1
|
Yadav S, Couch FJ, Domchek SM. Germline Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Current Concepts in Risk Evaluation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2024; 14:a041318. [PMID: 38151326 PMCID: PMC11293548 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has significantly improved over the past two decades. In addition to BRCA1/2, pathogenic variants in several other DNA-repair genes have been shown to increase the risks of breast and ovarian cancer. The magnitude of cancer risk is impacted not only by the gene involved, but also by family history of cancer, polygenic risk scores, and, in certain genes, pathogenic variant type or location. While estimates of breast and ovarian cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants are available, these are predominantly based on studies of high-risk populations with young age at diagnosis of cancer, multiple primary cancers, or family history of cancer. More recently, breast cancer risk for germline pathogenic variant carriers has been estimated from population-based studies. Here, we provide a review of the field of germline genetic testing and risk evaluation for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in high-risk and population-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhartha Yadav
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55901, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doose M, Mollica MA, Acevedo AM, Tesauro G, Gallicchio L, Reed C, Guida J, Maher ME, Srinivasan S, Tonorezos E. Advancing health equity in cancer survivorship research: National Institutes of Health 2017-2022 portfolio review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:1238-1245. [PMID: 38544292 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communities and researchers have called for a paradigm shift from describing health disparities to a health equity research agenda that addresses structural drivers. Therefore, we examined whether the cancer survivorship research portfolio has made this shift. METHODS We identified grants focused on populations experiencing health disparities from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cancer Survivorship Research Portfolio (N = 724), Fiscal Years 2017-2022. Grant characteristics were abstracted, drivers of health disparities were mapped onto the levels and domains of influence, and opportunities for future research were identified. RESULTS A total of 147 survivorship grants focused on health disparities were identified, of which 73.5% of grants focused on survivors from racial and ethnic minoritized groups, 25.9% living in rural areas, 24.5% socioeconomically disadvantaged, and 2.7% sexual and gender minority groups. Study designs were 51.0% observational; 82.3% of grants measured or intervened on at least 1 individual-level of influence compared to higher levels of influence (32.7% interpersonal, 41.5% institutional and community, and 12.2% societal). Behavioral and health care system domains of influence were commonly represented, especially at the individual level (47.6% and 36.1%, respectively). Less frequently represented was the physical and built environment (12.2%). CONCLUSIONS NIH-funded cancer survivorship research on health disparities is still focused on individual level of influence. However, the proportion of grants examining structural and social drivers as well as the mechanisms that drive disparities in health care and health outcomes among cancer survivors have increased over time. Gaps in funded research on specific populations, cancer types, and focus areas of survivorship science were identified and warrant priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Doose
- Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Michelle A Mollica
- Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Amanda M Acevedo
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Gina Tesauro
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Lisa Gallicchio
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Crystal Reed
- Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Guida
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Molly E Maher
- Office of Cancer Centers, Office of the Director, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Shobha Srinivasan
- Office of the Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Emily Tonorezos
- Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakahara M, Ushiama M, Tanabe N, Gotoh M, Sakamoto H, Yoshida T, Hirata M. Multi-gene panel analysis in BRCA1/2-negative patients suspected of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome: Real-world data from a single institution. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2024. [PMID: 39077936 DOI: 10.1111/jog.16026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
AIM Although BRCA1/2 is most frequently associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), many other related genes have been implicated. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of non-BRCA1/2 genes associated with hereditary cancer predisposition in BRCA1/2-negative patients from the Department of Genetic Medicine and Services with breast and ovarian cancer using a multi-gene panel (MGP) analysis. METHODS We conducted a retrospective MGP analysis (National Cancer Center Onco-Panel for Familial Cancer; NOP_FC) in BRCA1/2-negative patients with breast, ovarian, and overlapping breast/ovarian cancers who visited our genetic counseling between April 2004 and October 2022. RESULTS NOP_FC was performed in 128 of the 390 BRCA test-negative cases (117 breast cancer, 9 ovarian cancer, and 2 overlapping breast/ovarian cancer cases). Among the BRCA1/2-negative patients, nine (7.7%) with breast cancer and one (11%) with ovarian cancer had pathogenic variants (PVs) in non-BRCA1/2 genes associated with breast and ovarian cancers, respectively. Five patients had PVs in RAD51D, two in PALB2, one in BARD1, one in ATM, and one in RAD51C. CONCLUSIONS Additional MGP testing of germline genes associated with hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome in BRCA1/2-negative breast and ovarian cancer patients revealed PVs in non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer- and ovarian cancer-related genes in 7.7% of breast cancer and 11% of ovarian cancer. Therefore, additional testing may provide useful information for subsequent risk-reducing surgery and surveillance in BRCA1/2-negative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Nakahara
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mineko Ushiama
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriko Tanabe
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Gotoh
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromi Sakamoto
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Teruhiko Yoshida
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makoto Hirata
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Giannakeas V, Lim DW, Narod SA. Bilateral Mastectomy and Breast Cancer Mortality. JAMA Oncol 2024:2821596. [PMID: 39052262 PMCID: PMC11273285 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Importance The benefit of bilateral mastectomy for women with unilateral breast cancer in terms of deaths from breast cancer has not been shown. Objectives To estimate the 20-year cumulative risk of breast cancer mortality among women with stage 0 to stage III unilateral breast cancer according to the type of initial surgery performed. Design, Settings, and Participants This cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registry database to identify women with unilateral breast cancer (invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ) who were diagnosed from 2000 to 2019. Three closely matched cohorts of equal size were generated using 1:1:1 matching according to surgical approach. The cohorts were followed up for 20 years for contralateral breast cancer and for breast cancer mortality. The analysis compared the 20-year cumulative risk of breast cancer mortality for women treated with lumpectomy vs unilateral mastectomy vs bilateral mastectomy. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to February 2024. Exposures Type of breast surgery performed (lumpectomy, unilateral mastectomy, or bilateral mastectomy). Main Outcomes and Measures Contralateral breast cancer or breast cancer mortality during the 20-year follow-up period among the groups treated with lumpectomy vs unilateral mastectomy vs bilateral mastectomy. Results The study sample included 661 270 women with unilateral breast cancer (mean [SD] age, 58.7 [11.3] years). After matching, there were 36 028 women in each of the 3 treatment groups. During the 20-year follow-up, there were 766 contralateral breast cancers observed in the lumpectomy group, 728 contralateral breast cancers in the unilateral mastectomy group, and 97 contralateral cancers in the bilateral mastectomy group. The 20-year risk of contralateral breast cancer was 6.9% (95% CI, 6.1%-7.9%) in the lumpectomy-unilateral mastectomy group. The cumulative breast cancer mortality was 32.1% at 15 years after developing a contralateral cancer and was 14.5% for those who did not develop a contralateral cancer (hazard ratio, 4.00; 95% CI, 3.52-4.54, using contralateral breast cancer as a time-dependent covariate). Deaths from breast cancer totaled 3077 women (8.54%) in the lumpectomy group, 3269 women (9.07%) in the unilateral mastectomy group, and 3062 women (8.50%) in the bilateral mastectomy group. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study indicates that the risk of dying of breast cancer increases substantially after experiencing a contralateral breast cancer. Women with breast cancer treated with bilateral mastectomy had a greatly diminished risk of contralateral breast cancer; however, they experienced similar mortality rates as patients treated with lumpectomy or unilateral mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasily Giannakeas
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women’s Age Lab, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David W. Lim
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fabi A, Cortesi L, Duranti S, Cordisco EL, Di Leone A, Terribile D, Paris I, de Belvis AG, Orlandi A, Marazzi F, Muratore M, Garganese G, Fuso P, Paoletti F, Dell'Aquila R, Minucci A, Scambia G, Franceschini G, Masetti R, Genuardi M. Multigenic panels in breast cancer: Clinical utility and management of patients with pathogenic variants other than BRCA1/2. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 201:104431. [PMID: 38977141 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Multigene panels can analyze high and moderate/intermediate penetrance genes that predispose to breast cancer (BC), providing an opportunity to identify at-risk individuals within affected families. However, considering the complexity of different pathogenic variants and correlated clinical manifestations, a multidisciplinary team is needed to effectively manage BC. A classification of pathogenic variants included in multigene panels was presented in this narrative review to evaluate their clinical utility in BC. Clinical management was discussed for each category and focused on BC, including available evidence regarding the multidisciplinary and integrated management of patients with BC. The integration of both genetic testing and counseling is required for customized decisions in therapeutic strategies and preventative initiatives, as well as for a defined multidisciplinary approach, considering the continuous evolution of guidelines and research in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Fabi
- Precision Medicine Unit in Senology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Modena Hospital University, Modena Italy (Cortesi)
| | - Simona Duranti
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Emanuela Lucci Cordisco
- Section of Genomic Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alba Di Leone
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Terribile
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Giulio de Belvis
- Value Lab, Faculty of Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Armando Orlandi
- Unit of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Marazzi
- UOC Oncological Radiotherapy, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Margherita Muratore
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Fuso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Paoletti
- Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Dell'Aquila
- Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Minucci
- Genomics Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park (GSTeP), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Breast Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Genuardi
- Section of Genomic Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patel MM, Adrada BE. Hereditary Breast Cancer: BRCA Mutations and Beyond. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:627-642. [PMID: 38777539 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancers are manifested by pathogenic and likely pathogenic genetic mutations. Penetrance expresses the breast cancer risk associated with these genetic mutations. Although BRCA1/2 are the most widely known genetic mutations associated with breast cancer, numerous additional genes demonstrate high and moderate penetrance for breast cancer. This review describes current genetic testing, details the specific high and moderate penetrance genes for breast cancer and reviews the current approach to screening for breast cancer in patients with these genetic mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miral M Patel
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, CPB5.3208, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Beatriz Elena Adrada
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, CPB5.3208, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abdel-Razeq H, Tamimi F, Iweir S, Sharaf B, Abdel-Razeq S, Salama O, Edaily S, Bani Hani H, Azzam K, Abaza H. Genetic counseling and genetic testing for pathogenic germline mutations among high-risk patients previously diagnosed with breast cancer: a traceback approach. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12820. [PMID: 38834641 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63300-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Genetic counseling and testing are more accessible than ever due to reduced costs, expanding indications and public awareness. Nonetheless, many patients missed the opportunity of genetic counseling and testing due to barriers that existed at that time of their cancer diagnoses. Given the identified implications of pathogenic mutations on patients' treatment and familial outcomes, an opportunity exists to utilize a 'traceback' approach to retrospectively examine their genetic makeup and provide consequent insights to their disease and treatment. In this study, we identified living patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) between July 2007 and January 2022 who would have been eligible for testing, but not tested. Overall, 422 patients met the eligibility criteria, 282 were reached and invited to participate, and germline testing was performed for 238, accounting for 84.4% of those invited. The median age (range) was 39.5 (24-64) years at BC diagnosis and 49 (31-75) years at the date of testing. Genetic testing revealed that 25 (10.5%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants; mostly in BRCA2 and BRCA1. We concluded that long overdue genetic referral through a traceback approach is feasible and effective to diagnose P/LP variants in patients with history of BC who had missed the opportunity of genetic testing, with potential clinical implications for patients and their relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan.
