1
|
Fuchs M, Jacob AS, Kaul H, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Pabst T, Greil R, Bröckelmann PJ, Topp MS, Just M, Hertenstein B, Soekler M, Vogelhuber M, Zijlstra JM, Keller UB, Krause SW, Dührsen U, Meissner J, Viardot A, Eich HT, Baues C, Diehl V, Rosenwald A, Buehnen I, von Tresckow B, Dietlein M, Borchmann P, Engert A, Eichenauer DA. Follow-up of the GHSG HD16 trial of PET-guided treatment in early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma. Leukemia 2024; 38:160-167. [PMID: 37845285 PMCID: PMC10776396 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-02064-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
The primary analysis of the GHSG HD16 trial indicated a significant loss of tumor control with PET-guided omission of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This analysis reports long-term outcomes. Overall, 1150 patients aged 18-75 years with newly diagnosed early-stage favorable HL were randomized between standard combined-modality treatment (CMT) (2x ABVD followed by PET/CT [PET-2] and 20 Gy involved-field RT) and PET-2-guided treatment omitting RT in case of PET-2 negativity (Deauville score [DS] < 3). The study aimed at excluding inferiority of PET-2-guided treatment and assessing the prognostic impact of PET-2 in patients receiving CMT. At a median follow-up of 64 months, PET-2-negative patients had a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 94.2% after CMT (n = 328) and 86.7% after ABVD alone (n = 300; HR = 2.05 [1.20-3.51]; p = 0.0072). 5-year OS was 98.3% and 98.8%, respectively (p = 0.14); 4/12 documented deaths were caused by second primary malignancies and only one by HL. Among patients assigned to CMT, 5-year PFS was better in PET-2-negative (n = 353; 94.0%) than in PET-2-positive patients (n = 340; 90.3%; p = 0.012). The difference was more pronounced when using DS4 as cut-off (DS 1-3: n = 571; 94.0% vs. DS ≥ 4: n = 122; 83.6%; p < 0.0001). Taken together, CMT should be considered standard treatment for early-stage favorable HL irrespective of the PET-2-result.
Collapse
Grants
- Sanofi-Genzyme, Takeda
- Employment/leadership position (University Hospital of Cologne, Head of the GHSG Trial Coordination Centre), honorarium (Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Affimed, Lukon, Janssen)
- Takeda Medical Research Foundation
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada (BMS Canada)
- BeiGene, MSD Stemline
- Gilead Sciences (Gilead)
- Miltenyi Biotec
- Novartis
- Roche (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd)
- Amgen (Amgen Inc.)
- Pfizer (Pfizer Inc.)
- Merck & Co., Inc. | Merck Sharp and Dohme (Merck Sharp & Dohme)
- AbbVie (AbbVie Inc.)
- AstraZeneca
- allogene, Cerus, incyte, IQVIA, Noscendo, Pentixapharm,
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anne Sophie Jacob
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Kaul
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Pabst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard Greil
- IIIrd Medical Department, Paracelcus Medical University and Salzburg Cancer Research Institute, Salzburg, Austria
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute and AGMT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Paul J Bröckelmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Max S Topp
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marianne Just
- Dres. med. Just/Düwel/Riesenberg/Steinke/Schäfer, Studiengesellschaft, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Hertenstein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Martin Soekler
- Onkology, Spital Thun, Switzerland, formerly University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Vogelhuber
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinik Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ulrich Bernd Keller
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum "Rechts der Isar", Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan W Krause
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology/Oncology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Dührsen
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Viardot
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Hans-Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Diehl
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Rosenwald
- Institute of Pathology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ina Buehnen
