Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia After Treatment With Trastuzumab Emtansine

Liver Pathology Related to Onco-Therapeutic Agents

Oncotherapeutic agents can cause a wide range of liver injuries from elevated liver functions tests to fulminant liver failure. In this review, we emphasize a newer generation of drugs including immune checkpoint inhibitors, protein kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and hormonal therapy. A few conventional chemotherapy agents are also discussed.

High risks adverse events associated with trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of HER2-positive/mutated malignancies: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

T-DM1 and T-DXd are two promising antibody-drug conjugates for treating advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and HER2-mutated lung cancer. Understanding the differences in the adverse events (AEs) profile of both drugs may help clinicians make an appropriate treatment decision.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All data obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from Q1 2004 to Q3 2022 underwent disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis to detect and assess the AE signals of T-DM1 and T-DXd for comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 2,113 and 1,269 AE reports associated with T-DM1 and T-Dxd, respectively, were retrieved from FAERS database, in which, respondents were mostly elderly women. Their statistical differences (p < 0.001), poses high incidence of thrombocytopenia, including cardiotoxicity (p < 0.05) for T-DM1, while myelosuppression, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and pneumonitis for T-DXd. Splenomegaly, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, hepatic cirrhosis, portal hypertension, neuropathy peripheral, and spider nevus, are particular to T-DM1. Similarly, febrile neutropenia, pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, neutrophil count decreased, and KL-6 increased, are unique to T-DXd.

CONCLUSIONS

T-DXd is more likely to induce ILD/pneumonia and myelosuppression than T-DM1, whereas T-DM1 has higher risk of hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia than T-DXd. T-DM1-related hepatotoxicity may need redefinition. Clinicians may need to balance the benefits and risks of antibody-drug conjugates treatment for certain patients.

Review article: clinical assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury and its management

BACKGROUND

Idisyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare instance of liver injury after exposure to an otherwise safe drug or herbal or dietary supplement. DILI can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, it is an important consideration in drug development due to safety concerns.

AIMS AND METHODS

To highlight pearls and pitfalls to aid clinicians in diagnosing DILI and surmising the management options. We also share the best practices from personal insights developed from decades long participation in the causality assessment committee meetings of the DILI Network.

RESULTS

DILI lacks a diagnostic test and is currently diagnosed through a process of exclusion of competing aetiologies of liver injury. This requires a high degree of suspicion to consider the possibility of DILI, skill in ruling out the obvious and less obvious competing liver insults, and an understanding of the expected phenotypes of DILI. The facets of DILI cover multiple aspects, including the latency, liver injury pattern, course of injury, and associated autoimmune or immuno-allergic features. Care for patients with DILI is geared towards stopping the offending drug and symptom management that include the use of corticosteroids in select cases.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of DILI is challenging and is primarily made through a carefully crafted patient interview, temporal relationship with the implicated drug or supplement, and exclusion of competing aetiology. LiverTox is a useful resource for clinicians to review the literature and recognise the likelihood of the implicated agent in causing DILI.

Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension after Trastuzumab Emtansine in HER2-positive Breast Cancer as Determined by Deep Learning-measured Spleen Volume at CT

Background Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for use in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Case reports have suggested an association between T-DM1 and portal hypertension. Purpose To evaluate the association of T-DM1 therapy with spleen volume changes and portal hypertension on CT scans and clinical findings compared with lapatinib and capecitabine therapy. Materials and Methods Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who were administered at least two cycles of T-DM1 or lapatinib and capecitabine (controls) in a tertiary institution from 2001 to 2020 and who underwent CT before initial treatment and at least once during treatment were retrospectively enrolled. Spleen volume changes and the signs of portal hypertension (gastroesophageal varix [GEV], spontaneous portosystemic shunt [SPSS], and ascites) were evaluated at contrast-enhanced CT. Patients were followed until treatment ended or for 2 years after the start of treatment. Spleen volume changes were measured with a deep learning algorithm and evaluated by using a linear mixed model. The incidences of splenomegaly and portal hypertension were compared between the T-DM1 and control groups by using a χ² test or Fisher exact test. Results The T-DM1 group included 111 patients (mean age, 54 years ± 11 [SD]; 111 women) and the control group included 122 patients (mean age, 50 years ± 9; 121 women). Spleen volume progressively increased with T-DM1 therapy but was constant in the control group (104% ± 5 vs -1% ± 6 at the 33rd treatment cycle, respectively; P < .001). Incidences of splenomegaly (46% [51 of 111] vs 3% [four of 122] of patients; P < .001), GEV (11% [12 of 111] vs 1% [one of 122] of patients; P < .001), and SPSS (27% [30 of 111] vs 1% [one of 122] of patients; P < .001) were higher in the T-DM1 group than in the control group. Conclusion Trastuzumab emtansine therapy was associated with noncirrhotic portal hypertension at CT, with higher incidences of splenomegaly, gastroesophageal varix, and spontaneous portosystemic shunt than those with lapatinib and capecitabine therapy. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Safety of trastuzumab after trastuzumab emtansine-induced nodular regenerative hyperplasia: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Trastuzumab emtansine is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 use in recurrent metastatic breast cancer. Cases of trastuzumab emtansine-induced nodular regenerative hyperplasia are often reported as overt noncirrhotic portal hypertension with ascites and variceal bleeding.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 61-year-old woman who present multiple stellate angiomas with gradual increased liver transaminases and reduced platelet count during a 27-months course on trastuzumab emtansine therapy for recurrent metastatic breast cancer. After the nodular regenerative hyperplasia was histologically confirmed, the trastuzumab emtansine was stopped. After two months, trastuzumab was restarted together with exemestane. During trastuzumab therapy, the patient had a normalization of liver transaminases, platelet count and a gradual improvement of her stellate angiomas. Trastuzumab was continued for 15 months without any reoccurrence of nodular regenerative hyperplasia.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia should be suspected after one year of trastuzumab emtansine treatment in patients with signs of portal hypertension without cirrhosis. Definitive cessation of trastuzumab emtansine is required after a diagnosis of nodular regenerative hyperplasia and complete resolution of symptoms generally takes several months.

