Differential benefits of unmasking extended high-frequency content of target or background speech

Current evidence supports the contribution of extended high frequencies (EHFs; >8 kHz) to speech recognition, especially for speech-in-speech scenarios. However, it is unclear whether the benefit of EHFs is due to phonetic information in the EHF band, EHF cues to access phonetic information at lower frequencies, talker segregation cues, or some other mechanism. This study investigated the mechanisms of benefit derived from a mismatch in EHF content between target and masker talkers for speech-in-speech recognition. EHF mismatches were generated using full band (FB) speech and speech low-pass filtered at 8 kHz. Four filtering combinations with independently filtered target and masker speech were used to create two EHF-matched and two EHF-mismatched conditions for one- and two-talker maskers. Performance was best with the FB target and the low-pass masker in both one- and two-talker masker conditions, but the effect was larger for the two-talker masker. No benefit of an EHF mismatch was observed for the low-pass filtered target. A word-by-word analysis indicated higher recognition odds with increasing EHF energy level in the target word. These findings suggest that the audibility of target EHFs provides target phonetic information or target segregation and selective attention cues, but that the audibility of masker EHFs does not confer any segregation benefit.

Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech

OBJECTIVES

Masked speech recognition is typically assessed as though the target and background talkers are all directly facing the listener. However, background speech in natural environments is often produced by talkers facing other directions, and talker head orientation affects the spectral content of speech, particularly at the extended high frequencies (EHFs; >8 kHz). This study investigated the effect of masker head orientation and listeners' EHF sensitivity on speech-in-speech recognition and spatial release from masking in children and adults.

DESIGN

Participants were 5- to 7-year-olds (n = 15) and adults (n = 34), all with normal hearing up to 8 kHz and a range of EHF hearing thresholds. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for target sentences recorded from a microphone directly in front of the talker's mouth and presented from a loudspeaker directly in front of the listener, simulating a target directly in front of and facing the listener. The maskers were two streams of concatenated words recorded from a microphone located at either 0° or 60° azimuth, simulating masker talkers facing the listener or facing away from the listener, respectively. Maskers were presented in one of three spatial conditions: co-located with the target, symmetrically separated on either side of the target (+54° and -54° on the horizontal plane), or asymmetrically separated to the right of the target (both +54° on the horizontal plane).

RESULTS

Performance was poorer for the facing than for the nonfacing masker head orientation. This benefit of the nonfacing masker head orientation, or head orientation release from masking (HORM), was largest under the co-located condition, but it was also observed for the symmetric and asymmetric masker spatial separation conditions. SRTs were positively correlated with the mean 16-kHz threshold across ears in adults for the nonfacing conditions but not for the facing masker conditions. In adults with normal EHF thresholds, the HORM was comparable in magnitude to the benefit of a symmetric spatial separation of the target and maskers. Although children benefited from the nonfacing masker head orientation, their HORM was reduced compared to adults with normal EHF thresholds. Spatial release from masking was comparable across age groups for symmetric masker placement, but it was larger in adults than children for the asymmetric masker.

CONCLUSIONS

Masker head orientation affects speech-in-speech recognition in children and adults, particularly those with normal EHF thresholds. This is important because masker talkers do not all face the listener under most natural listening conditions, and assuming a midline orientation would tend to overestimate the effect of spatial separation. The benefits associated with EHF audibility for speech-in-speech recognition may warrant clinical evaluation of thresholds above 8 kHz.

Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children

Extended high frequencies (EHF), above 8 kHz, represent a region of the human hearing spectrum that is generally ignored by clinicians and researchers alike. This article is a compilation of contributions that, together, make the case for an essential role of EHF in both normal hearing and auditory dysfunction. We start with the fundamentals of biological and acoustic determinism - humans have EHF hearing for a purpose, for example, the detection of prey, predators, and mates. EHF hearing may also provide a boost to speech perception in challenging conditions and its loss, conversely, might help explain difficulty with the same task. However, it could be that EHF are a marker for damage in the conventional frequency region that is more related to speech perception difficulties. Measurement of EHF hearing in concert with otoacoustic emissions could provide an early warning of age-related hearing loss. In early life, when EHF hearing sensitivity is optimal, we can use it for enhanced phonetic identification during language learning, but we are also susceptible to diseases that can prematurely damage it. EHF audiometry techniques and standardization are reviewed, providing evidence that they are reliable to measure and provide important information for early detection, monitoring and possible prevention of hearing loss in populations at-risk. To better understand the full contribution of EHF to human hearing, clinicians and researchers can contribute by including its measurement, along with measures of speech in noise and self-report of hearing difficulties and tinnitus in clinical evaluations and studies.

Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing

A fundamental principle of neuroscience is that each species' and individual's sensory systems are tailored to meet the demands placed upon them by their environments and experiences. What has driven the upper limit of the human frequency range of hearing? The traditional view is that sensitivity to the highest frequencies (i.e., beyond 8 kHz) facilitates localization of sounds in the environment. However, this has yet to be demonstrated for naturally occurring non-speech sounds. An alternative view is that, for social species such as humans, the biological relevance of conspecific vocalizations has driven the development and retention of auditory system features. Here, we provide evidence for the latter theory. We evaluated the contribution of extended high-frequency (EHF) hearing to common ecological speech perception tasks. We found that restricting access to EHFs reduced listeners' discrimination of talker head orientation by approximately 34%. Furthermore, access to EHFs significantly improved speech recognition under listening conditions in which the target talker's head was facing the listener while co-located background talkers faced away from the listener. Our findings raise the possibility that sensitivity to the highest audio frequencies fosters communication and socialization of the human species. These findings suggest that loss of sensitivity to the highest frequencies may lead to deficits in speech perception. Such EHF hearing loss typically goes undiagnosed, but is widespread among the middle-aged population.

Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

There exist perceptible differences between sound emanating from a talker who faces and a talker who does not face a listener: Sound from a non-facing talker is attenuated and acquires a spectral tilt. The present study assessed the role that these facing-orientation cues play for speech perception. Digit identification for a frontal target talker in the presence of two spatially separated interfering talkers was measured for 10 normal-hearing (NH) and 11 hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. Overall-level differences and spectral tilts were reproduced by means of digital filtering and playback via loudspeakers. Both NH and HI listeners performed significantly better when the interfering talkers were simulated not to be facing them. Spectral tilts and level differences across talkers reduced target-interferer confusions. They enabled the NH listeners to sequentially stream the digits. This was not the case for the HI listeners, who showed smaller benefits, irrespective of whether they were aided by their own hearing aids or not. While hearing-aid amplification increased audibility, it may not have aided target-interferer segregation or target selection. The present results suggest that facing orientation cannot be neglected in the exploration of speech perception in multitalker situations.