1
|
Fritz Z. ReSPECT the process: The importance of good conversations and documentation in advance care planning. Resuscitation 2024; 200:110249. [PMID: 38788793 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë Fritz
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute) Strangeways Research Laboratory, 2 Worts' Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, and Department of Acute Medicine Cambridge University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stevens J, Elston D, Tan A, Barwich D, Carter RZ, Cochrane D, Frenette N, Howard M. Clinicians' experiences implementing an advance care planning pathway in two Canadian provinces: a qualitative study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:217. [PMID: 38879532 PMCID: PMC11179357 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02468-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) is a process which enables patients to communicate wishes, values, fears, and preferences for future medical care. Despite patient interest in ACP, the frequency of discussions remains low. Barriers to ACP may be mitigated by involving non-physician clinic staff, preparing patients ahead of visits, and using tools to structure visits. An ACP care pathway incorporating these principles was implemented in longitudinal generalist outpatient care, including primary care/family medicine and general internal medicine, in two Canadian provinces. This study aims to understand clinician experiences implementing the pathway. METHODS The pathway was implemented in one family practice in Alberta, two family practices in British Columbia (BC), and one BC internal medicine outpatient clinic. Physicians and allied health professionals delivered structured pathway visits based on the Serious Illness Conversation Guide. Twelve physicians and one social worker participated in interviews or focus groups at the end of the study period. Qualitative data were coded inductively using an iterative approach, with regular meetings between coders. RESULTS Clinicians described experiences with the ACP care pathway, impact at the clinician level, and impact at the patient level. Within each domain, clinicians described barriers and facilitators experienced during implementation. Clinicians also reflected candidly about potential for future implementation and the sustainability of the pathway. CONCLUSIONS While the pathway was implemented slightly differently between provinces, core experiences were that implementation of the pathway, and integration with current practice, were feasible. Across settings, similar themes recurred regarding usefulness of the pathway structure and its tools, impact on clinician confidence and interactions with patients, teamwork and task delegation, compatibility with existing workflow, and patient preparation and readiness. Clinicians were supportive of ACP and of the pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was prospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03508557). Registered April 25, 2018. https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/show/NCT03508557 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Stevens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarkbeeklaan 103, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Dawn Elston
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Amy Tan
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Doris Barwich
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Centre for Palliative Care, 300 - 601 Sixth St., New Westminster, BC, Canada
| | - Rachel Zoe Carter
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Centre for Palliative Care, 300 - 601 Sixth St., New Westminster, BC, Canada
| | - Diana Cochrane
- BC Centre for Palliative Care, 300 - 601 Sixth St., New Westminster, BC, Canada
| | - Nicole Frenette
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michelle Howard
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colley A, Valderrama A, Tang V, Pierce L, Sudore RL, Wick EC. Health Care Navigators for Perioperative Advance Care Planning. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2415452. [PMID: 38888926 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
This cohort study evaluates the addition of a patient-centered intervention to an advance care planning process for older surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Colley
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Victoria Tang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Logan Pierce
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Rebecca L Sudore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Letica-Kriegel AS, Rosen R, McNeil N, Thompson E, James M, Broach V, Roche KL, Riportella M, Ng S, Bernal C, Vaynrub M, Downey R, Voigt L, Epstein AS, Nelson J, Goldfrank D, Nash GM. Development and perception of surgery-specific goals of care discussions in the preoperative setting: A learning pilot. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1384-1389. [PMID: 38549286 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goals of care discussions are infrequently documented in the preoperative period. Furthermore, documentation does not consistently address what matters most to patients, although patient values (PV) are central to person-centered care. METHODS A multidisciplinary working group was formed. An electronic note comprised of (1) topics of discussion, (2) PV, and (3) advance care planning (ACP), was created and embedded into existing note templates for Gynecologic Surgical Oncology. Surgeons and advanced practice providers (APPs) were educated to conduct and document these conversations in preoperative clinic for patients undergoing cancer surgery for a pilot period. Data were collected regarding usage of the template. Focus groups with surgeons, APPs, and patients were conducted. Qualitative analysis was performed on transcripts. RESULTS During the pilot, 7 surgeon/APP teams utilized the template on a total of 55 notes. Average number of notes completed per surgeon was 7.8 (SD 8.5). Forty-six notes (84%) included topics of discussion, 15 (27%) included PV, 4 (7%) included ACP. Qualitative analysis of focus group transcripts revealed that clinicians and patients perceived the initiative to be useful and important, although implementation barriers were identified. CONCLUSION Creating a surgery-specific GOC template is feasible. Iterative revisions are needed to increase utility in clinic workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roni Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nita McNeil
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Errika Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Monique James
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michaela Riportella
- Clinical Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susan Ng
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Camila Bernal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Max Vaynrub
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert Downey
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Louis Voigt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew S Epstein
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Judith Nelson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Deborah Goldfrank
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shilling DM, Manz CR, Strand JJ, Patel MI. Let Us Have the Conversation: Serious Illness Communication in Oncology: Definitions, Barriers, and Successful Approaches. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e431352. [PMID: 38788187 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_431352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Serious illness communications are crucial elements of care delivery for patients with cancer. High-quality serious illness communications are composed of open, honest discussions between patients, caregivers, and clinicians regarding patient's communication preferences, expected illness trajectory, prognosis, and risks and benefits of any recommended care. High-quality communication ideally starts at the time of a patients' cancer diagnosis, allows space for and response to patient emotions, elicits patients' values and care preferences, and is iterative and longitudinal. When integrated into cancer care, such communication can result in improved patient experiences with their care, care that matches patients' goals, and reduced care intensity at the end of life. Despite national recommendations for routine integration of these communication into cancer care, a minority of patients with cancer receive such communication. In this chapter, we describe elements of high-quality serious illness communication, patient-, clinician-, institution-, and payer-level barriers, and successful strategies that can routinely integrate such communication into cancer care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Shilling
