography protocol was performed again. Due to reduction in LVEF, two patients were discontinued from additional treatment.

RESULTS

A statistically significant QTc prolongation was found after each drug dose application, with an increase in mean QTc duration with every successive application, reaching the peak QTc values just before the fifth cycle of treatment. The QTc interval returned to its initial value six months after the last cycle (p < 0.001). These results were similar for both drugs. Mean LVEF before both treatment protocols was significantly higher compared to LVEF value after the treatment. LVEF before trastuzumab emtansine treatment was non-significantly higher than LVEF after trastuzumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

Trastuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine cardiotoxicity manifested as a significant and progressive QTc prolongation after successive drug applications, reaching the peak value just before the fifth cycle of both drugs. Both medications also caused statistically significant but asymptomatic LVEF reduction. Complete reversibility of cardiotoxic effects of both drugs was confirmed by QTc interval and LVEF normalisation after the treatment discontinuation.

Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Heart Failure Associated With Anti-HER2 Monotherapies and Combination Regimens for Cancer

Background

Trastuzumab improves outcomes in patients with HER2-overexpressing malignancies but is associated with decreases in left ventricular ejection fraction. Heart failure (HF) risks from other anti-HER2 therapies are less clear.

Objectives

Using World Health Organization pharmacovigilance data, the authors compared HF odds across anti-HER2 regimens.

Methods

In VigiBase, 41,976 patients had adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies (trastuzumab, n = 16,900; pertuzumab, n = 1,856), antibody-drug conjugates (trastuzumab emtansine [T-DM1], n = 3,983; trastuzumab deruxtecan, n = 947), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (afatinib, n = 10,424; lapatinib, n = 5,704; neratinib, n = 1,507; tucatinib, n = 655); additionally, 36,052 patients had ADRs with anti-HER2-based combination regimens. Most patients had breast cancer (monotherapies, n = 17,281; combinations, n = 24,095). Outcomes included comparison of HF odds with each monotherapy relative to trastuzumab, within each therapeutic class, and among combination regimens.

Results

Of 16,900 patients with trastuzumab-associated ADRs, 2,034 (12.04%) had HF reports (median time to onset 5.67 months; IQR: 2.85-9.32 months) compared with 1% to 2% with antibody-drug conjugates. Trastuzumab had higher odds of HF reporting relative to other anti-HER2 therapies collectively in the overall cohort (reporting OR [ROR]: 17.37; 99% CI: 14.30-21.10) and breast cancer subgroup (ROR: 17.10; 99% CI: 13.12-22.27). Pertuzumab/T-DM1 had 3.4 times higher odds of HF reporting than T-DM1 monotherapy; tucatinib/trastuzumab/capecitabine had similar odds as tucatinib. Among metastatic breast cancer regimens, HF odds were highest with trastuzumab/pertuzumab/docetaxel (ROR: 1.42; 99% CI: 1.17-1.72) and lowest with lapatinib/capecitabine (ROR: 0.09; 99% CI: 0.04-0.23).

Conclusions

Trastuzumab and pertuzumab/T-DM1 had higher odds of HF reporting than other anti-HER2 therapies. These data provide large-scale, real-world insight into which HER2-targeted regimens would benefit from left ventricular ejection fraction monitoring.

Management of Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: An Expert Committee's Opinion

Patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (BC) are candidates of choice for metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). This paper summarizes the opinions of an expert committee about the management of oligometastatic BC. The experts could complete the questionnaire from 13 September 2021, to 10 October 2021, followed by a discussion. The experts were physicians working in the Province of Quebec (Canada) and specialized in BC care, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists. The experts provided their opinions about the context of the disease and therapeutic approach, local and systemic therapies, and the prognosis of oligometastatic BC. In addition to the expert panel's opinions about the management of oligometastatic disease per se, the experts stated that a prospective data registry should be implemented to collect data about oligometastatic BC to improve knowledge about oligometastatic BC and implement data-driven MDT. These data could also allow for the design of treatment algorithms. In conclusion, this paper presents the expert panel's opinions about the management of oligometastatic BC and highlights the needs to be met to improve the care of this condition.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

