1
|
Bao H, Bao H, Lin L, Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang H, Liu L, Cao X. Radical chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer complicated with liver cirrhosis. PeerJ 2024; 12:e18065. [PMID: 39282115 PMCID: PMC11401512 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Although chemoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for esophageal cancer, its feasibility in esophageal cancer with cirrhosis remains largely unclear. Methods We retrospectively studied 11 patients with superficial esophageal cancer with liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh score ≤8) who underwent radical chemoradiotherapy from four centers, and the overall survival rate, local control rate and adverse events at 1 and 3 years were explored. Results The median age of the included patients was 67 years (Inter-Quartile Range 60-75 years). Complete response was observed in most patients (n = 10, 90.9%), and the remaining patient was unevaluable. The 1- and 3-year overall survival and local control rates were 90.9% and 90.9%, and 72.7% and 63.6%, respectively. Hematotoxicity was a common adverse reaction, and seven patients developed radiation esophagitis, with grade 3-4 observed in two cases. All cases of radiation dermatitis (n = 4) and radiation pneumonia (n = 2) were grade 1-2. Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in two patients, including one with grade 1-2 bleeding, and one died. Conclusion Radical chemoradiotherapy is a potential treatment option for patients with superficial esophageal cancer complicated with cirrhosis. However, it can increase the risk of bleeding, which warrants prompt recognition and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hejing Bao
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Panyu Center Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Cancer Institute of Panyu, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hehong Bao
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China
| | - Liping Lin
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Panyu Center Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Cancer Institute of Panyu, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuhuan Wang
- Department of Oncology, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Longbin Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China
| | - Han Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China
| | - Lingxiang Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Panyu Center Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Cancer Institute of Panyu, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaolong Cao
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Panyu Center Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Cancer Institute of Panyu, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abe T, Fujieda H, Higaki E, Komori K, Ito S, Shimizu Y. Thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy with prophylactic mediastinal lymph node dissection after definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10986-6. [PMID: 38886226 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10986-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage esophagectomy for residual tumor and localized relapses after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for patients with esophageal cancer is associated with a high rate of postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality. In addition, there are many controversial issues associated with salvage esophagectomy, such as the acceptability of minimally invasive surgery and the need for prophylactic dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and usefulness of thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy with prophylactic mediastinal lymph node dissection. METHODS The study included 31 patients who underwent thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy with prophylactic mediastinal lymph node dissection after dCRT between 2013 and 2022 (salvage patients) and 610 nonsalvage patients who underwent conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy during the same time period. RESULTS Differences between the median ages and sexes of the 2 patient groups were not significant. The dominant location of tumors in the salvage patients was the upper thoracic esophagus. More salvage patients had clinical T4 disease. The salvage patients had a lower median number of retrieved mediastinal lymph nodes than the nonsalvage patients. The differences between the rates of R0, postoperative complications, and in-hospital deaths in the 2 patient groups were not significant. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for the salvage patients were 73%, with 3-year OS rates for R0 vs non-R0 of 81% vs 0%, p < 0.01 and pN0 vs pN1-3 of 89% vs 49%, p < 0.01. CONCLUSION Regarding short-term outcomes, prophylactic mediastinal lymph node dissection for patients undergoing thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy was as safe as prophylactic dissection for patients undergoing conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy. R0 surgery and pN0 are important factors for long-term survival in patients undergoing thoracoscopic salvage esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Abe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
| | - Hironori Fujieda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Eiji Higaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Koji Komori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Seiji Ito
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knipper K, Krey T, Lyu SI, Jung JO, Wirsik NM, Fuchs HF, Schröder W, Schlößer HA, Popp FC, Quaas A, Bruns CJ, Schmidt T. Treatment of local recurrence of esophageal cancer following Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy-Experiences of a high-volume center. World J Surg 2024; 48:1414-1423. [PMID: 38554145 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with local recurrence of esophageal cancer have a highly decreased overall survival. There is currently no standardized treatment algorithm for this group. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the survival of patients with local recurrence, despite receiving individualized treatment options. METHODS 241 of 1791 patients were diagnosed with a local recurrence following Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at the University Hospital of Cologne. 59 patients, who were diagnosed only with a local recurrence of adeno- or squamous cell carcinoma and received their individualized therapy regimes at our high-volume center, were included. RESULTS The study included 52 patients with adenocarcinoma and 7 with squamous cell carcinoma. Among these, 6 patients underwent resection, 19 received solely chemotherapy, 29 received chemoradiotherapy, and 5 were provided with best supportive care. Patients who underwent resection showed a better survival outcome compared to patients without resection (median OS: not reached vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.012). Best supportive care and palliative care were found to be independent risk factors for shorter overall survival compared to curative intended treatment options like local resection or chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION In this study, different treatment strategies for patients with local recurrence of esophageal cancer were depicted. Resection as well as chemoradiotherapy could play a role in selected patients. Further prospective studies are needed to improve the selection of eligible patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Knipper
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thaddaeus Krey
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Su Ir Lyu
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jin-On Jung
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Naita M Wirsik
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans F Fuchs
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schröder
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans A Schlößer
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix C Popp
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Quaas
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McClurg DP, Sanghera C, Mukherjee S, Fitzgerald RC, Jones CM. A systematic review of circulating predictive and prognostic biomarkers to aid the personalised use of radiotherapy in the radical treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110224. [PMID: 38479442 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The availability of circulating biomarkers that are predictive of treatment response or prognostic of overall outcome could enable the personalised and adaptive use of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS A systematic review was carried out following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidance. Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus and the Web of Science databases were searched for studies published between January 2005-February 2023 relating to circulating biomarkers evaluated in the context of neoadjuvant or definitive RT delivered for OAC/OSCC. Study quality was assessed using predefined criteria. RESULTS A total of 3012 studies were screened and 57 subsequently included, across which 61 biomarkers were reported. A majority (43/57,75.4%) of studies were of Asian origin and retrospective (40/57, 70.2%), with most (52/57, 91.2%) biomarkers reported in the context of patients with OSCC. There was marked inter-study heterogeneity in patient populations, treatment characteristics, biomarker measurement and the cut points used to define biomarker positivity. Nevertheless, there is evidence for the prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumour DNA and numerous miRNAs in OAC and OSCC, as well as for the prognostic and predictive value of circulating levels of CYFRA21.1 in OSCC. CONCLUSIONS There is consistent evidence for the potential predictive and prognostic value of a small number of biomarkers in OSCC and OAC, though these data are insufficient for translation to current clinical practice. Well-designed prospective studies are now required to validate their role in stratified and personalised RT treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan P McClurg
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Chandan Sanghera
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Somnath Mukherjee
- Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Christopher M Jones
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oshima K, Tsushima T, Ito Y, Kato K. Recent progress in chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2024; 54:395-402. [PMID: 38342589 PMCID: PMC10999767 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a common malignancy worldwide. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with resectable stage oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who cannot undergo surgery, as well as those with locally advanced unresectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, it has several disadvantages such as poor survival, radiation-related toxicities and severe and lethal complications related to salvage treatment for residual or recurrent disease. Numerous clinical trials on chemoradiotherapy have been conducted to confirm the optimal combination of irradiation and chemotherapy. For advanced disease, multimodal treatment strategies including salvage surgery are essential. Palliative chemoradiotherapy is also crucial for dysphagia in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma with or without metastatic lesions. Recently, the synergistic mechanism of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy has been reported. Early phase clinical trials suggest that a combination of immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy can improve clinical outcomes with manageable side effects, but further investigations are needed. Here, we reviewed the existing clinical data and current development of chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kotoe Oshima
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsushima
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken Kato
- Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ebert MP, Fischbach W, Hollerbach S, Höppner J, Lorenz D, Stahl M, Stuschke M, Pech O, Vanhoefer U, Porschen R. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:535-642. [PMID: 38599580 DOI: 10.1055/a-2239-9802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias P Ebert
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
- DKFZ-Hector Krebsinstitut an der Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg
| | - Wolfgang Fischbach
- Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Bekämpfung der Krankheiten von Magen, Darm und Leber sowie von Störungen des Stoffwechsels und der Ernährung (Gastro-Liga) e. V., Giessen
| | | | - Jens Höppner
- Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck
| | - Dietmar Lorenz
- Chirurgische Klinik I, Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt
| | - Michael Stahl
- Klinik für Internistische Onkologie und onkologische Palliativmedizin, Evang. Huyssensstiftung, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen
| | - Oliver Pech
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Interventionelle Endoskopie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg
| | - Udo Vanhoefer
- Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
| | - Rainer Porschen
- Gastroenterologische Praxis am Kreiskrankenhaus Osterholz, Osterholz-Scharmbeck
