1
|
Uit den Boogaard A, de Jongh D, van den Elst MJT, Trompet S, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Portielje JEA, Meuleman Y, Mooijaart SP, de Glas NA, van den Bos F. Older patients' experiences with and attitudes towards an oncogeriatric pathway: A qualitative study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101745. [PMID: 38490100 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To tailor treatment for older patients with cancer, an oncogeriatric care pathway has been developed in the Leiden University Medical Center. In this care pathway a geriatric assessment is performed and preferences concerning cancer treatment options are discussed. This study aimed to explore patient experiences with and attitudes towards this pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS A qualitative study was performed using an exploratory descriptive approach. Individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with older patients (≥70 years) who had followed the oncogeriatric care pathway in the six months prior to the interview. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analyzed inductively using thematic analysis. RESULTS After interviews with 14 patients with a median age of 80 years, three main themes were identified. (1) Patients' positive experiences with the oncogeriatric pathway: Patients appreciated the attitudes of the healthcare professionals and felt heard and understood. (2) Unmet information needs about the oncogeriatric care pathway: Patients experienced a lack of information about the aim and process. (3) Incomplete information for decision-making: Most patients were satisfied with decision-making process. However, treatment decisions had often been made before oncogeriatric consultation. No explicit naming and explaining of different available treatment options had been provided, nor had risk of physical or cognitive decline during and after treatment been addressed. DISCUSSION Older patients had predominately positive attitudes towards the oncogeriatric care pathway. Most patients were satisfied with the treatment decision. Providing information on the aim and process of the care pathway, available treatment options, and treatment-related risks of cognitive and physical decline may further improve the oncogeriatric care pathway and the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Uit den Boogaard
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
| | - Dide de Jongh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Marjan J T van den Elst
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Stella Trompet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke M de Man-van Ginkel
- Nursing Science, Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Johanneke E A Portielje
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Yvette Meuleman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke A de Glas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dotan E, Lynch SM, Ryan JC, Mitchell EP. Disparities in care of older adults of color with cancer: A narrative review. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6790. [PMID: 38234214 PMCID: PMC10905558 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
This review describes the barriers and challenges faced by older adults of color with cancer and highlights methods to improve their overall care. In the next decade, cancer incidence rates are expected to increase in the United States for people aged ≥65 years. A large proportion will be older adults of color who often have worse outcomes than older White patients. Many issues contribute to racial disparities in older adults, including biological factors and social determinants of health (SDOH) related to healthcare access, socioeconomic concerns, systemic racism, mistrust, and the neighborhood where a person lives. These disparities are exacerbated by age-related challenges often experienced by older adults, such as decreased functional status, impaired cognition, high rates of comorbidities and polypharmacy, poor nutrition, and limited social support. Additionally, underrepresentation of both patients of color and older adults in cancer clinical research results in a lack of adequate data to guide the management of these patients. Use of geriatric assessments (GA) can aid providers in uncovering age-related concerns and personalizing interventions for older patients. Research demonstrates the ability of GA-directed care to result in fewer treatment-related toxicities and improved quality of life, thus supporting the routine incorporation of validated GA into these patients' care. GA can be enhanced by including evaluation of SDOH, which can help healthcare providers understand and address the needs of older adults of color with cancer who face disparities related to their age and race.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efrat Dotan
- Department of Hematology/OncologyFox Chase Cancer CenterPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | | | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Clinical Professor of Medicine and Medical OncologySidney Kimmel Cancer Center at JeffersonPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dale W, Klepin HD, Williams GR, Alibhai SMH, Bergerot C, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Hopkins JO, Jhawer MP, Katheria V, Loh KP, Lowenstein LM, McKoy JM, Noronha V, Phillips T, Rosko AE, Ruegg T, Schiaffino MK, Simmons JF, Subbiah I, Tew WP, Webb TL, Whitehead M, Somerfield MR, Mohile SG. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4293-4312. [PMID: 37459573 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To update the ASCO guideline (2018) on the practical assessment and management of age-associated vulnerabilities in older patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy. METHODS An Expert Panel conducted a systematic review to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses from January 2016 to December 2022. RESULTS A total of 26 publications met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the update. RECOMMENDATIONS The Expert Panel reiterates its overarching recommendation from the prior guideline that geriatric assessment (GA), including all essential domains, should be used to identify vulnerabilities or impairments that are not routinely captured in oncology assessments for all patients over 65 years old with cancer. Based on recently published RCTs demonstrating significantly improved clinical outcomes, all older adults with cancer (65+ years old) receiving systemic therapy with GA-identified deficits should have GA-guided management (GAM) included in their care plan. GAM includes using GA findings to inform cancer treatment decision-making as well as to address impairments through appropriate interventions, counseling, and/or referrals. A GA should include high priority aging-related domains known to be associated with outcomes in older adults with cancer: physical and cognitive function, emotional health, comorbid conditions, polypharmacy, nutrition, and social support. Clinical adaptation of the GA based on patient population, resources, and time is appropriate.The Panel recommends the Practical Geriatric Assessment as one option for this purpose (https://old-prod.asco.org/sites/new-www.asco.org/files/content-files/practice-patients/documents/2023-PGA-Final.pdf; https://youtu.be/jnaQIjOz2Dw; https://youtu.be/nZXtwaGh0Z0).Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Dale
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vani Katheria
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | - June M McKoy
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Tanyanika Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Ashley E Rosko
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Tracy Ruegg
- WellStar School of Nursing, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA
| | | | | | | | - William P Tew
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Tracy L Webb
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, NC
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ninomiya K, Inoue D, Sugimoto K, Tanaka C, Murofushi K, Okuyama T, Watanuki S, Imamura CK, Sakai D, Sakurai N, Watanabe K, Tamura K, Saeki T, Ishiguro H. Significance of the comprehensive geriatric assessment in the administration of chemotherapy to older adults with cancer: Recommendations by the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee. J Geriatr Oncol 2023:101485. [PMID: 37062639 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of older patients with cancer is expected to continue to increase owing to the aging population. Recently, the usefulness of geriatric assessment (GA) conducted by multiple staff members from different medical backgrounds has been reported; however, a consensus on the effectiveness of GA has not yet been achieved. MATERIALS AND METHODS We, as the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee for elderly patients with cancer, conducted a literature search of randomized controlled trials published before August 2021 that used GA or comprehensive GA (CGA) as an intervention for patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. As the key outcomes for answering the clinical question, we focused on survival benefit, adverse events, and quality of life (QOL). After a systematic review of these studies, the expert panel member developed recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS For older patients with cancer, GA or CGA is suggested during or before chemotherapy (weakly recommended). Chemotherapy-induced adverse events were significantly reduced by GA/CGA interventions without any adverse effects on survival. Health-related QOL tended to improve with the GA/CGA interventions. DISCUSSION Although, in our opinion, GA/CGA does require time and resources, it poses no harm patients. Therefore, we suggest expanding the human resources and educating skills of medical providers for clinical implementation of GA/CGA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiichiro Ninomiya
- Center for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Inoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Ken Sugimoto
- Department of General Geriatric Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Chie Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Keiko Murofushi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Okuyama
- Department of Psychiatry / Palliative Care Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shigeaki Watanuki
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, National College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chiyo K Imamura
- Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Sakai
- Department of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kiyotaka Watanabe
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuo Tamura
- NPO Clinical Hematology/Oncology Treatment Study Group, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Saeki
- Breast Oncology Service, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ishiguro
- Breast Oncology Service, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jensen-Battaglia M, Lei L, Xu H, Loh KP, Wells M, Tylock R, Ramsdale E, Kleckner AS, Mustian KM, Dunne RF, Kehoe L, Bearden J, Burnette BL, Whitehead M, Mohile SG, Wildes TM. Communication About Fall Risk in Community Oncology Practice: The Role of Geriatric Assessment. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1630-e1640. [PMID: 35984998 PMCID: PMC9835996 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Falls are a modifiable source of morbidity for older adults with cancer, yet are underassessed in oncology practice. In this secondary analysis of a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial, we examined characteristics associated with patient-oncologist conversations about falls, and whether oncologist knowledge of geriatric assessment (GA) resulted in more conversations. METHODS Eligible patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02107443) were age ≥ 70 years, had stage III/IV solid tumor or lymphoma, were being treated with noncurative treatment intent, and ≥ 1 GA domain impairment. Patients in both arms underwent GA. At practices randomly assigned to the intervention arm, oncologists were provided a GA summary with management recommendations. In both arms, patients had one clinical encounter audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded to categorize whether a conversation about falls occurred. Generalized linear mixed models adjusted for arm, practice site, and other important covariates were used to generate proportions and odds ratios (ORs) from the full sample. RESULTS Of 541 patients (intervention N = 293 and usual care N = 248, mean age: 77 years, standard deviation: 5.3), 528 had evaluable audio recordings. More patients had conversations about falls in the intervention versus usual care arm (61.3% v 10.3%, P < .001). Controlling for the intervention and practice site, history of falls (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.6; P = .005) and impaired physical performance (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.7 to 12.8; P = .002) were significantly associated with patient-oncologist conversations about falls. CONCLUSION GA intervention increased conversations about falls. History of falls and impaired physical performance were associated with patient-oncologist conversations about falls in community oncology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marielle Jensen-Battaglia
- University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Huiwen Xu
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health and Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | - Megan Wells
- University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | - Rachael Tylock
- University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | - Erika Ramsdale
- University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | - Amber S. Kleckner
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
| | - Karen M. Mustian
- University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | - Richard F. Dunne
- University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | - Lee Kehoe
- University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Brian L. Burnette
- Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan (CROWN) NCORP, Green Bay, WI
| | - Mary Whitehead
- SCOREboard Advisory Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Supriya G. Mohile
- University of Rochester Medical Center, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Williams CP, Davidoff A, Halpern MT, Mollica M, Castro K, Allaire B, de Moor JS. Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence and Patient Cost Responsibility for Rural and Urban Cancer Survivors. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1234-e1246. [PMID: 35947881 PMCID: PMC9377697 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The relationship between out-of-pocket spending and cost-related medication nonadherence among older rural- and urban-dwelling cancer survivors is not well understood. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, Medicare claims, and the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey linked data resource linked data (2007-2015) to investigate the relationship between cancer survivors' cost responsibility in the year before and after report of delaying or not filling a prescription medication because of cost in the past 6 months (cost-related medication nonadherence). Secondary exposures and outcomes included Medicare spending and utilization. Generalized linear models assessed bidirectional relationships between cost-related medication nonadherence, spending, and utilization. Effects of residence were assessed via interaction terms. RESULTS Of 6,591 older cancer survivors, 13% reported cost-related medication nonadherence. Survivors were a median 8 years (interquartile range, 4.5-12.5 years) from their cancer diagnosis, 15% were dually Medicare/Medicaid-eligible, and prostate (40%) and breast (32%) cancer survivors were most prevalent. With every $500 USD increase in patient cost responsibility, risk of cost-related medication nonadherence increased by 3% (risk ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.04). After report of cost-related medication nonadherence, patient cost responsibility was 22% higher (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.32) compared with those not reporting nonadherence, amounting to $523 USD (95% CI, $430 USD to $630 USD). Medicare spending and utilization were also higher before and after report of cost-related nonadherence versus none. For survivors residing in rural (18%) and urban (82%) areas, residence did not modify adherence or cost outcomes. CONCLUSION A bidirectional relationship exists between patient cost responsibility and cost-related medication nonadherence. Interventions reducing urban- and rural-dwelling survivor health care costs and cost-related adherence barriers are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney P. Williams
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Amy Davidoff
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Michael T. Halpern
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Michelle Mollica
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Kathleen Castro
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Janet S. de Moor
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kleckner AS, Culakova E, Uemura T, Zittel J, Burnette BL, Bradley T, Mohile SG. The relationship between comorbidities and other aging-related conditions among patients with advanced cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:1066-1069. [PMID: 35710772 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amber S Kleckner
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States; Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.
