1
|
Peng F, He R, Liu Y, Xie Y, Xiong G, Li X, Wang M, Zhao C, Zhang H, Xu S, Qin R. MiR-200b-3p elevates 5-FU sensitivity in cholangiocarcinoma cells via autophagy inhibition by targeting KLF4. Noncoding RNA Res 2024; 9:1098-1110. [PMID: 39022678 PMCID: PMC11254509 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2024.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is one of the most lethal human cancers, and chemotherapy failure is a major cause of recurrence and poor prognosis. We previously demonstrated that miR-200 family members are downregulated in clinical samples of cholangiocarcinoma and inhibit cholangiocarcinoma tumorigenesis and metastasis. However, the role of differentially expressed miR-200b-3p in 5-fluorouracil chemosensitivity remains unclear. Here, we examined how miR-200b-3p modulates 5-fluorouracil chemosensitivity in cholangiocarcinoma. We observed that miR-200b-3p was associated with 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in cholangiocarcinoma and increased 5-fluorouracil-induced mitochondrial apoptosis in cholangiocarcinoma cells. Mechanistically, miR-200b-3p suppressed autophagy in cholangiocarcinoma cells to mediate 5-fluorouracil sensitivity. Further, we identified KLF4 as an essential target of miR-200b-3p in cholangiocarcinoma. Notably, the miR-200b-3p/KLF4/autophagy pathway augmented the chemosensitivity of cholangiocarcinoma cells to 5-fluorouracil. Our findings underscore the key role of miR-200b-3p in chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil and highlight the miR-200b-3p/KLF4/autophagy axis as a potential therapeutic target for cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Peng
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Ruizhi He
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Yuhui Liu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Yu Xie
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Guangbing Xiong
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Xu Li
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Chunle Zhao
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Hang Zhang
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Simiao Xu
- Division of Endocrinology, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Disease, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
| | - Renyi Qin
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Imamura H, Adachi T, Matsushima H, Ishimaru H, Fukumoto M, Yoshino K, Matsuguma K, Matsumoto R, Hara T, Soyama A, Hidaka M, Eguchi S. Analysis of the Clinical Course in a Population of Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer Diagnosed as Unresectable After Portal Vein Embolization: A Case Series. Kurume Med J 2024; 70:77-81. [PMID: 38508738 DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.ms7012001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended as a preoperative procedure for patients with biliary tract cancer scheduled to undergo hepatic resection of more than 50%-60% of the liver. However, details and/or information regarding the follow-up of unresectable cases are often lacking, and the clinical course of unresectable cases is not well analyzed and reported. This study aimed to clarify the clinical prognosis of patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer after PVE. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical backgrounds of patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent PVE without subsequent resection between January 2011 and October 2022. Of the 21 patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent PVE during the study period, eight (38%) cases were unsuitable for resection after PVE for the following reasons: intraoperatively detected dissemination (n=2), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (n=1), liver metastasis (n=1), decreased liver function (n=2), development of liver metastasis while waiting (n=1), and insufficient residual liver volume (n=1). All patients received subsequent chemotherapy, including gemcitabine plus S-1 therapy in three cases, gemcitabine plus cisplatin plus S-1 in three cases, and gemcitabine plus cisplatin or S-1+cisplatin in one case each. As there is currently no curative treatment for biliary tract cancer other than surgery, multidisciplinary management and treatment of patient factors, including tumor factors and liver function, are essential to reducing the number of unresectable cases after PVE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajime Imamura
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Tomohiko Adachi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Hajime Matsushima
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | | | - Masayuki Fukumoto
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Kyohei Yoshino
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Kunihiro Matsuguma
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Ryo Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Takanobu Hara
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Akihiko Soyama
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Masaaki Hidaka
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Susumu Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shen D, Zhang J, Yuan K, Zhao J, Zhao Z, Cui L, Zhang Y, Wang G, Cai S, Bai Y, Li W, Huang X. Landscape of IDH1/2 mutations in Chinese patients with solid tumors: A pan-cancer analysis. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2021; 9:e1697. [PMID: 34145795 PMCID: PMC8404228 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is an enzyme family involved in cell aerobic metabolism of tricarboxylic acid cycle. However, the landscape of IDH mutations in pan-cancer has not been fully characterized. METHODS Tissue or blood samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detection the IDH mutation. RESULTS A total of 28.868 patients from more than 20 solid tumor species were analyzed. A total of 374 cases (1.30%) with IDH mutations were identified. Among all the IDH mutations cases, 80 (21.4%) were biliary tract cancer (BTC), 80 (21.4%) were lung cancer, 57 (15.2%) were liver cancer, and 42 (11.2%) were colorectal cancer. The most common IDH variant were IDH1 and IDH2 which were discovered in 0.81% cases and 0.47% cases, respectively. However, there were significant differences in IDH1 and IDH2 mutation frequency among different tumor species (p = 0.0003). Of the patients with IDH1 mutations, about 53.0% of these mutations occur in codons 132. Codons 172 (25.4%) was high-frequency mutation subtypes in IDH2 mutation. TP53, PBRM1, and BAP1 were the most significantly mutated genes in BTC which were different from others cancer. Moreover, TMB were significantly higher in lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and gastric cancer than BTC (p = 0.0164, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0067, respectively) and BTC patients with IDH mutation had lower TMB compared with wild-type IDH. CONCLUSION Somatic IDH mutation was found in multiple solid tumors and IDH would be a driver gene in BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Shen
- Department of Medical OncologyThe Jiangyin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical UniversityJiangyinChina
| | | | - Kai Yuan
- Departments of Thoracic SurgeryThe Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityChangzhouChina
| | - Jing Zhao
- Medical Department3D Medicines Inc.ShanghaiChina
| | - Zhengyi Zhao
- Medical Department3D Medicines Inc.ShanghaiChina
| | - Longgang Cui
- Medical Department3D Medicines Inc.ShanghaiChina
| | - Yuzi Zhang
- Medical Department3D Medicines Inc.ShanghaiChina
| | | | - Shangli Cai
- Medical Department3D Medicines Inc.ShanghaiChina
| | - Yuezong Bai
- Medical Department3D Medicines Inc.ShanghaiChina
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Medical OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Xiang Huang
- Department of Medical OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nara S, Esaki M, Ban D, Takamoto T, Shimada K, Ioka T, Okusaka T, Ishii H, Furuse J. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer: a review of clinical trials. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 50:1353-1363. [PMID: 33037430 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer originating in the biliary tract can be classified as bile duct cancer (cholangiocarcinoma), gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer. Bile duct cancer is further divided to intrahepatic, perihilar and distal bile duct subtypes according to the anatomical location of the tumor. The biological characteristics of each tumor are heterogeneous. However, because of the rarity of each disease, the efficacy of new drugs has been tested in groups of patients with different biliary tract cancers. In patients with metastatic or recurrent biliary tract cancer, recent randomized clinical trials revealed the non-inferiority of gemcitabine + S-1 and the superiority of gemcitabine + cisplatin + S-1 compared with gemcitabine + cisplatin in terms of overall survival, thereby establishing a new standard treatment. In the field of adjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer, the British BILCAP (capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer) study revealed longer median overall survival in the capecitabine group than in the observation group in the per-protocol analysis (but not in the intention-to-treat analysis), bringing a shift toward postoperative management. Several other studies of adjuvant therapy are ongoing, and they may lead to reforms in treatment strategy for resectable biliary tract cancer in the future. The use of neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer is in its infancy, but it is expected to overcome the limitations of adjuvant therapy for this malignancy. In this review, we summarized the evidence available from clinical trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer and described ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Nara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Minoru Esaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ban
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takamoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Shimada
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ioka
- Oncology Center, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami Kogushi Ube-shi, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan
| | - Takuji Okusaka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ishii
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan
| | - Junji Furuse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McNamara MG, Lopes A, Wasan H, Malka D, Goldstein D, Shannon J, Okusaka T, Knox JJ, Wagner AD, André T, Cunningham D, Moehler M, Jensen LH, Koeberle D, Bekaii-Saab T, Bridgewater J, Valle JW. Landmark survival analysis and impact of anatomic site of origin in prospective clinical trials of biliary tract cancer. J Hepatol 2020; 73:1109-1117. [PMID: 32446715 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Whether all patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) should be included in prospective trials, irrespective of the anatomic site of origin, is debated. Herein, we aimed to assess the survival impact of anatomic site of origin in prospective clinical trials of aBTC using landmark survival analysis. METHODS Patients enrolled into prospective first-line aBTC clinical trials (Jan 97-Dec 15) were included. Overall survival (OS) was analysed using Cox proportional hazard regression; landmark survival (LS) and 95% CIs were calculated. RESULTS Overall, 1,333 patients were included: median age 63 years (range 23-85); 46% male; 84% ECOG-PS0/1; 25% with locally advanced disease, 72% with metastatic, 3% not reported (NR). Patients were treated with mono-chemotherapy (23%), cisplatin/gemcitabine (36%), other combinations (39%), or NR (2%). Median OS was 10.2 months (95% CI 9.6-10.9). All sites (treatment-adjusted) had decreased risk of death vs. gallbladder