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics & Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Christopher R Manz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jacob J Strand
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics & Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Manali I Patel
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Colley A, Broering J, Lee K, Lin JA, Pierce L, Finlayson E, Sudore RL, Wick EC. "It Gives Me Peace of Mind So I Can Focus on Healing": Views on Advance Care Planning for Older Surgical Patients. J Palliat Med 2024; 27:667-674. [PMID: 38386513 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The period of time before an elective operation may be an opportune time to engage older adults in advance care planning (ACP). Past interventions have not been readily incorporated into surgical workflows leaving a need for ACP tools that are generalizable, easy to implement, and effective. Design: This is a qualitative study. Setting and Subjects: Older adults with a history of cancer and a recent major operation were recruited through their surgical oncologist at a tertiary medical center in the United States. Interviews were conducted to determine how to adapt the validated PrepareForYourCare.org ACP program with electronic health record prompts for the perioperative setting and openness to introducing ACP during a presurgical visit. We used qualitative content analysis to determine themes. Results: Eight themes were identified: (1) ACP as static and private, (2) people expected a prompt, (3) family trusted to do the "right" thing, (4) lack of relationship or comfort with providers, (5) a team-based approach can be helpful, (6) surgeon's expertise (e.g., prognosis and surgical risk), (7) ACP belongs on the surgical checklist, and (8) patients would welcome a conversation starter. Discussion: Older surgical patients are interested in engaging with ACP, particularly if prompted, and believe it has a place on the preoperative "checklist." Conclusions: To effectively engage patients with ACP, a combination of routine prompts by the health care team and patient-centered follow-up may be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Colley
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jeannette Broering
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Katherine Lee
- Division of Palliative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joseph A Lin
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Logan Pierce
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Emily Finlayson
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rebecca L Sudore
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Wick
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Svendsen SJ, Grov EK, Staats K. Patients' experiences with shared decision-making in home-based palliative care - navigation through major life decisions. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:101. [PMID: 38627710 PMCID: PMC11022472 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01434-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study addresses the issue of shared decision-making (SDM) in a Norwegian home-based palliative care setting. The significance of patient involvement in SDM is widely acknowledged, and many patients want to participate in decisions about care and treatment. Yet, it remains a need for more knowledge regarding the initiators and approaches of SDM in the context of home-based palliative care, particularly from the patients' perspective. The aim of this study is to understand patients' experiences and preferences for SDM in home-based palliative care, seeking to enhance the quality of care and direct the planning of healthcare services. METHODS We used a qualitative explorative design. A hermeneutic approach was employed, and data was collected through in-dept interviews with 13 patients. RESULTS The study uncovered an overarching theme of "Navigating to reach own decisions," comprising three sub-themes: "To be trapped in life without decisions to act on"; "To surrender to others and let others deal with decisions"; "To continue to be oneself without focusing on disease and decision-making". CONCLUSIONS The findings underscore the need for flexible, person-centered approaches in SDM, tailored to the fluctuating health literacy and changing preferences of patients in palliative care settings. Our study contributes to the understanding of SDM in palliative care by highlighting how patients navigate the balance between autonomy and reliance on HCPs. Future research should explore how healthcare systems, including HCPs' roles in the system, can adapt to the patients' dynamic needs, to ensuring that SDM will remain a supportive and empowering process for patients at all stages of their disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Jahr Svendsen
- Lillestrøm Municipality, Lillestrøm, Norway.
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Kjeller, Norway.
| | - Ellen Karine Grov
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Pilestredet, Norway
| | - Katrine Staats
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Kjeller, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cambriel A, Serey K, Pollina-Bachellerie A, Cancel M, Michalet M, Bay JO, Bouleuc C, Lotz JP, Philippart F. Oncologists' perspective on advance directives, a French national prospective cross-sectional survey - the ADORE study. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:44. [PMID: 38600485 PMCID: PMC11008039 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01046-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The often poor prognosis associated with cancer necessitates empowering patients to express their care preferences. Yet, the prevalence of Advance Directives (AD) among oncology patients remains low. This study investigated oncologists' perspectives on the interests and challenges associated with implementing AD. METHODS A French national online survey targeting hospital-based oncologists explored five areas: AD information, writing support, AD usage, personal perceptions of AD's importance, and respondent's profile. The primary outcome was to assess how frequently oncologists provide patients with information about AD in daily clinical practice. Additionally, we examined factors related to delivering information on AD. RESULTS Of the 410 oncologists (50%) who responded to the survey, 75% (n = 308) deemed AD relevant. While 36% (n = 149) regularly inform patients about AD, 25% (n = 102) remain skeptical about AD. Among the respondents who do not consistently discuss AD, the most common reason given is the belief that AD may induce anxiety (n = 211/353; 60%). Of all respondents, 90% (n = 367) believe patients require specific information to draft relevant AD. Physicians with experience in palliative care were more likely to discuss AD (43% vs 32.3%, p = 0.027). Previous experience in critical care was associated with higher levels of distrust towards AD (31.5% vs 18.8%, p = 0.003), and 68.5% (n = 281) of the respondents expressed that designating a "person of trust" would be more appropriate than utilizing AD. CONCLUSION Despite the perceived relevance of AD, only a third of oncologists regularly apprise their patients about them. Significant uncertainty persists about the safety and relevance of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Cambriel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Saint-Antoine and Tenon Hospitals, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- DMU DREAM, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GRC 29, Paris, France
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- REQUIEM (Research/Reflexion On End of Life Support Quality in Everyday Medical Practice) Study Group, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Serey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
- REQUIEM (Research/Reflexion On End of Life Support Quality in Everyday Medical Practice) Study Group, Paris, France
| | - Adrien Pollina-Bachellerie
- Department of Anesthesiology Cancer, University Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
- REQUIEM (Research/Reflexion On End of Life Support Quality in Everyday Medical Practice) Study Group, Paris, France
| | - Mathilde Cancel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - Morgan Michalet
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Jacques-Olivier Bay
- Department of Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Cancer Resistance Exploring and Targeting. EA7283, INSERM CIC501, BP 10448, Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Carole Bouleuc
- Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Lotz
- Service D'oncologie Médicale Et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Pôle Onco-Hématologie, APHP-HôpitauxUniversitaires de L'estParisien, 75020, Paris, France
- REQUIEM (Research/Reflexion On End of Life Support Quality in Everyday Medical Practice) Study Group, Paris, France
| | - Francois Philippart
- Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, 185 Rue R. Losserand, 75674, Paris, France.
