Mini-consolidations or intermediate-dose cytarabine for the post-remission therapy of AML patients over 60. A retrospective study from the DATAML and SAL registries

According to current recommendations, older AML patients in first complete remission (CR) after induction chemotherapy should receive consolidation with intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC). However, no study has demonstrated the superiority of IDAC over other regimen. In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy of mini-consolidations (idarubicin 8 mg/m2 day 1, cytarabine 50 mg/m2/12 h, day 1-5) and IDAC. Inclusion criteria were newly diagnosed AML, age > 60 years, first CR after induction and at least 1 cycle of consolidation. Of the 796 included patients, 322 patients received mini-consolidations and 474 patients received IDAC. Mini-consolidation patients were older, and more often, they had de novo AML and unfavorable risk. The rate of allogeneic transplantation was higher in the IDAC group. The median number of cycles was higher in the mini-consolidation group (4 vs. 2; p < .0001). Median relapse-free survival was 18 months with mini-consolidations and 12 months with IDAC (p = .0064). In multivariate analysis, the risk of relapse or death was significantly higher in the IDAC group (p = .004). Median OS was 36 versus 31 months with mini-consolidations or IDAC, respectively (p = .46). In multivariate analysis, the consolidation regimen had no significant influence on OS (p = .43). In older AML patients, post-remission therapy with mini-consolidations represents an alternative to IDAC.

Artificial intelligence-based prediction models for acute myeloid leukemia using real-life data: A DATAML registry study

We designed artificial intelligence-based prediction models (AIPM) using 52 diagnostic variables from 3687 patients included in the DATAML registry treated with intensive chemotherapy (IC, N = 3030) or azacitidine (AZA, N = 657) for an acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A neural network called multilayer perceptron (MLP) achieved a prediction accuracy for overall survival (OS) of 68.5% and 62.1% in the IC and AZA cohorts, respectively. The Boruta algorithm could select the most important variables for prediction without decreasing accuracy. Thirteen features were retained with this algorithm in the IC cohort: age, cytogenetic risk, white blood cells count, LDH, platelet count, albumin, MPO expression, mean corpuscular volume, CD117 expression, NPM1 mutation, AML status (de novo or secondary), multilineage dysplasia and ASXL1 mutation; and 7 variables in the AZA cohort: blood blasts, serum ferritin, CD56, LDH, hemoglobin, CD13 and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). We believe that AIPM could help hematologists to deal with the huge amount of data available at diagnosis, enabling them to have an OS estimation and guide their treatment choice. Our registry-based AIPM could offer a large real-life dataset with original and exhaustive features and select a low number of diagnostic features with an equivalent accuracy of prediction, more appropriate to routine practice.

Improving long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy for patients with AML

Intensive chemotherapy in combination with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and supportive care can induce long-term remissions in around 50% of acute myeloid leukemia patients eligible for intensive treatment. Several treatment optimization trials helped to refine schedule and dosing of the historic "7 + 3" combination. Together with the addition of novel agents, increased efficacy and tolerability led to improved long-term outcomes. Unsatisfactory outcomes in fit elderly patients and unfavorable genetic subgroups have raised the question of whether less-intensive venetoclax-based approaches may be beneficial as an alternative. Although tempting and worth exploring, this issue will remain controversial until the results of randomized comparisons appear. To date, intensive chemotherapy remains the only evident curative treatment option for long-term disease eradication in a fixed treatment time. With the advent of more novel agents and advances in minimal residual disease (MRD) detection and maintenance approaches, the face of intensive treatment could change in many ways. Several are being explored in clinical trials, such as (1) combinations of more than 1 novel agent with the intensive backbone, (2) head-to-head comparisons of novel agents, (3) replacement or dose reduction of cytotoxic components such as anthracyclines, and (4) MRD-guided escalation and de-escalation strategies. The combination of intensive treatment with individualized tailored innovative strategies will most certainly reduce treatment-related toxicities and increase the chances for long-term remission in the future.

