Outcomes in Lung Cancer: 9-Year Experience From a Tertiary Cancer Center in India

Uniqueness of lung cancer in Southeast Asia

Lung cancer varies between Caucasians and Asians. There have been differences recorded in the epidemiology, genomics, standard therapies and outcomes, with variations according to the geography and ethnicity which affect the decision for optimal treatment of the patients. To better understand the profile of lung cancer in Southeast Asia, with a focus on India, we have comprehensively reviewed the available data, and discuss the challenges and the way forward. A substantial proportion of patients with lung cancer in Southeast Asia are neversmokers, and adenocarcinoma is the common histopathologic subtype, found in approximately a third of the patients. EGFR mutations are noted in 23-30% of patients, and ALK rearrangements are noted in 5-7%. Therapies are similar to global standards, although access to newer modalities and molecules is a challenge. Collaborative research, political will with various policy changes and patient advocacy are urgently needed.

Survival among patients with lung cancer managed at a tertiary care center in North India

Though there has been advancement in the management of lung cancer, it is not well utilized due to its limited availability and high cost. This is a prospective observational study done at a tertiary care center from January 2014 to December 2022, involving patients with primary lung cancer. After tumor-node-metastasis staging and molecular testing, the patients received chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy in various combinations as per the prevailing National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines. 92 patients were enrolled in the study, with the mean age being 58.94±10.33 and 72 (78.26%) being males. 69 (75%) patients were either current or former smokers. 78 (84.78%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2 while the remaining had an ECOG of 3-4. 80 (86.95%) patients had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [44 (47.83%) adenocarcinoma, 25 (27.17%) squamous cell carcinoma, and 11 (11.95%) NSCLC: not otherwise specified], while 12 (13.04%) patients had small cell lung cancer. One (1.08%) patient each presented in stage I and stage II, 31 (33.69%) patients presented in stage III, and 59 (64.13%) patients presented in stage IV. 44 patients with adenocarcinoma were subjected to mutational analysis, and an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation was found in 13 (29.5%) patients. None of the patients had ALK mutation, ROS-1 rearrangement, or BRAF mutation. PD-L1 expression was evaluated in 9 patients with NSCLC, and it was found in 6 (66.66%) patients. The overall mean survival was 12.7 months. The mean survival for patients with stages I, II, III, and IV was 70, 96, 8.1, and 12.7 months, respectively. Survival in stage IV was better than in stage III, as the eligible patients received targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy have improved survival. Molecular analysis should be done whenever indicated, and eligible patients must be administered targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Surgery for lung cancer: insight from a state cancer centre in India

Purpose

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in India. However, less than half receive treatment with a curative intent and very few undergo surgery amongst them. We present our surgical experience with non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a cohort of 92 non-small cell lung cancer patients operated with curative intent.

Results

Less than 2% patients of lung cancer were operated on at our centre. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological subtype. Right upper lobectomy was the most common surgery performed. Two- and 3-year overall survival was 74.3% and 70.6% respectively. Two- and 3- year disease-free survival was 65.4% and 60.8% respectively.

Conclusion

The fraction of patients who are operated for lung cancer is very less. There is a definite missed window of opportunity. We have comparable survival to international data.

Assessment of survival outcomes among lung cancer patients at the National and Referral Hospital in Kenya

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer has a low overall survival rate linked to late diagnosis and metastasis. Unfortunately, comprehensive data within the African continent are limited due to the lack of a registry, low public awareness of lung cancer, financial constraints, and inadequate screening and treatment facilities. In addition, there was a lack of conclusive data in our setting. Therefore, this study aimed to assess survival outcomes among lung cancer patients at Kenyatta National Hospital.

METHODS

A hospital-based retrospective cohort study was performed to examine the survival outcomes of 151 lung cancer patients. All eligible lung cancer patients diagnosed and treated in the facility between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were included. The patients were retrospectively followed from the date of primary cancer diagnosis until death or the last follow-up period. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 statistical software was used to enter and analyze the data. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis were employed to determine median survival and predictors of mortality, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean and median follow-time was 18.2 and 17.5 months, respectively. Most (98%) of the patients had non-small cell lung cancer. The 2-year survival rate was 66.7%, with 59.6% of patients having developed distant metastasis during the follow-up, while 25.1% were deceased. The median cancer-specific survival time among the study population was 18.0 ± 3.40 months. Cox regression analyses showed that patients with distant metastasis had five times more risk of dying (AHR: 4.74, 95% CI: 2.1-10.8, p < 0.001) than patients without distant metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall two-year survival rate of lung cancer patients at the Kenyatta National Hospital was 66.7%, with most patients developed distant metastasis during the follow-up period. Distant metastasis was the only significant predictor of mortality among lung cancer patients in our setting.

