Comparative Analysis of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer According to 2007 and 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations

Opportunities and Challenges in the Development of Antibody-Drug Conjugate for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The Diverse Choices and Changing Needs

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous breast cancer subtype, which is also characterized by the aggressive phenotype, high recurrence rate, and poor prognosis. Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) is a monoclonal antibody with a cytotoxic payload connected by a linker. ADC is gaining more and more attention as a targeted anti-cancer agent. Clinical studies of emerging ADC drugs such as sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with metastatic breast cancer (including TNBC) are progressing rapidly. In view of its excellent clinical efficacy and good tolerability, Sacituzumab govitecan gained accelerated approval by the FDA for the treatment of advanced metastatic TNBC in 2020. This review discusses the treatment status and challenges in TNBC, with an emphasis on the current status of ADC development and clinical trials in TNBC and metastatic breast cancer. We also summarize the clinical experience and future exploration directions of ADC development for TNBC patients.

Imaging and Monitoring HER2 Expression in Tumors during HER2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate Therapy Utilizing a Radiolabeled Site-Specific Single-Domain Antibody Probe: 68Ga-NODAGA-SNA004-GSC

The overexpression of HER2 is pivotal in the initiation and progression of breast cancer. Developing HER2-targeted radiotracers is crucial for noninvasive assessment of HER2 expression, patient selection for HER2-targeted therapy, monitoring treatment response, and identifying resistance. Here, we reported a nonsite-specific coupled radiotracer, 68Ga-NOTA-SNA004-His6, and a site-specific coupled radiotracer, 68Ga-NODAGA-SNA004-GSC, based on a novel HER2 nanobody, SNA004. Both radiotracers exhibited high affinity, specific targeting, and rapid clearance in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, these tracers and trastuzumab showed noncompetitive binding to HER2. Compared to 68Ga-NOTA-SNA004-His6, 68Ga-NODAGA-SNA004-GSC demonstrated significantly reduced renal and liver uptake. PET/CT imaging with 68Ga-NODAGA-SNA004-GSC sensitively detected the responsiveness of various tumor models to trastuzumab and its antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Overall, the site-specific coupled radiotracer 68Ga-NODAGA-SNA004-GSC offered significant advantages in biodistribution and signal-to-noise ratio, making it a valuable tool for monitoring HER2 expression levels before, during, and after trastuzumab and ADC treatment.

MR-based radiomics predictive modelling of EGFR mutation and HER2 overexpression in metastatic brain adenocarcinoma: a two-centre study

OBJECTIVES

Magnetic resonance (MR)-based radiomics features of brain metastases are utilised to predict epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression in adenocarcinoma, with the aim to identify the most predictive MR sequence.

METHODS

A retrospective inclusion of 268 individuals with brain metastases from adenocarcinoma across two institutions was conducted. Utilising T1-weighted imaging (T1 contrast-enhanced [T1-CE]) and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) sequences, 1,409 radiomics features were extracted. These sequences were randomly divided into training and test sets at a 7:3 ratio. The selection of relevant features was done using the least absolute shrinkage selection operator, and the training cohort's support vector classifier model was employed to generate the predictive model. The performance of the radiomics features was evaluated using a separate test set.

RESULTS

For contrast-enhanced T1-CE cohorts, the radiomics features based on 19 selected characteristics exhibited excellent discrimination. No significant differences in age, sex, and time to metastasis were observed between the groups with EGFR mutations or HER2 + and those with wild-type EGFR or HER2 (p > 0.05). Radiomics feature analysis for T1-CE revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98, classification accuracy of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.92, and specificity of 0.93 in the training cohort. In the test set, the AUC was 0.82. The 19 radiomics features for the T2-FLAIR sequence showed AUCs of 0.86 in the training set and 0.70 in the test set.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed a T1-CE signature that could serve as a non-invasive adjunctive tool to determine the presence of EGFR mutations and HER2 + status in adenocarcinoma, aiding in the direction of treatment plans.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

We propose radiomics features based on T1-CE brain MR sequences that are both evidence-based and non-invasive. These can be employed to guide clinical treatment planning in patients with brain metastases from adenocarcinoma.

FOXO3a deregulation in uterine smooth muscle tumors

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to investigate FOXO3a deregulation in Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors (USMT) and its potential association with cancer development and prognosis.

METHODS

The authors analyzed gene and protein expression profiles of FOXO3a in 56 uterine Leiomyosarcomas (LMS), 119 leiomyomas (comprising conventional and unusual leiomyomas), and 20 Myometrium (MM) samples. The authors used techniques such as Immunohistochemistry (IHC), FISH/CISH, and qRT-PCR for the present analyses. Additionally, the authors conducted an in-silico analysis to understand the interaction network involving FOXO3a and its correlated genes.

RESULTS

This investigation revealed distinct expression patterns of the FOXO3a gene and protein, including both normal and phosphorylated forms. Expression levels were notably elevated in LMS, and Unusual Leiomyomas (ULM) compared to conventional Leiomyomas (LM) and Myometrium (MM) samples. This upregulation was significantly associated with metastasis and Overall Survival (OS) in LMS patients. Intriguingly, FOXO3a deregulation did not seem to be influenced by EGF/HER-2 signaling, as there were minimal levels of EGF and VEGF expression detected, and HER-2 and EGFR were negative in the analyzed samples. In the examination of miRNAs, the authors observed upregulation of miR-96-5p and miR-155-5p, which are known negative regulators of FOXO3a, in LMS samples. Conversely, the tumor suppressor miR-let7c-5p was downregulated.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the outcomes of the present study suggest that the imbalance in FOXO3a within Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors might arise from both protein phosphorylation and miRNA activity. FOXO3a could emerge as a promising therapeutic target for individuals with Unusual Leiomyomas and Leiomyosarcomas (ULM and LMS), offering novel directions for treatment strategies.

Atypical Co-amplification with Co-localization of HER2 Gene in Breast Cancer: Combined IHC/FISH Approach as per ASCO/CAP 2018 Guidelines for Targeted Therapy Eligibility

Breast cancer patients with HER2 gene amplification as assessed by FISH are eligible for HER2-targeted therapy. However, in a small subset of patients, unusual FISH pattern of co-localization and co-amplification can pose challenges in interpretation of the HER2 status and hence to assess the HER2 status accurately; our aim was to report their incidence and analyze them based on latest ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines. We present seven cases with HER2/CEP17 co-amplification and co-localization from a total 4040 cases referred during the year 2017 to 2021 at Mumbai Reference Laboratory, SRL Diagnostics. Core needle biopsy/excision invasive breast carcinoma specimens from metastatic sites were tested for IHC for expressions of ER, PR, and HER2. The ones which came equivocal on HER2 IHC were then evaluated for HER2 amplification by FISH. Co-amplification and co-localization of HER2 and centromeric 17 was observed with a frequency of 0.1% that falls in the range of 0.5-0.1% as reported from other large-scale studies. Our study showed that implementation of a binary inhouse concurrent assessment with IHC as per the ASCO/CAP 2018 helps to reach the most definitive and accurate HER2 status. Our study is an attempt to report such challenging FISH patterns and their work-up for a better understanding on the interpretation. Cumulative data along with follow-up in these cases would bring an insight into exact therapeutic outcome.