[Management of AML in the elderly]

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia, ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, have long had a very poor prognosis and have always represented one of the main patient populations included in early phase clinical research trials. In recent years, many molecules have shown very interesting efficacy, often targeted therapies whose indication is based on a specific mutation profile (gilteritinib, ivosidenib), or mutation-independent (venetoclax), but also drugs whose indication is based on a specific biomarker (tamibarotene) or on new generation immunotherapies targeting macrophages (magrolimab) or other immune effectors while targeting leukemic cells resulting in forced immunological synapse (flotetuzumab) or activation of lymphocyte effectors associated with inhibition of the AML cells' stem signature in their microenvironment (cusatuzumab sabatolimab). All of these new strategies are discussed in this review, as well as the challenges of this frail population, which has benefited in recent months from all the major advances in the field, questioning in a second phase the modification of practices in younger patients.

Acute myeloid leukemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a frequently fatal bone marrow stem cell cancer characterized by unbridled proliferation of malignant marrow stem cells with associated infection, anemia, and bleeding. An improved understanding of pathophysiology, improvements in measurement technology and at least 10 recently approved therapies have led to revamping the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic landscape of AML.

DIAGNOSIS

One updated and one new classification system were published in 2022, both emphasizing the integration of molecular analysis into daily practice. Differences between the International Consensus Classification and major revisions from the previous 2016 WHO system provide both challenges and opportunities for care and clinical research.

RISK ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING

The European Leukemia Net 2022 risk classification integrates knowledge from novel molecular findings and recent trial results, as well as emphasizing dynamic risk based on serial measurable residual disease assessment. However, how to leverage our burgeoning ability to measure a small number of potentially malignant myeloid cells into therapeutic decision making is controversial.

RISK ADAPTED THERAPY

The diagnostic and therapeutic complexity plus the availability of newly approved agents requires a nuanced therapeutic algorithm which should integrate patient goals of care, comorbidities, and disease characteristics including the specific mutational profile of the patient's AML. The framework we suggest only represents the beginning of the discussion.

How I Treat TP53-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are among the myeloid malignancies with the poorest prognosis. In this review, we analyze the prognosis of these two diseases, focussing particularly on the extent of the mono or biallelic mutation status of TP53 mutation, which is largely correlated with cytogenetic complexity. We discuss the possible/potential improvement in outcome based on recent results obtained with new drugs (especially eprenetapopt and magrolimab). We also focus on the impact of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) including post aHSCT treatment.

Prognostic impact of DDX41 germline mutations in intensively treated acute myeloid leukemia patients: an ALFA-FILO study

DDX41 germline mutations (DDX41MutGL) are the most common genetic predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent reports suggest that DDX41MutGL myeloid malignancies could be considered as a distinct entity, even if their specific presentation and outcome remain to be defined. We describe here the clinical and biological features of 191 patients with DDX41MutGL AML. Baseline characteristics and outcome of 86 of these patients, treated with intensive chemotherapy in 5 prospective Acute Leukemia French Association/French Innovative Leukemia Organization trials, were compared with those of 1604 patients with DDX41 wild-type (DDX41WT) AML, representing a prevalence of 5%. Patients with DDX41MutGL AML were mostly male (75%), in their seventh decade, and with low leukocyte count (median, 2 × 109/L), low bone marrow blast infiltration (median, 33%), normal cytogenetics (75%), and few additional somatic mutations (median, 2). A second somatic DDX41 mutation (DDX41MutSom) was found in 82% of patients, and clonal architecture inference suggested that it could be the main driver for AML progression. DDX41MutGL patients displayed higher complete remission rates (94% vs 69%; P < .0001) and longer restricted mean overall survival censored at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) than 2017 European LeukemiaNet intermediate/adverse (Int/Adv) DDX41WT patients (5-year difference in restricted mean survival times, 13.6 months; P < .001). Relapse rates censored at HSCT were lower at 1 year in DDX41MutGL patients (15% vs 44%) but later increased to be similar to Int/Adv DDX41WT patients at 3 years (82% vs 75%). HSCT in first complete remission was associated with prolonged relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.88; P = .02) but not with longer overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.68; P = .5).

