Intrauterine growth retardation associated with maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 6 unmasked by congenital adrenal hyperplasia

Maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 6 in 2 prenatal cases with IUGR: case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is a rare genetic condition leading to potential disease risks. Maternal UPD of chromosome 6 upd(6)mat is exceptionally rare, with limited cases reported. This study reported two new cases of upd(6)mat and reviewed the literature of previous cases.

CASE PRESENTATION

Both cases exhibited intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and genetic analysis confirmed upd(6)mat in each case. The literature review identified a total of 19 cases. IUGR and preterm labor were the most common two symptoms observed, and additional anomalies and genetic variations were also reported in some cases.

CONCLUSION

upd(6)mat is potentially associatied with IUGR, but the precise genotype-phenotype relationship remains unclear. The cases with upd(6)mat may present clinical features due to imprinting disorders.

Uniparental disomy as a cause of pediatric endocrine disorders

Uniparental disomy (UPD) refers to a condition in which two homologous chromosomes or chromosomal regions are inherited from one parent. Recent studies have shown that UPD is not rare among the general population, arising from trisomy rescue, gamete complementation, and other mechanisms. Although UPD is not necessarily pathogenic, it can lead to various disease phenotypes by causing imprinting disorders or by unmasking autosomal recessive mutations. Notably, known UPD-mediated autosomal recessive disorders include congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency, 11β-hydroxylase deficiency, and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency. In addition, UPD can occur in combination with additional cytogenetic abnormalities that may affect growth and development. Therefore, UPD represents a clinically important condition that accounts for a certain percentage of the etiology of growth failure and endocrine abnormalities. Although UPD is barely detectable by standard karyotyping or sequence analyses, it can be screened by single nucleotide polymorphism- and microsatellite-genotyping of patients and their parents, or by DNA methylation analysis of the patients. This mini-review introduces the underlying mechanisms and phenotypic consequences of UPD in association with pediatric endocrine disorders.

The maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 6 (upd(6)mat) "phenotype": result of placental trisomy 6 mosaicism?

BACKGROUND

Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 6 (upd(6)mat) is a rare finding and its clinical relevance is currently unclear. Based on clinical data from two new cases and patients from the literature, the pathogenetic significance of upd(6)mat is delineated.

METHODS

Own cases were molecularly characterized for isodisomic uniparental regions on chromosome 6. For further cases with upd(6)mat, a literature search was conducted and genetic and clinical data were ascertained.

RESULTS

Comparison of isodisomic regions between the new upd(6)mat cases and those from four reports did not reveal any common isodisomic region. Among the patients with available cytogenetic data, five had a normal karyotype in lymphocytes, whereas a trisomy 6 (mosaicism) was detected prenatally in four cases. A common clinical picture was not obvious in upd(6)mat, but intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preterm delivery were frequent.

CONCLUSION

A common upd(6)mat phenotype is not obvious, but placental dysfunction due to trisomy 6 mosaicism probably contributes to IUGR and preterm delivery. In fact, other clinical features observed in upd(6)mat patients might be caused by homozygosity of recessive mutations or by an undetected trisomy 6 cell line. Upd(6)mat itself is not associated with clinical features, and can rather be regarded as a biomarker. In case upd(6)mat is detected, the cause for the phenotype is identified indirectly, but the UPD is not the basic cause.

Elevated Testosterone Reduces Uterine Blood Flow, Spiral Artery Elongation, and Placental Oxygenation in Pregnant Rats