A multivariable model of ultrasound and clinicopathological features for predicting axillary nodal burden of breast cancer: potential to prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

To develop a clinical model for predicting high axillary nodal burden in patients with early breast cancer by integrating ultrasound (US) and clinicopathological features.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with breast cancer who underwent preoperative US examination and breast surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (centre 1, n = 250) and at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (centre 2, n = 97) between January 2012 and December 2016 and between January 2020 and March 2022, respectively, were deemed eligible for this study (n = 347). According to the number of lymph node (LN) metastasis based on pathology, patients were divided into two groups: limited nodal burden (0-2 metastatic LNs) and heavy nodal burden (≥ 3 metastatic LNs). In addition, US features combined with clinicopathological variables were compared between these two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the most valuable variables for predicting ≥ 3 LNs in breast cancer. A nomogram was then developed based on these independent factors.

RESULTS

Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the cortical thickness (p < 0.001), longitudinal to transverse ratio (p = 0.001), absence of hilum (p < 0.001), T stage (p = 0.002) and Ki-67 (p = 0.039) were significantly associated with heavy nodal burden. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, cortical thickness (p = 0.001), absence of hilum (p = 0.042) and T stage (p = 0.012) were considered independent predictors of high-burden node. The area under curve (AUC) of the nomogram was 0.749.

CONCLUSION

Our model based on US variables and clinicopathological characteristics demonstrates that can help select patients with ≥ 3 LNs, which can in turn be helpful to predict high axillary nodal burden in early breast cancer patients and prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of breast cancers characterizes germline-somatic mutation interactions mediating therapeutic vulnerabilities

Germline-somatic mutation interactions are universal and associated with tumorigenesis, but their role in breast cancer, especially in non-Caucasians, remains poorly characterized. We performed large-scale prospective targeted sequencing of matched tumor-blood samples from 4079 Chinese females, coupled with detailed clinical annotation, to map interactions between germline and somatic alterations. We discovered 368 pathogenic germline variants and identified 5 breast cancer DNA repair-associated genes (BCDGs; BRCA1/BRCA2/CHEK2/PALB2/TP53). BCDG mutation carriers, especially those with two-hit inactivation, demonstrated younger onset, higher tumor mutation burden, and greater clinical benefits from platinum drugs, PARP inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, we leveraged a multiomics cohort to reveal that clinical benefits derived from two-hit events are associated with increased genome instability and an immune-activated tumor microenvironment. We also established an ethnicity-specific tool to predict BCDG mutation and two-hit status for genetic evaluation and therapeutic decisions. Overall, this study leveraged the large sequencing cohort of Chinese breast cancers, optimizing genomics-guided selection of DNA damaging-targeted therapy and immunotherapy within a broader population.

The chromatin architectural regulator SND1 mediates metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer by promoting CDH1 gene methylation

BACKGROUND

SND1 participates in tumorigenesis, tumour invasion and metastasis in different cancers. Previous studies have shown that SND1 can promote the invasion and migration of breast cancer cells. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a specific breast cancer subtype with high metastatic potential and poor prognosis. However, the specific roles and mechanisms of SND1 in TNBC metastasis remain unaddressed.

METHODS

Immunostaining was used to detect the SND1 expression in tissue samples of 58 TNBC and 10 glioblastomas (GBM) as positive control. The correlation between SND1 expression and patient prognosis was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The gene expression was evaluated by qRT-PCR, Western blot and immunofluorescence analyses. Gene Ontology analysis, ChIP, a dual-luciferase reporter assay, EMSA, and 3C analysis were applied to identify SND1-activated target genes. Bisulfite sequencing PCR and MeDIP were used to detect DNA methylation. We also used wound healing, Transwell and orthotopic implantation assays to investigate the function of SND1 in TNBC cell migration and invasion.

RESULTS

The data of immunohistochemistry manifested that SND1 is the overexpression in metastasized TNBC and an independent factor for TNBC prognosis. SND1 knockdown inhibited the migration and invasion of TNBC cells. We found that SND1 promotes the metastatic phenotype of TNBC cells by epigenetically altering chromatin conformational interactions, which in turn activates DNMT3A transcription. Then, DNMT3A attenuates CCND1 expression by inducing CCND1 gene methylation, leading to TNBC metastasis.

CONCLUSION

SND1 can promote the invasion and migration of TNBC cells by promoting DNMT3A expression and suppressing CDH1 activity. SND1 is a potential biomarker and a promising therapeutic target for TNBC.

Clinical Genetic Features and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in HER2-Low Breast Cancers: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this work is to reveal differences in clinical and genetic features, as well as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response, between HER2-low and HER2-zero or HER2-positive breast cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 245 female patients with breast cancer were retrospectively enrolled from seven hospitals. Core needle biopsy (CNB) samples were collected before NAC and used for next-generation sequencing by a commercial gene panel. Clinical and genetic features, as well as NAC response, were compared between HER2-low and HER2-zero or HER2-positive breast cancers. The nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) method was applied to cluster the C-Score of enrolled cases to reveal the intrinsic features of each HER2 subgroup.

RESULTS

A total of 68 (27.8%) cases are HER2-positive, 117 (47.8%) cases are HER2-low, and 60 (24.5%) cases are HER2-zero. HER2-low breast cancers have a significantly lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rate than HER2-positive and HER2-zero breast cancers (p < 0.050 for all comparisons). Compared with HER2-low breast cancers, HER2-positive cases have higher rates of TP53 mutation, TOP2A amplification, and ERBB2 amplification, as well as lower rates of MAP2K4 mutation, ESR1 amplification, FGFR1 amplification, and MAPK pathway alteration (p < 0.050 for all comparisons). After clustering HER2-low cases by the NMF method, 56/117 (47.9%) are in cluster 1, 51/117 (43.6%) are in cluster 2, and 10/117 (8.5%) are in cluster 3. HER2-low cases in cluster 2 have the lowest pCR rate among the three clusters (p < 0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low breast cancers have significant genetic differences from HER2-positive cases. Genetic heterogeneity exists in HER2-low breast cancers and impacts on NAC response in this subgroup.

Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing

PURPOSE

To investigate the HER2 status and clinicopathological features in invasive breast cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0, which has always been controversial.

METHODS

Forty breast cancer cases with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected and classified into two groups based on the HRE2/CEP17 ratio (Group A: ≥2.0, n=22; Group B: <2.0, n=18). Clinicopathological characteristics, HER2 status, risk classification, and molecular typing were further analyzed and compared by 21-Gene expression assay and MammaPrint plus BluePrint test.

RESULTS

The majority of cases in both groups were invasive carcinoma (NOS), with histological grade II, HR+, Ki-67 ≥20%, HER2 2+, and a high risk of recurrence, although younger patients and lymph node metastases were more common in Group A. Surprisingly, all HR+ breast cancers in both groups were classified as luminal-type, HR- cases were all basal-type or unknown, and the index of HER2 in all cases was <0.000 using the BluePrint test, which indicated that HER2 status should be negative. Furthermore, the level of HER2 mRNA expression in all cases of both groups was <10.7, which was defined as HER2 negative by the 21-Gene expression assay. In addition, 10 patients of Group A received anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy; only one patient with HR- achieved Grade 5 based on the Miller-Payne system, whereas none of the patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) based on the Residual Cancer Burden system.

CONCLUSION

Group A breast cancer, which has always been unquestionably diagnosed as HER2 amplification, was more likely to be HER2 negative and derived less benefit from anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Group A breast cancer should be distinguished from classical HER2-positive breast cancers when assessing HER2 FISH, and a larger cohort of Group A patients should be included in further studies.

Advances in PET/CT Imaging for Breast Cancer

One out of eight women will be affected by breast cancer during her lifetime. Imaging plays a key role in breast cancer detection and management, providing physicians with information about tumor location, heterogeneity, and dissemination. In this review, we describe the latest advances in PET/CT imaging of breast cancer, including novel applications of 18F-FDG PET/CT and the development and testing of new agents for primary and metastatic breast tumor imaging and therapy. Ultimately, these radiopharmaceuticals may guide personalized approaches to optimize treatment based on the patient's specific tumor profile, and may become a new standard of care. In addition, they may enhance the assessment of treatment efficacy and lead to improved outcomes for patients with a breast cancer diagnosis.

Survival differences between HER2-0 and HER2-low-expressing breast cancer - A meta-analysis of early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

HER2-low (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) breast cancer takes up 40-50% in all breast cancer subtypes. The survival difference between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers remain uncertain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare survival outcome of the two subtypes and to explore the impact of hormone receptor status.

METHODS

A comprehensive medical literature search was performed by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries up to August 2022. We included observational studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results of individual studies were pooled by random-effects models using Stata 16.0. Seventeen articles with a total of 78984 breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant association between low HER2 expression and better breast cancer survival outcomes (OS: HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.90; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.91). In a subgroup analysis, we found that HER2-low patients had better survival outcomes relative to hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients (OS: HR: 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.93; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.96). Similarly, in triple-negative breast cancer patients, we also observed a positive association between HER2 low expression and better survival (OS: HR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.98; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.74, 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that HER2-low breast cancer had better survival outcomes compared to HER2 negative breast cancer in patients with early stage breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status.

REGISTRATION

This meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022335704) on June 10, 2022.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Interobserver Variation in the Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Expression Levels in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Can We Improve the Identification of Low Levels of HER2 Expression by Adjusting the Criteria? An International Interobserver Study

The classification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is optimized to detect HER2-amplified breast cancer (BC). However, novel HER2-targeting agents are also effective for BCs with low levels of HER2. This raises the question whether the current guidelines for HER2 testing are sufficiently reproducible to identify HER2-low BC. The aim of this multicenter international study was to assess the interobserver agreement of specific HER2 immunohistochemistry scores in cases with negative HER2 results (0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization negative) according to the current American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the agreement improved by redefining immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring criteria or by adding fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). We conducted a 2-round study of 105 nonamplified BCs. During the first assessment, 16 pathologists used the latest version of the ASCO/CAP guidelines. After a consensus meeting, the same pathologists scored the same digital slides using modified IHC scoring criteria based on the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines, and an extra "ultralow" category was added. Overall, the interobserver agreement was limited (4.7% of cases with 100% agreement) in the first round, but this was improved by clustering IHC categories. In the second round, the highest reproducibility was observed when comparing IHC 0 with the ultralow/1+/2+ grouped cluster (74.3% of cases with 100% agreement). The FISH results were not statistically different between HER2-0 and HER2-low cases, regardless of the IHC criteria used. In conclusion, our study suggests that the modified 2007 ASCO/CAP criteria were more reproducible in distinguishing HER2-0 from HER2-low cases than the 2018 ASCO/CAP criteria. However, the reproducibility was still moderate, which was not improved by adding FISH. This could lead to a suboptimal selection of patients eligible for novel HER2-targeting agents. If the threshold between HER2 IHC 0 and 1+ is to be clinically actionable, there is a need for clearer, more reproducible IHC definitions, training, and/or development of more accurate methods to detect this subtle difference in protein expression levels.

Phase II study to investigate the efficacy of trastuzumab biosimilar (Herzuma®) plus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with heavily pretreated HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer (KCSG BR 18–14/KM10B)

We investigated the efficacy and safety of a trastuzumab biosimilar, Herzuma®, in combination with treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had failed at least two HER2 directed chemotherapies.

•

Treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer is rapidly evolving with the development of new agents. However, treatment options are still limited after progression with proven anti-HER2 therapies.

•

The combination of chemotherapy with a trastuzumab biosimilar, Herzuma®, was effective and safe in patients with heavily pre-treated HER2+ MBC.

•

Duration of response to previous anti-HER2 therapy, PIK3CA and ERBB2 mutations were associated with clinical efficacies of trastuzumab biosimilar plus chemotherapy.

Development and validation of a clinicoradiomic nomogram to assess the HER2 status of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma

Background

The determination of HER2 expression status contributes significantly to HER2-targeted therapy in breast carcinoma. However, an economical, efficient, and non-invasive assessment of HER2 is lacking. We aimed to develop a clinicoradiomic nomogram based on radiomics scores extracted from multiparametric MRI (mpMRI, including ADC-map, T2W1, DCE-T1WI) and clinical risk factors to assess HER2 status.

