1
|
Yabroff KR, Mittu K, Halpern MT. Cost-of-care discussions for individuals with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma: Findings from a large, population-based pilot study. Cancer 2024; 130:3364-3374. [PMID: 38869706 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Costs of cancer care can result in patient financial hardship; many professional organizations recommend provider discussions about treatment costs as part of high-quality care. In this pilot study, the authors examined patient-provider cost discussions documented in the medical records of individuals who were diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma-cancers with recently approved, high-cost treatment options. METHODS Individuals who were newly diagnosed in 2017-2018 with stage III/IV NSCLC (n = 1767) and in 2018 with stage III/IV melanoma (n = 689) from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results regions were randomly selected for the National Cancer Institute Patterns of Care Study. Documentation of cost discussions was abstracted from the medical record. The authors examined patient, treatment, and hospital factors associated with cost discussions in multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Cost discussions were documented in the medical records of 20.3% of patients with NSCLC and in 24.0% of those with melanoma. In adjusted analyses, privately insured (vs. publicly insured) patients were less likely to have documented cost discussions (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.80). Patients who did not receive systemic therapy or did not receive any cancer-directed treatment were less likely to have documented cost discussions than those who did receive systemic therapy (OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.19-0.81] and 0.46 [95% CI, 0.30-0.70], respectively), as were patients who were treated at hospitals without residency programs (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98). CONCLUSIONS Cost discussions were infrequently documented in the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with advanced NSCLC and melanoma, which may hinder identifying patient needs and tracking outcomes of associated referrals. Efforts to increase cost-of-care discussions and relevant referrals, as well as their documentation, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Karen Mittu
- Information Management Services, Calverton, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael T Halpern
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Conti RM, McCue S, Dockter T, Gunn HJ, Dusetzina SB, Bennett AV, Rapkin B, Gracia G, Jazowski S, Johnson M, Behrens R, Richardson P, Subbiah N, Chow S, Chang GJ, Neuman HB, Weiss ES. Self-Reported Financial Difficulties Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated at U.S. Community Oncology Clinics (Alliance A231602CD). MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.09.13.24311098. [PMID: 39371185 PMCID: PMC11451638 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.13.24311098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
Objectives To estimate the proportion and correlates of self-reported financial difficulty among patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Setting 23 U.S. community and minority oncology practice sites affiliated with the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). Participants 521 patients (≥18 years) with MM or CLL were consented and 416 responded to a survey (completion rate=79.8%). Respondents had a MM diagnosis (74.0%), an associate degree or higher (53.4%), were White (89.2%), insured (100%) and treated with clinician-administered drugs (68.0%). Interventions Observational, prospective, protocol-based survey administered in 2019-2020. Primary and secondary outcome measures Financial difficulty was assessed using a single-item standard measure, the EORTC QLQC30: "Has your physical condition or medical treatment caused you financial difficulties in the past year?" and using an 'any-or-none' composite measure of 22 items assessing financial difficulty, worries and the use of cost-coping strategies. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the association between financial difficulty, diagnosis, and socioeconomic and treatment characteristics. Results 16.8% reported experiencing financial difficulty using the single-item measure and 60.3% using the composite measure. Most frequently endorsed items in the composite measure were financial worry about having to pay large medical bills related to cancer and difficulty paying medical bills. Financial difficulty using the single-item measure was associated with having MM versus CLL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.84; P=.02), having insurance other than Medicare (aOR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.37-4.66; P=.003), being non-White (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.04-4.72; P=.04), and having a high school education or below (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.64; P=.001). Financial difficulty using the composite measure was associated with having a high school education or below (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94; P=.03). Conclusions U.S. patients with blood cancer report financial difficulty, especially those with low socio-economic status. Evidence-based and targeted interventions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rena M. Conti
- Boston University, Questrom School of Business, Boston, MA
| | - Shaylene McCue
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Travis Dockter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Heather J. Gunn
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Stacie B. Dusetzina
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center /Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Bruce Rapkin
- Montefiore Medical Center -Einstein Campus, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Shelley Jazowski
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center /Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | | | | - Selina Chow
- Alliance Protocol Operations Office, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gharzai LA, Liu YA, Sun Z, Mady LJ, Mohn M, Larson A, Kircher S, Yanez B, Carlos RC, Pottow J, Jagsi R, Sadigh G. Financial Toxicity Screening Preferences in Patients With Breast Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400415. [PMID: 39288337 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity is an important issue in cancer that affects quality of life and treatment adherence. Screening can identify patients at risk but consensus on appropriate timing or methods is lacking. METHODS We sent an anonymous survey to e-mail subscribers of a nationwide breast cancer-specific philanthropic organization in July 2023 asking about financial toxicity screening preferences. Frequencies, percentages, and medians were calculated for categorical and continuous variables. RESULTS Of 5,774 potential participants, 738 respondents with a confirmed cancer diagnosis participated (12.7% response rate). Participants were 93% female (n = 690), had a median age of 50 years (IQR, 44-57), were 57% non-Hispanic White (n = 418), 20% Black/African-American (n = 149), 9.2% Hispanic (n = 68). 93% confirmed a breast cancer diagnosis (n = 689), and 54% were currently undergoing treatment (n = 400). Most indicated not being asked about financial stressors by (58%, n = 425) and not receiving assistance from their care team (68%, n = 498). Most preferred for providers to reach out regarding financial needs (83%, n = 615). Most wished for these discussions to take place early (when first diagnosed [45%, n = 334] or when treatment selected [37%, n = 275]) and to be asked frequently (each appointment [42%, n = 312] or once per month [36%, n = 268]). Participants felt most comfortable discussing financial needs with a social worker or patient/financial navigator (92%, n = 679), in person (75%, n = 553), or via telephone (65%, n = 479). CONCLUSION Patients in this sample primarily consisting of women with breast cancer desired financial screening to occur early, often, and to be initiated by their providers. Patient preferences can inform optimal implementation of financial toxicity screening practices. Continued work refining best practices for financial toxicity screening should incorporate these patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila A Gharzai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Yingzhe Alex Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Zequn Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Leila J Mady
- Department of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michelle Mohn
- Department of Social Work, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Alexis Larson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Sheetal Kircher
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Ruth C Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - John Pottow
- University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Gelareh Sadigh
- Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klok JM, Duijts SFA, Engelen V, Masselink R, Dingemans AMC, Aerts JGJV, Lingsma HF, van Klaveren D. Experienced financial toxicity among long-term cancer survivors: results from a national cross-sectional survey. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01668-2. [PMID: 39225899 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01668-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity, the subjective distress caused by objective financial burden, significantly impacts cancer survivors. Yet, enduring effects on survivors remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the experienced objective financial burden and subjective financial distress in long-term cancer survivors. METHODS A cross-sectional nationwide online survey of adult cancer survivors ≥ 5y after diagnosis were analyzed. Objective financial burden was measured via extra expenses and income loss, while subjective financial distress covered psychological well-being, coping and support-seeking behavior, and financial concerns. Groups were compared (i.e., having cancer vs. former patients) by t-tests and chi-squared tests. Financial toxicity was visualized with Sankey plots and sunburst diagrams. RESULTS 4,675 respondents completed the survey, of whom 2,391 (51%) were ≥ 5y after their cancer diagnosis. Among them, 75% experienced income loss and/or extra expenses after diagnosis. One-third of the previously employed respondents relied on work disability benefits. Further, 'being unable to make ends meet' increased from 2% before diagnosis to 13% ≥ 5y after diagnosis (p < .001). Additionally, 58% reported negative psychological impacts of financial toxicity, and 47% worried about their financial future. CONCLUSIONS Cancer survivors often face income loss and additional expenses, leading to ongoing financial difficulties that affect their psychological well-being. Despite this significant impact, there is a lack of guidance and support to help them manage these financial challenges. These findings highlight the need for healthcare professionals to recognize and address the financial challenges. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This study underscores the widespread financial challenges cancer survivors encounter, emphasizing the need for ongoing financial support and comprehensive assessments of their physical and psychological well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jente M Klok
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia F A Duijts
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vivian Engelen
- Dutch Federation of Cancer Patient Organizations (NFK), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Masselink
- Dutch Federation of Cancer Patient Organizations (NFK), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester F Lingsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sadigh G, Duan F, An N, Gareen ID, Sicks J, Suga JM, Kehn H, Mehan PT, Bajaj R, Hanson DS, Dalia SM, Acoba JD, Yasar DG, Taylor MA, Park E, Wagner LI, Kircher SM, Carlos RC. Financial Hardship Among Patients With Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2431967. [PMID: 39287948 PMCID: PMC11409151 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The degree of cancer patients' financial hardship is dynamic and can change over time. Objective To assess longitudinal changes in financial hardship among patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants In this prospective longitudinal cohort study, English-speaking adult patients with a new diagnosis of stage I to III colorectal cancer being treated with curative intent at National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practices between May 2018 and July 2020 and who had not started chemotherapy and/or radiation were included. Data analysis was conducted from March to December 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Patients completed surveys at baseline as well as at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after enrollment. Cost-related care nonadherence and material hardship, as adopted by Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, were measured. Factors associated with financial hardship were assessed using longitudinal multivariable logistic regression models with time interaction. Results A total of 451 patients completed baseline questions, with 217 (48.1%) completing the 24-month follow-up. Mean (SD) age was 61.0 (12.0) years (210 [46.6%] female; 33 [7.3%] Black, 380 [84.3%] White, and 33 [7.3%] American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, multiracial, or Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individuals or those who did not report race or who had unknown race). Among 217 patients with data at baseline and 24 months, 19 (8.8%) reported cost-related care nonadherence at baseline vs 20 (9.2%) at 24 months (P = .84), and 125 (57.6%) reported material hardship at baseline vs 76 (35.0%) at 24 months (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, lower financial worry (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93), higher education (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.77), and older age (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98) were associated with lower nonadherence. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with higher material hardship (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.15-6.29), while lower financial worry was associated with lower material hardship (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96). Over 24 months, female sex was associated with lower nonadherence (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96), while higher education was associated with higher nonadherence (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17). Being employed was associated with lower material hardship (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93), while receipt of care at safety-net hospitals was associated with higher hardship (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17). Conclusions and Relevance In patients with early-stage colorectal cancer, material hardship was more common than cost-related cancer care nonadherence and decreased over time, while nonadherence remained unchanged. Early and longitudinal financial screening and referral to intervention are recommended to mitigate financial hardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fenghai Duan
- Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Na An
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ilana D Gareen
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - JoRean Sicks
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jennifer M Suga
- Kaiser Permanente NCI Community Oncology Research Program and NCORP, Vallejo, California
| | - Heather Kehn
- Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St Louis Park
| | | | - Rajesh Bajaj
- Carolina Health Care and NCORP, Florence, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Elyse Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Sheetal M Kircher
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ruth C Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Forman R, Long JB, Westvold SJ, Agnish K, Mcmanus HD, Leapman MS, Hurwitz ME, Spees LP, Wheeler SB, Gross CP, Dinan MA. Cost trends of metastatic renal cell carcinoma therapy: the impact of oral anticancer agents and immunotherapy. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae067. [PMID: 39133171 PMCID: PMC11376369 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy (IO) and oral anticancer agents (OAA) have improved outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but there is a need to understand real-world costs from the perspective of payers and patients. METHODS We used retrospective fee-for-service Medicare 100% claims data to study patients diagnosed with mRCC in 2015-2019. We identified initial treatment type and costs (the year after diagnosis) and analyzed differences in monthly and 12-month costs over time and between OAA, IO, and combination groups and the association between Out-Of-Pocket (OOP) costs and adherence. RESULTS We identified 15 407 patients with mRCC (61% male; 85% non-Hispanic White). A total of 6196 received OAA, IO, or combination OAA/IO as initial treatment. OAA use decreased (from 31% to 11%) with a simultaneous rise in patients receiving IO (3% to 26%) or combination IO/OAA therapy (1% to 11%). Medicare payments for all patients with mRCC increased by 41%, from $60 320 (95% confidence interval = 58 260 to 62 380) in 2015 to $85 130 (95% confidence interval = 82 630 to 87 630) in 2019. Payments increased in patients who received OAA, IO, or combination OAA/IO but were stable in those with other/no treatment. Initial higher OOP responsibility ($200-$1000) was associated with 13% decrease in percent days covered in patients receiving OAA in the first 90 days of treatment, compared with those whose OOP responsibility was less than $200. CONCLUSION From 2015 to 2019, costs for Medicare patients with mRCC rose substantially due to more patients receiving IO or IO/OAA combined therapy and increases in costs among those receiving those therapies. Increased OOP costs was associated with decreased adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Forman
