A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate Rucaparib Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer (ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45)

Precision Medicine in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Targeted Therapies and the Challenge of Chemoresistance

The poor prognosis for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the dominant subtype of ovarian cancer, reflects its aggressive nature, late diagnosis, and the highest mortality rate among all gynaecologic cancers. Apart from late diagnosis, the main reason for the poor prognosis and its unsuccessful treatment is primarily the emergence of chemoresistance to carboplatin. Although there is a good response to primary treatment, the disease recurs in 80% of cases, at which point it is largely resistant to carboplatin. The introduction of novel targeted therapies in the second decade of the 21st century has begun to transform the treatment of HGSOC, although their impact on overall survival remains unsatisfactory. Targeting the specific pathways known to be abnormally activated in HGSOC is especially difficult due to the molecular diversity of its subtypes. Moreover, a range of molecular changes are associated with acquired chemoresistance, e.g., reversion of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline alleles. In this review, we examine the advantages and disadvantages of approved targeted therapies, including bevacizumab, PARP inhibitors (PARPis), and treatments targeting cells with neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK), B-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF), and rearranged during transfection (RET) gene alterations, as well as antibody-drug conjugates. Additionally, we explore promising new targets under investigation in ongoing clinical trials, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, Wee1 kinase inhibitors, and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) inhibitors for platinum-resistant disease. Despite the development of new targeted therapies, carboplatin remains the fundamental medicine in HGSOC therapy. The correct choice of treatment strategy for better survival of patients with advanced HGSOC should therefore include a prediction of patients' risks of developing chemoresistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Moreover, effective targeted therapy requires the selection of patients who are likely to derive clinical benefit while minimizing potential adverse effects, underscoring the essence of precision medicine.

Predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

PARP inhibitors are effective in treating ovarian cancer, especially for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and those with HRD (homologous recombination deficiency). Concerns over toxicity and costs have led to the search for predictive biomarkers. We present an updated systematic review, expanding on a previous ESMO review on PARP inhibitor biomarkers.

METHODS

Following ESMO's 2020 review protocol, we extended our search to March 31, 2023, including PubMed and clinical trial data. We also reviewed the reference lists of review articles. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to evaluate hazard ratios and assess the predictive potential of biomarkers and the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in survival.

RESULTS

We found 375 articles, 103 of which were included after screening (62 primary research, 41 reviews). HRD remained the primary biomarker (95%), particularly BRCA1/2 variants (77%). In the non-HRD category, six articles (10%) introduced innovative biomarkers, including ADP-ribosylation, HOXA9 promoter methylation, patient-derived organoids, KELIM, and SLFN11.

DISCUSSION

Prospective assessment of real-time homologous recombination repair via nuclear RAD51 levels shows promise but needs validation. Emerging biomarkers like ADP-ribosylation, HOXA9 promoter methylation, patient-derived organoids, KELIM, and SLFN11 offer potential but require large-scale validation.

The Landscape of PARP Inhibitors in Solid Cancers

PARP inhibitors are a class of agents that have shown significant preclinical activity in models defective in homologous recombination (HR). The identification of synthetic lethality between HR defects and PARP inhibition led to several clinical trials in tumors with known HR defects (initially mutations in BRCA1/2 genes and subsequently in other genes involved in HR). These studies demonstrated significant responses in breast and ovarian cancers, which are known to have a significant proportion of patients with HR defects. Since the approval of the first PARP inhibitor (PARPi), olaparib, several other inhibitors have been developed, expanding the armamentarium available to clinicians in this setting. The positive results obtained in breast and ovarian cancer have expanded the use of PARPi in other solid tumors with HR defects, including prostate and pancreatic cancer in which these defects have been identified. The clinical trials have demonstrated responses to PARPi which are now also available for the subset of patients with prostate and pancreatic cancer with HR defects. This review summarizes the results obtained in solid tumors with PARPi and their potential use when combined with other agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors that are likely to further increase the survival of these patients which still needs a dramatic improvement.

Semi-mechanistic efficacy model for PARP + ATR inhibitors-application to rucaparib and talazoparib in combination with gartisertib in breast cancer PDXs

BACKGROUND

Promising cancer treatments, such as DDR inhibitors, are often challenged by the heterogeneity of responses in clinical trials. The present work aimed to build a computational framework to address those challenges.

METHODS

A semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of tumour growth inhibition was developed to investigate the efficacy of PARP and ATR inhibitors as monotherapies, and in combination. Key features of the DNA damage response were incorporated into the model to allow the emergence of synthetic lethality, including redundant DNA repair pathways that may be impaired due to genetic mutations, and due to PARP and ATR inhibition. Model parameters were calibrated using preclinical in vivo data for PARP inhibitors rucaparib and talazoparib and the ATR inhibitor gartisertib.

RESULTS

The model successfully captured the monotherapy efficacies of rucaparib and talazoparib, as well as the combination efficacy with gartisertib. The model was evaluated against multiple tumour xenografts with diverse genetic backgrounds and was able to capture the observed heterogeneity of response profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

By enabling simulation of in vivo tumour growth inhibition with PARP and ATR inhibitors for specific tumour types, the model provides a rational approach to support the optimisation of dosing regimens to stratified populations.

A pan-tumor review of the role of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitors

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib, talazoparib, rucaparib, and niraparib, comprise a therapeutic class that targets PARP proteins involved in DNA repair. Cancer cells with homologous recombination repair defects, particularly BRCA alterations, display enhanced sensitivity to these agents because of synthetic lethality induced by PARP inhibitors. These agents have significantly improved survival outcomes across various malignancies, initially gaining regulatory approval in ovarian cancer and subsequently in breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers in different indications. This review offers a comprehensive clinical overview of PARP inhibitor approvals, emphasizing their efficacy across different cancers based on landmark phase 3 clinical trials.

Sepsis: the evolution of molecular pathogenesis concepts and clinical management

The mortality rate of sepsis is approximately 22.5%, accounting for 19.7% of the total global mortality. Since Lewis Thomas proposed in 1972 that "it is our response that makes the disease (sepsis)" rather than the invading microorganisms, numerous drugs have been developed to suppress the "overwhelming" inflammatory response, but none of them has achieved the desired effect. Continued failure has led investigators to question whether deaths in septic patients are indeed caused by uncontrolled inflammation. Here, we review the history of clinical trials based on evolving concepts of sepsis pathogenesis over the past half century, summarize the factors that led to the failure of these historical drugs and the prerequisites for the success of future drugs, and propose the basic principles of preclinical research to ensure successful clinical translation. The strategy of targeting inflammatory factors are like attempting to eliminate invaders by suppressing the host's armed forces, which is logically untenable. Sepsis may not be that complex; rather, sepsis may be the result of a failure to fight microbes when the force of an invading pathogen overwhelms our defenses. Thus, strengthening the body's defense forces instead of suppressing them may be the correct strategy to overcome sepsis.

Homologous recombination deficiency test validation in patients with high-grade advanced ovarian cancer

Background

Along with BRCA mutation status, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing is a prognostic and predictive biomarker for poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy indication in high-grade epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Approximately 50% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers exhibit HRD, even in the absence of germline or somatic BRCA1/2 loss-of-function mutations. In this scenario, access to a validated diagnostic HRD test can optimize treatment selection and increase the effectiveness of the intervention.

Objective

To technically validate an in-house next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based HRD test, QIAseq Custom Panel (QIAGEN), by comparing it with the reference assay, MyChoice CDx® Plus HRD (Myriad Genetics), which is used in routine care.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study conducted at the Oncoclínicas Precision Medicine (OCPM) laboratory using samples from patients with advanced or relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer eligible for HRD testing in a diagnostic clinical setting at Oncoclínicas and Co. We assessed the performance of the in-house test (GS Focus HRD) using Cohen's kappa statistic to measure agreement with the gold standard assay (MyChoice® HRD Plus CDx) in HRD status classification, along with other accuracy metrics.

