1
|
Gilson S. Deconditioning in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151676. [PMID: 38945732 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Provide an overview of hospital-associated deconditioning in hospitalized patients with cancer, including risk factors and trajectory of deconditioning. Discuss interdisciplinary roles in preventing deconditioning, best practices, and oncology nursing implications. METHODS A literature search was conducted in PubMed and on Google Scholar using search terms Hospital*, Mobility, Immobility, Deconditioning, Cancer, and Oncology. Peer-reviewed research studies, review articles, and websites of professional organizations were reviewed to provide an overview on mobility concerns in hospitalized patients with cancer. RESULTS Thirty-eight references were included in this overview of hospital-associated deconditioning (HAD) in patients with cancer. HAD is a widespread phenomenon with grave consequences. Patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable to HAD due to their cancer diagnosis and treatment effects. Physical activity in hospitalized patients is one of the most important practices to prevent HAD and is achieved through standardized mobility assessment and interdisciplinary collaboration. CONCLUSIONS Promoting mobility in hospitalized patients with cancer is essential to prevent the complications of HAD. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurses are leaders of the interdisciplinary approach to enhance inpatient mobility. As they are most often at the bedside, nurses assess patients' level of mobility, recognize risk factors for HAD, and implement safe mobility interventions. Nurses experience barriers to promoting mobility including workforce shortages, high workloads, and competing priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savanna Gilson
- PIH Health Whittier Hospital, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Medical Oncology, Whittier, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hidalgo Filho CM, Lazar Neto F, Sobottka VP, da Rocha JW, Stangler LTB, Andrade HG, Benfatti Olivato G, Claro MZ, Souza DZDO, Yamamoto VJ, Soares MMN, Estevez-Diz MDP, Hoff PM, Bonadio RC. Unplanned Hospital Admissions in Patients With Solid Tumors in Brazil: Causes and Progressive Disease's Impact on Outcomes. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2400063. [PMID: 38991187 DOI: 10.1200/go.24.00063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Most patients with cancer will be hospitalized throughout the disease course. However, most evidence on the causes and outcomes of these hospitalizations comes from administrative data or small retrospective studies from high-income countries. METHODS This study is a retrospective cohort of patients with solid tumors hospitalized from February 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, in a tertiary cancer center in São Paulo, Brazil. We collected data on cancer diagnosis, symptoms at admission, hospitalization diagnosis, and survival clinical outcomes during in-hospital stay (in-hospital mortality) and after discharge (readmission rates and overall survival [OS]). Progressive disease (PD) diagnosis during admission was retrieved from manual chart review if explicitly stated by the attending physician. We modeled in-hospital mortality and postdischarge OS with logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. RESULTS A total of 3,726 unique unplanned admissions were identified. The most common symptoms at admission were pain (40.6%), nausea (16.8%), and dyspnea (16.1%). PD (34.0%), infection (31.1%), and cancer pain (13.4%) were the most frequent reasons for admission. The in-hospital mortality rate was 18.9%. Patients with PD had a high in-hospital mortality rate across all tumor groups and higher odds of in-hospital death (odds ratio, 3.5 [95% CI, 3.0 to 4.2]). The 7-, 30-, and 90-day readmission rates were 11.9%, 33.5%, and 54%, respectively. The postdischarge median OS (mOS) was 12.6 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 13.7). Poorer postdischarge survival was observed among patients with PD (mOS, 5 months v 18 months; P < .001; hazard ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6]). CONCLUSION PD is a common diagnosis during unplanned hospitalizations and is associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates and poorer OS after discharge. Oncologists should be aware of the prognostic implications of PD during admission and align goals of care with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Felippe Lazar Neto
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - João Wilson da Rocha
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Heloisa Guedes Andrade
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Mateus Zapparoli Claro
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Victor Junji Yamamoto
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Paulo M Hoff
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renata Colombo Bonadio
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oladapo-Shittu O, Cosgrove SE, Rock C, Hsu YJ, Klein E, Harris AD, Mejia-Chew C, Saunders H, Ching PR, Gadala A, Mayoryk S, Pineles L, Maragakis L, Salinas A, Helsel T, Keller SC. Characterizing Patients Presenting on Hospital Admission With Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: A Multicenter Study. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:1632-1639. [PMID: 38483930 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no systematic measures of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in patients maintaining central venous catheters (CVCs) outside acute care hospitals. To clarify the burden of CLABSIs in these patients, we characterized patients with CLABSI present on hospital admission (POA). METHODS Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients with CLABSI-POA in 3 health systems covering 11 hospitals across Maryland, Washington DC, and Missouri from November 2020 to October 2021. CLABSI-POA was defined using an adaptation of the acute care CLABSI definition. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were collected via record review. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess factors associated with the all-cause mortality rate within 30 days. RESULTS A total of 461 patients were identified as having CLABSI-POA. CVCs were most commonly maintained in home infusion therapy (32.8%) or oncology clinics (31.2%). Enterobacterales were the most common etiologic agent (29.2%). Recurrent CLABSIs occurred in a quarter of patients (25%). Eleven percent of patients died during the hospital admission. Among patients with CLABSI-POA, mortality risk increased with age (hazard ratio vs age <20 years by age group: 20-44 years, 11.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.46-86.22]; 45-64 years, 20.88 [2.84-153.58]; ≥65 years, 22.50 [2.98-169.93]) and lack of insurance (2.46 [1.08-5.59]), and it decreased with CVC removal (0.57 [.39-.84]). CONCLUSIONS CLABSI-POA is associated with significant in-hospital mortality risk. Surveillance is required to understand the burden of CLABSI in the community to identify targets for CLABSI prevention initiatives outside acute care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Opeyemi Oladapo-Shittu
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sara E Cosgrove
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Clare Rock
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yea-Jen Hsu
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Eili Klein
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Anthony D Harris
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Institute for Health Computing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Carlos Mejia-Chew
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Heather Saunders
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Patrick R Ching
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Avi Gadala
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie Mayoryk
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa Pineles
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- University of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa Maragakis
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alejandra Salinas
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Taylor Helsel
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sara C Keller
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bhimani J, O'Connell K, Ergas IJ, Foley M, Gallagher GB, Griggs JJ, Heon N, Kolevska T, Kotsurovskyy Y, Kroenke CH, Laurent CA, Liu R, Nakata KG, Persaud S, Rivera DR, Roh JM, Tabatabai S, Valice E, Bowles EJA, Bandera EV, Kushi LH, Kantor ED. Trends in chemotherapy use for early-stage breast cancer from 2006 to 2019. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:101. [PMID: 38872192 PMCID: PMC11170793 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01822-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about how use of chemotherapy has evolved in breast cancer patients. We therefore describe chemotherapy patterns for women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer in the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) Study using data from KPNC (Kaiser Permanente Northern California) and KPWA (Kaiser Permanente Washington). FINDINGS Among 33,670 women, aged 18 + y, diagnosed with primary stage I-IIIA breast cancer at KPNC and KPWA from 2006 to 2019, we explored patterns of intravenous chemotherapy use, defined here as receipt of intravenous cytotoxic drugs and/or anti-HER2 therapies. We evaluated trends in chemotherapy receipt, duration over which chemotherapy was received, and number of associated infusion visits. In secondary analyses, we stratified by receipt of anti-HER2 therapies (trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab), given their longer duration. 38.9% received chemotherapy intravenously, declining from 40.2% in 2006 to 35.6% in 2019 (p-trend < 0.001). Among 13,089 women receiving chemotherapy, neoadjuvant treatment increased (4.1-14.7%; p-trend < 0.001), as did receipt of anti-HER2 therapies (20.8-30.9%) (p-trend < 0.001). The average treatment duration increased (5.3 to 6.0 months; p-trend < 0.001), as did the number of infusion visits (10.8 to 12.5; p-trend < 0.001). For those receiving anti-HER2 therapies, treatment duration and average number of visits decreased; among those not receiving anti-HER2 therapies, number of visits increased, with no change in duration. CONCLUSIONS While the prevalence of chemotherapy receipt has decreased over time, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has increased, as has use of anti-HER2 therapies; duration and number of administration visits have also increased. Understanding these trends is useful to inform clinical and administrative planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Bhimani
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kelli O'Connell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Isaac J Ergas
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Marilyn Foley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Grace B Gallagher
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Griggs
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Narre Heon
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tatjana Kolevska
- Department of Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Vallejo, CA, USA
| | - Yuriy Kotsurovskyy
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Candyce H Kroenke
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Cecile A Laurent
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Raymond Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
- San Francisco Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kanichi G Nakata
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sonia Persaud
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna R Rivera
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Janise M Roh
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Sara Tabatabai
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily Valice
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Erin J A Bowles
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Lawrence H Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Kantor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 Third Avenue 3rd Floor, 10017, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Poco LC, Malhotra C. More competent informal caregivers reduce advanced cancer patients' unplanned healthcare use and costs. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7366. [PMID: 38872395 PMCID: PMC11176569 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic cancer experience high healthcare use and costs, most of which are unplanned. We aimed to assess whether patients with more competent informal caregivers have lower unplanned healthcare use and costs. METHODS This study used data from a prospective cohort of patients with solid metastatic cancer. Patients and their informal family caregivers were surveyed every 3 months until patients' death. Patients' unplanned healthcare use/costs were examined through hospital records. Caregivers responded to the 4-item Caregiver Competence Scale. First, in a deceased subsample of patients and their caregivers, we used patients' last 2 years of data (226 dyads) to assess the association between caregivers' competency (independent variable) and patients' unplanned healthcare use/costs (outcomes). Next, in a prospective sample of patient-caregiver dyads (up to 15 surveys), we assessed whether patients' functional well-being and psychological distress moderated the association between caregivers' competency and unplanned healthcare use/costs (311 dyads). RESULTS In the deceased subsample, during last 2 years of patients' life, caregivers' higher competency lowered the odds of patients' unplanned healthcare use [OR (CI) = 0.86 (0.75, 0.98), p = 0.03], and was associated with a significant reduction in unplanned healthcare costs [Coeff (CI) = -0.19 (-0.36, -0.01), p = 0.03]. In the prospective sample, patients' functional well-being and psychological distress moderated the association between caregivers' competency and patients' unplanned healthcare use/costs. CONCLUSION With deterioration in patients' condition and an increase in caregiving demands, improving caregivers' competency can reduce patients' unplanned healthcare use and costs. This should be further tested in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Camille Poco
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sindet-Pedersen C, El-Chouli M, Nouhravesh N, Lamberts M, Christensen DM, Kümler T, Lock M, Grove EL, Holt A, Schou M, Gislason G, Butt JH, Strange JE. High risk of rehospitalization within 1 year following a pulmonary embolism-insights from the Danish nationwide registries from 2000-2020. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES 2024; 10:256-264. [PMID: 37541959 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM To identify the absolute risk, causes, and factors associated with rehospitalization within 1 year of discharge with a pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS AND RESULTS Using the Danish nationwide registries, all patients admitted with a first-time PE between 2000 and 2020 and discharged alive were included. Subsequent hospitalizations were categorized and crude cumulative incidences were used to estimate the absolute risk (AR) of any rehospitalization and specific causes of rehospitalizations. Risk factors for rehospitalization were investigated using cause specific Cox regression models.A total of 55 201 patients were identified. The median age of the study population was 70 years (inter quartile range: 59;79), and the most prevalent comorbidities were cancer (29.3%) and ischemic heart disease (12.7%). The 1-year AR of any rehospitalization after discharge with a PE was 48.6% (95% confidence interval (CI); 48.2%-48.8%). The most common cause for being rehospitalized was due to respiratory disease [1-year AR: 9.5% (95% CI: 9.3%-9.8%)], followed by cardiovascular disease [1-year AR: 6.3% (95% CI: 5.9%-6.5%)], cancer [1-year AR: 6.0% (95% CI: 5.8%-6.4%)], venous thromboembolism [1-year AR: 5.2% (95% CI: 5.0%-5.2%)], and symptom diagnoses [1-year AR: 5.2% (95% CI: 5.0%-5.4%)]. Factors that were associated with an increased risk of rehospitalization were cancer, liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and immobilization. CONCLUSION Patients with PE have a high risk of rehospitalization, with almost half of patients being rehospitalized within 1 year. Identification of high-risk patients may help target interventions aiming at reducing the risk of rehospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Sindet-Pedersen
