1
|
Withofs N, Bonnet C, Hustinx R. 2-deoxy-2-[ 18F]FDG PET Imaging for Therapy Assessment in Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas. PET Clin 2024; 19:447-462. [PMID: 38945737 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
The 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) has contributed to outcome improvement of patients with lymphoma. The use of [18F]FDG PET/CT for staging and response assessment is successfully applied both in routine clinical practice and in clinical trials. The challenges lie in enhancing the outcomes of lymphoma patients, particularly those with advanced or refractory/relapsed disease, and to minimize the long-term toxicity associated with treatments, including radiation therapy. The objective of this review article is to present contemporary data on the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT for treatment assessment of aggressive lymphomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Withofs
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, CHU of Liege, Quartier Hopital, Avenue de l'hopital 1, Liege, Belgium; GIGA-Nuclear Medicine Lab, University of Liege, CHU - B34 Quartier Hôpital, Avenue de l'Hôpital 11, Liège, BELGIQUE.
| | - Christophe Bonnet
- Department of Hematology, CHU of Liege, Quartier Hôpital, Avenue de l'hôpital 1, 4000 Liege 1, Belgium
| | - Roland Hustinx
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, CHU of Liege, Quartier Hopital, Avenue de l'hopital 1, Liege, Belgium; GIGA-Nuclear Medicine Lab, University of Liege, CHU - B34 Quartier Hôpital, Avenue de l'Hôpital 11, Liège, BELGIQUE
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heger JM, Mammadova L, Mattlener J, Sobesky S, Cirillo M, Altmüller J, Kirst E, Reinke S, Klapper W, Bröckelmann PJ, Ferdinandus J, Kaul H, Schneider G, Schneider J, Schleifenbaum JK, Ullrich RT, Freihammer M, Awerkiew S, Lohmann M, Klein F, Nürnberg P, Hallek M, Rossi D, Mauz-Körholz C, Gattenlöhner S, Bräuninger A, Borchmann P, von Tresckow B, Borchmann S. Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing for Biologic Classification and Individualized Risk Stratification in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301867. [PMID: 39348625 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Current clinical challenges in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) include difficult-to-treat relapsed/refractory disease and considerable long-term toxicities of treatment. Since clinical risk factors lack discriminatory power, intensity of therapy is mainly based on tumor burden. Exploring HL genetics and tumor microenvironment (TME) might provide valuable insights for improved risk stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this study, we applied circulating tumor DNA sequencing to 243 patients obtained from pivotal German Hodgkin Study Group trials to identify subtypes of HL. Independent validation of the subtypes was performed in 96 patients treated in the EuroNet-PHL-C2 study. Outcome differences of subtypes were assessed in an event-enriched clinical validation cohort comprising 72 patients from the HD21 trial, using a refined, validated, and clinically feasible assay. RESULTS We propose a biologic classification of HL consisting of three distinct subtypes: inflammatory immune escape HL is characterized by frequent copy-number variations including immune escape variants such as high-level amplifications of the PD-L1 locus and an inflammatory TME. Virally-driven HL is associated with Epstein-Barr virus and/or human herpesvirus 6 and an inflammatory TME with neutrophils and macrophages, while the tumor mutational burden (TMB) is low. Oncogene-driven HL is defined by a high TMB, recurrent mutations in oncogenic drivers such as TNFAIP3, ITPKB, and SOCS1, and a cold TME. A refined and validated assay version aiming at clinically feasible risk stratification showed significant progression-free survival differences between subtypes. In addition, assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) allowed for the detection of patients at very high risk of relapse within the subtypes. CONCLUSION We propose a clinically feasible, noninvasive method for individualized risk stratification and MRD monitoring in patients with HL on the basis of circulating tumor DNA sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Michel Heger
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany
- Mildred Scheel School of Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (MSSO ABCD), Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Laman Mammadova
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Mattlener
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Sophia Sobesky
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Melita Cirillo
- University of Western Australia and Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Janine Altmüller
- West German Genome Center (WGGC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Technology Platform Genomics, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Kirst
- West German Genome Center (WGGC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Hematopathology Section and Lymph Node Registry, Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sarah Reinke
- Hematopathology Section and Lymph Node Registry, Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Wolfram Klapper
- Hematopathology Section and Lymph Node Registry, Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Paul J Bröckelmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany
- Mildred Scheel School of Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (MSSO ABCD), Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany
| | - Justin Ferdinandus
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Kaul
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Jessica Schneider
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Katharina Schleifenbaum
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Roland T Ullrich
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Max Freihammer
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Awerkiew
- Institute for Virology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mia Lohmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK Partner Site Essen), Essen, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Klein
- Institute for Virology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Nürnberg
- West German Genome Center (WGGC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Hallek
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Davide Rossi
- Division of Hematology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Christine Mauz-Körholz
- Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunodeficiencies, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Medical Faculty of the Martin-Luther-University of Halle, Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Bräuninger
- Institute for Pathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK Partner Site Essen), Essen, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sven Borchmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cellini A, Cavarretta CA, Angotzi F, Ruocco V, Serafin A, Danesin N, Pizzi M, Gregianin M, Vio S, Crimì F, Vianello F, Piazza F, Trentin L, Visentin A. Baseline prognostic predictors in classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: a retrospective, single-center analysis on patients treated with PET/CT-guided ABVD. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1419118. [PMID: 39301543 PMCID: PMC11410762 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1419118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The identification of baseline prognostic factors in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma could help in tailoring a risk-based approach as the therapeutic landscape expands. Currently, the International Prognostic Score (IPS) represents the most used prediction tool in clinical practice, but other potential baseline risk predictors have been identified. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis in a cohort of 274 patients treated with 18FDG-PET/CT-guided ABVD to assess the prognostic significance of the IPS risk factors, and to validate the impact of the peripheral blood lymphocyte to monocyte (LMR) and neutrophil to lymphocyte (NLR) ratios on prognosis definition. Results Among the considered risk factors, stage IV disease (HR 1.83), leukocytosis (HR 2.28), anemia (HR 3.23) and low LMR (HR 2.01) significantly predicted PFS, whereas male sex (HR 2.93), stage IV disease (HR 3.00) and lymphopenia (HR 7.84) significantly predicted OS. A 4 variable and a 3 variable prognostic system was subsequently proposed for PFS and OS, respectively. In both cases, a stark decrease in the survival probability was documented as the score increased. Moreover, by selecting only the significant IPS items and considering a more recently proposed prognostic factor (LMR) we were able to better identify patients at higher risk of relapsing after PET/CT-guided ABVD. Discussion Although the IPS was still able to identify a subgroup of high-risk patients within our cohort of individuals treated with PET/CT-guided ABVD, not all the risk factors that it considers were found to have an impact on survival times. Moreover, by selecting only the significant IPS items and considering a more recently proposed prognostic factor (LMR) we were able to better identify patients at higher risk of relapse, in an effort to contribute to the building of a modern risk prediction tool that can help guide treatment choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Cellini
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Angotzi
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Valeria Ruocco
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrea Serafin
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicolò Danesin
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Pizzi
- Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Michele Gregianin
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Stefania Vio
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Filippo Crimì
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Federica Vianello
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Piazza
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Livio Trentin
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrea Visentin
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luttwak E, Moskowitz AJ. What is the best salvage therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma? Curr Opin Oncol 2024; 36:346-352. [PMID: 39007229 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000001073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Historically, salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) was the mainstay approach for relapsed or refractory classic HL. The emergence of novel agents for HL, such as brentuximab vedotin and programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade has revolutionized therapeutic strategies, yielding excellent results. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of new salvage therapies and offer insights into forthcoming therapeutic options. RECENT FINDINGS The incorporation of brentuximab vedotin and PD-1 blockade into salvage therapy before HDT/ASCT has led to markedly improved outcomes. Notably, PD-1 based salvage studies yield posttransplant 2-year progression-free survival rates approaching 90%, marking a significant advancement in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Studies are beginning to explore nontransplant treatment approaches following front-line treatment failure and may identify certain risk groups eligible for these strategies. SUMMARY The landscape of HL treatment is rapidly evolving, leading to significant changes in the standard of care. Novel agents are now administered earlier in the disease course, resulting in higher cure rates. The focus of treatment is shifting towards achieving cure with minimal toxicity, reducing exposure to various agents, and advancing research in optimizing treatment sequencing and patient selection for less intensive therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efrat Luttwak
- Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bröckelmann PJ. Treatment approaches for older Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Curr Opin Oncol 2024; 36:353-359. [PMID: 39005230 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000001071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) occurs at two age peaks around 25 and 60 years of age. Due to varying fitness and co-morbidities older patients are a heterogeneous group that has relatively poor treatment outcomes. The evolving therapeutic landscape for older HL is summarized herein. RECENT FINDINGS Due to lack of data from larger trials and approval of novel drugs, first-line treatment of limited-stage HL (i.e. early-stage favourable and unfavourable) remains largely A(B)VD and radiotherapy based. For patients with advanced-stage HL, the anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin is approved in combination with AVD chemotherapy (BV-AVD). Due to toxicities such as febrile neutropenia or polyneuropathy and lack of improvement in progression-free and overall survival in the older subgroup, fully concomitant BV-AVD is however not used widely. More recently, promising early data was reported with the combination of nivolumab and AVD (N-AVD) in patients >60 years with advanced-stage HL. Second-line treatment depends on fitness and might include high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for selected patients. For unfit or multiply relapsed patients, anti-PD1 antibodies are the preferred treatment option. SUMMARY The increasing number of older HL patients constitutes a therapeutic challenge despite recent advances and the increased usage of targeted agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Bröckelmann
