Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model of Oral Fludrocortisone and Intravenous Hydrocortisone in Healthy Volunteers

Fludrocortisone dose-response relationship in septic shock: a randomised phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of intravenous hydrocortisone and enteral fludrocortisone may reduce mortality in patients with septic shock. The optimal dose and reliability of absorption of fludrocortisone in critically ill patients are unclear.

METHODS

In a multi-centre, open label, phase II randomized clinical trial, intravenous hydrocortisone alone or in combination with one of three doses of enteral fludrocortisone (50 µg, 100 µg or 200 µg daily) for 7 days was compared in patients with septic shock. The primary outcome was time to shock resolution. We conducted pharmacokinetic studies to assess absorption.

RESULTS

Out of 153 enrolled patients, 38 (25%) received hydrocortisone alone, 42 (27%) received additional 50 µg, 36 (24%) received 100 µg and 37 (24%) received 200 µg fludrocortisone. Plasma concentrations of fludrocortisone were detected in 97% of patients at 3 h-median (interquartile range [IQR]) 261 (156-334) ng/L. There was no significant difference in the time to shock resolution between groups with median (IQR) of 3 (2.5-4.5), 3 (2-4), 3 (2-6) and 3 (2-5.5) days in the hydrocortisone alone, 50 µg, 100 µg and 200 µg fludrocortisone groups, respectively. The corresponding 28-day mortality rates were 9/38 (24%), 7/42 (17%), 4/36 (11%) and 4/37 (11%), respectively. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to, recurrence of shock, indices of organ failure or other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteral fludrocortisone resulted in detectable plasma fludrocortisone concentrations in the majority of critically ill patients with septic shock, although they varied widely indicating differing absorption and bioavailability. Its addition to hydrocortisone was not associated with shorter time to shock resolution.

Effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination on mortality in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy on the mortality of patients with septic shock.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other databases for articles published until October 1, 2023. Only clinical studies that assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone therapy for the treatment of septic shock were included. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate.

RESULTS

Seven studies with a total of 90, 756 patients were included. The study group exhibited lower in-hospital mortality rates (40.8% vs. 42.8%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92). Compared to the control group, the study group also had lower intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95), 28-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00), 90-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01), 180-day mortality (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90), and one-year mortality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42-1.16). Subgroup analyses showed a similar trend, particularly prominent in the pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials, multicenter studies, and ICU patients, the study drug regimen involved hydrocortisone at a dose of 50 mg every 6 h in combination with fludrocortisone at 50 µg daily, with the control group receiving either placebo or standard care. Hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone also increased vasopressor-free days and reduced vasopressor duration, without elevating the risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the potential survival benefits of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy for patients with septic shock and its additional advantages, including reduced vasopressor use.

Semimechanistic modeling of copeptin and aldosterone kinetics and dynamics in response to rehydration treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis in children

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), a frequent complication of type 1 diabetes (T1D), is characterized by hyperosmolar hypovolemia. The response of water-regulating hormones arginine vasopressin (AVP; antidiuretic hormone) and aldosterone to DKA treatment in children is not well understood, although they may have potential as future diagnostic, prognostic, and/or treatment monitoring markers in diabetic patients. We aimed to characterize the dynamics of the response in copeptin (marker for AVP) and aldosterone secretion to rehydration treatment in pediatric patients with DKA. Data originated from a prospective, observational, multicenter study including 28 pediatric T1D patients treated for DKA (median age, 11.5 years; weight, 35 kg). Serial measurements of hormone levels were obtained during 72 h following rehydration start. Semimechanistic pharmacometric modeling was used to analyze the kinetic/dynamic relationship of copeptin and aldosterone secretion in response to the correction of hyperosmolality and hypovolemia, respectively. Modeling revealed different sensitivities for osmolality-dependent copeptin secretion during the first 72 h of rehydration, possibly explained by an osmotic shift introduced by hypovolemia. Response in aldosterone secretion to the correction of hypovolemia seemed to be delayed, which was well described by an extra upstream turnover compartment, possibly representing chronic upregulation of aldosterone synthase (cytochrome P450 11B2). In conclusion, semimechanistic modeling provided novel physiological insights in hormonal water regulation in pediatric patients during DKA treatment, providing rationale to further evaluate the potential of monitoring copeptin, but not aldosterone due to its delayed response, for future optimization of rehydration treatment to reduce the risk of acute complications such as cerebral edema.

What Is the Role of Steroids for Septic Shock in 2021?

Corticosteroids have been used for decades in the adjunctive treatment of severe infections in intensive care. The most frequent scenario in intensive care is in septic shock, where low doses of glucocorticoids appear to restore vascular responsiveness to norepinephrine. There is a strong body of evidence suggesting that hydrocortisone reduces time on vasopressor, and may modulate the immune response. In this review, we explore the current evidence supporting the use of corticosteroids in septic shock, its benefits, and potential harms. In addition to landmark clinical trials, we will also describe new frontiers for the use of corticosteroids in septic shock which should be explored in future studies.

Management Strategies for Comorbid Supine Hypertension in Patients with Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In autonomic failure, neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) and neurogenic supine hypertension (nSH) are interrelated conditions characterized by postural blood pressure (BP) dysregulation. nOH results in a sustained BP drop upon standing, which can lead to symptoms that include lightheadedness, orthostatic dizziness, presyncope, and syncope. nSH is characterized by elevated BP when supine and, although often asymptomatic, may increase long-term cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk. This article reviews the pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of nOH and nSH, and describes the management of patients with both nOH and nSH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pressor medications required to treat the symptoms of nOH also increase the risk of nSH. Because nOH and nSH are hemodynamically opposed, therapies to treat one condition may exacerbate the other. The management of patients with nOH who also have nSH can be challenging and requires an individualized approach to balance the short- and long-term risks associated with these conditions. Approaches to manage neurogenic BP dysregulation include nonpharmacologic approaches and pharmacologic treatments. A stepwise treatment approach is presented to help guide neurologists in managing patients with both nOH and nSH.

Perioperative Glucocorticoid Therapy for Patients with Adrenal Insufficiency: Dosing Based on Pharmacokinetic Data

BACKGROUND

Perioperative glucocorticoid therapy for patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) is currently based on anecdotal reports, without supporting pharmacokinetic data.

METHODS

We determined the half-life, clearance, and volume of distribution of 2 consecutive intravenously (IV)-administered doses of hydrocortisone (15 or 25 mg every 6 hours) to 22 dexamethasone-suppressed healthy individuals and used the data to develop a novel protocol to treat 68 patients with AI who required surgical procedures. Patients received 20 mg of hydrocortisone orally 2 to 4 hours before intubation and were started on 25 mg of IV hydrocortisone every 6 hours for 24 hours and 15 mg every 6 hours during the second day. Nadir cortisol concentrations were repeatedly measured during that period.

RESULTS

In healthy individuals, cortisol half-life was longer when the higher hydrocortisone dose was administered (2.02 ± 0.15 vs 1.81 ± 0.11 hours; P < 0.01), and in patients with AI, the half-life was longer than in healthy individuals given the same hydrocortisone dose. In both populations, the cortisol half-life increased further with the second hormone injection. Prolongation of cortisol half-life was due to decreased hydrocortisone clearance and an increase in its volume of distribution. Nadir cortisol levels determined throughout the 48 postoperative hours were within the range of values and often exceeded those observed perioperatively in patients without adrenal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Cortisol pharmacokinetics are altered in the postoperative period and indicate that lower doses of hydrocortisone can be safely administered to patients with AI undergoing major surgery. The findings of this investigation call into question the current practice of administering excessive glucocorticoid supplementation during stress.

Interaction between accumulated 21-deoxysteroids and mineralocorticoid signaling in 21-hydroxylase deficiency

21-Hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD) is a rare genetic disorder in which salt-wasting syndrome occurs in 75% of cases, due to inability to synthesize cortisol and aldosterone. Recent mass spectrometry progress allowed identification of 21-deoxysteroids, i.e., 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP), 21-deoxycortisol (21DF), and 21-deoxycorticosterone (21DB). We hypothesized that they may interfere with mineralocorticoid signaling and fludrocortisone therapy in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) without effective glucocorticoid replacement and ACTH suppression. Our goal was to quantify circulating 21-deoxysteroids in a pediatric cohort with CAH related to 21OHD and to examine their impact on mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation. Twenty-nine patients with salt-wasting phenotype were classified in two groups according to their therapeutic control. During routine follow-up, 17OHP, 21DF, 21DB, and cortisol levels were quantified by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry before hydrocortisone intake and 1 and 2.5 h following treatment administration. Luciferase reporter gene assays were performed on transfected HEK293T cells while in silico modeling examined structural interactions between these steroids within ligand-binding domain of MR. Plasma 17OHP, 21DF, and 21DB accumulate in uncontrolled patients reaching micromolar concentrations even after hydrocortisone intake. 21DF and 21DB act as partial MR agonists with antagonist features similar to 17OHP, consistent with altered anchoring to Asn⁷⁷⁰ and unfavorable contact with Ala⁷⁷³ in ligand-binding pocket of MR. Our results demonstrate a complex interaction between all accumulating 21-deoxysteroids in uncontrolled 21OHD patients and mineralocorticoid signaling and suggest that appropriate steroid profiling should optimize management and follow-up of such patients, as keeping those steroids to low plasma levels should attest therapeutic efficacy and prevent interference with MR signaling.

Hydrocortisone with fludrocortisone for septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Combined hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone therapy for septic shock has not been evaluated with an independent systematic review. We aimed to elucidate the beneficial effects of a dual corticosteroid treatment regime involving both hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone for adult patients with septic shock on mortality.

METHODS

We searched the Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ICHUSHI databases for reports published before April 2019. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the use of both hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone with either corticosteroid-free or hydrocortisone-only treatments on adult patients with septic shock. Three researchers independently reviewed the studies. The meta-analyses were undertaken to assess primary outcome (28-day mortality) and secondary outcomes (in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, shock reversal, and adverse events).

RESULTS

Among the four studies eligible for data synthesis, we included 2,050 patients from three studies for quantitative synthesis. All studies used similar regimens (hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone for 7 days without tapering). The 28-day mortality rate was reduced after dual corticosteroid treatment (risk ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.78-0.99). The heterogeneity between the studies was low (I 2 = 0%). Patients who underwent dual corticosteroid treatment had lower long-term mortality rates (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98) and higher rate of shock reversal after 28 days (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12) than control patients. Adverse events (except for hyperglycemia) were similar among the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests that a combination of fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone is more effective than adjunctive therapy and could be recommended for septic shock.

Hydrocortisone Compared with Placebo in Patients with Septic Shock Satisfying the Sepsis-3 Diagnostic Criteria and APROCCHSS Study Inclusion Criteria

Editor’s Perspective

What We Already Know about This Topic

What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Background

Two recent randomized controlled trials (Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock [ADRENAL] and Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock [APROCCHSS]) of corticosteroids in patients with septic shock reported different treatment effects on 90-day mortality. Both trials enrolled patients who met the criteria for septic shock using the second international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-2), but the APROCCHSS trial mandated a greater severity of shock as an inclusion criterion.

Methods

The authors conducted post hoc sensitivity analyses of the ADRENAL trial to determine the effects of hydrocortisone versus placebo in subgroups selected using third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) diagnostic criteria or APROCCHSS inclusion criteria.

Results

There were 1,950 subjects (973 hydrocortisone and 977 placebo) who met the Sepsis-3 criteria (ADRENAL–Sepsis-3 cohort) and 905 patients (455 hydrocortisone and 450 placebo) who met the APROCCHSS criteria (ADRENAL–APROCCHSS cohort). At 90 days after randomization, in the ADRENAL–Sepsis-3 cohort, 312 of 963 (32.4%) and 337 of 958 (35.2%) patients assigned to hydrocortisone and placebo, respectively, had died (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.06; P = 0.166). The corresponding figures for the ADRENAL–APROCCHSS cohorts were 187 of 453 (41.3%) and 200 of 445 (44.9%), respectively (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.17; P = 0.303). There was no statistically significant difference in the time to death between the groups during the 90 days after randomization (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.02; P = 0.082 for ADRENAL–Sepsis-3; and hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.06; P = 0.156 for ADRENAL–APROCCHSS cohorts). In both cohorts, patients assigned to hydrocortisone had faster resolution of shock. In the ADRENAL–Sepsis-3 cohort, patients assigned to hydrocortisone had an increase in the number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation (57.0 ± 37.2 vs. 53.7 ± 38.2 days; 95% CI, 0.40 to 7.04; P = 0.028) and the number of days alive and free of the intensive care unit (54.3 ± 36.0 vs. 51.0 ± 37.1; 95% CI, 0.82 to 7.24; P = 0.014).

Conclusions

In a post hoc analysis of the ADRENAL trial participants who fulfilled either the Sepsis-3 or the APROCCHSS inclusion criteria, a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone did not result in a lower 90-day mortality than placebo in septic shock.

Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Septic Shock

Two recent randomized controlled trials have provided new data to inform opinion on the use of corticosteroids in septic shock. This article discusses the background and rationale for corticosteroid use, compares the findings and methodologies of the new trials, and provides suggestions for practice.

Effects of dexamethasone and hydrocortisone on rocuroniuminduced neuromuscular blockade and reversal by sugammadex in phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm rat model

Background

The facilitator effects of steroids on neuromuscular transmission may cause resistance to neuromuscular blocking agents. Additionally, steroids may hinder sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular blockade, but these findings remain controversial. Therefore, we explored the effect of dexamethasone and hydrocortisone on rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade and their inhibitory effect on sugammadex.

Methods

We explored the effects of steroids, dexamethasone and hydrocortisone, in vitro using a phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm rat model. In the first phase, an effective dose of rocuronium was calculated, and in the second phase, following sugammadex administration, the recovery of the train-of-four (TOF) ratio and T1 was evaluated for 30 minutes, and the recovery index was calculated in dexamethasone 0, 0.5, 5, and 50 μg/ml, or hydrocortisone 0, 1, 10, or 100 μg/ml.

Results

No significant effect of steroids on the effective dose of rocuronium was observed. The TOF ratios at 30 minutes after sugammadex administration were decreased significantly only at high experimental concentrations of steroids: dexamethasone 50 μg/ml and hydrocortisone 100 μg/ml (P < 0.001 and P = 0.042, respectively). There were no statistical significances in other concentrations. No differences were observed in T1. Recovery index was significantly different only in 100 μg/ml of hydrocortisone (P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Acute exposure to steroids did not resist the neuromuscular blockade caused by rocuronium. And inhibition of sugammadex reversal on rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade is unlikely at typical clinical doses of dexamethasone and also hydrocortisone. Conclusively, we can expect proper effects of rocuronium and sugammadex when dexamethasone or hydrocortisone is used during general anesthesia.

Utilization of data below the analytical limit of quantitation in pharmacokinetic analysis and modeling: promoting interdisciplinary debate

Traditionally, bioanalytical laboratories do not report actual concentrations for samples with results below the LOQ (BLQ) in pharmacokinetic studies. BLQ values are outside the method calibration range established during validation and no data are available to support the reliability of these values. However, ignoring BLQ data can contribute to bias and imprecision in model-based pharmacokinetic analyses. From this perspective, routine use of BLQ data would be advantageous. We would like to initiate an interdisciplinary debate on this important topic by summarizing the current concepts and use of BLQ data by regulators, pharmacometricians and bioanalysts. Through introducing the limit of detection and evaluating its variability, BLQ data could be released and utilized appropriately for pharmacokinetic research.

Immune Effects of Corticosteroids in Sepsis

Sepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction, results from a dysregulated host response to invading pathogens that may be characterized by overwhelming systemic inflammation or some sort of immune paralysis. Sepsis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Treatment is nonspecific and relies on source control and organ support. Septic shock, the most severe form of sepsis is associated with the highest rate of mortality. Two large multicentre trials, undertaken 15 years apart, found that the combination of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone significantly reduces mortality in septic shock. The corticosteroids family is composed of several molecules that are usually characterized according to their glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid power, relative to hydrocortisone. While the immune effects of glucocorticoids whether mediated or not by the intracellular glucocorticoid receptor have been investigated for several decades, it is only very recently that potential immune effects of mineralocorticoids via non-renal mineralocorticoid receptors have gained popularity. We reviewed the respective role of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids in counteracting sepsis-associated dysregulated immune systems.

Use of fludrocortisone for intradialytic hypotension

Intradialytic hypotension during dialysis adversely affects a patient’s prognosis and increases mortality. We report a case in which intradialytic hypotension that persisted after the administration of midodrine was relieved after the use of fludrocortisone. Administration of 0.2 mg of fludrocortisone occurred 30 minutes before dialysis. We compared 45 sessions of dialysis without fludrocortisone administration and 45 sessions of dialysis with fludrocortisone administration in one patient. The number of times in which systolic blood pressure became lower than 80 mmHg and the number of early terminations of dialysis due to a decrease in systolic blood pressure were higher in the sessions without fludrocortisone administration than in the sessions with fludrocortisone administration (P < 0.05). Fludrocortisone may be helpful for the treatment of intradialytic hypotension that does not respond to midodrine administration.