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Mohamad El-Chouli
- The Danish Heart Foundation, 1120 Copenhagen K, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Nina Nouhravesh
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Morten Lamberts
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | | | - Thomas Kümler
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Morten Lock
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Erik Lerkevang Grove
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anders Holt
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| | - Morten Schou
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Gunnar Gislason
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
- The Danish Heart Foundation, 1120 Copenhagen K, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Jawad Haider Butt
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jarl Emanuel Strange
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Trojan A, Kühne C, Kiessling M, Schumacher J, Dröse S, Singer C, Jackisch C, Thomssen C, Kullak-Ublick GA. Impact of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Unplanned Consultations and Hospitalizations in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Systemic Therapy: Results of a Patient-Reported Outcome Study Compared With Matched Retrospective Data. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e55917. [PMID: 38710048 PMCID: PMC11106695 DOI: 10.2196/55917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) is increasingly being used in clinical studies of patients with cancer and enables structured and standardized data collection in patients' everyday lives. So far, few studies or analyses have focused on the medical benefit of ePROs for patients. OBJECTIVE The current exploratory analysis aimed to obtain an initial indication of whether the use of the Consilium Care app (recently renamed medidux; mobile Health AG) for structured and regular self-assessment of side effects by ePROs had a recognizable effect on incidences of unplanned consultations and hospitalizations of patients with cancer compared to a control group in a real-world care setting without app use. To analyze this, the incidences of unplanned consultations and hospitalizations of patients with cancer using the Consilium Care app that were recorded by the treating physicians as part of the patient reported outcome (PRO) study were compared retrospectively to corresponding data from a comparable population of patients with cancer collected at 2 Swiss oncology centers during standard-of-care treatment. METHODS Patients with cancer in the PRO study (178 included in this analysis) receiving systemic therapy in a neoadjuvant or noncurative setting performed a self-assessment of side effects via the Consilium Care app over an observational period of 90 days. In this period, unplanned (emergency) consultations and hospitalizations were documented by the participating physicians. The incidence of these events was compared with retrospective data obtained from 2 Swiss tumor centers for a matched cohort of patients with cancer. RESULTS Both patient groups were comparable in terms of age and gender ratio, as well as the distribution of cancer entities and Joint Committee on Cancer stages. In total, 139 patients from each group were treated with chemotherapy and 39 with other therapies. Looking at all patients, no significant difference in events per patient was found between the Consilium group and the control group (odds ratio 0.742, 90% CI 0.455-1.206). However, a multivariate regression model revealed that the interaction term between the Consilium group and the factor "chemotherapy" was significant at the 5% level (P=.048). This motivated a corresponding subgroup analysis that indicated a relevant reduction of the risk for the intervention group in the subgroup of patients who underwent chemotherapy. The corresponding odds ratio of 0.53, 90% CI 0.288-0.957 is equivalent to a halving of the risk for patients in the Consilium group and suggests a clinically relevant effect that is significant at a 2-sided 10% level (P=.08, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS A comparison of unplanned consultations and hospitalizations from the PRO study with retrospective data from a comparable cohort of patients with cancer suggests a positive effect of regular app-based ePROs for patients receiving chemotherapy. These data are to be verified in the ongoing randomized PRO2 study (registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT05425550). TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03578731; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03578731. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/29271.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Trojan
- Oncology, Breast Center Zürichsee, Horgen, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Kühne
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Kiessling
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Christian Singer
- Center for Breast Health and Female Medicine, University Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Sana Clinic Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynecology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Gerd A Kullak-Ublick
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
MiriMoghaddam M, Bohlouli B, Lai H, Viegas S, Amin M. Trends and predictors of unplanned hospitalization among oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients; an 8-year population-based study. Oral Oncol 2024; 151:106742. [PMID: 38460285 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of oral cancers, particularly HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer, is steadily increasing worldwide, presenting a significant healthcare challenge. This study investigates trends and predictors of unplanned hospitalizations for oral cavity cancer (OCC) and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients in the province of Alberta, Canada. METHODS This retrospective, population-based, cohort study used administrative data collected from all hospitals in the province. Using the Alberta Cancer Registry (ACR), a cohort of adult patients diagnosed with a single primary OCC or OPC between January 2010 and December 2017 was identified. Linking this cohort with the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD), trends in hospitalizations, primary diagnoses, and predictors of unplanned hospitalization (UH) and 30-day unplanned readmission were analyzed. RESULTS Of 1,721 patients included, 1,244 experienced 2,228 hospitalizations, with 48 % being categorized as UH. The UHs were significantly associated with a higher mortality rate, 18.5 % as compared to 4.6 % for planned, and influenced by sex, age groups, comorbidities, cancer types, stages, and treatment modalities. The rate of UH per patient decreased from 0.69 to 0.54 visits during the study period (P = 0.02). Common diagnoses for UH were palliative care and post-surgical convalescence, while surgery-related complications such as infection and hemorrhage were frequent in 30-day unplanned readmissions. Predictors of UH included cancer stage, material deprivation, and treatment, while cancer type and comorbidity predicted readmissions. CONCLUSION The rate of UHs showed a noteworthy decline in this study, which could be a result of enhanced care coordination. Furthermore, identified primary diagnosis and predictors associated with UHs and readmissions, provide valuable insights for enhancing the quality of care for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoud MiriMoghaddam
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Babak Bohlouli
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Hollis Lai
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Shefali Viegas
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - Maryam Amin
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peerenboom R, Ackroyd S, Lee N. The burden of cervical cancer survivorship: Understanding morbidity and survivorship needs through hospital admissions. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024; 51:101328. [PMID: 38318201 PMCID: PMC10839575 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To describe disease- and treatment-related survivorship burden amongst survivors of cervical cancer and identify risk factors for hospital admissions after initial treatment. Methods Retrospective chart review including patients treated for cervical cancer from 2014 to 2020 at a single urban academic institution. Clinical, demographic, and hospital admission characteristics were summarized. Associations between patient characteristics and likelihood of admission were examined using univariate and multivariate regression. Results Of 366 patients undergoing surveillance following completion of primary treatment, 156 (43 %) were hospitalized for cancer or treatment-related sequela in the median follow-up of 3.6 years (IQR 1.4-6.4), with a median of 2 admissions (IQR 1-4.5) per patient and 570 unique admissions. While 65 (35 %) of admitted patients had multiple reasons for admission, the most common reasons for admission were: gastrointestinal complications (43 %), infection (38 %), genitourinary complications (33 %), and pain control (23 %). A substantial proportion of admitted patients underwent interventions including surgical procedures (57 %), transfusion of blood products (40 %), and interventional radiology procedures (28 %) and utilized supportive care services including case management (53 %), physical therapy (40 %), and occupational therapy (36 %). On multivariate analysis, odds of admission were higher among Black patients (aOR 2.4, p <.01), uninsured patients (aOR 2.7, p <.05), those with lower performance status (aOR 1.4, p <.05), and those with recurrence (aOR 5.5, p <.001). Conclusion Survivors of cervical cancer represent a high-risk population frequently hospitalized after initial treatment. Black patients, uninsured patients, those with recurrence, and those with lower performance status faced higher odds of admission. Comprehensive, team-based care is necessary to address complex survivorship needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rayne Peerenboom
- University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, United States
| | - Sarah Ackroyd
- University of Chicago, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Gynecologic Oncology, United States
| | - Nita Lee
- University of Chicago, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Gynecologic Oncology, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Han S, Sohn TJ, Avanceña AL, Park C. Rate, Timing, and Duration of Unplanned Readmissions Due to Cardiovascular Diseases among Hospitalized Patients with Cancer in the United States. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2023; 24:326. [PMID: 39076430 PMCID: PMC11272843 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2411326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) can lead to unplanned care in patients with cancer, which may affect their prognosis and survival. We aimed to compare the rates, timing, and length of stay of unplanned CVD readmission in hospitalized patients with and without cancer. Methods This study used the 2017-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify adult hospitalized patients with and without cancer. The primary outcome was 180-day unplanned CVD readmission rates. CVD was defined based on a composite variable that included atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, cardiomegaly, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, peripheral artery disease, and stroke. For patients readmitted due to CVD, the timing between admissions (based on the mean number of days between index hospitalization and readmission) and length of stay were further identified. Results After matching, 300,398 patients were included in the two groups. The composite CVD readmission rates were significantly higher in patients with cancer (5.92% vs 4.10%; odds ratio (OR) 1.47, 95% CI 1.44-1.51, p < 0.001). Patients with cancer were also associated with shorter mean number of days to composite CVD readmission (60.48 days vs 68.32 days, p < 0.001) and longer length of stay of composite CVD readmission (8.21 days vs 7.13 days, p < 0.001). These trends were maintained in analyses of the individual CVD. Conclusions Hospitalized patients with cancer experienced higher rates of unplanned readmission due to CVD, and their CVD readmissions occurred sooner and required longer lengths of stay compared to patients without cancer. Efforts to reduce unplanned CVD readmissions, such as providing optimized chronic post-discharge care, may improve the health outcomes of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sola Han
- Health Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at
Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Ted J. Sohn
- Health Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at
Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Anton L.V. Avanceña
- Health Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at
Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Chanhyun Park
- Health Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at
Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leonetti A, Peroni M, Agnetti V, Pratticò F, Manini M, Acunzo A, Marverti F, Sulas S, Rapacchi E, Mazzaschi G, Perrone F, Bordi P, Buti S, Tiseo M. Thirty-day mortality in hospitalised patients with lung cancer: incidence and predictors. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004558. [PMID: 37666650 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with lung cancer experience high rates of hospitalisation, mainly due to the high risk of complications that emerge during the natural history of the disease. We designed a retrospective, single-centre, observational study aimed at defining the clinical predictors of 30-day mortality in hospitalised patients with lung cancer. METHODS Clinical records from the first admission of patients with lung cancer to the oncology ward of the University Hospital of Parma from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2022 were collected. RESULTS 251 consecutive patients were enrolled at the time of data cut-off. In the univariate analysis, baseline clinical predictors of 30-day mortality were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) (≥2 vs 0-1: 27.5% vs 14.8%, p=0.028), high Blaylock Risk Assessment Screening Score (BRASS) (high vs intermediate-low: 34.3% vs 11.9%, p<0.001), presence of pain (yes vs no: 24.4% vs 11.7%, p=0.009), number of metastatic sites (≥3 vs <3: 26.5% vs 13.4%, p=0.017) and presence of bone metastases (yes vs no: 29.0% vs 10.8%, p=0.001). In the multivariate analysis, high BRASS remained significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality (high vs intermediate-low; OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.21 to 6.78, p=0.016). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that baseline poor ECOG PS, high BRASS, presence of pain, high tumour burden and presence of bone metastases could be used as clinical predictors of 30-day mortality in hospitalised patients with lung cancer. In particular, the BRASS scale should be used as a simple tool to predict 30-day mortality in hospitalised patients with lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marianna Peroni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Virginia Agnetti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabiana Pratticò
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Martina Manini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Acunzo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Simone Sulas
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Elena Rapacchi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giulia Mazzaschi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabiana Perrone
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Paola Bordi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Marcello Tiseo
