Mechanistic Modeling of the Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Relationship of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor-Neutralizing Antibody (BAY 1093884) in Cynomolgus Monkeys

Toward non-factor therapy in hemophilia: an antithrombin insensitive Gla-domainless factor Xa as tissue factor pathway inhibitor bait

Background

Gla-domainless factor (F) Xa (GD-FXa) was proposed as a trap to endogenous anticoagulant tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) to restore thrombin generation in hemophilia. Using computational chemistry and experimental approaches, we previously showed that S195A GD-FXa also binds TFPI and restores ex vivo coagulation in plasma obtained from person(s) with hemophilia.

Methods

To design a GD-FXa variant with improved anti-TFPI affinity, we performed molecular dynamics simulations and identified suitable sites for mutagenesis. The calculations identified residues R150FXa and K96Fxa as cold-spots of interaction between GD-FXa and the K2 domain of TFPI. In the three-dimensional model, both residues face toward TFPI hydrophobic residues and are thus potential candidates for mutagenesis into hydrophobic residues to favor an improved protein-protein interaction.

Results

Catalytically inactive GD-FXa variants containing the S195A mutation and the additional mutations K96Y, R150I, R150G, R150F, and K96YR150F, were produced to experimentally confirm these computational hypotheses. Among these mutants, the R150FFXa and the K96YR150FFXa were slightly more effective than S195A GD-FXa in restoring coagulation in FVIII deficient plasmas. However, in surface plasmon resonance experiments, they showed TFPI binding affinities in the same range and acted similarly as S195A GD-FXa in FXa/TFPI competition assays. In contrast, the R150 mutants completely lost their interactions with antithrombin as observed in the surface plasmon resonance experiments.

Conclusions

We therefore conclude that their antithrombin resistance is responsible for their improved thrombin generation, through an extension of their half-lives.

Early stage clinical trials for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a severe bleeding disorder affecting about 1 in 5,000 males. The gold standard for prophylaxis and treatment of acute bleeding has been factor (F) VIII concentrate. A multitude of treatment modalities are now available and under clinical investigation.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses ongoing/recently completed early-phase clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in patients with hemophilia A through April 2022. These new pipeline therapies are focused on addressing the safety and efficacy of new factor-related products, non-factor related products, and gene therapy options for hemophilia.

EXPERT OPINION

Current standard of care effectively prevents and treats acute bleeding and has significantly improved the quality of life in hemophilia. The biggest challenges in the improvement of care are treatment-related burden and the burden of cost in developing countries. New drugs under development are likely to enter practice by the end of this decade and address many of the unmet needs particularly of those with severe disease. Data is limited in unique populations (e.g. congenital/inherited FVIII inhibitors, non-severe hemophilia A, women/girls with hemophilia and children) which are important areas for future research; additional clinical trials and long-term outcome data are necessary prior to incorporating these new therapies in our treatment arsenal.

Befovacimab, an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibody: Early termination of the multiple-dose, dose-escalating Phase 2 study due to thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

Befovacimab (formerly BAY 1093884) is a fully human monoclonal antibody able to bind to tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and developed as a non-replacement therapy for individuals with haemophilia A/B, with or without inhibitors.

AIM

To assess the safety of multiple escalating doses of befovacimab in individuals with severe haemophilia A/B with or without inhibitors.

METHODS

In this non-randomised, open-label Phase 2 study (NCT03597022), adult males with <1% factor VIII or <2% factor IX and ≥4 bleeds in the previous six months were enrolled in three dose cohorts (100/225/400 mg). Participants received befovacimab subcutaneously once weekly. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of befovacimab.

RESULTS

A total of 24 participants (n = 8 in each dose cohort) were treated for 2-47 weeks. Patients treated with 100 mg and 225 mg doses of befovacimab demonstrated improved bleeding control compared with pre-study bleeding rates, with a dose-dependent effect. Dosing was suspended and the study prematurely terminated following three drug-related thrombotic serious adverse events (SAEs): two at the 225 mg dose and one at the 400 mg dose. These occurred in the absence of bleeding episodes or concomitant use of replacement/bypass therapies. No laboratory abnormalities were observed, and PK/PD data did not show correlation between SAE occurrence and levels of circulating befovacimab or free TFPI.

CONCLUSION

Despite favourable initial results from preclinical and clinical studies, a positive safety profile of befovacimab was not confirmed. The lack of SAE-related laboratory abnormalities or differentiating PK/PD characteristics in participants experiencing SAEs raises concerns about the predictability of thrombosis following befovacimab treatment and emphasises the need for further investigation into the therapeutic window of anti-TFPI treatment.