- Section of Medical Oncology, Internal Medicine Department, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jessica B Long
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sarah J Westvold
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Hannah D Mcmanus
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael S Leapman
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael E Hurwitz
- Section of Medical Oncology, Internal Medicine Department, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lisa P Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Cary P Gross
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michaela A Dinan
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Halpern MT, Thamm C, Knowles R, Chan RJ. Cancer Survivors' Experience of Care and Financial Toxicity: Results From a National Survey. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400370. [PMID: 39173093 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity (FT) can adversely affect quality of life, treatment adherence, and clinical outcomes. Patient experience of care (PEC) captures patient's perspectives on interactions with health care providers (HCPs) and systems, but the impact of PEC on FT is unknown. This study examined the relationship between PEC and FT. METHODS We used data from the 2016-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) Experience with Cancer Survivorship Supplement. PEC was assessed by patient-reported frequencies of their HCPs providing explanations that were easy to understand, listening carefully, showing respect, and spending enough time with the patient. FT was assessed by nine items to measure material, psychological, and behavioral FT. Analyses were performed using multivariable logistic regression controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and weighted to produce nationally representative estimates and account for survey nonresponse. RESULTS Data from 1,068 individuals diagnosed with cancer at age >18 years were assessed. A total of 30% reported material FT, 35% reported psychological FT, and 27% reported behavioral FT. Examining PEC, 64% of respondents indicated that HCPs always explained things, 60% always listened, 66% always showed respect, and 57% always spent adequate time with them. Odds of psychological FT were significantly (P < .05) lower among patients reporting HCPs always (v never/sometimes) listened to them (odds ratio [OR], 0.37 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.70]), showed them respect (OR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.81]), and spent enough time with them (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86]). Significant associations with PEC were also found with MEPS psychological FT items on worry about paying medical bills, family's financial stability, and keeping job/income because of cancer. CONCLUSION Worry/anxiety regarding costs can be a major factor affecting individuals diagnosed with cancer. Improving patient-provider interactions to enhance patient experience of care may reduce psychological financial toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Halpern
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Health Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Carla Thamm
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Reegan Knowles
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Raymond J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Edwards AL, Trang K, Tolstykh IV, Van Blarigan EL, Van Loon K, Laffan A, Stanfield D, Steiding P, Neuhaus J, Atreya CE, Piawah S, Venook AP, Varma MG. Association between gastrointestinal symptoms and specialty care utilization among colon cancer survivors: a cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:130. [PMID: 39138736 PMCID: PMC11322428 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04685-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Persistent gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are frequently experienced by colon cancer survivors and may help identify patients with higher utilization of healthcare services. To assess the relationship between GI symptoms and specialty care utilization among colon cancer survivors. METHODS A prospective longitudinal cohort study at an academic medical center of 126 adults surgically treated for stage I-IV colon cancer between February 2017 and June 2022. Participants reported GI symptoms through the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 at enrollment and as frequently as every 6 months for 5 years. Main outcome measures were visits, telephone encounters, and secure messages with a medical provider within specialty oncology clinics within 6 months after each survey completion. Generalized linear mixed regression model for repeated measurements with random trajectory for each participant was performed to estimate the associations between symptoms and healthcare use. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical and surgical factors, and timing in relation to onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS In the 6 months after each survey time point, patients averaged 1.2 visits, 0.5 telephone encounters, and 3.2 patient-initiated messages. In adjusted models, those with any abdominal pain (RR 1.45; p = 0.002), buttock pain (RR 1.30; p = 0.050), or increased stool frequency (RR 1.26; p = 0.046) had more clinic visits in the following 6 months than those without these symptoms. Including these three symptoms in one model revealed that only abdominal pain was statistically significantly associated with increased clinic visits (RR 1.36; p = 0.016). Patients with any blood or mucus in stool (RR 2.46; p = 0.009) had significantly more telephone encounters, and those with any abdominal pain (RR 1.65; p = 0.002) had significantly more patient-initiated messages than those without these symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Our findings identify GI symptoms associated with increased use of oncologic specialty care among colon cancer survivors, with abdominal pain as an important predictor of utilization. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Early identification and anticipatory management of colon cancer survivors experiencing abdominal pain may decrease healthcare utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anya L Edwards
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karen Trang
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Irina V Tolstykh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Erin L Van Blarigan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Angela Laffan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dalila Stanfield
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paige Steiding
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John Neuhaus
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Chloe E Atreya
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sorbarikor Piawah
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Madhulika G Varma
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Nápoles AM. Financial strain, neighborhood cohesion, and health-related quality of life among rural and urban Spanish-speaking Latina breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1275-1284. [PMID: 36991270 PMCID: PMC11324799 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01369-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Among Latina breast cancer survivors, explore associations between rural/urban residence and health-related quality of life (HRQL), and whether associations are moderated by financial strain and low neighborhood cohesion. METHODS We combined baseline data from two randomized controlled trials of a stress management intervention conducted among 151 urban and 153 rural dwelling Latinas with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Generalized linear models estimated associations between rural/urban status and HRQL (overall, emotional, social-family, physical, and functional well-being), and we examined moderation effects of financial strain and low neighborhood cohesion, controlling for age, marital status, and breast cancer characteristics. RESULTS Rural women reported better emotional (β = 1.85; 95% CI = 0.37, 3.33), functional (β = 2.23; 95% CI = 0.69, 3.77), and overall (β = 5.68; 95% CI = 1.12, 10.25) well-being than urban women, regardless of degree of financial strain or neighborhood cohesion; moderation effects were not statistically significant. Financial strain was inversely associated with emotional (β = -2.34; 95% CI = 3.63, -1.05), physical (β = -2.56; 95% CI = -4.12, -1.01), functional (β = -1.61; 95% CI = -2.96, -0.26), and overall (β = -6.67; 95% CI = -10.96, -2.98) well-being. Low neighborhood cohesion was inversely associated with emotional (β = -1.27; 95% CI = -2.50, -0.04), social-family (β = -1.72; 95% CI = -3.02, -0.42), functional (β = -1.63; 95% CI = -2.92, -0.34), and overall (β = -5.95; 95% CI = 9.76, -2.14) well-being. CONCLUSIONS Rural Latina breast cancer survivors reported better emotional, functional and overall well-being than their urban counterparts. Greater financial strain and less neighborhood cohesion were associated with worse HRQL on most domains regardless of rural/urban context. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Interventions that focus on increasing perceived neighborhood cohesion and reducing or better managing financial strain, could help improve Latina cancer survivors' well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson
- University of California San Francisco, Division of Internal Medicine, 490 Illinois Street, 9th floor, Box 0856, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
- University of California Berkeley, School of Public Health, 2121 Berkeley Way, Room 5302, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
| | - Anita L Stewart
- University of California San Francisco, Institute for Health & Aging, Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, 490 Illinois Street, 12th floor, Box 0646, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Anna María Nápoles
- Division of Intramural Research, National Institute On Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 3, Floor 5, Room E08, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lim M, Bohorquez NG, Mitchell R, Cramb S, Bradford N, Naicker S, Kularatna S, Senanayake S. Financial Aid in Children, Adolescents and Young Adult's Cancer Care: A Scoping Review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:583-596. [PMID: 38451723 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The financial burden resulting from cancers on families is higher when it arises in young people compared with older adults. Previous research has provided insight into the financial toxicities associated with childhood cancer, but less is known about the efficacy of financial aid systems in reducing the financial burden on families. We conducted a scoping review to identify the determinants of success and failure of financial aid. Methods: Five databases were searched for articles published between January 1, 2000 and December 1, 2022. Dual processes were used to screen and select studies. Through thematic content analysis, we identified barriers and enablers of financial aid, categorised by country income level. Results: From 17 articles, which were evenly split between high-income countries and upper middle- to low-income countries, four major themes emerged: (1) accessibility of support, (2) delivery of support, (3) administration, and (4) psychosocial factors. Within these themes, the enablers identified were (1) support navigators, (2) establishing a direct contact between donors and beneficiaries, (3) implementation of digital solutions to improve outreach, and (4) using cultural and community values to encourage donor engagement. Conclusions: This scoping review identified the determinants of success and failure of financial aid in supporting families in the context of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancers. By understanding the barriers and enablers identified in this review, organizations could develop pragmatic evidence-based care models and policies to ensure access to assistance is equitable and appropriate for families experiencing CAYA cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megumi Lim
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Natalia Gonzalez Bohorquez
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Remai Mitchell
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Susanna Cramb
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Natalie Bradford
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre at the Centre for Children's Health Research, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sundresan Naicker
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sanjeewa Kularatna
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sameera Senanayake
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Myers SP, Aviki E, Sevilimedu V, Thom B, Gemignani ML. Financial Toxicity Among Women with Breast Cancer Varies by Age and Race. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15895-5. [PMID: 39078600 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15895-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Financial toxicity negatively affects clinical outcomes in breast cancer. Underrepresented demographics may be at higher risk for financial toxicity. We characterized disparities on the basis of age and other factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Surveys completed by women with stage 0-IV breast cancer treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 06/2022 and 05/2023 were analyzed. The comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) scale was used to assess financial toxicity. Descriptive statistics were calculated for differences in financial toxicity/related factors, and outcomes by age and race. Associations between variables of interest and COST scores were analyzed using linear regression. RESULTS Of 8512 respondents (75% white, 9.3% Asian, 8.4% Black), most (68%) had clinical stage 0/I disease. Stratified by age, young Black women had higher financial toxicity than young white or Asian women (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, women age < 45 years experienced higher financial toxicity than older women (coefficient - 2.0, 95% CI - 2.8 to - 1.1, p < 0.001). Compared with white women, financial toxicity was greater among Black (coefficient - 6.8, 95% CI - 7.8 to - 5.8) and Asian women (coefficient - 3.5, 95% CI - 4.4 to - 2.5). Cost-related medication non-adherence was more frequent among Black and Asian women (p < 0.001). Asian women more often paid for treatment with savings than white and Black women (p < 0.001). Young women reported using savings for treatment-related costs more than older (45% vs. 32%); p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Racial minorities and young patients are disproportionately affected by financial toxicity. Further studies are planned to determine how financial toxicity evolves over time and whether referral to financial services effectively reduces toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara P Myers
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emeline Aviki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NYU Langone Health, Mineola, NY, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bridgette Thom
- School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary L Gemignani
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yabroff KR, Doran JF, Zhao J, Chino F, Shih YCT, Han X, Zheng Z, Bradley CJ, Bryant MF. Cancer diagnosis and treatment in working-age adults: Implications for employment, health insurance coverage, and financial hardship in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74:341-358. [PMID: 38652221 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The rising costs of cancer care and subsequent medical financial hardship for cancer survivors and families are well documented in the United States. Less attention has been paid to employment disruptions and loss of household income after a cancer diagnosis and during treatment, potentially resulting in lasting financial hardship, particularly for working-age adults not yet age-eligible for Medicare coverage and their families. In this article, the authors use a composite patient case to illustrate the adverse consequences of cancer diagnosis and treatment for employment, health insurance coverage, household income, and other aspects of financial hardship. They summarize existing research and provide nationally representative estimates of multiple aspects of financial hardship and health insurance coverage, benefit design, and employee benefits, such as paid sick leave, among working-age adults with a history of cancer and compare them with estimates among working-age adults without a history of cancer from the most recently available years of the National Health Interview Survey (2019-2021). Then, the authors identify opportunities for addressing employment and health insurance coverage challenges at multiple levels, including federal, state, and local policies; employers; cancer care delivery organizations; and nonprofit organizations. These efforts, when informed by research to identify best practices, can potentially help mitigate the financial hardship associated with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Jingxuan Zhao
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Zheng
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cathy J Bradley