- School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
| | - Faris Tamimi
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Sereen Iweir
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
- CRDF Global, Global Health Mission Area, Amman, Jordan
| | - Baha Sharaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | | | - Osama Salama
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Sarah Edaily
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Hira Bani Hani
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Khansa Azzam
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Haneen Abaza
- Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Apostolova C, Ferroum A, Alhassan B, Prakash I, Basik M, Boileau JF, Martel K, Meterissian S, Villareal Corpuz V, Wong N, Foulkes WD, Wong SM. Timing of genetic testing in BRCA1/2 and PALB2-Associated breast cancer: Preoperative result disclosure increases uptake of risk-reducing mastectomy and reduces unnecessary exposure to radiotherapy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108324. [PMID: 38636249 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The impact of timing of genetic testing on uptake of risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) in affected female BRCA1/2 or PALB2 carriers remains an area of evolving interest, particularly with the introduction of mainstream genetic testing initiatives. METHODS Women with stage I-III breast cancer and a confirmed germline pathogenic variant in BRCA1/2 or PALB2 between 2000 and 2023 were identified from an institutional genetics database. Uptake of RRM was evaluated according to disclosure of genetic testing results before or after index surgery for a first diagnosis of breast cancer. RESULTS The cohort included 287 female BRCA1/2 or PALB2 carriers with a median age of 44 years (IQR, 36-52). Overall, 155 (54 %) carriers received genetic testing results before and 132 (46 %) after index breast surgery. Receipt of genetic testing results before surgery was associated with a higher rate of index bilateral mastectomy (58.7 % vs. 7.6 %, p < 0.001) and a commensurate decrease in adjuvant radiation (41.9 % vs. 74.2 %, p < 0.001). At a median follow up of 4.4 years after genetic testing, 219 (76.3 %) affected carriers had undergone bilateral RRM, including 83.9 % with preoperative knowledge and 67.4 % of patients with postoperative knowledge of their germline pathogenic variant (log rank, p < 0.001). On multivariate regression, disclosure of genetic testing results before index breast surgery was independently associated with long-term uptake of bilateral mastectomy (HR 1.69, 95 % CI 1.21-2.38). CONCLUSION Genetic testing results delivered prior to index breast surgery increase uptake of bilateral RRM in affected BRCA1/2 and PALB2 carriers. Efforts to mainstream genetic testing would help optimize surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Apostolova
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amina Ferroum
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Basmah Alhassan
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ipshita Prakash
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Karyne Martel
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarkis Meterissian
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Nora Wong
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brantley KD, Rosenberg SM, Collins LC, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Warner E, Come SE, Zheng Y, Kirkner GJ, Snow C, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Second Primary Breast Cancer in Young Breast Cancer Survivors. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:718-725. [PMID: 38602683 PMCID: PMC11009864 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Importance Among women diagnosed with primary breast cancer (BC) at or younger than age 40 years, prior data suggest that their risk of a second primary BC (SPBC) is higher than that of women who are older when they develop a first primary BC. Objective To estimate cumulative incidence and characterize risk factors of SPBC among young patients with BC. Design, Setting, and Participants Participants were enrolled in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a prospective study of 1297 women aged 40 years or younger who were diagnosed with stage 0 to III BC from August 2006 to June 2015. Demographic, genetic testing, treatment, and outcome data were collected by patient surveys and medical record review. A time-to-event analysis was used to account for competing risks when determining cumulative incidence of SPBC, and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to evaluate associations between clinical factors and SPBC risk. Data were analyzed from January to May 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The 5- and 10- year cumulative incidence of SPBC. Results In all, 685 women with stage 0 to III BC (mean [SD] age at primary BC diagnosis, 36 [4] years) who underwent unilateral mastectomy or lumpectomy as the primary surgery for BC were included in the analysis. Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 10.0 (7.4-12.1) years, 17 patients (2.5%) developed an SPBC; 2 of these patients had cancer in the ipsilateral breast after lumpectomy. The median (IQR) time from primary BC diagnosis to SPBC was 4.2 (3.3-5.6) years. Among 577 women who underwent genetic testing, the 10-year risk of SPBC was 2.2% for women who did not carry a pathogenic variant (12 of 544) and 8.9% for carriers of a pathogenic variant (3 of 33). In multivariate analyses, the risk of SPBC was higher among PV carriers vs noncarriers (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 5.27; 95% CI, 1.43-19.43) and women with primary in situ BC vs invasive BC (sHR, 5.61; 95% CI, 1.52-20.70). Conclusions Findings of this cohort study suggest that young BC survivors without a germline pathogenic variant have a low risk of developing a SPBC in the first 10 years after diagnosis. Findings from germline genetic testing may inform treatment decision-making and follow-up care considerations in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen D. Brantley
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shoshana M. Rosenberg
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Laura C. Collins
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathryn J. Ruddy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rulla M. Tamimi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Lidia Schapira
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | | | - Ellen Warner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven E. Come
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yue Zheng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Craig Snow
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Ann H. Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Breast Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tsoulaki O, Tischkowitz M, Antoniou AC, Musgrave H, Rea G, Gandhi A, Cox K, Irvine T, Holcombe S, Eccles D, Turnbull C, Cutress R, Archer S, Hanson H. Joint ABS-UKCGG-CanGene-CanVar consensus regarding the use of CanRisk in clinical practice. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:2027-2036. [PMID: 38834743 PMCID: PMC11183136 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02733-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CanRisk tool, which operationalises the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) is used by Clinical Geneticists, Genetic Counsellors, Breast Oncologists, Surgeons and Family History Nurses for breast cancer risk assessments both nationally and internationally. There are currently no guidelines with respect to the day-to-day clinical application of CanRisk and differing inputs to the model can result in different recommendations for practice. METHODS To address this gap, the UK Cancer Genetics Group in collaboration with the Association of Breast Surgery and the CanGene-CanVar programme held a workshop on 16th of May 2023, with the aim of establishing best practice guidelines. RESULTS Using a pre-workshop survey followed by structured discussion and in-meeting polling, we achieved consensus for UK best practice in use of CanRisk in making recommendations for breast cancer surveillance, eligibility for genetic testing and the input of available information to undertake an individualised risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS Whilst consensus recommendations were achieved, the meeting highlighted some of the barriers limiting the use of CanRisk in clinical practice and identified areas that require further work and collaboration with relevant national bodies and policy makers to incorporate wider use of CanRisk into routine breast cancer risk assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Tsoulaki
- St George's University of London, London, UK
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hannah Musgrave
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Gillian Rea
- Northern Ireland Regional Genetics Service, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Ashu Gandhi
- Manchester University Hospitals; Manchester Breast Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Cox
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK
| | | | | | - Diana Eccles
- Department of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Translational Genetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Ramsey Cutress
- University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Somers Research Building, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Stephanie Archer
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- Translational Genetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanabria-Salas MC, Pedroza-Duran A, Díaz-Casas SE, Nuñez Lemus M, Grillo-Ardila CF, Briceño-Morales X, García-Mora M, Ángel-Aristizábal J, Mariño Lozano IF, Suarez Rodríguez RA, Guzmán Abisaab LH. Management and Clinical Outcomes of Breast Cancer in Women Diagnosed with Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in a Clinic-Based Sample from Colombia. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2020. [PMID: 38893140 PMCID: PMC11171067 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate prognosis and survival differences in 82 breast cancer patients with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) treated and followed at the Breast Unit of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Colombia (INC-C) between 2018 and 2021. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years, with 62.2% presenting locally advanced tumors, 47.6% histological grade 3, and 35.4% with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Most carriers, 74.4% (61/82), had PVs in known breast cancer susceptibility genes (i.e., "associated gene carriers" group, considered inherited breast cancer cases): BRCA2 (30), BRCA1 (14), BARD1 (4), RAD51D (3), TP53 (2), PALB2 (2), ATM (2), CHEK2 (1), RAD51C (1), NF1 (1), and PTEN (1). BRCA1-2 represented 53.7%, and homologous recombination DNA damage repair (HR-DDR) genes associated with breast cancer risk accounted for 15.9%. Patients with PVs in non-breast-cancer risk genes were combined in a different category (21/82; 25.6%) (i.e., "non-associated gene carriers" group, considered other breast cancer cases). Median follow-up was 38.1 months, and 24% experienced recurrence, with 90% being distant. The 5-year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) for inherited breast cancer cases was 66.5%, and for other breast cancer cases it was 88.2%. In particular, for carriers of PVs in the BRCA2 gene, it was 37.6%. The 5-year Overall Survival (OS) rates ranged from 68.8% for those with PVs in BRCA2 to 100% for those with PVs in other HR-DDR genes. Further studies are crucial for understanding tumor behavior and therapy response differences among Colombian breast cancer patients with germline PVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Carolina Sanabria-Salas
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Ana Pedroza-Duran
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Sandra E. Díaz-Casas
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Marcela Nuñez Lemus
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Carlos F. Grillo-Ardila
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Avenida Carrera 30 N. 45-3, Bogotá 111321, Colombia;
| | - Ximena Briceño-Morales
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Mauricio García-Mora
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Javier Ángel-Aristizábal
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Iván Fernando Mariño Lozano
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Raúl Alexis Suarez Rodríguez
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Luis Hernán Guzmán Abisaab