Results

In total, 41 samples were analyzed (20 HRD-positive, 19 HRD-negative, and 2 inconclusive results with the MyChoice® HRD Plus CDx assay). The GS Focus HRD test demonstrated high concordance for HRD status with the reference test (kappa: 0.8 and 95% CI: 0.60-0.98). Overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 90%. Six samples had BRCA1/2 mutations identified by the MyChoice® HRD Plus CDx, all of which were detected by the GS Focus HRD test.

Conclusion

In summary, the results demonstrate substantial agreement and high accuracy of the NGS-based GS Focus HRD test compared to MyChoice® HRD Plus CDx. Our in-house assay is eligible for diagnostic test approval and market access as per Brazilian regulations.

Predicting benefit from PARP inhibitors using deep learning on H&E-stained ovarian cancer slides

PURPOSE

Ovarian cancer patients with a Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) often benefit from polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy after response to platinum-based chemotherapy. HR status is currently analyzed via complex molecular tests. Predicting benefit from PARP inhibitors directly on histological whole slide images (WSIs) could be a fast and cheap alternative.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We trained a Deep Learning (DL) model on H&E stained WSIs with "shrunken centroid" (SC) based HRD ground truth using the AGO-TR1 cohort (n = 208: 108 training, 100 test) and tested its ability to predict HRD as evaluated by the Myriad classifier and the benefit from olaparib in the PAOLA-1 cohort (n = 447) in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

In contrast to the HRD prediction AUROC of 72 % on hold-out, our model only yielded an AUROC of 57 % external. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that progression free survival (PFS) in the PARP inhibitor treated PAOLA-1 patients was significantly improved in the HRD positive group as defined by our model, but not in the HRD negative group. PFS improvement in PARP inhibitor-treated patients was substantially longer in our HRD positive group, hinting at a biologically meaningful prediction of benefit from PARP inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Together, our results indicate that it might be possible to generate a predictor of benefit from PARP inhibitors based on the DL-mediated analysis of WSIs. However, further studies with larger cohorts and further methodological improvements will be necessary to generate a predictor with clinically useful accuracy across independent patient cohorts.

Efficacy of subsequent therapies in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who relapse after first-line olaparib maintenance: results of the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

BACKGROUND

The use of first-line poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy is increasing in advanced ovarian cancer. Understanding the efficacy of first subsequent therapy (FST) in patients experiencing disease progression in the first-line setting is important to optimize postprogression treatments. We evaluated the efficacy of FST in patients from PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (NCT02477644) who received first-line olaparib maintenance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy following disease progression by assessing time from FST to second subsequent therapy (SST) according to whether progression occurred during versus after first-line olaparib maintenance and FST type. A multivariate Cox model was used in the olaparib plus bevacizumab arm to identify prognostic factors influencing the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 806 randomized patients, 544 (67.5%) progressed and received subsequent chemotherapy. The median time from FST to SST was shorter in patients in the olaparib plus bevacizumab arm who progressed during first-line olaparib maintenance (6.1 months) than in those who progressed after first-line olaparib maintenance (11.4 months). Multivariate analysis indicated that progression after (versus during) first-line olaparib maintenance influenced time from FST to SST (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.84; P = 0.0011) independently of platinum-free interval or clinical risk. Among patients who progressed and received platinum-based chemotherapy with a PARP inhibitor as FST, the efficacy of subsequent therapies was also dependent on whether progression occurred during versus after first-line olaparib maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the timing of disease progression relative to first-line olaparib maintenance may impact the efficacy of subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy. Although results should be interpreted with caution, across all subgroups, including patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy with PARP inhibitor rechallenge as FST, the median time from FST to SST was longer if progression occurred after versus during first-line olaparib maintenance.

First-line PARP inhibitor maintenance treatment in ovarian carcinoma for older adult women: a review of the current literature

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the leading cause of death in women with gynecological cancers. Its diagnosis is more likely in advanced ages, with the older population being the most seen in consultations. Poly(ADP-ribose) inhibitors (PARPi) have changed OC clinical practice and evolution, showing great benefit. However, there is a lack of evidence of PARPi in elderly population that can impact the therapeutic decision and the safety/efficacy. It is necessary to avoid age as limiting factor in PARPis prescription. We conducted a review of the most relevant randomized phase III trials of maintenance PARPi after first-line treatment of advanced OC. We observed the lack of a single criterion for considering older patients, varying among trials. There is a benefit of PARPis in different populations. However, PARPi effect on quality of life is not reported, something of great relevance considering their vulnerability. Measures are needed to benefit older patients to better adapt PARPi treatment.

Incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors in epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic interventions for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have increased greatly over the last decade but improvements outside of biomarker selected therapies have been limited. There remains a pressing need for more effective treatment options that can prolong survival and enhance the quality of life of patients with EOC. In contrast to the significant benefits of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) seen in many solid tumors, initial experience in EOC suggests limited efficacy of CPIs monotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic review of phase III studies testing the role of CPIs in ovarian cancer was performed.

RESULTS

Seven randomized trials testing CPIs in newly diagnosed (n = 3) and recurrent (n = 4) EOC are evaluated. Overall, those trials included data of 5671 patients. Single-agent PD-L1 inhibitor trials have not shown significant efficacy in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Triplet maintenance with bevacizumab plus olaparib and durvalumab is associated with longer progression-free survival than maintenance with bevacizumab alone in patients without tumor BRCA mutations. CPIs were not effective in platinum-sensitive (n = 1031) and platinum-resistant (n = 1420) EOC.

CONCLUSIONS

The value of adding CPI to standard treatment including poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with or without bevacizumab remains unclear and is being addressed in ongoing clinical trials. The combination of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in EOC and studies are underway to investigate the combination of CPI with other emerging treatment modalities. PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024536017.

Physician knowledge, use, and perceptions of genetic biomarker testing for the management of patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: an international physician survey

AIMS

To explore physician-reported knowledge, use, and perceptions of genetic testing for advanced ovarian cancer management.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Gynecology/oncology specialists (n = 390) in the US, Europe, Canada, Japan, and Australia completed an online survey spanning March 2021 to April 2022.

RESULTS

Physician-reported breast cancer gene mutation (BRCAm) testing rates increased over the 2 years before the survey; most patients underwent testing in the preceding 6 months. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) genomic instability testing rates and physicians' confidence interpreting results remained relatively low. Genetic testing was driven by the associated treatment implications of the findings. Poor performance status, inadequate tissue, and patients' willingness to undergo testing were reported barriers to testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate that there is a need to improve both access to and information about HRD testing.

Haematological toxicity of PARP inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are effective treatment options for patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC). A typical adverse event (AE) of these agents is haematological toxicity, which represents the leading cause of treatment modification and discontinuation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyse the risk of haematological AEs, including anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia due to the use of PARPis in patients with OC.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, and international meeting abstracts were searched systematically for clinical trials concerning the use of PARPis in patients with OC. The search deadline was 30 March 2024. The pooled incidence of all grades and grade 3or more (≥G3) anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were analysed. Subsequently, risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for all grades and ≥G3 AEs of PARPis compared with non-PARPis from randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

In total, 12 phase II/III trials with olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib were included in this study. Anaemia was the most common all grade (28.8 %) and ≥G3 (12.1 %) AE. The administration of PARPis increased the risk of developing all grade anaemia [risk ratio (RR) = 2.44], neutropenia (RR = 3.15) and thrombocytopenia (RR = 4.66) significantly compared with non-PARPis. Similarly, a significant increase in the risk of ≥G3 anaemia (RR = 5.73) and thrombocytopenia (RR = 5.44), and a non-significant increase in the risk of neutropenia (RR = 3.41) were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced OC, PARPis increase the risk of haematological toxicity compared with other treatments (high-quality evidence). Clinicians should be aware of this risk and the correct management, as these drugs are highly employed in these patients.

