High-Dose Methotrexate as CNS Prophylaxis in High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma

Development of a novel nomogram for predicting delayed methotrexate excretion following high-dose methotrexate in adult patients with hematologic malignancies

PURPOSE

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is integral in treating hematologic malignancies but carries risks of severe toxicities due to prolonged MTX exposure. However, knowledge of delayed MTX excretion is primarily derived from pediatric and adolescent cohorts, with the reported predictors being presented as rough dichotomous values. This study aimed to identify risk factors for delayed MTX excretion exclusively in adult patients with hematologic malignancies and develop a more applicable predictive nomogram based on continuous clinical and laboratory variables.

METHODS

517 HDMTX cycles in 194 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Delayed MTX excretion was defined as either MTX concentration ≥ 1.0 µmol/L at 48 h or ≥ 0.1 µmol/L at 72 h after HDMTX initiation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to construct the nomogram internally validated with the bootstrap method.

RESULTS

Delayed MTX excretion was observed in 24.0% of cycles. Six significant predictors were identified: relapsed/refractory disease (Odds ratio [OR] 2.03), fewer HDMTX cycles (OR 0.771), treatment intent (OR 2.13), lower albumin (OR 0.563) and creatinine clearance levels (OR 0.993), and increased γ-glutamyl transpeptidase levels (OR 1.004, all P < 0.05). These were incorporated into a web-based nomogram as continuous variables with good prediction accuracy (area under the curve, 0.73) and without significant overfitting. Delayed MTX excretion increased risks of developing acute kidney injury, even solely at the 72 h timepoint (OR 2.57, P = 0.025), without providing any benefit of clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study comprehensively characterized MTX elimination failure following HDMTX in adult patients and could pave the way for individualized risk prediction.

Circulating Tumor DNA in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: from Bench to Bedside?

OPINION STATEMENT

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a curable disease with variable outcomes due to underlying heterogeneous clinical and molecular features-features that are insufficiently characterized with our current tools. Due to these limitations, treatment largely remains a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a novel biomarker in cancers that is increasingly utilized for risk stratification and response assessment. ctDNA is readily detectable from the plasma of patients with DLBCL but has not yet been incorporated into clinical care to guide treatment. Here, we describe how ctDNA sequencing represents a promising technology in development to personalize the care of patients with DLBCL. We will review the different types of ctDNA assays being studied and the rapidly growing body of evidence supporting the utility of ctDNA in different treatment settings in DLBCL. Risk stratification by estimation of tumor burden and liquid genotyping, molecular response assessment during treatment, and monitoring for measurable residual disease (MRD) to identify therapy resistance and predict clinical relapse are all potential applications of ctDNA. It is time for clinical trials in DLBCL to utilize ctDNA as an integral biomarker for patient selection, response-adapted designs, and surrogate endpoints. As more ctDNA assays become commercially available for routine use, clinicians should consider liquid biopsy when treatment response is equivocal on imaging. Incorporating MRD may also guide decision-making if patients experience severe treatment toxicities. Though important barriers remain, we believe that ctDNA will soon be ready to transition from bench to bedside to individualize treatment for our patients with DLBCL.

IELSG30 phase 2 trial: intravenous and intrathecal CNS prophylaxis in primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT

Primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PTL) is characterized by high risk of contralateral testis and central nervous system (CNS) relapse. Chemoimmunotherapy with intrathecal (IT) CNS prophylaxis and contralateral testis irradiation eliminates contralateral recurrences and reduces CNS relapses. The IELSG30 phase 2 study investigated feasibility and activity of an intensified IT and IV CNS prophylaxis. Patients with stage I/II PTL who had not received treatment received 2 cycles of IV high-dose methotrexate (MTX) (1.5 g/m2) after 6 cycles of the R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, every 21 days). IT liposomal cytarabine was administered on day 0 of cycles 2 to 5 of 21-day R-CHOP regimen. Contralateral testis radiotherapy (25-30 Gy) was recommended. Fifty-four patients (median age: 66 years) with stage I (n = 32) or II (n = 22) disease were treated with R-CHOP, 53 received at least 3 doses of IT cytarabine, 48 received at least 1 dose of IV MTX, and 50 received prophylactic radiotherapy. No unexpected toxicity occurred. At a median follow-up of 6 years, there was no CNS relapse; 7 patients progressed, and 8 died, with 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79-96) and 92% (95% CI, 81-97), respectively. Extranodal recurrence was documented in 6 patients (in 2 without nodal involvement). In 4 cases, the relapse occurred >6 years after treatment. Causes of death were lymphoma (n = 4), second primary malignancy (n = 1), cerebral vasculopathy (n = 1), unknown (n = 2). Intensive prophylaxis was feasible and effective in preventing CNS relapses. Late relapses, mainly at extranodal sites, represented the most relevant pattern of failure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00945724.

Recent updates on central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The use of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial. Although uncommon, CNS relapses are invariably fatal in this otherwise curable disease. Accurate identification of patients at risk and the optimal approach to CNS prophylaxis therefore remains an area of unmet need. The existing literature, largely retrospective in nature, provides mixed conclusions regarding the efficacy of CNS prophylaxis. The utility of CNS prophylaxis has itself been challenged. In this review, we dissect the issues which render the value of CNS prophylaxis uncertain. We first compare international clinical guidelines for CNS prophylaxis. We then interrogate the factors that should be used to identify high-risk patients accurately. We also explore how clinical patterns of CNS relapse have changed in the pre-rituximab and rituximab era. We then discuss the efficacy of CNS-directed approaches, intensification of systemic treatment and other novel approaches in CNS prophylaxis. Improved diagnostics for early detection of CNS relapses and newer therapeutics for CNS prophylaxis are areas of active investigation. In an area where prospective, randomized studies are impracticable and lacking, guidance for the use of CNS prophylaxis will depend on rigorous statistical review of retrospective data.