1
|
Smith KL, Zhao F, Mayer IA, Tevaarwerk AJ, Garcia SF, Arteaga CL, Symmans WF, Park BH, Burnette BL, Makower DF, Block M, Morley KA, Jani CR, Mescher C, Dewani SJ, Brown-Glaberman U, Flaum LE, Mayer EL, Sikov WM, Rodler ET, DeMichele AM, Sparano JA, Wolff AC, Miller KD, Wagner LI. Adjuvant platinum versus capecitabine for residual, invasive, triple-negative breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in ECOG-ACRIN EA1131. Cancer 2024; 130:1747-1757. [PMID: 38236702 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a better tool for evaluating the experiences of patients who have symptomatic, treatment-associated adverse events (AEs) compared with clinician-rated AEs. The authors present PROs assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment-related neurotoxicity for adjuvant capecitabine versus platinum on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) EA1131 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02445391). METHODS Participants completed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale (platinum arm only) at baseline, cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), 6 months, and 15 months. Because of early termination, power was insufficient to test the hypothesis that HRQoL, as assessed by the NFBSI-16 treatment side-effect (TSE) subscale, would be better at 6 and 15 months in the capecitabine arm; all analyses were exploratory. Means were compared by using t-tests or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and proportions were compared by using the χ2 test. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-six of 330 eligible patients provided PROs. The mean NFBSI-16 TSE subscale score was lower for the platinum arm at baseline (p = .02; absolute difference, 0.6 points) and for the capecitabine arm at C3D1 (p = .04; absolute difference, 0.5 points), but it did not differ at other times. The mean change in TSE subscale scores differed between the arms from baseline to C3D1 (platinum arm, 0.15; capecitabine arm, -0.72; p = .03), but not from baseline to later time points. The mean decline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale scores exceeded the minimal meaningful change (1.38 points) from baseline to each subsequent time point (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS Despite the similar frequency of clinician-rated AEs, PROs identified greater on-treatment symptom burden with capecitabine and complemented clinician-rated AEs by characterizing patients' experiences during chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L Smith
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ingrid A Mayer
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Sofia F Garcia
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- University of Texas Southwestern Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - William F Symmans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ben H Park
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian L Burnette
- Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan (CROWN) NCORP, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Margaret Block
- Alegent Health Bergan Mercy Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | | | - Chirag R Jani
- Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Albany, Georgia, USA
| | - Craig Mescher
- Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St Louis Park, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shabana J Dewani
- Columbus Oncology and Hematology Associates Inc., Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ursa Brown-Glaberman
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Lisa E Flaum
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Erica L Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William M Sikov
- Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Eve T Rodler
- University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Angela M DeMichele
- University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathy D Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu Y, Yang Y, Wang Z, Sjostrom M, Jiang Y, Tang Y, Cheng S, Deng S, Wang C, Gonzalez J, Johnson NA, Li X, Li X, Metang LA, Mukherji A, Xu Q, Tirado CR, Wainwright G, Yu X, Barnes S, Hofstad M, Chen Y, Zhu H, Hanker AB, Raj GV, Zhu G, He HH, Wang Z, Arteaga CL, Liang H, Feng FY, Wang Y, Wang T, Mu P. ZNF397 Deficiency Triggers TET2-driven Lineage Plasticity and AR-Targeted Therapy Resistance in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Discov 2024:742967. [PMID: 38591846 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Cancer cells exhibit phenotypical plasticity and epigenetic reprogramming, which allows them to evade lineage-dependent targeted treatments by adopting lineage plasticity. The underlying mechanisms by which cancer cells exploit the epigenetic regulatory machinery to acquire lineage plasticity and therapy resistance remain poorly understood. We identified Zinc Finger Protein 397 (ZNF397) as a bona fide coactivator of the androgen receptor (AR), essential for the transcriptional program governing AR-driven luminal lineage. ZNF397 deficiency facilitates the transition of cancer cell from an AR-driven luminal lineage to a Ten-Eleven Translocation 2 (TET2)-driven lineage plastic state, ultimately promoting resistance to therapies inhibiting AR signaling. Intriguingly, our findings indicate that a TET2 inhibitor can eliminate the resistance to AR targeted therapies in ZNF397-deficient tumors. These insights uncover a novel mechanism through which prostate cancer acquires lineage plasticity via epigenetic rewiring and offer promising implications for clinical interventions designed to overcome therapy resistance dictated by lineage plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaru Xu
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Yuqiu Yang
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Zhaoning Wang
- University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
| | - Martin Sjostrom
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Yuyin Jiang
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Yitao Tang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Siyuan Cheng
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, United States
| | - Su Deng
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Choushi Wang
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Julisa Gonzalez
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Nickolas A Johnson
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Xiang Li
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Xiaoling Li
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Lauren A Metang
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Atreyi Mukherji
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Quanhui Xu
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | | | - Garrett Wainwright
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Xinzhe Yu
- Baylor College of Medicine, United States
| | - Spencer Barnes
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Mia Hofstad
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Yu Chen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Hong Zhu
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
| | - Ariella B Hanker
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Ganesh V Raj
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Guanghui Zhu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario,, Canada
| | | | - Zhao Wang
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Han Liang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Yunguan Wang
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Tao Wang
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Ping Mu
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gong J, Mita AC, Wei Z, Cheng HH, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Ivy SP, Wang V, Gray RC, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Tricoli JV, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Erdafitinib in Patients With Tumors With Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Mutations or Fusions: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol K2. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300407. [PMID: 38603650 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Subprotocol K2 (EAY131-K2) of the NCI-MATCH platform trial was an open-label, single-arm, phase II study designed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the oral FGFR1-4 inhibitor, erdafitinib, in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1-4 mutations or fusions. METHODS Central confirmation of tumor FGFR1-4 mutations or fusions was required for outcome analysis. Patients with urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Enrolled subjects received oral erdafitinib at a starting dose of 8 mg daily continuously until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) with key secondary end points of safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 25 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the protocol. The median age was 61 years, and 52% of subjects had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy. The confirmed ORR was 16% (4 of 25 [90% CI, 5.7 to 33.0], P = .034 against the null rate of 5%). An additional seven patients experienced stable disease as best-confirmed response. Four patients had a prolonged PFS including two with recurrent WHO grade IV, IDH1-/2-wildtype glioblastoma. The median PFS and OS were 3.6 months and 11.0 months, respectively. Erdafitinib was manageable with no new safety signals. CONCLUSION This study met its primary end point in patients with several pretreated solid tumor types harboring FGFR1-3 mutations or fusions. These findings support advancement of erdafitinib for patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor-altered tumors outside of currently approved indications in a potentially tumor-agnostic manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Gong
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Zihan Wei
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Edith P Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John J Wright
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Robert C Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R Patton
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Barbara A Conley
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen MF, Song Z, Yu HA, Sequist LV, Lovly CM, Mitchell EP, Moscow JA, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Umemura Y, Tricoli JV, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Osimertinib in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN (EAY131) Trial Subprotocol E. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300454. [PMID: 38591867 PMCID: PMC10896470 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice trial is a signal-finding genomically driven platform trial that assigns patients with any advanced refractory solid tumor, lymphoma, or myeloma to targeted therapies on the basis of next-generation sequencing results. Subprotocol E evaluated osimertinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with EGFR mutations. METHODS Eligible patients had EGFR mutations (T790M or rare activating) and received osimertinib 80 mg once daily. Patients with lung cancer with EGFR T790M were excluded. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary end points were 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 19 patients were enrolled: 17 were evaluable for toxicity and 13 for efficacy. The median age of the 13 included in the efficacy analysis was 63 years, 62% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1, and 31% received >three previous systemic therapies. The most common tumor type was brain cancers (54%). The ORR was 15.4% (n = 2 of 13; 90% CI, 2.8 to 41.0) and 6-month PFS was 16.7% (90% CI, 0 to 34.4). The two confirmed RECIST responses were observed in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma not otherwise specified (EGFR exon 20 S768T and exon 18 G719C mutation) and a patient with low-grade epithelial carcinoma of the paranasal sinus (EGFR D770_N771insSVD). The most common (>20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, and maculopapular rash. CONCLUSION In this pretreated cohort, osimertinib did not meet the prespecified end point threshold for efficacy, but responses were seen in a neuroendocrine carcinoma with an EGFR exon 20 S768T and exon 18 G719C mutation and an epithelial carcinoma with an EGFR D770_N771insSVD mutation. Osimertinib was well tolerated and had a safety profile consistent with previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zihe Song
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Helena A. Yu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey A. Moscow
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R. Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - Yoshie Umemura
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - James V. Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Barbara A. Conley
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P. Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gong J, Mita AC, Wei Z, Cheng HH, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Ivy SP, Wang V, Gray RC, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Alva AS, Tricoli JV, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Erdafitinib in Patients With Tumors With FGFR Amplifications: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol K1. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300406. [PMID: 38603651 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors being approved in tumor types with select FGFR rearrangements or gene mutations, amplifications of FGFR represent the most common FGFR alteration across malignancies. Subprotocol K1 (EAY131-K1) of the National Cancer Institute-MATCH platform trial was designed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the oral FGFR1-4 inhibitor, erdafitinib, in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1-4 amplification. METHODS EAY131-K1 was an open-label, single-arm, phase II study with central confirmation of presence of FGFR1-4 amplification in tumors. Patients with urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Enrolled patients received oral erdafitinib at a starting dose of 8 mg once daily continuously with escalation to 9 mg once daily continuously, on the basis of predefined time point assessments of phosphate levels, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR), with key secondary end points being 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled into this study with 18 included in the prespecified primary efficacy analysis. The median age of the 18 patients was 60 years, and 78% had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy. There were no confirmed responses to erdafitinib; however, five patients experienced stable disease (SD) as best response. One patient with an FGFR1-amplified breast cancer had a prolonged PFS >168 days (5.5 months). The median PFS was 1.7 months (90% CI, 1.1 to 1.8 months) and the median OS was 4.2 months (90% CI, 2.3 to 9.3 months). The estimated PFS6 rate was 13.8% (90% CI, 3.3 to 31.6). The majority of toxicities were grade 1 to 2 in nature, although there was one grade 5 treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSION Erdafitinib did not meet its primary end point of efficacy as determined by ORR in treatment-refractory solid tumors harboring FGFR1-4 amplifications. Our findings support that rearrangements and gene mutations, but not amplifications, of FGFR remain the established FGFR alterations with approved indications for FGFR inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Gong
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Zihan Wei
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Edith P Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John J Wright
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Robert C Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R Patton
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - Ajjai S Alva
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Barbara A Conley
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Connolly RM, Wang V, Hyman DM, Grivas P, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Sharon E, Gray RJ, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Wang J, Wisinski KB, Tricoli JV, Conley BA, Harris LN, Arteaga CL, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in Patients with Non-Breast/Gastroesophageal HER2-Amplified Tumors: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol J. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1273-1280. [PMID: 38433347 PMCID: PMC10984755 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE NCI-MATCH assigned patients with advanced cancer and progression on prior treatment, based on genomic alterations in pretreatment tumor tissue. Arm J (EAY131-J) evaluated the combination of trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP) across HER2-amplified tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had high levels of HER2 amplification [copy number (CN) ≥7] detected by central next-generation sequencing (NGS) or through NCI-designated laboratories. Patients with breast/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and those who received prior HER2-directed therapy were excluded. Enrollment of patients with colorectal cancer was capped at 4 based on emerging data. Patients received HP IV Q3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, with 25 included in the primary efficacy analysis (CN ≥7 confirmed by a central lab, median CN = 28). Median age was 66 (range, 31-80), and half of all patients had ≥3 prior therapies (range, 1-11). The confirmed ORR was 12% [3/25 partial responses (colorectal, cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial cancers), 90% confidence interval (CI) 3.4%-28.2%]. There was one additional partial response (urothelial cancer) in a patient with an unconfirmed ERBB2 copy number. Median PFS was 3.3 months (90% CI 2.0-4.1), and median OS 9.4 months (90% CI 5.0-18.9). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with prior studies. There was no association between HER2 CN and response. CONCLUSIONS HP was active in a selection of HER2-amplified tumors (non-breast/gastroesophageal) but did not meet the predefined efficacy benchmark. Additional strategies targeting HER2 and potential resistance pathways are warranted, especially in rare tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roisin M Connolly
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David M Hyman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Edith P Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John J Wright
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Elad Sharon
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robert J Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - David R Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - P Mickey Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland
| | | | - Jue Wang
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kari B Wisinski
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Barbara A Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T Flaherty
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin CC, Chang TC, Wang Y, Guo L, Gao Y, Bikorimana E, Lemoff A, Fang YV, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Ye D, Soria-Bretones I, Servetto A, Lee KM, Luo X, Otto JJ, Akamatsu H, Napolitano F, Mani R, Cescon DW, Xu L, Xie Y, Mendell JT, Hanker AB, Arteaga CL. PRMT5 is an actionable therapeutic target in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+/RB-deficient breast cancer. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2287. [PMID: 38480701 PMCID: PMC10937713 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46495-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved survival of patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. However, patients treated with CDK4/6i eventually develop drug resistance and progress. RB1 loss-of-function alterations confer resistance to CDK4/6i, but the optimal therapy for these patients is unclear. Through a genome-wide CRISPR screen, we identify protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a molecular vulnerability in ER+/RB1-knockout breast cancer cells. Inhibition of PRMT5 blocks the G1-to-S transition in the cell cycle independent of RB, leading to growth arrest in RB1-knockout cells. Proteomics analysis uncovers fused in sarcoma (FUS) as a downstream effector of PRMT5. Inhibition of PRMT5 results in dissociation of FUS from RNA polymerase II, leading to hyperphosphorylation of serine 2 in RNA polymerase II, intron retention, and subsequent downregulation of proteins involved in DNA synthesis. Furthermore, treatment with the PRMT5 inhibitor pemrametostat and a selective ER degrader fulvestrant synergistically inhibits growth of ER+/RB-deficient cell-derived and patient-derived xenografts. These findings highlight dual ER and PRMT5 blockade as a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome resistance to CDK4/6i in ER+/RB-deficient breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Ching Lin