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bonares M, Stillos K, Huynh L, Selby D. Differences in trends in discharge location in a cohort of hospitalized patients with cancer and non-cancer diagnoses receiving specialist palliative care: A retrospective cohort study. Palliat Med 2023; 37:1241-1251. [PMID: 37452565 PMCID: PMC10503238 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231183009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with and without cancer are frequently hospitalized, and have specialist palliative care needs. In-hospital mortality can serve as a quality indicator of acute care. Trends in acute care outcomes have not previously been evaluated in patients with confirmed specialist palliative care needs or between diagnostic groups. AIM To compare trends in discharge location between hospitalized patients with and without cancer who received specialist palliative care. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. Association between diagnosis (cancer, non-cancer) and in-hospital mortality was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for demographic, clinical, and admission-specific information. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Patients who received specialist palliative care at an academic tertiary hospital in Toronto, Canada from 2013 to 2019. RESULTS The cohort comprised 6846 patients, 5024 with and 1822 without cancer. A higher proportion of patients without cancer had a Palliative Performance Scale score <30%, anticipated prognosis of <1 month, and were referred for end-of-life care (all p < 0.001). The adjusted odds of dying in hospital was 1.24-times higher among patients without cancer (95% CI: 1.05-1.46; p = 0.011). Though the proportion of patients without cancer who died in hospital decreased by 8.4% from 2013 to 2019, this proportion (41.2%) remained substantially higher compared to patients with cancer (14.0%) in 2019. CONCLUSIONS Hospitalized patients without cancer were referred to specialist palliative care at a lower functional status, a poorer anticipated prognosis, and more likely for end-of-life care; and were more likely to die in hospital. Future studies are required to determine whether a proportion of hospital deaths in patients without cancer represent goal-discordant end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bonares
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kalli Stillos
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lise Huynh
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Debbie Selby
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sánchez JC, Nuñez-García B, Ruano-Ravina A, Blanco M, Martín-Vegue AR, Royuela A, Cantos B, Méndez M, Calvo V, Provencio M. Patterns and outcome of unplanned care in lung cancer patients: an observational study in a medical oncology department. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2023; 12:1752-1765. [PMID: 37691863 PMCID: PMC10483072 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-23-48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Background There is increasing interest in unplanned care utilization among lung cancer patients and its evaluation should allow the identification of areas for quality improvement. Being a major priority for transformation in oncology, we aim to measure the risk and burden of unplanned care in a medical oncology department and identify factors that determine acute care. Methods This was an observational retrospective cohort study that included all lung cancer patients treated at Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital between January 1st 2016 and December 31st 2020. Data cut off: June 30th, 2021. The main objective was to assess the incidence of unplanned care, emergency department (ED) visits and unplanned hospital admissions, from the first visit to the medical oncology service and its potential conditioning variables, considering patient death as a competitive event. As secondary objectives, a description and a quality of unplanned care evaluation was carried out. Results A total of 821 lung cancer patients, all histologies and stages, were included (median follow-up: 32.8 months). Six hundred and eighty-one patients required consultation in the ED (82.9%), and 558 required an unplanned admission (68%). Eighty-six percent of ED consultations and 80.9% of unplanned hospital admissions were related to cancer or its treatment. The 1-year cumulative incidence for ED consultation and for unplanned hospital admission was 71.3% (95% CI: 67.8-74.5%) and 56.7% (95% CI: 53-60%), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, a higher tumor stage increased the risk of consultation in the ED, while a higher stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 compared to ECOG PS 0, male sex, opioid or steroid use at first consultation increased the risk of unplanned admission. Conclusions Our study shows that lung cancer patients have an extremely high demand for unplanned care. It is an early need and related to cancer in the majority of consultations and admissions and therefore a key issue for the management of oncology departments. We must optimize the follow-up of patients with a higher risk of unplanned care, advanced lung cancer or symptomatic patients, incorporating remote monitoring strategies and early interventions, as developing specific urgent care pathways for a better comprehensive cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C. Sánchez
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Nuñez-García
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Ruano-Ravina
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariola Blanco
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Arturo Ramos Martín-Vegue
- Admission and Clinical Documentation Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Royuela
- Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, IDIPHISA, CIBERESP, ISCIII, Madrid, España
| | - Blanca Cantos
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miriam Méndez
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Virginia Calvo
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariano Provencio
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shi JJ, Maldonado JA, Wu CF, Peterson SK, Chen YS, Diao K, Volk RJ, Giordano SH, Shih YCT, Kaiser K, Smith GL. Financial toxicity in cancer patients and subsequent risk of repeat acute care utilization. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1209526. [PMID: 37663351 PMCID: PMC10469858 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1209526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Acute care (AC) visits by cancer patients are costly sources of healthcare resources and can exert a financial burden of oncology care both for individuals with cancer and healthcare systems. We sought to identify whether cancer patients who reported more severe initial financial toxicity (FT) burdens shouldered excess risks for acute care utilization. Methods In 225 adult patients who participated in the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) survey study of individuals receiving ambulatory cancer care between March and September 2019, we measured the baseline FT (a multidimensional score of 0-10 indicating the least to most severe global, material, and coping FT burdens). All AC visits, including emergency department (ED) and unplanned hospital admissions, within 1-year follow-up were identified. The association between the severity of FT and the total number of AC visits was tested using Poisson regression models. Results A total of 18.6% (n = 42) of patients had any AC visit, comprising 64.3% hospital admissions and 35.7% ED visits. Global FT burden was associated with the risk of repeat AC visits within 1-year follow-up (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.29, P < 0.001 for every unit increase), even after adjusting for sociodemographic and disease covariates. When examining subdimensions of FT, the burden of depleted FT coping resources (coping FT) was strongly associated with the risk of repeat AC visits (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.40, P < 0.001) while material FT burden showed a trend toward association (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, P = 0.07). Conclusion In this prospective study of acute oncology care utilization outcomes among adult cancer patients, FT was a predictor of a higher burden of acute care visits. Patients with severely depleted material and also practical and social coping resources were at particular risk for repeated visits. Future studies are needed to identify whether early FT screening and intervention efforts may help to mitigate urgent acute care utilization burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia J. Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - J. Alberto Maldonado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- John Sealy School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Chi-Fang Wu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ying-Shiuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kevin Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Robert J. Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ya-Chen T. Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kelsey Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cracchiolo JR, Arafat W, Atreja A, Bruckner L, Emamekhoo H, Heinrichs T, Raldow AC, Smerage J, Stetson P, Sugalski J, Tevaarwerk AJ. Getting ready for real-world use of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for patients with cancer: A National Comprehensive Cancer Network ePRO Workgroup paper. Cancer 2023; 129:2441-2449. [PMID: 37224181 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Electronic patient‐reported outcome (ePRO) programs may offer advantages for patients with cancer, clinicians, health care systems, payors, and society in general; but developing and maintaining an ePRO program will require cancer centers to navigate defining meaningful problems, collecting ePROs, implementing action when those ePROs require intervention without over‐burdening clinicians, and monitoring the successes and failures of their ePRO programs. Physician informaticists from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Electronic Health Record Advisory Group offer 10 guiding principles to consider when contemplating, building, or refining an ePRO program for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Waddah Arafat
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ashish Atreja
- University of California-Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Lauren Bruckner
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Hamid Emamekhoo
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Tricia Heinrichs
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ann C Raldow
- University of California-Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey Smerage
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Peter Stetson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica Sugalski
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mohamed MR, Loh KP, Mohile SG, Sohn M, Webb T, Wells M, Yilmaz S, Tylock R, Culakova E, Magnuson A, Sun CL, Bearden J, Hopkins JO, Faller BA, Klepin HD. External Validation of Risk Factors for Unplanned Hospitalization in Older Adults With Advanced Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:273-280.e3. [PMID: 36898361 PMCID: PMC10966463 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults (age ≥65 years) receiving chemotherapy are at risk for hospitalization. Predictors of unplanned hospitalization among older adults receiving chemotherapy for cancer were recently published using data from a study conducted by the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG). Our study aimed to externally validate these predictors in an independent cohort including older adults with advanced cancer receiving chemotherapy. METHODS This validation cohort included patients (n=369) from the GAP70+ trial usual care arm. Enrolled patients were aged ≥70 years with incurable cancer and were starting a new line of chemotherapy. Previously identified risk factors proposed by the CARG study were ≥3 comorbidities, albumin level <3.5 g/dL, creatinine clearance <60 mL/min, gastrointestinal cancer, ≥5 medications, requiring assistance with activities of daily activities (ADLs), and having someone available to take them to the doctor (ie, presence of social support). The primary outcome was unplanned hospitalization within 3 months of treatment initiation. Multivariable logistic regression was applied including the 7 identified risk factors. Discriminative ability of the fitted model was performed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve. RESULTS Mean age of the cohort was 77 years, 45% of patients were women, and 29% experienced unplanned hospitalization within the first 3 months of treatment. The proportions of hospitalized patients with 0-3, 4-5, and 6-7 identified risk factors were 24%, 28%, and 47%, respectively (P=.04). Impaired ADLs (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-2.99) and albumin level <3.5 g/dL (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.37-3.62) were significantly associated with increased odds of unplanned hospitalization. The AUC of the model, including the 7 identified risk factors, was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.71). CONCLUSIONS The presence of a higher number of risk factors was associated with increased odds of unplanned hospitalization. This association was largely driven by impairment in ADLs and low albumin level. Validated predictors of unplanned hospitalization can help with counseling and shared decision-making with patients and their caregivers. CLINICALTRIALS gov identifier: NCT02054741.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa R Mohamed
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Michael Sohn
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Tracy Webb
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Megan Wells
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Sule Yilmaz
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Rachael Tylock
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Eva Culakova
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Allison Magnuson
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Can-Lan Sun
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - James Bearden
- Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, Spartanburg, South Carolina
| | - Judith O Hopkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP/Novant Health Cancer Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee HC, Ramasamy K, Weisel K, Abonour R, Hardin JW, Rifkin RM, Ailawadhi S, Terebelo HR, Durie BGM, Tang D, Joshi P, Liu L, Jou YM, Che M, Hernandez G, Narang M, Toomey K, Gasparetto C, Wagner LI, Jagannath S. Treatment Patterns, Survival, Quality of Life, and Healthcare Resource Use Among Patients With Triple-Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma in US Clinical Practice: Findings From the Connect MM Disease Registry. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2023; 23:112-122. [PMID: 36567211 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with triple-class refractory (TCR) multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and poor prognosis, but the burden of TCR MM has not been well characterized. This study evaluated treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and healthcare resource use (HCRU) among patients with TCR MM in US clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with TCR MM in the Connect MM Registry (NCT01081028; a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed MM) were included. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRQoL, and HCRU were analyzed using descriptive statistics. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology for the overall cohort and for patients with/without ≥1 post-TCR line of therapy (LOT). RESULTS A total of 232 patients with TCR MM were included; 155 (67%) had ≥1 post-TCR LOT (post-TCR-Treated subgroup; median 9.9 months of follow-up). Most common post-TCR treatments were carfilzomib (47%), pomalidomide (40%), and daratumumab (26%); median treatment duration was 3.3 months. Median OS was 9.9 months in the overall population, 10.8 months in post-TCR-Treated patients, and 2.6 months for those with no new post-TCR LOT. HRQoL deteriorated and pain increased over 1 year of follow-up, with clinically meaningfully changes in EQ-5D (mean, -0.06 points) and FACT-G (mean, -9.9 points). 124 (53%) patients had ≥1 all-cause hospitalization and 58 (25%) had ≥1 MM-related hospitalization; median annualized length of stay was 35.3 and 42.9 days, respectively. CONCLUSION The burden of TCR MM is substantial, emphasizing the need for more effective treatment options in the TCR setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans C Lee
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karthik Ramasamy
- Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Katja Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, University Medical Center of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rafat Abonour
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Robert M Rifkin