Elevated maternal testosterone levels are shown to cause fetal growth restriction, eventually culminating in sex-specific adult-onset hypertension that is more pronounced in males than in females. In this study, we tested whether uteroplacental and fetoplacental disturbances underlie fetal growth restriction and if these changes vary in male and female placentas. Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with vehicle (n=16) or testosterone propionate (0.5 mg/kg per day from gestation day 15-19; n=16). On gestation day 20, we quantified uterine artery blood flow using microultrasound, visualized placental arterial network using x-ray microcomputed tomography, determined fetoplacental hypoxia using pimonidazole and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, and used Affymetrix array to determine changes in placental expression of genes involved in vascular development. Plasma testosterone levels increased 2-fold in testosterone-injected rats. Placental and fetal weights were lower in rats with elevated testosterone. Uterine artery blood flow was lower, and resistance index was higher in the testosterone group. Radial and spiral artery diameter and length, the number of fetoplacental arterial branches, and umbilical artery diameter were reduced in the testosterone group. In addition, markers of hypoxia in the placentas and fetuses were elevated in the testosterone group. The magnitude of changes in placental vasculature and hypoxia was greater in males than in females and was associated with sex-specific alteration of unique sets of genes involved in angiogenesis and blood vessel morphogenesis. The results demonstrate that elevated testosterone during gestation induces a decrease in uterine arterial blood flow and fetal sex-related uteroplacental vascular changes, which may set the stage for subsequent sex differences in adult-onset diseases.

Maternal uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 6 reveals a TULP1 mutation as a novel cause of cone dysfunction

PURPOSE

The majority of the genetic causes of autosomal recessive (ar) cone dystrophy (CD) and cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) are currently unknown. We used a high-resolution homozygosity mapping approach in a cohort of patients with CD or CRD to identify new genes for ar cone disorders.

DESIGN

Case series.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 159 patients with ar CD and 91 patients with CRD.

METHODS

The genomes of 83 patients with ar CD and 73 patients with CRD were analyzed for homozygous regions using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays. One patient showed homozygosity of SNPs across chromosome 6, and segregation analysis was performed using microsatellite markers. Direct sequencing of all retinal disease genes on chromosome 6 revealed a novel pathogenic TULP1 mutation in this patient. A cohort of 159 individuals with CD and 91 individuals with CRD was screened for this particular mutation using the restriction enzyme HhaI. The medical history of patients carrying the TULP1 mutation was reviewed and additional ophthalmic examinations were performed, including electroretinography (ERG), perimetry, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and fundus photography.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

TULP1 mutations, age at diagnosis, visual acuity, fundus appearance, color vision defects, visual field, ERG, FAF, and OCT findings.

RESULTS

In 1 patient, homozygosity mapping and subsequent segregation analysis revealed maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 6. A novel homozygous missense mutation (p.Arg420Ser) was identified in TULP1, whereas no mutations were detected in other retinal disease genes on chromosome 6. The mutation affects a highly conserved amino acid residue in the Tubby domain and is predicted to be pathogenic. The same homozygous mutation was also identified in an additional, unrelated patient with CRD. Both patients carrying the p.Arg420Ser mutation presented with a bull's eye maculopathy. The first patient had progressive loss of visual acuity with a relatively preserved ERG, whereas the second patient developed loss of visual acuity, peripheral degeneration, and severely reduced ERG responses in a cone-rod pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal UPD of chromosome 6 unmasked a mutation in the TULP1 gene as a novel cause of cone dysfunction. This expands the disease spectrum of TULP1 mutations from Leber congenital amaurosis and early-onset retinitis pigmentosa to cone-dominated disease.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Segmental Maternal UPD6 with Prenatal Growth Restriction

We report a child with segmental maternal uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 6, involving most of the long arm distal to 6q16, detected by SNP microarray. Clinical features include prenatal growth restriction, global developmental delay, and severe gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 6 has previously been reported to cause intrauterine growth restriction. Paternal UPD of this chromosome is well known to cause transient neonatal diabetes mellitus. We discuss reported cases of maternal UPD of chromosome 6 and consider whether our patient's features may be due to disordered imprinting or unmasking of an autosomal recessive condition.

