CPX-351 in FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

CPX-351, a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a 1:5 molar ratio, is approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. In a pivotal phase III trial, CPX-351 significantly improved overall survival compared with standard-of-care 7 + 3 chemotherapy (7 days cytarabine; 3 days daunorubicin) in adults aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML (median = 9.56 months vs. 5.95 months; hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval = 0.52-0.90; p = 0.003). Approximately 30% of patients with newly diagnosed AML have mutations in the FLT3 gene, which may be associated with poor outcomes. Here, we review the current in vitro, clinical, and real-world evidence on the use of CPX-351 in patients with AML and mutations in FLT3. Additionally, we review preliminary data from clinical trials and patient case reports that suggest the combination of CPX-351 with FLT3 inhibitors may represent another treatment option for patients with FLT3 mutation-positive AML.

Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy

The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial. In this study, we assessed survival and relapse rates of patients in the ADMIRAL trial who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), as well as safety outcomes in patients who received post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy. ADMIRAL was a global phase 3 randomized controlled trial that enrolled adult patients with FLT3-mutated R/R AML. Patients with R/R AML who harbored FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations in the juxtamembrane domain or D835/I836 point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain were randomized (2:1) to gilteritinib (120 mg/day) or to preselected high- or low-intensity salvage chemotherapy (1 or 2 cycles). Patients in the gilteritinib arm who proceeded to HSCT could receive post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy if they were within 30 to 90 days post-transplantation and had achieved composite complete remission (CRc) with successful engraftment and no post-transplantation complications. Adverse events (AEs) during HSCT were recorded in the gilteritinib arm only. Survival outcomes and the cumulative incidence of relapse were assessed in patients who underwent HSCT during the trial. Treatment-emergent AEs were evaluated in patients who restarted gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy. Patients in the gilteritinib arm underwent HSCT more frequently than those in the chemotherapy arm (26% [n = 64] versus 15% [n = 19]). For all transplantation recipients, 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% and 47%, respectively. Despite a trend toward longer OS after pretransplantation CRc, post-transplantation survival was comparable in the 2 arms. Patients who resumed gilteritinib after HSCT had a low relapse rate after pretransplantation CRc (20%) or CR (0%). The most common AEs observed with post-transplantation gilteritinib therapy were increased alanine aminotransferase level (45%), pyrexia (43%), and diarrhea (40%); grade ≥3 AEs were related primarily to myelosuppression. The incidences of grade ≥III acute graft-versus-host disease and related mortality were low. Post-transplantation survival was similar across the 2 study arms in the ADMIRAL trial, but higher remission rates with gilteritinib facilitated receipt of HSCT. Gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy had a stable safety and tolerability profile and was associated with low relapse rates. Taken together, these data support a preference for bridging therapy with gilteritinib over chemotherapy in transplantation-eligible patients.

Results from a phase I/II trial of cusatuzumab combined with azacitidine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy

Cusatuzumab is a high-affinity, anti-CD70 monoclonal antibody under investigation in AML. This two-part, open-label, multicenter, phase I/II trial evaluated cusatuzumab plus azacitidine in patients with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Patients received a single dose of cusatuzumab at one of four dose levels (1, 3, 10, or 20 mg/kg), 14 days before starting combination therapy. In phase I dose-escalation, cusatuzumab was then administered on days 3 and 17, in combination with azacitidine (75 mg/m2) on days 1-7, every 28 days. Primary objective in phase I was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of cusatuzumab plus azacitidine. Phase II primary objective was efficacy at the RP2D (selected as 10 mg/kg). Thirty-eight patients enrolled: 12 in phase I (three per dose level; four with ELN adverse risk) and 26 in phase II (21 with adverse risk). Objective response (≥ partial remission) was achieved by 19/38 patients (including 8/26 in phase II); 14/38 achieved complete remission. Eleven patients (37.9%) achieved objective response among the 29 patients in phase I and phase II treated at the RP2D. At median follow-up of 10.9 months, median duration of first response was 4.5 months and median overall survival was 11.5 months. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were infections (84.2%) and hematologic toxicities (78.9%). Seven patients (18.4%) reported infusion-related reactions, including two with grade 3 events. Thus, cusatuzumab/azacitidine appears generally well tolerated and shows preliminary efficacy in this setting. Investigation of cusatuzumab combined with current standard-of-care therapy, comprising venetoclax and azacitidine, is ongoing.

Outcomes in Patients with Poor-Risk Cytogenetics with or without TP53 Mutations Treated with Venetoclax and Azacitidine

PURPOSE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of venetoclax + azacitidine in treatment-naïve patients with acute myeloid leukemia harboring poor-risk cytogenetics and TP53mut or TP53wt.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from a phase III study (NCT02993523) comparing venetoclax (400 mg orally days 1-28) + azacitidine (75 mg/m2 days 1-7) or placebo + azacitidine, and from a phase Ib study (NCT02203773) of venetoclax + azacitidine. Patients were ineligible for intensive therapy. TP53 status was analyzed centrally; cytogenetic studies were performed locally.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 127) with poor-risk cytogenetics receiving venetoclax + azacitidine (TP53wt = 50; TP53mut = 54) were compared with patients with poor-risk cytogenetics (n = 56) receiving azacitidine alone (TP53wt = 22; TP53mut = 18).For poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53wt patients, venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine alone resulted in composite remission rates (CRc) of 70% versus 23%, median duration of remission (DoR) of 18.4 versus 8.5 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 23.4 versus 11.3 months, respectively. Outcomes with venetoclax + azacitidine were comparable with similarly treated patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and TP53wt.For poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53mut patients, venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine alone resulted in CRc of 41% versus 17%, median DoR of 6.5 versus 6.7 months, and median OS of 5.2 versus 4.9 months, respectively.For poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53mut patients, predominant grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) for venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine were febrile neutropenia (55%/39%), thrombocytopenia (28%/28%), neutropenia (26%/17%), anemia (13%/6%), and pneumonia (28%/33%). AEs were comparable between TP53mut and TP53wt patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53mut patients, venetoclax + azacitidine improved remission rates but not DoR or OS compared with azacitidine alone. However, in poor-risk cytogenetics + TP53wt patients, venetoclax + azacitidine resulted in higher remission rates and longer DoR and OS than azacitidine alone, with outcomes comparable with similarly treated patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Toxicities were similar in TP53mut and TP53wt patients. See related commentary by Green and Zeidner, p. 5235.

Prognostic impact of DDX41 germline mutations in intensively treated acute myeloid leukemia patients: an ALFA-FILO study

DDX41 germline mutations (DDX41MutGL) are the most common genetic predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent reports suggest that DDX41MutGL myeloid malignancies could be considered as a distinct entity, even if their specific presentation and outcome remain to be defined. We describe here the clinical and biological features of 191 patients with DDX41MutGL AML. Baseline characteristics and outcome of 86 of these patients, treated with intensive chemotherapy in 5 prospective Acute Leukemia French Association/French Innovative Leukemia Organization trials, were compared with those of 1604 patients with DDX41 wild-type (DDX41WT) AML, representing a prevalence of 5%. Patients with DDX41MutGL AML were mostly male (75%), in their seventh decade, and with low leukocyte count (median, 2 × 109/L), low bone marrow blast infiltration (median, 33%), normal cytogenetics (75%), and few additional somatic mutations (median, 2). A second somatic DDX41 mutation (DDX41MutSom) was found in 82% of patients, and clonal architecture inference suggested that it could be the main driver for AML progression. DDX41MutGL patients displayed higher complete remission rates (94% vs 69%; P < .0001) and longer restricted mean overall survival censored at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) than 2017 European LeukemiaNet intermediate/adverse (Int/Adv) DDX41WT patients (5-year difference in restricted mean survival times, 13.6 months; P < .001). Relapse rates censored at HSCT were lower at 1 year in DDX41MutGL patients (15% vs 44%) but later increased to be similar to Int/Adv DDX41WT patients at 3 years (82% vs 75%). HSCT in first complete remission was associated with prolonged relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.88; P = .02) but not with longer overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.68; P = .5).

Impact of FLT3 Mutation on Outcomes after Venetoclax and Azacitidine for Patients with Treatment-Naïve Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of venetoclax + azacitidine among treatment-naïve patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were pooled from patients enrolled in a phase III study (NCT02993523) that compared patients treated with venetoclax + azacitidine or placebo + azacitidine and a prior phase Ib study (NCT02203773) where patients were treated with venetoclax + azacitidine. Enrolled patients were ineligible for intensive therapy due to age ≥75 years and/or comorbidities. Patients on venetoclax + azacitidine received venetoclax 400 mg orally (days 1-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m2; days 1-7/28-day cycle). FLT3 mutation was analyzed centrally on pretreatment bone marrow aspirates.

