Communicating safe outpatient management of fever and neutropenia

Variation in Antibiotic Prescription in High-Risk Febrile Neutropenia in Portuguese Hospitals

INTRODUCTION

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially severe entity, particularly in hemato-oncologic patients who have higher incidence of colonization with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Discrepancies among guidelines contribute to divergence in antimicrobial practices. Our objective was to assess the variation of practices in antimicrobial therapy in high-risk FN among Portuguese hematologists.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study through the implementation of an online survey, open to all clinical hematologists in the country. To characterize practice patterns regarding critical elements in FN management, three clinical vignettes were designed to describe typical situations where narrow-spectrum empiric antibiotics (vignette 1), short-course therapy (vignette 2) and de-escalation (vignette 3) could be performed. The remaining questions characterized clinical experience, department size, and differentiation and decision-making process regarding FN antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

The survey yielded 31 responses from 11 hospitals across four regions. All respondents opted for empiric narrow-spectrum antibiotics, 22.6% opted for short-course therapy (mostly senior specialists from larger settings) and 35.5% for de-escalation (mostly young specialists). Availability of an FN protocol seemed to favor both approaches. These findings should be complemented by qualitative assessments of barriers to best practices and should support the need for interventions to improve antibiotic use in febrile neutropenia.

The Risk of Rectal Temperature Measurement in Neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Avoiding rectal thermometry is recommended in patients with neutropenic fever. Permeability of the anal mucosa may result in a higher risk of bacteremia in these patients. Still, this recommendation is based on only a few studies.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all individuals admitted to our emergency department during 2014-2017 with afebrile (body temperature <38.3°C) neutropenia (neutrophil count <500 cells/microL) who were over the age of 18. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of a rectal temperature measurement. The primary outcome was bacteremia during the first five days of index hospitalization; the secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 40 patients with rectal temperature measurements and 407 patients whose temperatures were only measured orally. Among patients with oral temperature measurements, 10.6% had bacteremia, compared to 5.1% among patients who had rectal temperature measurements. Rectal temperature measurement was not associated with bacteremia, neither in non-matched (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-1.77) nor in matched cohort analyses (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.04-3.29). In-hospital mortality was also similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with neutropenia who had their temperature taken using a rectal thermometer did not experience a higher frequency of events of documented bacteremia or increased in-hospital mortality.

Bone marrow toxicity and immune reconstitution in melanoma and non-melanoma solid cancer patients after non-myeloablative conditioning with chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition

BACKGROUND AIMS

Lymphodepletion with non-myeloablative (NMA) chemotherapy is currently a prerequisite for adoptive cell therapy (ACT). ACT based on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes has long been used in malignant melanoma (MM), but with the advance of ACT into new cancer diagnoses, the patient predisposition will change. The authors here evaluate the bone marrow (BM) toxicity of NMA in combination with checkpoint inhibition and a priori risk factors in a wide range of cancer diagnoses.

METHODS

Thirty-one non-MM and MM patients were included from two different clinical trials with ACT. The treatment history was extracted from the medical records, together with the hematology data. Immune monitoring with flow cytometry was performed before and at several time points after therapy.

RESULTS

NMA induced reversible myelosuppression in all patients. No significant differences in BM toxicity between MM and non-MM patients were found. The overall hematology counts were reconstituted within 3-6 months but with great individual heterogeneity, including eight patients who developed a second phase of neutropenia after hospital discharge. A performance status >0 was found, and shorter overall survival and sex were statistically associated with longer duration of anemia. By contrast, high expression of co-stimulatory markers CD28+ and CD27+ on T cells at baseline was significantly correlated with shorter duration of neutropenia (P = 0.010 and P = 0.009, respectively), anemia (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) and thrombocytopenia (P = 0.017 and P = 0.030, respectively). In addition, following NMA, the authors saw a significant differentiation of T-cell phenotype associated with old age.

CONCLUSIONS

ACT with NMA and checkpoint inhibition is tolerable in patients with multiple cancer diagnoses and therapy backgrounds but comes with substantial transient BM toxicity that is comparable in both non-MM and MM patients. Baseline T-cell CD28/CD27 expression level is predictive of duration of BM toxicity. Furthermore, NMA conditioning induces changes in the immune system that may affect a patient's immunocompetence for many months following therapy.