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center and Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu T, Fu W, Xue Y, Zhu L, Ma X, Wei Y, Li H, Wang Y, Kang M, Fang Y, Zhang H. Health-related quality of life in children with childhood acute myeloid leukemia in China: A five-year prospective study. Heliyon 2024; 10:e31948. [PMID: 38841441 PMCID: PMC11152954 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to identify the key factors influencing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients following their initial diagnosis and examine their impact on the five-year survival prognosis. Methods A chart review and follow-up were conducted for children with AML who participated in a prospective cohort study between 2017 and 2020. We identified factors influencing HRQoL through Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™ 4.0), PedsQL™ Cancer Module 3.0 (CM 3.0) and PedsQL™ Family Impact Module 2.0 (FIM 2.0), as well as assessed the impact of impaired HRQoL on the overall outcomes of patients. Results Sixty-four subjects enrolled in the study had complete HRQoL outcome data, and 61 of them completed the 5-year follow-up. In CM 3.0, age was positively associated with parental proxy reports (p = 0.040), whereas divorced families were negatively associated with child self-reports (p = 0.045). A positive medical history correlates with FIM 2.0 (p = 0.025). Residence (p = 0.046), the occupation of caregivers (p = 0.014), disease severity (p = 0.024), and the only child (p = 0.029) exhibited statistically significant associations with the impairment of HRQoL. Impaired HRQoL scores shown by the PedsQL™4.0 parent proxy report (p = 0.013) and FIM 2.0 (p = 0.011) were associated with a reduced 5-year survival rate. Conclusions This study demonstrated that early impairment of HRQoL in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patients has predictive value for long-term prognosis. Once validated, these findings may provide some guidance to clinicians treating children with AML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Xiaopeng Ma
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Yuting Wei
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Huimin Li
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Yaping Wang
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Meiyun Kang
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Yongjun Fang
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Heng Zhang
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Thomy LB, Crichton M, Jones L, Yates PM, Hart NH, Collins LG, Chan RJ. Measures of financial toxicity in cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:403. [PMID: 38831061 PMCID: PMC11147933 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08601-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Comprehensive cancer-related financial toxicity (FT) measures as a multidimensional construct are lacking. The aims of this systematic review were to (1) identify full measures designed explicitly for assessing FT and evaluate their psychometric properties (content validity, structural validity, reliability, and other measurement properties) using Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN), and (2) provide an analysis of the domains of FT covered in these measures. METHODS MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for quantitative studies published from January 2000 to July 2023 that reported psychometric properties of FT measures in cancer survivors. The psychometric properties of FT measures and study risk of bias were analysed using COSMIN. Each FT measure was compared against the six domains of FT recommended by Witte and colleagues. Results were synthesized narratively. The detailed search strategies are available in Table S1. RESULTS Six FT tools including the COST-FACIT, PROFFIT, FIT, SFDQ, HARDS, and ENRICh-Spanish were identified. The COST-FACIT measure had good measurement properties. No measure reached an excellent level for overall quality but was mostly rated as sufficient. The SFDQ, HARDS, and ENRICh-Spanish were the most comprehensive in the inclusion of the six domains of FT. CONCLUSION This review emphasizes the need for validated multidimensional FT measures that can be applied across various cancer types, healthcare settings, and cultural backgrounds. Furthermore, a need to develop practical screening tools with high predictive ability for FT is highly important, considering the significant consequences of FT. Addressing these gaps in future research will further enhance the understanding of FT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L B Thomy
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba Q4102, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - M Crichton
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - L Jones
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - P M Yates
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - N H Hart
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Human Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Perth, WA, Australia
- Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - L G Collins
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australia School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - R J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Takemura N, Jia S, Lin CC. Financial hardship experience in middle- and older-aged patients with advanced lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:372. [PMID: 38775918 PMCID: PMC11111556 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08571-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advancements in medical treatments have resulted in increased medical costs for cancer patients. More than half of the patients with advanced lung cancer reported unmet financial needs. The purpose of this study is to examine the differences in the prevalence and correlates of financial hardship between middle- and older-aged patients with advanced lung cancer, and its impact on multiple health-related outcomes. METHODS This study presents a cross-sectional analysis involving 226 patients with advanced lung cancer, who were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2018 and 2020. Data collection was performed through self-reported questionnaires and electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were adopted for analysis. RESULTS 58.0% reported experiencing financial hardships. Middle-aged participants who were single and had a lower education level were more likely to experience financial difficulties. However, males and higher performance status were associated with a lower likelihood of experiencing financial difficulties among older-aged participants. Financial hardship was significantly associated with anxiety (p < 0.001), depression (p < 0.001), sleep disturbances (p < 0.001), quality of life, global health status (p = 0.002), functional scale score (p < 0.001), symptom scale score (p < 0.001), and lung cancer-specific scale score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS More than half of the patients with advanced lung cancer experienced financial hardships caused by cancer or its treatment, with a higher prevalence reported in middle-aged patients. Different sociodemographic and clinical variables correlated with financial hardship in middle- and older-aged participants, respectively. More attention should be paid to middle-aged patients with advanced lung cancer, particularly during routine assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Takemura
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Academic Building, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F3 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Shumin Jia
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Academic Building, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F3 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Chia-Chin Lin
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Academic Building, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F3 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
- Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Charity Foundation Professor in Nursing, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Edward J, Brown KA, Caldwell M, Ruschman EA, Fariduddin H, Northrip KD, D'Orazio JA. Two Case Reports on Financial Toxicity and Healthcare Transitions in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2024; 28:227-231. [PMID: 38511924 PMCID: PMC11242928 DOI: 10.1188/24.cjon.227-231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
A team conducted semistructured interviews and developed case reports about financial toxicity (FT) and healthcare transitions (HCTs) with two adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. These reports found poor HCTs f.
Collapse
|
17
|
Alacevich C, Abi Nehme AM, Lee JH, Li D, Mobley EM, Close JL, George TJ, LeLaurin JH, Hong YR, Shenkman EA, Gutter MS, Salloum RG. A point-of-care pilot randomized intervention to connect patients with cancer-induced financial toxicity to telehealth financial counseling. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:393-403. [PMID: 37794203 PMCID: PMC10872295 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01794-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Elevated costs of cancer treatment can result in economic and psychological "financial toxicity" distress. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of a point-of-care intervention to connect adult patients with cancer-induced financial toxicity to telehealth-delivered financial counseling. METHODS We conducted a three-armed parallel randomized pilot study, allocating newly referred patients with cancer and financial toxicity to individual, group accredited telehealth financial counseling, or usual care with educational material (1:1:1). We assessed the feasibility of recruitment, randomization, retention, baseline and post-intervention COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), and Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) scores. RESULTS Of 382 patients screened, 121 were eligible and enrolled. 58 (48%) completed the intervention (9 individual, 9 group counseling, 40 educational booklet). 29 completed follow-up surveys: 45% female, 17% African American, 79% white, 7% Hispanic, 55% 45-64 years old, 31% over 64, 34% lived in rural areas, 24% had cancer stage I, 21% II, 7% III, 31% IV. Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms, retention status, surveys completion. Mean (SD) COST was 12.4 (6.1) at baseline and 16.0 (8.4) post-intervention. Mean (SD) COST score differences were 6.3 (11.6) after individual counseling, 5.8 (8.5) after group counseling, and 2.5 (6.4) after usual care. Mean TUQ score among nine counseling participants was 5.5 (0.9) over 7.0. Non-parametric comparisons were not statistically meaningful. CONCLUSION Recruitment and randomization were feasible, while study retention presented challenges. Nine participants reported good usability and satisfaction with telehealth counseling. Larger-scale trials focused on improving participation, retention, and impact of financial counseling among patients with cancer are justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Alacevich
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
| | - Anna Maria Abi Nehme
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Ji-Hyun Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, USA
| | - Derek Li
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, USA
| | - Erin M Mobley
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Julia L Close
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Thomas J George
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Jennifer H LeLaurin
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Shenkman
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Michael S Gutter
- Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
- Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA
| | - Ramzi G Salloum
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kinzer H, Lee CN, Cooksey K, Myckatyn T, Olsen MA, Foraker R, Johnson AR, Politi MC. Financial Toxicity Considerations in Breast Reconstruction: Recommendations for Research and Practice. Womens Health Issues 2024; 34:107-114. [PMID: 38413293 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Kinzer
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| | - Clara N Lee
- University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Krista Cooksey
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Terence Myckatyn
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Margaret A Olsen
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Randi Foraker
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Anna Rose Johnson
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Mary C Politi
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Berlin NL, Albright BB, Moss HA, Offodile AC. Catastrophic health expenditures, insurance churn, and non-employment among women with breast cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae006. [PMID: 38331405 PMCID: PMC11003299 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer treatment and survivorship entails a complex and expensive continuum of subspecialty care. Our objectives were to assess catastrophic health expenditures, insurance churn, and non-employment among women younger than 65 years who reported a diagnosis of breast cancer. We also evaluated changes in these outcomes related to implementation of the Affordable Care Act. METHODS The data source for this study was the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2005-2019), which is a national annual cross-sectional survey of families, providers, and insurers in the United States. To assess the impact of breast cancer, comparisons were made with a matched cohort of women without cancer. We estimated predicted marginal probabilities to quantify the effects of covariates in models for catastrophic health expenditures, insurance churn, and non-employment. RESULTS We identified 1490 respondents younger than 65 years who received care related to breast cancer during the study period, representing a weight-adjusted annual mean of 1 062 129 patients. Approximately 31.8% of women with breast cancer reported health expenditures in excess of 10% of their annual income. In models, the proportion of women with breast cancer who experienced catastrophic health expenditures and non-employment was inversely related to increasing income. During Affordable Care Act implementation, mean number of months of uninsurance decreased and expenditures increased among breast cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS Our study underscores the impact of breast cancer on financial security and opportunities for patients and their families. A multilevel understanding of these issues is needed to design effective and equitable strategies to improve quality of life and survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Berlin
- Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Benjamin B Albright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Haley A Moss
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Anaeze C Offodile
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ritaccio G, Barritt Iv AS, Conklin JL, Richardson DR, Evon DM, Sanoff HK, Basch E, Wheeler SB, Moon AM. Scoping review of values elicitation tools for treatment decisions in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:90. [PMID: 38418997 PMCID: PMC10900684 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03167-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment choices in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involve consideration of tradeoffs between the benefits, toxicities, inconvenience, and costs. Stated preference elicitation methods have been used in the medical field to help evaluate complex treatment decision-making. The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review to assess the evidence base for the use of preference elicitation tools or willingness to pay/willingness to accept methods for HCC treatment decision-making from both the patient and provider perspective. METHODS We performed a scoping review to identify abstracts or manuscripts focused on the role preference elicitation tools or willingness to pay/willingness to accept methods for HCC treatment options among patients, caregivers, and/or providers. Two researchers independently screened full-text references and resolved conflicts through discussion. We summarized key findings, including the type and setting of preference-elicitation tools used for HCC treatment decisions. RESULTS Ten published abstracts or manuscripts evaluated the role of preference elicitation tools for HCC treatments. The studies revealed several attributes that are considered by patients and providers making HCC treatment decisions. Many of the studies reviewed suggested that while patients place the most value on extending their overall survival, they are willing to forgo overall survival to avoid risks of treatments and maintain quality of life. Studies of physicians and surgeons found that provider preferences are dependent on patient characteristics, provider specialty, and surgeon or hospital-related factors. CONCLUSION This scoping review explored both patient and physician preferences towards treatment modalities in all stages of HCC. The studies revealed a large scope of potential attributes that may be important to patients and that many patients are willing to forgo survival to maintain quality of life. Further research should explore both preference elicitation of currently available and emerging therapies for HCC as well as the use of this data to develop patient-facing tools to assist in navigating treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Ritaccio
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 8009 Burnett Womack Bldg, CB#7584, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7584, USA
| | - A Sidney Barritt Iv
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 8009 Burnett Womack Bldg, CB#7584, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7584, USA
- UNC Liver Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jamie L Conklin
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Daniel R Richardson
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Donna M Evon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 8009 Burnett Womack Bldg, CB#7584, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7584, USA
- UNC Liver Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hanna K Sanoff
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ethan Basch
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Andrew M Moon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 8009 Burnett Womack Bldg, CB#7584, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7584, USA.