A comprehensive comparison of PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

PARP inhibitors (PARPis) have shown promising effectiveness for ovarian cancer. This network meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number CRD42024503390) comprehensively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of PARPis in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC).

METHODS

Articles published before January 6, 2024 were obtained from electronic databases. The study assessed and compared survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), second progression-free survival (PFS2), time to first subsequent treatment (TFST), time to second subsequent treatment (TSST), and chemotherapy-free interval (CFI). Additionally, safety outcomes were investigated, specifically focusing on grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs). The evaluation of OS and PFS was also conducted based on the BRCA and HRD (homologous recombination deficiency) statuses.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials were examined and the four PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib and fuluzolparib) have been found to significantly increase the PFS in entire population as well as in subgroups of HRD and BRCAm (BRCA mutation). Only olaparib demonstrated a substantial improvement in OS compared to placebo in entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.90), as well as in the subgroup of BRCAm. All analyzed PARPis had significant efficacy in prolonging PFS2, TFST, TSST and CFI. For safety concerns, PARPis could significantly increase incidence of TEAEs (grade3-4), while olaparib had least haematological TEAEs (grade3-4) events compared to other PARPis.

CONCLUSION

All included PARPis showed various degrees of benefit in survival outcomes and safety profile was acceptable for PSROC patients. Among them olaparib had the best performance in both efficacy and safety.

Disease-free survival of 15 years after primary surgery in a patient with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a case report and literature review

Background

Ovarian cancer, particularly high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), is the most lethal gynecological tumor, with most patients experiencing recurrence within 5 years. Long-term survival in HGSOC patients with advanced stages is exceedingly rare.

Case summary

We report a case of advanced HGSOC with exceptional long-term recurrence-free survival following initial treatment. In June 2009, the patient underwent suboptimal cytoreductive surgery for stage IIIC ovarian cancer, including total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy, and resection of mesenteric and peritoneal lesions. Postoperatively, residual lesions were observed in the mesenteries and para-aortic lymph nodes. Despite unfavorable prognostic factors (advanced stage, aggressive pathology, and incomplete resection), the patient showed remarkable chemosensitivity, remaining recurrence-free for 15 years.

Conclusion

The factors influencing long-term survival in HGSOC patients are not yet fully understood. We present this rare case to contribute data for further studies on long-term survival in advanced HGSOC.

Homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer: Global expert consensus on testing and a comparison of companion diagnostics

BACKGROUND

Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are a treatment option for patients with advanced high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (OC). Recent guidelines have clarified how homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may influence treatment decision-making in this setting. As a result, numerous companion diagnostic assays (CDx) have been developed to identify HRD. However, the optimal HRD testing strategy is an area of debate. Moreover, recently published clinical and translational data may impact how HRD status may be used to identify patients likely to benefit from PARPi use. We aimed to extensively compare available HRD CDx and establish a worldwide expert consensus on HRD testing in primary and recurrent OC.

METHODS

A group of 99 global experts from 31 different countries was formed. Using a modified Delphi process, the experts aimed to establish consensus statements based on a systematic literature search and CDx information sought from investigators, companies and/or publications.

RESULTS

Technical information, including analytical and clinical validation, were obtained from 14 of 15 available HRD CDx (7 academic; 7 commercial). Consensus was reached on 36 statements encompassing the following topics: 1) the predictive impact of HRD status on PARPi use in primary and recurrent OC; 2) analytical and clinical validation requirements of HRD CDx; 3) resource-stratified HRD testing; and 4) how future CDx may include additional approaches to help address unmet testing needs.

CONCLUSION

This manuscript provides detailed information on currently available HRD CDx and up-to-date guidance from global experts on HRD testing in patients with primary and recurrent OC.

Efficacy of PARPi re-maintenance therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer

Objective

The current clinical data regarding the re-administration of PARPi maintenance therapy in platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) is limited. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and associated factors of PARPi re-maintenance therapy in PSROC patients in China.

Methods

In this study, there were 201 patients with PSROC who had received maintenance therapy previously and achieved complete or partial response after platinum-based chemotherapy upon recurrence. The re-maintenance therapy group (Re-PARPi) and chemotherapy alone group (Chem-A) were categorized based on whether PARPi was reused after recurrence chemotherapy. A propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted between re-maintenance therapy group (Re-PARPi-P) and chemotherapy alone group(Chem-A-P)to adjust for imbalanced risk factors. The efficacy was evaluated via progression-free survival (PFS) and prognostic factors were also analyzed.

Results

In the PSM subgroup, the median PFS (mPFS) of Re-PARPi-P group (44 cases) and Chem-A-P (44 cases) group were 10.0 months and 6.5 months (HR 1.64, P=0.041) respectively, confirming that re-maintenance therapy was superior to relapse chemotherapy alone. The mPFS was 10.8 months in all patients in the Re-PARPi group (51 cases), with 11.0 months in BRCAm group and 10.2 months in BRCAwt group (P=0.806). Intervals of more than 6 months between two PARPi therapies might improve the efficacy of PARPi re-treatment (mPFS 11.2 months vs. 7.8 months, HR 3.94, P=0.005). Age, BRCA status, number of previous treatment lines, CA125 level prior to re-administration, and other factors were not significantly related to the efficacy of re-maintenance therapy. Patients with a frameshift mutation (p. Ile1824Aspfs3) in the C-terminal domain of BRCA1 germline gene had significantly better efficacy with PARPi re-treatment compared to other groups. Only nonsense mutation (p.Gln1037, p.Cys328, p.Leu1072) occur in BRCA germline gene with re-treatment with PARPi might be suboptimal. The incidence of PARRi re-treatment interruption was 3.9%.

Conclusion

PARPi re-maintenance therapy in PSROC might improve prognosis compared to chemotherapy alone, regardless of their genetic mutation status. Patients with re-maintenance therapy might benefit if the interval between the use of PARP inhibitors exceeded 6 months. The structural domains of BRCA mutations with different sensitivity to PARPi might serve as a promising biomarker for optimizing treatment. Re-treatment with PARPi was well-tolerated.

Tumor-intrinsic chemosensitivity assessed by KELIM and prognosis by BRCA status in patients with advanced ovarian carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas relies on surgery and chemotherapy, potentially followed by bevacizumab and/or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM) is a pragmatic indicator of tumor primary chemosensitivity. Although it is well established that BRCA mutations are associated with platinum sensitivity, the relationship between BRCA status and KELIM score has yet to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the interactions between BRCA and KELIM, and their respective prognostic values.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 743 patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas included in a French nationwide registry (NCT03275298) treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by surgery. We analyzed the interactions between BRCA and KELIM, and their impacts on progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) patients had higher standardized KELIM than BRCA-wild type (BRCAwt) tumors (median 1.16 vs 1.06, respectively; p=0.001). The prognostic value of the KELIM score was independent of BRCA in multivariate analyses. KELIM score and BRCA could be combined to define three prognostic groups: (1) an unfavorable prognostic group with both BRCAwt and unfavorable KELIM (median progression-free survival 12.0 months); (2) an intermediate prognostic group with either BRCAm and unfavorable KELIM, or BRCAwt and favorable KELIM (median progression-free survival of 16.0 and 18.8 months, respectively; HR 0.64 compared with the unfavorable group, p<0.001); and (3) a favorable prognostic group with both BRCAm and favorable KELIM (median progression-free survival 28.8 months; HR 0.37 compared with the unfavorable group, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The KELIM score provides complementary prognostic information with respect to BRCA, and discriminates different prognoses within BRCAm or BRCAwt patients. Patients with both BRCAwt/unfavorable KELIM have a poor prognosis, underscoring the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies.