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Tsung-Cheng Chang
- Department of Molecular Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yunguan Wang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Lei Guo
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yunpeng Gao
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Emmanuel Bikorimana
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrew Lemoff
- Department of Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yisheng V Fang
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - He Zhang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yanfeng Zhang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Dan Ye
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Alberto Servetto
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Kyung-Min Lee
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Life Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Xuemei Luo
- Department of Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Joseph J Otto
- Department of Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Hiroaki Akamatsu
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Fabiana Napolitano
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ram Mani
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David W Cescon
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lin Xu
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yang Xie
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Joshua T Mendell
- Department of Molecular Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ariella B Hanker
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Marquez-Palencia M, Reza Herrera L, Parida PK, Ghosh S, Kim K, Das NM, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Sanders ME, Mobley BC, Diegeler S, Aguilera TA, Peng Y, Lewis CM, Arteaga CL, Hanker AB, Whitehurst AW, Lorens JB, Brekken RA, Davis AJ, Malladi S. AXL/WRNIP1 Mediates Replication Stress Response and Promotes Therapy Resistance and Metachronous Metastasis in HER2+ Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2024; 84:675-687. [PMID: 38190717 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-1459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Therapy resistance and metastatic progression are primary causes of cancer-related mortality. Disseminated tumor cells possess adaptive traits that enable them to reprogram their metabolism, maintain stemness, and resist cell death, facilitating their persistence to drive recurrence. The survival of disseminated tumor cells also depends on their ability to modulate replication stress in response to therapy while colonizing inhospitable microenvironments. In this study, we discovered that the nuclear translocation of AXL, a TAM receptor tyrosine kinase, and its interaction with WRNIP1, a DNA replication stress response factor, promotes the survival of HER2+ breast cancer cells that are resistant to HER2-targeted therapy and metastasize to the brain. In preclinical models, knocking down or pharmacologically inhibiting AXL or WRNIP1 attenuated protection of stalled replication forks. Furthermore, deficiency or inhibition of AXL and WRNIP1 also prolonged metastatic latency and delayed relapse. Together, these findings suggest that targeting the replication stress response, which is a shared adaptive mechanism in therapy-resistant and metastasis-initiating cells, could reduce metachronous metastasis and enhance the response to standard-of-care therapies. SIGNIFICANCE Nuclear AXL and WRNIP1 interact and mediate replication stress response, promote therapy resistance, and support metastatic progression, indicating that targeting the AXL/WRNIP1 axis is a potentially viable therapeutic strategy for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio Marquez-Palencia
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Luis Reza Herrera
- Department of Pharmacology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Pravat Kumar Parida
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Suvranil Ghosh
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kangsan Kim
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nikitha M Das
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Melinda E Sanders
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Bret C Mobley
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Sebastian Diegeler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Todd A Aguilera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yan Peng
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Cheryl M Lewis
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ariella B Hanker
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - James B Lorens
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rolf A Brekken
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Pharmacology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery and Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Anthony J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Srinivas Malladi
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li Z, Metzger Filho O, Viale G, dell'Orto P, Russo L, Goyette MA, Kamat A, Yardley DA, Gupta Abramson V, Arteaga CL, Spring LM, Chiotti K, Halsey C, Waks AG, King TA, Lester SC, Bellon JR, Winer EP, Spellman PT, Krop IE, Polyak K. HER2 heterogeneity and treatment response-associated profiles in HER2-positive breast cancer in the NCT02326974 clinical trial. J Clin Invest 2024; 134:e176454. [PMID: 38300710 PMCID: PMC10977978 DOI: 10.1172/jci176454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDHER2-targeting therapies have great efficacy in HER2-positive breast cancer, but resistance, in part due to HER2 heterogeneity (HET), is a significant clinical challenge. We previously described that in a phase II neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and pertuzumab (P) clinical trial in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, none of the patients with HER2-HET tumors had pathologic complete response (pCR).METHODSTo investigate cellular and molecular differences among tumors according to HER2 heterogeneity and pCR, we performed RNA sequencing and ERBB2 FISH of 285 pretreatment and posttreatment tumors from 129 patients in this T-DM1+P neoadjuvant trial. A subset of cases was also subject to NanoString spatial digital profiling.RESULTSPretreatment tumors from patients with pCR had the highest level of ERBB2 mRNA and ERBB signaling. HER2 heterogeneity was associated with no pCR, basal-like features, and low ERBB2 expression yet high ERBB signaling sustained by activation of downstream pathway components. Residual tumors showed decreased HER2 protein levels and ERBB2 copy number heterogeneity and increased PI3K pathway enrichment and luminal features. HET tumors showed minimal treatment-induced transcriptomic changes compared with non-HET tumors. Immune infiltration correlated with pCR and HER2-HET status.CONCLUSIONResistance mechanisms in HET and non-HET tumors are distinct. HER2-targeting antibodies have limited efficacy in HET tumors. Our results support the stratification of patients based on HET status and the use of agents that target downstream components of the ERBB signaling pathway in patients with HET tumors.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02326974.FUNDINGThis study was funded by Roche and the National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheqi Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Otto Metzger Filho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia dell'Orto
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Leila Russo
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marie-Anne Goyette
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Avni Kamat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Denise A Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Carlos L Arteaga
- University of Texas Southwestern, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kami Chiotti
- Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Carol Halsey
- Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Adrienne G Waks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan C Lester
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer R Bellon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Paul T Spellman
- Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Ian E Krop
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhu J, Wang Y, Chang WY, Malewska A, Napolitano F, Gahan JC, Unni N, Zhao M, Yuan R, Wu F, Yue L, Guo L, Zhao Z, Chen DZ, Hannan R, Zhang S, Xiao G, Mu P, Hanker AB, Strand D, Arteaga CL, Desai N, Wang X, Xie Y, Wang T. Mapping Cellular Interactions from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Data. bioRxiv 2024:2023.09.18.558298. [PMID: 37781617 PMCID: PMC10541142 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.18.558298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Cell-cell communication (CCC) is essential to how life forms and functions. However, accurate, high-throughput mapping of how expression of all genes in one cell affects expression of all genes in another cell is made possible only recently, through the introduction of spatially resolved transcriptomics technologies (SRTs), especially those that achieve single cell resolution. However, significant challenges remain to analyze such highly complex data properly. Here, we introduce a Bayesian multi-instance learning framework, spacia, to detect CCCs from data generated by SRTs, by uniquely exploiting their spatial modality. We highlight spacia's power to overcome fundamental limitations of popular analytical tools for inference of CCCs, including losing single-cell resolution, limited to ligand-receptor relationships and prior interaction databases, high false positive rates, and most importantly the lack of consideration of the multiple-sender-to-one-receiver paradigm. We evaluated the fitness of spacia for all three commercialized single cell resolution ST technologies: MERSCOPE/Vizgen, CosMx/Nanostring, and Xenium/10X. Spacia unveiled how endothelial cells, fibroblasts and B cells in the tumor microenvironment contribute to Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and lineage plasticity in prostate cancer cells. We deployed spacia in a set of pan-cancer datasets and showed that B cells also participate in PDL1/PD1 signaling in tumors. We demonstrated that a CD8+ T cell/PDL1 effectiveness signature derived from spacia analyses is associated with patient survival and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments in 3,354 patients. We revealed differential spatial interaction patterns between γδ T cells and liver hepatocytes in healthy and cancerous contexts. Overall, spacia represents a notable step in advancing quantitative theories of cellular communications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Zhu
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Yunguan Wang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA
| | - Woo Yong Chang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Alicia Malewska
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Fabiana Napolitano
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Jeffrey C. Gahan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Nisha Unni
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Min Zhao
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Rongqing Yuan
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Fangjiang Wu
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Lauren Yue
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Lei Guo
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Zhuo Zhao
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA
| | - Danny Z. Chen
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Siyuan Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Guanghua Xiao
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
- Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Ping Mu
- Department of Molecular Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
- Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Ariella B. Hanker
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Douglas Strand
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Carlos L. Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Neil Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Xinlei Wang
- Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
- Center for Data Science Research and Education, College of Science, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
| | - Yang Xie
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
- Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Tao Wang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Arteaga CL, Cleveland JL, Foti M, Mesa RA, Weiner LM, Willman CL, Tuveson DA. AACR Cancer Centers Alliance: Fostering Collaboration and Innovation to Advance Lifesaving Scientific Discoveries for Patients. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4338-4340. [PMID: 37732904 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Basic and clinical cancer research discoveries stemming from the nation's cancer centers have markedly improved outcomes for many cancer patients. Despite this forward momentum in our progress against this complex disease, cancer in all its forms remains a major public health challenge that touches the lives of nearly every American, either directly or indirectly. The newly formed AACR Cancer Centers Alliance will accelerate the pace of discovery by providing an ongoing mechanism for transferring new knowledge, sharing resources, developing national demonstration projects, and driving innovation that impacts cancer science, cancer care delivery, and science and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Margaret Foti
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, -Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Louis M Weiner
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Cheryl L Willman
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Arteaga CL, Cleveland JL, Foti M, Mesa RA, Weiner LM, Willman CL, Tuveson DA. AACR Cancer Centers Alliance: Fostering Collaboration and Innovation to Advance Lifesaving Scientific Discoveries for Patients. Cancer Immunol Res 2023; 11:1446-1448. [PMID: 37732896 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-23-0765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Basic and clinical cancer research discoveries stemming from the nation's cancer centers have markedly improved outcomes for many cancer patients. Despite this forward momentum in our progress against this complex disease, cancer in all its forms remains a major public health challenge that touches the lives of nearly every American, either directly or indirectly. The newly formed AACR Cancer Centers Alliance will accelerate the pace of discovery by providing an ongoing mechanism for transferring new knowledge, sharing resources, developing national demonstration projects, and driving innovation that impacts cancer science, cancer care delivery, and science and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Margaret Foti
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Louis M Weiner
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Cheryl L Willman
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Arteaga CL, Cleveland JL, Foti M, Mesa RA, Weiner LM, Willman CL, Tuveson DA. AACR Cancer Centers Alliance: Fostering Collaboration and Innovation to Advance Lifesaving Scientific Discoveries for Patients. Mol Cancer Ther 2023; 22:1245-1247. [PMID: 37732909 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-23-0620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Basic and clinical cancer research discoveries stemming from the nation's cancer centers have markedly improved outcomes for many cancer patients. Despite this forward momentum in our progress against this complex disease, cancer in all its forms remains a major public health challenge that touches the lives of nearly every American, either directly or indirectly. The newly formed AACR Cancer Centers Alliance will accelerate the pace of discovery by providing an ongoing mechanism for transferring new knowledge, sharing resources, developing national demonstration projects, and driving innovation that impacts cancer science, cancer care delivery, and science and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Margaret Foti
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Louis M Weiner
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Cheryl L Willman
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arteaga CL, Cleveland JL, Foti M, Mesa RA, Weiner LM, Willman CL, Tuveson DA. AACR Cancer Centers Alliance: Fostering Collaboration and Innovation to Advance Lifesaving Scientific Discoveries for Patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1482-1484. [PMID: 37732892 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-1118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Basic and clinical cancer research discoveries stemming from the nation's cancer centers have markedly improved outcomes for many cancer patients. Despite this forward momentum in our progress against this complex disease, cancer in all its forms remains a major public health challenge that touches the lives of nearly every American, either directly or indirectly. The newly formed AACR Cancer Centers Alliance will accelerate the pace of discovery by providing an ongoing mechanism for transferring new knowledge, sharing resources, developing national demonstration projects, and driving innovation that impacts cancer science, cancer care delivery, and science and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Margaret Foti
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, -Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Louis M Weiner
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Cheryl L Willman
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Arteaga CL, Cleveland JL, Foti M, Mesa RA, Weiner LM, Willman CL, Tuveson DA. AACR Cancer Centers Alliance: Fostering Collaboration and Innovation to Advance Lifesaving Scientific Discoveries for Patients. Blood Cancer Discov 2023; 4:420-422. [PMID: 37732908 PMCID: PMC10621678 DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-23-0187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Basic and clinical cancer research discoveries stemming from the nation's cancer centers have markedly improved outcomes for many cancer patients. Despite this forward momentum in our progress against this complex disease, cancer in all its forms remains a major public health challenge that touches the lives of nearly every American, either directly or indirectly. The newly formed AACR Cancer Centers Alliance will accelerate the pace of discovery by providing an ongoing mechanism for transferring new knowledge, sharing resources, developing national demonstration projects, and driving innovation that impacts cancer science, cancer care delivery, and science and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Margaret Foti
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruben A. Mesa
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Louis M. Weiner
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Cheryl L. Willman
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David A. Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
André F, Su F, Solovieff N, Hortobagyi G, Chia S, Neven P, Bardia A, Tripathy D, Lu YS, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Slamon D, Arteaga CL. Pooled ctDNA analysis of MONALEESA phase III advanced breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1003-1014. [PMID: 37673211 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phase III MONALEESA trials tested the efficacy and safety of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitor ribociclib with different endocrine therapy partners as first- or second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Using the largest pooled biomarker dataset of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib in ABC to date, we identified potential biomarkers of response to ribociclib. PATIENTS AND METHODS Baseline circulating tumour DNA from patients in the MONALEESA trials was assessed using next-generation sequencing. An analysis of correlation between gene alteration status and progression-free survival (PFS) was carried out to identify potential biomarkers of response to ribociclib. RESULTS Multiple frequently altered genes were identified. Alterations in ERBB2, FAT3, FRS2, MDM2, SFRP1, and ZNF217 were associated with a greater PFS benefit with ribociclib versus placebo. Patients with high tumour mutational burden (TMB) and with ANO1, CDKN2A/2B/2C, and RB1 alterations exhibited decreased sensitivity to ribociclib versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS Although exploratory, these results provide insight into alterations associated with the improved response to ribociclib treatment and may inform treatment sequencing in patients with actionable alterations following progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors. Validation of potential biomarkers identified here and development of prospective trials testing their clinical utility are warranted. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIERS NCT01958021, NCT02422615, NCT02278120.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F André