DISCUSSION

Based on fundamental studies, nodular regenerative hyperplasia is probably caused by the emtansine (DM1) part of the trastuzumab emtansine. It is still unclear if trastuzumab therapy can be reintroduced after nodular regenerative hyperplasia induced by trastuzumab emtansine, depriving the patient of a HER2-targeted therapy. Only one case reported having given trastuzumab in this situation over one month. In our case, trastuzumab was reintroduced without any complications for a long extent following TDM1-associated nodular regenerative hyperplasia.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome post-treatment with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in advanced breast cancer

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for use in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Here, we present the cases of two patients with metastatic breast cancer who received T-DM1 monotherapy and developed noncirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). Patient 1 presented with ruptured gastric varices at 2 years and 5 months after T-DM1 treatment. Patient 2 presented with intrahepatic portal-hepatic venous shunt at 2 years and 6 months and portal-systemic shunt encephalopathy at 4 years and 11 months after T-DM1 treatment. In both the patients, liver biopsies revealed sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). T-DM1-induced hepatotoxicity can result from SOS. In long-term administration of T-DM1 the unfavorable events associated with chronic liver circulatory disorder due to SOS, such as NCPH, are concerning.

Safety and Tolerability of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Cancer

Antibody-drug conjugates are monoclonal antibodies attached to biologically active drugs through chemical linkers that deliver and release cytotoxic agents at the tumor site, reducing the likelihood of systemic exposure and therefore toxicity. Currently, there are about 110 ongoing studies implementing antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of multiple human malignancies. Antibody-drug conjugates carry a feature of the specificity of a monoclonal antibody and the anti-neoplastic potential of a cytotoxin. The first antibody-drug conjugate was approved in 2001, and the field of antibody-drug conjugates has expanded since then with three more antibody-drug conjugates being added to the market. The complex structure of the antibody-drug conjugate poses a challenge in designing a clinically adequate molecule. Antibody-drug conjugates are usually well tolerated with some predictable adverse reactions, as well as new medical issues, that need careful approach. This review provides an outline of the current status of the efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in malignant diseases.

Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia Induced by Trastuzumab Emtansine: Role of Emtansine?

Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeted against the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) overexpressed in some breast cancer. This targeted therapy significantly improves the prognosis of these cancers. Recently an anti-HER2 antibodydrug conjugate was shaped in order to facilitate the targeted delivery of potent cytotoxic drug to cancer cells and to reduce resistance. This formulation, called trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), consists of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab linked to a cytotoxic drug (a derivative of maytansine) via a chemical linker. Little is known about adverse reactions due to this new formulation. Herein we described the case of a woman suffering from a HER2-positive breast cancer, treated with trastuzumab for 30 months followed by T-DM1 monotherapy. After 12 months of T-DM1 treatment, a nodular regenerative hyperplasia confirmed by liver biopsy occurred. T-DM1 was stopped and medical imagery showed a resolution of the nodular regenerative hyperplasia. Unfortunately, hepatic metastasis progressed. Few cases of nodular regenerative hyperplasia induced by T-DM1 have been described so far. Further studies are needed to explore pathogenesis of nodular regenerative hyperplasia with this new antibody-drug conjugate treatment.