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG)
- Max Planck Research Group Mechanisms of DNA Repair, Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stepanishyna Y, Meunier F, Bron D. Survivorship after Hodgkin lymphoma and the right to be forgotten. Curr Opin Oncol 2024; 36:360-368. [PMID: 39007329 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000001072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The significantly improved survivorship in Hodgkin lymphoma is fraught with challenges, including persistent symptoms, secondary health complications, and socio-professional obstacles. This review highlights the need for comprehensive survivorship care plans that include detection of relapse, assessment of long-term side effects, screening for secondary cancers, psychological support, and assistance with socio-professional integration. RECENT FINDINGS Cardiovascular diseases, secondary malignancies and other associated risks remains an important problem related to the effective treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Furthermore, fertility concerns and endocrine disorders remain prevalent issues posttreatment. An optimal evaluation of the risks before and after treatment is essential to reduce the impact of these side effects on quality of life. Addressing the socio-professional reintegration of survivors, the concept of the 'Right to be forgotten' emerges as a critical consideration. This principle seeks to eliminate discrimination against cancer survivors in accessing financial services and aims for legislative changes to ensure that past cancer diagnosis does not unfairly affect survivors' futures. Implementation of this 'Right to be forgotten' in the legislature, is currently underway in European countries. SUMMARY The focus of survivorship care has shifted towards the holistic management of these long-term outcomes. Quality of life for Hodgkin lymphoma survivors is affected by various treatment-related factors, with evidence suggesting that physical, psychological and socio-professional domains remain impacted years after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Françoise Meunier
- Founder of Ending discrimination against cancer survivors project, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gallamini A, Filippi A, Camus V, Vassilakopoulos TP. Toward a paradigm shift in prognostication and treatment of early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2024. [PMID: 39039814 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Twenty years after the conceptual revolution that occurred in the millennium turnaround upon the introduction of PET/CT in lymphoma staging, restaging, and prognostication, a number of new parameters for PET reading have been proposed: (1) the shift from a qualitative to a semi-quantitative reading for PET reporting, (2) an international consensus on these novel interpretation keys, (3) a standardized and agreed procedure to measure the total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV), and (4) the proposition of new indexes to portray the tumour spread: (D-Max and Total Lesion Surface -TLS). These proved to be very powerful prognosticators, able to revolutionize the traditional Ann Arbor four-stage lymphoma staging. During the 17° Lugano meeting on lymphoma, one main question was asked to experts attending a closed workshop dedicated to new metrics for lymphoma diagnosis, staging, restaging, and prognostication: "Should the traditional 4-stage anatomic staging system be simplified to a more clinically relevant 2-stage system (e.g., limited vs. extensive disease)?" Early-stage HL is an example of how these new metrics could fit with this proposal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallamini
- Research and Clinical Innovation, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, Nice, France
| | - Andrea Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincent Camus
- Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Department of Haematology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Theodoros P Vassilakopoulos
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kelly KM, Friedberg JW. Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma in Adolescents and Young Adults. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:653-664. [PMID: 37983570 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represents one of the more common cancers occurring in adolescent and young adults (AYAs) age 15-39 years. Despite a generally high cure rate, age-related differences in HL biology and the optimal therapeutic approaches including supportive care and risks for long-term adverse effects in the AYA population remain understudied. After an overview of HL epidemiology and biology in the AYA population, this review will cover frontline pediatric and adult treatment approaches. Recently completed and ongoing studies will foster harmonization of risk group definition and trial eligibility criteria across the AYA spectrum, enabling more rapid progress. In addition to treatment approaches, an evolving holistic care approach to AYA HL will result in enhanced understanding of unique challenges, and continued improved short- and long-term outcome for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara M Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center., Buffalo, NY
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Oishei Children's Hospital, Buffalo, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mohanty S, Patil D, Joshi K, Gamre P, Mishra A, Khairnar S, Kakoti S, Nayak L, Punatar S, Jain J, Phurailatpam R, Goda JS. Dosimetric Impact of Voluntary Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) in Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Delivery Methods Using Voluntary DIBH and Free Breathing Techniques. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:690. [PMID: 38398081 PMCID: PMC10886974 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphomas are radiosensitive and curable tumors that often involve the mediastinum. However, the application of radiation therapy to the mediastinum is associated with late effects including cardiac and pulmonary toxicities and secondary cancers. The adoption of conformal IMRT and deep inspiration breath- hold (DIBH) can reduce the dose to healthy normal tissues (lungs, heart and breast). We compared the dosimetry of organs at risk (OARs) using different IMRT techniques for two breathing conditions, i.e., deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing. Twenty-three patients with early-stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphomas were accrued in the prospective study. The patients were given treatment plans which utilized full arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (F-VMAT), Butterfly VMAT (B-VMAT), and fixed field IMRT (FF-IMRT) techniques for both DIBH and free breathing methods, respectively. All the plans were optimized to deliver 95% of the prescription dose which was 25.2 Gy to 95% of the PTV volume. The mean dose and standard error of the mean for each OAR, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for the target using the three planning techniques were calculated and compared using Student's t-test for parametric data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-parametric data. The HI and CI of the target was not compromised using the DIBH technique for mediastinal lymphomas. The mean values of CI and HI for both DIBH and FB were comparable. The mean heart doses were reduced by 2.1 Gy, 2.54 Gy, and 2.38 Gy in DIBH compared to FB for the F-VMAT, B-VMAT, and IMRT techniques, respectively. There was a significant reduction in V5Gy, V10Gy, and V15Gy to the heart (p < 0.005) with DIBH. DIBH reduced the mean dose to the total lung by 1.19 Gy, 1.47 Gy, and 1.3 Gy, respectively. Among the 14 female patients, there was a reduction in the mean right breast dose with DIBH compared to FB (4.47 Gy vs. 3.63 Gy, p = 0.004). DIBH results in lower heart, lung, and breast doses than free breathing in mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma. Among the different IMRT techniques, FF-IMRT, B-VMAT, and F-VMAT showed similar PTV coverage, with similar conformity and homogeneity indices. However, the time taken for FF-IMRT was much longer than for the F-VMAT and B-VMAT techniques for both breathing methods. B-VMAT and F-VMAT emerged as the optimal planning techniques able to achieve the best target coverage and lower doses to the OARs, with less time required to deliver the prescribed dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samarpita Mohanty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Divya Patil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Kishore Joshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Poonam Gamre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Ajay Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Sunil Khairnar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Sangeeta Kakoti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Lingaraj Nayak
- Department of Hemato Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (L.N.); (S.P.)
| | - Sachin Punatar
- Department of Hemato Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (L.N.); (S.P.)
| | - Jeevanshu Jain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Reena Phurailatpam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Jayant S. Goda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 410210, India; (S.M.); (D.P.); (K.J.); (P.G.); (A.M.); (S.K.); (S.K.); (J.J.); (R.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fuchs M, Jacob AS, Kaul H, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Pabst T, Greil R, Bröckelmann PJ, Topp MS, Just M, Hertenstein B, Soekler M, Vogelhuber M, Zijlstra JM, Keller UB, Krause SW, Dührsen U, Meissner J, Viardot A, Eich HT, Baues C, Diehl V, Rosenwald A, Buehnen I, von Tresckow B, Dietlein M, Borchmann P, Engert A, Eichenauer DA. Follow-up of the GHSG HD16 trial of PET-guided treatment in early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma. Leukemia 2024; 38:160-167. [PMID: 37845285 PMCID: PMC10776396 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-02064-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
The primary analysis of the GHSG HD16 trial indicated a significant loss of tumor control with PET-guided omission of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This analysis reports long-term outcomes. Overall, 1150 patients aged 18-75 years with newly diagnosed early-stage favorable HL were randomized between standard combined-modality treatment (CMT) (2x ABVD followed by PET/CT [PET-2] and 20 Gy involved-field RT) and PET-2-guided treatment omitting RT in case of PET-2 negativity (Deauville score [DS] < 3). The study aimed at excluding inferiority of PET-2-guided treatment and assessing the prognostic impact of PET-2 in patients receiving CMT. At a median follow-up of 64 months, PET-2-negative patients had a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 94.2% after CMT (n = 328) and 86.7% after ABVD alone (n = 300; HR = 2.05 [1.20-3.51]; p = 0.0072). 5-year OS was 98.3% and 98.8%, respectively (p = 0.14); 4/12 documented deaths were caused by second primary malignancies and only one by HL. Among patients assigned to CMT, 5-year PFS was better in PET-2-negative (n = 353; 94.0%) than in PET-2-positive patients (n = 340; 90.3%; p = 0.012). The difference was more pronounced when using DS4 as cut-off (DS 1-3: n = 571; 94.0% vs. DS ≥ 4: n = 122; 83.6%; p < 0.0001). Taken together, CMT should be considered standard treatment for early-stage favorable HL irrespective of the PET-2-result.
Collapse
Grants
- Sanofi-Genzyme, Takeda
- Employment/leadership position (University Hospital of Cologne, Head of the GHSG Trial Coordination Centre), honorarium (Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Affimed, Lukon, Janssen)
- Takeda Medical Research Foundation
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada (BMS Canada)
- BeiGene, MSD Stemline
- Gilead Sciences (Gilead)
- Miltenyi Biotec
- Novartis
- Roche (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd)
- Amgen (Amgen Inc.)
- Pfizer (Pfizer Inc.)
- Merck & Co., Inc. | Merck Sharp and Dohme (Merck Sharp & Dohme)
- AbbVie (AbbVie Inc.)