Methods

We retrospectively collected 214 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma between January 2018 to March 2021 from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, and randomly divided this cohort into training set (n = 128, 42 HER2-positive and 86 HER2-negative cases) and validation set (n = 86, 28 HER2-positive and 58 HER2-negative cases) at a ratio of 6:4. The original and transformed pretherapy mpMRI images were treated by semi-automated segmentation and manual modification on the DeepWise scientific research platform v1.6 (http://keyan.deepwise.com/), then radiomics feature extraction was implemented with PyRadiomics library. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) based on logistic regression (LR) and LASSO regression were adpoted to identify optimal features before modeling. LR, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), naive Bayesian (NB) and XGBoost (XGB) algorithms were used to construct the radiomics signatures. Independent clinical predictors were identified through univariate logistic analysis (age, tumor location, ki-67 index, histological grade, and lymph node metastasis). Then, the radiomics signature with the best diagnostic performance (Rad score) was further combined with significant clinical risk factors to develop a clinicoradiomic model (nomogram) using multivariate logistic regression. The discriminative power of the constructed models were evaluated by AUC, DeLong test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

70 (32.71%) of the enrolled 214 cases were HER2-positive, while 144 (67.29%) were HER2-negative. Eleven best radiomics features were retained to develop 6 radiomcis classifiers in which RF classifier showed the highest AUC of 0.887 (95%CI: 0.827–0.947) in the training set and acheived the AUC of 0.840 (95%CI: 0.758–0.922) in the validation set. A nomogram that incorporated the Rad score with two selected clinical factors (Ki-67 index and histological grade) was constructed and yielded better discrimination compared with Rad score (p = 0.374, Delong test), with an AUC of 0.945 (95%CI: 0.904–0.987) in the training set and 0.868 (95%CI: 0.789–0.948; p = 0.123) in the validation set. Moreover, calibration with the p-value of 0.732 using Hosmer–Lemeshow test demonstrated good agreement, and the DCA verified the benefits of the nomogram.

Conclusion

Post largescale validation, the clinicoradiomic nomogram may have the potential to be used as a non-invasive tool for determination of HER2 expression status in clinical HER2-targeted therapy prediction.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09967-6.

Characteristics of HER2-negative breast cancers with FISH-equivocal status according to 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline

BACKGROUND

According to 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline, HER2 FISH-equivocal breast cancers will be categorized as HER2 negative except those with IHC 3+. However, whether or not HER2 FISH-equivocal breast cancers was a heterogeneous group has not been well illustrated.

METHODS

195 HER2 FISH-equivocal breast cancer samples were collected from 2014 to 2018. The molecular subtype was identified according to 2013 St Gallen consensus, and HER2 status was also re-determined following 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. All samples were classified into 4 groups according to the average HER2 copy number (4.0-4.4, 4.5-4.9, 5.0-5.4, 5.5-5.9 signals/cell). The relationship between HER2 copy number and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed.

RESULTS

183 (93.8%) of 195 FISH-equivocal cases were classified as luminal-like subtype, while the other 12 (6.2%) were undetermined. Following 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline, all FISH-equivocal cases were recategorized as HER2 negative. Therefore, 31(15.9%) cases were luminal A-like, 152 (77.9%) were luminal B-like (HER2 negative) and 12 (6.2%) were triple negative. The average HER2 copy number showed a positive correlation with chromosome 17 polysomy, but had no significant association with other clinicopathological parameters as well as prognosis. 17 (8.7%) patients were treated with trastuzumab, but showed no difference in prognosis with those who didn't receive targeted therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, all HER2 FISH-equivocal breast cancers were recategorized as HER2 negative according to 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. Most of these patients were luminal B-like (HER2 negative). The average HER2 copy number had no significant association with clinicopathological parameters, as well as prognosis.

Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy is associated with HER2 immunohistochemistry score in HER2-positive early breast cancer

To evaluate whether pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy is dependent on the HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score.A total of 181 HER2-positive early breast cancer patients who had received neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy were included in this study. Associations were examined between IHC score and tumor pCR status (commonly defined by ypT0+ypN0, ypT0/is+ypN0, or ypT0/is).In trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant-treated patients, ypT0+ypN0 was achieved in 46.0% of patients with HER2 IHC 3+ tumors but only 25.0% of patients with HER2 IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-positive tumors (P = .016). When pCR was defined as ypT0/is+ypN0 or ypT0/is, 54.7% and 61.3% of patients with HER2 IHC 3+ tumors had a pCR, whereas only 29.5% and 38.6% with HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive tumors achieved pCR (P = .004 and P = .008, respectively). The association between dual HER2 blockade and pCR was almost exclusively confined to HER2 IHC 3+ tumors (ypT0+ypN0: 61.9% vs 38.9%, P = .013; ypT0/is+ypN0: 71.4% vs 47.4%, P = .009; and ypT0/is: 81.0% vs 52.6%, P = .002) and was absent in HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive tumors. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that HER2 IHC 3+ tumors had a significantly higher probability of achieving ypT0+ypN0 (odds ratio [OR], 0.265; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.109-0.645; P = .003), ypT0/is+ypN0 (OR, 0.221; 95% CI, 0.094-0.521; P = .001), and ypT0/is (OR, 0.254; 95% CI, 0.111-0.583; P = .001) than HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive tumors. A significantly better pCR rate was also found in patients with T1 tumors and patients with dual HER2 blockade.The pCR rate was highly correlated with the HER2 IHC score in neoadjuvant anti-HER2 treatment. The addition of pertuzumab to a neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based regimen improved pCR rates, but there was no significant difference in pCR rates in the IHC 2+/FISH-positive group. This suggests that HER2 IHC scores can predict the effectiveness of treatment.

Review: Radionuclide Molecular Imaging Targeting HER2 in Breast Cancer with a Focus on Molecular Probes into Clinical Trials and Small Peptides

As the most frequently occurring cancer worldwide, breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in women. The overexpression of HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) is found in about 15% of BC patients, and it is often associated with a poor prognosis due to the effect on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and survival. As a result of the heterogeneity of BC, molecular imaging with HER2 probes can non-invasively, in real time, and quantitatively reflect the expression status of HER2 in tumors. This will provide a new approach for patients to choose treatment options and monitor treatment response. Furthermore, radionuclide molecular imaging has the potential of repetitive measurements, and it can help solve the problem of heterogeneous expression and conversion of HER2 status during disease progression or treatment. Different imaging probes of targeting proteins, such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments, nanobodies, and affibodies, are currently in preclinical and clinical development. Moreover, in recent years, HER2-specific peptides have been widely developed for molecular imaging techniques for HER2-positive cancers. This article summarized different types of molecular probes targeting HER2 used in current clinical applications and the developmental trend of some HER2-specific peptides.