The consequences of uniparental disomy and copy number neutral loss-of-heterozygosity during human development and cancer

UPD (uniparental disomy) describes the inheritance of a pair of chromosomes from only one parent. Mechanisms that lead to UPD include trisomy rescue, gamete complementation, monosomy rescue and somatic recombination. Most of these mechanisms can involve aberrant chromosomes, particularly isochromosomes and Robertsonian translocations. In the last decade, the number of UPD cases reported in the literature has increased exponentially. This is partly due to the advances in genomic technologies that have allowed for high-resolution SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) studies, which have complemented traditional methods relying on polymorphic microsatellite markers. In this review, we discuss aberrant cellular mechanisms leading to UPD and their impact on gene expression. Special emphasis is placed on the unmasking of mutant recessive alleles and the disruption of imprinted gene dosage, which give rise to specific and recurrent imprinting phenotypes. Finally, we discuss how copy number maps determined from SNP array datasets have helped identify not only deletions and duplications but also recurrent copy number neutral regions of loss-of-heterozygosity, which have been reported in many cancer types and that may constitute an important driving force in cancer. These tiny regions of UPD also alter imprinted gene dosage, which may have cumulative tumourgenic effects in addition to that of unmasking homozygous cancer-associated mutations.

Partial paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 6 in monozygotic twins with transient neonatal diabetes mellitus and macroglossia

Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDM) usually develops within the first few weeks of life and resolves at a median age of 3 months. In most of the cases, TNDM is caused by the over-expression of a paternally expressed imprinted PLAGL1 locus on chromosome 6q24. The most frequent manifestation other than TNDM is intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), and in some cases macroglossia. We investigated monozygotic twins who had macroglossia without IUGR. Both of the twins developed insulin-dependent hyperglycemia within the first week of life, which subsequently resolved. DNA profiling with polymerase chain reaction amplification was performed for polymorphic microsatellite markers of chromosome 6. The six informative markers, located between 6p24 and 6q15, showed normal biparental inheritance. However, the six distal informative markers, located between 6q23.2 and the 6q telomeric region, showed the absence of a maternal allele and the presence of a single paternal allele. The monosomy of the 6q telomeric region was not confirmed by chromosome banding showing 46, XX. These findings provide further evidence that partial paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 6 (pUPD6) causes TNDM. The phenotypes other than diabetes observed in patients with partial pUPD6 may differ from those observed in patients with complete pUPD6.

Maternal uniparental heterodisomy of chromosome 6 in a boy with an isolated cleft lip and palate

We describe a chromosome 6 uniparental disomy (UPD6) in a boy, discovered during a screening for the genetic cause of cleft lip and palate. In the medical literature, almost all documented cases of UPD6 are paternal in origin, and only four were maternal. We present here a report of complete maternal chromosome 6 uniparental heterodisomy. Haplotype analysis was performed using highly polymorphic short tandem repeat (STR) markers that span both arms of chromosome 6. Analysis of these markers revealed the presence of two maternal alleles but no paternal allele, indicating an instance of maternal uniparental heterodisomy. Chromosome analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes confirmed a normal male karyotype. Advanced maternal age at the time of the infant's birth and heterodisomy of markers around the centromere favors a meiosis-I error. No specific phenotype has been reported for maternal UPD6. Therefore, the cleft lip and palate in the present case probably occurred due to other risk factors. This report provides further evidence that maternal UPD6 has no specific clinical consequences and adds to the collective knowledge of this rare chromosomal finding.

Offspring birth weight in second-generation 'small for gestational age' infants

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the intergenerational effects on intrauterine growth in pregnant women who were themselves small for gestational age (SGA) at birth.

METHODS

A retrospective case control was carried out on infants born in the period 1 January 2009 to 31 March 2009 at the Sant'Orsola Hospital, Bologna. Out of 958 infants, 707 met the criteria for inclusion in the study.

RESULTS

After calculation of the percentiles stratified for gestational age at delivery, 68 cases were classified as SGA. Logistic regression analysis was used as the multivariable tool for calculating the bearing of each covariable on the outcome (SGA), including smoking and the presence of an SGA in previous pregnancies. A total of 28.6% of the infants of SGA women were SGA compared with 8.6% of the children of non-SGA women (p-value < 0.01). The multivariable odds ratio was 2.61 (95% CI = 1.16-5.86) for women who were SGA to have SGA children. The extra risk of being SGA in the actual pregnancy when the mother was SGA was estimated at about 7%.

CONCLUSION

Reduced intrauterine growth of the mother is a risk factor for reduced intrauterine growth of her children.