- AstraZeneca
- allogene, Cerus, incyte, IQVIA, Noscendo, Pentixapharm,
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anne Sophie Jacob
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Kaul
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Pabst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard Greil
- IIIrd Medical Department, Paracelcus Medical University and Salzburg Cancer Research Institute, Salzburg, Austria
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute and AGMT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Paul J Bröckelmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Max S Topp
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marianne Just
- Dres. med. Just/Düwel/Riesenberg/Steinke/Schäfer, Studiengesellschaft, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Hertenstein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Martin Soekler
- Onkology, Spital Thun, Switzerland, formerly University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Vogelhuber
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinik Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ulrich Bernd Keller
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum "Rechts der Isar", Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan W Krause
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology/Oncology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Dührsen
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Viardot
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Hans-Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Diehl
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Rosenwald
- Institute of Pathology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ina Buehnen
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK partner site Essen), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Randall MP, Spinner MA. Optimizing Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Era of Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4509. [PMID: 37760478 PMCID: PMC10526852 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Most patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are cured with combination chemotherapy, but approximately 10-20% will relapse, and another 5-10% will have primary refractory disease. The treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL has evolved significantly over the past decade following the approval of brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate, and the PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab. These agents have significantly expanded options for salvage therapy prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT), post-transplant maintenance, and treatment of relapse after AHCT, which have led to improved survival in the modern era. In this review, we highlight our approach to the management of R/R cHL in 2023 with a focus on choosing first salvage therapy, post-transplant maintenance, and treatment of relapse after AHCT. We also discuss the management of older adults and transplant-ineligible patients, who require a separate approach. Finally, we review novel immunotherapy approaches in clinical trials, including combinations of PD-1 inhibitors with other immune-activating agents as well as novel antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and cellular immunotherapies. Ongoing studies assessing biomarkers of response to immunotherapy and dynamic biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA may further inform treatment decisions and enable a more personalized approach in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael A. Spinner
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Suwanban T, Chamnanchanunt S, Thungthong P, Nakhahes C, Iam‐arunthai K, Akrawikrai T, Bunworasate U. Survival rates of adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent ABVD versus escalated BEACOPP in a resource-limited country: An observational study. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2023; 6:e1839. [PMID: 37254799 PMCID: PMC10432437 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The survival rate of adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) depends on the responses to standard chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combined therapy. Resource-limited countries face numerous obstacles in supporting patients with HL who undergo chemotherapy, especially in advanced stages. AIM To analyze the survival outcomes of adult patients with HL after combined-modality treatment (CMT) with involved-field or non-involved-field radiotherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 90 adult patients with HL who received CMT at Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok between 2007 and 2021. Patients with stage I-IV disease received different therapies depending on their risk group. The risk groups were evaluated according to initial response, bulky disease, and B symptoms. Patients (n = 90) who underwent CMT were followed up for 34.7 months (range, 1-141 months). The median follow-up periods of early and advanced-stage patients were 53.1 months and 23.5 months, respectively. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates of patients with advanced-stage diseases were 85% and 62%, respectively. There was a difference in the 3-year overall survival among advance-stage patients who underwent ABVD (94%) compared to those administered BEACOPPesc (50%), and the 3-year PFS (84%) among patients who underwent ABVD was higher than that among those administered BEACOPPesc (66%). Radiotherapy increased toxicity but did not improve the survival rate. CONCLUSION Chemotherapy administered to patients with advanced-stage adult HL was more effective than BEACOPPesc when ABVD was administered. Our findings are relevant for hospitals with limited resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tawatchai Suwanban
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi HospitalCollege of Medicine, Rangsit UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Supat Chamnanchanunt
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi HospitalCollege of Medicine, Rangsit UniversityBangkokThailand
- Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Pravinwan Thungthong
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi HospitalCollege of Medicine, Rangsit UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Chajchawan Nakhahes
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi HospitalCollege of Medicine, Rangsit UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Kunapa Iam‐arunthai
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi HospitalCollege of Medicine, Rangsit UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Tananchai Akrawikrai
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi HospitalCollege of Medicine, Rangsit UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Udomsak Bunworasate
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
- Research Unit in Translational Hematology, Faculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Munir F, Hardit V, Sheikh IN, AlQahtani S, He J, Cuglievan B, Hosing C, Tewari P, Khazal S. Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: From Past to Future-A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Advances. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10095. [PMID: 37373245 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma, a hematological malignancy of lymphoid origin that typically arises from germinal-center B cells, has an excellent overall prognosis. However, the treatment of patients who relapse or develop resistant disease still poses a substantial clinical and research challenge, even though current risk-adapted and response-based treatment techniques produce overall survival rates of over 95%. The appearance of late malignancies after the successful cure of primary or relapsed disease continues to be a major concern, mostly because of high survival rates. Particularly in pediatric HL patients, the chance of developing secondary leukemia is manifold compared to that in the general pediatric population, and the prognosis for patients with secondary leukemia is much worse than that for patients with other hematological malignancies. Therefore, it is crucial to develop clinically useful biomarkers to stratify patients according to their risk of late malignancies and determine which require intense treatment regimens to maintain the ideal balance between maximizing survival rates and avoiding late consequences. In this article, we review HL's epidemiology, risk factors, staging, molecular and genetic biomarkers, and treatments for children and adults, as well as treatment-related adverse events and the late development of secondary malignancies in patients with the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faryal Munir
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Viney Hardit
- CARTOX Program, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Irtiza N Sheikh
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Shaikha AlQahtani
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jiasen He
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Branko Cuglievan
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Pediatrics-Patient Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Priti Tewari
- CARTOX Program, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sajad Khazal
- CARTOX Program, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gao Y, Perez CA, Chhor C, Heller SL. Breast Cancer Screening in Survivors of Childhood Cancer. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220155. [PMID: 36927127 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Women who survived childhood cancers or cancers at a young age are at high risk for breast cancer later in life. The accentuated risk is notable among those treated at a young age with a high radiation dose but also extends to survivors treated with therapies other than or in addition to radiation therapy. The predisposing risk factors are complex. Advances in radiation therapy continue to curtail exposure, yet the risk of a second cancer has no dose threshold and a long latency period, and concurrent use of chemotherapy may have an additive effect on long-term risk of cancer. Early screening with annual mammography and MRI is recommended for chest radiation exposure of 10 Gy or greater, beginning 8 years after treatment or at age 25 years, whichever is later. However, there is a lack of recommendations for those at high risk without a history of radiation therapy. Because mortality after breast cancer among survivors is higher than in women with de novo breast cancer, and because there is a higher incidence of a second asynchronous breast cancer in survivors than that in the general population, regular screening is essential and is expected to improve mortality. However, awareness and continuity of care may be lacking in these young patients and is reflected in their poor screening attendance. The transition of care from childhood to adulthood for survivors requires age-targeted and lifelong strategies of education and risk prevention that are needed to improve long-term outcomes for these patients. © RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Chikarmane in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiming Gao
- From the Departments of Radiology (Y.G., C.C., S.L.H.) and Pathology (C.A.P.), New York University School of Medicine, 160 E 34th St, New York, NY 10016
| | - Carmen A Perez
- From the Departments of Radiology (Y.G., C.C., S.L.H.) and Pathology (C.A.P.), New York University School of Medicine, 160 E 34th St, New York, NY 10016
| | - Chloe Chhor
- From the Departments of Radiology (Y.G., C.C., S.L.H.) and Pathology (C.A.P.), New York University School of Medicine, 160 E 34th St, New York, NY 10016
| | - Samantha L Heller
- From the Departments of Radiology (Y.G., C.C., S.L.H.) and Pathology (C.A.P.), New York University School of Medicine, 160 E 34th St, New York, NY 10016
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Desai SH, Spinner MA, David K, Bachanova V, Goyal G, Kahl B, Dorritie K, Azzi J, Kenkre VP, Arai S, Chang C, Fusco B, Sumransub N, Hatic H, Saba R, Ibrahim U, Harris EI, Shah H, Murphy J, Ansell S, Jagadish D, Orellana-noia V, Diefenbach C, Iyenger S, Rappazzo KC, Mishra R, Choi Y, Nowakowski GS, Advani RH, Micallef IN. Checkpoint inhibitor-based salvage regimens prior to autologous stem cell transplant improve event-free survival in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Am J Hematol 2023; 98:464-471. [PMID: 36629030 PMCID: PMC11234511 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Clinical trials of novel salvage therapies have encouraging outcomes for relapsed/refractory transplant-eligible classic Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) but comparison with conventional chemotherapy is lacking. Herein, we report the final analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort of R/R cHL assessing outcomes by type of salvage therapy before autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). R/R cHL patients who underwent ASCT at 14 institutions across the United States were included. Outcomes were compared among patients receiving conventional chemotherapy, brentuximab vedotin (BV) + chemotherapy, BV alone, and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based regimens before ASCT. Study endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). All endpoints are defined from relapse. Of 936 patients, 728 received conventional chemotherapy, 73 received BV + chemotherapy, 70 received BV alone, and 65 received CPI-based regimens prior to ASCT. When adjusted for time to relapse, pre-ASCT response and use of BV maintenance, patients receiving CPI-based regimens had superior 2-year EFS compared to conventional chemotherapy, BV + chemotherapy, and BV alone (79.7, 49.6, 62.3, and 36.9%, respectively, p < .0001). Among 649 patients transplanted after 1 line of salvage therapy, CPI-based regimens were associated with superior 2-year PFS compared to conventional chemotherapy (98% vs. 68.8%, hazard ratio: 0.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.5, p < .0001). OS did not differ by pre-ASCT salvage regimen. In this large multicenter retrospective study, CPI-based regimens improved EFS and PFS compared to other salvage regimens independent of pre-ASCT response. These data support earlier sequencing of CPI-based regimens in R/R cHL in the pre-ASCT setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjal H. Desai
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Michael A. Spinner
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kevin David
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Veronika Bachanova
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gaurav Goyal
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Brad Kahl
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Kathleen Dorritie
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jacques Azzi
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Sally Arai
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Cheryl Chang
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Brendon Fusco
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Nuttavut Sumransub
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Haris Hatic
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Raya Saba
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Uroosa Ibrahim
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elyse I. Harris
- Department of Hematology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Harsh Shah
- Division of Hematology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jacob Murphy
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephen Ansell
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Victor Orellana-noia
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Siddharth Iyenger
- Division of Hematology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - K. C. Rappazzo
- Department of Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rahul Mishra
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Yun Choi
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Grossman Medical School, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Ranjana H. Advani
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kosydar S, Ansell SM. Long-term outcomes for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma at increased risk of progression or relapse. Leuk Lymphoma 2023; 64:5-17. [PMID: 36215148 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2131422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Although advancements in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma have enabled many patients to be cured of their disease, about half of patients who relapse or experience refractory disease ultimately fail treatment, even after autologous stem cell transplant. Risk stratification is crucial to enable escalation of therapy in patients at increased risk for progression while allowing for less intensive therapy in lower risk groups. Utilization of clinical factors to inform risk scores was common practice, but this historical approach has been supplemented by PET/CT risk adapted management. Long-term outcomes of high-risk patients have improved over the decades with advancements in therapy and emergence of novel agents including antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors, yet further research is urgently needed. Herein, we review long-term outcomes of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma at increased risk for progression or relapse and discuss limitations of current risk strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Kosydar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hanel W, Herrera AF, Epperla N. Management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a look at up to date evidence and current treatment approaches. Exp Hematol Oncol 2022; 11:108. [PMID: 36575540 PMCID: PMC9793517 DOI: 10.1186/s40164-022-00360-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment landscape of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has undergone significant changes over the past 20 years. Gradual improvements have been made in the management of cHL patients, particularly in prolonging the survival rate for those in the relapsed setting. Most of these improvements came with the addition of brentuximab vedotin and PD1 blockade (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) into the current cHL treatment algorithms. On the other hand, the treatment approach to cHL has become more complex than ever before, with multiple ways to add and sequence therapies to achieve long-term remission. In this review, we will discuss the most up-to-date evidence on the management of cHL patients with the inclusion of ongoing clinical trials in cHL. We will provide a general overview of the current therapeutic landscape of cHL in light of these most recent data. We conclude with our perspective on how the approach to cHL treatment may evolve in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Hanel
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Alex F Herrera
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Narendranath Epperla
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1110E Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Drive, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Weil CR, Parsons MJ, Hutten RJ, Lew FH, Johnson SB, Gaffney DK, Tao R. Patterns of care and outcomes of early stage I-II Hodgkin lymphoma treated with or without radiation therapy. Leuk Lymphoma 2022; 63:2847-2857. [PMID: 35904407 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2105325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Omission of radiotherapy in the upfront management of early-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has become more common with time. We report patterns of care and outcomes of stage I-II cHL treated with chemotherapy (CT) only versus CT and radiotherapy (combined modality therapy, CMT). From the National Cancer Database, we identified 28,327 early-stage cHL patients treated with CT (n = 15,798) or CMT (n = 12,529) from 2004 to 2018. CMT utilization declined over the period from 58% to 34%. With median follow-up of 6.2 years, the 5- and 10-year overall survival for CT versus CMT was 93.3% versus 96.9% (p < 0.001) and 88.7% versus 93.5% (p < 0.001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, uninsured (OR 0.75, p < 0.001) and Black patients (OR 0.86, p = 0.02) were less likely to receive CMT, and treatment with CT was predictive of death (OR 2.0, p < 0.001). This report highlights real-world outcomes in early-stage cHL, with worse survival with CT and notable disparities in CMT utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Matthew J Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ryan J Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Felicia H Lew
- Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David K Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Randa Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Filling the Gap: The Immune Therapeutic Armamentarium for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11216574. [PMID: 36362802 PMCID: PMC9656939 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite years of clinical progress which made Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) one of the most curable malignancies with conventional chemotherapy, refractoriness and recurrence may still affect up to 20–30% of patients. The revolution brought by the advent of immunotherapy in all kinds of neoplastic disorders is more than evident in this disease because anti-CD30 antibodies and checkpoint inhibitors have been able to rescue patients previously remaining without therapeutic options. Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation still represents a significant step in the treatment algorithm for chemosensitive HL; however, the possibility to induce complete responses after allogeneic transplant procedures in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning regimens informs on its sensitivity to immunological control. Furthermore, the investigational application of adoptive T cell transfer therapies paves the way for future indications in this setting. Here, we seek to provide a fresh and up-to-date overview of the new immunotherapeutic agents dominating the scene of relapsed/refractory HL. In this optic, we will also review all the potential molecular mechanisms of tumor resistance, theoretically responsible for treatment failures, and we will discuss the place of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the era of novel therapies.