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers/US Oncology Research, Denver, CO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Min Che
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Gabriela Hernandez
- Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Alishahi Tabriz A, Turner K, Hong YR, Gheytasvand S, Powers BD, Elston Lafata J. Trends and Characteristics of Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Visits Among Patients With Cancer in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2250423. [PMID: 36656584 PMCID: PMC9857289 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE An initial step to reducing emergency department (ED) visits among patients with cancer is to identify the characteristics of patients visiting the ED and examine which of those visits could be prevented. OBJECTIVE To explore nationwide trends and characteristics of ED visits and examine factors associated with potentially preventable ED visits and unplanned hospitalizations among patients with cancer in the US. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study used data on ED visits from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019; US Cancer Statistics reports were used to estimate new cancer cases each year. Frequencies and trends among 35 510 014 ED visits by adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with cancer were calculated. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was potentially preventable ED visits, and secondary outcomes were unplanned hospitalizations and the immediacy of the ED visits. Potentially preventable ED visits were identified using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services definition. The Emergency Severity Index, a triage algorithm that ranks patients based on the urgency of their health care condition, was used to measure the immediacy of ED visits (immediate [most urgent], emergent, urgent, less urgent, and nonurgent), with the categories of immediate and emergent classified as high acuity. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to calculate trends in ED visits among patients with cancer over time. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations of patient, hospital, and temporal factors with potentially preventable ED use and ED use resulting in hospitalization. RESULTS Among 854 911 106 ED visits, 35 510 014 (4.2%) were made by patients with cancer (mean [SD] age, 66.2 [16.2] years); of those, 55.2% of visits were among women, 73.2% were among non-Hispanic White individuals, 89.8% were among patients living in a private residence, and 54.3% were among Medicare enrollees. A total of 18 316 373 ED visits (51.6%) were identified as potentially preventable, and 5 770 571 visits (21.3%) were classified as high acuity. From 2012 to 2019, potentially preventable ED visits increased from 1 851 692 to 3 214 276. Pain (36.9%) was the most common reason for potentially preventable ED visits. The number of patients who visited an ED because of pain increased from 1 192 197 in 2012 to 2 405 849 in 2019 (a 101.8% increase). Overall, 28.9% of ED visits resulted in unplanned hospitalizations, which did not change significantly over time (from 32.2% in 2012 to 26.6% in 2019; P = .78 for trend). Factors such as residence in a nursing home (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.25-2.41) were positively associated with having a potentially preventable ED visit, and factors such as the presence of more than 1 comorbidity (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.43-2.32) were positively associated with having an unplanned hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, 51.6% of ED visits among patients with cancer were identified as potentially preventable, and the absolute number of potentially preventable ED visits increased substantially between 2012 and 2019. These findings highlight the need for cancer care programs to implement evidence-based interventions to better manage cancer treatment complications, such as uncontrolled pain, in outpatient and ambulatory settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Alishahi Tabriz
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kea Turner
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Sara Gheytasvand
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Benjamin D. Powers
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jennifer Elston Lafata
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bayesian Network Analysis for Prediction of Unplanned Hospital Readmissions of Cancer Patients with Breakthrough Cancer Pain and Complex Care Needs. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10101853. [PMID: 36292299 PMCID: PMC9601725 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Unplanned hospital readmissions (HRAs) are very common in cancer patients. These events can potentially impair the patients’ health-related quality of life and increase cancer care costs. In this study, data-driven prediction models were developed for identifying patients at a higher risk for HRA. Methods: A large dataset on cancer pain and additional data from clinical registries were used for conducting a Bayesian network analysis. A cohort of gastrointestinal cancer patients was selected. Logical and clinical relationships were a priori established to define and associate the considered variables including cancer type, body mass index (BMI), bone metastasis, serum albumin, nutritional support, breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP), and radiotherapy. Results: The best model (Bayesian Information Criterion) demonstrated that, in the investigated setting, unplanned HRAs are directly related to nutritional support (p = 0.05) and radiotherapy. On the contrary, BTcP did not significantly affect HRAs. Nevertheless, the correlation between variables showed that when BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, the spontaneous BTcP is more predictive for HRAs. Conclusions: Whilst not without limitations, a Bayesian model, combined with a careful selection of clinical variables, can represent a valid strategy for predicting unexpected HRA events in cancer patients. These findings could be useful for calibrating care interventions and implementing processes of resource allocation.
Collapse
|
20
|
Patel MI, Kapphahn K, Dewland M, Aguilar V, Sanchez B, Sisay E, Murillo A, Smith K, Park DJ. Effect of a Community Health Worker Intervention on Acute Care Use, Advance Care Planning, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Advanced Stages of Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1139-1148. [PMID: 35771552 PMCID: PMC9247857 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Importance Deficiencies in advance care planning and symptom management are associated with avoidable acute care use among patients with cancer. Community health worker (CHW)-led approaches may be an approach to reduce acute care use but remain untested in community settings. Objective To determine whether a CHW-led advance care planning and symptom screening intervention can reduce acute care use more than usual care in a community setting. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial was conducted among patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage or recurrent solid and hematologic cancers from August 8, 2017, through November 30, 2021. Data analysis was performed November 30, 2021, through January 1, 2022, by intention to treat. Interventions Participants were randomized 1:1 to usual care (control group) or usual care with the 6-month CHW-led intervention (intervention group). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was acute care use. Secondary outcomes included advance care planning documentation, supportive care use, patient-reported outcomes, survival, and end-of-life care use. Results Among 128 participants, median (range) age was 67 (19-89) years; 61 (47.7%) were female; and 2 (1.6%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 11 (8.6%) were Asian, 5 (3.9%) were Black, 23 (18.0%) were Hispanic or Latino, 2 (1.6%) were of mixed race, 2 (1.6%) were Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, 86 (67.2%) were White, and 20 (15.6%) did not report race. Intervention participants had 62% lower risk of acute care use than the control (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.76) within 6 months. At 12 months, intervention participants had 17% lower odds of acute care use (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98), 8 times the odds of advance care planning documentation (OR, 7.18; 95% CI, 2.85-18.13), 4 times the odds of palliative care (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.88-10.55), nearly double the odds of hospice (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.16-2.88), and nearly double the odds of improved mental and emotional health from enrollment to 6 and 12 months postenrollment (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.03-3.28; and OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.04-4.65, respectively) than the control. There were no differences in the death (control, 26 [40.6%] vs intervention, 32 [50.0%]). Fewer intervention participants had acute care use (0 vs 6 [23.1%]) in the month before death than the control. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, integration of a CHW-led intervention into cancer care reduced acute care use and is one approach to improve cancer care delivery for patients with advanced stages of disease in community settings. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03154190.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manali I. Patel
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California,Medical Services, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California,Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research/Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kristopher Kapphahn
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | | | | | | | - Ariana Murillo
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kim Smith
- St Jude Crosson Cancer Institute, Center for Hematology and Oncology, Fullerton, California
| | - David J. Park
- St Jude Crosson Cancer Institute, Center for Hematology and Oncology, Fullerton, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cheng D, Dumontier C, Sheikh AR, La J, Brophy MT, Do NV, Driver JA, Tuck DP, Fillmore NR. Prognostic value of the veterans affairs frailty index in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med 2022; 11:3009-3022. [PMID: 35338613 PMCID: PMC9359868 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a heterogeneous population with varying degrees of frailty. An electronic frailty index such as the Veterans Affairs Frailty Index (VA-FI) can potentially help identify vulnerable patients at high risk of poor outcomes. METHODS NSCLC patients ≥65 years old and diagnosed in 2002-2017 were identified using the VA Central Cancer Registry. The VA-FI was calculated using administrative codes from VA electronic health records data linked with Medicare and Medicaid data. We assessed associations between the VA-FI and times to mortality, hospitalization, and emergency room (ER) visit following diagnosis by Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable stratified Cox models. We also evaluated the change in discrimination and calibration of reference prognostic models after adding VA-FI. RESULTS We identified a cohort of 42,204 older NSCLC VA patients, in which 55.5% were classified as frail (VA-FI >0.2). After adjustment, there was a strong association between VA-FI and the risk of mortality (HR = 1.23 for an increase of four deficits or, equivalently, an increase of 0.129 on VA-FI, p < 0.001), hospitalization (HR = 1.16 for four deficits, p < 0.001), and ER visit (HR = 1.18 for four deficits, p < 0.001). Adding VA-FI to baseline prognostic models led to statistically significant improvements in time-dependent area under curves and did not have a strong impact on calibration. CONCLUSION Older NSCLC patients with higher VA-FI have significantly elevated risks of mortality, hospitalizations, and ER visits following diagnosis. An electronic frailty index can serve as an accessible tool to identify patients with vulnerabilities to inform clinical care and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cheng
- Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUnited States
- Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUnited States
| | - Clark Dumontier
- Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUnited States
- VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMAUnited States
- Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMAUnited States
| | | | - Jennifer La
- VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMAUnited States
| | - Mary T. Brophy
- VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMAUnited States
- Boston UniversityBostonMAUnited States
| | - Nhan V. Do
- VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMAUnited States
- Boston UniversityBostonMAUnited States
| | - Jane A. Driver
- Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUnited States
- VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMAUnited States
- Boston UniversityBostonMAUnited States
- Dana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMAUnited States
| | - David P. Tuck
- VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMAUnited States
- Boston UniversityBostonMAUnited States
| | - Nathanael R. Fillmore
- Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUnited States
- VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonMAUnited States
- Dana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMAUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mills SEE, Buchanan D, Donnan PT, Smith BH. Community prescribing trends and prevalence in the last year of life, for people who die from cancer. BMC Palliat Care 2022; 21:120. [PMID: 35799225 PMCID: PMC9264643 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00996-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People who die from cancer (‘cancer decedents’) may latterly experience unpleasant and distressing symptoms. Prescribing medication for pain and symptom control is essential for good-quality palliative care; however, such provision is variable, difficult to quantify and poorly characterised in current literature. This study aims to characterise trends in prescribing analgesia, non-analgesic palliative care medication and non-palliative medications, to cancer decedents, in their last year of life, and to assess any associations with demographic or clinical factors. Methods This descriptive study, analysed all 181,247 prescriptions issued to a study population of 2443 cancer decedents in Tayside, Scotland (2013–2015), in the last year of life, linking prescribing data to demographic, and cancer registry datasets using the unique patient-identifying Community Health Index (CHI) number. Anonymised linked data were analysed in Safe Haven using chi-squared test for trend, binary logistic regression and Poisson regression in SPSSv25. Results In their last year of life, three in four cancer decedents were prescribed strong opioids. Two-thirds of those prescribed opioids were also prescribed laxatives and/or anti-emetics. Only four in ten cancer decedents were prescribed all medications in the ‘Just in Case’ medication categories and only one in ten was prescribed breakthrough analgesia in the last year of life. The number of prescriptions for analgesia and palliative care drugs increased in the last 12 weeks of life. The number of prescriptions for non-palliative care medications, including anti-hypertensives, statins and bone protection, decreased over the last year, but was still substantial. Cancer decedents who were female, younger, or had lung cancer were more likely to be prescribed strong opioids; however, male cancer decedents had higher odds of being prescribed breakthrough analgesia. Cancer decedents who had late diagnoses had lower odds of being prescribed strong opioids. Conclusions A substantial proportion of cancer decedents were not prescribed strong opioids, breakthrough medication, or medication to alleviate common palliative care symptoms (including ‘Just in Case’ medication). Many patients continued to be prescribed non-palliative care medications in their last days and weeks of life. Age, gender, cancer type and timing of diagnosis affected patients’ odds of being prescribed analgesic and non-analgesic palliative care medication. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00996-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E E Mills
- University of St Andrews, School of Medicine, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.