Radiomics Signatures Based on Multiparametric MRI for the Preoperative Prediction of the HER2 Status of Patients with Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to preoperatively predict the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of patients with breast cancer using radiomics signatures based on single-parametric and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Three hundred six patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type (IDC-NST) were retrospectively enrolled. Quantitative imaging features were extracted from fat-suppressed T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1 weighted (DCE-T1) preoperative MRI. Then, three radiomics signatures based on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, DCE-T1 images and their combination were developed using a support vector machine (SVM) to predict the HER2-positive vs HER2-negative status of patients with breast cancer. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to assess the predictive performances of the signatures.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight quantitative radiomics features, namely, 14 texture features, 4 first-order features, 9 wavelet features, and 1 shape feature, were used to construct radiomics signatures. The performance of the radiomics signatures for distinguishing HER2-positive from HER2-negative breast cancer based on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, DCE-T1 images, and their combination had an AUC of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.700 to 0.770), 0.71 (0.673 to 0.738), and 0.86 (0.832 to 0.882) in the primary cohort and 0.70 (0.666 to 0.744), 0.68 (0.650 to 0.726), and 0.81 (0.776 to 0.837) in the validation cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics signatures based on multiparametric MRI represent a potential and efficient alternative tool to evaluate the HER2 status in patients with breast cancer.

Lower response to trastuzumab emtansine in metastatic breast cancer patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry score of 2 and fluorescence in situ hybridization positive compared with immunohistochemistry score of 3: a retrospective study

Tumor human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is defined by either protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Approximately 20% of HER2-positive breast cancer is HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive. Unlike trastuzumab, it has not been studied whether the response to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) differs according to HER2-positive status. We retrospectively identified and reviewed medical records of all patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) who received T-DM1 in our hospital from October 2013 to December 2016. We compared the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients in the HER2 IHC 3+ group and those in the HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive group. A total of 39 patients (IHC 3+: n = 32; IHC 2+/FISH-positive: n = 7) were analyzed. Nineteen (48.7%), 13 (33.3%), and 29 (74.4%) patients had received at least one prior chemotherapy, more than three lines of chemotherapy, and prior pertuzumab for ABC, respectively. ORR was significantly higher in the IHC 3+ group than in the IHC 2+/FISH-positive group (53.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.024). Median PFS was 7.9 months in the IHC 3+ group versus 3.9 months in the IHC 2+/FISH-positive group (hazard ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.69, P = 0.408). Among the HER2-positive ABC patients treated with T-DM1, ORR was significantly worse in HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive than in HER2 IHC 3+ patients. Median PFS tended to be shorter in patients with HER2 IHC 2+/FISH-positive.

Notch3 inhibits cell proliferation and tumorigenesis and predicts better prognosis in breast cancer through transactivating PTEN

Notch receptors (Notch1-4) play critical roles in tumorigenesis and metastasis of malignant tumors, including breast cancer. Although abnormal Notch activation is related to various tumors, the importance of single receptors and their mechanism of activation in distinct breast cancer subtypes are still unclear. Previous studies by our group demonstrated that Notch3 may inhibit the emergence and progression of breast cancer. PTEN is a potent tumor suppressor, and its loss of function is sufficient to promote the occurrence and progression of tumors. Intriguingly, numerous studies have revealed that Notch1 is involved in the regulation of PTEN through its binding to CBF-1, a Notch transcription factor, and the PTEN promoter. In this study, we found that Notch3 and PTEN levels correlated with the luminal phenotype in breast cancer cell lines. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Notch3 transactivated PTEN by binding CSL-binding elements in the PTEN promoter and, at least in part, inhibiting the PTEN downstream AKT-mTOR pathway. Notably, Notch3 knockdown downregulated PTEN and promoted cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. In contrast, overexpression of the Notch3 intracellular domain upregulated PTEN and inhibited cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, inhibition or overexpression of PTEN partially reversed the promotion or inhibition of cell proliferation induced by Notch3 alterations. In general, Notch3 expression positively correlated with elevated expression of PTEN, ER, lower Ki-67 index, and incidence of involved node status and predicted better recurrence-free survival in breast cancer patients. Therefore, our findings demonstrate that Notch3 inhibits breast cancer proliferation and suppresses tumorigenesis by transactivating PTEN expression.

Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy on prognosis in small hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has been previously established. However, significant adverse events related to endocrine therapy cannot be ignored. T1 breast cancer is expected to have a good prognosis. Therefore, adjuvant endocrine therapy for T1a breast cancer patients is controversial. Thus, in this study, we examined the effect of endocrine therapy on the prognosis of T1N0 hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients in each tumor size group, and re-considered the application of endocrine therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively obtained clinical and pathological data from medical records of 7635 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer at Aichi Cancer Hospital between January 2000 and December 2017. The primary end point of our analysis was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end points were distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). The log-rank test, cumulative survival generated curves with Kaplan-Meier methods and the hazard ratio (HR) calculated with a Cox regression model were used to assess the effects of endocrine therapy on prognosis.

RESULTS

The 5-year DFS was worse in the non-endocrine therapy (non-ET) group (78%) than the endocrine therapy (ET) group (95%) in the T1c population (p < 0.001, HR 0.25). However, there was no statistically significant difference in DFS between the ET and the non-ET groups in T1a (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.9314, HR 0.94) and T1b (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.1481HR 0.53) breast cancer. The OS, DDFS, and BCSS of the patients also showed that endocrine therapy was associated with improvement of the prognosis in the T1c group, but not in the T1a and T1b groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant endocrine therapy may be essential for T1c breast cancer patients. In contrast, this therapy should be discussed for T1a and T1b luminal breast cancer patients under some circumstances, such as suffering from adverse events.

A population-based comparison of treatment, resource utilization, and costs by cancer stage for Ontario patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

We sought to expand the currently limited, Canadian, population-based data on the characteristics, treatment pathways, and health care costs according to stage in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

We extracted data from the publicly funded health care system in Ontario. Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and health care costs were descriptively compared by cancer stage (I-III vs. IV) for adult women diagnosed with invasive HER2+ BC between 2012 and 2016. Resource use was multiplied by unit costs for publicly funded health care services to calculate costs.

RESULTS

Overall, 4535 patients with stage I-III and 354 with stage IV HER2+ BC were identified. Most patients with stage I-III disease were treated with surgery (4372, 96.4%), with the majority having a lumpectomy, and 3521 (77.6%) received radiation. Neoadjuvant (NAT) and adjuvant (AT) systemic treatment rates were 20.1% (n = 920) and 88.8% (n = 3065), respectively. Systemic treatment was received by 311 patients (87.9%) with metastatic HER2+ BC, 264 of whom (84.9%) received trastuzumab. Annual health care costs per patient were nearly 3 times higher for stage IV vs. stage I-III HER2+ BC.