Comparison of scoring systems evaluating suitability for intensive chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia-a Grand Ouest Against Leukemia (GOAL) study

Several scoring systems have been developed to assess suitability of individual patients for intensive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy. We sought to compare the performance of these scores in a cohort of 428 consecutive adults with AML who received conventional induction chemotherapy in five academic centers in France. All scoring systems identified a subset of patients with increased 28 and 56-day mortality although the prediction accuracy was overall limited with C-statistics of ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 Overall survival (OS) prediction was more limited and restricted to scoring systems that include AML-related parameters. The outcome of 104 patients (24%) considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy based on criteria used in recent randomized trials was similar to that of the other 324 patients (28-day mortality, odds ratio [OR] = 1.88, P = 0.2; 56-day mortality, OR = 1.71, P = 0.21; event-free survival, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, P = 0.6; OS, HR = 1.25, P = 0.14) with low discrimination (C-statistic: 0.57, 0.56, 0.50, and 0.52 for 28-day, 56-day mortality, EFS, and OS, respectively). Together, our findings indicate that the accuracy of currently available approaches to identify patients at increased risk of early mortality and shortened survival after intensive AML therapy is relatively limited. Caution regarding the use of available scoring systems should be warranted in clinical decision-making.

In-depth time-dependent analysis of the benefit of allo-HSCT for elderly patients with CR1 AML: a FILO study

The benefit of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged >60 years remains a matter of debate, notably when performed in first complete remission (CR1). To clarify this issue, the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) performed a 10-year real-world time-dependent analysis. The study enrolled patients between 60 and 70 years of age with AML in CR1 after intensive chemotherapy with intermediate (IR) or unfavorable (UR) risk according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2010 classification. The impact of allo-HSCT was analyzed through three models: (1) time-dependent Cox; (2) multistate for dynamic prediction; and (3) super landmark. The study enrolled 369 (73%) IR and 138 (27%) UR patients with AML, 203 of whom received an allo-HSCT. Classical multivariate analysis showed that allo-HSCT significantly improved relapse-free survival (RFS; hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)], 0.47 [0.35-0.62]; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; HR [95% CI], 0.56 [0.42-0.76]; P < .001), independently of the ELN risk group. With the multistate model, the predicted 5-year probability for IR and UR patients to remain in CR1 without allo-HSCT was 8% and 1%, respectively. Dynamic predictions confirmed that patients without allo-HSCT continue to relapse over time. Finally, the super landmark model showed that allo-HSCT significantly improved RFS (HR [95% CI], 0.47 [0.36-0.62]; P < .001) and OS (HR [95% CI], 0.54 [0.40-0.72]; P < .001). allo-HSCT in CR1 is reported here as significantly improving the outcome of fit older patients with AML. Long-term RFS without allo-HSCT is very low (<10%), supporting allo-HSCT as being the best curative option for these patients.

Can venetoclax-based therapy replace 7+3 induction in fit older adults with AML?

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face a dismal prognosis. Although venetoclax-based therapy has led to improved outcomes among unfit older patients with AML, it is not curative and its efficacy and long-term outcomes among fit older patients is unclear. This review provides insights into factors that influence treatment choices among older patients with AML and what we would need to know for venetoclax-based therapy to replace standard intensive 7 + 3 induction therapy.

Is there an optimal adjunct therapy to traditional cytotoxic induction?

The traditional cytotoxic induction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is seven days of standard-dose cytarabine and three days of an anthracycline antibiotic (such as daunorubicin or idarubicin), commonly known as "7 + 3." Many studies have been conducted to find an additional agent that might improve efficacy. Data from select studies has shown, in certain populations, benefit to adding cladribine, clofarabine and lomustine to a traditional backbone. For mutation-based chemotherapy regimens, midostaurin with 7 + 3 is the current standard of care for FLT3-mutant, younger AML patients. As we learn more about the synergism of molecular agents and traditional anti-cancer treatments, we can hopefully develop novel regimens without abandoning some of the benefits of these mutation agnostic historical therapies.