Maternal uniparental isodisomy is responsible for serious molybdenum cofactor deficiency

Molybdenum cofactor (MoCo) deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive inherited metabolic disorder resulting in the combined deficiency of aldehyde oxidase, xanthine dehydrogenase, and sulfite oxidase. We report a male infant with MoCo deficiency whose clinical findings consisted of microcephaly, intractable seizures soon after birth, feeding difficulties, and developmental delay. Sequencing of MOCS1, MOCS2, and GEPH genes, and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping array analysis showed, to our knowledge, unusual inheritance of MoCo deficiency/maternal uniparental isodisomy for the first time in the literature. At 10 months of age, he now has microcephaly and developmental delay, and his seizures are controlled with phenobarbital, clonozepam, and vigabatrin therapy.

Non-placental causes of intrauterine growth restriction

Placental insufficiency, in some form or fashion, is associated with the majority of cases of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). There are numerous causes of IUGR which are not caused primarily by placental insufficiency, but indirectly lead to it. The causes of IUGR can be subdivided into fetal and maternal etiologies. The fetal etiologies consist of genetic diseases, congenital malformations, infections, multiple gestations, and placental/cord abnormalities. The maternal etiologies are categorized as follows: (1) decreased uteroplacental blood flow, (2) reduced blood volume, (3) decreased oxygen carrying capacity, (4) nutrition status, (5) teratogens, and (6) miscellaneous causes such as short interpregnancy intervals, race, maternal age, and low socioeconomic status. Knowledge of the etiologies of fetal growth restriction is essential, so that future care can be targeted at prevention. There are several primary and secondary prevention strategies that can be adopted.

Epigenetics in Silver-Russell syndrome

Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) is a clinically heterogeneous syndrome characterized by intra-uterine and postnatal growth retardation with spared cranial growth, dysmorphic features and frequent body asymmetry. Various cytogenetic abnormalities have been described in a small number of SRS or SRS-like cases involving chromosomes 7, 8, 11, 15, 17 and 18. However, until recent data became available involving imprinted genes on chromosome 7 and chromosome 11p15, the molecular cause of the syndrome was unknown in most cases. Genomic imprinting is the best example of transcriptional control of genes by epigenetic modifications. Many imprinted genes play key roles in fetal and placental growth and behaviour. This is illustrated in SRS, which can now be considered as a new imprinting disease model. These new findings in the pathophysiology of SRS allow long-term follow-up studies to be performed based on molecular diagnosis. This could help to define appropriate clinical guidelines regarding growth and feeding difficulties.

Mosaic trisomy 6 and maternal uniparental disomy 6 in a 23-week gestation fetus with atrioventricular septal defect

Trisomy 6 is seen in early miscarriages in association with an intact, empty amniotic sac or as a pseudomosaic in amniotic fluid cultures. We report the finding of mosaic trisomy 6 in a 23-week-gestation pregnancy terminated because of intrauterine death. The post-mortem showed a well formed macerated male fetus with an atrioventricular septal defect and an exomphalos. By conventional cytogenetics, trisomy 6 was found in 12 out of 25 (48%) fibroblast colonies from fetal skin and 21 out of 32 (66%) colonies derived from amnion, while the remaining metaphases showed an apparently normal male karyotype. Molecular genetic studies on DNA from uncultured fetal skin and cord samples using polymorphic microsatellite repeat sequences showed no evidence of trisomy 6, but demonstrated that both chromosome 6 homologs were of maternal origin consistent with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD).