Promising new drugs and therapeutic approaches for treatment of ovarian cancer-targeting the hallmarks of cancer

Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Despite the approval of promising targeted therapy such as bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors, 5-year survival has not improved significantly. Thus, there is an urgent need for new therapeutics. New advancements in therapeutic strategies target the pivotal hallmarks of cancer. This review is giving an updated overview of innovative and upcoming therapies for the treatment of ovarian cancer that focuses specific on the hallmarks of cancer. The hallmarks of cancer constitute a broad concept to reenact complexity of malignancies and furthermore identify possible targets for new treatment strategies. For this purpose, we analyzed approvals and current clinical phase III studies (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2024)) for new drugs on the basis of their mechanisms of action and identified new target approaches. A broad spectrum of new promising drugs is currently under investigation in clinical phase III studies targeting mainly the hallmarks "self-sufficiency in growth signals," "genomic instability," and "angiogenesis." The benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian cancer has been demonstrated for the first time. Besides, targeting the tumor microenvironment is of growing interest. Replicative immortality, energy metabolism, tumor promoting inflammation, and the microbiome of ovarian cancer are still barely targeted by drugs. Nevertheless, precision medicine, which focuses on specific disease characteristics, is becoming increasingly important in cancer treatment.

Real-world outcomes of first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

AIMS

To assess real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and time to next treatment (rwTTNT) among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received first-line maintenance (1LM) niraparib monotherapy.

PATIENTS & METHODS

In this US-nationwide, electronic health record-derived, deidentified database study, eligible patients with EOC initiated 1LM niraparib monotherapy (1 January 2017-1 December 2022) following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Median rwPFS and rwTTNT were estimated with Kaplan-Meier methodology overall and in a homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) subgroup (further stratified as BRCA wild-type [BRCAwt] or BRCA-mutated [BRCAm]).

RESULTS

Observed median rwPFS was 11.4 (95% CI, 10.1-12.7) months overall (N = 560), 18.2 (95% CI, 13.9-24.2) months for the HRd subgroup (n = 144), and 25.4 (95% CI, 15.9-not reached) and 14.2 (95% CI, 8.6-18.6) months for HRd patients with BRCAm and BRCAwt tumors, respectively. Observed median rwTTNT was 12.4 (95% CI, 11.5-13.8) months overall, 19.6 (95% CI, 14.9-23.9) months for the HRd subgroup, and 24.9 (95% CI, 16.0-not reached) and 15.1 (95% CI, 10.3-19.8) months for HRd patients with BRCAm and BRCAwt tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The real-world observed median rwPFS and rwTTNT were longer for patients with EOC who received 1LM niraparib monotherapy in the HRd subgroup (specifically for the BRCAm subgroup).

Key takeaways: Gynecologic cancer breakthroughs at ESMO Congress 2024

The "Key Takeaways: Gynecological cancer breakthroughs at ESMO Congress 2024" aims to include the most original and potentially practice-changing research in gynecologic oncology presented during the Annual Congress of the European Society of Medical Oncology, held in Barcelona, Spain, September 13 to 17, 2024. The scientific program encompassed a wide range of topics across various fields within oncology, and we selected 13 studies presented during the conference considered highly significant in the field of gynecologic oncology.

Unraveling the complexity of HRD assessment in ovarian cancer by combining genomic and functional approaches: translational analyses of MITO16-MaNGO-OV-2 trial

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer (OvC) constitutes significant management challenges primarily due to its late-stage diagnosis and the development of resistance to chemotherapy. The standard treatment regimen typically includes carboplatin and paclitaxel, with the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. However, the variability in treatment responses suggests the need to investigate factors beyond BRCA1/2 mutations, such as DNA repair mechanisms and epigenetic alterations. Notably, homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) is observed in an additional 20% of HGSOC cases, indicating a broader spectrum of DNA repair defects. Existing commercial HRD assays have certain limitations, prompting a global effort to develop new genomic and functional tests through academic research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study investigates, in the 187 high-grade serous and endometrioid tumors from the MITO16/MaNGO-OV-2 trial, academic HRD genomic tests in conjunction with a RAD51 immunofluorescence assay to assess functional activation of HRD. Additionally, the study incorporates analysis of microRNA-506 (miR-506) expression as a putative epigenetic effector.

RESULTS

The RAD51 test identified HRD in 73% of the samples and genomic HRD testing in 57%, with HRD identified in 45% of samples by both tests. The significant discrepancy between the two assays emphasizes the need to refine tumor classification for HRD. A three-group genomic classification unveiled superior progression-free survival (PFS) in high- and mild-HRD tumors compared with negative-HRD tumors. High concordance between RAD51 and genomic testing in high-HRD tumors suggests a subset of 'super-HRD' tumors exhibiting superior PFS. High expression of miR-506 may be used to further refine HRD status.

CONCLUSIONS

The study underscores the complexities of HRD assessment and advocates for a combined genomic and functional approach to enhance predictive accuracy in OvC treatment responses.

Synthetic lethal strategies for the development of cancer therapeutics

Synthetic lethality is a genetic phenomenon whereby the simultaneous presence of two different genetic alterations impairs cellular viability. Importantly, targeting synthetic lethal interactions offers potential therapeutic strategies for cancers with alterations in pathways that might otherwise be considered undruggable. High-throughput screening methods based on modern CRISPR-Cas9 technologies have emerged and become crucial for identifying novel synthetic lethal interactions with the potential for translation into biologically rational cancer therapeutic strategies as well as associated predictive biomarkers of response capable of guiding patient selection. Spurred by the clinical success of PARP inhibitors in patients with BRCA-mutant cancers, novel agents targeting multiple synthetic lethal interactions within DNA damage response pathways are in clinical development, and rational strategies targeting synthetic lethal interactions spanning alterations in epigenetic, metabolic and proliferative pathways have also emerged and are in late preclinical and/or early clinical testing. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of established and emerging technologies for synthetic lethal drug discovery and development and discuss promising therapeutic strategies targeting such interactions.

No news, bad news: When the result of a clinical biomarker is "no result available"

This study from a tertiary center focuses on how timing, sample selection, and preparation contribute to "no result available” in biomarker analysis. It emphasizes the need to analyze and report the preanalytical, analytical, bioinformatics, and clinical factors underlying these results in future research.

New Therapeutic Options for BRCA Mutant Patients

Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with significantly elevated lifetime risks of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. These genes are critical in double-strand break repair through homologous recombination. An understanding of the biology of BRCA1 and BRCA2 led to the development of targeted therapeutics, specifically poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, which are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for multiple BRCA1/2-associated cancers. Here, we discuss the development of PARP inhibitors, mechanisms of resistance, and the potential utility of these drugs beyond canonical BRCA1/2 tumors, and we describe novel agents under study.

Factors associated with an inconclusive result from commercial homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing is used to determine the appropriateness of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and no germline/somatic BRCA1/2 alterations. Myriad MyChoice CDx reports a genomic instability score (GIS) to quantify the level of HRD, with a positive score defined as ≥42. The authors sought to define factors associated with obtaining an inconclusive HRD test result.

METHODS

GIS was retrieved for patients at their institution with epithelial ovarian cancer without germline/somatic BRCA1/2 deleterious alterations who underwent HRD testing from April 2020-August 2023. Clinical data were abstracted from the medical record.