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mantziari S, Farinha HT, Messier M, Winiker M, Allemann P, Ozsahin EM, Demartines N, Piessen G, Schäfer M. Low-Dose Radiation Yields Lower Rates of Pathologic Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2499-2508. [PMID: 38198002 PMCID: PMC10908612 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14810-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery is standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) cancer, the optimal radiation dose is still under debate. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different preoperative radiation doses (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy or 50.4 Gy) on pathologic response and survival in E/GEJ cancer patients. METHODS All consecutive patients with E/GEJ tumors, treated with curative intent between January 2009 and December 2016 in two referral centers were divided into three groups (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy) according to the dose of preoperative radiotherapy. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, postoperative morbidity, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared among the three groups, with separate analyses for adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). RESULTS From the 326 patients analyzed, 48 were included in the 41.4 Gy group (14.7%), 171 in the 45 Gy group (52.5%) and 107 in the 50.4 Gy group (32.8%). Postoperative complication rates were comparable (p = 0.399). A pCR was observed in 15%, 30%, and 34% of patients in the 41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy groups, respectively (p = 0.047). A 50.4 Gy dose was independently associated with pCR (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.10-7.99) in multivariate analysis. Within AC patients, pCR was observed in 6.2% of patients in the 41.4 Gy group, 29.2% of patients in the 45 Gy group, and 22.7% of patients in the 50.4 Gy group (p = 0.035). No OS or DFS differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS A pCR was less common after a preoperative radiation dose of 41.4 Gy in AC patients. Radiation dose had no impact on postoperative morbidity, long-term survival, and recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Styliani Mantziari
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Hugo Teixeira Farinha
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marguerite Messier
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Michael Winiker
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Allemann
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, CHU Lille, Lille, France
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Lille, France
| | - Markus Schäfer
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Scheck MK, Ekmekciu I, Sommerhäuser G, Heise C, Mavroeidi IA, Kunzmann V, Wege H, Reinacher-Schick A, Hofheinz RD, Oliver Götze T, Lorenzen S, Nieto AE. Gastroesophageal Oncology Highlights from the European Society for Medical Oncology Annual Meeting 2023. Oncol Res Treat 2024; 47:224-228. [PMID: 38479362 DOI: 10.1159/000538324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena K Scheck
- 3rd Department of Medicine (Hematology and Oncology), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ira Ekmekciu
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Greta Sommerhäuser
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Heise
- Clinic for Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Infectious Disease and Poisoning), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Volker Kunzmann
- Clinic for Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Henning Wege
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology, Hematology, Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | | | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- 3rd Department of Medicine (Hematology and Oncology), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Edward Nieto
- 3rd Department of Medicine (Hematology and Oncology), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang VP, Ding L, Kim AW, Wightman SC, Atay SM. Delayed esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma is associated with a negative impact on long-term survival and an increased risk of perioperative morbidity. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:592-600. [PMID: 37986276 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Delayed esophagectomy (DE) following chemoradiation therapy (CXRT) for esophageal carcinoma is undertaken in selected patients. This study aimed to assess both short-term outcomes and long-term survival for patients with adenocarcinoma undergoing DE. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage II-III esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing esophagectomy after CXRT. Patients were categorized as (1) DE, ≥90 days between completion of CXRT and surgery or (2) nondelayed esophagectomy (NDE), <90 days. Cox regression was performed to identify factors associated with mortality. RESULTS A total of 8157 patients met criteria. Age >69, nonwhite race, Medicare/Medicaid insured patients preferentially underwent DE. Five-year overall survival (OS) favored NDE (36% vs. 31%, p = 0.008). Cox regression identified DE, clinical stage >T2, or >N0 as factors associated with mortality. Within the DE group, OS favored early cT-status. DE fared worse than NDE in 30- and 90-day mortality (4.5%/11.1% vs. 2.9%/6.5%, p < 0.01/p < 0.001) and margin positive resection (7.1% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS For esophageal adenocarcinoma, DE is associated with decreased OS compared to NDE. For DE, cT-status is prognostic for OS, while cN-status was not. Increased 30-/90-day mortality and margin positive resection rates for DE question whether patients with locally advanced (cT3/T4) primary esophageal adenocarcinoma should undergo intentional DE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie P Huang
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Li Ding
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anthony W Kim
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sean C Wightman
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Scott M Atay
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mantziari S, Elliott JA, Markar SR, Klevebro F, Goense L, Johar A, Lagergren P, Zaninotto G, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Schäfer M, Nilsson M, Hanna GB, Reynolds JV. Sex-related differences in oncologic outcomes, operative complications and health-related quality of life after curative-intent oesophageal cancer treatment: multicentre retrospective analysis. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae026. [PMID: 38568850 PMCID: PMC10989878 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophageal cancer, in particular adenocarcinoma, has a strong male predominance. However, the impact of patient sex on operative and oncologic outcomes and recovery of health-related quality of life is poorly documented, and was the focus of this large multicentre cohort study. METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent oncological oesophagectomy from 2009 to 2015 in the 20 European iNvestigation of SUrveillance after Resection for Esophageal cancer study group centres were assessed. Clinicopathologic variables, therapeutic approach, postoperative complications, survival and health-related quality of life data were compared between male and female patients. Multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, tumour histology, treatment protocol and major complications. Specific subgroup analyses comparing adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell cancer for all key outcomes were performed. RESULTS Overall, 3974 patients were analysed, 3083 (77.6%) male and 891 (22.4%) female; adenocarcinoma was predominant in both groups, while squamous cell cancer was observed more commonly in female patients (39.8% versus 15.1%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated improved outcomes in female patients for overall survival (HRmales 1.24, 95% c.i. 1.07 to 1.44) and disease-free survival (HRmales 1.22, 95% c.i. 1.05 to 1.43), which was caused by the adenocarcinoma subgroup, whereas this difference was not confirmed in squamous cell cancer. Male patients presented higher health-related quality of life functional scores but also a higher risk of financial problems, while female patients had lower overall summary scores and more persistent gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION This study reveals uniquely that female sex is associated with more favourable long-term survival after curative treatment for oesophageal cancer, especially adenocarcinoma, although long-term overall and gastrointestinal health-related quality of life are poorer in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Styliani Mantziari
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jessie A Elliott
- Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, and St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Lucas Goense
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Asif Johar
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Markus Schäfer
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - John V Reynolds
- Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, and St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Honing J, Koch AD, Siersema PD, Spaander M. Endoscopic resection for residual oesophageal neoplasia after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 68:101885. [PMID: 38522883 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Definitive chemoradiation is the recommended treatment for locally advanced, irresectable oesophageal cancer and a valid alternative to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with surgery in oesophageal squamous cell cancer (OSCC) patients. In case of locoregional recurrence, salvage treatment can be considered in fit and resectable patients. Salvage surgery is a valid option but associated with significant morbidity. Therefore, for tumors confined to the mucosa or submucosal layers endoscopic resection is a good and less-invasive alternative. Over the last decade several case-series have demonstrated a high technical success rate of endoscopic treatment after definitive CRT. In this review we summarize the clinical outcomes and challenges of endoscopic treatment of early recurrence after definitive CRT in oesophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Honing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jinnouchi H, Yamashita H, Nozawa Y, Nakamoto T, Sawayanagi S, Katano A. Prognostic value of radiomic features in patients with esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20:243-248. [PMID: 38554328 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1627_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of radiomic features in patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. METHODS In this retrospective study, two independent cohorts of esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy were included. Radiomics features of each patient were extracted from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images. Radiomic features were selected by employing univariate and multivariate analyses in the test cohort. Selected radiomic features were verified in the validation cohort. The endpoint of the present study was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 101 esophageal cancer patients were included in our study, with 71 patients in the test cohort and 30 patients in the validation cohort. Univariate analysis identified 158 radiomic features as prognostic factors for overall survival in the test cohort. A multivariate analysis revealed that root mean squared and Low-High-High (LHH) median were prognostic factors for overall survival with a hazard ratio of 2.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-4.70, P = 0.017) and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.13-0.54, P < 0.001), respectively. In the validation cohort, root mean squared high/LHH median low group had the most preferable prognosis with a median overall survival of 73.30 months (95% CI: 32.13-NA), whereas root mean squared low/LHH median low group had the poorest prognosis with a median overall survival of 9.72 months (95% CI: 2.50-NA), with a P value of < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS We identified two radiomic features that might be independent prognostic factors of overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haruka Jinnouchi
- Departments of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Veziant J, Bouché O, Aparicio T, Barret M, El Hajbi F, Lepilliez V, Lesueur P, Maingon P, Pannier D, Quero L, Raoul JL, Renaud F, Seitz JF, Serre AA, Vaillant E, Vermersch M, Voron T, Tougeron D, Piessen G. Esophageal cancer - French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFP, RENAPE, SNFCP, AFEF, SFR). Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1583-1601. [PMID: 37635055 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of esophageal cancer (EC) published in July 2022, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org). METHODS This collaborative work was conducted under the auspices of several French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of EC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B and C), according to the level of evidence found in the literature until April 2022. RESULTS EC diagnosis and staging evaluation are mainly based on patient's general condition assessment, endoscopy plus biopsies, TAP CT-scan and 18F FDG-PET. Surgery alone is recommended for early-stage EC, while locally advanced disease (N+ and/or T3-4) is treated with perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT) or preoperative chemoradiation (CROSS regimen) followed by immunotherapy for adenocarcinoma. Preoperative chemoradiation (CROSS regimen) followed by immunotherapy or definitive chemoradiation with the possibility of organ preservation are the two options for squamous cell carcinoma. Salvage surgery is recommended for incomplete response or recurrence after definitive chemoradiation and should be performed in an expert center. Treatment for metastatic disease is based on systemic therapy including chemotherapy, immunotherapy or combined targeted therapy according to biomarkers testing such as HER2 status, MMR status and PD-L1 expression. CONCLUSION These guidelines are intended to provide a personalised therapeutic strategy for daily clinical practice and are subject to ongoing optimization. Each individual case should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Veziant
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille F-59000, France.
