1
|
Piedimonte S, Murray C, Atenafu EG, Rouzbahman M, Lheureux S, May T. Correlating the KELIM (CA125 elimination rate constant K) score and the chemo-response score as predictors of chemosensitivity in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 187:92-97. [PMID: 38735145 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study is to assess the correlation between the pre-operative CA125 Elimination rate constant K(KELIM) score and the intraoperative chemo-response score (CRS) in patients with advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer(HGSC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT). METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with Stage III-IV HGSC treated with NACT from March 2010 to December 2019 at Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada. KELIM scores were calculated based on the tool devised by You et al. available online. CRS was assessed using an established 3-tier scoring system. An association analysis was performed to determine if the KELIM score assessed during NACT can predict CRS score at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery(ICS). RESULTS 172 patients were included in this analysis. Patients with CRS 1-2 had a lower median Platinum Free Interval(PFI) (9.24 vs 13.64 months, p = 0.005), lower median progression free survival(PFS) (14.99 vs 20.29 months, p = 0.003) and lower 5-year overall survival(OS) (63.8% vs 69.7%, p = 0.54) compared to patients with CRS3. Among patients with CRS 1-2(n = 115), 68.7% had KELIM <1, while 56.2% of patients with CRS3 had KELIM ≥1(56.2%), p = 0.0017, suggesting a correlation between the KELIM and CRS scores. Furthermore, patients with KELIM ≥1 and CRS3 had significantly higher PFS compared to other groups(median PFS 28.27 months vs 17.66 months for KELIM ≥1/CRS 1/2; 17.13 months for KELIM <1/CRS 3; and 14.53 months for KELIM <1/CRS 1-2, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION The biochemical KELIM score correlated with the surgical pathologic CRS score and may predict pathological response to chemotherapy. This information can be utilized to tailor and personalize treatment in patients with advanced ovarian malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Piedimonte
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ciara Murray
- Department of Pathology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marjan Rouzbahman
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taymaa May
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gaitskell K, Rogozińska E, Platt S, Chen Y, Abd El Aziz M, Tattersall A, Morrison J. Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 4:CD007930. [PMID: 37185961 PMCID: PMC10111509 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007930.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many women, and other females, with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) develop resistance to conventional chemotherapy drugs. Drugs that inhibit angiogenesis (development of new blood vessels), essential for tumour growth, control cancer growth by denying blood supply to tumour nodules. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness and toxicities of angiogenesis inhibitors for treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). SEARCH METHODS We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase (from 1990 to 30 September 2022). We searched clinical trials registers and contacted investigators of completed and ongoing trials for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with standard chemotherapy, other types of anti-cancer treatment, other angiogenesis inhibitors with or without other treatments, or placebo/no treatment in a maintenance setting, in women with EOC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QoL), adverse events (grade 3 and above) and hypertension (grade 2 and above). MAIN RESULTS We identified 50 studies (14,836 participants) for inclusion (including five studies from the previous version of this review): 13 solely in females with newly-diagnosed EOC and 37 in females with recurrent EOC (nine studies in platinum-sensitive EOC; 19 in platinum-resistant EOC; nine with studies with mixed or unclear platinum sensitivity). The main results are presented below. Newly-diagnosed EOC Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS compared to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.07; 2 studies, 2776 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence is very uncertain for PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.05; 2 studies, 2746 participants; very low-certainty evidence), although the combination results in a slight reduction in global QoL (mean difference (MD) -6.4, 95% CI -8.86 to -3.94; 1 study, 890 participants; high-certainty evidence). The combination likely increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.26; 1 study, 1485 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 4.27, 95% CI 3.25 to 5.60; 2 studies, 2707 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to block VEGF receptors (VEGF-R), given with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance, likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.17; 2 studies, 1451 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and likely increase PFS slightly (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.00; 2 studies, 2466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination likely reduces QoL slightly (MD -1.86, 95% CI -3.46 to -0.26; 1 study, 1340 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but it increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.55; 1 study, 188 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 3) (RR 6.49, 95% CI 2.02 to 20.87; 1 study, 1352 