RESULTS

Of 477 HRD test results identified, 57 (12%) were inconclusive. High-grade serous ovarian cancers had higher GIS than other histologic types (median 29 vs. 21, p < .001). Most HRD cases were of high-grade serous histology; no cases with clear cell or endometrioid histology were HRD-positive. On univariate analysis, interval versus primary cytoreductive surgery, other specimen sources versus surgical specimens, and chemotherapy exposure were risk factors for inconclusive HRD testing. On multivariable analysis, chemotherapy exposure, and tissue source were associated with an inconclusive test result, with surgical specimens more likely to yield a conclusive result than other sources (biopsy, cytology, other). Age, stage, self-reported race, and histology were not associated with an inconclusive result.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical tissue was more likely to yield a conclusive HRD test result versus other sources of epithelial ovarian cancer tissue acquisition. When feasible, laparoscopic biopsy before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase the likelihood of obtaining interpretable HRD test results.

Evaluation of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus NGS Panel and the OncoScan CNV Assay for Homologous Recombination Deficiency Detection

INTRODUCTION

Testing for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) as a biomarker in relation to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) treatment in ovarian cancer is done by sequencing of the BRCA1/2 genes and/or by assessing a genomic instability signature. Here we present data obtained with two different methods for genomic instability testing: the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA Plus) NGS panel and the OncoScan CNV assay.

METHODS

The retrospective analytical study included 80 ovarian cancer samples of patients previously referred to clinical Myriad testing (reference cohort), and 50 ovarian cancer samples from patients collected as part of the Pelvic Mass study. OCA Plus NGS libraries were sequenced with the Ion S5™XL Sequencer and analyzed with the Ion Reporter™ Software v5.20 for calculation of the genomic instability metric (GIM). In addition, all samples were tested with the OncoScan CNV FFPE Assay and analyzed with a previously published R-algorithm for generation of an in-house genomic instability score (in-house GIS).

RESULTS

The OCA Plus assay had a concordance to the reference of 89% on samples with a tumor fraction ≥ 30% (auto-calculated or via molecular estimation). A total of 15 samples in the reference cohort had a calculated tumor fraction < 30% in the OCA Plus assay. In these, the concordance to reference was only 60%. For the OncoScan CNV in-house GIS a local cutoff point of ≥ 50 was calculated. This gave a concordance to the reference of 85%, with 91% of the samples in the reference cohort passing quality control (QC) on tumor fraction. Both assays had a high sensitivity for the detection of genomic instability in samples with pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, with 12/13 being GIM positive (OCA Plus assay) and 13/13 being in-house GIS positive (OncoScan CNV assay).

CONCLUSIONS

The OCA Plus assay and the OncoScan CNV assay show a high but not complete concordance to reference standard homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) detection. The main reason for QC failure or non-concordance in our study was a low tumor fraction estimated in the assay, despite the selection of material by a pathologist with an inclusion criterion of > 30% tumor. QC steps should include careful tumor content evaluation, and results on samples with < 30% tumor should not be reported.

Collateral lethality: A unique type of synthetic lethality in cancers

Genetic interactions play crucial roles in cell-essential functions. Intrinsic genetic defects in tumors typically involve gain-of- and loss-of-function mutations in tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) and oncogenes, respectively, providing potential antitumor vulnerabilities. Moreover, tumor cells with TSG deficiencies exhibit heightened sensitivity to the inhibition of compensatory pathways. Synthetic and collateral lethality are two strategies used for exploiting novel drug targets in multiple types of cancer. Collateral lethality is a unique type of synthetic lethality that occurs when passenger genes are co-deleted in neighboring TSGs. Although synthetic lethality has already been successfully demonstrated in clinical practice, antitumor therapeutics based on collateral lethality are predominantly still in the preclinical phase. Therefore, screening for potential genetic interactions within the cancer genome has emerged as a promising approach for drug development. Here, the two conceptual therapeutic strategies that involve the deletion or inactivation of cancer-specific TSGs are discussed. Moreover, existing approaches for screening and identifying potential gene partners are also discussed. Particularly, this review highlights the current advances of "collateral lethality" in the preclinical phase and addresses the challenges involved in translating them into therapeutic applications. This review provides insights into these strategies as new opportunities for the development of personalized antitumor therapies.

BRCA and Beyond: Impact on Therapeutic Choices Across Cancer

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients with gBRCAm is crucial to facilitate screening strategies, preventive measures and the usage of targeted therapeutics in their management. This review examines the evidence for the latest predictive and therapeutic approaches in BRCA-associated cancers.

CLINICAL DESCRIPTION

Data supports the use of adjuvant olaparib in patients with gBRCAm high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer. In advanced gBRCAm HER2-negative breast cancer, the PARPis talazoparib and olaparib have demonstrated benefit over standard chemotherapy. In ovarian cancer, olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib can be used as monotherapy in frontline maintenance. Olaparib and bevacizumab as a combination can also be used as frontline maintenance. In the relapsed platinum-sensitive setting, olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib are effective maintenance options in BRCAm patients who are PARPi naive. Both olaparib and rucaparib are effective options in BRCAm metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Evidence also exists for the benefit of PARPi combinations in mCRPC. In metastatic pancreatic cancer, olaparib can be used in gBRCAm patients who are responding to platinum chemotherapy. However, there may be a development of PARPi resistance. Understanding the pathophysiology that contributes to such resistance may allow the development of novel therapeutics. Combination therapy appears to have promising results in emerging trials. Seeking avenues for subsidised genetic testing can reduce the total costs of cancer management, leading to improve detection rates.

CONCLUSION

Identifying breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer patients with gBRCAm plays a crucial predictive role in selecting those who will benefit significantly from PARPi therapy. The use of PARPi in gBRCAm HBOC-related cancers has resulted in significant survival benefits. Beyond BRCA1/2, HRR gene assessment and the consideration of other cancer predisposition syndromes may allow more patients to be eligible for and benefit from targeted therapies.

Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib

BACKGROUND

The introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represented a paradigm shift in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Genomic data from patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in six phase II/III trials involving the PARP inhibitor olaparib were analyzed to better understand patterns and potential causes of genomic instability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was assessed in 2147 tumor samples from SOLO1, PAOLA-1, Study 19, SOLO2, OPINION, and LIGHT using next-generation sequencing technology. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were assessed in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA)-mutated (BRCAm), non-BRCA homologous recombination repair-mutated (non-BRCA HRRm), and non-HRRm tumors.

RESULTS

BRCAm was identified in 1021/2147 (47.6%) tumors. BRCAm tumors had significantly higher GIS than non-BRCAm tumors (P < 0.001) and high biallelic loss (815/838; 97.3%) regardless of germline (658/672; 97.9%) or somatic (101/108; 93.5%) BRCAm status. In non-BRCA HRRm tumors (n = 121) a similar proportion were HRD-positive (GIS ≥ 42: 55/121; 45.5%) relative to HRD-negative (GIS < 42: 52/121; 43.0%). GIS was highly variable in non-BRCA HRRm (median 42 [interquartile range (IQR) 29-58]) and non-HRRm (n = 1005; median 32 [IQR 20-55]) tumors. Gene mutations with high GIS included HRR genes BRIP1 (median 46 [IQR 41-58]), RAD51C (median 58 [IQR 48-66]), RAD51D (median 62 [IQR 54-69]), and PALB2 (median 64 [IQR 58-74]), and non-HRR genes NF1 (median 49 [IQR 25-60]) and RB1 (median 55 [IQR 30-71]). CCNE1-amplified and PIK3CA-mutated tumors had low GIS (CCNE1-amplified: median 24 [IQR 18-29]; PIK3CA-mutated: median 32 [IQR 14-52]) and were predominantly non-BRCAm.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses provide valuable insight into patterns of genomic instability and potential drivers of HRD, besides BRCAm, in ovarian cancer and will help guide future research into the potential clinical effectiveness of anti-cancer treatments in ovarian cancer, including PARP inhibitors as well as other precision oncology agents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The SOLO1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844986) on April 30, 2013; the PAOLA-1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02477644) on June 18, 2015 (retrospectively registered); Study 19 was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00753545) on September 12, 2008 (retrospectively registered); the SOLO2 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01874353) on June 7, 2013; the OPINION trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03402841) on January 3, 2018; the LIGHT trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02983799) on November 4, 2016.

