1
|
Huang H, Xie J, Wang F, Jiao S, Li X, Wang L, Liu D, Wang C, Wei X, Tan P, Tu P, Li J, Hu Z. Commiphora myrrha n-hexane extract suppressed breast cancer progression through induction of G0/G1 phase arrest and apoptotic cell death by inhibiting the Cyclin D1/CDK4-Rb signaling pathway. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1425157. [PMID: 39161904 PMCID: PMC11330881 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1425157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most frequently observed malignancies globally, yet drug development for BC has been encountering escalating challenges. Commiphora myrrha is derived from the dried resin of C. myrrha (T. Nees) Engl., and is widely adopted in China for treating BC. However, the anti-BC effect and underlying mechanism of C. myrrha remain largely unclear. Methods MTT assay, EdU assay, and colony formation were used to determine the effect of C. myrrha n-hexane extract (CMHE) on the proliferation of human BC cells. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis were assessed via flow cytometry analysis. Moreover, metastatic potential was evaluated using wound-scratch assay and matrigel invasion assay. The 4T1 breast cancer-bearing mouse model was established to evaluate the anti-BC efficacy of CMHE in vivo. RNA-sequencing analysis, quantitative real-time PCR, immunoblotting, immunohistochemical analysis, RNA interference assay, and database analysis were conducted to uncover the underlying mechanism of the anti-BC effect of CMHE. Results We demonstrated the significant inhibition in the proliferative capability of BC cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 by CMHE. Moreover, CMHE-induced G0/G1 phase arrest and apoptosis of the above two BC cell lines were also observed. CMHE dramatically repressed the metastatic potential of these two cells in vitro. Additionally, the administration of CMHE remarkably suppressed tumor growth in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. No obvious toxic or side effects of CMHE administration in mice were noted. Furthermore, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis demonstrated that CMHE treatment inhibited the proliferative and metastatic abilities of cancer cells, while also promoting apoptosis in the tumor tissues of mice. Based on RNA sequencing analysis, quantitative real-time PCR, immunoblotting, and IHC assay, the administration of CMHE downregulated Cyclin D1/CDK4-Rb signaling pathway in BC. Furthermore, RNA interference assay and database analysis showed that downregulated Cyclin D1/CDK4 signaling cascade participated in the anti-BC activity of CMHE. Conclusion CMHE treatment resulted in the suppression of BC cell growth through the stimulation of cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase and the induction of apoptotic cell death via the inhibition of the Cyclin D1/CDK4-Rb pathway, thereby enhancing the anti-BC effect of CMHE. CMHE has potential anti-BC effects, particularly in those harboring aberrant activation of Cyclin D1/CDK4-Rb signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiming Huang
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jinxin Xie
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Wang
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Shungang Jiao
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xingxing Li
- Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Longyan Wang
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Dongxiao Liu
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Chaochao Wang
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xuejiao Wei
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Tan
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Pengfei Tu
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Li
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongdong Hu
- Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Im SA, Gennari A, Park YH, Kim JH, Jiang ZF, Gupta S, Fadjari TH, Tamura K, Mastura MY, Abesamis-Tiambeng MLT, Lim EH, Lin CH, Sookprasert A, Parinyanitikul N, Tseng LM, Lee SC, Caguioa P, Singh M, Naito Y, Hukom RA, Smruti BK, Wang SS, Kim SB, Lee KH, Ahn HK, Peters S, Kim TW, Yoshino T, Pentheroudakis G, Curigliano G, Harbeck N. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101541. [PMID: 37178669 PMCID: PMC10186487 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was published in 2021. A special, hybrid guidelines meeting was convened by ESMO and the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO) in collaboration with nine other Asian national oncology societies in May 2022 in order to adapt the ESMO 2021 guidelines to take into account the differences associated with the treatment of MBC in Asia. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with MBC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Indonesia (ISHMO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO). The voting was based on the best available scientific evidence and was independent of drug access or practice restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter were discussed when appropriate. The aim of these guidelines is to provide guidance for the harmonisation of the management of patients with MBC across the different regions of Asia, drawing from data provided by global and Asian trials whilst at the same time integrating the differences in genetics, demographics and scientific evidence, together with restricted access to certain therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S-A Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - A Gennari
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Y H Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J H Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Z-F Jiang
- Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - S Gupta
- Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - T H Fadjari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - K Tamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan
| | - M Y Mastura
- Cancer Centre, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - M L T Abesamis-Tiambeng
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardinal Santos Cancer Center, San Juan, The Philippines
| | - E H Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C-H Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Cancer Center Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - A Sookprasert
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - N Parinyanitikul
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital and Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - L-M Tseng
- Taipei-Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - S-C Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - P Caguioa
- The Cancer Institute of St Luke's Medical Center, National Capital Region, The Philippines; The Cancer Institute of the University of Santo Tomas Hospital, National Capital Region, The Philippines
| | - M Singh
- Department of Radiotherapy, Pantai Cancer Institute, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Department of Oncology, Pantai Cancer Institute, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Y Naito
- Department of General Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - R A Hukom
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Dharmais Hospital (National Cancer Center), Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - B K Smruti
- Medical Oncology, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre and Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, Mumbai, India
| | - S-S Wang
- Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - S B Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Centre, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - K-H Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - H K Ahn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - S Peters
- Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - T W Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | - G Curigliano
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krampe NA, Oerline MK, Asplin JR, Hsi RS, Crivelli JJ, Shahinian VB, Hollingsworth JM. Potential for Urolithiasis-related Research Using the Novel Medicare-Litholink Database. UROLOGY PRACTICE 2023; 10:147-152. [PMID: 37103409 PMCID: PMC10140542 DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To overcome the data availability hurdle of observational studies on urolithiasis, we linked claims data with 24-hour urine results from a large cohort of adults with urolithiasis. This database contains the sample size, clinical granularity, and long-term follow-up needed to study urolithiasis on a broad level. METHODS We identified adults enrolled in Medicare with urolithiasis who had a 24-hour urine collection processed by Litholink (2011 to 2016). We created a linkage of their collections results and paid Medicare claims. We characterized them across a variety of sociodemographic and clinical factors. We measured frequencies of prescription fills for medications used to prevent stone recurrence, as well as frequencies of symptomatic stone events, among these patients. RESULTS In total, there were 11,460 patients who performed 18,922 urine collections in the Medicare-Litholink cohort. The majority were male (57%), White (93.2%), and lived in a metropolitan county (51.5%). Results from their initial urine collections revealed abnormal pH to be the most common abnormality (77.2%), followed by low volume (63.8%), hypocitraturia (45.6%), hyperoxaluria (31.1%), hypercalciuria (28.4%), and hyperuricosuria (11.8%). Seventeen percent had prescription fills for alkali monotherapy, and 7.6% had prescription fills for thiazide diuretic monotherapy. Symptomatic stone events occurred in 23.1% at 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS We successfully linked Medicare claims with results from 24-hour urine collections performed by adults that were processed by Litholink. The resulting database is a unique resource for future studies on the clinical effectiveness of stone prevention strategies and urolithiasis more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah A. Krampe
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Mary K. Oerline
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - John R. Asplin
- Litholink Corporation, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Itasca, Il
| | - Ryan S. Hsi
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Joseph J. Crivelli
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Vahakn B. Shahinian
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - John M. Hollingsworth
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Qian J, Huang C, Zhu Z, He Y, Wang Y, Feng N, He S, Li X, Zhou L, Zhang C, Gong Y. NFE2L3 promotes tumor progression and predicts a poor prognosis of bladder cancer. Carcinogenesis 2022; 43:457-468. [PMID: 35022660 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgac006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The high incidence and vulnerability to recurrence of bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) is a challenge in the clinical. Recent studies have revealed that NFE2L3 plays a vital role in the carcinogenesis and progression of different human tumors. However, the role of NFE2L3 in bladder cancer has not been elucidated. In this study, NFE2L3 expression was significantly increased in bladder cancer samples. Its high expression was associated with advanced clinicopathological characteristics and was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in 106 patients with BLCA. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that NFE2L3 knockdown inhibited bladder cancer cells proliferation by inducing the cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis. Meanwhile, NFE2L3 overexpression promotes BLCA cell migration and invasion in vitro cell lines and in vivo xenografts. Moreover, we identified many genes and pathway alterations associated with tumor progression and metastasis by performing RNA-Seq analysis and functional enrichment of NFE2L3 overexpressing BLCA cells. Mechanistic investigation reveals that overexpression of NFE2L3 promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in bladder cancer cells with decreased expression of gap junction-associated protein ZO-1 and epithelial marker E-cadherin with the elevation of transcription factors Snail1 and Snail2. Finally, we performed a comprehensive proteomics analysis to explore more potential molecular mechanisms. Our findings revealed that NFE2L3 might serve as a valuable clinical prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in BLCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinqin Qian
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Cong Huang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zhenpeng Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yuhui He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Urology, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214000, China
| | - Ninghan Feng
- Department of Urology, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214000, China
| | - Shiming He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Cuijian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yanqing Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing,100034, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.,National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, Cortés J, de Azambuja E, DeMichele A, Dent R, Fenlon D, Gligorov J, Hurvitz SA, Im SA, Krug D, Kunz WG, Loi S, Penault-Llorca F, Ricke J, Robson M, Rugo HS, Saura C, Schmid P, Singer CF, Spanic T, Tolaney SM, Turner NC, Curigliano G, Loibl S, Paluch-Shimon S, Harbeck N. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1475-1495. [PMID: 34678411 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 550] [Impact Index Per Article: 183.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Gennari
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - F André
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - C H Barrios
- Oncology Research Center, Grupo Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - J Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain; Scientific Department, Medica Scientia Innovation Research, Valencia, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
| | - E de Azambuja
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A DeMichele
- Hematology/Oncology Department, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - R Dent
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - D Fenlon
- College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University-Singleton Park Campus, Swansea, UK
| | - J Gligorov
- Départment d' Oncologie Médicale, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - S A Hurvitz
- Department of Medicine/Division of Hematology Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - S-A Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - D Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Kiel, Kiely, Germany
| | - W G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Loi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Jean Perrin, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR INSERM-UCA, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - J Ricke
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Robson
- Medicine Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - H S Rugo
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA
| | - C Saura
- Breast Cancer Program, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Schmid
- Centre of Experimental Cancer Medicine, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - C F Singer
- Center for Breast Health and Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - T Spanic
- Europa Donna Slovenia, Slovenia, USA
| | | | - N C Turner