- Department of Medical Oncology and INSERM U981, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | - F Su
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover
| | - N Solovieff
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge
| | - G Hortobagyi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - S Chia
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - P Neven
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D Tripathy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Y-S Lu
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - A Lteif
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover
| | - T Taran
- Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - N Babbar
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover
| | - D Slamon
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles
| | - C L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Arteaga CL, Cleveland JL, Foti M, Mesa RA, Weiner LM, Willman CL, Tuveson DA. AACR Cancer Centers Alliance: Fostering Collaboration and Innovation to Advance Lifesaving Scientific Discoveries for Patients. Cancer Discov 2023; 13:2316-2318. [PMID: 37702762 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Basic and clinical cancer research discoveries stemming from the nation's cancer centers have markedly improved outcomes for many cancer patients. Despite this forward momentum in our progress against this complex disease, cancer in all its forms remains a major public health challenge that touches the lives of nearly every American, either directly or indirectly. The newly formed AACR Cancer Centers Alliance will accelerate the pace of discovery by providing an ongoing mechanism for transferring new knowledge, sharing resources, developing national demonstration projects, and driving innovation that impacts cancer science, cancer care delivery, and science and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Margaret Foti
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, -Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Louis M Weiner
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Cheryl L Willman
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Arteaga CL, Cleveland JL, Foti M, Mesa RA, Weiner LM, Willman CL, Tuveson DA. AACR Cancer Centers Alliance: Fostering Collaboration and Innovation to Advance Lifesaving Scientific Discoveries for Patients. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2023; 16:591-594. [PMID: 37732897 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Basic and clinical cancer research discoveries stemming from the nation's cancer centers have markedly improved outcomes for many cancer patients. Despite this forward momentum in our progress against this complex disease, cancer in all its forms remains a major public health challenge that touches the lives of nearly every American, either directly or indirectly. The newly formed AACR Cancer Centers Alliance will accelerate the pace of discovery by providing an ongoing mechanism for transferring new knowledge, sharing resources, developing national demonstration projects, and driving innovation that impacts cancer science, cancer care delivery, and science and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Margaret Foti
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, -Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Louis M Weiner
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Cheryl L Willman
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Arteaga CL, Cleveland JL, Foti M, Mesa RA, Weiner LM, Willman CL, Tuveson DA. AACR Cancer Centers Alliance: Fostering Collaboration and Innovation to Advance Lifesaving Scientific Discoveries for Patients. Mol Cancer Res 2023; 21:1139-1141. [PMID: 37732893 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-23-0750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Basic and clinical cancer research discoveries stemming from the nation's cancer centers have markedly improved outcomes for many cancer patients. Despite this forward momentum in our progress against this complex disease, cancer in all its forms remains a major public health challenge that touches the lives of nearly every American, either directly or indirectly. The newly formed AACR Cancer Centers Alliance will accelerate the pace of discovery by providing an ongoing mechanism for transferring new knowledge, sharing resources, developing national demonstration projects, and driving innovation that impacts cancer science, cancer care delivery, and science and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Margaret Foti
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, -Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Louis M Weiner
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Cheryl L Willman
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Arteaga CL, Cleveland JL, Foti M, Mesa RA, Weiner LM, Willman CL, Tuveson DA. AACR Cancer Centers Alliance: Fostering Collaboration and Innovation to Advance Lifesaving Scientific Discoveries for Patients. Cancer Res 2023; 83:3504-3506. [PMID: 37732910 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-2803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Basic and clinical cancer research discoveries stemming from the nation's cancer centers have markedly improved outcomes for many cancer patients. Despite this forward momentum in our progress against this complex disease, cancer in all its forms remains a major public health challenge that touches the lives of nearly every American, either directly or indirectly. The newly formed AACR Cancer Centers Alliance will accelerate the pace of discovery by providing an ongoing mechanism for transferring new knowledge, sharing resources, developing national demonstration projects, and driving innovation that impacts cancer science, cancer care delivery, and science and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Margaret Foti
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, -Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Louis M Weiner
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Cheryl L Willman
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cancer Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jhaveri K, Eli LD, Wildiers H, Hurvitz SA, Guerrero-Zotano A, Unni N, Brufsky A, Park H, Waisman J, Yang ES, Spanggaard I, Reid S, Burkard ME, Vinayak S, Prat A, Arnedos M, Bidard FC, Loi S, Crown J, Bhave M, Piha-Paul SA, Suga JM, Chia S, Saura C, Garcia-Saenz JÁ, Gambardella V, de Miguel MJ, Gal-Yam EN, Rapael A, Stemmer SM, Ma C, Hanker AB, Ye D, Goldman JW, Bose R, Peterson L, Bell JSK, Frazier A, DiPrimeo D, Wong A, Arteaga CL, Solit DB. Neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab for HR-positive, HER2-negative, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer: outcomes and biomarker analysis from the SUMMIT trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:885-898. [PMID: 37597578 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HER2 mutations are targetable alterations in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In the SUMMIT basket study, patients with HER2-mutant MBC received neratinib monotherapy, neratinib + fulvestrant, or neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab (N + F + T). We report results from 71 patients with HR+, HER2-mutant MBC, including 21 (seven in each arm) from a randomized substudy of fulvestrant versus fulvestrant + trastuzumab (F + T) versus N + F + T. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HR+ HER2-negative MBC with activating HER2 mutation(s) and prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy received N + F + T (oral neratinib 240 mg/day with loperamide prophylaxis, intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1, 15, and 29 of cycle 1 then q4w, intravenous trastuzumab 8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg q3w) or F + T or fulvestrant alone. Those whose disease progressed on F + T or fulvestrant could cross-over to N + F + T. Efficacy endpoints included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (RECIST v1.1), duration of response, and progression-free survival (PFS). Plasma and/or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were collected at baseline; plasma was collected during and at end of treatment. Extracted DNA was analyzed by next-generation sequencing. RESULTS ORR for 57 N + F + T-treated patients was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26% to 52%); median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.0-15.1 months). No responses occurred in fulvestrant- or F + T-treated patients; responses in patients crossing over to N + F + T supported the requirement for neratinib in the triplet. Responses were observed in patients with ductal and lobular histology, 1 or ≥1 HER2 mutations, and co-occurring HER3 mutations. Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA sequencing revealed acquisition of additional HER2 alterations, and mutations in genes including PIK3CA, enabling further precision targeting and possible re-response. CONCLUSIONS The benefit of N + F + T for HR+ HER2-mutant MBC after progression on CDK4/6is is clinically meaningful and, based on this study, N + F + T has been included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines. SUMMIT has improved our understanding of the translational implications of targeting HER2 mutations with neratinib-based therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Jhaveri
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
| | - L D Eli
- Clinical Development, Puma Biotechnology, Los Angeles, USA
| | - H Wildiers
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S A Hurvitz
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, USA
| | - A Guerrero-Zotano
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - N Unni
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - A Brufsky
- Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh
| | - H Park
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis
| | - J Waisman
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte
| | - E S Yang
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - I Spanggaard
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S Reid
- Division of Hematology/Oncology (Breast Oncology), The Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville
| | - M E Burkard
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
| | - S Vinayak
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, USA
| | - A Prat
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Arnedos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - F-C Bidard
- Department of Medical Oncology, UVSQ/Paris-Saclay University, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - S Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - J Crown
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Bhave
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta
| | - S A Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - J M Suga
- Kaiser Permanente, Department of Medical Oncology, Vallejo, USA
| | - S Chia
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - C Saura
- Medical Oncology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona
| | - J Á Garcia-Saenz
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), CIBERONC, Madrid
| | - V Gambardella
- Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Valencia
| | - M J de Miguel
- START Madrid - Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - E N Gal-Yam
- Institute of Breast Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan
| | - A Rapael
- Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv
| | - S M Stemmer
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - C Ma
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis
| | - A B Hanker
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas
| | - D Ye
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas
| | | | - R Bose
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis
| | - L Peterson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis
| | | | - A Frazier
- Clinical Development, Puma Biotechnology, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D DiPrimeo
- Clinical Development, Puma Biotechnology, Los Angeles, USA
| | - A Wong
- Clinical Development, Puma Biotechnology, Los Angeles, USA
| | - C L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas
| | - D B Solit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Marín A, Al Mamun A, Patel H, Akamatsu H, Ye D, Sudhan DR, Eli L, Marcelain K, Brown BP, Meiler J, Arteaga CL, Hanker AB. Acquired Secondary HER2 Mutations Enhance HER2/MAPK Signaling and Promote Resistance to HER2 Kinase Inhibition in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2023; 83:3145-3158. [PMID: 37404061 PMCID: PMC10530374 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-3617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
HER2 mutations drive the growth of a subset of breast cancers and are targeted with HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) such as neratinib. However, acquired resistance is common and limits the durability of clinical responses. Most HER2-mutant breast cancers progressing on neratinib-based therapy acquire secondary mutations in HER2. It is unknown whether these secondary HER2 mutations, other than the HER2T798I gatekeeper mutation, are causal to neratinib resistance. Herein, we show that secondary acquired HER2T862A and HER2L755S mutations promote resistance to HER2 TKIs via enhanced HER2 activation and impaired neratinib binding. While cells expressing each acquired HER2 mutation alone were sensitive to neratinib, expression of acquired double mutations enhanced HER2 signaling and reduced neratinib sensitivity. Computational structural modeling suggested that secondary HER2 mutations stabilize the HER2 active state and reduce neratinib binding affinity. Cells expressing double HER2 mutations exhibited resistance to most HER2 TKIs but retained sensitivity to mobocertinib and poziotinib. Double-mutant cells showed enhanced MEK/ERK signaling, which was blocked by combined inhibition of HER2 and MEK. Together, these findings reveal the driver function of secondary HER2 mutations in resistance to HER2 inhibition and provide a potential treatment strategy to overcome acquired resistance to HER2 TKIs in HER2-mutant breast cancer. SIGNIFICANCE HER2-mutant breast cancers acquire secondary HER2 mutations that drive resistance to HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which can be overcome by combined inhibition of HER2 and MEK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaldo Marín
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Doctoral Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8380453, Chile
- Department of Basic and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 838045, Chile
- These authors contributed equally: Arnaldo Marin, Abdullah Al Mamun
| | - Abdullah Al Mamun
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA
- These authors contributed equally: Arnaldo Marin, Abdullah Al Mamun
| | - Hima Patel
- Department of Basic and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 838045, Chile
| | - Hiroaki Akamatsu
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Current Address: Internal Medicine III, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Dan Ye
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Dhivya R. Sudhan
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Lisa Eli
- Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Katherine Marcelain
- Department of Basic and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 838045, Chile
| | - Benjamin P. Brown
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA
| | - Jens Meiler
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA
- Institute for Drug Discovery, Leipzig University Medical School, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
| | - Carlos L. Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Ariella B. Hanker
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lin CC, Chang TC, Wang Y, Guo L, Gao Y, Bikorimana E, Lemoff A, Fang YV, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Ye D, Soria-Bretones I, Servetto A, Lee KM, Luo X, Otto JJ, Akamatsu H, Napolitano F, Mani R, Cescon DW, Xu L, Xie Y, Mendell JT, Hanker AB, Arteaga CL. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is an actionable therapeutic target in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+/RB-deficient breast cancer. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2966905. [PMID: 37502925 PMCID: PMC10371097 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2966905/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved survival of patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. However, patients treated with CDK4/6i eventually develop drug resistance and progress. RB1 loss-of-function alterations confer acquired resistance to CDK4/6i, but the optimal therapy for these patients is unclear. Using a genome-wide CRISPR screen, we identified protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a molecular vulnerability in ER+/RB1-knockout (RBKO) breast cancer cells. PRMT5 inhibition blocked cell cycle G1-to-S transition independent of RB, thus arresting growth of RBKO cells. Proteomics analysis uncovered fused in sarcoma (FUS) as a downstream effector of PRMT5. Pharmacological inhibition of PRMT5 resulted in dissociation of FUS from RNA polymerase II (Pol II), Ser2 Pol II hyperphosphorylation, and intron retention in genes that promote DNA synthesis. Treatment with the PRMT5i inhibitor pemrametostat and fulvestrant synergistically inhibited growth of ER+/RB-deficient patient-derived xenografts, suggesting dual ER and PRMT5 blockade as a novel therapeutic strategy to treat ER+/RB-deficient breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Ching Lin
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Tsung-Cheng Chang
- Department of Molecular Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yunguan Wang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Lei Guo
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yunpeng Gao
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Emmanuel Bikorimana
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrew Lemoff
- Department of Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yisheng V. Fang
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - He Zhang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yanfeng Zhang
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Dan Ye
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Alberto Servetto
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Kyung-min Lee
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Life Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Xuemei Luo
- Department of Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Joseph J. Otto
- Department of Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Hiroaki Akamatsu
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Fabiana Napolitano
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ram Mani
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David W. Cescon
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lin Xu
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yang Xie
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center, Department of Population & Data Sciences, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Joshua T. Mendell
- Department of Molecular Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ariella B. Hanker