Navigating patient journey in early diagnosis of lung cancer in India

Lung cancer (LC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide. In India, the incidence of LC is increasing rapidly, and a majority of the patients are diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease when treatment is less likely to be effective. Recent therapeutic developments have significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with LC. Prompt specialist referral remains critical for early diagnosis for improved patient survival. In the Indian scenario, distinguishing LC from benign and endemic medical conditions such as tuberculosis can pose a challenge. Hence, awareness regarding the red flags-signs and symptoms that warrant further investigations and referral-is vital. This review is an effort toward encouraging general physicians to maintain a high index of clinical suspicion for those at risk of developing LC and assisting them in refering patients with concerning symptoms to specialists or multidisciplinary teams as early as possible.

Lung Cancer in Non-Smokers: Clinicopathological and Survival Differences from Smokers

Background Lung cancer in non-smokers is a clinically distinct entity based on unique epidemiology, clinicopathology, genetics, treatment response, and outcome. Data from Indian centres are scarce. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency, clinical characteristics, driver mutations, and survival of non-smoking and smoking lung cancer patients treated at a tertiary cancer centre in North India. Methodology Two years of data on 724 consecutive lung cancer patients were assessed. Clinical, demographics, smoking history, and EGFR and ALK mutation test results were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Non-smokers comprised 40.9% of the study sample. Non-smokers were more likely than smokers to experience disease onset at a younger age (P = 0.004) and metastasis (P < 0.001). The tumor histology showed significant differences (P < 0.001), with non-smokers more likely to be diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (77.4%), while squamous and small cell histologies were commonly found among smokers (37.6% and 13.8%, respectively). The EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement rates in the cohort were 23.3% and 10.1%, respectively, and were more frequent in non-smoking patients. Overall, 10-year survival was 7%, with a significantly better survival rate of non-smokers than smokers (median survival time of 15.13 vs 10.17 months; P = 0.012). Conclusions About four out of 10 patients diagnosed with lung cancer at our centre were non-smokers. They were more often young, diagnosed at an advanced stage, with predominantly adenocarcinoma histology, and had a threefold higher frequency of EGFR mutations than smokers. In our cohort, non-smokers appear to be a targetable group with better survival than smokers.

A clinicoepidemiological profile of lung cancers in India - Results from the National Cancer Registry Programme

Background & objectives

Lung cancer is a significant public health concern in low- and middle-income countries such as India. The present article describes the epidemiology, and clinical profile of lung cancer in India, based on recent data from the National Cancer Registry Programme (NCRP).

Methods

The latest data on lung cancer from the NCRP were collated from 28 population-based cancer registries and 58 hospital-based cancer registries across a five-year (2012-2016) reporting period.

Results

The highest age-adjusted incidence rate and mortality (AAMR) was found amongst males and females in the Aizawl district of Mizoram. A significant increase in the annual per cent change of lung cancer incidence was observed in metropolitan cities from 1982 to 2016. About one-third of the cases (36.5%) in males and females (31.7%) were recorded in the age group of 55-64 yr. Adenocarcinoma accounted for about a third (34.3%) of the morphological type in males and half (52.7% ) amongst females. Out of 22,645 recorded lung cancer cases, close to half (44.8%) of the patients presented with distant spread, while over one-third (35.3%) had loco-regional spread of disease at the time of diagnosis.

Interpretation & conclusions

Our estimates suggest that the number of cases is expected to rise sharply to 81,219 cases amongst males and 30,109 in females in 2025. The rising incidence and delayed diagnosis of lung cancer in India are grave concerns. The findings of the present study call for scaling up and intensification of lung cancer-specific preventive, early diagnosis and control measures.