An improvement in progression-free survival was shown with trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the progression-free survival interim analysis of the DESTINY-Breast03 trial. The aim of DESTINY-Breast03 was to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done in 169 study centres in North America, Asia, Europe, Australia, and South America. Eligible patients were aged 18 or older, had HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg or trastuzumab emtansine 3·6 mg/kg, both administered by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by hormone receptor status, previous treatment with pertuzumab, and history of visceral disease, and was managed through an interactive web-based system. Within each stratum, balanced block randomisation was used with a block size of four. Patients and investigators were not masked to the treatment received. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival and this prespecified second overall survival interim analysis reports updated overall survival, efficacy, and safety results. Efficacy analyses were performed using the full analysis set. Safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03529110.

FINDINGS

Between July 20, 2018, and June 23, 2020, 699 patients were screened for eligibility, 524 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=261) or trastuzumab emtansine (n=263). Median duration of study follow-up was 28·4 months (IQR 22·1-32·9) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 26·5 months (14·5-31·3) with trastuzumab emtansine. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 28·8 months (95% CI 22·4-37·9) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 6·8 months (5·6-8·2) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio [HR] 0·33 [95% CI 0·26-0·43]; nominal p<0·0001). Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 40·5 months-not estimable), with 72 (28%) overall survival events, in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and was not reached (34·0 months-not estimable), with 97 (37%) overall survival events, in the trastuzumab emtansine group (HR 0·64; 95% CI 0·47-0·87]; p=0·0037). The number of grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in patients who received trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine (145 [56%] patients versus 135 [52%] patients). Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in 39 (15%) patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan and eight (3%) patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine, with no grade 4 or 5 events in either group.

INTERPRETATION

Trastuzumab deruxtecan showed a significant improvement in overall survival versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, as well as the longest reported median progression-free survival, reaffirming trastuzumab deruxtecan as the standard of care in the second-line setting. A manageable safety profile of trastuzumab deruxtecan was confirmed with longer treatment duration.

FUNDING

Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Treatment-related adverse events associated with HER2-Targeted antibody-drug conjugates in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the increasing use of HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) worldwide, the summary of toxicity incidence and profiles of these drugs is crucial to provide reference for clinical application. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the mean incidences of treatment-related adverse events of HER2-targeted ADCs and to investigate the differences between different drugs and cancer types.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of literature in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to February 1, 2022 and the last search was updated to August 1, 2022. Published prospective clinical trials on single-agent of the US Food and Drug Administration approved HER2-targeted ADCs with available count data regarding treatment-related adverse events were included. The primary outcomes were pooled incidences of treatment-related adverse events and differences between different drugs and cancer types. The data synthesis was performed using a Bayesian hierarchical modelling method and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022331627).

FINDINGS

A total of 39 studies (37 trials) involving 7688 patients across five cancer types were included in the final analysis. On pooling the data using Bayesian hierarchical modelling, the overall mean incidence of all-grade adverse events, high-grade adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events that resulted in drug discontinuation were 98.29% (95% CrI, 97.33%-99.07%, τ = 1.49), 47.88% (95% CrI, 42.74%-53.17%, τ = 0.37), 19.45% (95% CrI, 15.70%-23.67%, τ = 0.55), and 10.52% (95% CrI, 8.03%-13.21%, τ = 0.56), respectively. The most common all-grade adverse events were nausea (41.57%; 95% CrI, 40.46%-42.64%, τ = 0.81), fatigue (35.86%; 95% CrI, 34.85%-36.96%, τ = 0.65), and decreased appetite (28.84%; 95% CrI, 22.93%-36.87%, τ = 0.76). The most common high-grade adverse events were thrombocytopenia (8.37%; 95% CrI, 7.75%-9.07%, τ = 0.71), anaemia (6.49%; 95% CrI, 5.86%-7.11%, τ = 1.06), and neutropenia (6.42%; 95% CrI, 5.76%-7.04%, τ = 1.21). We found no difference in the mean incidences of adverse events among different cancer types, as well as different dosing regimens. However, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) appeared to have higher mean incidences of adverse events compared with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), especially for the higher dose of T-DXd (6.4 mg/kg Q3W).