RESULTS

In the biomarker evaluable population, FLT3 mutation was detected in 42 (15%) and 22 (19%) patients in the venetoclax + azacitidine and azacitidine groups. Composite complete remission [CRc; complete remission (CR) + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)] rates (venetoclax + azacitidine/azacitidine) for FLT3-mutant patients were 67%/36%, median duration of remission (DoR) was 17.3/5.0 months, and median OS was 12.5/8.6 months. The CRc rates among FLT3 wild-type patients were 67%/25%, median DoR 18.4/13.4 months, and median OS 14.7/10.1 months. In patients treated with venetoclax + azacitidine, CRc in patients with FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD was 63% and 77% and median OS was 9.9 and 19.2 months, and in comutated FLT3-ITD + NPM1 patients, CRc was 70%, median DoR was not reached, and median OS was 9.1 months. There were no unexpected toxicities in the venetoclax + azacitidine group.

CONCLUSIONS

When treated with venetoclax + azacitidine, patients with FLT3 mutations and FLT3 wild-type had similar outcomes. Future analyses in larger patient populations may further define the impact of venetoclax + azacitidine in patients harboring FLT3-ITD. See related commentary by Perl and Vyas, p. 2719.

Hematologic improvements with ivosidenib + azacitidine compared to placebo + azacitidine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

7042

Background: Ivosidenib (IVO) is a potent oral targeted inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1). IVO plus azacitidine (AZA) significantly improved event-free survival (EFS), overall survival and complete remission + partial hematologic recovery rates compared with placebo (PBO) + AZA, in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the Phase 3 AGILE trial (NCT03173248). Here we report blood count recovery results from the AGILE trial. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to IVO 500 mg QD + AZA 75 mg/m2 SC or IV for 7 days in 28-day cycles (n = 72), or PBO+AZA (n = 74). Red blood cell (RBC)/platelet transfusion history were assessed at screening and follow-up. Bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood samples were obtained at screening, and during weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 53, and every 24 weeks thereafter, and at end of treatment and during EFS follow up. Samples were analyzed at each local site according to ICSH guidelines. Results: In the IVO+AZA and PBO+AZA arms, 4.2% and 5.5% of pts, respectively, received concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Hemoglobin levels steadily increased from baseline at a similar rate in both treatment arms. Mean platelet count recovered from baseline values in the IVO+AZA and PBO+AZA arms (71.0 and 92.6 x 109/L, respectively) as early as week 9 of treatment (171.1 and 155.1 x 109/L, respectively) and continued to steadily increase thereafter in the treated population. In pts receiving IVO+AZA, mean neutrophil counts rapidly increased from baseline (0.99 x 109/L) to week 2 (2.05 x 109/L) and week 5 (4.07 x 109/L), and then generally stabilized to within the normal range to study end (last available cycle value; ̃2.0 x 109/L). Mean neutrophil counts initially declined with PBO+AZA before slowly recovering to near-normal levels after 36-40 weeks. The increased blood counts were accompanied by a rapid decrease in the mean BM blast percentage from 54.8% at baseline to 12.0% and 7.2% at week 9 and 17, respectively, in IVO+AZA treated patients and were maintained for 149 weeks. The decline in BM blasts was slower in the PBO+AZA arm (53.7%, 34.6% and 19.6% at baseline, week 9 and week 17, respectively). Among patients who were RBC/platelet transfusion-dependent at baseline (̃54.0% in both groups), 46.2% in the IVO+AZA group achieved RBC/platelet transfusion independence compared with 17.5% in the PBO+AZA arm (1-sided p = 0.0032). Additionally, fewer adverse events of febrile neutropenia (28.2% vs 34.2%) and infections (28.2% vs 49.3%) were reported in the IVO+AZA arm compared to the PBO+AZA arm. Conclusions: IVO+AZA demonstrated a significant clinical benefit compared with PBO+AZA and this sub-analysis demonstrated a rapidly improved recovery of blood counts and a reduced dependence on RBC and/or platelet transfusion. Moreover, rates of febrile neutropenia and infections were reduced with IVO+AZA. Clinical trial information: NCT03173248.

Changes in health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia receiving ivosidenib + azacitidine or placebo + azacitidine

e19024

Background: Ivosidenib (IVO) is a potent, targeted inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) that is approved for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). IVO plus azacitidine (AZA) demonstrated clinical benefit compared with placebo (PBO) and AZA in the AGILE study (NCT03173248), and here we report the impact of IVO+AZA versus PBO+AZA on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: In the double-blind, PBO-controlled phase 3 AGILE study, patients (pts) were randomized 1:1 to IVO 500 mg QD + AZA 75 mg/m2 SC or IV for 7 days in 28-day cycles, or PBO+AZA. HRQoL was a secondary endpoint assessed using two validated questionnaires: the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Questionnaires were administered pre-dose on cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1, on C1D15, C2D1, C2D15, and on D1 of every odd cycle thereafter until the end of treatment. Score change from baseline across visits for all subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 was analyzed with mixed models. A 10-point threshold in EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale score was used to evaluate clinically meaningful changes from baseline or differences between arms. Two-sided nominal p-values are reported. Results: At baseline, 69 and 68 pts out of 72 receiving IVO+AZA completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L, respectively, and 66 pts out of 74 receiving PBO+AZA completed both. Mean baseline HRQoL scores were similar between treatment arms. There was an initial decline in HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status [GHS/QoL]) in both arms for ̃4 months, consistent with time to response, and which was generally not clinically meaningful. IVO+AZA was associated with preserved or improved HRQoL compared to baseline for most subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 from C5 to C19 (after which no PBO+AZA HRQoL data were available), and at most timepoints for EQ-5D-5L VAS scores and index values. EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales with clinically meaningful improvements from baseline at most timepoints from C5 to C19 in the IVO+AZA arm included GHS/QoL, fatigue, pain and appetite loss. In contrast, there were few clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in PBO+AZA pts. GHS/QoL scores were significantly improved (p≤0.05) for IVO+AZA versus PBO+AZA at C2D1, C2D15, C7 and C9, and differences were clinically meaningful at C2D1 (10.2 point difference), C2D15 (10.1), C7 (12.6), C9 (22.6), C13 (14.9), C15 (15.4) and C19 (19.2). Likewise, improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue, appetite loss, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, cognitive functioning and social functioning favored IVO+AZA over PBO+AZA at multiple timepoints. Conclusions: Data from the AGILE study show that patients with mIDH1 AML receiving treatment with IVO+AZA tended to report maintenance or improved HRQoL from cycle 5 through to cycle 19 compared with PBO+AZA. Clinical trial information: NCT03173248.

Molecular characterization of clinical response in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia treated with ivosidenib + azacitidine compared to placebo + azacitidine

7019

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease with a dynamic mutational landscape; 6–10% of patients (pts) have somatic mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 ( IDH1), which can drive oncogenesis. Ivosidenib (IVO) is a potent oral targeted inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1). IVO 500 mg QD + azacitidine (AZA) 75 mg/m2 SC or IV for 7 days in 28-day cycles was shown to significantly improve event-free survival (HR = 0.33 [95% CI 0.16, 0.69], p = 0.0011), median overall survival (24.0 vs 7.9 months), and complete remission + partial hematologic recovery rates (CR/CRh; 52.8% vs 17.6%) vs placebo (PBO) + AZA in the double-blind phase 3 AGILE study (NCT03173248) in pts with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutated AML (ND-AML). IDH1-mutation clearance ( IDH1-MC) and baseline co-mutation analysis from AGILE is reported. Methods: Genomic DNA from bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and/or bone marrow aspirate (BMA) were used for molecular studies. IDH1-MC analysis on BMMCs was performed by BEAMing digital PCR (limit of detection 0.02%-0.04%). BMA, BMMCs and PBMCs were utilized for co-mutational analysis by next-generation sequencing, ACE Extended Cancer Panel (detection limit 2%). Results: 146 pts were randomized: 72 to IVO+AZA; 74 to PBO+AZA. Median (range) baseline m IDH1 variant allele frequency in BMMCs was 36.7% (3.1–50.5) in the IVO+AZA arm and 35.5% (3.0–48.6) in the PBO+AZA arm. Updated IDH1-MC data (October 2021) from 47 IVO+AZA and 32 PBO+AZA treated pts with at least 1 on-treatment sample demonstrated IDH1-MC in 21/35 (60%) IVO+AZA pts achieving CR/CRh vs 4/11 (36%) PBO+AZA pts. In CR/CRh pts with time points available after IDH1-MC, suppression of the m IDH1 was durable and IDH1-MC maintained in all subsequent samples in 17/17 (100%) IVO+AZA treated pts and 1/3 (33%) PBO+AZA pts. Further analysis of baseline co-mutations on 120 pts (IVO+AZA: n = 58; PBO+AZA: n = 62) showed that DNMT3A, SRSF2, and RUNX1 were the most frequent in both treatment arms. Importantly, comparison of CR/CRh and non CR/CRh responses by cohort did not identify any single gene or pathway associated with an inferior outcome in IVO+AZA pts compared to PBO+AZA pts (p < 0.05, Fisher’s Exact test). Several genes ( DNMT3A, RUNX1, SRSF2, STAG2) and pathways (Differentiation, Epigenetics, Splicing) were associated with improved outcomes with IVO+AZA, including the RTK pathway, which was previously reported to be associated with primary resistance to IVO monotherapy. Further analysis of patient subgroups, including R132 variants (i.e., R132C vs R132S), will be presented. Conclusions: These data suggest that improved clinical outcomes with IVO+AZA are associated with sustained clearance of the m IDH1 clone including pts with disease that harbor mutations implicated in resistance to IVO monotherapy (e.g., with RTK pathway mutations). Clinical trial information: NCT03173248.

Clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia treated with gilteritinib who received prior midostaurin or sorafenib

The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib is indicated for relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), based on its observed superior response and survival outcomes compared with salvage chemotherapy (SC). Frontline use of FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) midostaurin and sorafenib may contribute to cross-resistance to single-agent gilteritinib in the R/R AML setting but has not been well characterized. To clarify the potential clinical impact of prior TKI use, we retrospectively compared clinical outcomes in patients with R/R FLT3-mutated AML in the CHRYSALIS and ADMIRAL trials who received prior midostaurin or sorafenib against those without prior FLT3 TKI exposure. Similarly high rates of composite complete remission (CRc) were observed in patients who received a FLT3 TKI before gilteritinib (CHRYSALIS, 42%; ADMIRAL, 52%) and those without prior FLT3 TKI therapy (CHRYSALIS, 43%; ADMIRAL, 55%). Among patients who received a prior FLT3 TKI in ADMIRAL, a higher CRc rate (52%) and trend toward longer median overall survival was observed in the gilteritinib arm versus the SC arm (CRc = 20%; overall survival, 5.1 months; HR = 0.602; 95% CI: 0.299, 1.210). Remission duration was shorter with prior FLT3 TKI exposure. These findings support gilteritinib for FLT3-mutated R/R AML after prior sorafenib or midostaurin.

Ivosidenib and Azacitidine in IDH1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

The combination of ivosidenib - an inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) - and azacitidine showed encouraging clinical activity in a phase 1b trial involving patients with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.

METHODS

In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia who were ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy to receive oral ivosidenib (500 mg once daily) and subcutaneous or intravenous azacitidine (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area for 7 days in 28-day cycles) or to receive matched placebo and azacitidine. The primary end point was event-free survival, defined as the time from randomization until treatment failure (i.e., the patient did not have complete remission by week 24), relapse from remission, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat population included 146 patients: 72 in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group and 74 in the placebo-and-azacitidine group. At a median follow-up of 12.4 months, event-free survival was significantly longer in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group than in the placebo-and-azacitidine group (hazard ratio for treatment failure, relapse from remission, or death, 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.69; P = 0.002). The estimated probability that a patient would remain event-free at 12 months was 37% in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group and 12% in the placebo-and-azacitidine group. The median overall survival was 24.0 months with ivosidenib and azacitidine and 7.9 months with placebo and azacitidine (hazard ratio for death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.73; P = 0.001). Common adverse events of grade 3 or higher included febrile neutropenia (28% with ivosidenib and azacitidine and 34% with placebo and azacitidine) and neutropenia (27% and 16%, respectively); the incidence of bleeding events of any grade was 41% and 29%, respectively. The incidence of infection of any grade was 28% with ivosidenib and azacitidine and 49% with placebo and azacitidine. Differentiation syndrome of any grade occurred in 14% of the patients receiving ivosidenib and azacitidine and 8% of those receiving placebo and azacitidine.

CONCLUSIONS

Ivosidenib and azacitidine showed significant clinical benefit as compared with placebo and azacitidine in this difficult-to-treat population. Febrile neutropenia and infections were less frequent in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group than in the placebo-and-azacitidine group, whereas neutropenia and bleeding were more frequent in the ivosidenib-and-azacitidine group. (Funded by Agios Pharmaceuticals and Servier Pharmaceuticals; AGILE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03173248.).

Venetoclax combinations delay the time to deterioration of HRQoL in unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Phase 3 trials Viale-A and Viale-C evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy who received venetoclax (VEN) + (AZA) (Viale-A) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) (Viale-C) or placebo (PBO) + AZA or LDAC. Patient-reported outcomes included: EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS/QoL) and physical functioning (PF), PROMIS Cancer Fatigue Short Form 7a (Fatigue), and EQ-5D-5L health status visual analog scale (HS-VAS). Time to deterioration (TTD), defined as worsening from baseline in meaningful change thresholds (MCT) of ≥10, 5, or 7 points for GHS/QoL or PF, fatigue, and HS-VAS, respectively, was assessed; differences between groups were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and unadjusted log-rank analyses. VEN + AZA vs PBO + AZA patients had longer TTD in GHS/QoL (P = 0.066) and fatigue (P = 0.189), and significantly longer TTD in PF (P = 0.028) and HS-VAS (P < 0.001). VEN + LDAC vs PBO + LDAC patients had significantly longer TTD in GHS/QoL (P = 0.011), PF (P = 0.020), and fatigue (P = 0.004), and a trend in HS-VAS (P = 0.057). Approximately 43%, 35%, 32%, and 18% of patients treated with VEN + AZA, AZA + PBO, VEN + LDAC, or LDAC + PBO, respectively, saw improvements >MCT in GHS/QoL. Overall, VEN may positively impact HRQoL in patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, leading to longer preservation of functioning and overall health status.

A randomised phase II study of azacitidine (AZA) alone or with Lenalidomide (LEN), Valproic acid (VPA) or Idarubicin (IDA) in higher-Risk MDS or low blast AML: GFM's "pick a winner" trial, with the impact of somatic mutations

In order to improve the outcome observed with azacitidine (AZA) in higher-risk Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), its combination with other drugs in MDS must be evaluated. So far, no combination has not been shown to be more effective than AZA alone. AZA-PLUS was a phase II trial that, in a "pick a winner" approach, randomly assigned patients with higher-risk MDS, CMML and low blast count AML to: AZA; AZA plus lenalidomide; AZA plus Valproic Acid or AZA plus Idarubicin. 322 patients were included. After six cycles, 69 (21.4%) CR + PR were observed with no benefit from any combination. Median EFS and OS were 17.2 and 19.7 months in the whole cohort, respectively, with no difference across randomised arms. Infection and rates of hospitalisation during the first six cycles were higher in the AZA-LEN And AZA-IDA arm, related to increased myelosuppression. Factors associated with better response were IPSS, favourable or intermediate karyotype, haemoglobin, lower circulating blast count, fibrinogen level and lower LDH, while poorer survival was seen in therapy-related MDS and, in the case of TP53, PTPN11 or CSF3R mutation. The combinations used did not improve the outcome obtained with AZA alone. However, our "pick a winner" randomised strategy may remain useful with potentially more active drugs to be tested in combination with AZA.

Daunorubicin and Its Active Metabolite Pharmacokinetic Profiles in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients: A Pharmacokinetic Ancillary Study of the BIG-1 Trial

Daunorubicin pharmacokinetics (PK) are characterised by an important inter-individual variability, which raises questions about the optimal dose regimen in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. The aim of the study is to assess the joint daunorubicin/daunorubicinol PK profile and to define an optimal population PK study design. Fourteen patients were enrolled in the PK ancillary study of the BIG-1 trial and 6–8 samples were taken up to 24 h after administration of the first dose of daunorubicin (90 mg/m2/day). Daunorubicin and daunorubicinol quantifications were assessed using a validated liquid chromatography technique coupled with a fluorescence detector method. Data were analysed using a non-compartmental approach and non-linear mixed effects modelling. Optimal sampling strategy was proposed using the R function PFIM. The median daunorubicin and daunorubicinol AUC0-tlast were 577 ng/mL·hr (Range: 375–1167) and 2200 ng/mL·hr (range: 933–4683), respectively. The median metabolic ratio was 0.32 (range: 0.1–0.44). Daunorubicin PK was best described by a three-compartment parent, two-compartment metabolite model, with a double first-order transformation of daunorubicin to metabolite. Body surface area and plasma creatinine had a significant impact on the daunorubicin and daunorubicinol PK. A practical optimal population design has been derived from this model with five sampling times per subject (0.5, 0.75, 2, 9, 24 h) and this can be used for a future population PK study.

Measurable Residual Disease Response and Prognosis in Treatment-Naïve Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Venetoclax and Azacitidine

PURPOSE

There is limited evidence on the clinical utility of monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower-intensity therapy. Herein, we explored the outcomes of patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine who achieved composite complete remission (CRc; complete remission + complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) and MRD < 10^-3 in the VIALE-A trial.

METHODS

The patients included in this report were treated with venetoclax and azacitidine. Bone marrow aspirate samples for multiparametric flow cytometry assessments were collected for central analysis at baseline, end of cycle 1, and every three cycles thereafter. MRD-negative response was defined as < 1 residual blast per 1,000 leukocytes (< 10^-3 or 0.1%) with an estimated analytic sensitivity of 0.0037%-0.0027%. CRc, duration of remission (DoR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified prognostic factors associated with OS.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-four of one hundred ninety (86%) patients with CRc were evaluable for MRD. MRD < 10^-3 was achieved by 67 of 164 (41%), and 97 of 164 (59%) had MRD ≥ 10^-3. The median DoR, EFS, and OS were not reached in patients with CRc and MRD < 10^-3, and the 12-month estimates for DoR, EFS, and OS in this group were 81.2%, 83.2%, and 94.0%. Among patients with CRc and MRD ≥ 10^-3, the median DoR, EFS, and OS were 9.7, 10.6, and 18.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that CRc with MRD < 10^-3 was a strong predictor of OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.285; 95% CI, 0.159 to 0.510; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients who achieved CRc and MRD < 10^-3 with venetoclax and azacitidine had longer DoR, EFS, and OS, than responding patients with MRD ≥ 10^-3.

