1
|
Pham H, Hitos K, Pawaskar R, Sinclair JL, Mathuthu H, Nahm CB, Pang T, Lam V, Richardson A. Multidisciplinary protocol to reduce surgical readmissions in Australia: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. ANZ J Surg 2024. [PMID: 39431747 DOI: 10.1111/ans.19252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unplanned readmissions in general surgery are an important quality indicator of patient care and are associated with increased costs to healthcare services. This study aims to implement a multidisciplinary protocol in a single institution in a tertiary referral hospital to monitor and reduce unplanned readmission rates. METHODS A prospective cohort study using an institution-based protocol was conducted over an 18-month period including patients undergoing a general surgical procedure. The protocol included: (i) implementation of a surgical readmissions nurse-patient liaison; (ii) access to a surgical walk-in clinic; and (iii) early post-discharge phone contact. Data included demographic details, index procedure, hospital length of stay (LOS), and whether contact between patient/nurse occurred upon discharge. The primary outcome was the cause and rate of 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes were mortality, use of surgical clinic, emergency department presentations, and complications. RESULTS After protocol implementation, 874 patients underwent a general surgical procedure, with 354 (49%) being male and an overall median age of 53.0 years (interquartile range: 36.0-67.0). The overall readmission rate was 5.6% (n = 49), with a median LOS after readmission of 4 days. Compared with historical pre-protocol ACS-NSQIP data, this reflects a 30% reduction compared to that of readmission rate of 7.9%, P = 0.03. CONCLUSION The multidisciplinary protocol was efficacious in significantly reducing unplanned readmissions. Continued audits and monitoring of factors associated with readmissions are required to help design targeted projects that may lead to improved outcomes, lower costs, increased patient satisfaction, and better efficiency within our healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Pham
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic/Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerry Hitos
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Research Centre for Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes, Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rishan Pawaskar
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic/Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane-Louise Sinclair
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic/Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hazel Mathuthu
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic/Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher B Nahm
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic/Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tony Pang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic/Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vincent Lam
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic/Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Arthur Richardson
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic/Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hovdenak I, Thaysen HV, Bernstein IT, Christensen P, Hauberg A, Iversen LH, Johansen C, Larsen SL, Laurberg S, Madsen AH, Madsen MR, Rasmussen HV, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Juul T. Quality of life and symptom burden after rectal cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial comparing patient-led versus standard follow-up. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1709-1722. [PMID: 37395934 PMCID: PMC11424718 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01410-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE After curatively intended rectal cancer (RC) surgery, new follow-up strategies are warranted, seeking more individualised care and targeting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional outcomes. The FURCA trial aimed to investigate the effect of patient-led follow-up on HRQoL and symptom burden 3 years after surgery. METHODS RC patients from four Danish centres were randomised 1:1 to intervention (patient-led follow-up with patient education and self-referral to a specialist nurse) or control (standard follow-up with five routine doctor visits). Patients in both groups had a computed tomography (CT) at 1 and 3 years. The primary outcome (HRQoL) was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - colorectal (FACT-C) score (Ward et al. in Qual Life Res. 8(3):181-95, 18). Secondary outcomes were functional measures, patient involvement and satisfaction and cancer recurrence at 3 years. RESULTS From Feb 2016 to Aug 2018, 336 patients were included of whom 248 completed 3 years of follow-up. Between-group differences were found neither for the primary endpoint, nor for functional outcomes. The recurrence rate did not differ between the groups. Patient involvement and satisfaction were higher in the intervention group with statistical significance in almost half of the items. CONCLUSIONS We found no effect on HRQoL and symptom burden from patient-led follow-up, although it may improve patient-perceived involvement and satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The findings in this study suggest that patient-led follow-up is a more tailored approach to meet cancer survivors' needs and might improve their ability to cope with survivorship. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER R97-A6511-14-S23.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Hovdenak
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Henriette Vind Thaysen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Inge Thomsen Bernstein
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Ann Hauberg
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lene Hjerrild Iversen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Late Effect Research Unit, Oncology Clinic, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susie Lindhardt Larsen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Hospitalsparken 15, 7400, Herning, Denmark
| | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Anders Husted Madsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Hospitalsparken 15, 7400, Herning, Denmark
| | - Mogens Rørbæk Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Hospitalsparken 15, 7400, Herning, Denmark
| | - Helle Vindfeldt Rasmussen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ole Thorlacius-Ussing
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Cancer Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Therese Juul
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Song HJ, Seo HJ, Choi EJ, Lee JS, Choi Y. Nursing care services to address unmet supportive care needs among cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01661-9. [PMID: 39240428 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01661-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing population of cancer survivors poses a significant challenge for healthcare systems globally, necessitating comprehensive post-treatment care to address diverse physical, psychological, and social needs. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to synthesize and critically evaluate the current evidence concerning the unmet needs for nursing services among cancer survivors, spanning various dimensions of survivorship care. METHODS A systematic search was conducted across major databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, to identify relevant studies investigating the unmet needs and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) of nursing services led by nurses among cancer survivors. The final search update was conducted in June 2024. Unmet needs dimensions were categorized by the biopsychosocial-spiritual framework. RESULTS Of the 9503 records searched, 18 studies were included. This review revealed mixed findings in the domains of unmet needs and interventions aimed at addressing them. While nurse-led interventions showed promise in addressing physical and daily living needs, outcomes related to psychological and emotional needs varied across studies. Additionally, nurse-led interventions were effective in addressing patient-clinician communication and health system/information needs, although statistical significance was not consistently observed. HRQOL assessments using general and cancer-specific measures yielded mixed findings. CONCLUSIONS Despite limitations of the risk of bias of included studies and weak study designs for evaluating nurse-led intervention effects for cancer survivors, the findings highlight the potential of nursing practice to significantly contribute to improving unmet needs of physical, psychological, and social perspectives and ultimately improving their HRQOL. However, the impact on the spiritual needs of nursing care services is limited by the low number of studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS By providing comprehensive support and management, nursing practice can enhance post-treatment outcomes and HRQOL for cancer survivors, contributing to more patient-centered and effective care delivery. More rigorous research considering a biopsychosocial-spiritual perspective to help cancer survivors improve HRQOL is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jin Song
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32601, USA
| | - Hyun-Ju Seo
- College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, 266 Munhwa-Ro, Jung-Gu, Daejeon, 35015, Republic of Korea.
| | - Eun Jeong Choi
- Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Sung Lee
- Clinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yumi Choi
- College of Nursing, Graduate School of Chungnam National University, 266 Munhwa-Ro, Jung-Gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balitsky AK, Rayner D, Britto J, Lionel AC, Ginsberg L, Cho W, Wilfred AM, Sardar H, Cantor N, Mian H, Levine MN, Guyatt GH. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer Care: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2424793. [PMID: 39136947 PMCID: PMC11322847 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) come directly from the patient, without clinician interpretation, to provide a patient-centered perspective. Objective To understand the association of PROM integration into cancer care with patient-related, therapy-related, and health care utilization outcomes. Data Sources Searches included MEDLINE and MEDLINE Epub ahead of print, in-process, and other nonindexed citations; Embase databases (OvidSP); PsychINFO; CENTRAL; and CINAHL from January 1, 2012 to September 26, 2022. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that enrolled adult patients (ages 18 years and older) with active cancer receiving anticancer therapy using a PROM as an intervention. Data Extraction and Synthesis Pairs of review authors, using prepiloted forms, independently extracted trial characteristics, disease characteristics, and intervention details. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline was followed. Random-effects analyses were conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures, and hospital utilization outcomes. Results From 1996 to 2022, 45 RCTs including 13 661 participants addressed the association of PROMs with outcomes considered important to patients. The addition of a PROM likely reduced the risk of overall mortality (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; moderate certainty), improved HRQoL (range 0-100) at 12 weeks (mean difference [MD], 2.45; 95% CI, 0.42-4.48; moderate certainty). Improvements of HRQoL at 24 weeks were not significant (MD, 1.87; 95% CI, -1.21 to 4.96; low certainty). There was no association between the addition of a PROM and HRQoL at 48 weeks. The addition of a PROM was not associated with reduced ED visits (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.02; low certainty) or hospital admissions (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.02; low certainty). Conclusion and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that the integration of PROMs into cancer care may improve overall survival and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaris K. Balitsky
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences–Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Rayner
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne Britto
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences–Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anath C. Lionel
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lydia Ginsberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wanjae Cho
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Huda Sardar
- Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale
| | - Nathan Cantor
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hira Mian
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences–Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark N. Levine
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences–Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gordon H. Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Askjær T, Juhl CB, Maribo T, Christiansen AF, Oestergaard LG. Telephone consultation for cancer survivors with unclarified need for rehabilitation in a primary healthcare setting: a mixed methods process evaluation. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:2901-2909. [PMID: 37480338 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2238599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the implementation of telephone consultations to assess cancer patients' needs for rehabilitation, with focus on patients' acceptance, health professionals' experience and contextual factors. METHODS A mixed methods process evaluation was conducted at a primary healthcare rehabilitation clinic. Cancer survivors above 18 years of age with an unclarified rehabilitation need at discharge from hospital, was offered a telephone consultation provided by health professionals. Data on implementation and acceptability were collected using medical records systems, data collection forms and semi-structured interviews with six patients and two health professionals. RESULTS Eighty-one cancer survivors were referred to the intervention, and 54% continued to further rehabilitation. The telephone consultations were executed approximately eight days after referral and took on average 44 min to deliver. Overall, the patients found that the telephone consultation addressed what they considered the most important topics, and the health professionals found the intervention to be acceptable. Both patients and health professionals reported challenges regarding the referral process. CONCLUSION Patient acceptance of the intervention was high, and the telephone consultation was implemented to a high degree, resulting in more than half of the patients continuing to further rehabilitation. Patients' and health professionals' perspectives provided valuable insights about contextual factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenna Askjær
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Health and Care, Municipality of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
- Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Carsten B Juhl
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Thomas Maribo
- Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard
- Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bath NM, Palettas M, Stevens L, Sarna A, Ejaz A, Kim A, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM. Patient Perceptions of Care Coordination during Neoadjuvant Therapy for Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Mixed Methods Analysis. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:862-868. [PMID: 38351391 PMCID: PMC11186897 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01030-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Effective cancer care coordination (CCC) is an integral component of health care delivery and critical to achieving optimal oncologic outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapy (NT), the delivery of multimodality therapy prior to surgery, is inherently complex and multidisciplinary, but CCC during NT is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to characterize patient perceptions of CCC during NT using a mixed methods approach. METHODS This study is a cross-sectional analysis of patients with gastrointestinal cancers receiving NT who participated in a prospective longitudinal cohort study evaluating their real-time experience using a customized smartphone application. Patients completed the Cancer Care Coordination Questionnaire for Patients (CCCQ-P), a 20-item validated measure of care coordination quality, six weeks after initiating NT. Items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale, and subsections on communication (13 questions) and navigation (7 questions) were calculated with higher scores signifying better CCC. Univariate linear regression was used to calculate the impact of fragmented care and other factors on perceived CCC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among a convenience sample of patients (n = 5); transcribed interviews were then coded using an inductive approach. RESULTS Among 82 participants, mean age was 61 years old, 68% were male, and mean number of comorbidities was 1.68. Overall (mean 76.6 out of 100), communication subsection (48.6 out of 65), and navigation subsection (28.0 out of 35) CCCQ-P scores suggested overall positive perceptions of care coordination. Qualitative analysis of patient interviews highlighted the need for coordination among physicians before communicating the plan to patients as well as the importance of providers communicating plans in verbal and written form. CONCLUSIONS Successful completion of NT requires significant care coordination between patients and healthcare professionals. Yet, in this cross-sectional analysis of patients on a prospective cohort study, patient perceptions of CCC during NT were overall positive. Future research should focus on optimizing other aspects of care delivery in order to improve outcomes of NT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie M Bath