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Curigliano
- Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS and University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - S Loibl
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Sharett Institute of Oncology Department, Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haslam A, Gill J, Prasad V. The frequency of assessment of progression in randomized oncology clinical trials. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 5:e1527. [PMID: 34821077 PMCID: PMC9327664 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Progression in tumor assessments is often detected at a follow‐up appointment rather than when actual change in progression has occurred, which can bias PFS outcomes. Aim We sought to evaluate the frequency of tumor assessment scans in clinical trials of anti‐cancer interventions and to compare this to recommended (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) and real‐world frequencies of tumor assessments. Methods In a cross‐sectional analysis, we searched for articles published in the three top oncology journals between July 2017 and June 2020. We included articles that were RCTs of patients that had unresectable or metastatic solid tumors and used an intervention that was designed to be anti‐tumor. We abstracted median PFS survival for each group, the PFS hazard ratio, frequency of tumor assessment scans, tumor type, intervention type, and information regarding the study. Results We found that, in the 182 comparisons (163 articles), less frequent tumor assessment (occurring more than 9 weeks between assessments) was associated with higher median PFS values for both the intervention group (p < .0001) and the control group (p < .0001). PFS hazard ratios for studies scanning for tumors every 10 or more weeks were no different than for studies scanning for tumors more frequently (p = .88). Data on the frequency of tumor assessments in the real world is sparse. Conclusion We found that less frequent tumor assessment frequency was associated with longer median PFS in both intervention and control groups of clinical oncology trials but was not associated with differences in PFS hazard ratios. Future research is needed to compare real world to trial assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson Haslam
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Vinay Prasad
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vyas A, Mantaian T, Kamat S, Kurian S, Kogut S. Association of guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment with clinical and economic outcomes among older women with metastatic breast cancer in the United States. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:1092-1099. [PMID: 34099411 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We examined guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment among women with metastatic breast cancer, its predictors, and if guideline-concordant treatment was associated with mortality, healthcare utilization and Medicare expenditures. METHODS This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results-Medicare linked database. Women aged 66-90 years diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer during 2010-2013 (N = 1282) were included. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines were used to determine the guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment following cancer diagnosis. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine significant predictors of guideline-concordant treatment. Generalized linear regressions were used to examine the association between guideline-concordant treatment and healthcare utilization and average monthly Medicare expenditures. RESULTS About 74% of the study cohort received guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment. Women who received guideline-concordant treatment were significantly more likely to be comparatively younger (p < 0.05), were married/partnered (p = 0.0038), had HER2 positive tumors, and had good performance status. Adjusted hazards ratios for all-cause (2.364, p < 0.0001) and breast-cancer specific mortality (2.179, p < 0.0001) were higher for women who did not receive guideline-concordant treatment. Rates of healthcare utilization were also higher for women not receiving guideline-concordant treatment. Average monthly Medicare expenditures were 100.4% higher (95% confidence interval: $77.3%-126.5%) for women who did not receive guideline-concordant treatment compared to those who received guideline-concordant treatment (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION One fourth of the study cohort did not receive guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment. Guideline-concordant initial treatment was associated with reduced mortality, and lower healthcare utilization and Medicare expenditures in women with metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami Vyas
- University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kingston, RI, United States of America.
| | - Tyler Mantaian
- University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kingston, RI, United States of America
| | - Shweta Kamat
- University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kingston, RI, United States of America
| | - Sobha Kurian
- West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States of America
| | - Stephen Kogut
- University of Rhode Island, College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kingston, RI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vyas A, Gabriel M, Kurian S. Disparities in Guideline-Concordant Initial Systemic Treatment in Women with HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A SEER-Medicare Analysis. BREAST CANCER: TARGETS AND THERAPY 2021; 13:259-269. [PMID: 33880062 PMCID: PMC8053132 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s295526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami Vyas
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
- Correspondence: Ami Vyas Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881, USATel +1-401-874-7255Fax +1-401-874-2717 Email
| | | | - Sobha Kurian
- West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Williams SB, Howard LE, Foster ML, Klaassen Z, Sieluk J, De Hoedt AM, Freedland SJ. Estimated Costs and Long-term Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in the Veterans Affairs Health System. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e213800. [PMID: 33787908 PMCID: PMC8013821 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Management of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represents a clinical challenge due to high failure rates despite prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. OBJECTIVE To describe real-world patient characteristics, long-term outcomes, and the economic burden in a population with high-risk NMIBC treated with BCG therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study identified 412 patients with high-risk NMIBC from 63 139 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer who received at least 1 dose of BCG within Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) centers across the US from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2015. Adequate induction BCG therapy was defined as at least 5 installations, and adequate maintenance BCG therapy was defined as at least 7 installations. Data were analyzed from January 2, 2020, to January 20, 2021. EXPOSURES Intravesical BCG therapy, including adequate induction BCG therapy, was defined as at least 5 intravesical instillations of BCG within 70 days from BCG therapy start date. Adequate maintenance BCG therapy was defined as at least 7 installations of BCG within 274 days of the start (the first instillation) of adequate induction BCG therapy (ie, adequate induction BCG plus some form of additional BCG). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate outcomes, including event-free survival. All-cause expenditures were summarized as medians with corresponding interquartile ranges (IQRs) and adjusted to 2019 USD. RESULTS Of the 412 patients who met inclusion criteria, 335 (81%) were male and 77 (19%) were female, with a median age of 67 (IQR, 61-74) years. Follow-up was 2694 person-years. A total of 392 patients (95%) received adequate induction BCG therapy, and 152 (37%) received adequate BCG therapy. For all patients with high-risk NMIBC, the 10-year progression-free survival rate and disease-specific death rate were 78% and 92%, respectively. Patients with carcinoma in situ (Cis) had worse disease-free survival than those without Cis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.34-2.56). Total median costs at 1 year were $29 459 (IQR, $14 991-$52 060); at 2 years, $55 267 (IQR, $28 667-$99 846); and at 5 years, $117 361 (IQR, $59 680-$211 298). Patients with progressive disease had significantly higher median 5-year costs ($232 729 [IQR, $151 321-$341 195] vs $94 879 [IQR, $52 498-$172 631]; P < .001), with outpatient care, pharmacy, and surgery-related costs contributing. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Despite adequate induction BCG therapy, only 37% of patients received adequate BCG therapy. Patients with Cis had increased risk of progression, and progression regardless of Cis was associated with significantly increased costs relative to patients without progression. Extrapolating cost figures, regardless of progression, resulted in nationwide costs at 1 year of $373 million for patients diagnosed with high-risk NMIBC in 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B. Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | - Lauren E. Howard
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Meagan L. Foster
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta
| | | | | | - Stephen J. Freedland
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
- Center for Integrated Research on Cancer and Lifestyle, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Carlson JJ, Guzauskas GF, Dann RA, Ramsey SD. Budget impact analysis of the DiviTum TKa assay in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. J Med Econ 2021; 24:1309-1317. [PMID: 34763605 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2003674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND DiviTum TKa, a blood-based biomarker assay developed to monitor and predict treatment response in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer (HR + mBC), may decrease traditional disease monitoring assessments and avoid prolongation of futile treatments. OBJECTIVE To estimate the diagnostic and treatment budget impact of the assay on a postmenopausal HR + HER2- mBC population in a one-million-member U.S. health plan. METHODS We developed a budget impact model comparing inclusion and exclusion of DiviTum TKa to standard care under which DiviTum TKa (1) reduces the frequency of traditional mBC monitoring tools, and (2) predicts treatment futility in advance of radiological disease progression. Traditional disease monitoring assessment schedules were based on guidelines and expert opinions. DiviTum TKa's impact on therapy utilization was based on published literature and expert opinion. Modeled costs included DiviTum TKa, NCCN-recommended treatments, imaging, biomarker testing, and adverse events. We calculated total and per-member per-month (PMPM) costs with a 3-year time horizon. RESULTS The inclusion of 416 DiviTum TKa assays ($166,400) was largely offset by 193 fewer CT scans, 88 fewer bone scans, and 55 fewer biomarker tests over 3 years, a savings of -$128,400, resulting in a PMPM of $0.001. In scenario analyses, adding DiviTum TKa resulted in additional treatment-related cost-savings (-$465,600), resulting in a PMPM cost-savings of -$0.013, or an average savings of -$7,400 per each patient initiating first-line cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus aromatase inhibitor therapy. Expected savings approached 3× the spend on the new test. Results were most sensitive to DiviTum TKa cost, population parameters, and treatment costs. CONCLUSIONS Clinical use of the DiviTum TKa assay is expected to decrease traditional imaging and monitoring and may reduce the overall cost of managing mBC if it leads to clinical decisions to avoid futile therapy. Post-coverage, real-world monitoring of palliative therapies among post-menopausal mBC populations is needed to better categorize cost savings over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh J Carlson
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gregory F Guzauskas
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Scott D Ramsey
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bonotto M, Basile D, Gerratana L, Bartoletti M, Lisanti C, Pelizzari G, Vitale MG, Fanotto V, Poletto E, Minisini AM, Russo S, Andreetta C, Mansutti M, Fasola G, Puglisi F. Clinico-radiological monitoring strategies in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a real-world study. Future Oncol 2020; 16:2059-2073. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: A monitoring strategy for metastatic breast cancer patients (M-MBC) has been little studied. Materials & methods: This retrospective study analyzed a consecutive cohort of 382 MBC patients to analyze different M-MBC strategies to identify factors influencing intensive M-MBC. Results: Elevated baseline serum tumor markers (STM) was the strongest factor associated with increased use of STM tests. Having more frequent oncology office visits was associated with more intensive chemotherapy/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using. Increased use of imaging tests was associated with participation to clinical trial. Single and elderly patients were less likely to have frequent testing. Having clinically measurable disease was less likely to have more intensive M-MBC. Conclusion: STM testing and scans were frequently ordered in M-MBC. In the present study, strategies are little influenced by clinico-pathological characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Bonotto
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Debora Basile
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gerratana
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Michele Bartoletti
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Camilla Lisanti
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pelizzari
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Vitale
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Valentina Fanotto
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Elena Poletto
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Russo
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Mansutti
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Fasola