participants; low-certainty evidence). Recurrent EOC (platinum-sensitive) Moderate-certainty evidence from three studies (with 1564 participants) indicates that bevacizumab with chemotherapy, and continued as maintenance, likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.02), but likely improves PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.63) compared to chemotherapy alone. The combination may result in little to no difference in QoL (MD 0.8, 95% CI -2.11 to 3.71; 1 study, 486 participants; low-certainty evidence), but it increases the rate of any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.11, 1.07 to 1.16; 3 studies, 1538 participants; high-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common in arms with bevacizumab (RR 5.82, 95% CI 3.84 to 8.83; 3 studies, 1538 participants). TKIs with chemotherapy may result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.11; 1 study, 282 participants; low-certainty evidence), likely increase PFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.72; 1 study, 282 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may have little to no effect on QoL (MD 6.1, 95% CI -0.96 to 13.16; 1 study, 146 participants; low-certainty evidence). Hypertension (grade ≥ 3) was more common with TKIs (RR 3.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 9.10). Recurrent EOC (platinum-resistant) Bevacizumab with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance increases OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88; 5 studies, 778 participants; high-certainty evidence) and likely results in a large increase in PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.58; 5 studies, 778 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination may result in a large increase in hypertension (grade ≥ 2) (RR 3.11, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.27; 2 studies, 436 participants; low-certainty evidence). The rate of bowel fistula/perforation (grade ≥ 2) may be slightly higher with bevacizumab (RR 6.89, 95% CI 0.86 to 55.09; 2 studies, 436 participants). Evidence from eight studies suggest TKIs with chemotherapy likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; 940 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with low-certainty evidence that it may increase PFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89; 940 participants), and may result in little to no meaningful difference in QoL (MD ranged from -0.19 at 6 weeks to -3.40 at 4 months). The combination increases any adverse event (grade ≥ 3) slightly (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.49; 3 studies, 402 participants; high-certainty evidence). The effect on bowel fistula/perforation rates is uncertain (RR 2.74, 95% CI 0.77 to 9.75; 5 studies, 557 participants; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Bevacizumab likely improves both OS and PFS in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC. In platinum-sensitive relapsed disease, bevacizumab and TKIs probably improve PFS, but may or may not improve OS. The results for TKIs in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC are similar. The effects on OS or PFS in newly-diagnosed EOC are less certain, with a decrease in QoL and increase in adverse events. Overall adverse events and QoL data were more variably reported than were PFS data. There appears to be a role for anti-angiogenesis treatment, but given the additional treatment burden and economic costs of maintenance treatments, benefits and risks of anti-angiogenesis treatments should be carefully considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kezia Gaitskell
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Sarah Platt
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Yifan Chen
- Oxford Medical School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Jo Morrison
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blanc-Durand F, Yaniz-Galende E, Llop-Guevara A, Genestie C, Serra V, Herencia-Ropero A, Klein C, Berton D, Lortholary A, Dohollou N, Desauw C, Fabbro M, Malaurie E, Bonichon-Lamaichhane N, Dubot C, Kurtz JE, de Rauglaudre G, Raban N, Chevalier-Place A, Ferron G, Kaminsky MC, Kramer C, Rouleau E, Leary A. A RAD51 functional assay as a candidate test for homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 171:106-113. [PMID: 36868112 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), defined as BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAmut) or high genomic instability, is used to identify ovarian cancer (OC) patients most likely to benefit from PARP inhibitors. While these tests are useful, they are imperfect. Another approach is to measure the capacity of tumor cells to form RAD51 foci in the presence of DNA damage using an immunofluorescence assay (IF). We aimed to describe for the first time this assay in OC and correlate it to platinum response and BRCAmut. METHODS Tumor samples were prospectively collected from the randomized CHIVA trial of neoadjuvant platinum +/- nintedanib. IF for RAD51, GMN and gH2AX was performed on FFPE blocks. Tumors were considered RAD51-low if ≤10% of GMN-positive tumor cells had ≥5 RAD51 foci. BRCAmut were identified by NGS. RESULTS 155 samples were available. RAD51 assay was contributive for 92% of samples and NGS available for 77%. gH2AX foci confirmed the presence of significant basal DNA damage. 54% of samples were considered HRD by RAD51 and presented higher overall response rates to neoadjuvant platinum (P = 0.04) and longer progression-free survival (P = 0.02). In addition, 67% of BRCAmut were HRD by RAD51. Among BRCAmut, RAD51-high tumors seem to harbor poorer response to chemotherapy (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS We evaluated a functional assay of HR competency. OC demonstrate high levels of DNA damage, yet 54% fail to form RAD51 foci. These RAD51-low OC tend to be more sensitive to neoadjuvant platinum. The RAD51 assay also identified a subset of RAD51-high BRCAmut tumors with unexpected poor platinum response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Félix Blanc-Durand