A fascination with chromosome rescue in uniparental disomy: Mendelian recessive outlaws and imprinting copyrights infringements

With uniparental disomy (UPD), the presence in a diploid genome of a chromosome pair derived from one genitor carries two main types of developmental risk: the inheritance of a recessive trait or the occurrence of an imprinting disorder. When the uniparentally derived pair carries two homozygous sequences (isodisomy) with a duplicated mutant, this 'reduction to homozygosity' determines a recessive phenotype solely inherited from one heterozygote. Thus far, some 40 examples of such recessive trait transmission have been reported in the medical literature and, among the current 32 known types of UPDs, UPD of chromosomes 1, 2, and 7 have contributed to the larger contingent of these conditions. Being at variance with the traditional mode of transmission, they constitute a group of 'Mendelian outlaws'. Several imprinted chromosome domains and loci have been, for a large part, identified through different UPDs. Thus, disomies for paternal 6, maternal 7, paternal 11, paternal and maternal 14 and 15, maternal 20 (and paternal 20q) and possibly maternal 16 cause as many syndromes, as at the biological level the loss or duplication of monoparentally expressed allele sequences constitutes 'imprinting rights infringements'. The above pitfalls represent the price to pay when, instead of a Mendelian even segregation and independent assortment of the chromosomes, the fertilized product with a nondisjunctional meiotic error undergoes correction (for unknown or fortuitous reasons) through a mitotic adjustment as a means to restore euploidy, thereby resulting in UPD. Happily enough, UPDs leading to the healthy rescue from some chromosomal mishaps also exist.

Prenatal testosterone excess programs reproductive and metabolic dysfunction in the female

Findings discussed in this review stress the importance of normal estrogen and androgen signaling at appropriate developmental time points in maintaining normal phenotypic expression, reproductive and metabolic function and document how inappropriate steroid signaling, at inopportune times can have undesirable outcomes. For example, inappropriate testosterone exposure during fetal life alters the developmental trajectory of the female culminating in a suite of disorders, which include intrauterine growth-retardation and postnatal catch up growth, phenotypic masculinization, reproductive neuroendocrine and ovarian disruptions leading to progressive loss of cyclicity and metabolic disruptions manifested as hyperinsulinemia.

Uniparental disomy (UPD) other than 15: Phenotypes and bibliography updated

Uniparental disomy (UPD) describes the inheritance of a pair of chromosomes from only one parent. The concept was introduced in Medical Genetics by Engel (1980); Am J Med Genet 6:137-143. Aside UPD 15, which is the most frequent one, up to now (February 2005) 197 cases with whole chromosome maternal UPD other than 15 (124 X heterodisomy, 59 X isodisomy, and 14 cases without information of the mode of UPD) and 68 cases with whole chromosome paternal UPD other than 15 (13 X heterdisomy, 53 X isodisomy, and 2 cases without information of the mode of UPD) have been reported. In this review we discuss briefly the problems associated with UPD and provide a comprehensive clinical summary with a bibliography for each UPD other than 15 as a guide for genetic counseling.

Complex and segmental uniparental disomy (UPD): review and lessons from rare chromosomal complements

OBJECTIVE

To review all cases with segmental and/or complex uniparental disomy (UPD), to study aetiology and mechanisms of formation, and to draw conclusions.

DESIGN

Searching published reports in Medline.

RESULTS

The survey found at least nine cases with segmental UPD and a normal karyotype, 22 cases with UPD of a whole chromosome and a simple or a non-homologous Robertsonian translocation, eight cases with UPD and two isochromosomes, one of the short arm and one of the long arm of a non-acrocentric chromosome, 39 cases with UPD and an isochromosome of the long arm of two homologous acrocentric chromosomes, one case of UPD and an isochromosome 8 associated with a homozygous del(8)(p23.3pter), and 21 cases with UPD of a whole or parts of a chromosome associated with a complex karyotype. Segmental UPD is formed by somatic recombination (isodisomy) or by trisomy rescue. In the latter mechanism, a meiosis I error is associated with meiotic recombination and an additional somatic exchange between two non-uniparental chromatids. Subsequently, the chromatid that originated from the disomic gamete is lost (iso- and heterodisomy). In cases of UPD associated with one isochromosome of the short arm and one isochromosome of the long arm of a non-acrocentric chromosome and in cases of UPD associated with a true isochromosome of an acrocentric chromosome, mitotic complementation is assumed. This term describes the formation by misdivision at the centromere during an early mitosis of a monosomic zygote. In cases of UPD associated with an additional marker chromosome, either mitotic formation of the marker chromosome in a trisomic zygote or fertilisation of a gamete with a marker chromosome formed in meiosis by a disomic gamete or by a normal gamete and subsequent duplication are possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Research in the field of segmental and/or complex UPD may help to explain undiagnosed non-Mendelian disorders, to recognise hotspots for meiotic and mitotic recombinations, and to show that chromosomal segregation is more complex than previously thought. It may also be helpful to map autosomal recessively inherited genes, genes/regions of genomic imprinting, and dysmorphic phenotypes. Last but not least it would improve genetic counselling.