Prognostic factors for treatment response and survival outcomes after first-line management of Stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world Indian perspective

Background:

Indian data on treatment outcomes and survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain scarce.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective review of 537 advanced NSCLC patients treated at a tertiary care facility in North India from January 2008 to March 2018 was done to assess treatment response and survival in terms of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results:

Median age of enrolled patients was 60 years (range: 26–89 years). The majority were males (78.2%) and smokers (66.5%). Adenocarcinoma (51.2%) was the most common pathological type. Most patients had good performance status (PS) (the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0 or 1 in 55.7%) and received conventional chemotherapy (86.6%). ORR and DCR after 3–4 months of first-line treatment were 55.2% and 71.75%, respectively (n = 223). Never smokers had better ORR as well as DCR compared to chronic smokers whereas treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors achieved significantly better ORR, and patients with good PS had better DCR compared to those with poor PS. Median PFS (n = 455) was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7–14.0) and median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI: 5.5–29.9 months). Good PS and nonsmoking status were independent predictors of better PFS on multivariate analysis. For OS, good PS, nonsmoking behavior, and treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors were independent predictors.

Conclusion:

In advanced NSCLC, never-smokers, and patients with good baseline ECOG have favorable treatment and survival outcomes. Treatment with targeted therapy results in better ORR and OS but did not affect PFS.

Challenges in the Management of Lung Cancer: Real-World Experience from a Tertiary Center in South India

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers and an important cause of cancer-related mortality. Recent advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy have improved outcomes, but these have limited penetration in resource-constrained situations. We report the real-world experience in treating patients with lung cancer in India. A retrospective analysis of baseline characters, treatment and outcomes of patients with lung cancer seen between January 2015 to December 2018 ( n = 302) at our center was carried out. Survival data were censored on July 31, 2019. A total of 302 patients (median age: 57 years [range, 23–84 years]; males [ n = 203; 67.2%]) were registered. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology ( n = 225, 75%). The testing rate of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation analysis in stage IV adenocarcinoma ( n = 191) was 67% and 63%, respectively. Systemic therapy (chemotherapy/gefitinib) was started after a median of 62 days (range, 1–748) from presentation and 38 days (range, 1–219 days) from diagnosis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.2–5.4) and 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.6–10.5), respectively in the 141 patient without targetable mutations who started palliative chemotherapy. Of the 58 patients who tested positive for EGFR mutation, 41 (71%) started an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and the median PFS and OS in these patients were 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.6–11.4) and 18.4 months (95% CI, 12.2–24.6), respectively. Only 1 out of 10 patients with stage IV ALK -positive adenocarcinoma was started on ALK inhibitor. On multivariate analysis of OS for patients who started on palliative chemotherapy, response to first-line treatment, long distance from the center, use of second line therapy, and a delay of > 40 days from diagnosis to treatment predicted improved survival. Despite providing free diagnostic and treatment services, there was considerable delay in therapy initiation, and a significant proportion of treatment noninitiation and abandonment. Measures should be taken to understand and address the causes of these issues to realize the benefits of newer therapies The apparent paradox of improved survival in those with long delay in initiation of treatment could be explained based on a less aggressive disease biology.

Primary lung cancer with chest wall involvement: Outcomes of a multimodality management approach

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of lung cancer with chest wall (CW) involvement is approximately 5%. Surgical resection with tumor-free margin is the mainstay of the treatment but these patients generally require multimodality management. CW resection for lung cancer is a complex procedure and requires a balance of radical oncological resection and reconstruction. Herein, we shared an experience of primary lung cancer with CW involvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcome analysis of a prospectively maintained lung cancer database was done for the patients having primary lung cancer with CW involvement. All the patients underwent radical surgical resection of the primary tumor along with the CW.

RESULTS

Among the 208 patients undergoing surgery for non-small cell lung cancer, 20 (9.5%) were found to have CW involvement radiologically. The most common symptom was chronic cough. A total of 11 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the rest were taken for upfront surgery. Six patients had a partial response to NACT and none of them had tumor progression during the chemotherapy. All the patients underwent en bloc resection of the CW with anatomical resection of lung and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The mean duration of surgery was 199 min and the average blood loss was 560 ml. Reconstruction was done with a combination of prosthetic mesh and pedicled muscle flap. Median disease-free and overall survivals were 21 and 26 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radical resection with reconstruction is required for optimal long-term oncological and functional outcomes for NSCLC with CW involvement.

First-line management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: An Indian perspective

Lung cancer has been the most common cancer in the world for several decades. The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes approximately about 80% of the total cases of lung cancer. Therapeutic interventions in NSCLC have shifted to the target-based approach from histology-based approach, and this has completely changed the face of the management of NSCLC. Developing countries, such as India, have very limited data compiled about the prevalence and treatment practices of lung cancer, despite a large burden of the disease. However, in recent times, there has been a lot of data generated in this regard. This article is an attempt to collate and shine light on the available data for the first-line treatment of NSCLC in India keeping in mind the current standards of care in this area.