- Medical Oncology, Gynecology Unit, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Alba Llop-Guevara
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Violeta Serra
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Christophe Klein
- Center of Cellular Imaging and Cytometry, INSERM UMRS 1138, Cordeliers Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Berton
- Medical Oncology, GINECO & Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Alain Lortholary
- Medical Oncology, GINECO-Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France
| | - Nadine Dohollou
- Medical Oncology, Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitain, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Michel Fabbro
- Medical Oncology, ICM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuelle Malaurie
- Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | | | - Coraline Dubot
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and Institut Curie - Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | | | - Nadia Raban
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and CHU La Milétrie, Poitiers, France
| | | | - Gwenael Ferron
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Claire Kramer
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Medical Oncology, Gynecology Unit, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France; INSERM UMR981, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bryant A, Hiu S, Kunonga PT, Gajjar K, Craig D, Vale L, Winter-Roach BA, Elattar A, Naik R. Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 9:CD015048. [PMID: 36161421 PMCID: PMC9512080 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015048.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and a leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancies. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type, accounting for around 90% of all ovarian cancers. This specific type of ovarian cancer starts in the surface layer covering the ovary or lining of the fallopian tube. Surgery is performed either before chemotherapy (upfront or primary debulking surgery (PDS)) or in the middle of a course of treatment with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS)), with the aim of removing all visible tumour and achieving no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD). The aim of this review is to investigate the prognostic impact of size of residual disease nodules (RD) in women who received upfront or interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). OBJECTIVES To assess the prognostic impact of residual disease after primary surgery on survival outcomes for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. In separate analyses, primary surgery included both upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Each residual disease threshold is considered as a separate prognostic factor. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), MEDLINE via Ovid (to 30 August 2021) and Embase via Ovid (to 30 August 2021). SELECTION CRITERIA We included survival data from studies of at least 100 women with advanced EOC after primary surgery. Residual disease was assessed as a prognostic factor in multivariate prognostic models. We excluded studies that reported fewer than 100 women, women with concurrent malignancies or studies that only reported unadjusted results. Women were included into two distinct groups: those who received PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and those who received IDS, analysed separately. We included studies that reported all RD thresholds after surgery, but the main thresholds of interest were microscopic RD (labelled NMRD), RD 0.1 cm to 1 cm (small-volume residual disease (SVRD)) and RD > 1 cm (large-volume residual disease (LVRD)). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we synthesised the data in meta-analysis. To assess the adequacy of adjustment factors used in multivariate Cox models, we used the 'adjustment for other prognostic factors' and 'statistical analysis and reporting' domains of the quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool. We also made judgements about the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in the main comparisons, using GRADE. We examined differences between FIGO stages III and IV for different thresholds of RD after primary surgery. We considered factors such as age, grade, length of follow-up, type and experience of surgeon, and type of surgery in the interpretation of any heterogeneity. We also performed sensitivity analyses that distinguished between studies that included NMRD in RD categories of < 1 cm and those that did not. This was applicable to comparisons involving RD < 1 cm with the exception of RD < 1 cm versus NMRD. We evaluated women undergoing PDS and IDS in separate analyses. MAIN RESULTS We found 46 studies reporting multivariate prognostic analyses, including RD as a prognostic factor, which met our inclusion criteria: 22,376 women who underwent PDS and 3697 who underwent IDS, all with varying levels of RD. While we identified a range of different RD thresholds, we mainly report on comparisons that are the focus of a key area of clinical uncertainty (involving NMRD, SVRD and LVRD). The comparison involving any visible disease (RD > 0 cm) and NMRD was also important. SVRD versus NMRD in a PDS setting In PDS studies, most showed an increased risk of death in all RD groups when those