Origin of uniparental disomy 6: presentation of a new case and review on the literature

Paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 6 has been reported several times in patients with (transient) neonatal diabetes mellitus ((T)NDM). Here we present our short tandem repeat typing results in a new patient with NDM, revealing a paternal isodisomy (UPiD). Summarising these data with those published previously on complete paternal (n=13) and maternal (n=2) UPD6, all cases show isodisomy. In general, several modes of UPD formation have been suggested: While a meiotic origin of UPD mainly results in a uniparental heterodisomy (UPhD), UPiD is probably the result of a post-zygotic mitotic error. This mode of formation consists of a mitotic nondisjunction in a disomic zygote, followed by either a trisomic rescue or a reduplication. Endoduplication in a monosomic zygote is another possible but less probable mechanism, taking into consideration that monosomic zygotes are not viable. The exclusive finding of isodisomy in case of chromosome 6 therefore gives strong evidence that segregational errors of this chromosome are mainly influenced by postzygotic factors. This hypothesis is supported by the observation of two cases with partial paternal UPiD6 originating from mitotic recombination events. The influence of mitotic segregational errors in UPD6 formation is in agreement with the results in trisomy/UPD of other chromosomes of the C group (7 and 8), and is in remarkable contrast to the findings in studies on the origin of the frequent aneuploidies. Multiple factors ensure normal segregation and we speculate that they vary in importance for each chromosome.

Partial paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 6 in an infant with neonatal diabetes, macroglossia, and craniofacial abnormalities

Neonatal diabetes, which can be transient or permanent, is defined as hyperglycemia that presents within the first month of life and requires insulin therapy. Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus has been associated with abnormalities of the paternally inherited copy of chromosome 6, including duplications of a portion of the long arm of chromosome 6 and uniparental disomy, implicating overexpression of an imprinted gene in this disorder. To date, all patients with transient neonatal diabetes mellitus and uniparental disomy have had complete paternal isodisomy. We describe a patient with neonatal diabetes, macroglossia, and craniofacial abnormalities, with partial paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 6 involving the distal portion of 6q, from 6q24-qter. This observation demonstrates that mitotic recombination of chromosome 6 can also give rise to uniparental disomy and neonatal diabetes, a situation similar to that observed in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, another imprinted disorder. This finding has clinical implications, since somatic mosaicism for uniparental disomy of chromosome 6 should also be considered in patients with transient neonatal diabetes mellitus.

No evidence of uniparental disomy 2, 6, 14, 16, 20, and 22 as a major cause of intrauterine growth retardation

Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) is defined as length and/or weight below the 10th percentile. Etiology and, consequently, long-term outcome are extremely heterogeneous with chromosomal abnormalities found in up to 7%. Recently, uniparental disomy (UPD), i.e. the inheritance of both homologues of one pair of chromosomes from only one parent, was found in an increasing number of children with IUGR. Particularly, UPD of chromosome 7 was found in up to 10% of patients with IUGR and/or a phenotype of primordial growth retardation or Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS), but also UPD of chromosomes 2, 6, 14, 16, 20, and 22 was reported in single cases with IUGR. To evaluate impact and relevance of UPD in children with IUGR we investigated 23 sporadic cases with IUGR subsequently diagnosed as primordial growth retardation (n = 13) or SRS (n = 10) by molecular methods for UPD of chromosomes 2, 6, 14, 16, 20, and 22. No instance of UPD was found. Inheritance of all chromosomes investigated was biparental in all cases. Therefore, we conclude that UPD of these chromosomes is not a major cause of IUGR.