CONCLUSION

Per-patient annual costs were substantially higher for women with metastatic HER2+ BC, despite less frequent exposure to surgery and radiation compared to those with early stage disease. Increasing NAT rates in early stage disease represent a critical opportunity to prevent recurrence and reduce the costs associated with treating metastatic HER2+ BC.

Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry

In 2018, the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists revised the criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) equivocal (2+) classification in their updated guideline. We reviewed invasive breast cancer specimens originally classified as equivocal (2+) under the 2018 guideline that underwent HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing from August 2018 to August 2019 at our Canadian reference hospital to investigate cases with ambiguous staining patterns between the 1+ and 2+ definitions. Demographics, pathologic features, and pre-analytic conditions were recorded. The H&E and corresponding HER2 IHC slides were reviewed to confirm tumor type and grade, and classify as HER2 indeterminate, 0, 1+, 2+, or "Intermediate" (staining features between the 1+ and 2+ classifications). FISH testing was performed on 289 cases and 273 met inclusion criteria. The FISH-amplified rate was 12.1%. Upon IHC review, 44.7% (122/273) of cases were reclassified as Intermediate. These cases had incomplete staining with moderate intensity (43/122, 35.3%) and/or <10% complete weak or moderate staining (102/122, 83.6%). Intermediate cases had a significantly lower frequency of amplified FISH results than 2+ cases (p < 0.0001), with only four (3.3%) FISH positive and two (1.6%) FISH heterogeneous. Our study highlights the ambiguity in the current guideline for classifying some HER2 IHC patterns. As the rate of gene amplification in these cases was low (4.9%), we recommend adhering to the 2018 HER2 2+ criteria for reflex FISH testing. However, cases with <10% moderate complete staining and certain heterogeneous patterns warrant special consideration. Further descriptive clarification of 1+ criteria is needed.

Impact of the Updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer

CONTEXT.—

The updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer requires pathologists to re-evaluate HER2 status.

OBJECTIVE.—

To define HER2 status of breast cancer using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

DESIGN.—

Diagnostic reports of invasive breast cancers made between 2014 and 2018 with HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization results were retrieved. HER2 status was re-defined using the updated recommendations.

RESULTS.—

Of 2514 tumors, 89.7% (2254 of 2514) suggested for fluorescence in situ hybridization assay were HER2 immunohistochemistry 2+. Approximately 8.9% (225 of 2514) and 1.4% (35 of 2514) of tumors were of immunohistochemistry 0/1+ and 3+, respectively. Based on the average HER2 copy number and HER2:CEP17 ratio, tumors were assigned into 5 groups, including 13.1% (330 of 2514) group 1 tumors, 2.1% (52 of 2514) group 2 tumors, 1.1% (27 of 2514) group 3 tumors, 7.0% (175 of 2514) group 4 tumors, and 76.8% (1930 of 2514) group 5 tumors. In combination with immunohistochemistry, all tumors in group 2 and group 4 changed HER2 status, from positive and equivocal into negative, respectively, while group 3 tumors remained positive. Comparative analyses of clinicopathologic features of tumors in different groups revealed that group 2 and 4 tumors displayed worse clinicopathologic features than those of group 5, while group 3 tumors shared similar clinicopathologic features to those of group 1.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Following the updated guideline, HER2 status is clearly designated. Significant differences regarding clinical features were observed between tumors in different groups but they share the same HER2 status, suggesting further validation of the accuracy of this diagnostic approach is warranted.

TRPC1 inhibits the proliferation and migration of estrogen receptor-positive Breast cancer and gives a better prognosis by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway

PURPOSE

Previous studies have indicated that transient receptor potential (TRP) channels can influence cancer development. The TRPC subfamily consists of seven subtypes, TRPC1 - TRPC7. Interestingly, the expression levels of TRPC1 have been shown to be totally different in different breast cancer cell lines. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism remains unknown. In this study, we explore the significance of TRPC1 expression in breast cancer.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical TRPC1 staining was performed in 278 samples. TRPC1 expression in different breast tissues were examined. Then, the influence of TRPC1 on migration, invasion and proliferation was explored. We analyzed the protein of TRPC1 by Western blot to prove which pathway may be involved in. Finally, we use online database to predict the prognosis of TRPC1 in breast cancer.

RESULTS

Through immunohistochemistry and in vitro experiments, we found that the expression level of TRPC1 was higher in breast cancer cells as compared with that in normal breast epithelial cells. Moreover, the expression level of TRPC1 was different between estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) and -negative (ER -) breast cancer. It was shown that TRPC1 inhibited MCF7 cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro. Western blotting revealed that TRPC1 inhibited the PI3K/AKT pathway and epithelium-mesenchymal transformation, leading to subsequent inhibition of cell proliferation and metastasis. In luminal A and luminal B patients, those with high TRPC1 expression had a better prognosis. On the contrary, in basal-like and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes, patients with high-TRPC1 expression had a worse prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that TRPC1 was high expression in breast cancer. Overexpression of TRPC1 inhibits proliferation and migration of ER + breast cancer and gives a better prognosis by inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway activation. TRPC1 may be an independent prognostic predictor in breast cancer patients.

Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines on various HER2 reporting categories in breast cancer by fluorescentin-situhybridization and Immunohistochemistry: A meta-analysis with systematic review

Objective:

The ASCO/CAP guidelines for reporting HER2 in breast cancer, first released in 2007, aimed to standardize the reporting protocol, and were updated in 2013 and 2018, to ensure right treatment. Several studies have analyzed the changes attributed to 2013 updated guidelines, and majority of them found increase in positive and equivocal cases. However, the precise implication of these updated guidelines is still contentious, in spite of the latest update (2018 guidelines) addressing some of the issues. We conducted systematic review and meta- analysis to see the impact of 2013 guidelines on various HER2 reporting categories by both FISH and IHC.

Materials and Methods:

After extensively searching the pertinent literature, 16 studies were included for the systematic review. We divided our approach in three strategies: (1) Studies in which breast cancer cases were scored for HER2 by FISH or IHC as a primary test concurrently by both 2007 and 2013 guidelines, (2) Studies in which HER2 results were equivocal by IHC and were followed by reflex-FISH test by both 2007 and 2013 guidelines, and (3) Studies in which trends of HER2 reporting were compared in the two periods before and after implementation of updated 2013 guidelines. All the paired data in these respective categories was pooled and analyzed statistically to see the overall impact of the updated guidelines.