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hinić S, Cybulski C, Van der Post RS, Vos JR, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers J, Brugnoletti F, Koene S, Vreede L, van Zelst-Stams WAG, Kets CM, Haadsma M, Spruijt L, Wevers MR, Evans DG, Wimmer K, Schnaiter S, Volk AE, Möllring A, de Putter R, Soikkonen L, Kahre T, Tooming M, de Jong MM, Vaz F, Mensenkamp AR, Genuardi M, Lubinski J, Ligtenberg M, Hoogerbrugge N, de Voer RM. The heterogeneous cancer phenotype of individuals with biallelic germline pathogenic variants in CHEK2. Genet Med 2024; 26:101101. [PMID: 38362852 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Females with biallelic CHEK2 germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) more often develop multiple breast cancers than individuals with monoallelic CHEK2 gPVs. This study is aimed at expanding the knowledge on the occurrence of other malignancies. METHODS Exome sequencing of individuals who developed multiple primary malignancies identified 3 individuals with the CHEK2 (NM_007194.4) c.1100del p.(Thr367MetfsTer15) loss-of-function gPV in a biallelic state. We collected the phenotypes of an additional cohort of individuals with CHEK2 biallelic gPVs (n = 291). RESULTS In total, 157 individuals (53.4%; 157/294 individuals) developed ≥1 (pre)malignancy. The most common (pre)malignancies next to breast cancer were colorectal- (n = 19), thyroid- (n = 19), and prostate (pre)malignancies (n = 12). Females with biallelic CHEK2 loss-of-function gPVs more frequently developed ≥2 (pre)malignancies and at an earlier age compared with females biallelic for the CHEK2 c.470T>C p.(Ile157Thr) missense variant. Furthermore, 26 males (31%; 26/84 males) with CHEK2 biallelic gPVs developed ≥1 (pre)malignancies of 15 origins. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that CHEK2 biallelic gPVs likely increase the susceptibility to develop multiple malignancies in various tissues, both in females and males. However, it is possible that a substantial proportion of individuals with CHEK2 biallelic gPVs is missed as diagnostic testing for CHEK2 often is limited to individuals who developed breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snežana Hinić
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel S Van der Post
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janet R Vos
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Schuurs-Hoeijmakers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fulvia Brugnoletti
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Genomic Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Saskia Koene
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lilian Vreede
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C Marleen Kets
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Haadsma
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Spruijt
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke R Wevers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - D Gareth Evans
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; The University of Manchester, Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomic Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Katharina Wimmer
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Institute of Human Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Simon Schnaiter
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Institute of Human Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alexander E Volk
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Möllring
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robin de Putter
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Leila Soikkonen
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Oulu University Hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tiina Kahre
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Genetics and Personalized Medicine Clinic, Department of Laboratory Genetics, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia; Department of Clinical Genetics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Mikk Tooming
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Genetics and Personalized Medicine Clinic, Department of Laboratory Genetics, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia; Department of Clinical Genetics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Mirjam M de Jong
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Fátima Vaz
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Instituto Português Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Arjen R Mensenkamp
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maurizio Genuardi
- European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Genomic Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Genetics Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn Ligtenberg
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Richarda M de Voer
- Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; European Reference Network for Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cardoso MJ, Poortmans P, Senkus E, Gentilini OD, Houssami N. Breast cancer highlights from 2023: Knowledge to guide practice and future research. Breast 2024; 74:103674. [PMID: 38340683 PMCID: PMC10869942 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This narrative work highlights a selection of published work from 2023 with potential implications for breast cancer practice. We feature publications that have provided new knowledge immediately relevant to patient care or for future research. We also highlight guidelines that have reported evidence-based or consensus recommendations to support practice and evaluation in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. The scope of selected highlights represents various domains and disciplines in cancer control, from prevention to treatment of early and advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria-Joao Cardoso
- Champalimaud Foundation Breast Unit, Lisbon, Portugal; University of Lisbon, Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Elżbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Oreste D Gentilini
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Wiser Healthcare, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Singh P, Agnese D, Amin M, Barrio AV, Botty Van den Bruele A, Burke E, Danforth DN, Dirbas FM, Eladoumikdachi F, Kantor O, Kumar S, Lee MC, Matsen C, Nguyen TT, Ozmen T, Park KU, Plichta JK, Reyna C, Showalter SL, Styblo T, Tranakas N, Weiss A, Laronga C, Boughey J. Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Contralateral Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2212-2223. [PMID: 38261126 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14893-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Rates of contralateral mastectomy (CM) among patients with unilateral breast cancer have been increasing in the United States. In this Society of Surgical Oncology position statement, we review the literature addressing the indications, risks, and benefits of CM since the society's 2017 statement. We held a virtual meeting to outline key topics and then conducted a literature search using PubMed to identify relevant articles. We reviewed the articles and made recommendations based on group consensus. Patients consider CM for many reasons, including concerns regarding the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), desire for improved cosmesis and symmetry, and preferences to avoid ongoing screening, whereas surgeons primarily consider CBC risk when making a recommendation for CM. For patients with a high risk of CBC, CM reduces the risk of new breast cancer, however it is not known to convey an overall survival benefit. Studies evaluating patient satisfaction with CM and reconstruction have yielded mixed results. Imaging with mammography within 12 months before CM is recommended, but routine preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging is not; there is also no evidence to support routine postmastectomy imaging surveillance. Because the likelihood of identifying an occult malignancy during CM is low, routine sentinel lymph node surgery is not recommended. Data on the rates of postoperative complications are conflicting, and such complications may not be directly related to CM. Adjuvant therapy delays due to complications have not been reported. Surgeons can reduce CM rates by encouraging shared decision making and informed discussions incorporating patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puneet Singh
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | | | | - Andrea V Barrio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Erin Burke
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Olga Kantor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shicha Kumar
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Tolga Ozmen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ko Un Park
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anna Weiss
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abdulkareem AA, Shirah BH, Bagabir HA, Haque A, Naseer MI. Whole exome sequencing of a novel homozygous missense variant in PALB2 gene leading to Fanconi anaemia complementation group. Biomed Rep 2024; 20:67. [PMID: 38476606 PMCID: PMC10928473 DOI: 10.3892/br.2024.1756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Partner and localiser of BRCA2 (PALB2), also known as FANCN, is a key tumour suppressor gene in maintaining genome integrity. Monoallelic mutations of PALB2 are associated with breast and overian cancers, while bi-allelic mutations cause Fanconi anaemia (FA). In the present study, whole exome sequencing (WES) identified a novel homozygous missense variant, NM_024675.3: c.3296C>G (p.Thr1099Arg) in PALB2 gene (OMIM: 610355) that caused FA with mild pulmonary valve stenosis and dysmorphic and atypical features, including lymphangiectasia, non-immune hydrops fetalis and right-sided pleural effusion in a preterm female baby. WES results were further validated by Sanger sequencing. WES improves the screening and detection of novel and causative genetic variants to improve management of disease. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first reported FA case in a Saudi family with phenotypic atypical FA features. The results support the role of PALB2 gene and pathogenic variants that may cause clinical presentation of FA. Furthermore, the present results may establish a disease database, providing a groundwork for understanding the key genomic regions to control diseases resulting from consanguinity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angham Abdulrhman Abdulkareem
- Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- Faculty of Science, Department of Biochemistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bader H. Shirah
- Department of Neuroscience, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah 11211, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hala Abubaker Bagabir
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh 25732, Saudi Arabia
| | - Absarul Haque
- King Fahd Medical Research Centre, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad Imran Naseer
- Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kurian AW, Bedrosian I, Kohlmann WK, Somerfield MR, Robson ME. Germline Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer: ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline Q and A. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:466-471. [PMID: 38252903 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Wendy K Kohlmann
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Mark E Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cil T, Boileau JF, Chia S, DeCoteau MJ, Jerzak KJ, Koch A, Nixon N, Quan ML, Roberts A, Brezden-Masley C. The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2023 Meeting Report. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1774-1802. [PMID: 38668038 PMCID: PMC11049169 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
On 15-16 June 2023, healthcare professionals and breast cancer patients and advocates from across Canada met in Toronto, Ontario, for the 2023 Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium (CBSC.). The CBSC. is a national, multidisciplinary event that occurs every 2 years with the goal of developing a personalized approach to the management of breast cancer in Canada. Experts provided state-of-the-art information to help optimally manage breast cancer patients, including etiology, prevention, diagnosis, experimental biology, and therapy of breast cancer and premalignant breast disease. The symposium also had the objectives of increasing communication and collaboration among breast cancer healthcare providers nationwide and providing a comprehensive and real-life review of the many facets of breast cancer. The sessions covered the patient voice, the top breast cancer papers from different disciplines in 2022, artificial intelligence in breast cancer, systemic therapy updates, the management of central nervous system metastases, multidisciplinary management of ductal carcinoma in situ, special populations, optimization-based individual prognostic factors, toxicity management of novel therapeutics, survivorship, and updates in surgical oncology. The key takeaways of these sessions have been summarized in this conference report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tulin Cil
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (T.C.); (A.K.)
| | | | - Stephen Chia
- British Columbia Cancer Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada;
| | - MJ DeCoteau
- Rethink Breast Cancer, Toronto, ON M4M 3G3, Canada;
| | - Katarzyna J. Jerzak
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada; (K.J.J.); (A.R.)
| | - Anne Koch
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (T.C.); (A.K.)
| | - Nancy Nixon
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (N.N.); (M.L.Q.)
| | - May Lynn Quan
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (N.N.); (M.L.Q.)