- UNC Liver Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Somayaji D, Mohedat H, Li CS. Evaluating Social Determinants of Health Related to Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Care. Cancer Nurs 2024:00002820-990000000-00215. [PMID: 38416076 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social determinants of health posit that negative outcomes are influenced by individuals living in underserved and underresourced neighborhoods. OBJECTIVE This study examines a cancer diagnosis, race/ethnicity, age, geographic location (residence), education, and social economic status factors at disease onset and treatment. METHODS A multivariable PO regression analysis was run for quality of care at testing or diagnosis, and quality of care at treatment and the quality of received care compared with another person. RESULTS Participants are representative of the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) of adults diagnosed with breast (n = 263), prostate (n = 195), lung (n = 46), colorectal (n = 105), or other cancers (n = 526). This study includes cancer survivors who completed the SCCS Baseline and Cancer Navigation Surveys in urban (73.13%) and rural (26.87%) areas. White participants reported a higher quality of received care for testing or diagnosis and care for treatment compared with Black participants. Participants with high school or equivalent education (odds ratio, 1.662; 95% confidence interval, 1.172-2.356; P = .0044) or some college or junior college education (odds ratio, 1.970; 95% confidence interval, 1.348-2.879; P = .0005) were more likely to report a better level of quality of received care for treatment. CONCLUSIONS The SCCS represents individuals who are historically underrepresented in cancer research. The results of this study will have broad implications across diverse communities to reduce disparities and inform models of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Nurses are positioned to evaluate the quality of population health and design and lead interventions that will benefit underserved and underresourced communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl Somayaji
- Author Affiliation: School of Nursing, University at Buffalo (Dr Somayaji and Mrs Mohedat), New York; and Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (Dr Li), Rochester, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bell-Brown A, Hopkins T, Watabayashi K, Overstreet K, Leahy A, Bradshaw E, Gallagher K, Obenchain J, Padron A, Scott B, Flores B, Shankaran V. A proactive financial navigation intervention in patients with newly diagnosed gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:189. [PMID: 38400905 PMCID: PMC10894103 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08399-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many cancer patients and caregivers experience financial hardship, leading to poor outcomes. Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer patients are particularly at risk for financial hardship given the intensity of treatment. This pilot randomized study among gastric/GEJ cancer patients and caregivers tested a proactive financial navigation (FN) intervention to obtain a signal of efficacy to inform a larger, more rigorous randomized study. METHODS We tested a 3-month proactive FN intervention among gastric/GEJ cancer patients and caregivers compared to usual care. Caregiver participation was optional. The primary endpoint was incidence of financial hardship, defined as follows: accrual of debt, income decline of ≥ 20%, or taking loans to pay for treatment. Data from participant surveys and documentation by partner organizations delivering the FN intervention was analyzed and outcomes were compared between study arms. RESULTS Nineteen patients and 12 caregivers consented. Primary FN resources provided included insurance navigation, budget planning, and help with out-of-pocket medical expenses. Usual care patients were more likely to experience financial hardship (50% vs 40%) and declines in quality of life (37.5% vs 0%) compared to intervention patients. Caregivers in both arms reported increased financial stress and poorer quality of life over the study period. CONCLUSIONS Proactive financial navigation has potentially positive impacts on financial hardship and quality of life for cancer patients and more large-scale randomized interventions should be conducted to rigorously explore the impact of similar interventions. Interventions that have the potential to lessen caregiver financial stress and burden need further exploration. TRIAL REGISTRATION TRN: NCT03986502, June 14, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ari Bell-Brown
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., Mailstop M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
| | - Talor Hopkins
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., Mailstop M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Kate Watabayashi
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., Mailstop M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | | | - Anthony Leahy
- Consumer Education and Training Services, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Amber Padron
- Patient Advocate Foundation, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Beth Scott
- Patient Advocate Foundation, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Veena Shankaran
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., Mailstop M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Villalona S, Castillo BS, Chavez Perez C, Ferreira A, Nivar I, Cisneros J, Guerra CE. Interventions to Mitigate Financial Toxicity in Adult Patients with Cancer in the United States: A Scoping Review. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:918-932. [PMID: 38392062 PMCID: PMC10888212 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Financial toxicity adversely affects quality of life and treatment outcomes for patients with cancer. This scoping review examined interventions aimed at mitigating financial toxicity in adult patients with cancer and their effectiveness. We utilized five bibliographical databases to identify studies that met our inclusion criteria. The review included studies conducted among adult patients with cancer in the United States and published in English between January 2011 to March 2023. The review identified eight studies that met the inclusion criteria. Each of the studies discussed the implementation of interventions at the patient/provider and/or health system level. Collectively, the findings from this scoping review highlight both the limited number of published studies that are aimed at mitigating financial toxicity and the need to create and assess interventions that directly impact financial toxicity in demographically diverse populations of adult patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiichi Villalona
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (B.S.C.); (C.C.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Brenda S. Castillo
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (B.S.C.); (C.C.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Carlos Chavez Perez
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (B.S.C.); (C.C.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Alana Ferreira
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (B.S.C.); (C.C.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Isoris Nivar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
| | - Juan Cisneros
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, USA;
| | - Carmen E. Guerra
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang S, Wang J, Kang H, Zeng L, Liu G, Qiu Y, Wei M. Assessment of the prevalence and related factors of financial toxicity in cancer patients based on the COST scale: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2024; 68:102489. [PMID: 38118267 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The high cost of cancer treatment exposes patients to financial toxicity during treatment; however, no study has comprehensively analyzed the incidence of financial toxicity using a validated assessment tool. In this study, the objective was to ascertain the incidence of financial toxicity in cancer patients and the factors influencing it. METHODS Nine electronic databases were retrieved to collect cross-sectional studies reporting financial toxicity in cancer patients. A random effects meta-analysis was applied to yield the overall prevalence of financial toxicity. Subgroup analyses were conducted depending on the factors affecting financial toxicity. RESULTS In total, 30 studies met our inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of financial toxicity in cancer patients was 48% (95%CI:38%-58%, I2 = 99.4%, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, a higher prevalence of financial toxicity in patients aged <67 years (47%, 95%CI: 28%-66%, I2 = 97.5%, p < 0.001), female (46%, 95%CI:39%-53%, I2 = 94.9%,p < 0.001), lung cancer(57%, 95%CI:38%-75%, I2 = 96.9%, p < 0.001), developing countries (64%, 95%CI:55%-72%, I2 = 98.1%, p < 0.001), time of investigation following COVID-19 (53%, 95%CI:37%-69%, I2 = 99.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Financial toxicity is prevalent in cancer patients and is increasingly evident after COVID-19. Furthermore, the odds of financial toxicity are higher in patients who are female, younger, whose cancer type is lung cancer, and from developing countries. These findings emphasize the significance of evaluating financial toxicity in cancer patients after COVID-19, especially in developing countries. This may play a pivotal role in helping patients cope with financial toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuping Wang
- College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.1166 Liutai Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan province, 611137, China.
| | - Jialin Wang
- College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.1166 Liutai Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan province, 611137, China.
| | - Hua Kang
- College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.1166 Liutai Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan province, 611137, China.
| | - Li Zeng
- Sichuan Nursing Vocational College, Chengdu City, Sichuan province, China.
| | - Guiling Liu
- College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.1166 Liutai Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan province, 611137, China.
| | - Yinong Qiu
- College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.1166 Liutai Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan province, 611137, China.