Collapse
|
20
|
Papachristofilou A, Bedke J, Hayoz S, Schratzenstaller U, Pless M, Hentrich M, Krege S, Lorch A, Aebersold DM, Putora PM, Berthold DR, Zihler D, Zengerling F, Dieing A, Mueller AC, Schaer C, Biaggi C, Gillessen S, Cathomas R. Single-dose carboplatin followed by involved-node radiotherapy for stage IIA and stage IIB seminoma (SAKK 01/10): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1441-1450. [PMID: 36228644 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00564-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment options for patients with stage IIA or stage IIB seminoma include either para-aortic and pelvic radiotherapy or three to four cycles of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. These options result in 3-year progression free survival rates of at least 90%, but bear risks for acute and late toxic effects, including secondary malignancies. We tested a novel approach combining de-escalated chemotherapy with de-escalated involved node radiotherapy, with the aim of reducing toxicity while preserving efficacy. METHODS In the single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 SAKK 01/10 trial, patients with stage IIA or IIB classic seminoma (either at primary diagnosis or at relapse during active surveillance for stage I) were enrolled at ten centres of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and ten centres of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. WHO performance status 0-2, age 18 years or older, and adequate bone marrow and kidney function were required for eligibility. Treatment comprised one cycle of carboplatin (area under the curve 7) followed by involved-node radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 fractions for stage IIA disease and 36 Gy in 18 fractions for stage IIB disease). The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival. Efficacy analyses were done on the full analysis set, which comprised all patients who signed the informed consent, were registered in the trial, initiated trial treatment, and met all medically relevant inclusion or exclusion criteria. Safety was assessed in all patients who were treated at least once with one of the trial treatments. The study is ongoing but no longer recruiting, and is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01593241. FINDINGS Between Oct 18, 2012, and June 22, 2018, 120 patients were registered in the study. 116 patients were eligible and started treatment according to the study protocol (46 patients with stage IIA disease and 70 with stage IIB disease). After a median follow-up of 4·5 years (IQR 3·9-6·0), 3-year progression-free survival was 93·7% (90% CI 88·5-96·6). With a target progression-free survival of 95% at 3 years, the primary endpoint was not met. Acute treatment-related adverse events of any grade were noted in 58 (48%) of 116 patients, and grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in the form of neutropenia in five (4%) patients, thrombocytopenia in three (3%) patients, and vomiting in one (1%) patient. No treatment-related deaths and no late treatment-related adverse events were reported. Serious adverse events were reported in five (4%) of 116 patients (one transient creatinine increase and four second primary tumours). INTERPRETATION Despite the fact that the primary endpoint was not met, we observed favourable 3-year progression-free survival with single-dose carboplatin area under the curve 7 and involved-node radiotherapy, with minimal toxic effects. Our findings might warrant discussion with patients about the SAKK 01/10 regimen as an alternative to standard-of-care treatment, but more research on this strategy is needed. FUNDING Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation and Rising Tide Foundation for Clinical Cancer Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Competence Center of SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Miklos Pless
- Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel-M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Dominik-R Berthold
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Annette Dieing
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Corinne Schaer
- Competence Center of SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christine Biaggi
- Competence Center of SAKK-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Real-world evidence of ABVD-like regimens compared with ABVD in classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a 10-year study from China. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04321-6. [DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04321-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
22
|
Frechette KM, Lester SC, Taparra K, Breen WG, Martenson JA, Hoppe BS, Peterson JL, Rule WG, Stafford SL, Stish BJ, Habermann TM, Young JR, Harmsen WS, Laack NN. Outcomes of patients with stage I-II Hodgkin lymphoma who had uniform pre-treatment staging with PET/CT and treatment with limited field radiation therapy after chemotherapy. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:121. [PMID: 35995767 PMCID: PMC9395516 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00711-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kekoa Taparra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - William G Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Scott L Stafford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bradley J Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Jason R Young
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William S Harmsen
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nakhoda S, Rizwan F, Vistarop A, Nejati R. Updates in the Role of Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2936. [PMID: 35740598 PMCID: PMC9220999 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Classical Hodgkin's lymphoma is a highly curable disease, but 10-25% of patients with higher-risk disease relapse. The introduction of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) targeting PD-1 have changed the landscape of treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory disease to multiple lines of therapy. The depth of response to CPI as a monotherapy is highest in the first relapse as salvage therapy based on outcomes reported in several phase II studies. With earlier use of CPI and brentuximab vedotin, the optimal sequencing of therapy is evolving. In this review, we will summarize clinical investigation of anti-PD-1 mAb in earlier line settings to provide insights on utilizing these agents as chemotherapy- and radiation-sparing approaches, increasing depth of response, and as part of combination regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shazia Nakhoda
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (A.V.); (R.N.)
| | - Farsha Rizwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA;
| | - Aldana Vistarop
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (A.V.); (R.N.)
| | - Reza Nejati
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (A.V.); (R.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pathak N, Pramanik R, Bakhshi S, Kumar A, Sharma MC, Shamim SA, Kumar S, Thulkar S, Sharma A. Modified Protocol of Nivolumab in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Brief Communication of Real World Data. J Immunother 2022; 45:239-242. [PMID: 35404324 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Immune check point inhibitors such as nivolumab are changing the treatment paradigm of relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (r/rHL). Data from single arm studies have shown nivolumab to be an effective and safe therapy. Real world data from resource constrained settings are limited. Our study is a retrospective single center analysis of nivolumab in r/rHL from India. Data regarding baseline and pretreatment characteristics were collected for 20 patients treated with nivolumab from January 2016 to March 2021. Of 20, 15 patients received nivolumab in modified protocol, because of financial limitations. Postnivolumab therapy, the overall response rate was 90%, with 40% in complete remission. The median progression free survival was 13.1 month (95% confidence interval 8.33 mo, not reached) and median overall survival not reached, at a follow up of 24.3 months. No patients discontinued nivolumab because of side effects. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed no effect of dose reduction or increased duration of administration. Most common adverse effect seen was autoimmune hypothyroidism. Possible delayed immune-related side effects were seen in 3 out 5 patients in peritransplant period, in those who received nivolumab as salvage regimen before autologous stem cell transplant. In conclusion, nivolumab shows comparable efficacy and safety even with compromised dosing and schedule of administration of the drug in real world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sanjay Thulkar
- Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Miyazaki K. Management of elderly patients with malignant lymphoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:690-699. [PMID: 35435235 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
More than half of patients with malignant lymphoma are 65 years old or older. The outcome for older patients is poorer than that for younger patients. A poor prognosis is associated with heterogeneity and consists of physical function, performance status, poor nutritional status and various comorbidities. Therefore, attention should be given to serious treatment-related toxicities. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most frequently diagnosed type of malignant lymphoma. Most patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma can be potentially cured with the current standard chemotherapeutic regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone. However, a reduced-dose regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone or alternative treatment options might be suitable for older patients who are frail or unfit and have cardiac comorbidities. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is a potential tool for determining an appropriate therapeutic approach for each older patient. Follicular lymphoma is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and the disease course is usually characterized by an indolent clinical course. Advanced follicular lymphoma with a high tumor burden has historically been treated with chemoimmunotherapy, but the treatment goal for older patients is relief of symptoms. Incorporating novel targeted agents such as brentuximab vedotin into therapies for older Hodgkin lymphoma patients might be a promising alternative to the anthracycline-containing regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kana Miyazaki
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dionisi F, Scartoni D, Rombi B, Vennarini S, Righetto R, Farace P, Lorentini S, Schwarz M, Di Murro L, Demofonti C, D'Angelillo RM, Petrongari MG, Sanguineti G, Amichetti M. Consolidative active scanning proton therapy for mediastinal lymphoma: selection criteria, treatment implementation and clinical feasibility. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:558-565. [PMID: 35394144 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01918-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Proton therapy (PT) represents an advanced form of radiotherapy with unique physical properties which could be of great advantage in reducing long-term radiation morbidity for cancer survivors. Here, we aim to describe the whole process leading to the clinical implementation of consolidative active scanning proton therapy treatment (PT) for mediastinal lymphoma. METHODS The process included administrative, technical and clinical issues. Authorization of PT is required in all cases as mediastinal lymphoma is currently not on the list of diseases reimbursable by the Italian National Health Service. Technically, active scanning PT treatment for mediastinal lymphoma is complex, due to the interaction between actively scanned protons and the usually irregular and large volumes to be irradiated, the nearby healthy tissues and the target motion caused by breathing. A road map to implement the technical procedures was prepared. The clinical selection of patients was of utmost importance and took into account both patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS The first mediastinal lymphoma was treated at our PT center in 2018, four years after the start of the clinical activities. The treatment technique implementation included mechanical deep inspiration breath-hold simulation computed tomography (CT), clinical target volume (CTV)-based multifield optimization planning and plan robustness analysis. The ultimate authorization rate was 93%. In 4 cases a proton-photon plan comparison was required. Between May 2018 and February, 2021, 14 patients were treated with consolidative PT. The main clinical reasons for choosing PT over photons was a bulky disease in 8 patients (57%), patient's age in 11 patients (78%) and the proximity of the lymphoma to cardiac structures in 10 patients (71%). With a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 1-33 months) all patients but one (out-of-field relapse) are without evidence of disease, all are alive and no late toxicities were observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS The clinical implementation of consolidative active scanning PT for mediastinal lymphoma required specific technical procedures and a prolonged experience with PT treatments. An accurate selection of patients for which PT could be of advantage in comparison with photons is mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Dionisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | - D Scartoni