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| | - T Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Barret
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - F El Hajbi
- Department of Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - V Lepilliez
- Gastroenterology Department, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France
| | - P Lesueur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Guillaume le Conquérant, Le Havre, France
| | - P Maingon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, La Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - D Pannier
- Department of Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - L Quero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - J L Raoul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - F Renaud
- Department of Pathology, La Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - J F Seitz
- Department of Digestive Oncology, La Timone, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - A A Serre
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - M Vermersch
- Medical Imaging Department, Valencienne Hospital Centre, Valencienne 59300, France
| | - T Voron
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, 184 rue du faubourg Saint-Antoine, Paris 75012, France
| | - D Tougeron
- Department of Gastro-Enterology and Hepatology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille F-59000, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li K, Zhang S, Hu Y, Cai A, Ao Y, Gong J, Liang M, Yang S, Chen X, Li M, Tian J, Shan H. Radiomics Nomogram with Added Nodal Features Improves Treatment Response Prediction in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8231-8243. [PMID: 37755566 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14253-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram and determine the value of radiomic features from lymph nodes (LNs) for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS In this multicenter retrospective study, eligible participants who had undergone NCRT followed by radical esophagectomy were consecutively recruited. Three radiomics models (modelT, modelLN, and modelTLN) based on tumor and LN features, alone and combined, were developed in the training cohort. The radiomics nomogram was developed by incorporating the prediction value of the radiomics model and clinicoradiological risk factors using multivariate logistic regression, and was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, validated in two external validation cohorts. RESULTS Between October 2011 and December 2018, 116 patients were included in the training cohort. Between June 2015 and October 2020, 51 and 27 patients from two independent hospitals were included in validation cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The radiomics modelTLN performed better than the radiomics modelT for predicting pCR. The radiomics nomogram incorporating the predictive value of the radiomics modelTLN and heterogeneous after NCRT outperformed the clinicoradiological model, with an area under the curve (95% confidence interval) of 0.833 (0.765-0.894) versus 0.764 (0.686-0.833) [p = 0.088, DeLong test], 0.824 (0.718-0.909) versus 0.692 (0.554-0.809) [p = 0.012], and 0.902 (0.794-0.984) versus 0.696 (0.526-0.857) [p = 0.024] in all three cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Radiomic features from LNs could provide additional value for predicting pCR in ESCC patients, and the radiomics nomogram provided an accurate prediction of pCR, which might aid treatment decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunwei Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuaitong Zhang
- School of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Aiqun Cai
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong Ao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Gong
- Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingzhu Liang
- Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Songlin Yang
- Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiangmeng Chen
- Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Man Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| | - Jie Tian
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
- Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beihang University, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Hong Shan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chidambaram S, Owen R, Sgromo B, Chmura M, Kisiel A, Evans R, Griffiths EA, Castoro C, Gronnier C, MaoAwyes MA, Gutschow CA, Piessen G, Degisors S, Alvieri R, Feldman H, Capovilla G, Grimminger PP, Han S, Low DE, Moore J, Gossage J, Voeten D, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda J, van Hillegersberg R, D'Journo XB, Chmelo J, Phillips AW, Rosati R, Hanna GB, Maynard N, Hofstetter W, Ferri L, Berge Henegouwen MI, Markar SR. Delayed Surgical Intervention After Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer: (DICE) Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:701-708. [PMID: 37477039 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of delayed surgical intervention following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on survival from esophageal cancer. BACKGROUND CRT is a core component of multimodality treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The timing of surgery following CRT may influence the probability of performing an oncological resection and the associated operative morbidity. METHODS This was an international, multicenter, cohort study, including patients from 17 centers who received CRT followed by surgery between 2010 and 2020. In the main analysis, patients were divided into 4 groups based upon the interval between CRT and surgery (0-50, 51-100, 101-200, and >200 days) to assess the impact upon 90-day mortality and 5-year overall survival. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs adjusted for relevant patient, oncological, and pathologic confounding factors. RESULTS A total of 2867 patients who underwent esophagectomy after CRT were included. After adjustment for relevant confounders, prolonged interval following CRT was associated with an increased 90-day mortality compared with 0 to 50 days (reference): 51 to 100 days (HR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.04-2.29), 101 to 200 days (HR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.37-3.35), and >200 days (HR=3.06, 95% CI: 1.64-5.69). Similarly, a poorer 5-year overall survival was also observed with prolonged interval following CRT compared with 0 to 50 days (reference): 101 to 200 days (HR=1.41, 95% CI: 1.17-1.70), and >200 days (HR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.24-2.17). CONCLUSIONS Prolonged interval following CRT before esophagectomy is associated with increased 90-day mortality and poorer long-term survival. Further investigation is needed to understand the mechanism that underpins these adverse outcomes observed with a prolonged interval to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swathikan Chidambaram
- Academic Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Richard Owen
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
- The Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bruno Sgromo
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Magdalena Chmura
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Aaron Kisiel
- Department of Surgery, Birmingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard Evans
- Department of Surgery, Birmingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Surgery, Birmingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Carlo Castoro
- General Gastric and Esophagus Surgery Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- Esophageal and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Department, Centre Magellan, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mometo Ali MaoAwyes
- Stomach and Oesophageal Tumor Centre, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian A Gutschow
- Stomach and Oesophageal Tumor Centre, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, University Hospital Claude Huriez, Lille, Cedex, France
| | - Sébastien Degisors
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, University Hospital Claude Huriez, Lille, Cedex, France
| | - Rita Alvieri
- Oncological Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Hope Feldman
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Giovanni Capovilla
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter P Grimminger
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Shiwei Han
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Hospital & Seattle Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Donald E Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Hospital & Seattle Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jonathan Moore
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - James Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dan Voeten
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Ruurda
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Xavier B D'Journo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Diseases of the Esophagus & Lung Transplantations, Chemin des Bourrely, North Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Jakub Chmelo
- Northern Esophago-Gastric Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alexander W Phillips
- Northern Esophago-Gastric Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Department of GI Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - George B Hanna
- Academic Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark I Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hngorani M, Jain P. The role of surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy in management of localized squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus - What is the verdict? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 190:104111. [PMID: 37660931 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of esophagus has significantly changed over last decade with the development of newer surgical techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection for early superficial esophageal cancer and refinement of existing surgical techniques (e.g., Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy) that has been associated with an improvement in patient outcomes. The data from the pivotal CROSS study has established neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as standard of care for patients with locally advanced disease progressing to esophagectomy Simultaneously, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has emerged as an effective therapeutic modality with an added advantage of organ preservation. The present review focuses on reviewing the management of localized esophageal SqCC and exploring the evidence regarding the efficacy and caveats of different therapeutic modalities. One of the key objectives is to identify any specific features which may influence choosing a particular modality (e.g. surgery cf. dCRT) and definition of an appropriate evidence-based algorithm for management of early (superficial) and locally advanced SqCC of esophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohan Hngorani
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Prashant Jain
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Demir M, Demircan NC. The Naples prognostic score in esophagus cancer: Prognostic and beyond. Bull Cancer 2023; 110:1027-1040. [PMID: 37516650 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The role of inflammation in tumor biology has been better understood over time. The utility of the Naples prognostic score (NPS), which is a novel inflammation-based marker, was shown in esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients treated with surgery. We herein presented the prognostic and predictive value of NPS in EC patients treated with upfront chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS Adult EC patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma were included. Median survival was compared by log-rank test. Cox regression analyses were performed to establish the independent prognostic effect of NPS. RESULTS Of 153 patients, 97 (63.4%) and 56 (36.6%) patients were treated with CRT alone and CRT followed by surgery, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was significantly different among the Naples prognostic groups (NPG) (60+ months [CI 95%: NA], 27 months [CI 95%: 16.8-37.5], and 18.5 months [CI 95%: 15.3-30.7] for NPG 0,1, and 2, respectively; P=0.007). Surgery following CRT provided survival benefit in NPG 1 (65+ months with surgery vs. 17.3 months without surgery, P<0.001) and in NPG 2 (33 months with surgery vs. 15 months without surgery, P=0.009). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the NPS is an independent prognostic marker for OS (HR is 1.28 for OS [CI 95%: 1.03-1.59], P=0.02). CONCLUSION NPS might be useful as a prognostic marker in also EC patients treated with upfront CRT. Patients with high NPS may have a high risk of recurrence. Surgery might be planned in EC at the diagnosis in NPG 1 and 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Metin Demir
- Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, 25100 Erzurum, Turkey.
| | - Nazım Can Demircan
- Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, 25100 Erzurum, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ho YC, Lai YC, Lin HY, Ko MH, Wang SH, Yang SJ, Chou TW, Hung LC, Huang CC, Chang TH, Lin JB, Lin JC. Cardiac Dose Predicts the Response to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4580. [PMID: 37760549 PMCID: PMC10526131 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is the standard treatment for cervical esophageal cancer and non-surgical candidates. Initial treatment response affects survival; however, few validated markers are available for prediction. This study evaluated the clinical variables and chemoradiation parameters associated with treatment response. Between May 2010 and April 2016, 86 completed CCRT patients' clinical, dosimetric, and laboratory data at baseline and during treatment were collected. Cox regression analysis assessed the risk factors for overall survival (OS). A receiver operating characteristic curve with Youden's index was chosen to obtain the optimal cut-off value of each parameter. Treatment response was defined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v.1.1 at the first post-CCRT computed tomography scan. Responders had complete and partial responses; non-responders had stable and progressive diseases. Logistic regression (LR) was used to evaluate the variables associated with responders. The Cox regression model confirmed the presence of responders (n = 50) vs. non-responders (n = 36) with a significant difference in OS. In multivariate LR, cardiac dose-volume received ≥10 Gy; the baseline hemoglobin level, highest neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio during CCRT, and cumulative cisplatin dose were significantly associated with the responders. The initial clinical treatment response significantly determines disease outcome. Cardiac irradiation may affect the treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Chieh Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (S.-J.Y.); (T.-W.C.); (L.-C.H.); (C.-C.H.); (T.-H.C.); (J.-C.L.)
| | - Yuan-Chun Lai
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.L.); (M.-H.K.)
- Department of Medical Imaging Radiological Science, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung 406, Taiwan
| | - Hsuan-Yu Lin
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan;
| | - Ming-Hui Ko
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.L.); (M.-H.K.)
| | - Sheng-Hung Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lukang Christian Hospital, Changhua Christian Medical Foundation, Lukang 505, Taiwan;
| | - Shan-Jun Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (S.-J.Y.); (T.-W.C.); (L.-C.H.); (C.-C.H.); (T.-H.C.); (J.-C.L.)
| | - Tsai-Wei Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (S.-J.Y.); (T.-W.C.); (L.-C.H.); (C.-C.H.); (T.-H.C.); (J.-C.L.)
| | - Li-Chung Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (S.-J.Y.); (T.-W.C.); (L.-C.H.); (C.-C.H.); (T.-H.C.); (J.-C.L.)
| | - Chia-Chun Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (S.-J.Y.); (T.-W.C.); (L.-C.H.); (C.-C.H.); (T.-H.C.); (J.-C.L.)
| | - Tung-Hao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (S.-J.Y.); (T.-W.C.); (L.-C.H.); (C.-C.H.); (T.-H.C.); (J.-C.L.)
- Department of Medical Imaging Radiological Science, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung 406, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Technology, Yuanpei University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
| | - Jhen-Bin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (S.-J.Y.); (T.-W.C.); (L.-C.H.); (C.-C.H.); (T.-H.C.); (J.-C.L.)
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (S.-J.Y.); (T.-W.C.); (L.-C.H.); (C.-C.H.); (T.-H.C.); (J.-C.L.)