| | - Meng Wei
- College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.1166 Liutai Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan province, 611137, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yamamoto S, Nakagoshi H, Kondoh C, Iwagami Y, Katayama M, Fukae A, Kakumen M, Kodani N, Kumagai A, Higashide C, Mizuta C, Oyamada S, Arao H. Relationship between nurses' perceptions and financial toxicity management in the public health insurance system. Future Oncol 2024; 20:269-282. [PMID: 38440864 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-1029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Aims: To describe nursing practices for financial toxicity management based on nurses' perceptions. Materials & methods: A survey was conducted with 615 oncology nurses in Japan, focusing on nurses' perspectives on the importance of financial toxicity, nursing practices to manage financial toxicity and factors inhibiting its management. Results: A total of 521 participated, of whom 266 respondents (51.1%) considered nurses' role important, and they engaged in a significantly higher proportion of nursing practices. Participants with greater perceptions of their role included certified or specialized nurses and nurses responsible for outpatient care. Conclusion: Interventions leveraging the expertise of certified or specialized nurses and nurses involved in outpatient care could help to spread proactive nurse practices addressing financial toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sena Yamamoto
- Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hideko Nakagoshi
- Nursing Department, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | - Yuichi Iwagami
- Social Welfare Organization Saiseikai Imperial Gift, Foundation, Inc. Osaka Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Ai Fukae
- Hakuaikai Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Kagoshima, Japan
| | | | - Naoko Kodani
- National Hospital Organization, Yonago Medical Center, Yonago, Tottori, Japan
| | | | | | - Chiharu Mizuta
- Nursing Department, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Oyamada
- Department of Biostatistics, JORTC Data Center, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Harue Arao
- Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Miller MF, Olson JS, Doughtie K, Zaleta AK, Rogers KP. The interplay of financial toxicity, health care team communication, and psychosocial well-being among rural cancer patients and survivors. J Rural Health 2024; 40:128-137. [PMID: 37449966 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial toxicity contributes to psychosocial distress among cancer patients and survivors. Yet, contextual factors unique to rural settings affect patient experiences, and a deeper understanding is needed of the interplay between financial toxicity and health care team communication and its association with psychosocial well-being among rural oncology patients. PURPOSE We examined associations between financial toxicity and psychosocial well-being among rural cancer patients, exploring variability in these linkages by health care team communication. METHODS Using data from 273 rural cancer patients who participated in Cancer Support Community's Cancer Experience Registry, we estimated multivariable regression models predicting depression, anxiety, and social function by financial toxicity, health care team communication, and the interplay between them. RESULTS We demonstrate robust associations between financial toxicity and psychosocial outcomes among our sample of rural cancer patients and survivors. As financial toxicity increased, symptoms of depression and anxiety increased. Further, financial toxicity was linked with decreasing social function. Having health care team conversations about treatment costs and distress-related care reduced the negative impact of financial toxicity on depressive symptoms and social function, respectively, in rural cancer patients at greatest risk for financial burden. CONCLUSIONS Financial toxicity and psychosocial well-being are strongly linked, and these associations were confirmed in a rural sample. A theorized buffer to the detrimental impacts of financial toxicity-health care team communication-played a role in moderating these associations. Our findings suggest that health care providers in rural oncology settings may benefit from tools and resources to bolster communication with patients about costs, financial distress, and coordination of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa F Miller
- Cancer Support Community, Research and Training Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Julie S Olson
- Cancer Support Community, Research and Training Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kara Doughtie
- Cancer Support Community, Research and Training Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexandra K Zaleta
- Cancer Support Community, Research and Training Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kimberly P Rogers
- Cancer Support Community, Research and Training Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tesfaye EA, O'Neill RC, McGregor T, Clemens MW. Financial Toxicity in Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 92:34-40. [PMID: 37994417 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial toxicity is a growing concern due to its considerable effects on medical adherence, quality of life, and mortality. The cost associated with breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is substantial from diagnosis to treatment, including adjuvant therapy and surgery. This study aims to assess the prevalence of financial toxicity in BIA-ALCL patients. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional, survey-based study on women with confirmed cases of BIA-ALCL from December 2019 to March 2023. The primary study outcomes were financial toxicity measured by Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) score and patient-reported financial burden measured by the responses to the Evaluation of the Financial Impact of BIA-ALCL survey. Lower COST scores signify higher financial toxicity. Responses were linked to patient data extracted from the medical records. RESULTS Thirty-two women treated for confirmed BIA-ALCL were included. Patients were all White and were diagnosed at a median age of 51 years (range, 41-65 years). The mean COST score was 27.9 ± 2.23. Lower COST scores were associated with receipt of radiotherapy ( P = 0.033), exceeding credit card limits ( P = 0.036), living paycheck to paycheck ( P = 0.00027), requiring financial support from friends and family ( P = 0.00044), and instability in household finances ( P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS Financial toxicity is prevalent in BIA-ALCL patients and has a substantial impact on patient reported burden. Insurance denial is frequent for patients with a prior history of cosmetic augmentation. Risk assessments and cost discussions should occur throughout the care continuum to minimize financial burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliora A Tesfaye
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Rebecca C O'Neill
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Terri McGregor
- Breast Implant Safety Alliance (BISA), North Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark W Clemens
- Department of Plastic Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Çakmak C, Uğurluoğlu Ö. The Effects of Patient-Centered Communication on Patient Engagement, Health-Related Quality of Life, Service Quality Perception and Patient Satisfaction in Patients with Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Türkiye. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241236327. [PMID: 38411086 PMCID: PMC10901059 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241236327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-centered communication is a type of communication that takes place between the provider and the patient. OBJECTIVES It is aimed to reveal the effects of patient-centered communication on patient engagement, health-related quality of life, perception of service quality and patient satisfaction. METHOD The study was conducted by applying multiple regression analysis to the data obtained from 312 patients with cancer treated in a training and research hospital affiliated to the Ministry of Health in Diyarbakır, Türkiye. RESULTS More than half of the patients were female and had stage 4 cancer. Different types of cancer were detected (breast cancer, cancer of the digestive organs, lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer, cancer of the genital organs, cancer of the respiratory organs, etc.). It can be stated that the average values obtained by patients from patient-centered communication and its sub-dimensions are high. There are positive, moderate and low and significant relationships between the overall patient-centered communication and patient engagement, patient satisfaction, service quality perception and quality of life. It was statistically revealed that patient-centered communication positively affected patient engagement, health-related quality of life, service quality perception, and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION Patient-centered communication positively affects various short and medium-term health outcomes and this study offers suggestions for improving patient-provider communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuma Çakmak
- Department of Health Care Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Türkiye
| | - Özgür Uğurluoğlu
- Department of Health Care Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Patel A, Perrone F, Ashcroft DM, Flaum N, Cook N, Riva S. Cross-cultural adaptation of the PROFFIT Instrument to measure financial toxicity in people living with cancer within a UK population. J Cancer Policy 2023; 38:100440. [PMID: 37633419 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to develop a British version of the Patient Reported Outcomes for Fighting Financial Toxicity of Cancer (PROFFIT): originally designed to measure financial toxicity in cancer for an Italian universal healthcare system. The instrument was carefully evaluated for crosscultural equivalence, face validity and practicality. METHODS A systematic approach to cross-cultural adaptation was used, including forward translation, synthesis, backward translation, consolidation of translations with an expert committee, and cognitive interviews. As part of the cognitive interview process, 18 cancer patients completed a structured interview of 60-90 min in length. RESULTS The translated and modified PROFFIT questionnaire demonstrated good psycho-linguistic properties, including high compliance (only one item was revised for clarity), high retrieval from memory, high decision-making processes, and high response processes. CONCLUSION PROFFIT has been found to be functional and adaptable in a new social environment. The tool may be useful for tailoring interventions to address and measure financial hardships within the cancer population, which appear to be a current challenge for public health. POLICY SUMMARY Even in universal healthcare systems, financial toxicity due to the increase in outof-pocket expenses poses a significant problem. The FT phenomenon warrants proper attention in the United Kingdom since it may negatively impact financial well-being, quality of life, psychosocial health, and treatment adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alkesh Patel
- Pharmacy Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Darren M Ashcroft
- Division of Pharmacy & Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Flaum
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Cook
- University of Manchester and the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Silvia Riva
- The St Mary's University, Twickenham, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Williams C, Meyer L, Kawam O, Leventakos K, DeMartino ES. The Faces of Financial Toxicity: A Qualitative Interview Study of Financial Toxicity in Advanced Cancer Patients in Phase I Oncology Trials. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2023; 7:524-533. [PMID: 38035050 PMCID: PMC10685144 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To characterize the financial toxicity experienced by advanced cancer patients enrolled in phase I oncology trials. Patients and Methods We conducted structured interviews with cancer patients participating in phase I clinical trials. Using a thematic analysis approach, we identified recurring themes in patients' experiences of financial toxicity resulting from trial participation. Results Seven major themes emerged from the interviews: (1) the burden of travel, (2) a willingness to pursue treatment despite financial risk, (3) fear of destitution, (4) financial toxicity equaling physical toxicity, (5) changes in food spending, (6) reluctance to confide in the study investigator about financial toxicity, and (7) difficulty navigating financial aid. These themes highlight the multifaceted financial challenges faced by patients in early phase clinical trials and the need for targeted support services. Conclusion Our findings underscore the relevance of financial toxicity in the context of phase I clinical trials and provide insights into the diverse challenges faced by advanced cancer patients. These challenges likely augment the disparities seen in trial enrollment for historically marginalized populations. Addressing financial toxicity in this population is crucial for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Future research should focus on developing effective interventions and support services tailored to the needs of patients in early phase clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colt Williams
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Leigh Meyer
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Omar Kawam
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Erin S. DeMartino
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Deboever N, Eisenberg M, Hofstetter WL, Mehran RJ, Rice DC, Roth J, Sepesi B, Swisher SG, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Antonoff MB, Rajaram R. Financial Toxicity in Patients With Resected Lung Cancer. Ann Surg 2023; 278:1038-1044. [PMID: 37249193 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe financial toxicity (FT) in patients with resected lung cancer and identify risk factors in this population. BACKGROUND FT describes the financial burden associated with cancer care and its impact on the quality of survivorship. Few prior studies have examined FT in patients with lung cancer. METHODS Patients who underwent lung cancer resection at our institution between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021, were surveyed to gather demographic information and evaluate FT using a validated questionnaire. A multivariable model was built to identify risk factors for FT. RESULTS Of the total, 1477 patients were contacted, of whom 463 responded (31.3%). Most patients were stage I (n = 349, 75.4%) and lobectomy was performed often (n = 290, 62.8%). There were 196 patients (42.3%) who experienced FT. Upon multivariable analyses, divorced marital status [odds ratio (OR) = 3.658, 95% CI: 1.180-11.337], household income <$40,000 (OR = 2.544, 95% CI: 1.003-6.455), credit score below 739 (OR = 2.744, 95% CI: 1.326-5.679), clinical stage >I (OR = 2.053, 95% CI: 1.088-3.877), and change in work hours or work cessation (all P < 0.05) were associated with FT. Coping mechanisms, such as decreased spending on food or clothing and increased use of savings or borrowing money, were more likely to be reported by patients experiencing FT than those who did not ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing lung cancer resection often experienced significant financial stress with several identifiable risk factors. FT should be considered early in the care of these patients to alleviate detrimental coping mechanisms and enhance their quality of survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Deboever
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Halpern MT, Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR. Enhancing Cancer Economic Data Resources: The Interagency Consortium to Promote Health Economics Research on Cancer (HEROiC). Med Care 2023; 61:S109-S115. [PMID: 37963029 PMCID: PMC10635328 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer diagnosis and treatment can substantially affect health and financial outcomes for patients and families. Research in health care delivery across the cancer control continuum includes diverse activities led by multiple government and private sector organizations. Assessing the economic drivers and influencing factors associated with costs across this continuum is challenging as organizations leading research efforts often do not have forums to share data, develop linkages, and explore collaborative opportunities. OBJECTIVE To describe the objectives, activities, and goals of the Interagency Consortium to Promote Health Economics Research on Cancer (HEROiC) to strengthen data resources and capacity for collaborative patient-focused cancer health economics research. MAIN ARGUMENT HEROiC's goals include assessing the economic burden of cancer; examining the effects of policies, health care setting/system factors, and health service delivery approaches across the cancer control continuum; and enhancing collaborations among researchers and organizations. CONCLUSIONS Data resources to study economic outcomes associated with cancer control are highly fragmented; HEROIC provides a forum to collaboratively develop, enhance, and utilize data resources and infrastructure for patient-centered cancer health economics research. This includes sharing data resources, developing linkages, identifying new data collection venues, and creating and supporting the dissemination of evidence-based information to diverse stakeholders. These efforts provide critical information to address the economic burden of cancer. RELEVANCE TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE Cancer diagnosis and treatment affect patient health and financial outcomes. This commentary describes how HEROiC will enhance research data infrastructure and collaborations to support patient-centered research with the goal of reducing the economic burden of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Halpern