INTERPRETATION

The incidences of adverse events between two HER2-targeted ADCs were similar in different cancer types, but different HER2-targeted ADCs appeared to have different mean incidences of adverse events. The comprehensive summary of the adverse events of HER2-targeted ADCs is critical for clinicians caring for patients with cancer receiving HER2-targeted ADCs therapy.

FUNDING

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82073402) and Key R&D Plan of Hubei Province, China (No.2020BCA060) funded this study.

New Concepts in Cardio-Oncology

Cancer and cardiovascular disease are the two major causes of morbidity and mortality in worldwide. Discovering new therapeutic agents for the management of breast cancer (BC) has increased the numbers of cancer survivors but with the risk of cardiovascular adverse events (CV-AEs). All drugs can potentially damage the cardiovascular system, with different types of clinical manifestations from ischemic myocardial disease to vasculitis, thrombosis or pericarditis. An early detection of CV-AEs guarantees an earlier treatment, which is associated with better outcomes. Cardio-oncology field enlarged its studies to improve prevention, monitoring and treatment of all cardiotoxic manifestations related to old or modern oncological agents. A multidisciplinary approach with a close partnership between oncologists and cardiologists is essential for an optimal management and therapeutic decision-making. The aim of this chapter is to review all types of cardiotoxic manifestations related to novel and old agents approved for treatment of BC patients including chemotherapy, anti-HER2 agents, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, PolyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, antiangiogenic drugs and immunotherapy. We also focused our discussion on prevention, monitoring, treatment, and management of CV-AEs.

Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in triple-negative and HER-2 positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Breast cancer (BC) is the 2nd most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are monoclonal antibodies linked to cytotoxic agents and are directed towards a specific tumor protein. Therefore, they are more potent and can have relatively less toxicity. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ADCs in breast cancer. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for relevant studies and included 7 randomized clinical trials (N = 5,302) and 7 non-randomized clinical trials (N = 658). R programming language software was used to conduct this meta-analysis. In 4 RCTs on HER-2 positive BC (N = 2,825), the pooled HR of PFS and OS was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.61-0.84, I2 = 71%) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.64-0.84, I2 = 20%), respectively in favor of ADCs versus chemotherapy. In RCT on triple negative BC (N = 468), HR of PFS and OS were 0.55 (95%CI = 0.51-0.61) and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.54-0.66), respectively, in favor of saci-gov versus chemotherapy. In RCT on HER-2 positive residual invasive BC, HR of recurrence/death was 0.61 (95% CI = 0.54-0.69) in favor of ADC versus chemotherapy. In an RCT (N = 524), the HR of PFS and OS were 0.28 (95% CI = 0.22-0.37) and 0.55 (95%CI = 0.36-0.86), respectively, in favor of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-der) as compared to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). Anemia, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, thrombocytopenia, and elevated aminotransferases were the common ≥grade 3 adverse events reported in 4%, 1%, 2%, 1%, 2%, 9%, and 3% of the patients, respectively. ADCs were more effective than single and double agent chemotherapy in patients with HER-2 positive or triple negative BC. Among ADCs, T-der was more effective than T-DM1.

Antibody drug conjugates targeting HER2: Clinical development in metastatic breast cancer

The identification of the HER2 alteration as an actionable oncogenic driver in breast cancer has propelled the development of HER-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, which led to dramatic improvements in survival outcomes. Lately, the great strides made toward developing antibody-conjugation methods have led to the development of a new class of compelling compounds, the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting HER2 which have profoundly transformed the treatment landscape of breast cancer. HER2-targeting ADCs, trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan, have improved the overall survival in the second and third-line settings with manageable adverse events. Other HER2-targeting ADCs using novel technological advances in the antibody, linker and/or payload conception have shown promising activity in preclinical and clinical studies and some of them are now being evaluated in larger clinical trials. Multiple challenges still impede the success of ADCs in breast cancer namely the lack of a comprehensive understanding of resistance mechanisms as well as the mechanisms of action of ADCs in special subgroups of patients such as those with low or ultra-low HER2 expression and patients with brain or leptomeningeal metastases (BM). In this framework, we review the approved indications and ongoing trials for HER2-targeting ADCs, across patient subgroups, including those with BM and discuss the associated potential mechanisms of action and resistance. Last, we provide an overview of the future perspectives involving HER2-targeting ADCs in breast cancer.