Project 2025: Proposals for the Continued Success of Drug Development in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence initiated Project 2025 to develop five-year goals in specific areas of oncology drug development. This meeting, in October 2020, brought together a panel of regulators and academic experts in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to discuss opportunities to maximize the success that has recently occurred in AML drug development. The panel discussed challenges and opportunities in clinical trial design and novel endpoints, and outlined key considerations for drug development to facilitate continued growth in the field.

MAIT cells numbers and frequencies in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at diagnosis: association with cytogenetic profile and gene mutations

Harnessing or monitoring immune cells is actually a major topic in pre-clinical and clinical studies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Mucosal-Associated Invariant T cells (MAIT) constitute one of the largest subset of innate-like, cytotoxic T cell subsets in humans. Despite some papers suggesting a role for MAIT cells in cancer, their specific involvement remains unclear, especially in myeloid malignancies. This prospective monocentric study included 216 patients with a newly diagnosed AML. Circulating MAIT cells were quantified by flow cytometry at diagnosis and during intensive chemotherapy. We observed that circulating MAIT cells show a specific decline in AML patients at diagnosis compared to healthy donors. Post-induction monitored patients presented with a drastic drop in MAIT cell numbers, with recovery after one month. We also found correlation between decrease in MAIT cells number and adverse cytogenetic profile. FLT3-ITD and IDH ½ mutations were associated with higher MAIT cell numbers. Patients with high level of activated MAIT cells are under-represented within patients with a favorable cytogenetic profile, and over-represented among patients with IDH1 mutations or bi-allelic CEBPA mutations. We show for the first time that circulating MAIT cells are affected in newly diagnosed AML patients, suggesting a link between MAIT cells and AML progression. Our work fosters new studies to deepen our knowledge about the role of MAIT cells in cancer.

Conventional chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in older adults: Impact on nutritional, cognitive, and functional status

OBJECTIVES

The impact of conventional treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on the nutritional, cognitive, and functional status of elderly patients is seldom studied. This assessment was performed in the context of the LAMSA 2007 trial.

METHODS

The trial enrolled 424 patients with de novo AML. Among them, 316 benefited from geriatric assessment (GA) including nutritional, cognitive, and functional status and were scored according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and sorror for the prediction of treatment toxicity, morbidity, and mortality. Patients were investigated at diagnosis for three times during follow-up.

RESULTS

This study showed that AML and its treatment have no impact on cognitive (P = .554) nor functional status (P = .842 for Activity of Daily Living and P = .087 for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living). The nutritional status improved over time (P = .041). None of these three parameters at baseline, associated or not with ECOG and sorror scores, impacted survivals or toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

The cognitive, functional, and nutritional status had no impact in this cohort of fit elderly AML patients without unfavorable cytogenetics. The GA tools used provided no additional information compared with ECOG and sorror scores, to predict toxicity, morbidity, or mortality due to intensive chemotherapy.

Clinical Implications of Inflammation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Recent advances in the description of the tumor microenvironment of acute myeloid leukemia, including the comprehensive analysis of the leukemic stem cell niche and clonal evolution, indicate that inflammation may play a major role in many aspects of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) such as disease progression, chemoresistance, and myelosuppression. Studies on the mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors along with high-throughput drug screening have underpinned the potential role of glucocorticoids in this disease classically described as steroid-resistant in contrast to acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Moreover, some mutated oncogenes such as RUNX1, NPM1, or SRSF2 transcriptionally modulate cell state in a manner that primes leukemic cells for glucocorticoid sensitivity. In clinical practice, inflammatory markers such as serum ferritin or IL-6 have a strong prognostic impact and may directly affect disease progression, whereas interesting preliminary data suggested that dexamethasone may improve the outcome for AML patients with a high white blood cell count, which paves the way to develop prospective clinical trials that evaluate the role of glucocorticoids in AML.