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Donatus U. Ekwueme
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
| | - K. Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sun KA, Moon J. Relationship between Subjective Health, the Engel Coefficient, Employment, Personal Assets, and Quality of Life for Korean People with Disabilities. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2994. [PMID: 37998486 PMCID: PMC10671432 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11222994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this research is to examine the effect of subjective health on the quality of life of Korean people with disabilities. The second goal of this study is to examine the effect of the Engel coefficient on quality of life. Additionally, this study is conducted to inspect the effect of employment and personal assets on quality of life. Further, in this work, the moderating effect of personal assets on the association between employment and quality of life for people with a disability is explored. The Panel Survey of Employment for the Disabled served as the source of data. The study period ranges from 2016 to 2018. To test the research hypotheses, this study adopted econometric analyses, namely, ordinary least squares, fixed effect, and random effect models. The results revealed that the quality of life for people with disabilities is positively influenced by subjective health, employment, and personal assets. In contrast, the Engel coefficient exerts a negative impact on quality of life. Plus, the finding indicates that personal assets negatively moderate the relationship between employment and quality of life for people with disabilities. This research is aimed at presenting policy implications for the welfare of people with disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung-A Sun
- Department of Tourism Management, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea;
| | - Joonho Moon
- Department of Tourism Administration, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Van Houtven CH, Miller KEM, James HJ, Blunt R, Zhang W, Mariani AC, Rose S, Alolod GP, Wilson-Genderson M, Smith VA, Thomson MD, Siminoff LA. Economic costs of family caregiving for persons with advanced stage cancer: a longitudinal cohort study. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01462-6. [PMID: 37823982 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01462-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To form a multifaceted picture of family caregiver economic costs in advanced cancer. METHODS A multi-site cohort study collected prospective longitudinal data from caregivers of patients with advanced solid tumor cancers. Caregiver survey and out-of-pocket (OOP) receipt data were collected biweekly in-person for up to 24 weeks. Economic cost measures attributed to caregiving were as follows: amount of OOP costs, debt accrual, perceived economic situation, and working for pay. Descriptive analysis illustrates economic outcomes over time. Generalized linear mixed effects models asses the association of objective burden and economic outcomes, controlling for subjective burden and other factors. Objective burden is number of activities and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL/IADL) tasks, all caregiving tasks, and amount of time spent caregiving over 24 h. RESULTS One hundred ninety-eight caregivers, 41% identifying as Black, were followed for a mean period of 16 weeks. Median 2-week out-of-pocket costs were $111. One-third of caregivers incurred debt to care for the patient and 24% reported being in an adverse economic situation. Whereas 49.5% reported working at study visit 1, 28.6% of caregivers at the last study visit reported working. In adjusted analysis, a higher number of caregiving tasks overall and ADL/IADL tasks specifically were associated with lower out-of-pocket expenses, a lower likelihood of working, and a higher likelihood of incurring debt and reporting an adverse economic situation. CONCLUSIONS Most caregivers of cancer patients with advanced stage disease experienced direct and indirect economic costs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Results support the need to find solutions to lessen economic costs for caregivers of persons with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Harold Van Houtven
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Katherine E M Miller
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Hailey J James
- RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Durham, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Ryan Blunt
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, 1700 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA
| | - Wenhan Zhang
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Abigail Cadua Mariani
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 E. Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA
| | - Sydney Rose
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, 1700 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA
| | - Gerard P Alolod
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, 1700 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA
| | - Maureen Wilson-Genderson
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, 1700 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA
| | - Valerie A Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Maria D Thomson
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 E. Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA
| | - Laura A Siminoff
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, 1700 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cortese BD, Dusetzina SB, Luckenbaugh AN, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Stimson CJ, Barocas DA, Penson DF, Chang SS, Talwar R. Projected Savings for Generic Oncology Drugs Purchased via Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company Versus in Medicare. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4664-4668. [PMID: 37290029 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Self-administered oncology drugs contribute disproportionately to Medicare Part D spending; prices often remain high even after generic entry. Outlets for low-cost drugs such as Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) offer opportunities for decreased Medicare, Part D, and beneficiary spending. We estimate potential savings if Part D plans obtained prices such as those offered under the MCCPDC for seven generic oncology drugs. METHODS Using the 2020 Medicare Part D Spending dashboard, Q3-2022 Part D formulary prices, and Q3-2022 MCCPDC prices for seven self-administered generic oncology drugs, we estimated Medicare savings by replacing Q3-2022 Part D unit costs with costs under the MCCPDC plan. RESULTS We estimate potential savings of $661.8 million (M) US dollars (USD; 78.8%) for the seven oncology drugs studied. Total savings ranged from $228.1M USD (56.1%) to $2,154.5M USD (92.4%) compared with 25th and 75th percentiles of Part D plan unit prices. The median savings replacing Part D plan prices were abiraterone $338.0M USD, anastrozole $1.2M USD, imatinib 100 mg $15.6M USD, imatinib 400 mg $212.0M USD, letrozole $1.9M USD, methotrexate $26.7M USD, raloxifene $63.8M USD, and tamoxifen $2.6M USD. All 30-day prescription drug prices offered by MCCPDC generated cost savings except for three drugs offered at the 25th percentile Part D formulary pricing: anastrozole, letrozole, and tamoxifen. CONCLUSION Replacing current Part D median formulary prices with MCCPDC pricing could yield significant savings for seven generic oncology drugs. Individual beneficiaries could save nearly $25,200 USD per year for abiraterone or between $17,500 USD and $20,500 USD for imatinib. Notably, Part D cash-pay prices for abiraterone and imatinib under the catastrophic phase of coverage were still more expensive than baseline MCCPDC prices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian D Cortese
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stacie B Dusetzina
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Amy N Luckenbaugh
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - C J Stimson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Sam S Chang
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Ruchika Talwar
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Blinder VS, Deal AM, Ginos B, Jansen J, Dueck AC, Mazza GL, Henson S, Carr P, Rogak LJ, Weiss A, Rapperport A, Jonsson M, Spears PA, Cella D, Gany F, Schrag D, Basch E. Financial Toxicity Monitoring in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient-Reported Outcomes During Cancer Treatment (Alliance AFT-39). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4652-4663. [PMID: 37625107 PMCID: PMC10564309 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity (FT) affects 20% of cancer survivors and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. No large-scale programs have been implemented to mitigate FT. We evaluated the effect of monthly FT screening as part of a larger patient-reported outcomes (PROs) digital monitoring intervention. METHODS PRO-TECT (AFT-39) is a cluster-randomized trial of patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic cancer. Practices were randomly assigned 1:1 to digital symptom monitoring (PRO practices) or usual care (control practices). Digital monitoring consisted of between-visit online or automated telephone patient surveys about symptoms, functioning, and FT (single-item screening question from Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity) for up to 1 year, with automated alerts sent to practice nurses for concerning survey scores. Clinical team actions in response to alerts were not mandated. The primary outcome of this planned secondary analysis was development or worsening of financial difficulties, assessed via the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 financial difficulties measure, at any time compared with baseline. A randomly selected subset of patients and nurses were interviewed about their experiences with the intervention. RESULTS One thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled (593 PRO; 598 control) at 52 US community oncology practices. Overall, 30.2% of patients treated at practices that received the FT screening intervention developed, or experienced worsening of, financial difficulties, compared with 39.0% treated at control practices (P = .004). Patients and nurses interviewed stated that FT screening identified patients for financial counseling who otherwise would be reluctant to seek, or unaware of the availability of, assistance. CONCLUSION In this report of a secondary outcome from a randomized clinical trial, FT screening as part of routine digital patient monitoring with PROs reduced the development, or worsening, of financial difficulties among patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allison M. Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Brenda Ginos
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Jennifer Jansen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Amylou C. Dueck
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Gina L. Mazza
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Sydney Henson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Philip Carr
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Anna Weiss
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Mattias Jonsson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Patricia A. Spears
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - David Cella
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Ethan Basch
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Towfighi P, Huffman SS, Bovill JD, Shan HD, Haffner ZK, Kim EY, Slamin R, Benedict CD, Evans KK. Financial toxicity of hidradenitis suppurativa: A single-center experience at an urban wound-care clinic. J Dermatol 2023; 50:1279-1286. [PMID: 37501527 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.16868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that confers a substantial financial burden to patients. The aim of the current study was to assess the patient-reported financial impact of HS. Patients presenting to a wound center between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, and disease characteristics were collected. The financial impact of HS was assessed via the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity - Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) version 2 and investigator-generated surveys. Of 199 patients contacted, 27.1% (n = 54) completed the survey. The majority were women (77.8%, n = 42) and had private health insurance (n = 30; 55.6%). Most patients (66.7%, n = 36) had Hurley stage III disease. Mean follow-up was 2.3 + 2.8 years. The overall COST score was 19.7 + 12.4, indicating grade 1 financial toxicity (FT). Grade 0 FT was reported in 31.5% (n = 17) of patients, grade 1 in 37.0% (n = 20), grade 2 in 27.8% (n = 15), and grade 3 in 3.7% (n = 2). The mean self-reported 12-month out-of-pocket cost and credit scores were $2250 + 3269.24 and 674.6 + 95.3, respectively. Patients with private insurance had lower FT compared with Medicaid and Medicare (p = 0.003). Higher out-of-pocket costs were positively correlated with FT (p = 0.042), while higher credit scores were negatively correlated (p = 0.003). Patients with HS lesions in three or more anatomic regions reported the highest FT (p = 0.031). HS is a debilitating skin disorder that affects the livelihood of patients in a multifaceted manner. These patient-reported outcomes highlight the impact that HS has on an individual's financial security, calling for further attention to this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parhom Towfighi
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Samuel S Huffman
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - John D Bovill
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Holly D Shan
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Zoë K Haffner
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Emily Y Kim
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Robert Slamin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Carol D Benedict
- Department of Rheumatology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Karen K Evans
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bogdanovski AK, Sturgeon C, James BC. Financial toxicity in thyroid cancer survivors. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2023; 30:238-243. [PMID: 37470486 DOI: 10.1097/med.0000000000000826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Financial burden and distress are high in patients with thyroid cancer. However, little has been done to evaluate potential interventions to mitigate financial toxicity in survivors. This review will cover current data on the impact of financial toxicity on quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with thyroid cancer and highlight areas for future study. RECENT FINDINGS Thyroid cancer incidence has nearly tripled in the past decades, and cost of treatment is predicted to rise more than other cancers over the next decade. With mean age of diagnosis at 51 years, most patients begin treatment while still working, do not qualify for Medicare or Social Security, and are susceptible to higher financial burden. Though thyroid cancer has high survival rates, some studies suggest patients have worse quality of life and higher financial burden than more morbid cancers. SUMMARY Thyroid cancer survivors have high rates of financial toxicity, and there remains need for longitudinal studies to evaluate how financial burden may change during the treatment process while also assessing potential tools to mitigate this burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia K Bogdanovski
- Harvard Medical School
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cord Sturgeon
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin C James
- Harvard Medical School
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yabroff KR, Zhao J, Chen MH, Hoque J, Arias G, Han X, Zheng Z. Financial hardship and psychosocial well-being and quality of life among prostate cancer survivors in the United States. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:380-386. [PMID: 37202329 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis among men in the United States and the prevalence of prostate cancer survivors is growing. Cancer treatment and lasting or late effects of disease and treatment can adversely affect financial health, psychosocial well-being, and health-related quality of life for prostate cancer survivors, even many years after cancer diagnosis and treatment. These outcomes are important, especially because most men live for many years following a prostate cancer diagnosis. In this essay, we describe health care spending associated with prostate cancer, including patient out-of-pocket costs, and summarize research examining medical financial hardship and associations of financial hardship and psychosocial well-being and health-related quality of life among cancer survivors. We then discuss implications for health care delivery and opportunities to mitigate financial hardship for patients with prostate cancer and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Robin Yabroff
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Sciences, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.
