Model Combining Tumor Molecular and Clinicopathologic Risk Factors Predicts Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma

Global Applicability of a Risk Prediction Tool for Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients With Primary Cutaneous Melanoma

Importance

The Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) sentinel node (SN) metastasis risk calculator provides estimates of positivity for individual patients based on 6 standard clinicopathological parameters and the full 6-parameter model has been externally validated previously using US data. However, given its geographically widespread use, further validation is required to ensure its applicability to other populations.

Objective

To further externally validate the MIA SN metastasis risk calculator and increase its precision by refinement of the 95% CIs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective multicenter cohort study was carried out using data from 4 continents, including the national Danish Melanoma Database and cancer centers in the UK (n = 3), US (n = 2), New Zealand (n = 1), Sweden (n = 1), and Brazil (n = 1). All patients aged 18 years or older who had an SN biopsy performed for an invasive primary cutaneous melanoma and data available on the following parameters: SN status, patient age at diagnosis, Breslow thickness, and melanoma subtype were included (n = 15 731). Available data were also collected on ulceration status, lymphovascular invasion, and the tumor mitotic rate. Data were collected between July 2021 and December 2023, and the analysis was conducted between January 2024 and June 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics for the full (6-parameter) risk prediction model. Secondary outcomes were the AUCs for each country and for the limited models (3-5 parameters), the model calibration, and the recalculated 95% CIs for the models. Decision curve analysis was performed to assess the tool's clinical utility.

Results

The whole pooled cohort consisted of 15 731 patients; 4989 had all 6 parameters available. The AUC was 73.0% (95% CI, 70.6%-75.3%) in the subset with all 6 parameters available, and 70.8%, 71.5%, and 70.1% when 1, 2, or 3 optional parameters were missing, respectively. Calibration was excellent, with an intercept and calibration slope of 0.01 (95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03) and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.90-1.16), respectively. The updated 95% CI ranges were substantially tighter, with a median reduction of more than 75%.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that the MIA SN-positivity calculator performed best with all 6 parameters and has been significantly improved (version 2), with the same risk point estimates but much tighter 95% CIs. These results demonstrated that the calculator was robust, precise, and applicable to geographically widespread melanoma populations.

Abscopal Effects and Immunomodulation in Skin Cancer Therapy

Radiation therapy (RT) is a crucial modality in cancer treatment, functioning through direct DNA damage and immune stimulation. However, RT's effects extend beyond targeted cells, influencing neighboring cells through the bystander effect (ByE) and distant sites via the abscopal effect (AbE). The AbE, first described by Mole in 1953, encompasses biological reactions at sites distant from the irradiation field. While RT can enhance antitumor immune responses, it may also contribute to an immunosuppressive microenvironment. To address this limitation, combining RT with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has gained renewed interest, aiming to amplify antitumor immune responses. Evidence of AbEs has been observed in various metastatic or advanced cutaneous cancers, including melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous lymphoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Clinical studies suggest combining RT with ICIs targeting CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 may enhance AbE incidence in these cancers. This review primarily explores the current understanding of AbEs in skin cancers, briefly acknowledging the ByE focusing on combining RT with immunomodulation. It focuses on proposed mechanisms, preclinical and clinical evidence, challenges in clinical translation, and future directions for harnessing AbEs in managing advanced skin malignancies. Alternative modalities for inducing abscopal-like responses are also explored. While promising, challenges remain in consistently reproducing AbEs in clinical practice, necessitating further research to optimize treatment combinations, timing, and patient selection.

MGAT3 and MGAT5 overexpression alters the protein cargo of extracellular vesicles released by metastatic melanoma cells

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are potential non-invasive diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic tools. Additionally, they are important contributors to tumorigenesis. Glycosylation has been found to modulate the composition of the EV proteome. Increased amounts of β1,6-branched N-glycans, synthesized by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V), are most commonly observed in melanoma and are associated with decreased cell adhesion and increased metastasis. The opposite effect is caused by the addition of bisecting GlcNAc by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III). To date, the impact of these enzymes on EV cargo in melanoma remains unexplored. Flow cytometry was used to study the surface glycosylation of genetic variants of WM266-4 melanoma cells with induced overexpression of GnT-III or GnT-V encoding genes (MGAT3 or MGAT5) and EVs released by these cells. LC-MS/MS proteomics was applied to analyze the effect of altered glycosylation on the proteome of released EVs, followed by detailed bioinformatic analysis. Flow cytometry analysis revealed dynamic changes in the surface glycosylation of EVs derived from melanoma cells overexpressing MGAT3 or MGAT5. Induced overexpression of MGAT3 or MGAT5 also caused significant changes in the proteome of EVs. The proteomic analysis identified a total of 1770 microvesicular and 704 exosomal proteins that play different roles in melanoma progression, including those with established diagnostic/prognostic potential and those closely associated with melanoma onset. Proteomic profiling of EVs derived from cells overexpressing MGAT3 and MGAT5 revealed functional changes in EV protein content driven by glycosylation modifications. The study presented a potential multifaced application of melanoma-derived EVs for diagnostic and prognostic purposes.

Enhanced Risk Stratification for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma Using the Merlin Assay (CP-GEP)

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for head and neck melanomas involves complex challenges due to intricate lymphatic networks and delicate anatomic structures. The Merlin Assay (CP-GEP), merging clinicopathologic data with gene expression profiling, offers a non-invasive method to identify patients who have a low risk for nodal metastasis, potentially sparing these low-risk patients from surgical procedures.

METHODS

This study evaluated 250 clinically node-negative patients with stage I, II, or III melanoma from the Mayo Clinic and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center who had tumors in the head and neck region diagnosed between 2004 and 2021. All the patients underwent SLNB. The Merlin Assay, using the CP-GEP model, combines patient age at diagnosis, Breslow thickness, and gene expression of eight specific genes from the primary tumor to predict the risk of nodal metastasis.

RESULTS

The SLNB positivity rate was 14% overall, and CP-GEP predicted a possible 40.8% reduction in SLNB procedures with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98%. For 215 SLNB-negative patients (5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] of 76.9%, distant metastasis-free survival [DMFS] of 84.3%, and melanoma-specific survival [MSS] of 90.6%), CP-GEP improved risk stratification by identifying 100 patients as low risk with 5-year RFS of 86.1%, DMFS of 92.7%, and MSS of 95.3%. Among 167 T1-T2 patients, the SLNB positivity rate was 8.4%, and CP-GEP achieved an SLNB reduction rate of 56.3% with an NPV of 98.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Merlin Assay effectively categorizes head and neck melanoma patients by risk, enabling more accurate clinical decision-making regarding SLNB and follow-up evaluation, especially for early-stage melanoma patients.