The NADPH oxidase NOX2 is a marker of adverse prognosis involved in chemoresistance of acute myeloid leukemias

Resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs is a major cause of treatment failure in acute myeloid leukemias (AML). To better characterize the mechanisms of chemoresistance, we first identified genes whose expression is dysregulated in AML cells resistant to daunorubicin or cytarabine, the main drugs used for induction therapy. The genes found to be activated are mostly linked to immune signaling and inflammation. Among them, we identified a strong upregulation of the NOX2 NAPDH oxidase subunit genes (CYBB, CYBA, NCF1, NCF2, NCF4 and RAC2). The ensuing increase in NADPH oxidase expression and production of reactive oxygen species, which is particularly strong in daunorubicin-resistant cells, participates in the acquisition and/or maintenance of resistance to daunorubicin. Gp91^phox (CYBB-encoded Nox2 catalytic subunit), was found to be more expressed and active in leukemic cells from patients with the French-American-British (FAB) M4/M5 subtypes of AML than in those from patients with the FAB M0-M2 ones. Moreover, its expression was increased at the surface of patients’ chemotherapy-resistant AML cells. Finally, using a gene expression based score we demonstrated that high expression of NOX2 subunit genes is a marker of adverse prognosis in AML patients. The prognostic NOX score we defined is independent of the cytogenetic-based risk classification, FAB subtype, FLT3/NPM1 mutational status and age.

Eltrombopag Added to Immunosuppression in Severe Aplastic Anemia

BACKGROUND

A single-group, phase 1-2 study indicated that eltrombopag improved the efficacy of standard immunosuppressive therapy that entailed horse antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine in patients with severe aplastic anemia.

METHODS

In this prospective, investigator-led, open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of horse ATG plus cyclosporine with or without eltrombopag as front-line therapy in previously untreated patients with severe aplastic anemia. The primary end point was a hematologic complete response at 3 months.

RESULTS

Patients were assigned to receive immunosuppressive therapy (Group A, 101 patients) or immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag (Group B, 96 patients). The percentage of patients who had a complete response at 3 months was 10% in Group A and 22% in Group B (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 7.8; P = 0.01). At 6 months, the overall response rate (the percentage of patients who had a complete or partial response) was 41% in Group A and 68% in Group B. The median times to the first response were 8.8 months (Group A) and 3.0 months (Group B). The incidence of severe adverse events was similar in the two groups. With a median follow-up of 24 months, a karyotypic abnormality that was classified as myelodysplastic syndrome developed in 1 patient (Group A) and 2 patients (Group B); event-free survival was 34% and 46%, respectively. Somatic mutations were detected in 29% (Group A) and 31% (Group Β) of the patients at baseline; these percentages increased to 66% and 55%, respectively, at 6 months, without affecting the hematologic response and 2-year outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of eltrombopag to standard immunosuppressive therapy improved the rate, rapidity, and strength of hematologic response among previously untreated patients with severe aplastic anemia, without additional toxic effects. (Funded by Novartis and others; RACE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02099747; EudraCT number, 2014-000363-40.).

SHED-Dependent Oncogenic Signaling of the PEAK3 Pseudo-Kinase

Simple Summary

The human kinome is composed of about 50 pseudo-kinases with unclear function, because they are predicted to be catalytically inactive; however, they are shown to play an important role in cancer, similar to active kinases. Understanding how these pseudo-kinases promote tumor formation despite their catalytic inactivity is a great challenge, which may lead to innovative anti-cancer therapies. The PEAK1 and 2 pseudo-kinases have emerged as important components of the protein tyrosine kinase pathway implicated in cancer progression. They can signal using a scaffolding mechanism via a conserved split helical dimerization (SHED) module. In this study, we uncovered a similar SHED-dependent oncogenic activity for PEAK3, a recently discovered new member of this family. We also show that this new signaling mechanism may be implicated in acute myeloid leukemia.

Abstract

The PEAK1 and Pragmin/PEAK2 pseudo-kinases have emerged as important components of the protein tyrosine kinase pathway implicated in cancer progression. They can signal using a scaffolding mechanism that involves a conserved split helical dimerization (SHED) module. We recently identified PEAK3 as a novel member of this family based on structural homology; however, its signaling mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we found that, although it can self-associate, PEAK3 shows higher evolutionary divergence than PEAK1/2. Moreover, the PEAK3 protein is strongly expressed in human hematopoietic cells and is upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia. Functionally, PEAK3 overexpression in U2OS sarcoma cells enhanced their growth and migratory properties, while its silencing in THP1 leukemic cells reduced these effects. Importantly, an intact SHED module was required for these PEAK3 oncogenic activities. Mechanistically, through a phosphokinase survey, we identified PEAK3 as a novel inducer of AKT signaling, independent of growth-factor stimulation. Then, proteomic analyses revealed that PEAK3 interacts with the signaling proteins GRB2 and ASAP1/2 and the protein kinase PYK2, and that these interactions require the SHED domain. Moreover, PEAK3 activated PYK2, which promoted PEAK3 tyrosine phosphorylation, its association with GRB2 and ASAP1, and AKT signaling. Thus, the PEAK1-3 pseudo-kinases may use a conserved SHED-dependent mechanism to activate specific signaling proteins to promote oncogenesis.

MAIT cells numbers and frequencies in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at diagnosis: association with cytogenetic profile and gene mutations

Harnessing or monitoring immune cells is actually a major topic in pre-clinical and clinical studies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Mucosal-Associated Invariant T cells (MAIT) constitute one of the largest subset of innate-like, cytotoxic T cell subsets in humans. Despite some papers suggesting a role for MAIT cells in cancer, their specific involvement remains unclear, especially in myeloid malignancies. This prospective monocentric study included 216 patients with a newly diagnosed AML. Circulating MAIT cells were quantified by flow cytometry at diagnosis and during intensive chemotherapy. We observed that circulating MAIT cells show a specific decline in AML patients at diagnosis compared to healthy donors. Post-induction monitored patients presented with a drastic drop in MAIT cell numbers, with recovery after one month. We also found correlation between decrease in MAIT cells number and adverse cytogenetic profile. FLT3-ITD and IDH ½ mutations were associated with higher MAIT cell numbers. Patients with high level of activated MAIT cells are under-represented within patients with a favorable cytogenetic profile, and over-represented among patients with IDH1 mutations or bi-allelic CEBPA mutations. We show for the first time that circulating MAIT cells are affected in newly diagnosed AML patients, suggesting a link between MAIT cells and AML progression. Our work fosters new studies to deepen our knowledge about the role of MAIT cells in cancer.

Improved survival with enasidenib versus standard of care in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia associated with IDH2 mutations using historical data and propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The present study evaluated the relative survival benefits associated with enasidenib and current standard of care (SoC) therapies for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutation who are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared survival outcomes observed with enasidenib 100 mg daily in the phase I/II AG221-C-001 trial and SoC outcomes obtained from a real-world chart review of patients in France.

RESULTS

Before matching, enasidenib (n = 195) was associated with numerically improved overall survival (OS) relative to SoC (n = 80; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.11). After matching and adjusting for covariates (n = 78 per group), mortality risk was significantly lower with enasidenib than with SoC (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.97). The median OS was 9.26 months for enasidenib (95% CI, 7.72-13.24) and 4.76 months for SoC (95% CI, 3.81-8.21). Results remained robust across all sensitivity analyses conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

PSM analyses indicate that enasidenib significantly prolongs survival relative to SoC among patients with R/R AML and an IDH2 mutation who are ineligible for HSCT. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings using other data sources and to assess the comparative efficacy of enasidenib for other treatment outcomes.

Minimal residual disease monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia with non-A/B/D-NPM1 mutations by digital polymerase chain reaction: feasibility and clinical use

Not available.

Gut microbiota diversity after autologous fecal microbiota transfer in acute myeloid leukemia patients

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) intensive chemotherapy combined with broad-spectrum antibiotics, leads to gut microbiota dysbiosis promoting pathological conditions and an increased incidence of complications. Here we report findings from a phase II single-arm, multicenter study evaluating autologous fecal microbiota transfer (AFMT) in 25 AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy and antibiotics (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02928523). The co-primary outcomes of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of AFMT in dysbiosis correction and multidrug-resistant bacteria eradication. The main secondary outcomes are to define a dysbiosis biosignature, to evaluate the effect of dysbiosis correction on patient clinical status, to assess the short and mid-term safety of AFMT in this immunocompromised population, and to evaluate the feasibility of the AFMT procedure and acceptability by the patient. Intensive induction chemotherapy induces a dramatic decrease of α-diversity indices, and a microbial dysbiosis with a significant shift of the microbial communities and domination of pro-inflammatory families. After AFMT treatment, α-diversity indices return to their initial mean levels and the similarity index shows the restoration of microbial communities. The trial meets pre-specified endpoints. AFMT appears to be safe and may be effective for gut microbiota restoration in AML patients receiving intensive chemotherapy and antibiotics, with an excellent gut microbiota reconstruction based on both richness and diversity indices at the species level.