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Carlos L. Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu S, Xie SM, Liu W, Gagea M, Hanker AB, Nguyen N, Singareeka Raghavendra A, Yang-Kolodji G, Chu F, Neelapu SS, Marchese A, Hanash S, Zimmermann J, Arteaga CL, Tripathy D. Targeting CXCR4 abrogates resistance to trastuzumab by blocking cell cycle progression and synergizes with docetaxel in breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:62. [PMID: 37280713 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01665-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted therapies have significantly improved survival in patients with HER2 overexpressed or amplified (HER2+) breast cancer, a significant proportion of patients do not respond or eventually develop clinical resistance. Strategies to reverse trastuzumab resistance remain a high clinical priority. We were the first to report the role of CXCR4 in trastuzumab resistance. The present study aims to explore the therapeutic potential of targeting CXCR4 and better understand the associated mechanisms. METHODS Immunofluorescent staining, confocal microscopy analysis, and immunoblotting were used to analyze CXCR4 expression. BrdU incorporation assays and flow cytometry were used to analyze dynamic CXCR4 expression. Three-dimensional co-culture (tumor cells/breast cancer-associated fibroblasts/human peripheral blood mononuclear cells) or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assay was used to mimic human tumor microenvironment, which is necessary for testing therapeutic effects of CXCR4 inhibitor or trastuzumab. The FDA-approved CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100, trastuzumab, and docetaxel chemotherapy were used to evaluate therapeutic efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Reverse phase protein array and immunoblotting were used to discern the associated molecular mechanisms. RESULTS Using a panel of cell lines and patient breast cancer samples, we confirmed CXCR4 drives trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer and further demonstrated the increased CXCR4 expression in trastuzumab-resistant cells is associated with cell cycle progression with a peak in the G2/M phases. Blocking CXCR4 with AMD3100 inhibits cell proliferation by downregulating mediators of G2-M transition, leading to G2/M arrest and abnormal mitosis. Using a panel of trastuzumab-resistant cell lines and an in vivo established trastuzumab-resistant xenograft mouse model, we demonstrated that targeting CXCR4 with AMD3100 suppresses tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, and synergizes with docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support CXCR4 as a novel therapeutic target and a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuying Liu
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shelly M Xie
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wenbin Liu
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mihai Gagea
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ariella B Hanker
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Nguyen Nguyen
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Gloria Yang-Kolodji
- Department of Medicine, University of South California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Fuliang Chu
- Department of Lymphoma-Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sattva S Neelapu
- Department of Lymphoma-Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adriano Marchese
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Samir Hanash
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Carlos L Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Debasish Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
O'Dwyer PJ, Gray RJ, Flaherty KT, Chen AP, Li S, Wang V, McShane LM, Patton DR, Tricoli JV, Williams PM, Iafrate AJ, Sklar J, Mitchell EP, Takebe N, Sims DJ, Coffey B, Fu T, Routbort M, Rubinstein LV, Little RF, Arteaga CL, Marinucci D, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Harris LN, Doroshow JH. The NCI-MATCH trial: lessons for precision oncology. Nat Med 2023; 29:1349-1357. [PMID: 37322121 PMCID: PMC10612141 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02379-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) trial ( NCT02465060 ) was launched in 2015 as a genomically driven, signal-seeking precision medicine platform trial-largely for patients with treatment-refractory, malignant solid tumors. Having completed in 2023, it remains one of the largest tumor-agnostic, precision oncology trials undertaken to date. Nearly 6,000 patients underwent screening and molecular testing, with a total of 1,593 patients (inclusive of continued accrual from standard next-generation sequencing) being assigned to one of 38 substudies. Each substudy was a phase 2 trial of a therapy matched to a genomic alteration, with a primary endpoint of objective tumor response by RECIST criteria. In this Perspective, we summarize the outcomes of the initial 27 substudies in NCI-MATCH, which met its signal-seeking objective with 7/27 positive substudies (25.9%). We discuss key aspects of the design and operational conduct of the trial, highlighting important lessons for future precision medicine studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert J Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shuli Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David R Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - P Mickey Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - A John Iafrate
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Naoko Takebe
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David J Sims
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Brent Coffey
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tony Fu
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Mark Routbort
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard F Little
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Barbara A Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James H Doroshow
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Parida PK, Marquez-Palencia M, Ghosh S, Khandelwal N, Kim K, Nair V, Liu XZ, Vu HS, Zacharias LG, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Sanders ME, Mobley BC, McDonald JG, Lemoff A, Peng Y, Lewis C, Vale G, Halberg N, Arteaga CL, Hanker AB, DeBerardinis RJ, Malladi S. Limiting mitochondrial plasticity by targeting DRP1 induces metabolic reprogramming and reduces breast cancer brain metastases. Nat Cancer 2023; 4:893-907. [PMID: 37248394 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00563-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Disseminated tumor cells with metabolic flexibility to utilize available nutrients in distal organs persist, but the precise mechanisms that facilitate metabolic adaptations remain unclear. Here we show fragmented mitochondrial puncta in latent brain metastatic (Lat) cells enable fatty acid oxidation (FAO) to sustain cellular bioenergetics and maintain redox homeostasis. Depleting the enriched dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) and limiting mitochondrial plasticity in Lat cells results in increased lipid droplet accumulation, impaired FAO and attenuated metastasis. Likewise, pharmacological inhibition of DRP1 using a small-molecule brain-permeable inhibitor attenuated metastatic burden in preclinical models. In agreement with these findings, increased phospho-DRP1 expression was observed in metachronous brain metastasis compared with patient-matched primary tumors. Overall, our findings reveal the pivotal role of mitochondrial plasticity in supporting the survival of Lat cells and highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting cellular plasticity programs in combination with tumor-specific alterations to prevent metastatic recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pravat Kumar Parida
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Mauricio Marquez-Palencia
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Suvranil Ghosh
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Nitin Khandelwal
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kangsan Kim
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vidhya Nair
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Xiao-Zheng Liu
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hieu S Vu
- Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Lauren G Zacharias
- Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Melinda E Sanders
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bret C Mobley
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jeffrey G McDonald
- Center for Human Nutrition and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrew Lemoff
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yan Peng
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Cheryl Lewis
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Gonçalo Vale
- Center for Human Nutrition and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Nils Halberg
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ariella B Hanker
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ralph J DeBerardinis
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Srinivas Malladi
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Clark AS, Hong F, Finn RS, DeMichele AM, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel J, Arnaldez FI, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Copur MS, Kasbari SS, Thind R, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, O'Dwyer PJ, Harris LN, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Palbociclib (PD-0332991) in CCND1, 2, or 3 Amplification: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1B. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:1477-1483. [PMID: 36853016 PMCID: PMC10102836 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cyclin D/CDK4/6 is critical in controlling the G1 to S checkpoint. CCND, the gene encoding cyclin D, is known to be amplified in a variety of solid tumors. Palbociclib is an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, approved in advanced breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy. We explored the efficacy of palbociclib in patients with nonbreast solid tumors containing an amplification in CCND1, 2, or 3. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with tumors containing a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and expression of the retinoblastoma protein were assigned to subprotocol Z1B and received palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles. RESULTS Forty patients were assigned to subprotocol Z1B; 4 patients had outside assays identifying the CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and were not confirmed centrally; 3 were ineligible and 2 were not treated (1 untreated patient was also ineligible), leaving 32 evaluable patients for this analysis. There were no partial responses; 12 patients (37.5%) had stable disease as best response. There were seven deaths on study, all during cycle 1 and attributable to disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months. The most common toxicities were leukopenia (n = 21, 55%) and neutropenia (n = 19, 50%); neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 event (n = 12, 32%). CONCLUSIONS Palbociclib was not effective at treating nonbreast solid tumors with a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification in this cohort. These data do not support further investigation of single-agent palbociclib in tumors with CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy S. Clark
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard S. Finn
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - James Zwiebel
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Fernanda I. Arnaldez
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - David Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alice P. Chen
- Early Clinical Trials Development Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lin CC, Chang TC, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Lemoff A, Fang YV, Zhang H, Ye D, Soria-Bretones I, Servetto A, Lee KM, Luo X, Otto JJ, Akamatsu H, Cescon DW, Xu L, Xie Y, Mendell JT, Hanker AB, Arteaga CL. Abstract 3934: PRMT5 is an actionable target in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+/Rb-deficient breast cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-3934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
RB1 loss-of-function genomic alterations confer resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and are enriched post treatment of CDK4/6i in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer. ER+/Rb-deficient breast cancer is a rising patient population in need of novel therapeutic strategies. Herein, we used a genome-wide CRISPR screen and identified protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a molecular vulnerability in this refractory breast cancer subtype. sgRNA-induced depletion of PRMT5 arrested growth of MCF-7 and T47D RB1 knockout (RBKO) cells. PRMT5 catalyzes symmetric dimethylation of arginine (SDMA). In RBKO cells carrying doxycycline-inducible shRNA targeting the 3’UTR of PRMT5, rescue with wild-type but not an enzymatically dead mutant of PRMT5 restored cell growth, supporting that PRMT5 methyltrasferase activity is essential for growth of these cells. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of RNA-seq data revealed significant downregulation of cell cycle-related Hallmark gene signatures in RBKO cells treated with PRMT5 siRNA versus control siRNA. Both gene silencing and pharmacological blockade of PRMT5 with the small molecule inhibitor pemrametostat impeded G1-to-S cell cycle progression in MCF-7 and T47D RBKO cells and in lung, prostate, and triple-negative breast cancer cells with natural RB1 mutations or deletions, suggesting that PRMT5 inhibition can block the G1-to-S transition even in the absence of Rb. To identify the protein interactome of PRMT5 and the mechanism by which it promotes cell cycle progression in Rb-deficient cells, we performed proteomics analysis of Co-IP mass spectrometry and an SDMA post-translational modification scan and pinpointed FUS (fused in sarcoma) as a putative downstream effector of PRMT5. FUS is known to regulate RNA polymerase II (Pol II)-mediated transcription. Inhibition of PRMT5 with pemrametostat significantly reduced SDMA levels on FUS and dissociated FUS from Pol II as evidenced by FUS Co-IP and immunoblot analysis. ChIP-seq analysis revealed that treatment of RBKO cells with pemrametostat derepressed phosphorylation of Ser2 in the C-terminus of Pol II at transcription start sites (TSS) of genes involved in cell cycle progression. In accordance with the abnormal accumulation of pSer2 Pol II at TSS, pemrametostat treatment also resulted in an increased Pol II pausing index and an enrichment of intron retention splicing variants. Finally, therapeutic inhibition of PRMT5 with pemrametostat synergized with fulvestrant (a selective ER degrader) against growth of ER+/Rb-deficient breast cancer cell line- and patient-derived xenografts in mice, suggesting this combination as a novel therapeutic strategy for ER+/Rb-deficient metastatic breast cancers.
Citation Format: Chang-Ching Lin, Tsung-Cheng Chang, Yunguan Wang, Yanfeng Zhang, Andrew Lemoff, Yisheng V. Fang, He Zhang, Dan Ye, Isabel Soria-Bretones, Alberto Servetto, Kyung-min Lee, Xuemei Luo, Joseph J. Otto, Hiroaki Akamatsu, David W. Cescon, Lin Xu, Yang Xie, Joshua T. Mendell, Ariella B. Hanker, Carlos L. Arteaga. PRMT5 is an actionable target in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+/Rb-deficient breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3934.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - He Zhang
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Dan Ye
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | - Xuemei Luo
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | - Lin Xu
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yang Xie
- 1UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wisinski KB, Flamand Y, Wilson MA, Luke JJ, Tawbi HA, Hong F, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel JA, Chen H, Gray RJ, Li S, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Behrens RJ, Pennington KP, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Trametinib in Patients With NF1-, GNAQ-, or GNA11-Mutant Tumors: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocols S1 and S2. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200421. [PMID: 37053535 PMCID: PMC10309549 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE NCI-MATCH is a precision medicine trial using genomic testing to allocate patients with advanced malignancies to targeted treatment subprotocols. This report combines two subprotocols evaluating trametinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1[S1] or GNA11/Q [S2]) altered tumors. METHODS Eligible patients had tumors with deleterious inactivating NF1 or GNA11/Q mutations by the customized Oncomine AmpliSeq panel. Prior MEK inhibitor treatment was excluded. Glioblastomas (GBMs) were permitted, including malignancies associated with germline NF1 mutations (S1 only). Trametinib was administered at 2 mg once daily over 28-day cycles until toxicity or disease progression. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, PFS, and overall survival. Exploratory analyses included co-occurring genomic alterations and PTEN loss. RESULTS Fifty patients were eligible and started therapy: 46 with NF1 mutations (S1) and four with GNA11 mutations (S2). In the NF1 cohort, nonsense single-nucleotide variants were identified in 29 and frameshift deletions in 17 tumors. All in S2 had nonuveal melanoma and GNA11 Q209L variant. Two partial responses (PR) were noted in S1, one patient each with advanced lung cancer and GBM for an ORR of 4.3% (90% CI, 0.8 to 13.1). One patient with melanoma in S2 had a PR (ORR, 25%; 90% CI, 1.3 to 75.1). Prolonged stable disease (SD) was also noted in five patients (four in S1 and one in S2) with additional rare histologies. Adverse events were as previously described with trametinib. Comutations in TP53 and PIK3CA were common. CONCLUSION Although these subprotocols did not meet the primary end point for ORR, significant responses or prolonged SD noted in some disease subtypes warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari B. Wisinski
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | - Yael Flamand
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Melissa A. Wilson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, St Luke's University Health Network, Easton, PA
| | - Jason J. Luke
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Fangxin Hong
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - James A. Zwiebel
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Helen Chen
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Shuli Li
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Lawrence V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P. Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liu S, Xie SM, Liu W, Gagea M, Hanker AB, Nguyen N, Raghavendra AS, Yang-Kolodji G, Chu F, Neelapu SS, Hanash S, Zimmermann J, Arteaga CL, Tripathy D. Targeting CXCR4 abrogates resistance to trastuzumab by blocking cell cycle progression and synergizes with docetaxel in breast cancer treatment. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2388864. [PMID: 36824840 PMCID: PMC9949251 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2388864/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Background: Although trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted therapies have significantly improved survival in patients with HER2 overexpressed or amplified (HER2+) breast cancer, a significant proportion of patients do not respond or eventually develop clinical resistance. Strategies to reverse trastuzumab resistance remain a high clinical priority. We were the first to report the role of CXCR4 in trastuzumab resistance. The present study aims to explore the therapeutic potential of targeting CXCR4 and better understand the associated mechanisms. Methods: Immunofluorescent staining, confocal microscopy analysis, and immunoblotting were used to analyze CXCR4 expression. BrdU incorporation assays and flow cytometry were used to analyze dynamic CXCR4expression. Three-dimensional co-culture (tumor cells/ breast cancer-associated fibroblasts / human peripheral blood mononuclear cells) or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assay was used to mimic human tumor microenvironment, which is necessary for testing therapeutic effect of CXCR4 inhibitor or trastuzumab. The FDA-approved CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100, trastuzumab, and docetaxel chemotherapy were used to evaluate therapeutic efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Reverse phase protein array and immunoblotting were used to discern the associated molecular mechanisms. Results: Using multiple cell lines and patient breast cancer samples we confirmed CXCR4 drives trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer and further demonstrated that the increased CXCR4 expression in trastuzumab-resistant cells is associated with cell cycle progression with a peak in the G2/M phases. Blocking CXCR4 with AMD3100 inhibits cell proliferation by downregulating mediators of G2-M transition, leading to G2/M arrest and abnormal mitosis. Using multiple trastuzumab-resistant cell lines and an in vivo established trastuzumab-resistant xenograft mouse model, we demonstrated that targeting CXCR4 with AMD3100 suppresses tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, and synergizes with docetaxel. Conclusions: Our findings support CXCR4 as a novel therapeutic target and a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuying Liu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Wenbin Liu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Mihai Gagea