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, N-907 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Marilly Palettas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, N-907 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Lena Stevens
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, N-907 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Angela Sarna
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, N-907 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, N-907 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Alex Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, N-907 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, N-907 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, N-907 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodriguez AL, Cappelletti L, Kurian SM, Passio C, Rux S. Transitional Care Navigation. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151580. [PMID: 38290928 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This manuscript aims to provide an extensive review of the literature, synthesize findings, and present substantial insights on the current state of transitional care navigation. Additionally, the existing models of care, pertaining to the concept and approach to transitional care navigation, will be highlighted. METHODS An extensive search was conducted though using multiple search engines, topic-specific key terminology, eligibility of studies, as well as a limitation to only literature of existing relevance. Integrity of the evidence was established through a literature review matrix source document. A synthesis of nursing literature from organizations and professional publications was used to generate a comparison among various sources of evidence for this manuscript. Primary evidence sources consisted of peer-reviewed journals and publications from professional organizations such as the AHRQ, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and the Talbot research library. RESULTS A total of five systematic reviews (four with meta-analysis) published between 2016 and 2022 and conducted in several countries (Brazil, Korea, Singapore, and the US) were included in this review. A combined total of 105 studies were included in the systematic reviews with 53 studies included in meta-analyses. The review of the systematic reviews identified three overarching themes: care coordination, care transition, and patient navigation. Care coordination was associated with an increase in care quality rating, increased the health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed patients, reduced hospitalization rates, reduced emergency department visits, timeliness in care, and increased appropriateness of healthcare utilization. Transitional care interventions resulted to reduced average number of admissions in the intervention (I) group vs control (C) (I = 0.75, C = 1.02) 180 days after a 60-day intervention, reduced readmissions at 6 months, and reduced average number of visits 180 days after 60-day intervention (I = 2.79, C = 3.60). Nurse navigators significantly improved the timeliness of care from cancer screening to first-course treatment visit (MD = 20.42, CI = 8.74 to 32.10, P = .001). CONCLUSION The care of the cancer patient entails treatments, therapies, and follow-up care outside of the hospital setting. These transitions can be challenging as they require coordination and collaboration among various health care sites. The attributes of transitional care navigation overlap with care coordination, care transition, and patient navigation. There is an opportunity to formally develop a transitional care navigation model to effectively addresses the challenges in care transitions for patient including barriers to health professional exchange of information or communication across care settings and the complexity of coordination between care settings. The transitional care navigation and clinic model developed at a free-standing NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center is a multidisciplinary approach created to close the gaps in care from hospital to home. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE A transitional care navigation model aims to transform the existing perspectives and viewpoints of hospital discharge and transition of care to home or post-acute care settings as two solitary processes to that of a collective approach to care. The model supports provides an integrated continuum of quality, comprehensive care that supports patient compliance with treatment regimens, reinforces patient and caregiver education, and improves health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Liza Rodriguez
- Chief Nursing Officer and Vice President, Nursing and Patient Services, Department of Nursing, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Lauren Cappelletti
- Clinical Nurse Manager, Department of Nursing, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sherry M Kurian
- Advanced Practice Provider, Department of Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christina Passio
- Clinical Director, Inpatient Services and Operations, Department of Nursing, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Susan Rux
- Associate Vice President, Nursing Education & Professional Development/Innovation, Department of Nursing, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grygorian A, Montano D, Shojaa M, Ferencak M, Schmitz N. Digital Health Interventions and Patient Safety in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e248555. [PMID: 38669018 PMCID: PMC11053376 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Over the past 2 decades, several digital technology applications have been used to improve clinical outcomes after abdominal surgery. The extent to which these telemedicine interventions are associated with improved patient safety outcomes has not been assessed in systematic and meta-analytic reviews. Objective To estimate the implications of telemedicine interventions for complication and readmission rates in a population of patients with abdominal surgery. Data Sources PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were queried to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies published from inception through February 2023 that compared perioperative telemedicine interventions with conventional care and reported at least 1 patient safety outcome. Study Selection Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts to exclude irrelevant studies as well as assessed the full-text articles for eligibility. After exclusions, 11 RCTs and 8 cohort studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis and 7 were included in the narrative review. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were extracted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline and assessed for risk of bias by 2 reviewers. Meta-analytic estimates were obtained in random-effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures Number of complications, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions. Results A total of 19 studies (11 RCTs and 8 cohort studies) with 10 536 patients were included. The pooled risk ratio (RR) estimates associated with ED visits (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.94) and readmissions (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78) favored the telemedicine group. There was no significant difference in the risk of complications between patients in the telemedicine and conventional care groups (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.77-1.43). Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that perioperative telehealth interventions are associated with reduced risk of readmissions and ED visits after abdominal surgery. However, the mechanisms of action for specific types of abdominal surgery are still largely unknown and warrant further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Grygorian
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Diego Montano
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Mahdieh Shojaa
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Ferencak
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Population-Based Medicine, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fethney J, Kim B, Boustany C, McKenzie H, Hayes L, Cox K, Simpson JM, Horvath LG, Vardy JL, McLeod J, Willcock S, Cook N, Acret L, White K. Evaluating a shared care pathway intervention for people receiving chemotherapy to reduce post-treatment unplanned hospital presentations: a randomised controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:77. [PMID: 38170289 PMCID: PMC10764538 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08261-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) was to explore whether a community nursing intervention for outpatients receiving systemic therapy reduced unplanned hospital presentations and improved physical and psychosocial health outcomes over the first three cycles of treatment compared to a control group receiving standard care. METHODS The number of and reasons for unplanned presentations were obtained for 170 intervention and 176 control group adult patients with solid tumours starting outpatient chemotherapy. Poisson regression was used to compare the number of presentations between the intervention and control groups. Patients self-completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Cancer Behavior Inventory and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at the start of the first four cycles. Linear regression techniques were used to compare quality of life outcomes. RESULTS The reduction in unplanned presentations in the intervention group relative to the control group was 12% (95% CI, - 25%, 37%; P = 0.48). At the start of cycle 4, there was no difference in anxiety (difference = 0.47 (95% CI, - 0.28, 1.22; P = 0.22)), depression (difference = 0.57 (95% CI, - 0.18, 1.31; P = 0.13)) or EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score (difference = 0.16 (95% CI, - 2.67, 3.00; P = 0.91)). Scores for self-efficacy as measured by the Cancer Behavior Inventory were higher in the intervention group (difference = 4.3 (95% CI, 0.7, 7.9; P = 0.02)). CONCLUSION This RCT did not demonstrate a benefit in reducing unplanned presentations to hospital. The trial identified improved cancer-based self-efficacy in patients receiving the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614001113640, registered 21/10/2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Fethney
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Bora Kim
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cancer Care Research Unit, Sydney Local Health District, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chantale Boustany
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cancer Care Research Unit, Sydney Local Health District, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heather McKenzie
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lillian Hayes
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Keith Cox
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia
| | - Judy M Simpson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Janette L Vardy
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jodi McLeod
- Sydney District Nursing, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Simon Willcock
- MQ Health, Macquarie University Hospital, Primary Care, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Louise Acret
- Cancer Care Research Unit, Sydney Local Health District, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cancer Care Research Unit, Sydney Local Health District, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mardani A, Azizi M, Alazmani Noodeh F, Alizadeh A, Maleki M, Vaismoradi M, Glarcher M. A concept analysis of transitional care for people with cancer. Nurs Open 2024; 11:e2083. [PMID: 38268301 PMCID: PMC10803885 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.2083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM Transitional care as the journey between different caregivers in multiple healthcare centres is crucial for the provision of care to people with cancer, but it is often complex and poorly coordinated. This study aimed to analyse the concept of transitional care for people with cancer. DESIGN Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on the databases of PubMed (including MEDLINE), EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science to retrieve articles published between 2000 and 2022. RESULTS Twenty-nine eligible articles were selected and their findings were classified in terms of related concepts and alternative terms, antecedents, attributes and consequences. Attributes included three main categories, namely 'nurse-related attributes', 'organisation-related attributes' and 'patient-related attributes'. Antecedents of transitional care for people with cancer were categorized into two main categories: 'patient-related antecedents' and 'caregiver-related antecedents'. Consequences were categorized into 'psychological consequences' and 'objective consequences'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas Mardani
- Department of Medical‐Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and MidwiferyZanjan University of Medical SciencesZanjanIran
| | - Maryam Azizi
- Department of Health in Disaster and Emergencies, Faculty of NursingAja University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Farshid Alazmani Noodeh
- Critical Care Nursing Department, Faculty of NursingAja University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Azizeh Alizadeh
- Department of Education and Research, Army Center of Excellence (NEZAJA)Center of Consultation of Khanevadeh HospitalTehranIran
| | - Maryam Maleki
- Department of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing Education, School of Nursing and MidwiferyTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health SciencesNord UniversityBodøNorway
- Faculty of Science and HealthCharles Sturt UniversityOrangeNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Manela Glarcher
- Institute of Nursing Science and PracticeParacelsus Medical UniversitySalzburgAustria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Husebø ALM, Søreide JA, Kørner H, Storm M, Wathne HB, Richardson A, Morken IM, Urstad KH, Nordfonn OK, Karlsen B. eHealth interventions to support colorectal cancer patients' self-management after discharge from surgery-an integrative literature review. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:11. [PMID: 38055087 PMCID: PMC10700211 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08191-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) creates elevated self-management demands and unmet support needs post-discharge. Follow-up care through eHealth post-primary surgery may be an effective means of supporting patients' needs. This integrative review describes the evidence regarding eHealth interventions post-hospital discharge focusing on delivery mode, user-interface and content, patient intervention adherence, impact on patient-reported outcomes and experiences of eHealth. METHODS A university librarian performed literature searches in 2021 using four databases. After screening 1149 records, the authors read 30 full-text papers and included and extracted data from 26 papers. Two authors analysed the extracted data using the 'framework synthesis approach'. RESULTS The 26 papers were published between 2012 and 2022. The eHealth interventions were mainly delivered by telephone with the assistance of healthcare professionals, combined with text messages or video conferencing. The user interfaces included websites, applications and physical activity (PA) trackers. The interventions comprised the monitoring of symptoms or health behaviours, patient information, education and counselling. Evidence showed a better psychological state and improved PA. Patients reported high satisfaction with eHealth. However, patient adherence was inadequately reported. CONCLUSIONS eHealth interventions may positively impact CRC patients' anxiety and PA regardless of the user interface. Patients prefer technology combined with a human element.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Lunde Marie Husebø
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hartwig Kørner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Marianne Storm