Results:

In the first category, by pooled analysis of primary FISH testing there has been a significant increase in the equivocal cases (P< 0.001) and positive cases (P= 0.037). We also found 8.3% and 0.8% of all the negative cases from 2007 guidelines shifted to equivocal and positive categories, respectively. Similarly by primary IHC testing there has been a significant increase in both equivocal cases (P< 0.001) and positive cases (P= 0.02). In the second category of reflex-FISH testing there was a substantial increase in the equivocal cases (P< 0.0001); however there is insignificant decrease (10% to 9.7%;P= 0.66) in the amplified cases. In the third approach for evaluating the trend, with the implementation of 2013 guidelines, there was increase in the equivocal category (P= 0.025) and positive category (P= 0.0088) by IHC. By FISH test also there was significant increase in the equivocal category (P< 0.001) while the increase in the positive category was non-significant (P= 0.159).

Conclusions:

The updated 2013 guidelines has significantly increased the positive and equivocal cases using primary FISH or IHC test and with further reflex testing, thereby increasing the double equivocal cases and increasing the cost and delaying the decision for definite management. However, whether the additional patients becoming eligible for HDT will derive treatment benefit needs to be answered by further large clinical trials.

Clinical and epidemiologic factors associated with breast cancer and its subtypes among Northeast Chinese women

The incidence of breast cancer has increased dramatically in China. We evaluated the clinical and epidemiologic factors associated with breast cancer, and its stage in a case‐control study of Northeast Chinese women. We also examined whether these factors were differentially distributed among molecular subtypes of breast cancer in a case‐only analysis. We identified 1118 breast cancer patients and 2284 healthy women from Cancer Hospital of Medical University between January 2014 and December 2017. Logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We found that postmenopausal women had a decreased risk of breast cancer (multivariate‐adjusted OR = 0.33, 95% CI:0.25‐0.43), and tended to have breast cancer of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐overexpressing (multivariate‐adjusted OR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.49‐5.97) and triple‐negative (multivariate‐adjusted OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.02‐4.56) subtypes, compared with the luminal B subtype. Women with history of abortion had an increased risk of breast cancer (multivariate‐adjusted OR = 4.70, 95% CI: 3.60‐6.14). Women with high breast density and high Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) scores of lesions tended to have breast cancer of advanced stage, but were not differentially distributed among its molecular subtypes. In conclusion, postmenopausal women had decreased risk of breast cancer, and tended to have nonluminal subtype, while women with history of abortion had increased risk of breast cancer. Women with high breast density and BIRADS scores of lesions tended to have advanced stage breast cancer. We provide evidence on the epidemiologic factors for breast cancer and its subtypes, which may help with breast cancer risk stratification.

Changing patterns and survival improvements of young breast cancer in China and SEER database, 19992017

Objective

Breast cancer in young females was usually considered more aggressive and requires aggressive therapy. We investigated whether early detection and improved treatments changed the patterns of characteristics, management and outcomes of young breast cancer patients over time.

Methods

Females under 40 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer during the periods 1999−2017 and 1999−2015 were identified in the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) and the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry, respectively. Clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment information were collected. Patients diagnosed before 2013 were followed up.

Results

The proportions of young breast cancer patients were 15.0% and 5.3% in the FUSCC and SEER cohorts, respectively. In the FUSCC cohort, there was a significant increase in the proportion of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (from 8.8% to 16.9%; P<0.0001) and it remained stable in SEER cohort. The proportion of T1-stage tumors increased dramatically in the FUSCC cohort (from 35.3% to 41.9%; P=0.008), whereas it decreased in SEER cohort (from 42.4% to 33.0%; P<0.0001). The percentage of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cancers was consistently increased in both the invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and DCIS patients in the two cohorts. Breast-conserving surgery and immediate implant reconstruction after mastectomy both exhibited increased use over time in the FUSCC cohort. Both the FUSCC and SEER cohorts showed a significantly better prognosis in the recent time period.

Conclusions

With the increased early-stage and ER-positive diseases in young patients as well as better systemic treatment strategies, improved survival has been observed in recent years. There has been a substantial de-escalation in surgical therapies in young breast cancer patients.

Targeted therapeutic options and future perspectives for HER2-positive breast cancer

Over the past 2 decades, there has been an extraordinary progress in the regimens developed for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) are commonly recommended anti-HER2 target agents by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This review summarizes the most significant and updated research on clinical scenarios related to HER2-positive breast cancer management in order to revise the guidelines of everyday clinical practices. In this article, we present the data on anti-HER2 clinical research of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic studies from the past 2 decades. We also highlight some of the promising strategies that should be critically considered. Lastly, this review lists some of the ongoing clinical trials, findings of which may soon be available.

Pharmacogenetics in the clinical analysis laboratory: clinical practice, research, and drug development pipeline

Introduction: Over the last decade, the spread of next-generation sequencing technology along with the rising cost in health management in national health systems has led to widespread use/abuse of pharmacogenetic tests (PGx) in the practice of many clinical disciplines. However, given their clinical significance, it is important to standardize these tests for having an interaction with the clinical analysis laboratory (CAL), in which a PGx service can meet these requirements. Areas covered: A diagnostic test must meet the criteria of reproducibility and validity for its utility in the clinical routine. This present review mainly describes the utility of introducing PGx tests in the CAL routine to produce correct results useful for setting up personalized drug treatments. Expert opinion: With a PGx service, CALs can provide the right tool to help clinicians to make better choices about different categories of drugs and their dosage and to manage the economic impact both in hospital-based settings and in National Health Services, throughout electronic health records. Advances in PGx also allow a new approach for pharmaceutical companies in order to improve drug development and clinical trials. As a result, CALs can achieve a powerful source of epidemiological, clinical, and research findings from PGx tests.

Assessing the impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma

The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recently updated their recommendations on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in invasive breast cancer, with a focus on the clarification of less common test patterns of ISH. We assessed the impact of the updated ASCO/CAP guidelines on 1044 FISH tested tumors by comparing categorization according to the 2007, 2013, and 2018 ISH classification criteria. The 2013 guidelines increased the number of positive cases (17.4% vs 10.7%) identifying 70 (6.7%) additional patients who met the eligibility criteria for consideration for HER2-targeted therapy compared with the 2007 guidelines. There was a reduction in equivocal tumors (7.7%) with tumors classified as equivocal by the 2007 guidelines (n = 136) redistributed into positive (74, 54.4%) and negative (49, 36.0%) groups. The 2018 guidelines reclassified 10.8% of tumors in our series with a reduction in the number of positive tumors (7.1%). While the proportion of positive tumors (10.2%) was similar to that in 2007 (10.7%), the composition of this group was significantly altered. HER2 equivocal cases, a group which under the 2013 guidelines caused diagnostic and treatment difficulties, were largely eliminated. Our findings suggest that the 2018 update represents a potentially significant change in therapeutic options for a substantial proportion of patients with 2.9% of FISH-positive tumors according to the 2007 and 2013 guidelines now categorized as HER2 negative and, thus, ineligible for HER2-targeted therapy.