Current challenges and unmet needs in treating patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 oncogene (HER2-positive) overexpression/amplification occurs in less than 20% of breast cancers and has traditionally been associated with poor prognosis. Development of therapies that target HER2 has significantly improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). Currently available HER2-targeted agents include the monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and margetuximab, the small-molecule inhibitors lapatinib, tucatinib, neratinib, and pyrotinib, as well as the antibody-drug conjugates trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan. Optimal sequencing of these agents in the continuum of the disease is critical to maximize treatment outcomes. The large body of clinical evidence generated over the past 2 decades aids clinicians in treatment decision-making. However, patients with HER2-positive ABC and specific disease characteristics and/or comorbidities, such as leptomeningeal disease, brain metastases, or cardiac dysfunction, are generally excluded from large randomized clinical trials, and elderly or frail patients are often underrepresented. In addition, there is great inequality in the accessibility of approved drugs across countries. This article addresses various challenging clinical situations when treating patients with HER2-positive ABC. The objective is to provide guidance to clinicians on how and when HER2-targeted therapies and additional treatments can be best implemented in routine clinical practice, on the basis of existing clinical evidence and expert opinion where needed.

Phase Ib study of pembrolizumab in combination with trastuzumab emtansine for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer

Background

Preclinical and clinical data support potential synergy between anti-HER2 therapy plus immune checkpoint blockade. The safety and tolerability of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) combined with pembrolizumab is unknown.

Methods

This was a single-arm phase Ib trial (registration date January 26, 2017) of T-DM1 plus pembrolizumab in metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Eligible patients had HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxane, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab, and were T-DM1-naïve. A dose de-escalation design was used, with a dose-finding cohort followed by an expansion cohort at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), with mandatory baseline biopsies. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Immune biomarkers were assessed using histology, protein/RNA expression, and whole exome sequencing. Associations between immune biomarkers and treatment response, and biomarker changes before and during treatment, were explored.

Results

20 patients received protocol therapy. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The RP2D was 3.6 mg/kg T-DM1 every 21 days plus 200 mg pembrolizumab every 21 days. 85% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs) ≥grade 2, 20% of patients experienced grade 3 AEs, and no patients experienced grade >4 AEs. Four patients (20%) experienced pneumonitis (three grade 2 events; one grade 3 event). ORR was 20% (95% CI 5.7% to 43.7%), and median PFS was 9.6 months (95% CI 2.8 to 16.0 months). Programmed cell death ligand-1 and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes did not correlate with response in this small cohort.

Conclusions

T-DM1 plus pembrolizumab was a safe and tolerable regimen. Ongoing trials will define if there is a role for checkpoint inhibition in the management of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Trial registration number

NCT03032107.

Small-molecule inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and more: FDA-approved novel therapeutic drugs for solid tumors from 1991 to 2021

The United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has always been a forerunner in drug evaluation and supervision. Over the past 31 years, 1050 drugs (excluding vaccines, cell-based therapies, and gene therapy products) have been approved as new molecular entities (NMEs) or biologics license applications (BLAs). A total of 228 of these 1050 drugs were identified as cancer therapeutics or cancer-related drugs, and 120 of them were classified as therapeutic drugs for solid tumors according to their initial indications. These drugs have evolved from small molecules with broad-spectrum antitumor properties in the early stage to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) with a more precise targeting effect during the most recent decade. These drugs have extended indications for other malignancies, constituting a cancer treatment system for monotherapy or combined therapy. However, the available targets are still mainly limited to receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), restricting the development of antitumor drugs. In this review, these 120 drugs are summarized and classified according to the initial indications, characteristics, or functions. Additionally, RTK-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint-based immunotherapies are also discussed. Our analysis of existing challenges and potential opportunities in drug development may advance solid tumor treatment in the future.