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - B Rombi
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | | | - R Righetto
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - P Farace
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | | | - M Schwarz
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - L Di Murro
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - C Demofonti
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - R M D'Angelillo
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - M G Petrongari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - G Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Andersen MD, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Modvig L, Vase M, Christiansen I, Christensen JH, Dahl-Sørensen RB, Stoltenberg D, Kamper P, d'Amore F. Late recurrence of lymphoid malignancies after initial treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma - A study from the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Br J Haematol 2022; 198:50-61. [PMID: 35396711 PMCID: PMC9324165 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We analysed a large cohort of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients in order to characterize: (1) the pattern of late recurrence of lymphoid malignancies (LR) after initial treatment for HL over a 35-year period; (2) the clinicopathological parameters influencing the risk of LR; and (3) the outcome of patients experiencing LR. We reviewed data of 3350 HL patients diagnosed in Denmark between 1982 and 2018 and registered in the Danish National Lymphoma Registry (LYFO). LR was defined as a recurrence of lymphoid malignancy at least five years after initial diagnosis. LR occurred in 58 patients, with a cumulative incidence at 10, 15 and 20 years of 2.7%, 4.0% and 5.4% respectively. LR was more frequently observed in patients with nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL (NLPHL) [hazard ratio (HR) 4.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-8.4, p < 0.001]. In classical HL (cHL) patients, older age and lymphocytopenia were risk factors for LR with HRs of 1.04 per additional year (95% CI: 1.02-1.06) and 5.6 (95% CI: 2.7-11.5) respectively. Mixed cellularity histological subtype was a risk factor for LR, but only in females, with a HR of 5.4 (95% CI: 1.4-20.4, p = 0.014). In contrast to what was observed in NLPHL, LR in cHL was associated with an almost threefold increased risk of death compared with patients in continuous complete remission. Approximately one fifth (22.4%) of patients with LR experienced a second relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Dam Andersen
- Department of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Maja Vase
- Department of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ilse Christiansen
- Department of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | | | - Danny Stoltenberg
- Department of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Peter Kamper
- Department of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Francesco d'Amore
- Department of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Samara Y, Mei M. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Hodgkin Lymphoma-Latest Advances in the Era of Novel Therapies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1738. [PMID: 35406509 PMCID: PMC8996995 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Standard treatment for relapsed and/or refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) consists of salvage therapy, historically consisting of multiagent cytotoxic chemotherapy, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) in responding patients. With this approach, most patients can proceed to autoHCT, of whom approximately half are cured. However, the introduction of the novel agents brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) nivolumab and pembrolizumab has changed the decision making and peri-transplant decision making, as early incorporation of one or more of these agents can reduce or even eliminate the need for cytotoxic chemotherapy prior to autoHCT. Furthermore, post-autoHCT maintenance therapy with BV has also been shown to decrease relapse in high-risk rel/ref HL patients. In this review, we survey the current data regarding autoHCT in HL with a focus on pre-autoHCT salvage as well as maintenance strategies, and we also talk about the emerging data challenging the long-held dogma of chemosensitivity being a requirement for successful autoHCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazeed Samara
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, USA;
| | - Matthew Mei
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bröckelmann PJ, Borchmann P. Navigating increasingly individualised Hodgkin lymphoma treatments to optimally balance risks and benefits. Br J Haematol 2022; 197:515-517. [PMID: 35262911 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Bröckelmann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany.,Mildred Scheel School of Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (MSSO ABCD), Cologne, Germany.,Max Planck Research Group Mechanisms of DNA Repair, Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bröckelmann PJ, Müller H, Gillessen S, Yang X, Koeppel L, Pilz V, Marinello P, Kaskel P, Raut M, Fuchs M, Borchmann P, Engert A, von Tresckow B. Clinical outcomes of relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma patients after contemporary first-line treatment: a German Hodgkin Study Group analysis. Leukemia 2022; 36:772-780. [PMID: 34628472 PMCID: PMC8885415 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01442-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate patterns of rrHL after contemporary first-line treatment we studied 409 patients with first rrHL (HD13: n = 87, HD14: n = 118, HD15: n = 188, HDR3i: n = 51) at a median age of 37.4 years (18.4-76.8) from the GHSG database. Time to first relapse was ≤12 months in 49% and stage III/IV rrHL present in 52% of patients. In total, 291 patients received high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) and intended ASCT failed in 38 patients. ASCT was primarily not intended in 80 patients largely due to low risk disease or age/comorbidities. Overall, 10-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates after first relapse were 48.2% (95% CI 41.9-54.2%) and 59.4% (95% CI 53.0-65.2%), respectively, with significant differences between subgroups. Inferior survival was observed with no ASCT due to advanced age/comorbidities (five-year PFS 36.2%, 95% CI 17.7-55.0%) or failure of salvage therapy (five-year PFS 36.3%, 95% CI 19.7-53.2%). Similarly, presence of primary refractory disease or stage IV at rrHL conferred inferior survival. In patients with low-risk disease, however, survival appeared favorable even without ASCT (10 y PFS 72.6%, 95% CI 53.7-84.8%). We herein confirm the curative potential of current rrHL treatments providing a robust benchmark to evaluate novel therapeutic strategies in rrHL. Approximately 50% of rrHL patients experienced a consecutive relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Bröckelmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen (CCCE), Cologne/Essen, Germany
| | - Horst Müller
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen (CCCE), Cologne/Essen, Germany
| | - Sarah Gillessen
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen (CCCE), Cologne/Essen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Fuchs
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen (CCCE), Cologne/Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen (CCCE), Cologne/Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen (CCCE), Cologne/Essen, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen (CCCE), Cologne/Essen, Germany.
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Follows GA, Barrington SF, Bhuller KS, Culligan DJ, Cutter DJ, Gallop-Evans E, Kassam S, Osborne W, Sadullah S, Townsend W, Uttenthal BJ, Collins GP. Guideline for the first-line management of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma - A British Society for Haematology guideline. Br J Haematol 2022; 197:558-572. [PMID: 35191541 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
This guideline was compiled according to the British Society for Haematology (BSH) process at https://b-s-h.org.uk/media/16732/bsh-guidance-development-process-dec-5-18.pdf. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org. Recommendations are based on a review of the literature using Medline, PubMed/Medline and Cochrane searches beginning from 2013 up to January 2021. The following search terms were used: [Hodgkin lymphoma OR Hodgkin disease] NOT non-Hodgkin; AND [chemotherapy OR radiotherapy]; AND [elderly]; AND [teenage OR adolescent OR young adult]; AND [pregnancy]. Filters were applied to include only publications written in English, studies carried out in humans, clinical conferences, congresses, clinical trials, clinical studies, meta-analyses, multicentre studies and randomised controlled trials. References pre-2013 were taken from the previous version of this guideline.1 Review of the manuscript was performed by the British Society for Haematology (BSH) Guidelines Committee Haematology Oncology Taskforce, the BSH Guidelines Committee and the Haematology Oncology sounding board of BSH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George A Follows
- Department of Haematology, Cambridge University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sally F Barrington
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - Kaljit S Bhuller
- Paediatric, Teenage & Young Adult (TYA) Haematology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | | | - David J Cutter
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Shireen Kassam
- Department of Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Wendy Osborne
- Department of Haematology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Shalal Sadullah
- Department of Haematology, James Paget University Hospital, Great Yarmouth, UK
| | - William Townsend
- Department of Haematology, University College Hospital London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Benjamin J Uttenthal
- Department of Haematology, Cambridge University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Graham P Collins
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nassi L, De Sanctis V, Loseto G, Gerardi C, Allocati E, Ciavarella S, Minoia C, Guarini A, Bari A. Second Cancers in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030519. [PMID: 35158787 PMCID: PMC8833346 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increase of lymphoma patient survival led to a modification of the incidence of long-term sequelae, including second malignancies (SM). Several groups have dealt with the incidence of SM, according to the primary treatment; however, a standardized approach for the early detection and screening of SM in the population of lymphoma survivors should be implemented. METHODS A systematic review was conducted by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL), in order to define the incidence of SM, the impact of modern radiotherapy on SM risk, and the usefulness of tailored follow-up and screening strategies for early diagnosis of SM. Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survivors were investigated. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were checked for relevant reports published up to January 2020. The selection process was reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS A total of 27 full-text manuscripts resulted as eligible for the analysis. The incidence of SM in cHL patients treated with ABVD was higher compared to the general population and was even higher in patients treated with intensified regimens. The risk increased over time, as well as after 10-15 years from therapy, and was augmented by radiotherapy exposure. In DLBCL, more intensive regimens (i.e., R-CHOEP or R-MegaCHOEP) vs. R-CHOP were associated with a higher SM incidence. Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplants increased the risk of SM in both cHL and DLBCL cohorts. A lower incidence of SM, particularly of breast cancer (BC), was shown in cohorts of cHL survivors treated with reduced radiation volumes and doses (involved fields vs. extended fields), but robust trials are still lacking. Considering the advantage of a structured screening for early detection of SM, all the included studies regarded cHL survivors and screening strategy for early BC detection. Moreover, the authors discuss additional papers, to guide the early diagnosis of lung, colorectal, skin, and thyroid cancer in patients at risk due to family history, drug or RT exposure, or unhealthy lifestyles. These screening strategies all passed through patient awareness. CONCLUSION A modern approach to chemotherapy and radiotherapy led to a lower risk of SM, which should be confirmed over time. Early detection of secondary cancers could be achieved through a tailored screening program, according to the individual risk profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nassi
- Department of Hematology, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicina e Psicologia, Sant’Andrea Hospital, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Giacomo Loseto
- Hematology Unit—IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.L.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (A.G.)
| | - Chiara Gerardi
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri” IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (E.A.)