Reduction in surgical interventions in melanoma

Melanoma surgery has evolved from elective lymph node dissection (ELND) to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and wide local excision (WLE) margins have come down from 5 cm to nowadays 1 - 2 cm. Recent studies have illustrated the low frequency of residual tumour cells in WLE specimen, particularly for pT2 or lower tumours, where 97 % of patients cannot benefit from WLE. Moreover, a cohort of completely excised primary melanomas did not seem to have inferior clinical outcomes to those who did undergo WLE. Biomarkers, such as clinicopathological gene expression profilers (CP-GEP), can stratify high- and low-risk disease and make therapy decisions, in particular in clinical stage I/II melanoma and make sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) largely redundant. Also SLNB needs to be reconsidered due to the lack of a clear overall survival benefit for adjuvant therapy in stage III. Moreover SLNB is redundant in stage IIB/C for decision making on adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy. Moreover the superiority of neo-adjuvant to salvage patients with macroscopic stage III over adjuvant therapy leads to sharp reduction of therapeutic lymph node dissections (TLND). Overall, the major impact of current developments is that SLNB might soon become obsolete and may be replaced by standard CP-GEP testing of the primary for clinical management, reduction of surgical interventions and simplification of follow up schedules in low risk patients. Thus, we are on the eve of a significant reduction in surgical interventions for melanoma that will come in the upcoming years.

Risk Prediction Models for Sentinel Node Positivity in Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

There is a need to identify the best performing risk prediction model for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) positivity in melanoma.

Objective

To comprehensively review the characteristics and discriminative performance of existing risk prediction models for SLNB positivity in melanoma.

Data Sources

Embase and MEDLINE were searched from inception to May 1, 2024, for English language articles.

Study Selection

All studies that either developed or validated a risk prediction model (defined as any calculator that combined more than 1 variable to provide a patient estimate for probability of melanoma SLNB positivity) with a corresponding measure of model discrimination were considered for inclusion by 2 reviewers, with disagreements adjudicated by a third reviewer.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were extracted in duplicate according to Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies, Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. Effects were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome was the mean pooled C statistic. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

Results

In total, 23 articles describing the development of 21 different risk prediction models for SLNB positivity, 20 external validations of 8 different risk prediction models, and 9 models that included sufficient information to obtain individualized patient risk estimates in routine preprocedural clinical practice were identified. Among all risk prediction models, the pooled weighted C statistic was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.81) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 97.4%) that was not explained in meta-regression. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Melanoma Institute of Australia models were most frequently externally validated with both having strong and comparable discriminative performance (pooled weighted C statistic, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.78 vs pooled weighted C statistic, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74). Discrimination was not significantly different between models that included gene expression profiles (pooled C statistic, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90) and those that only used clinicopathologic features (pooled C statistic, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81) (P = .11).

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review and meta-analysis found several risk prediction models that have been externally validated with strong discriminative performance. Further research is needed to evaluate the associations of their implementation with preprocedural care.

Society of Surgical Oncology Consensus Statement: Assessing the Evidence for and Utility of Gene Expression Profiling of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Gene expression profiling (GEP) of primary cutaneous melanoma aims to offer prognostic and predictive information to guide clinical care. Despite limited evidence of clinical utility, these tests are increasingly incorporated into clinical care.

METHODS

A panel of melanoma experts from the Society of Surgical Oncology convened to develop recommendations regarding the use of GEP to guide management of patients with melanoma. The use of currently available GEP tests were evaluated in three clinical scenarios: (1) the utility in patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy; (2) the utility to guide surveillance; and (3) the utility to inform adjuvant therapy. As a basis for these recommendations, the panel performed a systematic review of the literature, including articles published from January 2012 until August 2023.

RESULTS

After review of 137 articles, 50 met the inclusion criteria. These articles included evidence related to three available GEP tests: 31-GEP, CP-GEP, and 11-GEP. The consensus recommendations were finalized using a modified Delphi process. The panel found that current evidence often fails to account for known clinicopathologic risk factors and lacks high-level data. The panel recognizes that the study of GEP tests is still evolving. The integration of GEP into routine clinical practice for predicting sentinel lymph node status and patient prognosis in melanoma is therefore not currently recommended.

CONCLUSION

At present, GEP should be considered primarily an investigational tool, ideally used in the context of clinical trials or specialized research settings.

The Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study: a discovery set and validation cohort to predict the absolute risk of distant metastases in stage I/II cutaneous melanoma

Early-stage cutaneous melanoma patients generally have a favorable prognosis, yet a significant proportion of metastatic melanoma cases arise from this group, highlighting the need for improved risk stratification using novel prognostic biomarkers. The Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study introduces a robust, population-based methodology to develop an absolute risk prediction model for stage I/II melanoma, incorporating clinical, imaging, and multi-omics data to identify patients at increased risk for distant metastases. Utilizing the Netherlands Cancer Registry and Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank, we collected primary tumor samples from early-stage melanoma patients, with and without distant metastases during follow-up. Our study design includes a discovery set of metastatic cases and matched controls to identify novel prognostic factors, followed by a validation cohort using a nested case-control design to validate these factors and to build a risk prediction model. Tissue sections underwent Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) staining, RNA sequencing (RNAseq), DNA sequencing (DNAseq), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF).The discovery set included 442 primary melanoma samples (221 case-control sets), with 46% stage I and 54% stage II melanomas. The median time to distant metastasis was 3.4 years, while controls had a median follow-up time of 9.8 years. The validation cohort included 154 cases and 154 controls from a random population-based selection of 5,815 patients. Our approach enabled the collection of a large number of early-stage melanoma samples from population-based databases with extensive follow-up and a sufficient number of metastatic events. This methodology in prognostic cancer research holds the potential to impact clinical decision-making through absolute risk prediction.

Melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy in the modern era

The initial route of metastasis for many cancers, including melanoma, is via regional lymphatic channels. This fact, recognized more than a century ago, has spurred tremendous interest in the optimal method of assessing and treating lymph nodes and eventually led to the development of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. The potential utility of nodal treatment includes providing the most accurate staging or prognostic information and removing early metastases in order to halt the cascade of metastatic spread in an effort to save the patient's life. In the past, pathologic assessment of regional lymph nodes required removal of all regional nodes, a procedure that results in moderate levels of short and long-term morbidity. SLN biopsy allows not only a minimally invasive method of nodal assessment, but one more accurate than full node dissection as it permits more intensive pathologic scrutiny of the tissue. The question of the therapeutic effect of SLN biopsy has been a subject of much controversy. There is clear evidence that SLN biopsy improves relapse-free survival in melanoma, but its effect on melanoma-specific and overall survival remains less clear.

Lymph node metastasis in cancer: Clearing the clouds to see the dawn

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is often regarded as an indicator of poor prognosis in various cancers. Despite over three centuries of exploration since its discovery, the molecular mechanisms underlying LNM remain inconclusive. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms of LNM, using the "PUMP+" principle for clarification. Pathological examination remains the gold standard for LNM diagnosis, yet there is a need to explore early diagnostic strategies that can effectively improve patient outcomes. With the advent of immunotherapy, discussions on the fate of lymph nodes (LN) have emerged, emphasizing the importance of preserving LN integrity prior to immunotherapy. This, in turn, poses higher demands for diagnostic accuracy and precision treatment of LNM. This review comprehensively discusses the molecular mechanisms, diagnostic methods, and treatment strategies for cancer lymph node metastasis, along with current bottlenecks and future directions in this field.