Plasma Exchange May Enhance Antitumor Effects by Removal of Soluble Programmed Death-Ligand 1 and Extracellular Vesicles: Preliminary Study

The antitumor effect of antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) is the main factor in achieving cures. Although the mechanism of tumor resistance to treatment is multifaceted, tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (T-EVs) have been implicated as contributing to the attenuation of ADC therapeutic efficacy. Thus, strategies to eliminate T-EVs are highly promising for overcoming drug resistance. Here we demonstrate plasma exchange therapy to remove T-EVs, decreasing their amount in vitro by 75%. Although trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) treatment alone was effective in our rat tumor model, the combination therapy of T-DM1 and T-EV filtration achieved early tumor shrinkage. Our results indicate that T-EV filtration plus ADC is a promising strategy for overcoming drug resistance.

Incidence and risk of severe adverse events associated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in the treatment of breast cancer: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

T-DM1 has proved its value and effectiveness for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. However, there are clinical concerns regarding T-DM1 induced severe adverse events (AEs). We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to quantify the overall incidence and risk of severe AEs associated with T-DM1 in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase and oncology conference proceedings were searched for relevant studies. Data were extracted to calculate the summary incidence rate and relative risk (RR) of grade ≥3 AEs.

RESULTS

A total of 5,045 patients from 7 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The use of T-DM1 was associated with an increased risk of severe thrombocytopenia (RR 10.66, 95% CI 3.23-35.18, P<0.001), anemia (RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.15-2.44, P= 0.007), elevated ALT (RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.60-4.47, P<0.001) and AST (RR 3.76, 95% CI 1.45-9.78, P=0.007). In addition, the use of T-DM1 can increase the risk of severe hypertension (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.03-2.45, P=0.037) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (RR 8.13, 95% CI 1.89-35.03, P= 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with T-DM1 increases the risk of severe hematologic toxicities, hepatotoxicity, hypertension and peripheral sensory neuropathy in patients with breast cancer, while the overall incidence of these AEs is low.

Is antibody-drug conjugate a rising star for clinical treatment of solid tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) show significant advantages in cancer treatment due to their high selectivity and anti-tumor activity, but the efficacy and safety of the treatment of solid tumors are unknown. We searched research databases, major conference proceedings and trial registries for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Then, we selected qualified studies and extracted dates. Studies were assessed for quality, and a meta-analysis was conducted to quantify effects of ADCs on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). The within-study heterogeneity was evaluated by subgroup and sensitivity analysis. Eleven RCTs with 4353 participants were included. ADCs had better PFS (HR: 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.56-0.82) and OS (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.61-0.92). ADCs resulted in lower risk of febrile neutropenia in blood system. Conversely, ADC therapy had not a prepotent on ORR (RR: 1.36, 95 % CI: 0.71-2.60).

Prognostic/predictive markers in systemic therapy resistance and metastasis in breast cancer

Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous group of diseases posing a significant challenge in biomarker-driven research and the development of effective targeted therapies. Especially the treatment of metastatic breast cancer poses even more challenges, as we still lose more than 42,000 women and men each year in the United States alone. New biological insight helps to improve breast cancer treatment through early detection, adaptation to chemotherapy resistance, and tailoring to find the right size of care. This review focuses on existing and new areas of predictive biomarkers under development to tailor the management of breast cancer and the application of integrative approaches that have resulted in the promising candidate biomarker discovery. Furthermore, we review new methods to detect metastatic progression using imaging, and blood-based assays. We hope to increase the attention and awareness of a new generation of therapeutic development strategies in metastatic breast cancer.

Research Trend of Publications Concerning Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Solid Cancer: A Bibliometric Study

Background: Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) is a promising therapy for solid cancer that has raised global concern. Although several papers have reviewed the current state of ADCs in different solid cancers, a quantitative analysis of the publications in this field is scarce.

Methods: Publications related to ADC in the field of solid cancer were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection. Data analyses were performed with VOSviewer 1.6.9, HistCite 2.1, CiteSpace V and R package Bibliometrix.