cancer (GBC) (p <0.001). This reduced risk vs. GBC was maintained in those receiving cisplatin/gemcitabine for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (p<0.001) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC, p<0.001), but not in cholangiocarcinoma-not specified (CCA-NS, p = 0.82) or ampullary carcinoma (p = 0.96). One-year OS rates amongst patients who survived beyond 1, 2, 3 and 4 years post-trial registration were 37%, 45%, 61%, and 63%, respectively. For patients who survived 1 year, those receiving combination therapy vs. mono (p = 0.008) (acknowledging potential selection bias) and those with IHC and CCA-NS vs. GBC had better LS (both p <0.05). Metastatic disease was associated with shorter LS than locally advanced disease (p = 0.002). ECOG-PS and gender were not associated with LS (p >0.05, p = 0.08 respectively). CONCLUSIONS GBC is associated with worse OS than other BTC sites and should be considered as a stratification factor in clinical trials. LS rates enable adjusted prognostication for aBTC survivors. LAY SUMMARY Patients with gallbladder cancer have worse overall survival compared to those with biliary tract cancers of different primary origin. Thus, gallbladder cancer should be considered as a stratification factor in future clinical trials. Landmark survival rates enable adjusted prognosis prediction for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who survive for some time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairéad Geraldine McNamara
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
| | - Andre Lopes
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London WCIE 6BT, UK
| | | | | | - David Goldstein
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Thierry André
- Sorbonne université and Hôpital Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Dieter Koeberle
- Leiter Medizinische Klinik, Chefarzt Onkologie, St. Claraspital, CH - 4016 Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Juan W Valle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Genetic alterations analysis in prognostic stratified groups identified TP53 and ARID1A as poor clinical performance markers in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2018; 8:7119. [PMID: 29740198 PMCID: PMC5940669 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25669-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence and mortality rates of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have been rising worldwide. Few patients present an early-stage disease that is amenable to curative surgery and after resection, high recurrence rates persist. To identify new independent marker related to aggressive behaviour, two prognostic groups of patient were selected and divided according to prognostic performance. All patients alive at 36 months were included in good prognostic performers, while all patients died due to disease within 36 months in poor prognostic performers. Using high-coverage target sequencing we analysed principal genetic alterations in two groups and compared results to clinical data. In the 33 cases included in poor prognosis group, TP53 was most mutated gene (p = 0.011) and exclusively present in these cases. Similarly, ARID1A was exclusive of this group (p = 0.024). TP53 and ARID1A are mutually exclusive in this study. Statistical analysis showed mutations in TP53 and ARID1A genes and amplification of MET gene as independent predictors of poor prognosis (TP53, p = 0.0031, ARID1A, p = 0.0007, MET, p = 0.0003 in Cox analysis). LOH in PTEN was also identified as marker of disease recurrence (p = 0.04) in univariate analysis. This work improves our understanding of aggressiveness related to this tumour type and has identified novel prognostic markers of clinical outcome.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yoo C, Kang J, Kim D, Kim KP, Ryoo BY, Hong SM, Hwang JJ, Jeong SY, Hwang S, Kim KH, Lee YJ, Hoeflich KP, Schmidt-Kittler O, Miller S, Choi EK. Multiplexed gene expression profiling identifies the FGFR4 pathway as a novel biomarker in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2018; 8:38592-38601. [PMID: 28445152 PMCID: PMC5503556 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) pathway is an essential regulatory component of bile acid synthesis, and its relationship with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been reported. We investigated the gene expression and clinical significance of FGFR4 and related pathways in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Results The median age was 56 years (range 30–78) and 34 patients (74%) were male. Six patients (13%) had hepatitis B virus infection, with or without liver cirrhosis. Overall survival was significantly associated with FGFR4 (p = 0.004), FGF19 (p = 0.047), FGF21 (p = 0.04), and KLB (p = 0.03) expression. In the multivariate analysis with potential prognostic factors, high expression of FGF19, FGF21, and FGFR4 was significantly associated with better survival. In the analysis using the TCGA iCCA dataset, mRNA overexpression of at least 1 of the FGFR4-related genes was significantly associated with better disease-free survival (p = 0.02). Materials and Methods We assessed the expression of 98 genes in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue specimens from 46 patients with surgically resected iCCA using a NanoString platform. This included 10 FGF pathway genes (e.g. FGFR1-4, KLB, FGF3, 4, 19, 21, and 23), 19 distal marker genes (e.g. CYP7A1 and CYP17A1), 31 genes relevant to HCC and iCCA (e.g. AFP, TS), 18 copy number variation matched genes, and 20 control genes. Log-transformation of gene expression was performed for normalization and statistical analysis. Overall survival was correlated with gene expression (< median vs. ≥ median) using a log-rank test. The prognostic impact of FGFR4-related genes was validated using the public TCGA dataset for iCCA. Conclusions Our results indicate that mRNA expression of FGFR4-related genes may be a biomarker to define the distinctive molecular phenotype of iCCA. Future preclinical and clinical validation is required to define the role of the FGFR4 pathway in iCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihoon Kang