Metabolic insights into tumor lymph node metastasis in melanoma

Although accounting for only a small amount of skin cancers, melanoma contributes prominently to skin cancer-related deaths, which are mostly caused by metastatic diseases, and lymphatic metastasis constitutes the main route. In this review, we concentrate on the metabolic mechanisms of tumor lymph node (LN) metastasis in melanoma. Two hypotheses of melanoma LN metastasis are introduced, which are the premetastatic niche (PMN) and parallel progression model. Dysregulation of oxidative stress, lactic acid concentration, fatty acid synthesis, amino acid metabolism, autophagy, and ferroptosis construct the metabolic mechanisms in LN metastasis of melanoma. Moreover, melanoma cells also promote LN metastasis by interacting with non-tumor cells through metabolic reprogramming in TIME. This review will deepen our understanding of the mechanism of lymph node metastasis in melanoma.

Are Nomograms Useful for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Melanoma Patients?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Clinical nomograms have been developed to predict sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in early-stage melanoma patients, but the clinical utility of these tools remains debatable. We created and validated a nomogram using data from a randomized clinical trial and assessed its accuracy against the well-validated Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) nomogram.

METHODS

We developed our model to predict SLN status using logistic regression on clinicopathological patient data from the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial-I. The model was externally validated using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) data set, and its performance was compared to that of the MIA nomogram.

RESULTS

Our model had good discrimination between positive and negative SLNs, with a training set area under the curve (AUC) of 0.706 (0.661-0.751). Our model achieved an AUC of 0.715 (0.706-0.724) compared to 0.723 (0.715-0.731) with the MIA model, using the NCDB set.

CONCLUSION

Our model performed similarly to the MIA model, confirming that despite using different clinical features and data sets, no clinical nomogram is currently accurate enough for clinical use.

The Prognostic Value of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous melanoma is an increasingly common and potentially lethal form of skin cancer. Current staging systems based on clinical and pathological features have limitations in accurately predicting outcomes, particularly for early-stage disease. The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test has emerged as a promising tool for improving risk stratification in melanoma patients.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the prognostic performance of the 31-GEP test in cutaneous melanoma. A comprehensive literature search was performed in multiple databases. Studies reporting survival outcomes stratified by 31-GEP class were included. Random-effects models were used to determine survival estimates across studies.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies comprising 14,760 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The 31-GEP test consistently stratified patients into risk groups with significantly different outcomes. The 5-year melanoma-specific survival rates were 99.8% (95% CI: 98-100%) for Class 1A, 97.6% (95% CI: 92.4-99.3%) for Class 1B/2A, and 83.4% (95% CI: 66.5-92.7%) for Class 2B. Similar trends were observed for recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports the prognostic utility of the 31-GEP test in cutaneous melanoma prognostication. The test consistently stratified patients into clinically meaningful risk groups across multiple survival metrics. These findings support the potential clinical utility of the 31-GEP test in enhancing current staging systems and informing personalized management strategies for melanoma patients.

Clinicopathological and cellular senescence biomarkers in chronic stalled wounds

BACKGROUND

Chronic wounds have been associated with an elevated burden of cellular senescence, a state of essentially irreversible cell cycle arrest, resistance to apoptosis, and a secretory phenotype. However, whether senescent cells contribute to wound chronicity in humans remains unclear. The objective of this article is to assess the role of clinicopathological characteristics and cellular senescence in the time-to-healing of chronic wounds.

METHODS

A cohort of 79 patients with chronic wounds was evaluated in a single-center academic practice from February 1, 2005, to February 28, 2015, and followed for up to 36 months. Clinical characteristics and wound biopsies were obtained at baseline, and time-to-healing was assessed. Wound biopsies were analyzed histologically for pathological characteristics and molecularly for markers of cellular senescence. In addition, biopsy slides were stained for p16INK4a expression.

RESULTS

No clinical or pathological characteristics were found to have significant associations with time-to-healing. A Cox proportional hazard ratio model revealed increased CDKN1A (p21CIP1/WAF1) expression to predict longer time-to-healing, and a model adjusted for gender and epidermal hyperplasia revealed increased CDKN1A expression and decreased PAPPA expression to predict longer time-to-healing. Increased p16INK4a staining was observed in diabetic wounds compared to non-diabetic wounds, and the same association was observed in the context of high dermal fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this pilot study suggest that senescent cells contribute to wound chronicity in humans, especially in diabetic wounds.

Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Stage II Melanoma: Current Paradigms in Management and Future Directions

Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States and accounts for the majority of all skin cancer-related deaths, making it the most lethal cutaneous malignancy. Systemic adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-IV melanoma is now approved for patients who have undergone surgical resection, given the appreciable risk of recurrence and mortality in this patient population. Despite the lower stage, high-risk stage II melanoma (stage IIB/IIC) can often exhibit an even more aggressive course when compared to stage IIIA/IIIB disease, thus justifying consideration of adjuvant therapy in these patients. In this review, we highlight the current standard of practice for the treatment of stage IIB/C melanoma, with a focus on adjuvant therapies supported by published landmark clinical trials, including anti-PD-1 therapy. Notably, adjuvant therapies approved thus far in this patient population have demonstrated an improvement in recurrence-free survival, while their impact on overall survival is pending. Finally, this review highlights currently ongoing trials and future directions for research and treatment possibilities for high-risk clinical stage II melanoma.

Risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis in Korean acral and non-acral melanoma patients

Breslow thickness, ulceration, and mitotic rate are well-known prognostic factors for sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in cutaneous melanoma. We investigated risk factors, including especially the degree of pigmentation, for SLN metastasis in Korean melanoma patients. We enrolled 158, composed of Korean 107 acral and 51 non-acral melanoma patients who underwent SLN biopsy. Clinicopathologic features such as Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, and the degree of pigmentation were evaluated. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and date of recurrence were determined. Fifty-four patients (34.2%) had a positive SLN biopsy result. In a multivariate analysis, Breslow thickness (odds ratio [OR] 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-3.47; p = .022) and heavy pigmentation (OR 13.14; 95% CI, 2.96-95.20, p = .002) were associated with SLN metastasis. Positive SLN patients had a higher rate of loco-regional and/or distant recurrence (hazard ratio 6.32; 95% CI, 3.39-11.79; p < .001). Heavy pigmentation was associated with poor RFS. Heavy pigmentation is an independent predictor of SLN metastasis in both acral and non-acral melanoma. Our results suggest the need for in-depth SLN evaluation of cutaneous melanoma patients with heavy pigmentation and provide clinicians with important information for determining patient prognosis.

Sentinel lymph node risk prognostication in primary cutaneous melanoma through tissue-based profiling, potentially redefining the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is pivotal in the contemporary staging of cutaneous melanoma. In this review, we examine advanced molecular testing platforms like gene expression profiling (GEP) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as tools for predicting the prognosis of sentinel lymph nodes. We compare these innovative approaches with traditional staging assessments. Additionally, we delve into the shared genetic and protein markers between GEP and IHC tests and their relevance to melanoma biology, exploring their prognostic and predictive characteristics. Finally, we assess alternative methods to potentially obviate the need for SLNB altogether.