Results: A total of 3,482 records were obtained in the holistic field and 1,197 in the clinical field. Steady growth in the number of publications was observed. The United States was the leading contributor in this field. Krop IE was the most influential author. The most productive institution was Genentech Inc., while Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr was the most cited one. The most impactful journal was the Journal of Clinical Oncology. A total of 37 burst references and five burst references were identified between 2017–2022 in the holistic and clinical fields, respectively. Keywords analysis indicated that ADCs research mainly involved breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer, small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, gastric cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. ADC agents including trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan, sacituzumab govitecan, enfortumab vedotin, and rovalpituzumab tesirine were highly studied. Targets including HER2, trophoblast cell-surface antigen, mesothelin, delta-like ligand 3, and nectin-4 were the major concerns.

Conclusion: This study analyzed publications concerning ADCs in the field of solid cancer with bibliometric analysis. Further clinical trials of ADCs and designs of the next generation of ADCs are the current focuses of the field. Acquired resistance of ADCs and biomarkers for ADC therapy efficacy monitoring are future concerns.

Dynamics of Endocytosis and Degradation of Antibody-Drug Conjugate T-DM1 in HER2 Positive Cancer Cells

Purpose

T-DM1 is an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of trastuzumab and DM1 linked together. T-DM1 binds to human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) in tumors and then triggers the endocytosis of T-DM1 and release of payload. Therefore, endocytosis efficacy is considered as a critical step for the initiation of T-DM1 therapy; however, the endocytosis mechanism of T-DM1 remains poorly understood. Meanwhile, HER2 is regarded as an internalization-resistant receptor, which hinders the endocytosis and effectiveness of T-DM1. The present study is to explore the T-DM1 endocytosis pathway, which may provide insights into the internalization mechanism of ADCs and help to improve efficacy.

Methods

Confocal microscopy and flow cytometry were used to analyse T-DM1 intracellular trafficking and endocytosis efficiency, while Western blot assay was performed to detect T-DM1 degradation.

Results

We found that intracellular T-DM1 was increased to 50% within 12 h. T-DM1 was colocalized with cholera toxin B (CTxB), a lipid raft marker, within 2 h and then degraded in lysosome. Upon overexpression of caveolin-1 (CAV-1) and utilization of caveolae/lipid-raft disruptors, we found that temporal CAV-1 upregulation significantly facilitated T-DM1 endocytosis and degradation, whereas nystatin and lovastatin disrupted caveolae/lipid-raft structure and inhibited T-DM1 degradation. We demonstrate that T-DM1 internalizes through the lipid raft-mediated endocytosis in a CAV-1 dependent manner, rather than through the clathrin-mediated endocytosis in HER2-positive cancer cells.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that modulation of the caveolae/lipid-raft mediated endocytosis may be a possible option for improving the clinical therapeutic effect of T-DM1 because it plays a key role in regulating T-DM1 internalization.

Comparative review of pharmacological therapies in individuals with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with focus on hormone receptor subgroups

Breast cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of targeted therapies in human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) have provided an evidence base for regulatory and reimbursement agencies to appraise the use of cancer therapies in clinical practice. However, a subset of these patients harbor additional biomarkers, for example, a positive hormone receptor status that may be more amenable to therapy and improve overall survival (OS). This review seeks to explore the reporting of evidence for treatment effects by the hormone receptor status using the RCT evidence of targeted therapies for HER2-positive ABC patients. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify published RCTs. Extracted data were synthesized using network meta-analysis to obtain the relative effects of HER2-positive-targeted therapies. We identified a gap in the reporting of the effectiveness of therapies by the hormone receptor status as only 15 out of 42 identified RCTs reported hormone receptor subgroup analyses; the majority of which reported progression-free survival but not OS or the overall response rate. In conclusion, we recommend that future trials in ABC should report the effect of cancer therapies in hormone receptor subgroups for all outcomes.

Cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): a single-center experience

Objective

New anti-cancer drugs promise to increased survival benefits and reduce adverse events. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 agent that has shown minimal cardiotoxicity in clinical trials. However, data on real-life outcomes are required.

