A Cohort Study to Evaluate Genetic Predictors for Aromatase Inhibitor Musculoskeletal Symptoms (AIMSS): Results from ECOG-ACRIN E1Z11

PURPOSE

Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Symptoms (AIMSS) are common and frequently lead to AI discontinuation. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes have been associated with AIMSS and AI discontinuation. E1Z11 is a prospective cohort study designed to validate associations between 10 SNPs and AI discontinuation due to AIMSS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal women with stage I-III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer received anastrozole 1 mg daily and completed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to assess AIMSS (Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire; HAQ) at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. We estimated that 40% of participants would develop AIMSS, and 25% would discontinue AI treatment within 12 months. Enrollment of 1,000 women with a fixed number per racial strata provided 80% power to detect an effect size of 1.5-4. SNPs were in ESR1 (rs2234693, rs2347868, rs9340835), CYP19A1 (rs1062033, rs4646), TCL1A (rs11849538, rs2369049, rs7158782, rs7159713), and HTR2A (rs2296972).

RESULTS

Of 970 evaluable women, 43% developed AIMSS and 12% discontinued AI therapy within 12 months. While more Black and Asian women developed AIMSS compared to White women (49% vs 39%, p=0.017; 50% vs 39%, p=0.004, respectively), AI discontinuation rates were similar across groups. None of the SNPs were significantly associated with AIMSS or AI discontinuation in the overall population, or in distinct cohorts. The odds ratio for rs2296972 (HTR2A) approached significance for developing AIMSS.

CONCLUSION

We were unable to prospectively validate candidate SNPs previously associated with AI discontinuation due to AIMSS. Future analyses will explore additional genetic markers, PRO predictors of AIMSS, and differences by race.

Phase II Study of Erdafitinib in Patients With Tumors With Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Mutations or Fusions: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol K2

PURPOSE

Subprotocol K2 (EAY131-K2) of the NCI-MATCH platform trial was an open-label, single-arm, phase II study designed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the oral FGFR1-4 inhibitor, erdafitinib, in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1-4 mutations or fusions.

METHODS

Central confirmation of tumor FGFR1-4 mutations or fusions was required for outcome analysis. Patients with urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Enrolled subjects received oral erdafitinib at a starting dose of 8 mg daily continuously until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) with key secondary end points of safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 25 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the protocol. The median age was 61 years, and 52% of subjects had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy. The confirmed ORR was 16% (4 of 25 [90% CI, 5.7 to 33.0], P = .034 against the null rate of 5%). An additional seven patients experienced stable disease as best-confirmed response. Four patients had a prolonged PFS including two with recurrent WHO grade IV, IDH1-/2-wildtype glioblastoma. The median PFS and OS were 3.6 months and 11.0 months, respectively. Erdafitinib was manageable with no new safety signals.

CONCLUSION

This study met its primary end point in patients with several pretreated solid tumor types harboring FGFR1-3 mutations or fusions. These findings support advancement of erdafitinib for patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor-altered tumors outside of currently approved indications in a potentially tumor-agnostic manner.

A review of dairy food intake for improving health for black women in the US during pregnancy, fetal development, and lactation

Pregnancy and lactation are special life stages that require regular nutritional and medical attention to help protect the health of the mother and promote the growth and development of the offspring. Despite an increased focus on maternal and fetal health over the last several decades, the rates of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality are increasing in the United States (US). On average, Black women who are pregnant or lactating face greater health disparities and birth complications than other racial/ethnic groups in the US. The issues contributing to these disparities are multi-faceted and include sociocultural, economic, medical, and dietary factors. For example, Black women face greater rates of food insecurity, worse access to healthcare, and lower nutrient status when compared to White women. A growing body of research suggests that consuming a healthier dietary pattern is one of the most potent modifiable risk factors associated with improved fertility and reducing pregnancy-related complications. Recent publications have also shed light on the role of dairy foods in improving diet quality and nutrient status among Black women and for impacting maternal and fetal health outcomes, such as preeclampsia, spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, and fetal growth. To support healthy pregnancy and lactation, the current national dietary guidelines recommend the consumption of 3 servings of dairy foods per day. However, the vast majority of Black women in the US are falling short of these recommendations and are not meeting nutrient requirements for calcium and vitamin D. Therefore, strategies that target misconceptions surrounding lactose intolerance and focus on the health value of adequate dairy intake among Black women of child-bearing age may benefit both prenatal and postpartum health. This review presents the current evidence on health disparities faced by pregnant and lactating Black women in the US, and the role of dairy foods in supporting healthy pregnancy, fetal development, and lactation outcomes in this population.

Phase II Study of Osimertinib in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN (EAY131) Trial Subprotocol E

PURPOSE

The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice trial is a signal-finding genomically driven platform trial that assigns patients with any advanced refractory solid tumor, lymphoma, or myeloma to targeted therapies on the basis of next-generation sequencing results. Subprotocol E evaluated osimertinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Eligible patients had EGFR mutations (T790M or rare activating) and received osimertinib 80 mg once daily. Patients with lung cancer with EGFR T790M were excluded. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary end points were 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were enrolled: 17 were evaluable for toxicity and 13 for efficacy. The median age of the 13 included in the efficacy analysis was 63 years, 62% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1, and 31% received >three previous systemic therapies. The most common tumor type was brain cancers (54%). The ORR was 15.4% (n = 2 of 13; 90% CI, 2.8 to 41.0) and 6-month PFS was 16.7% (90% CI, 0 to 34.4). The two confirmed RECIST responses were observed in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma not otherwise specified (EGFR exon 20 S768T and exon 18 G719C mutation) and a patient with low-grade epithelial carcinoma of the paranasal sinus (EGFR D770_N771insSVD). The most common (>20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, and maculopapular rash.

CONCLUSION

In this pretreated cohort, osimertinib did not meet the prespecified end point threshold for efficacy, but responses were seen in a neuroendocrine carcinoma with an EGFR exon 20 S768T and exon 18 G719C mutation and an epithelial carcinoma with an EGFR D770_N771insSVD mutation. Osimertinib was well tolerated and had a safety profile consistent with previous studies.

Phase II Study of Erdafitinib in Patients With Tumors With FGFR Amplifications: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol K1

PURPOSE

Despite fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors being approved in tumor types with select FGFR rearrangements or gene mutations, amplifications of FGFR represent the most common FGFR alteration across malignancies. Subprotocol K1 (EAY131-K1) of the National Cancer Institute-MATCH platform trial was designed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the oral FGFR1-4 inhibitor, erdafitinib, in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1-4 amplification.

METHODS

EAY131-K1 was an open-label, single-arm, phase II study with central confirmation of presence of FGFR1-4 amplification in tumors. Patients with urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Enrolled patients received oral erdafitinib at a starting dose of 8 mg once daily continuously with escalation to 9 mg once daily continuously, on the basis of predefined time point assessments of phosphate levels, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR), with key secondary end points being 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled into this study with 18 included in the prespecified primary efficacy analysis. The median age of the 18 patients was 60 years, and 78% had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy. There were no confirmed responses to erdafitinib; however, five patients experienced stable disease (SD) as best response. One patient with an FGFR1-amplified breast cancer had a prolonged PFS >168 days (5.5 months). The median PFS was 1.7 months (90% CI, 1.1 to 1.8 months) and the median OS was 4.2 months (90% CI, 2.3 to 9.3 months). The estimated PFS6 rate was 13.8% (90% CI, 3.3 to 31.6). The majority of toxicities were grade 1 to 2 in nature, although there was one grade 5 treatment-related adverse event.

CONCLUSION

Erdafitinib did not meet its primary end point of efficacy as determined by ORR in treatment-refractory solid tumors harboring FGFR1-4 amplifications. Our findings support that rearrangements and gene mutations, but not amplifications, of FGFR remain the established FGFR alterations with approved indications for FGFR inhibition.

Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in Patients with Non-Breast/Gastroesophageal HER2-Amplified Tumors: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol J

PURPOSE

NCI-MATCH assigned patients with advanced cancer and progression on prior treatment, based on genomic alterations in pretreatment tumor tissue. Arm J (EAY131-J) evaluated the combination of trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP) across HER2-amplified tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had high levels of HER2 amplification [copy number (CN) ≥7] detected by central next-generation sequencing (NGS) or through NCI-designated laboratories. Patients with breast/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and those who received prior HER2-directed therapy were excluded. Enrollment of patients with colorectal cancer was capped at 4 based on emerging data. Patients received HP IV Q3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled, with 25 included in the primary efficacy analysis (CN ≥7 confirmed by a central lab, median CN = 28). Median age was 66 (range, 31-80), and half of all patients had ≥3 prior therapies (range, 1-11). The confirmed ORR was 12% [3/25 partial responses (colorectal, cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial cancers), 90% confidence interval (CI) 3.4%-28.2%]. There was one additional partial response (urothelial cancer) in a patient with an unconfirmed ERBB2 copy number. Median PFS was 3.3 months (90% CI 2.0-4.1), and median OS 9.4 months (90% CI 5.0-18.9). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with prior studies. There was no association between HER2 CN and response.

CONCLUSIONS

HP was active in a selection of HER2-amplified tumors (non-breast/gastroesophageal) but did not meet the predefined efficacy benchmark. Additional strategies targeting HER2 and potential resistance pathways are warranted, especially in rare tumors.

Disparities in care of older adults of color with cancer: A narrative review

This review describes the barriers and challenges faced by older adults of color with cancer and highlights methods to improve their overall care. In the next decade, cancer incidence rates are expected to increase in the United States for people aged ≥65 years. A large proportion will be older adults of color who often have worse outcomes than older White patients. Many issues contribute to racial disparities in older adults, including biological factors and social determinants of health (SDOH) related to healthcare access, socioeconomic concerns, systemic racism, mistrust, and the neighborhood where a person lives. These disparities are exacerbated by age-related challenges often experienced by older adults, such as decreased functional status, impaired cognition, high rates of comorbidities and polypharmacy, poor nutrition, and limited social support. Additionally, underrepresentation of both patients of color and older adults in cancer clinical research results in a lack of adequate data to guide the management of these patients. Use of geriatric assessments (GA) can aid providers in uncovering age-related concerns and personalizing interventions for older patients. Research demonstrates the ability of GA-directed care to result in fewer treatment-related toxicities and improved quality of life, thus supporting the routine incorporation of validated GA into these patients' care. GA can be enhanced by including evaluation of SDOH, which can help healthcare providers understand and address the needs of older adults of color with cancer who face disparities related to their age and race.