- Research Department, Division of Translation Research, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xu YH, Lu P, Gao MC, Wang R, Li YY, Song JX. Progress of magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in preoperative lymph node diagnosis of esophageal cancer. World J Radiol 2023; 15:216-225. [PMID: 37545645 PMCID: PMC10401402 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i7.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer, also referred to as esophagus cancer, is a prevalent disease in the cardiothoracic field and is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in China. Accurately determining the status of lymph nodes is crucial for developing treatment plans, defining the scope of intraoperative lymph node dissection, and ascertaining the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. Recent advances in diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have improved the effectiveness of MRI for assessing lymph node involvement, making it a beneficial tool for guiding personalized treatment plans for patients with esophageal cancer in a clinical setting. Radiomics is a recently developed imaging technique that transforms radiological image data from regions of interest into high-dimensional feature data that can be analyzed. The features, such as shape, texture, and waveform, are associated with the cancer phenotype and tumor microenvironment. When these features correlate with the clinical disease outcomes, they form the basis for specific and reliable clinical evidence. This study aimed to review the potential clinical applications of MRI-based radiomics in studying the lymph nodes affected by esophageal cancer. The combination of MRI and radiomics is a powerful tool for diagnosing and treating esophageal cancer, enabling a more personalized and effectual approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-Han Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University, Yancheng 224000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Peng Lu
- Department of Imaging, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University, Yancheng 224000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ming-Cheng Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University, Yancheng 224000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University, Yancheng 224000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yang-Yang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University, Yancheng 224000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jian-Xiang Song
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University, Yancheng 224000, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Du Q, Wu X, Zhang K, Cao F, Zhao G, Wei X, Guo Z, Li Y, Dong J, Zhang T, Zhang W, Wang P, Chen X, Pang Q. Predictive and prognostic markers from endoscopic ultrasound with biopsies during definitive chemoradiation therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:681. [PMID: 37474893 PMCID: PMC10357763 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10803-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) may play a role in evaluating treatment response after definitive chemoradiation therapy (dCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study explored the prognostic markers of EUS with biopsies and developed two nomograms for survival prediction. METHODS A total of 821 patients newly diagnosed with ESCC between January 2015 and December 2019 were reviewed. We investigated the prognostic value of the changes in tumor imaging characteristics and histopathological markers by an interim response evaluation, including presence of stenosis, ulceration, tumor length, tumor thickness, lumen involvement, and tumor remission. Independent prognostic factors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using Cox regression analysis and further selected to build two nomogram models for survival prediction. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to respectively assess its discriminatory capacity, predictive accuracy, and clinical usefulness. RESULTS A total of 155 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into the training (109 cases) and testing (46 cases) cohorts. Tumor length, residual tumor thickness, reduction in tumor thickness, lumen involvement, and excellent remission (ER) of spatial luminal involvement in ESCC (ER/SLI) differed significantly between responders and non-responders. For patients undergoing dCRT, tumor stage (P = 0.001, 0.002), tumor length (P = 0.013, 0.008), > 0.36 reduction in tumor thickness (P = 0.004, 0.004) and ER/SLI (P = 0.041, 0.031) were independent prognostic markers for both PFS and OS. Time-dependent ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA indicated that the predicted survival rates of our two established nomogram models were highly accurate. CONCLUSION Our nomogram showed high accuracy in predicting PFS and OS for ESCC after dCRT. External validation and complementation of other biomarkers are needed in further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingwu Du
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoyue Wu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Kunning Zhang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Fuliang Cao
- Departments of Endoscopy Diagnosis and Therapy, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Gang Zhao
- Departments of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoying Wei
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhoubo Guo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Li
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jie Dong
- Department of Nutrition Therapy, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Tian Zhang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| | - Xi Chen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Xiang G, Xu C, Chai G, Lyu B, Li Z, Wang B, Shi M, Zhao L. Re-irradiation for local primary-recurrence esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with IMRT/VMAT. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:114. [PMID: 37430276 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02265-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Local primary-recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after definitive treatment has the potential for increasing overall survival with re-irradiation (Re-RT), especially with advanced technique. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of Re-RT using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for local primary-recurrence of ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 130 ESCC patients with local primary-recurrence from Xijing hospital between 2008 and 2021 were enrolled and 30 patients underwent IMRT/VMAT based salvage Re-RT. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and after recurrence survival (ARS). The toxicities of 30 patients receiving Re-RT were also assessed. RESULTS The median OS and ARS of the 130 recurrent patients were 21 months (1-164 months) and 6 months (1-142 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 81.5%, 39.2%, and 23.8%, respectively. Besides, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year ARS rates were 30.0%, 10%, and 6.2%. Multivariate analysis showed that Re-RT ± chemotherapy (p = 0.043) and chemotherapy alone (p < 0.001) and esophageal stents (p = 0.004) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The median OS of 30 patients treated with Re-RT were significantly better than that of 29 patients treated with chemotherapy (34.5 months vs. 22 months, p = 0.030). Among 30 ESCC patients treated with Re-RT, the median OS and ARS were 34.5 months (range 12-163 months) and 6 months (range 1-132 months), respectively. The recurrence-free interval (RFI) (> 12 months) and initial radiation dose (> 60 Gy) were significantly associated with improved OS. Radiation esophagitis (Grade 1-2) occurred in 16 patients and myelosuppression (Grade1-2) occurred in 10 patients. Grade 3 toxicities (radiation esophagitis and myelosuppression) were only 13.3%. There were no grade 4 toxicities. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrated that IMRT/VMAT-based Re-RT was an effective therapeutic option for ESCC patients with local primary-recurrence compared with chemotherapy alone or without any treatment. Re-RT had improved OS but unfavorable ARS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geng Xiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Chunsheng Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Guangjin Chai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Bo Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhaohui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Mei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Lina Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Francischetto T, Pinheiro VPDSF, Viana EF, Moraes EDD, Protásio BM, Lessa MAO, Almeida GLD, Barretto VRD, Albuquerque AFD. EARLY POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF THE ESOPHAGECTOMY MINIMALLY INVASIVE IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA : ABCD = BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY 2023; 36:e1743. [PMID: 37436277 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020230025e1743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of esophageal cancer is high in some regions and the surgical treatment requires reference centers, with high volume, to make surgery feasible. AIMS To evaluate patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in prone position for the treatment of esophageal cancer and to recognize the experience acquired over time in our service after the introduction of this technique. METHODS From January 2012 to August 2021, all patients who underwent the minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. In order to assess the factors associated with the predefined outcomes as fistula, pneumonia, and intrahospital death, we performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, accounting for age as an important factor. RESULTS Sixty-six patients were studied, with mean age of 59.5 years. The main histological type was squamous cell carcinoma (81.8%). The incidence of postoperative pneumonia and fistula was 38% and 33.3%, respectively. Eight patients died during this period. The patient's age, T and N stages, the year the procedure was performed, and postoperative pneumonia development were factors that influenced postoperative death. There was a 24% reduction in the chance of mortality each year, associated with the learning curve of our service. CONCLUSIONS The present study presented the importance of the team's experience and the concentration of the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer in reference centers, allowing to significantly improve the postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thiago Francischetto
- Aristides Maltez Hospital, Bahia League Against Cancer - Salvador (BA), Brazil
- Universidade Federal da Bahia, Bahia School of Medicine - Salvador (BA), Brazil
- Santa Casa de Misericórdia da Bahia, Santa Izabel Hospital - Salvador (BA), Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Boerner T, Harrington C, Tan KS, Adusumilli PS, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Downey RJ, Huang J, Ilson D, Isbell JM, Janjigian YY, Park BJ, Rocco G, Rusch VW, Sihag S, Wu AJ, Jones DR, Molena D. Waiting to Operate: The Risk of Salvage Esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2023; 277:781-788. [PMID: 36727949 PMCID: PMC10354214 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess postoperative morbidity, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with salvage esophagectomy (SE). BACKGROUND DATA A shift toward a "surgery as needed" approach for esophageal cancer has emerged, potentially resulting in delayed esophagectomy. METHODS We identified patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who underwent chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy from 2001 to 2019. SE was defined as esophagectomy performed >90 days after chemoradiation ("for time") and esophagectomy performed for recurrence after curative-intent chemoradiation ("for recurrence"). The odds of postoperative serious complications were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. The relationship between SE and OS and DFS were quantified using Cox regression models. RESULTS Of 1137 patients identified, 173 (15%) underwent SE. Of those, 61 (35%) underwent SE for recurrence, and 112 (65%) underwent SE for time. The odds of experiencing any serious complication [odds ratio, 2.10 (95% CI, 1.37-3.20); P =0.001] or serious pulmonary complication [odds ratio, 2.11 (95% CI, 1.31-3.42); P =0.002] were 2-fold higher for SE patients; SE patients had a 1.5-fold higher hazard of death [hazard ratio, 1.56 (95% CI, 1.25-1.94); P <0.0001] and postoperative recurrence [hazard ratio, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16-1.77); P =0.001]. Five-year OS for nonsalvage esophagectomy was 45% [(95% CI, 41.6%-48.6%) versus 26.5% (95% CI, 20.2%-34.8%) for SE (log-rank P <0.001)]. Five-year OS for SE for time was 27.1% [(95% CI, 19.5%-37.5%) versus 25.2% (95% CI, 15.3%-41.5%) for SE for recurrence ( P =0.611)]. CONCLUSIONS SE is associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications and shorter DFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Boerner
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Caitlin Harrington
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J. Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David Ilson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yelena Y. Janjigian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van der Zijden CJ, Lagarde SM, Hermus M, Kranenburg LW, van Lanschot JJB, Mostert B, Nuyttens JJME, Oudijk L, van der Sluis PC, Spaander MCW, Valkema MJ, Valkema R, Wijnhoven BPL. A prospective cohort study on active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: protocol of Surgery As Needed for Oesophageal cancer-2. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:327. [PMID: 37038138 PMCID: PMC10084614 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10747-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by esophagectomy is a standard treatment for potentially curable esophageal cancer. Active surveillance in patients with a clinically complete response (cCR) 12 weeks after nCRT is regarded as possible alternative to standard surgery. The aim of this study is to monitor the safety, adherence and effectiveness of active surveillance in patients outside a randomized trial. METHODS This nationwide prospective cohort study aims to accrue operable patients with non-metastatic histologically proven adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Patients receive nCRT and response evaluation consists of upper endoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies, endoscopic ultrasonography plus fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. When residue or regrowth of tumor in the absence of distant metastases is detected, surgical resection is advised. Patients with cCR after nCRT are suitable to undergo active surveillance. Patients can consult an independent physician or psychologist to support decision-making. Primary endpoint is the number and severity of adverse events in patients with cCR undergoing active surveillance, defined as complications from response evaluations, delayed surgery and the development of distant metastases. Secondary endpoints include timing and quality of diagnostic modalities, overall survival, progression-free survival, fear of cancer recurrence and decisional regret. DISCUSSION Active surveillance after nCRT may be an alternative to standard surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. Similar to organ-sparing approaches applied in other cancer types, the safety and efficacy of active surveillance needs monitoring before data from randomized trials are available. TRIAL REGISTRATION The SANO-2 study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04886635 (May 14, 2021) - Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlène J van der Zijden
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Merel Hermus
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonieke W Kranenburg
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Jan B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bianca Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lindsey Oudijk
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter C van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Valkema
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roelf Valkema