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Fuliang Chu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Samir Hanash
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bergman R, Berko YA, Sanchez V, Sanders ME, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Arteaga CL, Rexer BN. Obesity and metabolic syndrome are associated with short-term endocrine therapy resistance in early ER + breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 197:307-317. [PMID: 36396775 PMCID: PMC10603601 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06794-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Increased body mass index (BMI) and metabolic syndrome (MS) are associated with increased breast cancer recurrence risk. Whether this is due to intrinsic tumor biology or modifiable factors of the obese state remains incompletely understood. METHODS Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores of 751 patients were stratified by BMI to assess association with tumor-intrinsic recurrence risk. Cellular proliferation by Ki67 after 10-21 days of presurgical letrozole treatment was used to stratify endocrine therapy response (sensitive-ln(Ki67) < 1; intermediate-ln(Ki67)1-2; resistant-ln(Ki67) > = 2). BMI at the time of surgery and MS variables were collected retrospectively for 143 patients to analyze association between therapy response and BMI/MS. Additionally, PI3K pathway signaling was evaluated by immunohistochemistry of phosphorylated Akt and S6. RESULTS There was no significant association between BMI and recurrence score (p = 0.99), and risk score distribution was similar across BMI groups. However, BMI was associated with short-term endocrine therapy resistance, with a significant enrichment of intermediate and resistant tumors in patients with obesity (55%, p = 0.0392). Similarly, the relative risk of an endocrine therapy-resistant tumor was 1.4-fold greater for patients with MS (p = 0.0197). In evaluating PI3K pathway mediators, we found patients with 3 or more MS criteria had more tumors with pAkt scores above the median (p = 0.0436). There were no significant differences in S6 activation. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest the association between obesity/metabolic syndrome and breast cancer recurrence is better reflected by response to treatment than tumor-intrinsic properties, suggesting interventions to reverse obesity and/or MS may improve outcomes for breast cancer recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley Bergman
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yvonne A Berko
- Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
- Currently Piedmont Newnan Hospital, Newnan, Georgia
| | - Violeta Sanchez
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Melinda E Sanders
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Carlos L Arteaga
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- UTSW Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brent N Rexer
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2220 Pierce Ave, Nashville, TN 777 PRB 37232-6307, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bardia A, Mayer I, Winer E, Linden HM, Ma CX, Parker BA, Bellet M, Arteaga CL, Cheeti S, Gates M, Chang CW, Fredrickson J, Spoerke JM, Moore HM, Giltnane J, Friedman LS, Chow Maneval E, Chan I, Jhaveri K. The oral selective estrogen receptor degrader GDC-0810 (ARN-810) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR + /HER2 -) advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 197:319-331. [PMID: 36401732 PMCID: PMC9823088 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06797-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE GDC-0810 (ARN-810) is a novel, non-steroidal, orally bioavailable, selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that potentially inhibits ligand-dependent and ligand-independent estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated signaling. METHODS A phase Ia/Ib/IIa dose escalation, combination treatment with palbociclib or a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, and expansion study determined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GDC-0810 in postmenopausal women with ER + (HER2 -) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Baseline plasma ctDNA samples were analyzed to determine the ESR1 mutation status. RESULTS Patients (N = 152) received GDC-0810 100-800 mg once daily (QD) or 300-400 mg twice daily, in dose escalation, expansion, as single agent or combination treatment. Common adverse events regardless of attribution to study drug were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, and constipation. There was one dose-limiting toxicity during dose escalation. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. GDC-0810 600 mg QD taken with food was the RP2D. Pharmacokinetics were predictable. FES reduction (> 90%) highlighting pharmacodynamic engagement of ER was observed. Outcomes for the overall population and for patients with tumors harboring ESR1 mutations included partial responses (4% overall; 4% ESR1), stable disease (39% overall; 42% ESR1), non-complete response/non-progressive disease (13% overall; 12% ESR1), progressive disease (40% overall; 38% ESR1), and missing/unevaluable (5% overall; 5% ESR1). Clinical benefit (responses or SD, lasting ≥ 24 weeks) was observed in patients in dose escalation (n = 16, 39%) and expansion (n = 24, 22%). CONCLUSION GDC-0810 was safe and tolerable with preliminary anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with ER + advanced/MBC, with/without ESR1 mutations, highlighting the potential for oral SERDs. Clinical Trial and registration date April 4, 2013. NCT01823835 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Bartlett Hall Extension 237, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Ingrid Mayer
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Eric Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Cynthia X Ma
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Barbara A Parker
- University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Mary Gates
- Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lori S Friedman
- Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
- ORIC Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Iris Chan
- Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Komal Jhaveri
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Servetto A, Formisano L, Sánchez V, Mayer IA, Arteaga CL, Sanders ME. FGFR1 Antibody Validation and Characterization of FGFR1 Protein Expression in ER+ Breast Cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2022; 30:600-608. [PMID: 36083147 PMCID: PMC9547979 DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000001058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trials in patients with ER+ breast cancer with or without FGFR pathway somatic alterations have shown limited clinical benefit from treatment with FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone or in combination with endocrine therapy. This is likely because of an inadequate predictive biomarker to select appropriate patients. In this study, we evaluated 4 anti-FGFR1 antibodies in breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts with FGFR1 amplification. We correlated D8E4 expression in 209 tumors from postmenopausal patients with stage I-III operable ER+ breast cancer with FGFR1 amplification status as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. FGFR1 amplification was identified in 10% of tumors (21/209), 80% of which exhibited membranous FGFR1 expression; however, only 50% of amplified cases showed strong, complete membranous staining (3+) based on established criteria to score HER2 by immunohistochemistry. These findings suggest the combined evaluation of FGFR1 status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization may need to be incorporated into the selection of patients for trials with FGFR inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula I. Gonzalez-Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Alberto Servetto
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Luigi Formisano
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Violeta Sánchez
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ingrid A. Mayer
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Carlos L. Arteaga
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Melinda E. Sanders
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bedard PL, Li S, Wisinski KB, Yang ES, Limaye SA, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel JA, Moscow JA, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Afatinib in Patients With Tumors With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Activating Mutations: Results From the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol EAY131-B. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200165. [PMID: 35939768 PMCID: PMC9384949 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice is a multicohort trial that assigns patients with advanced cancers to targeted therapies on the basis of central tumor genomic testing. Arm B evaluated afatinib, an ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with ERBB2-activating mutations. METHODS Eligible patients had selected ERBB2 single-nucleotide variants or insertions/deletions detected by the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice next-generation sequencing assay. Patients had performance status ≤ 1, left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%, grade ≤ 1 diarrhea, and no prior human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. Patients received afatinib 40 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were 6-month progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and molecular correlates. RESULTS A total of 59 patients were assigned and 40 were enrolled. The median age was 62 years, 78% were female, 68% had performance status = 1, and 58% had received > 3 prior therapies. The confirmed ORR was 2.7% (n = 1 of 37; 90% CI, 0.14 to 12.2), and 6-month progression-free survival was 12.0% (90% CI, 5.6 to 25.8). A confirmed partial response occurred in a patient with adenocarcinoma of extra-mammary Paget disease of skin who progressed after cycle 6. Two unconfirmed partial responses were observed (low-grade serous gynecological tract and estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative immunohistochemistry breast ductal carcinoma). Of 12 patients with breast cancer, 1 additional patient with lobular carcinoma (estrogen receptor-positive/HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization) had a 51% reduction in target lesions but progressed because of a new lesion at cycle 6. The most common (> 20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (68%), mucositis (43%), fatigue (40%), acneiform rash (30%), dehydration (27%), vomiting (27%), nausea (27%), anemia (27%), and anorexia (22%). Four patients (11%) discontinued because of adverse events. CONCLUSION Although afatinib did not meet the prespecified threshold for antitumor activity in this heavily pretreated cohort, the response in a rare tumor type is notable. The safety profile of afatinib was consistent with prior studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shuli Li
- E-A Biostatistical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Eddy S. Yang
- University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | - James A. Zwiebel
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jeffrey A. Moscow
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R. Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P. Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee KM, Lin CC, Servetto A, Bae J, Kandagatla V, Ye D, Kim G, Sudhan DR, Mendiratta S, González Ericsson PI, Balko JM, Lee J, Barnes S, Malladi VS, Tabrizi S, Reddy SM, Yum S, Chang CW, Hutchinson KE, Yost SE, Yuan Y, Chen ZJ, Fu YX, Hanker AB, Arteaga CL. Epigenetic Repression of STING by MYC Promotes Immune Evasion and Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 2022; 10:829-843. [PMID: 35561311 PMCID: PMC9250627 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-21-0826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The MYC oncogene is frequently amplified in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we show that MYC suppression induces immune-related hallmark gene set expression and tumor-infiltrating T cells in MYC-hyperactivated TNBCs. Mechanistically, MYC repressed stimulator of interferon genes (STING) expression via direct binding to the STING1 enhancer region, resulting in downregulation of the T-cell chemokines CCL5, CXCL10, and CXCL11. In primary and metastatic TNBC cohorts, tumors with high MYC expression or activity exhibited low STING expression. Using a CRISPR-mediated enhancer perturbation approach, we demonstrated that MYC-driven immune evasion is mediated by STING repression. STING repression induced resistance to PD-L1 blockade in mouse models of TNBC. Finally, a small-molecule inhibitor of MYC combined with PD-L1 blockade elicited a durable response in immune-cold TNBC with high MYC expression, suggesting a strategy to restore PD-L1 inhibitor sensitivity in MYC-overexpressing TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung-min Lee
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
- Department of Life Sciences, College of Natural Science, Hanyang University, Seoul 04736, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Ching Lin
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Alberto Servetto
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Joonbeom Bae
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Vishal Kandagatla
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Dan Ye
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - GunMin Kim
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Dhivya R. Sudhan
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Saurabh Mendiratta
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Paula I. González Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Justin M. Balko
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Jeon Lee
- Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Spencer Barnes
- Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Venkat S. Malladi
- Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Siamak Tabrizi
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Sangeetha M. Reddy
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Seoyun Yum
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Ching-Wei Chang
- Oncology Biostatistics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | | | - Susan E. Yost
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutic Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Yuan Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutic Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Zhijian J. Chen
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Yang-Xin Fu
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Ariella B. Hanker
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Carlos L. Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Frerich C, Durdana I, Hanker A, Arteaga CL, Bennett L, Conzen S. Abstract 2699: Glucocorticoid receptor biology in lobular breast cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-2699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
While considered uncommon, there are an estimated 39,000 new invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) cases in the US yearly, making it the sixth most common among all tumor types. ILC is recognized for unique metastatic organotropism. Its propensity to metastasize to serosal surfaces lining the gut (peritoneum) and lung (pleura) make it particularly challenging to diagnose and consequently is associated with overall unfavorable prognosis. We hypothesize that GR activation will slow cell proliferation and reduce metastatic potential of ILC cells in vitro and in vivo. Using transcriptome data from 142 ILC tumors with long-term follow up clinical data from the METABRIC dataset we found a trend towards improved overall patient survival with increased GR (NR3C1) expression (and presumably activity). Preliminary in vitro data showed slowed cell proliferation in an ILC cell line (MDA-MB-134IV) treated with GR agonist dexamethasone relative to vehicle control. ILC cell lines (MDA-MB-134IV and SUM44PE) have dramatically different adhesion preference for extracellular components and we will study whether GR mediates the metastatic organotrophism of ILC cells. Preliminary transcriptome data lends insight into the proliferative and adhesive gene expression changes elicited by both ER and GR activation. Two GR+ ILC patient derived organoid lines have GR dependent proliferative and adhesive phenotypes. In future studies we will utilize an in vivo mouse model that recapitulates ILC progression from an in situ to invasive breast carcinoma and finally to metastatic colonization of distant organs to determine the role of GR activity in proliferation and metastasis to the serosal surfaces.
Citation Format: Candace Frerich, Ishrat Durdana, Ariella Hanker, Carlos L. Arteaga, Lynda Bennett, Suzanne Conzen. Glucocorticoid receptor biology in lobular breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2699.
Collapse
|
37
|
Ramani V, Nooka S, Zhang YA, Gibbs S, Huang HC, Hullings M, Conzen S, Arteaga CL, Chan I, Reddy SM. Abstract 4197: Treatment with chemotherapy, CD40 agonist, and Flt3 ligand triplet combination enhances antigen presentation and leads to cures in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-4197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) have shown limited responses to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Breast cancer is associated with defects in antigen presentation which may contribute to resistance to ICB. Flt3 ligand (Flt3L) is a growth factor that increases differentiation of DC1 dendritic cells, critical mediators of antigen presentation. CD40 agonist activates all 3 classes of antigen presenting cells - dendritic cells, B cells, and macrophages. Synergy has been demonstrated between Flt3L and CD40 agonist as well as between CD40 agonist and chemotherapy in other cancers, however the combination of all three has not been studied in breast cancer.
Methods: 6-8 week old Balb/c mice were injected with 4T1 triple negative breast cancer cells. When tumors were 50 mm3, mice were first treated with intraperitoneal pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) once and subcutaneous Flt3L daily for 5 days in different sequencing schedules (PLD first followed by Flt3L immediately or 4 days later or Flt3L first followed by PLD 7 days or 10 days later). Based on optimal scheduling of PLD and Flt3L, mice were treated with PLD alone, Flt3L alone, CD40 agonist alone, PLD + Flt3L, PLD + CD40 agonist, PLD + PD-1 blockade, or PLD + CD40 agonist + Flt3L. In addition to serial tumor measurements, mice were sacrificed and tumors and lymphoid organs harvested for flow cytometry analyses.
Results: Treatment with PLD at least 4 days before Flt3L led to an optimal increase in intra-tumoral DC1 cells (p=0.0002), increase in polyfunctional CD8 T cell response (p<0.0001), reduced PD-L1 expression on DC1 cells (p<0.0001), and reduced PD-1 expression on CD8 T cells (p<0.0001) compared to other sequencing schedules. Therefore, this regimen was advanced for further study. Treatment with novel triplet combination of PLD, Flt3L, and CD40 agonist resulted in improved tumor control and survival compared to PLD alone (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively), Flt3L alone (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001), CD40 agonist alone (p <0.0001 and p<0.0001), PLD + Flt3L (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001), PLD + CD40 agonist (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001), and PLD + PD-1 blockade (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001). 22% of mice were tumor-free in the triplet therapy group only and were resistant to tumor re-challenge. Treatment with triplet therapy was associated with an increase in antigen specific CD8 T cells. Additional mechanistic studies will also be presented.