Paclitaxel With or Without Cixutumumab as Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Randomized Phase II ECOG-ACRIN Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced esophageal cancer carry poor prognoses; limited data exist to guide second-line therapy in the metastatic setting. Paclitaxel has been used yet is associated with limited efficacy. There is preclinical evidence of synergy between paclitaxel and cixutumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. We conducted a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel (arm A) versus paclitaxel plus cixutumumab (arm B) in the second-line for patients with metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); 87 patients (43 in arm A, 44 in arm B) were treated.

RESULTS

Median PFS was 2.6 months in arm A [90% CL 1.8-3.5] and 2.3 months in arm B [90% 2.0-3.5], P = .86. Stable disease was observed in 29 (33%) patients. Objective response rates for Arms A and B were 12% [90% CI, 5-23%] and 14% [90% CI, 6-25%]. Median overall survival was 6.7 months [90% CL 4.9-9.5] in arm A and 7.2 months [90% CL 4.9-8.1] in arm B, P = 56.

CONCLUSION

The addition of cixutumumab to paclitaxel in second-line therapy of metastatic esophageal/GEJ cancer was well tolerated but did not improve clinical outcomes relative to standard of care (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01142388).

Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Antiangiogenic therapy with bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy improves survival in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. This study was conducted to determine the effect of bevacizumab (at 10 mg/kg) on survival duration for oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight hundred twenty-nine metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) with bevacizumab; FOLFOX4 without bevacizumab; or bevacizumab alone. The primary end point was overall survival, with additional determinations of progression-free survival, response, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The median duration of survival for the group treated with FOLFOX4 and bevacizumab was 12.9 months compared with 10.8 months for the group treated with FOLFOX4 alone (corresponding hazard ratio for death = 0.75; P = .0011), and 10.2 months for those treated with bevacizumab alone. The median progression-free survival for the group treated with FOLFOX4 in combination with bevacizumab was 7.3 months, compared with 4.7 months for the group treated with FOLFOX4 alone (corresponding hazard ratio for progression = 0.61; P < .0001), and 2.7 months for those treated with bevacizumab alone. The corresponding overall response rates were 22.7%, 8.6%, and 3.3%, respectively (P < .0001 for FOLFOX4 with bevacizumab v FOLFOX4 comparison). Bevacizumab was associated with hypertension, bleeding, and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin improves survival duration for patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Physician Perceptions on Cancer Screening for LGBTQ+ Patients

The LGBTQ+ community experiences cancer disparities due to increased risk factors and lower screening rates, attributable to health literacy gaps and systemic barriers. We sought to understand the experiences, perceptions, and knowledge base of healthcare providers regarding cancer screening for LGBTQ+ patients. A 20-item IRB-approved survey was distributed to physicians through professional organizations. The survey assessed experiences and education regarding the LGBTQ+ community and perceptions of patient concerns with different cancer screenings on a 5-point Likert scale. Complete responses were collected from 355 providers. Only 100 (28%) reported past LGBTQ+-related training and were more likely to be female (p = 0.020), have under ten years of practice (p = 0.014), or practice family/internal medicine (p < 0.001). Most (85%) recognized that LGBTQ+ subpopulations experience nuanced health issues, but only 46% confidently understood them, and 71% agreed their clinics would benefit from training. Family/internal medicine practitioners affirmed the clinical relevance of patients' sexual orientation (94%; 62% for medical/radiation oncology). Prior training affected belief in the importance of sexual orientation (p < 0.001), confidence in understanding LGBTQ+ health concerns (p < 0.001), and willingness to be listed as "LGBTQ+-friendly" (p = 0.005). Our study suggests that despite a paucity of formal training, most providers acknowledge that LGBTQ+ patients have unique health needs. Respondents had a lack of consensus regarding cancer screenings for lesbian and transgender patients, indicating the need for clearer screening standards for LGBTQ+ subpopulations and educational programs for providers.

The NCI-MATCH trial: lessons for precision oncology

The NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) trial ( NCT02465060 ) was launched in 2015 as a genomically driven, signal-seeking precision medicine platform trial-largely for patients with treatment-refractory, malignant solid tumors. Having completed in 2023, it remains one of the largest tumor-agnostic, precision oncology trials undertaken to date. Nearly 6,000 patients underwent screening and molecular testing, with a total of 1,593 patients (inclusive of continued accrual from standard next-generation sequencing) being assigned to one of 38 substudies. Each substudy was a phase 2 trial of a therapy matched to a genomic alteration, with a primary endpoint of objective tumor response by RECIST criteria. In this Perspective, we summarize the outcomes of the initial 27 substudies in NCI-MATCH, which met its signal-seeking objective with 7/27 positive substudies (25.9%). We discuss key aspects of the design and operational conduct of the trial, highlighting important lessons for future precision medicine studies.

Phase II Study of Palbociclib (PD-0332991) in CCND1, 2, or 3 Amplification: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1B

PURPOSE

Cyclin D/CDK4/6 is critical in controlling the G1 to S checkpoint. CCND, the gene encoding cyclin D, is known to be amplified in a variety of solid tumors. Palbociclib is an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, approved in advanced breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy. We explored the efficacy of palbociclib in patients with nonbreast solid tumors containing an amplification in CCND1, 2, or 3.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with tumors containing a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and expression of the retinoblastoma protein were assigned to subprotocol Z1B and received palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles.

RESULTS

Forty patients were assigned to subprotocol Z1B; 4 patients had outside assays identifying the CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and were not confirmed centrally; 3 were ineligible and 2 were not treated (1 untreated patient was also ineligible), leaving 32 evaluable patients for this analysis. There were no partial responses; 12 patients (37.5%) had stable disease as best response. There were seven deaths on study, all during cycle 1 and attributable to disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months. The most common toxicities were leukopenia (n = 21, 55%) and neutropenia (n = 19, 50%); neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 event (n = 12, 32%).

CONCLUSIONS

Palbociclib was not effective at treating nonbreast solid tumors with a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification in this cohort. These data do not support further investigation of single-agent palbociclib in tumors with CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification.

Trametinib in Patients With NF1-, GNAQ-, or GNA11-Mutant Tumors: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocols S1 and S2

PURPOSE

NCI-MATCH is a precision medicine trial using genomic testing to allocate patients with advanced malignancies to targeted treatment subprotocols. This report combines two subprotocols evaluating trametinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1[S1] or GNA11/Q [S2]) altered tumors.

METHODS

Eligible patients had tumors with deleterious inactivating NF1 or GNA11/Q mutations by the customized Oncomine AmpliSeq panel. Prior MEK inhibitor treatment was excluded. Glioblastomas (GBMs) were permitted, including malignancies associated with germline NF1 mutations (S1 only). Trametinib was administered at 2 mg once daily over 28-day cycles until toxicity or disease progression. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, PFS, and overall survival. Exploratory analyses included co-occurring genomic alterations and PTEN loss.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were eligible and started therapy: 46 with NF1 mutations (S1) and four with GNA11 mutations (S2). In the NF1 cohort, nonsense single-nucleotide variants were identified in 29 and frameshift deletions in 17 tumors. All in S2 had nonuveal melanoma and GNA11 Q209L variant. Two partial responses (PR) were noted in S1, one patient each with advanced lung cancer and GBM for an ORR of 4.3% (90% CI, 0.8 to 13.1). One patient with melanoma in S2 had a PR (ORR, 25%; 90% CI, 1.3 to 75.1). Prolonged stable disease (SD) was also noted in five patients (four in S1 and one in S2) with additional rare histologies. Adverse events were as previously described with trametinib. Comutations in TP53 and PIK3CA were common.

CONCLUSION

Although these subprotocols did not meet the primary end point for ORR, significant responses or prolonged SD noted in some disease subtypes warrants further investigation.

Abstract P4-07-52: Caloric Restriction for Oncology Research (CaReFOR): Assessing dietary adherence and outcomes in African American patients during breast cancer treatment

Purpose: Epidemiologic and clinical evidence have shown an association between obesity and increased risk for breast cancer (BC) incidence and mortality. Data from human and animal studies support a potential role for weight loss in counteracting tumor-promoting properties of obesity in BC. However, dietary intervention clinical trials often show low patient adherence, especially among African American (AA) women compared to Caucasian (CC) women. They also show that AA women are disproportionately obese and lose less weight during behavior lifestyle interventions compared to CC with similar risk factors. We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of a 10-week caloric restricted diet in patients undergoing radiation and have performed analysis to determine if adherence to dietary alterations is feasible in underrepresented patients. Methods: In an IRB approved clinical trial, we determined the feasibility and toxicity of dietary intervention during radiation in breast cancer patients 18 years and older who were undergoing breast conservation therapy with T1-2N0 cancers. The dietary intervention consisted of caloric intake reduction of 25% from baseline for a total of 10 weeks during their six-week radiation treatment which was administered to the whole breast to a dose of 50Gy with a 10Gy boost to the tumor bed. To optimize adherence to caloric restriction (CR), patients received personalized counseling, maintained food diaries, and were educated on behavioral modifications at weekly visits. To characterize the effects of CR, baseline physiologic and blood parameters were collected and compared with post intervention measurements and samples. Biometric and biological data collected during the study comparing compliant participants before and after the CaReFOR intervention was stratified by race and analyzed via two-sample paired t-test. The difference between AA and CC study participants was determined to be significant if the calculated p-value was less than &lt; 0.05 (CI 95%). Results: A total of 32 female patients were enrolled in the CaReFOR trial, 16 were AA and 16 were CC. Participant demographics were similar across age, primary tumor size (pT), nuclear grade, and hormone receptor status. Evaluation of patients’ baseline diet demonstrated similar macronutrients across races, with AA showing less fruit/vegetable and grains. AA patients were more overweight compared to their CC counterparts. They also showed a more inflamed state compared to CC patients. The baseline inflammatory biomarker levels for ESR and cholesterol were significantly higher while adiponectin was significantly lower in AA than that of CC patients. The trends for insulin, HbA1c, and leptin were also higher for AA compared to CC. Following the 10-week diet, AA patients (87.3%) were more compliant than CC’s (81.3%). Both AA and CC patients lost weight during the trial, with AA having a significant loss in body fat and gain in muscle mass compared to CC. Similarly, after completing the CR diet, biological inflammatory markers improved in AA and CC patients. Particularly, in AA, there was a significant decrease in cholesterol levels, while insulin, leptin, and ESR serum levels trended downwards, suggesting a decreased inflammatory state. Conclusions: Contrary to published studies, we found AA patients are successful in adhering to dietary alterations and have a benefit with respect to physiologic and biologic parameters. Our dietary intervention was able to positively affect our AA patients adverse baseline factors such as obesity and inflammation. Future studies should consider dietary alterations as a possible means to decrease AA patient disparate outcomes in breast cancer.