Germline BRCA1/2 status and chemotherapy response score in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) can be treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and delayed primary surgery (DPS). Histopathological response to NACT can be assessed using Böhm's chemotherapy response score (CRS). We investigated whether germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) genotype associated with omental CRS phenotype.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stage IIIC/IV HGSOC prescribed NACT and tested for gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) between September 2017 and December 2022 at The Christie Hospital. The Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the association between survival and key clinical factors. The chi-square test assessed the association between CRS3 (no/minimal residual tumour) and gBRCA1/2 status.

RESULTS

Of 586 eligible patients, 393 underwent DPS and had a CRS reported. Independent prognostic factors by multivariable analysis were gBRCA1/2 status (PV versus wild type [WT]), CRS (3 versus 1 + 2), surgical outcome (complete versus optimal/suboptimal) and first-line poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1/2 inhibitor maintenance therapy (yes versus no) (all P < 0.05). There was a non-significant trend for tumours with a gBRCA2 PV having CRS3 versus WT (odds ratio [OR] = 2.13, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.95-4.91; P = 0.0647). By contrast, tumours with a gBRCA1 PV were significantly less likely to have CRS3 than WT (OR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.14-0.91; P = 0.0291).

CONCLUSIONS

Germline BRCA1/2 genotype was not clearly associated with superior omental CRS. Further research is required to understand how HGSOC biology defines CRS.

First evidence of olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination deficient positive/BRCA wild-type ovarian cancer: real-world multicenter study

Although olaparib has demonstrated substantial clinical benefits as maintenance therapy in BRCA mutation-carrying women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, its effectiveness in patients without BRCA mutations remains poorly investigated. This study aims to provide the first evidence on the efficacy of mono-olaparib maintenance therapy in such context. Using real-world data from 11 high-volume tertiary care centers in China, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of olaparib as first-line maintenance therapy in patients with BRCA wild-type ovarian cancer. The primary objective was 1-year progression-free survival rate. Safety was also evaluated. Fifty patients with a median age of 54 years were included, and all of them tested negative for BRCA mutations but positive for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The 1-year PFS rate was 75.2% (95% CI, 63.4 to 89.2), and the median PFS was 21.0 months (95% CI, 13.8 to 28.2). All the patients received olaparib at a starting dose of 300 mg twice daily, and none experienced serious adverse events (AEs). Eight (16%) patients had dose adjustment, but none discontinued olaparib treatment due to AEs. We provide the first evidence that mono-olaparib could be a safe and effective maintenance treatment option for patients newly diagnosed with HRD-positive/BRCA wild-type ovarian cancer.

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Magnetic Resonance in the Assessment of Peritoneal Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer in Patients with or Without BRCA Mutation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the differences in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) parameters between patients with peritoneal high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) recurrence with BRCA mutations (BRCAmut) or BRCA wild type (BRCAwt).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the abdominal and pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) images of 43 patients suspected of having recurrent HGSOC, of whom 18 had BRCA1/2 gene mutations. Patients underwent MRI examination via a 1.5 T MRI scanner, and the analyzed parameters were as follows: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), time to peak (TTP) and perfusion maximum enhancement (Perf. Max. En.).

RESULTS

The mean ADC in patients with BRCAwt was lower than that in patients with BRCAmut: 788.7 (SD: 139.5) vs. 977.3 (SD: 103), p-value = 0.00002. The average TTP value for patients with BRCAwt was greater than that for patients with mutations: 256.3 (SD: 50) vs. 160.6 (SD: 35.5), p-value < 0.01. The Perf. Max. En. value was lower in the BRCAwt group: 148.6 (SD: 12.3) vs. 233.6 (SD: 29.2), p-value < 0.01.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed a statistically significant correlation between DWI and DCE parameters in examinations of peritoneal metastasis in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations. Adding DCE perfusion to the MRI protocol for ovarian cancer recurrence in patients with BRCAmut may be a valuable tool.

A randomized phase II study of secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who have progressed on a PARP inhibitor as first-line maintenance therapy: the SOCCER-P study (KGOG 3067/JGOG 3036/APGOT-OV11)

BACKGROUND

Although two recent phase III randomized controlled trials showed survival benefits of undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery for an initial relapse of ovarian cancer, patients who received a poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) as the first-line maintenance treatment, which is currently the standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, were not included in those trials. Therefore, determining an optimal treatment strategy, including secondary cytoreductive surgery, in patients whose cancer progresses even with PARPi treatment, is needed.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether secondary cytoreductive surgery is beneficial in patients who have progressed on PARPi maintenance treatment.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

Secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone for patients who have progressed on PARPi maintenance treatment.

TRIAL DESIGN

The SOCCER-P study is a multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized to either undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery and subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy plus or minus bevacizumab, or to receive platinum-based chemotherapy plus or minus bevacizumab alone. Patients randomly allocated to the surgery group will undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by six cycles of a physician's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy once they have recovered from surgery.

MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA

The major inclusion criteria are as follows: first recurrence of disease with treatment-free interval from last platinum dose (TFIp) ≥6 months and progression during PARPi maintenance or treatment-free interval from last PARPi therapy (TFIPARPi) <3 months. The major exclusion criteria are as follows: >1 line of prior chemotherapy, TFIp <6 months, and radiological signs suggesting metastases not accessible to surgical removal (complete resection is deemed not possible).

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

Progression-free survival.

SAMPLE SIZE

124 patients.

ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS

Accrual completion approximately the end of 2026 and the results are expected after 2 years of follow-up in 2029.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05704621.

Racial and sociodemographic disparities in the use of targeted therapies in advanced ovarian cancer patients with Medicare

OBJECTIVE

To describe sociodemographic and racial disparities in receipt of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and bevacizumab among insured patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify patients with advanced stage, high grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome of interest was receipt of PARPi or bevacizumab at any time after diagnosis. χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables. Factors independently associated with the receipt of PARPi and/or bevacizumab were identified using a multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The cohort included 6242 patients; 276 (4.4%) received PARPi, 2142 (34.3%) received bevacizumab, and 389 (6.2%) received both. Receipt of either targeted treatment increased over the study period. On univariate analysis, patients who received either targeted therapy were younger (63% vs 48% aged <75 years; p<0.001), had a lower comorbidity index (86% vs 80% Charlson Comorbidity Index 0-1; p<0.001), and higher socioeconomic status (74% vs 71% high socioeconomic status; p=0.047) compared with those who did not receive targeted therapy. In the multivariable model, non-Hispanic black patients were less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to receive either targeted therapy (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.98; p=0.032). Older patients (aged >74 years) were also less likely to receive PARPi or bevacizumab compared with those aged 65-69 years (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sociodemographic and racial disparities exist in receipt of PARPi and bevacizumab among patients with advanced ovarian cancer insured by Medicare. As targeted therapies become more commonly used, a widening disparity gap is likely.