| | - Eva Culakova
- Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Takeshi Uemura
- Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States
| | - Jason Zittel
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States; Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Brian L Burnette
- Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan (CROWN), Green Bay, WI 54301, United States
| | - Thomas Bradley
- Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, 11042, United States
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States; Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tian F, Zhao M, Chen Z, Yang R. Prescription of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Cancer Outpatients With Multimorbidity: Concordance Among the Chinese, AGS/Beers, and STOPP Criteria. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:857811. [PMID: 35496292 PMCID: PMC9039126 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.857811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Age-related multimorbidity is a general problem in older patients, which increases the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and predictors of PIM use in older Chinese cancer outpatients with multimorbidity based on the 2017 Chinese criteria, 2019 AGS/Beers criteria, and 2014 STOPP criteria. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using electronic medical data from nine tertiary hospitals in Chengdu from January 2018 to December 2018. The 2017 Chinese criteria, 2019 AGS/Beers criteria, and 2014 STOPP criteria were used to evaluate the PIM status of older cancer outpatients (age ≥65 years), the concordance among the three PIM criteria was calculated using kappa tests, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors associated with PIM use. Results: A total of 6,160 cancer outpatient prescriptions were included in the study. The prevalence of PIM use was 34.37, 32.65, and 15.96%, according to the 2017 Chinese criteria, 2019 AGS/Beers criteria, and 2014 STOPP criteria, respectively. Furthermore, 62.43% of PIMs met table 2, 0.27% of PIMs met table 3, 34.68% of PIMs met table 4, 2.62% of PIMs met table 5 of 2019 AGS/Beers criteria, respectively. According to the three criteria, 84.93%, 82.25%, and 94.61% of older cancer outpatients had one PIM. The most frequently used PIM in cancer outpatients was estazolam. The Chinese criteria and the STOPP criteria indicated poor concordance, whereas the 2019 AGS/Beers criteria showed moderate concordance with the other two criteria. Logistic regression demonstrated that age ≥ 80, more diseases, polypharmacy, irrational use of drugs, and lung cancer were positively associated with PIM use in older cancer outpatients. Conclusion: The prevalence of PIM use in Chinese older cancer outpatients with multimorbidity is high in China, and poor-to-moderate concordance among the three criteria was observed. Research on building PIM criteria for the older cancer population is necessary in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangyuan Tian
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Fangyuan Tian, , orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-0386
| | - Mengnan Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhaoyan Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ruonan Yang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lund JL, Duberstein PR, Loh KP, Gilmore N, Plumb S, Lei L, Keil AP, Islam JY, Hanson LC, Giguere JK, Vogel VG, Burnette BL, Mohile SG. Life expectancy in older adults with advanced cancer: Evaluation of a geriatric assessment-based prognostic model. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:176-181. [PMID: 34483079 PMCID: PMC8882125 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Oncologists estimate patients' prognosis to guide care. Evidence suggests oncologists tend to overestimate life expectancy, which can lead to care with questionable benefits. Information obtained from geriatric assessment may improve prognostication for older adults. In this study, we created a geriatric assessment-based prognostic model for older adults with advanced cancer and compared its performance to alternative models. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a trial (URCC 13070; PI: Mohile) capturing geriatric assessment and vital status up to one year for adults age ≥ 70 years with advanced cancer. Oncologists estimated life expectancy as 0-6 months, 7-12 months, and > 1 year. Three statistical models were developed: (1) a model including age, sex, cancer type, and stage (basic model), (2) basic model + Karnofsky Performance Status (≤50, 60-70, and 80+) (KPS model), and (3) basic model +16 binary indicators of geriatric assessment impairments (GA model). Cox regression was used to model one-year survival; c-indices and time-dependent c-statistics assessed model discrimination and stratified survival curves assessed model calibration. RESULTS We included 484 participants; mean age was 75; 48% had gastrointestinal or lung cancer. Overall, 43% of patients died within one year. Oncologists classified prognosis accurately for 55% of patients, overestimated for 35%, and underestimated for 10%. C-indices were 0.61 (basic model), 0.62 (KPS model), and 0.63 (GA model). The GA model was well-calibrated. CONCLUSIONS The GA model showed moderate discrimination for survival, similar to alternative models, but calibration was improved. Further research is needed to optimize geriatric assessment-based prognostic models for use in older adults with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Lund
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Paul R Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Nikesha Gilmore
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Sandy Plumb
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Lianlian Lei