Citation Format: Siani Harding, Adeseye Adekeye, Edith P. Mitchell, Nicole Simone. Caloric Restriction for Oncology Research (CaReFOR): Assessing dietary adherence and outcomes in African American patients during breast cancer treatment. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-52.

Abstract P2-11-13: High PD-L2 Protein Expression in Cancer Cells is an Independent Marker of Unfavorable Prognosis in Luminal Breast Tumors

Background PD-1 inhibitors have shown significant efficacy in triple negative breast cancer (BC), however, durable responses are less common in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC. Better markers are therefore needed that will identify likely responders to PD-1 inhibitors among patients with luminal BC. While most efforts have focused on the immune checkpoint protein PD-L1, the alternative PD-1 ligand, PD-L2, has been largely overlooked. We aimed to determine if PD-L2 is associated with unfavorable prognosis in ER+ BC. Methods PD-L2 protein levels in cancer cells and stromal cells were measured retrospectively by quantitative immunofluorescence histocytometry in tissue microarrays of therapy-naïve, localized or locoregional ER+ BC and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS). Evaluable tumor PD-L2 data were derived from a main study cohort A diagnosed between 1988-2005 (n=684) with extensive clinical and outcome data and from an independent validation cohort B diagnosed between 1992-2012 (n=273). Patients received standard-of-care adjuvant therapy without immune checkpoint inhibitors after tumor resection. Results Univariate analysis of the main cohort A revealed that high PD-L2 expression in cancer cells was associated with shorter PFS (HR=1.8; 95%CI:1.3-2.6; p=0.001), an observation that was validated in an independent cohort B (HR=2.3, 95%CI:1.1-4.8; p=0.026). Approximately one third of ER+ BC cases were classified as high PD-L2. After multivariable adjustment for common clinicopathological variables, high cancer cell levels of PD-L2 remained independently predictive of early recurrence (HR=2.0; 95%CI:1.4-2.9; p&lt; 0.001). Sub-analysis of ER+ BC cases treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n=197) suggested that high PD-L2 levels in cancer cells was associated with particularly increased risk of progression (multivariable HR=3.4; 95%CI:1.9-6.2; p&lt; 0.001). The observed frequent expression of PD-L2 protein in BC provided scientific rationale for the design of our ongoing phase II clinical trial (NCT04243616) of neoadjuvant combined PD-1 inhibitor (cemiplimab; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc) and chemotherapy in patients diagnosed with PD-L1+ and/or PD-L2+ BC. The primary objective of this trial is to assess pathologic responses to neoadjuvant treatment with secondary objective of assessing the correlation between PD-L1/PD-L2 status and tumor responses. Pathologist review of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in an initial set of ER+ tumors (n=15) screened for trial eligibility revealed frequent discordance between cancer cell positivity for PD-L1 and PD-L2 protein (PD-L1: median=0%; range 0-2% vs. PD-L2: median=18%; range &lt; 1-60%) as well as immune cell positivity (PD-L1: median=5%; range 0-50% vs. PD-L2: median=0; range 0-50%). Conclusions In treatment-naïve ER+ breast tumors, high cancer cell expression of PD-L2 protein was an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome, with evidence of further elevated risk of progression in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Preliminary analyses of ER+ tumors from our ongoing clinical trial showed frequent discordance between baseline PD-L1 and PD-L2 protein expression in both cancer cells and immune cells. Collectively, our analyses indicate that PD-L2 has prognostic value for ER+ BC, and our progress justify further studies to determine whether PD-L2, alone or in combination with PD-L1, may serve as a predictive marker of response to PD-1 inhibitors.

Citation Format: Lubna N. Chaudhary, Inna Chervoneva, Amy R. Peck, Yunguang Sun, Misung Yi, John F. Langenheim, Julie M. Jorns, Sailaja Kamaraju, Yee Chung Cheng, John Burfeind, Christopher R. Chitambar, Jeffrey A. Hooke, Albert J. Kovatich, Craig Shriver, Hai Hu, Juan P. Palazzo, Marluce Bibbo, Terry Hyslop, Richard Pestell, Edith P. Mitchell, Hallgeir Rui. High PD-L2 Protein Expression in Cancer Cells is an Independent Marker of Unfavorable Prognosis in Luminal Breast Tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-13.

Futibatinib for FGFR2-Rearranged Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) have emerged as promising drug targets for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a rare cancer with a poor prognosis. Futibatinib, a next-generation, covalently binding FGFR1-4 inhibitor, has been shown to have both antitumor activity in patients with FGFR-altered tumors and strong preclinical activity against acquired resistance mutations associated with ATP-competitive FGFR inhibitors.

METHODS

In this multinational, open-label, single-group, phase 2 study, we enrolled patients with unresectable or metastatic FGFR2 fusion-positive or FGFR2 rearrangement-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and disease progression after one or more previous lines of systemic therapy (excluding FGFR inhibitors). The patients received oral futibatinib at a dose of 20 mg once daily in a continuous regimen. The primary end point was objective response (partial or complete response), as assessed by independent central review. Secondary end points included the response duration, progression-free and overall survival, safety, and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Between April 16, 2018, and November 29, 2019, a total of 103 patients were enrolled and received futibatinib. A total of 43 of 103 patients (42%; 95% confidence interval, 32 to 52) had a response, and the median duration of response was 9.7 months. Responses were consistent across patient subgroups, including patients with heavily pretreated disease, older adults, and patients who had co-occurring TP53 mutations. At a median follow-up of 17.1 months, the median progression-free survival was 9.0 months and overall survival was 21.7 months. Common treatment-related grade 3 adverse events were hyperphosphatemia (in 30% of the patients), an increased aspartate aminotransferase level (in 7%), stomatitis (in 6%), and fatigue (in 6%). Treatment-related adverse events led to permanent discontinuation of futibatinib in 2% of the patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Quality of life was maintained throughout treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In previously treated patients with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the use of futibatinib, a covalent FGFR inhibitor, led to measurable clinical benefit. (Funded by Taiho Oncology and Taiho Pharmaceutical; FOENIX-CCA2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02052778.).

High PD-L2 Predicts Early Recurrence of ER-Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity is suppressed when programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) is bound by PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) or PD-L2. Although PD-1 inhibitors have been approved for triple-negative breast cancer, the lower response rates of 25%-30% in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer will require markers to identify likely responders. The focus of this study was to evaluate whether PD-L2, which has higher affinity than PD-L1 for PD-1, is a predictor of early recurrence in ER+ breast cancer.

METHODS

PD-L2 protein levels in cancer cells and stromal cells of therapy-naive, localized or locoregional ER+ breast cancers were measured retrospectively by quantitative immunofluorescence histocytometry and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) in the main study cohort (n = 684) and in an independent validation cohort (n = 273). All patients subsequently received standard-of-care adjuvant therapy without immune checkpoint inhibitors.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis of the main cohort revealed that high PD-L2 expression in cancer cells was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.6; P = .001), which was validated in an independent cohort (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.8; P = .026) and remained independently predictive after multivariable adjustment for common clinicopathological variables (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9; P < .001). Subanalysis of the ER+ breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 197) revealed that high PD-L2 levels in cancer cells associated with short PFS in univariate (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.4; P = .003) and multivariable analyses (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.9 to 6.2; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Up to one third of treatment-naive ER+ breast tumors expressed high PD-L2 levels, which independently predicted poor clinical outcome, with evidence of further elevated risk of progression in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Collectively, these data warrant studies to gain a deeper understanding of PD-L2 in the progression of ER+ breast cancer and may provide rationale for immune checkpoint blockade for this patient group.

“I need more knowledge”: Qualitative analysis of oncology providers’ experiences with sexual and gender minority patients

Background

While societal acceptance for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals is increasing, this group continues to face barriers to quality healthcare. Little is known about clinicians’ experiences with SGM patients in the oncology setting. To address this, a mixed method survey was administered to members of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group.

Materials and methods

We report results from the open-ended portion of the survey. Four questions asked clinicians to describe experiences with SGM patients, reservations in caring for them, suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care, and additional comments. Data were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method.

Results

The majority of respondents noted they had no or little familiarity with SGM patients. A minority of respondents noted experience with gay and lesbian patients, but not transgender patients; many who reported experience with transgender patients also noted difficulty navigating the correct use of pronouns. Many respondents also highlighted positive experiences with SGM patients. Suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care included providing widespread training, attending to unique end-of-life care issues among SGM patients, and engaging in efforts to build trust.

Conclusion

Clinicians have minimal experiences with SGM patients with cancer but desire training. Training the entire workforce may improve trust with, outreach efforts to, and cancer care delivery to the SGM community.

Phase II Study of Afatinib in Patients With Tumors With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Activating Mutations: Results From the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol EAY131-B

PURPOSE

National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice is a multicohort trial that assigns patients with advanced cancers to targeted therapies on the basis of central tumor genomic testing. Arm B evaluated afatinib, an ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with ERBB2-activating mutations.

METHODS

Eligible patients had selected ERBB2 single-nucleotide variants or insertions/deletions detected by the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice next-generation sequencing assay. Patients had performance status ≤ 1, left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%, grade ≤ 1 diarrhea, and no prior human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. Patients received afatinib 40 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were 6-month progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and molecular correlates.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients were assigned and 40 were enrolled. The median age was 62 years, 78% were female, 68% had performance status = 1, and 58% had received > 3 prior therapies. The confirmed ORR was 2.7% (n = 1 of 37; 90% CI, 0.14 to 12.2), and 6-month progression-free survival was 12.0% (90% CI, 5.6 to 25.8). A confirmed partial response occurred in a patient with adenocarcinoma of extra-mammary Paget disease of skin who progressed after cycle 6. Two unconfirmed partial responses were observed (low-grade serous gynecological tract and estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative immunohistochemistry breast ductal carcinoma). Of 12 patients with breast cancer, 1 additional patient with lobular carcinoma (estrogen receptor-positive/HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization) had a 51% reduction in target lesions but progressed because of a new lesion at cycle 6. The most common (> 20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (68%), mucositis (43%), fatigue (40%), acneiform rash (30%), dehydration (27%), vomiting (27%), nausea (27%), anemia (27%), and anorexia (22%). Four patients (11%) discontinued because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Although afatinib did not meet the prespecified threshold for antitumor activity in this heavily pretreated cohort, the response in a rare tumor type is notable. The safety profile of afatinib was consistent with prior studies.

