1
|
Fusegi A, Nomura H, Ueki A, Abe A, Kamata M, Misaka S, Aoki Y, Tanigawa T, Yunokawa M, Kanao H. Ovarian surveillance including endometrial cytology for patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer before risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: A retrospective analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2024; 50:1002-1009. [PMID: 38528763 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
AIM Ovarian surveillance in women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who do not undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy has been controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to demonstrate the clinical features of ovarian surveillance at our institution using a technique that combines serum cancer antigen 125 measurements, transvaginal ultrasonography, and uterine endometrial cytology. METHODS We retrospectively examined 65 women, who had not undergone risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy diagnosed with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer between 2000 and 2021 at our hospital. Clinical information was obtained and analyzed through a chart review. The details of the treatment course were reviewed for patients who had developed ovarian cancer. RESULTS Overall, 5 of the 65 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer based on abnormal findings during periodic surveillance. All patients who developed ovarian cancer were asymptomatic, even if the cancer was at an advanced stage. Two of the 65 patients had endometrial cytology abnormalities, both of whom had ovarian cancer. All patients who developed ovarian cancer underwent primary debulking surgery, and complete gross resection was achieved. None of the patients experienced ovarian cancer recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The ovarian surveillance strategy at our institution for women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who do not undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy can identify asymptomatic ovarian cancer and contribute to achieving complete gross resection during primary surgery. Ovarian surveillance may contribute to a reduction in ovarian cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Fusegi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Nomura
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Arisa Ueki
- Department of Clinical Genetic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akiko Abe
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayumi Kamata
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoki Misaka
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoichi Aoki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Terumi Tanigawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kanao
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slade E, Berg L, Dworzynski K, Manchanda R. Ovarian cancer: identifying and managing familial and genetic risk-summary of new NICE guidance. BMJ 2024; 385:q807. [PMID: 38724099 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.q807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Slade
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London
| | - Laura Berg
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London
| | | | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London
- Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kikuchi Y, Shimada H, Yamasaki F, Yamashita T, Araki K, Horimoto K, Yajima S, Yashiro M, Yokoi K, Cho H, Ehira T, Nakahara K, Yasuda H, Isobe K, Hayashida T, Hatakeyama S, Akakura K, Aoki D, Nomura H, Tada Y, Yoshimatsu Y, Miyachi H, Takebayashi C, Hanamura I, Takahashi H. Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor marker, 2nd edition review part 2. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:512-534. [PMID: 38493447 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02497-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, rapid advancement in gene/protein analysis technology has resulted in target molecule identification that may be useful in cancer treatment. Therefore, "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" was published in Japan in September 2021. These guidelines were established to align the clinical usefulness of external diagnostic products with the evaluation criteria of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. The guidelines were scoped for each tumor, and a clinical questionnaire was developed based on a serious clinical problem. This guideline was based on a careful review of the evidence obtained through a literature search, and recommendations were identified following the recommended grades of the Medical Information Network Distribution Services (Minds). Therefore, this guideline can be a tool for cancer treatment in clinical practice. We have already reported the review portion of "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" as Part 1. Here, we present the English version of each part of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hideaki Shimada
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
- Department of Surgery, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Fumiyuki Yamasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Taku Yamashita
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Koji Araki
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kohei Horimoto
- Department of Dermatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Masakazu Yashiro
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Therapeutics, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keigo Yokoi
- Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Cho
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuya Ehira
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazunari Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yasuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Isobe
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori), Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsu Hayashida
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | | | - Daisuke Aoki
- International University of Health and Welfare Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nomura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuji Tada
- Department of Pulmonology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Yoshimatsu
- Department of Patient-Derived Cancer Model, Tochigi Cancer Center Research Institute, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hayato Miyachi
- Faculty of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Nitobe Bunka College, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chiaki Takebayashi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori), Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Hanamura
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
DiSilvestro JB, Haddad J, Robison K, Beffa L, Laprise J, Scalia-Wilbur J, Raker C, Clark MA, Lokich E, Hofstatter E, Dalela D, Brown A, Bradford L, Toland M, Stuckey A. Ovarian Cancer Risk-Reduction and Screening in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2024; 33:624-628. [PMID: 38488054 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: To determine the utilization of risk-reducing strategies and screening protocols for ovarian cancer in female BRCA1/2 carriers. Methods: This study was a sub-analysis of female participants from a larger multicenter, cross-sectional survey of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers unaffected by cancer. The questionnaire was administered electronically via email at four institutions located in the northeast United States. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. Results: The survey was completed by 104 female BRCA mutation carriers. BRCA subtypes included 54.3% BRCA2, 41.0% BRCA1, and 2.9% both. The age at which patients underwent genetic testing varied 21.2% were 18-24 years, 25.0% were 25-34 years, 29.8% were 35-44 years, and 24.0% were 45 years or older. Nearly, all respondents (97.1%) reported that a provider had discussed risk-reducing surgeries. Of the 79 females who underwent genetic testing before 45 years of age, 53.2% reported that a health care provider recommended taking combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) to reduce their risk of ovarian cancer, and, of these women, 88.1% chose to use them. COCs were offered at higher rates among women who were younger at the age of genetic testing (18-24: 86%, 25-34: 62%, 35-44: 23%; p < 0.0001). Approximately half (55.8%) of the respondents reported having been offered increased screening for possible early detection of ovarian cancer, of which 81.0% chose to undergo screening. The majority utilized a combination of transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 measurements. There were no differences observed in screening utilization based on BRCA mutation type. Conclusion: In our cohort of female BRCA mutation carriers, risk-reducing surgery was offered to almost all women, whereas only half were offered risk-reducing medication and/or increased screening. Further investigation is needed to identify barriers to the utilization of risk-reducing strategies among this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica B DiSilvestro
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jessica Haddad
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Katina Robison
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Lindsey Beffa
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jessica Laprise
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jennifer Scalia-Wilbur
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christina Raker
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Melissa A Clark
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- The School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Elizabeth Lokich
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Erin Hofstatter
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Disha Dalela
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Amy Brown
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Leslie Bradford
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Maine Medical Partners, Scarborough, Maine, USA
| | - Maris Toland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Maine Medical Partners, Scarborough, Maine, USA
| | - Ashley Stuckey
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kyrgiou M, Bowden S, Denny L, Fagotti A, Abu-Rustum NR, Ramirez PT, Querleu D. Innovation in gynaecological cancer: highlighting global disparities. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:425-430. [PMID: 38461833 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00137-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kyrgiou
- Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Sarah Bowden
- Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lynette Denny
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, South Africa
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA)
| | - Denis Querleu
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sideris M, Menon U, Manchanda R. Screening and prevention of ovarian cancer. Med J Aust 2024; 220:264-274. [PMID: 38353066 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy with 314 000 cases and 207 000 deaths annually worldwide. Ovarian cancer cases and deaths are predicted to increase in Australia by 42% and 55% respectively by 2040. Earlier detection and significant downstaging of ovarian cancer have been demonstrated with multimodal screening in the largest randomised controlled trial of ovarian cancer screening in women at average population risk. However, none of the randomised trials have demonstrated a mortality benefit. Therefore, ovarian cancer screening is not currently recommended in women at average population risk. More frequent surveillance for ovarian cancer every three to four months in women at high risk has shown good performance characteristics and significant downstaging, but there is no available information on a survival benefit. Population testing offers an emerging novel strategy to identify women at high risk who can benefit from ovarian cancer prevention. Novel multicancer early detection biomarker, longitudinal multiple marker strategies, and new biomarkers are being investigated and evaluated for ovarian cancer screening. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) decreases ovarian cancer incidence and mortality and is recommended for women at over a 4-5% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Pre-menopausal women without contraindications to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) undergoing RRSO should be offered HRT until 51 years of age to minimise the detrimental consequences of premature menopause. Currently risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) should only be offered to women at increased risk of ovarian cancer within the context of a research trial. Pre-menopausal early salpingectomy is associated with fewer menopausal symptoms and better sexual function than bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbria (SEE-FIM) protocol should be used for histopathological assessment in women at high risk of ovarian cancer who are undergoing surgical prevention. Opportunistic salpingectomy may be offered at routine gynaecological surgery to all women who have completed their family. Long term prospective opportunistic salpingectomy studies are needed to determine the effect size of ovarian cancer risk reduction and the impact on menopause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Sideris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Usha Menon
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Herzog C, Jones A, Evans I, Reisel D, Olaitan A, Doufekas K, MacDonald N, Rådestad AF, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Zikan M, Cibula D, Dostálek L, Paprotka T, Leimbach A, Schmitt M, Ryan A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Apostolidou S, Rosenthal AN, Menon U, Widschwendter M. Plasma cell-free DNA methylation analysis for ovarian cancer detection: Analysis of samples from a case-control study and an ovarian cancer screening trial. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:679-691. [PMID: 37861205 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Analysis of cell-free DNA methylation (cfDNAme), alone or combined with CA125, could help to detect ovarian cancers earlier and may reduce mortality. We assessed cfDNAme in regions of ZNF154, C2CD4D and WNT6 via targeted bisulfite sequencing in diagnostic and early detection (preceding diagnosis) settings. Diagnostic samples were obtained via prospective blood collection in cell-free DNA tubes in a convenience series of patients with a pelvic mass. Early detection samples were matched case-control samples derived from the UK Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study (UKFOCSS). In the diagnostic set (ncases = 27, ncontrols = 41), the specificity of cfDNAme was 97.6% (95% CI: 87.1%-99.9%). High-risk cancers were detected with a sensitivity of 80% (56.3%-94.3%). Combination of cfDNAme and CA125 resulted in a sensitivity of 94.4% (72.7%-99.9%) for high-risk cancers. Despite technical issues in the early detection set (ncases = 29, ncontrols = 29), the specificity of cfDNAme was 100% (88.1%-100.0%). We detected 27.3% (6.0%-61.0%) of high-risk cases with relatively lower genomic DNA (gDNA) contamination. The sensitivity rose to 33.3% (7.5%-70.1%) in samples taken <1 year before diagnosis. We detected ovarian cancer in several patients up to 1 year before diagnosis despite technical limitations associated with archival samples (UKFOCSS). Combined cfDNAme and CA125 assessment may improve ovarian cancer screening in high-risk populations, but future large-scale prospective studies will be required to validate current findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Herzog