| | - Deans Buchanan
- NHS Tayside, South Block, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital, DD2 4BF, Dundee, Scotland
| | - Peter T Donnan
- Population Health and Genomics Division, University of Dundee Medical School Mackenzie Building, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, Scotland
| | - Blair H Smith
- Population Health and Genomics Division, University of Dundee Medical School Mackenzie Building, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wonders KY, Schmitz K, Wise R, Hale R. Cost-Savings Analysis of an Individualized Exercise Oncology Program in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Control Trial. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1170-e1180. [PMID: 35363502 PMCID: PMC9287397 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In an attempt to promote the integration of exercise oncology as a standard part of clinical practice, economic evaluations are warranted. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze cost savings of an individualized exercise oncology program when patients were randomly assigned. METHODS For this open-label, randomized, prospective, comparative clinical trial, patients with early-stage breast cancer (stage I-II) were randomly assigned into two groups: the control group (CG, n = 120) and the exercise training group (EX, n = 123). Patients in the exercise intervention group completed 12 weeks of prescribed, individualized exercise that aligned with ACSM exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. The CG received the current standard of care, which includes a resource guide with various options available to the cancer survivor. RESULTS In the EX group, all physical fitness measures significantly improved compared with baseline (P < .001), while remaining unchanged for the CG (P > .05). Patients in the CG had the highest total mean health care utilization across all measures (CG: $8,598 US dollars, compared with EX: $6,356 US dollars) for emergency visits, outpatient visits, and office-base visits that were not a part of their treatment plan. At baseline, the mean Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores did not significantly differ (P > .05); however, at follow-up, a larger proportion of the EX group had ECOG scores of 0 or 1, compared with the CG (P < .05). Finally, patient-reported outcomes were significantly higher in the exercise group, compared with the CG at the 12-week follow-up (P < .001). CONCLUSION A supervised, individualized 12-week exercise intervention led to significant improvements in fitness parameters and ECOG scores, as well as a decrease in unplanned health care utilization among early-stage breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Y. Wonders
- Department of Kinesiology and Health, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
- Maple Tree Cancer Alliance, Dayton, OH
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dufton PH, Gerdtz MF, Jarden R, Krishnasamy M. Methodological approaches to measuring the incidence of unplanned emergency department presentations by cancer patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:75. [PMID: 35313807 PMCID: PMC8935762 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01555-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The need to mitigate the volume of unplanned emergency department (ED) presentations is a priority for health systems globally. Current evidence on the incidence and risk factors associated with unplanned ED presentations is unclear because of substantial heterogeneity in methods reporting on this issue. The aim of this review was to examine the methodological approaches to measure the incidence of unplanned ED presentations by patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy in order to determine the strength of evidence and to inform future research. Methods An electronic search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane was undertaken. Papers published in English language between 2000 and 2019, and papers that included patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy as the denominator during the study period were included. Studies were eligible if they were analytical observational studies. Data relating to the methods used to measure the incidence of ED presentations by patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy were extracted and assessed for methodological rigor. Findings are reported in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guideline. Results Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria: 20 cohort studies, and one cross-sectional study. Overall risk of bias was moderate. There was substantial methodological and clinical heterogeneity in the papers included. Methodological rigor varied based on the description of methods such as the period of observation, loss to follow-up, reason for ED presentation and statistical methods to control for time varying events and potential confounders. Conclusions There is considerable diversity in the population and methods used in studies that measure the incidence of unplanned ED presentations by patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy. Recommendations to support the development of robust evidence include enrolling participants at diagnosis or initiation of treatment, providing adequate description of regular care to support patients who experience toxicities, reporting reasons for and characteristics of participants who are lost to follow-up throughout the study period, clearly defining the outcome including the observation and follow-up period, and reporting crude numbers of ED presentations and the number of at-risk days to account for variation in the length of treatment protocols. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01555-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P H Dufton
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
| | - M F Gerdtz
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - R Jarden
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - M Krishnasamy
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Farhan HA, Yaseen IF. Perceptions of the Cardiologists and Oncologists: Initial Step for Establishing Cardio-Oncology Service. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:704029. [PMID: 34917654 PMCID: PMC8670435 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.704029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Over the last years, there was no established cardio-oncology service in Iraq and no firm data about the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients with cancer. As an initial step, we decided to conduct a national cardio-oncology online survey for cardiologists, oncologists, and their residents which would help us to understand the expected prevalence, problems, and readiness for collaboration between the two specialties. Objectives: For evaluating the current national practice in the cardiology and oncology specialty fields and to identify the hidden gaps associated with the development or worsening of CVD among patients with cancer. Methods: An online survey including 19-question for cardiologists/cardiology residents (CCRs) and 30-question for oncologists/oncology residents (OORs) about cardio-oncology service was sent to them including all Iraqi cities using Google document form during December 2020. Results: The total number of responses was 164, mainly 62.2% from CCRs while 37.8% from OORs. Hypertension was the main baseline risk factor (71%). A 77.5% of CCRs prescribe cardiovascular drugs vs. 35.5% by OORs. About 76.5% of CCRs and 79% of OORs are facing difficulties in the management of patients with cancer with established CVD. CVD was the leading cause of both hospitalization (30.7%) and mortality (48.4%). About 62.8% of CCRs and 64.5% of OORs have an interest to work in cardio-oncology service. Conclusion: Based on the perception of cardiologists and oncologists, CVD is the main cause of hospitalization and mortality among patients with cancer. High interest among CCRs and OORs to work in cardio-oncology service. Positive initiatives are available to take the action plan in this emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Ali Farhan
- Scientific Council of Cardiology, Iraqi Board for Medical Specializations, Baghdad, Iraq.,Baghdad Heart Center, Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Israa Fadhil Yaseen
- Baghdad Heart Center, Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shaver AL, Tufuor TA, Nie J, Ekimura S, Marshall K, Mitmesser SH, Noyes K. Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:6276. [PMID: 34944894 PMCID: PMC8699187 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer patients are at risk for malnutrition; the aim of this study was to provide a cost-effectiveness analysis of dietary supplementation in cancer survivors. We estimated prevalence of supplementation, hospitalization rates, quality of life (QOL), cost of care and mortality among cancer survivors. We built a decision analytic model to simulate life-long costs of health care and supplementation and QOL among cancer survivors with and without supplementation. Cost of supplements was derived from national pharmacy databases including single- and multivitamin formularies. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to changes in supplementation costs and duration. The study cohort represented the national cancer survivor population (average age 61 years, 85% white, 52% male, and 94% insured). Hospitalization rates for supplement users and non-users were 12% and 21%, respectively. The cost of hospitalization was $4030. Supplementation was associated with an additional 0.48 QALYs (10.26 vs. 9.78) at the incremental cost of $2094 ($236,933 vs. $234,839) over the remaining lifetime of survivors (on average 13 years). Adequate nutrition provides a cost-effective strategy to achieving potentially optimum health. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of specific nutrient doses and supplementation on long-term outcomes per cancer type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L. Shaver
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; (A.L.S.); (T.A.T.); (J.N.)
| | - Theresa A. Tufuor
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; (A.L.S.); (T.A.T.); (J.N.)