Abstract CT160: BVD-523FB (Ulixertinib) in Patients with Tumors with BRAF Fusions, or with Non-V600E, Non-V600K BRAF Mutations: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol EAY131-Z1L

Purpose: Mutations in BRAF at codons other than V600 (non-V600) and BRAF fusions confer dependence on RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. BVD-523FB (ulixertinib) is a small molecule that potently inhibits both ERK1 and ERK2 protein kinases in the sub-nanomolar range. Based on the reports of early clinical activity in the phase 1 trial, including in non-V600 BRAF mutations, subprotocol Z1L (EAY131-Z1L) sought to investigate the clinical activity of ulixertinib in patients with tumors harboring these alterations. Methods: In this single-arm study, patients with BRAF non-V600 mutation or BRAF fusion were given ulixertinib orally at a dose of 600 mg twice daily, continuously for each 28-day cycle until progression or intolerability. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). BRAF mutation status was determined by an analytically validated assay in a CLIA-certified laboratory for all patients. Results: From August 2019 to July 2020, 35 patients were enrolled and received protocol treatment on the trial. Among the 34 patients who were eligible, median age was 66.5; 50% were female, 88% were white, 9% black, 1% Asian. Performance status was ECOG PS 1 in 74% of patients, with remaining PS 0. Median number of prior therapies was &gt;3.Tumor types included multiple gastrointestinal malignancies (N=16), lung cancer (N=3), and melanoma (N=3), among others. Mutations were centrally confirmed in 26 patients who were deemed analyzable per protocol. Twenty-two patients had a single nucleotide variant (SNV) in BRAF; one patient had an insertion/deletion (indel) in BRAF, and three patients harbored BRAF fusions. No patients achieved CR or PR, resulting in ORR = 0%. Stable disease was the best response in 7/26 centrally confirmed cases. Median PFS was 1.8 months (90% CI: 1.6, 2.2), 6-month PFS rate was 11% (90% CI: 4%, 22%), and median OS was 4.0 months (90% CI: 2.8, 7.4). Twenty patients (57%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity; there were no grade 5 toxicities. Most common toxicities include anemia (n=11), diarrhea (n=16), nausea (n=16), vomiting (n=11), fatigue (n=16), increased creatinine (n=12), and acneiform rash (n=14). Conclusion: BVD-523FB (ulixertinib) had no demonstrable evidence of clinical activity in this small, heavily pre-treated population of patients with tumors harboring BRAF fusions, or with non-V600E, non-V600K BRAF mutations

Citation Format: Vivek Subbiah, Fengmin Fengmin, Ragini Kudchadkar, Ryan J. Sullivan, Edith P. Mitchell, John J. Wright, Helen X. Chen, Robert J. Gray, Xin Victoria Wang, Lisa M. McShane, Larry V. Rubinstein, David Patton, P. Mickey Williams, Tilak K. Sundaresan, Barbara A. Conley, Carlos L. Arteaga, Lyndsay N. Harris, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Alice P. Chen, Keith T. Flaherty. BVD-523FB (Ulixertinib) in Patients with Tumors with BRAF Fusions, or with Non-V600E, Non-V600K BRAF Mutations: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol EAY131-Z1L [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT160.

Medical student clinical cultural awareness in cancer care of sexual and gender minorities

11003

Background: Health disparities in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ+), or sexual and gender minorities (SGMs), patients are a known in health care. SGMs have higher cancer risk but lower rates of screenings, resulting in a higher likelihood of late-stage disease. Relevant gaps in medical school curricula regarding SGMs must be addressed to prevent these disparities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate medical students’ (MS) clinical cultural awareness in cancer care of SGM patients. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey distributed to medical degree students actively enrolled at a large urban academic center. This survey was adapted from a study by Schabath et. Al. The survey had 38 questions on demographics, attitudes, and knowledge of SGM topics. Questions were scored on a Likert scale from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’ with ‘don’t know’ and ‘prefer not to answer’ as options. Results are reported using descriptive statistics. Results: There were 238 responses. Most respondents were white (63.9%), cis-gender female (57.6%), and heterosexual (78.6%). Distribution according to year are as follows: MS1 36.6%, MS2 14.7%, MS3 27.3%, and MS4 19.3%. Attitudes are listed in the table below. Four of the seven questions on knowledge had “Don’t Know” as the most common response. Notably, 47.1% of respondents did not know if screening gay/bisexual men with anal pap is associated with increased life expectancy. Students were interested in learning guidelines regarding SGM cancer screening and considerations for patients who are on hormone therapy. Conclusions: While most medical students are comfortable treating LGBTQ+ patients, most are not confident in their knowledge. This difference is most profound in knowledge of transgender patients. Schools must consider longitudinal education in SGM topics to improve student knowledge to produce confident and competent providers. Participants Responses to Attitude Items. [Table: see text]

An update to a retrospective comparison of results between the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program and NCI cancer center based early detection program with evidenced based patient navigation and social work support

e18572

Background: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) through the CDC has provided uninsured women access to breast and cervical cancer screening/diagnostic services. The uninsured face obstacles which include fear, lack of access and trust in the system, financial and logistical barriers to accessing health care services (Natale-Pereira, et.al, 2011) Disparities in access to screening and diagnostic testing, cancer treatment and survivorship is well documented for medically vulnerable populations that impact stage of diagnosis and mortality (Guadagnolo, Dohan & Raich 2011). The Jefferson's program participates in the NBCCEDP program and uses other private resources which incorporate Social Work core competencies that provide assistance to address barriers. The program navigates along the continuum of cancer care (e.g, prevention, screening, treatment and survival). We have found in a comparative analysis that TJUH’s program has higher rates of diverse racial and ethnic participation of key medically underserved demographics than the National Program. Methods: TJUH's program employs a clinical model, Clinical Patient Navigation with a Licensed Clinical Social Worker operating from a strengths based framework to direct care with administrative support. The program utilizes best practices for working with the at risk population: translation services for the Limited English Proficient, appointment confirmation, transportation assistance and psychosocial support from initial point of contact through final diagnosis. Program staff coordinate internal and external referrals from multiple providers. Results: The study population includes 3144 participants who received breast and cervical cancer screening services through the program from 2012 through 2020. 13.9% were white, 41.7% were African-American, 24.5% were Asian and 19.1% Latinx participated in the program, Table. The age of the participants was slightly younger than the National program as well with 15% under 40, 46% between the ages of 40-49. Conclusions: TJUH’s program provides comprehensive psychosocial support to address barriers along the continuum of screening and diagnostic services leading with increased participation among at risk populations. This further reduces no show rates and participants being lost to follow up. TJUH’s program screens a larger proportion of African American and Asian and younger women compared to the NBCCED program. Additionally, we serviced a slightly younger population than the national program. TJUH’s program addresses health disparities and inequity in access to cancer screening services as shown by the data of the diversity of the participants.

Phase II study of vismodegib in patients with SMO or PTCH1 mutated tumors: Results from NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol T

3010

Background: NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a platform trial enrolling patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on matching genomic alterations (NCT02465060). Subprotocol Arm T evaluated vismodegib (GDC0449), a hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in pts with tumors harboring PTCH1 and SMO mutations. Methods: Pts whose tumors had SMO or PTCH1 mutations were eligible; results were confirmed by NCI-MATCH central labs if possible. Pts received oral vismodegib (150 mg daily) for 4-week cycles until progression/toxicity. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles. Primary endpoint was ORR; secondary endpoints included PFS, 6-month PFS, OS, and predictive biomarkers. Cutaneous basal cell carcinomas were excluded. Results: Of 34 pts enrolled (6/20/16 – 9/22/20); 2 were ineligible and 1 did not start therapy. The 31 analyzable pts’ demographics were primary tumor sites/histology [gastrointestinal (n = 9), skin/soft tissue (n = 7), gynecologic (n = 5), lung (n = 4), unknown primary (n = 4), ductal breast (n = 1), meningioma (n = 1)]; median age 64 (range 19-81); 48.4% women; 61.3% (19/31) > 3 lines of prior therapy; 74% (23/31) > 1 co-occurring mutation [median 2 co-alterations (range 1-20)]. 8/31 > 4 co-occurring alterations. 9 pts had SMO mutant tumors (all SNVs); 5/9 had > 1 co-occurring gene alterations. 22 pts had PTCH1 alterations (7 SNVs and 15 indels); 18/22 pts had > 1 additional gene alteration. Of 31 analyzable pts, 22 were MATCH-confirmed (i.e. had central confirmation of tumor PTCH1/SMO mutations). MATCH-confirmed pts had ORR 9.1% (2/22) while all analyzable pts had ORR 6.5% (2/31). 2 PRs were seen in pts with a skin/soft tissue sarcoma ( PTCH) and a meningioma ( SMO) with a median duration of response 14 months. The 6-month PFS rate was similar in MATCH-confirmed and analyzable pts (22.4% and 23.2% respectively) and median PFS was identical at 1.8 months. Median OS was 9.1 months in MATCH-confirmed and 7.3 months in analyzable pts. Within analyzable SMO variants: 1 PR, 3 SD, 4 PD, and 1 unevaluable responses were documented. Within analyzable PTCH1 variants: 1 PR, 7 SD, 10 PD, and 4 unevaluable responses were seen. 4 pts (12.9%) discontinued therapy due to AE. Among 33 pts starting therapy, 18 (54.5%) had grade 1-2 toxicity, while 2 (6.1%) had grade 3 treatment-related toxicity. Most common toxicities: grade 1-2 fatigue (n = 11), anorexia (n = 8), weight loss (n = 7), alopecia (n = 7), and dysgeusia (n = 6). There were 4 on-study deaths, but none were treatment related. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, vismodegib was well-tolerated with mostly grade 1-2 toxicities and substantial responses were seen in patients with SMOPro641Ala and PTCHGlu947Ter alterations. Further study of the impact of concomitant molecular alterations may yield additional insights into vismodegib mechanisms of response. Clinical trial information: NCT02465060.