The combination of chemotherapy and broad-spectrum antibiotics induces gut microbiota (GM) dysbiosis in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) leading to additional complications. Here, the authors report the efficacy in GM restoration and safety of autologous faecal microbiota transfer in treated AML patients in a phase II clinical trial.

Follow-up of patients with FLT3-mutated R/R AML in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial

7013

Background: The phase 3 ADMIRAL trial demonstrated the superiority of gilteritinib to salvage chemotherapy (SC) in patients (pts) with FLT3-mutated ( FLT3mut+) R/R AML. Aim/Objective: A follow-up of ADMIRAL assessed long-term survivors, transplant (HSCT) outcomes. and gilteritinib safety beyond 1 year. Methods: A data cut was performed on September 20, 2020—2 years after the primary analysis. Patients who were alive without relapse, pts who underwent HSCT, and adverse events of interest (AEIs) in Years 1 (≤12 months) and 2 ( > 12 months) of gilteritinib therapy were evaluated. Results: As of September 20, 2020, 17% (n = 63/371) of pts in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population were alive (gilteritinib, n = 49; SC, n = 14); 16 pts assigned to gilteritinib remained on treatment. After a median follow-up of 37.1 months, 26 of the 49 pts in the gilteritinib arm who were alive were also without relapse; 18 of these 26 pts underwent HSCT, with 16 receiving post-HSCT gilteritinib maintenance therapy. Nineteen of the 26 pts in the gilteritinib arm without relapse continued gilteritinib beyond 1 year and remained in CR. Of the 371 ITT pts, 83 (22%) underwent HSCT during the study (gilteritinib, n = 64; SC, n = 19). Pre-HSCT CRc rates were similar across arms (gilteritinib: n = 40/64; 63%; SC: n = 11/19; 58%); 10 of 11 pts preselected for low-intensity SC achieved pre-HSCT CRc (gilteritinib, n = 9; SC, n = 1). Forty of 64 (63%) transplanted pts in the gilteritinib arm received post-HSCT gilteritinib maintenance after achieving pre-HSCT CRc; the 24-month relapse rate in pts who resumed gilteritinib after pre-HSCT CRc was 19%. Post-HSCT treatment with chemotherapy or other tyrosine kinase inhibitors was administered in 26 pts who received gilteritinib before transplantation. Cumulative 24-month relapse rates in gilteritinib-treated pts who achieved pre-HSCT CR and CRc were 20% and 45%, respectively. Median post-HSCT overall survival (landmarked to HSCT date), was similar across arms (gilteritinib, 16.1 months; SC, 15.3 months; HR = 1.076; 95% CI: 0.536, 2.160). Overall, 10.2% (n = 25/246) had ≥24 months of gilteritinib exposure. Most common AEIs during Years 1 and 2 of gilteritinib therapy were elevated ALT/AST levels. Incidences of all AEIs declined in Year 2. Cardiac AEIs in Year 2 were nonfatal cardiorespiratory arrest (n = 1) and ventricular tachycardia (n = 1). One case of differentiation syndrome and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma occurred in Years 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusions: A high proportion of gilteritinib-treated R/R FLT3mut+ AML pts who were alive without relapse had received HSCT followed by gilteritinib maintenance. Among all transplanted pts in ADMIRAL, pre-HSCT remission rates and post-HSCT survival were similar across arms. Post-HSCT gilteritinib maintenance may relate to the low post-HSCT relapse rate in the gilteritinib arm. The safety profile of gilteritinib is stable at 2 years with no new or significant safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT02421939.

Effect of olutasidenib (FT-2102) on complete remissions in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mIDH1 acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Results from a planned interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial

7006

Background: Olutasidenib, a potent, selective, oral, small molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (m IDH1), has exhibited favorable tolerability and clinical activity in high-risk AML patients (pts) in a phase 1 trial (Watts, Blood 2019). Here, we present interim analysis results of a phase 2 trial (NCT02719574) in R/R m IDH1 AML pts receiving olutasidenib monotherapy 150 mg twice daily. Methods: The efficacy evaluable (EE) set comprised m IDH1R132X pts whose first dose was ≥180 days before the data cut-off (18-JUN-20). The primary endpoint was CR+CRh (complete remission [CR] or CR with partial hematologic recovery [CRh] according to modified IWG 2003 criteria) rate. CRh was defined as bone marrow blasts <5%, absolute neutrophil count >0.5×109/L, and platelet count >50×109/L. Overall response rate (ORR) comprised CR+CRh+CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) + morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) + partial response (PR). Duration of treatment (DOT), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: This clinical trial met its pre-specified early enrollment-stopping criteria for efficacy. A total of 153 pts with R/R AML received olutasidenib; median DOT, 5.5 mo (95% CI: 4.4, 8.7). 43 pts (28%) remain on treatment and 110 (72%) discontinued, most commonly due to: disease progression, 31%; AEs, 14%; death, 10%; and transplant, 8%. For the EE set (123 pts), the median age was 71 y (range: 32‒87) with a median number of prior therapies of 2 (1‒7). The CR+CRh rate was 33% including 30% of pts in CR (Table). Median duration of CR+CRh was not reached (NR) and 13.8 mo in a sensitivity analysis when HSCT or relapse was deemed end of response. ORR was 46% and median duration of ORR was 11.7 mo. Of responders who were transfusion-dependent at baseline, 56-day platelet transfusion independence (TI) and RBC TI were gained by 100% and 83%, respectively, of pts who achieved CR+CRh, and by 56% and 50% who did not. Median OS was 10.5 mo (EE set). In CR+CRh responders, median OS was NR and the estimated 18-mo OS was 87%. TEAEs in ≥25% of pts were nausea, 38%; constipation, 25%; leukocytosis, 25%. Grade 3/4 all-causality TEAEs in >10% of pts were febrile neutropenia, 20%; anemia, 19%; thrombocytopenia, 16%; neutropenia, 13%. Investigator-assessed IDH1 differentiation syndrome (any grade) was observed in 21 pts (14%); most cases resolved with treatment management; one case was fatal; 19 pts had concomitant leukocytosis. Conclusions: Olutasidenib was well tolerated and induced durable CR in a subset of high-risk R/R m IDH1 AML pts. TI was achieved in all response groups. Clinical benefit, per DOR and OS, extended beyond CR+CRh responders. Clinical trial information: NCT02719574. [Table: see text]

Venetoclax and azacitidine combination in chemotherapy ineligible untreated patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, antecedent myelodysplastic syndromes, or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms

7011

Background: Patients (pts) with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (tMN), antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome, or antecedent myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (A-MDS/MPN) may have poor outcomes due to age and adverse genetic/karyotypic features. In the VIALE-A study, pts with tMN and A-MDS/MPN unfit for intensive chemotherapy treated with venetoclax (Ven) and azacitidine (Aza) demonstrated superior response rates and overall survival (OS) than Aza alone. Herein, the efficacy and safety of Ven+Aza among pts with tMN and A-MDS/MPN are described. Methods: Data were pooled from pts enrolled in VIALE-A (NCT02993523) comparing pts who received Ven+Aza or placebo (Pbo)+Aza and a prior phase 1b study (NCT02203773) where pts received Ven+Aza. Enrolled pts were ≥18 years, treatment-naïve with no prior exposure to hypomethylating agents, and ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Pts on Ven+Aza received Ven 400 mg orally (days 1–28) and Aza (75 mg/m2; days 1-7/28-day cycle). Composite complete remission rate (CRc; complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]), duration of response (DoR), and OS were assessed. Disease assessments were per modified International Working Group response criteria for AML. Results: In this pooled analysis, tMN was observed in (Ven+Aza/Pbo+Aza) 31/9 and A-MDS/MPN in 59/26 pts. Poor-risk cytogenetics were observed in 18 (58%)/6 (67%) with tMN (5 or 5q deletion [del]: 4/1 ; 7 or 7q del: 6/1 ; complex [≥ 3 clonal abnormalities]: 10/4), and 19 (32%)/13 (50%) with A-MDS/MPN (5 or 5q del: 10/5; 7 or 7q del: 6/1; complex: 14/9). TP53 mutation was observed in 5/3 pts with tMN and 8/0 pts with A-MDS/MPN. Pts with tMN received a median (Ven+Aza/Pbo+Aza) of 5/4 cycles of treatment. CRc was achieved by 19 (61%)/1 (11%). The mDoR was not reached (NR) (95% CI: 17.8, NR)/8.5 (NR, NR) months. The mOS was 16.4 (95% CI: 4.1, NR)/11.3 (0.6, 17.5) months. Pts with A-MDS/MPN received a median (Ven+Aza/Pbo+Aza) of 9/5 cycles of treatment. CRc was achieved by 39 (66%)/7 (27%) pts with mDoR of 17.3 (95% CI: 9.6, NR)/5.8 (1.1, NR) mos. The mOS was 15.9 (95% CI: 11.5, NR)/10.1 (4.7, 14.5) mos. Common grade≥3 adverse events (Ven+Aza/Pbo+Aza) were febrile neutropenia (tMN: 39%/11% and A-MDS/MPN: 36%/12%) neutropenia (tMN: 29%/33%; A-MDS/MPN: 39%31%), and thrombocytopenia (tMN: 32%/33%; A-MDS/MPN: 39%/62%). Conclusions: Ven+Aza compared to Aza monotherapy resulted in higher CRc rates with longer DoR and median OS among treatment-naïve pts with tMN and A-MDS/MPN ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The safety profile was similar to overall pts with the Ven+Aza combination. Outcomes by cytogenetic and molecular risk-groups will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02993523, NCT02203773.