- European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Research Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Allison Jones
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Iona Evans
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Reisel
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Adeola Olaitan
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Konstantinos Doufekas
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola MacDonald
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Angelique Flöter Rådestad
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michal Zikan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and Hospital, Na Bulovce, Czech Republic
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague and, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lukáš Dostálek
- Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague and, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Markus Schmitt
- Eurofins Genomics Europe Sequencing GmbH, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Andy Ryan
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sophia Apostolidou
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Adam N Rosenthal
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Research Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wei X, Sun L, Slade E, Fierheller CT, Oxley S, Kalra A, Sia J, Sideris M, McCluggage WG, Bromham N, Dworzynski K, Rosenthal AN, Brentnall A, Duffy S, Evans DG, Yang L, Legood R, Manchanda R. Cost-Effectiveness of Gene-Specific Prevention Strategies for Ovarian and Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2355324. [PMID: 38334999 PMCID: PMC10858404 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) confer an increased ovarian cancer (OC) risk, with BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D PVs also conferring an elevated breast cancer (BC) risk. Risk-reducing surgery, medical prevention, and BC surveillance offer the opportunity to prevent cancers and deaths, but their cost-effectiveness for individual CSGs remains poorly addressed. Objective To estimate the cost-effectiveness of prevention strategies for OC and BC among individuals carrying PVs in the previously listed CSGs. Design, Setting, and Participants In this economic evaluation, a decision-analytic Markov model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and, where relevant, risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) compared with nonsurgical interventions (including BC surveillance and medical prevention for increased BC risk) from December 1, 2022, to August 31, 2023. The analysis took a UK payer perspective with a lifetime horizon. The simulated cohort consisted of women aged 30 years who carried BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, or BRIP1 PVs. Appropriate sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed. Exposures CSG-specific interventions, including RRSO at age 35 to 50 years with or without BC surveillance and medical prevention (ie, tamoxifen or anastrozole) from age 30 or 40 years, RRM at age 30 to 40 years, both RRSO and RRM, BC surveillance and medical prevention, or no intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. OC and BC cases and deaths were estimated. Results In the simulated cohort of women aged 30 years with no cancer, undergoing both RRSO and RRM was most cost-effective for individuals carrying BRCA1 (RRM at age 30 years; RRSO at age 35 years), BRCA2 (RRM at age 35 years; RRSO at age 40 years), and PALB2 (RRM at age 40 years; RRSO at age 45 years) PVs. The corresponding ICERs were -£1942/QALY (-$2680/QALY), -£89/QALY (-$123/QALY), and £2381/QALY ($3286/QALY), respectively. RRSO at age 45 years was cost-effective for RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 PV carriers compared with nonsurgical strategies. The corresponding ICERs were £962/QALY ($1328/QALY), £771/QALY ($1064/QALY), and £2355/QALY ($3250/QALY), respectively. The most cost-effective preventive strategy per 1000 PV carriers could prevent 923 OC and BC cases and 302 deaths among those carrying BRCA1; 686 OC and BC cases and 170 deaths for BRCA2; 464 OC and BC cases and 130 deaths for PALB2; 102 OC cases and 64 deaths for RAD51C; 118 OC cases and 76 deaths for RAD51D; and 55 OC cases and 37 deaths for BRIP1. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated both RRSO and RRM were most cost-effective in 96.5%, 89.2%, and 84.8% of simulations for BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 PVs, respectively, while RRSO was cost-effective in approximately 100% of simulations for RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 PVs. Conclusions and Relevance In this cost-effectiveness study, RRSO with or without RRM at varying optimal ages was cost-effective compared with nonsurgical strategies for individuals who carried BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, or BRIP1 PVs. These findings support personalizing risk-reducing surgery and guideline recommendations for individual CSG-specific OC and BC risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Wei
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Li Sun
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eric Slade
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caitlin T. Fierheller
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel Oxley
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ashwin Kalra
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline Sia
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michail Sideris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - W. Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Nathan Bromham
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Adam N. Rosenthal
- Department of Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Women’s Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Brentnall
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Duffy
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Li Yang
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wilczyński J, Paradowska E, Wilczyński M. High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer-A Risk Factor Puzzle and Screening Fugitive. Biomedicines 2024; 12:229. [PMID: 38275400 PMCID: PMC10813374 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most lethal tumor of the female genital tract. Despite extensive studies and the identification of some precursor lesions like serous tubal intraepithelial cancer (STIC) or the deviated mutational status of the patients (BRCA germinal mutation), the pathophysiology of HGSOC and the existence of particular risk factors is still a puzzle. Moreover, a lack of screening programs results in delayed diagnosis, which is accompanied by a secondary chemo-resistance of the tumor and usually results in a high recurrence rate after the primary therapy. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify the substantial risk factors for both predisposed and low-risk populations of women, as well as to create an economically and clinically justified screening program. This paper reviews the classic and novel risk factors for HGSOC and methods of diagnosis and prediction, including serum biomarkers, the liquid biopsy of circulating tumor cells or circulating tumor DNA, epigenetic markers, exosomes, and genomic and proteomic biomarkers. The novel future complex approach to ovarian cancer diagnosis should be devised based on these findings, and the general outcome of such an approach is proposed and discussed in the paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacek Wilczyński
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, 4 Kosciuszki Str., 90-419 Lodz, Poland
| | - Edyta Paradowska
- Laboratory of Virology, Institute of Medical Biology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, 106 Lodowa Str., 93-232 Lodz, Poland;
| | - Miłosz Wilczyński
- Department of Surgical, Endoscopic and Gynecological Oncology, Polish Mother’s Health Center—Research Institute, 281/289 Rzgowska Str., 93-338 Lodz, Poland;
- Department of Surgical and Endoscopic Gynecology, Medical University of Lodz, 4 Kosciuszki Str., 90-419 Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tjalma WAA. There is no place for ovarian cancer screening in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:138-139. [PMID: 37866813 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- W A A Tjalma
- Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Gynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brincat MR, Mira AR, Lawrence A. Current and Emerging Strategies for Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Diagnostics. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3331. [PMID: 37958227 PMCID: PMC10647517 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Tubo-ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. More than 75% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, which is associated with poorer overall survival. Symptoms at presentation are vague and non-specific, contributing to late diagnosis. Multimodal risk models have improved the diagnostic accuracy of adnexal mass assessment based on patient risk factors, coupled with findings on imaging and serum-based biomarker tests. Newly developed ultrasonographic assessment algorithms have standardised documentation and enable stratification of care between local hospitals and cancer centres. So far, no screening test has proven to reduce ovarian cancer mortality in the general population. This review is an update on the evidence behind ovarian cancer diagnostic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R. Brincat
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| | - Ana Rita Mira
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
- Hospital Garcia de Orta, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal
| | - Alexandra Lawrence
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wei X, Oxley S, Sideris M, Kalra A, Brentnall A, Sun L, Yang L, Legood R, Manchanda R. Quality of life after risk-reducing surgery for breast and ovarian cancer prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 229:388-409.e4. [PMID: 37059410 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the impact of risk-reducing surgery for breast cancer and ovarian cancer prevention on quality of life. We considered risk-reducing mastectomy, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, and risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy. DATA SOURCES We followed a prospective protocol (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42022319782) and searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We followed a PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design) framework. The population included women at increased risk of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. We focused on studies reporting quality of life outcomes (health-related quality of life, sexual function, menopause symptoms, body image, cancer-related distress or worry, anxiety, or depression) after risk-reducing surgery, including risk-reducing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer. METHODS We used the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) for study appraisal. Qualitative synthesis and fixed-effects meta-analysis were performed. RESULTS A total of 34 studies were included (risk-reducing mastectomy: 16 studies; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: 19 studies; risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy: 2 studies). Health-related quality of life was unchanged or improved in 13 of 15 studies after risk-reducing mastectomy (N=986) and 10 of 16 studies after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (N=1617), despite short-term deficits (N=96 after risk-reducing mastectomy and N=459 after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy). Sexual function (using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire) was affected in 13 of 16 studies (N=1400) after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in terms of decreased sexual pleasure (-1.21 [-1.53 to -0.89]; N=3070) and increased sexual discomfort (1.12 [0.93-1.31]; N=1400). Hormone replacement therapy after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with an increase (1.16 [0.17-2.15]; N=291) in sexual pleasure and a decrease (-1.20 [-1.75 to -0.65]; N=157) in sexual discomfort. Sexual function was affected in 4 of 13 studies (N=147) after risk-reducing mastectomy, but stable in 9 of 13 studies (N=799). Body image was unaffected in 7 of 13 studies (N=605) after risk-reducing mastectomy, whereas 6 of 13 studies (N=391) reported worsening. Increased menopause symptoms were reported in 12 of 13 studies (N=1759) after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with a reduction (-1.96 [-2.81 to -1.10]; N=1745) in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms. Cancer-related distress was unchanged or decreased in 5 of 5 studies after risk-reducing mastectomy (N=365) and 8 of 10 studies after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (N=1223). Risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (2 studies, N=413) led to better sexual function and menopause-specific quality of life. CONCLUSION Risk-reducing surgery may be associated with quality of life outcomes. Risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy reduce cancer-related distress, and do not affect health-related quality of life. Women and clinicians should be aware of body image problems after risk-reducing mastectomy, and of sexual dysfunction and menopause symptoms after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy may be a promising alternative to mitigate quality of life-related risks of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Wei
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel Oxley
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michail Sideris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ashwin Kalra
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Brentnall
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Li Sun
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Li Yang