The Efficacy and Safety of Folate Receptor α-Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugate Therapy in Patients With High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) have emerged as a highly promising systemic option in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy of folate receptor α (FRα)-targeting ADCs, associated treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and their impact on treatment safety.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search to identify prospective trials of single-agent ADCs targeting FRα and those combined with chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. Information regarding the objective response rate (ORR) and TRAEs was collectively analyzed, and differences in subgroups based on FRα receptor expression levels were investigated. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023491151).

RESULTS

Ten studies with a total of 940 patients (859 treated with Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV)), 45 with Farletuzumab Ecteribulin (MORAb-202), and 36 with Luveltamab Tazevibulin (STRO-002) were included in this meta-analysis. Based on the pooled data, the ORR of the entire cohort was 37% (95% CI: 0.30-0.43), while that of the high-FRα expression group was 34% (95% CI: 0.26-0.42). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was 27% (95% CI: 0.19-0.36).

CONCLUSION

FRα-targeting ADCs, including MIRV, demonstrated definite efficacy and good safety as novel choices for second-line and beyond treatment of advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients with high FRα expression showed ORR and PFS benefits similar to those in the overall cohort.

Niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

BACKGROUND

The phase III PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial met its primary endpoint. Niraparib first-line maintenance significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Final overall survival (OS) results are reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to niraparib or placebo, stratified by response to first-line treatment, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor HRD status. After reaching 60% target maturity, OS was evaluated via a stratified log-rank test using randomization stratification factors and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. OS testing was hierarchical [overall population first, then the homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) population]. Other secondary outcomes and long-term safety were assessed; an updated, ad hoc analysis of investigator-assessed PFS was also conducted (cut-off date, 8 April 2024).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 73.9 months. In the overall population, the OS hazard ratio was 1.01 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23; P = 0.8834] for niraparib (n = 487) versus placebo (n = 246). In the HRd (n = 373) and homologous recombination-proficient (n = 249) populations, the OS hazard ratios were 0.95 (95% CI 0.70-1.29) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.69-1.26), respectively. Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy was received by 11.7% and 15.8% of niraparib patients and 37.8% and 48.4% of placebo patients in the overall and HRd populations, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate numerically favored niraparib in the overall (niraparib, 22%; placebo, 12%) and HRd populations (niraparib, 35%; placebo, 16%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia incidence was <2.5% (niraparib, 2.3%; placebo, 1.6%). No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between treatment arms. In the HRd population, patients alive at 5 years were two times as likely to be progression free with niraparib treatment than placebo. Long-term safety remained consistent with the established niraparib safety profile.

Long-term outcomes of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: survival, adverse events, and post-progression insights

Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have revolutionized the management of BRCA-mutated (BRCAmut) and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive ovarian cancer (OC). While long-term analyses clearly support the use of PARPi as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy, recent data have raised concerns on detrimental overall survival (OS) in non-BRCAmut OC, a greater incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and unfavorable outcomes following subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy in pretreated OC patients. In this report we discuss the long-term follow-up results from phase III trials in pretreated OC patients, which led to the Food and Drug Administration's withdrawal of PARPi indications in this setting. We summarize the newly available evidence concerning the risk of MDS/AML and the post-progression efficacy results after PARPi. We emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up and real-world data coming from international registries to define the efficacy and safety of stopping PARPi at relapse at a pre-specified time. To this point, biomarkers able to identify the patients who will experience long-term remission with PARPi maintenance or develop early resistance are urgently needed to guide treatment decision and duration.

Examining the evidence for immune checkpoint therapy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

The 5-year survival rate for ovarian cancer has remained relatively static over the past number of years, which can be attributed in part to the lack of new therapeutic strategies to target this disease. Although numerous other cancer types have benefited from the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors, their use in clinical trials targeting ovarian cancer has shown limited efficacy. Most clinical trials have focused on PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade, either as a monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapies, however inhibiting other pathways may potentially be more efficacious in treating ovarian cancer. For example, drugs targeting some emerging immune checkpoints (such as LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT and PVRIG), are entering into clinical trials, which could show improved success for ovarian cancer patients. Similarly, predictive biomarkers that have been approved for use with immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-L1 expression, are limited, as only the presence or absence of PD-L1 is assessed. However, the development of next generation predictive biomarkers, which assesses density and location of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, could be more beneficial for this heterogenous cancer. In this review we discuss the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian cancer, with a focus on high-grade serous disease, and delve into what the future may hold for immunotherapy in this cancer type.

ZBP1 as a prognostic biomarker correlated with cell proliferation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Background

Z-DNA-binding protein 1 (ZBP1) is a critical Z-DNA- and Z-RNA-binding protein. However, its diagnostic and prognostic significance, as well as its functions in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), are not well understood.

Materials and methods

Paired and unpaired differential expression analyses of ZBP1 were performed in pan-cancer cells. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and survival analyses were used to evaluate the clinical significance of ZBP1. Functional enrichment and immune infiltration analyses were used to explore the mechanisms underlying ZBP1 expression. Western blotting, qRT-PCR, CCK-8, and colony formation assays were used to investigate the potential function of ZBP1 in ccRCC cells. Molecular docking was utilized to identify drugs targeting ZBP1.

Results

ZBP1 was highly expressed in ccRCC, demonstrating significant diagnostic and prognostic value. ZBP1 mRNA expression correlated with TNM stage, pathologic stage, and histologic grade. Functional enrichment analyses indicated that ZBP1 is involved in multiple immune processes. Moreover, ZBP1 mRNA expression was positively correlated with the infiltrating levels of T cells and cytotoxic cells, and negatively correlated with the infiltrating levels of mast cells and Th17 cells in ccRCC. Biological experiments confirmed that ZBP1 promotes ccRCC cell proliferation. Molecular docking studies identified rucaparib as a potential drug targeting ZBP1.

Conclusion

Our research findings suggest that targeting ZBP1 could represent a novel therapeutic approach to inhibit the progression of ccRCC.

The Role of Tumor Biomarkers in Tailoring the Approach to Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Growing evidence has demonstrated the role of mutations of tumor biomarkers in diagnosing and treating epithelial ovarian cancer. This review aims to analyze recent literature on the correlation between tumor biomarkers and chemotherapy in nonmucinous ovarian cancer, providing suggestions for personalized treatment approaches. An extensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies and trials. BRCA1/2 mutations are central in homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) in ovarian cancer, but several other genetic mutations also contribute to varying cancer risks. While the role of MMR testing in ovarian cancer is debated, it is more commonly linked to non-serous ovarian cancer, often associated with Lynch syndrome. A significant proportion of ovarian cancer patients have HRD, affecting treatment decisions in both first-line (especially in advanced stages) and second-line therapy due to HRD's connection with platinum-based therapy and PARP inhibitors' response. However, validated genetic tests to identify HRD have not yet been universally implemented. There is no definitive therapeutic algorithm for advanced ovarian cancer, despite ongoing efforts and multiple proposed tools. Future research should focus on expanding the utility of biomarkers, reducing resistance, and increasing the actionable biomarker pool.

Effectiveness of PARP Inhibitor Maintenance Therapy in Ovarian Cancer by BRCA1/2 and a Scar-Based HRD Signature in Real-World Practice

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy (mPARPi) in real-world practice by biomarker status [BRCA1/2 alterations (BRCAalt) and a homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig)] in advanced ovarian cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with ovarian cancer receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and either mPARPi or no maintenance were included. Patient data were obtained by a US-based de-identified ovarian cancer Clinico-Genomic Database, from ∼280 US cancer clinics (01/2015-03/2023). Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) were compared by biomarker status using Cox models, weighted by propensity scores.

