New designs in early clinical drug development

The availability of an unprecedented massive amount of data has provided a magnificent window of opportunity for the development of new drugs. There are currently more drugs in development targeting cancer than any other disease. While this has brought us new waves of drugs, the counterpart is that with these new molecules we have different mechanisms of action, drug kinetics and dynamics, response types and toxicity profiles, which impair classical early clinical trial designs from being effective and efficient. What we once treated as a 'one-size-fits-all' homogeneous disease, has now been uncovered to be a rather heterogeneous condition with multiple targetable mutations. As this generates endless scenarios, it will be impossible to design single 'me-too' trials for every different disease, target, biomarker and agent. To overcome this, we must focus on improving early phase studies, undoubtedly the most critical step from bench to bedside. Goals include decreasing clinical development times, lowering research and development costs and optimizing decisions in advancing through the several phases with a higher degree of certainty in exchange for less failed attempts. We need more informative and, really, transformative early phase designs that seek to obtain the typical late phase objectives in a time continuum and to allow for more robust and efficient go/no-go decisions. With this in mind, different classes of drugs seem to fit with different designs, which present solutions to the different challenges that they pose after finding the maximum tolerated dose/optimum biological dose. This article reviews these concepts and designs and how they can adapt to this new reality in early phase investigation.

Molecular screening programs in different countries: what we learned and perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Precision medicine arised as a new paradigm in oncology in which molecular profiling aims at guiding therapy in oncology. The implementation of precision medicine necessitates setting up molecular tumor boards (MTBs) that coordinate the workflow of tumor samples to efficiently seek for actionable molecular alterations. We review here the main precision medicine initiatives that involve MTBs and decipher challenges that still need to be overcome along with future perspectives for a broader implementation of precision medicine in routine patient care.

RECENT FINDINGS

MTBs have been implemented in multiple countries. They identify actionable molecular alteration in up to 50% of patients. However, around 10-20% receive matched therapy and less than 6% of patients experience an objective response. The challenges that need to be overcome for a successful implementation of precision medicine include an earlier molecular profiling of patients during their disease course, the use of liquid biopsies that allow sequential analyses, along with more exhaustive gene panels and extended access to drugs.

SUMMARY

Molecular screening programs allow to successfully guiding patients to individualized therapy in a minority of patients, and few patients actually benefit from these programs.

Path toward Precision Oncology: Review of Targeted Therapy Studies and Tools to Aid in Defining "Actionability" of a Molecular Lesion and Patient Management Support

Precision medicine trials and targeted therapies have shifted to the forefront of oncology. Although targeted therapies have shown initial promise, implementation across the broad landscape of oncology has many challenges. These limitations include an incomplete understanding of the functional significance of variant alleles as well as the need for clinical research and practice models that are more patient-centered and account for the complexity of individual patient tumors. Furthermore, successful implementation of targeted therapies will also be predicated on efforts to standardize the framework for patient management support. Here, we review current implementations of targeted therapies in precision oncology and discuss how "actionability" is defined for molecular targets in cancer therapeutics. We also comment on the growing need for bioinformatics tools and data platforms to complement advances in precision oncology. Finally, we discuss current frameworks for integrating precision oncology into patient management and propose an integrated model that combines features of molecular tumor boards and decision support systems. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2645-55. ©2017 AACRSee related article by Pilié et al., p. 2641.

HER2 is not a cancer subtype but rather a pan-cancer event and is highly enriched in AR-driven breast tumors

BACKGROUND

Approximately one in five breast cancers are driven by amplification and overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor kinase, and HER2-enriched (HER2E) is one of four major transcriptional subtypes of breast cancer. We set out to understand the genomics of HER2 amplification independent of subtype, and the underlying drivers and biology of HER2E tumors.

METHODS

We investigated published genomic data from 3155 breast tumors and 5391 non-breast tumors.

RESULTS

HER2 amplification is a distinct driver event seen in all breast cancer subtypes, rather than a subtype marker, with major characteristics restricted to amplification and overexpression of HER2 and neighboring genes. The HER2E subtype has a distinctive transcriptional landscape independent of HER2A that reflects androgen receptor signaling as replacement for estrogen receptor (ER)-driven tumorigenesis. HER2 amplification is also an event in 1.8% of non-breast tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

These discoveries reveal therapeutic opportunities for combining anti-HER2 therapy with anti-androgen agents in breast cancer, and highlight the potential for broader therapeutic use of HER2 inhibitors.

Next-generation Sequencing-based genomic profiling: Fostering innovation in cancer care?

OBJECTIVES

With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, DNA sequencing has been increasingly utilized in clinical practice. Our goal was to investigate the impact of genomic evaluation on treatment decisions for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed metastatic cancer patients from a single institution whose cancers had progressed after all available standard-of-care therapies and whose tumors underwent next-generation sequencing analysis. We determined the percentage of patients who received any therapy directed by the test, and its efficacy.

RESULTS

From July 2013 to December 2015, 185 consecutive patients were tested using a commercially available next-generation sequencing-based test, and 157 patients were eligible. Sixty-six patients (42.0%) were female, and 91 (58.0%) were male. The mean age at diagnosis was 52.2 years, and the mean number of pre-test lines of systemic treatment was 2.7. One hundred and seventy-seven patients (95.6%) had at least one identified gene alteration. Twenty-four patients (15.2%) underwent systemic treatment directed by the test result. Of these, one patient had a complete response, four (16.7%) had partial responses, two (8.3%) had stable disease, and 17 (70.8%) had disease progression as the best result. The median progression-free survival time with matched therapy was 1.6 months, and the median overall survival was 10 months.

CONCLUSION

We identified a high prevalence of gene alterations using an next-generation sequencing test. Although some benefit was associated with the matched therapy, most of the patients had disease progression as the best response, indicating the limited biological potential and unclear clinical relevance of this practice.