Knockdown and Knockout of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor in Zebrafish

Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) is an anticoagulant that inhibits factor VIIa and Xa in the blood coagulation pathways. TFPI contains three Kunitz domains, K1, K2, and K3. K1 and K2 inhibit factor VIIa and Xa, respectively. However, the regulation of TFPI is poorly studied. Since zebrafish has become an alternate model to discover novel actors in hemostasis, we hypothesized that TFPI regulation could be studied using this model. As a first step, we confirmed the presence of tfpia in zebrafish using RT-PCR. We then performed piggyback knockdowns of tfpia and found increased coagulation activity in tfpia knockdown. We then created a deletion mutation in tfpia locus using CRISPR/Cas9 method. The tfpia homozygous deletion mutants showed increased coagulation activities similar to that found in tfpia knockdown. Taken together, our data suggest that tfpia is a negative regulator for zebrafish coagulation, and silencing it leads to thrombotic phenotype. Also, the zebrafish tfpia knockout model could be used for reversing this thrombotic phenotype to identify antithrombotic novel factors by the genome-wide piggyback knockdown method.

Nonfactor Therapies: New Approaches to Prophylactic Treatment of Haemophilia

For several decades, the treatment of haemophilia has relied on factor replacement therapy, which restores haemostasis by replacing the missing coagulation factor. In recent years, novel alternative therapies for the treatment of haemophilia in patients with and without inhibitors have been developed. These emergent therapies promote haemostasis by mimicking coagulation factors or inhibiting natural anticoagulants. They provide a less invasive route of administration (i.e. subcutaneous) and some offer reduced frequency of dosing (i.e. every 2 weeks, monthly) compared with the majority of factor replacement therapies, and thus have the potential to simplify treatment, increase adherence and subsequently improve outcomes for patients. Their introduction has transformed the care of haemophilia patients with inhibitors to factor VIII, with similar expectation for haemophilia B patients with inhibitors. However, these therapies also come with several new challenges including their limitation to prophylactic treatment, the observed increased incidence of thrombosis, or their impact on the natural history of the disease and potential disruption of existing treatment guidelines like the use of immune tolerance induction. Moreover, questions remain regarding the long-term impact of non-replacement therapies on joint health as well as the optimal strategy to manage breakthrough bleeds in patients with inhibitors.

Target-mediated drug disposition modeling of an anti-TFPI antibody (MG1113) in cynomolgus monkeys to predict human pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

BACKGROUND

MG1113 is a human monoclonal antibody of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) under development for prophylaxis for hemophilia patients with or without inhibitors against factor VIII products, which have been used for the treatment of hemophilia. Because TFPI is a negative regulator in the extrinsic coagulation pathway, neutralization of TFPI function by MG1113 can potentially increase coagulation activity by bypassing the intrinsic coagulation pathway, which factor VIII activates.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine the correlation between pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) after administering MG1113 to monkeys and to predict the PK and PD of MG1113 in humans by the Target-Mediated Drug Disposition (TMDD) model using the results from monkeys.

METHODS

The PK profile of MG1113 and the PD effect on the free TFPI level were evaluated after intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administrations of MG1113 (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg) to male cynomolgus monkeys. After setting up the PK/PD model on monkeys, PK parameters on humans were calculated using allometric scaling, and then clinically effective doses were predicted applying the TMDD model.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

MG1113 showed nonlinear PK after both IV and SC administrations at the dosing range from 2.5 to10 mg/kg. The concentrations of MG1113 versus TFPI could be characterized a dose-response relationship using a TMDD model. The TMDD modeling and simulation built in this study were used to simulate various dosage regimens of MG1113 to apply to the first-in-human study design, and moreover expected to be referred to establish the dose for further clinical trials.

Progress in the Development of Anti-tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitors for Haemophilia Management

The unprecedented progress in addressing unmet needs in haemophilia care to date includes developing several novel therapies that rebalance haemostasis by restoring thrombin generation in patients with haemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors. These novel therapies are FVIII mimetics, antithrombin interference RNA therapy and several monoclonal antibodies directed against the tissue factor pathway inhibitor (anti-TFPI). In this review, we provide an update on the progress made in developing anti-TFPI therapie. Phase 1 data from the three anti-TFPI studies showed acceptable safety profiles, and currently, available phase 2 data are encouraging. While these data support these molecules' further development progression, there is uncertainty on several aspects of their evolution. Two of the three anti-TFPIs have shown drug-related thrombosis, with one study consequently terminated. None of the thrombotic events is predictable with current monitoring tools, and none correlate with known coagulation parameters. All three anti-TFPIs undergo target mediated drug disposition, which impacts the formulation of dosing regimen fo these therapies. They would require more frequent dosing than some of the extended half-life clotting factor products and antithrombin RNAi therapy. There is no assay to measure the TFPI as the physiological levels are very low, which makes monitoring the impact of the anti-TFPI a challenge. The anti-TFPIs have several advantages, including their bioavailability when administered subcutaneously, their stable pharmacokinetics and their ability to prevent bleeds in haemophilia A or B patients with and without inhibitors. Whether these advantages can be realized will depend on the outcome of the currently ongoing studies.