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Hege Bjøkne Wathne
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Alison Richardson
- NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 11, Clinical Academic Facility (Room AA102), South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Ingvild Margreta Morken
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Oda Karin Nordfonn
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Stord, Norway
| | - Bjørg Karlsen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maheta BJ, Singh NK, Lorenz KA, Fereydooni S, Dy SM, Wong HN, Bergman J, Leppert JT, Giannitrapani KF. Interdisciplinary interventions that improve patient-reported outcomes in perioperative cancer care: A systematic review of randomized control trials. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294599. [PMID: 37983229 PMCID: PMC10659207 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Interdisciplinary teams are often leveraged to improve quality of cancer care in the perioperative period. We aimed to identify the team structures and processes in interdisciplinary interventions that improve perioperative patient-reported outcomes for patients with cancer. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL for randomized control trials published at any time and screened 7,195 articles. To be included in our review, studies needed to report patient-reported outcomes, have interventions that occur in the perioperative period, include surgical cancer treatment, and include at least one non physician intervention clinical team member: advanced practice providers, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, and registered nurses. We narratively synthesized intervention components, specifically roles assumed by intervention clinical team members and interdisciplinary team processes, to compare interventions that improved patient-reported outcomes, based on minimal clinically important difference and statistical significance. RESULTS We included 34 studies with a total of 4,722 participants, of which 31 reported a clinically meaningful improvement in at least one patient-reported outcome. No included studies had an overall high risk of bias. The common clinical team member roles featured patient education regarding diagnosis, treatment, coping, and pain/symptom management as well as postoperative follow up regarding problems after surgery, resource dissemination, and care planning. Other intervention components included six or more months of continuous clinical team member contact with the patient and involvement of the patient's caregiver. CONCLUSIONS Future interventions might prioritize supporting clinical team members roles to include patient education, caregiver engagement, and clinical follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhagvat J. Maheta
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, CA, United States of America
- California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, United States of America
| | - Nainwant K. Singh
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, CA, United States of America
- Department of Health Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Karl A. Lorenz
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, CA, United States of America
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | | | - Sydney M. Dy
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Hong-nei Wong
- Lane Medical Library, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Jonathan Bergman
- VA Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Olive View UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - John T. Leppert
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, CA, United States of America
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Karleen F. Giannitrapani
- VA Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, CA, United States of America
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ridgeon E, Shadwell R, Wilkinson A, Odor PM. Mismatch of populations between randomised controlled trials of perioperative interventions in major abdominal surgery and current clinical practice. Perioper Med (Lond) 2023; 12:60. [PMID: 37974283 PMCID: PMC10655289 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-023-00344-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Demographics of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery are changing. External validity of relevant RCTs may be limited by participants not resembling patients encountered in clinical practice. We aimed to characterise differences in age, weight, BMI, and ASA grade between participants in perioperative trials in major abdominal surgery and patients in a reference real-world clinical practice sample. The secondary aim was to investigate whether time since trial publication was associated with increasing mismatch between these groups. METHODS MEDLINE and Embase were searched for multicentre RCTs from inception to September 2022. Studies of perioperative interventions in adults were included. Studies that limited enrolment based on age, weight, BMI, or ASA status were excluded. We compared trial cohort age, weight, BMI, and ASA distribution to those of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at our tertiary referral hospital during September 2021 to September 2022. We used a local, single-institution reference sample to reflect the reality of clinical practice (i.e. patients treated by a clinician in their own hospital, rather than averaged nationally). Mismatch was defined using comparison of summary characteristics and ad hoc criteria based on differences relevant to predicted mortality risk after surgery. RESULTS One-hundred and six trials (44,499 participants) were compared to a reference cohort of 2792 clinical practice patients. Trials were published a median (IQR [range]) 13.4 (5-20 [0-35]) years ago. A total of 94.3% of trials were mismatched on at least one characteristic (age, weight, BMI, ASA). Recruitment of ASA 3 + participants in trials increased over time, and recruitment of ASA 1 participants decreased over time (Spearman's Rho 0.58 and - 0.44, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Patients encountered in our current local clinical practice are significantly different from those in our defined set of perioperative RCTs. Older trials recruit more low-risk than high-risk participants-trials may thus 'expire' over time. These trials may not be generalisable to current patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, and meta-analyses or guidelines incorporating these trials may therefore be similarly non-applicable. Comparison to local, rather than national cohorts, is important for meaningful on-the-ground evidence-based decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliott Ridgeon
- Department of Anaesthetics and Perioperative Medicine, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK.
- Department of Anaesthetics and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
- Perioperative Medicine MSc, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Rory Shadwell
- Department of Critical Care, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Alice Wilkinson
- Department of Anaesthetics, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Peter M Odor
- Department of Anaesthetics and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hwang M, Jiang Y. Personalization in digital health interventions for older adults with cancer: A scoping review. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101652. [PMID: 37866009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Digital health interventions (DHIs) are promising to support older adults with cancer in managing their conditions and improving their health outcomes. However, there is a lack of overall understanding of various DHIs for the aging population with cancer. Specifically, it is unclear how personalization components are included in those DHIs to promote engagement in the interventions among older adults with cancer. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of existing DHIs for older adults with cancer and identify the intervention components, especially personalized features, and effectiveness of these DHIs for improving self-management and psychosocial health. MATERIALS AND METHODS A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, focusing on older adults diagnosed with cancer who participated in DHIs to improve self-management and psychosocial health. Studies using an experimental design and published from 2000 to January 2023 were retrieved from four databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus. After primary data extraction of study characteristics, participants, interventions, and outcomes, DHIs were categorized according to personalized features. RESULTS Out of 9,750 articles, 20 were eligible for this scoping review. The main personalized features of DHIs were categorized into four domains: goal setting, adjusting the plan, data-driven approaches, and motivating behavioral changes. Self-management outcomes were focused on physical activity, diet, and symptom management. Quality of life, depression, and anxiety were addressed as psychosocial health-related outcomes. Although no consistent results were reported on the effectiveness, DHIs with a combination of multiple personalized features, more than three domains, were likely to be more effective in improving self-management outcomes. DISCUSSION This review enhances the understanding of personalized DHIs for older adults with cancer by identifying intervention components, personalized features, and effectiveness on self-management and psychosocial health. Several gaps were identified, including the absence of targeted studies exclusively focusing on older adults, a relative scarcity of personalized features for improving patient engagement, a lack of understanding of the mechanism of effective personalized features, and the necessity for more experimental studies. Addressing these gaps can contribute to improving health outcomes and the quality of care for older adults with cancer by providing the direction for developing effective DHIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misun Hwang
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, MI, USA.
| | - Yun Jiang
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Paley CA, Boland JW, Santarelli M, Murtagh FEM, Ziegler L, Chapman EJ. Non-pharmacological interventions to manage psychological distress in patients living with cancer: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:88. [PMID: 37407974 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01202-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological distress is common in patients with cancer; interfering with physical and psychological wellbeing, and hindering management of physical symptoms. Our aim was to systematically review published evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for cancer-related psychological distress, at all stages of the disease. METHODS We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022311729). Searches were made using eight online databases to identify studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Data were collected on outcome measures, modes of delivery, resources and evidence of efficacy. A meta-analysis was planned if data allowed. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). RESULTS Fifty-nine studies with 17,628 participants were included. One third of studies included mindfulness, talking or group therapies. Half of all studies reported statistically significant improvements in distress. Statistically significant intervention effects on distress were most prevalent for mindfulness techniques. Four of these mindfulness studies had moderate effect sizes (d = -0.71[95% CI: -1.04, -0.37] p < 0.001) (d = -0.60 [95% CI: -3.44, -0.89] p < 0.001) (d = -0.77 [CI: -0.146, -1.954] p < 0.01) (d = -0.69 [CI: -0.18, -1.19] p = 0.008) and one had a large effect size (d = -1.03 [95% CI: -1.51, -0.54] p < 0.001). Heterogeneity of studies precluded meta-analysis. Study quality was variable and some had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS The majority of studies using a mindfulness intervention in this review are efficacious at alleviating distress. Mindfulness-including brief, self-administered interventions-merits further investigation, using adequately powered, high-quality studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42022311729.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole A Paley
- University of Leeds, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds, UK.
| | - Jason W Boland
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Martina Santarelli
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Fliss E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Lucy Ziegler
- University of Leeds, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds, UK
| | - Emma J Chapman
- University of Leeds, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim YM, Min A, Hong HC. The Effectiveness of Telenursing Interventions on Patient Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Semin Oncol Nurs 2023; 39:151406. [PMID: 36966061 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review existing telenursing interventions for patients with colorectal cancer and determine the effects of such interventions on health-related quality of life and health care service utilization. DATA SOURCES We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis after protocol registration. International databases, including PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL and Korean databases, were searched. The last search was conducted on June 8, 2021. Two authors independently selected relevant studies, evaluated their methodological quality, and extracted data. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted using the statistical software STATA 16.0. Of the 223 articles retrieved, 7 were included for narrative synthesis and 3 were used for the meta-analysis. There were 857 patients in the telenursing group and 842 patients in the conventional group. Three studies applied theoretical frameworks for designing the intervention. CONCLUSION The effect of telenursing intervention was not different from that of usual care. However, both readmission rates and emergency department visits were lower in the telenursing group than in the usual care group, although these trends were not statistically significant. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE These findings indicate that telenursing intervention did not differ from usual care in terms of health-related quality of life while reducing readmission and emergency department visits in a nonstatistically significant manner. Therefore, telenursing interventions could serve as a partial alternative to current face-to-face interventions for patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Man Kim
- Assistant Professor, College of Nursing·Research Institute of Nursing Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, South Korea
| | - Ari Min
- Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hye Chong Hong
- Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vohra Y, Brown CM, Moczygemba LR, Wilfong L. Evaluating the relationship between patient activation and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with pancreatic cancer (PwPC). Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:191. [PMID: 36847972 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07632-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advanced pancreatic cancer is synonymous with a high mortality rate, debilitating symptom profile, and minimal prolongation in overall survival. Therefore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is important in patients with pancreatic cancer (PwPC). In chronic conditions, patient activation is positively associated and higher HRQOL. However, no known study has evaluated patient activation, HRQOL, and their association in PwPC. METHODS A 43-item cross-sectional survey assessed patient activation and HRQOL of patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Variables were analyzed descriptively, and relationships were assessed using bivariate statistics (sig p < 0.05). RESULTS Fifty-six patients participating in the study had an average age of 69.5 ± 11.1 years, and the majority were females (51.8%), Caucasians (61.8%), married/partnered (64.3%), and had at least a college degree (59%). Almost half were at stage 4 (48.2%), and most were newly diagnosed (66.1%). Mean patient activation score was 63.5 ± 17.2 (scale range: 0-100), with most at higher activation levels of 3 or 4 (66.7%). Mean HRQOL score of 41.0 ± 12.7 (scale range: 0-72) was low. Patient activation levels, age, education level, and gender explained 21% of variation in overall HRQOL scores. Patients at activation level 4 had significantly higher overall HRQOL versus those at lower activation (level 1 or 2). Higher patient activation was significantly associated with having either private insurance only or multiple insurances and being partnered. CONCLUSION Patient activation significantly predicted HRQOL in PwPC despite the low sample size. Initiatives to increase patient activation should focus on patients of low socioeconomic status and those without partner support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yogesh Vohra