Lomustine is beneficial to older AML with ELN2017 adverse risk profile and intermediate karyotype: a FILO study

We previously reported the benefit of lomustine addition to conventional chemotherapy in older acute myeloid leukemias with nonadverse chromosomal aberrations in the LAM-SA 2007 randomized clinical trial (NCT00590837). A molecular analysis of 52 genes performed in 330 patients included in this trial, 163 patients being treated with lomustine in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine and 167 without lomustine, identified 1088 mutations with an average of 3.3 mutations per patient. NPM1, FLT3, and DNMT3A were the most frequently mutated genes. A putative therapeutic target was identified in 178 patients (54%). Among five molecular classifications analyzed, the ELN2017 risk classification has the stronger association with the clinical evolution. Patients not treated with lomustine have an expected survival prognosis in agreement with this classification regarding the overall and event-free survivals. In strong contrast, lomustine erased the ELN2017 classification prognosis. The benefit of lomustine in nonadverse chromosomal aberrations was restricted to patients with RUNX1, ASXL1, TP53, and FLT3-ITD^high/NPM1^WT mutations in contrast to the intermediate and favorable ELN2017 patients. This post-hoc analysis identified a subgroup of fit elderly AML patients with intermediate cytogenetics and molecular markers who may benefit from lomustine addition to intensive chemotherapy.

＜Editors' Choice＞ How to improve outcomes of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: era of excitement

Among elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially those who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy, a policy of reduced-intensity chemotherapy or conservative observation has been chosen, resulting in unmet medical needs. Clinical trials using anticancer drugs including antimetabolites or drugs targeted to cell cycle-related molecules failed to show superiority over conventional treatments. Recently, drugs targeted to Bcl-2, SMO, FLT3, and IDH1/2 have been shown to prolong overall survival alone or in combination with reduced-intensity chemotherapy. These treatments are likely to reshape the therapeutic landscape of AML, which will be personalized for individual patients based on leukemia genetics.

CD34+CD38-CD123+ Leukemic Stem Cell Frequency Predicts Outcome in Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated by Intensive Chemotherapy but Not Hypomethylating Agents

The prognostic impact of immunophenotypic CD34⁺CD38⁻CD123⁺ leukemic stem cell (iLSC) frequency at diagnosis has been demonstrated in younger patients treated by intensive chemotherapy, however, this is less clear in older patients. Furthermore, the impact of iLSC in patients treated by hypomethylating agents is unknown. In this single-center study, we prospectively assessed the CD34⁺CD38⁻CD123⁺ iLSC frequency at diagnosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients aged 60 years or older. In a cohort of 444 patients, the median percentage of iLSC at diagnosis was 4.3%. Significant differences were found between treatment groups with a lower median in the intensive chemotherapy group (0.6%) compared to hypomethylating agents (8.0%) or supportive care (11.1%) (p <0.0001). In the intensive chemotherapy group, the median overall survival was 34.5 months in patients with iLSC ≤0.10% and 14.6 months in patients with >0.10% (p = 0.031). In the multivariate analyses of this group, iLSC frequency was significantly and independently associated with the incidence of relapse, event-free, relapse-free, and overall survival. However, iLSC frequency had no prognostic impact on patients treated by hypomethylating agents. Thus, the iLSC frequency at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor in older acute myeloid patients treated by intensive chemotherapy but not hypomethylating agents.

Low-intensity regimens versus standard-intensity induction strategies in acute myeloid leukemia

Treatment options for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain limited. In this age group, AML is frequently associated with poor-risk features, while patients’ present comorbidities and reduced functional reserves. As such, intensive chemotherapy (ICT) is frequently too toxic or ineffective in elderly patients and is restricted to a select minority, though it is standard therapy for the youngest and fittest patients or for those belonging to either the favorable or intermediate-risk groups. The use of hypomethylating agents represent an effective alternative for patients who are unfit for ICT, yet the results remain unsatisfactory. In recent years, prognostic scores were developed that include geriatric assessment tools and improved risk-stratification. In addition, several effective new drugs have emerged. The combination of these drugs with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine has produced encouraging preliminary results that may change standard practices and offer an alternative to the dilemma of ICT versus low-intensity therapies.