with macroscopic RD (MRD) were compared to NMRD. Women who had SVRD after PDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.29; I2 = 50%; 17 studies; 9404 participants; moderate-certainty). The analysis of progression-free survival found that women who had SVRD after PDS had nearly twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.16; I2 = 63%; 10 studies; 6596 participants; moderate-certainty). LVRD versus SVRD in a PDS setting When we compared LVRD versus SVRD following surgery, the estimates were attenuated compared to NMRD comparisons. All analyses showed an overall survival benefit in women who had RD < 1 cm after surgery (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 5 studies; 6000 participants; moderate-certainty). The results were robust to analyses of progression-free survival. SVRD and LVRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting The one study that defined the categories as NMRD, SVRD and LVRD showed that women who had SVRD and LVRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women who had NMRD (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.66; 310 participants; I2 = 56%, and HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34; 343 participants; I2 = 35%; very low-certainty, for SVRD versus NMRD and LVRD versus NMRD, respectively). LVRD versus SVRD + NMRD in an IDS setting Meta-analysis found that women who had LVRD had a greater risk of death and disease progression compared to women who had either SVRD or NMRD (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.11; 6 studies; 1572 participants; I2 = 58% for overall survival and HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; 1145 participants; I2 = 60% for progression-free survival; very low-certainty). However, this result is biased as in all but one study it was not possible to distinguish NMRD within the < 1 cm thresholds. Only one study separated NMRD from SVRD; all others included NMRD in the SVRD group, which may create bias when comparing with LVRD, making interpretation challenging. MRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting Women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.29, I2 = 81%; 906 participants; very low-certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In a PDS setting, there is moderate-certainty evidence that the amount of RD after primary surgery is a prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer. We separated our analysis into three distinct categories for the survival outcome including NMRD, SVRD and LVRD. After IDS, there may be only two categories required, although this is based on very low-certainty evidence, as all but one study included NMRD in the SVRD category. The one study that separated NMRD from SVRD showed no improved survival outcome in the SVRD category, compared to LVRD. Further low-certainty evidence also supported restricting to two categories, where women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had a significantly greater risk of death compared to women with NMRD. Therefore, the evidence presented in this review cannot conclude that using three categories applies in an IDS setting (very low-certainty evidence), as was supported for PDS (which has convincing moderate-certainty evidence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Bryant
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Shaun Hiu
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Patience T Kunonga
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ketankumar Gajjar
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, 1st Floor Maternity Unit, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Brett A Winter-Roach
- The Department of Surgery, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ahmed Elattar
- City Hospital & Birmingham Treatment Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Raj Naik
- Gynaecological Oncology, Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guy H, Hawkes C, Walder L, Malinowska IA, Gupta D. Systematic literature review of efficacy and safety of first-line maintenance therapy trials in advanced ovarian cancer. Future Oncol 2022; 18:3435-3447. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To review safety and efficacy outcomes in studies of first-line maintenance therapies for advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed (27 February 2020) to identify clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and Grade ≥3 adverse events. Results: Overall 50 references met prespecified criteria; 18 studies evaluated 10 different agents, including PARP inhibitors. PFS was an end point in 16 trials and OS in 12 trials. PARP inhibitors reported better PFS hazard ratios (HRs: 0.59–0.68) compared with other classes; no mature OS data were identified. Safety reporting was inconsistent. Conclusion: Reported PFS HRs were better for PARP inhibitors than for other ovarian cancer maintenance therapies; overall survival data remain immature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Guy
- FIECON Ltd., 3 College Yard, Lower Dagnall St, St Albans, Hertfordshire, AL3 4PA, UK
| | - Carol Hawkes
- GlaxoSmithKline, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, TW8 9GS, UK
| | - Lydia Walder
- FIECON Ltd., 3 College Yard, Lower Dagnall St, St Albans, Hertfordshire, AL3 4PA, UK
| | | | - Divya Gupta