Measurable residual disease response in acute myeloid leukemia treated with venetoclax and azacitidine

7018

Background: In the phase 3 VIALE-A trial, rates of composite complete remission (CRc; complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) and measurable residual disease response (MRD<10-3) were higher in patients (pts) treated with venetoclax (Ven) + azacitidine (Aza) compared to Aza alone (23.4%/7.6%, p<0.001). There is limited evidence of the clinical significance of MRD monitoring in pts receiving low-intensity chemotherapy. Herein, we explored the outcomes of pts treated with Ven+Aza who achieved both CRc and MRD<10-3 in the VIALE-A trial (NCT02993523). Methods: Enrolled pts were ≥18 years and unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Pts received Ven 400 mg orally; days 1–28 and Aza 75 mg/m2; days 1-7/28-day cycle. Bone marrow aspirate samples for multiparametric flow cytometry assessments by integrated leukemia-associated immunophenotypes and different than normal procedures were collected for central analysis (Covance Central Laboratory Services) at baseline, end of cycle 1, and every 3 cycles thereafter. Assessments were performed independent of disease responses. MRD response was defined as <1 residual blast /1000 leukocytes (<10-3). CRc, DoR, OS, and EFS were assessed. Disease assessments were per modified International Working Group response criteria for AML. Results: 211/286 (74%) pts treated with Ven+Aza with at least one valid post-baseline MRD assessment were considered MRD evaluable; 78/211 (37%) achieved MRD<10-3 and 133/211 (63%) had MRD≥10-3. Median age (MRD<10-3/ MRD≥10-3) was 76 (range: 49-89)/77 (58-91) yrs. Pts (MRD<10-3/ MRD≥10-3) received median of 14.5 (range: 1-28) /7.0 (1-30) cycles of Ven+Aza. At median follow-up of 22.0 (range: 20.1-23.0)/20.8 (19.8-22.3) months (mos), CRc + MRD<10-3/ MRD≥10-3 was achieved by 67 (86%)/ 97 (73%); 20/67 (30%) achieved CRc + MRD<10-3 by end of cycle 1. Median DoR, OS, and EFS were not reached in pts with CRc + MRD<10-3 response (Table). The 12-mo estimates for DoR, OS, and EFS for pts with CRc + MRD<10-3response were 81.2%, 94.0%, and 83.2%, respectively. Adverse events ≥grade 3 (MRD<10-3/ MRD≥10-3) were febrile neutropenia (50%/43%), neutropenia (50%/35%), and thrombocytopenia (44%/44%), similar to the overall population. Conclusions: Pts with best response of CRc who achieved MRD<10-3 response with Ven+Aza treatment had longer DoR, OS, and EFS than pts who were CRc and MRD positive. Clinical trial information: NCT02993523. [Table: see text]

Conventional chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in older adults: Impact on nutritional, cognitive, and functional status

OBJECTIVES

The impact of conventional treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on the nutritional, cognitive, and functional status of elderly patients is seldom studied. This assessment was performed in the context of the LAMSA 2007 trial.

METHODS

The trial enrolled 424 patients with de novo AML. Among them, 316 benefited from geriatric assessment (GA) including nutritional, cognitive, and functional status and were scored according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and sorror for the prediction of treatment toxicity, morbidity, and mortality. Patients were investigated at diagnosis for three times during follow-up.

RESULTS

This study showed that AML and its treatment have no impact on cognitive (P = .554) nor functional status (P = .842 for Activity of Daily Living and P = .087 for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living). The nutritional status improved over time (P = .041). None of these three parameters at baseline, associated or not with ECOG and sorror scores, impacted survivals or toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

The cognitive, functional, and nutritional status had no impact in this cohort of fit elderly AML patients without unfavorable cytogenetics. The GA tools used provided no additional information compared with ECOG and sorror scores, to predict toxicity, morbidity, or mortality due to intensive chemotherapy.

Eprenetapopt Plus Azacitidine in TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase II Study by the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies (GFM)

TP53-mutated (TP53m) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have very poor outcome irrespective of the treatment received, including 40% responses (20% complete remission [CR]) with azacitidine (AZA) alone, short response duration, and a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 6 months. Eprenetapopt (APR-246), a novel first-in-class drug, leads to p53 protein reconformation and reactivates its proapoptotic and cell-cycle arrest functions.

Kidney Involvement in Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia or BCR-ABL-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Introduction

The identification of specific molecular signatures and the development of new targeted drugs have changed the paradigm of onco-nephrology, now allowing a multiscale approach of kidney involvement related to hematologic malignancies relying on combined hematologic and molecular assessments. In this study, we aimed to refine the spectrum of kidney disorders associated with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or BCR-ABL–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), 2 very rare conditions scarcely described.

Methods

Case series. Patients with myeloid neoplasms who were referred to Toulouse University Hospital Nephrology Unit and were diagnosed with acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or urine abnormalities were retrospectively included.

Results

Eighteen patients (males n=13, CMML n=8, essential thrombocytosis [ET] n=7, polycythemia vera [PV] n=1, and myelofibrosis n=2) developed kidney disease 7.7±2 years after the diagnosis of the malignancy. Twelve patients had AKI at presentation. Eight patients had glomerular presentation (high-range proteinuria 33%, microscopic hematuria 56%). Kidney biopsy (n=14) showed various patterns, including pauci-immune glomerulosclerosis (n=5), extramedullary hematopoiesis (n=6), or tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis with polymorphic inflammation (n=8). Immunostaining of CD61 confirmed the infiltration of megakaryocytes within glomeruli or interstitium in 5 of 8 patients. Other pictures of glomerulopathy were identified in 3 patients (IgA nephropathy n=2, AA amyloidosis n=1). Massive kidney infiltration by CMML was identified in 1 patient. After a mean follow-up of 24±6 months, malignancy was considered as stable in 11 patients (61%), but 22% of patients had progressed to end-stage renal failure. The remaining had persistently reduced kidney function. No correlation between the malignancy and the renal presentation and outcomes could be identified.

Conclusions

Kidney complications of CMML/MPN are heterogenous, and kidney biopsy may help to identify new molecular targets to prevent the development of kidney fibrosis.

Dermatological Toxicities of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

The development of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors represents a major breakthrough in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other B cell malignancies. The first-generation inhibitor ibrutinib works by covalent irreversible binding to BTK, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase of the TEC (transient erythroblastopenia of childhood) family that plays a critical role in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway. It also induces an 'off-target' inhibition of a range of other kinases including (but not limited to) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), SRC, and other kinases of the TEC family (interleukin-2-inducible T-cell kinase [ITK], Tec, BMX). Dermatological toxicities are among the most common toxicities of ibrutinib, but remain of mild to moderate intensity in most cases and are readily manageable. Their incidence is highest during the first year of treatment and declines over time. In addition, it has been postulated that ibrutinib-related dermatologic adverse events are mediated by the direct binding to both BTK and other 'off-target' kinases. Bruising, ecchymoses, and petechiae represent the most characteristic dermatologic adverse events. Nail and hair changes are also common, as skin infections (opportunistic infections including herpes simplex and herpes zoster virus reactivations, and Staphylococcus aureus superinfection), folliculitis, and other types of rashes. Panniculitis, aphthous-like ulcerations with stomatitis, neutrophilic dermatosis, peripheral edema, and skin cracking can also occur. Next-generation BTK inhibitors, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, have been designed to optimize BTK inhibition and minimize off-target inhibition of alternative kinases (Tec, ITK, EGFR, SRC-family kinases). These drugs have been recently FDA-approved for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Although the overall incidence of their toxicities is expected to be more limited, acalubrutinib and zanubrutinib are associated with a range of dermatologic toxic effects that appear to be similar to those previously described with ibrutinib, including bruising and ecchymoses, panniculitis, human herpesvirus infections, cellulitis, and skin rash. In particular, both drugs induce skin bleeding events in more than 30% of patients treated. However, the available dermatological data are still rather limited and will have to be consolidated prospectively. This review article analyses the wide spectrum of dermatological toxicities that can be encountered with first- and second-generation BTK inhibitors. Finally, recommendations for appropriate treatment as well as a synthesis algorithm for management are also proposed.