Post-remission therapy of adults aged 60 and older with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: role of treatment intensity on the outcome

Although complete remission (CR) is achieved in 50 to 70% of older fit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), consolidation therapy in this age group remains challenging. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare outcome in elderly patients treated with different post-remission modalities, including allogenic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), intensive chemotherapy, and standard-dose chemotherapy (repeated 1 + 5 regimen). We collected data of 441 patients ≥ 60 years in first CR from a single institution. Median age was 67 years. Sixty-one (14%) patients received allo-HSCT, 51 (12%) auto-HSCT, 70 (16%) intensive chemotherapy with intermediate- or high-dose cytarabine (I/HDAC), and 190 (43%) 1 + 5 regimen. Median follow-up was 6.5 years. In multivariate analysis, allo-HSCT, cytogenetics, and PS had a significant impact on OS and LFS. In spite of a more favorable-risk profile, the patients who received I/HDAC had no significantly better LFS as compared with patients treated with 1 + 5 (median LFS 8.8 months vs 10.6 months, p = 0.96). In transplanted patients, median LFS was 13.3 months for auto-HSCT and 25.8 months for allo-HSCT. Pre-transplant chemotherapy with I/HDAC had no effect on the outcome. Toxicity was significantly increased for both transplanted and non-transplanted patients treated with I/HDAC, with more units of blood and platelet transfusion and more time spent in hospitalization, but no higher non-relapse mortality. This study shows that post-remission chemotherapy intensification is not associated with significantly better outcome as compared with standard-dose chemotherapy in elderly patients for whom, overall results remain disappointing.

Lenalidomide added to standard intensive treatment for older patients with AML and high-risk MDS

More effective treatment modalities are urgently needed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of older age. We hypothesized that adding lenalidomide to intensive standard chemotherapy might improve their outcome. After establishing a safe lenalidomide, dose elderly patients with AML were randomly assigned in this randomized Phase 2 study (n = 222) to receive standard chemotherapy ("3 + 7") with or without lenalidomide at a dose of 20 mg/day 1-21. In the second cycle, patients received cytarabine 1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-6 with or without lenalidomide (20 mg/day 1-21). The CR/CRi rates in the two arms were not different (69 vs. 66%). Event-free survival (EFS) at 36 months was 19% for the standard arm versus 21% for the lenalidomide arm and overall survival (OS) 35% vs. 30%, respectively. The frequencies and grade of adverse events were not significantly different between the treatment arms. Cardiovascular toxicities were rare and equally distributed between the arms. The results of the present study show that the addition of lenalidomide to standard remission induction chemotherapy does not improve the therapeutic outcome of older AML patients. This trial is registered as number NTR2294 in The NederlandsTrial Register (www.trialregister.nl).

Will new agents impact survival in AML?

In recent years, several drugs-including midostaurin, gilteritinib, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin, to name a few-have been approved or reapproved in the United States to treat patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Yet survival rates for younger patients had improved with chemotherapy alone even before the approvals of these new agents. This begs the question whether the new therapies will actually have a positive impact on survival. The 5-year survival rate for older patients has also risen, again without the addition of these new agents. The challenge will be to incorporate new therapies and use them where they will have the greatest impact-major work for clinicians and researchers alike.

Post-remission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: Are we ready for an individualized approach?