- GlaxoSmithKline, 1000 Winter St, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paclitaxel with or without pazopanib for ovarian cancer relapsing during bevacizumab maintenance therapy: The GINECO randomized phase II TAPAZ study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:389-396. [PMID: 35902297 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-angiogenic rechallenge with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is effective in recurrent ovarian cancer (rOC); however, data are limited on tyrosine kinase inhibitors after progression on maintenance bevacizumab. METHODS In the randomized phase II TAPAZ trial, patients with rOC during the first year of bevacizumab maintenance therapy were assigned 2:1 to either weekly paclitaxel 65 mg/m2 plus pazopanib 600-800 mg daily or standard weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2. The primary endpoint was 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. RESULTS Overall, 116 patients were randomized and treated: 79 with combination therapy and 37 with single-agent paclitaxel. Median follow-up was 13.1 months. There was no difference between treatment arms in 4-month PFS rate (61% [95% CI, 51-73%] with the combination versus 68% [95% CI, 54-85%] with paclitaxel alone), median PFS (4.9 [95% CI, 4.1-6.1] versus 5.8 [95% CI, 4.8-7.4] months, respectively) or median overall survival (13.6 versus 12.9 months, respectively). The combination was associated with more grade 3/4 toxicities (87% versus 70%, respectively) and toxicity-related paclitaxel discontinuations (22% versus 11%). Pazopanib was discontinued for toxicity in 44% of patients, most commonly for gastrointestinal and vascular events. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in the combination arm (pulmonary embolism and gastrointestinal perforation). At month 4, patient-reported outcomes deteriorated from baseline in the combination arm, particularly for abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms, which showed a clinically important difference versus paclitaxel alone. CONCLUSIONS In rOC progressing during maintenance bevacizumab, adding pazopanib to paclitaxel did not improve efficacy, increased toxicity, and compromised chemotherapy delivery. CLINICALTRIALS govregistration:NCT02383251.
Collapse
|
7
|
Murphy AD, Morgan RD, Clamp AR, Jayson GC. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:851-864. [PMID: 34716396 PMCID: PMC8927157 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01605-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers (EOC) are a leading cause of gynaecological cancer-associated mortality and angiogenesis plays a key role in their growth. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi) disrupt angiogenesis and improve the response rate, progression-free survival and in some cases, overall survival, when administered with and following cytotoxic chemotherapy, irrespective of the platinum sensitivity of EOC. Recent data have identified new indications for VEGFi in EOC: repeated exposure to VEGFi in the first- and then second-line treatment has sustained clinical efficacy; combinations of VEGFi with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have proven effective as first-line or second-line maintenance regimens. However, recent trial data have not shown improved outcomes with combinations of VEGFi and immune checkpoint inhibitors. There remains a critical need to optimise patient selection for these effective yet somewhat toxic and expensive treatments. The search continues for validated biomarkers to optimise the use of VEGFi, of which the most promising at present is plasma Tie2. Based upon these studies, we propose a model of care incorporating VEGFi into the treatment of EOC, highlighting the need to change from the prescription of single courses of VEGFi, to allow use and re-use as clinically indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert D Morgan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew R Clamp
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gordon C Jayson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lorusso D, Guy H, Samyshkin Y, Hawkes C, Estenson K, Coleman RL. Feasibility Study of a Network Meta-Analysis and Unanchored Population-Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparison of Niraparib, Olaparib, and Bevacizumab as Maintenance Therapies in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1285. [PMID: 35267593 PMCID: PMC8909094 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Selecting a first-line (1L) maintenance option for ovarian cancer is challenging given the variety of therapies, differing trials, and the lack of head-to-head data for angiogenesis and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Thus, indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) can aid treatment decision making. This study assessed the feasibility of two ITCs, a network meta-analysis (NMA) and a population-adjusted ITC (PAIC), comparing the efficacy of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in the PRIMA trial (NCT02655016) with other 1L maintenance treatments. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify trials using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions to assess differences in trial design, population characteristics, treatment arms, and outcome measures. All 12 trials identified were excluded from the NMA due to the absence of a common comparator and differences in survival measures and/or inclusion criteria. The PAIC comparing PRIMA and PAOLA-1 trials was also not feasible due to differences in inclusion criteria, survival measures, and the previous receipt of chemotherapy/bevacizumab. Neither ITC met recommended guidelines for analysis; the results of such comparisons would not be considered appropriate evidence when selecting 1L maintenance options in ovarian cancer. ITCs in this setting should be performed cautiously, as many factors can preclude objective trial comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenica Lorusso
- Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Carol Hawkes
- GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford TW8 9GS, UK; (Y.S.); (C.H.)