RESULTS

Of 673 patients, 160 received mPARPi [31.2% BRCAalt and 51.9% HRDsig(+)] and 513 no maintenance [15.6% BRCAalt and 34.1% HRDsig(+)]. BRCAalt patients receiving mPARPi versus no maintenance had favorable rwPFS [HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26-0.87; P = 0.0154], as did BRCA wild-type (WT; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57-1.01; P = 0.0595). Favorable rwOS was not observed with mPARPi for BRCAalt or BRCA-WT. HRDsig(+) patients receiving mPARPi versus no maintenance had favorable rwPFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.55; P < 0.001) and numerically favorable rwOS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.02; P = 0.0561). No differences were observed for HRDsig(-). mPARPi treatment interaction was observed for HRDsig(+) versus HRDsig(-) (rwPFS P < 0.001/rwOS P = 0.016) but not for BRCAalt versus BRCA-WT. Patients with BRCA-WT/HRDsig(+) receiving mPARPi had favorable rwPFS (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.72; P = 0.003), whereas no difference was observed for BRCA-WT/HRDsig(-).

CONCLUSIONS

HRDsig predicted benefit of mPARPi better than BRCAalt. Patients with HRDsig(+) status experienced favorable outcomes, even if they had BRCA-WT status. In contrast, patients with HRDsig(-) status did not show significant benefit from mPARPi treatment. HRDsig might predict benefit from mPARPi regardless of BRCAalt status.

Unlocking the potential of immunotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: rationale, challenges, and novel strategies

Ovarian cancer is a significant global health challenge, with cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy serving as established primary treatments. Unfortunately, most patients relapse and ultimately become platinum-resistant, at which point there are limited effective treatment options. Given the success of immunotherapy in inducing durable treatment responses in several other cancers, its potential in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is currently being investigated. However, in unselected advanced ovarian cancer populations, researchers have reported low response rates to immune checkpoint inhibition, and thus far, no validated biomarkers are predictive of response. Understanding the intricate interplay between platinum resistance, immune recognition, and the tumour microenvironment (TME) is crucial. In this review, we examine the research challenges encountered thus far, the biological rationale for immunotherapy, the underlying mechanisms of immune resistance, and new strategies to overcome resistance.

Nanotechnology for boosting ovarian cancer immunotherapy

Ovarian cancer, often referred to as the "silent killer," is notoriously difficult to detect in its early stages, leading to a poor prognosis for many patients. Diagnosis is often delayed until the cancer has advanced, primarily due to its ambiguous and frequently occurring clinical symptoms. Ovarian cancer leads to more deaths than any other cancer of the female reproductive system. The main reasons for the high mortality rates include delayed diagnosis and resistance to treatment. As a result, there is an urgent need for improved diagnostic and treatment options for ovarian cancer. The standard treatments typically involve debulking surgery along with platinum-based chemotherapies. Among patients with advanced-stage cancer who initially respond to current therapies, 50-75% experience a recurrence. Recently, immunotherapy-based approaches to enhance the body's immune response to combat tumor growth have shown promise. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results in treating other types of tumors. However, in ovarian cancer, only a few of these inhibitors have been effective because the tumor's environment suppresses the immune system and creates barriers for treatment. This hampers the effectiveness of existing immunotherapies. Nonetheless, advanced immunotherapy techniques and delivery systems based on nanotechnology hold promise for overcoming these challenges.

Robotic Rectosigmoid Resection with Totally Intracorporeal Colorectal Anastomosis (TICA) for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Case Series and Description of the Technique

BACKGROUND

Most patients with ovarian cancer relapse within 2 years. Prospective randomized trials, such as DESKTOP III and SOC-I, have shown the role of secondary cytoreduction in improving oncological outcomes in selected patients, when complete tumor resection is achieved. Recent retrospective series suggest that minimally invasive surgery is a feasible option in oligometastatic recurrences, such as rectal ones.

METHODS

Five patients with an isolated rectal recurrence infiltrating the bowel wall underwent a robotic rectosigmoid resection with totally intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis. The procedure began with retroperitoneal access to manage the vascular structures, followed by visceral resection with a minimally invasive approach. The standard steps of an en-bloc pelvic resection, including intracorporeal end-to-end anastomosis, were performed. The treatment data were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 54 years, and their mean body mass index was 30. All patients had at least one previous abdominal surgery and 60% had high-grade serous ovarian cancer at their initial diagnosis. Their mean platinum-free interval was 17.4 months. Complete secondary cytoreduction was achieved in all cases, with histopathology confirming bowel infiltration. The mean procedure duration was 294 min, with an estimated blood loss of 180 mL. No intraoperative complications occurred. The mean hospital stay was 8 days. One patient had a grade 2 postoperative complication. The mean follow-up period was 14 months, with only one patient experiencing a recurrence at the level of the abdominal wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic rectosigmoid resection is a viable option for complete cytoreduction in isolated recurrent ovarian cancer.

Extended panel testing in ovarian cancer reveals BRIP1 as the third most important predisposition gene

PURPOSE

The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination repair (HRR) and Lynch syndrome (LS) genes in ovarian cancer (OC) is uncertain.

METHODS

An observational study reporting the detection rate of germline PVs in HRR and LS genes in all OC cases tested in the North West Genomic Laboratory Hub between September 1996 and May 2024. Effect sizes are reported using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for unselected cases tested between April 2021 and May 2024 versus 50,703 controls from the Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing study.

RESULTS

2934 women were tested for BRCA1/2 and 433 (14.8%) had a PV. In up to 1572 women tested for PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, detection rates were PALB2 = 0.8%, BRIP1 = 1.1%, RAD51C = 0.4% and RAD51D = 0.4%. In 940 unselected cases, BRIP1 (OR = 8.7, 95% CI 4.6-15.8) was the third most common OC predisposition gene followed by RAD51C (OR = 8.3, 95% CI 3.1-23.1), RAD51D (OR = 6.5, 95% CI 2.1-19.7), and PALB2 (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.5-10.3). No PVs in LS genes were detected in unselected cases.

CONCLUSION

Panel testing in OC resulted in a detection rate of 2% to 3% for germline PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, with the largest contributor being BRIP1. Screening for LS in unselected cases of OC is unnecessary.

Targeted radiopharmaceuticals: an underexplored strategy for ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy worldwide with the highest mortality. This low survival rate can be attributed to the fact that symptoms arise only at an advanced disease stage, characterized by a (micro)metastatic spread across the peritoneal cavity. Radiopharmaceuticals, composed of a targeting moiety coupled with either a diagnostic or therapeutic radionuclide, constitute a relatively underexplored theranostic approach that may improve the current standard of care. Efficient patient stratification, follow-up and treatment are several caveats that could be addressed with theranostics to improve patient outcomes. So far, the bulk of research is situated and often halted at the preclinical level, employing murine models of primary and metastatic peritoneal disease that do not necessarily provide an accurate representation of the disease heterogeneity, (intrinsic) drug resistance or the complex physiological interactions with the tumor microenvironment. Radioimmunoconjugates with therapeutic α- and electron-emitting radionuclides have been the prevailing standard, targeting a myriad of cell-membrane markers that are expressed in the various heterogeneous histological subtypes of ovarian cancer. Evidently, several hurdles exist within preclinical research that are potentially withholding these agents from advancing into clinical practice. On the other hand, the field of nuclear medicine has also seen significant innovation to address shortcomings related to target/ligand identification, preclinical research models, radiochemistry, radiopharmacy and dosimetry, as outlined in this review. Altogether, theranostics hold great promise to answer an unmet medical need for ovarian cancer.

Predictive value of homologous recombination deficiency status for survival outcomes in primary tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (prognosis). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the predictive value of the prognostic factor HRD status, as determined by various clinically validated HRD assays at the time of staging laparotomy, compared to BRCA1/2 mutation status for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma treated in the first-line setting with a combination of surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy and/or maintenance with PARP inhibitors.