Clinical predictors of response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world multicentric cohort analysis from India

BACKGROUND

The development of various targeted therapies against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) has been a major step in therapeutic advancements in lung cancer. However, the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) therapy in a real-world setting has not been well elucidated.

METHODS

As part of a retrospective analysis, patients with EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer at 4 tertiary care Institutions in North India between December 2007 and August 2018 were evaluated. The overall response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and factors affecting PFS were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 483 patients were included, including 52.4% males, with mean (±SD) age of 56.7 (±12.4) years. Majority (63.8%) had good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1) and 77.4% were nonsmokers. Among the EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletion was the most common mutation detected (68.1%), followed by L858R mutation in exon 21 (26.9%). Extra-thoracic metastasis was present in 69.5% patients and majority of them had ≤ 2 metastatic sites (85.1%). TKIs were used as the first-line therapy in 64.8% patients, and gefitinib was the most frequently used TKI (67.3%), followed by erlotinib (26.7%). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 65.9% and 90.7% respectively. The median PFS was 9.3 months and brain was the exclusive site of progression in 18.0% patients. On univariate analysis, the factors that significantly affected PFS were, the number of metastatic sites and the type of EGFR mutation. On multivariate analysis, the number of metastatic sites was the only factor that affected the PFS [HR (95% CI): 2.5 (1.7-3.6); Pvalue <0.001]. Skin toxicity was the most common adverse event (32.3%), followed by involvement of the gastro-intestinal tract (22.5%).

CONCLUSION

In this one of the largest multicentric Indian study of treatment outcomes in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world setting, we found that increased tumor burden (number of metastatic sites > 2) was the only significant factor associated with a worse PFS.

Small cell lung cancer: Recent changes in clinical presentation and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a leading cause of death all over the world. Diagnostic and therapeutic arsenals have improved in recent years, but we are unsure as to whether these advances have been transferred to clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in SCLC diagnostic processes and short-term survival rates between two recent cohorts.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was conducted with patients diagnosed with SCLC (either at extensive or limited stages) in the 2011-2016 period. Patients were divided into two cohorts (2011-2013 and 2014-2016) and followed up for 1 year after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Around 713 patients with lung cancer were selected, 134 of whom had SCLC (74 patients in the 2011-2013 cohort and 60 in the 2014-2016 cohort). We observed a chronological increase in the use of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) between the cohorts. Overall, short-term survival was similar between the two groups and improved survival was associated with age and limited stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in diagnostic process in SCLC have been observed towards a more precise stadification. Although short-term survival has not changed for SCLC, it is unclear that the real benefit of PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA is far from correct disease staging.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcome in small cell lung cancer: A single institutional experience from India

Background and Objectives

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) constitutes 14%-20% of all lung cancers. Clinical data on SCLC are scarce in literature. To report clinical features and treatment outcome of SCLC treated at our center.

Materials and Methods

This is a single institutional data review of SCLC patients treated between June 2011 and December 2018. Patients were staged as either localized or extensive disease after appropriate staging work-up. Patients with localized disease were treated with concurrent chemoradiation with platinum-based chemotherapy. Those with extensive disease were treated with platinum based palliative chemotherapy. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment details, and outcome were recorded in this study. Patients who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy were included for survival analysis as intent-to-treat analysis.

Results

A total of 181 were patients registered with a median age of 62 years (range: 35-86 years) and male: female ratio of 166:15. Eighty-seven percent (n = 157) of patients had smoking history and 15% (n = 28) of patients had symptom of superior vena cava obstruction at baseline. Twenty-seven (15%) patients had localized disease at presentation. One hundred and twenty (66%) patients took systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimen was carboplatin only in 9 (7%), etoposide-carboplatin in 54 (45%), and cisplatin-etoposide in 57 (48%). Patients received median cycle number of 6 (range: 1-6). Of the evaluable 87 (73%) patients, initial response was complete response in 4, partial response in 57, stable disease in 20, and progressive disease in 6. Twenty patients received second-line chemotherapy at time of disease progression. After a median follow-up of 8.8 months (range: 0.3-46.1), median progression-free survival (PFS) of the whole population was 9.3 months.

Conclusions

Small cell carcinoma in our series had a high incidence of advanced stage (85%) and 13% of patients were nonsmoker. Only 66% of patients received palliative chemotherapy and achieved high disease control rate (>75%) in the evaluable patients with median PFS of 9.3 months.