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alexander P Keil
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jessica Y Islam
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Laura C Hanson
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey K Giguere
- NCORP of the Carolinas (Greenville Health System NCORP), Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | - Brian L Burnette
- Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan (CROWN) NCORP, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jensen-Battaglia M, Lei L, Xu H, Kehoe L, Patil A, Loh KP, Ramsdale E, Magnuson A, Kleckner AS, Wildes TM, Lin PJ, Mustian KM, Giri G, Whitehead M, Bearden J, Burnette BL, Geer J, Mohile SG, Dunne RF. Association of Oncologist-Patient Communication With Functional Status and Physical Performance in Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e223039. [PMID: 35302628 PMCID: PMC8933739 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The functional status and physical performance of older adults with cancer are underassessed and undertreated despite the high prevalence of impaired functional status and physical performance in this population and their associations with chemotherapy-induced toxic effects and mortality. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between providing oncologists with a geriatric assessment (GA) summary with recommendations and having oncologist-patient conversations about functional and physical performance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Data for this secondary analysis were collected from October 29, 2014, to April 28, 2017, for a national cluster randomized clinical trial conducted by the University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program evaluating the effect of a GA intervention on patient satisfaction with communication about aging-related concerns. There were 17 practice clusters in the intervention group and 14 in the usual care group. All 541 participants underwent a GA including standardized functional and physical performance measures and had 1 clinical encounter audio-recorded, transcribed, and blindly coded to categorize conversations by GA domain. Participants were aged 70 years or older, with a stage III or IV solid tumor or lymphoma with palliative treatment intent, and impairment in 1 or more GA domain. Statistical analysis was performed from August 18, 2020, to January 10, 2022. INTERVENTIONS Oncologist practices randomized to the intervention received a GA summary and validated recommendations for each patient prior to the audio-recorded clinical encounter. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary analysis of this clinical trial assessed the effect of the intervention on patient satisfaction with oncologist communication about aging-related concerns. This secondary analysis assessed the post hoc hypothesis that the intervention would be associated with an increase in the proportion of patients having conversations with their oncologists and receiving oncologist recommendations specific to functional and physical performance concerns. RESULTS A total of 541 patients (276 men [51%]; mean [SD] age, 77.5 [5.2] years [range, 70-96 years]) were analyzed at baseline. Excluding 13 patients without audio recordings, 86% of patients (95% CI, 78%-91%) in the intervention group vs 59% of patients (95% CI, 47%-69%; P < .001) receiving usual care had conversations about functional or physical performance. Conversations were more frequently initiated by oncologists in the intervention group (84%; 95% CI, 77%-90%) than oncologists in the usual care group (58%; 95% CI, 45%-70%; P < .001). Oncologists in the intervention group were more likely to address patients' concerns (43%; 95% CI, 33%-53%) than oncologists in the usual care group (17%; 95% CI, 10%-26%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this secondary analysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial, providing oncologists with a GA summary was associated with an increase in the number of oncologist-patient conversations about functional and physical performance-related concerns with recommendations to address these concerns. These findings support the use of the GA summary and recommendations as important tools in caring for older adults with advanced cancer and functional or physical impairments. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02107443.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marielle Jensen-Battaglia
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Lianlian Lei
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Huiwen Xu
- Sealy Center on Aging, Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | - Lee Kehoe
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Amita Patil
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Erika Ramsdale
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Allison Magnuson
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Amber S. Kleckner
- School of Nursing, Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | | | - Po-Ju Lin
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Karen M. Mustian
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Gilbert Giri
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Mary Whitehead
- SCOREboard Advisory Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - James Bearden
- Upstate Carolina National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Spartanburg, South Carolina
| | - Brian L. Burnette
- Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Green Bay
| | - Jodi Geer
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Program National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, St Louis Park
| | - Supriya G. Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Richard F. Dunne
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|