- College of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
| | - Carolyn M Brown
- College of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mavragani A, Baniasadi T, Shirkhoda M, Rostam Niakan Kalhori S, Mohammadzadeh N, Roudini K, Ghalehtaki R, Memari F, Jalaeefar A. Remote Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Survivors Using a Smartphone App and Internet of Things-Based Device: Development and Usability Study. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9:e42250. [PMID: 36790851 PMCID: PMC9978953 DOI: 10.2196/42250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with colorectal cancer who undergo surgery face many postoperative problems. These problems include the risk of relapse, side effects, and long-term complications. OBJECTIVE This study sought to design and develop a remote monitoring system as a technological solution for the postdischarge care of these patients. METHODS This research was conducted in 3 main steps: system feature extraction, system design, and evaluation. After feature extraction from a systematic review, the necessary features were defined by 18 clinical experts in Iran. In the next step, the architecture of the system was designed based on the requirements; the software and hardware parts of the system were embedded in the architecture, then the software system components were drawn using the unified modeling language diagrams, and the details of software system implementation were identified. Regarding the hardware design, different accessible hardware modules were evaluated, and suitable ones were selected. Finally, the usability of the system was evaluated by demonstrating it over a Skype virtual meeting session and using Nilsen's usability principles. RESULTS A total of 21 mandatory features in 5 main categories, including patient information registration, periodic monitoring of health parameters, education, reminders, and assessments, were defined and validated for the system. The software was developed using an ASP.Net core backend, a Microsoft SQL Server database, and an Ionic frontend alongside the Angular framework, to build an Android app. The user roles of the system included 3 roles: physicians, patients, and the system administrator. The hardware was designed to contain an Esp8266 as the Internet of Things module, an MLX90614 infrared temperature sensor, and the Maxim Integrated MAX30101 sensor for sensing the heartbeat. The hardware was designed in the shape of a wristband device using SolidWorks 2020 and printed using a 3D printer. The firmware of the hardware was developed in Arduino with the capability of firmware over the air. In evaluating the software system from the perspective of usability, the system received an average score of 3.8 out of 5 from 4 evaluators. CONCLUSIONS Sensor-based telemonitoring systems for patients with colorectal cancer after surgery are possible solutions that can make the process automatic for patients and caregivers. The apps for remote colorectal patient monitoring could be designed to be useful; however, more research regarding the developed system's implementation in clinic settings and hospitals is required to understand the probable barriers and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tayebeh Baniasadi
- Department of Health Information Technology, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Mohammad Shirkhoda
- Department of General Surgery, Subdivision of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics (PLRI), Technical University of Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Niloofar Mohammadzadeh
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kamran Roudini
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Ghalehtaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fereidoon Memari
- Department of General Surgery, Subdivision of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirmohsen Jalaeefar
- Department of General Surgery, Subdivision of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Savira F, Gupta A, Gilbert C, Huggins CE, Browning C, Chapman W, Haines T, Peeters A. Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e38081. [PMID: 36652291 PMCID: PMC9892987 DOI: 10.2196/38081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a rapid shift toward the adoption of virtual health care services in Australia. It is unknown how widely virtual care has been implemented or evaluated for the care of older adults in Australia. OBJECTIVE We aimed to review the literature evaluating virtual care initiatives for older adults across a wide range of health conditions and modalities and identify key challenges and opportunities for wider adoption at both patient and system levels in Australia. METHODS A scoping review of the literature was conducted. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AgeLine, and gray literature (January 1, 2011, to March 8, 2021) to identify virtual care initiatives for older Australians (aged ≥65 years). The results were reported according to the World Health Organization's digital health evaluation framework. RESULTS Among the 6296 documents in the search results, we identified 94 that reported 80 unique virtual care initiatives. Most (69/80, 89%) were at the pilot stage and targeted community-dwelling older adults (64/79, 81%) with chronic diseases (52/80, 65%). The modes of delivery included videoconference, telephone, apps, device or monitoring systems, and web-based technologies. Most initiatives showed either similar or better health and behavioral outcomes compared with in-person care. The key barriers for wider adoption were physical, cognitive, or sensory impairment in older adults and staffing issues, legislative issues, and a lack of motivation among providers. CONCLUSIONS Virtual care is a viable model of care to address a wide range of health conditions among older adults in Australia. More embedded and integrative evaluations are needed to ensure that virtually enabled care can be used more widely by older Australians and health care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feby Savira
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Adyya Gupta
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Cecily Gilbert
- Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catherine E Huggins
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Colette Browning
- Health Innovation and Transformation Centre, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia
| | - Wendy Chapman
- Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Terry Haines
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Monash University, Frankston, Australia
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, Australia
| | - Anna Peeters
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nain RA, Ahmedy F, Thomas DC. Telephone-based Support in Preventing Stoma and Peristomal Complications: A Review of Literature. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.10888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A stoma is classified as either permanent or temporary depending on the time of anastomosis, and is referred to as a colostomy, ileostomy, or urostomy based on the organ to which it is anastomosed. The creation of a stoma poses many challenges to patients as they adapt to this profound life-changing event that affects fundamental aspects of quality of life. To reduce the risk of stoma and peristomal complications after discharge, telephone-based support (TBS) program which includes patient follow-up, counselling, and the benefits of group support activities including information sharing, health education and counselling, symptom management, early detection of problems, reassurance, and high-quality aftercare. This article narrates common stoma and peristomal complications as well as TBS program to support in reducing these complications.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bu S, Smith A‘B, Janssen A, Donnelly C, Dadich A, Mackenzie LJ, Smith AL, Young AL, Wu VS, Smith SJ, Sansom-Daly UM. Optimising implementation of telehealth in oncology: A systematic review examining barriers and enablers using the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 180:103869. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
22
|
Nkhoma KB, Cook A, Giusti A, Farrant L, Petrus R, Petersen I, Gwyther L, Venkatapuram S, Harding R. A systematic review of impact of person-centred interventions for serious physical illness in terms of outcomes and costs. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054386. [PMID: 35831052 PMCID: PMC9280891 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centred care (PCC) is being internationally recognised as a critical attribute of high-quality healthcare. The International Alliance of Patients Organisations defines PCC as care that is focused and organised around people, rather than disease. Focusing on delivery, we aimed to review and evaluate the evidence from interventions that aimed to deliver PCC for people with serious physical illness and identify models of PCC interventions. METHODS Systematic review of literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, using the following key concepts: patient/person-centred care, family centred care, family based care, individualised care, holistic care, serious illness, chronic illness, long-term conditions from inception to April 2022. Due to heterogeneity of interventions and populations studied, narrative synthesis was conducted. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs checklist. RESULTS We screened n=6156 papers. Seventy-two papers (reporting n=55 different studies) were retained in the review. Most of these studies (n=47) were randomised controlled trials. Our search yielded two main types of interventions: (1) studies with self-management components and (2) technology-based interventions. We synthesised findings across these two models:Self-management component: the interventions consisted of training of patients and/or caregivers or staff. Some studies reported that interventions had effect in reduction hospital admissions, improving quality of life and reducing costs of care.Technology-based interventions: consisted of mobile phone, mobile app, tablet/computer and video. Although some interventions showed improvements for self-efficacy, hospitalisations and length of stay, quality of life did not improve across most studies. DISCUSSION PCC interventions using self-management have some effects in reducing costs of care and improving quality of life. Technology-based interventions improves self-efficacy but has no effect on quality of life. However, very few studies used self-management and technology approaches. Further work is needed to identify how self-management and technology approaches can be used to manage serious illness. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018108302.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kennedy Bashan Nkhoma
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Amelia Cook
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alessandra Giusti
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lindsay Farrant
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ruwayda Petrus
- School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal College of Humanities, Durban, South Africa
| | - I Petersen
- Centre for Rural Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Liz Gwyther
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Richard Harding
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bonetti L, Tolotti A, Anderson G, Nania T, Vignaduzzo C, Sari D, Barello S. Nursing interventions to promote patient engagement in cancer care: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2022; 133:104289. [PMID: 35751947 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient engagement is becoming increasingly relevant in cancer care. Nurses have been recognized as crucial in promoting active engagement of people with carcer. Despite the growing interest on this topic and the relevance of patient engagement interventions to improve patient' conditions, to the best of our knowledge there is no synthesis of the literature on the characteristics and impact of nurse-led patient engagement intervention for adults with cancer. OBJECTIVE This review aims to systematically summarize nurse-led patient engagement interventions for adult patients diagnosed with cancer and to describe the state of the art on the impact of these interventions on patients' outcomes. DESIGN Systematic review. SETTING(S) Hospital and outpatient care. PARTICIPANTS Adults with cancer. METHODS We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane library from 2005 to 2021. We included randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental studies and single-arm, pre-test/post-test studies written in English, Spanish, French and Italian. All the included articles reported nurse-led patient engagement interventions designed to improve patient engagement in the management of their own disease and to assess outcomes related to patient engagement. We appraised the methodological quality of the included articles with the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. RESULTS Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria. Four distinct types of nurse-led engagement interventions, showing different degrees of complexity, were classified: (i) generic health information delivery, (ii) patient-specific information delivery, (iii) personalized decision support and (iv) motivational support. These interventions were effective in supporting behavioral changes and reducing symptoms burden of adults with cancer. In addition, many of the retrieved studies showed significant increase in patients' knowledge, informed decisions making, perceived quality of nurse-patient interaction and quality of life after the engagement intervention. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review summarized a wide variety of nurse-led patient engagement interventions with different degrees of complexity. In addition, a significant positive effect of these interventions was found on outcomes such as patient activation, self-efficacy, health literacy and quality of life. Among those identified, nurse-led motivational interventions appear to be the most effective ones for improving engagement outcomes in adults with cancer. REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO Nr: CRD42020146189.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loris Bonetti
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Department of Nursing, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland; University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, Via Violino, 11, Manno 6928, Switzerland.
| | - Angela Tolotti
- Nursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
| | - Gloria Anderson
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Tiziana Nania
- Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
| | - Camilla Vignaduzzo
- EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Department of Phychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano and Cremona, L.Go Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.
| | - Davide Sari
- Department of Nursing, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
| | - Serena Barello
- EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Department of Phychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano and Cremona, L.Go Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Effectiveness of care transition strategies for colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:6251-6261. [PMID: 35459953 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07033-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implementing effective strategies to transition care for individuals with colorectal cancer is an important tool to qualify care for affected individuals, as well as contribute to the dispensation of continuous and quality care to patients. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to transition from hospital care to the community compared to usual care for colorectal cancer patients to reduce hospital stay, readmissions at 30 days, and visit to the emergency department up to 30 days. METHOD Systematic review and meta-analysis followed the recommendations of PRISMA statement, with protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42,020,162,249). Searches were carried out in May 2020 in the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The measure of effect used for dichotomous outcomes was relative risk, and for continuous outcomes, the difference of means was used, with their confidence intervals of 95%. Heterogeneity was evaluated using inconsistency statistics. RESULTS Of 631 identified studies, seven studies were included. The meta-analysis of the studies showed a reduction in readmissions at 30 days of 32% and a significant reduction in hospital stay time of approximately one and a half days, both of which were analyzed in favor of the group of care transition interventions. CONCLUSION The findings showed effective care transition strategies for the transition of colorectal cancer patients, such as post-discharge active surveillance program, standardized protocol of improved recovery, and telephone follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION CRD42020162249.