Analysis of the relationship between social determinants of health and survival outcomes in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in the United States

e17537

Background: Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare disease with a reported incidence of 1 in 40,000 pregnancies. There have been no studies evaluating the impact of social determinants of health (SDH) on outcomes in GTN. This study seeks to examine the influence of social and biologic prognostic factors related to survival among women with GTN. We hypothesized that older age at diagnosis, lower household income, and marginalized, racial/ethnic groups are associated with worse prognosis. Methods: In this retrospective study, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify women with GTN diagnosed from 2010-2018. Clinical-pathologic characteristics were described including initial stage of disease, presence of brain metastases at diagnosis, treatment with chemotherapy or surgery, and treatment at a Commission on Cancer (CoC) accredited center. Demographic factors were collected, including race/ethnicity, age at diagnosis, marital status, median household income, and rural or urban location. Log-logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between various prognostic factors and the odds of survival. We compared overall survival distributions across race/ethnicity using the log-rank test. Results: Of the 1,149 eligible patients (pts), 36% were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 21% non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 28% Hispanic, and 14% Other (Native American, Alaska Native, Asian, Pacific Islander). Mean age was 33.8 years (range 14-87 years). The majority was in the 21-35 age group (51%). Compared to NHW pts, Hispanic pts had over two times the odds of increased survival (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08-3.27; p = 0.032). NHB pts had similar survival compared to NHW pts (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.50-1.76; p = 0.860). Poor prognostic factors demonstrating decreased odds of survival included age ≥40 years (OR 0.139; 95% CI 0.025-0.478; p < 0.001) and widowed status (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.018-0.375; p < 0.001). Localized stage (OR 2.94; 95% CI 1.13-5.53; p = 0.03), the absence of brain metastases (OR 4.58; 95% CI 1.96-7.91; p = 0.002), and rural location (OR 5.62; 95% CI 1.25-15.2; p = 0.028) were significantly associated with increased odds of survival. Household income and race/ethnicity were not independent predictors of survival. Conclusions: Compared to NHW pts, Hispanic pts have an increased cause-specific survival for GTN. NHB pts and NHW pts have similar survival. Additionally, rural location was significantly associated with greater odds of survival. Further research is needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms linking race/ethnicity and survival outcomes, considering structural racism, bias, and discrimination. Our findings highlight the importance of recognizing the role of racism and SDH on health disparities and call to attention the need for addressing social inequities in GTN.

Assessing Real-World Racial Differences Among Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in US Community Practices

Objective

Real-world data characterizing differences between African American (AA) and White women with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) are limited. Using 9 years of data collected from community practices throughout the United States, we assessed racial differences in the proportion of patients with mTNBC, and their characteristics, treatment, and overall survival (OS).

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed de-identified data from 2,116 patients with mTNBC in the Flatiron Health database (January 2011 to March 2020). Characteristics and treatment patterns between AA and White patients with mTNBC were compared using descriptive statistics. OS was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results

Among patients with metastatic breast cancer, more AA patients (23%) had mTNBC than White patients (12%). This difference was particularly pronounced in patients who lived in the Northeast, were aged 45–65, had commercial insurance, and had initial diagnosis at stage II. AA patients were younger and more likely to have Medicaid. Clinical characteristics and first-line treatments were similar between AA and White patients. Unadjusted median OS (months) was shorter in AA (10.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.1, 11.7) vs. White patients (11.9; 95% CI: 10.9, 12.8) but not significantly different. After adjusting for potential confounders, the hazard ratio for OS was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.25) for AA vs. White patients.

Conclusions

The proportion of patients with mTNBC was higher in AA than White mBC patients treated in community practices. Race did not show an association with OS. Both AA and White patients with mTNBC received similar treatments. OS was similarly poor in both groups, particularly in patients who had not received any documented anti-cancer treatment. Effective treatment remains a substantial unmet need for all patients with mTNBC.

Phase II Study of Copanlisib in Patients With Tumors With PIK3CA Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1F

PURPOSE

Activating mutations in PIK3CA are observed across multiple tumor types. The NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a tumor-agnostic platform trial that enrolls patients to targeted therapies on the basis of matching genomic alterations. Arm Z1F evaluated copanlisib, an α and δ isoform-specific phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with PIK3CA mutations (with or without PTEN loss).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received copanlisib (60 mg intravenous) once weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles until progression or toxicity. Patients with KRAS mutations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancers, and lymphomas were excluded. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival, 6-month progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 25 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the Protocol. Multiple histologies were enrolled, with gynecologic (n = 6) and gastrointestinal (n = 6) being the most common. Sixty-eight percent of patients had ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. The ORR was 16% (4 of 25, 90% CI, 6 to 33) with P = .0341 against a null rate of 5%. The most common reason for protocol discontinuation was disease progression (n = 17, 68%). Grade 3/4 toxicities observed were consistent with reported toxicities for PI3K pathway inhibition. Sixteen patients (53%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity (CTCAE v5.0). Most common toxicities include hyperglycemia (n = 19), fatigue (n = 12), diarrhea (n = 11), hypertension (n = 10), and nausea (n = 10).

CONCLUSION

The study met its primary end point with an ORR of 16% (P = .0341) with copanlisib showing clinical activity in select tumors with PIK3CA mutation in the refractory setting.

Phase II Study of Taselisib in PIK3CA-Mutated Solid Tumors Other Than Breast and Squamous Lung Cancer: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol I

PURPOSE

PIK3CA mutations frequently contribute to oncogenesis in solid tumors. Taselisib, a potent and selective inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, has demonstrated clinical activity in PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer. Whether PIK3CA mutations predict sensitivity to taselisib in other cancer types is unknown. National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Arm EAY131-I is a single-arm, phase II study of the safety and efficacy of taselisib in patients with advanced cancers.

METHODS

Eligible patients had tumors with an activating PIK3CA mutation. Patients with breast or squamous cell lung carcinoma, or whose cancer had KRAS or PTEN mutations, were excluded. Patients received taselisib 4 mg, orally once daily continuously, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, overall survival (OS), and identification of predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled, and 61 were eligible and initiated protocol therapy. Types of PIK3CA mutations included helical 41 of 61 (67%), kinase 11 of 61 (18%), and other 9 of 61 (15%). With a median follow-up of 35.7 months, there were no complete or partial responses. Six-month PFS was 19.9% (90% CI, 12.0 to 29.3) and median PFS was 3.1 months (90% CI, 1.8 to 3.7). Six-month OS was 60.7% (90% CI, 49.6 to 70.0) and median OS was 7.2 months (90% CI, 5.9 to 10.0). Individual comutations were too heterogeneous to correlate with clinical outcome. Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and hyperglycemia were the most common toxicities, and most were grade 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

In this study, taselisib monotherapy had very limited activity in a heterogeneous cohort of heavily pretreated cancer patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumors; the presence of a PIK3CA mutation alone does not appear to be a sufficient predictor of taselisib activity.

Personalized Nutrition as a Key Contributor to Improving Radiation Response in Breast Cancer

Understanding metabolic and immune regulation inherent to patient populations is key to improving the radiation response for our patients. To date, radiation therapy regimens are prescribed based on tumor type and stage. Patient populations who are noted to have a poor response to radiation such as those of African American descent, those who have obesity or metabolic syndrome, or senior adult oncology patients, should be considered for concurrent therapies with radiation that will improve response. Here, we explore these populations of breast cancer patients, who frequently display radiation resistance and increased mortality rates, and identify the molecular underpinnings that are, in part, responsible for the radiation response and that result in an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment. The resulting immune phenotype is discussed to understand how antitumor immunity could be improved. Correcting nutrient deficiencies observed in these populations should be considered as a means to improve the therapeutic index of radiation therapy.

Abstract LBA003: Erdafitinib in patients with tumors harboring FGFR gene mutations or fusions: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol K2

Background: The NCI-MATCH precision medicine trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma whose cancers have progressed on prior treatment to a targeted therapy based on genetic alterations identified in pre-treatment biopsies. Arm K2 (EAY131-K2) evaluated the pan-FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib (E) in pts with FGFR mutations or fusions. Patients and methods: Pts with bladder or urothelial cancers were excluded. Pts received E 8 mg PO daily (28-day cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity; dose reduction for toxicities was allowed; imaging was performed every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 35 pts were enrolled to this arm from 07/2018-07/2019; one was ineligible and one did not receive treatment. Nine distinct tumor histologies were represented, most common being pancreatobiliary (11), CNS (7) and gynecological tumors (5). 73% of pts were female, with median age of 59y (range 26-83y), 70% were Caucasian, and 61% of pts had received at least 3 prior therapies (range 0-22). Alterations in FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3 were recorded in 6, 18, and 9 evaluable pts, respectively. 18 pt tumors had fusions and 15 had mutations in an FGFR gene. The confirmed ORR was 12% (90% CI 4%, 26%), with a median duration of response (DoR) of 7.3 months (mo), range 4.2-11.7 mo. Responses were seen in cholangiocarcinoma (2 pts), Brenner ovarian tumor and adenoid cystic carcinoma (1 pt each). Two (50%) of these 4 tumors harbored FGFR fusions and 2 FGFR mutations. 13 pts had stable disease (SD). Median PFS was 3.9 mo, and 6-mo PFS was 32.8% (90% CI 21.2%, 50.6%). Median OS was 11.0 mo. Of the 6 pts with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 2 had PR and 2 SD. The most frequent grade 3 treatment-related AEs were oral mucositis/pain (5 pts), paronychia, electrolyte disorders, and anemia/lymphopenia (2 pts each). There were no treatment-related grade 4-5 toxicities. Toxicities were reversible and manageable with E dose interruptions and/or dose reduction. Conclusions: In this pre-treated, mixed histology cohort with tumors harboring FGFR somatic alterations, E showed activity with durable responses and disease stabilizations outside of currently approved FDA indications, although the pre-specified criterion that the primary endpoint, ORR, be significantly greater than 16% was not reached. Toxicities were consistent with E safety profile. Responses were observed in tumors harboring FGFR fusions as well as in those with mutations of FGFR; further correlative analyses are planned.

Citation Format: Alain C Mita, Zihan Wei, Ingrid A Mayer, Heather Cheng, Edith P Mitchell, John J Wright, Percy Ivy, Robert J Gray, Victoria Wang, Lisa M McShane, Larry V Rubinstein, David R Patton, Mickey Williams, Stanley R Hamilton, Barbara A Conley, Carlos L Arteaga, Lyndsay N Harris, Peter J O'Dwyer, Alice P Chen, Keith T Flaherty. Erdafitinib in patients with tumors harboring FGFR gene mutations or fusions: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol K2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LBA003.

