1
|
Al-Mansor E, Mahoney M, Chenard-Poirier M, Ramjeesingh R, Nair V, Kennedy E, Locke G, Welch S, Berry S, Couture F, Elimova E, Pollett A, Mahmud A, Wilson B, Armstrong D, Falkson C, Asmis T, Vickers M, Goodwin R. Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2023. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8172-8185. [PMID: 37754508 PMCID: PMC10527697 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2023 was held in Quebec City, Quebec 2-4 February 2023. The purpose of the conference was to develop consensus statements on emerging and evolving treatment paradigms. Participants included Canadian medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists and surgical oncologists from across Ontario, Quebec, and the Atlantic provinces. Consensus statements were developed following rapid review presentations and discussion of available literature. The recommendations proposed here represent the consensus opinions of physicians involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who participated in this meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Essa Al-Mansor
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Meghan Mahoney
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canadac
| | | | - Ravi Ramjeesingh
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
| | - Vimoj Nair
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Erin Kennedy
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (E.K.)
| | - Gordon Locke
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Stephen Welch
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada;
| | - Scott Berry
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Felix Couture
- CHU de Québec—Université Laval, Québec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada (F.C.)
| | - Elena Elimova
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Aaron Pollett
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (E.K.)
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Brooke Wilson
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Dawn Armstrong
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canadac
| | - Conrad Falkson
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Timothy Asmis
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Michael Vickers
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Rachel Goodwin
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mège A, Biau J, Meyer E, Allouache N, Guigo M, Servagi Vernat S. Les essais cliniques en radiothérapie qui ont changé les pratiques 2010–2020. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:612-622. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
3
|
Neuzillet C, Gaujoux S, Williet N, Bachet JB, Bauguion L, Colson Durand L, Conroy T, Dahan L, Gilabert M, Huguet F, Marthey L, Meilleroux J, de Mestier L, Napoléon B, Portales F, Sa Cunha A, Schwarz L, Taieb J, Chibaudel B, Bouché O, Hammel P. Pancreatic cancer: French clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, AFC). Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:1257-1271. [PMID: 30219670 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA), updated in July 2018. DESIGN This collaborative work was produced under the auspices of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of PA. It is based on the previous guidelines, recent literature review and expert opinions. Recommendations were graded in three categories, according to the level of evidence. RESULTS Over the last seven years, significant changes in PA management have been implemented in clinical practice. Imaging/staging: diffusion magnetic resonance imaging is useful before surgery to rule out small liver metastases. SURGERY centralization of pancreatic surgery in expert centers is associated with a decreased postoperative mortality. Adjuvant chemotherapy: modified FOLFIRINOX in fit patients, or gemcitabine, or 5-FU, or gemcitabine plus capecitabine, to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. Locally advanced PA: no survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy. Metastatic PA: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination are first-line standards in fit patients; second-line with 5FU/nal-IRI or 5FU/oxaliplatin combination after first-line gemcitabine. CONCLUSION Guidelines for management of PA are continuously evolving and need to be regularly updated. This constant progress is made possible through clinical and translational research. However, as each individual case is particular, they cannot substitute to multidisciplinary tumor board discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Neuzillet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Curie Institute, Versailles Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), Saint-Cloud, France.
| | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Descartes Faculty of Medicine, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Williet
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, Pitié Salpétrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Lucile Bauguion
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, Departmental Hospital Center, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - Laurianne Colson Durand
- Department of Radiotherapy, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est Creteil, Créteil, France
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lorraine Institute of Oncology and Lorraine University, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex, France
| | - Laetitia Dahan
- Digestive Oncology Department, "DACCORD" (Digestif, Anatomie pathologique, Chirurgie, CISIH, Oncologie, Radiothérapie, Dermatologie) pole, CHU Timone, Marseille Cedex 05, France
| | - Marine Gilabert
- Paoli Calmettes Institute, Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068 Stress Cell, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Florence Huguet
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Tenon Hospital, East Paris University Hospitals, AP-HP, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Lysiane Marthey
- Gastroenterology Department, Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, Clamart, France
| | - Julie Meilleroux
- Pathology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Louis de Mestier
- Department of Gastroenterology-Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital, APHP, Paris 7 University, Clichy, France
| | - Bertrand Napoléon
- Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Fabienne Portales
- Digestive Oncology Department, Regional Institute of Cancer, Montpellier, France
| | - Antonio Sa Cunha
- INSERM UMR 935, Paul Brousse Hospital, Hepatobiliary Center, AP-HP, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France and Genomic and Personalized Medicine in Cancer and Neurological Disorders, UMR 1245 INSERM, Rouen University, France
| | - Julien Taieb
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Benoist Chibaudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Institute, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Avenue Général Koenig, 51092 Reims Cedex, France
| | - Pascal Hammel
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP), Paris VII Diderot University, Clichy-la-Garenne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heerkens HD, van Vulpen M, Erickson B, Reerink O, Intven MP, van den Berg CA, Molenaar IQ, Vleggaar FP, Meijer GJ. MRI guided stereotactic radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170563. [PMID: 30063383 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We want to explore the safety and technical feasibility of MRI-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A custom-made abdominal corset was manufactured to reduce breathing induced tumour motion. Delineation of the tumour and organs at risk (OARs) was performed on CT and multiparametric MRI. Tumour motion was quantified with cine MRI. After treatment planning, the static dose distribution was convolved with the cine MRI-based motion trajectory to simulate the delivered dose to the tumour and OARs. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was carried out up to a dose of 24 G in three fractions in 1 week. RESULTS: From July 2013 to January 2016, 20 patients were included. Tumours and OARs were clearly visible with contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. After simulation of the delivered dose taking the motion into account, an adequate target coverage was achieved with acceptable dose in the OARs. No Grade3 or higher treatment related toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided SBRT for pancreatic cancer is technical feasible and safe, with no treatment related grade ≥3 toxicity. New strategies are applied, including an individual corset to reduce breathing motion, MRI-based delineation and simulation of motion-integrated dose distributions. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This article is the first to describe an MRI-integrated workflow in SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, it demonstrated that SBRT with an abdominal corset to reduce tumour motion is feasible and safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01898741) on July 9, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne D Heerkens
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - Marco van Vulpen
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands.,2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Holland Particle Therapy Centre , Delft , The Netherlands
| | - Beth Erickson
- 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin , Milwaukee, WI , USA
| | - Onne Reerink
- 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Isala Clinic , Zwolle , The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Pw Intven
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis At van den Berg
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- 5 Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- 6 Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - Gert J Meijer
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Essential role of radiation therapy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2017; 194:185-195. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1227-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
6
|