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wong LY, Liou DZ, Vitzthum LK, Backhus LM, Lui NS, Chang D, Shrager JB, Berry MF. Impact of Delaying Surgery After Chemoradiation on Outcomes for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2212-2223. [PMID: 36572807 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12980-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performing selective esophagectomy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma may spare patients morbidity, but delayed surgery may infer higher risks. This study evaluated the impact of length of time between chemoradiation and esophagectomy on perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. METHODS The impact of surgical timing, stratified by surgery performed < 180 and ≥ 180 days from starting radiation, on perioperative outcomes and survival in patients treated with chemoradiation and esophagectomy for cT1N + M0 and cT2-4, any N, M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the mid-distal esophagus in the National Cancer Database (2006-2016) was evaluated with logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional-hazards methods, and propensity-matched analysis. RESULTS Median time between starting radiation and esophagectomy in 1641 patients was 93 (IQR 81-114) days. Most patients (96.8%, n = 1589) had surgery within 180 days of starting radiation, while 52 patients (3.2%) had delayed surgery. Black race and clinical T stage were associated with delayed surgery. Rates of pathologic upstaging, downstaging, complete response, and positive margins were not significantly different between the groups. Patients with delayed surgery had increased major morbidity as measured by a composite of length of hospital stay, readmission, and 30-day mortality [42.3% (22/52) vs 22.3% (355/1589), p = 0.001]. However, delayed surgery was not associated with a significant difference in survival in both univariate [5-year survival 32.8% (95% CI 21.1-50.7) vs 47.3% (44.7-50.1), p = 0.19] and multivariable analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.23 (0.85-1.78), p = 0.26]. CONCLUSIONS Delaying surgery longer than 180 days after starting chemoradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with worse perioperative outcomes but not long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lye-Yeng Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Douglas Z Liou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Leah M Backhus
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Natalie S Lui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joseph B Shrager
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Mark F Berry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kitagawa Y, Ishihara R, Ishikawa H, Ito Y, Oyama T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, Kawachi H, Kuribayashi S, Kono K, Kojima T, Takeuchi H, Tsushima T, Toh Y, Nemoto K, Booka E, Makino T, Matsuda S, Matsubara H, Mano M, Minashi K, Miyazaki T, Muto M, Yamaji T, Yamatsuji T, Yoshida M. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus 2023:10.1007/s10388-023-00993-2. [PMID: 36933136 PMCID: PMC10024303 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-023-00993-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 90.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Ryu Ishihara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Oyama
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tsuneo Oyama
- Department of Endoscopy, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Nagano, Japan
| | - Ken Kato
- Department Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hirofumi Kawakubo
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kawachi
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiko Kuribayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Koji Kono
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takashi Kojima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroya Takeuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsushima
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yasushi Toh
- National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kenji Nemoto
- Department of Radiology, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Eisuke Booka
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Tomoki Makino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoru Matsuda
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Hisahiro Matsubara
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masayuki Mano
- Department of Central Laboratory and Surgical Pathology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keiko Minashi
- Clinical Trial Promotion Department, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Miyazaki
- Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Gunma, Japan
| | - Manabu Muto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Taiki Yamaji
- Division of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoki Yamatsuji
- Department of General Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kowalchuk RO, Spears GM, Morris LK, Owen D, Yoon HH, Jethwa K, Chuong MD, Ferris MJ, Haddock MG, Hallemeier CL, Wigle D, Lin SH, Merrell KW. Risk stratification of postoperative cardiopulmonary toxicity after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1081024. [PMID: 36845682 PMCID: PMC9948243 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1081024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objective Postoperative toxicity for esophageal cancer impacts patient quality of life and potentially overall survival (OS). We studied whether patient and toxicity parameters post-chemoradiation therapy predict for post-surgical cardiopulmonary total toxicity burden (CPTTB) and whether CPTTB was associated with short and long-term outcomes. Materials/methods Patients had biopsy-proven esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy. CPTTB was derived from total perioperative toxicity burden (Lin et al. JCO 2020). To develop a CPTTB risk score predictive for major CPTTB, recursive partitioning analysis was used. Results From 3 institutions, 571 patients were included. Patients were treated with 3D (37%), IMRT (44%), and proton therapy (19%). 61 patients had major CPTTB (score ≥ 70). Increasing CPTTB was predictive of decreased OS (p<0.001), lengthier post-esophagectomy length of stay (LOS, p<0.001), and death or readmission within 60 days of surgery (DR60, p<0.001). Major CPTTB was also predictive of decreased OS (hazard ratio = 1.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.47, p=0.005). The RPA-based risk score included: age ≥ 65, grade ≥ 2 nausea or esophagitis attributed to chemoradiation, and grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity attributed to chemoradiation. Patients treated with 3D radiotherapy had inferior OS (p=0.010) and increased major CPTTB (18.5% vs. 6.1%, p<0.001). Conclusion CPTTB predicts for OS, LOS, and DR60. Patients with 3D radiotherapy or age ≥ 65 years and chemoradiation toxicity are at highest risk for major CPTTB, predicting for higher short and long-term morbidity and mortality. Strategies to optimize medical management and reduce toxicity from chemoradiation should be strongly considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Grant M. Spears
- Department of Statistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Lindsay K. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Harry H. Yoon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Krishan Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Michael D. Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Matthew J. Ferris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Michael G. Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Dennis Wigle
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Steven H. Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kenneth W. Merrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States,*Correspondence: Kenneth W. Merrell,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Patel DC, Yang CFJ, Liou DZ, Berry MF. Treatment and Outcomes of Proximal Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:818-827. [PMID: 36305985 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12683-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study evaluated the treatment of proximal (cervical or upper thoracic) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), for which chemoradiation is the recommended therapy. METHODS Treatment and outcomes of patients with cT1-3N0-1M0 proximal esophageal SCC in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2016 was evaluated using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and propensity-score matching. RESULTS Therapy of 2159 patients was chemoradiation (n = 1500, 69.5%), no treatment (n = 205, 9.5%), surgery (n = 203, 9.4%), radiation alone (n = 190, 8.8%), and chemotherapy alone (n = 61, 2.8%). Factors associated with definitive therapy with either chemoradiation or surgery were younger age, non-Black race, being insured, cervical tumor location, clinical T2 and T3 stage, clinical nodal involvement, and treatment at a research/academic program. Five-year survival was significantly better in patients treated with definitive therapy than patients not treated definitively (34.0% vs. 13.3%, p < 0.001). In multivariable survival analysis, receiving definitive therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, p = 0.017) was associated with improved survival, while increasing age, male sex, clinical T3 stage, positive clinical nodal involvement, and increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index were associated with worse survival. Esophagectomy was not associated with improved survival in multivariable analysis of the definitive therapy cohort (HR 0.84, p = 0.08) or propensity matched analysis. However, the pathologic complete response was only 33.3% (40/120) for patients who did have an esophagectomy after chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS This national analysis supports definitive chemoradiation for not only cervical but also proximal thoracic esophageal SCC. Routine surgery does not appear to be necessary but may have a role in patients with residual disease after chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deven C Patel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Douglas Z Liou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Mark F Berry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA. .,VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Petric J, Handshin S, Bright T, Watson DI. Planned oesophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy versus salvage oesophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2022; 93:829-839. [PMID: 36582046 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer and sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Salvage oesophagectomies are associated with an increased risk of mortality, although recent data suggests that long-term survival rates following salvage oesophagectomy are similar to planned oesophagectomy. The aim was therefore to meta-analyse outcomes for patients undergoing salvage versus planned oesophagectomies to assess the differences in short-term mortality and long-term survival. METHODS A systematic review of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed was performed to identify relevant studies. Data were extracted and compared by meta-analysis, using odds ratio and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Nineteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis, which compared patients in the planned oesophagectomy group (n = 23 555) to patients in the salvage oesophagectomy group (n = 2227). There were significant differences between the groups in terms of rates of postoperative mortality (5.7% salvage oesophagectomy versus 3.1% planned oesophagectomy, P = 0.0004), anastomotic leak (20.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 14.5% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.00001), pulmonary complications (37.1% salvage oesophagectomy versus 24.2% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001) and R0 margin (87.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 91.3% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between long-term survival rates at 5 years with 39.2% for salvage and 42.6% for planned oesophagectomy (P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS Salvage oesophagectomies do offer a meaningful chance of long-term survival (at 5 years) for select patients with oesophageal cancer, but the elevated risk of post-operative complications and mortality following salvage oesophagectomy should be recognized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josipa Petric
- Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Samuel Handshin
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tim Bright
- Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - David I Watson
- Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nachiappan M, Kapoor VK. Esophageal Cancer: Whether and What Before or After Surgery? Indian J Surg Oncol 2022; 13:880-887. [PMID: 36687238 PMCID: PMC9845445 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01655-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer and the sixth most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Surgery has been the mainstay of the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, given the dismal survival with surgery alone, other modalities, e.g., chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT), have been used for the management of these cancers. This review aims to look at the evolution of multi-modality management of esophageal cancer and tries to answer certain questions pertaining to the management of these cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murugappan Nachiappan
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sahasra Hospitals, Jayanagar, Bangalore Karnataka, 560082 India
| | - V. K. Kapoor
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital (MGMCH), Jaipur Rajasthan, 302022 India
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lewis S, Lukovic J. Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer. Thorac Surg Clin 2022; 32:447-456. [DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
32
|
Yamashita H, Nakajo K, Takashima K, Murano T, Kadota T, Sinmura K, Yoda Y, Ikematsu H, Fujii S, Yano T. Recurrent metastasis risk factors in esophageal cancer after salvage endoscopic resection for local failure following chemoradiotherapy. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:1356-1369. [PMID: 35452160 DOI: 10.1111/den.14338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although salvage endoscopic resection is an optimal treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, recurrent metastasis (lymph node and/or distant metastasis) after salvage endoscopic resection may occur with a certain degree of unavoidable frequency and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the risk factors for recurrent metastasis are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for recurrent metastasis after salvage endoscopic resection. METHODS Patients who underwent salvage endoscopic resection for local failure after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy were analyzed in this single-center, retrospective study. We evaluated the cumulative incidence rates of recurrent metastases, overall survival, and the risk factors for recurrent metastasis after salvage endoscopic resection. RESULTS We analyzed 132 patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of recurrent metastases after salvage endoscopic resection was 25.7%. The 5-year overall survival rates in all patients and in patients with recurrent metastasis were 66.8% and 22.5%, respectively. Local failure pattern with a residual lesion after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio 2.34; P = 0.012) and the presence of lymphatic invasion in salvage endoscopic resection specimen (subdistribution hazard ratio 3.20; P = 0.002) were significant risk factors for recurrent metastasis. CONCLUSIONS Patients with local failure pattern with a residual lesion after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and presence of lymphatic invasion have a high risk for recurrent metastasis. Thus, appropriate surveillance for these patients should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Nakajo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenji Takashima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Murano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Kadota