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri” IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (E.A.)
| | - Sabino Ciavarella
- Hematology Unit—IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.L.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (A.G.)
| | - Carla Minoia
- Hematology Unit—IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.L.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (A.G.)
| | - Attilio Guarini
- Hematology Unit—IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.L.); (S.C.); (C.M.); (A.G.)
| | - Alessia Bari
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Materno-Infantili e dell’Adulto, Universita’ di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gillessen S, Hüttmann A, Vucinic V, Müller H, Plütschow A, Viardot A, Topp MS, Kobe C, Böll B, Eichenauer DA, Sasse S, Haverkamp H, Schmitz C, Borchmann S, Bröckelmann PJ, Heger JM, Fuchs M, Engert A, Borchmann P, von Tresckow B. Reinduction therapy with everolimus in combination with dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabin and cisplatinum in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: an experimental phase I/II multicentre trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG HD-R3i). Br J Haematol 2021; 196:606-616. [PMID: 34775591 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Reinduction chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDCT + ASCT) is second-line standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r cHL) but has a high failure rate. Because response to reinduction is predictive of the outcome after HDCT + ASCT, we aimed to improve the standard dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine and cisplatinum (DHAP) reinduction regimen by addition of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (everDHAP). Transplant-eligible patients aged 18-60 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL were included in this experimental phase I/II trial. Everolimus (10 mg/day, determined in phase-I-part) was administered on day 0-13 of each DHAP cycle. From July 2014 to March 2018, 50 patients were recruited to the phase II everDHAP group; two were not evaluable, three discontinued due to toxicity. Randomization to a placebo group stopped in October 2015 due to poor recruitment after nine patients. The primary end-point of computed tomography (CT)-based complete remission (CR) after two cycles of everDHAP was expected to be ≥40%. With a CT-based CR rate of 27% (n = 12/45) after two cycles of everDHAP the trial did not meet the primary end-point. Adding everolimus to DHAP is thus feasible; however, the everDHAP regimen failed to show an improved efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Gillessen
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Hüttmann
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation and Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Vladan Vucinic
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Horst Müller
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annette Plütschow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Viardot
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Max S Topp
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Boris Böll
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Sasse
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Department IV of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Heinz Haverkamp
- Institute for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMSIE), University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christine Schmitz
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation and Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sven Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Paul J Bröckelmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Michel Heger
- Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation and Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Brice P, de Kerviler E, Friedberg JW. Classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Lancet 2021; 398:1518-1527. [PMID: 33493434 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32207-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma is one of the more frequent lymphomas and is generally considered a highly curable disease with standard first-line chemotherapy and radiotherapy in some cases. Despite these outstanding results, major problems remain unresolved. First, there are still patients who will not be cured with front-line regimens and, second, many patients who are cured of classical Hodgkin lymphoma continue to die prematurely due to the late toxic effects of their therapy. Because the median age of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma is in the mid-30s, the disease's impact on the number of years lost from productive life is remarkable. In recent years, the gold standard of chemotherapy (often combined with radiotherapy) has changed, with the approval of immunotherapy mostly in relapse settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Brice
- Department of Oncohaematology, Hôpital saint Louis APHP, Université Paris 7, Paris, France.
| | - Eric de Kerviler
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital saint Louis APHP, Université Paris 7, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Guerini AE, Filippi AR, Tucci A, Simontacchi G, Re A, Guaineri A, Morelli V, Borghetti P, Triggiani L, Pegurri L, Pedretti S, Volpi G, Spiazzi L, Magrini SM, Buglione M. 'Le Roi est mort, vive le Roi': New Roles of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Lymphomas in Combination With Immunotherapy. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2021; 22:e135-e148. [PMID: 34728169 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND immunotherapy (IT), including checkpoint inhibitors (CIs) and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) revolutionized the treatment of relapsing or refractory (r/r) lymphoma. Several preliminary experiences evaluated concomitant administration of radiotherapy and IT. METHODS we performed a systematic review of current literature as of March 30, 2020. A total of 1090 records was retrieved, 42 articles were selected on the basis of title and abstract and, after the removal of analyses with no original data or insufficient clinical information, 28 papers were included in the review. RESULTS previous studies were mostly represented by case reports/series or small cohorts. Nonetheless, combination of radiotherapy and CIs or CAR-T led to promising outcomes, resulting in extremely high rates of complete response and improving progression free and overall survival compared with data from recent clinical trials. Combination of RT and CIs had a fair toxicity profile with no reports of severe side effects. Within the limits of the small cohorts retrieved, RT seems a superior option compared with systemic treatment as a 'bridge' to CAR-T and could as well reduce severe complications rates. Radiotherapy could elicit immune response against lymphoma, as demonstrated by multiple cases of abscopal effect and its inclusion in anti-neoplastic vaccines protocols. CONCLUSION The results of this review warrant the evaluation of combination of RT and immunotherapy in larger and preferably prospective and randomized cohorts to confirm these preliminary impressive outcomes. The optimal dose, fractionation and timing of RT still have to be clarified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandra Tucci
- Department of Haematology, ASST-Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Re
- Department of Haematology, ASST-Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Annamaria Guaineri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Morelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ludovica Pegurri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giulia Volpi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michela Buglione
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Buglione M, Guerini AE, Filippi AR, Spiazzi L, Pasinetti N, Magli A, Toraci C, Borghetti P, Triggiani L, Alghisi A, Costantino G, Bertagna F, Giaj Levra N, Pegurri L, Magrini SM. A Systematic Review on Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Mediastinal Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 167:103437. [PMID: 34358649 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) and cardiovascular diseases induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy represent the main cause of excess mortality for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients, especially when the mediastinum is involved. Conformal radiotherapy techniques such as Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) could allow a reduction of the dose to the organs-at-risk (OARs) and therefore limit long-term toxicity. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the current literature regarding comparisons between IMRT and conventional photon beam radiotherapy, or between different IMRT techniques, for the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS IMRT allows a substantial reduction of the volumes of OARs exposed to high doses, reducing the risk of long-term toxicity. This benefit is conterbalanced by the increase of volumes receiving low doses, that could potentially increase the risk of SMNs. Treatment planning should be personalized on patient and disease characteristics. Dedicated techniques such as "butterfly" VMAT often provide the best trade-off.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Buglione
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Andrea Emanuele Guerini
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; Radiation Oncology Service, ASST Valcamonica Esine, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Udine General Hospital, Udine, Italy.
| | - Cristian Toraci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Alghisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy.
| | | | - Francesco Bertagna
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Niccolò Giaj Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Italy.
| | - Ludovica Pegurri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques for Mediastinal Lymphomas: Results from an Italian Survey. HEMATO 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/hemato2030031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: Multiple methods have been implemented to limit the impact of radiotherapy on patients affected by mediastinal lymphoma, including breathing control techniques, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), although the actual diffusion of such techniques is unclear. No surveys have been published to date evaluating the techniques adopted at different centers. Methods: A survey with a dedicated questionnaire was submitted to 195 Italian radiotherapy centers, assessing items regarding the characteristics of the center and clinical practice in the treatment of mediastinal lymphomas. Results: A total of 43 centers (22%) responded, the majority of which were university hospitals (37.2%) or cancer care centers (27.9%). In 95.4% of the centers, IMRT was used in the clinical practice, and the most frequently employed techniques were VMAT (48.8% of centers) and non-rotational IMRT (31.7%). Comparison of multiple plans was performed by 66.7% of the responding centers. Dose constraints for organs at risk were consistently prescribed. IGRT techniques were adopted by 93% of the centers, while breathing control or gating techniques were routinely used by only 25.6% of the centers. A necessity to standardize OAR constraints and define guidelines was perceived by almost all participants. Conclusions: Modern radiotherapy techniques are widely used in the Italian centers, although with heterogeneous characteristics.
Collapse
|
39
|
Santoro A, Mazza R, Spina M, Califano C, Specchia G, Carella M, Consoli U, Palombi F, Musso M, Pulsoni A, Kovalchuk S, Bonfichi M, Ricci F, Fabbri A, Liberati AM, Rodari M, Giordano L, Chimienti E, Balzarotti M, Sorasio R, Gallamini A, Ghiggi C, Ciammella P, Ricardi U, Chauvie S, Carlo-Stella C, Merli F. Dose-dense ABVD as first-line therapy in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a prospective, multicenter double-step phase II study by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Ann Hematol 2021; 100:2547-2556. [PMID: 34327561 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04604-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the feasibility and activity of an intensified dose-dense ABVD (dd-ABVD) regimen in patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This prospective, multicenter, phase II study enrolled 96 patients with newly diagnosed, unfavorable stage I or II classical HL. The patients received four cycles of dd-ABVD followed by radiotherapy. Interim PET (PET-2) was mandatory after two courses. Primary endpoints were the evaluation of dd-ABVD feasibility and activity (incidence of PET-2 negativity). The feasibility endpoint was achieved with 48/52 (92.3%) patients receiving > 85% of the programmed dose. The mean dose intensity in the overall patient population (n = 96) was 93.7%, and the median duration of dd-ABVD was 85 days (range, 14-115) versus an expected duration of 84 days. PET-2 was available for 92/96 (95.8%) patients, of whom 79 were PET-2 negative (85.9%). In total, 90 (93.8%) patients showed complete response at the end of treatment. With a follow-up of 80.9 months (3.3-103.2), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. At 84 months, PFS and OS rates were 88.4% and 95.7%, respectively. No evidence for a difference in PFS or OS was observed for PET-2-negative and PET-2-positive patients. Infections were documented in 8.3% and febrile neutropenia in 6.2% of cases. Four patients died: one had alveolitis at cycle 3, one death was unrelated to treatment, and two died from a secondary cancer. dd-ABVD is feasible and demonstrates activity in early-stage unfavorable HL. The predictive role of PET-2 positivity in early-stage unfavorable HL remains controversial. The study was registered in the EudraCT (reference number, 2011-003,191-36) and the ClinicalTrials.gov (reference number, NCT02247869) databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armando Santoro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Italy. .,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Rita Mazza
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Spina
- Medical Oncology Division, Centro Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy
| | - Catello Califano
- Onco-Hematology Department, A. Tortora Hospital, Pagani, Salerno, Italy
| | - Giorgina Specchia
- Emergency and Transplantation Department, Hematology Section, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Carella
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Clinica La Madonnina, Milan, Italy.,Clinica Villa Pia, Rome, Italy
| | - Ugo Consoli
- Hematology Department, Garibaldi Nesima Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Musso
- Onco-Hematology Unit, Casa Di Cura "La Maddalena", Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pulsoni
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesca Ricci
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Anna Marina Liberati
- Onco-Hematology Division, S. Maria Hospital, Università Degli Studi Di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Marcello Rodari
- IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Via Manzoni 56, Milano, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Laura Giordano
- Biostatistic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Monica Balzarotti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Sorasio
- Division of Hematology, S. Croce E Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallamini
- Division of Hematology, S. Croce E Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.,Research and Clinical Innovation Department, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Chiara Ghiggi
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Stephane Chauvie
- Medical Physics Department, S. Croce E Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Carmelo Carlo-Stella
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Merli