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
| | - Jing Nie
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; (A.L.S.); (T.A.T.); (J.N.)
| | - Shauna Ekimura
- Pharmavite LLC, West Hills, CA 91304, USA; (S.E.); (K.M.); (S.H.M.)
| | - Keri Marshall
- Pharmavite LLC, West Hills, CA 91304, USA; (S.E.); (K.M.); (S.H.M.)
| | | | - Katia Noyes
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; (A.L.S.); (T.A.T.); (J.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Murakawa Y, Ootsuka K, Abue M. The Appropriate First-Line Chemotherapy Regimen for Incurable Pancreatic Cancer in Clinical Practice: A Consideration of Patients' Overall Survival and Quality of Life. J Pancreat Cancer 2021; 7:48-56. [PMID: 34901695 PMCID: PMC8655810 DOI: 10.1089/pancan.2021.0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: For incurable pancreatic cancer, the therapeutic goal is to prolong survival and maintain the quality of life (QOL). Unexpected outpatient consultation (OCT) and emergency hospitalization lead to QOL deterioration. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (nabPTX+GEM) as the preferred first-line regimens. Japanese clinical practice guidelines further recommend GEM and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1). Currently, no treatment strategy considers QOL at any stage during a patient's clinical course. Methods: In this study, hospital-free survival (HFS), defined as the period without hospitalization and OCT, was introduced as a new indicator of the qualitative aspect of overall survival (OS). We compared OS, length of hospitalization (LOH), OCT, and HFS for the four first-line chemotherapy groups. Results: No significant difference was observed in the median OS and HFS, nor was there a strong correlation between OS and LOH, based on the four first-line chemotherapy groups. In contrast, there were strong correlations between OS and OCT and between OS and HFS in all first-line chemotherapy groups. The ratio of OCT to OS was similar for mFOLFIRINOX and nabPTX+GEM. S-1 had the lowest OCT-to-OS ratio. The ratio of HFS to OS declined from highest to lowest in the order S-1, nabPTX+GEM, mFOLFIRINOX, and GEM. Conclusion: Our findings suggested existence of correlation differences between OS and HFS between first-line mFOLFIRINOX and first-line nabPTX+GEM. In addition, a good HFS was obtained with S-1 alone in some cases. In the future, clinical trials for chemotherapy should examine QOL during the entire clinical course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Murakawa
- Department of Cancer Chemotherapy and Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan
| | - Kazunori Ootsuka
- Department of Cancer Chemotherapy and Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan
| | - Makoto Abue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zu K, Greenwood KL, LaMori JC, Smith B, Smith T, Lee A. Factors Associated With Unplanned Acute Care Services for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Hematologic Malignancies. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:1197-1206. [PMID: 34882484 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated risk factors predicting unplanned 30-day acute service utilization among adults subsequent to hospitalization for a new diagnosis of leukemia, lymphoma, or myeloma. This study explored the prevalence of medical complications (aligned with OP-35 measure specifications from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting Program) and the potential impact of psychosocial factors on unplanned acute care utilization. METHODS This study included 933 unique patients admitted to three acute care inpatient facilities within a nonprofit community-based health care system in southern California from 2012 to 2017. Integrated comprehensive data elements from electronic medical records and facility oncology registries were leveraged for univariate statistics, predictive models constructed using multivariable logistic regression, and further exploratory data mining, with predictive accuracy of the models measured with c-statistics. RESULTS The mean age of study participants was 65 years, and 55.1% were male. Specific diagnoses were lymphoma (48.7%), leukemia (35.2%), myeloma (14.0%), and mixed types (2.1%). Approximately one fifth of patients received unplanned acute care services within 30 days postdischarge, and over half of these patients presented with one or more symptoms associated with the CMS medical complication measure. The predictive models, with c-statistics ranging from 0.7 and above for each type of hematologic malignancy, indicated good predictive qualities with the impact of psychosocial functioning on the use of acute care services (P values < .05), including lack of consult for social work during initial admission (lymphoma or myeloma), history of counseling or use of psychotropic medications (lymphoma), and past substance use (myeloma). CONCLUSION This study provides insights into patient-related factors that may inform a proactive approach to improve health outcomes, such as enhanced care transition, monitoring, and support interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Zu
- Sharp HealthCare, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mukkala AN, Song JB, Lee M, Boasie A, Irish J, Finelli A, Wei AC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2021; 15:E531-E544. [PMID: 33750517 PMCID: PMC8525525 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unplanned visits (UPV) - re-admissions and emergency room (ER) visits - are markers of healthcare system quality. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a commonly performed cancer procedure, where variation in UPV represents a gap in care for prostate cancer patients. Here, we systematically synthesize the rates, reasons, predictors, and interventions for UPV after RP to inform evidence-based quality improvement (QI) initiatives. METHODS A systematic review was performed for studies from 2000-2020 using keywords: "re-admission," "emergency room/department," "unplanned visit," and "prostatectomy." Studies that focused on UPV following RP and that reported rates, reasons, predictors, or interventions, were included. Data was extracted via a standardized form. Meta-analysis was completed. RESULTS Sixty studies, with 406 107 RP patients, were eligible; 16 028 UPV events (approximately 5%) were analyzed from 317 050 RP patients. UPV rates after RP varied between studies (ER visit range 6-24%; re-admissions range 0-56%). The 30-day and 90-day ER visit rates were 12% and 14%, respectively; the 30-day and 90-day re-admission rates were 4% and 9%, respectively. A total of 55% of all re-admissions after RP are directly due to postoperative genitourinary (GU)-related complications, such as strictures, obstructions, fistula, bladder-related, incontinence, urine leak, renal problems, and other unspecified urinary complications. The next most common re-admission reasons were anastomosis-related, infection-related, cardiovascular/pulmonary events, and wound-related issues. Thirty-four percent of all ER visits after RP are directly due to urine-related issues, such as retention, urinoma, obstruction, leak, and catheter problems. The next most common ER visit reasons were abdominal/gastrointestinal issues, infection-related, venous thromboembolic events, and wound-related issues. Predictors for increased re-admission included: open RP, lymph node dissection, Charlson comorbidity index ≥2, low surgeon/hospital case volume, and socioeconomic determinants of health. Of the 10 interventions evaluated, a 3.4% average reduction in UPV rate was observed, highlighting an approximate two-fold decrease. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant benefit of interventions over controls, with odds ratio 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.46-0.84). Interventions that used multidisciplinary, nurse-centered, programs, with patient self-care/empowerment were more beneficial than algorithmic patient care pathways and preoperative patient education. CONCLUSIONS Twenty years of international, retrospective experience suggests UPV after RP are often related to GU complications and infection- or wound-related factors. QI interventions to reduce UPV should target these factors. While many re-admissions after RP appear to be unavoidable, ER visits have more opportunity for volume reduction by QI. The interventions evaluated herein have the potential to reduce UPV after RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avinash N. Mukkala
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jasmine B. Song
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Lee
- Regional Cancer Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Boasie
- Surgery and Critical Care Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan Irish
- Surgical Oncology Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alice C. Wei
- Surgical Oncology Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
- Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Reizine N, Danahey K, Schierer E, Liu P, Middlestadt M, Ludwig J, Truong TM, van Wijk XMR, Yeo KTJ, Malec M, Ratain MJ, O'Donnell PH. Impact of CYP2D6 Pharmacogenomic Status on Pain Control Among Opioid-Treated Oncology Patients. Oncologist 2021; 26:e2042-e2052. [PMID: 34423496 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several opioids have pharmacogenomic associations impacting analgesic efficacy. However, germline pharmacogenomic testing is not routinely incorporated into supportive oncology. We hypothesized that CYP2D6 profiling would correlate with opioid prescribing and hospitalizations. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed 61,572 adult oncology patients from 2012 to 2018 for opioid exposures. CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype (ultra-rapid [UM], normal metabolizer [NM], intermediate [IM], or poor [PM]), the latter two of which may cause inefficacy of codeine, tramadol, and standard-dose hydrocodone, was determined for patients genotyped for reasons unrelated to pain. The primary endpoint was number of opioid medications received during longitudinal care (IM/PMs vs. NMs). Secondary endpoint was likelihood of pain-related hospital encounters. RESULTS Most patients with cancer (n = 34,675, 56%) received multiple opioids (average 2.8 ± 1.6/patient). Hydrocodone was most commonly prescribed (62%), followed by tramadol, oxycodone, and codeine. In the CYP2D6 genotyped cohort (n = 105), IM/PMs received a similar number of opioids (3.4 ± 1.4) as NMs (3.3 ± 1.9). However, IM/PMs were significantly more likely to experience pain-related hospital encounters compared with NMs, independent of other variables (odds ratio [OR] = 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-23.6; p = .03). IM/PMs were also more likely to be treated with later-line opioids that do not require CYP2D6 metabolism, such as morphine and hydromorphone (OR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1-9.8; p = .03). CONCLUSION CYP2D6 genotype may identify patients with cancer at increased risk for inadequate analgesia when treated with typical first-line opioids like codeine, tramadol, or standard-dose hydrocodone. Palliative care considerations are an integral part of optimal oncology care, and these findings justify prospective evaluation of preemptive genotyping as a strategy to improve oncology pain management. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Genomic variation in metabolic enzymes can predispose individuals to inefficacy when receiving opioid pain medications. Patients with intermediate and/or poor CYP2D6 metabolizer status do not adequately convert codeine, tramadol, and hydrocodone into active compounds, with resulting increased risk of inadequate analgesia. This study showed that patients with cancer frequently receive CYP2D6-dependent opioids. However, patients with CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizer status had increased numbers of pain-related hospitalizations and more frequently required the potent non-CYP2D6 opioids morphine and hydromorphone. This may reflect inadequate initial analgesia with the common "first-line" CYP2D6-metabolized opioids. Preemptive genotyping to guide opioid prescribing during cancer care may improve pain-related patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Reizine
- Section of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keith Danahey
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center for Research Informatics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emily Schierer
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ping Liu
- Department of Public Health Services, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Merisa Middlestadt
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jenna Ludwig
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Tien M Truong
- Section of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Xander M R van Wijk
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kiang-Teck J Yeo
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Monica Malec
- Section of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark J Ratain
- Section of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Peter H O'Donnell
- Section of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Morikawa S, Amanat Y. Occupational Therapy's Role with Oncology in the Acute Care Setting: A Descriptive Case Study. Occup Ther Health Care 2021; 36:152-167. [PMID: 34396894 DOI: 10.1080/07380577.2021.1961181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
As individuals with cancer actively undergo medical treatment, they often experience profound impairments and side-effects that impact their physical and psychosocial functioning and well-being. As occupational therapy practitioners working in acute care, challenges when working with those with oncological diseases may include high acuity, impact on multiple body systems, and fluctuating symptom presentation and levels of function. Thus, it is critical for occupational therapy practitioners to be skilled in identifying and addressing the distinct needs of cancer survivors in the acute care setting. This manuscript presents a descriptive case study to highlight occupational therapy's role in cancer rehabilitation in the acute care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Morikawa
- USC Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yasaman Amanat
- USC Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Loerzel VW, Hines RB, Deatrick CW, Geddie PI, Clochesy JM. Unplanned emergency department visits and hospital admissions of older adults under treatment for cancer in the ambulatory/community setting. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7525-7533. [PMID: 34105026 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06338-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to identify the incidence and risk/protective factors for (1) unplanned emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) and (2) nausea/vomiting/dehydration (NVD) at time of treatment in older adults under treatment for cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a exploratory retrospective cohort study of adults (60 and older) with cancer. Adults were included if they had a new cancer diagnosis and were being treated with chemotherapy. Study outcomes included the number of ED visits and HA (cycles 1-4) and NVD at the time of receiving chemotherapy (cycles 2-4). Repeated measures, Poisson regression was used to obtain risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals for independent predictors of outcomes. RESULTS Of 402 study participants, 20% experienced an ED visit, and 18% experienced a HA. Common reasons for ED visits were pain (23.5%) and NVD (20.4%). Common reasons for HA were infection (34.4%) and NVD (22.2%). Multivariate analysis showed risk factors for ED visits included chemotherapy cycle 1, having esophageal cancer, being treated with ≥ 3 chemotherapy agents, and increasing levels of functional impairment. Risk factors for HA included chemotherapy cycle 1, increasing levels of functional impairment, intravenous fluids between treatment, and being prescribed antiemetics for home use. Predictors of NVD at time of chemotherapy treatment included Hispanic ethnicity, insurance status, cancer type, chemotherapy emetic potent, treatment frequency, intravenous fluids between cycles, and number of home antiemetics. CONCLUSION Unplanned ED visits and HA occur in older adults under treatment for cancer due to numerous treatment-related side effects. Helping older adults identify and manage side effects early may reduce the number of unplanned admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Wochna Loerzel
- College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, 12201 Research Parkway, Suite 300, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.