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kensuke Sinmura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yusuke Yoda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ikematsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Fujii
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tomonori Yano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Duff AM, Lambe G, Donlon NE, Donohoe CL, Brady AM, Reynolds JV. Interventions targeting postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and narrative discussion. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6565163. [PMID: 35393612 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) represent the most common complications after esophageal cancer surgery. The lack of a uniform reporting nomenclature and a severity classification has hampered consistency of research in this area, including the study of interventions targeting prevention and treatment of PPCs. This systematic review focused on RCTs of clinical interventions used to minimize the impact of PPCs. Searches were conducted up to 08/02/2021 on MEDLINE (OVID), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and the COCHRANE library for RCTs and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 339 citations, with a pooled dataset of 1,369 patients and 14 RCTs, were included. Heterogeneity of study design and outcomes prevented meta-analysis. PPCs are multi-faceted and not fully understood with respect to etiology. The review highlights the paucity of high-quality evidence for best practice in the management of PPCs. Further research in the area of intraoperative interventions and early postoperative ERAS standards is required. A consistent uniform for definition of pneumonia after esophagectomy and the development of a severity scale appears warranted to inform further RCTs and guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Marie Duff
- National Esophageal and Gastric Centre, St James's Hospital Dublin 8 and Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.,Trinity Centre for Practice & Health Care Innovation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gerard Lambe
- Department of Radiology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8 & University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- National Esophageal and Gastric Centre, St James's Hospital Dublin 8 and Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Claire L Donohoe
- National Esophageal and Gastric Centre, St James's Hospital Dublin 8 and Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anne-Marie Brady
- Trinity Centre for Practice & Health Care Innovation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John V Reynolds
- National Esophageal and Gastric Centre, St James's Hospital Dublin 8 and Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Obermannová R, Alsina M, Cervantes A, Leong T, Lordick F, Nilsson M, van Grieken NCT, Vogel A, Smyth EC. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:992-1004. [PMID: 35914638 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 95.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Obermannová
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - M Alsina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Pamplona; Gastrointestinal Tumours Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - T Leong
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - F Lordick
- Department of Medicine II (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology and Infectious Diseases), University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - M Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N C T van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - E C Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nilsson M, Olafsdottir H, Alexandersson von Döbeln G, Villegas F, Gagliardi G, Hellström M, Wang QL, Johansson H, Gebski V, Hedberg J, Klevebro F, Markar S, Smyth E, Lagergren P, Al-Haidari G, Rekstad LC, Aahlin EK, Wallner B, Edholm D, Johansson J, Szabo E, Reynolds JV, Pramesh CS, Mummudi N, Joshi A, Ferri L, Wong RKS, O’Callaghan C, Lukovic J, Chan KKW, Leong T, Barbour A, Smithers M, Li Y, Kang X, Kong FM, Chao YK, Crosby T, Bruns C, van Laarhoven H, van Berge Henegouwen M, van Hillegersberg R, Rosati R, Piessen G, de Manzoni G, Lordick F. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Versus Definitive Chemoradiotherapy With Salvage Surgery as Needed: The Study Protocol for the Randomized Controlled NEEDS Trial. Front Oncol 2022; 12:917961. [PMID: 35912196 PMCID: PMC9326032 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.917961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The globally dominant treatment with curative intent for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with subsequent esophagectomy. This multimodal treatment leads to around 60% overall 5-year survival, yet with impaired post-surgical quality of life. Observational studies indicate that curatively intended chemoradiotherapy, so-called definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) followed by surveillance of the primary tumor site and regional lymph node stations and surgery only when needed to ensure local tumor control, may lead to similar survival as nCRT with surgery, but with considerably less impairment of quality of life. This trial aims to demonstrate that dCRT, with selectively performed salvage esophagectomy only when needed to achieve locoregional tumor control, is non-inferior regarding overall survival, and superior regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL), compared to nCRT followed by mandatory surgery, in patients with operable, locally advanced ESCC. Methods This is a pragmatic open-label, randomized controlled phase III, multicenter trial with non-inferiority design with regard to the primary endpoint overall survival and a superiority hypothesis for the experimental intervention dCRT with regard to the main secondary endpoint global HRQOL one year after randomization. The control intervention is nCRT followed by preplanned surgery and the experimental intervention is dCRT followed by surveillance and salvage esophagectomy only when needed to secure local tumor control. A target sample size of 1200 randomized patients is planned in order to reach 462 events (deaths) during follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04460352.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Magnus Nilsson,
| | - Halla Olafsdottir
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Thoracic Oncology Center, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gabriella Alexandersson von Döbeln
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Thoracic Oncology Center, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fernanda Villegas
- Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Giovanna Gagliardi
- Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Hellström
- Center for Clinical Cancer Studies, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Qiao-Li Wang
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Center for Clinical Cancer Studies, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Val Gebski
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jakob Hedberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Klevebro
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sheraz Markar
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elizabeth Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Lars Cato Rekstad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Eirik Kjus Aahlin
- Department of GI and HPB Surgery, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Bengt Wallner
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - David Edholm
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Jan Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Szabo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Örebro, Örebro, Sweden
| | - John V. Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - CS Pramesh
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Naveen Mummudi
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Amit Joshi
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Rebecca KS Wong
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jelena Lukovic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kelvin KW Chan
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Trevor Leong
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Barbour
- Academy of Surgery, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark Smithers
- Academy of Surgery, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Yin Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaozheng Kang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Feng-Ming Kong
- Thoracic Oncology Center, HKU Shenzhen Hospital, Hong Kong University Li Ka Shing Medical School, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yin-Kai Chao
- Department of thoracic surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tom Crosby
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Christiane Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hanneke van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mark van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Riccardo Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Rafaele Hospital, Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER – Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, F-59000 Lille, France
| | | | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chidambaram S, Sounderajah V, Maynard N, Markar SR. Evaluation of post-operative surveillance strategies for esophageal and gastric cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6628787. [PMID: 35788834 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus or guidelines internationally to inform clinicians of how patients should be monitored for recurrence after esophagogastric resections. AIM This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the latest evidence investigating the usefulness of surveillance protocols in patients who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Review and Scopus databases. Articles were evaluated for the use of surveillance strategies including history-taking, physical examination, imaging modalities and endoscopy for monitoring patients post-gastrectomy or esophagectomy. Studies that compared surveillance strategies and reported detection of recurrence and post-recurrence survival were also included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS Fifteen studies that described a surveillance protocol for post-operative patients were included in the review. Seven studies were used in the meta-analysis. Random-effects analysis demonstrated a statistically significant higher post-recurrence survival (standardized mean difference [SMD] 14.15, 95% CI 1.40-27.26, p = 0.03) with imaging-based planned surveillance post-esophagectomy. However, the detection of recurrence (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.78-3.97, p = 0.17) for esophageal cancers as well as detection of recurrence (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.11-5.12, p = 0.76) and post-recurrence survival (SMD 6.42, 95% CI -2.16-18.42, p = 0.14) for gastric cancers were not significantly different with planned surveillance. CONCLUSION There is no consensus on whether surveillance carries prognostic survival benefit or how surveillance should be carried out. Surveillance may carry prognostic benefit for patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. Randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate the survival benefits of intensive surveillance strategies, determine the ideal surveillance protocol and tailor it to the appropriate population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper GI Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Qian D, Chen X, Shang X, Wang Y, Tang P, Han D, Jiang H, Chen C, Zhao G, Zhou D, Cao F, Er P, Zhang W, Li X, Zhang T, Zhang B, Guan Y, Wang J, Yuan Z, Yu Z, Wang P, Pang Q. Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved clinical complete response when induction chemoradiation finished: A phase II random. Radiother Oncol 2022; 174:1-7. [PMID: 35764191 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE More than 40% of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) exhibit pathological complete responses (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), and theoretically, these patients may be cured by CRT and omit surgery. This prospectively randomized pilot study compared definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with nCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC who achieved clinical complete responses (cCRs) to nCRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Single center, randomized, open phase 2 study of 256 patients with locally advanced ESCC enrolled between April 2016 and November 2018. Immediately when nCRT finished, patients enrolled underwent response evaluations within 1 week. Patients with cCR were randomly allocated to undergo surgery (arm A) or complete CRT up to the definitive radiation dose (arm B). The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Finally, 71 patients were randomly assigned to the nCRT (n = 36) and dCRT (n = 35) arms. The median observation time was 35.7 months. The 3-year DFS rate was 56.43% in arm A versus 54.73% in arm B (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.862, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.452 to 1.645, P = 0.652). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in arms A and B were 69.5% and 62.3% (HR = 0.824, 95% CI = 403-1.688, P = 0.597), respectively. CONCLUSIONS According to our treatment response evaluation criteria, survival of the patients with cCR after nCRT was not significant different between nCRT group and dCRT group. An optimized response evaluation strategy soon after nCRT may guide next therapy decisions for patients with locally advanced ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Qian
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, PR China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Xiaobin Shang
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuwen Wang
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Peng Tang
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Dong Han
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Hongjing Jiang
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Chuangui Chen
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Gang Zhao
- Department of pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Dejun Zhou
- Department of endoscopy diagnosis and therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Fuliang Cao
- Department of endoscopy diagnosis and therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Puchun Er
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Xiaoxia Li
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Tian Zhang
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Baozhong Zhang
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Yong Guan
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Zhentao Yu
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of radiation oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kurosaki T, Hoshino I, Kuwayama N, Isozaki T, Gunji H, Tonooka T, Soda H, Takiguchi N, Nabeya Y, Takayama W. Primary esophageal cancer treated by esophagectomy with distal pancreatectomy: a report of three cases. Clin J Gastroenterol 2022; 15:694-701. [PMID: 35661087 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-022-01646-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Esophagectomy and pancreatectomy are recognized as highly invasive procedures with relatively high complication rates; therefore, careful indication decisions are required. The depth of tumors invading adjacent organs, such as the aorta, vertebral body, and trachea, is defined as T4, and are estimated to have a low survival rate even after treatment. Conversely, pancreatic invasion of esophageal cancer is uncommon and not clearly defined as T4. Thus, it is often difficult to decide on a treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. In this study, we describe three cases of esophagectomy with combined resection of the pancreas and spleen for esophageal cancer or esophagogastric junction cancer with invasion of the pancreatic body or tail. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of esophagectomy and combined resection of the pancreas and spleen in multiple patients from a single institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Kurosaki
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan
| | - Isamu Hoshino
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan.