- REQUIEM (Research/Reflexion On End of Life Support Quality in Everyday Medical Practice) Study Group, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hussein S, Lim CA, Manokaran T, Kassam S, Earp M, Tang PA, Karim S, Biondo P, Watanabe SM, Sinnarajah A, Tan A, Simon J. Colorectal Cancer Patients' Reported Frequency, Content, and Satisfaction with Advance Care Planning Discussions. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1235-1245. [PMID: 38534925 PMCID: PMC10969091 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: This observational cohort study describes the frequency, content, and satisfaction with advance care planning (ACP) conversations with healthcare providers (HCPs), as reported by patients with advanced colorectal cancer. (2) Methods: The patients were recruited from two tertiary cancer centers in Alberta, Canada. Using the My Conversations survey with previously validated questions, the patients were asked about specific ACP elements discussed, with which HCPs these elements were discussed, their satisfaction with these conversations, and whether they had a goals of care designation (GCD) order. We surveyed and analyzed data from the following four time points: enrollment, months 1, 2, and 3. (3) Results: In total, 131 patients were recruited. At enrollment, 24% of patients reported discussing at least one ACP topic. From enrollment to month 3, patients reported a high frequency of discussions (80.2% discussed fears, 71.0% discussed prognosis, 54.2% discussed treatment preferences at least once); however, only 44.3% of patients reported discussing what is important to them in considering health care preferences. Patients reported having ACP conversations most often with their oncologists (84.7%) and cancer clinic nurses (61.8%). Patients reported a high level of satisfaction with their ACP conversations, with over 80% of patients reported feeling heard and understood. From enrollment to month 3, there was an increase in the number of patients with a GCD order from 53% to 74%. (4) Conclusions: Patients reported more frequent conversations compared to the literature and clinical documentation. While the satisfaction with these conversations is high, there is room for quality improvement, particularly in eliciting patients' personal goals for their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Said Hussein
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (S.H.); (S.K.); (M.E.); (P.B.); (A.S.)
| | - Chloe Ahryung Lim
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (C.A.L.); (T.M.)
| | - Thulasie Manokaran
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (C.A.L.); (T.M.)
| | - Shireen Kassam
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (S.H.); (S.K.); (M.E.); (P.B.); (A.S.)
| | - Madalene Earp
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (S.H.); (S.K.); (M.E.); (P.B.); (A.S.)
| | - Patricia A. Tang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (P.A.T.); (S.K.)
| | - Safiya Karim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (P.A.T.); (S.K.)
| | - Patricia Biondo
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (S.H.); (S.K.); (M.E.); (P.B.); (A.S.)
| | - Sharon M. Watanabe
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada;
| | - Aynharan Sinnarajah
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (S.H.); (S.K.); (M.E.); (P.B.); (A.S.)
| | - Amy Tan
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Jessica Simon
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada; (S.H.); (S.K.); (M.E.); (P.B.); (A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Golmohammadi M, Ebadi A, Ashrafizadeh H, Rassouli M, Barasteh S. Factors related to advance directives completion among cancer patients: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:3. [PMID: 38166983 PMCID: PMC10762918 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01327-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advance directives (ADs) has recently been considered as an important component of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer and is a legally binding directive regarding a person's future medical care. It is used when a person is unable to participate in the decision-making process about their own care. Therefore, the present systematic review investigated the factors related to ADs from the perspective of cancer patients. METHODS A systematic review study was searched in four scientific databases: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest using with related keywords and without date restrictions. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Hawker criterion. The research papers were analyzed as directed content analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. RESULTS Out of 5900 research papers found, 22 were included in the study. The perspectives of 9061 cancer patients were investigated, of whom 4347 were men and 4714 were women. The mean ± SD of the patients' age was 62.04 ± 6.44. According to TPB, factors affecting ADs were categorized into four categories, including attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and external factors affecting the model. The attitude category includes two subcategories: "Lack of knowledge of the ADs concept" and "Previous experience of the disease", the subjective norm category includes three subcategories: "Social support and interaction with family", "Respecting the patient's wishes" and "EOL care choices". Also, the category of perceived control behavior was categorized into two sub-categories: "Decision-making" and "Access to the healthcare system", as well as external factors affecting the model, including "socio-demographic characteristics". CONCLUSION The studies indicate that attention to EOL care and the wishes of patients regarding receiving medical care and preservation of human dignity, the importance of facilitating open communication between patients and their families, and different perspectives on providing information, communicating bad news and making decisions require culturally sensitive approaches. Finally, the training of cancer care professionals in the palliative care practice, promoting the participation of health care professionals in ADs activities and creating an AD-positive attitude should be strongly encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mobina Golmohammadi
- Student Research Committee, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abbas Ebadi
- Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadis Ashrafizadeh
- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nursing, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran
| | - Maryam Rassouli
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Salman Barasteh
- Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Health Management Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
LoCastro M, Mortaz-Hedjri S, Wang Y, Mendler JH, Norton S, Bernacki R, Carroll T, Klepin H, Liesveld J, Huselton E, Kluger B, Loh KP. Telehealth serious illness care program for older adults with hematologic malignancies: a single-arm pilot study. Blood Adv 2023; 7:7597-7607. [PMID: 38088668 PMCID: PMC10733103 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) feel shocked and bewildered when diagnosed. Serious illness conversations (SICs) may increase disease understanding and preparations for the future. However, SICs often happen late, in part because of clinician-perceived patient discomfort. Telehealth may promote patient comfort by allowing SICs to take place at home. This study assesses the feasibility and usability of a telehealth-delivered Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) for older adults with AML and MDS. We conducted a single-arm pilot study including 20 older adults with AML and MDS. Feasibility was measured using retention rate, with >80% considered feasible. Usability was measured using telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ; range, 1-7): >5 considered usable. We collected other outcomes including acceptability and disease understanding and conducted post-visit qualitative interviews to elicit feedback. Hypothesis testing was performed at α = 0.10 owing to the pilot nature and small sample size. Retention rate was 95% (19/20); mean TUQ scores were 5.9 (standard deviation [SD], 0.9) and 5.9 (SD, 1.1) for patients and caregivers, respectively. We found the SICP to be acceptable. The majority of patients found the SICP to be very or extremely worthwhile (88.2%; 15/17), and reported it increased closeness with their clinician (75.0%; 12/16). After their visit, patient estimates of curability, and overall life expectancy aligned more closely with those of their clinicians. In qualitative interviews, most patients said that they would recommend this program to others (89.5%, 17/19). This study demonstrated that delivery of the telehealth SICP to older patients with AML and MDS is feasible, usable, and acceptable. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04745676.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa LoCastro