Practical considerations for nonfactor-replacement therapies in the treatment of haemophilia with inhibitors

New therapeutic agents for haemophilia with inhibitors that are in development or already licensed are expected to provide transformative treatment options. Many of these new therapies are not based on simply replacing the missing factor; new strategies include bispecific antibody technology that mimics factor VIII coagulation function (emicizumab), and inhibition of anticoagulant proteins such as tissue factor pathway inhibitor (eg PF-06741086) and antithrombin (eg fitusiran). These agents are administered subcutaneously and should significantly reduce treatment burden and increase the ability to deliver prophylaxis for patients. Limited real-world data and validated practical guidance on these recently licensed/upcoming treatments resulted in the authors convening to discuss recommendations on their use. Emicizumab is currently the only licenced nonfactor therapy; thus, our recommendations focus on this product. Target candidates for emicizumab prophylaxis are difficult-to-treat patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors and/or venous access issues, frequent bleeds and target joints. In case of breakthrough bleeding while receiving emicizumab, patients still require treatment with bypassing agents; the adjunct treatment of choice is recombinant activated factor VII. This treatment is also recommended to prevent bleeds in patients with inhibitors undergoing surgery. Our recommendations on suitable laboratory assays and monitoring new products, as well as the benefit of patient-reported outcomes (such as pain and physical activity levels), are included. We also briefly discuss future treatment options for patients with haemophilia B and inhibitors. Although these nonfactor treatments offer great promise, further data and real-world evidence are needed.

Novel treatments for hemophilia through rebalancing of the coagulation cascade

Hemophilia A and B are inherited hemorrhagic disorders that result from alterations in the coagulation cascade. Aside from spontaneous bleeding, the main complication of hemophilia is hemarthrosis. Progress over the last three decades, specifically prophylaxis using recombinant factor, has prevented hemarthrosis and lengthened patient life expectancies. However, many treatments require frequent dosing up to three times a week, and alloantibodies (inhibitors) against replacement factor continues to be an issue. These problems call for novel treatments for patients with hemophilia. Although there has been progress in extended half-life factors and mimetics of factor VIII, an alternative treatment methodology is to rebalance the activities of pro- and anticoagulant factors through inhibition of the natural anticoagulants: antithrombin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, protein C, and protein S. This review will explore the efficacy of targeting these inhibitory pathways from preclinical development through clinical trials, and delve into concerns of thrombotic risk.

An in vitro pharmacodynamic spiking study of befovacimab, a tissue factor pathway inhibitor monoclonal antibody, in blood samples from patients with severe FVIII deficiency

INTRODUCTION

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is an endogenous protein that inhibits the extrinsic (tissue factor) pathway and negatively regulates thrombin production during coagulation. Inhibiting TFPI may become a useful target for haemophilia drug development to allow greater thrombin generation without use of the intrinsic (contact) pathway.

AIMS

The in vitro effects of befovacimab, a humanized TFPI neutralizing antibody, were studied in whole blood and plasma samples from patients with severe FVIII deficiency.

METHODS

Blood and plasma obtained from participants was supplemented in vitro with befovacimab (0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 100 nM) or recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) 5-, 10- and 40% and analysed using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), thrombin generation assay (TGA) and the dilute prothrombin time (dPT) assay. The in vitro coagulation effects of befovacimab were compared to samples supplemented with rFVIII.

RESULTS

Befovacimab induced consistent pro-coagulant responses in ROTEM parameters including reduction in clotting times and increases in α-angle; induced reductions in dPT clotting time; and improvements in TGA parameters (reduced lag time and increased thrombin generation parameters). There was a modest concentration-dependent response generally from 0.5- to 10 nM, after which, the pharmacodynamic effect plateaued through the 100 nM concentration. Befovacimab concentrations of 5 to 10 nM showed pro-coagulant activity comparable to blood samples supplemented with rFVIII 10-40%.

CONCLUSIONS

Befovacimab has modest dose-response effects from 0.5 to 10 nM with minimal improvement with higher concentrations. In vitro befovacimab blood concentrations of 5 to 10 nM had pro-coagulant effects similar to blood supplemented with rFVIII 10- to 40%.

The changing treatment landscape in haemophilia: from standard half-life clotting factor concentrates to gene editing

Congenital haemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency) and B (factor IX deficiency) are X-linked bleeding disorders. Replacement therapy has been the cornerstone of the management of haemophilia, aiming to reduce the mortality and morbidity of chronic crippling arthropathy. Frequent intravenous injections are burdensome and costly for patients, consequently with poor adherence and restricted access to therapy for many patients worldwide. Bioengineered clotting factors with enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles can reduce the burden of treatment. However, replacement therapy is associated with a risk for inhibitor development that adversely affects bleeding prevention and outcomes. Novel molecules that are subcutaneously delivered provide effective prophylaxis in the presence or absence of inhibitors, either substituting for the procoagulant function of clotting factors (eg, emicizumab) or targeting the natural inhibitors of coagulation (ie, antithrombin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, or activated protein C). The ultimate goal of haemophilia treatment would be a phenotypical cure achievable with gene therapy, currently under late phase clinical investigation.