| | - Naoki Kuwayama
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Isozaki
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan
| | - Hisashi Gunji
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan
| | - Toru Tonooka
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Soda
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Takiguchi
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Nabeya
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan
| | - Wataru Takayama
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0801, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mayanagi S, Haneda R, Inoue M, Ishii K, Tsubosa Y. Selective Lymphadenectomy for Salvage Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:4863-4870. [PMID: 35552931 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11625-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extensive lymph node dissection increases the risk of postoperative complications, especially in salvage surgery, after definitive chemoradiotherapy (≥ 50 Gy) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the outcomes of salvage esophagectomy with selective lymphadenectomy of only clinically positive lymph nodes. METHODS Clinically positive lymph nodes, diagnosed as metastases using computed and positron emission tomography performed before chemoradiotherapy or salvage surgery, were targeted for dissection in selective lymphadenectomy. We compared postoperative complications between 52 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy with selective lymphadenectomy and 207 controls who underwent nonsalvage esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy. We also analyzed postoperative recurrence pattern and survival in salvage group. RESULTS The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 12.9 in the salvage esophagectomy group compared with 48.1 in the 3-field lymphadenectomy group (p < 0.001). Differences in the number of postoperative complications, comparing Clavien-Dindo all-grade and ≥ grade 3, were not significant between the groups. Both 30- and 90-day mortality were 0% (0/52) in the salvage group. Five cases had recurrence only in the locoregional area without distant metastasis. Of these five cases, only one had recurrence in the subcarinal lymph node without prophylactic mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A 3-year recurrence-free survival and 3-year overall survival from salvage esophagectomy were 43.3% and 46.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS It may contribute to obtaining good short- and long-term outcomes by dissecting only clinically positive lymph nodes in salvage esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhei Mayanagi
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Ryoma Haneda
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masazumi Inoue
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Ishii
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Tsubosa
- Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Miyata H, Sugimura K, Kanemura T, Takeoka T, Sugase T, Tanaka K, Makino T, Yamashita K, Yamasaki M, Motoori M, Shiraishi O, Kimura Y, Yasuda T, Yano M, Doki Y. Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Disease after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5657-5665. [PMID: 35536523 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11802-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes of salvage surgery after failed definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for esophageal cancer have been well defined. However, only a few studies have focused on salvage esophagectomy for recurrent disease after CRT. METHODS In 227 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT, consisting of 116 patients who underwent esophagectomy for persistent disease (the persistent group) and 111 patients who underwent esophagectomy for recurrent disease (the recurrent group), the short- and long-term outcomes were investigated. RESULTS The rates of any postoperative complication were similar between the groups (49.1% in the persistent group vs. 49.5% in the recurrent group, p = 0.951), although there was a higher rate of anastomotic leakage in the recurrent group (p = 0.027). Thirty-day mortality was also similar between the groups (1.7% in the persistent group vs. 0.9% in the recurrent group, p = 0.587). The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 33.7% and 28.0% in the persistent group and 48.7% and 41.7% in the recurrent group, respectively (p = 0.0175). In the recurrent group, clinically nodal status before CRT as well as pathologically nodal status and time to relapse were identified as independent prognostic factors. In the persistent group, pT and resection margin were identified as independent factors associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS The present study showed that salvage surgery for recurrent disease can provide acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Considering clinically and pathologically nodal status and time to relapse, adjuvant therapy might be offered for patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy for recurrent disease after definitive CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Miyata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Keijiro Sugimura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Kanemura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomohira Takeoka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahito Sugase
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoki Makino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kotaro Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Yamasaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaaki Motoori
- Department of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Yutaka Kimura
- Department of Surgery, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Masahiko Yano
- Department of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Schiffner C, Christiansen H, Brandes I, Grannas G, Wichmann J, Merten R. Neoadjuvant versus definitive radiochemotherapy of locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer-who benefits? Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:1062-1071. [PMID: 35416495 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01929-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For years, there have been discussions on whether neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery (nRCT-S) is superior to definitive radiochemotherapy (dRCT) as the standard of care for locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer (OC). This retrospective study aimed to evaluate our patient cohort regarding differences in survival and recurrence between nRCT‑S and dRCT. METHODS Data from 68 patients with dRCT and 33 patients with nRCT‑S treated from 2010 to 2018 were analysed. Comorbidities were recorded using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Recurrence patterns were recorded as in-field or out-field. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare survival data (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], and locoregional control [LRC]). RESULTS Patients with nRCT‑S showed significantly lower CCI values than those with dRCT (p = 0.001). The median follow-up was 47 months. The median OS times were 31 months for nRCT‑S and 12 months for dRCT (p = 0.009), the median PFS times were 11 and 9 months, respectively (p = 0.057), and the median LRC times were not reached and 23 months, respectively (p = 0.037). The only further factor with a significant impact on OS was the CCI (p = 0.016). In subgroup analyses for comorbidities regarding differences in OS, the superiority of the nRCT‑S remained almost significant for CCI values 2-6 (p = 0.061). CONCLUSION Our study showed significantly longer OS and LRC for patients with nRCT‑S than for those with dRCT. Due to different comorbidities in the groups, it can be deduced from the subgroup analysis that patients with few comorbidities seem to especially profit from nRCT‑S.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Schiffner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Iris Brandes
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gerrit Grannas
- Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jörn Wichmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Roland Merten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Deantonio L, Garo ML, Paone G, Valli MC, Cappio S, La Regina D, Cefali M, Palmarocchi MC, Vannelli A, De Dosso S. 18F-FDG PET Radiomics as Predictor of Treatment Response in Oesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:861638. [PMID: 35371989 PMCID: PMC8965232 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.861638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The best treatment strategy for oesophageal cancer patients achieving a complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is a burning topic. The available diagnostic tools, such as 18F-FDG PET/CT performed routinely, cannot accurately evaluate the presence or absence of the residual tumour. The emerging field of radiomics may encounter the critical challenge of personalised treatment. Radiomics is based on medical image analysis, executed by extracting information from many image features; it has been shown to provide valuable information for predicting treatment responses in oesophageal cancer. This systematic review with a meta-analysis aims to provide current evidence of 18F-FDG PET-based radiomics in predicting response treatments following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer. A comprehensive literature review identified 1160 studies, of which five were finally included in the study. Our findings provided that pooled Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the five selected studies was relatively high at 0.821 (95% CI: 0.737–0.904) and not influenced by the sample size of the studies. Radiomics models exhibited a good performance in predicting pathological complete responses (pCRs). This review further strengthens the great potential of 18F-FDG PET-based radiomics to predict pCRs in oesophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Additionally, our review imparts additional support to prospective studies on 18F-FDG PET radiomics for a tailored treatment strategy of oesophageal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letizia Deantonio
- Radiation Oncology Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland.,University of Southern Switzerland, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | - Gaetano Paone
- Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Maria Carla Valli
- Radiation Oncology Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Cappio
- Clinic for Radiology, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Davide La Regina
- Department of Surgery, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.,University of Southern Switzerland, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Marco Cefali
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Maria Celeste Palmarocchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | - Sara De Dosso
- University of Southern Switzerland, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Lugano, Switzerland.,Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gabrys D, Kulik R, Namysł-Kaletka A. Re-irradiation for intra-thoracic tumours and extra-thoracic breast cancer: dose accumulation, evaluation of efficacy and toxicity based on a literature review. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20201292. [PMID: 34826226 PMCID: PMC9153724 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The improvement seen in the diagnostic procedures and treatment of thoracic tumours means that patients have an increased chance of longer overall survival. Nevertheless, we can still find those who have had a recurrence or developed a secondary cancer in the previously treated area. These patients require retreatment including re-irradiation. We have reviewed the published data on thoracic re-irradiation, which shows that some specific healthy tissues can tolerate a significant dose of irradiation and these patients benefit from aggressive treatment; however, there is a risk of damage to normal tissue under these circumstances. We analysed the literature data on re-irradiation in the areas of vertebral bodies, spinal cord, breast, lung and oesophagus. We evaluated the doses of primary and secondary radiotherapy, the treatment techniques, as well as the local control and median or overall survival in patients treated with re-radiation. The longest OS is reported in the case of re-irradiation after second breast-conserving therapy where the 5-year OS range is 81 to 100% and is shorter in patients with loco-reginal re-irradiation where the 5-y OS range is 18 to 60%. 2-year OS in patients re-irradiated for lung cancer and oesophagus cancer range from 13 to 74% and 18 to 42%, respectively. Majority grade ≥3 toxicity after second breast-conserving therapy was fibrosis up to 35%. For loco-regional breast cancer recurrences, early toxicity occurred in up to 33% of patients resulting in mostly desquamation, while late toxicity was recorded in up to 23% of patients and were mostly ulcerations. Early grade ≥3 lung toxicity developed in up to 39% of patients and up to 20% of Grade 5 hemoptysis. The most frequently observed early toxicity grade ≥3 in oesophageal cancer was oesophagitis recorded in up to 57% of patients, followed by hematological complications which was recorded in up to 50% of patients. The most common late complications included dysphagia, recorded in up to 16.7% of patients. We have shown that thoracic re-irradiation is feasible and effective in achieving local control in some patients. Re-irradiation should be performed with maximum accuracy and care using the best available treatment methods with a highly conformal, image-guided approach. Due to tremendous technological progress in the field of radiotherapy, we can deliver radiation precisely, shorten the overall treatment time and potentially reduce treatment-related toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorota Gabrys
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Roland Kulik
- Radiotherapy Planning Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Namysł-Kaletka
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD Clinical Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer (2021). Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:658-669. [PMID: 35347573 PMCID: PMC8986732 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02801-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is an aggressive tumor, and is the sixth-leading cause of death from cancer. Incidence is rising in Spain, particularly among men. Two main pathological different subtypes have been described: squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Growing evidence of their epidemiology and molecular differences explains their different response to novel treatments, and they are therefore likely to be treated as two separate entities in the near future. The best results are obtained with a multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy, and the introduction of immunotherapy is a promising new approach that will improve prognosis. In these guidelines, we review the evidence for the different methods of diagnosis and therapeutic strategies that form the basis of our standard of care.