Clinical profile of lung cancer in North India: A 10-year analysis of 1862 patients from a tertiary care center

Introduction:

Over the past few years, the demographic profile of lung cancer has changed. However, most reports are limited by small numbers, short follow-up period, and show an inconsistent pattern. A comprehensive evaluation of changing trends over a long period has not been done.

Materials and Methods:

Consecutive lung cancer patients were studied over a 10-year period from January 2008 to March 2018 at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, and relevant clinical information, and survival outcomes were analyzed.

Results:

A total of 1862 patients were evaluated, with mean (SD) age of 59 (11.1) years, and comprising 82.9% males. Majority were smokers (76.2%) with median smoking index of 500 (interquartile range [IQR]: 300–800). Adenocarcinoma (ADC) was the most common type (34%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC – 28.6%) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (16.1%). Over the 10-year period, ADC increased from 9.5% to 35.9%, SCC from 25.4% to 30.6%, and non-small cell lung cancer -not otherwise specified (NSCLC-NOS) decreased from 49.2% to 21.4%. The proportion of females with lung cancer increased although smoking rates remained similar. Majority of NSCLC (95%) continued to be diagnosed at an advanced stage (3 or 4). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements were present in 25.3% and 11.5% ADC patients, respectively. The median overall survival was 8.8 months (IQR 3.7–19) for all patients and 12.57 (IQR 6.2–28.7) months among the 1013 patients who were initiated on specific treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, or surgery). Never-smokers were younger, more likely to be female and educated, had a higher prevalence of ADC and EGFR/ALK mutations, and had better survival.

Conclusion:

Among this large cohort, our center seems to follow the global trend with increasing incidence of ADC. EGFR mutation positivity was similar to existing reports, while higher ALK positivity was detected. A characteristic phenotype of never-smokers with lung cancer was elucidated which demonstrated better survival.

Unmet Clinical Need in the Management of Locally Advanced Unresectable Lung Cancer: Treatment Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes

Stage III locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA NSCLC) comprises the most heterogeneous group of patients, accounts for one-third of patients with lung cancer, and is unresectable at presentation. Multiple treatment approaches have evolved over the past few decades focusing on timing of chemoradiation (concurrent vs. sequential) and sequencing of therapy (induction vs. consolidation). Concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) emerged as the standard of care for the majority of the patients worldwide. Despite improvements in median and overall survival (OS) using the concurrent approach, the rate of distant failure remains high. Consolidation with chemotherapy or targeted agents, adding more radiation dose, or induction chemotherapy did not improve OS. With continued research on defining optimal radiation doses and schedules and integrating novel systemic agents, immunotherapy consolidation has renewed optimism. Synergistic use of radiation and immunotherapy can prevent micrometastatic disease and reduce local failure and may have an abscopal effect in addition to survival benefits. The PACIFIC study reported an absolute progression-free survival benefit of 11.2 months with durvalumab consolidation after standard CCRT compared with placebo. The OS data with durvalumab consolidation are encouraging. Durvalumab is the only approved immunotherapy for unresectable stage III LA NSCLC. Improved survival confirms the definitive role of durvalumab as an effective adjuvant therapy after CCRT with no new safety signals. However, the potential mechanisms driving interaction between immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy require definitive investigation. These mechanisms may help define the timing of immunotherapy initiation as neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or consolidation and maintenance therapy after progression. FUNDING: AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited.

Changes in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis, molecular testing and prognosis 2011-2016

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of death all over the world. Diagnostic and therapeutic arsenals have improved in recent years, but we are unsure as to whether these advances have been transferred to clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in NSCLC diagnostic processes and short-term survival rates between two recent cohorts.

Methods

A prospective, observational study was conducted with patients diagnosed with NSCLC in the period of 2011-2016. Patients were divided into two cohorts (2011-2013 and 2014-2016), and monitored for up to 1 year after diagnosis.

Results

A total of 713 patients with lung cancer were selected, 500 of whom had NSCLC (222 patients in the 2011-2013 cohort, and 278 in the 2014-2016 cohort). We observed a chronological increase in the use of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and ultrasound-guided transthoracic puncture (US-TTP) between the cohorts. Overall short-term survival was similar between the two groups, both for locally and for advanced disease. Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) was the only therapeutic factor associated with an improved likelihood of survival.

Conclusions

Changes in diagnostic process in NSCLC have been observed towards a more precise stratification. Although short-term survival has not changed for advanced NSCLC, some of the newer therapeutic options are associated with increased survival in real-world scenarios.