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Ryan A, Singh N, Manchanda R, Kalsi JK, Woolas R, Arora R, Casey L, Dawnay A, Sharma A, Williamson K, Apostolidou S, Fallowfield L, McGuire AJ, Campbell S, Skates SJ, Jacobs IJ, Parmar MKB. Tumour stage, treatment, and survival of women with high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer in UKCTOCS: an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:1018-1028. [PMID: 37657461 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00335-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In UKCTOCS, there was a decrease in the diagnosis of advanced stage tubo-ovarian cancer but no reduction in deaths in the multimodal screening group compared with the no screening group. Therefore, we did exploratory analyses of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer to understand the reason for the discrepancy. METHODS UKCTOCS was a 13-centre randomised controlled trial of screening postmenopausal women from the general population, aged 50-74 years, with intact ovaries. The trial management system randomly allocated (2:1:1) eligible participants (recruited from April 17, 2001, to Sept 29, 2005) in blocks of 32 using computer generated random numbers to no screening or annual screening (multimodal screening or ultrasound screening) until Dec 31, 2011. Follow-up was through national registries until June 30, 2020. An outcome review committee, masked to randomisation group, adjudicated on ovarian cancer diagnosis, histotype, stage, and cause of death. In this study, analyses were intention-to-screen comparisons of women with high-grade serous cancer at censorship (Dec 31, 2014) in multimodal screening versus no screening, using descriptive statistics for stage and treatment endpoints, and the Versatile test for survival from randomisation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, 22488978, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00058032. FINDINGS 202 562 eligible women were recruited (50 625 multimodal screening; 50 623 ultrasound screening; 101 314 no screening). 259 (0·5%) of 50 625 participants in the multimodal screening group and 520 (0·5%) of 101 314 in the no screening group were diagnosed with high-grade serous cancer. In the multimodal screening group compared with the no screening group, fewer were diagnosed with advanced stage disease (195 [75%] of 259 vs 446 [86%] of 520; p=0·0003), more had primary surgery (158 [61%] vs 219 [42%]; p<0·0001), more had zero residual disease following debulking surgery (119 [46%] vs 157 [30%]; p<0·0001), and more received treatment including both surgery and chemotherapy (192 [74%] vs 331 [64%]; p=0·0032). There was no difference in the first-line combination chemotherapy rate (142 [55%] vs 293 [56%]; p=0·69). Median follow-up from randomisation of 779 women with high-grade serous cancer in the multimodal and no screening groups was 9·51 years (IQR 6·04-13·00). At censorship (June 30, 2020), survival from randomisation was longer in women with high-grade serous cancer in the multimodal screening group than in the no screening group with absolute difference in survival of 6·9% (95% CI 0·4-13·0; p=0·042) at 18 years (21% [95% CI 15·6-26·2] vs 14% [95% CI 10·5-17·4]). INTERPRETATION To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that screening can detect high-grade serous cancer earlier and lead to improved short-term treatment outcomes compared with no screening. The potential survival benefit for women with high-grade serous cancer was small, most likely due to only modest gains in early detection and treatment improvement, and tumour biology. The cumulative results of the trial suggest that surrogate endpoints for disease-specific mortality should not currently be used in screening trials for ovarian cancer. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK, The Eve Appeal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Women's Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Burnell
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andy Ryan
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jatinderpal K Kalsi
- AGE Research Unit, School of Public Health Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Woolas
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Rupali Arora
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Laura Casey
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Anne Dawnay
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Aarti Sharma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Karin Williamson
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sophia Apostolidou
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lesley Fallowfield
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research and Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | | | | | - Steven J Skates
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ian J Jacobs
- Department of Women's Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mahesh K B Parmar
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Blustein P, Werner SR, Uppalapati P, Leung TM, Husk GA, Pereira EB, Whyte JS, Villella JA. Adherence to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy guidelines among gynecologic oncologists compared to general gynecologists. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 229:280.e1-280.e8. [PMID: 37308046 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy reduces mortality from high-grade serous carcinoma in patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer associated gene mutations. Ideal surgical management includes 5 steps outlined in 2005 by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. In addition, it is recommended that pathologic examination include serial sectioning of specimens. In practice, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is performed by both gynecologic oncologists and general gynecologists. To ensure optimal detection of occult malignancy, standardized adherence to outlined guidelines is necessary. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the adherence to optimal surgical and pathologic examination guidelines and to compare the rate of occult malignancy at the time of surgery between 2 provider types. STUDY DESIGN Institutional review board exemption was obtained. A retrospective review of patients undergoing risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without hysterectomy from October 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, at 3 sites within a healthcare system was conducted. The inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years and a documented indication for surgery being a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 or a strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Compliance with 5 surgical steps and pathologic specimen preparation was based on medical record documentation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine differences in adherence between provider groups and surgical and pathologic examination guidelines. A P value of <.025 was considered statistically significant for the 2 primary outcomes after Bonferroni correction was applied to adjust for multiple comparisons. RESULTS A total of 185 patients were included. Among the 96 cases performed by gynecologic oncologists, 69 (72%) performed all 5 steps of surgery, 22 (23%) performed 4 steps, 5 (5%) performed 3 steps, and none performed 1 or 2 steps. Among the 89 cases performed by general gynecologists, 4 (5%) performed all 5 steps, 33 (37%) performed 4 steps, 38 (43%) performed 3 steps, 13 (15%) performed 2 steps, and 1 (1%) performed 1 step. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to document adherence to all 5 recommended surgical steps in their surgical dictation (odds ratio, 54.3; 95% confidence interval, 18.1-162.7; P<.0001). Among the 96 cases documented by gynecologic oncologists, 41 (43%) had serial sectioning of all specimens performed, compared with 23 of 89 cases (26%) performed by general gynecologists. No difference in adherence to pathologic guidelines was identified between the 2 provider groups (P=.0489; note: P value of >.025). Overall, 5 patients (2.70%) had occult malignancy diagnosed at the time of risk-reducing surgery, with all surgeries performed by general gynecologists. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrated greater compliance with surgical guidelines for risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in gynecologic oncologists than in general gynecologists. No considerable difference was determined between the 2 provider types in adherence to pathologic guidelines. Our findings demonstrated a need for institution-wide protocol education and implementation of standardized nomenclature to ensure provider adherence to evidence-based guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pegah Blustein
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY.
| | - Sarah R Werner
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Uppalapati
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Hospital, Queens, NY
| | - Tung Ming Leung
- Department of Biostatistics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Gregg A Husk
- Medical Informatics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Elena B Pereira
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Jill S Whyte
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Hospital, Queens, NY
| | - Jeannine A Villella
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ngadikun, Pradjatmo H, Nugroho KA, Pasala M, Prasetyastuti. Analysis of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Order in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. J Cancer 2023; 14:2173-2180. [PMID: 37576394 PMCID: PMC10414036 DOI: 10.7150/jca.82941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate order (ESRO), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), red cell distribution width (RDW), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are hematological parameters that reflect the presence of biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This study evaluated the best haematological parameter in order to distinguish between EOC patients and healthy individuals. There were a total of 33 patients with EOC as subjects treated in Dr. Sardjito hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia and 32 volunteer subjects as controls. Curves of receiver operation, area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity were estimated. To demonstrate EOC's presence, the ESRO was better than the hematological parameters of RDW, PLR, and NLR (AUC = 0.9245, 0.9010, 0.8351, and 0.7457, respectively; sensitivity and specificity = 83.3 and 90.6; 88.9 and 87.5; 100.0 and 68.8; and 94.4 and 53.1, respectively) at the cut-off points 1,125, 44.2, 163.2, and 2,551. Hence, ESRO is a better parameter to indicate the presence of EOC compared to RDW, PLR and NLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngadikun
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Heru Pradjatmo
- Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Kuncoro Asih Nugroho
- Department of Physics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Metamalik Pasala
- Master Student of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Prasetyastuti
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gebhart P, Singer CF, Gschwantler-Kaulich D. CA125 Levels in BRCA mutation carriers - a retrospective single center cohort study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:610. [PMID: 37393265 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11116-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers utilizes assessment of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), despite low sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated the association between CA125 levels, BRCA1/2 mutation status and menopausal status to provide more information on clinical conditions that may influence CA125 levels. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed repeated measurements of CA125 levels and clinical data of 466 women at high risk for ovarian cancer. CA125 levels were compared between women with and without deleterious mutations in BRCA1/2. Pearson's correlation was used to determine the association between age and CA125 serum level. Differences in CA125 levels were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. The effect of BRCA1/2 mutation status and menopausal status on the change in CA125 levels was determined by Two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS The CA125 serum levels of premenopausal women (median, 13.8 kU/mL; range, 9.4 - 19.5 kU/mL) were significantly higher than in postmenopausal women (median, 10.4 kU/mL; range, 7.7 - 14.0 kU/mL; p < .001). There was no significant difference in the CA125 levels of BRCA mutation carriers and non-mutation carriers across all age groups (p = .612). When investigating the combined effect of BRCA1/2 mutation and menopausal status, variance analysis revealed a significant interaction between BRCA1/2 mutation status and menopausal status on CA125 levels (p < .001). There was a significant difference between the CA125 levels of premenopausal and postmenopausal women, with a large effect in BRCA mutation carriers (p < .001, d = 1.05), whereas in non-mutation carriers there was only a small effect (p < .001, d = 0.32). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that hereditary mutations in BRCA1/2 affect the decline of CA125 levels with increasing age. To prove a definite effect of this mutation on the CA125 level, prospective trials need to be conducted to define new cut-off levels of CA 125 in mutation carriers and optimize ovarian cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gebhart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - C F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - D Gschwantler-Kaulich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Burke W, Barkley J, Barrows E, Brooks R, Gecsi K, Huber-Keener K, Jeudy M, Mei S, O'Hara JS, Chelmow D. Executive Summary of the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142:179-195. [PMID: 37348094 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention awarded funding to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to develop educational materials for clinicians on gynecologic cancers. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in evidence review from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and content experts from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review relevant literature, best practices, and existing practice guidelines as a first step toward developing evidence-based educational materials for women's health care clinicians about ovarian cancer. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members and discussed at a virtual meeting of stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations in February 2022. This article is the executive summary of the relevant literature and existing recommendations to guide clinicians in the prevention, early diagnosis, and special considerations of ovarian cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps are noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Burke
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stony Brook University Hospital, New York, New York, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, the University of California, Davis, Davis, California, the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, and New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York; and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Manning-Geist BL, Flint M, Roche KL. Prevention over screening for ovarian cancer in patients with high-risk germline mutations: Misinterpreting the findings of ALDO. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2023; 46:101157. [PMID: 36938343 PMCID: PMC10020112 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In November 2022, the findings of the Avoiding Late Diagnosis of Ovarian cancer (ALDO) study were published. Subsequent media coverage suggested that investigators had found a safe alternative to risk-reducing bilateral salpingoophorectomy (rrBSO) in patients with pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations who chose to decline or defer risk-reducing surgery. Unfortunately, this media coverage was largely misleading. Specifically, in the ALDO trial, 4 of 6 patients found to have ovarian cancer by the ALDO screening methodology were diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. The primary endpoint of the ALDO study was the rate of complete surgical cytoreduction, rather than stage at diagnosis or overall survival, which is an inappropriate surrogate for benefit in a population at risk of ovarian cancer. The ALDO trial again demonstrates that screening women at high-risk of ovarian cancer should not be considered a safe alternative to risk-reducing surgery, and can lead to false reassurance and the development of preventable cases of ovarian cancer. While we should continue to investigate new screening options, future efforts should largely focus on why patients decline rrBSO in the first place and how we can pivot our efforts to better address concerns related to rrBSO, including sequelae of surgical menopause. Furthermore, as we continue to understand the role of the fallopian tube in the epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) disease process, we must identify the role of salpingectomy alone in prevention of EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beryl L. Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Corresponding author.
| | | | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
AlHilli MM, Batur P, Hurley K, Al-Hilli Z, Coombs D, Schwarz G, Djohan R, Marquard J, Ashton K, Pederson HJ. Comprehensive Care of Women With Genetic Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 2023; 98:597-609. [PMID: 36870859 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes are frequently seen in primary care and gynecology clinics. They present with a distinctive set of clinical and emotional needs that revolve around complex risk management discussions and decision making. The care of these women calls for the creation of individualized care plans that facilitate adjustment to the mental and physical changes associated with their choices. This article provides an update on comprehensive evidence-driven care of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The aim of this review is to aid clinicians in identifying those at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes and provide practical advice on patient-centered medical and surgical risk management. Topics of discussion include enhanced surveillance, preventive medications, risk-reducing mastectomy and reconstruction, risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, fertility, sexuality, and menopausal management, with attention to the importance of psychological support. High-risk patients may benefit from a multidisciplinary team that provides realistic expectations with consistent messaging. The primary care provider must be aware of the special needs of these patients and the consequences of their risk management interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam M AlHilli
- Department of Subspecialty Care for Women's Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ob/Gyn & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Subspecialty Care for Women's Health, Ob/Gyn & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| | - Pelin Batur
- Department of Subspecialty Care for Women's Health, Ob/Gyn & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Karen Hurley
- Center for Behavioral Health, Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zahraa Al-Hilli
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Demetrius Coombs
- Center for Behavioral Health, Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Graham Schwarz
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Risal Djohan
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Kathleen Ashton
- Breast Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Holly J Pederson
- Breast Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Manley K, Ryan N, Jenner A, Newton C, Hillard T. Counselling of path_ BRCA carriers who are considering risk-reducing oophorectomy. Post Reprod Health 2023; 29:42-52. [PMID: 36757900 DOI: 10.1177/20533691231156640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
path_BRCA 1/2 increases a woman's lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Interventions can be offered which manage cancer risk; annual breast screening from age 30, chemoprevention and, once a woman's family is complete, risk-reducing surgery. The latter is the most effective method of reducing cancer in path_BRCA carriers; salpingo-oophorectomy reduces breast and ovarian cancer, respectively, by up to 50% and 95%. Factors affecting a woman's decision to undergo risk-reducing surgery are complex; dominant factors include risks of surgery, effect on cancer outcomes and menopausal sequelae. Specific information relating to hormone replacement and non-hormonal alternatives are an important consideration for women but, are often overlooked. Informative counselling is required to enable satisfaction with the chosen intervention whilst improving survival outcomes. This review paper outlines the current data pertaining to these decision-making factors and provides a proforma to enable effective counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristyn Manley
- Department of Gynaecology, 1984University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,The Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Women's Health Sciences, 152004University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Neil Ryan
- The Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Women's Health Sciences, 152004University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
| | - Abigail Jenner
- Department of Gynaecology, 1984University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,Department of Oncology, 1556Royal United Hospitals Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Claire Newton
- Department of Gynaecology, 1984University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,The Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Women's Health Sciences, 152004University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Timothy Hillard
- Department of Gynaecology, 6655University Hospitals Dorset, Poole, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bahar-Shany K, Barnabas GD, Deutsch L, Deutsch N, Glick-Saar E, Dominissini D, Sapoznik S, Helpman L, Perri T, Blecher A, Katz G, Yagel I, Rosenblatt O, Shai D, Brandt B, Meyer R, Mohr-Sasson A, Volodarsky-Perel A, Zilberman I, Armon S, Jakobson-Setton A, Eitan R, Kadan Y, Beiner M, Josephy D, Brodsky M, Friedman E, Anafi L, Molchanov Y, Korach J, Geiger T, Levanon K. Proteomic signature for detection of high-grade ovarian cancer in germline BRCA mutation carriers. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:781-793. [PMID: 36214786 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
No current screening methods for high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) guarantee effective early detection for high-risk women such as germline BRCA mutation carriers. Therefore, the standard-of-care remains risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) around age 40. Proximal liquid biopsy is a promising source of biomarkers, but sensitivity has not yet qualified for clinical implementation. We aimed to develop a proteomic assay based on proximal liquid biopsy, as a decision support tool for monitoring high-risk population. Ninety Israeli BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers were included in the training set (17 HGOC patients and 73 asymptomatic women), (BEDOCA trial; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03150121). The proteome of the microvesicle fraction of the samples was profiled by mass spectrometry and a classifier was developed using logistic regression. An independent cohort of 98 BRCA mutation carriers was used for validation. Safety information was collected for all women who opted for uterine lavage in a clinic setting. We present a 7-protein diagnostic signature, with AUC >0.97 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% for detecting HGOC. The AUC of the biomarker in the independent validation set was >0.94 and the NPV >99%. The sampling procedure was clinically acceptable, with favorable pain scores and safety. We conclude that the acquisition of Müllerian tract proximal liquid biopsies in women at high-risk for HGOC and the application of the BRCA-specific diagnostic assay demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, technical feasibility and safety. Similar classifier for an average-risk population is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keren Bahar-Shany
- Sheba Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Georgina D Barnabas
- Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Lisa Deutsch
- BioStats, Statistical Consulting Ltd, Modiin, Israel
| | | | - Efrat Glick-Saar
- Sheba Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Dan Dominissini
- Sheba Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Stav Sapoznik
- Sheba Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Limor Helpman
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Tamar Perri
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Anna Blecher
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Guy Katz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Itai Yagel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Orgad Rosenblatt
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Daniel Shai
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Benny Brandt
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Raanan Meyer
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Aya Mohr-Sasson
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | - Itamar Zilberman
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Shunit Armon
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ariella Jakobson-Setton
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Ram Eitan
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Yfat Kadan
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Mario Beiner
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Dana Josephy
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Malka Brodsky
- Meirav Breast Health Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,The Susanne-Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Liat Anafi
- Department of Pathology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Yossef Molchanov
- Department of Pathology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Jacob Korach
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Tamar Geiger
- Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Keren Levanon
- Sheba Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zimovjanova M, Bielcikova Z, Miskovicova M, Vocka M, Zimovjanova A, Rybar M, Novotny J, Petruzelka L. Uptake and Effectiveness of Risk-Reducing Surgeries in Unaffected Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers: A Single Institution Experience in the Czech Republic. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041072. [PMID: 36831416 PMCID: PMC9954081 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Unnafected female carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) are at higher risk of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). In the retrospective single-institution study in the Czech Republic, we analyzed the rate, longitudinal trends, and effectiveness of prophylactic risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) on the incidence of BC and OC in BRCA1/2 carriers diagnosed between years (y) 2000 to 2020. The study included 496 healthy female BRCA1/2 carriers. The median follow-up was 6.0 years. RRM was performed in 156 (31.5%, mean age 39.3 y, range 22-61 y) and RRSO in 234 (47.2%, mean age 43.2 y, range 28-64 y) BRCA1/2 carriers. A statistically significant increase of RRM (from 12% to 29%) and RRSO (from 31% to 42%) was observed when comparing periods 2005-2012 and 2013-2020 (p < 0.001). BC developed in 15.9% of BRCA1/2 carriers without RRM vs. 0.6% of BRCA1/2 carriers after RRM (HR 20.18, 95% CI 2.78- 146.02; p < 0.001). OC was diagnosed in 4.3% vs. 0% of BRCA1/2 carriers without vs. after RRSO (HR not defined due to 0% occurrence in the RRSO group, p < 0.001). Study results demonstrate a significant increase in the rate of prophylactic surgeries in BRCA1/2 healthy carriers after 2013 and the effectiveness of RRM and RRSO on the incidence of BC and OC in these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Zimovjanova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +420-224-966-764
| | - Zuzana Bielcikova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michaela Miskovicova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, Nitra Faculty Hospital, Špitálska 6, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia
| | - Michal Vocka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Zimovjanova
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 601 77, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- International Clinical Research Center (ICRC) of St Anne’s University Hospital (FNUSA), Pekařská 664/53, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marian Rybar
- Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, náměstí Sítná 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Novotny
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Surgery, Sunderby Hospital, Sjukhusvägen 10, 954 42 Sunderbyn, Sweden
| | - Lubos Petruzelka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hereditary Women's Cancer: Management and Risk-Reducing Surgery. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59020300. [PMID: 36837501 PMCID: PMC9967188 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Hereditary women's syndromes due to inherited mutations result in an elevated risk of developing gynecological cancers over the lifetime of affected carriers. The BRCA 1 and 2 mutations, Lynch syndrome (LS), and mutations in rare hereditary syndromes increase this risk and require more effective management of these patients based on surveillance and prophylactic surgery. Patients need counseling regarding risk-reducing surgery (RRS) and the time required to perform it, considering the adverse effects of premenopausal surgery and the hormonal effect on quality of life, bone density, sexual activity, and cardiological and vascular diseases. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the gold standard for BRCA-mutated patients. An open question is that of endometrial cancer (EC) risk in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation to justify prophylactic hysterectomy during RRSO surgical procedures. RRS provides a 90-95% risk reduction for ovarian and breast cancer in women who are mutation carriers, but the role of prophylactic hysterectomy is underinvestigated in this setting of patients. In this review, we evaluate the management of the most common hereditary syndromes and the benefits of risk-reducing surgery, particularly exploring the role of prophylactic hysterectomy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Dite GS, Spaeth E, Murphy NM, Allman R. A combined clinical and genetic model for predicting risk of ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 2023; 32:57-64. [PMID: 36503897 PMCID: PMC9746333 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women with a family history of ovarian cancer or a pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene variant are at high risk of the disease, but very few women have these risk factors. We assessed whether a combined polygenic and clinical risk score could predict risk of ovarian cancer in population-based women who would otherwise be considered as being at average risk. METHODS We used the UK Biobank to conduct a prospective cohort study assessing the performance of 10-year ovarian cancer risks based on a polygenic risk score, a clinical risk score and a combined risk score. We used Cox regression to assess association, Harrell's C-index to assess discrimination and Poisson regression to assess calibration. RESULTS The combined risk model performed best and problems with calibration were overcome by recalibrating the model, which then had a hazard ratio per quintile of risk of 1.338 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.152-1.553], a Harrell's C-index of 0.663 (95% CI, 0.629-0.698) and overall calibration of 1.000 (95% CI, 0.874-1.145). In the refined model with estimates based on the entire dataset, women in the top quintile of 10-year risk were at 1.387 (95% CI, 1.086-1.688) times increased risk, while women in the top quintile of full-lifetime risk were at 1.527 (95% CI, 1.187-1.866) times increased risk compared with the population. CONCLUSION Identification of women who are at high risk of ovarian cancer can allow healthcare providers and patients to engage in joint decision-making discussions around the risks and benefits of screening options or risk-reducing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erika Spaeth