RECENT FINDINGS

Progress in adjuvant melanoma therapy has diminished the necessity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) while underscoring the importance of accurately identifying high-risk stage I and II melanoma patients who may benefit from additional anti-tumor interventions. The clinical application of testing through gene expression profiling (GEP) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) is gaining traction, with platforms such as DecisionDx, Merlin Assay (CP-GEP), MelaGenix GEP, and Immunoprint coming into play. Currently, extensive validation studies are in progress to incorporate routine molecular testing into clinical practice. However, due to significant methodological limitations, widespread clinical adoption of tissue-based molecular testing remains elusive at present.

SUMMARY

While various tissue-based molecular testing platforms have the potential to stratify the risk of sentinel lymph node positivity (SLNP), most suffer from significant methodological deficiencies, including limited sample size, lack of prospective validation, and limited correlation with established clinicopathological variables. Furthermore, the genes and proteins identified by individual gene expression profiling (GEP) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests exhibit minimal overlap, even when considering the most well-established melanoma mutations. However, there is hope that the ongoing prospective trial for the Merlin Assay may safely reduce the necessity for SLNB procedures if successful. Additionally, the MelaGenix GEP and Immunoprint tests could prove valuable in identifying high-risk stage I-II melanoma patients and potentially guiding their selection for adjuvant therapy, thus potentially reducing the need for SLNB. Due to the diverse study designs employed, effective comparisons between GEP or IHC tests are challenging, and to date, there is no study directly comparing the clinical utility of these respective GEP or IHC tests.

Validation of the Melanoma Institute of Australia's Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Risk Prediction Tool for Cutaneous Melanoma

BACKGROUND

For patients with cutaneous melanoma, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to stage regional lymph nodes pathologically and inform prognosis, treatment, and surveillance. To reduce unnecessary surgeries, predictive tools aim to identify those at lowest risk for node-positive disease. The Melanoma Institute of Australia (MIA)'s Prediction Tool for Sentinel Node Metastasis Risk estimates risk of a positive SLNB using patient age and primary melanoma Breslow depth, histologic subtype, ulceration, mitotic rate, and lymphovascular invasion.

METHODS

A single-institution validation was performed of the MIA Calculator with 982 cutaneous melanoma patients that included all relevant clinicopathologic factors and SLNB pathology outcomes. The study evaluated discrimination via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration via calibration plots, and clinical utility via decision curve analysis of the MIA model in various subgroups. The data were fit to MIA model parameters via a generalized linear model to assess the odds ratio of parameters in our dataset.

RESULTS

The Calculator demonstrated limited discrimination based on ROC curves (C-statistic, 0.709) and consistently underestimated risk of SLN positivity. It did not provide a net benefit over SLNB performed on all patients or reduce unnecessary procedures in the risk domain of 0% to 16%. Compared with the original development and validation cohorts, the current study cohort had thinner tumors and a larger proportion of acral melanomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The Calculator generally underestimated SLN positivity risk, including assessment in patients who would be counseled to forego SLNB based on a predicted risk lower than 5%. Recognition of the tool's current limitations emphasizes the need to refine it further for use in medical decision-making.

The effect of surgical timing in nonmetastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus guidelines on the best timing to perform Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in high-risk melanoma patients. We aimed to understand the impact of surgical timing on nodal upstaging in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2018 for patients with T2-T4, N0, M0 melanomas, who underwent melanoma excision and nodal surgery. We included patients who underwent surgery within 2-19 weeks postdiagnosis. We aimed to determine the association of surgical delay (weeks) with nodal positivity.

RESULTS

A total of 53 355 patients were included, of whom 20.9% had positive lymph nodes. Patients underwent surgery at a median of 5 (4-7) weeks after diagnosis. The rate of positive nodes increased with increased weeks to surgery (line of best-fit slope = 0.38). Multivariable regression analysis identified an association between time to surgery and nodal positivity (2.4% increased risk per week, p < 0.05). Our analysis showed significantly increased likelihood of nodal positivity beginning 9 weeks after diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3, p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with T2-3 tumors had a significant increase in nodal positivity with increased time to surgery (OR = 1.03 per week, p < 0.001). However, no significant trend in nodal positivity was identified for patients with T4 melanomas (OR = 1.01 per week, p = 0.596).

CONCLUSION

Surgery within 9 weeks of melanoma diagnosis was not associated with increased likelihood of nodal positivity. These data can guide clinical conversations regarding the importance of surgical timing for melanoma.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in melanoma

Biomarkers help to inform the clinical management of patients with melanoma. For patients with clinically localised primary melanoma, biomarkers can help to predict post-surgical outcome (including via the use of risk prediction tools), better select patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and tailor catch-all follow-up protocols to the individual. Systemic drug treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies and BRAF-targeted therapies, have radically improved the prognosis of metastatic (stage III and IV) cutaneous melanoma patients, and also shown benefit in the earlier setting of stage IIB/C primary melanoma. Unfortunately, a response is far from guaranteed. Here, we review clinically relevant, established, and emerging, prognostic, and predictive pathological biomarkers that refine clinical decision-making in primary and metastatic melanoma patients. Gene expression profile assays and nomograms are emerging tools for prognostication and sentinel lymph node risk prediction in primary melanoma patients. Biomarkers incorporated into clinical practice guidelines include BRAF V600 mutations for the use of targeted therapies in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, and the HLA-A∗02:01 allele for the use of a bispecific fusion protein in metastatic uveal melanoma. Several predictive biomarkers have been proposed for ICI therapies but have not been incorporated into Australian clinical practice guidelines. Further research, validation, and assessment of clinical utility is required before more prognostic and predictive biomarkers are fluidly integrated into routine care.

The Use of Gene Expression Profiling and Biomarkers in Melanoma Diagnosis and Predicting Recurrence: Implications for Surveillance and Treatment

Cutaneous melanoma is becoming more prevalent in the United States and has the highest mortality among cutaneous malignancies. The majority of melanomas are diagnosed at an early stage and, as such, survival is generally favorable. However, there remains prognostic uncertainty among subsets of early- and intermediate-stage melanoma patients, some of whom go on to develop advanced disease while others remain disease-free. Melanoma gene expression profiling (GEP) has evolved with the notion to help bridge this gap and identify higher- or lower-risk patients to better tailor treatment and surveillance protocols. These tests seek to prognosticate melanomas independently of established AJCC 8 cancer staging and clinicopathologic features (sex, age, primary tumor location, thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion, microsatellites, and/or SLNB status). While there is a significant opportunity to improve the accuracy of melanoma prognostication and diagnosis, it is equally important to understand the current landscape of molecular profiling for melanoma treatment. Society guidelines currently do not recommend molecular testing outside of clinical trials for melanoma clinical decision making, citing insufficient high-quality evidence guiding indications for the testing and interpretation of results. The goal of this chapter is to review the available literature for GEP testing for melanoma diagnosis and prognostication and understand their place in current treatment paradigms.