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Soroush Mortaz-Hedjri
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Jason H. Mendler
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Sally Norton
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Thomas Carroll
- Divisions of General Medicine and Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Heidi Klepin
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Jane Liesveld
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Eric Huselton
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Benzi Kluger
- Divisions of General Medicine and Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smith MA, Brøchner AC, Nedergaard HK, Jensen HI. "Gives peace of mind" - Relatives' perspectives of end-of-life conversations. Palliat Support Care 2023:1-8. [PMID: 37982296 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951523001633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Planning for end-of-life (EOL) and future treatment and care through advance care planning (ACP) is being increasingly implemented in different healthcare settings, and interest in ACP is growing. Several studies have emphasized the importance of relatives participating in conversations about wishes for EOL and being included in the process. Likewise, research has highlighted how relatives can be a valuable resource in an emergency setting. Although relatives have a significant role, few studies have investigated their perspectives of ACP and EOL conversations. This study explores relatives' experiences of the benefits and disadvantages of having conversations about wishes for EOL treatment. METHODS Semi-structured telephone interviews were held with 29 relatives who had participated in a conversation about EOL wishes with a patient and physician 2 years prior in a variety of Danish healthcare settings. The relatives were interviewed between September 2020 and June 2022. Content analysis was performed on the qualitative data. RESULTS The interviews revealed two themes: "gives peace of mind" and "enables more openness and common understanding of EOL." Relatives found that conversations about EOL could help assure that patients were heard and enhance their autonomy. These conversations relieved the relatives of responsibility by clarifying or confirming the patients' wishes, and they also made the relatives reflect on their own wishes for EOL. Moreover, they helped patients and relatives address other issues regarding EOL and made wishes more visible across settings. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS The results indicate that conducting conversations about wishes for EOL treatment and having relatives participate in those conversations were perceived as beneficial for both relatives and patients. Involving relatives in ACP should be prioritized by physicians and healthcare personnel when holding conversations about EOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette A Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne C Brøchner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helene K Nedergaard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Hanne I Jensen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nortje N, Zachariah F, Reddy A. Advance Care Planning conversations: What constitutes best practice and the way forward: Advance Care Planning-Gespräche: Was Best Practice ausmacht und wie es weitergehen kann. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2023; 180:8-15. [PMID: 37438167 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations are a cornerstone of modern health care and need to be supported. However, research indicates that the uptake thereof is limited, regardless of various campaigns. ACP conversations are complex and specific elements thereof should be discussed at various timepoints during the illness trajectory. OBJECTIVE This narrative review delineates what ACP conversation should entail, and a way forward. METHODS A PEO (Population, Exposure, Outcome) search was performed using relevant keywords, and 615 articles were identified. Through screening and coding, this number was reduced to 24 articles. All the authors were involved in the final selection of the articles. RESULTS Various themes developed throughout the review which include timing early on in the disease trajectory; incorporating beliefs and culturally relevant contexts; conversations needing to be iterative and short; involving surrogates and family; applying various media formats. DISCUSSION ACP conversations are relevant. ACP is not static and needs to be dynamic as patients' illness trajectories and goals change. The care team needs to guard themselves against having ACP conversations to satisfy a metric and should instead be guided by the patient's expressed values and wishes. A system-wide operational plan will help alleviate common barriers in having appropriate ACP conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Nortje
- Section of Integrated Ethics, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
| | - Finly Zachariah
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, CA, USA
| | - Akhila Reddy
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Doorne I, Mokkenstorm K, Willems D, Buurman B, van Rijn M. The perspectives of in-hospital healthcare professionals on the timing and collaboration in advance care planning: A survey study. Heliyon 2023; 9:e14772. [PMID: 37095949 PMCID: PMC10121622 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hospital admissions are common in the last phase of life. However, palliative care and advance care planning (ACP) are provided late or not at all during hospital admission. Aim To provide insight into the perceptions of in-hospital healthcare professionals concerning current and ideal practice and roles of in-hospital palliative care and advance care planning. Methods An electronic cross-sectional survey was send 398 in-hospital healthcare professionals in five hospitals in the Netherlands. The survey contained 48 items on perceptions of palliative care and ACP. Results We included non-specialists who completed the questions of interest, resulting in analysis of 96 questionnaires. Most respondents were nurses (74%). We found that current practice for initiating palliative care and ACP was different to what is considered ideal practice. Ideally, ACP should be initiated for almost every patient for whom no treatment options are available (96.2%), and in case of progression and severe symptoms (94.2%). The largest differences between current and ideal practice were found for patients with functional decline (Current 15.2% versus Ideal 78.5%), and patients with an estimated life expectancy <1 year (Current 32.6% versus ideal 86.1%). Respondents noted that providing palliative care requires collaboration, however, especially nurses noted barriers like a lack of inter-professional consensus. Conclusions The differences between current and ideal practice demonstrate that healthcare professionals are willing to improve palliative care. To do this, nurses need to increase their voice, a shared vision of palliative care and recognition of the added value of working together is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. van Doorne
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Corresponding author. Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Room D3-335 Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - K. Mokkenstorm
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D.L. Willems
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B.M. Buurman