- Phenogen Sciences Inc, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Richard Allman
- Genetic Technologies Limited, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hanson H, Kulkarni A, Loong L, Kavanaugh G, Torr B, Allen S, Ahmed M, Antoniou AC, Cleaver R, Dabir T, Evans DG, Golightly E, Jewell R, Kohut K, Manchanda R, Murray A, Murray J, Ong KR, Rosenthal AN, Woodward ER, Eccles DM, Turnbull C, Tischkowitz M, Lalloo F. UK consensus recommendations for clinical management of cancer risk for women with germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes: RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1 and PALB2. J Med Genet 2022; 60:417-429. [PMID: 36411032 PMCID: PMC10176381 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) in the cancer predisposition genes BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, BRIP1, PALB2, RAD51D and RAD51C are identified in approximately 15% of patients with ovarian cancer (OC). While there are clear guidelines around clinical management of cancer risk in patients with GPV in BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6, there are few guidelines on how to manage the more moderate OC risk in patients with GPV in BRIP1, PALB2, RAD51D and RAD51C, with clinical questions about appropriateness and timing of risk-reducing gynaecological surgery. Furthermore, while recognition of RAD51C and RAD51D as OC predisposition genes has been established for several years, an association with breast cancer (BC) has only more recently been described and clinical management of this risk has been unclear. With expansion of genetic testing of these genes to all patients with non-mucinous OC, new data on BC risk and improved estimates of OC risk, the UK Cancer Genetics Group and CanGene-CanVar project convened a 2-day meeting to reach a national consensus on clinical management of BRIP1, PALB2, RAD51D and RAD51C carriers in clinical practice. In this paper, we present a summary of the processes used to reach and agree on a consensus, as well as the key recommendations from the meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Hanson
- South West Thames Regional Genetic Services, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Anjana Kulkarni
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lucy Loong
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Grace Kavanaugh
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Bethany Torr
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Sophie Allen
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ruth Cleaver
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Tabib Dabir
- Northern Ireland Regional Genetics Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ellen Golightly
- Lothian Menopause Service, Chalmers Sexual Health Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rosalyn Jewell
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kelly Kohut
- South West Thames Regional Genetic Services, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Murray
- All Wales Medical Genomics Services, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jennie Murray
- South East Scotland Clinical Genetics Service, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kai-Ren Ong
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adam N Rosenthal
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma Roisin Woodward
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Philpott S, Raikou M, Manchanda R, Lockley M, Singh N, Scott M, Evans DG, Adlard J, Ahmed M, Edmondson R, Woodward ER, Lamnisos A, Balega J, Brady AF, Sharma A, Izatt L, Kulkarni A, Tripathi V, Solomons JS, Hayes K, Hanson H, Snape K, Side L, Skates S, McGuire A, Rosenthal AN. The avoiding late diagnosis of ovarian cancer (ALDO) project; a pilot national surveillance programme for women with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1and BRCA2. J Med Genet 2022; 60:440-449. [PMID: 36319079 PMCID: PMC10176325 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundOur study aimed to establish ‘real-world’ performance and cost-effectiveness of ovarian cancer (OC) surveillance in women with pathogenic germlineBRCA1/2variants who defer risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO).MethodsOur study recruited 875 femaleBRCA1/2-heterozygotes at 13 UK centres and via an online media campaign, with 767 undergoing at least one 4-monthly surveillance test with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) test. Surveillance performance was calculated with modelling of occult cancers detected at RRSO. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using Markov population cohort simulation.ResultsOur study identified 8 OCs during 1277 women screen years: 2 occult OCs at RRSO (both stage 1a), and 6 screen-detected; 3 of 6 (50%) were ≤stage 3a and 5 of 6 (83%) were completely surgically cytoreduced. Modelled sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for OC were 87.5% (95% CI, 47.3 to 99.7), 99.9% (99.9–100), 75% (34.9–96.8) and 99.9% (99.9–100), respectively. The predicted number of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained by surveillance was 0.179 with an ICER cost-saving of -£102,496/QALY.ConclusionOC surveillance for women deferring RRSO in a ‘real-world’ setting is feasible and demonstrates similar performance to research trials; it down-stages OC, leading to a high complete cytoreduction rate and is cost-saving in the UK National Health Service (NHS) setting. While RRSO remains recommended management, ROCA-based surveillance may be considered for femaleBRCA-heterozygotes who are deferring such surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Philpott
- North Central London Cancer Alliance, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Raikou
- Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, Athens, Greece
- Health Economics, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Wolfsen Institue of Population Health Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michelle Lockley
- Centre for Cancer genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, London, UK
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Malcolm Scott
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Department of Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Julian Adlard
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, London, UK
| | - Richard Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Emma Roisin Woodward
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | | | - Janos Balega
- Birmingham City Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Angela F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Aarti Sharma
- University Hospital of Wales Healthcare NHS Trust, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
- Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anjana Kulkarni
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Vishakha Tripathi
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Joyce S Solomons
- Oxford Centre for Genomic Medicine (OXGeM), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Kevin Hayes
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- 23 Clinical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Katie Snape
- Clinical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- IMBE, University of London St George's, London, UK
| | - Lucy Side
- 25, Wesses Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Steve Skates
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alistair McGuire
- Health Economics, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, London, UK
| | - Adam N Rosenthal
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Department of Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
- Gynaecological Oncology, University College London EGA Institute for Women's Health Department of Women's Cancer, London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bernstein-Molho R, Friedman E, Evron E. Controversies and Open Questions in Management of Cancer-Free Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1/BRCA2. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194592. [PMID: 36230512 PMCID: PMC9559251 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Females harboring germline BRCA1/BRCA2 (BRCA) P/LPV are offered a tight surveillance scheme from the age of 25−30 years, aimed at early detection of specific cancer types, in addition to risk-reducing strategies. Multiple national and international surveillance guidelines have been published and updated over the last two decades from geographically diverse countries. We searched for guidelines published between 1 January 2015 and 1 May 2022. Differences between guidelines on issues such as primary prevention, mammography screening in young (<30 years) carriers, MRI screening in carriers above age 65 years, breast imaging (if any) after risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy, during pregnancy, and breastfeeding, and hormone-replacement therapy, are just a few notable examples. Beyond formal guidelines, BRCA carriers’ concerns also focus on the timing of risk-reducing surgeries, fertility preservation, management of menopausal symptoms in cancer survivors, and pancreatic cancer surveillance, issues that, for some, there are no data to support evidence-based recommendations. This review discusses these unsettled issues, emphasizing the importance of future studies to enable global guideline harmonization for optimal surveillance strategies. Moreover, it raises the unmet need for personalized risk stratification and surveillance in BRCA P/LPV carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinat Bernstein-Molho
- The Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 5265601, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel, The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 8436322, Israel
| | - Ella Evron
- Oncology, Kaplan Medical Institute, Rehovot, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +972-502-056-171
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Afsar S. Biomarkers in Gynecologic Tumors. Biomark Med 2022. [DOI: 10.2174/9789815040463122010004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Gynecologic malignancies are one of the most frequent cancers amongst
women. Biomarkers are crucial for the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses;
however, their potential for diagnosis is limited. In the era of difficulty in ovarian
cancer screening, novel biomarkers are defined, but CA125 still remains the most
valuable one. Circulating tumor DNAs, DNA hypermethylation, metabolites,
microRNAs, and kallikreins have recently turned out as ovarian cancer biomarkers and
are being applied to clinical practice. For uterine cancer, genomic classification has
now been described, it will be used as a prognostic tool. In this chapter, we describe
ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer biomarkers in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selim Afsar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Balıkesir University Medical Faculty, Balikesir,
Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bommer C, Lupatsch J, Bürki N, Schwenkglenks M. Cost-utility analysis of risk-reducing strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA-mutation carriers in Switzerland. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022; 23:807-821. [PMID: 34767113 PMCID: PMC9170622 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01396-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify the most cost-effective of all prophylactic measures available in Switzerland for women not yet affected by breast and ovarian cancer who tested positive for a BRCA1/2 mutation. METHODS Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy (PBM), salpingo-oophorectomy (PBSO), combined PBM&PBSO and chemoprevention (CP) initiated at age 40 years were compared with intensified surveillance (IS). A Markov model with a life-long time horizon was developed from the perspective of the Swiss healthcare system using mainly literature-derived data to evaluate costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and survival. Costs and QALYs were discounted by 3% per year. Robustness of the results was tested with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS All prophylactic measures were found to be cost-saving with an increase in QALYs and life years (LYs) compared to IS. PBM&PBSO were found to be most cost-effective and dominated all other strategies in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Lifetime costs averaged to 141,293 EUR and 14.5 QALYs per woman with a BRCA1 mutation under IS, versus 76,639 EUR and 19.2 QALYs for PBM&PBSO. Corresponding results for IS per woman with a BRCA2 mutation were 102,245 EUR and 15.5 QALYs, versus 60,770 EUR and 19.9 QALYs for PBM&PBSO. The results were found to be robust in sensitivity analysis; no change in the dominant strategy for either BRCA-mutation was observed. CONCLUSION All more invasive strategies were found to increase life expectancy and quality of life of women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and were cost-saving for the Swiss healthcare system compared to IS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudine Bommer
- University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Judith Lupatsch
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 61, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Bürki
- Gynaecological Tumor Center, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Schwenkglenks
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 61, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee A, Yang X, Tyrer J, Gentry-Maharaj A, Ryan A, Mavaddat N, Cunningham AP, Carver T, Archer S, Leslie G, Kalsi J, Gaba F, Manchanda R, Gayther S, Ramus SJ, Walter FM, Tischkowitz M, Jacobs I, Menon U, Easton DF, Pharoah P, Antoniou AC. Comprehensive epithelial tubo-ovarian cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and epidemiological risk factors. J Med Genet 2022; 59:632-643. [PMID: 34844974 PMCID: PMC9252860 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-107904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epithelial tubo-ovarian cancer (EOC) has high mortality partly due to late diagnosis. Prevention is available but may be associated with adverse effects. A multifactorial risk model based on known genetic and epidemiological risk factors (RFs) for EOC can help identify women at higher risk who could benefit from targeted screening and prevention. METHODS We developed a multifactorial EOC risk model for women of European ancestry incorporating the effects of pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D and BRIP1, a Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) of arbitrary size, the effects of RFs and explicit family history (FH) using a synthetic model approach. The PRS, PV and RFs were assumed to act multiplicatively. RESULTS Based on a currently available PRS for EOC that explains 5% of the EOC polygenic variance, the estimated lifetime risks under the multifactorial model in the general population vary from 0.5% to 4.6% for the first to 99th percentiles of the EOC risk distribution. The corresponding range for women with an affected first-degree relative is 1.9%-10.3%. Based on the combined risk distribution, 33% of RAD51D PV carriers are expected to have a lifetime EOC risk of less than 10%. RFs provided the widest distribution, followed by the PRS. In an independent partial model validation, absolute and relative 5-year risks were well calibrated in quintiles of predicted risk. CONCLUSION This multifactorial risk model can facilitate stratification, in particular among women with FH of cancer and/or moderate-risk and high-risk PVs. The model is available via the CanRisk Tool (www.canrisk.org).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Lee