| | - Robert B Hines
- College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Christine Wargo Deatrick
- College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, 12201 Research Parkway, Suite 300, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA
| | | | - John M Clochesy
- School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
A Machine Learning Model Approach to Risk-Stratify Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer for Hospitalization and Mortality Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:135-142. [PMID: 33933480 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer frequently experience unplanned hospitalizations, but predictive tools to identify high-risk patients are lacking. We developed a machine learning model to identify high-risk patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS In the study, 1341 consecutive patients undergoing GI (abdominal or pelvic) radiation treatment (RT) from March 2016 to July 2018 (derivation) and July 2018 to January 2019 (validation) were assessed for unplanned hospitalizations within 30 days of finishing RT. In the derivation cohort of 663 abdominal and 427 pelvic RT patients, a machine learning approach derived random forest, gradient boosted decision tree, and logistic regression models to predict 30-day unplanned hospitalizations. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and prospectively validated in 161 abdominal and 90 pelvic RT patients using Mann-Whitney rank-sum test. Highest quintile of risk for hospitalization was defined as "high-risk" and the remainder "low-risk." Hospitalizations for high- versus low-risk patients were compared using Pearson's χ2 test and survival using Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. RESULTS Overall, 13% and 11% of patients receiving abdominal and pelvic RT experienced 30-day unplanned hospitalization. In the derivation phase, gradient boosted decision tree cross-validation yielded AUC = 0.823 (abdominal patients) and random forest yielded AUC = 0.776 (pelvic patients). In the validation phase, these models yielded AUC = 0.749 and 0.764, respectively (P < .001 and P = .002). Validation models discriminated high- versus low-risk patients: in abdominal RT patients, frequency of hospitalization was 39% versus 9% in high- versus low-risk groups (P < .001) and 6-month survival was 67% versus 92% (P = .001). In pelvic RT patients, frequency of hospitalization was 33% versus 8% (P = .002) and survival was 86% versus 92% (P = .15) in high- versus low-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS In patients with GI cancer undergoing RT as part of multimodality treatment, machine learning models for 30-day unplanned hospitalization discriminated high- versus low-risk patients. Future applications will test utility of models to prompt interventions to decrease hospitalizations and adverse outcomes.
Collapse
|
34
|
Feliu J, Espinosa E, Basterretxea L, Paredero I, Llabrés E, Jiménez-Munárriz B, Losada B, Pinto A, Custodio AB, Muñoz MDM, Gómez-Mediavilla J, Torregrosa MD, Cruz P, Higuera O, Molina-Garrido MJ. Prediction of Unplanned Hospitalizations in Older Patients Treated with Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1437. [PMID: 33809852 PMCID: PMC8004134 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the incidence of unplanned hospitalization (UH) and to identify risk factors for UH in elderly patients with cancer who start chemotherapy. METHODS In all, 493 patients over 70 years starting new chemotherapy regimens were prospectively included. A pre-chemotherapy geriatric assessment was performed, and tumor and treatment variables were collected. The association between these factors and UH was examined by using multivariable logistic regression. Score points were assigned to each risk factor. RESULTS During the first 6 months of treatment, 37% of patients had at least one episode of UH. Risk factors were the use of combination chemotherapy at standard doses, a MAX2 index ≥1, a Charlson comorbidity score ≥2, albumin level <3.5 g/dL, falls in the past 6 months ≥1, and weight loss >5%. Three risk groups for UH were established according to the score in all patients: 0-1: 17.5%; 2: 34%; and 3-7: 57% (p < 0.001). The area under receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67-0.77). CONCLUSION This simple tool can help to reduce the incidence of UH in elderly patients with cancer who are scheduled to initiate chemotherapy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Feliu
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Enrique Espinosa
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Laura Basterretxea
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Donostia, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (L.B.); (J.G.-M.)
| | - Irene Paredero
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, 46017 Valencia, Spain; (I.P.); (M.D.T.)
| | - Elisenda Llabrés
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canarias, 35016 Las Palmas, Spain;
| | | | - Beatriz Losada
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, 28942 Fuenlabrada, Spain;
| | - Alvaro Pinto
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Ana Belén Custodio
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - María del Mar Muñoz
- Oncology Department, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, 16002 Cuenca, Spain; (M.d.M.M.); (M.J.M.-G.)
| | | | | | - Patricia Cruz
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Oliver Higuera
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nieder C, Imingen KS, Haukland E. Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Outpatients: Reasons for Unplanned Hospitalization and Its Impact on Survival. J Clin Med Res 2021; 13:177-183. [PMID: 33854658 PMCID: PMC8016527 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aims of the study were to examine the rates of and reasons for unplanned hospitalization after start of palliative radiotherapy or chemoradiation (CRT), and to study whether unplanned hospitalization deteriorates patients’ prognosis. In addition, risk factors were identified. Methods A retrospective review of 136 patients treated with palliative radiotherapy or CRT was performed. Inclusion criteria were prescribed total dose at least 30 Gy and outpatient at the start of treatment. Uni- and multivariate analyses were employed. Results Fifty-eight patients (43%) were hospitalized within 3 months from start of radiotherapy or CRT. Their median overall survival was 6.7 months as compared to 11.1 months in non-hospitalized patients (P = 0.09). The median length of hospitalization was 8 days (range 1 - 61). In patients with possibly treatment-related hospitalization (n = 32), median survival was 5.0 months, significantly shorter than the 11.1 months observed in the remaining patients (P = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, only one variable was significantly associated with higher risk of unplanned hospitalization: previous hospitalization in the last 4 weeks before commencing radiotherapy or CRT. Conclusions Unplanned hospitalization occurred frequently in a standard care setting without early involvement of a dedicated palliative team. Patients with preceding hospitalization might represent a group that is particularly vulnerable, thus qualifying for a targeted intervention aiming at continued outpatient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Nieder
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, 8092 Bodo, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromso, 9037 Tromso, Norway
| | - Kristian S Imingen
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, 8092 Bodo, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromso, 9037 Tromso, Norway
| | - Ellinor Haukland
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, 8092 Bodo, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromso, 9037 Tromso, Norway.,SHARE - Center for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Quality and Health Technology, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Oselin K, Pisarev H, Ilau K, Kiivet RA. Intensity of end-of-life health care and mortality after systemic anti-cancer treatment in patients with advanced lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:274. [PMID: 33722202 PMCID: PMC7958422 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07992-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to study the mortality and intensity of health care in patients with advanced lung cancer who received systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) compared with patients who were not eligible for SACT (no-SACT). METHODS A retrospective cohort of patients with lung cancer, who were treated at the North Estonia Medical Centre from 2015 to 2017, was linked to population-based health care data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. We calculated 14- and 30-day mortality after SACT and used a composite measure of intensity of care, comprised from the following: emergency department visit, admission to hospital, admission to intensive care unit, receipt of radiotherapy or systemic treatment. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) of patients who received at least one cycle of SACT (n = 489) was 9.1 months and in patients with no-SACT (n = 289) 1.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.23, 95% CI = 3.60-5.00). During the final 30 days of life, intensive EOL care was received by 69.9% of the SACT patients and 43.7% of the no-SACT patients. Intensive EOL care in the last 30 days of life is more probable among patients in the SACT group (odds ratio [OR] = 3.58, 95% CI = 2.54-5.04, p < 0.001), especially in those with a stage IV disease (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.31-2.71, p = 0.001). In the SACT group 6.7 and 14.7% of patients died within 14 days and 30 days after the last cycle, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Significant proportion of patients with advanced lung cancer continue to receive intensive care near death. Our results reflect current patterns of EOL care for patients with lung cancer in Estonia. Availability of palliative care and hospice services must be increased to improve resource use and patient-oriented care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kersti Oselin
- Department of Chemotherapy, Clinic of Haematology and Oncology, North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419, Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - Heti Pisarev
- Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Keit Ilau
- Pharmacy, North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Raul-Allan Kiivet
- Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Shah MP, Neal JW. Relative Impact of Anticancer Therapy on Unplanned Hospital Care in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 17:e1131-e1138. [PMID: 33351677 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In lung cancer, unplanned hospital care is a significant driver of costs. While toxicities of cancer therapies are well-known, there are little data on their relative contribution to unplanned care. This study aims to (1) determine the relative impact of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy on unplanned hospital care and (2) identify potential strategies to prevent unplanned hospital encounters in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS A research database search of the electronic health record was used to identify 97 patients with established NSCLC who were undergoing either TKI therapy, immunotherapy, or chemotherapy at our institution and visited our emergency department (ED) in 2018. The resulting 173 ED encounters were reviewed to determine (1) the cause (cancer, therapy, other, or rule-out) of each encounter and (2) whether the encounter was preventable. RESULTS A small portion (9%) of all unplanned hospital encounters were therapy related (2% in the TKI therapy group, 12% in the immunotherapy group, and 21% in the chemotherapy group). Cancer itself was the leading cause (54%) of the encounters. Over 20% of all encounters were classified as preventable, and half of those encounters were deemed unnecessary. DISCUSSION TKI therapy, immunotherapy, and, to a lesser extent, chemotherapy are relatively small drivers of unplanned acute hospital care for patients with NSCLC. A significant share of unplanned hospital encounters may be prevented through proactive evidence-based initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manan P Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Joel W Neal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lodewijckx E, Kenis C, Flamaing J, Debruyne P, De Groof I, Focan C, Cornélis F, Verschaeve V, Bachmann C, Bron D, Luce S, Debugne G, Van den Bulck H, Goeminne JC, Schrijvers D, Geboers K, Petit B, Langenaeken C, Van Rijswijk R, Specenier P, Jerusalem G, Praet JP, Vandenborre K, Lobele JP, Milisen K, Wildiers H, Decoster L. Unplanned hospitalizations in older patients with cancer: Occurrence and predictive factors. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 12:368-374. [PMID: 33223483 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to investigate the occurrence of unplanned hospitalizations in older patients with cancer and to determine predictive factors. METHODS A prospective Belgian multicentre (n = 22), observational cohort study was performed. Patients ≥70 years with a malignant tumor were included. Patients underwent G8 screening followed by geriatric assessment (GA) if abnormal at baseline and were followed for unplanned hospitalizations at approximately three months. Uni- and multivariable regression models were performed to determine predictive factors associated with unplanned hospitalizations in older patients with an abnormal G8. RESULTS In total, 7763 patients were included in the current analysis of which 2409 (31%) patients with a normal G8 score and 5354 (69%) with an abnormal G8 score. Patients with an abnormal G8 were hospitalized more frequently than patients with a normal G8 (22.9% versus 12.4%; p < 0.0001). Reasons for unplanned hospitalizations were most frequently cancer related (25.7%) or cancer therapy related (28%). In multivariable analysis, predictive factors for unplanned hospitalizations in older patients with cancer and an abnormal G8 were female gender, absence of surgery, chemotherapy, ADL dependency, malnutrition and presence of comorbidities. CONCLUSION Older patients with cancer and an abnormal G8 screening present a higher risk (23%) for unplanned hospitalizations. Predictive factors for these patients were identified and include not only patient and treatment related factors but also GA related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Lodewijckx
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncologisch Centrum, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cindy Kenis