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada; (K.J.J.); (A.R.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Irelli A, Patruno LV, Chiatamone Ranieri S, Di Giacomo D, Malatesta S, Alesse E, Tessitore A, Cannita K. Role of Breast Cancer Risk Estimation Models to Identify Women Eligible for Genetic Testing and Risk-Reducing Surgery. Biomedicines 2024; 12:714. [PMID: 38672070 PMCID: PMC11048717 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is responsible for approximately 10% of breast cancers (BCs). The HBOC gene panel includes both high-risk genes, i.e., a four times higher risk of BC (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CDH1, PTEN, STK11 and TP53), and moderate-risk genes, i.e., a two to four times higher risk of BC (BARD1, CHEK2, RAD51C, RAD51D and ATM). Pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in HBOC genes confer an absolute risk of BC that changes according to the gene considered. We illustrate and compare different BC risk estimation models, also describing their limitations. These models allow us to identify women eligible for genetic testing and possibly to offer surgical strategies for primary prevention, i.e., risk-reducing mastectomies and salpingo-oophorectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azzurra Irelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, “Giuseppe Mazzini” Hospital, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (L.V.P.); (K.C.)
| | - Leonardo Valerio Patruno
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, “Giuseppe Mazzini” Hospital, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (L.V.P.); (K.C.)
| | - Sofia Chiatamone Ranieri
- Pathology Unit, Department of Services, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (S.C.R.); (D.D.G.); (S.M.)
| | - Daniela Di Giacomo
- Pathology Unit, Department of Services, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (S.C.R.); (D.D.G.); (S.M.)
| | - Sara Malatesta
- Pathology Unit, Department of Services, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (S.C.R.); (D.D.G.); (S.M.)
| | - Edoardo Alesse
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (E.A.); (A.T.)
| | - Alessandra Tessitore
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (E.A.); (A.T.)
| | - Katia Cannita
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, “Giuseppe Mazzini” Hospital, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (L.V.P.); (K.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Steadman JA, Hoskin TL, Klassen C, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, Piltin MA, Mrdutt MM, Johnson JE, Hieken TJ. Assessment of the effect of the American Society of Breast Surgery guidelines on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates for unilateral breast cancer. Surgery 2024; 175:677-686. [PMID: 37863697 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In July 2016, the American Society of Breast Surgeons published guidelines discouraging contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for average-risk women with unilateral breast cancer. We incorporated these into practice with structured patient counseling and aimed to assess the effect of this initiative on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates. METHODS We evaluated female patients with unilateral breast cancer undergoing mastectomy at our institution from January 2011 to November 2022. Variables associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and trends over time were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test or χ2 analysis as appropriate. RESULTS Among 3,208 patients, (median age 54 years) 1,366 (43%) had a unilateral mastectomy, and 1,842 (57%) also had a concomitant contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Across all patients, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates significantly decreased post-implementation from 2017 to 2019 (55%) vs 2015 to 2016 (62%) (P = .01) but increased from 2020 to 2022 (61%). Immediate breast reconstruction rate was 70% overall (81% with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and 56% without contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, P < .001). Younger age, White race, mutation status, and earlier stage were also associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Genetic testing increased from 27% pre-guideline to 74% 2020 to 2022, as did the proportion of patients with a pathogenic variant (4% pre-guideline vs 11% from 2020-2022, P < .001), of whom 91% had a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Among tested patients without a pathogenic variant and patients not tested, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates declined from 78% to 67% and 48% to 38% pre -and post-guidelines, respectively, P < .001. CONCLUSION Implementation of specific patient counseling was effective in decreasing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates. While recognizing that patient choice plays a significant role in the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, further educational efforts are warranted to affect contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates, particularly in the setting of negative genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Steadman
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Division of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amy C Degnim
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mara A Piltin
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mary M Mrdutt
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jeffrey E Johnson
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kamaraju S, Conroy M, Harris A, Georgen M, Min H, Powell M, Kurzrock R. Challenges to genetic testing for germline mutations associated with breast cancer among African Americans. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 124:102695. [PMID: 38325071 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Inequities in preventive cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment, and inferior cancer outcomes continue to pose challenges across the cancer continuum. While the exact reasons for these inferior outcomes are unknown, multiple barriers to various domains of social determinants of health (SDOH) play a vital role, leading to inequities in cancer care. These include barriers to transportation, housing, and food insecurities, contributing to delays in preventive screening and treatment. Furthermore, aggressive biologies also exist across various racial profiles with accompanying germline mutations. For example, African Americans (AAs) have a higher incidence of triple-negative breast cancer subtype and a high prevalence of BRCA1/2 gene mutations, increasing the risk of multiple cancers, warranting high-risk screening for these populations. Unfortunately, other barriers, such as financial insecurities, low health literacy rates, and lack of awareness, lead to delays in cancer screening and genetic testing, even with available high-risk screening and risk reduction procedures. In addition, physicians receive minimal interdisciplinary training to address genetic assessment, interpretation of the results, and almost no additional training in addressing the unique needs of racial minorities, leading to suboptimal delivery of genetic assessment provision resources among AAs. In this review, we discuss the confluence of factors and barriers limiting genetic testing among AAs and highlight the prevalence of germline mutations associated with increased risk of breast cancer among AAs, reflecting the need for multi-panel germline testing as well as education regarding hereditary cancer risks in underserved minorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kamaraju
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| | - M Conroy
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - A Harris
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - M Georgen
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - H Min
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - M Powell
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - R Kurzrock
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wu V, Chichura AM, Dickard J, Turner C, Al-Hilli Z. Perioperative genetic testing and time to surgery in patients with breast cancer. Surgery 2024; 175:712-717. [PMID: 37848355 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Time to treatment has been identified as a quality metric, with longer time to treatment associated with poorer outcomes. Genetic evaluation is an integral part of treatment counseling for patients with breast cancer. With expanding indications for genetic testing and consideration of expansion of genetic testing to all patients with a personal history of breast cancer, this study aims to evaluate the effect of genetic evaluation on the time interval from initial surgical visit to surgery. METHODS A retrospective review of patients undergoing upfront surgery for stage 0-3 breast cancer from June 2022 to December 2022. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for genetic testing, and results were obtained. RESULTS The study included 492 patients (489 females). Eighty-one (16.2%) were ≤50 years of age at diagnosis. In total, 281 patients (57.1%) met National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for genetic testing and 199 consulted with a genetic counselor (72.4%). Seventy-six patients (27.6%) not meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria pursued genetic counseling. In total, 218 patients (79.3%) referred for genetic counseling completed testing. Mean turnaround time to genetic testing result was 11 days (range, 6-66 days). Twenty-six patients (11.9%) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Twenty-four of these patients met National Comprehensive Cancer Network testing criteria (92.3%) and 2 did not (7.7%). The time to treatment for patients undergoing genetic testing was 33 vs 34 days in those without testing (P = .45). Three patients (11.5%) with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants altered their initial surgical plan due to their genetic testing results. Seven patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant results returning postoperatively did not undergo additional surgery. CONCLUSION Hereditary breast cancer evaluation and genetic testing did not appear to delay time to treatment for patients with breast cancer in our study cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Anna M Chichura
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Benign Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jennifer Dickard
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Christine Turner
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zahraa Al-Hilli
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bedrosian I, Somerfield MR, Achatz MI, Boughey JC, Curigliano G, Friedman S, Kohlmann WK, Kurian AW, Laronga C, Lynce F, Norquist BS, Plichta JK, Rodriguez P, Shah PD, Tischkowitz M, Wood M, Yadav S, Yao K, Robson ME. Germline Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer: ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:584-604. [PMID: 38175972 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop recommendations for germline mutation testing for patients with breast cancer. METHODS An ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) panel convened to develop recommendations based on a systematic review and formal consensus process. RESULTS Forty-seven articles met eligibility criteria for the germline mutation testing recommendations; 18 for the genetic counseling recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS BRCA1/2 mutation testing should be offered to all newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer ≤65 years and select patients >65 years based on personal history, family history, ancestry, or eligibility for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy. All patients with recurrent breast cancer who are candidates for PARP inhibitor therapy should be offered BRCA1/2 testing, regardless of family history. BRCA1/2 testing should be offered to women who develop a second primary cancer in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast. For patients with prior history of breast cancer and without active disease, testing should be offered to patients diagnosed ≤65 years and selectively in patients diagnosed after 65 years, if it will inform personal and family risk. Testing for high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes beyond BRCA1/2 should be offered to those with supportive family histories; testing for moderate-penetrance genes may be offered if necessary to inform personal and family cancer risk. Patients should be provided enough pretest information for informed consent; those with pathogenic variants should receive individualized post-test counseling. Variants of uncertain significance should not impact management, and patients with such variants should be followed for reclassification. Referral to providers experienced in clinical cancer genetics may help facilitate patient selection and interpretation of expanded testing, and provide counseling of individuals without pathogenic germline variants but with significant family history.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- University of Milan, Italy
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Sue Friedman
- FORCE (Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered), Tampa, FL
| | - Wendy K Kohlmann
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Rodriguez
- Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment Program, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Arlington, VA
| | - Payal D Shah
- Basser Center for BRCA & Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Katherine Yao