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Xin Yang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Tyrer
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andy Ryan
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nasim Mavaddat
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alex P Cunningham
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tim Carver
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephanie Archer
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Goska Leslie
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jatinder Kalsi
- Department of Women's Cancer, University College London Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Research, London, UK
| | - Faiza Gaba
- CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Simon Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Susan J Ramus
- University of New South Wales, School of Women's and Children's Health, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fiona M Walter
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Jacobs
- Department of Women's Cancer, University College London Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
- University of New South Wales, School of Women's and Children's Health, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Steenbeek MP, van Bommel MH, Bulten J, Hulsmann JA, Bogaerts J, Garcia C, Cun HT, Lu KH, van Beekhuizen HJ, Minig L, Gaarenstroom KN, Nobbenhuis M, Krajc M, Rudaitis V, Norquist BM, Swisher EM, Mourits MJ, Massuger LF, Hoogerbrugge N, Hermens RP, IntHout J, de Hullu JA. Risk of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1879-1891. [PMID: 35302882 PMCID: PMC9851686 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE After risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers have a residual risk to develop peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). The etiology of PC is not yet clarified, but may be related to serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), the postulated origin for high-grade serous cancer. In this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis, we investigate the risk of PC in women with and without STIC at RRSO. METHODS Unpublished data from three centers were supplemented by studies identified in a systematic review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane library describing women with a BRCA-PV with and without STIC at RRSO until September 2020. Primary outcome was the hazard ratio for the risk of PC between BRCA-PV carriers with and without STIC at RRSO, and the corresponding 5- and 10-year risks. Primary analysis was based on a one-stage Cox proportional-hazards regression with a frailty term for study. RESULTS From 17 studies, individual patient data were available for 3,121 women, of whom 115 had a STIC at RRSO. The estimated hazard ratio to develop PC during follow-up in women with STIC was 33.9 (95% CI, 15.6 to 73.9), P < .001) compared with women without STIC. For women with STIC, the five- and ten-year risks to develop PC were 10.5% (95% CI, 6.2 to 17.2) and 27.5% (95% CI, 15.6 to 43.9), respectively, whereas the corresponding risks were 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.6) and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.4) for women without STIC at RRSO. CONCLUSION BRCA-PV carriers with STIC at RRSO have a strongly increased risk to develop PC which increases over time, although current data are limited by small numbers of events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda P. Steenbeek
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands,Miranda P. Steenbeek, MD, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; e-mail:
| | - Majke H.D. van Bommel
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Julia A. Hulsmann
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joep Bogaerts
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Christine Garcia
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Gynecologic Oncology San Francisco, San Francisco CA
| | - Han T. Cun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen H. Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Heleen J. van Beekhuizen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Gynecological Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucas Minig
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IMED Hospitales, Valencia, Spain
| | - Katja N. Gaarenstroom
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle Nobbenhuis
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Gynaecology, London, England
| | - Mateja Krajc
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Department of Clinical Genetics, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Vilius Rudaitis
- Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | - Marian J.E. Mourits
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F.A.G. Massuger
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rosella P.M.G. Hermens
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A. de Hullu
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Raoof S, Lee RJ, Jajoo K, Mancias JD, Rebbeck TR, Skates SJ. Multicancer Early Detection Technologies: A Review Informed by Past Cancer Screening Studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1139-1145. [PMID: 35320352 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
More than 75% of cancer-related deaths occur from cancers for which we do not screen. New screening liquid biopsies may help fill these clinical gaps, although evidence of benefit still needs to be assessed. Which lessons can we learn from previous efforts to guide those of the future? Screening trials for ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, and esophageal cancers are revisited to assess the evidence, which has been limited by small effect sizes, short duration of early-stage disease relative to screening frequency, study design, and confounding factors. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) to show mortality reduction have required millions of screening-years, two-decade durations, and been susceptible to external confounding. Future RCTs with late-stage incidence as a surrogate endpoint could substantially reduce these challenges, and clinical studies demonstrating safety and effectiveness of screening in high-risk populations may enable extrapolation to broader average-risk populations. Multicancer early detection tests provide an opportunity to advance these practical study designs. Conditional approvals based on RCTs with surrogate endpoints, contingent upon real world evidence generation and continuation of trials to definitive endpoints, may lower practical barriers to innovation in cancer screening and enable greater progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana Raoof
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard J Lee
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kunal Jajoo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joseph D Mancias
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven J Skates
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Xiao Y, Bi M, Guo H, Li M. Multi-omics approaches for biomarker discovery in early ovarian cancer diagnosis. EBioMedicine 2022; 79:104001. [PMID: 35439677 PMCID: PMC9035645 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is a heterogeneous disease with the highest mortality rate and the poorest prognosis among gynecological malignancies. Because of the absence of specific early symptoms, most OC patients are often diagnosed at late stages. Thus, improved biomarkers of OC for use in research and clinical practice are urgently needed. The last decade has seen increasingly rapid advances in sequencing and biotechnological methodologies. Consequently, multiple omics technologies, including genomic/transcriptomic sequencings and proteomic/metabolomic mass spectra, have been widely applied to analyze tissue- and liquid-derived samples from OC patients. The integration of multi-omics data has increased our knowledge of the disease and identified valuable OC biomarkers. In this review, we summarize the recent advances and perspectives in the use of multi-omics technologies in OC research and highlight potential applications of multi-omics for identifying novel biomarkers and improving clinical assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinan Xiao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China
| | - Meiyu Bi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China
| | - Hongyan Guo
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China
| | - Mo Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 10091, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lim N, Hickey M, Young GP, Macrae FA, Kelly C. Screening and risk reducing surgery for endometrial or ovarian cancers in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:646-655. [PMID: 35437274 PMCID: PMC9067008 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Lynch syndrome is a hereditary cancer syndrome caused by mismatch repair gene mutations, and female carriers are at an increased risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer. The best approach to screening is not yet clear and practice varies across countries and centers. We aimed to provide evidence to inform the best approach to screening and risk reduction. Methods A systematic search of the literature was conducted (Medline, Embase, PubMed). Studies evaluating the following were included: women with Lynch syndrome (by mismatch repair mutation or Amsterdam II criteria), screening methods for endometrial and/or ovarian cancer, intervention included endometrial biopsy, transvaginal ultrasound, or serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), outcomes evaluated were number of cancers and/or endometrial hyperplasia. Results A total of 18 studies of Lynch syndrome carriers which screened for endometrial cancer using transvaginal ultrasound and/or hysteroscopy/endometrial biopsy revealed an incidence of 3.9% at the time of screening. Most (64.1%) endometrial cancers detected were from screening, with the balance detected in symptomatic women at the first screening visits, regular review, or between screening intervals. In mismatch repair carriers, the overall sensitivity of endometrial screening was 66.7%, and the number needed to screen ranged between 4 and 38 (median 7). The sensitivity of endometrial biopsy was 57.1% and the number needed to screen was 23–380 (median 78). The sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasound was 34.4% and the number needed to screen was 35–973 (median 170). Fourteen studies which screened for ovarian cancer using transvaginal ultrasound and/or CA-125 revealed an incidence of 1.3% at the time of screening and 42.9% of ovarian cancers were detected at asymptomatic screening. The sensitivity of ovarian screening was 54.6%, and the number needed to screen was 9–191 (median 23) in mismatch repair carriers. Thirteen studies reported 5.8% incident endometrial cancers and 0.5% ovarian cancers at time of risk reducing surgery. Conclusions There is limited evidence to support screening for endometrial and ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome and data on mortality reduction are not available. Further prospective, randomized trials comparing targeted screening methods are needed. Risk reducing surgery remains the most reliable way to reduce endometrial and ovarian cancer risk in Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Lim
- The University of Melbourne Melbourne Medical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martha Hickey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Graeme P Young
- Cancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne Medicine at Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christabel Kelly
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gyllensten U, Hedlund-Lindberg J, Svensson J, Manninen J, Öst T, Ramsell J, Åslin M, Ivansson E, Lomnytska M, Lycke M, Axelsson T, Liljedahl U, Nordlund J, Edqvist PH, Sjöblom T, Uhlén M, Stålberg K, Sundfeldt K, Åberg M, Enroth S. Next Generation Plasma Proteomics Identifies High-Precision Biomarker Candidates for Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071757. [PMID: 35406529 PMCID: PMC8997113 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer among women and has a 5-year survival of only 30–50%. The survival is close to 90% for patients in stage I but only 20% for patients in stage IV. The presently available biomarkers have insufficient sensitivity and specificity for early detection and there is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers. The aim of our study was to broadly measure protein biomarkers to find tests for the early detection of ovarian cancer. We found that combinations of 4–7 protein biomarkers can provide highly accurate detection of early- and late-stage ovarian cancer compared to benign conditions. The performance of the tests was then validated in a second independent cohort. Abstract Background: Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer among women and has a 5-year survival of only 30–50%. The survival is close to 90% for patients in stage I but only 20% for patients in stage IV. The presently available biomarkers have insufficient sensitivity and specificity for early detection and there is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers. Methods: We employed the Explore PEA technology for high-precision analysis of 1463 plasma proteins and conducted a discovery and replication study using two clinical cohorts of previously untreated patients with benign or malignant ovarian tumours (N = 111 and N = 37). Results: The discovery analysis identified 32 proteins that had significantly higher levels in malignant cases as compared to benign diagnoses, and for 28 of these, the association was replicated in the second cohort. Multivariate modelling identified three highly accurate models based on 4 to 7 proteins each for separating benign tumours from early-stage and/or late-stage ovarian cancers, all with AUCs above 0.96 in the replication cohort. We also developed a model for separating the early-stage from the late-stage achieving an AUC of 0.81 in the replication cohort. These models were based on eleven proteins in total (ALPP, CXCL8, DPY30, IL6, IL12, KRT19, PAEP, TSPAN1, SIGLEC5, VTCN1, and WFDC2), notably without MUCIN-16. The majority of the associated proteins have been connected to ovarian cancer but not identified as potential biomarkers. Conclusions: The results show the ability of using high-precision proteomics for the identification of novel plasma protein biomarker candidates for the early detection of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulf Gyllensten
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala University, SE-75108 Uppsala, Sweden; (U.G.); (J.H.-L.); (E.I.); (P.-H.E.); (T.S.)
- Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS), Marais Rd., Mostertsdrift, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa
| | - Julia Hedlund-Lindberg
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala University, SE-75108 Uppsala, Sweden; (U.G.); (J.H.-L.); (E.I.); (P.-H.E.); (T.S.)
| | - Johanna Svensson
- Department of Medical Sciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden; (J.S.); (J.M.); (T.Ö.); (J.R.); (M.Å.); (T.A.); (U.L.); (J.N.); (M.Å.)
| | - Johanna Manninen
- Department of Medical Sciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden; (J.S.); (J.M.); (T.Ö.); (J.R.); (M.Å.); (T.A.); (U.L.); (J.N.); (M.Å.)
| | - Torbjörn Öst
- Department of Medical Sciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden; (J.S.); (J.M.); (T.Ö.); (J.R.); (M.Å.); (T.A.); (U.L.); (J.N.); (M.Å.)
| | - Jon Ramsell
- Department of Medical Sciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden; (J.S.); (J.M.); (T.Ö.); (J.R.); (M.Å.); (T.A.); (U.L.); (J.N.); (M.Å.)
| | - Matilda Åslin
- Department of Medical Sciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden; (J.S.); (J.M.); (T.Ö.); (J.R.); (M.Å.); (T.A.); (U.L.); (J.N.); (M.Å.)
| | - Emma Ivansson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala University, SE-75108 Uppsala, Sweden; (U.G.); (J.H.-L.); (E.I.); (P.-H.E.); (T.S.)
| | - Marta Lomnytska
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden; (M.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Maria Lycke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, SE-41685 Gothenburg, Sweden; (M.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Tomas Axelsson
- Department of Medical Sciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden; (J.S.); (J.M.); (T.Ö.); (J.R.); (M.Å.); (T.A.); (U.L.); (J.N.); (M.Å.)
| | - Ulrika Liljedahl
- Department of Medical Sciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden; (J.S.); (J.M.); (T.Ö.); (J.R.); (M.Å.); (T.A.); (U.L.); (J.N.); (M.Å.)
| | - Jessica Nordlund
- Department of Medical Sciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden; (J.S.); (J.M.); (T.Ö.); (J.R.); (M.Å.); (T.A.); (U.L.); (J.N.); (M.Å.)
| | - Per-Henrik Edqvist
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala University, SE-75108 Uppsala, Sweden; (U.G.); (J.H.-L.); (E.I.); (P.-H.E.); (T.S.)
| | - Tobias Sjöblom
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala University, SE-75108 Uppsala, Sweden; (U.G.); (J.H.-L.); (E.I.); (P.-H.E.); (T.S.)
| | - Mathias Uhlén
- Science for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, SE-17165 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Karin Stålberg
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden; (M.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, SE-41685 Gothenburg, Sweden; (M.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Mikael Åberg
- Department of Medical Sciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden; (J.S.); (J.M.); (T.Ö.); (J.R.); (M.Å.); (T.A.); (U.L.); (J.N.); (M.Å.)
| | - Stefan Enroth
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala University, SE-75108 Uppsala, Sweden; (U.G.); (J.H.-L.); (E.I.); (P.-H.E.); (T.S.)
- Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study, Thunbergsvägen 2, SE-752 38 Uppsala, Sweden
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +46-(0)-18-4710000
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
CXC Chemokine Signaling in Progression of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Theranostic Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23052642. [PMID: 35269786 PMCID: PMC8910147 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are often diagnosed at an advanced stage due to nonspecific symptoms and ineffective screening approaches. Although chemotherapy has been available and widely used for the treatment of advanced EOC, the overall prognosis remains dismal. As part of the intrinsic defense mechanisms against cancer development and progression, immune cells are recruited into the tumor microenvironment (TME), and this process is directed by the interactions between different chemokines and their receptors. In this review, the functional significance of CXC chemokine ligands/chemokine receptors (CXCL/CXCR) and their roles in modulating EOC progression are summarized. The status and prospects of CXCR/CXCL-based theranostic strategies in EOC management are also discussed.
Collapse
|
37
|
Barrett JE, Jones A, Evans I, Reisel D, Herzog C, Chindera K, Kristiansen M, Leavy OC, Manchanda R, Bjørge L, Zikan M, Cibula D, Widschwendter M. The DNA methylome of cervical cells can predict the presence of ovarian cancer. Nat Commun 2022; 13:448. [PMID: 35105887 PMCID: PMC8807742 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26615-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The vast majority of epithelial ovarian cancer arises from tissues that are embryologically derived from the Müllerian Duct. Here, we demonstrate that a DNA methylation signature in easy-to-access Müllerian Duct-derived cervical cells from women with and without ovarian cancer (i.e. referred to as the Women's risk IDentification for Ovarian Cancer index or WID-OC-index) is capable of identifying women with an ovarian cancer in the absence of tumour DNA with an AUC of 0.76 and women with an endometrial cancer with an AUC of 0.81. This and the observation that the cervical cell WID-OC-index mimics the epigenetic program of those cells at risk of becoming cancerous in BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers (i.e. mammary epithelium, fallopian tube fimbriae, prostate) further suggest that the epigenetic misprogramming of cervical cells is an indicator for cancer predisposition. This concept has the potential to advance the field of risk-stratified cancer screening and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Barrett
- European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Research Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - Allison Jones
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - Iona Evans
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - Daniel Reisel
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - Chiara Herzog
- European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Research Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Kantaraja Chindera
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - Mark Kristiansen
- UCL Genomics, Zayed Centre for Research into Rare Disease in Children, University College London, London, WC1N 1DZ, UK
| | - Olivia C Leavy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK
- Centre for Prevention, Detection & Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Health Services Research, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Line Bjørge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Michal Zikan
- Hospital Na Bulovce, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
- Research Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK.
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Manchanda R, Gaba F, Talaulikar V, Pundir J, Gessler S, Davies M, Menon U. Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy and the Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy Below the Age of Natural Menopause: Scientific Impact Paper No. 66 October 2021: Scientific Impact Paper No. 66. BJOG 2022; 129:e16-e34. [PMID: 34672090 PMCID: PMC7614764 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
This paper deals with the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after the removal of fallopian tubes and ovaries to prevent ovarian cancer in premenopausal high risk women. Some women have an alteration in their genetic code, which makes them more likely to develop ovarian cancer. Two well-known genes which can carry an alteration are the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Examples of other genes associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer include RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 and Lynch syndrome genes. Women with a strong family history of ovarian cancer and/or breast cancer, may also be at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Women at increased risk can choose to have an operation to remove the fallopian tubes and ovaries, which is the most effective way to prevent ovarian cancer. This is done after a woman has completed her family. However, removal of ovaries causes early menopause and leads to hot flushes, sweats, mood changes and bone thinning. It can also cause memory problems and increases the risk of heart disease. It may reduce libido or impair sexual function. Guidance on how to care for women following preventative surgery who are experiencing early menopause is needed. HRT is usually advisable for women up to 51 years of age (average age of menopause for women in the UK) who are undergoing early menopause and have not had breast cancer, to minimise the health risks linked to early menopause. For women with a womb, HRT should include estrogen coupled with progestogen to protect against thickening of the lining of the womb (called endometrial hyperplasia). For women without a womb, only estrogen is given. Research suggests that, unlike in older women, HRT for women in early menopause does not increase breast cancer risk, including in those who are BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and have preventative surgery. For women with a history of receptor-negative breast cancer, the gynaecologist will liaise with an oncology doctor on a case-by-case basis to help to decide if HRT is safe to use. Women with a history of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer are not normally offered HRT. A range of other therapies can be used if a woman is unable to take HRT. These include behavioural therapy and non-hormonal medicines. However, these are less effective than HRT. Regular exercise, healthy lifestyle and avoiding symptom triggers are also advised. Whether to undergo surgery to reduce risk or not and its timing can be a complex decision-making process. Women need to be carefully counselled on the pros and cons of both preventative surgery and HRT use so they can make informed decisions and choices.
Collapse
|
39
|
Guo J, Zheng J, Zhang H, Tong J. RNA m6A methylation regulators in ovarian cancer. Cancer Cell Int 2021; 21:609. [PMID: 34794452 PMCID: PMC8600856 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-02318-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant RNA modification of mammalian mRNAs and plays a vital role in many diseases, especially tumours. In recent years, m6A has become the topic of intense discussion in epigenetics. M6A modification is dynamically regulated by methyltransferases, demethylases and RNA-binding proteins. Ovarian cancer (OC) is a common but highly fatal malignancy in female. Increasing evidence shows that changes in m6A levels and the dysregulation of m6A regulators are associated with the occurrence, development or prognosis of OC. In this review, the latest studies on m6A and its regulators in OC have been summarized, and we focus on the key role of m6A modification in the development and progression of OC. Additionally, we also discuss the potential use of m6A modification and its regulators in the diagnosis and treatment of OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialu Guo
- Department of the Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310053, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hangzhou Women's Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), 310008, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianfeng Zheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hangzhou Women's Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), 310008, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hangzhou Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 310008, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Huizhi Zhang
- Department of the Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310053, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinyi Tong
- Department of the Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310053, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hangzhou Women's Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), 310008, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Single-cell RNA-seq highlights a specific carcinoembryonic cluster in ovarian cancer. Cell Death Dis 2021; 12:1082. [PMID: 34775482 PMCID: PMC8590695 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-021-04358-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Expounding the heterogeneity for ovarian cancer (OC) with the cognition in developmental biology might be helpful to search for robust prognostic markers and effective treatments. In the present study, we employed single-cell RNA-seq with ovarian cancers, normal ovary, and embryo tissue to explore their heterogeneity. Then the differentiation process of clusters was explored; the pivotal cluster and markers were identified. Furthermore, the consensus clustering algorithm was used to explore the different clinical phenotypes in OC. At last, a prognostic model was construct and used to assess the prognosis for OCs. As a result, eight diverse clusters were identified, and the similarity existed in some clusters between embryo and tumours based on their gene expression. Meaningfully, a subtype of malignant epithelial cluster, PEG10+ EME, was associated with poor survival and was an intermediate stage of embryo to tumour. PEG10 was a CSC marker and might influence CSC self-renewal and promote cisplatin resistance via NOTCH pathway. Utilising specific gene profiles of PEG10+ EME based on public data sets, four phenotypes with different survival and clinical response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy were identified. These insights allowed for the investigation of single-cell transcriptome of OCs and embryo, which advanced our current understanding of OC pathogenesis and resulted in promising therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
|
41
|
The Current and Future States of Screening in Gynecologic Cancers. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2021; 48:705-722. [PMID: 34756291 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Gynecologic cancers contribute to a significant portion of cancer morbidity and mortality among women in the United States and across the globe. This article provides a comprehensive review of current screening guidelines and novel techniques that have promise in the prevention and early detection of gynecologic cancers in the future. The authors anticipate a move toward less invasive testing modalities, use of cancer biomarkers, and the prevention and treatment of high-risk factors such as human papilloma virus infection and obesity.
Collapse
|
42
|
A Review of Breast Cancer Risk Factors in Adolescents and Young Adults. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215552. [PMID: 34771713 PMCID: PMC8583289 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cancer diagnosed in patients between the ages of 15 and 39 deserves special consideration. Diagnoses within this cohort of adolescents and young adults include childhood cancers which present at an older age than expected, or an early presentation of cancers that are typically observed in older adults, such as breast cancer. Cancers within this age group are associated with worse disease-free and overall survival rates, and the incidence of these cases are rising. Knowing an individual’s susceptibility to disease can change their clinical management and allow for the risk-testing of relatives. This review discusses the risk factors that contribute to breast cancer in this unique cohort of patients, including inherited genetic risk factors, as well as environmental and lifestyle factors. We also describe risk models that allow clinicians to quantify a patient’s lifetime risk of developing disease. Abstract Cancer in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) deserves special consideration for several reasons. AYA cancers encompass paediatric malignancies that present at an older age than expected, or early-onset of cancers that are typically observed in adults. However, disease diagnosed in the AYA population is distinct to those same cancers which are diagnosed in a paediatric or older adult setting. Worse disease-free and overall survival outcomes are observed in the AYA setting, and the incidence of AYA cancers is increasing. Knowledge of an individual’s underlying cancer predisposition can influence their clinical care and may facilitate early tumour surveillance strategies and cascade testing of at-risk relatives. This information can further influence reproductive decision making. In this review we discuss the risk factors contributing to AYA breast cancer, such as heritable predisposition, environmental, and lifestyle factors. We also describe a number of risk models which incorporate genetic factors that aid clinicians in quantifying an individual’s lifetime risk of disease.