Methods

A retrospective review of our center’s medical records was performed, including female patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer who were treated with T-DM1. Descriptive statistics were used to investigate clinical features that could increase the risk of cardiotoxicity. Cardiotoxicity was determined by comparing pre and post-T-DM1 echocardiogram results and was defined as a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >10% to below 55%.

Results

Data from 41 female patients with a mean age of 52 ± 11.5 years were evaluated. A significant LVEF decrease (from 59% to 33%) was observed in one patient during T-DM1 treatment. Further investigation showed that this decrease was due to underlying coronary artery disease, and LVEF recovered to the baseline value after coronary revascularization.

Conclusion

T-DM1 seems to be safe in terms of cardiotoxicity. Real-life data with a larger sample size are still needed to confirm the cardiac safety of T-DM1.

Antibody-drug conjugates in treating older patients suffering from cancer: what is the real value?

Immunotherapeutic drugs and target therapies have represented an epochal change in treating cancer patients. They represent an attractive option in oncologists' armamentarium, particularly if we consider the optimal balance between efficacy and toxicity. As a step forward, immuno- and target-therapies have merged intending to improve efficacy: antibody-drug conjugates ensure the perfect combination. They allow the delivery of large amounts of drugs to the target with a limited 'off-target' effect and a low rate of adverse events. These aspects could make immunoconjugates palatable as the first choice for fragile patients, but solid evidence does not exist on the use of these drugs in this population type, especially older people.

DHES0815A, a novel antibody-drug conjugate targeting HER2/neu, is highly active against uterine serous carcinomas in vitro and in vivo

OBJECTIVE

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive histologic variant of endometrial cancer which portends a poor prognosis. DHES0815A is a novel antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC) which binds specifically to HER2 overexpressing tumors at a distinct epitope from that bound by trastuzumab and pertuzumab after which it delivers the toxic payload, PBD-MA, a DNA mono-alkylating agent. The objective of this study was to evaluate the preclinical activity of DHES0815A against primary USC cell lines and xenografts.

METHODS

Twelve primary USC cell lines were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2 protein expression and for C-erbB2 gene amplification using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Cell viability and bystander killing in USC cell lines after exposure to DHES0815A, the non-targeted ADC, and the unconjugated antibody (i.e. MHES0488A) were evaluated using flow cytometry-based-assays. In vivo activity of DHES0815A was tested against HER2/neu overexpressing USC xenografts.

RESULTS

High HER2/neu protein expression was seen in 25% (3/12) of the primary USC cell lines. USC cell lines overexpressing HER2/neu were significantly more sensitive to DHES0815A when compared to the non-targeted control ADC (p < 0.001). DHES0815A did not induce significant bystander killing of HER2/neu negative tumors when admixed with HER2/neu positive tumors. DHES0815A caused growth-inhibition and increased survival in USC HER2/neu overexpressing xenografts when compared to controls (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

DHES0815A is both highly selective and toxic to USC tumors overexpressing HER2/neu both in vitro and in vivo. HER2-directed ADCs, alone or in combination with other HER2/neu targeted agents may represent a novel treatment option for patients with tumors harboring HER2/neu overexpression refractory to trastuzumab and traditional chemotherapy.

Antibody-Antineoplastic Conjugates in Gynecological Malignancies: Current Status and Future Perspectives

In the last decade, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), normally formed by a humanized antibody and a small drug via a chemical cleavable or non-cleavable linker, have emerged as a potential treatment strategy in cancer disease. They allow to get a selective delivery of the chemotherapeutic agents at the tumor level, and, consequently, to improve the antitumor efficacy and, especially to decrease chemotherapy-related toxicity. Currently, nine antibody-drug conjugate-based formulations have been already approved and more than 80 are under clinical trials for the treatment of several tumors, especially breast cancer, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. To date, no ADCs have been approved for the treatment of gynecological formulations, but many formulations have been developed and have reached the clinical stage, especially for the treatment of ovarian cancer, an aggressive disease with a low five-year survival rate. This manuscript analyzes the ADCs formulations that are under clinical research in the treatment of gynecological carcinomas, specifically ovarian, endometrial, and cervical tumors.