Collapse
|
25
|
Hladkowicz E, Dumitrascu F, Auais M, Beck A, Davis S, McIsaac DI, Miller J. Evaluations of postoperative transitions in care for older adults: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:329. [PMID: 35428193 PMCID: PMC9013054 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-02989-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most people having major surgery are over the age of 65. The transition out of hospital is a vulnerable time for older adults, particularly after major surgery. Research on postoperative transitions in care is growing, but it is not clear how postoperative transitions are being evaluated. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesize processes and outcomes used to evaluate postoperative transitions in care for older adults. Methods We conducted a scoping review that included articles evaluating a postoperative transition in care among adults aged > 65 having major elective surgery. We searched Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINHAL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from their respective inception dates to April 6, 2021. We also searched The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov from their respective inception dates to April 6, 2021. Screening and data extraction was completed by reviewers in duplicate. Data relevant to study design and objective, intervention description, and process or outcome evaluations were extracted. Process evaluations were categorized using the Ideal Transitions in Care Framework, and outcome evaluations were categorized using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Triple Aim Framework. Results After screening titles and abstracts and full-text article review, we included 20 articles in our final synthesis. There was variability in the processes and outcomes used to evaluate postoperative transitions in care. The most common outcomes evaluated were health service utilization (n = 9), including readmission and Emergency Department visits, experiential outcomes (n = 9) and quality of life (n = 7). Process evaluations included evaluating the education provided to patients to promote self-management (n = 6), coordination of care among team members (n = 3) and outpatient follow-up (n = 3). Only two articles measured frailty, one article used theory to guide their evaluations and no articles engaged knowledge users. Conclusions There is inconsistency in how postoperative transitions in care were evaluated. There is a need to use theories and to engage key stakeholders involved in postoperative transitions in care, including older adults and their caregivers, to identify the most appropriate approaches for developing and evaluating interventions to meaningfully improve care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-02989-6.
Collapse
|
26
|
Salmi LR, Roberts T, Renaud T, Buffeteau S, Cueille S, Fourneyron E, Gaillard A, Abraham M, Arditi N, Castry M, Daniel F, N'gom NF, Guéry O, L'Horty Y, Pincemail S, Purgues S, Thiessard F, Ramel V, Langlois E, Saillour-Glénisson F, Sibé M, Wittwer J. An evaluation of five regional health information technology-based programmes to improve health and social care coordination: A quasi-experimental controlled before/after mixed design. J Health Serv Res Policy 2022; 27:122-132. [DOI: 10.1177/13558196211065704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Health information technology (HIT) can help coordinate health and social actors involved in patients’ pathways. We assess five regional HIT-based programmes (‘ Territoires de Soins Numériques’ or TSN) introduced in France, covering the period 2012–2018. Methods This was a quasi-experimental controlled before/after mixed design. We used data from the French National Health Insurance database, qualitative and quantitative surveys, and information extracted from project documents and databases. We assessed the impact of TSN using four main impact indicators: emergency room visits, unplanned hospitalizations, avoidable hospitalizations and rehospitalization within 30 days. We also collected qualitative and secondary quantitative data covering perceived needs, knowledge, use, satisfaction, adoption and understanding of projects, pathway experience, impact on professional practices and appropriateness of hospitalizations. Results TSN implemented a heterogeneous mix of HIT. Implementation was slower than expected and was not well documented. Users perceived the HIT as having a positive but weak overall effect. There were no significant differences in trends for the main impact indicators, nor on the appropriateness of hospitalizations, but favourable trends on secondary polypharmacy indicators. Conclusions If similar innovations take place in future, they should be based on a logical framework that defines causal, measurable links between services provided and expected impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis-Rachid Salmi
- CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service d'Information Médicale, Bordeaux, France
- Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Tamara Roberts
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Thomas Renaud
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sophie Buffeteau
- Fédération nationale des observatoires de la santé, Paris, France
| | | | - Emmanuelle Fourneyron
- Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Aurélie Gaillard
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Maelys Abraham
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nora Arditi
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mathieu Castry
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Fabien Daniel
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - N'deye Fatou N'gom
- CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service d'Information Médicale, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Orlane Guéry
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Yannick L'Horty
- Fédération nationale des observatoires de la santé, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Pincemail
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sonia Purgues
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Franz Thiessard
- CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service d'Information Médicale, Bordeaux, France
- Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Viviane Ramel
- Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emmanuel Langlois
- Univ. Bordeaux/Sciences Po Bordeaux, Centre Emile Durkheim, Bordeaux, France
| | - Florence Saillour-Glénisson
- CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service d'Information Médicale, Bordeaux, France
- Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Matthieu Sibé
- Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jérôme Wittwer
- Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Development of an evidence-based reference framework for care coordination with a focus on the micro level of integrated care: A mixed method design study combining scoping review of reviews and nominal group technique. Health Policy 2022; 126:245-261. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
28
|
Goehner D, Kandregula S, Birk H, Carroll CP, Guthikonda B, Kosty JA. Improving patient care in neurosurgery through postoperative telephone calls: a systematic review and lessons from all surgical specialties. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 51:E5. [PMID: 34724638 DOI: 10.3171/2021.8.focus21410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative telephone calls are a simple intervention that can be used to improve communication with patients, potentially affecting patient safety and satisfaction. Few studies in the neurosurgical literature have examined the effect of a postoperative telephone call on patient outcomes, although several exist across all surgical specialties. The authors performed a systematic review and analyzed studies published since 2000 to assess the effect of a postoperative telephone call or text message on patient safety and satisfaction across all surgical specialties. METHODS A search of PubMed-indexed articles was performed on June 12, 2021, and was narrowed by the inclusion criteria of studies from surgical specialties with > 50 adult patients published after 1999, in which a postoperative telephone call was made and its effects on safety and satisfaction were assessed. Exclusion criteria included dental, medical, and pediatric specialties; systematic reviews; meta-analyses; and non-English-language articles. Dual review was utilized. RESULTS Overall, 24 articles met inclusion criteria. The majority reported an increase in patient satisfaction scores after a postoperative telephone call was implemented, and half of the studies demonstrated an improvement in safety or outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, these studies demonstrate that implementation of a postoperative telephone call in a neurosurgical practice is a feasible way to enhance patient care. The major limitations of this study were the heterogeneous group of studies and the limited neurosurgery-specific studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Goehner
- 1University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of General Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Sandeep Kandregula
- 2Louisiana State University Health Shreveport School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Harjus Birk
- 2Louisiana State University Health Shreveport School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Christopher P Carroll
- 3Department of Brain & Spine Surgery, Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia; and.,4Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Bharat Guthikonda
- 2Louisiana State University Health Shreveport School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Jennifer A Kosty
- 2Louisiana State University Health Shreveport School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Shreveport, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hovdenak Jakobsen I, Vind Thaysen H, Laurberg S, Johansen C, Juul T. Patient-led follow-up reduces outpatient doctor visits and improves patient satisfaction. One-year analysis of secondary outcomes in the randomised trial Follow-Up after Rectal CAncer (FURCA). Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1130-1139. [PMID: 34238100 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1950924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND FURCA (Follow-Up after Rectal Cancer) is a multi-centre randomised trial comparing patient-led follow-up with standard outpatient follow-up. This paper reports one-year follow-up data from the FURCA trial on selected secondary outcomes including type and number of contacts, patient-reported involvement and satisfaction with health care services during follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with rectal cancer (stage < IV) from four Danish surgical centres were randomised (1:1) into intervention (education and self-referral to project nurse) or standard follow-up (routine clinical doctor visits). The present analysis involved data on hospital contacts during the first year after surgery, patient involvement and satisfaction measured at one year, and baseline patient-reported and clinical variables. RESULTS Of 512 eligible patients, 168 were allocated to patient-led follow-up (intervention) and 168 to standard follow-up (control). The total number of hospital contacts in the intervention arm did not differ significantly from the number of contacts in the control arm (p = 0.44). More patients had ≥15 contacts in the intervention arm than in the control arm (p = 0.004). The total number of outpatient doctor visits was significantly lower in the intervention arm (p < 0.001). Patients in both arms rated involvement and satisfaction high; yet patients in the intervention arm scored significantly higher on two of six items regarding involvement and all five items regarding satisfaction. Of the 168 patients in the intervention arm, 43% made direct contact (self-referral) to the project nurse, and 14 of these patients (8%) had ≥4 contacts. The primary reason for self-referral was bowel dysfunction. DISCUSSION The findings indicate the value of a patient-led follow-up program in terms of direct access and more individually tailored intervention based on patients' needs, with most tasks being managed by nurses. Patient-led follow-up came with improved patient-perceived involvement and satisfaction; thus, it was both acceptable and favourable for the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Late Effect Research Unit, Oncology Clinic, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Therese Juul
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nazarpour S, Mohammadipour F, Mohammadi R, Goudarzi F, Esmaeilbeigy D. The effect of telephone counselling and follow-up on empowering women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Health Care Women Int 2021; 43:1415-1432. [PMID: 34283702 DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2021.1941026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Empowering women with breast cancer leads to better adaptation to diagnosis and treatment, and reduces the symptoms of cancer. The purpose of the researchers is to determine the effect of a telephone counseling and follow-up program on empowerment of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. We used a non-randomized clinical trial design. Researchers applied the telephone counseling and follow-up to the intervention group for 8 weeks. At the end of study, the intervention group showed improvement in measures of cancer functional management and breast cancer specific function, along with satisfaction with the decision, general symptoms of cancer and specific symptoms of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiva Nazarpour
- Student Research Committee, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Mohammadipour
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - Rasool Mohammadi
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Nutrition, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - Fateme Goudarzi
- Department of Nursing, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - Darya Esmaeilbeigy
- Student Research Committee, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ochoa CY, Toledo G, Iyawe-Parsons A, Navarro S, Farias AJ. Multilevel Influences on Black Cancer Patient Experiences With Care: A Qualitative Analysis. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e645-e653. [PMID: 33974829 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Black patients with cancer report worse experiences with health care compared with White patients; however, little is known about what influences these ratings. The objective of this study is to explore the multilevel factors that influence global ratings of care for Black cancer survivors. METHODS We conducted semistructured in-depth interviews with 18 Black cancer survivors. We assessed the global ratings of their personal doctor, specialist, health plan, prescription drug plan, and overall health care, and asked patients to elaborate on their rating. We analyzed the interviews with a deductive grounded theory approach using the socioecologic model to identify the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and environmental influences on Black cancer patient experiences with global ratings of care. We used an inductive constant comparison approach to identify additional themes that emerged. Two coauthors separately coded a set of transcripts and met to refine the codebook. RESULTS On average, participants reported the highest mean rating for their specialist (9.39/10) and the lowest mean rating for their personal doctor (7.33/10). Emerging themes that influenced patient ratings were perceptions about their interaction with medical providers, physician communication, the doctor's expertise, and aspects of the physical facilities. Global ratings of care measures were widely influenced by patient interactions with their providers that were empathetic, nondiscriminatory, and where the doctors addressed all concerns. CONCLUSION This grounded theory study identifies multiple aspects of health care that intervention researchers, health care administrators, and providers may target to improve Black cancer patient experiences with care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Y Ochoa
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Gabriela Toledo
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aisa Iyawe-Parsons
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.,Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stephanie Navarro
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.,Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Albert J Farias
- Department of Preventive Medicine, The Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Eustache J, El-Kefraoui C, Ekmekjian T, Latimer E, Lee L. Do postoperative telemedicine interventions with a communication feature reduce emergency department visits and readmissions?-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:5889-5904. [PMID: 34231068 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08607-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions after surgery are common and represent a significant cost-burden on the healthcare system. A notable portion of these unplanned visits are the result of expected complications or normal recovery after surgery, suggesting that improved coordination and communication in the outpatient setting could potentially prevent these. Telemedicine can improve patient-physician communication and as such may have a role in limiting unplanned emergency department visits and readmissions in postoperative patients. METHODS Major electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in surgical patients examining the effect of postoperative telemedicine interventions with a communication feature on 30-day readmissions and emergency department visits as compared to current standard postoperative follow-up. All surgical subspecialties were included. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias using standardized tools. Our primary outcomes of interest were 30-day ED visits and readmissions. Our secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction with the intervention. RESULTS 29 studies were included in the final analysis. Fourteen studies were RCTs, and the remaining fifteen were cohort studies. Eighteen studies reported 30-day ED visit as an outcome. There was no overall reduction in 30-day ED visit in the telemedicine group (RR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.70-1.12). Twenty-two studies reported 30-day readmission as an outcome. The overall pooled estimate did not show a difference in this outcome (RR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.74-1.09). Fifteen studies reported a metric of patient satisfaction regarding utilization of the telemedicine intervention. All studies demonstrated high levels of satisfaction (> 80%) with the telemedicine intervention. DISCUSSION This review fails to demonstrate a clear reduction ED visits and readmissions to support use of a telemedicine intervention across the board. This may be in part explained by significant heterogeneity in the proportions of potentially preventable visits in each surgical specialty. As such, targeting interventions to specific surgical settings may prove most useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jules Eustache