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK partner site Essen), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kreissl S, Goergen H, Buehnen I, Kobe C, Moccia A, Greil R, Eichenauer DA, Zijlstra JM, Markova J, Meissner J, Feuring-Buske M, Soekler M, Beck HJ, Willenbacher W, Ludwig WD, Pabst T, Topp MS, Hitz F, Bentz M, Keller UB, Kühnhardt D, Ostermann H, Hertenstein B, Aulitzky W, Maschmeyer G, Vieler T, Eich H, Baues C, Stein H, Fuchs M, Diehl V, Dietlein M, Engert A, Borchmann P. PET-guided eBEACOPP treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HD18): follow-up analysis of an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2021; 8:e398-e409. [PMID: 34048679 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(21)00101-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The German Hodgkin Study Group's HD18 trial established the safety and efficacy of PET-guided eBEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone in escalated doses) for the treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. However, because of a protocol amendment during the enrolment period (June 1, 2011) that changed standard treatment from eight to six cycles, the results of the HD18 trial have been partially immature. We report a prespecified 5-year follow-up analysis of the completed HD18 trial. METHODS HD18 was an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 301 hospitals and private practices in five European countries. Patients aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were recruited. After receiving an initial two cycles of eBEACOPP (1250 mg/m2 intravenous cyclophosphamide [day 1], 35 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin [day 1], 200 mg/m2 intravenous etoposide [day 1-3], 100 mg/m2 oral procarbazine [day 1-7], 40 mg/m2 oral prednisone [day 1-14], 1·4 mg/m2 intravenous vincristine [day 8], and 10 mg/m2 intravenous bleomycin [day 8]), patients underwent a contrast-enhanced CT and PET scan (PET-2). Patients with positive PET-2 were randomly assigned to receive standard therapy (an additional six cycles of eBEACOPP; ie, eight cycles in total) or experimental therapy (an additional six cycles of eBEACOPP plus 375 mg/m2 intravenous rituximab; ie, eight cycles in total) until June 1, 2011. After June 1, 2011, all patients with positive PET-2 were assigned to the updated standard therapy with an additional four cycles of eBEACOPP (ie, six cycles in total). Patients with negative PET-2 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard therapy (an additional six cycles of eBEACOPP [ie, eight cycles in total] until June 1, 2011; an additional four cycles of eBEACOPP [ie, six cycles in total] after June 1, 2011) or experimental therapy (an additional two cycles of eBEACOPP; ie, four cycles in total). Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation method, including a random component, stratified by centre, age, stage, international prognostic score, and sex. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. HD18 aimed to improve 5-year progression-free survival by 15% in the PET-2-positive intention-to-treat cohort and to exclude inferiority of 6% or more in 5-year progression-free survival in the PET-2-negative per-protocol population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00515554, and is completed. FINDINGS Between May 14, 2008, and July 18, 2014, 2101 patients were enrolled and 1945 were assigned to a treatment group according to their PET-2 result. In the PET-2-positive cohort, with a median follow-up of 73 months (IQR 59 to 94), 5-year progression-free survival was 89·9% (95% CI 85·7 to 94·1) in 217 patients assigned to eight cycles of eBEACOPP before the protocol amendment and 87·7% (83·1 to 92·4) in 217 patients assigned to eight cycles of rituximab plus eBEACOPP (p=0·40). Among 506 patients who received six cycles of eBEACOPP after the protocol amendment, 5-year progression-free survival was 90·1% (95% CI 87·2 to 92·9), with a median follow-up of 58 months (IQR 39 to 66). In the PET-2-negative cohort, with a median follow-up of 66 months (IQR 54 to 85) in the combined pre-amendment and post-amendment groups, 5-year progression-free survival was 91·2% (95% CI 88·4 to 93·9) in 446 patients who received eight or six cycles of eBEACOPP and 93·0% (90·6 to 95·4) in 474 patients who received four cycles of eBEACOPP (difference 1·9% [95% CI -1·8 to 5·5]). In the subgroup of PET-2-negative patients randomly assigned after protocol amendment, 5-year progression-free survival was 90·9% (95% CI 86·8 to 95·1) in 202 patients assigned to receive six cycles of eBEACOPP and 91·0% (86·6 to 95·5) in 200 patients assigned to receive four cycles of eBEACOPP (difference 0·1% [-5·9 to 6·2]). INTERPRETATION Long-term follow-up confirms the efficacy and safety of PET-2-guided eBEACOPP in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The reduction from eight to four cycles of eBEACOPP represents a benchmark in the treatment of early-responding patients, who can now be potentially cured with a short and safe treatment approach. FUNDING Deutsche Krebshilfe, Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI (Switzerland), and Roche Pharma. TRANSLATION For the German translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Kreissl
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, German Hodgkin Study Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Goergen
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, German Hodgkin Study Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ina Buehnen
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, German Hodgkin Study Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alden Moccia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard Greil
- IIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University and Salzburg Cancer Research Institute, Salzburg, Austria; Salzburg Cancer Research Institute and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, German Hodgkin Study Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Jana Markova
- Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | - Wolfgang Willenbacher
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie, Salzburg, Austria; Medical University Innsbruck, Internal Medicine V: Hematology & Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria; Oncotyrol, Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Thomas Pabst
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Max S Topp
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Martin Bentz
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bernd Keller
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology and Oncology at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dagmar Kühnhardt
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Charité University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helmut Ostermann
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernd Hertenstein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Walter Aulitzky
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Georg Maschmeyer
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Tom Vieler
- Karl Lennert-Cancer Center, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Hans Eich
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Harald Stein
- Berlin Reference Center for Lymphoma and Haematopathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, German Hodgkin Study Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Diehl
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, German Hodgkin Study Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, German Hodgkin Study Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, German Hodgkin Study Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fuchs M, Goergen H, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Lohri A, Greil R, Sasse S, Topp MS, Schäfer E, Hertenstein B, Soekler M, Vogelhuber M, Zijlstra JM, Keller UB, Krause SW, Wilhelm M, Maschmeyer G, Thiemer J, Dührsen U, Meissner J, Viardot A, Eich H, Baues C, Diehl V, Rosenwald A, von Tresckow B, Dietlein M, Borchmann P, Engert A. Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Treatment in Early-Stage Favorable Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Results of the International, Randomized Phase III HD16 Trial by the German Hodgkin Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2835-2845. [PMID: 31498753 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Combined-modality treatment (CMT) with 2× ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) and small-field radiotherapy is standard of care for patients with early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, the role of radiotherapy has been challenged. Positron emission tomography (PET) after 2× ABVD (PET-2) might help to predict individual outcomes and guide treatment. METHODS Between November 2009 and December 2015, we recruited patients age 18 to 75 years with newly diagnosed, early-stage favorable HL for this international randomized phase III trial. Patients were assigned to standard CMT of 2× ABVD and 20-Gy involved-field radiotherapy or PET-guided treatment, omitting involved-field radiotherapy after negative PET-2 (Deauville score < 3). Primary objectives were to exclude inferiority of 10% or more in 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of ABVD alone compared with CMT in a per-protocol analysis among PET-2-negative patients (noninferiority margin for hazard ratio, 3.01) and to confirm PET-2 positivity (Deauville score ≥ 3) as a risk factor for PFS among CMT-treated patients. RESULTS We enrolled 1,150 patients. Median follow-up was 45 months. Among 628 PET-2-negative, per-protocol-treated patients, 5-year PFS was 93.4% (95% CI, 90.4% to 96.5%) with CMT and 86.1% (95% CI, 81.4% to 90.9%) with ABVD (difference 7.3% [95% CI, 1.6% to 13.0%]; hazard ratio, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.02 to 3.12]). Five-year overall survival was 98.1% (95% CI, 96.5% to 99.8%) with CMT and 98.4% (95% CI, 96.5% to 100.0%) with ABVD. Among 693 patients who were assigned to CMT, 5-year PFS was 93.2% (95% CI, 90.2% to 96.2%) among PET-2-negative patients and 88.4% (95% CI, 84.2% to 92.6%) in PET-2-positive patients (P = .047). When using the more common liver cutoff (Deauville score, 4) for PET-2 positivity, the difference was more pronounced (5-year PFS, 93.1% [95% CI, 90.7% to 95.5%] v 80.9% [95% CI, 72.2% to 89.7%]; P = .0011). CONCLUSION In early-stage favorable HL, a positive PET after two cycles ABVD indicates a high risk for treatment failure, particularly when a Deauville score of 4 is used as a cutoff for positivity. In PET-2-negative patients, radiotherapy cannot be omitted from CMT without clinically relevant loss of tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Goergen