Clinical evaluation of the clinicopathologic and gene expression profile (CP-GEP) in patients with melanoma eligible for sentinel lymph node biopsy: A multicenter prospective Dutch study

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended for patients with >pT1b cutaneous melanoma, and should be considered and discussed with patients diagnosed with pT1b cutaneous melanoma for the purpose of staging, prognostication and determining eligibility for adjuvant therapy. Previously, the clinicopathologic and gene expression profile (CP-GEP, Merlin Assay®) model was developed to identify patients who can forgo SLNB because of a low risk for sentinel node metastasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical use and implementation of the CP-GEP model in a prospective multicenter study in the Netherlands. Both test performance and feasibility for clinical implementation were assessed in 260 patients with T1-T4 melanoma. The CP-GEP model demonstrated an overall negative predictive value of 96.7% and positive predictive value of 23.7%, with a potential SLNB reduction rate of 42.2% in patients with T1-T3 melanoma. With a median time of 16 days from initiation to return of test results, there was sufficient time left before the SLNB was performed. Based on these outcomes, the model may support clinical decision-making to identify patients who can forgo SLNB in clinical practice.

Histopathologic abundance of pigmentation correlates with disease-specific survival in malignant melanoma but is not independent of current AJCC pT stage

The increasing number of melanoma patients makes it necessary to develop best possible strategies for prognosis assessment in order to recommend appropriate therapy and follow-up. The prognostic significance of tumor cell pigmentation has not been fully elucidated. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of 775 melanomas diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 were independently assessed for melanin pigment abundance by two investigators, and the impact on melanoma-specific survival was calculated. Unpigmented melanomas (n = 99) had a melanoma-specific survival of 67.7%, melanomas with moderate pigmentation (n = 384) had a melanoma-specific survival of 85.9%, and strongly pigmented melanomas (n = 292) had a melanoma-specific survival of 91.4% (p < .001). In an analysis of melanoma-specific survival adjusted for pT stage and pigmentation, we found a nonsignificant impact of pigmentation abundance with a hazard ratio of 1.277 (p = .74). The study presented here provides evidence in a German cohort that patients with pigmented melanomas have a more favorable prognosis than those diagnosed with nonpigmented melanomas. Moreover, the abundance of pigmentation already seems to provide a first prognostic estimate. However, it does not appear to provide significant additional value for prognostic assessment according to the AJCC 2017 pT classification.

A Clinical Decision Tool to Calculate Pretest Probability of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) status is a strong prognostic indicator for cutaneous melanoma, unnecessary SLNBs have substantial cost and morbidity burden.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to develop, validate, and present a personalized, clinical, decision-making tool using nationally representative data with clinically actionable probability thresholds (Expected Lymphatic Metastasis Outcome [ELMO]).

METHODS

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry from 2000 to 2017 and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2015 were used to develop and internally validate a logistic ridge regression predictive model for SLNB positivity. External validation was done with 1568 patients at a large tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

The development cohort included 134,809 patients, and the internal validation cohort included 38,518 patients. ELMO (AUC 0.85) resulted in a 29.54% SLNB reduction rate and greater sensitivity in predicting SLNB status for T1b, T2a, and T2b tumors than previous models. In external validation, ELMO had an accuracy of 0.7586 and AUC of 0.7218. Limitations of this study are potential miscoding, unaccounted confounders, and effect modification.

CONCLUSIONS

ELMO ( https://melanoma-sentinel.herokuapp.com/ ) has been developed and validated (internally and externally) by using the largest publicly available dataset of melanoma patients and was found to have high accuracy compared with other published models and gene expression tests. Individualized risk estimates for SLNB positivity are critical in facilitating thorough decision-making for healthcare providers and patients with melanoma.

Alternatives and reduced need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) staging for melanoma

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced in the 1990s to identify patients who might benefit from completion lymph node dissection. Neither SLNB nor CLND improved survival, but SLNB staging did provide the best staging, above Breslow thickness and ulceration. The SLN status and SLN tumour burden were used in all trials until date looking at modern adjuvant systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) or targeted therapies (TT). Adjuvant ICI and TT are shifting towards stage II melanoma. The question is whether there is still role for SLNB in melanoma, in this day and age, and if so, how does the future look for SLNB staging? The SLN status and SLN tumour burden might be useful for a consultation to discuss the number needed to treat in a risk/benefit discussion. For stage IIB/C patients, it seems likely, however, that patients will forego a nuclear scan followed by the risk of surgical intervention and morbidity associated with SLNB if they opt to receive adjuvant therapy regardless of the SLNB result. For stage I/IIA, it is still required to detect high-risk patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy. However, biomarkers are emerging, such as gene expression profilers (GEP), immunohistological signatures and liquid biopsies with ctDNA. There still is a role for SLNB staging in melanoma today, but we expect that the availability of therapeutic option independent of SLNB status as well as emergence of validated biomarkers to predict risk will reduce the need for SLNB staging in the upcoming decade to the point it will no longer be used.

Identification of stage I/II melanoma patients at high risk for recurrence using a model combining clinicopathologic factors with gene expression profiling (CP-GEP)

PURPOSE

Patients with cutaneous melanoma stage I/IIA disease are currently not eligible for adjuvant therapy, despite their risk for relapses and death. This study validates the ability of a model combining clinicopathologic factors with gene expression profiling (CP-GEP) to identify patients at high risk for disease recurrence in stage I/II and subgroup stage I/IIA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

543 patients with stage I/II primary cutaneous melanoma from the University of Tuebingen diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 were analysed. All patients received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Analysis was conducted for a separate group of 80 patients who did not undergo SLNB.

RESULTS

CP-GEP stratified 424 stage I/IIA patients (78% of the cohort) according to their risk for recurrence, with five-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates of 77.8% and 93% for CP-GEP high risk (195 patients) and low risk (229 patients), respectively, and hazard ratio of 3.53 (p-value <0.001). In patients who did not receive SLNB biopsy, CP-GEP captured 6 out of 7 relapses.

CONCLUSION

CP-GEP can be used to identify primary cutaneous melanoma patients with a high risk for disease recurrence - especially for stage I/IIA, who are considered low risk by AJCC 8th. These patients may benefit from adjuvant therapy. Also, in the future, when SLNB may become irrelevant, CP-GEP may serve as a risk stratification tool.

Molecular testing in melanoma for the surgical pathologist

The diagnostic work-up of melanocytic tumours has undergone significant changes in the last years following the exponential growth of molecular assays. For the practising pathologist it is often difficult to sort through the multitude of different tests that are currently available for clinical use. The molecular tests used in melanocytic pathology can be broadly divided into four categories: (1) tests that predict response to systemic therapy in melanoma; (2) tests that predict prognosis in melanoma; (3) tests useful in determining the type or class of melanocytic tumour; and (4) tests useful in the differential diagnosis of naevus versus melanoma (primarily used as an aid in the diagnosis of histologically ambiguous melanocytic lesions). This review will present an updated synopsis of major molecular ancillary tests used in clinical practice.

Optimizing treatment approaches for patients with cutaneous melanoma by integrating clinical and pathologic features with the 31-gene expression profile test

BACKGROUND

Many patients with low-stage cutaneous melanoma will experience tumor recurrence, metastasis, or death, and many higher staged patients will not.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an algorithm by integrating the 31-gene expression profile test with clinicopathologic data for an optimized, personalized risk of recurrence (integrated 31 risk of recurrence [i31-ROR]) or death and use i31-ROR in conjunction with a previously validated algorithm for precise sentinel lymph node positivity risk estimates (i31-SLNB) for optimized treatment plan decisions.