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Glen Campus-DS1.3310, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Charbel El-Kefraoui
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Taline Ekmekjian
- Medical Libraries, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Eric Latimer
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Douglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Glen Campus-DS1.3310, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. .,Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Li J, Liu Y, Jiang J, Peng X, Hu X. Effect of telehealth interventions on quality of life in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud 2021; 122:103970. [PMID: 34303269 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With advances in cancer disease diagnosis and treatment, the trends of cancer survival continue to increase, but cancer survivors usually experience disease- or treatment-related problems (including both physiological and psychological problems) and poorer quality of life. Various types of telehealth interventions have been widespread in the field of medical care and have been shown to be cost-effective, to have high levels of patient satisfaction, and to have high acceptability among health professionals. Currently, there is no definite conclusion about the effectiveness of telehealth interventions on cancer survivors' quality of life. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of telehealth interventions on cancer survivors' quality of life and compare the effectiveness of different types. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) to identify relevant studies from inception to 14 April 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted the data. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Data synthesis was conducted in Review Manager (Version 5.3), and the quality of life scores were calculated by using the standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also conducted. RESULTS Twenty-eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2002 to 2020 were included. Meta-analysis revealed significant effects of telehealth interventions on cancer survivors' quality of life (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14-0.34, P < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis showed that the most effective method was application-based intervention (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.17-0.66) and the short-term telehealth intervention was more effective than other durations of intervention (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.06-0.50). The effects on breast cancer survivors' quality of life were greater than those on the other types of cancer survivors (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10-0.51). Sensitivity analysis indicated that the pooled results were robust and reliable. CONCLUSION Telehealth interventions are effective and alternative methods for improving quality of life among cancer survivors. The most effective approach was application-based intervention, the most common approach was website-based intervention, and in terms of intervention durations, the short-term telehealth intervention was the most effective. Most telehealth interventions included breast cancer survivors. More large, well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the effects of telehealth interventions on quality of life in cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juejin Li
- West China School of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No 37 Guo-xue-xiang Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China
| | - Yong Liu
- Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China
| | - Jianjun Jiang
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China
| | - Xingchen Peng
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China
| | - Xiaolin Hu
- West China School of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No 37 Guo-xue-xiang Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Meng X, Wang X, Dong Z. Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on quality of life, anxiety, and depression scores in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:5635-5652. [PMID: 33786669 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06185-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Different non-pharmacological interventions have been considered and applied to patients with colorectal cancer to improve their quality of life and distress symptoms; however, there is little evidence comparing the effectiveness of these strategies. This review aimed at assessing the effect of non-pharmacological interventions on quality of life, anxiety, and depression scores among patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS A systematic search for articles published until August 1, 2020, in the English language was performed in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library; the reference lists of eligible articles were scanned for other potentially eligible publications. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to estimate pooled effect sizes. RESULTS Twenty studies were included, representing a total of 3438 patients with colorectal cancer. Non-pharmacological interventions were associated with a significant reduction in anxiety (standardized mean difference [SMD] = - 0.157; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.312-[- 0.002]) and depression (SMD = - 0.207; 95% CI, - 0.390-[- 0.024]) scores during 5-8 months of follow-up. Subgroup analyses revealed that interventions delivered face-to-face improved patients' quality of life during 1-4 months of follow-up. Moreover, interventions delivered face-to-face but without a behavioral component were associated with improved anxiety scores, whereas interventions with a behavioral component improved the depression scores during 5-8 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Non-pharmacological interventions were associated with reduced anxiety and depression scores, whereas interventions delivered face-to-face were associated with improved quality of life scores in patients with colorectal cancer. Given the few studies and patients included in this meta-analysis, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyu Meng
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaodong Wang
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zaiquan Dong
- Mental Health Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Luo X, Li J, Chen M, Gong J, Xu Y, Li Q. A literature review of post-treatment survivorship interventions for colorectal cancer survivors and/or their caregivers. Psychooncology 2021; 30:807-817. [PMID: 33656767 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors have reported a number of concerns and unmet needs after treatment completion. This paper aims to explore existing survivorship interventions after CRC treatment according to the American Cancer Society CRC Survivorship Care Guidelines, to identify study gaps, and provide valuable evidence directing future research. METHODS Five electronic databases, including CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from 2005 to October 2020, were systematically searched to identify English or Chinese literature on CRC post-treatment survivorship interventions. Manual searching through the articles' references lists was also conducted. RESULTS Thirty studies met the criteria, and focused on addressing issues in four CRC Survivorship Care Guidelines domains. Several issues for CRC surveillance programmes remain to be explored. Regarding the long-term physical and psychosocial effects of CRC treatment, we found mounting evidence for various interventions to solve ostomy issues and improve distress/depression/anxiety, strong evidence for exercise to improve fatigue, and limited evidence in addressing CRC patient sexual concerns. For health promotion, high-quality evidence was found for exercises to improve cardiopulmonary fitness, metabolism, tumour-related biomarkers, and short-term improvement in physical fitness and QOL. Emerging evidence was found for a survivorship care plan to improve patient perceptions of care coordination. CONCLUSIONS Further refinements based on the existing evidence, and the development of comprehensive CRC survivorship care comprising multiple essential survivorship components, are required. Furthermore, considering both survivor and caregiver cancer survivorship needs, future research may optimise the care delivered, and help survivors and their families live better with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingjuan Luo
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jieyu Li
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Meizhen Chen
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiali Gong
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yongyong Xu
- School of Medicine, Northwest University, Xian, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qiuping Li
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Döking S, Koulil SSV, Thewes B, Braamse AM, Custers JA, Prins JB. Combined Face-to-Face and Online Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for High Distress of Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Case Study. COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2020.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
37
|
Miller M, Roxburgh CS, McCann L, Connaghan J, Van-Wyk H, McSorley S, Maguire R. Development of a Remote Monitoring Application to Improve Care and Support Patients in the First 30 Days Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Semin Oncol Nurs 2020; 36:151086. [PMID: 33218885 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To design and develop a digital monitoring application to support and improve the care of patients in the first 30 post-operative days following colorectal cancer surgery. DATA SOURCES Patient interviews, health professional focus groups, patient co-creation activities, and health professional prioritization discussions. CONCLUSION The structured and iterative co-design activities adopted in this study with key stakeholders, including patients and health professionals, lead to the development of a prototype application (app) to support patients at home during the first 30 days following surgery for colorectal cancer. A similar approach could be implemented to develop comparable apps for patients with other cancer diagnoses requiring different surgical procedures. Further research should focus on the continued development and testing of this app in relation to patient care and outcomes as well as the app's affect on nursing and other health services. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Clinical implementation of remote monitoring following discharge home after surgery for colorectal cancer gives patients the opportunity to report issues of concern to relevant health professionals. This could facilitate the early identification of concerning signs and symptoms, ensuring appropriate and timely interventions to minimize readmission rates. Patients' experiences during the recovery period could also be improved through the provision of reliable and relevant online information. More specifically, health professionals could easily identify those patients requiring additional support to manage their recovery, for example, those with more severe symptoms or problems, facilitating the direction of appropriate health services to those most in need of their expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morven Miller
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XH, United Kingdom
| | | | - Lisa McCann
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XH, United Kingdom
| | - John Connaghan
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XH, United Kingdom
| | - Hester Van-Wyk
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, G31 2ER, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen McSorley
- School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, United Kingdom
| | - Roma Maguire
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XH, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Liu A, Yan S, Wang H, Lin Y, Wu J, Fu L, Wu Q, Lu Y, Liu Y, Chen H. Ward nurses-focused educational intervention improves the quality of bowel preparation in inpatients undergoing colonoscopy: A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20976. [PMID: 32898990 PMCID: PMC7478607 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate bowel preparation is essential for the detection of pathological lesions during colonoscopy. However, it has been found to be inadequate in approximately 20% to 30% of colonoscopy examinations. Educational interventions focused on health staff, such as physicians and nurses, may improve the patients' understanding of the bowel preparation instructions, and consequently, increase the quality of bowel preparation. OBJECTIVES To investigate whether enhanced education of ward nurses could improve the bowel preparation quality in inpatients undergoing colonoscopy. DESIGN This was a single-center randomized controlled study. METHODS A total of 190 consecutive inpatients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy from March 2019 to March 2020 were randomized to the educated (nurses with enhanced education) or control group (nurses without enhanced education). We assessed the bowel preparation quality using the Boston bowel preparation scale. RESULTS There were 89 patients in the educated group and 101 patients in the control group. The proportion of colonoscopies with adequate bowel preparation was 83.1% in the educated group and 69.3% in the control group. Patients' compliance with bowel preparation in the educated group was superior to that in the control group. Furthermore, significantly better sleep quality was found in the educated group. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the ward nurses-focused enhanced educational intervention as a risk factor for bowel preparation quality. CONCLUSIONS The ward nurses-focused educational intervention improved the bowel preparation quality and reduced the adverse event rates in inpatients undergoing colonoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under number ChiCTR2000030366.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yijia Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery
| | - Junkui Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Liping Fu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Qining Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Yi Lu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Yanan Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Honglei Chen
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Patients with frailty experience substantial physical and emotional distress related to their condition and face increased morbidity and mortality compared with their nonfrail peers. Palliative care is an interdisciplinary medical specialty focused on improving quality of life for patients with serious illness, including those with frailty, throughout their disease course. Anesthesiology providers will frequently encounter frail patients in the perioperative period and in the intensive care unit (ICU) and can contribute to improving the quality of life for these patients through the provision of palliative care. We highlight the opportunities to incorporate primary palliative care, including basic symptom management and straightforward goals-of-care discussions, provided by the primary clinicians, and when necessary, timely consultation by a specialty palliative care team to assist with complex symptom management and goals-of-care discussions in the face of team and/or family conflict. In this review, we apply the principles of palliative care to patients with frailty and synthesize the evidence regarding methods to integrate palliative care into the perioperative and ICU settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita C. Crooms
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Laura P. Gelfman