- Hematology Department, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mohty R, Dulery R, Bazarbachi AH, Savani M, Hamed RA, Bazarbachi A, Mohty M. Latest advances in the management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma: the era of novel therapies. Blood Cancer J 2021; 11:126. [PMID: 34244478 PMCID: PMC8270913 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00518-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma is a highly curable disease. Although most patients achieve complete response following frontline therapy, key unmet clinical needs remain including relapsed/refractory disease, treatment-related morbidity, impaired quality of life and poor outcome in patients older than 60 years. The incorporation of novel therapies, including check point inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates, into the frontline setting, sequential approaches, and further individualized treatment intensity may address these needs. We summarize the current treatment options for patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma from frontline therapy to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and describe novel trials in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Razan Mohty
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rémy Dulery
- Department of Hematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Sorbonne University, INSERM UMRs 938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Paris, France
| | - Abdul Hamid Bazarbachi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Malvi Savani
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Rama Al Hamed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ali Bazarbachi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- Department of Hematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
- Sorbonne University, INSERM UMRs 938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kumar A, Casulo C, Advani RH, Budde E, Barr PM, Batlevi CL, Caron P, Constine LS, Dandapani SV, Drill E, Drullinsky P, Friedberg JW, Grieve C, Hamilton A, Hamlin PA, Hoppe RT, Horwitz SM, Joseph A, Khan N, Laraque L, Matasar MJ, Moskowitz AJ, Noy A, Palomba ML, Schöder H, Straus DJ, Vemuri S, Yang J, Younes A, Zelenetz AD, Yahalom J, Moskowitz CH. Brentuximab Vedotin Combined With Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Early-Stage, Unfavorable-Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2257-2265. [PMID: 33909449 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve curability and limit long-term adverse effects for newly diagnosed early-stage (ES), unfavorable-risk Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS In this multicenter study with four sequential cohorts, patients received four cycles of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD). If positron emission tomography (PET)-4-negative, patients received 30-Gy involved-site radiotherapy in cohort 1, 20-Gy involved-site radiotherapy in cohort 2, 30-Gy consolidation-volume radiotherapy in cohort 3, and no radiotherapy in cohort 4. Eligible patients had ES, unfavorable-risk disease. Bulk disease defined by Memorial Sloan Kettering criteria (> 7 cm in maximal transverse or coronal diameter on computed tomography) was not required for cohorts 1 and 2 but was for cohorts 3 and 4. The primary end point was to evaluate safety for cohort 1 and to evaluate complete response rate by PET for cohorts 2-4. RESULTS Of the 117 patients enrolled, 116 completed chemotherapy, with the median age of 32 years: 50% men, 98% stage II, 86% Memorial Sloan Kettering-defined disease bulk, 27% traditional bulk (> 10 cm), 52% elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 21% extranodal involvement, and 56% > 2 involved lymph node sites. The complete response rate in cohorts 1-4 was 93%, 100%, 93%, and 97%, respectively. With median follow-up of 3.8 years (5.9, 4.5, 2.5, and 2.2 years for cohorts 1-4), the overall 2-year progression-free and overall survival were 94% and 99%, respectively. In cohorts 1-4, the 2-year progression-free survival was 93%, 97%, 90%, and 97%, respectively. Adverse events included neutropenia (44%), febrile neutropenia (8%), and peripheral neuropathy (54%), which was largely reversible. CONCLUSION BV + AVD × four cycles is a highly active and well-tolerated treatment program for ES, unfavorable-risk Hodgkin lymphoma, including bulky disease. The efficacy of BV + AVD supports the safe reduction or elimination of consolidative radiation among PET-4-negative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Kumar
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Carla Casulo
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | | | | | - Paul M Barr
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Philip Caron
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Esther Drill
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Clare Grieve
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Paul A Hamlin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard T Hoppe
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Ashlee Joseph
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Niloufer Khan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Leana Laraque
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Ariela Noy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Heiko Schöder
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Shreya Vemuri
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joanna Yang
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | - Craig H Moskowitz
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gillessen S, Plütschow A, Fuchs M, Markova J, Greil R, Topp MS, Meissner J, Zijlstra JM, Eichenauer DA, Bröckelmann PJ, Diehl V, Borchmann P, Engert A, von Tresckow B. Intensified treatment of patients with early stage, unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma: long-term follow-up of a randomised, international phase 3 trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG HD14). LANCET HAEMATOLOGY 2021; 8:e278-e288. [PMID: 33770483 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(21)00029-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve the long-term tumour control in early, unfavourable Hodgkin Lymphoma, the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD14 trial compared four cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) with an intensified chemotherapy regimen consisting of two cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (escalated BEACOPP) plus two cycles of ABVD. The final analysis of the trial showed a significant advantage in terms of freedom from treatment failure (difference 7·2% [95% CI 3·8-10·5] at 5 years) for patients who received two cycles of escalated BEACOPP and two cycles of ABVD. However, there was no difference in overall survival between the two groups. To evaluate long-term efficacy and toxicity of this strategy, we did a follow-up analysis. METHODS Patients aged 18-60 years with performance status of 2 or less and primary diagnosis of early, unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma (all histologies) were included in an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of ABVD (ABVD group) or two cycles of escalated BEACOPP and two cycles of ABVD (2 + 2 group), both groups also received 30 Gy involved field radiotherapy. The ABVD dosing regimen was doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 (days 1 and 15), bleomycin 10 mg/m2 (days 1 and 15), vinblastine 6 mg/m2 (days 1 and 15), and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2 (days 1 and 15), repeated on day 29. The escalated BEACOPP dosing regimen was cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2 (day 1), doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 (day 1), etoposide 200 mg/m2 (days 1-3), procarbazine 100 mg/m2 (days 1-7), prednisone 40 mg/m2 (days 1-14), vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 (day 8; maximum 2 mg), and bleomycin 10 mg/m2 (day 8), repeated on day 22. After closure of the ABVD group according to prespecified rules, patients were assigned to receive two cycles of escalated BEACOPP and two cycles of ABVD (non-randomised 2 + 2 group), which continued until the end of the predefined 5-year recruitment period. In this prespecified long-term follow-up analysis, we aimed to evaluate the secondary endpoints progression-free survival, overall survival, and long-term toxicity. To this end, we did a descriptive intention-to-treat analysis of all qualified HD14 patients and on the predefined subsets of randomised qualified HD14 patients and patients in the non-randomised 2 + 2 group. The trial was registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial database, 04761296. FINDINGS Between Jan 28, 2003, and Dec 29, 2009, 1686 patients were randomly assigned to the ABVD group (847 [50·2%] patients) and the 2 + 2 group (839 [49·8%] patients). 370 additional patients were recruited to the non-randomised 2 + 2 group. 1550 (92%) randomly assigned patients (median observation time 112 months [IQR 80-132]) and 339 (92%) patients in the non-randomised 2 + 2 group (median observation time 74 months [58-100]) were included in the qualified analysis set. 10-year overall survival in the randomly assigned patients was 94·1% (95% CI 92·0-95·7) for the ABVD group and 94·1% (91·8-95·7) for the 2 + 2 group (HR 1·0 [95% CI 0·6-1·5]; p=0·88). 8-year overall survival in the non-randomised 2 + 2 group was 95·1% (95% CI 91·6-97·2). 10-year progression-free survival in the randomly assigned patients was 85·6% (95% CI 82·6-88·1) for the ABVD group and 91·2% (88·4-93·3) for the 2 + 2 group (HR 0·5% [95% CI 0·4-0·7]; p=0·0001), accounting for a significant difference of 5·6% (95% CI 1·9-9·2) favouring the 2 + 2 group (p=0·0001). In the non-randomised 2 + 2 group, 8-year progression-free survival was 94·5% (95% CI 91·1-96·6). Standardised incidence ratios of second primary malignancies were similar between the ABVD group (2·3 [95% CI 1·6-3·1]) and the 2 + 2 group (2·5 [1·8-3·4]; Gray's p=0·80). Standardised incidence ratio of second primary malignancies was 3·1 (95% CI 1·7-5·0) in the non-randomised 2 + 2 group. INTERPRETATION This long-term analysis confirms superior tumour control in the 2 + 2 group compared with the ABVD group without translating into an overall survival difference. At longer follow-up, there is no difference regarding second primary malignancies between groups. In conclusion, the 2 + 2 regimen spares a significant number of patients from the burden of relapse and additional treatment without increased long-term toxicity. FUNDING Deutsche Krebshilfe eV and Swiss Federal Government.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Gillessen
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Annette Plütschow
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Jana Markova
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Max S Topp
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Julia Meissner
- Fifth Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Vrije Universiteit, University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Paul J Bröckelmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Diehl
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Germany; Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation and Cancer Center Cologne Essen-Partner Site Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Momotow J, Borchmann S, Eichenauer DA, Engert A, Sasse S. Hodgkin Lymphoma-Review on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Current and Future Treatment Approaches for Adult Patients. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1125. [PMID: 33800409 PMCID: PMC7962816 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a rare malignancy accounting for roughly 15% of all lymphomas and mostly affecting young patients. A second peak is seen in patients above 60 years of age. The history of HL treatment represents a remarkable success story in which HL has turned from an incurable disease to a neoplasm with an excellent prognosis. First-line treatment with stage-adapted treatment consisting of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy results in cure rates of approximately 80%. Second-line treatment mostly consists of intensive salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Novel approaches such as antibody drug conjugates and immunomodulatory drugs have shown impressive results in clinical trials in refractory and relapsed HL and are now increasingly implemented in earlier treatment lines. This review gives a comprehensive overview on HL addressing epidemiology, pathophysiology and current treatment options as well as recent developments and perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesko Momotow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.M.); (S.B.); (D.A.E.); (A.E.)
| | - Sven Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.M.); (S.B.); (D.A.E.); (A.E.)
| | - Dennis A. Eichenauer
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.M.); (S.B.); (D.A.E.); (A.E.)
| | - Andreas Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.M.); (S.B.); (D.A.E.); (A.E.)
| | - Stephanie Sasse
- Department IV of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University Hospital Aachen, University of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is curable with chemotherapy but relapses occur in approximately 30% of cases. Novel agents, including brentuximb vedotin (BV) and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have encouraging activity in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory cHL, confirming that the use of agents that target tumor cells or the tumor microenvironment are promising strategies to improve patient outcomes. The field of immunotherapy in cHL is now moving toward combinations of PD-1 inhibitors with other immunological agents such as cytotoxic T- lymphocyte associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, newer PD-1 inhibitors such as sintilimab, tislelizumab, avelumab and camrelizumab, bispecific antibodies such as AFM-13, cellular therapies using CD30 chimeric antigen T-cells (CD30.CART) and anti-CD25 antibody-drug conjugates such as camidanlumab tesirine (cami-T). Here we review early phase studies evaluating these approaches in the treatment of cHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjal Desai
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stage I-II nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: a multi-institutional study of adult patients by ILROG. Blood 2021; 135:2365-2374. [PMID: 32211877 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019003877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is an uncommon histologic variant, and the optimal treatment of stage I-II NLPHL is undefined. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including patients ≥16 years of age with stage I-II NLPHL diagnosed from 1995 through 2018 who underwent all forms of management, including radiotherapy (RT), combined modality therapy (CMT; RT+chemotherapy [CT]), CT, observation after excision, rituximab and RT, and single-agent rituximab. End points were progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from transformation, and overall survival (OS) without statistical comparison between management groups. We identified 559 patients with median age of 39 years: 72.3% were men, and 54.9% had stage I disease. Median follow-up was 5.5 years (interquartile range, 3.1-10.1). Five-year PFS and OS in the entire cohort were 87.1% and 98.3%, respectively. Primary management was RT alone (n = 257; 46.0%), CMT (n = 184; 32.9%), CT alone (n = 47; 8.4%), observation (n = 37; 6.6%), rituximab and RT (n = 19; 3.4%), and rituximab alone (n = 15; 2.7%). The 5-year PFS rates were 91.1% after RT, 90.5% after CMT, 77.8% after CT, 73.5% after observation, 80.8% after rituximab and RT, and 38.5% after rituximab alone. In the RT cohort, but not the CMT cohort, variant immunoarchitectural pattern and number of sites >2 were associated with worse PFS (P < .05). Overall, 21 patients (3.8%) developed large-cell transformation, with a significantly higher transformation rate in those with variant immunoarchitectural pattern (P = .049) and number of involved sites >2 (P = .0006). OS for patients with stage I-II NLPHL was excellent after all treatments.