METHODS

Cox regression models for ROR were developed (n = 1581) and independently validated (n = 523) on a cohort with stage I-III melanoma. Using National Comprehensive Cancer Network cut points, i31-ROR performance was evaluated using the midpoint survival rates between patients with stage IIA and stage IIB disease as a risk threshold.

RESULTS

Patients with a low-risk i31-ROR result had significantly higher 5-year recurrence-free survival (91% vs 45%, P < .001), distant metastasis-free survival (95% vs 53%, P < .001), and melanoma-specific survival (98% vs 73%, P < .001) than patients with a high-risk i31-ROR result. A combined i31-SLNB/ROR analysis identified 44% of patients who could forego sentinel lymph node biopsy while maintaining high survival rates (>98%) or were restratified as being at a higher or lower risk of recurrence or death.

LIMITATIONS

Multicenter, retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

Integrating clinicopathologic features with the 31-GEP optimizes patient risk stratification compared to clinicopathologic features alone.

Cost evaluation of the Merlin assay for predicting melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy metastasis

BACKGROUND

The Merlin assay for melanoma-risk assessment has become commercially available to reduce the rate of unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) in SLNB-eligible patients with cutaneous melanoma. Merlin low-risk patients are recommended to undergo wide local excision (WLE) of the primary tumor, whereas Merlin high-risk patients are recommended to undergo both SLNB and WLE. Here, we compared the cost of a Merlin testing strategy to that of a no-testing strategy (usual care) before prescribing SLNB.

METHODS

We identified T1 and T2 patients who underwent WLE and SLNB but not completion lymph node dissection between 2007 and 2018. Controls were T1 patients who only underwent WLE. Costs for WLE and SLNB were calculated by converting institutional cost data to standardized Medicare reimbursement rates. We then developed a decision tree to compare the cost of Merlin testing to that of a no-testing strategy (usual care).

RESULTS

The average standardized cost of WLE was $2066, whereas the cost of WLE and SLNB was $11,976 based on Medicare rates. At a cost below $7350 for T1b melanoma and $4600 for T1b to T2 melanoma, Merlin testing was cost-saving compared to a no-testing strategy (usual care), assuming Medicare reimbursement rates.

CONCLUSION

Merlin testing for T1b and T2 melanoma is potentially cost saving depending on the cost of the molecular assay and SLNB reimbursement rates. In addition to being cost saving, Merlin is expected to improve health-related quality of life.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma, a Clinical Point of View

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a surgical procedure that has been used in patients with cutaneous melanoma for nearly 30 years. It is used for both staging and regional disease control with minimum morbidity, as proven by numerous worldwide prospective studies. It has been incorporated in the recommendations of national and professional guidelines. In this article, we provide a summary of the general information on SLNB in the clinical guidelines for the management of cutaneous malignant melanoma (American Association of Dermatology, European Society of Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and Cancer Council Australia) and review the most relevant literature to provide an update on the existing recommendations for SLNB.

Breslow thickness 2.0: Why gene expression profiling is a step toward better patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsies

Risk-stratification of cutaneous melanoma is important. Patients want to know what to expect after diagnosis, and physicians need to decide on a treatment plan. Historically, melanoma that had spread beyond the skin and regional lymph nodes was largely incurable, and the only approach to preventing a bad outcome was surgery. Through the seminal work of Alexander Breslow and Donald Morton, a system was devised to carefully escalate surgery based on primary tumor thickness and sentinel lymph node status. Today, we know that prophylactic lymph node dissections do not improve survival, but we continue to appreciate the prognostic implications of a positive sentinel node and the benefits of removing nodal metastases, which facilitates locoregional disease control. However, the question arises whether we can better select patients for sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) as, currently, 85% of these procedures are negative and non-therapeutic. Here, we argue that gene expression profiling (GEP) of the diagnostic biopsy is a valuable step toward better patient selection when combined with reliable clinicopathologic (CP) information such as patient age and Breslow thickness. Recently, a CP-GEP-based classifier of nodal metastasis risk, the Merlin Assay, has become commercially available. While CP-GEP is still being validated in prospective studies, preliminary data suggest that it is an independent predictor of nodal metastasis, outperforming clinicopathological variables. The hunt is on for Breslow thickness 2.0.

Integration of lncRNAs, Protein-Coding Genes and Pathology Images for Detecting Metastatic Melanoma

Melanoma is a lethal skin disease that develops from moles. This study aimed to integrate multimodal data to predict metastatic melanoma, which is highly aggressive and difficult to treat. The proposed EnsembleSKCM method evaluated the prediction performances of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), protein-coding messenger genes (mRNAs) and pathology images (images) for metastatic melanoma. Feature selection was used to screen for metastatic biomarkers in the lncRNA and mRNA datasets. The integrated EnsembleSKCM model was built based on the weighted results of the lncRNA-, mRNA- and image-based models. EnsembleSKCM achieved 0.9444 in the prediction accuracy of metastatic melanoma and outperformed the single-modal prediction models based on the lncRNA, mRNA and image data. The experimental data suggest the importance of integrating the complementary information from the three data modalities. WGCNA was used to analyze the relationship of molecular-level features and image features, and the results show connections between them. Another cohort was used to validate our prediction.

Clinically Significant Risk Thresholds in the Management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: A Survey of Melanoma Experts

BACKGROUND

Risk-based thresholds to guide management are undefined in the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma but are essential to advance the field from traditional stage-based treatment to more individualized care.

METHODS

To estimate treatment risk thresholds, hypothetical clinical melanoma scenarios were developed and a stratified random sample was distributed to expert melanoma clinicians via an anonymous web-based survey. Scenarios provided a defined 5-year risk of recurrence and asked for recommendations regarding clinical follow-up, imaging, and adjuvant therapy. Marginal probability of response across the spectrum of 5-year recurrence risk was estimated. The risk at which 50% of respondents recommended a treatment was defined as the risk threshold.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 56% (89/159). Three separate multivariable models were constructed to estimate the recommendations for clinical follow-up more than twice/year, for surveillance cross-sectional imaging at least once/year, and for adjuvant therapy. A 36% 5-year risk of recurrence was identified as the threshold for recommending clinical follow-up more than twice/year. The thresholds for recommending cross-sectional imaging and adjuvant therapy were 30 and 59%, respectively. Thresholds varied with the age of the hypothetical patient: at younger ages they were constant but increased rapidly at ages 60 years and above.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, these data provide the first estimates of clinically significant treatment thresholds for patients with cutaneous melanoma based on risk of recurrence. Future refinement and adoption of thresholds would permit assessment of the clinical utility of novel prognostic tools and represents an early step toward individualizing treatment recommendations.

Association of tumor molecular factors with in-transit metastasis in primary cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

In-transit metastases (ITM) are a form of locoregional relapse representing intralymphatic metastatic spread and occur in approximately 4-9% of patients with melanoma >1 mm Breslow thickness. Our objective was to evaluate a combination of clinicopathologic risk factors and gene expression biomarkers predictive of ITM risk.