Cuneo KC, Morgan MA, Griffith KA, Hawkins PG, Greenson JK, Ben-Josef E, Lawrence TS, Zalupski MM. Prognostic Value of c-MET Expression in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 100:490-497. [PMID: 29229329 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2017] [Revised: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the prognostic significance of c-MET expression and develop a predictor of distant failure in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer treated with chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS We used a tissue microarray to study protein expression by immunohistochemistry in 102 patients treated surgically for pancreatic cancer. Two cores per patient were blindly scored from 0 (no staining) to 3 (strong staining) by a single pathologist. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine time to local and distant failure, overall survival, and progression-free survival. P values were calculated with the log-rank test. RESULTS High tumor expression of c-MET was associated with a shorter time to distant failure in patients receiving neoadjuvant (n=23) or neoadjuvant therapy (n=73) (median 8.9 months vs 22.0 months, P=.0010). We then examined the ability of incorporating 2 known biomarkers, thymidylate synthase and DPC4 (SMAD4), with c-MET to risk-stratify patients. This multi-protein predictor divided our cohort into groups of similar numbers and was predictive of distant failure (median 13.4 months vs 24.2 months, P=.0094) but not of local control. CONCLUSION c-MET is potentially predictive of distant failure. Using c-MET, DPC4, and thymidylate synthase, we developed a multi-protein predictor that could be used to risk-stratify patients and guide decisions regarding the sequencing of locoregional and systemic therapies in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle C Cuneo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Meredith A Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kent A Griffith
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Peter G Hawkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joel K Greenson
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mark M Zalupski
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tumor Reduction in Primary and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Lesions With nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine: An Exploratory Analysis From a Phase 3 Study. Pancreas 2017; 46:203-208. [PMID: 27841795 PMCID: PMC5266413 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Results from the phase 3 Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (MPACT) led to approval of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. The current analysis evaluated the effects of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine on primary pancreatic and metastatic lesions. METHODS In this analysis of the previously described MPACT trial, changes in pancreatic and metastatic tumor burden were assessed using independently measured diameters of lesions on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Changes in the sums of longest tumor diameters were summarized using descriptive statistics and were included in a multivariate analysis of overall survival. RESULTS Primary pancreatic lesion measurement was feasible. Reductions in primary pancreatic tumor burden and metastatic burden from baseline to nadir were significantly greater with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine. Baseline pancreatic tumor burden was independently predictive of survival. Both regimens elicited linear reductions in primary pancreatic and metastatic tumor burden through time. There was a high within-patient concordance of tumor changes between primary pancreatic lesions and metastatic lesions. CONCLUSIONS This analysis of MPACT demonstrated significant tumor shrinkage benefit for nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in both primary pancreatic and metastatic lesions, supporting ongoing evaluation of this regimen in locally advanced disease.
Collapse
|
8
|
Recommendations for MRI-based contouring of gross tumor volume and organs at risk for radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 7:126-136. [PMID: 28089481 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Local recurrence is a common and morbid event in patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A more conformal and targeted radiation dose to the macroscopic tumor in nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer is likely to reduce acute toxicity and improve local control. Optimal soft tissue contrast is required to facilitate delineation of a target and creation of a planning target volume with margin reduction and motion management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers considerable advantages in optimizing soft tissue delineation and is an ideal modality for imaging and delineating a gross tumor volume (GTV) within the pancreas, particularly as it relates to conformal radiation planning. Currently, no guidelines have been defined for the delineation of pancreatic tumors for radiation therapy treatment planning. Moreover, abdominal MRI sequences are complex and the anatomy relevant to the radiation oncologist can be challenging. The purpose of this study is to provide recommendations for delineation of GTV and organs at risk (OARs) using MRI and incorporating multiple MRI sequences. METHODS AND MATERIALS Five patients with pancreatic cancer and 1 healthy subject were imaged with MRI scans either on 1.5T or on 3T magnets in 2 separate institutes. The GTV and OARs were contoured for all patients in a consensus meeting. RESULTS An overview of MRI-based anatomy of the GTV and OARs is provided. Practical contouring instructions for the GTV and the OARs with the aid of MRI were developed and included in these recommendations. In addition, practical suggestions for implementation of MRI in pancreatic radiation treatment planning are provided. CONCLUSIONS With this report, we attempt to provide recommendations for MRI-based contouring of pancreatic tumors and OARs. This could lead to better uniformity in defining the GTV and OARs for clinical trials and in radiation therapy treatment planning, with the ultimate goal of improving local control while minimizing morbidity.