Recent advances in remission induction treatment strategies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved the rates of complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS), owing to a concerted effort to tailor therapies toward specific AML subtypes. However, without effective post-remission therapy, most patients will relapse. The extent to which post-remission therapies is individualized in the current paradigm is quite varied. Core binding factor (CBF) AML is typically treated with post-remission high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), whereas those with intermediate or adverse-risk cytogenetics are treated with post-remission cytarabine followed by allogeneic HSCT in CR1 when feasible. A lack of clarity regarding the proper dosing of post-remission cytarabine has made consensus building on dosing and schedule a challenge. CBF AML benefits most from high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC), and dasatinib appears promising as an adjunct for those for KIT-mutated CBF AML. Other than series using CPX-351 or lomustine in older adults, multiagent chemotherapy approaches have resulted in excess toxicity without a survival benefit. Neither hypomethylating agents nor gemtuzumab ozogamicin have shown a material OS benefit. Targeted agents such as FLT3 inhibitors and IDH1/IDH2 inhibitors show potential for the patients who harbor these druggable targets, but few data are available. Many studies evaluating post-remission strategies to target AML in the MRD-positive state are already underway, and these remain a promising area of investigation.

Epigenetic down-regulation of the HIST1 locus predicts better prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation

BACKGROUND

The epigenetic machinery is frequently altered in acute myeloid leukemia. Focusing on cytogenetically normal (CN) AML, we previously described an abnormal H3K27me3 enrichment covering 70 kb on the HIST1 cluster (6.p22) in CN-AML patient blasts. Here, we further investigate the molecular, functional, and prognosis significance of this epigenetic alteration named H3K27me3 HIST1 in NPM1-mutated (NPM1mut) CN-AML.

RESULTS

We found that three quarter of the NPM1mut CN-AML patients were H3K27me3 HIST1^high. H3K27me3 HIST1^high group of patients was associated with a favorable outcome independently of known molecular risk factors. In gene expression profiling, the H3K27me3 HIST1^high mark was associated with lower expression of the histone genes HIST1H1D, HIST1H2BG, HIST1H2AE, and HIST1H3F and an upregulation of genes involved in myelomonocytic differentiation. Mass spectrometry analyses confirmed that the linker histone protein H1d, but not the other histone H1 subtypes, was downregulated in the H3K27me3 HIST1^high group of patients. H1d knockdown primed ATRA-mediated differentiation of OCI-AML3 and U937 AML cell lines, as assessed on CD11b/CD11c markers, morphological and gene expression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that NPM1mut AML prognosis depends on the epigenetic silencing of the HIST1 cluster and that, among the H3K27me3 silenced histone genes, HIST1H1D plays a role in AML blast differentiation.

CPX-351 (vyxeos) in AML

For decades, the standard induction for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been the combination of cytarabine with anthracycline (7 + 3 regimen). In August 2017 the US FDA approved CPX-351 (vyxeos), a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin at a fixed 5:1 molar ratio, for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) and therapy-related AML (t-AML). This is the first approved treatment specifically for patients with this subgroup of AML. The approval was based on findings from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study of CPX-351 Versus 7 + 3 in patients 60-75 years old with newly diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML. In this study CPX-351 had a higher median OS than 7 + 3 (9.56 vs 5.95 months, HR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.90, p = 0.005). In this profile, we review preclinical and clinical data, and discuss limitations and future directions with CPX-351 use in AML.

Outcome of patients aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia: A single-institution experience

A recent phase 3 trial showed that outcome of older patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may be improved by a liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin (CPX‐351). This phase 3 study represents a unique example of prospective data in this rare subgroup providing basis for comparison with real life data. Here, we retrospectively assessed characteristics and outcome of patients aged 60‐75 years with secondary or therapy‐related AML in real life. Out of 218 patients that fulfilled CPX‐351 study criteria, 181 patients (83.0%) received antileukemic treatment either intensive chemotherapy (n = 121) or hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 60). As compared with patients treated by chemotherapy, HMA‐treated patients were older, had lower WBC, more often AML with antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome and adverse cytogenetic risk. In chemotherapy‐treated patients, the complete response rate was 69%, median overall survival (OS) was 11 months whereas 3‐year and 5‐year OS was 21% and 17%, respectively. In HMA‐treated patients, the complete response rate was 15%, median OS was 11 months whereas 3‐year and 5‐year OS was 15% and 2%, respectively. In conclusion, although outcome of older patients with high‐risk AML is very poor, a significant proportion of patients treated by standard intensive chemotherapy but not HMA are long‐term survivors.