METHODS

We used PCR to quantify gene expression in diagnostic biopsy tissue across a prospectively designed archival cohort of 854 consecutive thin and intermediate thickness primary cutaneous melanomas. The outcome of interest was ITM >90 days after a melanoma diagnosis. Cox proportional hazard models were fit to estimate each clinicopathologic and molecular characteristic's association with the risk of ITM.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative incidence of ITM was 3.2%. Clinical factors univariately associated with an increased risk of ITM were older age, greater Breslow thickness, greater mitotic rate, lower extremity location, ulceration, and a positive SLN biopsy. Of 108 genes tested, five were significantly upregulated and five significantly downregulated when evaluated in Cox models adjusted for age, Breslow thickness, mitotic rate, and lower extremity location. Among the upregulated genes, the strongest association was observed for interleukin-8 (IL8).

CONCLUSION

A subset of gene expression biomarkers was identified as independently associated with the risk of ITM after adjusting for key covariates. Once sufficiently validated, our results may lead the way to regional therapy trials for a small, selected group of high-risk patients.

Predictors of Nodal Metastasis in Cutaneous Head and Neck Cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The complex and varied drainage patterns in the head and neck present a challenge in the regional control of cutaneous neoplasms. Lymph node involvement significantly diminishes survival, often warranting more aggressive treatment. Here, we review the risk factors associated with lymphatic metastasis, in the context of the evolving role of sentinel lymph node biopsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

In cutaneous head and neck melanomas, tumor thickness, age, size, mitosis, ulceration, and specific histology have been associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM). In head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, tumor thickness, size, perineural invasion, and immunosuppression are all risk factors for nodal metastasis. The risk factors for lymph node involvement in Merkel cell carcinoma are not yet fully defined, but emerging evidence indicates that tumor thickness and size may be  associated with regional metastasis. The specific factors that predict a greater risk of LNM for cutaneous head and neck cancers generally include depth of invasion, tumor size, mitotic rate, ulceration, immunosuppression, and other histopathological factors.

Using the Merlin assay for reducing sentinel lymph node biopsy complications in melanoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The assessment of the sentinel lymph node is a cornerstone of melanoma staging. However, ~80% of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) are negative and nontherapeutic, and patients are unnecessarily exposed to surgery-related complications. Here, we gauged the potential of the Merlin assay to reduce SLNB-associated complications. The Merlin assay uses clinicopathologic variables and tumor gene expression profiling to identify low-risk patients who may forgo SLNB.

METHODS

We utilized the Merlin test development cohort to determine SLNB complication rates for procedures performed between 2004 and 2018 at Mayo Clinic. Complications evaluated were lymphedema, seroma, infection/cellulitis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. Patients who underwent a completion lymph node dissection were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 558 patients were included. The overall 90-day complication rate specific to SLNB (1 year for lymphedema) was 17.4%. The most common complications were seroma (9.3%), infection/cellulitis (4.8%), and lymphedema (4.3%). All three were more common in patients with a lower extremity primary tumor location versus other locations. With Merlin test results applied, SLNB-related complications would have decreased by 59%.

CONCLUSION

SLNB is a safe procedure but carries a significant complication rate. Merlin testing might reduce the need for SLNB and its associated complications.

Using a Clinicopathologic and Gene Expression (CP-GEP) Model to Identify Stage I-II Melanoma Patients at Risk of Disease Relapse

Background: The current standard of care for patients without sentinel node (SN) metastasis (i.e., stage I−II melanoma) is watchful waiting, while >40% of patients with stage IB−IIC will eventually present with disease recurrence or die as a result of melanoma. With the prospect of adjuvant therapeutic options for patients with a negative SN, we assessed the performance of a clinicopathologic and gene expression (CP-GEP) model, a model originally developed to predict SN metastasis, to identify patients with stage I−II melanoma at risk of disease relapse. Methods: This study included patients with cutaneous melanoma ≥18 years of age with a negative SN between October 2006 and December 2017 at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Sweden) and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (The Netherlands). According to the CP-GEP model, which can be applied to the primary melanoma tissue, the patients were stratified into high or low risk of recurrence. The primary aim was to assess the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of low- and high-risk CP-GEP. A secondary aim was to compare the CP-GEP model with the EORTC nomogram, a model based on clinicopathological variables only. Results: In total, 535 patients (stage I−II) were included. CP-GEP stratification among these patients resulted in a 5-year RFS of 92.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 86.4−96.4) in CP-GEP low-risk patients (n = 122) versus 80.7% (95%CI: 76.3−84.3) in CP-GEP high-risk patients (n = 413; hazard ratio 2.93 (95%CI: 1.41−6.09), p < 0.004). According to the EORTC nomogram, 25% of the patients were classified as having a ‘low risk’ of recurrence (96.8% 5-year RFS (95%CI 91.6−98.8), n = 130), 49% as ‘intermediate risk’ (88.4% 5-year RFS (95%CI 83.6−91.8), n = 261), and 26% as ‘high risk’ (61.1% 5-year RFS (95%CI 51.9−69.1), n = 137). Conclusion: In these two independent European cohorts, the CP-GEP model was able to stratify patients with stage I−II melanoma into two groups differentiated by RFS.

Development of an Image Analysis-Based Prognosis Score Using Google's Teachable Machine in Melanoma

BACKGROUND

The increasing number of melanoma patients makes it necessary to establish new strategies for prognosis assessment to ensure follow-up care. Deep-learning-based image analysis of primary melanoma could be a future component of risk stratification.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a risk score for overall survival based on image analysis through artificial intelligence (AI) and validate it in a test cohort.

METHODS

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections of 831 melanomas, diagnosed from 2012-2015 were photographed and used to perform deep-learning-based group classification. For this purpose, the freely available software of Google's teachable machine was used. Five hundred patient sections were used as the training cohort, and 331 sections served as the test cohort.

RESULTS

Using Google's Teachable Machine, a prognosis score for overall survival could be developed that achieved a statistically significant prognosis estimate with an AUC of 0.694 in a ROC analysis based solely on image sections of approximately 250 × 250 µm. The prognosis group "low-risk" (n = 230) showed an overall survival rate of 93%, whereas the prognosis group "high-risk" (n = 101) showed an overall survival rate of 77.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The study supports the possibility of using deep learning-based classification systems for risk stratification in melanoma. The AI assessment used in this study provides a significant risk estimate in melanoma, but it does not considerably improve the existing risk classification based on the TNM classification.

Tetraspanin CD9 Expression Predicts Sentinel Node Status in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma

The tetraspanin CD9 is considered a metastasis suppressor in many cancers, however its role is highly debated. Currently, little is known about CD9 prognostic value in cutaneous melanoma. Our aim was to analyse CD9 expression in melanocytic nevi and primary cutaneous melanomas through immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence approaches to determine its correlation with invasiveness and metastatic potential. CD9 displayed homogeneous staining in all melanocytic nevi. In contrast, it showed a complete loss of reactivity in all thin melanomas. Interestingly, CD9 was re-expressed in 46% of intermediate and thick melanomas in small tumor clusters predominantly located at sites of invasion near or inside the blood or lymphatic vessels. The most notable finding is that all CD9 stained melanomas presented sentinel node positivity. Additionally, a direct association between CD9 expression and presence of distant metastasis was reported. Finally, we confirm that CD9 expression is consistent with an early protective role against tumorigenesis, however, our data endorse in melanoma a specific function of CD9 in vascular dissemination during late tumor progression. The presence of CD9 hotspots could be essential for melanoma cell invasion in lymphatic and endothelial vessels. CD9 could be a valid prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis risk.