Conclusions: Novel triplet combination with PLD, CD40 agonist, and Flt3L leads to enhanced tumor control in the 4T1 TNBC mouse model. A clinical trial with this combination in metastatic TNBC patients is expected to begin recruitment soon (NCT05029999).
Citation Format: Vijay Ramani, Shruthi Nooka, Yu-An Zhang, Serena Gibbs, Hai-Cheng Huang, Melanie Hullings, Suzanne Conzen, Carlos L. Arteaga, Isaac Chan, Sangeetha M. Reddy. Treatment with chemotherapy, CD40 agonist, and Flt3 ligand triplet combination enhances antigen presentation and leads to cures in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 4197.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Ramani
- 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Shruthi Nooka
- 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yu-An Zhang
- 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Serena Gibbs
- 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Hai-Cheng Huang
- 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Suzanne Conzen
- 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Isaac Chan
- 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Subbiah V, Fengmin F, Kudchadkar R, Sullivan RJ, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Chen HX, Gray RJ, Wang XV, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Sundaresan TK, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Abstract CT160: BVD-523FB (Ulixertinib) in Patients with Tumors with BRAF Fusions, or with Non-V600E, Non-V600K BRAF Mutations: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol EAY131-Z1L. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Mutations in BRAF at codons other than V600 (non-V600) and BRAF fusions confer dependence on RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. BVD-523FB (ulixertinib) is a small molecule that potently inhibits both ERK1 and ERK2 protein kinases in the sub-nanomolar range. Based on the reports of early clinical activity in the phase 1 trial, including in non-V600 BRAF mutations, subprotocol Z1L (EAY131-Z1L) sought to investigate the clinical activity of ulixertinib in patients with tumors harboring these alterations. Methods: In this single-arm study, patients with BRAF non-V600 mutation or BRAF fusion were given ulixertinib orally at a dose of 600 mg twice daily, continuously for each 28-day cycle until progression or intolerability. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). BRAF mutation status was determined by an analytically validated assay in a CLIA-certified laboratory for all patients. Results: From August 2019 to July 2020, 35 patients were enrolled and received protocol treatment on the trial. Among the 34 patients who were eligible, median age was 66.5; 50% were female, 88% were white, 9% black, 1% Asian. Performance status was ECOG PS 1 in 74% of patients, with remaining PS 0. Median number of prior therapies was >3.Tumor types included multiple gastrointestinal malignancies (N=16), lung cancer (N=3), and melanoma (N=3), among others. Mutations were centrally confirmed in 26 patients who were deemed analyzable per protocol. Twenty-two patients had a single nucleotide variant (SNV) in BRAF; one patient had an insertion/deletion (indel) in BRAF, and three patients harbored BRAF fusions. No patients achieved CR or PR, resulting in ORR = 0%. Stable disease was the best response in 7/26 centrally confirmed cases. Median PFS was 1.8 months (90% CI: 1.6, 2.2), 6-month PFS rate was 11% (90% CI: 4%, 22%), and median OS was 4.0 months (90% CI: 2.8, 7.4). Twenty patients (57%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity; there were no grade 5 toxicities. Most common toxicities include anemia (n=11), diarrhea (n=16), nausea (n=16), vomiting (n=11), fatigue (n=16), increased creatinine (n=12), and acneiform rash (n=14). Conclusion: BVD-523FB (ulixertinib) had no demonstrable evidence of clinical activity in this small, heavily pre-treated population of patients with tumors harboring BRAF fusions, or with non-V600E, non-V600K BRAF mutations
Citation Format: Vivek Subbiah, Fengmin Fengmin, Ragini Kudchadkar, Ryan J. Sullivan, Edith P. Mitchell, John J. Wright, Helen X. Chen, Robert J. Gray, Xin Victoria Wang, Lisa M. McShane, Larry V. Rubinstein, David Patton, P. Mickey Williams, Tilak K. Sundaresan, Barbara A. Conley, Carlos L. Arteaga, Lyndsay N. Harris, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Alice P. Chen, Keith T. Flaherty. BVD-523FB (Ulixertinib) in Patients with Tumors with BRAF Fusions, or with Non-V600E, Non-V600K BRAF Mutations: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol EAY131-Z1L [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT160.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert J. Gray
- 8Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Xin Victoria Wang
- 8Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- 9Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Houston, TX
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- 10Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Besthesda, MD
| | - David Patton
- 11Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- 14Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- 14Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P. Chen
- 17Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Reddy SM, Carter M, Chan I, Hullings M, Unni N, Medina J, Shakeel S, Armstrong S, Cade L, Fattah FJ, Ahn C, Fang YV, Chen N, McArthur HL, Sinclair N, Yellin MJ, O'Shaughnessy J, Nanda R, Conzen SD, Arteaga CL. Phase 1 pilot study with dose expansion of chemotherapy in combination with CD40 agonist and Flt3 ligand in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps1126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS1126 Background: Only a subset of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer demonstrate response to currently approved PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade, and few have durable responses. Antigen presentation defects may be a reason for this low response because deficiency of antigen-presenting DC1 dendritic cells is associated with poor anti-tumor immunity. CD40 agonists are a class of agents that activate antigen presenting cells including dendritic cells and B cells and also repolarize macrophages. Flt3 ligand is a growth factor that increases dendritic cells. In line with this, we recently demonstrated in pre-clinical models that the combination of liposomal-doxorubicin chemotherapy, a CD40 agonist, and a Flt3 ligand improves outcomes of breast cancer compared to alternate combinations. Methods: This is a single arm phase I pilot study of liposomal-doxorubicin, CDX-1140 (CD40 agonist), and CDX-301 (Flt3 ligand) combination therapy in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Patients will be randomized to 3 lead-in arms (triplet therapy, doublet immunotherapy only, liposomal-doxorubicin only) prior to receiving full triplet therapy with fresh tissue biopsies before and after the lead-in treatment. CDX-301 will be discontinued after 2 cycles; liposomal-doxorubicin and CDX-1140 will be continued until disease progression or clinically limiting toxicities. Primary endpoint is determination of a recommended phase 2 dose based on treatment-related adverse events including dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints include anti-tumor immune response after triplet therapy, after immunotherapy alone, and after liposomal-doxorubicin alone; median progression-free survival, overall response rate, duration of response, and clinical benefit rate. Key eligibility criteria are unresectable stage III or stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (ER ≤10%, PR ≤10%, HER2/neu negative), 1st to 3rd line metastatic treatment setting (1st line patients need to be PD-L1 negative by 22C3 assay), measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria, consent for pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies of amenable soft tissue tumor lesions, no prior treatment with an anti-CD40 antibody or a Flt3 ligand, no anthracycline treatment in the metastatic setting, no prior progression while on anthracycline-based therapy or within 6 months of completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and no history of non-infectious pneumonitis or current pneumonitis. This trial will enroll up to 45 patients across multiple sites. Clinical trial information: NCT05029999.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Isaac Chan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Nisha Unni
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jessica Medina
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Lakeisha Cade
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Chul Ahn
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yisheng V. Fang
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Nan Chen
- University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology Network, Dallas, TX
| | - Rita Nanda
- University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Carlos L. Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tsao AS, Song Z, Ho AL, Mehnert JM, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Takebe N, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane L, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris L, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty K. Phase II study of vismodegib in patients with SMO or PTCH1 mutated tumors: Results from NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol T. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.3010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3010 Background: NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a platform trial enrolling patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on matching genomic alterations (NCT02465060). Subprotocol Arm T evaluated vismodegib (GDC0449), a hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in pts with tumors harboring PTCH1 and SMO mutations. Methods: Pts whose tumors had SMO or PTCH1 mutations were eligible; results were confirmed by NCI-MATCH central labs if possible. Pts received oral vismodegib (150 mg daily) for 4-week cycles until progression/toxicity. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles. Primary endpoint was ORR; secondary endpoints included PFS, 6-month PFS, OS, and predictive biomarkers. Cutaneous basal cell carcinomas were excluded. Results: Of 34 pts enrolled (6/20/16 – 9/22/20); 2 were ineligible and 1 did not start therapy. The 31 analyzable pts’ demographics were primary tumor sites/histology [gastrointestinal (n = 9), skin/soft tissue (n = 7), gynecologic (n = 5), lung (n = 4), unknown primary (n = 4), ductal breast (n = 1), meningioma (n = 1)]; median age 64 (range 19-81); 48.4% women; 61.3% (19/31) > 3 lines of prior therapy; 74% (23/31) > 1 co-occurring mutation [median 2 co-alterations (range 1-20)]. 8/31 > 4 co-occurring alterations. 9 pts had SMO mutant tumors (all SNVs); 5/9 had > 1 co-occurring gene alterations. 22 pts had PTCH1 alterations (7 SNVs and 15 indels); 18/22 pts had > 1 additional gene alteration. Of 31 analyzable pts, 22 were MATCH-confirmed (i.e. had central confirmation of tumor PTCH1/SMO mutations). MATCH-confirmed pts had ORR 9.1% (2/22) while all analyzable pts had ORR 6.5% (2/31). 2 PRs were seen in pts with a skin/soft tissue sarcoma ( PTCH) and a meningioma ( SMO) with a median duration of response 14 months. The 6-month PFS rate was similar in MATCH-confirmed and analyzable pts (22.4% and 23.2% respectively) and median PFS was identical at 1.8 months. Median OS was 9.1 months in MATCH-confirmed and 7.3 months in analyzable pts. Within analyzable SMO variants: 1 PR, 3 SD, 4 PD, and 1 unevaluable responses were documented. Within analyzable PTCH1 variants: 1 PR, 7 SD, 10 PD, and 4 unevaluable responses were seen. 4 pts (12.9%) discontinued therapy due to AE. Among 33 pts starting therapy, 18 (54.5%) had grade 1-2 toxicity, while 2 (6.1%) had grade 3 treatment-related toxicity. Most common toxicities: grade 1-2 fatigue (n = 11), anorexia (n = 8), weight loss (n = 7), alopecia (n = 7), and dysgeusia (n = 6). There were 4 on-study deaths, but none were treatment related. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, vismodegib was well-tolerated with mostly grade 1-2 toxicities and substantial responses were seen in patients with SMOPro641Ala and PTCHGlu947Ter alterations. Further study of the impact of concomitant molecular alterations may yield additional insights into vismodegib mechanisms of response. Clinical trial information: NCT02465060.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne S. Tsao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Alan Loh Ho
- Solid Tumor Oncology Division, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John Joseph Wright
- National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Naoko Takebe
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert James Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lisa McShane
- Biometric Research Program, DCTD, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R. Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, NCI, NIH, Bethedsa, MD
| | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alice P. Chen
- Developmental Therapeutics Clinic, DCTD, NCI, Bethesda, MD
| | - Keith Flaherty
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Damodaran S, Zhao F, Deming DA, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Suga JM, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Copanlisib in Patients With Tumors With PIK3CA Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1F. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1552-1561. [PMID: 35133871 PMCID: PMC9084438 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Activating mutations in PIK3CA are observed across multiple tumor types. The NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a tumor-agnostic platform trial that enrolls patients to targeted therapies on the basis of matching genomic alterations. Arm Z1F evaluated copanlisib, an α and δ isoform-specific phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with PIK3CA mutations (with or without PTEN loss). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received copanlisib (60 mg intravenous) once weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles until progression or toxicity. Patients with KRAS mutations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancers, and lymphomas were excluded. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival, 6-month progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 25 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the Protocol. Multiple histologies were enrolled, with gynecologic (n = 6) and gastrointestinal (n = 6) being the most common. Sixty-eight percent of patients had ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. The ORR was 16% (4 of 25, 90% CI, 6 to 33) with P = .0341 against a null rate of 5%. The most common reason for protocol discontinuation was disease progression (n = 17, 68%). Grade 3/4 toxicities observed were consistent with reported toxicities for PI3K pathway inhibition. Sixteen patients (53%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity (CTCAE v5.0). Most common toxicities include hyperglycemia (n = 19), fatigue (n = 12), diarrhea (n = 11), hypertension (n = 10), and nausea (n = 10). CONCLUSION The study met its primary end point with an ORR of 16% (P = .0341) with copanlisib showing clinical activity in select tumors with PIK3CA mutation in the refractory setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John J. Wright
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R. Patton
- National Cancer Institute/Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, Rockville, MD
| | - P. Mickey Williams
- Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alice P. Chen
- Developmental Therapeutics Clinic/Early Clinical Trials Development Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Keith T. Flaherty
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Hart L, Campone M, Petrakova K, Winer EP, Janni W, Conte P, Cameron DA, André F, Arteaga CL, Zarate JP, Chakravartty A, Taran T, Le Gac F, Serra P, O'Shaughnessy J. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:942-950. [PMID: 35263519 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2114663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a previous analysis of this phase 3 trial, first-line ribociclib plus letrozole resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than letrozole alone among postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. Whether overall survival would also be longer with ribociclib was not known. METHODS Here we report the results of the protocol-specified final analysis of overall survival, a key secondary end point. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ribociclib or placebo in combination with letrozole. Overall survival was assessed with the use of a stratified log-rank test and summarized with the use of Kaplan-Meier methods after 400 deaths had occurred. A hierarchical testing strategy was used for the analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival to ensure the validity of the findings. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 181 deaths had occurred among 334 patients (54.2%) in the ribociclib group and 219 among 334 (65.6%) in the placebo group. Ribociclib plus letrozole showed a significant overall survival benefit as compared with placebo plus letrozole. Median overall survival was 63.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.4 to 71.0) with ribociclib plus letrozole and 51.4 months (95% CI, 47.2 to 59.7) with placebo plus letrozole (hazard ratio for death, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; two-sided P = 0.008). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS First-line therapy with ribociclib plus letrozole showed a significant overall survival benefit as compared with placebo plus letrozole in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Median overall survival was more than 12 months longer with ribociclib than with placebo. (Funded by Novartis; MONALEESA-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01958021.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel N Hortobagyi