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Medicine for Older People, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M. van Rijn
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Medicine for Older People, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fritz L, Peeters MCM, Zwinkels H, Koekkoek JAF, Reijneveld JC, Vos MJ, Pasman HRW, Dirven L, Taphoorn MJB. Advance care planning (ACP) in glioblastoma patients: Evaluation of a disease-specific ACP program and impact on outcomes. Neurooncol Pract 2022; 9:496-508. [PMID: 36388414 PMCID: PMC9665067 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The feasibility of implementing an advance care planning (ACP) program in daily clinical practice for glioblastoma patients is unknown. We aimed to evaluate a previously developed disease-specific ACP program, including the optimal timing of initiation and the impact of the program on several patient-, proxy-, and care-related outcomes. METHODS The content and design of the ACP program were evaluated, and outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety and depression, and satisfaction with care were measured every 3 months over 15 months. RESULTS Eighteen patient-proxy dyads and two proxies participated in the program. The content and design of the ACP program were rated as sufficient. The preference for the optimal timing of initiation of the ACP program varied widely, however, most of the participants preferred initiation shortly after chemoradiation. Over time, aspects of HRQoL remained stable in our patient population. Similarly, the ACP program did not decrease the levels of anxiety and depression in patients, and a large proportion of proxies reported anxiety and/or depression. The needed level of support for proxies was relatively low throughout the disease course, and the level of feelings of caregiver mastery was relatively high. Overall, patients were satisfied with the provided care over time, whereas proxies were less satisfied in some aspects. CONCLUSIONS The content and design of the developed disease-specific ACP program were rated as satisfactory. Whether the program has an actual impact on patient-, proxy-, and care-related outcomes proxies remain to be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Fritz
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Marthe C M Peeters
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Zwinkels
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Johan A F Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap C Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike J Vos
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - H Roeline W Pasman
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Michael N, Symons X, Mendz GL, Kissane D. Vulnerability and Resilience: Phenomenological Analysis of Cancer Patients Value Directives. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 64:438-448. [PMID: 35932954 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Personal values are individual conceptions of the desirable appraisals and actions that guide our attitudes and behaviour. Advance care planning (ACP) now emphasises the consideration of personal life goals and values expressed as a Values Directive (VD) to guide discussions concerning medical treatment. OBJECTIVE To investigate the diversity of values, experiences and adaptations expressed in cancer patients VDs. METHODS Contents of the VDs of ACPs of cancer patients who participated in a randomised control trial comparing a video intervention showing values communication between cancer patient-caregivers with usual care were analysed. Qualitative phenomenological content analysis was used to understand how participants made meaning of their lived experiences. RESULTS Forty-two participants completed an ACP (37.2% response rate), with 97.6% of these completing a VD (57.1% female, mean age 72 years, 30.1% gastrointestinal cancer). Participants described diverse adjustments to frailty and adaptive coping with deteriorating functionality. Emotional and financial concerns were eased through experiencing benevolence and trust established through family and friendship bonds and reciprocation of care. Death anxiety and ambivalence were expressed concurrently with the experiential acceptance of dying. Secular and sacred rituals featured as an affirmation of their faith or beliefs. CONCLUSION Cancer patients seek to make meaning of their experiences, concurrently posturing vulnerability and resilience, despite conflicting emotions and experiences. Given that the choices people make as they approach dying relate to their most deeply held values, ACP conversations should explore how patients draw from their values and life goals to optimise their adaptations to illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Michael
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department (N.M., D.K.), Cabrini Health, VIC Australia; School of Medicine (N.M., G.L.M., D.K.), University of Notre Dame Australia Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine (N.M., D.K.), Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
| | - Xavier Symons
- Plunkett Centre for Ethics (X.S.), St Vincent's Hospital, NSW, Australia; Institute of Ethics and Society (X.S.), University of Notre Dame, Australia, NSW, Australia
| | - George L Mendz
- School of Medicine (N.M., G.L.M., D.K.), University of Notre Dame Australia Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - David Kissane
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department (N.M., D.K.), Cabrini Health, VIC Australia; School of Medicine (N.M., G.L.M., D.K.), University of Notre Dame Australia Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine (N.M., D.K.), Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia; Sacred Heart Health Service (D.K.), St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Huepenbecker SP, Lewis S, Valentine MC, Palisoul ML, Thaker PH, Hagemann AR, McCourt CK, Fuh KC, Powell MA, Mutch DG, Kuroki LM. Gynecologic oncology patient perspectives and knowledge on advance care planning: A quality improvement intervention. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 43:101060. [PMID: 36032812 PMCID: PMC9399146 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Gynecologic oncology patients prefer advance care planning (ACP) communication outpatient with their gynecologic oncologist. A quality improvement intervention offering advance care planning resources increased ACP discussions. A quality improvement intervention offering advance care planning resources improved ACP document creation proficiency.
Objectives Assess and improve advance care planning (ACP) awareness and uptake among gynecologic oncology patients. Methods Using a quality improvement Plan-Do-Check-Act framework, we completed a single institution needs assessment and intervention. The needs assessment was a 26-question survey assessing baseline ACP knowledge and preferences of gynecologic oncology patients. We used this survey to implement an outpatient intervention in which patients were offered ACP resources (pamphlet, discussion with their gynecologic oncologist, and/or social work referral). We conducted a post-intervention survey among patients who had and had not received ACP resource(s) to assess whether our intervention increased ACP knowledge, discussions, or uptake. Results Among 106 patients surveyed in the needs assessment, 33 % had ACP documents, 26 % had discussed ACP with a physician, and 82 % thought discussing ACP was important. The majority preferred these conversations in the outpatient setting (52 %) with their gynecologic oncologist (80 %) instead of nurses or trainees. In the intervention, 526 patients were offered ACP resources. Compared to women who did not receive resources (n = 324), patients who received ACP resource(s) (n = 202) were more likely to have ACP discussions with their gynecologic oncologist (38 % vs 68 %, P = 0.001) and had greater proficiency regarding how to create ACP documents (median score 5/10 vs 8/10, P = 0.048), although they were no more likely to have ACP documented in their electronic medical record (27 % vs 9 %, p = 0.08). Conclusions ACP uptake among gynecologic oncology patients is low, but ACP discussions with an oncologist during outpatient visits are important to patients and improve their knowledge regarding completing ACP documents.