Predictive Model for Infection Risk in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Patients Treated With Azacitidine; Azacitidine Infection Risk Model: The Polish Adult Leukemia Group Study

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, including those treated with azacitidine, are at increased risk for serious infections. The aim of our study was to identify patients with higher infectious risk at the beginning of azacitidine treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective evaluation of 298 MDS/CMML/AML patients and included in the analysis 232 patients who completed the first 3 cycles of azacitidine therapy or developed Grade III/IV infection before completing the third cycle.

RESULTS

Overall, 143 patients (62%) experienced serious infection, and in 94 patients (41%) infection occurred within the first 3 cycles. The following variables were found to have the most significant effect on the infectious risk in multivariate analysis: red blood cell transfusion dependency (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-4.79), neutropenia <0.8 × 10⁹/L (OR, 3.03; 97.5% CI, 1.66-5.55), platelet count <50 × 10⁹/L (OR, 2.63; 97.5% CI, 1.42-4.76), albumin level <35 g/dL (OR, 2.04; 97.5% CI, 1.01-4.16), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (OR, 2.19; 97.5% CI, 1.40-3.54). Each of these variables is assigned 1 point, and the combined score represents the proposed Azacitidine Infection Risk Model. The infection rate in the first 3 cycles of therapy in lower-risk (0-2 score) and higher-risk (3-5 score) patients was 25% and 73%, respectively. The overall survival was significantly reduced in higher-risk patients compared with the lower-risk cohort (8 vs. 29 months).

CONCLUSION

We selected a subset with high early risk for serious infection and worse clinical outcome among patients treated with azacitidine.

Patterns of infectious complications in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes patients treated with 10-day decitabine regimen

Decitabine has been explored as a reduced-intensity therapy for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To better understand the risk of infections during decitabine treatment, we retrospectively examined the culture results from each infection-related serious adverse event that occurred among 85 AML and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients treated in a prospective clinical study using 10-day cycles of decitabine at Washington University School of Medicine. Culture results were available for 163 infection-related complications that occurred in 70 patients: 90 (55.2%) events were culture-negative, 32 (19.6%) were gram-positive bacteria, 20 (12.3%) were gram-negative bacteria, 12 (7.4%) were mixed, 6 (3.7%) were viral, 2 (1.2%) were fungal, and 1 (0.6%) was mycobacterial. Infection-related mortality occurred in 3/24 (13%) of gram-negative events, and 0/51 gram-positive events. On average, nearly one third of patients experienced an infection-related complication with each cycle, and the incidence did not decrease during later cycles. In summary, in patients receiving 10-day decitabine, infectious complications are common and may occur during any cycle of therapy. Although febrile events are commonly culture-negative, gram-positive infections are the most frequent source of culture-positive infections, but gram-negative infections represent a significant risk of mortality in AML and MDS patients treated with decitabine.

Application of the MASCC and CISNE Risk-Stratification Scores to Identify Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenic Patients in the Emergency Department

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Although validated risk-stratification tools have been used to send low-risk febrile neutropenic patients home from clinic and inpatient settings, there is a dearth of research evaluating these scores in the emergency department (ED). We compare the predictive accuracy of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scores for patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and presenting to the ED.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate all patients with febrile neutropenia (temperature ≥38°C [100.4°F], absolute neutrophil count <1,000 cells/μL) who presented to 2 academic EDs from June 2012 through January 2015. MASCC and CISNE scores were calculated for all subjects, and each visit was evaluated for several outcome variables, including inpatient length of stay, upgrade in level of care, clinical deterioration, positive blood culture results, and death. Descriptive statistics are reported and continuous variables were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank sum.

RESULTS

During our study period, 230 patients presented with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. The CISNE score identified 53 (23%) of these patients as low risk and was highly specific in the identification of a low-risk cohort for all outcome variables (98.3% specific, 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.7% to 99.9%; positive predictive value 98.1%, 95% CI 88.6% to 99.9%). Median length of stay was shorter for low-risk versus high-risk CISNE patients (3-day difference; P<.001). The MASCC score was much less specific (54.2%; 95% CI 40.8% to 67.1%) in the identification of a low-risk cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the CISNE score may be the most appropriate febrile neutropenia risk-stratification tool for use in the ED.