- Department of Oncology, University Academic Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Unit of Medical Oncology and Cancer Prevention, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dombroski JA, Jyotsana N, Crews DW, Zhang Z, King MR. Fabrication and Characterization of Tumor Nano-Lysate as a Preventative Vaccine for Breast Cancer. LANGMUIR : THE ACS JOURNAL OF SURFACES AND COLLOIDS 2020; 36:6531-6539. [PMID: 32437619 PMCID: PMC7942183 DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the United States, with late stages associated with the lowest survival rates. The latest stage, defined as metastasis, accounts for 90% of all cancer-related deaths. There is a strong need to develop antimetastatic therapies. TRAIL, or TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand, has been used as an antimetastatic therapy in the past, and conjugating TRAIL to nanoscale liposomes has been shown to enhance its targeting efficacy. When circulating tumor cells (CTCs) released during metastasis are exposed to TRAIL-conjugated liposomes and physiologically relevant fluid shear stress, this results in rapid cancer cell destruction into cell fragments. We sought to artificially recreate this phenomenon using probe sonication to mechanically disrupt cancer cells and characterized the resulting cell fragments, termed "tumor nano-lysate", with respect to size, charge, morphology, and composition. Furthermore, an in vivo pilot study was performed to investigate the efficacy of tumor nano-lysate as a preventative vaccine for breast cancer in an immunocompetent mouse model.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tkaczuk KHR, Hawkins D, Yue B, Hicks D, Tait N, Serrero G. Association of Serum Progranulin Levels With Disease Progression, Therapy Response and Survival in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 20:220-227. [PMID: 31928925 PMCID: PMC8284563 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Progranulin (GP88) is a critical player in breast tumorigenesis. GP88 tumor expression is associated with increased recurrence and mortality, whereas GP88 circulating levels are elevated in patients with breast cancer compared with healthy individuals. We examined here the correlation between serum GP88 levels in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with overall survival and disease status determined as response to therapy or progression of disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS An institutional review board (IRB)-approved study prospectively enrolled 101 patients with MBC at the University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center. GP88 serum levels were correlated with patients' disease status determined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria and survival outcomes by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank statistics. RESULTS Patients' survival was stratified by serum GP88 level. Patients with serum GP88 < 55 ng/mL had a 4-fold increased survival compared with patients with GP88 > 55 ng/mL. Examination of GP88 serum levels in association with disease status showed a statistically significant association between serum GP88 levels and disease progression or response to therapy while CA15-3 level was only associated to progression. CONCLUSION The association of serum GP88 level with survival and disease status suggests the potential of using the serum GP88 test for monitoring disease status in patients with MBC. Measurement of serum GP88 levels in patients with MBC may have clinical value as a cost-effective adjunct to the management of patients with MBC with imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine H R Tkaczuk
- University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Douglas Hawkins
- Department of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | | | - Nancy Tait
- University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ginette Serrero
- University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; A&G Pharmaceutical, Inc, Columbia, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Matulay JT, Tabayoyong W, Duplisea JJ, Chang C, Daneshmand S, Gore JL, Holzbeierlein JM, Karsh LI, Kim SP, Konety BR, Li R, McKiernan JM, Messing EM, Steinberg GD, Williams SB, Kamat AM. Variability in adherence to guidelines based management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer among Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) members. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:796.e1-796.e6. [PMID: 32430255 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The American Urological Association (AUA) introduced evidence-based guidelines for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in 2016. We sought to assess the implementation of these guidelines among members of the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) with an aim to identifying addressable gaps. METHODS AND MATERIALS An SUO approved survey was distributed to 747 members from December 28, 2018 to February 2, 2019. This 14-question online survey (Qualtrics, SAP SE, Germany) consisted of 38 individual items addressing specific statements from the AUA NMIBC guidelines within 3 broad categories - initial diagnosis, surveillance, and imaging/biomarkers. Adherence to guidelines was assessed by dichotomizing responses to each item that was related to recommended action statement within the guidelines. Statistical analysis was applied using Pearson's chi-squared test, where a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 121 (16.2%) members completed the survey. Members reported a mean of 71% guidelines adherence; adherence was higher for the intermediate- and high-risk subgroups (82% and 76%, respectively) compared to low-risk (58%). Specifically, adherence to guideline recommended cystoscopic surveillance intervals for low-risk disease differed based on clinical experience (60.9% [<10 years] vs. 36.8% [≥10 years], P = 0.01) and type of fellowship training (55.2% [urologic oncology] vs. 28.0% [none/other], P = 0.02). CONCLUSION Adherence to guidelines across risk-categories was higher for intermediate- and high-risk patients. Decreased adherence observed for low-risk patients resulted in higher than recommended use of cytology, imaging, and surveillance cystoscopy. These results identify addressable gaps and provide impetus for targeted interventions to support high-value care, especially for low-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin T Matulay
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - William Tabayoyong
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Jonathan J Duplisea
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Courtney Chang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Simon P Kim
- Division of Urology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - James M McKiernan
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Edward M Messing
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stewart DJ, Macdonald DB, Awan AA, Thavorn K. Optimal frequency of scans for patients on cancer therapies: A population kinetics assessment. Cancer Med 2019; 8:6871-6886. [PMID: 31560842 PMCID: PMC6853816 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Optimal frequency of follow‐up scans for patients receiving systemic therapies is poorly defined. Progression‐free survival (PFS) generally follows first‐order kinetics. We used exponential decay nonlinear regression analysis to calculate half‐lives for 887 published PFS curves. Method We used the Excel formula x = EXP(‐tn*0.693/t1/2) to calculate proportion of residual patients remaining progression‐free at different times, where tn is the interval in weeks between scans (eg, 6 weeks), * indicates multiplication, 0.693 is the natural logarithm of 2, and t1/2 is the PFS half‐life in weeks. Results Proportion of residual patients predicted to remain progression‐free at each subsequent scan varied with scan intervals and regimen PFS half‐life. For example, with a 4‐month half‐life (17.3 weeks) and scans every 6 weeks, 21% of patients would progress by the first scan, 21% of the remaining patients would progress by the second scan at 12 weeks, etc With 2, 6‐ and 12‐month half‐lives (for example), the proportion of remaining patients progressing at each subsequent scan if repeated every 3 weeks would be 21%, 8% and 4%, respectively, while with scans every 12 weeks it would be 62%, 27% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, optimal scan frequency can be calculated for populations comprised of distinct rapidly and slowly progressing subpopulations, as well as with convex curves arising from treatment breaks, where optimal scan frequency may differ during therapy administration vs during more rapid progression after therapy interruption. Conclusions A population kinetics approach permits a regimen‐ and tumor‐specific determination of optimal scan frequency for patients on systemic therapies.