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Flamaing
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing - CHROMETA, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philip Debruyne
- Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium & Positive Ageing Research Institute (PARI), Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Inge De Groof
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Iridium Cancer Network Antwerp, St. Augustinus, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Christian Focan
- Department of Oncology, Clinique Saint-Joseph, CHC-Liège Hospital Group, Liège, Belgium
| | - Frank Cornélis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Verschaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, GHDC Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | | | - Dominique Bron
- Department of Hematology, ULB Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sylvie Luce
- Department Medical Oncology, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gwenaelle Debugne
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de Mouscron, Mouscron, Belgium
| | | | - Jean-Charles Goeminne
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU-UCL-Namur, site Sainte-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Dirk Schrijvers
- Department of Medical Oncology, ZNA Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Katrien Geboers
- Centre for Oncology and Hematology, AZ Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium
| | - Benedicte Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Jolimont, La Louvière, Belgium
| | - Christine Langenaeken
- Department Medical Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network Antwerp, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
| | | | - Pol Specenier
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Guy Jerusalem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sart Tilman and Liege University, Liege, Belgium
| | - Jean-Philippe Praet
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, CHU St-Pierre, Free Universities Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Koen Milisen
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lore Decoster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncologisch Centrum, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dalhammar K, Malmström M, Schelin M, Falkenback D, Kristensson J. The impact of initial treatment strategy and survival time on quality of end-of-life care among patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer: A population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235045. [PMID: 32569329 PMCID: PMC7307755 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophageal and gastric cancer are highly lethal malignancies with a 5-year survival rate of 15-29%. More knowledge is needed about the quality of end-of-life care in order to understand the burden of the illness and the ability of the current health care system to deliver timely and appropriate end-of-life care. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of initial treatment strategy and survival time on the quality of end-of-life care among patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer. METHODS This register-based cohort study included patients who died from oesophageal and gastric cancer in Sweden during 2014-2016. Through linking data from the National Register for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer, the National Cause of Death Register, and the Swedish Register of Palliative Care, 2156 individuals were included. Associations between initial treatment strategy and survival time and end-of-life care quality indicators were investigated. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using modified Poisson regression. RESULTS Patients with a survival of ≤3 months and 4-7 months had higher RRs for hospital death compared to patients with a survival ≥17 months. Patients with a survival of ≤3 months also had a lower RR for end-of-life information and bereavement support compared to patients with a survival ≥17 months, while the risks of pain assessment and oral assessment were not associated with survival time. Compared to patients with curative treatment, patients with no tumour-directed treatment had a lower RR for pain assessment. No significant differences were shown between the treatment groups regarding hospital death, end-of-life information, oral health assessment, and bereavement support. CONCLUSIONS Short survival time is associated with several indicators of low quality end-of-life care among patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer, suggesting that a proactive palliative care approach is imperative to ensure quality end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Dalhammar
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marlene Malmström
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria Schelin
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Dan Falkenback
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jimmie Kristensson
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hasnain Z, Nilanon T, Li M, Mejia A, Kolatkar A, Nocera L, Shahabi C, Cozzens Philips FA, Lee JS, Hanlon SE, Vaidya P, Ueno NT, Yennu S, Newton PK, Kuhn P, Nieva J. Quantified Kinematics to Evaluate Patient Chemotherapy Risks in Clinic. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020; 4:583-601. [PMID: 32598179 PMCID: PMC7328110 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Performance status (PS) is a key factor in oncologic decision making, but conventional scales used to measure PS vary among observers. Consumer-grade biometric sensors have previously been identified as objective alternatives to the assessment of PS. Here, we investigate how one such biometric sensor can be used during a clinic visit to identify patients who are at risk for complications, particularly unexpected hospitalizations that may delay treatment or result in low physical activity. We aim to provide a novel and objective means of predicting tolerability to chemotherapy. METHODS Thirty-eight patients across three centers in the United States who were diagnosed with a solid tumor with plans for treatment with two cycles of highly emetogenic chemotherapy were included in this single-arm, observational prospective study. A noninvasive motion-capture system quantified patient movement from chair to table and during the get-up-and-walk test. Activity levels were recorded using a wearable sensor over a 2-month period. Changes in kinematics from two motion-capture data points pre- and post-treatment were tested for correlation with unexpected hospitalizations and physical activity levels as measured by a wearable activity sensor. RESULTS Among 38 patients (mean age, 48.3 years; 53% female), kinematic features from chair to table were the best predictors for unexpected health care encounters (area under the curve, 0.775 ± 0.029) and physical activity (area under the curve, 0.830 ± 0.080). Chair-to-table acceleration of the nonpivoting knee (t = 3.39; P = .002) was most correlated with unexpected health care encounters. Get-up-and-walk kinematics were most correlated with physical activity, particularly the right knee acceleration (t = -2.95; P = .006) and left arm angular velocity (t = -2.4; P = .025). CONCLUSION Chair-to-table kinematics are good predictors of unexpected hospitalizations, whereas the get-up-and-walk kinematics are good predictors of low physical activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaki Hasnain
- Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Tanachat Nilanon
- Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ming Li
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Aaron Mejia
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Anand Kolatkar
- The Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Luciano Nocera
- Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Cyrus Shahabi
- Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Jerry S.H. Lee
- Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sean E. Hanlon
- Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Poorva Vaidya
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Naoto T. Ueno
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sriram Yennu
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul K. Newton
- Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
- Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Peter Kuhn
- Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- The Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jorge Nieva
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Daly B, Kuperman G, Zervoudakis A, Baldwin Medsker A, Roy A, Ro AS, Arenas J, Yanamandala HV, Kottamasu R, Salvaggio R, Holland J, Hirsch S, Walters CB, Lauria T, Chow K, Begue A, Rozenshteyn M, Zablocki M, Dhami AK, Silva N, Brown E, Katzen LL, Chiu YO, Perry C, Sokolowski S, Wagner I, Veach SR, Grisham RN, Dang CT, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Simon BA, Perchick W. InSight Care Pilot Program: Redefining Seeing a Patient. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e1050-e1059. [PMID: 32468925 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Early detection and management of symptoms in patients with cancer improves outcomes. However, the optimal approach to symptom monitoring and management is unknown. InSight Care is a mobile health intervention that captures symptom data and facilitates patient-provider communication to mitigate symptom escalation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients initiating antineoplastic treatment at a Memorial Sloan Kettering regional location were eligible. Technology supporting the program included the following: a predictive model that identified patient risk for a potentially preventable acute care visit; a secure patient portal enabling communication, televisits, and daily delivery of patient symptom assessments; alerts for concerning symptoms; and a symptom-trending application. The main outcomes of the pilot were feasibility and acceptability evaluated through enrollment and response rates and symptom alerts, and perceived value evaluated on the basis of qualitative patient and provider interviews. RESULTS The pilot program enrolled 100 high-risk patients with solid tumors and lymphoma (29% of new treatment starts v goal of 25%). Over 6 months of follow-up, the daily symptom assessment response rate was 56% (the goal was 50%), and 93% of patients generated a severe symptom alert. Patients and providers perceived value in the program, and archetypes were developed for program improvement. Enrolled patients were less likely to use acute care than were other high-risk patients. CONCLUSION InSight Care was feasible and holds the potential to improve patient care and decrease facility-based care. Future work should focus on optimizing the cadence of patient assessments, the workforce supporting remote symptom management, and the return of symptom data to patients and clinical teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby Daly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Ankita Roy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alice S Ro
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Raj Kottamasu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Tara Lauria
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kim Chow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Aaron Begue
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Emily Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Yeneat O Chiu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Claire Perry
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Isaac Wagner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Chau T Dang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Brett A Simon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Feliciana Silva F, Macedo da Silva Bonfante G, Reis IA, André da Rocha H, Pereira Lana A, Leal Cherchiglia M. Hospitalizations and length of stay of cancer patients: A cohort study in the Brazilian Public Health System. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233293. [PMID: 32433706 PMCID: PMC7239479 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The hospitalizations are part of cancer care and has been studied by researchers worldwide. A better understanding about their associated factors may help to achieve improvements on this area. The aims of this study were to investigate the association between demographic and clinical characteristics and hospitalizations, as well as between these characteristics and the length of stay (LOS), within the first year of outpatient treatment, for the most incident cancers in the Brazilian population. In this cohort study, we investigated 417,477 patients aged 19 years or more, who started outpatient cancer treatment, from 2010-2014, for breast, prostate, colorectal, cervix, lung and stomach cancers. The outcomes evaluated were: i) Hospitalizations within the first year of outpatient cancer treatment; and ii) LOS of the hospitalized patients. It was performed a binary logistic regression to evaluate the association between the explanatory variables and the hospitalizations and a negative binomial regression to evaluate their influence on the length of hospital stay. The hospitalizations occurred for 34% of patients, with a median of LOS of 6 days (IQR: 2-15). Female patients were 16% less likely to be hospitalized (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.82-0.86), with lower average of LOS (AR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-0.99), each additional year of age reduced in 2% the hospitalization odds (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.98-0.99) and in 1% the average of LOS (AR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98-0.99), patients from South region had twice more chances of hospitalization than from North region (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.93-2.10) and patients with colorectal cancer had greater probability of hospitalization (OR: 4.42; 95% CI: 4.27-4.48), with the highest average of LOS (AR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.35-1.40). In view of our results, we consider that the government must expand the policies with potential to reduce the number of hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flávia Feliciana Silva
- Medicine School, Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Ilka Afonso Reis
- Department of Statistics, Institute of Exact Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Hugo André da Rocha
- Medicine School, Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Agner Pereira Lana
- Medicine School, Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Mariangela Leal Cherchiglia
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Medicine School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|