Collapse
|
18
|
Patel MI, Kapphahn K, Dewland M, Aguilar V, Sanchez B, Sisay E, Murillo A, Smith K, Park DJ. Effect of a Community Health Worker Intervention on Acute Care Use, Advance Care Planning, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Advanced Stages of Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1139-1148. [PMID: 35771552 PMCID: PMC9247857 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Importance Deficiencies in advance care planning and symptom management are associated with avoidable acute care use among patients with cancer. Community health worker (CHW)-led approaches may be an approach to reduce acute care use but remain untested in community settings. Objective To determine whether a CHW-led advance care planning and symptom screening intervention can reduce acute care use more than usual care in a community setting. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial was conducted among patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage or recurrent solid and hematologic cancers from August 8, 2017, through November 30, 2021. Data analysis was performed November 30, 2021, through January 1, 2022, by intention to treat. Interventions Participants were randomized 1:1 to usual care (control group) or usual care with the 6-month CHW-led intervention (intervention group). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was acute care use. Secondary outcomes included advance care planning documentation, supportive care use, patient-reported outcomes, survival, and end-of-life care use. Results Among 128 participants, median (range) age was 67 (19-89) years; 61 (47.7%) were female; and 2 (1.6%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 11 (8.6%) were Asian, 5 (3.9%) were Black, 23 (18.0%) were Hispanic or Latino, 2 (1.6%) were of mixed race, 2 (1.6%) were Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, 86 (67.2%) were White, and 20 (15.6%) did not report race. Intervention participants had 62% lower risk of acute care use than the control (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.76) within 6 months. At 12 months, intervention participants had 17% lower odds of acute care use (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98), 8 times the odds of advance care planning documentation (OR, 7.18; 95% CI, 2.85-18.13), 4 times the odds of palliative care (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.88-10.55), nearly double the odds of hospice (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.16-2.88), and nearly double the odds of improved mental and emotional health from enrollment to 6 and 12 months postenrollment (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.03-3.28; and OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.04-4.65, respectively) than the control. There were no differences in the death (control, 26 [40.6%] vs intervention, 32 [50.0%]). Fewer intervention participants had acute care use (0 vs 6 [23.1%]) in the month before death than the control. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, integration of a CHW-led intervention into cancer care reduced acute care use and is one approach to improve cancer care delivery for patients with advanced stages of disease in community settings. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03154190.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manali I. Patel
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California,Medical Services, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California,Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research/Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kristopher Kapphahn
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | | | | | | | - Ariana Murillo
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kim Smith
- St Jude Crosson Cancer Institute, Center for Hematology and Oncology, Fullerton, California
| | - David J. Park
- St Jude Crosson Cancer Institute, Center for Hematology and Oncology, Fullerton, California
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zachariah FJ, Rossi LA, Roberts LM, Bosserman LD. Prospective Comparison of Medical Oncologists and a Machine Learning Model to Predict 3-Month Mortality in Patients With Metastatic Solid Tumors. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2214514. [PMID: 35639380 PMCID: PMC9157269 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance To date, oncologist and model prognostic performance have been assessed independently and mostly retrospectively; however, how model prognostic performance compares with oncologist prognostic performance prospectively remains unknown. Objective To compare oncologist performance with a model in predicting 3-month mortality for patients with metastatic solid tumors in an outpatient setting. Design, Setting, and Participants This prognostic study evaluated prospective predictions for a cohort of patients with metastatic solid tumors seen in outpatient oncology clinics at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center and associated satellites between December 6, 2019, and August 6, 2021. Oncologists (57 physicians and 17 advanced practice clinicians) answered a 3-month surprise question (3MSQ) within clinical pathways. A model was trained with electronic health record data from January 1, 2013, to April 24, 2019, to identify patients at high risk of 3-month mortality and deployed silently in October 2019. Analysis was limited to oncologist prognostications with a model prediction within the preceding 30 days. Exposures Three-month surprise question and gradient-boosting binary classifier. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was performance comparison between oncologists and the model to predict 3-month mortality. The primary performance metric was the positive predictive value (PPV) at the sensitivity achieved by the medical oncologists with their 3MSQ answers. Results A total of 74 oncologists answered 3099 3MSQs for 2041 patients with advanced cancer (median age, 62.6 [range, 18-96] years; 1271 women [62.3%]). In this cohort with a 15% prevalence of 3-month mortality and 30% sensitivity for both oncologists and the model, the PPV of oncologists was 34.8% (95% CI, 30.1%-39.5%) and the PPV of the model was 60.0% (95% CI, 53.6%-66.3%). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 81.2% (95% CI, 79.1%-83.3%). The model significantly outperformed the oncologists in short-term mortality. Conclusions and Relevance In this prognostic study, the model outperformed oncologists overall and within the breast and gastrointestinal cancer cohorts in predicting 3-month mortality for patients with advanced cancer. These findings suggest that further studies may be useful to examine how model predictions could improve oncologists' prognostic confidence and patient-centered goal-concordant care at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finly J. Zachariah
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Lorenzo A. Rossi
- Department of Applied AI and Data Science, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Laura M. Roberts
- Department of Clinical Informatics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Linda D. Bosserman
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sarangi RK, Rajamani A, Lakshmanan R, Srinivasan S, Arvind H. A Survey of Clinicians Regarding Goals of Care for Patients with Severe Comorbid Illnesses Hospitalized for an Acute Deterioration. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022; 26:457-463. [PMID: 35656047 PMCID: PMC9067487 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with terminal illnesses hospitalized with acute deteriorations often suffer from unnecessary/inappropriate therapies at the end of their lives. Appropriate advance care planning (ACP) practices aligned to patients’ goals of care may mitigate this. Materials and methods To explore the rationale for clinical decision-making in hospitalized patients with terminal illnesses and formulate a practice pathway to streamline care. Between May and December 2018, a questionnaire survey with three case vignettes derived from intensive care unit (ICU) patients was emailed to ICU, respiratory and renal doctors, and nurses in two Sydney hospitals. Respondents chose various management options ranging from all active therapies to palliation. The primary outcome was the proportion of responses for each management option. With these and a thematic analysis of responses to identify barriers to ACP practice, a practice pathway was formulated. Results Of the 310 invited clinicians, 178 responded (57.4%). About 89.2% of respondents reported caring for dying patients frequently. Sixty percent saw patients suffering from prolonged therapies. Most respondents deemed patients in the case vignettes to be terminally ill, warranting ACP discussions. However, many still wanted to treat the acute deterioration with active ICU-level interventions. Most respondents reported being comfortable in having ACP discussions. Conclusion The survey showed discordance between the stated opinions and the choice of management options for terminally ill patients with acute deteriorations; possibly due to the lack of a considered approach in choosing management options that align with medical consensus and the patient's/family's wishes, a practice pathway is suggested to improve management. How to cite this article Sarangi RK, Rajamani A, Lakshmanan R, Srinivasan S, Arvind H. A Survey of Clinicians Regarding Goals of Care for Patients with Severe Comorbid Illnesses Hospitalized for an Acute Deterioration. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):457–463.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi K Sarangi
- Department of ICU, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Arvind Rajamani
- University of Sydney, Nepean Clinical School and Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
- Arvind Rajamani, University of Sydney, Nepean Clinical School and Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia, Phone: +61247342490, e-mail:
| | | | - Saradha Srinivasan