Collapse
|
16
|
Williams SB, Shan Y, Ray-Zack MD, Hudgins HK, Jazzar U, Tyler DS, Freedland SJ, Swanson TA, Baillargeon JG, Hu JC, Kaul S, Kamat AM, Gore JL, Mehta HB. Comparison of Costs of Radical Cystectomy vs Trimodal Therapy for Patients With Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:e191629. [PMID: 31166593 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Importance Earlier studies on the cost of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatments lack granularity and are limited to 180 days. Objective To compare the 1-year costs associated with trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy, accounting for survival and intensity effects on total costs. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cohort study used the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and included 2963 patients aged 66 to 85 years who had received a diagnosis of clinical stage T2 to T4a muscle-invasive bladder cancer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2011. The data analysis was performed from March 5, 2018, through December 4, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Total Medicare costs within 1 year of diagnosis following radical cystectomy vs trimodal therapy were compared using inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity score models that included a 2-part estimator to account for intrinsic selection bias. Results Of 2963 participants, 1030 (34.8%) were women, 2591 (87.4%) were white, 129 (4.4%) were African American, and 98 (3.3%) were Hispanic. Median costs were significantly higher for trimodal therapy than radical cystectomy in 90 days ($83 754 vs $68 692; median difference, $11 805; 95% CI, $7745-$15 864), 180 days ($187 162 vs $109 078; median difference, $62 370; 95% CI, $55 581-$69 160), and 365 days ($289 142 vs $148 757; median difference, $109 027; 95% CI, $98 692-$119 363), respectively. Outpatient care, radiology, medication expenses, and pathology/laboratory costs contributed largely to the higher costs associated with trimodal therapy. On inverse probability of treatment-weighted adjusted analyses, patients undergoing trimodal therapy had $136 935 (95% CI, $122 131-$152 115) higher mean costs compared with radical cystectomy 1 year after diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance Compared with radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy was associated with higher costs among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The differences in costs were largely attributed to medication and radiology expenses associated with trimodal therapy. Extrapolating cost figures resulted in a nationwide excess spending of $468 million for trimodal therapy compared with radical cystectomy for patients who received a diagnosis of bladder cancer in 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Yong Shan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Mohamed D Ray-Zack
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Hogan K Hudgins
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Usama Jazzar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | | | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Jacques G Baillargeon
- Sealy Center on Aging, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Jim C Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Sapna Kaul
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Hemalkumar B Mehta
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rotter J, Spencer JC, Wheeler SB. Financial Toxicity in Advanced and Metastatic Cancer: Overburdened and Underprepared. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15:e300-e307. [PMID: 30844331 PMCID: PMC6494243 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with metastatic or advanced cancer are likely to be particularly susceptible to financial hardship for reasons related both to the characteristics of metastatic disease and to the characteristics of the population living with metastatic disease. First, metastatic cancer is a resource-intensive condition with expensive treatment and consistent, high-intensity monitoring. Second, patients diagnosed with metastatic disease are disproportionately uninsured and low income and from racial or ethnic minority groups. These vulnerable subpopulations have higher cancer related financial burden even in earlier stages of illness, potentially resulting from fewer asset reserves, nonexisting or less generous health insurance benefits, and employment in jobs with less flexibility and fewer employment protections. This combination of high financial need and high financial vulnerability makes those with advanced cancer an important population for additional study. In this article, we summarize why financial toxicity is burdensome for patients with advanced disease; review prior work in the metastatic or advanced settings specifically; and close with implications and recommendations for research, practice, and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Rotter
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Martin LJ, Alibhai SMH, Komisarenko M, Timilshina N, Finelli A. Identification of subgroups of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone plus prednisone at low- vs. high-risk of radiographic progression: An analysis of COU-AA-302. Can Urol Assoc J 2018; 13:192-200. [PMID: 30407155 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiographic imaging is used to monitor disease progression for men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The optimal frequency of imaging, a costly and limited resource, is not known. Our objective was to identify predictors of radiographic progression to inform the frequency of imaging for men with mCRPC. METHODS We accessed data for men with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC in the abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA-P) group of a randomized trial (COU-AA-302) (n=546). We used Cox proportional hazards modelling to identify predictors of time to progression. We divided patients into groups based on the most important predictors and estimated the probability of radiographic progression-free survival (RPFS) at six and 12 months. RESULTS Baseline disease and change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at eight weeks were the strongest determinants of RPFS. The probability of RPFS for men with bone-only disease and a ≥50% fall in PSA was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87-96) at six months and 80% (95% CI 72-86) at 12 months. In contrast, the probability of RPFS for men with bone and soft tissue metastasis and <50% fall in PSA was 55% (95% CI 41-67) at six months and 34% (95% CI 22-47) at 12 months. These findings should be externally validated. CONCLUSIONS Patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC treated with first-line AA-P can be divided into groups with significantly different risks of radiographic progression based on a few clinically available variables, suggesting that imaging schedules could be individualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa J Martin