Collapse
|
45
|
Waters JK, Reznik SI. Update on Management of Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:375-385. [PMID: 35142974 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01153-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer death globally. Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC) is the predominant histologic type in the world. Treatment strategies have evolved in the last decade and new paradigms are replacing traditional approaches at all stages of cancer. This review will summarize the epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. RECENT FINDINGS Novel approaches to screening may be cost-effective in regions with a high incidence of ESCC. Multi-disciplinary evaluation and treatment has become the standard of care. Endoscopic resection may be an option for early stage ESCC. Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be performed safely as a primary therapy or after-induction chemoradiation. Several recent studies have found a survival benefit to immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or persistent disease. Multi-disciplinary evaluation and multi-modal therapy including cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and immunotherapy have improved survival compared to surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K Waters
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, MC 8879, Dallas, TX, 75390-8879, USA
| | - Scott I Reznik
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, MC 8879, Dallas, TX, 75390-8879, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cellini F, Manfrida S, Casà C, Romano A, Arcelli A, Zamagni A, De Luca V, Colloca GF, D’Aviero A, Fuccio L, Lancellotta V, Tagliaferri L, Boldrini L, Mattiucci GC, Gambacorta MA, Morganti AG, Valentini V. Modern Management of Esophageal Cancer: Radio-Oncology in Neoadjuvancy, Adjuvancy and Palliation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:431. [PMID: 35053594 PMCID: PMC8773768 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020431&n974851=v901586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The modern management of esophageal cancer is crucially based on a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. Radiotherapy is involved in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings; moreover, it includes radical and palliative treatment intention (with a focus on the use of a stent and its potential integration with radiotherapy). In this review, the above-mentioned settings and approaches will be described. Referring to available international guidelines, the background evidence bases will be reviewed, and the ongoing, more relevant trials will be outlined. Target definitions and radiotherapy doses to administer will be mentioned. Peculiar applications such as brachytherapy (interventional radiation oncology), and data regarding innovative approaches including MRI-guided-RT and radiomic analysis will be reported. A focus on the avoidance of surgery for major clinical responses (particularly for SCC) is detailed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Stefania Manfrida
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Calogero Casà
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Alessandra Arcelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.A.); (A.Z.); (A.G.M.)
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.A.); (A.Z.); (A.G.M.)
| | - Viola De Luca
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Andrea D’Aviero
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy;
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCSS—S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy;
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.A.); (A.Z.); (A.G.M.)
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica Diagnostica e Sperimentale (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cellini F, Manfrida S, Casà C, Romano A, Arcelli A, Zamagni A, De Luca V, Colloca GF, D’Aviero A, Fuccio L, Lancellotta V, Tagliaferri L, Boldrini L, Mattiucci GC, Gambacorta MA, Morganti AG, Valentini V. Modern Management of Esophageal Cancer: Radio-Oncology in Neoadjuvancy, Adjuvancy and Palliation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020431. [PMID: 35053594 PMCID: PMC8773768 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The modern management of esophageal cancer is crucially based on a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. Radiotherapy is involved in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings; moreover, it includes radical and palliative treatment intention (with a focus on the use of a stent and its potential integration with radiotherapy). In this review, the above-mentioned settings and approaches will be described. Referring to available international guidelines, the background evidence bases will be reviewed, and the ongoing, more relevant trials will be outlined. Target definitions and radiotherapy doses to administer will be mentioned. Peculiar applications such as brachytherapy (interventional radiation oncology), and data regarding innovative approaches including MRI-guided-RT and radiomic analysis will be reported. A focus on the avoidance of surgery for major clinical responses (particularly for SCC) is detailed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Stefania Manfrida
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Calogero Casà
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Alessandra Arcelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.A.); (A.Z.); (A.G.M.)
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.A.); (A.Z.); (A.G.M.)
| | - Viola De Luca
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Andrea D’Aviero
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy;
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCSS—S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy;
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.A.); (A.Z.); (A.G.M.)
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica Diagnostica e Sperimentale (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cellini F, Manfrida S, Casà C, Romano A, Arcelli A, Zamagni A, De Luca V, Colloca GF, D’Aviero A, Fuccio L, Lancellotta V, Tagliaferri L, Boldrini L, Mattiucci GC, Gambacorta MA, Morganti AG, Valentini V. Modern Management of Esophageal Cancer: Radio-Oncology in Neoadjuvancy, Adjuvancy and Palliation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:431. [PMID: 35053594 PMCID: PMC8773768 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020431&n923648=v907986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The modern management of esophageal cancer is crucially based on a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. Radiotherapy is involved in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings; moreover, it includes radical and palliative treatment intention (with a focus on the use of a stent and its potential integration with radiotherapy). In this review, the above-mentioned settings and approaches will be described. Referring to available international guidelines, the background evidence bases will be reviewed, and the ongoing, more relevant trials will be outlined. Target definitions and radiotherapy doses to administer will be mentioned. Peculiar applications such as brachytherapy (interventional radiation oncology), and data regarding innovative approaches including MRI-guided-RT and radiomic analysis will be reported. A focus on the avoidance of surgery for major clinical responses (particularly for SCC) is detailed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Stefania Manfrida
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Calogero Casà
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Alessandra Arcelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.A.); (A.Z.); (A.G.M.)
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.A.); (A.Z.); (A.G.M.)
| | - Viola De Luca
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Andrea D’Aviero
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy;
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCSS—S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy;
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.A.); (A.Z.); (A.G.M.)
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica Diagnostica e Sperimentale (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.C.); (G.C.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy; (S.M.); (C.C.); (V.D.L.); (G.F.C.); (V.L.); (L.T.); (L.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Poelsler L, Koch O, Gaggl A, Presl J, Hutter J, Brandtner C, Emmanuel K. Microvascular myocutaneous and cutaneous free flap reconstruction in patients with terminal esophagostomy after complicated oncological esophagus resection. Eur Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-021-00744-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Summary
Background
Persisting anastomotic leakage after oncological esophagectomy is a severe problem associated with high mortality and morbidity. Unfortunately, treatment options with promising results are scarce, especially when conventional operative and endoscopic methods have failed. Due to limitation of oral intake and the need for artificial nutrition, quality of life (QOL) is reduced. Microvascular myocutaneous and cutaneous free flap (MFF) reconstruction could be a promising alternative.
Methods
This retrospective case series presents 7 patients treated between March 2017 and November 2020 at our surgical department, with persisting postoperative anastomotic leakage without further feasible treatment options. All patients received anastomotic MFF reconstruction; used flaps and important intraoperative factors like microvascular anastomosis were evaluated. Complications and patient contentment was assessed.
Results
The included 7 male patients had median age of 65.15 years (range: 48–75). MFF function was adequate in 6/7 patients, one flap necrosis was encountered. Whereas 5 patients initially had good results, surgical revision was performed in 1 patient to ensure graft function. Postoperative complications appeared in 6/7 patients. Mean duration of inpatient care was 63 days (range: 24–156). At the time of evaluation, 1 patient has died of his malignant disease. No more additional nutrition was needed in 3/6 patients with adequate graft function. Most patients reported improved QOL after MFF.
Conclusion
MFF free flap can be an alternative treatment option for patients with terminal esophagostomy after complicated oncological esophagus resection without further treatment options. The renewed ability of oral food intake results in a significant improvement of QOL.
Collapse
|
50
|
Li Y, Liu J, Cai XW, Li HX, Cheng Y, Dong XH, Yu W, Fu XL. Biomarkers for the prediction of esophageal cancer neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response: A systemic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 167:103466. [PMID: 34508841 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has been established as the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. For patients with complete regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, active surveillance rather than planned surgery has been proposed as an organ preservation strategy. Reliable biomarkers to predict chemoradiation response is needed. We first summarized the previous reports of biomarkers with the potential to predict the treatment response of esophageal cancer neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. These traditional biomarkers are classified into three groups: genetic biomarkers, RNA biomarkers, and protein biomarkers. We then summarized some special types of biomarkers, including metabolites biomarkers, immune and tumor microenvironment biomarkers, and microbiome biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu-Wei Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong-Xuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Huan Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xiao-Long Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|