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Salomon M Stemmer
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Howard A Burris
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Yoon-Sim Yap
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Lowell Hart
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Mario Campone
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Katarina Petrakova
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Eric P Winer
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Pierfranco Conte
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - David A Cameron
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Fabrice André
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Juan P Zarate
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Arunava Chakravartty
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Tetiana Taran
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Fabienne Le Gac
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Paolo Serra
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- From the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.N.H.), and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (C.L.A.), and Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology (J.O.), Dallas - all in Texas; the Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.M.S.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville (H.A.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Y.-S.Y.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam (G.S.S.); Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers (L.H.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (M.C.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical School, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (F.A.) - both in France; the Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (K.P.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (E.P.W.); the Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.J.); the Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and the Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy (P.C.); the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genomics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (D.A.C.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (J.P.Z., A.C.); and Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T., F.L.G., P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lin CC, Chang TC, Servetto A, Lee KM, Zhang H, Wang Y, Ye D, Chatterjee S, Sudhan DR, Akamatsu H, Xie Y, Mendell JT, Hanker AB, Arteaga CL. Abstract P5-17-09: A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies PRMT5 as a novel therapeutic target in ER+/ RB1-deficient breast cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p5-17-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved survival of patients with advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. However, this benefit is transient as virtually all these tumors eventually develop drug resistance and recur. Clinical studies have reported an association of RB1 loss-of-function genomic alterations with acquired resistance to CDK4/6i. Given the enrichment of RB1 alterations post CDK4/6i treatment, ER+/RB1-deficient breast cancer will become a rising patient population in need of discovery of novel treatment strategies. In this study, we sought to identify actionable vulnerabilities for this refractory breast cancer subtype using a genome-wide CRISPR screen. Methods: RB1 was knocked out in ER+ MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells using CRISPR-Cas9; complete gene knockout was confirmed by PCR-based genotyping, Sanger sequencing, and immunoblot analysis. Isogenic RB1 knockout (RBKO) and wild-type (WT) T47D cells were used for the genome-wide CRISPR screen. MAGeCKFlute was used to identify differentially essential genes in T47D RBKO vs WT cells; Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was used to prioritize hits. MCF-7 and T47D RBKO cells were used for validating and studying the function of the identified genes. Results: Knockout of RB1 in MCF-7 and T47D cells increased IC50 of abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib 10-200 fold compared to WT cells. RNA-seq analysis showed upregulation of E2F target gene expression in RBKO vs WT cells. The CRISPR screen revealed that CCND1 and CDK4 lost their essentiality in T47D RBKO cells, suggesting that loss of RB1 uncouples the CDK4/Cyclin D1 complex from E2F-regulated transcription. GO analysis of the top 50 differentially essential hits of RBKO vs WT cells showed an enrichment of protein arginine methyltransferase activity, primarily PRMT5, which post-translationally mono-methylates and symmetrically di-methylates protein arginine. In agreement with this finding, PRMT5 knockout by three individual sgRNAs resulted in more potent growth inhibition of MCF-7 and T47D RBKO cells than WT cells. Further, transfection of PRMT5 siRNA or treatment with the PRMT5 small molecule inhibitor GSK3326595 - currently in clinical trials - resulted in G1 arrest of MCF-7 and T47D RBKO cells as assayed by propidium iodide staining but did not induce caspase 3/7 or PARP cleavage (apoptosis). RNA-seq of PRMT5 siRNA vs control siRNA in MCF-7 and T47D RBKO cells exhibited significant downregulation of E2F Hallmark gene signature, further suggesting PRMT5 inhibition as a strategy to suppress E2F-regulated gene expression when cells lose Rb. The CRISPR screen also revealed that transcription factors that drive ER signaling, such as FOXA1, GATA3, MYC, SPDEF, and ESR1 (the gene encoding ERα), were commonly essential in both T47D WT and RBKO cells. Estrogen deprivation or treatment with fulvestrant inhibited estrogen responsive element (ERE) luciferase reporter activity, expression of putative E2F target genes, and proliferation of both WT and RBKO cells, suggesting that ER+ cells still rely on ERα irrespective of RB1 status. Treatment of MCF-7 and T47D RBKO cells with fulvestrant and GSK3326595 resulted in more potent growth inhibition than each drug alone, suggesting a novel approach to treat ER+/RB1-deficient breast cancer. We are currently testing the antitumor activity of fulvestrant plus GSK3326595 against RBKO xenografts as well as the requirement of arginine methyltransferase activity associated with PRMT5 for growth of ER+/RB1-deficient breast cancer cells. Conclusion: PRMT5 is essential for proliferation of ER+/RB1-deficient breast cancer cells. Targeting PRMT5 in combination with anti-estrogens is a novel and testable strategy to suppress E2F-regulated cell cycle progression of this CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant breast cancer subtype.
Citation Format: Chang-Ching Lin, Tsung-Cheng Chang, Alberto Servetto, Kyung-min Lee, He Zhang, Yunguan Wang, Dan Ye, Sumanta Chatterjee, Dhivya R Sudhan, Hiroaki Akamatsu, Yang Xie, Joshua T Mendell, Ariella B Hanker, Carlos L Arteaga. A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies PRMT5 as a novel therapeutic target in ER+/RB1-deficient breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-17-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - He Zhang
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Dan Ye
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | - Yang Xie
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hanker AB, Chatterjee S, Wang Y, Ye D, Sudhan DR, Larsen BM, Smith LC, Zhang Y, Kandagatla V, Majmudar K, Renzulli E, Mendiratta S, Blackwell K, Welm AL, Sahoo S, Unni N, Lewis CM, Wang T, Salahudeen AA, Arteaga CL. Abstract PD2-01: A platform of CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant patient-derived breast cancer organoids illuminates mechanisms of resistance and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd2-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with antiestrogens have revolutionized the treatment of ER+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC), significantly prolonging survival. However, this combination is not curative, and tumors eventually acquire resistance. Following progression on this combination, patients are left with limited treatment options. A diverse array of mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6i + antiestrogens have been described. However, laboratory models that capture this heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms are lacking. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) provide a rapid, robust and reliable platform that recapitulates intra-tumor heterogeneity, partially mimics the cancer microenvironment, and accurately predicts drug response. We aspired to generate a platform of CDK4/6i-resistant breast cancer PDOs to serve as models for understanding acquired resistance to CDK4/6i + antiestrogens and identifying therapies to overcome resistance. We successfully established 16 PDOs out of 32 biopsies (50% efficiency) of metastates from patients with ER+ MBC progressing on CDK4/6i (palbociclib or abemaciclib) + antiestrogens (letrozole or fulvestrant; median response to combination = 9 months). Our collection includes PDOs derived from lobular (n=3) and inflammatory (n=2) breast cancers and reflects racial/ethnic diversity (50% white/not Hispanic; 18.8% Hispanic; 12.5% Black; 12.5% other/unknown). Next-gen sequencing reports were available for 10 patients from which organoids were established, revealing alterations associated with CDK4/6i and/or antiestrogen resistance, including ESR1 (n=2), HER2/ERBB2 (n=2), PTEN (n=2), CCNE1 (n=1), NF1 (n=1), and ARID1A (n=1). Furthermore, one biopsy and its derived organoid lost ER expression, and 5 harbored PIK3CA activating mutations. Thus far, we have performed targeted DNA-sequencing on 7 PDOs and found 13/15 (86.7%) concordance with driver mutations from tumor NGS reports. PDOs established from CDK4/6i-resistant biopsies maintained resistance to palbociclib or abemaciclib ± fulvestrant (500 nM each) in 3D cell viability assays (6 days of treatment). In contrast, control PDOs established from primary ER+ breast cancer surgical samples (n=2) were sensitive to each CDK4/6i ± fulvestrant (median viability for combination=25.6-31.5% for control vs 65.2-80.5% for resistant). GSEA analysis of RNA-seq data from control (n=2) and CDK4/6i-resistant (n=6) PDOs cultured in estrogen-depleted media ± 200 nM palbociclib revealed that palbociclib treatment resulted in downregulation of E2F target and G2M checkpoint signatures in control but not resistant PDOs. Next, we performed a high-throughput screen of 1,000 compounds in 3 resistant PDOs. One PDO showed exquisite sensitivity to G2/M cell cycle checkpoint components, including CDK1, PLK1, Aurora kinase, ATR, Chk1, and Wee1 inhibitors. Finally, treatment of 10 resistant PDOs with the CDK2/4/6 inhibitor PF-06873600 revealed that the CCNE1 (cyclin E1)-amplified PDO was highly sensitive (IC50=130 nM vs >1000 nM), supporting that CCNE1-amplified tumors are vulnerable to CDK2 inhibition. Conclusions: PDOs can be successfully established from ER+ MBC biopsies, maintain the resistant phenotype in culture, retain driver alterations found in tumors from which they were derived, and fail to suppress E2F targets following treatment with CDK4/6i. Therefore, these PDOs represent valuable models to understand and explore diverse mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance and therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Citation Format: Ariella B. Hanker, Sumanta Chatterjee, Yunguan Wang, Dan Ye, Dhivya R. Sudhan, Brian M. Larsen, Lauren C. Smith, Yilin Zhang, Vishal Kandagatla, Kuntal Majmudar, Ezequiel Renzulli, Saurabh Mendiratta, Kimberly Blackwell, Alana L. Welm, Sunati Sahoo, Nisha Unni, Cheryl M. Lewis, Tao Wang, Ameen A. Salahudeen, Carlos L. Arteaga. A platform of CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant patient-derived breast cancer organoids illuminates mechanisms of resistance and therapeutic vulnerabilities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dan Ye
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nisha Unni
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Tao Wang
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sudhan DR, Chatterjee S, Kim J, Wang Y, Kandagatla V, Ye D, Lin CC, Zanudo JGT, Jain E, Marin A, Servetto A, Lee KM, Povedano JM, McFadden D, Barrett A, Wagle N, Hanker AB, Arteaga CL. Abstract GS3-09: Loss of ASXL1 tumor suppressor promotes resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-gs3-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with antiestrogens have prolonged survival of patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer. However, this combination is not curative mainly due to acquired drug resistance. Knowledge about mechanisms of such resistance remains quite incomplete. We report herein a forward-genetics screen to discover a broad spectrum of novel somatic mutations causal to CDK4/6i resistance. Methods: We used CRISPR/Cas9 to delete the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene MSH2 in MCF7 and T47D ER+ breast cancer cells. Deficiency of DNA MMR proteins such as MSH2 results in a high nucleotide substitution rate which, in turn, predisposes cells to acquire drug resistance-associated mutations. MSH2-/- MCF7 and T47D cells were infected with a lentiviral barcode library containing ~1000 unique DNA barcodes. MSH2-/- barcoded cells were expanded for ~25 doublings to allow the accumulation of random mutations. Clones resistant to CDK4/6i were selected in the presence of IC90 of palbociclib (200 nM) or abemaciclib (500 nM) for 4-6 weeks. CDK4/6i resistant clones with unique barcode IDs were subjected to whole exome sequencing (WES). Results: Following drug selection, ~73 uniquely barcoded resistant colonies emerged from MCF7 and T47D MSH2-/- clonal lines. As expected, MCF7 and T47D MSH2-/- clones harbored a high mutation burden compared to parental cells. Candidate variants were distilled based on (a) functionality prediction and (b) mutation frequency in Project GENIE. We observed RB1 (5/73 clones; 6.8%) mutations in CDK4/6i resistant clones, providing proof-of-principle that this approach can identify clinically-relevant drug resistant alterations. Overall, we identified non-synonymous alterations in 2,206 genes in T47D palbociclib-resistant, 2,195 genes in T47D abemaciclib-resistant, and 1,312 genes in MCF7 palbociclib-resistant lines. A secondary screen of the 10 genes recurrently mutated in all three CDK4/6i resistant groups identified loss of ASXL1 as top hit. ASXL1 encodes a polycomb repressive complex protein that regulates chromatin accessibility. Loss of ASXL1 has been implicated in myeloid transformation through epigenetic reprogramming. WES of 76 CDK4/6i resistant tumor biopsies (DFCI/MBCproject cohort) identified ASXL1 alterations in two and four patients with acquired and primary resistance, respectively (6/76=7.9%). One of the tumors that progressed after an initial response to palbociclib had acquired the same ASXL1 R549C mutation that was identified in our screen. Among 1,769 tumors from patients treated with CDK4/6i (TEMPUS database), 37 exhibited ASXL1 alterations (4 frameshift, 6 truncating, 3 in-frame del, 24 missense mutations). DNAseq of patient-derived organoids established from post-CDK4/6i metastases identified ASXL1 mutations in 2/7 organoids (29%). ASXL1-/- MCF7 and T47D cells were cross-resistant to fulvestrant. GSEA analysis of RNA-seq data showed upregulation of E2F targets in palbociclib-treated cells stably transduced with ASXL1 shRNA but not control shRNA (Enrichment score=0.75, q=1.00E-09). This was associated with maintenance of RB phosphorylation in the presence of CDK4/6i, markedly higher levels of CDK2, CDK6, cyclins E and A, and downregulation of p21 and p27. Finally, siRNAs targeting CDK2 or cyclin A reduced the viability of ASXL1-deficient T47D cells by 50% and 90%, respectively. Conclusions: An accelerated mutagenesis approach using MMR-deficient ER+ breast cancer cells identified loss of ASXL1 as a novel mechanism of resistance to CDK4/6i. ASXL1 alterations were found in ~8% of tumors from patients with de novo or acquired resistance to CDK4/6i. Knockdown of CDK2 and cyclin A restored sensitivity to CDK4/6i and reduced viability of ASXL1 deficient cells, suggesting CDK2 inhibitors are a treatment approach against these drug-resistant tumors.