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kalbasi A, Komar C, Tooker GM, Liu M, Lee JW, Gladney WL, Ben-Josef E, Beatty GL. Tumor-Derived CCL2 Mediates Resistance to Radiotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 23:137-148. [PMID: 27354473 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2016] [Revised: 06/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Local tumor growth is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in nearly 30% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Radiotherapy is commonly used for local disease control in PDAC, but its efficacy is limited. We studied the impact of selectively intervening on radiotherapy-induced inflammation as an approach to overcome resistance to radiotherapy in PDAC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN PDAC cell lines derived from primary pancreatic tumors arising spontaneously in KrasLSL-G12D/+;Trp53LSL-R172H/+;Pdx-1 Cre mice were implanted into syngeneic mice and tumors were focally irradiated using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP). We determined the impact of depleting T cells and Ly6C+ monocytes as well as inhibiting the chemokine CCL2 on radiotherapy efficacy. Tumors were analyzed by flow cytometry and IHC to detect changes in leukocyte infiltration, tumor viability, and vascularity. Assays were performed on tumor tissues to detect cytokines and gene expression. RESULTS Ablative radiotherapy alone had minimal impact on PDAC growth but led to a significant increase in CCL2 production by tumor cells and recruitment of Ly6C+CCR2+ monocytes. A neutralizing anti-CCL2 antibody selectively inhibited radiotherapy-dependent recruitment of monocytes/macrophages and delayed tumor growth but only in combination with radiotherapy (P < 0.001). This antitumor effect was associated with decreased tumor proliferation and vascularity. Genetic deletion of CCL2 in PDAC cells also improved radiotherapy efficacy. CONCLUSIONS PDAC responds to radiotherapy by producing CCL2, which recruits Ly6C+CCR2+ monocytes to support tumor proliferation and neovascularization after radiotherapy. Disrupting the CCL2-CCR2 axis in combination with radiotherapy holds promise for improving radiotherapy efficacy in PDAC. Clin Cancer Res; 23(1); 137-48. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusha Kalbasi
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chad Komar
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Graham M Tooker
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mingen Liu
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jae W Lee
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Whitney L Gladney
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gregory L Beatty
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. .,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Conroy T, Bachet JB, Ayav A, Huguet F, Lambert A, Caramella C, Maréchal R, Van Laethem JL, Ducreux M. Current standards and new innovative approaches for treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer 2016; 57:10-22. [PMID: 26851397 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Revised: 12/20/2015] [Accepted: 12/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a devastating disease with a 5-year survival rate not exceeding 6%. Treatment of this disease remains a major challenge. This article reviews the state-of-the-art in the management of this disease and the new innovative approaches that may help to accelerate progress in treating its victims. After careful pre-therapeutic evaluation, only 15-20% of patients diagnosed with a pancreatic cancer (PC) are eligible for upfront radical surgery. After R0 or R1 resection in such patients, evidence suggests a significantly positive impact on survival of adjuvant chemotherapy comprising 6 months of gemcitabine or fluorouracil/folinic acid. Delayed adjuvant chemoradiation is considered as an option in cases of positive margins. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is defined as a tumour involving the mesenteric vasculature to a limited extend. Resection of these tumours is technically feasible, yet runs the high risk of a R1 resection. Neoadjuvant treatment probably offers the best chance of achieving successful R0 resection and long-term survival, but the best treatment options should be determined in prospective randomised studies. Gemcitabine has for 15 years been the only validated therapy for advanced PC. Following decades of negative phase III studies, increasing evidence now suggests that further significant improvements to overall survival can be achieved via either Folfirinox or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel regimens. Progress in systemic therapy may improve the chances of resection in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally advanced PC. This requires first enhancing knowledge of the genetic events driving carcinogenesis, which may then be translated into clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Conroy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine and Lorraine University, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30519, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, 47-83 boulevard de l'hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Ahmet Ayav