What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases?

To evaluate the effect of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline in the identification of HER2-positive breast carcinomas (BC) in reflex in situ hybridization (ISH) test. A total of 592 primary invasive BC cases from before and after the publication of the updated ASCO/CAP guideline were evaluated for HER2 amplification by silver ISH according to the 2013 and 2018 guidelines. Cases were mostly (95%) HER2 equivocal by immunohistochemistry (IHC), not centrally reviewed. Other reasons for referring cases were IHC confirmation, IHC discordancy (either between needle-core-biopsy (NCB) and surgical excision specimen (SES) or between different laboratories) and IHC result unexpected for histopathologic features. Cases evaluated with the 2013 guideline (1st cohort) were 14.6% HER2-positive, decreasing significantly after the reclassification with the 2018 guideline due to the exclusion of group 2 cases without HER2 protein overexpression. Cases studied after the implementation of the 2018 guideline (2nd cohort) were 8.7% HER2-positive, a frequency that was not significantly different from the reclassification of the 1st cohort with the 2018 guideline. All cases referred for IHC confirmation had the expected ISH result. Cases with IHC discordancy between NCB and SES were ISH concordant. Only one out of 14 cases with an IHC score 3+ and classified as histological grade 1 or with a Ki67 below 10% was classified as ISH HER2-positive. The 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline resulted in a decrease of HER2-positive cases in reflex ISH test, selecting less patients for anti-HER2-targeted therapy.

The FDA-Approved Breast Cancer HER2 Evaluation Kit (HercepTest; Dako) May Miss Some HER2-Positive Breast Cancers

OBJECTIVES

Accurate evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer is critical.

METHODS

HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests were performed on 52 cases using a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved kit (HercepTest, FDA kit) and a laboratory-developed test (LDT) with the HercepTest antibody and a Leica Bond automated stainer.

RESULTS

By FISH, 22 were HER2 positive, 29 were negative, and one was equivocal. Of the 22 HER2 FISH-positive cases, five were negative by the FDA kit and none by LDT. The five discrepant cases were retested using the same FDA kit in another Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory, and all five cases were still negative. None of the 29 HER2 FISH-negative cases were positive by the FDA kit or LDT. The overall IHC-FISH concordance rate was 90.4% for the FDA kit and 100% for the LDT.

CONCLUSIONS

The FDA kit may miss some HER2-positive cases. The LDT has a higher sensitivity and a higher concordance rate with FISH results.

Relationship between Ribosomal Protein S6-pS240 Expression and other Prognostic Factors in Non-Special Type Invasive Breast Cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of ribosomal protein (RP) S6-pS240 in non-special type invasive breast cancer in relation to other prognostic markers and gain new insights to facilitate more individualized treatment.

Methods

The following clinical and histopathological parameters of 120 patients were determined: S6-pS240 expression, age, menopausal status, tumor size and grade, TNM stage, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), lymph node stage, estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) expression, HER2/neu amplification, lymphovascular invasion, and proliferative index as measured by Ki-67. Treatment protocol and disease-free survival were evaluated accordingly.

Results

Significant positive correlations were seen between S6-pS240 expression and Ki-67 values (rho = 0.530, p < 0.001), and NPI (rho = 0.370, p < 0.001) and HER2/neu amplification (rho = 0.368, p < 0.001). A negative correlation was found between S6-pS240 and ER/PR expression (rho = 0.362, p < 0.001). Patients with negative RP S6-pS240 expression had significantly longer disease-free survival (log-rank test, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Immunohistochemical analysis of RP S6-pS240 is a valuable additional prognostic marker in patients with invasive breast cancer. Routine use of S6-pS240 immunohistochemistry is recommended.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update

PURPOSE.—

To update key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer guideline.

METHODS.—

Based on the signals approach, an Expert Panel reviewed published literature and research survey results on the observed frequency of less common in situ hybridization (ISH) patterns to update the recommendations.

RECOMMENDATIONS.—

Two recommendations addressed via correspondence in 2015 are included. First, immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ is defined as invasive breast cancer with weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in >10% of tumor cells. Second, if the initial HER2 test result in a core needle biopsy specimen of a primary breast cancer is negative, a new HER2 test may (not "must") be ordered on the excision specimen based on specific clinical criteria. The HER2 testing algorithm for breast cancer is updated to address the recommended workup for less common clinical scenarios (approximately 5% of cases) observed when using a dual-probe ISH assay. These scenarios are described as ISH group 2 ( HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 [CEP17] ratio ≥2.0; average HER2 copy number <4.0 signals per cell), ISH group 3 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥6.0 signals per cell), and ISH group 4 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 and <6.0 signals per cell). The diagnostic approach includes more rigorous interpretation criteria for ISH and requires concomitant IHC review for dual-probe ISH groups 2 to 4 to arrive at the most accurate HER2 status designation (positive or negative) based on combined interpretation of the ISH and IHC assays. The Expert Panel recommends that laboratories using single-probe ISH assays include concomitant IHC review as part of the interpretation of all single-probe ISH assay results.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update

Purpose To update key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer guideline. Methods Based on the signals approach, an Expert Panel reviewed published literature and research survey results on the observed frequency of less common in situ hybridization (ISH) patterns to update the recommendations. Recommendations Two recommendations addressed via correspondence in 2015 are included. First, immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ is defined as invasive breast cancer with weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in > 10% of tumor cells. Second, if the initial HER2 test result in a core needle biopsy specimen of a primary breast cancer is negative, a new HER2 test may (not "must") be ordered on the excision specimen based on specific clinical criteria. The HER2 testing algorithm for breast cancer is updated to address the recommended work-up for less common clinical scenarios (approximately 5% of cases) observed when using a dual-probe ISH assay. These scenarios are described as ISH group 2 ( HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 [CEP17] ratio ≥ 2.0; average HER2 copy number < 4.0 signals per cell), ISH group 3 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio < 2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥ 6.0 signals per cell), and ISH group 4 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio < 2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥ 4.0 and < 6.0 signals per cell). The diagnostic approach includes more rigorous interpretation criteria for ISH and requires concomitant IHC review for dual-probe ISH groups 2 to 4 to arrive at the most accurate HER2 status designation (positive or negative) based on combined interpretation of the ISH and IHC assays. The Expert Panel recommends that laboratories using single-probe ISH assays include concomitant IHC review as part of the interpretation of all single-probe ISH assay results. Find additional information at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .