1
|
Hilgers L, Ghaffari Laleh N, West NP, Westwood A, Hewitt KJ, Quirke P, Grabsch HI, Carrero ZI, Matthaei E, Loeffler CML, Brinker TJ, Yuan T, Brenner H, Brobeil A, Hoffmeister M, Kather JN. Automated curation of large-scale cancer histopathology image datasets using deep learning. Histopathology 2024; 84:1139-1153. [PMID: 38409878 DOI: 10.1111/his.15159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) has numerous applications in pathology, supporting diagnosis and prognostication in cancer. However, most AI models are trained on highly selected data, typically one tissue slide per patient. In reality, especially for large surgical resection specimens, dozens of slides can be available for each patient. Manually sorting and labelling whole-slide images (WSIs) is a very time-consuming process, hindering the direct application of AI on the collected tissue samples from large cohorts. In this study we addressed this issue by developing a deep-learning (DL)-based method for automatic curation of large pathology datasets with several slides per patient. METHODS We collected multiple large multicentric datasets of colorectal cancer histopathological slides from the United Kingdom (FOXTROT, N = 21,384 slides; CR07, N = 7985 slides) and Germany (DACHS, N = 3606 slides). These datasets contained multiple types of tissue slides, including bowel resection specimens, endoscopic biopsies, lymph node resections, immunohistochemistry-stained slides, and tissue microarrays. We developed, trained, and tested a deep convolutional neural network model to predict the type of slide from the slide overview (thumbnail) image. The primary statistical endpoint was the macro-averaged area under the receiver operating curve (AUROCs) for detection of the type of slide. RESULTS In the primary dataset (FOXTROT), with an AUROC of 0.995 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.994-0.996] the algorithm achieved a high classification performance and was able to accurately predict the type of slide from the thumbnail image alone. In the two external test cohorts (CR07, DACHS) AUROCs of 0.982 [95% CI: 0.979-0.985] and 0.875 [95% CI: 0.864-0.887] were observed, which indicates the generalizability of the trained model on unseen datasets. With a confidence threshold of 0.95, the model reached an accuracy of 94.6% (7331 classified cases) in CR07 and 85.1% (2752 classified cases) for the DACHS cohort. CONCLUSION Our findings show that using the low-resolution thumbnail image is sufficient to accurately classify the type of slide in digital pathology. This can support researchers to make the vast resource of existing pathology archives accessible to modern AI models with only minimal manual annotations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Hilgers
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Narmin Ghaffari Laleh
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alice Westwood
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Katherine J Hewitt
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Heike I Grabsch
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Pathology, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Zunamys I Carrero
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Emylou Matthaei
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Chiara M L Loeffler
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanwei Yuan
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Brobeil
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Tissue Bank, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hetz MJ, Bucher TC, Brinker TJ. Multi-domain stain normalization for digital pathology: A cycle-consistent adversarial network for whole slide images. Med Image Anal 2024; 94:103149. [PMID: 38574542 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
The variation in histologic staining between different medical centers is one of the most profound challenges in the field of computer-aided diagnosis. The appearance disparity of pathological whole slide images causes algorithms to become less reliable, which in turn impedes the wide-spread applicability of downstream tasks like cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, different stainings lead to biases in the training which in case of domain shifts negatively affect the test performance. Therefore, in this paper we propose MultiStain-CycleGAN, a multi-domain approach to stain normalization based on CycleGAN. Our modifications to CycleGAN allow us to normalize images of different origins without retraining or using different models. We perform an extensive evaluation of our method using various metrics and compare it to commonly used methods that are multi-domain capable. First, we evaluate how well our method fools a domain classifier that tries to assign a medical center to an image. Then, we test our normalization on the tumor classification performance of a downstream classifier. Furthermore, we evaluate the image quality of the normalized images using the Structural similarity index and the ability to reduce the domain shift using the Fréchet inception distance. We show that our method proves to be multi-domain capable, provides a very high image quality among the compared methods, and can most reliably fool the domain classifier while keeping the tumor classifier performance high. By reducing the domain influence, biases in the data can be removed on the one hand and the origin of the whole slide image can be disguised on the other, thus enhancing patient data privacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin J Hetz
- Division of Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tabea-Clara Bucher
- Division of Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Division of Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hekler A, Maron RC, Haggenmüller S, Schmitt M, Wies C, Utikal JS, Meier F, Hobelsberger S, Gellrich FF, Sergon M, Hauschild A, French LE, Heinzerling L, Schlager JG, Ghoreschi K, Schlaak M, Hilke FJ, Poch G, Korsing S, Berking C, Heppt MV, Erdmann M, Haferkamp S, Drexler K, Schadendorf D, Sondermann W, Goebeler M, Schilling B, Kather JN, Krieghoff-Henning E, Brinker TJ. Using multiple real-world dermoscopic photographs of one lesion improves melanoma classification via deep learning. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 90:1028-1031. [PMID: 38199280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.11.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roman C Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Haggenmüller
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Wies
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sarah Hobelsberger
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank F Gellrich
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mildred Sergon
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Lars E French
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Justin G Schlager
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz J Hilke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriela Poch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sören Korsing
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Konstantin Drexler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Goebeler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) WERA Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) WERA Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haggenmüller S, Maron RC, Hekler A, Krieghoff-Henning E, Utikal JS, Gaiser M, Müller V, Fabian S, Meier F, Hobelsberger S, Gellrich FF, Sergon M, Hauschild A, Weichenthal M, French LE, Heinzerling L, Schlager JG, Ghoreschi K, Schlaak M, Hilke FJ, Poch G, Korsing S, Berking C, Heppt MV, Erdmann M, Haferkamp S, Drexler K, Schadendorf D, Sondermann W, Goebeler M, Schilling B, Kather JN, Fröhling S, Kaminski K, Doppler A, Bucher T, Brinker TJ. Patients' and dermatologists' preferences in AI-driven skin cancer diagnostics: prospective multicentric survey study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024:S0190-9622(24)00649-2. [PMID: 38670313 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Haggenmüller
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roman C Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maria Gaiser
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Verena Müller
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sascha Fabian
- Department of Economics, University of Applied Science Neu-Ulm, Neu-Ulm, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany and Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sarah Hobelsberger
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany and Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank F Gellrich
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany and Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mildred Sergon
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany and Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Lars E French
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Justin G Schlager
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz J Hilke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriela Poch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sören Korsing
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Konstantin Drexler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen and German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT-West, Campus Essen and University Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen and German Cancer Consortium, partner site Essen and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT-West, Campus Essen and University Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Goebeler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) WERA Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) WERA Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Tabea Bucher
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kurz A, Müller H, Kather JN, Schneider L, Bucher TC, Brinker TJ. 3-Dimensional Reconstruction From Histopathological Sections: A Systematic Review. J Transl Med 2024; 104:102049. [PMID: 38513977 DOI: 10.1016/j.labinv.2024.102049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Although pathological tissue analysis is typically performed on single 2-dimensional (2D) histologic reference slides, 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction from a sequence of histologic sections could provide novel opportunities for spatial analysis of the extracted tissue. In this review, we analyze recent works published after 2018 and report information on the extracted tissue types, the section thickness, and the number of sections used for reconstruction. By analyzing the technological requirements for 3D reconstruction, we observe that software tools exist, both free and commercial, which include the functionality to perform 3D reconstruction from a sequence of histologic images. Through the analysis of the most recent works, we provide an overview of the workflows and tools that are currently used for 3D reconstruction from histologic sections and address points for future work, such as a missing common file format or computer-aided analysis of the reconstructed model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kurz
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heimo Müller
- Diagnostics and Research Institute for Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lucas Schneider
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tabea-C Bucher
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haggenmüller S, Schmitt M, Krieghoff-Henning E, Hekler A, Maron RC, Wies C, Utikal JS, Meier F, Hobelsberger S, Gellrich FF, Sergon M, Hauschild A, French LE, Heinzerling L, Schlager JG, Ghoreschi K, Schlaak M, Hilke FJ, Poch G, Korsing S, Berking C, Heppt MV, Erdmann M, Haferkamp S, Drexler K, Schadendorf D, Sondermann W, Goebeler M, Schilling B, Kather JN, Fröhling S, Brinker TJ. Federated Learning for Decentralized Artificial Intelligence in Melanoma Diagnostics. JAMA Dermatol 2024; 160:303-311. [PMID: 38324293 PMCID: PMC10851139 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.5550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Importance The development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based melanoma classifiers typically calls for large, centralized datasets, requiring hospitals to give away their patient data, which raises serious privacy concerns. To address this concern, decentralized federated learning has been proposed, where classifier development is distributed across hospitals. Objective To investigate whether a more privacy-preserving federated learning approach can achieve comparable diagnostic performance to a classical centralized (ie, single-model) and ensemble learning approach for AI-based melanoma diagnostics. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicentric, single-arm diagnostic study developed a federated model for melanoma-nevus classification using histopathological whole-slide images prospectively acquired at 6 German university hospitals between April 2021 and February 2023 and benchmarked it using both a holdout and an external test dataset. Data analysis was performed from February to April 2023. Exposures All whole-slide images were retrospectively analyzed by an AI-based classifier without influencing routine clinical care. Main Outcomes and Measures The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) served as the primary end point for evaluating the diagnostic performance. Secondary end points included balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results The study included 1025 whole-slide images of clinically melanoma-suspicious skin lesions from 923 patients, consisting of 388 histopathologically confirmed invasive melanomas and 637 nevi. The median (range) age at diagnosis was 58 (18-95) years for the training set, 57 (18-93) years for the holdout test dataset, and 61 (18-95) years for the external test dataset; the median (range) Breslow thickness was 0.70 (0.10-34.00) mm, 0.70 (0.20-14.40) mm, and 0.80 (0.30-20.00) mm, respectively. The federated approach (0.8579; 95% CI, 0.7693-0.9299) performed significantly worse than the classical centralized approach (0.9024; 95% CI, 0.8379-0.9565) in terms of AUROC on a holdout test dataset (pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank, P < .001) but performed significantly better (0.9126; 95% CI, 0.8810-0.9412) than the classical centralized approach (0.9045; 95% CI, 0.8701-0.9331) on an external test dataset (pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank, P < .001). Notably, the federated approach performed significantly worse than the ensemble approach on both the holdout (0.8867; 95% CI, 0.8103-0.9481) and external test dataset (0.9227; 95% CI, 0.8941-0.9479). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this diagnostic study suggest that federated learning is a viable approach for the binary classification of invasive melanomas and nevi on a clinically representative distributed dataset. Federated learning can improve privacy protection in AI-based melanoma diagnostics while simultaneously promoting collaboration across institutions and countries. Moreover, it may have the potential to be extended to other image classification tasks in digital cancer histopathology and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Haggenmüller
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roman C. Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Wies
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen S. Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sarah Hobelsberger
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank F. Gellrich
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mildred Sergon
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Lars E. French
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Dr Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Justin G. Schlager
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz J. Hilke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriela Poch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sören Korsing
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Konstantin Drexler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Goebeler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) WERA, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) WERA, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jakob N. Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J. Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wies C, Schneider L, Haggenmüller S, Bucher TC, Hobelsberger S, Heppt MV, Ferrara G, Krieghoff-Henning EI, Brinker TJ. Evaluating deep learning-based melanoma classification using immunohistochemistry and routine histology: A three center study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297146. [PMID: 38241314 PMCID: PMC10798511 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Pathologists routinely use immunohistochemical (IHC)-stained tissue slides against MelanA in addition to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides to improve their accuracy in diagnosing melanomas. The use of diagnostic Deep Learning (DL)-based support systems for automated examination of tissue morphology and cellular composition has been well studied in standard H&E-stained tissue slides. In contrast, there are few studies that analyze IHC slides using DL. Therefore, we investigated the separate and joint performance of ResNets trained on MelanA and corresponding H&E-stained slides. The MelanA classifier achieved an area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 and 0.74 on out of distribution (OOD)-datasets, similar to the H&E-based benchmark classification of 0.81 and 0.75, respectively. A combined classifier using MelanA and H&E achieved AUROCs of 0.85 and 0.81 on the OOD datasets. DL MelanA-based assistance systems show the same performance as the benchmark H&E classification and may be improved by multi stain classification to assist pathologists in their clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Wies
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lucas Schneider
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Haggenmüller
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tabea-Clara Bucher
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Hobelsberger
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Gerardo Ferrara
- Anatomic Pathology and Cytopathology Unit—Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy
| | - Eva I. Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J. Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chanda T, Hauser K, Hobelsberger S, Bucher TC, Garcia CN, Wies C, Kittler H, Tschandl P, Navarrete-Dechent C, Podlipnik S, Chousakos E, Crnaric I, Majstorovic J, Alhajwan L, Foreman T, Peternel S, Sarap S, Özdemir İ, Barnhill RL, Llamas-Velasco M, Poch G, Korsing S, Sondermann W, Gellrich FF, Heppt MV, Erdmann M, Haferkamp S, Drexler K, Goebeler M, Schilling B, Utikal JS, Ghoreschi K, Fröhling S, Krieghoff-Henning E, Brinker TJ. Dermatologist-like explainable AI enhances trust and confidence in diagnosing melanoma. Nat Commun 2024; 15:524. [PMID: 38225244 PMCID: PMC10789736 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43095-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been shown to help dermatologists diagnose melanoma more accurately, however they lack transparency, hindering user acceptance. Explainable AI (XAI) methods can help to increase transparency, yet often lack precise, domain-specific explanations. Moreover, the impact of XAI methods on dermatologists' decisions has not yet been evaluated. Building upon previous research, we introduce an XAI system that provides precise and domain-specific explanations alongside its differential diagnoses of melanomas and nevi. Through a three-phase study, we assess its impact on dermatologists' diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic confidence, and trust in the XAI-support. Our results show strong alignment between XAI and dermatologist explanations. We also show that dermatologists' confidence in their diagnoses, and their trust in the support system significantly increase with XAI compared to conventional AI. This study highlights dermatologists' willingness to adopt such XAI systems, promoting future use in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tirtha Chanda
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Hauser
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Hobelsberger
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tabea-Clara Bucher
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carina Nogueira Garcia
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Wies
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty of University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Harald Kittler
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philipp Tschandl
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Cristian Navarrete-Dechent
- Department of Dermatology, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Sebastian Podlipnik
- Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emmanouil Chousakos
- 1st Department of Pathology, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Iva Crnaric
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Linda Alhajwan
- Department of Dermatology, Dubai London Clinic, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Sandra Peternel
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | | | - İrem Özdemir
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Raymond L Barnhill
- Department of Translational Research, Institut Curie, Unit of Formation and Research of Medicine University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Gabriela Poch
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sören Korsing
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Konstantin Drexler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Goebeler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jiang X, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H, Muti HS, Yuan T, Foersch S, West NP, Brobeil A, Jonnagaddala J, Hawkins N, Ward RL, Brinker TJ, Saldanha OL, Ke J, Müller W, Grabsch HI, Quirke P, Truhn D, Kather JN. End-to-end prognostication in colorectal cancer by deep learning: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6:e33-e43. [PMID: 38123254 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00208-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precise prognosis prediction in patients with colorectal cancer (ie, forecasting survival) is pivotal for individualised treatment and care. Histopathological tissue slides of colorectal cancer specimens contain rich prognostically relevant information. However, existing studies do not have multicentre external validation with real-world sample processing protocols, and algorithms are not yet widely used in clinical routine. METHODS In this retrospective, multicentre study, we collected tissue samples from four groups of patients with resected colorectal cancer from Australia, Germany, and the USA. We developed and externally validated a deep learning-based prognostic-stratification system for automatic prediction of overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with resected colorectal cancer. We used the model-predicted risk scores to stratify patients into different risk groups and compared survival outcomes between these groups. Additionally, we evaluated the prognostic value of these risk groups after adjusting for established prognostic variables. FINDINGS We trained and validated our model on a total of 4428 patients. We found that patients could be divided into high-risk and low-risk groups on the basis of the deep learning-based risk score. On the internal test set, the group with a high-risk score had a worse prognosis than the group with a low-risk score, as reflected by a hazard ratio (HR) of 4·50 (95% CI 3·33-6·09) for overall survival and 8·35 (5·06-13·78) for disease-specific survival (DSS). We found consistent performance across three large external test sets. In a test set of 1395 patients, the high-risk group had a lower DSS than the low-risk group, with an HR of 3·08 (2·44-3·89). In two additional test sets, the HRs for DSS were 2·23 (1·23-4·04) and 3·07 (1·78-5·3). We showed that the prognostic value of the deep learning-based risk score is independent of established clinical risk factors. INTERPRETATION Our findings indicate that attention-based self-supervised deep learning can robustly offer a prognosis on clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer, generalising across different populations and serving as a potentially new prognostic tool in clinical decision making for colorectal cancer management. We release all source codes and trained models under an open-source licence, allowing other researchers to reuse and build upon our work. FUNDING The German Federal Ministry of Health, the Max-Eder-Programme of German Cancer Aid, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, the German Academic Exchange Service, and the EU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofeng Jiang
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and National Center for Tumour Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hannah Sophie Muti
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tanwei Yuan
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Foersch
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexander Brobeil
- Institute of Pathology, National Center for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Tissue Bank, National Center for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jitendra Jonnagaddala
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hawkins
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn L Ward
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Lester Saldanha
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jia Ke
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, and Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Heike I Grabsch
- Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel Truhn
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marmé F, Krieghoff-Henning E, Gerber B, Schmitt M, Zahm DM, Bauerschlag D, Forstbauer H, Hildebrandt G, Ataseven B, Brodkorb T, Denkert C, Stachs A, Krug D, Heil J, Golatta M, Kühn T, Nekljudova V, Gaiser T, Schönmehl R, Brochhausen C, Loibl S, Reimer T, Brinker TJ. Deep learning to predict breast cancer sentinel lymph node status on INSEMA histological images. Eur J Cancer 2023; 195:113390. [PMID: 37890350 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is a clinically important prognostic biomarker in breast cancer and is used to guide therapy, especially for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative cases. However, invasive lymph node staging is increasingly omitted before therapy, and studies such as the randomised Intergroup Sentinel Mamma (INSEMA) trial address the potential for further de-escalation of axillary surgery. Therefore, it would be helpful to accurately predict the pretherapeutic sentinel status using medical images. METHODS Using a ResNet 50 architecture pretrained on ImageNet and a previously successful strategy, we trained deep learning (DL)-based image analysis algorithms to predict sentinel status on hematoxylin/eosin-stained images of predominantly luminal, primary breast tumours from the INSEMA trial and three additional, independent cohorts (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and cohorts from the University hospitals of Mannheim and Regensburg), and compared their performance with that of a logistic regression using clinical data only. Performance on an INSEMA hold-out set was investigated in a blinded manner. RESULTS None of the generated image analysis algorithms yielded significantly better than random areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves on the test sets, including the hold-out test set from INSEMA. In contrast, the logistic regression fitted on the Mannheim cohort retained a better than random performance on INSEMA and Regensburg. Including the image analysis model output in the logistic regression did not improve performance further on INSEMA. CONCLUSIONS Employing DL-based image analysis on histological slides, we could not predict SLN status for unseen cases in the INSEMA trial and other predominantly luminal cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Marmé
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Bauerschlag
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Lippe, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center East Westphalia-Lippe, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Tobias Brodkorb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, University Clinic Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Angrit Stachs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg - Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg - Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Neckar, Germany
| | | | - Timo Gaiser
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Schönmehl
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Brochhausen
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kurz A, Krahl D, Kutzner H, Barnhill R, Perasole A, Figueras MTF, Ferrara G, Braun SA, Starz H, Llamas-Velasco M, Utikal JS, Fröhling S, von Kalle C, Kather JN, Schneider L, Brinker TJ. A 3-dimensional histology computer model of malignant melanoma and its implications for digital pathology. Eur J Cancer 2023; 193:113294. [PMID: 37690178 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Historically, cancer diagnoses have been made by pathologists using two-dimensional histological slides. However, with the advent of digital pathology and artificial intelligence, slides are being digitised, providing new opportunities to integrate their information. Since nature is 3-dimensional (3D), it seems intuitive to digitally reassemble the 3D structure for diagnosis. OBJECTIVE To develop the first human-3D-melanoma-histology-model with full data and code availability. Further, to evaluate the 3D-simulation together with experienced pathologists in the field and discuss the implications of digital 3D-models for the future of digital pathology. METHODS A malignant melanoma of the skin was digitised via 3 µm cuts by a slide scanner; an open-source software was then leveraged to construct the 3D model. A total of nine pathologists from four different countries with at least 10 years of experience in the histologic diagnosis of melanoma tested the model and discussed their experiences as well as implications for future pathology. RESULTS We successfully constructed and tested the first 3D-model of human melanoma. Based on testing, 88.9% of pathologists believe that the technology is likely to enter routine pathology within the next 10 years; advantages include a better reflectance of anatomy, 3D assessment of symmetry and the opportunity to simultaneously evaluate different tissue levels at the same time; limitations include the high consumption of tissue and a yet inferior resolution due to computational limitations. CONCLUSIONS 3D-histology-models are promising for digital pathology of cancer and melanoma specifically, however, there are yet limitations which need to be carefully addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kurz
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Krahl
- Dres. Krahl Dermatopathology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Kutzner
- Dermatopathology Friedrichshafen, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Raymond Barnhill
- Departments of Pathology and Translational Research, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Antonio Perasole
- Division of Histopathology, Cerba Healthcare S.r.l. Rete Diagnostica Italiana, Limena, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Fernandez Figueras
- University General Hospital of Catalonia, Grupo Quironsalud, International University of Catalonia, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gerardo Ferrara
- Anatomic Pathology and Cytopathology Unit Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione 'G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Stephan A Braun
- Department of Dermatology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Mar Llamas-Velasco
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jochen Sven Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Department of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lucas Schneider
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brinker TJ. Advances in Melanoma-Nevus Classification Using Artificially Generated Image Data Sets. JAMA Dermatol 2023; 159:1175-1176. [PMID: 37792340 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mehrtens HA, Kurz A, Bucher TC, Brinker TJ. Benchmarking common uncertainty estimation methods with histopathological images under domain shift and label noise. Med Image Anal 2023; 89:102914. [PMID: 37544085 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
In the past years, deep learning has seen an increase in usage in the domain of histopathological applications. However, while these approaches have shown great potential, in high-risk environments deep learning models need to be able to judge their uncertainty and be able to reject inputs when there is a significant chance of misclassification. In this work, we conduct a rigorous evaluation of the most commonly used uncertainty and robustness methods for the classification of Whole Slide Images, with a focus on the task of selective classification, where the model should reject the classification in situations in which it is uncertain. We conduct our experiments on tile-level under the aspects of domain shift and label noise, as well as on slide-level. In our experiments, we compare Deep Ensembles, Monte-Carlo Dropout, Stochastic Variational Inference, Test-Time Data Augmentation as well as ensembles of the latter approaches. We observe that ensembles of methods generally lead to better uncertainty estimates as well as an increased robustness towards domain shifts and label noise, while contrary to results from classical computer vision benchmarks no systematic gain of the other methods can be shown. Across methods, a rejection of the most uncertain samples reliably leads to a significant increase in classification accuracy on both in-distribution as well as out-of-distribution data. Furthermore, we conduct experiments comparing these methods under varying conditions of label noise. Lastly, we publish our code framework to facilitate further research on uncertainty estimation on histopathological data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik A Mehrtens
- Division of Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Kurz
- Division of Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tabea-Clara Bucher
- Division of Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Division of Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Höhn J, Krieghoff-Henning E, Wies C, Kiehl L, Hetz MJ, Bucher TC, Jonnagaddala J, Zatloukal K, Müller H, Plass M, Jungwirth E, Gaiser T, Steeg M, Holland-Letz T, Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Brinker TJ. Colorectal cancer risk stratification on histological slides based on survival curves predicted by deep learning. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:98. [PMID: 37752266 PMCID: PMC10522577 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00451-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Studies have shown that colorectal cancer prognosis can be predicted by deep learning-based analysis of histological tissue sections of the primary tumor. So far, this has been achieved using a binary prediction. Survival curves might contain more detailed information and thus enable a more fine-grained risk prediction. Therefore, we established survival curve-based CRC survival predictors and benchmarked them against standard binary survival predictors, comparing their performance extensively on the clinical high and low risk subsets of one internal and three external cohorts. Survival curve-based risk prediction achieved a very similar risk stratification to binary risk prediction for this task. Exchanging other components of the pipeline, namely input tissue and feature extractor, had largely identical effects on model performance independently of the type of risk prediction. An ensemble of all survival curve-based models exhibited a more robust performance, as did a similar ensemble based on binary risk prediction. Patients could be further stratified within clinical risk groups. However, performance still varied across cohorts, indicating limited generalization of all investigated image analysis pipelines, whereas models using clinical data performed robustly on all cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Höhn
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Wies
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lennard Kiehl
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin J Hetz
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tabea-Clara Bucher
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jitendra Jonnagaddala
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Kurt Zatloukal
- Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Heimo Müller
- Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Markus Plass
- Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Emilian Jungwirth
- Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Timo Gaiser
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Institute of Applied Pathology, Speyer, Germany
| | - Matthias Steeg
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tim Holland-Letz
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wessels F, Schmitt M, Krieghoff-Henning E, Nientiedt M, Waldbillig F, Neuberger M, Kriegmair MC, Kowalewski KF, Worst TS, Steeg M, Popovic ZV, Gaiser T, von Kalle C, Utikal JS, Fröhling S, Michel MS, Nuhn P, Brinker TJ. A self-supervised vision transformer to predict survival from histopathology in renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 2023; 41:2233-2241. [PMID: 37382622 PMCID: PMC10415487 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04489-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and validate an interpretable deep learning model to predict overall and disease-specific survival (OS/DSS) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS Digitised haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from The Cancer Genome Atlas were used as a training set for a vision transformer (ViT) to extract image features with a self-supervised model called DINO (self-distillation with no labels). Extracted features were used in Cox regression models to prognosticate OS and DSS. Kaplan-Meier for univariable evaluation and Cox regression analyses for multivariable evaluation of the DINO-ViT risk groups were performed for prediction of OS and DSS. For validation, a cohort from a tertiary care centre was used. RESULTS A significant risk stratification was achieved in univariable analysis for OS and DSS in the training (n = 443, log rank test, p < 0.01) and validation set (n = 266, p < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, including age, metastatic status, tumour size and grading, the DINO-ViT risk stratification was a significant predictor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.03; 95%-confidence interval [95%-CI] 2.11-4.35; p < 0.01) and DSS (HR 4.90; 95%-CI 2.78-8.64; p < 0.01) in the training set but only for DSS in the validation set (HR 2.31; 95%-CI 1.15-4.65; p = 0.02). DINO-ViT visualisation showed that features were mainly extracted from nuclei, cytoplasm, and peritumoural stroma, demonstrating good interpretability. CONCLUSION The DINO-ViT can identify high-risk patients using histological images of ccRCC. This model might improve individual risk-adapted renal cancer therapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Wessels
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Malin Nientiedt
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank Waldbillig
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Manuel Neuberger
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian C Kriegmair
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Thomas S Worst
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias Steeg
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Zoran V Popovic
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Timo Gaiser
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Department of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- National Centre for Tumour Diseases, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maurice S Michel
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Philipp Nuhn
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fogelberg K, Chamarthi S, Maron RC, Niebling J, Brinker TJ. Domain shifts in dermoscopic skin cancer datasets: Evaluation of essential limitations for clinical translation. N Biotechnol 2023:S1871-6784(23)00021-3. [PMID: 37146681 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
The limited ability of Convolutional Neural Networks to generalize to images from previously unseen domains is a major limitation, in particular, for safety-critical clinical tasks such as dermoscopic skin cancer classification. In order to translate CNN-based applications into the clinic, it is essential that they are able to adapt to domain shifts. Such new conditions can arise through the use of different image acquisition systems or varying lighting conditions. In dermoscopy, shifts can also occur as a change in patient age or occurence of rare lesion localizations (e.g. palms). These are not prominently represented in most training datasets and can therefore lead to a decrease in performance. In order to verify the generalizability of classification models in real world clinical settings it is crucial to have access to data which mimics such domain shifts. To our knowledge no dermoscopic image dataset exists where such domain shifts are properly described and quantified. We therefore grouped publicly available images from ISIC archive based on their metadata (e.g. acquisition location, lesion localization, patient age) to generate meaningful domains. To verify that these domains are in fact distinct, we used multiple quantification measures to estimate the presence and intensity of domain shifts. Additionally, we analyzed the performance on these domains with and without an unsupervised domain adaptation technique. We observed that in most of our grouped domains, domain shifts in fact exist. Based on our results, we believe these datasets to be helpful for testing the generalization capabilities of dermoscopic skin cancer classifiers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Fogelberg
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sireesha Chamarthi
- Data Analysis and Intelligence, German Aerospace Center (DLR - Institute of Data science), Jena, Germany
| | - Roman C Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Niebling
- Data Analysis and Intelligence, German Aerospace Center (DLR - Institute of Data science), Jena, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schneider L, Wies C, Krieghoff-Henning EI, Bucher TC, Utikal JS, Schadendorf D, Brinker TJ. Multimodal integration of image, epigenetic and clinical data to predict BRAF mutation status in melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2023; 183:131-138. [PMID: 36854237 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In machine learning, multimodal classifiers can provide more generalised performance than unimodal classifiers. In clinical practice, physicians usually also rely on a range of information from different examinations for diagnosis. In this study, we used BRAF mutation status prediction in melanoma as a model system to analyse the contribution of different data types in a combined classifier because BRAF status can be determined accurately by sequencing as the current gold standard, thus nearly eliminating label noise. METHODS We trained a deep learning-based classifier by combining individually trained random forests of image, clinical and methylation data to predict BRAF-V600 mutation status in primary and metastatic melanomas of The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. RESULTS With our multimodal approach, we achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80, whereas the individual classifiers yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.63 (histopathologic image data), 0.66 (clinical data) and 0.66 (methylation data) on an independent data set. CONCLUSIONS Our combined approach can predict BRAF status to some extent by identifying BRAF-V600 specific patterns at the histologic, clinical and epigenetic levels. The multimodal classifiers have improved generalisability in predicting BRAF mutation status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Schneider
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Wies
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva I Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tabea-Clara Bucher
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Niehues JM, Quirke P, West NP, Grabsch HI, van Treeck M, Schirris Y, Veldhuizen GP, Hutchins GGA, Richman SD, Foersch S, Brinker TJ, Fukuoka J, Bychkov A, Uegami W, Truhn D, Brenner H, Brobeil A, Hoffmeister M, Kather JN. Generalizable biomarker prediction from cancer pathology slides with self-supervised deep learning: A retrospective multi-centric study. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:100980. [PMID: 36958327 PMCID: PMC10140458 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) can predict microsatellite instability (MSI) from routine histopathology slides of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it is unclear whether DL can also predict other biomarkers with high performance and whether DL predictions generalize to external patient populations. Here, we acquire CRC tissue samples from two large multi-centric studies. We systematically compare six different state-of-the-art DL architectures to predict biomarkers from pathology slides, including MSI and mutations in BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA. Using a large external validation cohort to provide a realistic evaluation setting, we show that models using self-supervised, attention-based multiple-instance learning consistently outperform previous approaches while offering explainable visualizations of the indicative regions and morphologies. While the prediction of MSI and BRAF mutations reaches a clinical-grade performance, mutation prediction of PIK3CA, KRAS, and NRAS was clinically insufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Moritz Niehues
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Heike I Grabsch
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marko van Treeck
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Yoni Schirris
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gregory P Veldhuizen
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Gordon G A Hutchins
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Susan D Richman
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Sebastian Foersch
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Junya Fukuoka
- Department of Pathology Informatics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan; Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan
| | - Andrey Bychkov
- Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan
| | - Wataru Uegami
- Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daniel Truhn
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Brobeil
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Tissue Bank, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany; Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sondermann W, Wies C, Esser S, Utikal JS, Schadendorf D, Brinker TJ. The “Intimarzt” (intimate doctor) model project: anonymous remote diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international 2023; 120:94-95. [PMID: 37042644 PMCID: PMC10114138 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
20
|
Jutzi T, Krieghoff-Henning EI, Brinker TJ. [The Rise of Artificial Intelligence - High Prediction Accuracy in Early Detection of Pigmented Melanoma]. Laryngorhinootologie 2022. [PMID: 36580975 DOI: 10.1055/a-1949-3639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of malignant melanoma is increasing worldwide. If detected early, melanoma is highly treatable, so early detection is vital.Skin cancer early detection has improved significantly in recent decades, for example by the introduction of screening in 2008 and dermoscopy. Nevertheless, in particular visual detection of early melanomas remains challenging because they show many morphological overlaps with nevi. Hence, there continues to be a high medical need to further develop methods for early skin cancer detection in order to be able to reliably diagnosemelanomas at a very early stage.Routine diagnostics for melanoma detection include visual whole body inspection, often supplemented by dermoscopy, which can significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of experienced dermatologists. A procedure that is additionally offered in some practices and clinics is wholebody photography combined with digital dermoscopy for the early detection of malignant melanoma, especially for monitoring high-risk patients.In recent decades, numerous noninvasive adjunctive diagnostic techniques were developed for the examination of suspicious pigmented moles, that may have the potential to allow improved and, in some cases, automated evaluation of these lesions. First, confocal laser microscopy should be mentioned here, as well as electrical impedance spectroscopy, multiphoton laser tomography, multispectral analysis, Raman spectroscopy or optical coherence tomography. These diagnostic techniques usually focus on high sensitivity to avoid malignant melanoma being overlooked. However, this usually implies lower specificity, which may lead to unnecessary excision of benign lesions in screening. Also, some of the procedures are time-consuming and costly, which also limits their applicability in skin cancer screening. In the near future, the use of artificial intelligence might change skin cancer diagnostics in many ways. The most promising approach may be the analysis of routine macroscopic and dermoscopic images by artificial intelligence.For the classification of pigmented skin lesions based on macroscopic and dermoscopic images, artificial intelligence, especially in form of neural networks, has achieved comparable diagnostic accuracies to dermatologists under experimental conditions in numerous studies. In particular, it achieved high accuracies in the binary melanoma/nevus classification task, but it also performed comparably well to dermatologists in multiclass differentiation of various skin diseases. However, proof of the basic applicability and utility of such systems in clinical practice is still pending. Prerequisites that remain to be established to enable translation of such diagnostic systems into dermatological routine are means that allow users to comprehend the system's decisions as well as a uniformly high performance of the algorithms on image data from other hospitals and practices.At present, hints are accumulating that computer-aided diagnosis systems could provide their greatest benefit as assistance systems, since studies indicate that a combination of human and machine achieves the best results. Diagnostic systems based on artificial intelligence are capable of detecting morphological characteristics quickly, quantitatively, objectively and reproducibly, and could thus provide a more objective analytical basis - in addition to medical experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Jutzi
- Arbeitsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Eva I Krieghoff-Henning
- Arbeitsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Arbeitsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wessels F, Kuntz S, Krieghoff-Henning E, Schmitt M, Braun V, Worst TS, Neuberger M, Steeg M, Gaiser T, Fröhling S, Michel MS, Nuhn P, Brinker TJ. Artificial intelligence to predict oncological outcome directly from hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides in urology. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:538-550. [PMID: 35274903 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04758-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Artificial intelligence (AI) has been successfully applied for automatic tumor detection and grading in histopathological image analysis in urologic oncology. The aim of this review was to assess the applicability of these approaches in image-based oncological outcome prediction. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases MEDLINE through PubMed and Web of Science up to April 20, 2021. Studies investigating AI approaches to determine the risk of recurrence, metastasis, or survival directly from H&E-stained tissue sections in prostate, renal cell or urothelial carcinoma were included. Characteristics of the AI approach and performance metrics were extracted and summarized. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the PROBAST tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS 16 studies yielding a total of 6658 patients and reporting on 17 outcome predictions were included. Six studies focused on renal cell, six on prostate and three on urothelial carcinoma while one study investigated renal cell and urothelial carcinoma. Handcrafted feature extraction was used in five, a convolutional neural network (CNN) in six and a deep feature extraction in four studies. One study compared a CNN with handcrafted feature extraction. In seven outcome predictions, a multivariable comparison with clinicopathological parameters was reported. Five of them showed statistically significant hazard ratios for the AI's model's-prediction. However, RoB was high in 15 outcome predictions and unclear in two. CONCLUSIONS The included studies are promising but predominantly early pilot studies, therefore primarily highlighting the potential of AI approaches. Additional well-designed studies are needed to assess the actual clinical applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Wessels
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sara Kuntz
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Braun
- Library for the Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Thomas S Worst
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Manuel Neuberger
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias Steeg
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Timo Gaiser
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maurice-Stephan Michel
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Philipp Nuhn
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany -
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ghaffari Laleh N, Muti HS, Loeffler CML, Echle A, Saldanha OL, Mahmood F, Lu MY, Trautwein C, Langer R, Dislich B, Buelow RD, Grabsch HI, Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Alwers E, Brinker TJ, Khader F, Truhn D, Gaisa NT, Boor P, Hoffmeister M, Schulz V, Kather JN. Erratum to 'Benchmarking weakly-supervised deep learning pipelines for whole slide classification in computational pathology' Medical Image Analysis, Volume 79, July 2022, 102474. Med Image Anal 2022; 82:102622. [PMID: 36130464 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hannah Sophie Muti
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Amelie Echle
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Faisal Mahmood
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ming Y Lu
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christian Trautwein
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Rupert Langer
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Roman D Buelow
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Heike Irmgard Grabsch
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.; Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Alwers
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Firas Khader
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Daniel Truhn
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nadine T Gaisa
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Peter Boor
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Schulz
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany; Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Hyperion Hybrid Imaging Systems GmbH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Maron RC, Hekler A, Haggenmüller S, von Kalle C, Utikal JS, Müller V, Gaiser M, Meier F, Hobelsberger S, Gellrich FF, Sergon M, Hauschild A, French LE, Heinzerling L, Schlager JG, Ghoreschi K, Schlaak M, Hilke FJ, Poch G, Korsing S, Berking C, Heppt MV, Erdmann M, Haferkamp S, Schadendorf D, Sondermann W, Goebeler M, Schilling B, Kather JN, Fröhling S, Lipka DB, Krieghoff-Henning E, Brinker TJ. Model soups improve performance of dermoscopic skin cancer classifiers. Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:307-316. [PMID: 35973360 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Image-based cancer classifiers suffer from a variety of problems which negatively affect their performance. For example, variation in image brightness or different cameras can already suffice to diminish performance. Ensemble solutions, where multiple model predictions are combined into one, can improve these problems. However, ensembles are computationally intensive and less transparent to practitioners than single model solutions. Constructing model soups, by averaging the weights of multiple models into a single model, could circumvent these limitations while still improving performance. OBJECTIVE To investigate the performance of model soups for a dermoscopic melanoma-nevus skin cancer classification task with respect to (1) generalisation to images from other clinics, (2) robustness against small image changes and (3) calibration such that the confidences correspond closely to the actual predictive uncertainties. METHODS We construct model soups by fine-tuning pre-trained models on seven different image resolutions and subsequently averaging their weights. Performance is evaluated on a multi-source dataset including holdout and external components. RESULTS We find that model soups improve generalisation and calibration on the external component while maintaining performance on the holdout component. For robustness, we observe performance improvements for pertubated test images, while the performance on corrupted test images remains on par. CONCLUSIONS Overall, souping for skin cancer classifiers has a positive effect on generalisation, robustness and calibration. It is easy for practitioners to implement and by combining multiple models into a single model, complexity is reduced. This could be an important factor in achieving clinical applicability, as less complexity generally means more transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman C Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Haggenmüller
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Department of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Charité University Medicine and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Verena Müller
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maria Gaiser
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Sarah Hobelsberger
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank F Gellrich
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Mildred Sergon
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Lars E French
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Justin G Schlager
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz J Hilke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriela Poch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sören Korsing
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Goebeler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel B Lipka
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schneider L, Krieghoff-Henning E, Laiouar-Pedari S, Kuntz S, Hekler A, Kather JN, Gaiser T, Fröhling S, Brinker TJ. Response to letter entitled: Re: Integration of deep learning-based image analysis and genomic data in cancer pathology: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2022; 172:403-404. [PMID: 35781181 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Schneider
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Laiouar-Pedari
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Kuntz
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Department of Medicine III, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany; Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Timo Gaiser
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Laleh NG, Muti HS, Loeffler CML, Echle A, Saldanha OL, Mahmood F, Lu MY, Trautwein C, Langer R, Dislich B, Buelow RD, Grabsch HI, Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Alwers E, Brinker TJ, Khader F, Truhn D, Gaisa NT, Boor P, Hoffmeister M, Schulz V, Kather JN. Benchmarking weakly-supervised deep learning pipelines for whole slide classification in computational pathology. Med Image Anal 2022; 79:102474. [DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
26
|
Hauser K, Kurz A, Haggenmüller S, Maron RC, von Kalle C, Utikal JS, Meier F, Hobelsberger S, Gellrich FF, Sergon M, Hauschild A, French LE, Heinzerling L, Schlager JG, Ghoreschi K, Schlaak M, Hilke FJ, Poch G, Kutzner H, Berking C, Heppt MV, Erdmann M, Haferkamp S, Schadendorf D, Sondermann W, Goebeler M, Schilling B, Kather JN, Fröhling S, Lipka DB, Hekler A, Krieghoff-Henning E, Brinker TJ. Explainable artificial intelligence in skin cancer recognition: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2022; 167:54-69. [PMID: 35390650 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to their ability to solve complex problems, deep neural networks (DNNs) are becoming increasingly popular in medical applications. However, decision-making by such algorithms is essentially a black-box process that renders it difficult for physicians to judge whether the decisions are reliable. The use of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is often suggested as a solution to this problem. We investigate how XAI is used for skin cancer detection: how is it used during the development of new DNNs? What kinds of visualisations are commonly used? Are there systematic evaluations of XAI with dermatologists or dermatopathologists? METHODS Google Scholar, PubMed, IEEE Explore, Science Direct and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2017 and October 2021 applying XAI to dermatological images: the search terms histopathological image, whole-slide image, clinical image, dermoscopic image, skin, dermatology, explainable, interpretable and XAI were used in various combinations. Only studies concerned with skin cancer were included. RESULTS 37 publications fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Most studies (19/37) simply applied existing XAI methods to their classifier to interpret its decision-making. Some studies (4/37) proposed new XAI methods or improved upon existing techniques. 14/37 studies addressed specific questions such as bias detection and impact of XAI on man-machine-interactions. However, only three of them evaluated the performance and confidence of humans using CAD systems with XAI. CONCLUSION XAI is commonly applied during the development of DNNs for skin cancer detection. However, a systematic and rigorous evaluation of its usefulness in this scenario is lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Hauser
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Kurz
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Haggenmüller
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roman C Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Department of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Charité University Medicine and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Sarah Hobelsberger
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank F Gellrich
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Mildred Sergon
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Lars E French
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Justin G Schlager
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz J Hilke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriela Poch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heinz Kutzner
- Dermatopathology Laboratory, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Goebeler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel B Lipka
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Echle A, Ghaffari Laleh N, Quirke P, Grabsch HI, Muti HS, Saldanha OL, Brockmoeller SF, van den Brandt PA, Hutchins GGA, Richman SD, Horisberger K, Galata C, Ebert MP, Eckardt M, Boutros M, Horst D, Reissfelder C, Alwers E, Brinker TJ, Langer R, Jenniskens JCA, Offermans K, Mueller W, Gray R, Gruber SB, Greenson JK, Rennert G, Bonner JD, Schmolze D, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H, Trautwein C, Boor P, Jaeger D, Gaisa NT, Hoffmeister M, West NP, Kather JN. Artificial intelligence for detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-a multicentric analysis of a pre-screening tool for clinical application. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100400. [PMID: 35247870 PMCID: PMC9058894 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a key genetic feature which should be tested in every patient with colorectal cancer (CRC) according to medical guidelines. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods can detect MSI/dMMR directly in routine pathology slides, but the test performance has not been systematically investigated with predefined test thresholds. METHOD We trained and validated AI-based MSI/dMMR detectors and evaluated predefined performance metrics using nine patient cohorts of 8343 patients across different countries and ethnicities. RESULTS Classifiers achieved clinical-grade performance, yielding an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of up to 0.96 without using any manual annotations. Subsequently, we show that the AI system can be applied as a rule-out test: by using cohort-specific thresholds, on average 52.73% of tumors in each surgical cohort [total number of MSI/dMMR = 1020, microsatellite stable (MSS)/ proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) = 7323 patients] could be identified as MSS/pMMR with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. In an additional cohort of N = 1530 (MSI/dMMR = 211, MSS/pMMR = 1319) endoscopy biopsy samples, the system achieved an AUROC of 0.89, and the cohort-specific threshold ruled out 44.12% of tumors with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. As a more robust alternative to cohort-specific thresholds, we showed that with a fixed threshold of 0.25 for all the cohorts, we can rule-out 25.51% in surgical specimens and 6.10% in biopsies. INTERPRETATION When applied in a clinical setting, this means that the AI system can rule out MSI/dMMR in a quarter (with global thresholds) or half of all CRC patients (with local fine-tuning), thereby reducing cost and turnaround time for molecular profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Echle
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - N Ghaffari Laleh
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Quirke
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - H I Grabsch
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - H S Muti
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - O L Saldanha
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - S F Brockmoeller
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P A van den Brandt
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - G G A Hutchins
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S D Richman
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - K Horisberger
- Department of Abdominal and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Galata
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Academic Thoracic Center Mainz, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - M P Ebert
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Institute for Innate Immunoscience (MI3) and Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center of Preventive Medicine and Digital Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Cancer Center, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Eckardt
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Boutros
- Division of Signaling and Functional Genomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Horst
- Institut für Pathologie Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - E Alwers
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Langer
- Institute of Pathology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - J C A Jenniskens
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - K Offermans
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W Mueller
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Pathologie, Starnberg, Germany
| | - R Gray
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S B Gruber
- Center for Precision Medicine and Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - J K Greenson
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, USA
| | - G Rennert
- Department of Community Medicine & Epidemiology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - J D Bonner
- Center for Precision Medicine and Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - D Schmolze
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, USA
| | - J Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Trautwein
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Boor
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Nephrology and Immunology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - D Jaeger
- Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N T Gaisa
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N P West
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J N Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jutzi TB, Krieghoff-Henning EI, Brinker TJ. Künstliche Intelligenz auf dem Vormarsch – Hohe Vorhersage-Genauigkeit bei der Früherkennung pigmentierter Melanome. Aktuelle Dermatologie 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1514-2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungWeltweit steigt die Inzidenz des malignen Melanoms an. Bei frühzeitiger Erkennung ist das Melanom gut behandelbar, eine Früherkennung ist also lebenswichtig.Die Hautkrebs-Früherkennung hat sich in den letzten Jahrzehnten bspw. durch die Einführung des Screenings im Jahr 2008 und die Dermatoskopie deutlich verbessert. Dennoch bleibt die visuelle Erkennung insbesondere von frühen Melanomen eine Herausforderung, weil diese viele morphologische Überlappungen mit Nävi zeigen. Daher ist der medizinische Bedarf weiterhin hoch, die Methoden zur Hautkrebsfrüherkennung gezielt weiterzuentwickeln, um Melanome bereits in einem sehr frühen Stadium sicher diagnostizieren zu können.Die Routinediagnostik zur Hautkrebs-Früherkennung umfasst die visuelle Ganzkörperinspektion, oft ergänzt durch die Dermatoskopie, durch die sich die diagnostische Treffsicherheit erfahrener Hautärzte deutlich erhöhen lässt. Ein Verfahren, was in einigen Praxen und Kliniken zusätzlich angeboten wird, ist die kombinierte Ganzkörperfotografie mit der digitalen Dermatoskopie für die Früherkennung maligner Melanome, insbesondere für das Monitoring von Hochrisiko-Patienten.In den letzten Jahrzenten wurden zahlreiche nicht invasive zusatzdiagnostische Verfahren zur Beurteilung verdächtiger Pigmentmale entwickelt, die das Potenzial haben könnten, eine verbesserte und z. T. automatisierte Bewertung dieser Läsionen zu ermöglichen. In erster Linie ist hier die konfokale Lasermikroskopie zu nennen, ebenso die elektrische Impedanzspektroskopie, die Multiphotonen-Lasertomografie, die Multispektralanalyse, die Raman-Spektroskopie oder die optische Kohärenztomografie. Diese diagnostischen Verfahren fokussieren i. d. R. auf hohe Sensitivität, um zu vermeiden, ein malignes Melanom zu übersehen. Dies bedingt allerdings üblicherweise eine geringere Spezifität, was im Screening zu unnötigen Exzisionen vieler gutartiger Läsionen führen kann. Auch sind einige der Verfahren zeitaufwendig und kostenintensiv, was die Anwendbarkeit im Screening ebenfalls einschränkt.In naher Zukunft wird insbesondere die Nutzung von künstlicher Intelligenz die Diagnosefindung in vielfältiger Weise verändern. Vielversprechend ist v. a. die Analyse der makroskopischen und dermatoskopischen Routine-Bilder durch künstliche Intelligenz. Für die Klassifizierung von pigmentierten Hautläsionen anhand makroskopischer und dermatoskopischer Bilder erzielte die künstliche Intelligenz v. a. in Form neuronaler Netze unter experimentellen Bedingungen in zahlreichen Studien bereits eine vergleichbare diagnostische Genauigkeit wie Dermatologen. Insbesondere bei der binären Klassifikationsaufgabe Melanom/Nävus erreichte sie hohe Genauigkeiten, doch auch in der Multiklassen-Differenzierung von verschiedenen Hauterkrankungen zeigt sie sich vergleichbar gut wie Dermatologen. Der Nachweis der grundsätzlichen Anwendbarkeit und des Nutzens solcher Systeme in der klinischen Praxis steht jedoch noch aus. Noch zu schaffende Grundvoraussetzungen für die Translation solcher Diagnosesysteme in die dermatologischen Routine sind Möglichkeiten für die Nutzer, die Entscheidungen des Systems nachzuvollziehen, sowie eine gleichbleibend gute Leistung der Algorithmen auf Bilddaten aus fremden Kliniken und Praxen.Derzeit zeichnet sich ab, dass computergestützte Diagnosesysteme als Assistenzsysteme den größten Nutzen bringen könnten, denn Studien deuten darauf hin, dass eine Kombination von Mensch und Maschine die besten Ergebnisse erzielt. Diagnosesysteme basierend auf künstlicher Intelligenz sind in der Lage, Merkmale schnell, quantitativ, objektiv und reproduzierbar zu erfassen, und könnten somit die Medizin auf eine mathematische Grundlage stellen – zusätzlich zur ärztlichen Erfahrung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja B. Jutzi
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Eva I. Krieghoff-Henning
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Titus J. Brinker
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schneider L, Laiouar-Pedari S, Kuntz S, Krieghoff-Henning E, Hekler A, Kather JN, Gaiser T, Fröhling S, Brinker TJ. Integration of deep learning-based image analysis and genomic data in cancer pathology: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2021; 160:80-91. [PMID: 34810047 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past decade, the development of molecular high-throughput methods (omics) increased rapidly and provided new insights for cancer research. In parallel, deep learning approaches revealed the enormous potential for medical image analysis, especially in digital pathology. Combining image and omics data with deep learning tools may enable the discovery of new cancer biomarkers and a more precise prediction of patient prognosis. This systematic review addresses different multimodal fusion methods of convolutional neural network-based image analyses with omics data, focussing on the impact of data combination on the classification performance. METHODS PubMed was screened for peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 2015 and June 2021 by two independent researchers. Search terms related to deep learning, digital pathology, omics, and multimodal fusion were combined. RESULTS We identified a total of 11 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, namely studies that used convolutional neural networks for haematoxylin and eosin image analysis of patients with cancer in combination with integrated omics data. Publications were categorised according to their endpoints: 7 studies focused on survival analysis and 4 studies on prediction of cancer subtypes, malignancy or microsatellite instability with spatial analysis. CONCLUSIONS Image-based classifiers already show high performances in prognostic and predictive cancer diagnostics. The integration of omics data led to improved performance in all studies described here. However, these are very early studies that still require external validation to demonstrate their generalisability and robustness. Further and more comprehensive studies with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate performance and determine clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Schneider
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Laiouar-Pedari
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Kuntz
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Department of Medicine III, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany; Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Timo Gaiser
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumour Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brockmoeller S, Echle A, Ghaffari Laleh N, Eiholm S, Malmstrøm ML, Plato Kuhlmann T, Levic K, Grabsch HI, West NP, Saldanha OL, Kouvidi K, Bono A, Heij LR, Brinker TJ, Gögenür I, Quirke P, Kather JN. Deep Learning identifies inflamed fat as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. J Pathol 2021; 256:269-281. [PMID: 34738636 DOI: 10.1002/path.5831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The spread of early-stage (T1 and T2) adenocarcinomas to loco-regional lymph nodes is a key event in disease progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). The cellular mechanisms behind this event are not completely understood and existing predictive biomarkers are imperfect. Here, we used an end-to-end Deep Learning algorithm to identify risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) status in digitized histopathology slides of the primary CRC and its surrounding tissue. In two large population-based cohorts, we show that this system can predict the presence of more than one LNM in pT2 CRC patients with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.733 (0.67-0.758) and patients with any LNM with an AUROC of 0.711 (0.597-0.797). Similarly, in pT1 CRC patients, the presence of more than one LNM or any LNM was predictable with an AUROC of 0.733 (0.644-0.778) and 0.567 (0.542-0.597), respectively. Based on these findings, we used the Deep Learning system to guide human pathology experts towards highly predictive regions for LNM in the whole slide images. This hybrid human observer and Deep Learning approach identified inflamed adipose tissue as the highest predictive feature for LNM presence. Our study is a first proof of concept that artificial intelligence (AI) systems may be able to discover potentially new biological mechanisms in cancer progression. Our Deep Learning algorithm is publicly available and can be used for biomarker discovery in any disease setting. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scarlet Brockmoeller
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amelie Echle
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Susanne Eiholm
- Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Roskilde, Denmark
| | | | | | - Katarina Levic
- Department of Surgery, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Heike Irmgard Grabsch
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Katerina Kouvidi
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Aurora Bono
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lara R Heij
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ismayil Gögenür
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Køge, Denmark
- Gastrounit - Surgical Division, Center for Surgical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumour Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kiehl L, Kuntz S, Höhn J, Jutzi T, Krieghoff-Henning E, Kather JN, Holland-Letz T, Kopp-Schneider A, Chang-Claude J, Brobeil A, von Kalle C, Fröhling S, Alwers E, Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Brinker TJ. Deep learning can predict lymph node status directly from histology in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2021; 157:464-473. [PMID: 34649117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node status is a prognostic marker and strongly influences therapeutic decisions in colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVES The objective of the study is to investigate whether image features extracted by a deep learning model from routine histological slides and/or clinical data can be used to predict CRC lymph node metastasis (LNM). METHODS Using histological whole slide images (WSIs) of primary tumours of 2431 patients in the DACHS cohort, we trained a convolutional neural network to predict LNM. In parallel, we used clinical data derived from the same cases in logistic regression analyses. Subsequently, the slide-based artificial intelligence predictor (SBAIP) score was included in the regression. WSIs and data from 582 patients of the TCGA cohort were used as the external test set. RESULTS On the internal test set, the SBAIP achieved an area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 71.0%, the clinical classifier achieved an AUROC of 67.0% and a combination of the two classifiers yielded an improvement to 74.1%. Whereas the clinical classifier's performance remained stable on the TCGA set, performance of the SBAIP dropped to an AUROC of 61.2%. Performance of the clinical classifier depended strongly on the T stage. CONCLUSION Deep learning-based image analysis may help predict LNM of patients with CRC using routine histological slides. Combination with clinical data such as T stage might be useful. Strategies to increase performance of the SBAIP on external images should be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennard Kiehl
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Kuntz
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Höhn
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Jutzi
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Tim Holland-Letz
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Brobeil
- Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) and Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Alwers
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schrammen PL, Ghaffari Laleh N, Echle A, Truhn D, Schulz V, Brinker TJ, Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Alwers E, Brobeil A, Kloor M, Heij LR, Jäger D, Trautwein C, Grabsch HI, Quirke P, West NP, Hoffmeister M, Kather JN. Weakly supervised annotation-free cancer detection and prediction of genotype in routine histopathology. J Pathol 2021; 256:50-60. [PMID: 34561876 DOI: 10.1002/path.5800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Deep learning is a powerful tool in computational pathology: it can be used for tumor detection and for predicting genetic alterations based on histopathology images alone. Conventionally, tumor detection and prediction of genetic alterations are two separate workflows. Newer methods have combined them, but require complex, manually engineered computational pipelines, restricting reproducibility and robustness. To address these issues, we present a new method for simultaneous tumor detection and prediction of genetic alterations: The Slide-Level Assessment Model (SLAM) uses a single off-the-shelf neural network to predict molecular alterations directly from routine pathology slides without any manual annotations, improving upon previous methods by automatically excluding normal and non-informative tissue regions. SLAM requires only standard programming libraries and is conceptually simpler than previous approaches. We have extensively validated SLAM for clinically relevant tasks using two large multicentric cohorts of colorectal cancer patients, Darmkrebs: Chancen der Verhütung durch Screening (DACHS) from Germany and Yorkshire Cancer Research Bowel Cancer Improvement Programme (YCR-BCIP) from the UK. We show that SLAM yields reliable slide-level classification of tumor presence with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.980 (confidence interval 0.975, 0.984; n = 2,297 tumor and n = 1,281 normal slides). In addition, SLAM can detect microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite stability/mismatch repair proficiency with an AUROC of 0.909 (0.888, 0.929; n = 2,039 patients) and BRAF mutational status with an AUROC of 0.821 (0.786, 0.852; n = 2,075 patients). The improvement with respect to previous methods was validated in a large external testing cohort in which MSI/dMMR status was detected with an AUROC of 0.900 (0.864, 0.931; n = 805 patients). In addition, SLAM provides human-interpretable visualization maps, enabling the analysis of multiplexed network predictions by human experts. In summary, SLAM is a new simple and powerful method for computational pathology that could be applied to multiple disease contexts. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amelie Echle
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Daniel Truhn
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Schulz
- Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.,Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Hyperion Hybrid Imaging Systems GmbH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Alwers
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Brobeil
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Tumor Bank Unit, Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lara R Heij
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Dirk Jäger
- Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Trautwein
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Heike I Grabsch
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kuntz S, Krieghoff-Henning E, Kather JN, Jutzi T, Höhn J, Kiehl L, Hekler A, Alwers E, von Kalle C, Fröhling S, Utikal JS, Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Brinker TJ. Gastrointestinal cancer classification and prognostication from histology using deep learning: Systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2021; 155:200-215. [PMID: 34391053 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal cancers account for approximately 20% of all cancer diagnoses and are responsible for 22.5% of cancer deaths worldwide. Artificial intelligence-based diagnostic support systems, in particular convolutional neural network (CNN)-based image analysis tools, have shown great potential in medical computer vision. In this systematic review, we summarise recent studies reporting CNN-based approaches for digital biomarkers for characterization and prognostication of gastrointestinal cancer pathology. METHODS Pubmed and Medline were screened for peer-reviewed papers dealing with CNN-based gastrointestinal cancer analyses from histological slides, published between 2015 and 2020.Seven hundred and ninety titles and abstracts were screened, and 58 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. RESULTS Sixteen publications fulfilled our inclusion criteria dealing with tumor or precursor lesion characterization or prognostic and predictive biomarkers: 14 studies on colorectal or rectal cancer, three studies on gastric cancer and none on esophageal cancer. These studies were categorised according to their end-points: polyp characterization, tumor characterization and patient outcome. Regarding the translation into clinical practice, we identified several studies demonstrating generalization of the classifier with external tests and comparisons with pathologists, but none presenting clinical implementation. CONCLUSIONS Results of recent studies on CNN-based image analysis in gastrointestinal cancer pathology are promising, but studies were conducted in observational and retrospective settings. Large-scale trials are needed to assess performance and predict clinical usefulness. Furthermore, large-scale trials are required for approval of CNN-based prediction models as medical devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Kuntz
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Tanja Jutzi
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Höhn
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lennard Kiehl
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Alwers
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Department of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Charité University Medicine and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Steeb T, Wessely A, Petzold A, Brinker TJ, Schmitz L, Leiter U, Garbe C, Schöffski O, Berking C, Heppt MV. Evaluation of Long-term Clearance Rates of Interventions for Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:1066-1077. [PMID: 34347015 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Importance Multiple interventions are available for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). However, most randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses focus on short-term efficacy outcomes. Objective To investigate and synthesize the long-term efficacy (≥12 months) of interventions for AK from parallel-arm randomized clinical trials. Data Sources Searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and Central were conducted from inception until April 6, 2020. The reference lists of the included studies and pertinent trial registers were hand searched. The study was completed February 27, 2021. Study Selection Two reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of 2741 records. Finally, 17 published reports (original studies and follow-up reports) referring to 15 independent randomized clinical trials with an overall sample size of 4252 patients were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data on study, patient, and intervention characteristics. Network meta-analysis (NMA) of each outcome was conducted with a frequentist approach. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidance for NMA was used to assess the certainty of evidence. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials was used to evaluate the methodologic quality. Main Outcomes and Measures Participant complete clearance, participant partial clearance, and lesion-specific clearance were the outcomes, with each assessed at least 12 months after the end of treatment. Results Data from 15 independent randomized clinical trials including 4252 patients were extracted and synthesized. Ten studies were included in an NMA for the outcome of participant complete clearance, with photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinate (ALA-PDT) showing the most favorable risk ratio (RR) compared with placebo (RR, 8.06; 95% CI, 2.07-31.37; GRADE, moderate), followed by imiquimod, 5% (RR, 5.98; 95% CI, 2.26-15.84; GRADE, very low), photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) (RR, 5.95; 95% CI, 1.21-29.41; GRADE, low), and cryosurgery (RR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.36-16.66; GRADE, very low). Similarly, ALA-PDT had the highest RR in the NMA for lesion-specific clearance (RR, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.49-10.33; GRADE, moderate). No NMA was possible for participant partial clearance owing to poor reporting of this outcome. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and network meta-analysis found that therapy including ALA-PDT, imiquimod, 5%, MAL-PDT, and cryosurgery was associated with significant long-term efficacy in the NMA. This study provides data for a possible use in an evidence-based framework for selecting interventions with sustained lesion clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lutz Schmitz
- Department of Dermatology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.,Institute of Dermatopathology, MVZ Corius DermPathBonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Schöffski
- School of Business, Economics and Society, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Brinker TJ, Kiehl L, Schmitt M, Jutzi TB, Krieghoff-Henning EI, Krahl D, Kutzner H, Gholam P, Haferkamp S, Klode J, Schadendorf D, Hekler A, Fröhling S, Kather JN, Haggenmüller S, von Kalle C, Heppt M, Hilke F, Ghoreschi K, Tiemann M, Wehkamp U, Hauschild A, Weichenthal M, Utikal JS. Deep learning approach to predict sentinel lymph node status directly from routine histology of primary melanoma tumours. Eur J Cancer 2021; 154:227-234. [PMID: 34298373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM Sentinel lymph node status is a central prognostic factor for melanomas. However, the surgical excision involves some risks for affected patients. In this study, we therefore aimed to develop a digital biomarker that can predict lymph node metastasis non-invasively from digitised H&E slides of primary melanoma tumours. METHODS A total of 415 H&E slides from primary melanoma tumours with known sentinel node (SN) status from three German university hospitals and one private pathological practice were digitised (150 SN positive/265 SN negative). Two hundred ninety-one slides were used to train artificial neural networks (ANNs). The remaining 124 slides were used to test the ability of the ANNs to predict sentinel status. ANNs were trained and/or tested on data sets that were matched or not matched between SN-positive and SN-negative cases for patient age, ulceration, and tumour thickness, factors that are known to correlate with lymph node status. RESULTS The best accuracy was achieved by an ANN that was trained and tested on unmatched cases (61.8% ± 0.2%) area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). In contrast, ANNs that were trained and/or tested on matched cases achieved (55.0% ± 3.5%) AUROC or less. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that the image classifier can predict lymph node status to some, albeit so far not clinically relevant, extent. It may do so by mostly detecting equivalents of factors on histological slides that are already known to correlate with lymph node status. Our results provide a basis for future research with larger data cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Lennard Kiehl
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja B Jutzi
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva I Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Krahl
- Private Laboratory of Dermatohistopathology, Mönchhofstraße 52, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Kutzner
- Dermatopathology Laboratory, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Patrick Gholam
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg. Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Klode
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Sarah Haggenmüller
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Department of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Charité University Medicine and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franz Hilke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ulrike Wehkamp
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wessels F, Schmitt M, Krieghoff-Henning E, Jutzi T, Worst TS, Waldbillig F, Neuberger M, Maron RC, Steeg M, Gaiser T, Hekler A, Utikal JS, von Kalle C, Fröhling S, Michel MS, Nuhn P, Brinker TJ. Deep learning approach to predict lymph node metastasis directly from primary tumour histology in prostate cancer. BJU Int 2021; 128:352-360. [PMID: 33706408 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a new digital biomarker based on the analysis of primary tumour tissue by a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in a cohort matched for already established risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained primary tumour slides from 218 patients (102 N+; 116 N0), matched for Gleason score, tumour size, venous invasion, perineural invasion and age, who underwent radical prostatectomy were selected to train a CNN and evaluate its ability to predict LN status. RESULTS With 10 models trained with the same data, a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.678-0.682) and a mean balanced accuracy of 61.37% (95% CI 60.05-62.69%) was achieved. The mean sensitivity and specificity was 53.09% (95% CI 49.77-56.41%) and 69.65% (95% CI 68.21-71.1%), respectively. These results were confirmed via cross-validation. The probability score for LNM prediction was significantly higher on image sections from N+ samples (mean [SD] N+ probability score 0.58 [0.17] vs 0.47 [0.15] N0 probability score, P = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, the probability score of the CNN (odds ratio [OR] 1.04 per percentage probability, 95% CI 1.02-1.08; P = 0.04) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 11.73, 95% CI 3.96-35.7; P < 0.001) proved to be independent predictors for LNM. CONCLUSION In our present study, CNN-based image analyses showed promising results as a potential novel low-cost method to extract relevant prognostic information directly from H&E histology to predict the LN status of patients with prostate cancer. Our ubiquitously available technique might contribute to an improved LN status prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Wessels
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Jutzi
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas S Worst
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank Waldbillig
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Manuel Neuberger
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Roman C Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Steeg
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Timo Gaiser
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Department of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maurice S Michel
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Philipp Nuhn
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Loeffler CML, Ortiz Bruechle N, Jung M, Seillier L, Rose M, Laleh NG, Knuechel R, Brinker TJ, Trautwein C, Gaisa NT, Kather JN. Artificial Intelligence-based Detection of FGFR3 Mutational Status Directly from Routine Histology in Bladder Cancer: A Possible Preselection for Molecular Testing? Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:472-479. [PMID: 33895087 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor treatment has become the first clinically approved targeted therapy in bladder cancer. However, it requires previous molecular testing of each patient, which is costly and not ubiquitously available. OBJECTIVE To determine whether an artificial intelligence system is able to predict mutations of the FGFR3 gene directly from routine histology slides of bladder cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We trained a deep learning network to detect FGFR3 mutations on digitized slides of muscle-invasive bladder cancers stained with hematoxylin and eosin from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n = 327) and validated the algorithm on the "Aachen" cohort (n = 182; n = 121 pT2-4, n = 34 stroma-invasive pT1, and n = 27 noninvasive pTa tumors). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) for mutation detection. Performance of the deep learning system was compared with visual scoring by an uropathologist. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In the TCGA cohort, FGFR3 mutations were detected with an AUROC of 0.701 (p < 0.0001). In the Aachen cohort, FGFR3 mutants were found with an AUROC of 0.725 (p < 0.0001). When trained on TCGA, the network generalized to the Aachen cohort, and detected FGFR3 mutants with an AUROC of 0.625 (p = 0.0112). A subgroup analysis and histological evaluation found highest accuracy in papillary growth, luminal gene expression subtypes, females, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II tumors. In a head-to-head comparison, the deep learning system outperformed the uropathologist in detecting FGFR3 mutants. CONCLUSIONS Our computer-based artificial intelligence system was able to detect genetic alterations of the FGFR3 gene of bladder cancer patients directly from histological slides. In the future, this system could be used to preselect patients for further molecular testing. However, analyses of larger, multicenter, muscle-invasive bladder cancer cohorts are now needed in order to validate and extend our findings. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report, a computer-based artificial intelligence (AI) system was applied to histological slides to predict genetic alterations of the FGFR3 gene in bladder cancer. We found that the AI system was able to find the alteration with high accuracy. In the future, this system could be used to preselect patients for further molecular testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Max Jung
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lancelot Seillier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael Rose
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Ruth Knuechel
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Trautwein
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nadine T Gaisa
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Steeb T, Wessely A, Petzold A, Brinker TJ, Schmitz L, Schöffski O, Berking C, Heppt MV. Long-term recurrence rates of actinic keratosis: A systematic review and pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 86:1116-1119. [PMID: 33872716 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lutz Schmitz
- Department of Dermatology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany; Institute of Dermatopathology, Bonn, Germany
| | - Oliver Schöffski
- School of Business, Economics and Society, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Höhn J, Krieghoff-Henning E, Jutzi TB, von Kalle C, Utikal JS, Meier F, Gellrich FF, Hobelsberger S, Hauschild A, Schlager JG, French L, Heinzerling L, Schlaak M, Ghoreschi K, Hilke FJ, Poch G, Kutzner H, Heppt MV, Haferkamp S, Sondermann W, Schadendorf D, Schilling B, Goebeler M, Hekler A, Fröhling S, Lipka DB, Kather JN, Krahl D, Ferrara G, Haggenmüller S, Brinker TJ. Combining CNN-based histologic whole slide image analysis and patient data to improve skin cancer classification. Eur J Cancer 2021; 149:94-101. [PMID: 33838393 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians and pathologists traditionally use patient data in addition to clinical examination to support their diagnoses. OBJECTIVES We investigated whether a combination of histologic whole slides image (WSI) analysis based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and commonly available patient data (age, sex and anatomical site of the lesion) in a binary melanoma/nevus classification task could increase the performance compared with CNNs alone. METHODS We used 431 WSIs from two different laboratories and analysed the performance of classifiers that used the image or patient data individually or three common fusion techniques. Furthermore, we tested a naive combination of patient data and an image classifier: for cases interpreted as 'uncertain' (CNN output score <0.7), the decision of the CNN was replaced by the decision of the patient data classifier. RESULTS The CNN on its own achieved the best performance (mean ± standard deviation of five individual runs) with AUROC of 92.30% ± 0.23% and balanced accuracy of 83.17% ± 0.38%. While the classification performance was not significantly improved in general by any of the tested fusions, naive strategy of replacing the image classifier with the patient data classifier on slides with low output scores improved balanced accuracy to 86.72% ± 0.36%. CONCLUSION In most cases, the CNN on its own was so accurate that patient data integration did not provide any benefit. However, incorporating patient data for lesions that were classified by the CNN with low 'confidence' improved balanced accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Höhn
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja B Jutzi
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Department of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Charité University Medicine and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank F Gellrich
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sarah Hobelsberger
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Kiel, Germany
| | - Justin G Schlager
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lars French
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz J Hilke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriela Poch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heinz Kutzner
- Dermatopathology Laboratory, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Goebeler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Section Translational Cancer Epigenomics, Division Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Daniel B Lipka
- Section Translational Cancer Epigenomics, Division Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Dieter Krahl
- Private Laboratory of Dermatohistopathology, Mönchhofstraße 52, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Gerardo Ferrara
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Macerata General Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Sarah Haggenmüller
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Maron RC, Hekler A, Krieghoff-Henning E, Schmitt M, Schlager JG, Utikal JS, Brinker TJ. Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e21695. [PMID: 33764307 PMCID: PMC8074854 DOI: 10.2196/21695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Studies have shown that artificial intelligence achieves similar or better performance than dermatologists in specific dermoscopic image classification tasks. However, artificial intelligence is susceptible to the influence of confounding factors within images (eg, skin markings), which can lead to false diagnoses of cancerous skin lesions. Image segmentation can remove lesion-adjacent confounding factors but greatly change the image representation. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 2 image classification workflows where images were either segmented or left unprocessed before the subsequent training and evaluation of a binary skin lesion classifier. Methods Separate binary skin lesion classifiers (nevus vs melanoma) were trained and evaluated on segmented and unsegmented dermoscopic images. For a more informative result, separate classifiers were trained on 2 distinct training data sets (human against machine [HAM] and International Skin Imaging Collaboration [ISIC]). Each training run was repeated 5 times. The mean performance of the 5 runs was evaluated on a multi-source test set (n=688) consisting of a holdout and an external component. Results Our findings showed that when trained on HAM, the segmented classifiers showed a higher overall balanced accuracy (75.6% [SD 1.1%]) than the unsegmented classifiers (66.7% [SD 3.2%]), which was significant in 4 out of 5 runs (P<.001). The overall balanced accuracy was numerically higher for the unsegmented ISIC classifiers (78.3% [SD 1.8%]) than for the segmented ISIC classifiers (77.4% [SD 1.5%]), which was significantly different in 1 out of 5 runs (P=.004). Conclusions Image segmentation does not result in overall performance decrease but it causes the beneficial removal of lesion-adjacent confounding factors. Thus, it is a viable option to address the negative impact that confounding factors have on deep learning models in dermatology. However, the segmentation step might introduce new pitfalls, which require further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman C Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Justin G Schlager
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Krause J, Grabsch HI, Kloor M, Jendrusch M, Echle A, Buelow RD, Boor P, Luedde T, Brinker TJ, Trautwein C, Pearson AT, Quirke P, Jenniskens J, Offermans K, van den Brandt PA, Kather JN. Deep learning detects genetic alterations in cancer histology generated by adversarial networks. J Pathol 2021; 254:70-79. [PMID: 33565124 DOI: 10.1002/path.5638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Deep learning can detect microsatellite instability (MSI) from routine histology images in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, ethical and legal barriers impede sharing of images and genetic data, hampering development of new algorithms for detection of MSI and other biomarkers. We hypothesized that histology images synthesized by conditional generative adversarial networks (CGANs) retain information about genetic alterations. To test this, we developed a 'histology CGAN' which was trained on 256 patients (training cohort 1) and 1457 patients (training cohort 2). The CGAN synthesized 10 000 synthetic MSI and non-MSI images which contained a range of tissue types and were deemed realistic by trained observers in a blinded study. Subsequently, we trained a deep learning detector of MSI on real or synthetic images and evaluated the performance of MSI detection in a held-out set of 142 patients. When trained on real images from training cohort 1, this system achieved an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.742 [0.681, 0.854]. Training on the larger cohort 2 only marginally improved the AUROC to 0.757 [0.707, 0.869]. Training on purely synthetic data resulted in an AUROC of 0.743 [0.658, 0.801]. Training on both real and synthetic data further increased AUROC to 0.777 [0.715, 0.821]. We conclude that synthetic histology images retain information reflecting underlying genetic alterations in colorectal cancer. Using synthetic instead of real images to train deep learning systems yields non-inferior classifiers. This approach can be used to create large shareable data sets or to augment small data sets with rare molecular features. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremias Krause
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Heike I Grabsch
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Jendrusch
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amelie Echle
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Roman David Buelow
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Peter Boor
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Tom Luedde
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Trautwein
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Josien Jenniskens
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kelly Offermans
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Piet A van den Brandt
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Brinker TJ, Faria BL, de Faria OM, Klode J, Schadendorf D, Utikal JS, Mons U, Krieghoff-Henning E, Lisboa OC, Oliveira ACC, Lino HA, Bernardes-Souza B. Effect of a Face-Aging Mobile App-Based Intervention on Skin Cancer Protection Behavior in Secondary Schools in Brazil: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 156:737-745. [PMID: 32374352 PMCID: PMC7203674 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Question Can a face-aging mobile app improve the skin cancer protection behavior of
secondary school students? Findings In this cluster-randomized clinical trial of 52 school classes with 1573
Brazilian pupils, meaningful improvements were observed in sunscreen use,
tanning behavior, and skin self-examinations 3 to 6 months after an
intervention using a face-aging app compared with the nonintervention
group. Meaning Face-aging apps may be useful tools to increase skin cancer protection in
adolescents and thereby decrease skin cancer risk. Importance Because exposure to UV radiation early in life is an important risk factor
for melanoma development, reducing UV exposure in children and adolescents
is of paramount importance. New interventions are urgently required. Objective To determine the effect of the free face-aging mobile app Sunface on the skin
cancer protection behavior of adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants This cluster-randomized clinical trial included a single intervention and a
6-month follow-up from February 1 to November 30, 2018. Randomization was
performed on the class level in 52 school classes within 8 public secondary
schools (grades 9-12) in Itauna, Southeast Brazil. Data were analyzed from
May 1 to October 10, 2019. Interventions In a classroom seminar delivered by medical students, adolescents’
selfies were altered by the app to show UV effects on their future faces and
were shown in front of their class, accompanied by information about UV
protection. Information about relevant parameters was collected via
anonymous questionnaires before and 3 and 6 months after the
intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point of the study was the difference in daily sunscreen use
at 6 months of follow-up. Secondary end points included the difference in
daily sunscreen use at 3 months of follow-up, at least 1 skin
self-examination within 6 months, and at least 1 tanning session in the
preceding 30 days. All analyses were predefined and based on intention to
treat. Cluster effects were taken into account. Results Participants included 1573 pupils (812 girls [51.6%] and 761 boys [48.4%];
mean [SD] age, 15.9 [1.3] years) from 52 school classes. Daily sunscreen use
increased from 110 of 734 pupils (15.0%) to 139 of 607 (22.9%;
P < .001) at the 6-month follow-up in
the intervention group. The proportion of pupils performing at least 1 skin
self-examination in the intervention group rose from 184 of 734 (25.1%) to
300 of 607 (49.4%; P < .001). Use of tanning
decreased from 138 of 734 pupils (18.8%) to 92 of 607 (15.2%;
P = .04). No significant changes were
observed in the control group. The intervention was more effective for
female students (number needed to treat for the primary end point: 8 for
girls and 31 for boys). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that interventions based on face-aging apps may
increase skin cancer protection behavior in Brazilian adolescents. Further
studies are required to maximize the effect and to investigate the
generalizability of the effects. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03178240
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titus J Brinker
- Department of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Joachim Klode
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Mons
- Cancer Prevention Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Department of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hornung A, Steeb T, Wessely A, Brinker TJ, Breakell T, Erdmann M, Berking C, Heppt MV. The Value of Total Body Photography for the Early Detection of Melanoma: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:1726. [PMID: 33578996 PMCID: PMC7916771 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Early detection of melanoma is critical to reduce the mortality and morbidity rates of this tumor. Total body photography (TBP) may aid in the early detection of melanoma. To summarize the current evidence on TBP for the early detection of melanoma, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for eligible records up to 6th August 2020. Outcomes of interest included melanoma incidence, incisional and excisional biopsy rates, as well as the Breslow's index of detected tumors. Results from individual studies were described qualitatively. The risks of bias and applicability of the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist. In total, 14 studies published between 1997 and 2020 with an overall sample size of n = 12082 (range 100-4692) were included in the qualitative analysis. Individuals undergoing TBP showed a trend towards a lower Breslow's thickness and a higher proportion of in situ melanomas compared to those without TBP. The number needed to excise one melanoma varied from 3:1 to 14.3:1 and was better for lesions that arose de novo than for tracked ones. The included studies were judged to be of unclear methodological concern with specific deficiencies in the domains "flow and timing" and "reference standard". The use of TBP can improve the early detection of melanoma in high-risk populations. Future studies are warranted to reduce the heterogeneity of phenotypic risk factor definition and the technical implementation of TBP. Artificial intelligence-assisted analysis of images derived from 3-D TBP systems and digital dermoscopy may further improve the early detection of melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annkathrin Hornung
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.H.); (T.S.); (A.W.); (T.B.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Theresa Steeb
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.H.); (T.S.); (A.W.); (T.B.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.H.); (T.S.); (A.W.); (T.B.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Titus J. Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Thomas Breakell
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.H.); (T.S.); (A.W.); (T.B.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Erdmann
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.H.); (T.S.); (A.W.); (T.B.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.H.); (T.S.); (A.W.); (T.B.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V. Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.H.); (T.S.); (A.W.); (T.B.); (M.E.); (C.B.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen—European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kutzner H, Jutzi TB, Krahl D, Krieghoff‐Henning EI, Heppt MV, Hekler A, Schmitt M, Maron RCR, Fröhling S, Kalle C, Brinker TJ. Überdiagnose von Melanomen – Ursachen, Konsequenzen und Lösungsansätze. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2020; 18:1236-1244. [DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14233_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tanja B. Jutzi
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie (DBO), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) Heidelberg
| | - Dieter Krahl
- Privates Labor für Dermatohistopathologie Mönchhofstraße 52 Heidelberg
| | - Eva I. Krieghoff‐Henning
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie (DBO), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) Heidelberg
| | | | - Achim Hekler
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie (DBO), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) Heidelberg
| | - Max Schmitt
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie (DBO), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) Heidelberg
| | - Roman C. R. Maron
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie (DBO), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) Heidelberg
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie (DBO), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) Heidelberg
| | - Christof Kalle
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) und Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| | - Titus J. Brinker
- Nachwuchsgruppe Digitale Biomarker für die Onkologie (DBO), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) Heidelberg
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Maron RC, Utikal JS, Hekler A, Hauschild A, Sattler E, Sondermann W, Haferkamp S, Schilling B, Heppt MV, Jansen P, Reinholz M, Franklin C, Schmitt L, Hartmann D, Krieghoff-Henning E, Schmitt M, Weichenthal M, von Kalle C, Fröhling S, Brinker TJ. Artificial Intelligence and Its Effect on Dermatologists' Accuracy in Dermoscopic Melanoma Image Classification: Web-Based Survey Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18091. [PMID: 32915161 PMCID: PMC7519424 DOI: 10.2196/18091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early detection of melanoma can be lifesaving but this remains a challenge. Recent diagnostic studies have revealed the superiority of artificial intelligence (AI) in classifying dermoscopic images of melanoma and nevi, concluding that these algorithms should assist a dermatologist's diagnoses. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate whether AI support improves the accuracy and overall diagnostic performance of dermatologists in the dichotomous image-based discrimination between melanoma and nevus. METHODS Twelve board-certified dermatologists were presented disjoint sets of 100 unique dermoscopic images of melanomas and nevi (total of 1200 unique images), and they had to classify the images based on personal experience alone (part I) and with the support of a trained convolutional neural network (CNN, part II). Additionally, dermatologists were asked to rate their confidence in their final decision for each image. RESULTS While the mean specificity of the dermatologists based on personal experience alone remained almost unchanged (70.6% vs 72.4%; P=.54) with AI support, the mean sensitivity and mean accuracy increased significantly (59.4% vs 74.6%; P=.003 and 65.0% vs 73.6%; P=.002, respectively) with AI support. Out of the 10% (10/94; 95% CI 8.4%-11.8%) of cases where dermatologists were correct and AI was incorrect, dermatologists on average changed to the incorrect answer for 39% (4/10; 95% CI 23.2%-55.6%) of cases. When dermatologists were incorrect and AI was correct (25/94, 27%; 95% CI 24.0%-30.1%), dermatologists changed their answers to the correct answer for 46% (11/25; 95% CI 33.1%-58.4%) of cases. Additionally, the dermatologists' average confidence in their decisions increased when the CNN confirmed their decision and decreased when the CNN disagreed, even when the dermatologists were correct. Reported values are based on the mean of all participants. Whenever absolute values are shown, the denominator and numerator are approximations as every dermatologist ended up rating a varying number of images due to a quality control step. CONCLUSIONS The findings of our study show that AI support can improve the overall accuracy of the dermatologists in the dichotomous image-based discrimination between melanoma and nevus. This supports the argument for AI-based tools to aid clinicians in skin lesion classification and provides a rationale for studies of such classifiers in real-life settings, wherein clinicians can integrate additional information such as patient age and medical history into their decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman C Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Kiel, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Elke Sattler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Philipp Jansen
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Markus Reinholz
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Cindy Franklin
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Laurenz Schmitt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Daniela Hartmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Kiel, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Department of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Charité University Medicine and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kutzner H, Jutzi TB, Krahl D, Krieghoff-Henning EI, Heppt MV, Hekler A, Schmitt M, Maron RCR, Fröhling S, von Kalle C, Brinker TJ. Overdiagnosis of melanoma - causes, consequences and solutions. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2020; 18:1236-1243. [PMID: 32841508 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is the skin tumor that causes most deaths in Germany. At an early stage, melanoma is well treatable, so early detection is essential. However, the skin cancer screening program in Germany has been criticized because although melanomas have been diagnosed more frequently since introduction of the program, the mortality from malignant melanoma has not decreased. This indicates that the observed increase in melanoma diagnoses be due to overdiagnosis, i.e. to the detection of lesions that would never have created serious health problems for the patients. One of the reasons is the challenging distinction between some benign and malignant lesions. In addition, there may be lesions that are biologically equivocal, and other lesions that are classified as malignant according to current criteria, but that grow so slowly that they would never have posed a threat to patient's life. So far, these "indolent" melanomas cannot be identified reliably due to a lack of biomarkers. Moreover, the likelihood that an in-situ melanoma will progress to an invasive tumor still cannot be determined with any certainty. When benign lesions are diagnosed as melanoma, the consequences are unnecessary psychological and physical stress for the affected patients and incurred therapy costs. Vice versa, underdiagnoses in the sense of overlooked melanomas can adversely affect patients' prognoses and may necessitate more intense therapies. Novel diagnostic options could reduce the number of over- and underdiagnoses and contribute to more objective diagnoses in borderline cases. One strategy that has yielded promising results in pilot studies is the use of artificial intelligence-based diagnostic tools. However, these applications still await translation into clinical and pathological routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tanja B Jutzi
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Krahl
- Private Laboratory for Dermatohistopathology, Mönchhofstraße 52, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva I Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roman C R Maron
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) and Charité-University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology group (DBO), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Izar B, Tirosh I, Stover EH, Wakiro I, Cuoco MS, Alter I, Rodman C, Leeson R, Su MJ, Shah P, Iwanicki M, Walker SR, Kanodia A, Melms JC, Mei S, Lin JR, Porter CBM, Slyper M, Waldman J, Jerby-Arnon L, Ashenberg O, Brinker TJ, Mills C, Rogava M, Vigneau S, Sorger PK, Garraway LA, Konstantinopoulos PA, Liu JF, Matulonis U, Johnson BE, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Rotem A, Regev A. A single-cell landscape of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Med 2020; 26:1271-1279. [PMID: 32572264 PMCID: PMC7723336 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0926-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Malignant abdominal fluid (ascites) frequently develops in women with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and is associated with drug resistance and a poor prognosis1. To comprehensively characterize the HGSOC ascites ecosystem, we used single-cell RNA sequencing to profile ~11,000 cells from 22 ascites specimens from 11 patients with HGSOC. We found significant inter-patient variability in the composition and functional programs of ascites cells, including immunomodulatory fibroblast sub-populations and dichotomous macrophage populations. We found that the previously described immunoreactive and mesenchymal subtypes of HGSOC, which have prognostic implications, reflect the abundance of immune infiltrates and fibroblasts rather than distinct subsets of malignant cells2. Malignant cell variability was partly explained by heterogeneous copy number alteration patterns or expression of a stemness program. Malignant cells shared expression of inflammatory programs that were largely recapitulated in single-cell RNA sequencing of ~35,000 cells from additionally collected samples, including three ascites, two primary HGSOC tumors and three patient ascites-derived xenograft models. Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway, which was expressed in both malignant cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts, had potent anti-tumor activity in primary short-term cultures and patient-derived xenograft models. Our work contributes to resolving the HSGOC landscape3-5 and provides a resource for the development of novel therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Izar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Research at Harvard, Boston, MA, USA
- Laboratory for Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Itay Tirosh
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Elizabeth H Stover
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Isaac Wakiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael S Cuoco
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Idan Alter
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Christopher Rodman
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Rachel Leeson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mei-Ju Su
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Laboratory for Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Parin Shah
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marcin Iwanicki
- Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA
| | - Sarah R Walker
- Molecular, Cellular, and Biomedical Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
| | - Abhay Kanodia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Johannes C Melms
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shaolin Mei
- Laboratory for Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jia-Ren Lin
- Laboratory for Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caroline B M Porter
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Michal Slyper
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Julia Waldman
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Livnat Jerby-Arnon
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Orr Ashenberg
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Caitlin Mills
- Laboratory for Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meri Rogava
- Laboratory for Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sébastien Vigneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter K Sorger
- Laboratory for Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Joyce F Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ursula Matulonis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bruce E Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Asaf Rotem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Aviv Regev
- Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Research at MIT, Boston, MA, USA.
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jutzi TB, Krieghoff-Henning EI, Holland-Letz T, Utikal JS, Hauschild A, Schadendorf D, Sondermann W, Fröhling S, Hekler A, Schmitt M, Maron RC, Brinker TJ. Artificial Intelligence in Skin Cancer Diagnostics: The Patients' Perspective. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7:233. [PMID: 32671078 PMCID: PMC7326111 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in numerous experimental studies, particularly in skin cancer diagnostics. Translation of these findings into the clinic is the logical next step. This translation can only be successful if patients' concerns and questions are addressed suitably. We therefore conducted a survey to evaluate the patients' view of artificial intelligence in melanoma diagnostics in Germany, with a particular focus on patients with a history of melanoma. Participants and Methods: A web-based questionnaire was designed using LimeSurvey, sent by e-mail to university hospitals and melanoma support groups and advertised on social media. The anonymous questionnaire evaluated patients' expectations and concerns toward artificial intelligence in general as well as their attitudes toward different application scenarios. Descriptive analysis was performed with expression of categorical variables as percentages and 95% confidence intervals. Statistical tests were performed to investigate associations between sociodemographic data and selected items of the questionnaire. Results: 298 individuals (154 with a melanoma diagnosis, 143 without) responded to the questionnaire. About 94% [95% CI = 0.91–0.97] of respondents supported the use of artificial intelligence in medical approaches. 88% [95% CI = 0.85–0.92] would even make their own health data anonymously available for the further development of AI-based applications in medicine. Only 41% [95% CI = 0.35–0.46] of respondents were amenable to the use of artificial intelligence as stand-alone system, 94% [95% CI = 0.92–0.97] to its use as assistance system for physicians. In sub-group analyses, only minor differences were detectable. Respondents with a previous history of melanoma were more amenable to the use of AI applications for early detection even at home. They would prefer an application scenario where physician and AI classify the lesions independently. With respect to AI-based applications in medicine, patients were concerned about insufficient data protection, impersonality and susceptibility to errors, but expected faster, more precise and unbiased diagnostics, less diagnostic errors and support for physicians. Conclusions: The vast majority of participants exhibited a positive attitude toward the use of artificial intelligence in melanoma diagnostics, especially as an assistance system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja B Jutzi
- Division of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva I Krieghoff-Henning
- Division of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tim Holland-Letz
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen Sven Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Division of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Hekler
- Division of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Division of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roman C Maron
- Division of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Division of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hekler A, Kather JN, Krieghoff-Henning E, Utikal JS, Meier F, Gellrich FF, Upmeier Zu Belzen J, French L, Schlager JG, Ghoreschi K, Wilhelm T, Kutzner H, Berking C, Heppt MV, Haferkamp S, Sondermann W, Schadendorf D, Schilling B, Izar B, Maron R, Schmitt M, Fröhling S, Lipka DB, Brinker TJ. Effects of Label Noise on Deep Learning-Based Skin Cancer Classification. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7:177. [PMID: 32435646 PMCID: PMC7218064 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that deep learning is capable of classifying dermatoscopic images at least as well as dermatologists. However, many studies in skin cancer classification utilize non-biopsy-verified training images. This imperfect ground truth introduces a systematic error, but the effects on classifier performance are currently unknown. Here, we systematically examine the effects of label noise by training and evaluating convolutional neural networks (CNN) with 804 images of melanoma and nevi labeled either by dermatologists or by biopsy. The CNNs are evaluated on a test set of 384 images by means of 4-fold cross validation comparing the outputs with either the corresponding dermatological or the biopsy-verified diagnosis. With identical ground truths of training and test labels, high accuracies with 75.03% (95% CI: 74.39–75.66%) for dermatological and 73.80% (95% CI: 73.10–74.51%) for biopsy-verified labels can be achieved. However, if the CNN is trained and tested with different ground truths, accuracy drops significantly to 64.53% (95% CI: 63.12–65.94%, p < 0.01) on a non-biopsy-verified and to 64.24% (95% CI: 62.66–65.83%, p < 0.01) on a biopsy-verified test set. In conclusion, deep learning methods for skin cancer classification are highly sensitive to label noise and future work should use biopsy-verified training images to mitigate this problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Hekler
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob N Kather
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medicine III, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen S Utikal
- Department of Dermatology, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank F Gellrich
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Lars French
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Justin G Schlager
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tabea Wilhelm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heinz Kutzner
- Dermatopathology Laboratory, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sondermann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Bastian Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Izar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Roman Maron
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Cancer Epigenomics, Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel B Lipka
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Cancer Epigenomics, Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jansen P, Stoffels I, Müseler AC, Petri M, Brinker TJ, Schedlowski M, Schadendorf D, Engler H, Klode J. Salivary cortisol levels and anxiety in melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node excision under local anesthesia versus general anesthesia: a prospective study. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:53. [PMID: 32156303 PMCID: PMC7065350 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01823-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node excision (SLNE) can be performed in tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) or general anesthesia (GA). Perioperative cortisol level changes and anxiety are common in surgical interventions and might be influenced by the type of anesthesia. In this study, we intended to determine whether the type of anesthesia impacts the patients' perioperative levels of salivary cortisol (primary outcome) and the feeling of anxiety evaluated by psychological questionnaires (secondary outcome). METHODS All melanoma patients of age undergoing SLNE at the University Hospital Essen, Germany, could be included in the study. Exclusion criteria were patients' intake of glucocorticoids or psychotropic medication during the former 6 months, pregnancy, age under 18 years, and BMI ≥ 30 as salivary cortisol levels were reported to be significantly impacted by obesity and might confound results. RESULTS In total, 111 melanoma patients undergoing SLNE were included in our prospective study between May 2011 and April 2017 and could choose between TLA or GA. Salivary cortisol levels were measured three times intraoperatively, twice on the third and second preoperative day and twice on the second postoperative day. To assess anxiety, patients completed questionnaires (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)) perioperatively. Patients of both groups exhibited comparable baseline levels of cortisol and perioperative anxiety levels. Independent of the type of anesthesia, all patients showed significantly increasing salivary cortisol level from baseline to 30 min before surgery (T3) (TLA: t = 5.07, p < 0.001; GA: t = 3.09, p = 0.006). Post hoc independent t tests showed that the TLA group exhibited significantly higher cortisol concentrations at the beginning of surgery (T4; t = 3.29, p = 0.002) as well as 20 min after incision (T5; t = 277, p = 0.008) compared to the GA group. CONCLUSIONS The type of anesthesia chosen for SLNE surgery significantly affects intraoperative cortisol levels in melanoma patients. Further studies are mandatory to evaluate the relevance of endogenous perioperative cortisol levels on the postoperative clinical course. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00003076, registered 1 May 2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Jansen
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Stoffels
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne-Christine Müseler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Petri
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manfred Schedlowski
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Harald Engler
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Joachim Klode
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. .,West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|