- Department of Surgery, Nancy University Hospital Lorraine and Lorraine University, rue du Morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre-lès Nancy, France
| | - Florence Huguet
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Tenon Hospital, Paris Est University Hospitals, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Aurélien Lambert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine and Lorraine University, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30519, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Caroline Caramella
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, 114 rue Edouard-Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - Raphaël Maréchal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital-ULB-Brussels, Lennikstreet 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital-ULB-Brussels, Lennikstreet 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Ducreux
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, 114 rue Edouard-Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Doyen J, Falk AT, Floquet V, Hérault J, Hannoun-Lévi JM. Proton beams in cancer treatments: Clinical outcomes and dosimetric comparisons with photon therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 43:104-12. [PMID: 26827698 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2015] [Revised: 12/24/2015] [Accepted: 12/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review current evidence of the role of proton therapy (PT) in other tumors than skull base, sinusal/parasinusal, spinal and pediatric tumors; to determine medico-economic aspects raised by PT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic review on Medline was performed with the following keywords: proton therapy, proton beam, protontherapy, cancer; publications with comparison between PT and photon-therapy were also selected. RESULTS In silico studies have shown superiority (better dose delivery to the target and/or to organs at risk) of PT toward photon-therapy in most of thoracic and abdominal malignant tumors. Potential benefits of PT could be: reduction of toxicities (including radiation-induced cancer), increase of tumor control through a dose-escalation approach, hypofractionation. Cost of treatment is always cited as an issue which actually can be managed by a precise patient selection making PT a cost-effective procedure. Comparison plan with photon therapy may be useful to determine the dosimetric and clinical advantages of PT (Normal Tissue Complications Probability). CONCLUSION PT may be associated with a great advantage compared to the best photon-therapies in various types of cancers. Accumulation of clinical data is on-going and will challenge the in silico data analysis. Some indications are associated with strong superiority of PT and may be discussed as a new standard within prospective observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Alexander Tuan Falk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Vincent Floquet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Joël Hérault
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Jean-Michel Hannoun-Lévi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Neuzillet C, Tijeras-Raballand A, Bourget P, Cros J, Couvelard A, Sauvanet A, Vullierme MP, Tournigand C, Hammel P. State of the art and future directions of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma therapy. Pharmacol Ther 2015; 155:80-104. [PMID: 26299994 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is expected to become the second cause of cancer-related death in 2030. PDAC is the poorest prognostic tumor of the digestive tract, with 80% of patients having advanced disease at diagnosis and 5-year survival rate not exceeding 7%. Until 2010, gemcitabine was the only validated therapy for advanced PDAC with a modest improvement in median overall survival as compared to best supportive care (5-6 vs 3 months). Multiple phase II-III studies have used various combinations of gemcitabine with other cytotoxics or targeted agents, most in vain, in attempt to improve this outcome. Over the past few years, the landscape of PDAC management has undergone major and rapid changes with the approval of the FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimens in patients with metastatic disease. These two active combination chemotherapy options yield an improved median overall survival (11.1 vs 8.5 months, respectively) thus making longer survival a reasonably achievable goal. This breakthrough raises some new clinical questions about the management of PDAC. Moreover, better knowledge of the environmental and genetic events that underpin multistep carcinogenesis and of the microenvironment surrounding cancer cells in PDAC has open new perspectives and therapeutic opportunities. In this new dynamic context of deep transformation in basic research and clinical management aspects of the disease, we gathered updated preclinical and clinical data in a multifaceted review encompassing the lessons learned from the past, the yet unanswered questions, and the most promising research priorities to be addressed for the next 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Neuzillet
- INSERM UMR1149, Bichat-Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, and 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France; Department of Digestive Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France.