Development and validation of a nomogram incorporating gene expression profiling and clinical factors for accurate prediction of metastasis in patients with cutaneous melanoma following Mohs micrographic surgery

BACKGROUND

There is a need to improve prognostic accuracy for patients with cutaneous melanoma. A 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test uses the molecular biology of primary tumors to identify individual patient metastatic risk.

OBJECTIVE

Develop a nomogram incorporating 31-GEP with relevant clinical factors to improve prognostic accuracy.

METHODS

In an IRB-approved study, 1124 patients from 9 Mohs micrographic surgery centers were prospectively enrolled, treated with Mohs micrographic surgery, and underwent 31-GEP testing. Data from 684 of those patients with at least 1-year follow-up or a metastatic event were included in nomogram development to predict metastatic risk.

RESULTS

Logistic regression modeling of 31-GEP results and T stage provided the simplest nomogram with the lowest Bayesian information criteria score. Validation in an archival cohort (n = 901) demonstrated a significant linear correlation between observed and nomogram-predicted risk of metastasis. The resulting nomogram more accurately predicts the risk for cutaneous melanoma metastasis than T stage or 31-GEP alone.

LIMITATIONS

The patient population is representative of Mohs micrographic surgery centers. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was not performed for most patients and could not be used in the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of 31-GEP and T stage can gain clinically useful prognostic information from data obtained noninvasively.

Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group

BACKGROUND

Prognostic assessment of cutaneous melanoma relies on historical, clinicopathological, and phenotypic risk factors according to American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines but may not account for a patient's individual additional genetic risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

To review the available literature regarding commercially available gene expression profile (GEP) tests and their use in the management of cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted for original, English-language studies or meta-analyses published between 2010 and 2021 on commercially available GEP tests in cutaneous melanoma prognosis, clinical decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy, and real-world efficacy. After the literature review, the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group, an expert panel of dermatologists with specialized training in melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer diagnosis and management, utilized a modified Delphi technique to develop consensus statements regarding prognostic gene expression profile tests. Statements were only adopted with a supermajority vote of > 80%.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 1064 studies/meta-analyses that met the search criteria. Of these, we included 21 original articles and meta-analyses that studied the 31-GEP test (DecisionDx-Melanoma; Castle Biosciences, Inc.), five original articles that studied the 11-GEP test (Melagenix; NeraCare GmbH), and four original articles that studied the 8-GEP test with clinicopathological factors (Merlin; 8-GEP + CP; SkylineDx B.V.) in this review. Six statements received supermajority approval and were adopted by the panel.

CONCLUSION

GEP tests provide additional, reproducible information for dermatologists to consider within the larger framework of the eighth edition of the AJCC and NCCN cutaneous melanoma guidelines when counseling regarding prognosis and when considering a sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Follow-up of primary melanoma patients with high risk of recurrence: recommendations based on evidence and consensus

In spite of the good prognosis of patients with early-stage melanoma, there is a substantial proportion of them that develop local or distant relapses. With the introduction of targeted and immune therapies for advanced melanoma, including at the adjuvant setting, early detection of recurrent melanoma and/or second primary lesions is crucial to improve clinical outcomes. However, there is a lack of universal guidelines regarding both frequency of surveillance visits and diagnostic imaging and/or laboratory evaluations. In this article, a multidisciplinary expert panel recommends, after careful review of relevant data in the field, a consensus- and experience-based follow-up strategy for melanoma patients, taking into account prognostic factors and biomarkers and the high-risk periods and patterns of recurrence in each (sub) stage of the disease. Apart from the surveillance intensity, healthcare professionals should focus on patients' education to perform regular self-examinations of the skin and palpation of lymph nodes.

Comparison of Two Rapid Assays for the Detection of BRAF V600 Mutations in Metastatic Melanoma including Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Testing for the BRAF mutation is mandatory for the management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. Molecular analysis based on DNA sequencing remains the gold-standard method for the screening of the different BRAF mutations. These methods must be rapid, sensitive, and specific enough to allow optimal therapeutic management in daily practice and also to include patients in clinical trials. Here, we compared the Idylla BRAF Mutation Test and the anti-BRAF V600E (clone VE1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 90 melanoma samples, with a focus on a challenging cohort of 32 positive sentinel lymph nodes. The BRAF status was assessed with both methods independently of the percentage of tumor cells. The concordance rate was calculated excluding both non-contributory analyses and BRAFV600K/R/M mutants due to the specific V600E-IHC test design. The incidence of the BRAFV600E mutation was 33% with both BRAF Idylla and BRAF IHC. The agreement rate was 91% (72/79). Although the agreement rate was high, we suggest that the use of IHC is more suitable for rapid BRAF testing on sentinel lymph node biopsies when associated with a low percentage and scattered tumor cells, which gave a high risk of non-contributory analysis and/or false negative results with the Idylla^TMBRAF Mutation Test.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Positivity in Patients With Acral Lentiginous and Other Subtypes of Cutaneous Melanoma

IMPORTANCE

Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is a rare subtype of malignant melanoma typically occurring on the palmar and plantar surfaces. Although it has distinctive genetic, prognostic, and behavioral characteristics relative to cutaneous melanomas overall, owing to its rarity, treatment is largely guided by data extrapolated from more common subtypes. Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) status has been shown to be a significant prognostic factor for ALM, the independent effect of ALM-subtype disease on the likelihood of SLN positivity and the stage-specific positivity rates for ALM are not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of ALM with SLN status as well as to characterize the clinical stage-specific rates of SLN positivity for ALM based on the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition (AJCC-8).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) includes all reportable cases from Commission on Cancer accredited facilities and represents approximately 50% of all newly diagnosed melanoma cases in the US. This retrospective cohort study included cases of AJCC-8 clinical stage I to II melanomas from the NCDB diagnosed from 2012 to 2015. The analysis took place between April 2021 and September 2021.

EXPOSURES

Melanoma histopathologic subtype.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Sentinel lymph node status.

RESULTS

We identified 60 148 patients with malignant melanomas, 959 of whom had ALM-subtype disease. Among patients in the cohort, 25 550 (42.5%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 64 (16) years. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographic and histopathologic characteristics revealed that ALM was independently associated with the highest risk for SLN positivity among included subtypes (vs superficial spreading melanoma: odds ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.59-2.28). Subgroup analysis by AJCC clinical stage demonstrated that ALM was independently associated with the highest risk for SLN positivity for both stage IB and II disease. The rate of SLN positivity for patients with stage IB and II ALM was 18.39% (95% CI, 13.82%-24.03%) and 39.53% (34.98%-44.26%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study ALM was independently associated with SLN positivity and had relatively high positivity rates at clinical stage IB and II. This suggests that SLNB should be encouraged for all patients with clinical stage IB and II ALM, and such patients should receive appropriate counseling about the higher regional metastatic risk of their cancers. Future work with a larger cohort is required to elucidate the risk of SLN positivity for stage IA ALM.