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Komisarenko
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guérin A, Goldschmidt D, Small T, Gagnon-Sanschagrin P, Romdhani H, Gauthier G, Kelkar S, Wu EQ, Niravath P, Dalal AA. Monitoring of Hematologic, Cardiac, and Hepatic Function in Post-Menopausal Women with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer. Adv Ther 2018; 35:1251-1264. [PMID: 29946797 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0740-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC), regular monitoring is key in helping physicians to make informed clinical decisions, managing treatment side effects, and maintaining patients' quality of life. Therefore, we investigated the monitoring frequency in post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC stratified by first-line regimen. METHODS Treatment monitoring was assessed using two complementary data sources: a medical chart review (chart review analysis) and a commercial claims database (claims analysis). Women with post-menopausal HR+/HER2- mBC who initiated first-line therapy for mBC were selected and classified under three cohorts, based on treatment received: cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor (i.e., palbociclib-the only CDK4/6 approved at the time of the study), endocrine therapy (ET), and chemotherapy. Frequency of monitoring [complete blood count (CBC), electrocardiogram (EKG), and liver function test (LFT)] and laboratory abnormalities detected during the first line of therapy were analyzed. RESULTS In the chart review analysis, 64 US oncologists abstracted medical information on 401 eligible patients, including 210 CDK4/6 users, 121 ET users, 51 chemotherapy users; 19 patients used other regimens. All patients had ≥ 1 CBC; between 8.3% (ET users) and 39.5% (CDK4/6 users) had ≥ 1 EKG; and over 98% of patients had ≥ 1 LFT across all three cohorts. Among monitored patients, 64.6% had a CBC abnormality, with anemia (39.9%), leukopenia (27.4%), and neutropenia (26.7%) being the most common. Abnormal EKG readings were detected in 8.4, 0.0%, and 7.7% of CDK4/6, ET, and chemotherapy users, respectively. LFT abnormalities were detected in 14.1-26.0% of CDK4/6 and chemotherapy users, respectively. Similar frequency of monitoring was observed in the claims analysis, with the exception of EKG monitoring, for which the proportion of patients tested was higher. CONCLUSION Post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving first-line therapy with CDK4/6, ET, or chemotherapy were regularly monitored regardless of the first-line regimen received. FUNDING Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Guérin
- Analysis Group, Inc., 1000 De La Gauchetière West, Suite 1200, Montreal, QC, H3B 4W5, Canada.
| | - Debbie Goldschmidt
- Analysis Group, Inc., 10 Rockefeller Plaza, 15th floor, New York, NY, 10020, USA
| | - Tania Small
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 1 Health Plaza, East Hanover, 07936, NJ, USA
| | | | - Hela Romdhani
- Analysis Group, Inc., 1000 De La Gauchetière West, Suite 1200, Montreal, QC, H3B 4W5, Canada
| | - Genevieve Gauthier
- Analysis Group, Inc., 1000 De La Gauchetière West, Suite 1200, Montreal, QC, H3B 4W5, Canada
| | - Sneha Kelkar
- Analysis Group, Inc., 10 Rockefeller Plaza, 15th floor, New York, NY, 10020, USA
| | - Eric Q Wu
- Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave, 14th floor, Boston, MA, 02199, USA
| | - Polly Niravath
- Houston Methodist Hospital, 6445 Main St, Houston, 77030, TX, USA
| | - Anand A Dalal
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 1 Health Plaza, East Hanover, 07936, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Controversies in monitoring metastatic breast cancer during systemic treatment. Results of a GIM (Gruppo Italiano Mammella) survey. Breast 2018; 40:45-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2017] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
21
|
Kolodziej M. Transportation Security Administration, Prior Authorization, and Managing Risk. J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:400-402. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
22
|
Golan R, Bernstein AN, Gu X, Dinerman BF, Sedrakyan A, Hu JC. Increased resource use in men with metastatic prostate cancer does not result in improved survival or quality of care at the end of life. Cancer 2018; 124:2212-2219. [PMID: 29579318 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Revised: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer care and end-of-life (EOL) care contribute substantially to health care expenditures. Outside of clinical trials, to our knowledge there exists no standardized protocol to monitor disease progression in men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). The objective of the current study was to evaluate the factors and outcomes associated with increased imaging and serum prostate-specific antigen use in men with mPCa. METHODS Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data from 2004 to 2012, the authors identified men diagnosed with mPCa with at least 6 months of follow-up. Extreme users were classified as those who had either received prostate-specific antigen testing greater than once per month, or who underwent cross-sectional imaging or bone scan more frequently than every 2 months over a 6-month period. Associations between extreme use and survival outcomes, costs, and quality of care at EOL, as measured by timing of hospice referral, frequency of emergency department visits, length of stay, and intensive care unit or hospital admissions, were examined. RESULTS Overall, a total of 3026 men with mPCa were identified, 791 of whom (26%) were defined as extreme users. Extreme users were more commonly young, white/non-Hispanic, married, higher earning, and more educated (P<.001, respectively). Extreme use was not associated with improved quality of care at EOL. Yearly health care costs after diagnosis were 36.4% higher among extreme users (95% confidence interval, 27.4%-45.3%; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Increased monitoring among men with mPCa significantly increases health care costs, without a definitive improvement in survival nor quality of care at EOL noted. Monitoring for disease progression outside of clinical trials should be reserved for those in whom findings will change management. Cancer 2018;124:2212-9. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Golan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Adrien N Bernstein