| | - Kasey Estenson
- GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA;
- Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ 07677, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Increasing Prognostic and Predictive Roles of the Tumor Primary Chemosensitivity Assessed by CA-125 Elimination Rate Constant K (KELIM) in Ovarian Cancer: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010098. [PMID: 35008262 PMCID: PMC8750686 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the gynecological cancer with the worst prognosis and the highest mortality rate because 75% of patients are diagnosed with advanced stage III-IV disease. About 50% of patients are now treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). In that context, there is a need for accurate predictors of tumor primary chemosensitivity, as it may impact the feasibility of subsequent IDS. Across seven studies with more than 12,000 patients, including six large randomized clinical trials and a national cancer registry, along with a mega-analysis database with 5842 patients, the modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), the calculation of which is based on the longitudinal kinetics during the first three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, was shown to be a reproducible indicator of tumor intrinsic chemosensitivity. Indeed, KELIM is strongly associated with the likelihood of complete IDS, subsequent platinum-free interval, progression-free survival, and overall survival, along with the efficacy of maintenance treatment with bevacizumab or veliparib. As a consequence, KELIM might be used to guide more subtly the medical and surgical treatments in a first-line setting. Moreover, it could be used to identify the patients with poorly chemosensitive disease, who will be the best candidates for innovative treatments meant to reverse the chemoresistance, such as cell cycle inhibitors or immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hirte H, Yao X, Ferguson SE, May T, Elit L. An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline: Consolidation or Maintenance Systemic Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Stage II, III, or IV Epithelial Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:1114-1124. [PMID: 33804587 PMCID: PMC8025745 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28020107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide recommendations on systemic therapy options in consolidation or maintenance therapy for women with newly diagnosed stage II, III, or IV epithelial ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma including all histological types. METHODS Consistent with the Program in Evidence-based Program's standardized approach, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO (the international prospective register of systematic reviews) databases, and four relevant conferences were systematically searched. The Working Group drafted recommendations and revised them based on the comments from internal and external reviewers. RESULTS We have one recommendation for consolidation therapy and eight recommendations for maintenance therapy. Overall, consolidation therapy with chemotherapy should not be recommended in the target population. For maintenance therapy, we recommended olaparib (Recommendation), niraparib (Weak Recommendation), veliparib (Weak Recommendation), and bevacizumab (Weak Recommendation) for certain patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma, respectively. We do not recommend some agents as maintenance therapy in four recommendations. We are unable to specify the patient population by histological types for different maintenance therapy recommendations. When new evidence that can impact the recommendations is available, the recommendations will be updated as soon as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hal Hirte
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada;
| | - Xiaomei Yao
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada;
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada
| | - Sarah E. Ferguson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1A1, Canada; (S.E.F.); (T.M.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Taymaa May
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1A1, Canada; (S.E.F.); (T.M.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Laurie Elit
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Genomic profiling of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: The road into druggable targets. Semin Cancer Biol 2020; 77:29-41. [PMID: 33161141 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer. High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most frequent histologic subtype and while it is a highly platinum-sensitive cancer at initial treatment, nearly 90 % of stage IIIC patients recur in 5 years and eventually become resistant to platinum treatment. Historically, the definition of platinum-resistant disease is based on the time interval between last platinum therapy and recurrence shorter than 6 months. Nowadays the use of sophisticated imaging techniques and serum markers to detect recurrence makes the accuracy of this clinical definition less clear and even more debatable as we begin to better understand the molecular landscape of HGSC and markers of platinum resistance and sensitivity. HGSC is characterized by a low frequency of recurrent mutations, great genomic instability with widespread copy number variations, universal TP53 mutations, and homologous recombination deficiency in more than 50 % of cases. Platinum agents form DNA adducts and intra- and inter-strand cross-links in the DNA. Most of DNA repair pathways are involved at some point in the repair of platinum induced DNA damaging, most notably homologous recombination, Fanconi Anemia, and nucleotide excision repair pathways. Mechanisms of platinum resistance are related mostly to the limitation of platinum-DNA adduct formation by changing cellular pharmacology, and to the prevention of cell death after DNA damage due to alterations in DNA repair pathways and cell cycle regulation. Understanding these mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance may help to define the utility of platinum re-challenge in each situation and guide new therapeutic opportunities. Moreover, the discovery of mechanisms of synthetic lethality related to alterations in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation pathways has opened up a new avenue for drug therapy in the last decade. In the present article, we review pathways involved in platinum-induced DNA damage repair and their relationship with genomic alterations present in HGSC. Moreover, we report new treatment strategies that are underway to target these alterations.