Life-threatening complications after high-dose methotrexate and the benefits of glucarpidase as salvage therapy: a cohort study of 468 patients

The aims of this study were to characterize the incidence and outcomes of severe toxicities following the administration of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX; ≥1 g/m²). Among the 468 patients included in the study, 69 (14.9%) developed at least one episode of acute kidney injury (AKI; 138/1264 HD-MTX administrations), including 34 (7.2%) who developed KDIGO stage 2-3 AKI. The three baseline factors independently associated with the risk of developing AKI were age, body mass index and a diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Higher plasma MTX concentration was associated with AKI and extra-renal toxicities. Notwithstanding potentially confounding factors, most patients with AKI who received glucarpidase (n = 41) developed extra-renal toxicity (leading to the death of two patients) despite early administration. Thus, severe toxicity and death can occur whether or not glucarpidase is administered, which confirms the need for further interventional studies to provide greater precision on its role in the management of HD-MTX toxicity.

Oral acute graft versus host disease after donor lymphocyte infusions: Clinicopathological characterization in a monocenter cohort

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are used after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in order to boost the graft-versus-tumor effect. The most significant toxicity is acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), whose clinical symptoms mirror those occurring after HSCT. By contrast, oral acute GVHD lesions have been exceptionally described post-DLI. We report on a monocenter cohort of 12 adult patients that developed oral acute GVHD after DLI. The majority was treated for acute myeloid leukemia. A total of 29 DLI treatments were applied and the median time between the last DLI and the oral mucosal lesions was 42 days. Most patients presented these oral lesions concomitant with skin lesions and none of them had exclusive oral involvement. Oral lichenoid changes were observed in 11 patients, including plaque-like lesions and/or reticulated white streaks consistent with Wickham's striae, affecting mainly the buccal mucosa and dorsal or lateral aspects of the tongue. Mucosal histopathological findings showed a patchy-to-florid lichenoid interface dermatitis for 3 biopsied patients. Eight patients also experienced salivary gland changes. The treatment of oral lesions included high- to very high-potency topical corticosteroids in the majority of patients. Oral GVHD lesions have seldom been described after DLI, and only exceptionally in an acute setting. Our results are not consistent with those reported in the literature evaluating GVHD after DLI. In fact, oral acute GVHD lesions post-DLI appeared very common and similar to the oral lichenoid reactions of chronic GVHD following HSCT. The main limitations of this work are its retrospective design and the relatively small sample size.

Impact of TP53 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with azacitidine

Hypomethylating agents are a classical frontline low-intensity therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Recently, TP53 gene mutations have been described as a potential predictive biomarker of better outcome in patients treated with a ten-day decitabine regimen., However, functional characteristics of TP53 mutant are heterogeneous, as reflected in multiple functional TP53 classifications and their impact in patients treated with azacitidine is less clear. We analyzed the therapeutic course and outcome of 279 patients treated with azacitidine between 2007 and 2016, prospectively enrolled in our regional healthcare network. By screening 224 of them, we detected TP53 mutations in 55 patients (24.6%), including 53 patients (96.4%) harboring high-risk cytogenetics. The identification of any TP53 mutation was associated with worse overall survival but not with response to azacitidine in the whole cohort and in the subgroup of patients with adverse karyotype. Stratification of patients according to three recent validated functional classifications did not allow the identification of TP53 mutated patients who could benefit from azacitidine. Systematic TP53 mutant classification will deserve further exploration in the setting of patients treated with conventional therapy and in the emerging field of therapies targeting TP53 pathway.

Cost-effectiveness of midostaurin in the treatment of newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia in France

BACKGROUND

Midostaurin (MIDO) combined with standard chemotherapy was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2017 for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on results from the RATIFY trial.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare MIDO and standard-of-care (SOC) to SOC alone in France. Per Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) guidelines, a partitioned survival model with eight health states was used: diagnosis/induction, complete remission, relapse, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), HSCT recovery, post-HSCT recovery (stabilized after HSCT recovery), post-HSCT relapse, and mortality. A lifetime horizon was used beginning at diagnosis with a "cure model,", which assumed natural mortality after trial cut-off. Utility values were obtained from a systematic literature review and included disutilities. Resource utilization was based on HAS clinical guidelines and a survey of French physicians and included drugs and administration, adverse events, routine medical care, HSCT, and end-of-life care costs.

RESULTS

In RATIFY and after extrapolation, MIDO improved survival compared to SOC, translating into MIDO-treated patients gaining 1.12 life years (LYs) and 1.23 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus SOC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for MIDO versus SOC was €68,781 per LY and €62,305 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses showed consistency with base case findings.

CONCLUSIONS

MIDO represents a clinically significant advancement in the management of newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML. In this analysis, MIDO add-on therapy showed gains in LYs and QALYs versus SOC alone and was found to be a cost-effective option at a €100,000 per QALY threshold for end-of-life treatment.

Gilteritinib or Chemotherapy for Relapsed or Refractory FLT3-Mutated AML

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with mutations in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene (FLT3) infrequently have a response to salvage chemotherapy. Gilteritinib is an oral, potent, selective FLT3 inhibitor with single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML.

METHODS

In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML in a 2:1 ratio to receive either gilteritinib (at a dose of 120 mg per day) or salvage chemotherapy. The two primary end points were overall survival and the percentage of patients who had complete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery. Secondary end points included event-free survival (freedom from treatment failure [i.e., relapse or lack of remission] or death) and the percentage of patients who had complete remission.

RESULTS

Of 371 eligible patients, 247 were randomly assigned to the gilteritinib group and 124 to the salvage chemotherapy group. The median overall survival in the gilteritinib group was significantly longer than that in the chemotherapy group (9.3 months vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.83; P<0.001). The median event-free survival was 2.8 months in the gilteritinib group and 0.7 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for treatment failure or death, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.09). The percentage of patients who had complete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery was 34.0% in the gilteritinib group and 15.3% in the chemotherapy group (risk difference, 18.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 9.8 to 27.4); the percentages with complete remission were 21.1% and 10.5%, respectively (risk difference, 10.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.8 to 18.4). In an analysis that was adjusted for therapy duration, adverse events of grade 3 or higher and serious adverse events occurred less frequently in the gilteritinib group than in the chemotherapy group; the most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher in the gilteritinib group were febrile neutropenia (45.9%), anemia (40.7%), and thrombocytopenia (22.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gilteritinib resulted in significantly longer survival and higher percentages of patients with remission than salvage chemotherapy among patients with relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. (Funded by Astellas Pharma; ADMIRAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02421939.).

Chromosomal Abnormalities and Prognosis in NPM1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Nine International Cohorts

PURPOSE

Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations are associated with a favorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) when an internal tandem duplication (ITD) in the fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 gene (FLT3) is absent (FLT3-ITD^neg) or present with a low allelic ratio (FLT3-ITD^low). The 2017 European LeukemiaNet guidelines assume this is true regardless of accompanying cytogenetic abnormalities. We investigated the validity of this assumption.

METHODS

We analyzed associations between karyotype and outcome in intensively treated patients with NPM1^mut/FLT3-ITD^neg/low AML who were prospectively enrolled in registry databases from nine international study groups or treatment centers.

RESULTS

Among 2,426 patients with NPM1^mut/FLT3-ITD^neg/low AML, 2,000 (82.4%) had a normal and 426 (17.6%) had an abnormal karyotype, including 329 patients (13.6%) with intermediate and 83 patients (3.4%) with adverse-risk chromosomal abnormalities. In patients with NPM1^mut/FLT3-ITD^neg/low AML, adverse cytogenetics were associated with lower complete remission rates (87.7%, 86.0%, and 66.3% for normal, aberrant intermediate, and adverse karyotype, respectively; P < .001), inferior 5-year overall (52.4%, 44.8%, 19.5%, respectively; P < .001) and event-free survival (40.6%, 36.0%, 18.1%, respectively; P < .001), and a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (43.6%, 44.2%, 51.9%, respectively; P = .0012). These associations remained in multivariable mixed-effects regression analyses adjusted for known clinicopathologic risk factors (P < .001 for all end points). In patients with adverse-risk chromosomal aberrations, we found no significant influence of the NPM1 mutational status on outcome.

CONCLUSION

Karyotype abnormalities are significantly associated with outcome in NPM1^mut/FLT3-ITD^neg/low AML. When adverse-risk cytogenetics are present, patients with NPM1^mut share the same unfavorable prognosis as patients with NPM1 wild type and should be classified and treated accordingly. Thus, cytogenetic risk predominates over molecular risk in NPM1^mut/FLT3-ITD^neg/low AML.

Abstract CT184: Gilteritinib significantly prolongs overall survival in patients with FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut+) relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Results from the Phase III ADMIRAL trial

Introduction: Gilteritinib is a potent/selective oral inhibitor of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3). Based upon interim analysis response rates from the ADMIRAL Phase III study of gilteritinib vs salvage chemotherapy (SC) in patients (pts) with R/R FLT3mut+ AML (NCT02421939), gilteritinib became the first FLT3 inhibitor approved as single agent therapy in this population. Here we present the final results of this pivotal trial.