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Deokhoon Kim
- Asan Institute for Life Science, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu-Pyo Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Baek-Yeol Ryoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Jin Hwang
- Institute for Innovative Cancer Research, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Yun Jeong
- Institute for Innovative Cancer Research, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Joo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Stephen Miller
- Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eun Kyung Choi
- Institute for Innovative Cancer Research, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Farshidfar F, Zheng S, Gingras MC, Newton Y, Shih J, Robertson AG, Hinoue T, Hoadley KA, Gibb EA, Roszik J, Covington KR, Wu CC, Shinbrot E, Stransky N, Hegde A, Yang JD, Reznik E, Sadeghi S, Pedamallu CS, Ojesina AI, Hess JM, Auman JT, Rhie SK, Bowlby R, Borad MJ, Zhu AX, Stuart JM, Sander C, Akbani R, Cherniack AD, Deshpande V, Mounajjed T, Foo WC, Torbenson M, Kleiner DE, Laird PW, Wheeler DA, McRee AJ, Bathe OF, Andersen JB, Bardeesy N, Roberts LR, Kwong LN. Integrative Genomic Analysis of Cholangiocarcinoma Identifies Distinct IDH-Mutant Molecular Profiles. Cell Rep 2017; 19:2878-2880. [PMID: 28658632 PMCID: PMC6141445 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy of the bile ducts, with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Here, we describe the integrated analysis of somatic mutations, RNA expression, copy number, and DNA methylation by The Cancer Genome Atlas, of a set of predominantly intrahepatic CCA cases, and propose a molecular classification scheme. We identified an IDH -mutant enriched subtype with distinct molecular features including low expression of chromatin modifiers, elevated expression of mitochondrial genes, and increased mitochondrial DNA copy number. Leveraging the multi-platform data, we observed that ARID1A exhibited DNA hypermethylation and decreased expression in the IDH -mutant subtype. More broadly, we found that IDH mutations are associated with an expanded histological spectrum of liver tumors with molecular features that stratify with CCA. Our studies reveal insights into the molecular pathogenesis and heterogeneity of cholangiocarcinoma and provide classification information of potential therapeutic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farshad Farshidfar
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Arnie Charbonneau
Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Siyuan Zheng
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology,
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular
Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030,
USA
| | - Marie-Claude Gingras
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yulia Newton
- University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064,
USA
| | - Juliann Shih
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - A. Gordon Robertson
- Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC
Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Toshinori Hinoue
- Center for Epigenetics, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand
Rapids, MI 49503
| | - Katherine A. Hoadley
- Departments of Genetics and Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599,
USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Ewan A. Gibb
- Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC
Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Jason Roszik
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology,
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular
Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030,
USA
| | - Kyle R. Covington
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chia-Chin Wu
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology,
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular
Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030,
USA
| | - Eve Shinbrot
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Apurva Hegde
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology,
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular
Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030,
USA
| | - Ju Dong Yang
- Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and
Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
55905, USA
| | - Ed Reznik
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
10005, USA
| | - Sara Sadeghi
- Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC
Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Akinyemi I. Ojesina
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
35294, USA
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL
35806, USA
| | - Julian M. Hess
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - J. Todd Auman
- Departments of Genetics and Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599,
USA
| | - Suhn K. Rhie
- University of Southern California, USC/Norris
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Reanne Bowlby
- Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC
Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Mitesh J. Borad
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic,
Scottsdale, AZ 85054, USA
| | | | - Andrew X Zhu
- Departments of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Josh M. Stuart
- University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064,
USA
| | - Chris Sander
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
10005, USA
| | - Rehan Akbani
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology,
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular
Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030,
USA
| | - Andrew D. Cherniack
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Taofic Mounajjed
- Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and
Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
55905, USA
| | - Wai Chin Foo
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology,
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular
Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030,
USA
| | - Michael Torbenson
- Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and
Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
55905, USA
| | | | - Peter W. Laird
- Center for Epigenetics, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand
Rapids, MI 49503
| | - David A. Wheeler
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Autumn J. McRee
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Oliver F. Bathe
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Arnie Charbonneau
Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Jesper B. Andersen
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of
Copenhagen, DK-2200, Denmark
| | - Nabeel Bardeesy
- Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Lewis R. Roberts
- Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and
Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
55905, USA
| | - Lawrence N. Kwong
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology,
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular
Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Farshidfar F, Zheng S, Gingras MC, Newton Y, Shih J, Robertson AG, Hinoue T, Hoadley KA, Gibb EA, Roszik J, Covington KR, Wu CC, Shinbrot E, Stransky N, Hegde A, Yang JD, Reznik E, Sadeghi S, Pedamallu CS, Ojesina AI, Hess JM, Auman JT, Rhie SK, Bowlby R, Borad MJ, Zhu AX, Stuart JM, Sander C, Akbani R, Cherniack AD, Deshpande V, Mounajjed T, Foo WC, Torbenson MS, Kleiner DE, Laird PW, Wheeler DA, McRee AJ, Bathe OF, Andersen JB, Bardeesy N, Roberts LR, Kwong LN. Integrative Genomic Analysis of Cholangiocarcinoma Identifies Distinct IDH-Mutant Molecular Profiles. Cell Rep 2017; 18:2780-2794. [PMID: 28297679 PMCID: PMC5493145 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 351] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 01/04/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy of the bile ducts, with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Here, we describe the integrated analysis of somatic mutations, RNA expression, copy number, and DNA methylation by The Cancer Genome Atlas of a set of predominantly intrahepatic CCA cases and propose a molecular classification scheme. We identified an IDH mutant-enriched subtype with distinct molecular features including low expression of chromatin modifiers, elevated expression of mitochondrial genes, and increased mitochondrial DNA copy number. Leveraging the multi-platform data, we observed that ARID1A exhibited DNA hypermethylation and decreased expression in the IDH mutant subtype. More broadly, we found that IDH mutations are associated with an expanded histological spectrum of liver tumors with molecular features that stratify with CCA. Our studies reveal insights into the molecular pathogenesis and heterogeneity of cholangiocarcinoma and provide classification information of potential therapeutic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farshad Farshidfar
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Siyuan Zheng
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Marie-Claude Gingras
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yulia Newton
- University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Juliann Shih
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - A Gordon Robertson
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Toshinori Hinoue
- Center for Epigenetics, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
| | - Katherine A Hoadley
- Departments of Genetics and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Ewan A Gibb
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Jason Roszik
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kyle R Covington
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chia-Chin Wu
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eve Shinbrot
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Apurva Hegde
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ju Dong Yang
- Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Ed Reznik
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10005, USA
| | - Sara Sadeghi
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Akinyemi I Ojesina
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Julian M Hess
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - J Todd Auman
- Departments of Genetics and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Suhn K Rhie
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Reanne Bowlby
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Mitesh J Borad
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Andrew X Zhu
- Departments of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Josh M Stuart
- University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Chris Sander
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10005, USA
| | - Rehan Akbani
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Andrew D Cherniack
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Taofic Mounajjed
- Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Wai Chin Foo
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael S Torbenson
- Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Peter W Laird
- Center for Epigenetics, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
| | - David A Wheeler
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Autumn J McRee
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Oliver F Bathe
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Jesper B Andersen
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
| | - Nabeel Bardeesy
- Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Lewis R Roberts
- Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Lawrence N Kwong
