Time for better integration of oncology and palliative care

Concordant palliative care delivery in advanced head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe the palliative care consultation practices in an academic head and neck surgery practice.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of a palliative care database and the health record for all palliative care consultations of patients suffering from advanced stage head and neck cancer within a 21-month period.

RESULTS

Ten head and neck cancer patients received palliative care consults while on the otolaryngology service. One consultation occurred preoperatively; nine occurred postoperatively, on a median of hospital day 9. At the time of referral, seven patients were in the ICU and three were on a surgical floor. Code status de-escalation occurred in six patients and psycho-socio-spiritual suffering was supported in all consultations. Nine patients died within six months, with a median post-consultation survival of 35 days. Of these, two died in an ICU, five were discharged to hospice, one to a SNF, and one to a LTACH.

CONCLUSION

Palliative care consultation in this advanced head and neck cancer cohort was commonly late, however, significant suffering was mitigated following most consults. Palliative care specialists are experts at eliciting patient values, determining acceptable tradeoffs and suffering limitations by employing a shared decision-making process that ends with a patient-centered value-congruent treatment recommendation. Oftentimes, this embraces curative-intent or palliative surgery, along with contingency plans for unacceptable value-incongruent postoperative outcomes. Enhanced awareness of the benefits of embracing concordant palliative care in advanced head and neck cancer patients may help overcome the significant barriers to involving palliative care experts earlier.

A High-Touch Model of Community-Based Specialist Palliative Care: Latent Class Analysis Identifies Distinct Patient Subgroups

CONTEXT

Community-based palliative care may support seriously ill homebound patients. Programs vary widely, and few studies have described the heterogeneity of the populations served or service delivery models.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a diverse population served by an interdisciplinary model of community-based specialist palliative care and the variation in service delivery over time and identify subgroups with distinct illness burden profiles.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study evaluated longitudinal electronic health record data from 894 patients served during 2010-2013. Illness burden was defined by measures of performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status scale), symptom distress (Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale), palliative care needs (Palliative Outcome Scale), and quality of life (Spitzer Quality of Life Index). Service utilization included the frequency of visits received and calls made or received by patients. Latent class analysis identified patient subgroups with distinct illness burden profiles, and mixed-effects modeling was used to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and service utilization.

RESULTS

The mean age was 72.3 years (SD = 14.0); 56.2% were women; 67.5% were English speaking; and 22.2% were Spanish speaking. Most had congestive heart failure (36.4%) or cancer (30.4%); 98.0% had a Karnofsky Performance Status score of 40-70. Four patient subgroups were identified: very low illness burden (26.2%); low burden (39.5%); moderate burden (13.5%); and high burden (20.8%). The subgroups differed in both baseline characteristics and palliative care service utilization over time.

CONCLUSION

The population served by a community-based specialist palliative care program manages patients with different levels of illness burden, which are associated with patient characteristics and service utilization.

MASCC/ESMO/EAPC survey of palliative programs

BACKGROUND

Palliative care program structure is important to integrating palliative services into cancer care. A first step in understanding the structure of palliative care programs is to survey existing programs.

METHOD

This data was generated from members of MASCC, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and the European Association of Palliative Care (EAPC) who completed the surveys on the website. A survey questionnaire was developed using the survey tool developed by Dr. Hui and colleagues by permission which was modified for the purposes of this study. Findings were described in number and percentages. Inferential statistics involved the Fisher's exact test for factors with two levels, chi-Square test for unordered categorical factors with greater than two levels, Cochran-Armitage trend test for ordered categorical factors, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for measured factors.

RESULTS

Sixty-two program leaders completed the survey. Most programs had been in existence greater than 5 years and were led by oncology trained physicians who had an additional specialty. Most programs had consultative services and outpatient clinics with fewer having inpatient beds and institutionally associated hospices. Most programs provided patient continuity. Patients were generally seen late in the course of illness with the average survival of 23 days when seen as inpatients and 40 days when seen as outpatients. Less than half had palliative care fellowship training programs. Most had research structures in place.

DISCUSSION

These findings differ from results reported in a previous survey which may reflect a European palliative care program structure. However, there were similarities which include a high inpatient palliative care unit mortality and short survival of patients seen as outpatients, indicating that referrals to palliative care occur late in the course of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

This study not only differs in some respects to a previous survey of palliative care programs but also confirms the late referral of patients to palliative care.

A Comprehensive Palliative Care Program at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Jordan

Context:

The palliative care program in King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) is growing rapidly to serve the needs of patients with cancer and their families.

Objective:

To describe the KHCC palliative care program and its integration into the oncology care.

Methods:

Narrative review of our palliative care program.

Results:

Patients with cancer at KHCC have access to an interprofessional palliative care at different settings. In 2012, the inpatient team saw 400 consultations and 979 referrals and admissions. The outpatient clinic had a total of 1133 patient visits. The home care program provided a total of 1501 visits. Our program is a regional center for education and training and actively conducts research.

Conclusion:

Our palliative care program may be a model for successful delivery of comprehensive cancer care in the Middle East.

Interdisciplinary palliative care intervention in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Challenges and barriers continue to hinder the integration of palliative care models into comprehensive, ambulatory oncology care. This article aims to describe how symptoms, distress, and quality of life (QOL) data from the usual care phase of a National Cancer Institute-supported Program Project informed the development of an interdisciplinary, tailored palliative care intervention for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients receiving usual care for metastatic NSCLC were recruited into this prospective longitudinal study over a 1-year period. A total of 130 patients with stage IV NSCLC were accrued, and 114 patients had evaluable data. Research nurses assisted patients in completing the clinical section of the data forms, and patients completed surveys and self-reports at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients ranged in age from 40 to 84 years, and 61% were Caucasian non-Hispanic. Sixty-six former (N = 59) and current smokers had an average of 38 pack-year history of smoking. The Karnofsky Performance Status, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, and Cognitive scores deteriorated significantly (P = .001, .009, and .042, respectively). Social Activity was stable, whereas Social Support increased significantly. Overall symptom distress score and Total symptom score both significantly increased at 24 weeks (P = .003 and .017, respectively). Physical Well-Being decreased significantly (P = .036), whereas the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spirituality Subscale, and Distress scores remained statistically stable over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic NSCLC continue to experience high symptom burden and diminished physical well-being over time while receiving cancer treatments. An interdisciplinary palliative care intervention is currently being tested to improve symptom burden and overall QOL.