Methods: Adults with confirmed FLT3mut+ AML (FLT3-ITD and/or FLT3-TKD D835 or I836 mutations) refractory to induction chemotherapy or in untreated first relapse were randomized (2:1) to receive continuous 28-day cycles of 120 mg/day gilteritinib or pre-randomization selected SC: low-dose cytarabine (LoDAC), azacitidine (AZA), mitoxantrone/etoposide/cytarabine (MEC), or fludarabine/cytarabine/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor/idarubicin (FLAG-IDA). Prior FLT3 inhibitor use, other than midostaurin or sorafenib, was excluded. Overall survival (OS) and the combined rate of complete remission/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh) were co-primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS) and CR rate; safety/tolerability was also examined.

Results: A total of 371 pts were randomized: 247 to gilteritinib and 124 to SC (MEC, 25.7%; FLAG-IDA, 36.7%; LoDAC, 14.7%; AZA, 22.9%). Median age was 62 years (range, 19-85). Baseline FLT3 mutations were: FLT3-ITD, 88.4%; FLT3-TKD, 8.4%; both FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD, 1.9%; unconfirmed, 1.3%. Overall, 39.4% of pts had refractory AML and 60.6% had relapsed AML. Patients randomized to gilteritinib had significantly longer OS (9.3 months) than SC (5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] for death = 0.637; P=0.0007); 1-year survival rates were 37.1% and 16.7%, respectively. The CR/CRh rates for gilteritinib and SC were 34.0% and 15.3%, respectively (P=0.0001); CR rates were 21.1% and 10.5% (2-sided P=0.0106). Median EFS was 2.8 months and 0.7 months in the gilteritinib and SC arms, respectively (HR 0.793, P=0.0830). Common adverse events (AEs) in all randomized pts were febrile neutropenia (43.7%), anemia (43.4%), and pyrexia (38.6%). Common grade ≥3 AEs related to gilteritinib were anemia (19.5%), febrile neutropenia (15.4%), thrombocytopenia (12.2%), and decreased platelet count (12.2%). Adjusted for exposure duration, serious treatment-emergent AEs per patient year were less common with gilteritinib (7.1%) than SC (9.2%).

Conclusions: In patients with R/R FLT3mut+ AML, the potent, selective FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib resulted in significantly longer OS and higher response rates compared with chemotherapy and had a favorable safety profile. These results change the treatment paradigm for salvage therapy of R/R FLT3mut+ AML and establish gilteritinib as the new standard of care.

Citation Format: Alexander E. Perl, Giovanni Martinelli, Jorge E. Cortes, Andreas Neubauer, Ellin Berman, Stefania Paolini, Pau Montesinos, Maria R. Baer, Richard A. Larson, Celalettin Ustun, Francesco Fabbiano, Antonio Di Stasi, Robert Stuart, Rebecca Olin, Margaret Kasner, Fabio Ciceri, Wen-Chien Chou, Nikolai Podoltsev, Christian Recher, Hisayuki Yokoyama, Naoko Hosono, Sung-Soo Yoon, Je-Hwan Lee, Timothy Pardee, Amir T. Fathi, Chaofeng Liu, Xuan Liu, Erkut Bahceci, Mark J. Levis. Gilteritinib significantly prolongs overall survival in patients with FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut+) relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Results from the Phase III ADMIRAL trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT184.

Effect of gilteritinib on survival in patients with FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut+) relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML who have common AML co-mutations or a high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio

7000

Background: The FLT3 inhibitor, gilteritinib, showed superior response and overall survival (OS) compared with salvage chemotherapy (SC) in patients (pts) with FLT3mut+ R/R AML in the phase 3 ADMIRAL study. We analyzed the impact of baseline co-mutations and FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (AR) on response and OS. Methods: A total of 37 recurrently mutated genes in AML (Archer Core Myeloid Panel) were analyzed by next-generation sequencing; the cutoff for co-mutation positivity (co-mut+) was ≥0.027. Baseline FLT3-ITD AR ( FLT3-ITD to FLT3 wild-type DNA) was measured by the LeukoStrat CDx FLT3 Mutation Assay. The median FLT3-ITD AR value of 0.77 was used to define high (≥0.77) vs low (<0.77) FLT3-ITD AR. Results: Analysis of 361 FLT3mut+ pts identified four major co-mutation cohorts, each with ≥10% of pts: NPM1 (n=173; 47.9%), DNMT3A (n=115; 31.9%), DNMT3A/NPM1 (n=86; 23.8%) , and WT1 (n=65; 18.0%). In addition, seven pts (1.9%) had all three co-mutations (ie, NPM1, DNMT3A, and WT1). The gilteritinib arm had superior response rates and OS across all four major co-mutation cohorts, with the greatest survival benefit in pts with DNMT3A/NPM1 co-mut+ (Table). In FLT3-ITD AR analyses (n=335), gilteritinib conferred longer OS than SC in pts with a high or low FLT3-ITD AR (gilteritinib: high FLT3-ITD AR, 7.1 mos vs low FLT3-ITD AR, 10.6 mos; SC: high FLT3-ITD AR, 4.3 mos vs low FLT3-ITD AR, 6.9 mos). In both arms, OS was longer in the low FLT3-ITD AR cohort than the high FLT3-ITD AR cohort but the difference in the gilteritinib arm was not statistically significant (gilteritinib: HR=1.341, P=0.0712; SC: HR=2.01, P=0.0021). Conclusions: The ADMIRAL trial shows that the clinical benefit of gilteritinib in FLT3mut+ R/R AML is maintained regardless of NPM1, DNMT3A, DNMT3A/ NPM1, or WT1 co-mut+ or high FLT3-ITD AR. Clinical trial information: NCT02421939. [Table: see text]

Long non-coding RNA expression profile in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia identifies a distinct signature and a new biomarker in NPM1-mutated patients

Long non-coding RNAs are defined as transcripts larger than 200 nucleotides but without protein-coding potential. There is growing evidence of the important role of long non-coding RNAs in cancer initiation, development and progression. In this study, we sought to evaluate the long non-coding RNA expression profile of patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (AML). RNA-sequencing of 40 cytogenetically normal AML patients allowed us to quantify 11,036 long non-coding RNAs. Among these, more than 8000 were previously undescribed long non-coding RNAs. Using unsupervised analysis, we observed a specific long non-coding RNA expression profile dependent on the mutational status of the NPM1 gene. Statistical analysis allowed us to identify a minimal set of 12 long non-coding RNAs capable of discriminating NPM1-mutated from NPM1-wild-type patients. These results were validated by qRT-PCR on an independent cohort composed of 134 cytogenetically normal AML patients. Furthermore, we have identified one putative biomarker, the long non-coding RNA XLOC_109948 whose expression pattern predicts clinical outcome. Interestingly, low XLOC_109948 expression indicates a good prognosis especially for NPM1-mutated patients. Transient transfection of GapmeR against XLOC_109948 in NPM1-mutated OCI-AML3 cell line treated with Ara-C or ATRA enhances apoptosis suggesting XLOC_109948 plays a role in drug sensitivity. This study improves our knowledge of the long non-coding RNA transcriptome in cytogenetically normal AML patients. We observed a distinct long non-coding RNA expression profile in patients with the NPM1 mutation. The newly identified XLOC_109948 long non-coding RNA emerged as a strong prognostic factor able to better stratify NPM1-mutated patients.

Randomized Phase II Study of Clofarabine-Based Consolidation for Younger Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a clofarabine-based combination (CLARA) versus conventional high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) as postremission chemotherapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Patients age 18 to 59 years old with intermediate- or unfavorable-risk AML in first remission and no identified donor for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) were eligible. Two hundred twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive three CLARA or three HDAC consolidation cycles. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). To handle the confounding effect of SCT that could occur in patients with late donor identification, hazard ratios (HRs) of events were adjusted on the time-dependent treatment × SCT interaction term. Results At 2 years, RFS was 58.5% (95% CI, 49% to 67%) in the CLARA arm and 46.5% (95% CI, 37% to 55%) in the HDAC arm. Overall, 110 patients (55 in each arm) received SCT in first remission. On the basis of a multivariable Cox-adjusted treatment × SCT interaction, the HR of CLARA over HDAC before or in absence of SCT was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.98; P = .041). In a sensitivity analysis, when patients who received SCT in first remission were censored at SCT time, 2-year RFS was 53.3% (95% CI, 39% to 66%) in the CLARA arm and 31.0% (95% CI, 19% to 43%) in the HDAC arm (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.98; P = .043). Gain in RFS could be related to the lower cumulative incidence of relapse observed in the CLARA arm versus the HDAC arm (33.9% v 46.4% at 2 years, respectively; cause-specific HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.94; P = .025). CLARA cycles were associated with higher hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity than HDAC cycles. Conclusion These results suggest that CLARA might be considered as a new chemotherapy option in younger patients with AML in first remission.