| | - Annemilaï Tijeras-Raballand
- Department of Translational Research, AAREC Filia Research, 1 place Paul Verlaine, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Philippe Bourget
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, 149 Rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Cros
- INSERM UMR1149, Bichat-Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, and 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France; Department of Pathology, Bichat-Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, and 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Anne Couvelard
- INSERM UMR1149, Bichat-Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, and 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France; Department of Pathology, Bichat-Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, and 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Marie-Pierre Vullierme
- Department of Radiology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Pascal Hammel
- INSERM UMR1149, Bichat-Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, and 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France; Department of Digestive Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Doyen J, Bondiau PY, Bénézéry K, Chand MÈ, Thariat J, Leysalle A, Gérard JP, Habrand JL, Hannoun-Lévi JM. [Current situation and perspectives of proton therapy]. Cancer Radiother 2015; 19:211-9; quiz 231-2, 235. [PMID: 25840776 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2014] [Accepted: 12/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is indicated as a treatment for some rare tumours and paediatric tumours because the technique allows a good local control with minimal toxicity; the growing number of centres that use proton beam therapy is associated with an increase of dosimetric and clinical data for other malignant tumours as well. This paper reviews potential indications of proton beam therapy. A systematic review on Medline was performed with the following keywords proton beam therapy, cancer, heavy particle, charged particle. No phase III trial has been published using proton beam therapy in comparison with the best photon therapy, but numerous retrospective and dosimetric studies have revealed an advantage of proton beam therapy compared to photons, above all in tumours next to parallel organs at risk (thoracic and abdominal tumours). This could be accompanied with a better safety profile and/or a better tumoural control; numerous phase 0, I, II, III and IV studies are ongoing to examine these hypotheses in more common cancers. Use of proton beam therapy is growing for common cancers within clinical trials but some indications could be applied sooner since in silico analysis showed major advantages with this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Doyen
- Pôle de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Nice-Sophia, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - P-Y Bondiau
- Pôle de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Nice-Sophia, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - K Bénézéry
- Pôle de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Nice-Sophia, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - M-È Chand
- Pôle de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Nice-Sophia, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - J Thariat
- Pôle de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Nice-Sophia, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - A Leysalle
- Pôle de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Nice-Sophia, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - J-P Gérard
- Pôle de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Nice-Sophia, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - J-L Habrand
- Département de radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14076 Caen cedex 05, France
| | - J-M Hannoun-Lévi
- Pôle de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Nice-Sophia, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Herman JM, Chang DT, Goodman KA, Dholakia AS, Raman SP, Hacker-Prietz A, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Griffith ME, Pawlik TM, Pai JS, O'Reilly E, Fisher GA, Wild AT, Rosati LM, Zheng L, Wolfgang CL, Laheru DA, Columbo LA, Sugar EA, Koong AC. Phase 2 multi-institutional trial evaluating gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2014; 121:1128-37. [PMID: 25538019 PMCID: PMC4368473 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 332] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2014] [Revised: 10/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background This phase 2 multi-institutional study was designed to determine whether gemcitabine (GEM) with fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) results in acceptable late grade 2 to 4 gastrointestinal toxicity when compared with a prior trial of GEM with single-fraction SBRT in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods A total of 49 patients with LAPC received up to 3 doses of GEM (1000 mg/m2) followed by a 1-week break and SBRT (33.0 gray [Gy] in 5 fractions). After SBRT, patients continued to receive GEM until disease progression or toxicity. Toxicity was assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0] and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and pancreatic cancer-specific QLQ-PAN26 module before SBRT and at 4 weeks and 4 months after SBRT. Results The median follow-up was 13.9 months (range, 3.9-45.2 months). The median age of the patients was 67 years and 84% had tumors of the pancreatic head. Rates of acute and late (primary endpoint) grade ≥2 gastritis, fistula, enteritis, or ulcer toxicities were 2% and 11%, respectively. QLQ-C30 global quality of life scores remained stable from baseline to after SBRT (67 at baseline, median change of 0 at both follow-ups; P>.05 for both). Patients reported a significant improvement in pancreatic pain (P = .001) 4 weeks after SBRT on the QLQ-PAN26 questionnaire. The median plasma carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level was reduced after SBRT (median time after SBRT, 4.2 weeks; 220 U/mL vs 62 U/mL [P<.001]). The median overall survival was 13.9 months (95% confidence interval, 10.2 months-16.7 months). Freedom from local disease progression at 1 year was 78%. Four patients (8%) underwent margin-negative and lymph node-negative surgical resections. Conclusions Fractionated SBRT with GEM results in minimal acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity. Future studies should incorporate SBRT with more aggressive multiagent chemotherapy. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first prospective multi-institutional trial evaluating the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The results suggest that fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy with gemcitabine achieves favorable toxicity, quality of life, and preliminary efficacy compared with historical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|