| | - Jingxuan Zhao
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Sciences, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Min Hsuan Chen
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Sciences, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; Department of Public Policy, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Washington, DC
| | - Jennifer Hoque
- Department of Public Policy, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Washington, DC
| | - Gladys Arias
- Department of Public Policy, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Washington, DC
| | - Xuesong Han
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Sciences, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Zhiyuan Zheng
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Sciences, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Reeder-Hayes KE, Biddell CB, Manning ML, Rosenstein DL, Samuel-Ryals CA, Spencer JC, Smith S, Deal A, Gellin M, Wheeler SB. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Resources of Frontline Oncology Support Personnel Regarding Financial Burden in Patients With Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:654-661. [PMID: 37294912 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial navigation services support patients with cancer and address the direct and indirect financial burden of cancer diagnosis and treatment. These services are commonly delivered through a variety of frontline oncology support personnel (FOSP) including navigators, social workers, supportive care providers, and other clinic staff, but the perspective of FOSPs is largely absent from current literature on financial burden in oncology. We surveyed a national sample of FOSPs to understand their perspectives on patient financial burden, resource availability, and barriers and facilitators to assisting patients with cancer-related financial burden. METHODS We used Qualtrics online survey software and recruited participants using multiple professional society and interest group mailing lists. Categorical responses were described using frequencies, distributions of numeric survey responses were described using the median and IQR, and two open-ended survey questions were categorized thematically using a priori themes, allowing additional emergent themes. RESULTS Two hundred fourteen FOSPs completed this national survey. Respondents reported a high awareness of patient financial burden and felt comfortable speaking to patients about financial concerns. Patient assistance resources were commonly available, but only 15% described resources as sufficient for the observed needs. A substantial portion of respondents reported moral distress related to this lack of resources. CONCLUSION FOSPs, who already have requisite knowledge and comfort in discussing patient financial needs, are a critical resource for mitigating cancer-related financial burden. Interventions should leverage this resource but prioritize transparency and efficiency to reduce the administrative and emotional toll on the FOSP workforce and reduce the risk of burnout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Caitlin B Biddell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michelle L Manning
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Donald L Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Cleo A Samuel-Ryals
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Current Address: Flatiron Health, New York, NY
| | - Jennifer C Spencer
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Current Address: Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | | | - Allison Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Mindy Gellin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nwankwo T, Ogunyemi AO, Maduafokwa BA, Isikekpei BC, Alabi AO, Adegboyega BC, Otokpa E. Psychosocial Support and Cost Burden of Cancer Among Patients Attending Tertiary Oncology Clinics in Lagos State, Nigeria. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2023; 24:2313-2319. [PMID: 37505761 PMCID: PMC10676503 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2023.24.7.2313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer management brings about changes in patients' paths of life, in their daily activities, work, relationships, and family roles, and it is associated with a high level of patient psychological stress and financial toxicity. The objective of this study was to assess the psychosocial support and financial burden of cancer patients and determine socioeconomic factors that impact them. Methodology and Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study among 240 cancer patients in Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) and Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) in Nigeria. The respondents were recruited consecutively and data was collected using structured, adapted, interviewer administered questionnaires. The data was analyzed using epi info software version 7.1 with chi-square used to test for associations and the level of significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS Overall, 74.6% of respondents had perceived psychosocial support scores higher than 50 out of 100. The family was the most common source of support across the emotional, financial and tangible support dimension's (91.7%, 83.8% and 85.4%) while healthcare professionals (60%) were the commonest for informational support. Overall, 69.6% had COST scores less than 50% indicating worse financial toxicity. Statistical associations were found between cost burden and cancer type (p=0.01), age (p<0.0001) and financial support (p<0.0001). Older patients, those who had financial support, and those with gynecological cancers had a decreased financial burden For psychosocial support associations were seen with employment status (p=0.02), and treatment (p<0.0001). Higher psychosocial support for patients who were employed and had begun treatment. CONCLUSION The majority of respondents experienced high levels of financial toxicity but adequate psychosocial support. More research is needed, as well as the inclusion of support groups into clinics and the availability of loans to help with the initial costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adedoyin O Ogunyemi
- Department of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos State, Nigeria.
| | - Blossom A Maduafokwa
- Department of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos State, Nigeria.
| | - Brenda C Isikekpei
- Department of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos State, Nigeria.
| | - Adewumi O Alabi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria.
| | | | - Ejiro Otokpa
- Department of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos State, Nigeria.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Naraev BG, Mailman J, Halfdanarson TR, Soares HP, Mittra ES, Hallet J. Consideration of quality-of-life in the treatment decision-making for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:601-615. [PMID: 37158050 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2207829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a complex and heterogenous family of solid malignancies that originate from neuroendocrine tissue in the gastrointestinal tract or pancreas. Most patients diagnosed with GEP-NETs present with advanced or metastatic disease, and quality of life (QoL) is often an important priority when selecting treatments for these patients. Patients with advanced GEP-NETs often experience a substantial and persistent symptom burden that undermines their QoL. Addressing a patient's individual symptoms through judicious selection of treatment may improve QoL. AREAS COVERED The objectives of this narrative review are to summarize the impact of advanced GEP-NETs on patient QoL, assess the potential value of current treatments for maintaining or improving patient QoL, and offer a clinical framework for how these QoL data can be translated to inform clinical decision-making for patients with advanced GEP-NETs. EXPERT OPINION Patients with advanced GEP-NETs experience a significant and persistent symptom burden that impacts their daily lifestyle, activities, work life, and financial health, leading to erosion of their QoL. Ongoing and future studies incorporating longitudinal QoL assessments and head-to-head treatment evaluations will further inform the incorporation of QoL into clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris G Naraev
- Anderson Family Cancer Institute, 1240 S Old Dixie Highway, Jupiter, Florida33458, USA
| | - Josh Mailman
- NorCal CarciNET Community, 946 N Ripon Rd, Ripon, CA 95366, USA
| | - Thorvardur R Halfdanarson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Heloisa P Soares
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, 1950 Circle of Hope Dr. Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA
| | - Erik S Mittra
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon97239, USA
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario M5S, Canada; Susan Leslie Clinic for Neuroendocrine Tumors - Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Khan HM, Ramsey S, Shankaran V. Financial Toxicity in Cancer Care: Implications for Clinical Care and Potential Practice Solutions. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3051-3058. [PMID: 37071839 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer face an array of financial consequences as a result of their diagnosis and treatment, collectively referred to as financial toxicity (FT). In the past 10 years, the body of literature on this subject has grown tremendously, with a recent focus on interventions and mitigation strategies. In this review, we will briefly summarize the FT literature, focusing on the contributing factors and downstream consequences on patient outcomes. In addition, we will put FT into context with our emerging understanding of the role of social determinants of health and provide a framework for understanding FT across the cancer care continuum. We will then discuss the role of the oncology community in addressing FT and outline potential strategies that oncologists and health systems can implement to reduce this undue burden on patients with cancer and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba M Khan
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Scott Ramsey
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Veena Shankaran
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gharzai LA, Jagsi R. Incorporating financial toxicity considerations into clinical trial design to facilitate patient-centered decision-making in oncology. Cancer 2023; 129:1143-1148. [PMID: 36775839 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Financial toxicity is increasingly being recognized as an important and devastating consequence of cancer treatment that receives little attention when clinical trials are being designed. There is a significant need to obtain this important information in an era of increasingly expensive anticancer treatments. Patients who are informed of all implications of therapy-efficacy, side effects, cost, and broader financial impact-are able to select the best cancer treatment for themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ghazal LV, Abrahamse P, Ward KC, Morris AM, Hawley ST, Veenstra CM. Financial Toxicity and Its Association With Health-Related Quality of Life Among Partners of Colorectal Cancer Survivors. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e235897. [PMID: 37022684 PMCID: PMC10080378 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Partners of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors play a critical role in diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. While financial toxicity (FT) is well documented among patients with CRC, little is known about long-term FT and its association with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among their partners. Objective To understand long-term FT and its association with HRQoL among partners of CRC survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants This survey study incorporating a mixed-methods design consisted of a mailed dyadic survey with closed- and open-ended responses. In 2019 and 2020, we surveyed survivors who were 1 to 5 years from a stage III CRC diagnosis and included a separate survey for their partners. Patients were recruited from a rural community oncology practice in Montana, an academic cancer center in Michigan, and the Georgia Cancer Registry. Data analysis was performed from February 2022 to January 2023. Exposures Three components of FT, including financial burden, debt, and financial worry. Main Outcomes and Measures Financial burden was assessed with the Personal Financial Burden scale, whereas debt and financial worry were each assessed with a single survey item. We measured HRQoL using the PROMIS-29+2 Profile, version 2.1. We used multivariable regression analysis to assess associations of FT with individual domains of HRQoL. We used thematic analysis to explore partner perspectives on FT, and we merged quantitative and qualitative findings to explain the association between FT and HRQoL. Results Of the 986 patients eligible for this study, 501 (50.8%) returned surveys. A total of 428 patients (85.4%) reported having a partner, and 311 partners (72.6%) returned surveys. Four partner surveys were returned without a corresponding patient survey, resulting in a total of 307 patient-partner dyads for this analysis. Among the 307 partners, 166 (56.1%) were aged younger than 65 years (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [11.1] years), 189 (62.6%) were women, and 263 (85.7%) were White. Most partners (209 [68.1%]) reported adverse financial outcomes. High financial burden was associated with worse HRQoL in the pain interference domain (mean [SE] score, -0.08 [0.04]; P = .03). Debt was associated with worse HRQoL in the sleep disturbance domain (-0.32 [0.15]; P = .03). High financial worry was associated with worse HRQoL in the social functioning (mean [SE] score, -0.37 [0.13]; P = .005), fatigue (-0.33 [0.15]; P = .03), and pain interference (-0.33 [0.14]; P = .02) domains. Qualitative findings revealed that in addition to systems-level factors, individual-level behavioral factors were associated with partner financial outcomes and HRQoL. Conclusions and Relevance This survey study found that partners of CRC survivors experienced long-term FT that was associated with worse HRQoL. Multilevel interventions for both patients and partners are needed to address factors at individual and systemic levels and incorporate behavioral approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren V. Ghazal
- Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Paul Abrahamse
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Kevin C. Ward
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Arden M. Morris