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Oemrawsingh A, Swami N, Valderas JM, Hazelzet JA, Pusic AL, Gliklich RE, Bergmark RW. Patient-Reported Morbidity Instruments: A Systematic Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:791-811. [PMID: 32540238 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although comorbidities play an essential role in risk adjustment and outcomes measurement, there is little consensus regarding the best source of this data. The aim of this study was to identify general patient-reported morbidity instruments and their measurement properties. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using multiple electronic databases (Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science) from inception to March 2018. Articles focusing primarily on the development or subsequent validation of a patient-reported morbidity instrument were included. After including relevant articles, the measurement properties of each morbidity instrument were extracted by 2 investigators for narrative synthesis. RESULTS A total of 1005 articles were screened, of which 34 eligible articles were ultimately included. The most widely assessed instruments were the Self-Reported Charlson Comorbidity Index (n = 7), the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (n = 3), and the Disease Burden Morbidity Assessment (n = 3). The most commonly included conditions were diabetes, hypertension, and myocardial infarction. Studies demonstrated substantial variability in item-level reliability versus the gold standard medical record review (κ range 0.66-0.86), meaning that the accuracy of the self-reported comorbidity data is dependent on the selected morbidity. CONCLUSIONS The Self-Reported Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire were the most frequently cited instruments. Significant variability was observed in reliability per comorbid condition of patient-reported morbidity questionnaires. Further research is needed to determine whether patient-reported morbidity data should be used to bolster medical records data or serve as a stand-alone entity when risk adjusting observational outcomes data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind Oemrawsingh
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nishwant Swami
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - José M Valderas
- International Society for Quality of Life Research, Health Services & Policy Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, England, UK
| | - Jan A Hazelzet
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Patient Reported Outcomes, Value, and Experience Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard E Gliklich
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Regan W Bergmark
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Patient Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jim HSL, Hoogland AI, Brownstein NC, Barata A, Dicker AP, Knoop H, Gonzalez BD, Perkins R, Rollison D, Gilbert SM, Nanda R, Berglund A, Mitchell R, Johnstone PAS. Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70:182-199. [PMID: 32311776 PMCID: PMC7488179 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-generated health data (PGHD), or health-related data gathered from patients to help address a health concern, are used increasingly in oncology to make regulatory decisions and evaluate quality of care. PGHD include self-reported health and treatment histories, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and biometric sensor data. Advances in wireless technology, smartphones, and the Internet of Things have facilitated new ways to collect PGHD during clinic visits and in daily life. The goal of the current review was to provide an overview of the current clinical, regulatory, technological, and analytic landscape as it relates to PGHD in oncology research and care. The review begins with a rationale for PGHD as described by the US Food and Drug Administration, the Institute of Medicine, and other regulatory and scientific organizations. The evidence base for clinic-based and remote symptom monitoring using PGHD is described, with an emphasis on PROs. An overview is presented of current approaches to digital phenotyping or device-based, real-time assessment of biometric, behavioral, self-report, and performance data. Analytic opportunities regarding PGHD are envisioned in the context of big data and artificial intelligence in medicine. Finally, challenges and solutions for the integration of PGHD into clinical care are presented. The challenges include electronic medical record integration of PROs and biometric data, analysis of large and complex biometric data sets, and potential clinic workflow redesign. In addition, there is currently more limited evidence for the use of biometric data relative to PROs. Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of PGHD make them increasingly likely to be integrated into oncology research and clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Aasha I Hoogland
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Naomi C Brownstein
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Anna Barata
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Hans Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Brian D Gonzalez
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Randa Perkins
- Department of Clinical Informatics and Clinical Systems, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Dana Rollison
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ronica Nanda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- BayCare Health Systems Inc, Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater, Florida
| | - Anders Berglund
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ross Mitchell
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Why focus on patient-reported outcome measures in older colorectal cancer patients? Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:394-401. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
43
|
Keng CJS, Goriawala A, Rashid S, Goldstein R, Schmocker S, Easson A, Kennedy E. Home to Stay: An Integrated Monitoring System Using a Mobile App to Support Patients at Home Following Colorectal Surgery. J Patient Exp 2020; 7:1241-1246. [PMID: 33457571 PMCID: PMC7786720 DOI: 10.1177/2374373520904194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing colorectal surgery are vulnerable during their transition from hospital to home and require increased support following discharge from hospital. Study objectives were to perform an initial assessment of patient uptake, outcomes, and satisfaction with an integrated discharge monitoring system called Home to Stay. Methods: The intervention was an integrated discharge monitoring system that uses a mobile app platform. Patients downloaded the app prior to discharge from hospital and received a Daily Health Check day #1 to #14, #21, and #30. Patient responses’ were accessed by the health-care team via secure web site, and extreme responses were “flagged” to indicate that a follow-up telephone call was necessary. Primary outcomes were patient uptake, Quality of Recovery scores and satisfaction with the program. Secondary outcomes were 30-day emergency room (ER) visits and readmissions. Results: One hundred and thirty-two patients were invited to participate and 106 accepted. Of these, 93 used the app at least once. The mean overall score on the Quality of Recovery Scale increased significantly from day 1 to day 14. Patient satisfaction with the app was high, with 92% of patients reporting overall satisfaction as good or excellent. The 30-day readmission rate was 6% and was lower than the 30-day readmission rate of 18% reported for the 4 months prior to the start of the study. Conclusions: The Home to Stay Program to support patients at home after colorectal surgery is feasible with high patient uptake and satisfaction. This program has the potential to reduce 30-day readmissions, however further studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine J S Keng
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alifiya Goriawala
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Saira Rashid
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Goldstein
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Selina Schmocker
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandra Easson
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Erin Kennedy, Mount Sinai Hospital, 449-600 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Høeg BL, Bidstrup PE, Karlsen RV, Friberg AS, Albieri V, Dalton SO, Saltbæk L, Andersen KK, Horsboel TA, Johansen C. Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD012425. [PMID: 31750936 PMCID: PMC6870787 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012425.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most cancer survivors receive follow-up care after completion of treatment with the primary aim of detecting recurrence. Traditional follow-up consisting of fixed visits to a cancer specialist for examinations and tests are expensive and may be burdensome for the patient. Follow-up strategies involving non-specialist care providers, different intensity of procedures, or addition of survivorship care packages have been developed and tested, however their effectiveness remains unclear. OBJECTIVES The objective of this review is to compare the effect of different follow-up strategies in adult cancer survivors, following completion of primary cancer treatment, on the primary outcomes of overall survival and time to detection of recurrence. Secondary outcomes are health-related quality of life, anxiety (including fear of recurrence), depression and cost. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases and two trials registries on 11 December 2018 together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised trials comparing different follow-up strategies for adult cancer survivors following completion of curatively-intended primary cancer treatment, which included at least one of the outcomes listed above. We compared the effectiveness of: 1) non-specialist-led follow-up (i.e. general practitioner (GP)-led, nurse-led, patient-initiated or shared care) versus specialist-led follow-up; 2) less intensive versus more intensive follow-up (based on clinical visits, examinations and diagnostic procedures) and 3) follow-up integrating additional care components relevant for detection of recurrence (e.g. patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans) versus usual care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used the standard methodological guidelines by Cochrane and Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. For each comparison, we present synthesised findings for overall survival and time to detection of recurrence as hazard ratios (HR) and for health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression as mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). When meta-analysis was not possible, we reported the results from individual studies. For survival and recurrence, we used meta-regression analysis where possible to investigate whether the effects varied with regards to cancer site, publication year and study quality. MAIN RESULTS We included 53 trials involving 20,832 participants across 12 cancer sites and 15 countries, mainly in Europe, North America and Australia. All the studies were carried out in either a hospital or general practice setting. Seventeen studies compared non-specialist-led follow-up with specialist-led follow-up, 24 studies compared intensity of follow-up and 12 studies compared patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans with usual care. Risk of bias was generally low or unclear in most of the studies, with a higher risk of bias in the smaller trials. Non-specialist-led follow-up compared with specialist-led follow-up It is uncertain how this strategy affects overall survival (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.15; 2 studies; 603 participants), time to detection of recurrence (4 studies, 1691 participants) or cost (8 studies, 1756 participants) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Non-specialist- versus specialist-led follow up may make little or no difference to health-related quality of life at 12 months (MD 1.06, 95% CI -1.83 to 3.95; 4 studies; 605 participants; low-certainty evidence); and probably makes little or no difference to anxiety at 12 months (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.73 to 0.67; 5 studies; 1266 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We are more certain that it has little or no effect on depression at 12 months (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.42; 5 studies; 1266 participants; high-certainty evidence). Less intensive follow-up compared with more intensive follow-up Less intensive versus more intensive follow-up may make little or no difference to overall survival (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.14; 13 studies; 10,726 participants; low-certainty evidence) and probably increases time to detection of recurrence (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.92; 12 studies; 11,276 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-regression analysis showed little or no difference in the intervention effects by cancer site, publication year or study quality. It is uncertain whether this strategy has an effect on health-related quality of life (3 studies, 2742 participants), anxiety (1 study, 180 participants) or cost (6 studies, 1412 participants) because the certainty of evidence is very low. None of the studies reported on depression. Follow-up strategies integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans compared with usual care: None of the studies reported on overall survival or time to detection of recurrence. It is uncertain whether this strategy makes a difference to health-related quality of life (12 studies, 2846 participants), anxiety (1 study, 470 participants), depression (8 studies, 2351 participants) or cost (1 studies, 408 participants), as the certainty of evidence is very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Evidence regarding the effectiveness of the different follow-up strategies varies substantially. Less intensive follow-up may make little or no difference to overall survival but probably delays detection of recurrence. However, as we did not analyse the two outcomes together, we cannot make direct conclusions about the effect of interventions on survival after detection of recurrence. The effects of non-specialist-led follow-up on survival and detection of recurrence, and how intensity of follow-up affects health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression, are uncertain. There was little evidence for the effects of follow-up integrating additional patient symptom education/monitoring and survivorship care plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverley L Høeg
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterSurvivorship UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenCentral Denmark RegionDenmark2100
| | - Pernille E Bidstrup
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterSurvivorship UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenCentral Denmark RegionDenmark2100
| | - Randi V Karlsen
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterSurvivorship UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenCentral Denmark RegionDenmark2100
| | - Anne Sofie Friberg
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterSurvivorship UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenCentral Denmark RegionDenmark2100
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalDepartment of OncologyCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Vanna Albieri
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterStatistics and Pharmaco‐Epidemiology UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenDenmark
| | - Susanne O Dalton
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterSurvivorship UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenCentral Denmark RegionDenmark2100
- Zealand University HospitalDepartment of OncologyNæstvedDenmark
| | - Lena Saltbæk
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterSurvivorship UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenCentral Denmark RegionDenmark2100
- Zealand University HospitalDepartment of OncologyNæstvedDenmark
| | - Klaus Kaae Andersen
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterStatistics and Pharmaco‐Epidemiology UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenDenmark
| | - Trine Allerslev Horsboel
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterSurvivorship UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenCentral Denmark RegionDenmark2100
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterSurvivorship UnitStrandboulevarden 49CopenhagenCentral Denmark RegionDenmark2100
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalDepartment of OncologyCopenhagenDenmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Fox J, Janda M, Bennett F, Langbecker D. An outreach telephone program for advanced melanoma supportive care: Acceptability and feasibility. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2019; 42:110-115. [PMID: 31493669 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE People with advanced melanoma face an uncertain trajectory as new treatments now have the potential to provide longer-term survival for some. However, the disease course is variable and unpredictable, with many expressing a need for better supportive care. This study aimed to investigate the acceptability and feasibility of extending an existing melanoma-specific self-referral or 'passive' telephone consultation support service to an 'active' outreach call to offer a supportive care program tailored to the needs of the patient. METHOD Participants were enrolled by their oncology nurse into a single group pre-post intervention study. Participants received an outreach telephone call focused on knowledge and skill development. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline and four weeks post-intervention. Post-intervention interviews with patients and involved staff were used to explore acceptability and feasibility of the outreach service call. RESULTS Of 18 participants approached, 15 enrolled and 14 received the intervention. Staff time required for intervention delivery provided evidence for feasibility. Participants perceived the intervention as acceptable, and beneficial. In interviews, having someone with melanoma-specific knowledge to talk with was a key benefit of the outreach call program. Many participants expressed that they would have wished to receive the outreach call at an earlier stage, for example at the time of recurrence of/progression to advanced melanoma. CONCLUSIONS Extending an existing self-referral support service model to use a more 'active' outreach approach is acceptable and feasible. The next step in the evaluation process for this intervention is a randomised controlled trial to determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Fox
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Qld, 4075, Australia.