- Division of Surgical Oncology at NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| | - Mark E Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schwartz CJ, Khorsandi N, Blanco A, Mukhtar RA, Chen YY, Krings G. Clinicopathologic and genetic analysis of invasive breast carcinomas in women with germline CHEK2 variants. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 204:171-179. [PMID: 38091153 PMCID: PMC10806021 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07176-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline pathogenic variants in checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) are associated with a moderately increased risk of breast cancer (BC). The spectrum of clinicopathologic features and genetics of these tumors has not been fully established. METHODS We characterized the histopathologic and clinicopathologic features of 44 CHEK2-associated BCs from 35 women, and assessed responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A subset of cases (n = 23) was additionally analyzed using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS). RESULTS Most (94%, 33/35) patients were heterozygous carriers for germline CHEK2 variants, and 40% had the c.1100delC allele. Two patients were homozygous, and five had additional germline pathogenic variants in ATM (2), PALB2 (1), RAD50 (1), or MUTYH (1). CHEK2-associated BCs occurred in younger women (median age 45 years, range 25-75) and were often multifocal (20%) or bilateral (11%). Most (86%, 38/44) were invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (IDC-NST). Almost all (95%, 41/43) BCs were ER + (79% ER + HER2-, 16% ER + HER2 + , 5% ER-HER2 +), and most (69%) were luminal B. Nottingham grade, proliferation index, and results of multiparametric molecular testing were heterogeneous. Biallelic CHEK2 alteration with loss of heterozygosity was identified in most BCs (57%, 13/23) by NGS. Additional recurrent alterations included GATA3 (26%), PIK3CA (226%), CCND1 (22%), FGFR1 (22%), ERBB2 (17%), ZNF703 (17%), TP53 (9%), and PPM1D (9%), among others. Responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were variable, but few patients (21%, 3/14) achieved pathologic complete response. Most patients (85%) were without evidence of disease at time of study (n = 34). Five patients (15%) developed distant metastasis, and one (3%) died (mean follow-up 50 months). CONCLUSION Almost all CHEK2-associated BCs were ER + IDC-NST, with most classified as luminal B with or without HER2 overexpression. NGS supported the luminal-like phenotype and confirmed CHEK2 as an oncogenic driver in the majority of cases. Responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were variable but mostly incomplete.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Schwartz
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Nikka Khorsandi
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Amie Blanco
- Department of Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Yunn-Yi Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Gregor Krings
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sun X, Reiner AS, Tran AP, Watt GP, Oh JH, Mellemkjær L, Lynch CF, Knight JA, John EM, Malone KE, Liang X, Woods M, Derkach A, Concannon P, Bernstein JL, Shu X. A genome-wide association study of contralateral breast cancer in the Women's Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:16. [PMID: 38263039 PMCID: PMC10807183 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01765-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contralateral breast cancer (CBC) is the most common second primary cancer diagnosed in breast cancer survivors, yet the understanding of the genetic susceptibility of CBC, particularly with respect to common variants, remains incomplete. This study aimed to investigate the genetic basis of CBC to better understand this malignancy. FINDINGS We performed a genome-wide association analysis in the Women's Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology (WECARE) Study of women with first breast cancer diagnosed at age < 55 years including 1161 with CBC who served as cases and 1668 with unilateral breast cancer (UBC) who served as controls. We observed two loci (rs59657211, 9q32, SLC31A2/FAM225A and rs3815096, 6p22.1, TRIM31) with suggestive genome-wide significant associations (P < 1 × 10-6). We also found an increased risk of CBC associated with a breast cancer-specific polygenic risk score (PRS) comprised of 239 known breast cancer susceptibility single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rate ratio per 1-SD change: 1.25; 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.36, P < 0.0001). The protective effect of chemotherapy on CBC risk was statistically significant only among patients with an elevated PRS (Pheterogeneity = 0.04). The AUC that included the PRS and known breast cancer risk factors was significantly elevated. CONCLUSIONS The present GWAS identified two previously unreported loci with suggestive genome-wide significance. We also confirm that an elevated risk of CBC is associated with a comprehensive breast cancer susceptibility PRS that is independent of known breast cancer risk factors. These findings advance our understanding of genetic risk factors involved in CBC etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohui Sun
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Anne S Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Anh Phong Tran
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gordon P Watt
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Jung Hun Oh
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lene Mellemkjær
- Diet, Cancer and Health, Danish Cancer Institute, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Charles F Lynch
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Julia A Knight
- Prosserman Centre for Population Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kathleen E Malone
- Epidemiology Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Xiaolin Liang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Meghan Woods
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Andriy Derkach
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Patrick Concannon
- Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jonine L Bernstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Xiang Shu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wang Y, Dackus GMHE, Rosenberg EH, Cornelissen S, de Boo LW, Broeks A, Brugman W, Chan TWS, van Diest PJ, Hauptmann M, Ter Hoeve ND, Isaeva OI, de Jong VMT, Jóźwiak K, Kluin RJC, Kok M, Koop E, Nederlof PM, Opdam M, Schouten PC, Siesling S, van Steenis C, Voogd AC, Vreuls W, Salgado RF, Linn SC, Schmidt MK. Long-term outcomes of young, node-negative, chemotherapy-naïve, triple-negative breast cancer patients according to BRCA1 status. BMC Med 2024; 22:9. [PMID: 38191387 PMCID: PMC10775514 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03233-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the abundant usage of chemotherapy in young triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, the unbiased prognostic value of BRCA1-related biomarkers in this population remains unclear. In addition, whether BRCA1-related biomarkers modify the well-established prognostic value of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) is unknown. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of young, node-negative, chemotherapy-naïve TNBC patients according to BRCA1 status, taking sTILs into account. METHODS We included 485 Dutch women diagnosed with node-negative TNBC under age 40 between 1989 and 2000. During this period, these women were considered low-risk and did not receive chemotherapy. BRCA1 status, including pathogenic germline BRCA1 mutation (gBRCA1m), somatic BRCA1 mutation (sBRCA1m), and tumor BRCA1 promoter methylation (BRCA1-PM), was assessed using DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. sTILs were assessed according to the international guideline. Patients' outcomes were compared using Cox regression and competing risk models. RESULTS Among the 399 patients with BRCA1 status, 26.3% had a gBRCA1m, 5.3% had a sBRCA1m, 36.6% had tumor BRCA1-PM, and 31.8% had BRCA1-non-altered tumors. Compared to BRCA1-non-alteration, gBRCA1m was associated with worse overall survival (OS) from the fourth year after diagnosis (adjusted HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.18-3.75), and this association attenuated after adjustment for second primary tumors. Every 10% sTIL increment was associated with 16% higher OS (adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.90) in gBRCA1m, sBRCA1m, or BRCA1-non-altered patients and 31% higher OS in tumor BRCA1-PM patients. Among the 66 patients with tumor BRCA1-PM and ≥ 50% sTILs, we observed excellent 15-year OS (97.0%; 95% CI, 92.9-100%). Conversely, among the 61 patients with gBRCA1m and < 50% sTILs, we observed poor 15-year OS (50.8%; 95% CI, 39.7-65.0%). Furthermore, gBRCA1m was associated with higher (adjusted subdistribution HR, 4.04; 95% CI, 2.29-7.13) and tumor BRCA1-PM with lower (adjusted subdistribution HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.95) incidence of second primary tumors, compared to BRCA1-non-alteration. CONCLUSIONS Although both gBRCA1m and tumor BRCA1-PM alter BRCA1 gene transcription, they are associated with different outcomes in young, node-negative, chemotherapy-naïve TNBC patients. By combining sTILs and BRCA1 status for risk classification, we were able to identify potential subgroups in this population to intensify and optimize adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuwei Wang
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gwen M H E Dackus
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Efraim H Rosenberg
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sten Cornelissen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonora W de Boo
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim Brugman
- Genomics Core Facility, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Terry W S Chan
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Natalie D Ter Hoeve
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olga I Isaeva
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent M T de Jong
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Roelof J C Kluin
- Genomics Core Facility, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen Kok
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Koop
- Department of Pathology, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Petra M Nederlof
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Opdam
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip C Schouten
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Vreuls
- Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto F Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wong SM, Apostolova C, Eisenberg E, Foulkes WD. Counselling Framework for Germline BRCA1/2 and PALB2 Carriers Considering Risk-Reducing Mastectomy. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:350-365. [PMID: 38248108 PMCID: PMC10814079 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31010023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Female BRCA1/2 and PALB2 germline pathogenic variant carriers have an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer and may wish to consider risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) for surgical prevention. Quantifying the residual lifetime risk and absolute benefit from RRM requires careful consideration of a patient's age, pathogenic variant, and their personal history of breast or ovarian cancer. Historically, patients have been counselled that RRM does not necessarily prolong survival relative to high-risk surveillance, although recent studies suggest a possible survival benefit of RRM in BRCA1 carriers. The uptake of RRM has increased dramatically over the last several decades yet varies according to sociodemographic factors and geographic region. The increased adoption of nipple-sparing mastectomy techniques, ability to avoid axillary staging, and availability of reconstructive options for most germline pathogenic variant carriers has helped to minimize the morbidity of RRM. Preoperative discussions should include evidence regarding postmastectomy sensation, the potential for supplemental surgery, pregnancy-related chest wall changes, and the need for continued clinical surveillance. Approaches that include sensation preservation and robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy are an area of evolving research that may be more widely adopted in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M. Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
| | - Carla Apostolova
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Elisheva Eisenberg
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - William D. Foulkes
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yang T, Li W, Huang T, Zhou J. Genetic Testing Enhances the Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16607. [PMID: 38068930 PMCID: PMC10706486 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The contemporary comprehension of breast cancer has progressed to the molecular level. As a heterogeneous malignancy, conventional pathological diagnosis and histological classification could no longer meet the needs of precisely managing breast cancer. Genetic testing based on gene expression profiles and gene mutations has emerged and substantially contributed to the precise diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Multigene assays (MGAs) are explored for early-stage breast cancer patients, aiding the selection of adjuvant therapy and predicting prognosis. For metastatic breast cancer patients, testing specific genes indicates potentially effective antitumor agents. In this review, genetic testing in early-stage and metastatic breast cancer is summarized, as well as the advantages and challenges of genetic testing in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tao Huang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China (W.L.)