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Sarah T. Hawley
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Christine M. Veenstra
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Stockman LS, Gundersen DA, Gikandi A, Akindele RN, Svoboda L, Pohl S, Drews MR, Lathan CS. The Colocation Model in Community Cancer Care: A Description of Patient Clinical and Demographic Attributes and Referral Pathways. JCO Oncol Pract 2023:OP2200487. [PMID: 36940391 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer disparities are well documented among Black, Indigenous, and People of Color, yet little is known about the characteristics of programs that serve these populations. Integrating specialized cancer care services within community settings is important for addressing the needs of historically marginalized populations. Our National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center initiated a clinical outreach program incorporating cancer diagnostic services and patient navigation within a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) to expedite evaluation and resolution of potential cancer diagnoses with the goal of collaboration between oncology specialists and primary care providers in a historically marginalized community in Boston, MA. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed from patients who were referred to the program for cancer-related care between January 2012 and July 2018. RESULTS The majority of patients self-identified as Black (non-Hispanic) followed by Hispanic (Black and White). Twenty-two percent of patients had a cancer diagnosis. Treatment and surveillance plans were established for those with and without cancer at a median time to diagnostic resolution of 12 and 28 days, respectively. The majority of patients presented with comorbid health conditions. There was a high prevalence of self-reported financial distress among patients seeking care through this program. CONCLUSION These findings highlight the wide spectrum of cancer care concerns in historically marginalized communities. This review of the program suggests that integrating cancer evaluation services within community-based primary health care settings offers promise for enhancing the coordination and delivery of cancer diagnostic services among historically marginalized populations and could be a method to address clinical access disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah S Stockman
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel A Gundersen
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ajami Gikandi
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ruth N Akindele
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ludmila Svoboda
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Sarah Pohl
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Christopher S Lathan
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bello A, Makani NS. The Impact of Social Determinants of Health, Namely Financial Assistance, on Overall Survival in Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Cureus 2023; 15:e36355. [PMID: 37082487 PMCID: PMC10112388 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent form of lung cancer. Studies have evaluated the association of social determinants of health (SDH) with outcomes in early-stage NSCLC. These studies have shown statistically and clinically significant associations between overall survival (OS) and other SDH (e.g marital status, educational attainment).The aim of our study was to better understand the role of various SDH on OS in advanced-stage NSCLC patients in a community oncology practice in Florida. Methods: In this retrospective study, 125 patients with stage III and IV NSCLC were identified between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. We performed Pearson's chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis test to evaluate the association between median OS and several independent variables, including; gender, race, marital status, insurance status, living status, receiving financial assistance (FA), alcohol use, and smoking histories. OS is defined as the date of diagnosis up to the date of death. Other confounders that were analyzed included histology, treatment modality, comorbidities, and performance status of the patients. Results: Our results demonstrated that patients receiving FA had nearly a two-fold increase in median OS compared to patients without FA (median OS = 1.01 years vs. 0.545 years, respectively; p = 0.012). CONCLUSION Overall, this study highlighted the importance of reducing the financial burden of advanced-stage NSCLC on patients and how FA impacts patient outcomes. However, future prospective cohort studies with a larger sample size are warranted to identify other SDH, as well as the underlying mechanisms affecting median OS, in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.
Collapse
|
48
|
Kajimoto Y, Honda K, Suzuki S, Mori M, Tsubouchi H, Nakao K, Azuma A, Shibutani T, Nagao S, Koyanagi T, Kohara I, Tamaki S, Yabuki M, Teng L, Fujiwara K, Igarashi A. Association between financial toxicity and health-related quality of life of patients with gynecologic cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:454-467. [PMID: 36648710 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02294-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients often struggle with their financial situation during cancer treatment due to treatment-related costs or loss of income. This resulting negative effect is called financial toxicity, which is a known as a side effect of cancer care. This study aimed to evaluate the association between financial toxicity and health-related quality of life among patients with gynecologic cancer using validated questionnaires. METHODS In this multicenter study, patients with gynecologic cancer receiving anti-cancer drug treatment for > 2 months were recruited. Patients answered the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool, EORTC-QLQ-C30, disease-specific tools (EORTC-QLQ-OV28/CX24/EN24), and EQ-5D-5L. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine associations. RESULTS Between April 2019 and July 2021, 109 cancer patients completed the COST questionnaire. The mean COST score was 19.82. Strong associations were observed between financial difficulty (r = - 0.616) in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and body image (r = 0.738) in the EORTC-QLQ-CX24, while weak associations were noted between the global health status/quality of life (r = 0.207), EQ-5D-5L index score (r = 0.252), and several function and symptom scale scores with the COST score. CONCLUSIONS Greater financial toxicity was associated with worse health-related quality of life scores, such as financial difficulty in gynecologic cancer patients and body image in cervical cancer patients as strong associations, and weakly associated with general health-related quality of life scores and several function/symptom scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Kajimoto
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. .,Oncology Science Unit, MSD K.K., 1-13-12 Kudan-Kita, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, 102-8667, Japan.
| | - Kazunori Honda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Shiro Suzuki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Masahiko Mori
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Tsubouchi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Kohshiro Nakao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi City, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Anri Azuma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi City, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Takashi Shibutani
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kitaoujicho, Akashi, Hyogo, 673-8558, Japan
| | - Shoji Nagao
- Department of Gynecologic oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kitaoujicho, Akashi, Hyogo, 673-8558, Japan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Takahiro Koyanagi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Izumi Kohara
- School of Nursing, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Shuko Tamaki
- Nursing Department, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan
| | - Midori Yabuki
- Nursing Department, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan
| | - Lida Teng
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan
| | - Ataru Igarashi
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.,Department of Public Health, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Phookan J, Talukdar R. A Study on Quality of Life in Post-tracheostomised Patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023:1-9. [PMID: 36817016 PMCID: PMC9913029 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-03511-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Tracheostomy is a complex procedure which includes special care and attention with respect to the stoma and wound. But apart from surgical pitfalls certain qualities of life are also affected which needs due consideration for positive prognostic outcomes. Objective To assess the quality of life in post tracheostomised patients. Materials and Methods This study was a hospital based observational study conducted for a period of one year and included 97 patients. All patients underwent tracheostomy in ENT department and Central ICU. Nineteen post tracheostomy quality of life parameters were evaluated in 1st, 4th and 12th week interval. Results 83.51% were male belonging to 6th and 7th decade. Most of them were tracheostomised on emergency basis (90.72%) for malignant causes (82.47%) and 95.88% of them had it for temporary period of time. Aryepiglottic folds were the most common site of malignant lesion. In the 1st week post tracheostomy, all parameters were affected except taste, smell and aesthetic state whereas in the following weeks it was employment, anxiety and voice production which were the affected quality of life. Conclusion Most people had upper airway malignant growth and due to late presentation, they had to be put under emergency tracheostomy. Thus, leading to less time in pre-operative counselling that is a must in improving post-operative period quality of life. Awareness is required for timely screening of patients from 5th decade onwards so that adequate and timely treatment can be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyotirmoy Phookan
- Department of ENT, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, Assam 786002 India
| | - Rakesh Talukdar
- Department of ENT, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College and Hospital, Barpeta, Assam 781301 India
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bhatia S, Dai C, Hageman L, Wu J, Schlichting E, Siler A, Funk E, Hicks J, Lim S, Balas N, Bosworth A, Te HS, Francisco L, Bhatia R, Forman SJ, Wong FL, Arora M, Armenian SH, Weisdorf DJ, Landier W. Financial Burden in Blood or Marrow Transplantation Survivors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A BMTSS Report. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1011-1022. [PMID: 36455192 PMCID: PMC9928670 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The financial burden experienced by blood or marrow transplant (BMT) survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic remains unstudied. We evaluated the risk for high out-of-pocket medical costs and associated financial burden experienced by BMT survivors and a sibling comparison group during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS This study included 2,370 BMT survivors and 750 siblings who completed the BMT Survivor Study survey during the pandemic. Participants reported employment status, out-of-pocket medical costs, and financial burden. Medical expenses ≥ 10% of the annual household income constituted high out-of-pocket medical costs. Logistic regression identified factors associated with high out-of-pocket medical costs and financial burden. RESULTS BMT survivors were more likely to incur high out-of-pocket medical costs (11.3% v 3.1%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.88; 95% CI, 1.84 to 4.50) than the siblings. Survivor characteristics associated with high out-of-pocket medical costs included younger age at study (aORper_year_younger_age, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.03), lower prepandemic annual household income and/or education (< $50,000 US dollars and/or < college graduate: aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.69; reference: ≥ $50,000 in US dollars and ≥ college graduate), > 1 chronic health condition (aOR, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.00 to 3.98), ≥ 1 hospitalization during the pandemic (aOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.53 to 2.89), and being unemployed during the pandemic (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.17). Among BMT survivors, high out-of-pocket medical costs were significantly associated with problems in paying medical bills (aOR, 10.57; 95% CI, 7.39 to 15.11), deferring medical care (aOR, 4.93; 95% CI, 3.71 to 6.55), taking a smaller dose of medication than prescribed (aOR, 4.99; 95% CI, 3.23 to 7.70), and considering filing for bankruptcy (aOR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.14 to 6.73). CONCLUSION BMT survivors report high out-of-pocket medical costs, which jeopardizes their health care and may affect health outcomes. Policies aimed at reducing financial burden in BMT survivors, such as expanding access to patient assistance programs, may mitigate the negative health consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Bhatia
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
- Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Chen Dai
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Lindsey Hageman
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Jessica Wu
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Elizabeth Schlichting
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Arianna Siler
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Erin Funk
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Jessica Hicks
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Shawn Lim
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Nora Balas
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Hok Sreng Te
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Liton Francisco
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Ravi Bhatia
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Stephen J. Forman
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Mukta Arora
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Daniel J. Weisdorf
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Wendy Landier
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
- Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|