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Service Research, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Qld, 4102, Australia; School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
| | - Fiona Bennett
- Melanoma Patients Australia, Mater Foundation, 620 Stanley Street, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, 4102, Australia.
| | - Danette Langbecker
- Centre for Online Health - Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Ground floor, Building 33, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba, Qld, 4102, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Carrillo G, Mesa M, Gómez OJ, Numpaque O, Laguna M. Educational intervention (CUIDAR) in cancer patients treated with surgery: A quasi-experimental study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1475-1482. [PMID: 30878163 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of an educational intervention (CUIDAR) in cancer patients during the post-operatory, aimed to strength the competence to care patients at home in the dimensions knowledge, instrumental unicity, enjoy, anticipation and social relationships and interactions. METHODS Quantitative quasi-experimental design with control and intervention groups, 192 patients who received surgery in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Bogotá, Colombia. The intervention was conducted since the admission to the sixth week after release. Measurements of the home care competence and number of readmissions were made before and after the treatment. RESULTS In the intervention group a positive and statistically significant effect was observed in six dimensions, as well as the reduction of hospital readmissions. CONCLUSION The educational intervention CUIDAR is a feasible strategy that increases the capacity to care at home and significantly reduces the readmissions to emergency services in cancer patients treated with surgery. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Educational intervention (CUIDAR) may be used as a tool in cancer patients treated with surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Carrillo
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 48 No. 22-80 Manzana B, Casa 44, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
| | - Mónica Mesa
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Olga Janeth Gómez
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 48 No. 22-80 Manzana B, Casa 44, Bogotá 111321, Colombia
| | | | - María Laguna
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Schouten B, Avau B, Bekkering G(TE, Vankrunkelsven P, Mebis J, Hellings J, Van Hecke A. Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3:CD012387. [PMID: 30909317 PMCID: PMC6433560 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012387.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Receiving a diagnosis of cancer and the subsequent related treatments can have a significant impact on an individual's physical and psychosocial well-being. To ensure that cancer care addresses all aspects of well-being, systematic screening for distress and supportive care needs is recommended. Appropriate screening could help support the integration of psychosocial approaches in daily routines in order to achieve holistic cancer care and ensure that the specific care needs of people with cancer are met and that the organisation of such care is optimised. OBJECTIVES To examine the effectiveness and safety of screening of psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer. To explore the intervention characteristics that contribute to the effectiveness of these screening interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched five electronic databases in January 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. We also searched five trial registers and screened the contents of relevant journals, citations, and references to find published and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs) that studied the effect of screening interventions addressing the psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer compared to usual care. These screening interventions could involve self-reporting of people with a patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or a semi-structured interview with a screening interventionist, and comprise a solitary screening intervention or screening with guided actions. We excluded studies that evaluated screening integrated as an element in more complex interventions (e.g. therapy, coaching, full care pathways, or care programmes). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed methodological quality for each included study using the Cochrane tool for RCTs and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for NRCTs. Due to the high level of heterogeneity in the included studies, only three were included in meta-analysis. Results of the remaining 23 studies were analysed narratively. MAIN RESULTS We included 26 studies (18 RCTs and 8 NRCTs) with sample sizes of 41 to 1012 participants, involving a total of 7654 adults with cancer. Two studies included only men or women; all other studies included both sexes. For most studies people with breast, lung, head and neck, colorectal, prostate cancer, or several of these diagnoses were included; some studies included people with a broader range of cancer diagnosis. Ten studies focused on a solitary screening intervention, while the remaining 16 studies evaluated a screening intervention combined with guided actions. A broad range of intervention instruments was used, and were described by study authors as a screening of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), distress screening, needs assessment, or assessment of biopsychosocial symptoms or overall well-being. In 13 studies, the screening was a self-reported questionnaire, while in the remaining 13 studies an interventionist conducted the screening by interview or paper-pencil assessment. The interventional screenings in the studies were applied 1 to 12 times, without follow-up or from 4 weeks to 18 months after the first interventional screening. We assessed risk of bias as high for eight RCTs, low for five RCTs, and unclear for the five remaining RCTs. There were further concerns about the NRCTs (1 = critical risk study; 6 = serious risk studies; 1 = risk unclear).Due to considerable heterogeneity in several intervention and study characteristics, we have reported the results narratively for the majority of the evidence.In the narrative synthesis of all included studies, we found very low-certainty evidence for the effect of screening on HRQoL (20 studies). Of these studies, eight found beneficial effects of screening for several subdomains of HRQoL, and 10 found no effects of screening. One study found adverse effects, and the last study did not report quantitative results. We found very low-certainty evidence for the effect of screening on distress (16 studies). Of these studies, two found beneficial effects of screening, and 14 found no effects of screening. We judged the overall certainty of the evidence for the effect of screening on HRQoL to be very low. We found very low-certainty evidence for the effect of screening on care needs (seven studies). Of these studies, three found beneficial effects of screening for several subdomains of care needs, and two found no effects of screening. One study found adverse effects, and the last study did not report quantitative results. We judged the overall level of evidence for the effect of screening on HRQoL to be very low. None of the studies specifically evaluated or reported adverse effects of screening. However, three studies reported unfavourable effects of screening, including lower QoL, more unmet needs, and lower satisfaction.Three studies could be included in a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed no beneficial effect of the screening intervention on people with cancer HRQoL (mean difference (MD) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.83 to 8.12, 2 RCTs, 6 months follow-up); distress (MD 0.0, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36, 1 RCT, 3 months follow-up); or care needs (MD 2.32, 95% CI -7.49 to 12.14, 2 RCTs, 3 months follow-up). However, these studies all evaluated one specific screening intervention (CONNECT) in people with colorectal cancer.In the studies where some effects could be identified, no recurring relationships were found between intervention characteristics and the effectiveness of screening interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found low-certainty evidence that does not support the effectiveness of screening of psychosocial well-being and care needs in people with cancer. Studies were heterogeneous in population, intervention, and outcome assessment.The results of this review suggest a need for more uniformity in outcomes and reporting; for the use of intervention description guidelines; for further improvement of methodological certainty in studies and for combining subjective patient-reported outcomes with objective outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bojoura Schouten
- Hasselt UniversityResearch Group Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Life SciencesHasseltLimburgBelgium3500
| | - Bert Avau
- Belgian Red CrossCentre for Evidence‐Based PracticeMotstraat 42MechelenBelgium2800
- Belgian Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine ‐ Cochrane BelgiumKapucijnenvoer 33, blok JLeuvenBelgium3000
| | - Geertruida (Trudy) E Bekkering
- Belgian Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine ‐ Cochrane BelgiumKapucijnenvoer 33, blok JLeuvenBelgium3000
- KU LeuvenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care ‐ Faculty of MedicineKapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J Bus 7001LeuvenBelgium3000
| | - Patrick Vankrunkelsven
- Belgian Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine ‐ Cochrane BelgiumKapucijnenvoer 33, blok JLeuvenBelgium3000
- KU LeuvenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care ‐ Faculty of MedicineKapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J Bus 7001LeuvenBelgium3000
| | - Jeroen Mebis
- Jessa HospitalDepartment of Medical OncologyHasseltBelgium
- Hasselt UniversityResearch Group Immunology and BiochemistryFaculty of Medicine and Life SciencesHasseltBelgium
| | - Johan Hellings
- Hasselt UniversityResearch Group Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Life SciencesHasseltLimburgBelgium3500
- AZ DeltaRode‐Kruisstraat 20RoeselareBelgium
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Ghent UniversityUniversity Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public HealthDe Pintelaan 185GhentBelgium9000
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Oh EG, Kim JH, Lee HJ. Effects of a safe transition programme for discharged patients with high unmet needs. J Clin Nurs 2019; 28:2319-2328. [DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eui Geum Oh
- Mo‐Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing Yonsei University Seoul Korea
| | - Jeong Hyun Kim
- College of Nursing, Graduate School Yonsei University Seoul Korea
| | - Hyun Joo Lee
- Mo‐Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing Yonsei University Seoul Korea
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Monterosso L, Platt V, Bulsara M, Berg M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient reported outcomes for nurse-led models of survivorship care for adult cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 73:62-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
50
|
Iwanoff C, Giannopoulos M, Salamon C. Follow-up postoperative calls to reduce common postoperative complaints among urogynecology patients. Int Urogynecol J 2018; 30:1667-1672. [PMID: 30413866 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3809-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS The purpose of our study was to identify the most common reasons why postoperative urogynecology patients called their surgeon within the first 6 weeks of surgery. We hypothesize that implementing a follow-up postoperative call (FPC) policy would decrease the number of patient-initiated calls within this postoperative period. METHODS This is a prospective before-and-after cohort study that was conducted in two phases. The initial phase identified the most common reasons why patients call within 6 weeks of their inpatient or outpatient urogynecological surgery. In the second phase, an intervention was implemented where each postoperative patient was called within 48 to 72 h of discharge: the intervention group. The primary outcome was the number of phone calls initiated by patients during the 6-week postoperative period. RESULTS There were 226 patients in the control group and 233 patients in the intervention group. Significantly fewer calls were initiated by patients in the intervention group, both groups having a median of 1 call per person, range 0-8 in the control group and 0-10 in the intervention group (p = 0.04). The five most common complaints were as follows: pain (20.4%), medication management (17.4%), disability paperwork (15.5%), and laboratory results (11.5%). There was a significant reduction in calls concerning constipation, laboratory/pathology results, and disability insurance claims after implementing the FPC policy. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of the FPC policy resulted in fewer patient-initiated calls. As such, there were significant reductions in postoperative complaints of constipation, vaginal bleeding, incomplete bladder emptying, and inquiries into laboratory results and disability paperwork.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Iwanoff
- FPMRS, Atlantic Health System, 435 South Street, Suite 370, Morristown, NJ, 07960, USA.
| | - Maria Giannopoulos
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atlantic Health System, 100 Madison Ave, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Charbel Salamon
- FPMRS, Atlantic Health System, 435 South Street, Suite 370, Morristown, NJ, 07960, USA
| |
Collapse
|