Establishing a Primary Care Alliance for Conducting Cancer Prevention Clinical Research at Community Sites

In September 2020, the National Cancer Institute convened the first PARTNRS Workshop as an initiative to forge partnerships between oncologists, primary care professionals, and non-oncology specialists for promoting patient accrual into cancer prevention trials. This effort is aimed at bringing about more effective accrual methods to generate decisive outcomes in cancer prevention research. The workshop convened to inspire solutions to challenges encountered during the development and implementation of cancer prevention trials. Ultimately, strategies suggested for protocol development might enhance integration of these trials into community settings where a diversity of patients might be accrued. Research Bases (cancer research organizations that develop protocols) could encourage more involvement of primary care professionals, relevant prevention specialists, and patient representatives with protocol development beginning at the concept level to improve adoptability of the trials within community facilities, and consider various incentives to primary care professionals (i.e., remuneration). Principal investigators serving as liaisons for the NCORP affiliates and sub-affiliates, might produce and maintain "Prevention Research Champions" lists of PCPs and non-oncology specialists relevant in prevention research who can attract health professionals to consider incorporating prevention research into their practices. Finally, patient advocates and community health providers might convince patients of the benefits of trial-participation and encourage "shared-decision making."

Abstract 2624: Clinical trial participation in real-world patients with metastatic breast cancer: disparities and barriers

Background: Reducing barriers to patient participation in clinical trials is vitally important to the cancer care community. Using data from a real-world cohort of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients (pts), we evaluated how race/ethnicity and other socioeconomic, institutional, and clinical barriers play a role in trial participation.

Methods: Adult females with mBC were selected from Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database (2011- 2020). Clinical trial participation was determined by having “clinical study drug” in any line of therapy. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess how various barriers impact trial participation.

Results: In this cohort of 22,220 mBC pts, 1,131 (5.1%) were enrolled in clinical trials and participation rates vary by line of therapy, race/ethnicity, age, insurance, location, and care setting (Table 1). Comparing pts characteristics between enrolled vs. not enrolled, pts ever enrolled were significantly younger (mean age: 59 vs 63), had better performance status (ECOG PS ≥ 2: 3% vs 8%), and less Brain/CNS metastasis (3% vs 6%), more likely to be white (75% vs 61%), lived in the south (55% vs 38%), and had commercial insurance (34% vs 29%), with all p&lt;0.001. Controlling for all SES and clinical characteristics that significantly differ between pts enrolled vs. not enrolled, racial/ethnic minority status remained as a strong predictor for lack of trial participation ([OR(95%CI)]: African-American(AA) [0.5(0.4-0.7)]; Hispanic: [0.6(0.4-0.8)], vs White).

Conclusions: Preliminary results of this study reveal significant demographic and socioeconomic disparities in trial participation among mBC patients. In particular, AA and Hispanic patients were less likely to participate in clinical trials after controlling for other individual- or system-level factors that may impact enrollment. Future efforts to understand the relationship between racial disparity and other well-known barriers are needed.

TABLE 1.Proportion of Patients Enrolled in Clinical Trials (N=22,220)Total, NProportion enrolled in clinical trials, n(%)Line of Therapy1L19,559435 (2.2%)2L12,627336 (2.7%)3L+7,959360 (4.5%)*Age at Diagnosis&lt;6511,356732 (6.4%)*65 - 755,801273 (4.7%)75+5,063126 (2.5%)Race/EthnicityAfrican-American2,39597 (4.1%)Hispanic or Latino1,70251 (3.0%)Asian49420 (4.1%)White13,707851 (6.2%)*Other/Unknown3,922112 (2.9%)Geographic RegionMidwest3,062106 (3.5%)Northeast3,89476 (2.0%)South8,645618 (7.2%)*West3,998174 (4.4%)Insurance at DiagnosisCommercial6,398388 (6.1%)*Medicaid49013 (2.7%)Medicare4,232158 (3.7%)Other or Missing11,100572 (5.2%)Care SettingAcademic1,558137 (8.8%)*Community20,662994 (4.8%)Note: * denotes subgroup of patients with the highest rate of clinical trial participation

Citation Format: Ruoding Tan, Rongrong Wang, Ibrahim Abbass, Lourenia Cassoli, Edith P. Mitchell. Clinical trial participation in real-world patients with metastatic breast cancer: disparities and barriers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2624.

Differential Outcomes in Codon 12/13 and Codon 61 NRAS-Mutated Cancers in the Phase II NCI-MATCH Trial of Binimetinib in Patients with NRAS-Mutated Tumors

PURPOSE

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that downstream inhibition with an MEK inhibitor, such as binimetinib, might be efficacious for NRAS-mutated cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients enrolled in the NCI-MATCH trial master protocol underwent tumor biopsy and molecular profiling by targeted next-generation sequencing. Patients with NRAS-mutated tumors, except melanoma, were enrolled in subprotocol Z1A, a single-arm study evaluating binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A post hoc analysis examined the association of NRAS mutation type with outcome.

RESULTS

In total, 47 eligible patients with a refractory solid tumor harboring a codon 12, 13, or 61 NRAS mutation were treated. Observed toxicity was moderate, and 30% of patients discontinued treatment because of binimetinib-associated toxicity. The ORR was 2.1% (1/47 patients). A patient with malignant ameloblastoma harboring a codon 61 NRAS mutation achieved a durable partial response (PR). A patient with NRAS codon 61-mutated colorectal cancer had an unconfirmed PR, and two other patients with NRAS codon 61-mutated colorectal had stable disease for at least 12 months. In an exploratory analysis, patients with colorectal cancer bearing a NRAS codon 61 mutation (n = 8) had a significantly longer OS (P = 0.03) and PFS (P = 0.007) than those with codon 12 or 13 mutations (n = 16).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent binimetinib did not show promising efficacy in NRAS-mutated cancers. The observation of increased OS and PFS in patients with codon 61 NRAS-mutated colorectal cancer merits further investigation.

A phase 2 study of defactinib (VS-6063) in patients with NF2 altered tumors: Results from NCI-match (EAY131) subprotocol U

3087

Background: The NCI-MATCH trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on genetic alterations identified in tumor biopsies. Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)-inactivated tumors demonstrate increased sensitivity to FAK inhibition in preclinical models. Arm U evaluated the FAK inhibitor defactinib in pts with NF2 altered tumors. Methods: Patients found to harbor an inactivating NF2 mutation on NGS were assigned to the ARM U substudy MATCH. Defactinib 400 mg was given by mouth twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and 6-month PFS. Results: Of 5,548 cases with sufficient tissue for genomic analysis, 51 pts were found to have NF2 alterations (< 1% of the total analyzed). While NF2 alterations are known to occur more commonly in meningiomas and mesotheliomas, alterations were also detected in an array of other tumor types, including renal cell carcinomas and ovarian cancers. Thirty-five pts were ultimately enrolled; 33 patients were started on therapy, with 2 of those determined to be ineligible for outcome analysis. All pts had received at least one prior therapy, with 52% (16/31) having received 3 or more prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up was 35.9 months. ORR [90% CI] was 3% (1/31, [0.16, 14.86]), with the one partial response in a pt with choroid meningioma. Of the twelve pts whose best response was stable disease (39%, 12/31), 8 demonstrated some degree of tumor shrinkage (Table) with a disease control rate of 42% (13/31). Median PFS was 1.9 months for the 31 eligible pts who received study treatment, with median PFS of 9.3 months for the 9 patients who had a best response of stable disease or better. Six pts achieved a PFS of greater than 5.5 months. Among all treated pts (n=33), the most common treatment-related toxicities were fatigue (36%), nausea (33%), and hyperbilirubinemia (27%). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities; 27% of pts had grade 3 toxicities. No correlation could be made between clinical outcomes and tumor histology or specific NF2 genotype. Conclusions: Defactinib monotherapy had limited clinical activity in this cohort of previously treated patients with solid tumors exhibiting NF2 loss. Clinical trial information: NCT04439331. [Table: see text]

Associations between age and stage at presentation among black and white colorectal cancer patients

e15542

Background: Blacks have a 25% higher incidence of colorectal cancer compared to their white societal counterparts. Additionally, the overall mortality rate among black colorectal cancer patients is 50% higher than that of whites. It is suggested that the etiology of this disparity may be inadequate screening for colorectal cancer among racial communities. However, little is known about the correlations between age and stage at presentation among black and white colorectal cancer patients at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH). Objective: The objective of this study is to explore diagnostic trends that may unveil differences in age and stage at presentation between black and white colorectal cancer patients. Methods: De-identified patient data was obtained from The Oncology Data Services Department (Cancer Registry) of TJUH. The population cohort (n= 529) included newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients treated at TJUH from 2015-2019 and included information regarding race, sex, age at presentation, stage at presentation, histological code, tumor markers: KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, MS1, treatment received, surgical findings: tumor size, lymph node involvement, presence of distant metastases at first surgery, response to chemotherapy & disease-free survival. The cohort was divided by age (<50, 50-65, >65). Patient age was compared against AJCC stage at presentation. Results: Findings reveal 12.38% of blacks & 14.29% of whites presented before age 50. 36.19% of blacks and 30.19% of whites presented between ages 50-65. 51.43% of blacks & 55.42% of whites presented after age 65. Additionally, the average age at presentation among blacks was 62.71 years vs. 65.71 years among whites. Lastly, the average stage at presentation among blacks was between 2C and 3A while the average stage at diagnosis among whites was between least 2B and 2C. Conclusions: Within this population, similarities exist among age at presentation between black and white patients, however, differences in stage at presentation exist between blacks and whites. Further research is needed explore how these findings inform the poor clinical outcomes seen among black colorectal cancer patients. Future analysis of this cohort will explore trends regarding time to treatment and treatment received after diagnosis, as similar studies have found differences among racial populations.