Collapse
|
12
|
May T, Oza AM. Measurement Tool of Chemotherapy Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:4432-4434. [PMID: 32601078 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The modeled Ca125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM) can be used as a measure of chemotherapy sensitivity in women with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who are being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This marker may aid in decision-making regarding surgical resection and alternate systemic treatments in this cohort.See related article by You et al., p. 4625.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taymaa May
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
You B, Robelin P, Tod M, Louvet C, Lotz JP, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Fabbro M, Desauw C, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Kurtz JE, Follana P, Leheurteur M, Piano FD, Ferron G, De Rauglaudre G, Ray-Coquard I, Combe P, Chevalier-Place A, Joly F, Leary A, Pujade-Lauraine E, Freyer G, Colomban O. CA-125 ELIMination Rate Constant K (KELIM) Is a Marker of Chemosensitivity in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: Results from the Phase II CHIVA Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:4625-4632. [PMID: 32209570 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the first-line treatment success will depend on both the tumor-primary chemosensitivity and the completeness of interval debulking surgery (IDS). The modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), calculated with the CA-125 longitudinal kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days, is a validated early marker of tumor chemosensitivity. The objective was to investigate the role of the chemosensitivity relative to the success of first-line medical-surgical treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The CA-125 concentrations were prospectively measured in the randomized phase II trial CHIVA (NCT01583322, carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen ± nintedanib, and IDS, n = 188 patients). The KELIM predictive value regarding the tumor response rate, likelihood of complete IDS, risk of subsequent platinum-resistant relapse (PtRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariate and multivariate tests. RESULTS The data from 134 patients were analyzed. KELIM was an independent and major predictor of subsequent PtRR risk, and of survivals. The final logistic regression model, including KELIM [OR = 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03-0.49] and complete IDS (no vs. yes, OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.76) highlights the preponderant role of chemosensitivity on the success of the first-line treatment. In patients with highly chemosensitive diseases, the patient prognosis was driven more by the chemotherapy-induced antitumor effects than by the surgery. CONCLUSIONS The tumor-primary chemosensitivity, assessed by the modeled CA-125 KELIM calculated during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (http://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125-neo), may be a major parameter to consider for decision-making regarding IDS attempt, and selecting patients for treatments meant to reverse the primary chemoresistance.See related commentary by May and Oza, p. 4432.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit You
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France. .,Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, GINECO, GINEGEPS, Lyon, France
| | - Patrick Robelin
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.,Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, GINECO, GINEGEPS, Lyon, France
| | - Michel Tod
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.,Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pharmacie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France
| | - Christophe Louvet
- L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Service d'oncologie, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | - Sophie Abadie-Lacourtoisie
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - ICO - Site Paul Papin, Oncologie médicale gynécologique, Angers, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Michel Fabbro
- ICM Val d'Aurelle Parc Euromedecine, Oncologie médicale, Montpellier, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Desauw
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Oncologie médicale, Lille Cedex, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Service d'Oncologie et d'Hématologie, Strasbourg, France
| | - Philippe Follana
- CLCC Antoine Lacassagne, Département d'Hématologie - Oncologie médicale, NICE CEDEX 2, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | - Francesco Del Piano
- Hôpitaux de LEMAN, Chirurgie Gynécologique, THONON LES BAINS, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Gwénael Ferron
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, TOULOUSE, France
| | - Gaëtan De Rauglaudre
- Institut Sainte-Catherine, Oncologie radiothérapie, Avignon, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, & Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Combe
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Oncologie Médicale, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | - Florence Joly
- Centre François Baclesse, Oncologie Médicale, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Gilles Freyer
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.,Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, GINECO, GINEGEPS, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Colomban
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|