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China (W.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Gnant M, Loibl S, Cameron D, Regan MM, Denkert C, Poortmans P, Weber WP, Thürlimann B. Understanding breast cancer complexity to improve patient outcomes: The St Gallen International Consensus Conference for the Primary Therapy of Individuals with Early Breast Cancer 2023. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:970-986. [PMID: 37683978 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The 18th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference held in March 2023, in Vienna, Austria, assessed significant new findings for local and systemic therapies for early breast cancer with a focus on the evaluation of multimodal treatment options. The emergence of more effective, innovative agents in both the preoperative (primary or neoadjuvant) and post-operative (adjuvant) settings has underscored the pivotal role of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment decision making, particularly when selecting systemic therapy for an individual patient. The importance of multidisciplinary discussions regarding the clinical benefits of interventions was explicitly emphasized by the consensus panel as an integral part of developing an optimal treatment plan with the 'right' degree of intensity and duration. The panelists focused on controversies surrounding the management of common ductal/no special type and lobular breast cancer histology, which account for the vast majority of breast tumors. The expert opinion of the panelists was based on interpretations of available data, as well as current practices in their professional environments, personal and socioeconomic factors affecting patients, and cognizant of varying reimbursement and accessibility constraints around the world. The panelists strongly advocated patient participation in well-designed clinical studies whenever feasible. With these considerations in mind, the St Gallen Consensus Conference aims to offer guidance to clinicians regarding appropriate treatments for early-stage breast cancer and assist in balancing the realistic trade-offs between treatment benefit and toxicity, enabling patients and clinicians to make well-informed choices through a shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - H J Burstein
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
| | - M Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Loibl
- Center for Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - D Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - M M Regan
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - C Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - W P Weber
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - B Thürlimann
- SwissBreastCare, Bethanienspital, Zürich, Switzerland; SONK Foundation, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zhang JQ, Dos Anjos CH, Sevilimedu V, Crown A, Amoroso KA, Pilewskie ML, Robson ME, Gemignani ML. Association of Moderate-Risk Breast Cancer Genes with Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Bilateral Disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6990-6999. [PMID: 37661222 PMCID: PMC11005956 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14141-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, the three most prevalent moderate-risk breast cancer genes, on surgical decision making is not well known. METHODS Our retrospective study included patients with resectable non-metastatic breast cancer who underwent multigene panel testing between July 2014 and January 2020 with at least one genetic alteration (pathogenic or variant of uncertain significance [VUS] in ATM [n = 49], CHEK [n = 57], or PALB2 [n = 27]). Our objectives were to determine the rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) and the rate of bilateral breast cancer. Univariable analyses (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to identify factors associated with CPM and bilateral breast cancer. RESULTS The rate of CPM was 39% (n = 49/127), with 54% (n = 25/46) of patients with a pathogenic mutation and 30% (n = 24/81) of patients with a VUS choosing CPM. On MVA, premenopausal status (odds ratio [OR] 3.46) and a pathogenic alteration (OR 3.01) were associated with increased use of CPM. Bilateral disease was noted in 16% (n = 22/138). Patients with pathogenic mutations had a 22% (n = 11/51) incidence of bilateral breast cancer, while patients with VUS had a 13% (n = 11/87) incidence, although this was not statistically significant on UVA or MVA. On MVA, premenopausal status was associated with a decreased risk of bilateral disease (OR 0.33, p = 0.022). During follow-up, a breast cancer event occurred in 16% (n = 22/138). CONCLUSIONS Our study identified a high rate of CPM among those with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 alterations, including VUS. Further studies are needed to clarify reasons for CPM among patients with moderate-risk alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Q Zhang
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | | | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Angelena Crown
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Breast Surgery, True Family Women's Cancer Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kimberly A Amoroso
- Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa L Pilewskie
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary L Gemignani
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tuttle TM, Hui JYC. Breast Cancer Genes and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Beyond BRCA. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6958-6959. [PMID: 37633854 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14161-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Todd M Tuttle
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jane Yuet Ching Hui
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
An J, Lu SE, McDougall J, Walters ST, Lin Y, Heidt E, Stroup A, Paddock L, Grumet S, Toppmeyer D, Kinney AY. Identifying Mediators of Intervention Effects Within a Randomized Controlled Trial to Motivate Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment Among Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors. Ann Behav Med 2023; 57:965-977. [PMID: 37658805 PMCID: PMC10578392 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaad048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A theory-guided Tailored Counseling and Navigation (TCN) intervention successfully increased cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) uptake among cancer survivors at increased risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Understanding the pathways by which interventions motivate behavior change is important for identifying the intervention's active components. PURPOSE We examined whether the TCN intervention exerted effects on CGRA uptake through hypothesized theoretical mediators. METHODS Cancer survivors at elevated risk for HBOC were recruited from three statewide cancer registries and were randomly assigned to three arms: TCN (n = 212), Targeted Print (TP, n = 216), and Usual Care (UC, n = 213). Theoretical mediators from the Extended Parallel Process Model, Health Action Planning Approach, and Ottawa Decision Support Framework were assessed at baseline and 1-month follow-up; CGRA uptake was assessed at 6 months. Generalized structural equation modeling was used for mediation analysis. RESULTS The TCN effects were most strongly mediated by behavioral intention alone (β = 0.49 and 0.31) and by serial mediation through self-efficacy and intention (β = 0.041 and 0.10) when compared with UC and TP, respectively. In addition, compared with UC, the TCN also increased CGRA through increased perceived susceptibility, knowledge of HBOC, and response efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Risk communication and behavioral change interventions for hereditary cancer should stress a person's increased genetic risk and the potential benefits of genetic counseling and testing, as well as bolster efficacy beliefs by helping remove barriers to CGRA. System-level and policy interventions are needed to further expand access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghua An
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Shou-En Lu
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- School of Public Health, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Scott T Walters
- University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Yong Lin
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- School of Public Health, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Emily Heidt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- School of Public Health, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Lisa Paddock
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- School of Public Health, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Sherry Grumet
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Anita Y Kinney
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- School of Public Health, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zhunussova G, Omarbayeva N, Kaidarova D, Abdikerim S, Mit N, Kisselev I, Yergali K, Zhunussova A, Goncharova T, Abdrakhmanova A, Djansugurova L. Determination of genetic predisposition to early breast cancer in women of Kazakh ethnicity. Oncotarget 2023; 14:860-877. [PMID: 37791908 PMCID: PMC10549772 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer among women in Kazakhstan. To date, little data are available on the spectrum of genetic variation in Kazakh women with BC. We aimed to identify population-specific genetic markers associated with the risk of developing early-onset BC and test their association with clinical and prognostic factors. The study included 224 Kazakh women diagnosed with BC (≤40 age). Entire coding regions (>1700 exons) and the flanking noncoding regions of 94 cancer-associated genes were sequenced from blood DNA using MiSeq platform. We identified 38 unique pathogenic variants (PVs) in 13 different cancer-predisposing genes among 57 patients (25.4%), of which 6 variants were novel. In total, 12 of the 38 distinct PVs were detected recurrently, including BRCA1 c.5266dup, c.5278-2del, and c.2T>C, and BRCA2 c.9409dup and c.9253del that may be founder in this population. BRCA1 carriers were significantly more likely to develop triple-negative BC (OR = 6.61, 95% CI 2.44-17.91, p = 0.0002) and have family history of BC (OR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.14-8.76, p = 0.03) compared to non-carriers. This study allowed the identification of PVs specific to early-onset BC, which may be used as a foundation to develop regional expertise and diagnostic tools for early detection of BC in young Kazakh women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulnur Zhunussova
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
- Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| | - Nazgul Omarbayeva
- Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
- Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
- Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| | - Saltanat Abdikerim
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
- Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| | - Natalya Mit
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| | - Ilya Kisselev
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| | - Kanagat Yergali
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| | - Aigul Zhunussova
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| | | | - Aliya Abdrakhmanova
- Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
- Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| | - Leyla Djansugurova
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
- Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hanson H, Astiazaran-Symonds E, Amendola LM, Balmaña J, Foulkes WD, James P, Klugman S, Ngeow J, Schmutzler R, Voian N, Wick MJ, Pal T, Tischkowitz M, Stewart DR. Management of individuals with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CHEK2: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2023; 25:100870. [PMID: 37490054 PMCID: PMC10623578 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the role of CHEK2 germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition is well known, resources for managing CHEK2 heterozygotes in clinical practice are limited. METHODS An international workgroup developed guidance on clinical management of CHEK2 heterozygotes informed by peer-reviewed publications from PubMed. RESULTS Although CHEK2 is considered a moderate penetrance gene, cancer risks may be considered as a continuous variable, which are influenced by family history and other modifiers. Consequently, early cancer detection and prevention for CHEK2 heterozygotes should be guided by personalized risk estimates. Such estimates may result in both downgrading lifetime breast cancer risks to those similar to the general population or upgrading lifetime risk to a level at which CHEK2 heterozygotes are offered high-risk breast surveillance according to country-specific guidelines. Risk-reducing mastectomy should be guided by personalized risk estimates and shared decision making. Colorectal and prostate cancer surveillance should be considered based on assessment of family history. For CHEK2 heterozygotes who develop cancer, no specific targeted medical treatment is recommended at this time. CONCLUSION Systematic prospective data collection is needed to establish the spectrum of CHEK2-associated cancer risks and to determine yet-unanswered questions, such as the outcomes of surveillance, response to cancer treatment, and survival after cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Hanson
- Southwest Thames Regional Genetics Service, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Esteban Astiazaran-Symonds
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - William D Foulkes
- Departments of Human Genetics, Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan Klugman
- Division of Reproductive & Medical Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Genomic Medicine, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicoleta Voian
- Providence Genetic Risk Clinic, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | - Myra J Wick
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas R Stewart
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Al-Hilli Z, Noss R, Dickard J, Wei W, Chichura A, Wu V, Renicker K, Pederson HJ, Eng C. A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pre-test Genetic Counseling Using an Artificial Intelligence Automated Chatbot and Traditional In-person Genetic Counseling in Women Newly Diagnosed with Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5990-5996. [PMID: 37567976 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13888-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alternative service delivery models are critically needed to address the increasing demand for genetics services and limited supply of genetics experts available to provide pre-test counseling. METHODS We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of women with stage 0-III breast cancer not meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing. Patients were randomized to pre-test counseling with a Chatbot or a certified genetic counselor (GC). Participants completed a questionnaire assessing their knowledge of breast cancer genetics and a survey assessing satisfaction with their decision regarding pre-test counseling. RESULTS A total of 39 patients were enrolled and 37 were randomized to genetic counseling with an automated Chatbot or a GC; 19 were randomized to Chatbot and 18 to traditional genetic counseling, and 13 (38.2%) had a family member with breast cancer but did not meet NCCN criteria. All patients opted to undergo genetic testing. Testing revealed six pathogenic variants in five patients (13.5%): CHEK2 (n = 2), MSH3 (n = 1), MUTYH (n = 1), and BRCA1 and HOXB13 (n = 1). No patients had a delay in time-to-treatment due to genetic testing turnaround time, nor did any patients undergo additional risk reducing surgery. There was no significant difference in median knowledge score between Chatbot and traditional counseling (11 vs. 12, p = 0.09) or in median patient satisfaction score (30 vs. 30, p = 0.19). CONCLUSION Satisfaction and comprehension in patients with breast cancer undergoing pre-test genetic counseling using an automated Chatbot is comparable to in-person genetic testing. Utilization of this technology can offer improved access to care and a much-needed alternative for pre-test counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahraa Al-Hilli
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Ryan Noss
- Center for Personalized Genetic Healthcare, Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer Dickard
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anna Chichura
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Benign Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vincent Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kayla Renicker
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Holly J Pederson
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Center for Personalized Genetic Healthcare, Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Charis Eng
- Center for Personalized Genetic Healthcare, Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Evans DG, Burghel GJ, Schlecht H, Harkness EF, Gandhi A, Howell SJ, Howell A, Forde C, Lalloo F, Newman WG, Smith MJ, Woodward ER. Detection of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes in bilateral breast cancer. J Med Genet 2023; 60:974-979. [PMID: 37055167 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the frequency of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in women with bilateral breast cancer. METHODS We undertook BRCA1/2 and CHEK2 c.1100delC molecular analysis in 764 samples and a multigene panel in 156. Detection rates were assessed by age at first primary, Manchester Score, and breast pathology. Oestrogen receptor (ER) status of the contralateral versus first breast cancer was compared on 1081 patients with breast cancer with BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs. RESULTS 764 women with bilateral breast cancer have undergone testing of BRCA1/2 and CHEK2; 407 were also tested for PALB2 and 177 for ATM. Detection rates were BRCA1 11.6%, BRCA2 14.0%, CHEK2 2.4%, PALB2 1.0%, ATM 1.1% and, for a subset of mainly very early onset tumours, TP53 4.6% (9 of 195). The highest PV detection rates were for triple negative cancers for BRCA1 (26.4%), grade 3 ER+HER2 for BRCA2 (27.9%) and HER2+ for CHEK2 (8.9%). ER status of the first primary in BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV heterozygotes was strongly predictive of the ER status of the second contralateral tumour since ~90% of second tumours were ER- in BRCA1 heterozygotes, and 50% were ER- in BRCA2 heterozygotes if the first was ER-. CONCLUSION We have shown a high rate of detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs in triple negative and grade 3 ER+HER2- first primary diagnoses, respectively. High rates of HER2+ were associated with CHEK2 PVs, and women ≤30 years were associated with TP53 PVs. First primary ER status in BRCA1/2 strongly predicts the second tumour will be the same ER status even if unusual for PVs in that gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Ashu Gandhi
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sacha J Howell
- Genomic Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, UK
- Genomic Medicine, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Genomic Medicine, Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Forde
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - William G Newman
- Genetics, Central Manchester University foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Emma Roisin Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Butz H, Nagy P, Papp J, Bozsik A, Grolmusz VK, Pócza T, Oláh E, Patócs A. PALB2 Variants Extend the Mutational Profile of Hungarian Patients with Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4350. [PMID: 37686625 PMCID: PMC10487218 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant detection rate and profile of PALB2, the third most important breast cancer gene, may vary between different populations. METHODS PALB2 was analyzed in peripheral blood samples of three independent cohorts: prospectively between September 2021 and March 2023 (i) in 1280 consecutive patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC), (ii) in 568 patients with other cancers (controls), and retrospectively, (iii) in 191 young breast cancer (<33 years, yBC) patients. These data were compared with data of 134,187 non-cancer individuals retrieved from the Genome Aggregation Database. RESULTS Altogether, 235 cases (235/1280; 18.3%) carried at least one P/LP variant in one of the HBOC susceptibility genes. P/LP PALB2 variants were identified in 18 patients (1.4%; 18/1280) in the HBOC and 3 cases (1.5%; 3/191) in the yBC group. In the control group, only one patient had a disease-causing PALB2 variant (0.17%; 1/568) as a secondary finding not related to the disease, which was similar (0.15%; 205/134,187) in the non-cancer control group. The NM_024675.4:c.509_510delGA variant was the most common among our patients (33%; 6/18). We did not find a significant difference in the incidence of PALB2 disease-causing variants according to age; however, the median age of tumor onset was lower in PALB2 P/LP carriers versus wild-type patients (44 vs. 48 years). In our cohort, the odds ratio for breast cancer risk in women with PALB2 P/LP variants was between 8.1 and 9.3 compared to non-HBOC cancer patients and the non-cancer population, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PALB2 P/LP variants are not uncommon among breast and/or ovarian cancer patients. Their incidence was the same in the two breast cancer cohorts studied but may occur rarely in patients with non-breast/ovarian cancer. The c.509_510delGA variant is particularly common in the studied Hungarian patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henriett Butz
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1122 Budapest, Hungary (A.B.); (V.K.G.); (T.P.); (E.O.); (A.P.)
- Department of Oncology Biobank, National Institute of Oncology, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Hereditary Tumours Research Group, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1089 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1092 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Petra Nagy
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1122 Budapest, Hungary (A.B.); (V.K.G.); (T.P.); (E.O.); (A.P.)
| | - János Papp
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1122 Budapest, Hungary (A.B.); (V.K.G.); (T.P.); (E.O.); (A.P.)
- Hereditary Tumours Research Group, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1089 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Anikó Bozsik
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1122 Budapest, Hungary (A.B.); (V.K.G.); (T.P.); (E.O.); (A.P.)
- Hereditary Tumours Research Group, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1089 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Vince Kornél Grolmusz
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1122 Budapest, Hungary (A.B.); (V.K.G.); (T.P.); (E.O.); (A.P.)
- Hereditary Tumours Research Group, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1089 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tímea Pócza
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1122 Budapest, Hungary (A.B.); (V.K.G.); (T.P.); (E.O.); (A.P.)
| | - Edit Oláh
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1122 Budapest, Hungary (A.B.); (V.K.G.); (T.P.); (E.O.); (A.P.)
| | - Attila Patócs
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1122 Budapest, Hungary (A.B.); (V.K.G.); (T.P.); (E.O.); (A.P.)