Prospective validation of genetic predictors of aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS) in a racially diverse cohort: Results from ECOG-ACRIN E1Z11

12003

Background: AIMSS are common and frequently lead to early discontinuation of adjuvant AI therapy. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes have been associated with AIMSS and AI discontinuation. The primary objective of E1Z11 was to validate previously identified associations between 10 specific SNPs in candidate genes and AI discontinuation due to AIMSS in a community-based, racially diverse cohort. Methods: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive stage I-III breast cancer enrolled onto a prospective multi-site cohort study, the majority through the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). Participants received anastrozole 1 mg oral daily, and completed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. AIMSS was defined as >20% increase in Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score over baseline occurring within 1 year of AI therapy. We projected 40% would develop AIMSS and 25% would discontinue AI treatment within 1 year, informing a planned enrollment of 1000 women with a fixed number per strata (600 Caucasian, 200 African-American [AA] & 200 Asian) to provide 80% power to detect an effect size of 1.5-4. SNPs include ESR1 (rs2234693, rs2347868, rs9340835), CYP19A1 (rs1062033, rs4646), TCL1A (rs11849538, rs2369049, rs7158782, rs7159713), and HTR2A (rs2296972). Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was evaluated within each racial subset. SNP genotypes were coded as additive effects on the log odds ratio by coding as 0, 1 or 2 for the count of the minor allele. A Cochran-Armitage trend test was used with a 1-sided alpha of 0.0025 (Bonferroni correction for 10 tests). Results: We enrolled 999 evaluable women (616 Caucasian, 184 AA, 199 Asian). Genotyping was successful in 974 (98%). AIMSS developed in 43%, and AI therapy was discontinued in 12% within 1 year. While more AA and Asians developed AIMSS compared to Caucasians (48% vs 38%, p=0.017; 50% vs 38%, p=0.004), AI discontinuation rates were similar across racial groups. HWE was satisfied for all SNPs at the 5% alpha level, except for TCL1A/rs11849538 (p=0.002) in the AA cohort. None of the 10 SNPs were significantly associated with AI discontinuation or development of AIMSS in the overall population, or in any of the 3 cohorts. Conclusions: Although AIMSS were more common in AA and Asians, AI discontinuation rates were similar in the 3 cohorts. We were unable to prospectively validate 10 SNPs in 4 genes previously associated with AI discontinuation due to AIMSS. Future analyses will include other predictors of AIMSS, PROs, and additional genetic markers for the entire cohort and by race. Support: NCI UG1CA189828, UG1CA233196, UG1CA233277, UG1CA233320, UG1CA233178, UG1CA233160, UG1CA232760, UG1CA233341, UG1CA233329, U10CA180821, UG1CA189821, UG1CA189830, U10CA180888, UG1CA189859, UG1CA189863, UG1CA189971. Clinical trial information: NCT01824836.

The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design

Background

The proportion of tumors of various histologies that may respond to drugs targeted to molecular alterations is unknown. NCI-MATCH, a collaboration between ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and the National Cancer Institute, was initiated to find efficacy signals by matching patients with refractory malignancies to treatment targeted to potential tumor molecular drivers regardless of cancer histology.

Methods

Trial development required assumptions about molecular target prevalence, accrual rates, treatment eligibility, and enrollment rates as well as consideration of logistical requirements. Central tumor profiling was performed with an investigational next-generation DNA–targeted sequencing assay of alterations in 143 genes, and protein expression of protein expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog, mutL homolog 1, mutS homolog 2, and RB transcriptional corepressor 1. Treatments were allocated with a validated computational platform (MATCHBOX). A preplanned interim analysis evaluated assumptions and feasibility in this novel trial.

Results

At interim analysis, accrual was robust, tumor biopsies were safe (<1% severe events), and profiling success was 87.3%. Actionable molecular alteration frequency met expectations, but assignment and enrollment lagged due to histology exclusions and mismatch of resources to demand. To address this lag, we revised estimates of mutation frequencies, increased screening sample size, added treatments, and improved assay throughput and efficiency (93.9% completion and 14-day turnaround).

Conclusions

The experiences in the design and implementation of the NCI-MATCH trial suggest that profiling from fresh tumor biopsies and assigning treatment can be performed efficiently in a large national network trial. The success of such trials necessitates a broad screening approach and many treatment options easily accessible to patients.

Colorectal Cancer: In the Pursuit of Health Equity

Colorectal cancer mortality has decreased considerably following the adoption of national screening programs, yet, within at-risk subgroups, there continue to be measurable differences in clinical outcomes from variations in screening, receipt of chemotherapy, radiation or surgery, access to clinical trials, research participation, and survivorship. These disparities are well-described and some have worsened over time. Disparities identified have included race and ethnicity, age (specifically young adults), socioeconomic status, insurance access, geography, and environmental exposures. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, colorectal cancer care has necessarily shifted dramatically, with broad, immediate uptake of telemedicine, transition to oral medications when feasible, and considerations for sequence of treatment. However, it has additionally marginalized patients with colorectal cancer with historically disparate cancer-specific outcomes; among them, uninsured, low-income, immigrant, and ethnic-minority patients-all of whom are more likely to become infected, be hospitalized, and die of either COVID-19 or colorectal cancer. Herein, we outline measurable disparities, review implemented solutions, and define strategies toward ensuring that all have a fair and just opportunity to be as healthy as possible.

Racial Disparities in Rates of Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: a Study from the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Treatment guidelines for stage I-III esophageal cancer indicate that management should include surgery in appropriate patients. Variations in utilization of surgery may contribute to racial differences observed in survival. We sought to identify factors associated with racial disparities in surgical resection of esophageal cancer and evaluate associated survival differences.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage I-III esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2015 were identified using the National Cancer Database. Matched patient cohorts were created to reduce confounding. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of surgery. Multi-level modeling was performed to control for random effects of individual hospitals on surgical utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 60,041 patients were included (4402 black; 55,639 white). After 1:1 matching, there were 5858 patients evenly distributed across race. For all stages, significantly fewer black than white patients received surgery. Black race independently conferred lower likelihood of receiving surgery in single-level multivariable analysis (OR (95% CI); stage I, 0.67 (0.48-0.94); stage II, 0.76 (0.60-0.96); stage III, 0.62 (0.50-0.76)) and after controlling for hospital random effects. Hospital-level random effects accounted for one third of the unexplained variance in receipt of surgery. Risk-adjusted 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality was higher for patients who did not undergo surgery.

CONCLUSION

Black patients with esophageal cancer are at higher risk of mortality compared to white patients. This increased risk may be influenced by decreased likelihood of receiving surgical intervention for resectable disease, in part because of between-hospital differences. Improving access to surgical care may improve disparities in esophageal cancer survival.

Abstract PS7-53: Assessing racial differences in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Real-world evidence from US community oncology practices

Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an aggressive tumor phenotype with a poor prognosis and few treatment options. The prevalence of mTNBC is disproportionately higher among African American (AA) women, compared with white women. Data identifying the drivers of racial differences in mTNBC or characterizations of treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in AA patients with mTNBC are limited. Methods: This retrospective study used the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database (January 2011-March 2020). Adult AA and white female patients with confirmed mTNBC treated in US community oncology practices were included. Differences in mTNBC prevalence among AA and white patients were assessed by age, health insurance coverage, geographic region and stage at initial diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and time to treatment initiation between AA and white patients. Racial differences in overall survival (OS) were examined using Kaplan-Meir analysis and a multivariate Cox regression model. Results: Of the 21,804 Flatiron patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), 2116 eligible patients with mTNBC were identified; 383 (18%) were AA and 1155 (55%) were white. TNBC prevalence was twice as high among AA patients (23%) than white patients (12%). Racial differences in TNBC prevalence (AA vs white patients) were particularly higher among patients aged 45 to 65 y (26% vs 13%), patients in the Northeast (27% vs 11%) and those with initial diagnosis at Stage II (30% vs 13%) or Stage III (27% vs 15%). AA patients with TNBC were younger (mean age: 60 vs 63 y; P &lt; 0.001) and more likely to have Medicaid at the time of diagnosis (10% vs 3%; P &lt; 0.001) than white patients. Clinical characteristics were generally similar between AA and white patients, including the distribution of staging at initial diagnosis, disease recurrence, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and sites and number of metastases. Regardless of race, 25% of all patients with mTNBC had no documentation of receiving anti-cancer treatment in the database. Untreated patients in both race groups were older, had poorer ECOG PS and were less likely to have visceral metastases than treated patients (all P &lt; 0.001); they also had poorer survival than treated patients (median OS: 4.7 vs 13.1 months from diagnosis for all treated patients; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.51 [95% CI: 0.46, 0.57]). Among both AA and white treated patients, single-agent chemotherapy was the most prevalent first-line treatment (most common agent: capecitabine). More than half of treated patients initiated treatment in &lt; 30 days, and median time-to-treatment initiation did not differ by race. Although OS was numerically lower in AA patients (median OS, 10.3 vs 11.9 months in white patients), the difference was not significant when adjusted for prognostic and treatment factors (adjusted HR, 1.09 [95% CI: 0.95, 1.25]). Conclusions: The prevalence of mTNBC was twice as high among AA compared with white patients in US community oncology practices. Unlike prior research, race did not show an association with OS in this population. Regardless of race, 1 in every 4 patients with mTNBC had not received documented anti-cancer treatment, potentially due to poor PS and concerns about treatment tolerance. OS was poor for both AA and white patients with mTNBC, particularly for untreated patients. Effective treatment remains a substantial unmet need for all patients with mTNBC. In light of the lack of racial differences in this patient cohort, prospective studies are needed to further elucidate underlying biological differences that may have predictive or prognostic significance for AA patients with TNBC.

Citation Format: Amie Tan, Vincent Shen, Luciana Preger, Bann-mo Day, Edith P. Mitchell. Assessing racial differences in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Real-world evidence from US community oncology practices [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-53.

Status of the Clinician Investigator in America: An Essential Healthcare Provider Driving Advances in Cancer Care

BACKGROUND

Translation of basic discoveries to clinical care for patients with cancer is a difficult process greatly enabled by physician-trained researchers. Three categories of physicians, with responsibilities spanning from laboratory and preclinical research to direct patient care, are involved in the translational research continuum: physician-scientist (PS), clinician investigator (CI), and academic clinician (AC).

METHODS

To define how protected time for research efforts is supported, the Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI) conducted a survey of their member institutions, obtaining 56 responses documenting time spent in research and clinical activities across multiple cancer disciplines, and providing information about funding streams for the different categories of cancer physicians.

RESULTS

Responses showed that PSs and ACs are minimally involved in clinical research activities; the driver or clinical research in academic cancer centers is the CI. A significant concern was a lack of stable funding streams for nonbillable clinical research activities, putting the sustainability of the CI in jeopardy. Limited funding was derived from hospital sources, with most support derived from cancer center sources.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of the CI in translational cancer medicine and represents a call to action for institutions and research funding agencies to develop new programs targeted toward CI support to ensure continued progress against cancer.

Effect of Capivasertib in Patients With an AKT1 E17K-Mutated Tumor: NCI-MATCH Subprotocol EAY131-Y Nonrandomized Trial

Importance

In the National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial, agents targeting genetic tumor abnormalities are administered to patients. In the NCI-MATCH subprotocol EAY131-Y trial, patients with an AKT1 E17K-mutated metastatic tumor received the pan-AKT inhibitor capivasertib.

Objective

To assess the objective response rate (ORR) of capivasertib in patients with an AKT1 E17K-mutated tumor.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Between July 13, 2016, and August 10, 2017, patients in the NCI-MATCH trial were enrolled and assigned to the subprotocol EAY131-Y nonrandomized trial. Patients included adults with an AKT1 E17K-mutated metastatic tumor that had progressed with standard treatment, and these patients were assigned to receive capivasertib. Tumor assessments were repeated every 2 cycles. Data analysis of this evaluable population was performed from November 8, 2019, to March 12, 2020.