- Department of ICU, Fairfield Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hemamalini Arvind
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Advance care planning in primary care for cancer patients: Feasibility randomised trial. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:e571-e580. [PMID: 35760566 PMCID: PMC9242676 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Advance (anticipatory) care planning (ACP) requires discussions between patients and healthcare professionals about planning for future deterioration in health. ACP improves care coordination but uptake is limited and often deferred. Aim: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability to patients, carers and general practitioners (GPs) of a primary care ACP intervention for people with incurable oesophageal, gastric or pancreatic cancer. Design and Setting: 12-month feasibility randomised controlled trial in a Scottish Cancer Network. Method: Patients aged 18 or over starting palliative oncology treatment were randomised 1:1 to an ACP intervention or standard care. Intervention patients received an oncologist letter supporting them to request a GP review and ACP public information. Pre-specified analyses included trial recruitment and retention, ACP completion, and quality of life questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L, ICECAP-SCM) at baseline, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Qualitative interviews with purposive sampling explored patient, carer and GP experiences. Results: Of 99 eligible participants (269 screened), 46% were recruited (n=46) and randomised; 25 to intervention and 21 to control. By 12 weeks, 45% (9/20) intervention patients and 59% (10/17) controls had a documented ACP. Quality of life was maintained at 24 weeks except for physical symptoms but 30% had died. Social norms associating ACP with dying were prevalent among 23 participants interviewed. No psychological or clinical harms were identified. Conclusion: An RCT of ACP for people with incurable cancer in primary care is feasible. Acceptability and timing of care planning depended on patient, carer and GPs attitudes and behaviours. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03719716. Funder: Macmillan
Collapse
|
22
|
Tros W, van der Steen JT, Liefers J, Akkermans R, Schers H, Numans ME, van Peet PG, Groenewoud AS. General practitioners' evaluations of optimal timing to initiate advance care planning for patients with cancer, organ failure, or multimorbidity: A health records survey study. Palliat Med 2022; 36:510-518. [PMID: 34965754 PMCID: PMC8972953 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211068692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate timing to initiate advance care planning is difficult, especially for individuals with non-malignant disease in community settings. AIM To identify the optimal moment for, and reasons to initiate advance care planning in different illness trajectories. DESIGN AND METHODS A health records survey study; health records were presented to 83 GPs with request to indicate and substantiate what they considered optimal advance care planning timing within the 2 years before death. We used quantitative and qualitative analyses. SETTING AND PATIENTS We selected and anonymized 90 health records of patients who died with cancer, organ failure or multimorbidity, from a regional primary care registration database in the Netherlands. RESULTS The median optimal advance care planning timing according to the GPs was 228 days before death (interquartile range 392). This moment was closer to death for cancer (87.5 days before death, IQR 302) than for organ failure (266 days before death, IQR 401) and multimorbidity (290 days before death, IQR 389) (p < 0.001). The most frequently mentioned reason for cancer was "receiving a diagnosis" (21.5%), for organ failure it was "after a period of illness" (14.7%), and for multimorbidity it was "age" and "patients" expressed wishes or reflections' (both 12.0%). CONCLUSION The optimal advance care planning timing and reasons to initiate advance care planning indicated by GPs differ between patients with cancer and other illnesses, and they also differ between GPs. This suggests that "the" optimal timing for ACP should be seen as a "window of opportunity" for the different disease trajectories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemijn Tros
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jenny T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janine Liefers
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Reinier Akkermans
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Schers
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mattijs E Numans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Petra G van Peet
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A Stef Groenewoud
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Patel R, Torke A, Nation B, Cottingham A, Hur J, Gruber R, Sinha S. Crucial Conversations for High-Risk Populations before Surgery: Advance Care Planning in a Preoperative Setting. Palliat Med Rep 2021; 2:260-264. [PMID: 34927151 PMCID: PMC8675221 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: High-risk patients undergoing elective surgery are at risk for perioperative complications, including readmissions and death. Advance care planning (ACP) may allow for preparation for such events. Objectives: (1) To assess the completion rate of advance directives (ADs) and their association with one year readmissions and mortality (2) to examine clinical events for decedents. Design: This is an observational cohort study conducted through chart review. Setting/Subjects: Subjects were 400 patients undergoing preoperative evaluation for elective surgery at two hospitals in the United States. Measurements: The prevalence of ADs at the time of surgery and at one year, readmissions, and mortality at one year were determined. Results: Three-hundred ninety patients were included. In total, 102 (26.4%) patients were readmitted, yet did not complete an AD. Seventeen (4.4%) patients filed an AD during follow-up. Nineteen patients died and mortality rate was 4.9%. There was a significant association between completing an AD before death. Of the decedents, seven (37%) underwent resuscitation, but only four had ADs. Conclusions: Many high-risk surgical patients would benefit from ADs before clinical decline. Preoperative clinics present a missed opportunity to ensure ACP occurs before complications arise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roma Patel
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Alexia Torke
- IU Health Physicians, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Barb Nation
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,IU Health Physicians, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Ann Cottingham
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Advanced Scholars Program for Internists in Research and Education (ASPIRE) Indiana University (IU) School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Indiana University Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jennifer Hur
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Rachel Gruber
- Advanced Scholars Program for Internists in Research and Education (ASPIRE) Indiana University (IU) School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Indiana University Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Shilpee Sinha
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,IU Health Physicians, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Advanced Scholars Program for Internists in Research and Education (ASPIRE) Indiana University (IU) School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mills S, Cioletti A, Gingell G, Ramani S. Training Residents in Virtual Advance Care Planning: A New Twist in Telehealth. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:691-698. [PMID: 33819515 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Advance care planning (ACP) conversations represent an important physician skill, a need further highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Most resident ACP training occurs in inpatient, settings, often featuring goals of care (GOC) conversations during a crisis. Outpatient clinics are valuable but underutilized settings to provide skills training for residents, yet little research has been done in these spaces. OBJECTIVE We sought to 1) create an ACP curriculum harnessing the principles of a community of practice in a virtual format, and 2) obtain residents' perspectives regarding their skills and confidence in having early GOC conversations in the outpatient setting. METHODS We interviewed 48 internal medicine residents using questionnaires, reflective narratives, and transcripts of debriefing conversations. We created a virtual curriculum during the ambulatory week which included didactics, virtual role plays, ACP phone conversations with five patients, and group debriefings. Quantitative data were analyzed for changes in resident confidence. Qualitative data were coded using thematic analysis, guided by instructor field notes. RESULTS Residents reported decreased confidence in navigating advance directive conversations following training [Z=2.24, P=0.03, r = 0.33]. Resident reflections indicated that they felt more practiced at inpatient late GOC conversation skills, and that these skills were not fully transferable to the outpatient early GOC setting. Residents also endorsed the ambulatory environment as the best space for ACP conversations. CONCLUSION This study illustrates the feasibility of a virtual format for ACP curriculum. The virtual community of practice created space for a metacognitive unmasking of prior resident unconscious incompetence. Also, inpatient, crisis-oriented late GOC conversation skills may translate poorly to the outpatient setting requiring early and ongoing GOC skills. Residents need more training to navigate ACP conversations in ambulatory environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Mills
- Dell Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, Austin, Texas, USA.