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Georg Kuhnert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Lohri
- Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.,Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard Greil
- IIIrd Medical Department, Paracelcus Medical University and Salzburg Cancer Research Institute, Salzburg, Austria.,Salzburg Cancer Research Institute and AGMT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Stephanie Sasse
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Max S Topp
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Erhardt Schäfer
- Dres. med. Just/Düwel/Riesenberg/Steinke/Schäfer, Studiengesellschaft, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Hertenstein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Martin Vogelhuber
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinik Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ulrich Bernd Keller
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum "Rechts der Isar", Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan W Krause
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Haematology/Oncology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin Wilhelm
- Department of Medical Oncology, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Georg Maschmeyer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Julia Thiemer
- Clinic for Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Dührsen
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Viardot
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Hans Eich
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Diehl
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Rosenwald
- Institute of Pathology, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borchmann P, Goergen H, Kobe C, Lohri A, Greil R, Eichenauer DA, Zijlstra JM, Markova J, Meissner J, Feuring-Buske M, Hüttmann A, Dierlamm J, Soekler M, Beck HJ, Willenbacher W, Ludwig WD, Pabst T, Topp MS, Hitz F, Bentz M, Keller UB, Kühnhardt D, Ostermann H, Schmitz N, Hertenstein B, Aulitzky W, Maschmeyer G, Vieler T, Eich H, Baues C, Stein H, Fuchs M, Kuhnert G, Diehl V, Dietlein M, Engert A. PET-guided treatment in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD18): final results of an open-label, international, randomised phase 3 trial by the German Hodgkin Study Group. Lancet 2017; 390:2790-2802. [PMID: 29061295 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32134-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Revised: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intensive polychemotherapy regimen eBEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone in escalated doses) is very active in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma, albeit at the expense of severe toxicities. Individual patients might be cured with less burdensome therapy. We investigated whether metabolic response determined by PET after two cycles of standard regimen eBEACOPP (PET-2) would allow adaption of treatment intensity, increasing it for PET-2-positive patients and reducing it for PET-2-negative patients. METHODS In this open-label, randomised, parallel-group phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma in 301 hospitals and private practices in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic. After central review of PET-2, patients were assigned (1:1) to one of two parallel treatment groups on the basis of their PET-2 result. Patients with positive PET-2 were randomised to receive six additional cycles of either standard eBEACOPP (8 × eBEACOPP in total) or eBEACOPP with rituximab (8 × R-eBEACOPP). Those with negative PET-2 were randomised between standard treatment with six additional cycles of eBEACOPP (8 × eBEACOPP) or experimental treatment with two additional cycles (4 × eBEACOPP). A protocol amendment in June, 2011, introduced a reduction of standard therapy to 6 × eBEACOPP; after this point, patients with positive PET-2 were no longer randomised and were all assigned to receive 6 × eBEACOPP and patients with negative PET-2 were randomly assigned to 6 × eBEACOPP (standard) or 4 × eBEACOPP (experimental). Randomisation was done centrally using the minimisation method including a random component, stratified according to centre, age (<45 vs ≥45 years), stage (IIB, IIIA vs IIIB, IV), international prognostic score (0-2 vs 3-7), and sex. eBEACOPP was given as previously described; rituximab was given intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m2 (maximum total dose 700 mg). The primary objectives were to show superiority of the experimental treatment in the PET-2-positive cohort, and to show non-inferiority of the experimental treatment in the PET-2-negative cohort in terms of the primary endpoint, progression-free survival. We defined non-inferiority as an absolute difference of 6% in the 5-year progression-free survival estimates. Primary analyses in the PET-2-negative cohort were per protocol; all other analyses were by intention to treat. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00515554. FINDINGS Between May 14, 2008, and July 18, 2014, we recruited 2101 patients, of whom 137 were found ineligible before randomisation and a further 19 were found ineligible after randomisation. Among 434 randomised patients (217 per arm) with positive PET-2, 5-year progression-free survival was 89·7% (95% CI 85·4-94·0) with eBEACOPP and 88·1% (83·5-92·7) with R-eBEACOPP (log-rank p=0·46). Patients with negative PET-2 randomly assigned to either 8 × eBEACOPP or 6 × eBEACOPP (n=504) or 4 × eBEACOPP (n=501) had 5-year progression-free survival of 90·8% (95% CI 87·9-93·7) and 92·2% (89·4-95·0), respectively (difference 1·4%, 95% CI -2·7 to 5·4). 4 × eBEACOPP was associated with fewer severe infections (40 [8%] of 498 vs 75 [15%] of 502) and organ toxicities (38 [8%] of 498 vs 91 [18%] of 502) than were 8 × eBEACOPP or 6 × eBEACOPP in PET-2-negative patients. Ten treatment-related deaths occurred: four in the PET-2-positive cohort (one [<1%] in the 8 × eBEACOPP group, three [1%] in the 8 × R-eBEACOPP group) and six in the PET-2-negative group (six [1%] in the 8 × eBEACOPP or 6 × eBEACOPP group). INTERPRETATION The favourable outcome of patients treated with eBEACOPP could not be improved by adding rituximab after positive PET-2. PET-2 negativity allows reduction to only four cycles of eBEACOPP without loss of tumour control. PET-2-guided eBEACOPP provides outstanding efficacy for all patients and increases overall survival by reducing treatment-related risks for patients with negative PET-2. We recommend this PET-2-guided treatment strategy for patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. FUNDING Deutsche Krebshilfe, Swiss State Secretariat for Education and Research, and Roche Pharma AG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Helen Goergen
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Lohri
- Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard Greil
- IIIrd Medical Department, Paracelcus Medical University and Salzburg Cancer Research Institute, Salzburg, Austria; Salzburg Cancer Research Institute and AGMT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Jana Markova
- Department of Internal Medicine-Hematology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Julia Meissner
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Hüttmann
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Judith Dierlamm
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Soekler
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hans-Joachim Beck
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Willenbacher
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute and AGMT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie), Salzburg, Austria; Medical University Innsbruck, Internal Medicine V: Hematology & Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria; Oncotyrol, Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Thomas Pabst
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Max S Topp
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Felicitas Hitz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland; Cantonal Hospital of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Martin Bentz
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bernd Keller
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum "Rechts der Isar", Munich, Germany
| | - Dagmar Kühnhardt
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Charité University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helmut Ostermann
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Department of Haematology, Asklepios Hospital St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Hertenstein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Walter Aulitzky
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Georg Maschmeyer
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Tom Vieler
- Karl Lennert-Cancer Center, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Hans Eich
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Harald Stein
- Berlin Reference Center for Lymphoma and Haematopathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Georg Kuhnert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Diehl
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
p18(Ink4c) functions as a dedicated inhibitor of cyclin-D-dependent kinases. Loss of Ink4c predisposes mice to tumor development and, in a dose-dependent manner, complements the tumor-promoting effects of various oncogenes. We have now addressed whether Ink4c loss impacts B-cell tumor development in the Emu-Myc transgenic mouse, a model of human Burkitt lymphoma. Loss of one or both alleles did not influence the onset of lymphoma in Emu-Myc transgenics, and did not appreciably affect Myc's proliferative or apoptotic responses in precancerous B cells. Nevertheless, Ink4c loss modulated the effects of Myc-induced transformation by decreasing the frequency of Arf loss, an ordinarily common event in Emu-Myc-induced lymphomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Nilsson
- Department of Biochemistry, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|