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Xiangmei Gu
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Brian F Dinerman
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Art Sedrakyan
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jim C Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Accordino MK, Wright JD, Vasan S, Neugut AI, Gross T, Hillyer GC, Hershman DL. Association between survival time with metastatic breast cancer and aggressive end-of-life care. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 166:549-558. [PMID: 28752188 PMCID: PMC5695862 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For women with stage IV breast cancer (BC), the association between survival time (ST) and use of aggressive end-of-life (EOL) care is unknown. METHODS We used the SEER-Medicare database to identify women with stage IV BC diagnosed 2002-2011 who died by 12/31/2012. Aggressive EOL care was defined as receipt in the last month of life: >1 ED visit, >1 hospitalization, ICU admission, life-extending procedures, hospice admission within 3 days of death, IV chemotherapy within 14 days of death, and/or ≥10 unique physician encounters in the last 6 months of life. Receipt of aggressive EOL care and hospice in the last month of life were determined using claims, and multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with receipt. Costs of care were also evaluated. RESULTS We identified 4521 eligible patients. Of these, 2748 (60.8%) received aggressive EOL care. Factors associated with aggressive EOL care were race (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.19-1.81 for blacks compared to whites) and more frequent oncology office visits (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.28-1.90). Patients who lived >12 months after diagnosis were less likely to receive aggressive EOL care (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.38-0.52), and more likely to utilize hospice (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.21-1.69) compared to patients who lived ≤6 months. Patients with a shorter ST had significantly higher costs of care per-month-alive compared to patients with longer ST. CONCLUSION Patients with a shorter ST were more likely to receive aggressive EOL care and had higher costs of care compared to patients who lived longer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa K Accordino
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 161 Ft Washington Ave, Room 9-962, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jason D Wright
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sowmya Vasan
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alfred I Neugut
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 161 Ft Washington Ave, Room 9-962, New York, NY, 10032, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tal Gross
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Grace C Hillyer
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 161 Ft Washington Ave, Room 9-962, New York, NY, 10032, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Margolis B, Chen L, Accordino MK, Clarke Hillyer G, Hou JY, Tergas AI, Burke WM, Neugut AI, Ananth CV, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Trends in end-of-life care and health care spending in women with uterine cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217:434.e1-434.e10. [PMID: 28709581 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-intensity care including hospitalizations, chemotherapy, and other interventions at the end of life is costly and often of little value for cancer patients. Little is known about patterns of end-of-life care and resource utilization for women with uterine cancer. OBJECTIVE We examined the costs and predictors of aggressive end-of-life care for women with uterine cancer. STUDY DESIGN In this observational cohort study the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database was used to identify women age ≥65 years who died from uterine cancer from 2000 through 2011. Resource utilization in the last month of life including ≥2 hospital admissions, >1 emergency department visit, ≥1 intensive care unit admission, or use of chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life was examined. High-intensity care was defined as the occurrence of any of the above outcomes. Logistic regression models were developed to identify factors associated with high-intensity care. Total Medicare expenditures in the last month of life are reported. RESULTS Of the 5873 patients identified, the majority had stage IV cancer (30.2%), were white (79.9%), and had endometrioid tumors (47.6%). High-intensity care was rendered to 42.5% of women. During the last month of life, 15.0% had ≥2 hospital admissions, 9.0% had a hospitalization >14 days, 15.3% had >1 emergency department visits, 18.3% had an intensive care unit admission, and 6.6% received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life. The percentage of women who received high-intensity care was stable over the study period. Characteristics of younger age, black race, higher number of comorbidities, stage IV disease, residence in the eastern United States, and more recent diagnosis were associated with high-intensity care. The median Medicare payment during the last month of life was $7645. Total per beneficiary Medicare payments remained stable from $9656 (interquartile range $3190-15,890) in 2000 to $9208 (interquartile range $3309-18,554) by 2011. The median health care expenditure was 4 times as high for those who received high-intensity care compared to those who did not (median $16,173 vs $4099). CONCLUSION Among women with uterine cancer, high-intensity care is common in the last month of life, associated with substantial monetary expenditures, and does not appear to be decreasing.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wade JC. Unwanted Variation in Cancer Care: It Is Time to Innovate and Change. J Oncol Pract 2017; 13:6-8. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.018291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James C. Wade
- Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA
| |
Collapse
|