Origins, Development, Current Challenges and Future Directions with Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Treatment of Patients with Congenital Haemophilia with Inhibitors

Congenital haemophilia A (HA) is caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) activity, leading to spontaneous or traumatic bleeding events. While FVIII replacement therapy can treat and prevent bleeds, approximately 30% of patients with severe HA develop inhibitor antibodies that render FVIII replacement therapy ineffective. The bypassing agents (BPAs), activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated FVII, first approved in 1977 and 1996, respectively, act to generate thrombin independent of pathways that involve factors IX and VIII. Both may be used in patients with congenital haemophilia and inhibitors (PwHIs) for the treatment and prevention of acute bleeds and quickly became standard of care. However, individual patients respond differently to different agents. While both agents are approved for on-demand treatment and perioperative management for patients with congenital haemophilia with inhibitors, aPCC is currently the only BPA approved worldwide for prophylaxis in PwHI. Non-factor therapies (NFTs) have a mechanism of action distinct from BPAs and have reported higher efficacy rates as prophylactic regimens. Nonetheless, treatment challenges remain with NFTs, particularly regarding the potential for synergistic action on thrombin generation with concomitant use of other haemostatic agents, such as BPAs, for the treatment of breakthrough bleeds and in perioperative management. Concomitant use of NFTs with other haemostatic agents could increase the risk of adverse events such as thromboembolic events or thrombotic microangiopathy. This review focuses on the origins, development and on-going role of aPCC in the evolving treatment landscape in the management of PwHI.

MG1113, a specific anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibody, rebalances the coagulation system and promotes hemostasis in hemophilia

BACKGROUND

Replacement therapy is the most common treatment for reduction of bleeding and control of episodic bleeding in individuals with hemophilia. Despite the proven effectiveness of factor replacement therapy, repeated intravenous administration is a heavy burden to individuals with hemophilia.

OBJECTIVES

To reduce the burden, therapeutic agents that can be subcutaneously administered need to be developed, and an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) antibody may be a suitable candidate for this purpose.

METHODS

MG1113 is an IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to Kunitz-2 domain (KD2) of TFPI. To confirm the coagulation potential of MG1113, several tests were conducted using factor VIII (FVIII)- or IX (FIX)-deficient plasma. For the ex vivo spiking test, platelet-poor plasma samples from 14 individuals with hemophilia were spiked with MG1113. The in vivo efficacy was determined using blood loss tests, modified prothrombin time (mPT), and free TFPI quantification after intravenous or subcutaneous administration of MG1113 into hemophilia A (HA)-induced rabbits.

RESULTS

Radiographic crystallography demonstrated the specific binding site between MG1113 and KD2. In FVIII-deficient plasma and the plasma of individuals with hemophilia, peak thrombin and endogenous thrombin levels were increased by MG1113 in a concentration-dependent manner. Rotational thromboelastometry assay revealed that clotting time, clot formation time, and maximum clot firmness were normalized in MG1113-treated blood of patients. Intravenous or subcutaneous injection of MG1113 into HA-induced rabbits resulted in rebalancing of blood loss, mPT, and free TFPI levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that subcutaneous administration of MG1113 neutralizes the function of TFPI and regulates bleeding in individuals with hemophilia.

A bispecific antibody demonstrates limited measurability in routine coagulation assays

: Accurate monitoring of coagulation, needed for optimal management of patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors, presents a challenge for treating physicians. Although global haemostatic assays may be used in this population, their utility with nonfactor therapies has yet to be established in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to assess options for potential haemostatic activity monitoring and feasibility for factor VIII (FVIII)-equivalency measurement with a sequence identical analogue (SIA) to emicizumab using different coagulation assays. SIA was analysed using five commercial chromogenic assays and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assays including clot waveform analysis using five different triggers. Recombinant FVIII served as a comparator in all assays. Thrombin generation in haemophilia A plasma was measured using extrinsic and intrinsic trigger conditions (tissue factor or Factor XIa). Of the five chromogenic assays, a concentration-dependent increase in Factor Xa was observed with one assay, with human Factor IXa and X reagents. The SIA dose-response signal plateaued at therapeutically relevant concentrations and was nonparallel with FVIII reference, thereby not permitting FVIII-equivalence assessment. aPTT varied between reagents, with aPTT normalization occurring at low and below-therapeutic SIA concentrations. SIA [600 nmol/l (90 μg/ml)] only partially restored thrombin generation in individual haemophilia A patient plasma. FVIII-equivalence of SIA could not be determined using standard FVIII protocols and was found to be highly influenced by assay type, analytical conditions and parameters used for calculation. New and/or modified methodology and standard reagents specific for use with nonfactor therapies are required for their utilization in the clinical setting.

A Molecular Revolution in the Treatment of Hemophilia

For decades, the monogenetic bleeding disorders hemophilia A and B (coagulation factor VIII and IX deficiency) have been treated with systemic protein replacement therapy. Now, diverse molecular medicines, ranging from antibody to gene to RNA therapy, are transforming treatment. Traditional replacement therapy requires twice to thrice weekly intravenous infusions of factor. While extended half-life products may reduce the frequency of injections, patients continue to face a lifelong burden of the therapy, suboptimal protection from bleeding and joint damage, and potential development of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (inhibitors) that require less efficacious bypassing agents and further reduce quality of life. Novel non-replacement and gene therapies aim to address these remaining issues. A recently approved factor VIII-mimetic antibody accomplishes hemostatic correction in patients both with and without inhibitors. Antibodies against tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and antithrombin-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) target natural anticoagulant pathways to rebalance hemostasis. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy provides lasting clotting factor replacement and can also be used to induce immune tolerance. Multiple gene-editing techniques are under clinical or preclinical investigation. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of these approaches, explain how they differ from standard therapies, and predict how the hemophilia treatment landscape will be reshaped.

Hemophilia therapy: the future has begun

The success story of hemophilia care first began in the 1970s, when the availability of plasma-derived concentrates of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) provided efficacious treatment of bleeding in patients with hemophilia A and B. This positive scenario was consolidated in terms of greater safety and availability in the 1990s, when the first recombinant coagulation factors were produced. This meant that, instead of only treating episodic bleeding events, prophylaxis regimens could be implemented as a preventive measure. Following the demonstration of its superiority in the frame of two randomized clinical trials, prophylaxis became evidence-based standard of care. In high-income countries, these achievements have led to a patients’ life expectancy being extended to close to that of the general male population. Alongside this, the last decade has witnessed further spectacular therapeutic progress, such as the availability of coagulation factors with a longer plasma half-life that allow for wider intervals between treatment. Moreover, new therapeutic products based on new mechanisms other than the replacement of the deficient factor, have become available (emicizumab) or are at an advanced stage of development. This review celebrates the success story of hemophilia care, while also discussing current limitations, issues and as yet unmet needs. The prospects of cure by means of gene therapy are also outlined.

[Therapeutic antibodies in hemostasis. From the past to the future]

L’hémostase est un processus complexe qui implique de nombreux acteurs cellulaires et moléculaires. En pathologie, les thromboses d’une part, et les pathologies hémorragiques constitutionnelles dominées par l’hémophilie d’autre part, ont bénéficié ces dernières années du développement d’anticorps thérapeutiques qui révolutionnent aujourd’hui la prise en charge des malades.

Paradigm shift for the treatment of hereditary haemophilia: Towards precision medicine

Patients with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) experience spontaneous limb- or life-threatening bleedings which are prevented by regular prophylactic intravenous infusions of the deficient coagulation factor (FVIII or FIX). Prophylaxis with subcutaneous long-acting non-factor products that improve in vivo thrombin generation is now under intensive investigation (concizumab, fitusiran) or successfully employed (emicizumab) in haemophilia patients. Both haemophilia patients with/without inhibitors take advantage of non-factor products employed alone. In those who also need bypassing agents (or FVIII concentrates) for breakthrough bleeds, thromboembolic events and/or thrombotic microangiopathy may occur. By enhancing thrombin generation, prothrombotic mutations co-segregating with FVIII/FIX gene mutations may trigger thrombotic episodes in HA patients carrying acquired thrombogenic factors (e.g. venous catheters). A thorough knowledge of individual needs increasingly contributed to improve comprehensive care and personalize treatments in haemophilia. Integrating genomics, lifestyle and environmental data is expected to be key to: 1) identify which haemophilia patients are less likely to benefit from a given intervention; 2) define optimal dosing and scheduling of bypassing agents (or FVIII) to employ in combination with non-factor products; 3) establish tests to monitor in vivo thrombin generation; 4) improve communication and deliver results to individuals. As individual outcomes will be improved and the risk of adverse events minimized, non-factor products will come into wider use within the haemophilia community, and patients will hopefully have no more risks of breakthrough bleeds. The risks of a normal life for a "former haemophilia patient" is likely to change the treatment landscape and the structure of haemophilia Centers.

A systems pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for concizumab to explore the potential of anti-TFPI recycling antibodies

Concizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody in clinical investigation directed against membrane-bound and soluble tissue factor pathway inhibitor (mTFPI and sTFPI) for treatment of hemophilia. Concizumab displays a non-linear pharmacokinetic (PK) profile due to mTFPI-mediated endocytosis and necessitates a high dose and frequent dosing to suppress the abundant sTFPI, a negative regulator of coagulation. Recycling antibodies that can dissociate bound mTFPI/sTFPI in endosomes for degradation and rescue antibody from degradation have a potential in reducing the dose by extending antibody systemic persistence and sTFPI suppression. We developed a systems PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) model with nested endosome compartments to simulate the effect of decreased antibody binding to mTFPI/sTFPI in endosomes on antibody clearance and sTFPI suppression for exploring the potential of anti-TFPI recycling antibodies in reducing the dose. A dynamic model-building strategy was taken. A reduced PK/PD model without the endosome compartments was developed to optimize unknown target turnover parameters using concizumab PK data. The optimized parameters were then employed in the systems PK/PD model for simulations. The obtained systems PK/PD model adequately described the PK of concizumab in rabbits, monkeys, and humans and the PD in humans. The systems PK/PD model predicted that an anti-TFPI recycling antibody with a 100-fold higher mTFPI/sTFPI dissociation constant in endosomes than concizumab can extend sTFPI suppression from 12 days to 1 month. Thus, the systems PK/PD model provides a quantitative platform for guiding the engineering and translational development of anti-TFPI recycling antibodies.

Current and emerging biologics for the treatment of hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

The development of new biologic agents able to restore thrombin generation has become the focus of innovation in hemophilia management. There is growing interest in the proposal of novel, non-replacement therapy with alternative mechanisms of action and route of administration, hoping to solve still unmet needs in treatment of hemophilic patients with or without inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

The review describes the new molecules, in particular the bi-specific antibody mimicking the coagulation function of FVIII and/or those which work by inhibiting the natural anticoagulants, their mechanism of action and the results of ongoing clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Exciting results in enhancing the protection against bleeding and improving quality of life are emerging from clinical trials. However, these molecules with their mechanisms of action also open new problems. Treatment of bleeding and management of surgery in subjects with a rebalanced hemostasis may be difficult, especially for the lack of laboratory tests perfectly reflecting the in vivo coagulation status. A careful surveillance is required to evaluate the risk of thrombotic complication in patients with rebalanced hemostasis, in addition to understand whether these new products offer the same protection on joints as regular prophylaxis with the missing clotting factors.

Hemophilia in a Changing Treatment Landscape

The mainstay of hemophilia management has been the regular, prophylactic infusion of missing coagulation factors VIII/IX. This approach is limited by the need for frequent intravenous infusions, high cost, limited availability, and the development of inhibitory antibodies to factors VIII/IX. Numerous recent breakthroughs are addressing many of these limitations. These include the development of extended half-life factors that require less frequent infusions and the development of various novel agents that can be given subcutaneously and infrequently, including FVIII-mimetic antibody and downregulators of natural anticoagulants. Finally, gene therapy is set to offer patients a possibility for a cure.

Inhibitors in haemophilia A and B: Management of bleeds, inhibitor eradication and strategies for difficult-to-treat patients

The standard therapy for patients with haemophilia is prophylactic treatment with replacement factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX). Patients who develop inhibitors against FVIII/FIX face an increased risk of bleeding, and the likelihood of early development of progressive arthropathy, alongside higher treatment-related costs. Bypassing agents can be used to prevent and control bleeding, as well as the recently licensed prophylaxis, emicizumab, but their efficacy is less predictable than that of factor replacement therapy. Antibody eradication, by way of immune tolerance induction (ITI), is still the preferred management strategy for treating patients with inhibitors. This approach is successful in most patients, but some are difficult to tolerise and/or are unresponsive to ITI, and they represent the most complicated patients to treat. However, there are limited clinical data and guidelines available to help guide physicians in formulating the next treatment steps in these patients. This review summarises currently available treatment options for patients with inhibitors, focussing on ITI regimens and those ITI strategies that may be used in difficult-to-treat patients. Some alternative, non-ITI approaches for inhibitor management, are also proposed.

Anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) therapy: a novel approach to the treatment of haemophilia

Novel approaches to the treatment of haemophilia are needed due to the limitations of the current standard of care, factor replacement therapy. Aspirations include lessening the treatment burden and effectively preventing joint damage. Treating haemophilia by restoring thrombin generation may be an effective approach. A promising target for restoring thrombin generation is tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), a multivalent Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor that regulates tissue factor-induced coagulation via factor Xa-dependent feedback inhibition of the tissue factor-factor VIIa complex. Inhibition of TFPI reverts the coagulation process to a more primitive state evolutionarily, whilst regulation by other natural inhibitors is preserved. An aptamer and three monoclonal antibodies directed against TFPI have been investigated in clinical trials. As well as improving thrombin generation in the range associated with mild haemophilia, anti-TFPI therapies have the advantage of subcutaneous administration. However, the therapeutic window needs to be defined along with the potential for complications due to the novel mechanism of action. This review provides an overview of TFPI, its role in normal coagulation, the rationale for TFPI inhibition, and a summary of anti-TFPI therapies, previously or currently in development.

Navigating Speed Bumps on the Innovation Highway in Hemophilia Therapeutics

The unprecedented emergence of novel therapeutics for both hemophilia A and B during the last half decade has been accompanied by the promise of even more extraordinary progress in ameliorative and curative strategies for both disorders. Paradoxically, the speed of innovation has created new dilemmas for persons with hemophilia and their physicians with respect to optimizing individual choices from the expanding menu of standard and novel therapies and approaches to symptom or risk reduction, and ultimately, to normalizing the hemophilia phenotype. Among the most disruptive new approaches, challenges remain in the form of the adverse reactions that have been observed with nonfactor therapies, as well as in the uncertain long-term safety profile of potentially curative gene therapy. Together, these challenges have generated uncertainty as to how to adopt novel therapies and treatment strategies across a diverse patient population, creating speed bumps on the hemophilia innovation highway. It is from this perspective that this article discusses the current state of gene therapy and bleeding prophylaxis for hemophilia A and B, as well as prevention and treatment of the factor VIII inhibitor phenotype in hemophilia A. It further posits that these speed bumps may provide important clues to the mechanistic understanding of both symptom manifestation and resilience within the hemophilia phenotype, as well as opportunities to reconsider and reconfigure the current paradigms for symptom prediction and individualized therapeutic decision making.

A first-in-human study of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PF-06741086, an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor mAb, in healthy volunteers

Essentials Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is an antagonist of FXa and the TF-FVIIa complex. PF-06741086 is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the Kunitz-2 domain of TFPI. Single doses of PF-06741086 were evaluated in a phase 1 study in healthy volunteers. Data from this study support further investigation of PF-06741086 in individuals with hemophilia.

SUMMARY

Background Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is a protease inhibitor of the tissue factor-activated factor VII complex and activated FX. PF-06741086 is a mAb that targets TFPI to increase clotting activity. Objectives This study was a randomized, double-blind, sponsor-open, placebo-controlled, single intravenous or subcutaneous dose escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PF-06741086. Patients/Methods Volunteers who provided written informed consent were assigned to cohorts with escalating dose levels. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), infusion/injection site reactions, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and coagulation and hematology laboratory parameters. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints included exposures of PF-06741086 in plasma and measures of PF-06741086 pharmacology, respectively. Results Forty-one male volunteers were recruited overall. Thirty-two were dosed with PF-06741086 from 30 mg subcutaneously to 440 mg intravenously. All doses were safe and well tolerated. TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, laboratory abnormalities were transient, there were no serious adverse events, there were no infusion/injection site reactions, and no dose escalation stopping criteria were met. Plasma exposures of PF-06741086 increased greater than proportionally with dose under the same dosing route. Coagulation pharmacology was demonstrated via total TFPI, dilute prothrombin time, D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 and thrombin generation assay parameters. Conclusions Single doses of PF-06741086 at multiple dose levels were safe and well tolerated in a healthy adult male population. The safety, PK and PD data from this study support progression to a multiple-dose study in hemophilic patients.

Attempting to remedy sub-optimal medication adherence in haemophilia: The rationale for repeated ultrasound visualisations of the patient's joint status

Haemophilia is marked by joint bleeding (haemarthrosis) leading to cartilage damage (arthropathy). Lifelong prophylaxis-initiated after the first bleeding episode-leads to a dramatic decrease in arthropathy in haemophilia patients. However, adherence to continuous intravenous administrations of factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX products is challenging, and patients potentially suffer from breakthrough bleedings while on prophylaxis. Newer FVIII/FIX products with enhanced convenience attributes and/or easier infusion procedures are intended to improve adherence. However, pharmacokinetic data should be harmonised with information from individual attitudes and treatment needs, to tailor intravenous dosing and scheduling in patients who receive extended half-life products. Nor is there sound evidence as to how subcutaneous non-FVIII/FIX replacement approaches (concizumab; emicizumab; fitusiran) or single intravenous injections of adeno-associated viral vectors (when employing gene therapy) will revolutionize adherence in haemophilia. In rheumatoid arthritis, repeated ultrasound examination of a patient's major joints is a valuable tool to educate patients and parents to understand the disease and provide an objective framework for clinicians to acknowledge patient's adherence. Joint ultrasound examination in haemophilia significantly correlates with cartilage damage, effusion, and synovial hypertrophy evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, in patients with haemophilia undergoing prophylaxis with an extended half-life product for a ≈ 2.8 year period, a significant continued improvement in joint health is detected at the physical examination. This provides the rationale for studies on repeated ultrasound examinations of joint status to attempt to remedy sub-optimal medication adherence and help identify which approach is most suited on which occasion and for which patient.

Prophylactic versus on-demand treatments for hemophilia: advantages and drawbacks

INTRODUCTION

Early long-term prophylaxis is the standard of care to prevent joint bleeding and chronic arthropathy in patients with severe hemophilia. Areas covered: Despite the obvious prophylaxis advantages upon the clinical outcomes, there are still several drawbacks to be addressed for the optimal patients' compliance. Frequency of treatment due to short half-life of conventional FVIII and FIX concentrates, difficult venous access, adherence to the prescribed therapy and costs may represent significant critical issues. The development of inhibitors also makes replacement therapy ineffective, preventing patients from receiving long-term prophylaxis. This paper will review these drawbacks and the tools to overcome these limitations, mainly thanks to the use of extended half-life products and the development of novel non-conventional therapeutic approaches. Expert commentary: The use of extended half-life products may help in reducing the burden of the frequent intravenous administration and in better tailoring an individualized prophylaxis. The development of novel therapeutic approaches, like the bi-specific antibody mimicking the coagulation function of FVIII or inhibition of anticoagulant proteins may facilitate prophylaxis treatment not only in patients with inhibitors, but also in severe hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Exciting opportunities are emerging for improving prophylaxis in hemophilia.

Inhibition of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) as a Treatment for Haemophilia: Rationale with Focus on Concizumab

Replacement therapy with missing factor (F) VIII or IX in haemophilia patients for bleed management and preventative treatment or prophylaxis is standard of care. Restoration of thrombin generation through novel mechanisms has become the focus of innovation to overcome limitations imposed by protein replacement therapy. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is a multivalent Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor that regulates tissue factor (TF)-induced coagulation through a FXa-dependent feedback inhibition of the TF.FVIIa complex in plasma and on endothelial surfaces. Concizumab is a monoclonal, humanised antibody, specific for the second Kunitz domain of TFPI that binds and inhibits FXa, abolishing the inhibitory effect of TFPI. Concizumab restored thrombin generation in FVIII and FIX deficient plasmas and decreased blood loss in a rabbit haemophilia model. Phase 1 single and multiple dose escalation studies in haemophilia patients demonstrated a dose dependent decrease in TFPI levels and a pro-coagulant effect with increasing d-dimers and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2. A dose dependent increase in peak thrombin and endogenous thrombin potential was observed with values in the normal range when plasma TFPI levels were nearly undetectable. A few haemophilia patients in the highest dose cohorts with complete inhibition of plasma TFPI showed a decreased fibrinogen concentration with normal levels of anti-thrombin and platelets and no evidence of thrombosis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were influenced by binding to the target (TFPI), demonstrating target mediated drug disposition. A trend towards decreasing bleeding tendency was observed and this preventative effect is being studied in Phase 2 studies with additional data gathered to improve our understanding of the therapeutic window and potential for thrombosis.