- Hereditary Tumours Research Group, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1089 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1092 Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Toss A, Ponzoni O, Riccò B, Piombino C, Moscetti L, Combi F, Palma E, Papi S, Tenedini E, Tazzioli G, Dominici M, Cortesi L. Management of PALB2-associated breast cancer: A literature review and case report. Clin Case Rep 2023; 11:e7747. [PMID: 37621724 PMCID: PMC10444947 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.7747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants (PV) of the PALB2 tumor suppressor gene are associated with an increased risk of breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer. In previous research, PALB2-associated breast cancer showed aggressive clinicopathological phenotypes, particularly triple-negative subtype, and higher mortality regardless of tumor stage, type of chemotherapy nor hormone receptor status. The identification of this germline alteration may have an impact on clinical management of breast cancer (BC) from the surgical approach to the systemic treatment choice. We herein report the case of a patient with a germline PV of PALB2, diagnosed with locally advanced PD-L1 positive triple-negative BC, who progressed after an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen and then experienced a pathologic complete response after platinum-based chemotherapy. This case report hints a major role of the germline PALB2 alteration compared to the PD-L1 expression as cancer driver and gives us the opportunity to extensively review and discuss the available literature on the optimal management of PALB2-associated BC. Overall, our case report and review of the literature provide additional evidence that the germline analysis of PALB2 gene should be included in routine genetic testing for predictive purposes and to refine treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Ornella Ponzoni
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Beatrice Riccò
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Claudia Piombino
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Francesca Combi
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, International Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Enza Palma
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Simona Papi
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Elena Tenedini
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Diagnostic Hematology and Clinical Genomics UnitAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Giovanni Tazzioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Li B, Xu W, Cao J, Guo D, Tao Z, Jin J, Hu X. A study of clinical and molecular characteristics in bilateral primary breast cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15881-15892. [PMID: 37293877 PMCID: PMC10469734 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bilateral primary breast cancer (BPBC) is a rare type of breast cancer. Studies on the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of BPBC in a metastatic context are very limited. METHODS A total of 574 unselected metastatic breast cancer patients with clinical information were enrolled in our next-generation sequencing (NGS) database. Patients with BPBC from our NGS database were regarded as the study cohort. In addition, 1467 patients with BPBC and 2874 patients with unilateral breast cancer (UBC) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) public database were also analyzed to determine the characteristics of BPBC. RESULTS Among the 574 patients enrolled in our NGS database, 20 (3.5%) patients had bilateral disease, comprising 15 (75%) patients with synchronous bilateral disease and 5 (25%) patients with metachronous bilateral disease. Eight patients had bilateral hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative (HER2-) tumors, and three had unilateral HR+/HER2- tumors. More HR+/HER2- tumors and lobular components were found in BPBC patients than in UBC patients. The molecular subtype of the metastatic lesions in three patients was inconsistent with either side of the primary lesions, which suggested the importance of rebiopsy. Strong correlations in clinicopathologic features between the left and right tumors in BPBC were exhibited in the SEER database. In our NGS database, only one BPBC patient was found with a pathogenic germline mutation in BRCA2. The top mutated somatic genes in BPBC patients were similar to those in UBC patients, including TP53 (58.8% in BPBC and 60.6% in UBC) and PI3KCA (47.1% in BPBC and 35.9% in UBC). CONCLUSIONS Our study suggested that BPBC may tend to be lobular carcinoma and have the HR+/HER2- subtype. Although our study did not find specific germline and somatic mutations in BPBC, more research is needed for verification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Li
- Department of Breast and Urologic Medical OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Weiqi Xu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Department of Hepatic SurgeryFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
| | - Jianing Cao
- Department of Breast and Urologic Medical OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Duancheng Guo
- Department of Breast and Urologic Medical OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
| | - Zhonghua Tao
- Department of Breast and Urologic Medical OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Juan Jin
- Department of Breast and Urologic Medical OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Xichun Hu
- Department of Breast and Urologic Medical OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Grossi I, Marchina E, De Petro G, Salvi A. The Biological Role and Translational Implications of the Long Non-Coding RNA GAS5 in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3318. [PMID: 37444428 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The lncRNA GAS5 plays a significant role in tumorigenicity and progression of breast cancer (BC). In this review, we first summarize the role of GAS5 in cell biology, focusing on its expression data in human normal tissues. We present data on GAS5 expression in human BC tissues, highlighting its downregulation in all major BC classes. The main findings regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying GAS5 dysregulation are discussed, including DNA hypermethylation of the CpG island located in the promoter region of the gene. We focused on the action of GAS5 as a miRNA sponge, which is able to sequester microRNAs and modulate the expression levels of their mRNA targets, particularly those involved in cell invasion, apoptosis, and drug response. In the second part, we highlight the translational implications of GAS5 in BC. We discuss the current knowledge on the role of GAS5 as candidate prognostic factor, a responsive molecular therapeutic target, and a circulating biomarker in liquid biopsies with clinical importance in BC. The findings position GAS5 as a promising druggable biomolecule and stimulate the development of strategies to restore its expression levels for novel therapeutic approaches that could benefit BC patients in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Grossi
- Division of Biology and Genetics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marchina
- Division of Biology and Genetics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppina De Petro
- Division of Biology and Genetics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Salvi
- Division of Biology and Genetics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schick S, Manghelli J, Ludwig KK. The Role of the Surgeon in the Germline Testing of the Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patient. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:4677-4687. [PMID: 37232811 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
For patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, information regarding hereditary predisposition can influence treatment decisions. From a surgical standpoint, patients with known germline mutations may alter decisions of local therapy to reduce the risk of second breast primaries. This information may also be considered in the choice of adjuvant therapies or eligibility for clinical trials. In recent years, the criteria for the consideration of germline testing in patients with breast cancer has expanded. Additionally, studies have shown a similar prevalence of pathogenic mutations in those patients outside of these traditional criteria, prompting calls for genetic testing for all patients with a history of breast cancer. While data confirms the benefit of counseling by certified genetics professionals, the capacity of genetic counselors may no longer meet the needs of these growing numbers of patients. National societies assert that counseling and testing can be performed by providers with training and experience in genetics. Breast surgeons are well positioned to offer this service, as they receive formal genetics training during their fellowship, manage these patients daily in their practices, and are often the first providers to see patients after their cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Schick
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Joshua Manghelli
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Kandice K Ludwig
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Szczepanek J, Skorupa M, Jarkiewicz-Tretyn J, Cybulski C, Tretyn A. Harnessing Epigenetics for Breast Cancer Therapy: The Role of DNA Methylation, Histone Modifications, and MicroRNA. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24087235. [PMID: 37108398 PMCID: PMC10138995 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer exhibits various epigenetic abnormalities that regulate gene expression and contribute to tumor characteristics. Epigenetic alterations play a significant role in cancer development and progression, and epigenetic-targeting drugs such as DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, histone-modifying enzymes, and mRNA regulators (such as miRNA mimics and antagomiRs) can reverse these alterations. Therefore, these epigenetic-targeting drugs are promising candidates for cancer treatment. However, there is currently no effective epi-drug monotherapy for breast cancer. Combining epigenetic drugs with conventional therapies has yielded positive outcomes and may be a promising strategy for breast cancer therapy. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, such as azacitidine, and histone deacetylase inhibitors, such as vorinostat, have been used in combination with chemotherapy to treat breast cancer. miRNA regulators, such as miRNA mimics and antagomiRs, can alter the expression of specific genes involved in cancer development. miRNA mimics, such as miR-34, have been used to inhibit tumor growth, while antagomiRs, such as anti-miR-10b, have been used to inhibit metastasis. The development of epi-drugs that target specific epigenetic changes may lead to more effective monotherapy options in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Szczepanek
- Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland
| | - Monika Skorupa
- Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland
- Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland
| | | | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Andrzej Tretyn
- Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland
- Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bychkovsky BL, Lo MT, Yussuf A, Horton C, Hemyari P, LaDuca H, Garber JE, Scheib R, Rana HQ. Pathogenic variants among females with breast cancer and a non-breast cancer reveal opportunities for cancer interception. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 200:63-72. [PMID: 36856935 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06870-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Herein, we report the frequency and distribution of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) among females with breast cancer (BC) and at least one other non-BC who underwent multi-gene panel testing (MGPT). Among females with PVs diagnosed first with BC or ovarian cancer (OC), we sought to enumerate the frequency of subsequent PV-associated cancers. METHODS Females with BC and cancer of ≥ 1 other site (multiple primary cancers, MPC) who underwent MGPT through Ambry Genetics from March 2012 to December 2016 were included if they had testing of at least 21 genes of interest (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, NF1, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, and TP53). Phenotypic data were abstracted from test requisition forms and clinical notes. RESULTS Of 6,617 evaluable patients, most were White (70.8%) and median age at first cancer, second cancer, and MGPT was 49 (interquartile range [IQR]: 18), 59 (IQR: 16), and 63 (IQR: 16) years, respectively. PVs were found among 14.1% (932/6617) of the overall cohort and in 16.4% (440/2687) of females who were diagnosed first with BC. Among those, 55.2% (243/440) had an actionable PV associated with a subsequent cancer diagnosis including 150 OCs. Of the 2443 females with breast and ovarian cancer, few (n = 97, 9.5%) were diagnosed first with OC, limiting our analysis. CONCLUSIONS Females with MPC, including BC, have a high frequency of germline PVs (14.1%). These data delineate the opportunities for intercepting subsequent cancers associated with genetic risk among females diagnosed first with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany L Bychkovsky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. .,Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Judy E Garber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rochelle Scheib
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Huma Q Rana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|