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, Melanoma Medical Oncology, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim YS, Oh SY, Go SI, Kang JH, Park I, Song HN, Ji JH, Hwang IG, Jang JS. The role of adjuvant therapy after R0 resection for patients with intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2016; 79:99-106. [DOI: 10.1007/s00280-016-3206-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
11
|
Mantripragada KC, Hamid F, Shafqat H, Olszewski AJ. Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Gallbladder Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 109:djw202. [PMID: 27707843 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Management of resected gallbladder cancer relies on single-arm trials and retrospective observations. Our objective was to evaluate adjuvant therapy in a nationwide data set using causal inference methods to address sources of bias. Methods We studied patients with T2-3 or node-positive, nonmetastatic gallbladder cancer, resected with grossly negative margins and reported to the National Cancer Data Base between 2004 and 2011. We defined adjuvant therapy as any chemotherapy within 90 days of surgery, and upfront concurrent chemoradiation as radiation within 14 days of first chemotherapy. After adjusting for missing data and guarantee-time bias, and using propensity score analysis to minimize indication bias, we compared overall survival of patients receiving adjuvant therapies with untreated case subjects. Results Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 28.8% of 4775 patients, and upfront chemoradiation to 13.5%. Treatment was less frequent among patients who were older, patients with comorbidities, and among white Hispanic women. T3 or node-positive disease, microscopically positive margins, or extended resection increased the likelihood of adjuvant therapy. Overall survival at three years was 39.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.4% to 41.4%) and was unaffected by adjuvant therapy after adjusting for multiple confounders (hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.10). Patients with T3 or node-positive tumors treated with upfront adjuvant chemoradiation had a modest early survival advantage (absolute difference at two years = 6.8%, 95% CI = 1.1% to 12.6%), but survival curves converged after five years of follow-up. Conclusions The curative potential of current adjuvant therapy in gallbladder cancer is questionable, justifying placebo-controlled investigation of novel chemotherapy combinations or alternative approaches. Chemoradiation may provide a short-term benefit in locally advanced tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalyan C Mantripragada
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.,Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Fatima Hamid
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI, USA
| | - Hammad Shafqat
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI, USA
| | - Adam J Olszewski
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.,Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ahn DH, Javle M, Ahn CW, Jain A, Mikhail S, Noonan AM, Ciombor K, Wu C, Shroff RT, Chen JL, Bekaii-Saab T. Next-generation sequencing survey of biliary tract cancer reveals the association between tumor somatic variants and chemotherapy resistance. Cancer 2016; 122:3657-3666. [PMID: 27495988 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2016] [Revised: 05/31/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are uncommon and are associated with a dismal prognosis. Combinations of gemcitabine and platinum chemotherapy (gemcitabine and platinum-based therapy [GP]) form the standard approach for treating advanced BTC. To characterize the spectrum of mutations and to identify potential biomarkers for a GP response in BTC, this study evaluated the genomic landscape and assessed whether mutations affecting DNA repair were associated with GP resistance. METHODS Pretreatment, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from 183 BTC patients treated with GP were analyzed. Cox regression models were used to determine the association between mutations, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS When genes with an incidence > 10% were considered, no individual gene was independently predictive of a GP response. In patients with unresectable BTC who received GP as their first-line therapy, the joint status of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), tumor protein 53 (TP53), and AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) was associated with PFS (P = .0004) and OS (P ≤ .0001). Patients with mutations in CDKN2A and TP53 were identified as a poor-prognosis cohort with a median PFS of 2.63 months and a median OS of 5.22 months. Patients with mutant ARID1A, regardless of the single-mutation status of TP53 or CDKN2A, had similar outcomes. A patient who exhibited mutations in all 3 genes had a median PFS of 20.37 months, and OS was not reached. CONCLUSIONS In the largest exploratory analysis of this kind for BTC, 3 prevalent, mutually exclusive mutations represent distinct patient cohorts. These mutations are prognostic and may represent a predictive biomarker for a GP response. Prospective studies to validate these findings are needed, and they should include the incorporation of therapies that exploit the genomic instability observed with these mutations in BTC. Cancer 2016;122:3657-66. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H Ahn
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chul W Ahn
- Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Apurva Jain
- Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sameh Mikhail
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Anne M Noonan
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Christina Wu
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Rachna T Shroff
- Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - James L Chen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|