Interventions

The study treatment was capivasertib, 480 mg, orally twice daily for 4 days on and 3 days off weekly in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effect. If patients continued hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer, the capivasertib dose was 400 mg.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the ORR (ie, complete response [CR] and partial response) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, version 1.1. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, overall survival, and safety.

Results

In total, 35 evaluable and analyzable patients were included, of whom 30 were women (86%), and the median (range) age was 61 (32-73) years. The most prevalent cancers were breast (18 [51%]), including 15 patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ERBB2-negative and 3 with triple-negative disease, and gynecologic (11 [31%]) cancers. The ORR rate was 28.6% (95% CI, 15%-46%). One patient with endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma achieved a CR and remained on therapy at 35.6 months. Patients with confirmed partial response had the following tumor types: 7 had HR-positive/ERBB2-negative breast cancer, 1 had uterine leiomyosarcoma, and 1 had oncocytic parotid gland carcinoma and continued receiving treatment at 28.8 months. Sixteen patients (46%) had stable disease as the best response, 2 (6%) had progressive disease, and 7 (20%) were not evaluable. With a median follow-up of 28.4 months, the overall 6-month PFS rate was 50% (95% CI, 35%-71%). Capivasertib was discontinued because of adverse events in 11 of 35 patients (31%). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events included hyperglycemia (8 [23%]) and rash (4 [11%]). One grade 4 hyperglycemic adverse event was reported.

Conclusions and Relevance

This nonrandomized trial found that, in patients with an AKT1 E17K-mutated tumor treated with capivasertib, a clinically significant ORR was achieved, including 1 CR. Clinically meaningful activity with single-agent capivasertib was demonstrated in refractory malignant neoplasms, including rare cancers.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00700882.

Abstract PO-068: Survey of healthcare providers in the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group: Attitudes, knowledge, and practice behaviors about LGBTQ patients with cancer

INTRODUCTION: The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) community is a medically underserved population that suffers from cancer disparities. To identify potential gaps in attitudes, knowledge, and institutional practices toward LGBTQ patients, we conducted a mixed-methods survey of healthcare providers in the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group. METHODS: A validated, web-based survey was administered to members of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group in late 2019. The survey was completed by 490 healthcare providers measuring attitudes and knowledge about LGBTQ health and institutional practices regarding collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data. Results were quantified using descriptive and stratified analyses. RESULTS: Among the 490 healthcare providers that completed the survey, 77% were White, 86% were non- Hispanic, 75% were female, 81% were heterosexual, and the mean age was 46 years. Approximately 47% of the respondents were medical oncologists, 39% practiced in academic medical centers (AMCs), and 49% were from the Midwest/Northeast. As reported by prior institutional and national survey studies, there was high interest (77%) in receiving education regarding the unique health needs of LGBTQ patients, an overall limited knowledge about LGBTQ health and cancer needs, and a significant decrease from survey assessment to postsurvey assessment for confidence in knowledge for LGBT health needs. There was high agreement (71%) regarding the importance of knowing gender identity, which was contrasted with a low agreement (48%) regarding the importance of knowing sexual orientation. Stratified analyses revealed significant differences of some attitude and knowledge items. For example, when stratified by licensure/terminal degree, MD/DO vs. RN/NP/PA were significantly more willing to be listed as a LGBTQ-friendly provider (81% vs. 50%) and reported to be knowledgeable about LGB health needs (69% vs. 53%). Providers at AMCs were significantly more willing to be listed as a LGBTQ-friendly provider (71% vs.53%) believe there should be mandatory education (72% vs. 60%) regarding care of LGBQ patients versus those at non-AMCs. Having family and/or friends who are LGBTQ (vs. none) and political affiliation (conservative vs. liberal) were strong effect modifiers resulting in significant differences for 9 and 8 items, respectively.

CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this was the first study of cancer care providers in a large cancer clinical trials research group that assessed attitudes, knowledge, and institutional practices of LGBTQ patients with cancer. Consistent with prior studies, there was limited knowledge about LGBTQ health and cancer needs, but high interest in receiving education regarding this community. New and intriguing differences for many attitude and knowledge items were revealed when we stratified the responses by licensure/terminal degree, practice setting, LGBTQ friends and/or family members, and political affiliation.

Citation Format: Matthew B. Schabath, Jaileene Perez-Morales, Megan Sutter, Lynne Wagner, Melissa Simon, Ruth C. Carlos, Bruce J. Giantonio, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Edith P. Mitchell. Survey of healthcare providers in the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group: Attitudes, knowledge, and practice behaviors about LGBTQ patients with cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-068.

Abstract PO-013: Qualitative results to a survey of ECOG-ACRIN members regarding experience with sexual and gender minority patients with cancer

Background: While societal acceptance for sexual and gender minority (SGM/LGBTQ) individuals is increasing, this population continues to face health care barriers. In addition to encountering stigmatization, SGM/LGBTQ patients are an understudied population, particularly within oncology. Little is known about clinicians’ knowledge and practice behaviors regarding SGM in the oncology setting. To address this lack of knowledge, a mixed method survey was administered to members of the ECOG- ACRIN Cancer Research Group in late 2019. Methods: In this analysis, we report on results of the qualitative portion of the survey. Four open-ended questions asked healthcare providers (i.e., oncology physicians, researchers, physician assistants, and nurses) to describe experiences with SGM patients, reservations in caring for SGM patients, suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care, and any additional comments. Responses were organized in spreadsheet and content analysis was used to group a priori and emergent themes. Results: 490 people responded to the quantitative survey and 365 provided responses to the open-ended questions. In the personal experience question, the majority noted they had no or little familiarity with SGM patients. A minority of respondents noted experience with gay and lesbian patients with cancer, but not transgender patients; many who reported experience with transgender patients noted difficulty navigating the correct use of pronouns. In the reservations question, the majority stated they had no reservations treating SGM patients but lacked training. Suggestions for improvement included providing training in the care of SGM patients with cancer, ensuring training occurred throughout the institution and not only among clinicians, need to attend to unique end-of-life care issues among SGM patients, and need to build trust. A minority of respondents described SGM patients with cancer as difficult to treat and non- compliant. Many respondents endorsed a fear of offending patients due to general lack of knowledge or saying the wrong thing. Additional comments offered related to lack of knowledge about potential interactions between cancer treatment and gender-affirming hormones, and lesbian women’s frustrations with requirements of pregnancy testing. Conclusions: Clinicians have minimal experiences and/or exposure to SGM patients with cancer but desire training. Training the entire workforce may improve trust with, outreach efforts to, and cancer care delivery to the SGM community.

Citation Format: Christina L. Tamargo, Edith P. Mitchell, Lynne I. Wagner, Melissa A. Simon, Ruth C. Carlos, Bruce J. Giantonio, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Matthew B. Schabath. Qualitative results to a survey of ECOG-ACRIN members regarding experience with sexual and gender minority patients with cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-013.

Molecular Landscape and Actionable Alterations in a Genomically Guided Cancer Clinical Trial: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH)

Therapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across cancer types. The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial was designed to evaluate targeted therapy antitumor activity in underexplored cancer types. Tumor biopsy specimens were analyzed centrally with next-generation sequencing (NGS) in a master screening protocol. Patients with a tumor molecular alteration addressed by a targeted treatment lacking established efficacy in that tumor type were assigned to 1 of 30 treatments in parallel, single-arm, phase II subprotocols.

Abstract CT061: Binimetinib in patients with tumors with NRAS mutations: NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group subprotocol EAY131-Z1A

Background: NRAS-mutations are established oncologic drivers in many malignancies with no effective targeted therapy options. Preclinical and clinical data have suggested that downstream inhibition with a MEK inhibitor, such as binimetinib, might be efficacious for NRAS-mutated cancers. Methods: Patients who enrolled in the multicenter NCI-MATCH trial master protocol underwent tumor biopsy and molecular profiling by targeted next generation sequencing with a custom Oncomine AmpliSeq™ panel. Patients with refractory solid tumors harboring codon 12, 13, or 61 NRAS-mutations were enrolled in subprotocol Z1A, a single arm study of binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. Patients with melanoma were excluded. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A post-hoc analysis examined association of NRAS-mutation allele with outcome and histology. Results: 47 eligible patients with refractory solid tumors harboring codon 12, 13, or 61 NRAS-mutations were treated on this trial. The most common cancer types enrolled on this subprotocol were colorectal adenocarcinoma (24/47, 51%), cholangiocarcinoma (7/47, 15%), low-grade papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary (3/47, 6%), and endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma patients (3/47, 6%). Observed toxicity was moderate, similar to previous reports, and 27.7% (13 of 47) of eligible patients discontinued binimetinib because of adverse events. The ORR was 2.1% (1 of 47 patients), and the median PFS was 3.5 months. The sole confirmed partial response (PR) was observed in a codon 61 NRAS-mutated indolent malignant ameloblastoma. One patient with a colorectal cancer harboring a NRAS codon 61 mutation had an unconfirmed PR, and two others with NRAS codon 61 mutated colorectal cancer had stable disease for at least 12 months. In a post-hoc analysis, patients with cancers bearing a codon 61 NRAS-mutation (n=22) had a significantly longer OS (p=0.04) and PFS (p=0.006) than those with tumors harboring codon 12 or 13 NRAS-mutations (n=25). Similarly, colorectal cancer patients with NRAS codon 61 mutations treated with binimetinib (n=8) had a significantly longer OS (p=0.03) and PFS (p=0.007) than those with NRAS codon 12 or 13 mutated (n=16) tumors. Conclusions: Single-agent binimetinib did not demonstrate promising efficacy in NRAS-mutated solid tumors. Further studies are needed to clarify whether the increased OS and PFS observed in codon 61 NRAS-mutated cancers reflects a more favorable prognosis for this subtype.

Citation Format: James M. Cleary, Victoria Wang, Rebecca Heist, Scott Kopetz, Edith P. Mitchell, James Zwiebel, Helen X. Chen, Shuli Li, Robert Gray, Lisa McShane, Larry Rubinstein, David Patton, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Melissa Dillmon, Mickey Williams, Stanley Hamilton, Barbara Conley, Peter O'Dwyer, Lyndsay Harris, Carlos Arteaga, Alice Chen, Keith Flaherty. Binimetinib in patients with tumors with NRAS mutations: NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group subprotocol EAY131-Z1A [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT061.