Citation Format: Dhivya R. Sudhan, Sumanta Chatterjee, Jiwoong Kim, Yunguan Wang, Vishal Kandagatla, Dan Ye, Chang-Ching Lin, Jorge Gomez Tejeda Zanudo, Esha Jain, Arnaldo Marin, Alberto Servetto, Kyung-min Lee, Juan Manuel Povedano, David McFadden, Alex Barrett, Nikhil Wagle, Ariella B. Hanker, Carlos L. Arteaga. Loss of ASXL1 tumor suppressor promotes resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Dan Ye
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Esha Jain
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Smith KL, Zhao F, Mayer IA, Tevaarwerk AJ, Garcia SF, Arteaga CL, Symmans WF, Park BH, Burnette BL, Makower DF, Block M, Morley KA, Jani CR, Mescher C, Dewani SJ, Brown-Glaberman U, Flaum LE, Mayer EL, Sikov WM, Rodler ET, DeMichele AM, Sparano JA, Wolff AC, Miller KD, Wagner LI. Abstract P4-10-02: Patient-reported outcomes in EA1131: A randomized phase III trial of platinum vs. capecitabine in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p4-10-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Understanding health-related quality of life (HRQOL), including side effects, is critical to guide supportive care during chemotherapy. The EA1131 trial demonstrated that Platinum (Plat) was unlikely to improve outcomes compared to capecitabine (Cape) in patients with stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) of basal subtype and ≥1 cm residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), supporting Cape as the continued standard of care. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were administered as a sub-study to understand HRQOL and symptoms from the patient’s perspective. Methods: EA1131 was amended in 9/2017 to add PRO endpoints and all patients enrolled after this amendment were eligible for the PRO sub-study. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (FBSI) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity Subscale (NtxS; Plat arm only) were administered at baseline (BL), cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), and following treatment at 6 and 15 months. Due to early trial termination, the PRO sub-study target accrual (n=362) was not reached. It was hypothesized that HRQOL, assessed by the FBSI-Treatment Side Effect (TSE) subscale (range 0-16, higher score = less side effects, better HRQOL), would indicate fewer post-treatment side effects at 6 and 15 months following Plat compared to Cape. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare FBSI-TSE subscale scores and total FBSI scores (range 0-64, higher score = better overall HRQOL) between arms at BL, C3D1, 6 months and 15 months. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare change in FBSI-TSE subscale scores and total FBSI scores from BL to C3D1 between arms. Change in NtxS scores (range 0-44, higher score = less neurotoxicity) from BL to C3D1 was evaluated with the paired t-test. Analyses were exploratory and p-values <0.05 considered significant without multiple comparisons adjustment. Results: Of 331 patients eligible for the PRO sub-study (156 Plat arm, 175 Cape arm), 296 (89.4%) completed ≥1 PRO. Mean FBSI-TSE subscale scores were better for Cape at BL (Cape 14.5, Plat 13.9, p-value 0.02), for Plat at C3D1 (Cape 13.5, Plat 14.0, p-value 0.04), and did not differ at 6 months (Cape 14.6, Plat 14.7, p-value 0.70) or 15 months (Cape 14.9, Plat 14.5, p-value 0.44). FBSI-TSE subscale scores worsened from BL to C3D1 for Cape but not for Plat (mean change Cape -0.72, mean change Plat 0.15, p-value 0.003). FBSI-TSE subscale change scores from BL to C3D1 exceeded the threshold for clinically meaningful worsening (> 1.5 points) in 27% of patients on Cape and 23% of patients on Plat (p-value 0.51). Mean total FBSI scores did not differ between arms at any time (BL: Cape 50.6, Plat 49.7; C3D1: Cape 48.1, Plat 48.0; 6 months: Cape 49.9, Plat 51.1; 15 months: Cape 53.3, Plat 50.3; all p > 0.05). Mean change in total FBSI scores from BL to C3D1 did not differ between arms (Cape -2.20, Plat -1.83, p = 0.75). Mean (standard deviation) NtxS scores for the Plat arm were 38 (6.3), 36.1 (7.8), 36 (7.1) and 34.5 (7.9) at BL, C3D1, 6 months and 15 months, respectively. Mean NtxS score decreased (indicating worsening neurotoxicity) from BL to C3D1 (p-value 0.006). Conclusions: Despite more frequent severe toxicity by CTCAE criteria for Plat than Cape, patient-reported side effects worsened during treatment with Cape but not Plat. Overall, changes in HRQOL were small for both arms and resolved after therapy. However approximately one-fourth of patients had clinically meaningful worsening side effects on both arms. PRO-assessed neurotoxicity increased in the Plat arm. This PRO sub-study demonstrates that PROs capture toxicities beyond CTCAE criteria and provides novel data about patients’ experience during adjuvant chemotherapy following NAC for TNBC.
Citation Format: Karen L Smith, Fengmin Zhao, Ingrid A Mayer, Amye J Tevaarwerk, Sofia F Garcia, Carlos L Arteaga, William F Symmans, Ben H Park, Brian L Burnette, Della F Makower, Margaret Block, Kimberly A Morley, Chirag R Jani, Craig Mescher, Shabana J Dewani, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Lisa E Flaum, Erica L Mayer, William M Sikov, Eve T Rodler, Angela M DeMichele, Joseph A Sparano, Antonio C Wolff, Kathy D Miller, Lynne I Wagner. Patient-reported outcomes in EA1131: A randomized phase III trial of platinum vs. capecitabine in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L Smith
- Johns Hopkins University, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ingrid A Mayer
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | | | | - Ben H Park
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Brian L Burnette
- Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan (CROWN) NCORP, Green Bay, WI
| | | | | | | | | | - Craig Mescher
- Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St. Louis Park, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Antonio C Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kathy D Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Prat A, Solovieff N, Su F, Bardia A, Neven P, Hortobagyi GN, Tripathy D, Chia S, Slamon D, Lu YS, Taran T, Lteif A, Arteaga CL, André F. Abstract PD2-05: Genomic profiling of PAM50-based intrinsic subtypes in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) across the MONALEESA (ML) studies. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd2-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In the ML program, PAM50-based intrinsic subtypes (ie, luminal A [LumA], luminal B [LumB], HER2 enriched [HER2E], and basal-like [Basal]) were found to be prognostic and predictive of ribociclib benefit in ABC (Prat et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021). While ribocliclib demonstrated benefit in all subtypes (except Basal, with a limited sample size), LumB and HER2E derived the largest benefit. However, DNA features of the intrinsic subtypes in the advanced setting remain unknown. Here, we report the results of genomic profiling of baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by PAM50-based intrinsic subtypes across ML studies. Methods: A total of 883 of 2066 patients recruited in the ML-2, -3, and -7 phase 3 trials had both tumor intrinsic subtype and plasma ctDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based data obtained at baseline (ie, before starting treatment). The NGS-based panel targeted exonic regions in approximately 550 genes sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq instrument. A total of 130 patients had the normal-like subtype and were excluded from further analyses. For genes altered in > 5% of patients, we assessed the differences in frequency across intrinsic subtypes. Genetic alterations included mutations, indels, and copy number alterations. For each gene, a Fisher exact test was used to test for differences in frequency across the subtypes. A false discovery rate (FDR) correction was used to adjust for multiple testing. For genes with FDR < 0.10, a logistic regression model was used to quantify the relationship between subtypes and alteration status. Also, we evaluated differences across subtypes for tumor mutational burden (TMB) using analysis of variance and for ctDNA fraction using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Overall, gene amplifications were more frequent in the LumB, HER2E, and Basal subtypes. CCND1 (and genes FGF3/4/19 found in the same amplicon) was more frequently altered in HER2E (14.6%) and LumB (14.3%) than in the LumA (4.8%) subtype. Similarly, FGFR1 and MYC were more frequently altered in HER2E (13% and 9.8%), Basal (12.5% and 12.5%), and LumB (8.6% and 10%) than in the LumA (3.3% and 2.3%) subtype. PIK3CA alterations, including hotspot somatic mutations, were less frequent in Basal (12.5%) than in the LumB (27.6%), LumA (33.8%), and HER2E (37.4%) subtypes. In contrast, TP53 alterations were more frequent in Basal (66.7%) and HER2E (29.3%) than in the LumB (16.2%) and LumA (12.4%) subtypes. ERBB2 alterations (n = 25) were found in the LumA, LumB, and HER2E subtypes at similar frequencies (3%-4%). ESR1 did not show any significant difference across subtypes. TMB did not differ by subtype (P = .20), even when a TMB cutoff ≥ 10 was used (P = .23). Finally, ctDNA fraction differed across subtypes (P < .001), being significantly higher in the LumB (P < .001) and HER2E (P < .001) than in the LumA subtype. Conclusions: This is the first combined report of ctDNA NGS profiling and intrinsic molecular subtype in ABC. Differences in tumor DNA profiles were observed across PAM50 subtypes, with a trend for higher copy number alterations in HER2E and LumB than in the LumA subtype. LumA and Basal subtypes were found to have the most distinct genomic features. The Basal subtype is known to be similar to triple-negative BC from a clinical and biological perspective, which may explain the limited activity of ribociclib in this subgroup, as shown previously (Prat et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021). The pronounced activity of ribociclib in HER2E and LumB subtypes, which are enriched with somatic alterations associated with endocrine therapy resistance and tend to have a worse prognosis, warrants further investigation.
Citation Format: Aleix Prat, Nadia Solovieff, Faye Su, Aditya Bardia, Patrick Neven, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Debu Tripathy, Stephen Chia, Dennis Slamon, Yen-Shen Lu, Tetiana Taran, Agnes Lteif, Carlos L. Arteaga, Fabrice André. Genomic profiling of PAM50-based intrinsic subtypes in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) across the MONALEESA (ML) studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Faye Su
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Patrick Neven
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Debu Tripathy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephen Chia
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dennis Slamon
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Yen-Shen Lu
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Agnes Lteif
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Carlos L. Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Fabrice André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Krop IE, Jegede OA, Grilley-Olson JE, Lauring JD, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel JA, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Kono SA, Ford JM, Garcia AA, Sui XD, Siegel RD, Slomovitz BM, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Taselisib in PIK3CA-Mutated Solid Tumors Other Than Breast and Squamous Lung Cancer: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol I. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100424. [PMID: 35138919 PMCID: PMC8865530 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE PIK3CA mutations frequently contribute to oncogenesis in solid tumors. Taselisib, a potent and selective inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, has demonstrated clinical activity in PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer. Whether PIK3CA mutations predict sensitivity to taselisib in other cancer types is unknown. National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Arm EAY131-I is a single-arm, phase II study of the safety and efficacy of taselisib in patients with advanced cancers. METHODS Eligible patients had tumors with an activating PIK3CA mutation. Patients with breast or squamous cell lung carcinoma, or whose cancer had KRAS or PTEN mutations, were excluded. Patients received taselisib 4 mg, orally once daily continuously, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, overall survival (OS), and identification of predictive biomarkers. RESULTS Seventy patients were enrolled, and 61 were eligible and initiated protocol therapy. Types of PIK3CA mutations included helical 41 of 61 (67%), kinase 11 of 61 (18%), and other 9 of 61 (15%). With a median follow-up of 35.7 months, there were no complete or partial responses. Six-month PFS was 19.9% (90% CI, 12.0 to 29.3) and median PFS was 3.1 months (90% CI, 1.8 to 3.7). Six-month OS was 60.7% (90% CI, 49.6 to 70.0) and median OS was 7.2 months (90% CI, 5.9 to 10.0). Individual comutations were too heterogeneous to correlate with clinical outcome. Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and hyperglycemia were the most common toxicities, and most were grade 1 and 2. CONCLUSION In this study, taselisib monotherapy had very limited activity in a heterogeneous cohort of heavily pretreated cancer patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumors; the presence of a PIK3CA mutation alone does not appear to be a sufficient predictor of taselisib activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian E. Krop
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Opeyemi A. Jegede
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Parida PK, Marquez-Palencia M, Nair V, Kaushik AK, Kim K, Sudderth J, Quesada-Diaz E, Cajigas A, Vemireddy V, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Sanders ME, Mobley BC, Huffman K, Sahoo S, Alluri P, Lewis C, Peng Y, Bachoo RM, Arteaga CL, Hanker AB, DeBerardinis RJ, Malladi S. Metabolic diversity within breast cancer brain-tropic cells determines metastatic fitness. Cell Metab 2022; 34:90-105.e7. [PMID: 34986341 PMCID: PMC9307073 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
HER2+ breast cancer patients are presented with either synchronous (S-BM), latent (Lat), or metachronous (M-BM) brain metastases. However, the basis for disparate metastatic fitness among disseminated tumor cells of similar oncotype within a distal organ remains unknown. Here, employing brain metastatic models, we show that metabolic diversity and plasticity within brain-tropic cells determine metastatic fitness. Lactate secreted by aggressive metastatic cells or lactate supplementation to mice bearing Lat cells limits innate immunosurveillance and triggers overt metastasis. Attenuating lactate metabolism in S-BM impedes metastasis, while M-BM adapt and survive as residual disease. In contrast to S-BM, Lat and M-BM survive in equilibrium with innate immunosurveillance, oxidize glutamine, and maintain cellular redox homeostasis through the anionic amino acid transporter xCT. Moreover, xCT expression is significantly higher in matched M-BM brain metastatic samples compared to primary tumors from HER2+ breast cancer patients. Inhibiting xCT function attenuates residual disease and recurrence in these preclinical models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pravat Kumar Parida
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Mauricio Marquez-Palencia
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Vidhya Nair
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Akash K Kaushik
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kangsan Kim
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Jessica Sudderth
- Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Quesada-Diaz
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Ambar Cajigas
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Vamsidhara Vemireddy
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Melinda E Sanders
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bret C Mobley
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kenneth Huffman
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Sunati Sahoo
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Prasanna Alluri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Cheryl Lewis
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Yan Peng
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Robert M Bachoo
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Ariella B Hanker
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Ralph J DeBerardinis
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Srinivas Malladi
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Servetto A, Formisano L, Arteaga CL. FGFR signaling and endocrine resistance in breast cancer: Challenges for the clinical development of FGFR inhibitors. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2021; 1876:188595. [PMID: 34303787 PMCID: PMC10537726 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) have been extensively investigated in solid malignancies, representing an attractive therapeutic target. In breast cancer, especially in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) subtype, FGFR signaling aberrations have been reported to contribute to proliferation, dedifferentiation, metastasis and drug resistance. However, clinical trials evaluating the use of FGFR inhibitors in breast cancer have had disappointing results. The different biological properties of distinct FGFR alterations and lack of established patient selection criteria, in addition to the early use of non-selective inhibitors, are possible reasons of this failure. Herein, we review the current knowledge regarding the role of FGFR signaling in endocrine resistance in breast cancer. We will also summarize the results from the clinical development of FGFR inhibitors in breast cancer, discussing future challenges to identify the correct cohorts of patients to enroll in trials testing FGFR inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Servetto
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Formisano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|