Collapse
|
46
|
Tarnasky AM, Troy JD, LeBlanc TW. The patient experience of ABVD treatment in Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective cohort study of patient-reported distress. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:4987-4996. [PMID: 33576877 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06044-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Psychological distress is prevalent in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Many patients, regardless of prognosis, receive ABVD chemotherapy as first-line treatment, but few studies have specifically examined the nature of distress during this shared treatment experience. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of patient-reported distress in HL patients receiving ABVD treatment at a single tertiary care facility. Distress was measured using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List (PL). We used descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations to assess the prevalence of distress and specific problem items during treatment and associations with patient- and disease-related factors. RESULTS We collected data from 50 patients comprising 467 unique encounters, with 369/467 (79.0%) reporting a distress thermometer score. Median distress score was 2 (IQR: 0-5), but actionable distress (distress thermometer ≥4) was noted for 118/369 (32.0%) encounters. Actionable distress was only related to having a prior cancer, which conferred lower odds of actionable distress (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.74, p=0.01) Physical and emotional problems were reported for 287/369 (77.8%) and 125/369 (33.9%) visits, respectively. Female patients had greater odds of both physical (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.32-7.66, p=0.01) and emotional (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.25-8.73, p=0.02) problems. CONCLUSION ABVD treatment is associated with a high frequency of actionable distress, with physical and emotional problems acting as primary drivers. Female patients may be particularly vulnerable, while cancer survivors may be uniquely resilient. These findings demonstrate the need to thoroughly screen for and appropriately tailor distress management strategies for HL patients during treatment with ABVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jesse D Troy
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. .,Duke Cancer Institute, Box 2715, DUMC,, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Eichenauer DA, Müller H, Elger L, Goergen H, Fuchs M, Kreissl S, Böll B, Diehl V, von Tresckow B, Borchmann P, Engert A. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma after treatment for classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the German Hodgkin Study Group. Br J Haematol 2021; 193:515-519. [PMID: 33486762 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Data on non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) after classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are scarce. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis comprising 11·841 cHL patients who had first-line treatment within the randomized German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD7-HD15 studies. After a median follow-up of 106 months, 175 patients (1·5%) had developed NHL. The median time to NHL was 44 months, the median age at NHL diagnosis was 54 years. The five-year event-free survival and overall survival estimates from the diagnosis of NHL were 36·9% and 44·2%, respectively. Thus, NHL after cHL is a rare event primarily affecting older individuals and often resulting in the patient´s death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis A Eichenauer
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Horst Müller
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Leonard Elger
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Goergen
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefanie Kreissl
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Boris Böll
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Diehl
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Clinic for Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bröckelmann PJ, Goergen H, Keller U, Meissner J, Ordemann R, Halbsguth TV, Sasse S, Sökler M, Kerkhoff A, Mathas S, Hüttmann A, Bormann M, Zimmermann A, Mettler J, Fuchs M, von Tresckow B, Baues C, Rosenwald A, Klapper W, Kobe C, Borchmann P, Engert A. Efficacy of Nivolumab and AVD in Early-Stage Unfavorable Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Randomized Phase 2 German Hodgkin Study Group NIVAHL Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 6:872-880. [PMID: 32352505 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Importance In early-stage unfavorable classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), conventional therapy induces high cure rates but also relevant acute and long-term toxic effects. Nivolumab is well tolerated and highly effective in relapsed/refractory cHL but has not been adequately studied in first-line treatment of early-stage cHL. The NIVAHL trial evaluated nivolumab in this setting with the aim to develop a highly effective yet tolerable systemic therapy to ultimately mitigate morbidity in patients who survive cHL. Objective To evaluate efficacy of 2 experimental nivolumab-based first-line treatment strategies in patients with early-stage unfavorable cHL. Design, Setting, and Participants This was an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 randomized clinical trial, open between April 2017 and October 2018. The trial took place at 35 trial centers across Germany, ranging from academic centers to private offices. Eligibility was defined by age 18 to 60 years, cHL confirmed by expert pathology review, early-stage unfavorable disease by German Hodgkin Study Group criteria (stage I to II with risk factor[s]), and absence of serious concomitant disease or organ dysfunction. Among 110 enrolled patients, 109 were eligible. Interventions Systemic therapy, per random assignment (1:1) to either concomitant treatment with 4 cycles of nivolumab and doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N-AVD) or sequential treatment with 4 doses of nivolumab, 2 cycles of N-AVD, and 2 cycles of AVD at standard doses, followed by 30-Gy involved-site radiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Complete remission (CR) rate after study treatment, aiming at excluding a CR rate of 80% or lower via a 2-sided 95% CI for each treatment group. Results Of 109 patients included in this study, 65 (59.6%) were women, and the median (range) age was 27 (18-60) years. At interim staging after 2 cycles of N-AVD or 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy, 54 of 54 (100%) and 49 of 51 (96%) response-eligible patients, respectively, achieved an objective response, with CR in 47 (87%) and 26 (51%) patients, respectively. Among 101 patients eligible for primary end point analysis, 46 of 51 (90%; 95% CI, 79%-97%) patients receiving concomitant therapy and 47 of 50 (94%; 95% CI, 84%-99%) patients receiving sequential therapy achieved CR after study treatment. With a median follow-up of 13 months, 12-month progression-free survival was 100% for patients receiving concomitant treatment and 98% (95% CI, 95%-100%) for patients receiving sequential therapy. Conclusions and Relevance Both strategies combining nivolumab and AVD are feasible and resulted in high remission rates. Despite narrowly missing the efficacy benchmark in the concomitant group, the excellent 12-month progression-free survival and the unexpectedly high CR rate after 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy warrant further evaluation of this approach in the first-line treatment of patients with early-stage cHL. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03004833.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Bröckelmann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Goergen
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrich Keller
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar der TU München, Internal Medicine III, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Meissner
- Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rainer Ordemann
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Teresa V Halbsguth
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine II, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Stephanie Sasse
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Andrea Kerkhoff
- Medizinische Klinik A, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Stephan Mathas
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Hüttmann
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Zimmermann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jasmin Mettler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Radiooncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Wolfram Klapper
- Department of Hematopathology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Early Stage Nonbulky Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated With Combined Modality Therapy in the Stanford V Trials (the G4 and G5 Studies). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 110:444-451. [PMID: 33385495 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Combined modality therapy (CMT) is standard therapy for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (ESHL). We previously reported excellent outcomes with the abbreviated Stanford V regimen. Herein we report updated results with median follow-up >10 years on survival, therapy-related late effects, and impact of disease risk factors on patient outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS The G4 and G5 studies enrolled patients with stage I-IIA nonbulky ESHL. Patients received 8 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy followed by 30 Gy modified involved-field radiation therapy (mIFRT) (G4) or Stanford V-C + 20 Gy mIFRT (G5). Patients were categorized as favorable or unfavorable risk per German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) criteria and outcomes between groups compared. RESULTS A total of 129 patients were enrolled (68 favorable and 61 unfavorable risk). In the G4 study (n = 87), at median follow-up of 19.7 years, 5-, 10-, and 15-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 95.4%/97.7%, 91.8%/96.5%, and 91.8%/95.3%, respectively. In the G5 study (n = 42), at median follow-up of 13.5 years, the 5-, 10-, and 15-year PFS and OS were 92.9%/100%, 92.9%/100%, and 88.4%/91.9%, respectively. PFS (P = .86) and OS (P = .86) were not significantly different between studies. There were also no significant differences between studies in patients with favorable or unfavorable risk for PFS (F: P = .53; U: P = .96), OS (F: P = .99; U: P = .78), secondary malignancies (F: P = .74; U: P = 1.0), and cardiovascular complications (F: no cases; U: P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS The G4 and G5 studies achieve high rates of durable remission; 20 versus 30 Gy mIFRT and cyclophosphamide substituted for mechlorethamine did not compromise nodal control, PFS, or OS in both favorable and unfavorable risk disease. These results support the efficacy of CMT in early-stage disease and lower-dose radiation therapy in patients with favorable and nonbulky unfavorable ESHL.
Collapse
|
50
|
Shah BA, Oh C, Wu SP, Karp JM, Grossbard M, Gerber NK. Radiation Dose Reduction in Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2020; 20:820-829. [PMID: 32800712 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) involves radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, or combined modality therapy (CMT). We analyzed reduction of RT dose in CMT, particularly in the context of German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD10 randomized trial results of 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with stage I-II HL receiving CMT. RT dose and associated characteristics were analyzed. Stage I and absence of B symptoms were used as a surrogate for early-stage favorable disease. RESULTS Of 31,301 patients with stage I-II HL, 11,457 received CMT between 2004 and 2015. Using the surrogate defined above, 1955 patients (17.1%) were classified as having favorable disease. The majority (61.6%) received 30-36 Gy, while 7.0% received 20 Gy. The provision of 20 Gy was more common in stage I patients (12.3% vs. 5.4% in stage II) and at academic facilities (10.8% vs. 6.3%-8.9% at other facilities). Use of 20 Gy (vs. 30-36 Gy) was less likely with thorax site (odds ratio [OR] 0.43 vs. head and neck), stage II disease (OR 0.41), and B symptoms (OR 0.33). Notably, the use of 20 Gy increased dramatically after 2010 (the year of publication of GHSG HD10 trial results), with rates of 12.3% in 2010-2015 versus 0.1% in 2004-2009 (OR 6.3, P < .001). This was even more pronounced in cases of favorable early-stage disease, with 25.5% after 2010 versus 2.8% before 2010 (OR 13.2, P < .001). The use of doses > 36 Gy decreased over a corresponding time period (OR 0.44, P < .001). CONCLUSION Analysis of CMT for patients with early-stage HL demonstrates variability in RT dose, including increasing use of 20 Gy and decreasing use of high doses > 36 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhartesh A Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Cheongeun Oh
- Department of Population Health: Biostatistics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - S Peter Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Jerome M Karp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Naamit K Gerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|