Splenic Enlargement and Bone Marrow Hyperplasia in Patients Receiving Trastuzumab-Emtansine for Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

An association between trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and splenic enlargement is reported in preclinical data, and has been noted anecdotally in patients receiving T-DM1 at our institution. Use of whole-body MRI examinations (WB-MRI) allows for detailed bone marrow assessment and semi-automated splenic volume calculations.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate changes in splenic volume versus evidence of bone marrow hyperplasia and/or changes in portal venous pressure in patients receiving T-DM1 for metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve metastatic breast cancer patients underwent 29 WB-MRIs before and during T-DM1 therapy. Splenic volume, portal vein diameter, bone marrow diffusion-weighted normalised signal intensity (nSI), quantitative water diffusivity (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC) and fat fraction (rF%) were measured and correlated.

RESULTS

Splenic volume increases were observed in 92% of patients. Mean splenic volume increased from 144 cm³ (95% CI 110-177 cm³) to 209 cm³ (95% CI 161-257 cm³) on T-DM1 therapy (p = 0.006). Splenic volume increases correlated with treatment duration (r² = 0.43). Bone marrow hyperplasia was evidenced by an increase in bone marrow nSI (3.5 to 4.8, p = 0.12), and decreases in rF% (64.3% to 57.3%, p = 0.12) and ADC (655 μm²/s to 543 μm²/s, p = 0.11). No changes to portal vein diameter were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously unreported increases in splenic volume and bone marrow hyperplasia are observed on WB-MRI in patients on T-DM1 therapy. Caution must be applied to avoid misinterpreting T-DM1-induced bone marrow hyperplasia as diffuse disease progression in bone.

Imaging of hepatic toxicity of systemic therapy in a tertiary cancer centre: chemotherapy, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, molecular targeted therapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors

The purpose of this review is to familiarise radiologists with the spectrum of hepatic toxicity seen in the oncology setting, in view of the different systemic therapies used in cancer patients. Drug-induced liver injury can manifest in various forms, and anti-neoplastic agents are associated with different types of hepatotoxicity. Although chemotherapy-induced liver injury can present as hepatitis, steatosis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, and chronic parenchymal damages, molecular targeted therapy-associated liver toxicity ranges from mild liver function test elevation to fulminant life-threatening acute liver failure. The recent arrival of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncology has introduced a new range of immune-related adverse events, with differing mechanisms of liver toxicity and varied imaging presentation of liver injury. High-dose chemotherapy regimens for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation are associated with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Management of hepatic toxicity depends on the clinical scenario, the drug in use, and the severity of the findings. In this article, we will (1) present the most common types of oncological drugs associated with hepatic toxicity and associated liver injuries; (2) illustrate imaging findings of hepatic toxicities and the possible differential diagnosis; and (3) provide a guide for management of these conditions.

Drug Hepatotoxicity: Newer Agents

Idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity is one of the most common reasons for an approved drug being restricted. This article focuses on hepatotoxicity of selected and recently introduced agents, such as, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, novel oral anticoagulants, newer antiplatelets, antibiotics, anti-diabetics, anti-epileptics, anti-depressants, anti-psychotics and anti-retrovirals. Overall, the incidence of clinically relevant hepatotoxicity from newer agents seems to be lower than that of the older agents. Nevertheless, cases of severe hepatotoxicity have been reported due to some of these newer agents, including, trastuzumab, ipilimumab, infliximab, imatinib, bosutinib, dasatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, sunitinib, ponatinib, lapatinib, vemurafenib, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, felbamate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, venlafaxine, duloxetine, darunavir, and maraviroc.

Liver Microvascular Injury and Thrombocytopenia of Antibody-Calicheamicin Conjugates in Cynomolgus Monkeys-Mechanism and Monitoring

Purpose: Adverse reactions reported in patients treated with antibody-calicheamicin conjugates such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) and inotuzumab ozogamicin include thrombocytopenia and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). The objective of this experimental work was to investigate the mechanism for thrombocytopenia, characterize the liver injury, and identify potential safety biomarkers.Experimental Design: Cynomolgus monkeys were dosed intravenously at 6 mg/m²/dose once every 3 weeks with a nonbinding antibody-calicheamicin conjugate (PF-0259) containing the same linker-payload as gemtuzumab ozogamicin and inotuzumab ozogamicin. Monkeys were necropsied 48 hours after the first administration (day 3) or 3 weeks after the third administration (day 63).Results: PF-0259 induced acute thrombocytopenia (up to 86% platelet reduction) with nadirs on days 3 to 4. There was no indication of effects on megakaryocytes in bone marrow or activation of platelets in peripheral blood. Microscopic evaluation of liver from animals necropsied on day 3 demonstrated midzonal degeneration and loss of sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs) associated with marked platelet accumulation in sinusoids. Liver histopathology on day 63 showed variable endothelial recovery and progression to a combination of sinusoidal capillarization and sinusoidal dilation/hepatocellular atrophy, consistent with early SOS. Among biomarkers evaluated, there were early and sustained increases in serum hyaluronic acid (HA) that correlated well with serum aspartate aminotransferase and liver microscopic changes, suggesting that HA may be a sensitive diagnostic marker of the liver microvascular injury.Conclusions: These data support the conclusion that target-independent damage to liver SECs may be responsible for acute thrombocytopenia (through platelet sequestration in liver sinusoids) and development of SOS. Clin Cancer Res; 23(7); 1760-70. ©2016 AACR.

Drug-induced hepatotoxicity in cancer patients - implication for treatment

INTRODUCTION

All anticancer drugs can cause idiosyncratic liver injury. Therefore, hepatoprotective agents assume particular importance to preserve liver function. Hepatic injury represents 10% of cases of acute hepatitis in adults; drug-related damage is still misjudged because of relative clinical underestimation and difficult differential diagnosis. Chemotherapeutic agents can produce liver toxicity through different pathways, resulting in different categories of liver injuries, but these drugs are not homogeneously hepatotoxic. Frequently, anticancer-induced hepatotoxicity is idiosyncratic and influenced by multiple factors.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this paper is to perform a review of the literature regarding anticancer-induced liver toxicity. We described hepatotoxicity mechanisms of principal anticancer agents and respective dose reductions. Furthermore, we reviewed studies on hepatoprotectors and their optimal use. Tiopronin, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate and S-Adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) demonstrated, in some small studies, a potential hepatoprotective activity.

EXPERT OPINION

Actually, in the literature only small experiences are reported. Even though hepatoprotective agents seem to be useful in the oncologic setting, the lack of well-designed prospective Phase III randomized controlled trials is a major limit in the introduction of hepatoprotectors in cancer patients and these kind of studies are warranted to support their use and to give further recommendations for the clinical practice.

Hepatotoxicity of targeted therapy for cancer

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the mechanism of DILI with MTA, and how to avoid and manage these toxicities is essential for minimising inferior cancer treatment outcomes. An organised and comprehensive overview of MTA-associated hepatotoxicity is lacking; this review aims to fill the gap.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was performed based on published case reports and relevant studies or articles pertaining to the topics on PubMed. Food and Drug Administration drug information documents and search on the US National Library of Medicine LiverTox database was performed for all relevant MTA.

EXPERT OPINION

MTA-associated hepatotoxicity is common but rarely fatal. The pattern of hepatotoxicity is predominantly idiosyncratic. Pharmacogenomics show potential in predicting patients at risk of poorly metabolising or developing immunoallergic responses to MTA, but prospective data is scant. Preventing reactivation of viral hepatitis using anti-viral drugs, and avoidance of drug combinations at high risk of negative interactions are the most readily preventable measures for DILI.

Diagnosing Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia of the Liver Is Thwarted by Low Interobserver Agreement

Background and Aims

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) of the liver is associated with several diseases and drugs. Clinical symptoms of NRH may vary from absence of symptoms to full-blown (non-cirrhotic) portal hypertension. However, diagnosing NRH is challenging. The objective of this study was to determine inter- and intraobserver agreement on the histopathologic diagnosis of NRH.

Methods

Liver specimens (n=48) previously diagnosed as NRH, were reviewed for the presence of NRH by seven pathologists without prior knowledge of the original diagnosis or clinical background. The majority of the liver specimens were from thiopurine using inflammatory bowel disease patients. Histopathologic features contributing to NRH were also assessed. Criteria for NRH were modified by consensus and subsequently validated. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using the standard kappa index.

Results

After review, definite NRH, inconclusive NRH and no NRH were found in 35% (23-40%), 21% (13-27%) and 44% (38-56%), respectively (median, IQR). The median interobserver agreement for NRH was poor (κ = 0.20, IQR 0.14-0.28). The intraobserver variability on NRH ranged between 14% and 71%. After modification of the criteria and exclusion of biopsies with technical shortcomings, the interobserver agreement on the diagnosis NRH was fair (κ = 0.45).

Conclusions

The interobserver agreement on the histopathologic diagnosis of NRH was poor, even when assessed by well-experienced liver pathologists. Modification of the criteria of NRH based on consensus effort and exclusion of biopsies of poor quality led to a fairly increased interobserver agreement. The main conclusion of this study is that NRH is a clinicopathologic diagnosis that cannot reliably be based on histopathology alone.