Emerging therapies for hemophilia: controversies and unanswered questions

Several new therapies for hemophilia have emerged in recent years. These strategies range from extended half-life factor replacement products and non-factor options with improved pharmacokinetic profiles to gene therapy aiming for phenotypic cure. While these products have the potential to change hemophilia care dramatically, several challenges and questions remain regarding broader applicability, long-term safety, and which option to pursue for each patient. Here, we review these emerging therapies with a focus on controversies and unanswered questions in each category.

The Potential Close Future of Hemophilia Treatment - Gene Therapy, TFPI Inhibition, Antithrombin Silencing, and Mimicking Factor VIII with an Engineered Antibody

Summary Hemophilia is one of the best researched monogenic diseases. Hemophilia A will affect approximately 1:5,000 male live births. In recent decades, great progress has been made with the introduction of recombinant proteins in the 1990s for therapy and prophylaxis, securing adequate availability and, with the introduction of the prophylaxis concept, reducing the negative impact of hemophilia on morbidity (especially arthropathy). Despite this progress, there are still challenges to overcome to secure adequate prophylaxis and treatment: for the time being, causal pharmacological hemophilia prophylaxis and therapy requires repeated i.v. application on a regular basis. Although this approach leads to a reduced comorbidity, it does not yet represent an optimized approach with continuous reversal of the hemophilic defect, which would be the ideal solution. This review summarizes the very new treatment strategies for the treatment of hemophilia A and B.

Translational Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Characterization and Target-Mediated Drug Disposition Modeling of an Anti-Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor Antibody, PF-06741086

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) exhibits multiple isoforms, which are known to present in multiple locations such as plasma, endothelium, and platelets. TFPI is an endogenous negative modulator of the coagulation pathway, and therefore, neutralization of TFPI function can potentially increase coagulation activity. A human monoclonal antibody, PF-06741086, which interacts with all isoforms of TFPI is currently being tested in clinic for treating hemophilia patients with and without inhibitors. To support clinical development of PF-06741086, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of PF-06741086 were characterized in monkeys. In addition, a mechanistic model approach was used to estimate PK parameters in monkeys and simulate PK profiles in human. The results show that PF-06741086 exhibited target-mediated drug disposition and had specific effects on various hemostatic markers including diluted prothrombin time, thrombin generation, and thrombin-antithrombin complex in monkeys after administration. The model-predicted and observed human exposures were compared retrospectively, and the result indicates that the exposure prediction was reasonable within less than 2-fold deviation. This study demonstrated in vivo efficacy of PF-06741086 in monkeys and the utility of a rational mechanistic approach to describe PK for a monoclonal antibody with complex target binding.

Novel therapies and current clinical progress in hemophilia A

The evolution of hemophilia treatment and care is a fascinating one but has been fraught with many challenges at every turn. Over the last 50 years or so patients with hemophilia and providers have witnessed great advances in the treatment of this disease. With these advances, there has been a dramatic decrease in the mortality and morbidity associated with hemophilia. Even with the remarkable advancements in treatment, however, new and old challenges continue to plague the hemophilia community. The cost of factor replacement and the frequency of infusions, especially in patients with severe hemophilia on prophylaxis, remains a significant challenge for this population. Other challenges include obtaining reliable venous access, especially in younger patients, and the development of neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors). The development of extended half-life products, a bispecific antibody which mimics the coagulation function of factor VIII (FVIII) and inhibition of anticoagulation proteins such as antithrombin with antibodies, aptamers or RNA interference technology have offered novel therapeutic approaches to overcome some of these existing challenges. Additionally, ongoing gene therapy research offers a way to possibly cure hemophilia. These novel treatment tools in conjunction with the establishment of an increasing number of comprehensive hemophilia centers and worldwide advocacy efforts have continued to push the progress of hemophilia care to new frontiers. This review highlights and summarizes these novel therapeutic approaches and the current clinical progress of hemophilia A.

Novel approaches to hemophilia therapy: successes and challenges

New therapies for hemophilia A and hemophilia B will likely continue to change clinical practice. Ranging from extended half-life to nonfactor products and gene therapy, these innovative approaches have the potential to enhance the standard of care by decreasing infusion frequency to increase compliance, promoting prophylaxis, offering alternatives to inhibitor patients, and easing route of administration. Each category has intrinsic challenges that may limit the broader application of these promising therapies. To date, none specifically address the challenge of dispersing treatment to the developing world.