| | - Anne Cioletti
- Dell Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, Austin, Texas, USA; Dell Medical School, Department of Population Health, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Gareth Gingell
- The University of Texas at Austin, STEM Education Doctoral Program, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Subha Ramani
- Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Abstract
The importance of integrated palliative care in surgical oncology has been established by high-level evidence demonstrating improved patient-centered outcomes. There has been substantial improvement in efforts to incorporate palliative medicine training into medical and surgical education over the last decade. However, although trainees may feel confident in managing patients at the end of life, they may not have the insight or proficiency to provide optimal palliative care. Surgeons and palliative care physicians should collaborate on methods to optimize palliative care education for both trainees and practicing surgeons. A growing number of palliative care resources are available to this end.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra C Istl
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Blalock 684, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. https://twitter.com/AllyIstl
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Blalock 684, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Palmer MK, Jacobson M, Enguidanos S. Advance Care Planning For Medicare Beneficiaries Increased Substantially, But Prevalence Remained Low. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021; 40:613-621. [PMID: 33819084 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
In 2016 fee-for-service Medicare began reimbursing physicians for advance care planning conversations with enrollees during outpatient visits and waived the copayment for advance care planning when it was part of the Medicare annual wellness visit. Advance care planning is intended to help providers treat patients in ways consistent with their wishes and may also reduce unnecessary health care use and spending. Examining fee-for-service Medicare claims, we found a substantial increase in outpatient advance care planning claims between 2016 and 2019, although prevalence remained below 7.5 percent for all patient subgroups analyzed. Roughly half of beneficiaries with advance care planning claims received the service at an annual wellness visit; the remainder received it at a different outpatient visit. Among those with claims, Black, Hispanic, and Medicaid dual-eligible patients and patients with comorbidities were less likely to have a claim at an annual wellness visit, largely because they have fewer such visits overall. Medicare's annual wellness visits offer the potential to expand enrollees' access to advance care planning at no expense to them, in advance of serious illness, and to populations less likely to undertake advance care planning generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makayla K Palmer
- Makayla K. Palmer is an assistant professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Nevada Las Vegas, in Las Vegas, Nevada
| | - Mireille Jacobson
- Mireille Jacobson is an associate professor at the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology and codirector of the Aging and Cognition Program at the Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, in Los Angeles, California
| | - Susan Enguidanos
- Susan Enguidanos is an associate professor at the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nouri SS, Barnes DE, Shi Y, Volow AM, Shirsat N, Kinderman AL, Harris HA, Sudore RL. The PREPARE for Your Care program increases advance care planning engagement among diverse older adults with cancer. Cancer 2021; 127:3631-3639. [PMID: 34076892 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) is low among older adults with cancer. In a secondary analysis of randomized trial data, the authors compared the efficacy of the PREPARE for Your Care (PREPARE) website plus an easy-to-read advance directive (AD) with an AD only among older adults with and without cancer. METHODS Safety net, primary care patients in San Francisco were included if they were 55 years old or older, were English- or Spanish-speaking, and had 2 or more chronic conditions. The authors determined cancer diagnoses by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision/Tenth Revision codes. The primary outcome was new ACP documentation in the medical record at 15 months; the secondary outcomes were self-reported ACP engagement, ease of use, satisfaction, and depression/anxiety. The authors used mixed effects logistic and linear regression adjusted for prior ACP, health literacy, and clinician, including a cancer interaction term. RESULTS Of 986 participants, 220 (22%) had cancer. The mean age was 63 years (SD, 6 years), 61% were women, 81% were of a minority race/ethnicity, 45% were Spanish-speaking, 39% had limited health literacy, and 27% had prior ACP. New ACP documentation was higher in the PREPARE arm versus the AD-only arm among participants with cancer (62% vs 43%; P = .01) and without cancer (38% vs 28%; P = .01), as was ACP engagement in both arms (P < .001), with no interactions by cancer. Ease of use and satisfaction were high, and depression/anxiety was low, with no differences by study arm or by cancer/no cancer. CONCLUSIONS PREPARE plus an easy-to-read AD increased ACP documentation and engagement among diverse older adults with cancer more than an AD alone, with no increase in depression or anxiety between study arms or by cancer. PREPARE may help to decrease ACP disparities among patients with cancer. LAY SUMMARY Advance care planning (ACP) is the process of sharing values, goals, and preferences for medical care, but engagement in ACP is low among older adults with cancer. Among 986 English- and Spanish-speaking older adults from a safety net hospital, an interactive, multimedia, web-based ACP program (PREPARE for Your Care at https://prepareforyourcare.org/) plus an easy-to-read advance directive increased ACP documentation and engagement more than an advance directive alone. There were no differences in this increase in ACP between older adults with cancer and older adults without cancer. Also, engaging in ACP did not result in increased depression or anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah S Nouri
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Deborah E Barnes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| | - Ying Shi
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California.,Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Aiesha M Volow
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Nikita Shirsat
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Anne L Kinderman
- San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California.,Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Heather A Harris
- San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California.,Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rebecca L Sudore
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California.,Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Preferences on the Timing of Initiating Advance Care Planning and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment between Terminally-Ill Cancer Patients and Their Main Family Caregivers: A Prospective Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17217954. [PMID: 33138212 PMCID: PMC7662916 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background: The Western individualistic understanding of autonomy for advance care planning is considered not to reflect the Asian family-centered approach in medical decision-making. The study aim is to compare preferences on timing for advance care planning initiatives and life-sustaining treatment withdrawal between terminally-ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in Taiwan. Methods: A prospective study using questionnaire survey was conducted with both terminally-ill cancer patient and their family caregiver dyads independently in inpatient and outpatient palliative care settings in a tertiary hospital in Northern Taiwan. Self-reported questionnaire using clinical scenario of incurable lung cancer was employed. Descriptive analysis was used for data analysis. Results: Fifty-four patients and family dyads were recruited from 1 August 2019 to 15 January 2020. Nearly 80% of patients and caregivers agreed that advance care planning should be conducted when the patient was at a non-frail stage of disease. Patients’ frail stage of disease was considered the indicator for life-sustaining treatments withdrawal except for nutrition and fluid supplements, antibiotics or blood transfusions. Patient dyads considered that advance care planning discussions were meaningful without arousing emotional distress. Conclusion: Patient dyads’ preferences on the timing of initiating advance care planning and life-sustaining treatments withdrawal were found to be consistent. Taiwanese people’s medical decision-making is heavily influenced by cultural characteristics including relational autonomy and filial piety. The findings could inform the clinical practice and policy in the wider Asia–Pacific region.
Collapse
|