Collapse
|
43
|
Openshaw MR, McVeigh TP. Non-invasive Technology Advances in Cancer-A Review of the Advances in the Liquid Biopsy for Endometrial and Ovarian Cancers. Front Digit Health 2021; 2:573010. [PMID: 34713045 PMCID: PMC8521848 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.573010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Improving cancer survival rates globally requires improvements in disease detection and monitoring, with the aim of improving early diagnosis and prediction of disease relapse. Traditional means of detecting and monitoring cancers rely largely on imaging and, where possible, blood-based protein biomarkers, many of which are non-specific. Treatments are being improved by identification of inherited and acquired genomic aberrations in tumors, some of which can be targeted by newly developed therapeutic interventions. Treatment of gynecological malignancy is progressively moving toward personalized therapy, as exemplified by application of PARP-inhibition for patients with BRCA-deficient tubo-ovarian cancers, or checkpoint inhibition in patients with mismatch repair-deficient disease. However, the more recent discovery of a group of biomarkers described under the umbrella term of “liquid biopsy” promises significant improvement in our ability to detect and monitor cancers. The term “liquid biopsy” is used to describe an array of tumor-derived material found in blood plasma and other bodily fluids such as ascites, pleural fluid, saliva, and urine. It includes circulating tumors cells (CTCs), circulating nucleic acids including DNA, messenger RNA and micro RNAs, and extracellular vesicles (EVs). In this review, we discuss recent advancements in liquid biopsy for biomarker detection to help in diagnosis, prognosis, and planning of treatment of ovarian and endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R Openshaw
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Terri P McVeigh
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Bast et al. discuss the early detection of ovarian cancer in the context of the recent UKCTOCS screening trial. The authors suggest potential reasons why the trial failed to achieve a reduction in mortality and outline next steps in the development of biomarkers and imaging modalities to detect ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Bast
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chae Young Han
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zhen Lu
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Berek JS, Renz M, Kehoe S, Kumar L, Friedlander M. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 155 Suppl 1:61-85. [PMID: 34669199 PMCID: PMC9298325 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In 2014, FIGO's Committee for Gynecologic Oncology revised the staging of ovarian cancer, incorporating ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer into the same system. Most of these malignancies are high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC). Stage IC is now divided into three categories: IC1 (surgical spill); IC2 (capsule ruptured before surgery or tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface); and IC3 (malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings). The updated staging includes a revision of Stage IIIC based on spread to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes alone without intraperitoneal dissemination. This category is now subdivided into IIIA1(i) (metastasis ≤10 mm in greatest dimension), and IIIA1(ii) (metastasis >10 mm in greatest dimension). Stage IIIA2 is now "microscopic extrapelvic peritoneal involvement with or without positive retroperitoneal lymph node" metastasis. This review summarizes the genetics, surgical management, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies for epithelial cancers, and the treatment of ovarian germ cell and stromal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S. Berek
- Stanford Women’s Cancer CenterStanford Cancer InstituteStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Malte Renz
- Stanford Women’s Cancer CenterStanford Cancer InstituteStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynecological Cancer CenterChurchill HospitalOxfordUK
- St Peter’s CollegeOxfordUK
| | - Lalit Kumar
- Department of Medical OncologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Royal Hospital for WomenSydneyAustralia
- Prince of Wales Clinical SchoolUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Jacobson M, Coakley N, Bernardini M, Branco KA, Elit L, Ferguson S, Kim R. Risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 hereditary ovarian cancer syndromes: a clinical practice guideline. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2021; 19:39. [PMID: 34565426 PMCID: PMC8474940 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-021-00196-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this guideline is to make recommendations regarding the care of women who harbour a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1 and BRCA2. METHODS Draft recommendations were formulated based on evidence obtained through a systematic review of RCTs, comparative retrospective studies and guideline endorsement. The draft recommendations underwent an internal review by clinical and methodology experts, and an external review by clinical practitioners. RESULTS The literature search yielded 1 guideline, 5 systematic reviews, and 15 studies that met the eligibility criteria. CONCLUSIONS In women who harbour a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening for ovarian cancer is not recommended. Risk-reducing surgery is recommended to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. In the absence of contraindications, premenopausal women undergoing RRSO should be offered hormone therapy until menopause. Systemic hormone replacement therapy, is not recommended for women who have had a personal history of breast cancer. RRSO should be considered for breast cancer risk reduction in women younger than 50 years. After a breast cancer diagnosis, RRSO for breast cancer mortality reduction can be considered within two years to women who harbour a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1 if younger than the recommended age range for ovarian cancer risk reduction. RRSO before the age of 40 and specifically for breast cancer treatment in BRCA2 should be considered only if recommended by their breast cancer oncologist. Following RRSO, it is not recommended to do surveillance for peritoneal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Jacobson
- Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Nadia Coakley
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Ontario Health’s Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-based care, McMaster University, Juravinski Site, G Wing, 2nd Floor room 227, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3 Canada
| | - Marcus Bernardini
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network (UHN) Toronto, Mount Sinai, Toronto, ON Canada
| | | | - Laurie Elit
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences Centre-Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Sarah Ferguson
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
- Ontario Health, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON Canada
- University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Raymond Kim
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON Canada
- Sick Kids Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ryan N, Snowsill T, McKenzie E, Monahan KJ, Nebgen D. Should women with Lynch syndrome be offered gynaecological cancer surveillance? BMJ 2021; 374:n2020. [PMID: 34475027 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Naj Ryan
- The Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - T Snowsill
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | | | - K J Monahan
- The Lynch Syndrome and Family Cancer Clinic, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, London, UK Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - D Nebgen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Urogynecologic Surgery: Why, in Whom, and How? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2021; 26:401-406. [PMID: 31135579 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000000741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review aims to (1) describe evidence supporting the fallopian tube as a site of high-grade serous carcinoma, (2) review literature regarding salpingectomy in high- and average-risk women, and (3) discuss feasibility and safety of salpingectomy in urogynecologic surgery. METHODS PubMed and university library resources were used to retrieve relevant English-language publications via keyword search, including "ovarian cancer," "salpingectomy," "risk," "safety," "hysterectomy," "trends," "technique," and "urogynecology." Each publication was reviewed in detail and references incorporated, where relevant. RESULTS Evidence supports the fimbriated portion of the fallopian tube as a site of high-grade serous carcinoma in both hereditary and sporadic cases. Routine opportunistic salpingectomy in average-risk women may reduce ovarian cancer risk by 42% to 65% and prevent future surgery for benign tubal disease. Opportunistic salpingectomy is cost-effective for sterilization and cost-saving during hysterectomy. For genetically predisposed women, salpingo-oophorectomy remains the recommended strategy for ovarian cancer risk reduction. Despite being feasible, safe, and cost-effective, concomitant salpingectomy is least commonly performed during vaginal hysterectomy compared with other hysterectomy routes. Salpingectomy rates during vaginal hysterectomy are influenced by geographic factors, surgeon experience, and adhesive disease. CONCLUSIONS Opportunistic salpingectomy holds promise as a risk-reducing intervention for ovarian cancer. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommend that physicians counsel average-risk women regarding opportunistic salpingectomy when planning pelvic surgery. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate long-term implications of salpingectomy. Urogynecologic surgeons should discuss salpingectomy as part of surgical informed consent. Vaginal salpingectomy should be incorporated into residency and fellowship training programs.
Collapse
|
49
|
Ovarian cancer surveillance in the clinical follow up of women with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants in a large health care system. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:134-141. [PMID: 34330534 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess CA 125 and transvaginal ultrasound surveillance in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants in a pragmatic clinical setting with>1 year follow up. METHODS Retrospective cohort study in a large integrated health care system of women identified from 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2017 with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant with at least one intact ovary. Demographic and clinical data were collected from date of genetic testing until oophorectomy, an ovarian cancer diagnosis, or 7/1/2019. Primary outcome was frequency and findings of CA 125 tests and ultrasounds performed; secondary outcome was epithelial ovarian cancers diagnosed. RESULTS There were 1418 women, age ≥ 30 years with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant with at least one intact ovary. Of the total of 1683 ultrasounds and 2437 CA 125 tests done, 1022 ultrasounds and 1709 CA 125 tests were performed for surveillance in 771 women followed >1 year. Of these women 241 (31%) women had no surveillance, and 530 (69%) women underwent any surveillance. Only 108 (20%) underwent regular surveillance. The number who underwent regular surveillance declined each year. Twenty-one women underwent surveillance indicated surgery with only 2 ovarian cancers found by surveillance. CONCLUSIONS Many women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants undergo ultrasound and CA 125 surveillance testing but abnormal surveillance testing led to diagnosis of ovarian cancer in only two cases. These findings question the use of CA 125 and ultrasound surveillance in the clinical setting for ovarian cancer detection in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants.
Collapse
|
50
|
Controversies in Hereditary Cancer Management. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137:941-955. [PMID: 33831930 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Personalized management of patients at risk ideally should involve a multidisciplinary team of not only genetic counselors and surgeons, but also women's health or menopause specialists, knowledgeable psychologists, and primary care providers or obstetrician-gynecologists aware of the risks and fears "previvors" (survivors of a predisposition to cancer who have not had the disease) face as well as the issues that are common postoperatively. Identification of patients at risk for hereditary cancer, understanding of current genetic testing modalities and potential results, knowledge about screening and prevention including timing of surveillance, preventive medication and risk-reducing surgeries, understanding limitations and comorbidities associated with these risk management strategies and long-term psychological support are all important in hereditary cancer management. We describe issues surrounding the identification of the high-risk patient, universal testing in breast and ovarian cancer, and testing in special populations. We describe a simplified approach to understanding and communicating genetic testing results and nuances of testing including direct-to-consumer testing. We highlight concerns surrounding breast cancer screening during pregnancy and lactation. A framework for practical management and counseling of women who opt for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or risk-reducing mastectomy or both is provided. We provide an in-depth discussion of questions that arise in relation to timing of surgery, fertility preservation, management of menopausal symptoms, and surgical technique. Alternative choices in women who choose to delay bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are reviewed. Finally, the psychosocial effects of carrying a genetic mutation and the issues that women face when undergoing to risk-reducing surgery including adjustment, sexuality issues, and cosmesis are addressed.
Collapse
|